Smt A.Naga Sailaja

Senior Civil Judge, Tadepalligudem

XI ADJ Court Complex Tadepalligudem · West Godavari · Andhra Pradesh

Smt A.Naga Sailaja, Senior Civil Judge, Tadepalligudem, is posted at XI ADJ Court Complex Tadepalligudem, West Godavari, Andhra Pradesh, India. 2,488 court orders on record since 2014. 4 judgments with full text available. Primarily handles OS, H, EP cases.

2,488

Total Orders

Judgments

Orders/Month

Postings

Featured Judgments

H.M.O.P/84/2022 Compromised

Chintapalli Muralikrishna vs Chintapalli Bhagyalakshmi

11 Nov 2022

IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE:: TANUKU

PRESENT:- Smt A.NAGA SAILAJA,

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, TANUKU

Friday, this the 11th day of November, 2022

H.M.O.P.No.84/2022

Between:

Chintapalli Muralikrishna, S/o Bhaskara Rao, 36 years, Hindu, Male, D.No.34-153, Mallapa Dibba, Penugonda, Penugonda Mandal, TSCJC

….. Petitioner

And

Chintapalli Bhagyalakshmi, W/o Muralikrishna, D/o Dangeti Rambabu, 26 years, Hindu, Female, Housewife, D.No.32-10-14, Beside Vegetable Market, Meraka veedhi, Rajahmahendravaram, EGDt,.

….. Respondent

This petition is coming before me on 11-11-2022 for final hearing in the presence of Sri G.V.V. Appaji, Advocate for Petitioner and of Sri D.V.V. S.N. Murthy, Advocate for Respondent and upon hearing the arguments and having stood over the matter for consideration to this day, this court delivered the following :

O R D E R

This is a petition filed by the petitioner/husband Under Section 13(1) (ia) (ib) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 against the respondent/wife for dissolution of marriage between them held on 12-12-2014 on the grounds of Cruelty and Desertion.

2) The averments of the petition in brief are as follows:

(a) The respondent is the legally wedded wife of the petitioner and their marriage was performed on 12-12-2014 at Sri Rama Satyanarayana

Swamy Devasthanam, Annavaram, East Godavari District as per Hindu rites and caste customs. The marriage was duly consummated. The petitioner was not received any dowry or lanchanams from the parents of the respondent, but they gave only marriage expenses. After the marriage, the respondent joined the petitioner to lead marital life at Penugonda. The petitioner has utmost love and affection towards the respondent.

b)From the inception of the marriage, the respondent used to quarrel with the petitioner without any reasonable cause and she used to go to her parents house without informing him and used to show adamant nature towards him eventhough he treated her with utmost love and affection. The respondent also habituated to luxurious life and spend more money on her luxuries. Out of their wedlock, no issues were born to them.

The respondent used to say that she has no interest on the petitioner and she did not want to stay with him at in-laws house. The respondent married the petitioner only on the pressure of her family members and harassed him and her behaviour caused mental agony to the petitioner. The petitioner placed the matter before the family members of the respondent and the respondent bluntly stated that she has no interest on the petitioner.

c)On 07-01-2016, the respondent quarreled with the petitioner and insulted him and willfully neglected and deserted him and went to her parents house. Several efforts made by the petitioner and elders for reunion with the respondent failed as the respondent refused to join with him.

Having vexed with the attitude of the respondent, as there are no chances to reunion and no children out of the wedlock, the petitioner is constrained to file this petition. Hence, the petition.

3) After receipt of notice, the respondent appeared and filed counter by denying the averments of the petition except the relationship with the petitioner. She further stated that, in fact this petition is engineered with false allegations with a view to get divorce from her. Anyhow, she has no objection to grant divorce to the petitioner. Therefore, prays to allow the petition.

4) During the course of enquiry, P.W.1 is examined, Exs.P.1 to P-3 are marked.

5)No oral or documentary evidence is adduced by the respondent.

6) Heard both sides and perused the record.

7) Now the point for consideration is:

Whether the petitioner is entitled for dissolution of her marriage with the respondent on the grounds of

Cruelty and Desertion as prayed for?

8) P O I N T :-

Since this is an application filed by the husband for dissolution of his marriage with the respondent on the grounds of Cruelty and Desertion

Under Sec.13(1)(ia)(ib), the burden lies on the petitioner to establish that the respondent is his wife and he was subjected to cruelty in the hands of the respondent and he was deserted by the respondent without any reasonable cause and he has been residing separately from the respondent for a continuous period of not less than 2 years immediately preceding the presentation of the petition.

9) To substantiate his contention, the petitioner is examined himself as P.W.1 and reiterated the contents of the petition during his examination in chief. He got marked Wedding card of the marriage of the petitioner as

Ex.P-1. Attested copy of their marriage photo as Ex.P-2. Xerox copy of his

Aadhar card (compared with original) as Ex.P-3.

10) Per contra, the respondent did not choose to adduce any evidence.

11) As seen from the evidence of PW1 coupled with Ex.P.1, P-2, it is clear that the petitioner and the respondent are the legally wedded couple and their marriage was performed on 12-12-2014 at Sri Rama

Satyanarayana Swamy Devasthanam, Annavaram, East Godavari District as per Hindu rites and caste customs. The respondent also admits the marriage in her counter. So, there is no dispute with regard to marital relationship between the parties.

12) The evidence of P.W.1 is that, since the beginning of the marriage, the respondent used to quarrel with him without any reason and used to go to her parents house without informing him by showing adamant 4 nature towards him and used to say that she has no interest on him. He further stated that on 07-01-2016, the respondent quarreled with him and willfully neglected and deserted him and went to her parents house. All the efforts made by him through elders for reunion with the respondent failed as the respondent refused to join him. Since, there are no chances of reunion and no children out of the wedlock, he filed this petition seeking divorce on the grounds of Cruelty and Desertion.

13)The respondent did not choose to adduce any evidence except filing counter.

14) The petitioner made several allegations against the respondent during his pleadings, but coming to the evidence part, it is clear that both the parties have compromised the matter. The P.W.1 admits during his cross examination that after filing of the petition, the matter was compromised

before the elders. The P.W.1 deposed that as per the compromise, he paid

Rs.3,48,500/- to the respondent by way of demand draft bearing No.

932963, dated 01-11-2022 and the respondent received the said amount towards her permanent alimony. He further stated that the respondent is also consented for divorce. The respondent also expressed her willingness to dissolve the marital tie by way of her pleadings. Therefore, this Court is not inclined to go into the merits of the case ie., on the aspect of Cruelty and Desertion and straight away comes to conclusion that it is a fit case to grant divorce.

15)All the claims including the financial claims were settled between the parties and both are willing for divorce. When once both the parties are decided to live separately and not interested to lead conjugal life together, this Court has no option except to dissolve the marital tie between them. Therefore, it is held that the petitioner is entitled for dissolution of marriage with the respondent.

16)The marriage between the petitioner and respondent was held on 12-12-2014 and the petitioner and respondent have been residing separately since 07-01-2016. This petition is filed in the year 2022.

Therefore, the petitioner has complied the Provisions of Sections 14 and 13 (1) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 for seeking divorce.

17) In view of the above discussion, it is clear that both the petitioner and the respondent are not interested to lead the marital life together and both are willing to take divorce and to lead their lives separately. There are no chances of reunion and no children out of the wedlock. In these circumstances, forcing the parties to live together does not serve the purpose of marriage. Therefore, it is held that it is a fit case to grant divorce to the petitioner. Accordingly, the point is answered.

18) In the Result, the petition is allowed, by granting decree of divorce by dissolving the marriage between the petitioner and respondent held on 12-12-2014 with effect from the date of order. No costs.

Dictated to the Stenographer Grade-II, transcribed by her, corrected and Pronounced by me,

this the 11 th day of November, 2022.

Sd/- A. Naga Sailaja,

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

TANUKU.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

FOR PETITIONER:

P.W.1: Chintapalli Muralikrishna

FOR RESPONDENT: – Nil –

DOCUMENTS MARKED

FOR PETITIONER:

Ex.P-1:Wedding card of the marriage of the petitioner Ex.P-1:Attested copy of marriage photo of the petitioner and respondent Ex.P-3 :Xerox copy of Aadhar card of the petitioner (compared with original)

FOR RESPONDENT: Nil

Sd/- ANS,

S C J,

TNK 6

OS/64/2022

Medapati Venkateswara Reddy vs Chintada Appa Rao

11 Nov 2022

IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE:: TANUKU

PRESENT:- Smt A.NAGA SAILAJA,

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, TANUKU

Friday, this the 11th day of November, 2022

Original Suit No.64/2022

Between:

Medapati Venkateswara Reddy, S/o Rami Reddy, Male, 50 years, Agriculture, D.No.3-11/1, Pali village, Attili Mandal, JCJC. ….. Plaintif

And

Chintada Appa Rao, S/o Sitaramayya, Male, 45 years, D.No.1-3, Korukollu village, Palakoderu Mandal, Bhimavaram JCJC.

..defendant

This Suit is coming on 07-11-2022 for final before me in the presence of Sri Ch. Nageswara Rao, Advocate for Plaintif and Defendant remained Exparte and having stood over for consideration till this day, this court delivered the following :

J U D G M E N T

1) Suit for recovery of an amount of Rs.24,20,000/- being the

principal and interest due on a pronote dt.15-02-2020 executed by the

defendant in favour of the plaintif for Rs.15,00,000/- with subsequent interest @ 24% per annum from the date of suit till the date of realization and for costs.

2) The averments of the plaint in brief are as follows:-

The defendant borrowed an amount of Rs.15,00,000/- from the plaintif on 15-02-2020 for the purpose of his family expenses and business investment and executed a pronote in favour of the plaintif, agreeing to reapy the same with interest at 24% per annum to the plaintif or his order on demand.

b)Subsequently, inspite of repeated demands made by the plaintif personally , the defendant failed to pay the same. The plaintif got issued a legal notice through his advocate to the defendant on 24-08-2022 calling upon him to pay the amount together with interest. The defendant received 2 the said notice and kept quiet without making any payment. The defendant is not an agriculturist. Hence, the reliefs under Debt Relief Act does not applicable to the defendant. The plaintif claims contract rate of interest at 24% per annum. Therefore, the plaintif is constrained to file the suit for recovery of amount as prayed for. Hence, the suit.

3.After receipt of summons, the defendant did not choose to appear before the court and remained exparte.

4.Now the point for consideration is :

Whether the plaintiff is entitled for the suit claim as prayed for?

5) On behalf of plaintif, P.W.1 is examined and got marked Exs.A.1 to A-3.

6)No oral or documentary evidence is adduced by the defendant.

7) Heard the plaintif and perused the record.

8) POINT :

It is the case of the plaintif that the defendant borrowed an amount of Rs.15,00,000/- from him on 15-02-2020 for the purpose of his family expenses and business investment and got executed Ex.A-1 pronote in his favour. Subsequently, inspite of several demands as well as issuing of notice, the defendant failed to pay the same, thereby he is constrained to file the suit against him for recovery of amount.

9. Per contra, the defendant did not choose to adduce evidence.

10.Since, this is a suit filed for recovery of amount basing on the pronote, the initial burden lies on the plaintif to prove the suit transaction.

11. To substantiate her contention, the plaintif is examined himself as P.W.1 and reiterated the contents of the plaint in lieu of his examination in chief and got marked the Original Promissory note, dt.15-02-2020 for

Rs.15,00,000/- executed by the defendant in favour the plaintif as Ex.A.1.

Office copy of the Legal notice, dated 24-08-2022 as Ex.A-2.

Acknowledgment of the defendant, dt 27-08-2022 as Ex.A-3.

12.Per contra, the defendant did not choose to adduce any evidence.

13. From the evidence of P.W.1 coupled with the contents of Ex.A-1, it is clear that the defendant herein borrowed Rs.15,00,000/- from the plaintif on 15-02-2020. From Ex.A-2, it is clear that the defendant failed to pay the amount to the plaintif and thereby, the plaintif is constrained to issue notice to the defendant demanding him to pay the amount. From

Ex.A-3, it is clear that the defendant received the said notice. The evidence of P.W.1 is in consonance with the contents of Ex.A-1 and the purpose of borrowing is to meet the family expenses and business investment. So, the defendant is not entitled for scaling down of interest. The evidence of P.W.1 is not rebutted by the defendant by way of any contra evidence. So, the evidence of the P.W.1 remained unchallenged. The P.W.1 establishes his case by way of oral and documentary evidence. Thereby, it is held that the plaintif is entitled for recovery of suit amount from the defendant as prayed for. Accordingly, point is answered.

14.In the Result, the suit is decreed with costs in favour of the plaintif and against the defendant for Rs.24,20,000/- (Rupees twenty Four

Lakhs, Twenty Thousand only) with subsequent interest at 12% p.a., on the

principal amount of Rs.15,00,000/- (Rupees Fifteen lakhs only) from the date

of suit till the date of decree and at 6% p.a., from the date of decree till realization.

Dictated to the Stenographer Grade-II, transcribed by her, corrected and Pronounced by me

11 th day of November, 2022.

SD/- A. Naga Sailaja,

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

TANUKU.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

FOR PLAINTIFF: FOR DEFENDANT:

P.W.1: Medapati Venkateswara ReddyNIL

DOCUMENTS MARKED

FOR PLAINTIFF:

Ex.A1: Promissory note, dt.15-02-2020 executed by the defendant in favour of the plaintif. Ex.A-2:Office copy of Legal notice, dated 24-08-2022 got issued by the plaintif to the defendant Ex.A-3:Acknowledgment of the defendant, dt 27-08-2022

FOR DEFENDANT :-Nil-

Sd/- ANS,

S.C.J, TNK 5

CC/11/2015 Acquitted

BANDARU SURYA KUMAR vs VADDADI NAGA RAJU

22 Feb 2017

CC/40/2014 Acquitted

Velagala Venkata Reddy vs Mutyala Venkata Ramana sai ram

27 Feb 2017

Order Record 2,299 total

Case No.	Parties	Date	Type	Outcome
EP/37/2022	Tamanampudi Kaniki Reddy vs Satti Venkataratnam	12 Nov 2022	Other	—
OS/7/2018	Baruvu Nageswara Rao vs Samineni Nageswaea Rao	12 Nov 2022	Order	—
OS/65/2017	Adabala Jaya Lakshmi vs Ch.V.V.S.V.P.Kondala Rao	12 Nov 2022	Order	—
OS/64/2022	Medapati Venkateswara Reddy vs Chintada Appa Rao	11 Nov 2022	Judgement	—
H.M.O.P/84/2022	Chintapalli Muralikrishna vs Chintapalli Bhagyalakshmi	11 Nov 2022	Order	Compromised
H.M.O.P/139/2022	Saipu Dhana Lakshmi vs Saipu Durga Rao	11 Nov 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/222/2022	Mullapudi Ravi Teja vs Vsnil	11 Nov 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/243/2022	Punnam Durgaprasad vs Vsnil	11 Nov 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/140/2022	Thota Uma Devi vs Thota Murali Krishna	10 Nov 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/27/2022	Vendra Himasri vs Vendra Satti Babu	09 Nov 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/28/2016	Kurella Venkata Krishna Sarma vs Kurella Raja Rajeswari	09 Nov 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/90/2022	Chiluvuri Siva Raju vs Vsnil	09 Nov 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/117/2022	Narsipudi Jaya vs Narsipudi Satyanarayana	09 Nov 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/156/2018	Kurella Raja Rajeswari vs Kurella Venkata Krishna Sarma	09 Nov 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/164/2018	Thota Gopala Swamy vs Thota Bhargavi	07 Nov 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/204/2022	Maddukuri Panitha vs Maddukuri Pardhasaradhi	07 Nov 2022	Order	—
OS/10/2021	Chirla Kanaka Lakshmi vs Padala Lakshmanareddy	04 Nov 2022	Judgement	—
H.M.O.P/122/2020	Chorapalli Jyothi vs Chorapalli Srinu	04 Nov 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/188/2022	Bharanikapula Surendra vs Vsnil	04 Nov 2022	Order	—
EP/3/2022	Tamiri Brahmandam vs Veerni Ramchandra Rao	03 Nov 2022	Order	—
EP/16/2022	Kundala Krishna Veni vs Manda Subhash Chandra Bose	03 Nov 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/191/2022	Ravanam Durga Bhavani@ Kolla Bhavani vs Ravanam Venu Gopal Rao	03 Nov 2022	Order	—
EP/3/2020	Dwarampudi Venkata Reddy vs Illa Rama Chandra Rao	02 Nov 2022	Order	—
S.O.P/2/2022	Gopishetti Kumari vs The Chaitanya Godavari Grameena Bank	02 Nov 2022	Order	—
S.O.P/5/2021	Kudipudi Varalakshmi vs The Branch Manager SBI Siddantham	02 Nov 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/227/2022	Puligadda Visweswar @ Shiva vs Puligadda (Thota) Puja Bhargavai	01 Nov 2022	Order	—
IP/4/2018	Baruvu Nageswara rao vs Samineni Nageswara rao	31 Oct 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/123/2022	Juttiga Paramesh Kumar vs Juttiga (Yarlagadda) Tejaswi	31 Oct 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/134/2022	Bejjavarapu Tulasi Latha vs Bejjavarapu Mahesh	31 Oct 2022	Order	—
EP/3/2021	Gunturi Venkata Somaraju vs Mutta Vimala Devi	28 Oct 2022	Order	—
IP/2/2020	Subbisetti Naga Ramesh vs Konala Satish	28 Oct 2022	Order	—
OS/186/2016	Vs	28 Oct 2022	Judgement	—
H.M.O.P/114/2021	Chinta Mounika vs Chinta Veera Venkata Shiva	28 Oct 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/166/2022	Velagala Rama Pulla Reddy vs Velagala (Nallimilli) Lakshmi Parvathi	28 Oct 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/210/2021	Namala Srinivasa Rao vs NamalaJohnsy	28 Oct 2022	Order	—
FDP/342/2014	Chilaparapu Bhaskara veera swamy vs Vs	28 Oct 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/97/2020	Kovvuri Suresh Reddy. vs Kovvuri Sukanya.	27 Oct 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/43/2021	Pattikayala Narendra Prabhunadh vs Pattikayala Gayathri	21 Oct 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/44/2022	Beesapu Uopendra Kodanda Pani vs Beesapu Geetha	21 Oct 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/109/2020	Gudimetla Ganesh Reddy. vs Gudimetla Rama Lakshmi.	21 Oct 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/138/2022	Kappakayala alias Karri Swathi vs Kappakayala Krishna Babu	21 Oct 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/200/2022	Pudi Priya Naga Venkata Padmavathi vs Pudi Manikanta Venkatesh	20 Oct 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/270/2021	Relli Phani vs Relli Durga	20 Oct 2022	Order	—
EP/43/2019	Velakkayala Ratna Manikyam vs Dasari Veera Venkata Satyanarayana @ Annavaram	19 Oct 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/5/2022	Simhadri Jhansi vs Simhadri Jejeswara Rao	19 Oct 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/158/2022	Badarala Satyavathi vs Badarala Jagadish	19 Oct 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/163/2022	Kandukuri @ Kodavati Pavani vs Kandukuri Gangadhara Rao	19 Oct 2022	Order	—
EP/22/2015	Velakkayala Ratna Manikyam vs Dasari Veera Venkata Satyanarayana @ Annavaram	18 Oct 2022	Judgement	—
H.M.O.P/207/2022	Ulusu Satyasai Lakshmi Divya vs Vsnil	18 Oct 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/214/2022	Raaja(Kandelli) Chandra Leela vs NIL	18 Oct 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/64/2022	Donga Mallika @ Jahnavi vs NIL	17 Oct 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/134/2021	Chitikina Naga Lakshmi vs Chitikina Sreemannarayana	17 Oct 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/175/2022	Thonta (Komati) Satya Veera Durga @ Veera Durga vs Thonta Veera Venakta Durga Rao	17 Oct 2022	Order	—
FDP/269/2017	Rudra Seetha Ratnam vs Rudra Venkata Lakshmi	17 Oct 2022	Order	—
FDP/270/2017	Rudra Seetha Ratnam vs Rudra Venkata Lakshmi	17 Oct 2022	Order	—
EP/8/2020	Kovvuri Somi Reddy vs Pappu Veera Venkata Ramana Murthy.	14 Oct 2022	Order	—
OS/60/2017	Dwarampudi Samuel Reddy vs Jakkam Naga Satyanarayana	14 Oct 2022	Judgement	—
H.M.O.P/53/2022	Kandiboina Ramesh vs Nil	14 Oct 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/126/2020	Neeli Jagan Mohana Rao vs Neeli Naga Mani	14 Oct 2022	Order	—
OS/11/2021	Costal Agro Industries Pvt Ltd Rep by Managing Director Chilukuri Ramakrishna vs Tummala Padma	13 Oct 2022	Judgement	—
OS/148/2016	Jagatha Satish vs Jagatha Srinivas	13 Oct 2022	Judgement	—
H.M.O.P/126/2022	Karri Sandhya vs Karri Venkata Subba Reddy	13 Oct 2022	Judgement	—
FDP/275/2019	Vs	13 Oct 2022	Order	—
EP/4/2022	Mallina Rama Rao vs Kalla Srinivasu	12 Oct 2022	Order	—
EP/15/2021	Indugupalli Srinivasa Rao vs Lakkimsetti Veera Venkata Satyanarayana Murhty	12 Oct 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/147/2022	Guttikonda Sridevi vs Guttikonda Ramasatyanarayana	12 Oct 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/159/2021	Akula Durga Bhavani vs Akula Balaji	12 Oct 2022	Order	—
OS/170/2016	Nalla Krishnarao vs Vattikuti Srinivasulu	11 Oct 2022	Judgement	—
H.M.O.P/149/2022	Korumilli @ Jangam Jhansi vs Korumilli Srinu	11 Oct 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/198/2021	Sathiraju Venkata Surya Lakshmi vs Sathiraju Venkata Hanuman Satya Nagabhushanam	11 Oct 2022	Order	—
OS/82/2018	Alla Venkata Rama Gangadhara Raja vs Mutta Rupendra Prasad	10 Oct 2022	Order	—
OS/182/2018	Gundumogula Surya Rao vs Gundumogula Satyanarayana	10 Oct 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/62/2022	Bellana Raj Kumar vs NIL	10 Oct 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/174/2022	Varanasi Venkata Sridhar vs Varanasi Tejeswini	10 Oct 2022	Order	—
FDP/14/2021	Mogalla Pandu Ranga Vithal Kondayala Rayudu vs Ayluri Bala Subrahmanyam	10 Oct 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/6/2021	Munjuluri Sambasiva Rao vs Munjuluri Naga Venkata Vasavi Priyanka	30 Sep 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/55/2018	Geddada Annapurna vs Geddada Chandra Rao	30 Sep 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/101/2022	Mamidisetty Geetgha Kumar vs NIL	30 Sep 2022	Order	—
OS/26/2021	Polisetti Krishna Murthy vs Reddy and Reddy infrastructure	29 Sep 2022	Judgement	—
H.M.O.P/213/2020	Karri Satti Reddy @ Satyanarayana Reddy vs Karri Venkata Lakshmi @ Vjaya Lakshmi	29 Sep 2022	Order	—
OS/27/2017	State Bank of India, Palakol rep. by its Chief Manager, vs Thonta Srinivasarao	28 Sep 2022	Judgement	—
OS/16/2019	Thota Swamy vs Karri Venkata Surya Satyanarayana	27 Sep 2022	Judgement	—
EP/25/2014	Achanta Sesha Veni vs Anala Veeranjaneyulu	23 Sep 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/71/2022	Karri Sri Phani Krishna vs NIL	23 Sep 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/21/2022	Polemsetty Venkata Anusha Devi vs Polemsetty Venkata Vijay Kumar	22 Sep 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/193/2021	Sanaboina Madhavi vs Sanaboina Jai Prakash	22 Sep 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/100/2022	Munjuluri @ Sabbisetti Naga Venkata Priyanka vs Munuluri Sambasiva Rao @ Veera venkata Samba Siva Rao @ Pedda Pasi	21 Sep 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/120/2022	Madu Venkata Subba Lakshmi @ Kasani Venkata Subba Lakshmi vs Madu Ramanjaneyulu	21 Sep 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/151/2022	Bura @ Vankayala Venkata Lakshmi vs Vankayala Kalyana Chakravarthi	21 Sep 2022	Order	—
EP/3/2021	Gunturi Venkata Somaraju vs Mutta Vimala Devi	20 Sep 2022	Order	—
IP/16/2017	Kotipalli Venkateswara rao vs Proprietor N.S.Sarees	20 Sep 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/189/2022	Tammina Mohan Chaitanya vs Vsnil	20 Sep 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/124/2022	Kioduri (Adabala) Ganga Bhavani vs Koduri Srinivas	19 Sep 2022	Order	—
OS/78/2010	Konda Venkata Durga Suresh vs Akumarti Ananda Rao	16 Sep 2022	Order	—
OS/364/2014	Akumarthi Ruthamma vs Akumarthi Nageswara Rao	16 Sep 2022	Judgement	—
H.M.O.P/150/2020	Sirigina Sivanand vs Sirigina @ Balusu Venkata Sharmila	16 Sep 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/162/2022	Doonaboina Vatshav vs Nil	16 Sep 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/118/2022	Reddy Sravani vs Reddy Srinu	15 Sep 2022	Order	—
S.O.P/4/2022	Nidadavolu Naveen Chand vs Employees Providen Fund Organization	15 Sep 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/145/2022	Vattikuti Bharathi vs Vattikuti Purna Siva Krishna	14 Sep 2022	Order	—

Showing 100 of 2,299 orders — Log in to browse all pages.

Monthly Orders (Last 12 Months)

Nov 2022		26
Oct 2022		49
Sep 2022		50
Aug 2022		77
Jul 2022		52
Jun 2022		74
May 2022		24
Apr 2022		76
Mar 2022		82
Feb 2022		36
Jan 2022		37
Dec 2021		108

Frequently Asked Questions

How many cases has Smt A.Naga Sailaja handled?

Smt A.Naga Sailaja has handled 2488 court orders since 2014 at XI ADJ Court Complex Tadepalligudem. The average disposal rate is 28 orders per month.

What types of cases does Smt A.Naga Sailaja hear?

Based on available records, Smt A.Naga Sailaja primarily handles Civil matters (Original Suits, Execution Petitions) and Criminal matters (Criminal Cases, Sessions Cases) at XI ADJ Court Complex Tadepalligudem.

Where is Smt A.Naga Sailaja currently posted?

Smt A.Naga Sailaja is posted as Senior Civil Judge, Tadepalligudem at XI ADJ Court Complex Tadepalligudem, West Godavari, Andhra Pradesh.

Are judgments by Smt A.Naga Sailaja available online?

Yes. 4 judgments by Smt A.Naga Sailaja are available on Legistro with full text, outcome, and sections cited.

How fast does Smt A.Naga Sailaja dispose cases?

Smt A.Naga Sailaja disposes approximately 28 cases per month, based on 2488 orders handled over their tenure at XI ADJ Court Complex Tadepalligudem.

Since when is Smt A.Naga Sailaja serving?

Smt A.Naga Sailaja has been serving at XI ADJ Court Complex Tadepalligudem since 2014.

Case Types

OS 40%

H 25%

EP 20%

CC 10%

IP 2%

FDP 1%

SC 1%

RCC 1%

Posting History

Sep 2021 — Oct 2021

Senior Civil Judge, Tadepalligudem
Sep 2021 — Sep 2021

Senior Civil Judge, Tadepalligudem
Jul 2020 — Nov 2022

Senior Civil Judge · 1,097 orders
Apr 2014 — Feb 2017

Principal Junior Civil Judge -cum- Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Palakole · 1,391 orders

Outcomes on Record

Acquitted 2

Compromised 1

Other Judges at this Court

Smt. K. Madhavi

Senior Civil Judge, Tadepalligudem

1,310 orders

Smt. K.lalitha Devi

I Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division), Tadepa...

777 orders

M.Anuradha

XI Additional District Judge, Tadepalligudem

1 orders

P. Babu

Principal Civil Judge (Junior Division), Tadepalli...

0 orders

← View all judges at XI ADJ Court Complex Tadepalligudem

Smt A.Naga Sailaja

O R D E R

Cruelty and Desertion as prayed for?

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

DOCUMENTS MARKED

S C J,

Original Suit No.64/2022

J U D G M E N T

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

FOR PLAINTIFF: FOR DEFENDANT:

DOCUMENTS MARKED

OF I CLASS, PALAKOL.

CALENDAR CASE NO.11/2015

J U D G M E N T

C.C.No.40/2014

O R D E R

JUDL.MAGISTRATE OF I CLASS CUM

PALAKOL