Sri A.omkar, Pjcj, Dmm

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

DHARMAVARAM.

Present: Sri A.Omkar,

Principal Junior Civil Judge.

Wednesday, this the 30th day of December, 2020

ORIGINAL SUIT No.115/ 2020

Between:- Andhra Pragathi Grameena Bank, incorporated under the Regional Rural Banking Act, having its Regd. Head Office at Kadapa and one such Branch at Kanaganapalli, Anantapuramu District, represented by its Branch Manager.

…Plaintif

And

1. Gudisala Narasimhulu, S/o G.Gurappa, aged about 55 years, Hindu, Agriculture, residing at Muthuvakuntla village, Kanaganapalli Mandal, Anantapuramu District.

2. Talari Narasimhulu, S/o T.Maddiletappa, Hindu, Agriculture, residing at Muthuvakuntla village, Kanaganapalli Mandal, Anantapuramu District.

…Defendants

Suit to pass a decree in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendants for recovery of Rs.4,10,331/- being the balance of the principal and interest due for the purpose of Horticulture by the defendants on 10.03.2008 for an amount of

Rs.2,00,000/- under loan account No.19182129674. On the same day the defendant

No.1 have also executed a “Simple Mortgage Deed with Continuity Clause” in favour of the plaintiff’s bank and agreeing to repay the same with interest at 15.75% p.a. On 25.03.2008 the defendant No.1 executed “Agreement for Agricultural Advances in favour of the plaintiff’s bank for the sum of Rs.1,35,000/- and agreeing to repay the same with interest at 15.75% p.a. compounded with yearly rests. Further, the defendant No.2 executed “Guarantee for Agricultural Advances” in favour of the plaintiff’s bank on 25.03.2008 and on the same day 1st defendant executed a stamp receipt for Rs.50,000/-. Further on 25.05.2012 and 30.05.2008 the 1st defendant executed a stamp receipt for Rs.50,000/- and Rs.35,000/- in favour of the plaintiff

Bank. The defendant agreed to repay the penal interest at 2.25% p.a. on over due amount. Further, the 1st defendant acknowledgement of debt in favour of the plaintiff bank and on 20.06.2012 executed the acknowledgement of debts in favour of the plaintiff. Further after giving credit, the payments made by the defendants a sum of

Rs.4,10,331/- is due from the defendants to the plaintiff bank as per the account extract dated 28.01.2020.

This suit coming on this day before me in the presence of

Sri C.Krishna Reddy, Advocate for the plaintiff and notices to defendants are served and on perusing the material papers available on record, the Court delivered the following:

J U D G M E N T

Plaintiff counsel filed Full Satisfaction Memo and same is recorded. Hence, suit is dismissed as Full Satisfaction recorded.

Pronounced by me in open court on this the 30th day of December, 2020.

Prl. Junior Civil Judge Dharmavaram.

Appendix of evidence -NIL-

Prl.J.C.J.

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

DHARMAVARAM.

Present: Sri A.Omkar,

Principal Junior Civil Judge.

Monday, this the 14th day of December, 2020

ORIGINAL SUIT No.229/ 2018

Between:- Mandala Adinarayana, S/o M.Pothanna, Hindu, aged 39 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.3-53, Thopudurthi village, Athmakur Mandal, Anantapuramu District-515751, Aadhar No.393502417027.

…Plaintif

And

1. M.Pedda Chennappa, S/o Late M.Narasanna, aged about 65 years,

2. M.Thimmappa, S/o Late M.Narasanna, aged about 55 years,

3. M.Chinna Chennappa, S/o Late M.Narasanna, aged 50 years, All are Hindus, Cultivation, Residents of Thopudurthi Village, Athmakur Mandal, Anantapuramu District-515751. …Defendants

Suit to pass a decree in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendants restraining the defendants, their men, agents and followers from interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the plaint schedule mentioned property and for costs of the suit and to grant such other relief and reliefs.

This suit coming on this day before me in the presence of Sri A.Krishna Mohan and Sri K.Bhaskar, Advocates for the plaintiff and Sri G.Nagnna and Y.Narasimhulu, Advocates for the defendants and on perusing the material papers available on record, the Court delivered the following:

J U D G M E N T

In view of orders in I.A.No.270/2020 this suit is advanced from 29-1-2021 to today i.e. 14.12.2020. The plaintiff counsel filed Memo not pressing the suit. Hence, the same is recorded and the suit is dismissed as not pressed.

Pronounced by me in open court on this the 14th day of December, 2020.

Sd/- A.Omkar,

Prl. Junior Civil Judge Dharmavaram.

Appendix of evidence -NIL-

Id/- A.O., Prl.J.C.J.

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

DHARMAVARAM.

Present: Sri A.Omkar,

Principal Junior Civil Judge.

Monday, this the 14th day of December, 2020

ORIGINAL SUIT No.233/ 2018

Between:- M.Nagamani, W/o M.Ramanjineyulu, Hindu, aged 36 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.3-53, Thopudurthi village, Athmakur Mandal, Anantapuramu District-515751, Aadhaar No.489594881438.

…Plaintif

And

1. Mandala Ramachandra, S/o M.Thimmappa, aged about 45 years,

2. M.Suryanarayana, S/o Chinna Chinnappa, aged about 30 years,

3. M.Chandra, S/o Pedda Chennappa, aged about 30 years, All are Hindus, Cultivation, Residents of Thopudurthi Village, Athmakur Mandal, Anantapuramu District. …Defendants

Suit to pass a decree in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendants restraining the defendants, their men, agents and followers from interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the plaint schedule mentioned property and for costs of the suit and to grant such other relief and reliefs.

This suit coming on this day before me in the presence of Sri A.Krishna Mohan and Sri K.Bhaskar, Advocates for the plaintiff and Sri G.Nagnna and Y.Narasimhulu, Advocates for the defendants and on perusing the material papers available on record, the Court delivered the following:

J U D G M E N T

In view of orders in I.A.No.272/2020 this suit is advanced from 20.01.2021 to today i.e. 14.12.2020. The plaintiff counsel filed Memo not pressing the suit. Hence the same is recorded and the suit is dismissed as not pressed.

Pronounced by me in open court on this the 14th day of December, 2020.

Sd/- Sri A.Omkar,

Prl. Junior Civil Judge Dharmavaram.

Appendix of evidence -NIL-

Id/- A.O., Prl.J.C.J.

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

DHARMAVARAM.

Present: Sri A.Omkar,

Principal Junior Civil Judge.

Monday, this the 14th day of December, 2020

ORIGINAL SUIT No.231/ 2018

Between:- M.Lakshmidevi, W/o M.Narasimhulu, Hindu, aged 45 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.3-53, Thopudurthi village, Athmakur Mandal, Anantapuramu District-515751, Aadhar No.236818747404.

…Plaintif

And

1. M.Tipandlam Raju, S/o Thimmappa, aged about 38 years,

2. M.Adinarayana, S/o Pedda Chennappa, aged about 38 years,

3. M.Lakshmanna, S/o Chinna Chennappa, aged about 27 years, All are Hindus, Cultivation, Residents of Thopudurthi Village, Athmakur Mandal, Anantapuramu District-515751. …Defendants

Suit to pass a decree in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendants restraining the defendants, their men, agents and followers from interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the plaint schedule mentioned property and for costs of the suit and to grant such other relief and reliefs.

This suit coming on this day before me in the presence of Sri A.Krishna Mohan and Sri K.Bhaskar, Advocates for the plaintiff and Sri G.Nagnna and Y.Narasimhulu, Advocates for the defendants and on perusing the material papers available on record, the Court delivered the following:

J U D G M E N T

The plaintiff counsel filed Memo not pressing the suit. Hence the same is recorded and the suit is dismissed as not pressed.

Pronounced by me in open court on this the 14th day of December, 2020.

Sd/- Sri A.Omkar,

Prl. Junior Civil Judge Dharmavaram.

Appendix of evidence -NIL-

Id/- A.O., Prl.J.C.J.

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

DHARMAVARAM.

Present: Sri A.Omkar,

Principal Junior Civil Judge.

Tuesday, this the 24th day of November, 2020

ORIGINAL SUIT No.116/ 2014

Between:- Balam Jayalakshmi, W/o Balam Sreenivasulu, aged about 47 years, Hindu, Residing at D.No.14/321, PRT Street, Dharmavaram.

…Plaintif

And

1. Lakshmidevi, W/o Annan Pedda Venkatanarayana, aged about 52 years, Hindu, House wife, R/o D.No.6/581, Parameswari Function Hall Road, Siva Nagar, Dharmavaram.

2. Venkata Lakshmamma, W/o Annam Chinna Venkatanarayana, aged about 48 years, Hindu, House Wife, R/o D.No.4/541, Ramalayam Road, Siva Nagar, Dharmavaram. …Defendants

Suit for permanent injunction in favour of plaintiff and against the defendants restraining them, their men, agents and representatives from interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the plaintiff over the plaint schedule property and for costs of the suit.

This suit coming on this day before me in the presence of Sri G.Nagaraju, Advocate for the plaintiff and Sri T.Srinivasulu, Advocate for the defendants and on perusing the material papers available on record, the Court delivered the following:

J U D G M E N T

Plaintiff counsel filed Memo not pressing the suit, same is recorded. Hence, the suit is dismissed as not pressed.

Pronounced by me in open court on this the 24th day of November, 2020.

Sd/- Sri A.Omkar,

Prl. Junior Civil Judge Dharmavaram.

Appendix of evidence -NIL-

Id/- A.O., Prl.J.C.J.