CJ Court (SD), BBL
HMOP No.81 of 2025 Date : 08.05.2026
APVZ060001422025
IN THE COURT OF THE CIVIL JUDGE (SENIOR DIVISION) AT BOBBILI
PRESENT: SRI A.RADHA KRISHNA MURTHY
CIVIL JUDGE (SENIOR DIVISION)
BOBBILI
FRIDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF MAY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY-SIX
HMOP N o .81 OF 2025
Between :
01. Karri Pratap Naidu, S/o.David Prasanna Kumar, aged 32 years, Permanent resident of Kunayavalasa village, Therlam Mandal, Vizianagaram District.
02. Dasari Swetha, W/o.Karri Pratap Naidu, D/o.Mandata Naidu, aged 27 years, Homemaker, Permanent resident of Geddaluppi village, Seethanagaram Mandal Parvathipuram Manyam District, presently residing at Vepagunta, Pendurthi Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.… Petitioners
A n d
NIL…Respondent
This Petition coming before me for final hearing today in the presence of Sri. G.Gopala Krishna Sharma, U.Mallikarjun Rao, G.Satish Yadav and V.Chandrasekhar, learned Counsels for the Petitioners, upon hearing the learned Counsel for the Petitioners and considering the material available on record, this Court deliver the following :
Page 1 of 6
CJ Court (SD), BBL
HMOP No.81 of 2025 Date : 08.05.2026
ORDER
This is a Petition filed by the Petitioners under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1956 praying the Court to pass an order dissolving their marriage held on 23.08.2024 by granting a decree of divorce by mutual consent and for such other reliefs.
2. CASE OF THE PETITIONERS SUCCINCTLY :
The 2nd Petitioner is the legally wedded wife of the 1st
Petitioner and their marriage was performed on 23.08.2024. No dowry has been presented at the time of marriage. Immediately after marriage, the 2nd
Petitioner joined with the conjugal society of the 1st Petitioner and both of them led conjugal life for sometime. The Petitioners have got registered their marriage. Thereafter, differences of opinion arose in between the
Petitioners and as such, the 2nd Petitioner left the society of the 1st
Petitioner and went to her parents house. The parents of the 2nd Petitioner placed the matter before elders for the reunion of the Petitioners which became futile. There is no possibility of reunion and both the Petitioners agreed to take divorce and they have been residing separately from
February, 2025. The marriage between the Petitioners is irretrievably broken down and as such there is no possibility of reunion. The Petitioners have agreed to take mutual divorce with the following terms of compromise.
1. The 1st Petitioner agreed to pay ₹7,80,000 as a full and final settlement to the 2nd Petitioner towards permanent alimony.
Page 2 of 6
CJ Court (SD), BBL
HMOP No.81 of 2025 Date : 08.05.2026
2. The 1st Petitioner paid 2,80,000 on the date of filing of the Petition₹ and the 2nd Petitioner received the said amount and issued a receipt.
3. The 1st Petitioner agreed to pay 5,00,000 to the 2₹nd Petitioner at the time of giving evidence in this case.
4. The 2nd Petitioner agreed to return back one and half tolas of gold ornaments to the 1st Petitioner and further the 1st Petitioner agreed to return back the silver items to the 2nd Petitioner at the time of giving evidence in this case.
5. Both parties have mutually agreed that they will not initiate any civil and criminal proceedings against each other and will not make any crime against each other in future.
6. Both the Petitioners agreed that they both are at liberty to live independently and further not to raise any objection in case of their marriage with third parties of their choice in future by any one of the
Petitioners.
3.After registering this petition, both the petitioners are directed to appear before the court after expiry of 6 months. Accordingly both the petitioners appeared before the Court.
4.The Petitioners were examined as PW-1 and PW-2 and got marked Ex.A-1 to Ex.A-6. The testimonies of PW-1 & PW-2 are very much available on record and they are not reproducing here to avoid repetition.
Page 3 of 6
CJ Court (SD), BBL
HMOP No.81 of 2025 Date : 08.05.2026
5.Heard the learned counsel for the Petitioners and perused the material available on record.
6. Now the point germane for my determination is “Whether the
Petitioners are entitled to get divorce by mutual consent prayed for?”
7. P O I N T:
The Petitioners 1 & 2 have filed their chief examination affidavits as PW-1 & PW-2 respectively by adverting to the contents of the
Petition and hence, the chief examination affidavits of PW-1 & PW-2 are nothing but replica of the contents of the Petition.
7.2PW-1 & PW-2, with one voice, have testified that they have been residing separately from February 2025 and there is no possibility for their reunion and the mediation held before the elders became futile.
Further, according to the evidences of PW-1 & PW-2 coupled with Ex.A-4 and Ex.A-5, it is evident that PW-2 had received an amount of 7,80,000₹ from PW-1 towards full and final settlement as permanent alimony.
7.3It is pertinent to note that even during the statutory period of 6 months also the Petitioners did not show any interest for their reunion.
Further, multiple efforts have already been made to settle their differences and for reconciliation, but it yielded no results, for which there is no chance of reconciliation between the parties. Further, both the Petitioners voluntarily and with one voice prayed the Court for grant of divorce by mutual consent.
Page 4 of 6
CJ Court (SD), BBL
HMOP No.81 of 2025 Date : 08.05.2026
7.4The testimonies of PW-1 & PW-2 coupled with Ex.A-4 &
Ex.A-5 would goes to show that there is irreparable breakdown of marriage between PW-1 & PW-2 and there is no chance of their reunion it is also evident that both the Petitioners have complied with the terms and conditions of which they have agreed mutually. Hence, in view of the above discussion and by considering the fact that there is no chance of reunion between the Petitioners, this Court is of the considered opinion that the Petitioners are entitled for decree of divorce by mutual consent.
Accordingly the point is answered.
8. IN THE RESULT, this Petition is allowed by granting Decree of Divorce by mutual consent dissolving the marriage between the
Petitioners held on 23.08.2024.
Typed to my dictation to the Typist, corrected and pronounced by me in the open Court on this the 8 th day of May, 2026 .
Digitally Signed by
RADHA KRISHNARADHA KRISHNA MURTHY ANDE
Date: 2026.05.08 15:58:34 +0530
MURTHY ANDE
CIVIL JUDGE (SENIOR DIVISION)
BOBBILI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
FOR PETITIONERS FOR RESPONDENT
PW-1Karri Pratap Naidu NONE PW-2Dasari Swetha
Page 5 of 6
CJ Court (SD), BBL
HMOP No.81 of 2025 Date : 08.05.2026
DOCUMENTS MARKED FOR PETITIONERS
Sl.No. Date of Description of Document Document Ex.A-1---Marriage Photo Ex.A-2---Marriage Card Ex.A-3---Compared photocopy of Aadhar Card of the 1st Petitioner Ex.A-423.09.2025Receipt for 2,80,000₹ Ex.A-507.05.2026Receipt for 5,00,000₹ Ex.A-613.08.2023Compared Photocopy of Aadhar Card of the 2nd Petitioner Ex.A-4 to Ex.A-6 are marked through PW-2
DOCUMENTS MARKED FOR RESPONDENT
NIL Digitally Signed by
RADHA KRISHNA
RADHA KRISHNA MURTHY ANDE
MURTHY ANDEDate: 2026.05.08 15:59:23 +0530
CIVIL JUDGE (SENIOR DIVISION)
BOBBILI
Page 6 of 6