Sri A.Satyanand

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE:: KOVVUR

Present: A.Satyanand,

Principal Senior Civil Judge, Kovvur

Monday, this 6th day of February 2017

ORIGINAL SUIT No.410/2014 Between:

Sri Muramalla Venkateswra Rao. Plaintiff.

And

1) M/s Bharathi Airtel Limited, Hyderabad, Rep., by its Authorised person.

2) M/s Indus Towers Limited, Hyderabad Rep., by its Authorised person. Defendants

This suit filed by the plaintiff that a) that 1st defendant as well as 2nd defendant being its agent be directed to pay to the plaintiff an amount of

Rs.3,60,000/- with subsequent interest till payment towards the damages for use and occupation of plaint schedule premises from 1.9.2011 to 1.9.2014 b) that the defendants be directed to remove their cell towers equipments installed on the plaint schedule property within a reasonable time that would be fixed by the court failing with the plaintiff be given liberty to get them removed through process of law and for costs of the suit.

This suit is coming on this day for trial before me for settlement of issues in the presence of Sri Atkuri Satyanarayana, advocate for the plaintiff and of Sri Ch. Naga Kumar and Sri K.S.L.N. Prasad, advocates for the 2nd

Defendant and the 1st defendant remained exparte. Upon perusing the memo filed by the counsel for the plaintiff and having stood over for consideration till this day, this court made the following:

J U D G M E N T

Plaintiff's counsel filed memo requesting to dismiss the suit without costs as adjusted out of court. Memo recorded. Hence, the suit is dismissed without costs as adjusted out of court and defendant's counsel reported no objection.

Pronounced by me in open court, this 6th day of February 2017.

PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

KOVVUR.

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE:: KOVVUR

Present: A.Satyanand,

Principal Senior Civil Judge, Kovvur

Monday, this 20th day of February 2017

ORIGINAL SUIT No.617/2014 Between:

1. Smt.BoppanaVaraLakshmi.

...Plaintiff

And

1) Sri Dasari Appa Rao.

2) Smt Cherukuri Ammani.

3) Smt. Kantamani Sridevi.

4) Sri Dasari Veera Venkata Ratnaji Rao.

5) Sri Dasari Veera Venkata Satyanarayana.

...Defendants

This suit filed by the plaintiff to pass preliminary decree for partition of plaint schedule property into six equal shares and to allot one such share to the plaintiff and put her in exclusive possession of such share and for mesme profits that would be determined on separate application under Order 20

Rule 20 Civil Procedure Code and for costs of the suit.

This suit is coming on this day for proceedings under section 89 Civil

Procedure Code before me in the presence of Sri T. Prabhakara Rao,

Advocate for the plaintiff and of Sri V.V. Subba Rao, Advocate for the 5th defendant. Upon perusing the memo filed by the counsel for the plaintiff and having stood over for consideration till this day, this court made the following:

J U D G M E N T

Plaintiff's counsel filed memo requesting to dismiss the suit without costs as suit is adjusted out of court. Defendants 4 and 5 filed memo reporting no objection. Memo recorded. Hence, this suit is dismissed without costs as adjusted out of court.

Pronounced by me in open court, this 20th day of February 2017.

PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

KOVVUR.

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE:: KOVVUR

Present: A.Satyanand,

Principal Senior Civil Judge, Kovvur

Monday, this 6th day of February 2017

ORIGINAL SUIT No.108/2016 Between:

Smt. Mungara Manga. ...Plaintiff

And

1) Sri Panchikatla Venkata Rao.

2) Sri Panchikatla Veerraju

3) Sri Panchikatla Govindu

4) Sri Panchikatla Srinu

5) Smt.Panchikatla Ramanamma

6) Smt. Ganuboina Veera Lakshmi

7) Smt. Bolli Vara Lakshmi. ...Defendants

This suit filed by the plaintiffs to pass preliminary decree for partition of plaint schedule property into sixty four equal shares by metes and bounds and to allot nine such shares to the plaintiff and put her in exclusive possession of such shares and if defendants failed to do so the plaintiff is at liberty to get her share divided and obtain possession through process of law and for mesme profits that would be determined on separate application under Order 20 Rule 20 Civil Procedure Code and for costs of the suit.

This suit is coming on this day for plaintiff's evidence before me and the defendants remained exparte and having no representation on behalf of the plaintiff and plaintiff being called absent and having stood over for consideration till this day, this court made the following:

J U D G M E N T

Plaintiff called absent. No representation. Hence, this suit is dismissed for default.

Pronounced by me in open court, this 6th day of February 2017.

PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

KOVVUR.

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE:: KOVVUR

Present: A. Satyanand,

Principal Senior Civil Judge, Kovvur

Tuesday, the 21st day of February 2017.

ORIGINAL SUIT No.90/2010

Between:

Smt Inaparthi Mariyamma Plaintiff.

And

Sri Cheppula Nageswara Rao Defendant

This suit filed by the plaintiff for Cancellation of gift deed dated 12.2.2009 vide document No.600/2009 of Sub Registrar office,

Jangareddigudem executed by the Plaintiff in favour of defendant and for costs of the suit.

This suit is coming on this day for trial before me on costs of Rs.100/- in the presence of Sri V.V. Subba Rao, Counsel for the defendant and having no representation on behalf of the plaintiff and plaintiff being called absent and having stood over for consideration till this day, this court made the following:

J U D G M E N T

Costs of Rs.100/- not paid. Plaintiff called absent. No representation.

Hence, this suit is dismissed for default.

Pronounced by me in open court, this 21st day of February 2017..

PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

KOVVUR.

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE:: KOVVUR

Present: A.Satyanand,

Principal Senior Civil Judge, Kovvur

day, the 11th day of February, 2017.

O.S.No.274/2013.

Between:

Kantamani Satyanarayana. Plaintiff.

And

Sanamandra Surendranath. Defendant.

This suit is filed by the Plaintiff against the Defendant.

This suit is coming on this day before me and having stood over for consideration till this day, this court made the following:

J U D G M E N T

Plaintiff and Defendant are present before the Lok Adalat. They entered into compromise before the Lok Adalat. Both parties filed compromise terms. Compromise is recorded as per the terms. Accordingly award is passed and the suit is decreed as per the compromise terms. The Court fee shall be refunded to the Plaintiff.

Pronounced by me in open court, this 11th day of February, 2017.

PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

KOVVUR.