Sri. A. Veeraiah

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SESSIONS JUDGE, MANCHERIAL

Present:- Sri Lalsingh Sreenivasa Naik, I-Addl. Sessions Judge, Mancherial I/C Prl. Sessions Judge, Mancherial

Wednesday, this the 13th day of May, 2026

Crl.M.P. No.140 of 2026

in Cr.No.215 of 2026 of PS Mancherial Between:-

1)Dulgach Deepak @ Durgaj Deepak S/o Srinivas, 36 years, R/o H.No.13-718, Sanjeevaiah colony, Mancherial

2)Bittu @ Rohan S/o Srinivas, 25 years, R/o H.No.13-718, Sanjeevaiah colony, Mancherial … Petitioners/A2 and A3 // And // The State of Telangana represented through SHO, PS Mancherial

.. Respondent/Complainant

This petition is coming on 12.05.2026 for hearing in the presence of Sri Chiranjeeva Chary, Advocate for petitioners and the Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State and having stood over for consideration, this Court made the following:- ::ORDER::

The petitioners/A2 and A3 filed this anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagari Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) in

Cr.No.215 of 2026 of PS Mancherial for the offences punishable under

Sections 109(1), 118(1) read with 3(5) of BNS, stating that they did not commit the alleged offence, they are ready to face the trial to prove their innocence, they have nothing to do with the offence and they were falsely implicated in this case, he is the poor person, meanwhile, if the petitioner arrested by the police, he will lose his reputation in the society, the petitioner/A2 is suffering with pancreatic and having old aged parents and his father is suffering with kidney problem and hence prayed to grant anticipatory bail.

2.The learned Public Prosecutor opposed bail and filed counter stating that the investigation is under progress, and finally, requested to dismiss the petition.

2

3.Heard on both sides and perused the record.

4.Now the point for consideration is:

‘Whether the petitioners/A2 and A3 are entitled for grant of anticipatory bail as prayed for’? Point:-

5.A perusal of the remand case diary and other material available on record prima facie shows that the petitioner/A1 with the support of A2 to

A6 and other accused attacked on Panasa Rajender with empty beer bottles and sticks with an intention to kill him, resulting he received bleeding injuries on his head and face, so also Anvesh received bleeding injuries on his head, by keeping old grudges in the mind. The case diary further discloses that the investigation is still in progress for examination of some more witnesses. Further, if the petitioners/A2 and A3 released on anticipatory bail, they may influenced and threatened material witnesses.

The investigation is at crucial stage and if the petitioners/A2 and A3 are released on anticipatory bail, it has impact on the phase of investigation, so also there is a bad signal going into the society.

6.By considering the facts and circumstances of the case, and arguments advanced by the learned Public prosecutor for the prosecution, and also taking into consideration the gravity of the offence, and the custodial interrogation of the petitioners/A2 and A3 are necessary to unearth and resolve the entire crime. Therefore, this Court is not inclined to consider the request of the petitioners/A2 and A3 to grant them anticipatory bail.

7.In the result, the petition is dismissed.

Typed to my dictation by the Stenographer, corrected and pronounced by me in the open Court, on this the 13th day of May 2026.

sd/-

I ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE

MANCHERIAL

I/C PRINCIPAL SESSIONS JUDGE

MANCHERIAL

3

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SESSIONS JUDGE, MANCHERIAL

Present:- Sri Lalsingh Sreenivasa Naik,

I-Addl. Sessions Judge, Mancherial I/C Prl. Sessions Judge, Mancherial

Wednesday, this the 13th day of May, 2026

Crl.M.P. No.142 of 2026

in Cr.No.215 of 2026 of PS Mancherial Between:-

Dasari Bharath @ Babulu @ Bharath Kumar S/o Sudhakar, 27 years, Private employee, R/o H.No.13-756, Sanjeevaiah colony, Mancherial District Mancherial … Petitioner/A5

// And //

The State of Telangana represented through SHO, PS Mancherial

.. Respondent/Complainant

This petition is coming on 12.05.2026 for hearing in the presence of Sri Chitla Ramesh, Advocate for petitioner and the Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State and having stood over for consideration, this Court made the following:-

::ORDER::

The Petitioner/A5 filed this anticipatory bail application under

Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagari Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) in Cr.No.215 of 2026 of PS Mancherial for the offences punishable under Sections 109(1), 118(1) read with 3(5) of BNS, stating that he did not commit the alleged offence, he is ready to face the trial to prove his innocence, he has nothing to do with the offence and he was falsely implicated in this case, he is the poor person, meanwhile, if the petitioner arrested by the police, he will lose his reputation in the society and hence prayed to grant anticipatory bail.

2.The learned Public Prosecutor opposed bail and filed counter stating that the investigation is under progress, and finally, requested to dismiss the petition.

3.Heard on both sides and perused the record.

2

4.Now the point for consideration is:

‘Whether the petitioner/A5 is entitled for grant of anticipatory bail as prayed for’?

Point:-

5.A perusal of the remand case diary and other material available on record prima facie shows that the petitioner/A1 with the support of A2 to

A6 and other accused attacked on Panasa Rajender with empty beer bottles and sticks with an intention to kill him, resulting he received bleeding injuries on his head and face, so also Anvesh received bleeding injuries on his head, by keeping old grudges in the mind. The case diary further discloses that the investigation is still in progress for examination of some more witnesses. Further, if the petitioner/A5 released on anticipatory bail, he may influenced and threatened material witnesses.

The investigation is at crucial stage and if the petitioner/A5 is released on anticipatory bail, it has impact on the phase of investigation, so also there is a bad signal going into the society.

6.By considering the facts and circumstances of the case, and arguments advanced by the learned Public prosecutor for the prosecution, and also taking into consideration the gravity of the offence, and the custodial interrogation of the petitioner/A5 is necessary to unearth and resolve the entire crime. Therefore, this Court is not inclined to consider the request of the petitioner/A5 to grant him anticipatory bail.

7.In the result, the petition is dismissed.

Typed to my dictation by the Stenographer, corrected and pronounced by me in the open Court, on this the 13th day of May 2026.

Sd/-

I ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE

MANCHERIAL

I/C PRINCIPAL SESSIONS JUDGE

MANCHERIAL

3

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SESSIONS JUDGE, MANCHERIAL

Present:- Sri Lalsingh Sreenivasa Naik,

I-Addl. Sessions Judge, Mancherial I/C Prl. Sessions Judge, Mancherial

Wednesday, this the 13th day of May, 2026

Crl.M.P. No.142 of 2026

in Cr.No.215 of 2026 of PS Mancherial Between:-

Dasari Bharath @ Babulu @ Bharath Kumar S/o Sudhakar, 27 years, Private employee, R/o H.No.13-756, Sanjeevaiah colony, Mancherial District Mancherial … Petitioner/A5

// And //

The State of Telangana represented through SHO, PS Mancherial

.. Respondent/Complainant

This petition is coming on 12.05.2026 for hearing in the presence of Sri Chitla Ramesh, Advocate for petitioner and the Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State and having stood over for consideration, this Court made the following:-

::ORDER::

The Petitioner/A5 filed this anticipatory bail application under

Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagari Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) in Cr.No.215 of 2026 of PS Mancherial for the offences punishable under Sections 109(1), 118(1) read with 3(5) of BNS, stating that he did not commit the alleged offence, he is ready to face the trial to prove his innocence, he has nothing to do with the offence and he was falsely implicated in this case, he is the poor person, meanwhile, if the petitioner arrested by the police, he will lose his reputation in the society and hence prayed to grant anticipatory bail.

2.The learned Public Prosecutor opposed bail and filed counter stating that the investigation is under progress, and finally, requested to dismiss the petition.

3.Heard on both sides and perused the record.

2

4.Now the point for consideration is:

‘Whether the petitioner/A5 is entitled for grant of anticipatory bail as prayed for’?

Point:-

5.A perusal of the remand case diary and other material available on record prima facie shows that the petitioner/A1 with the support of A2 to

A6 and other accused attacked on Panasa Rajender with empty beer bottles and sticks with an intention to kill him, resulting he received bleeding injuries on his head and face, so also Anvesh received bleeding injuries on his head, by keeping old grudges in the mind. The case diary further discloses that the investigation is still in progress for examination of some more witnesses. Further, if the petitioner/A5 released on anticipatory bail, he may influenced and threatened material witnesses.

The investigation is at crucial stage and if the petitioner/A5 is released on anticipatory bail, it has impact on the phase of investigation, so also there is a bad signal going into the society.

6.By considering the facts and circumstances of the case, and arguments advanced by the learned Public prosecutor for the prosecution, and also taking into consideration the gravity of the offence, and the custodial interrogation of the petitioner/A5 is necessary to unearth and resolve the entire crime. Therefore, this Court is not inclined to consider the request of the petitioner/A5 to grant him anticipatory bail.

7.In the result, the petition is dismissed.

Typed to my dictation by the Stenographer, corrected and pronounced by me in the open Court, on this the 13th day of May 2026.

Sd/-

I ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE

MANCHERIAL

I/C PRINCIPAL SESSIONS JUDGE

MANCHERIAL

3

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SESSIONS JUDGE, MANCHERIAL

Present:- Sri Lalsingh Sreenivasa Naik,

I-Addl. Sessions Judge, Mancherial I/C Prl. Sessions Judge, Mancherial

Wednesday, this the 13th day of May, 2026

Crl.M.P. No.142 of 2026

in Cr.No.215 of 2026 of PS Mancherial Between:-

Dasari Bharath @ Babulu @ Bharath Kumar S/o Sudhakar, 27 years, Private employee, R/o H.No.13-756, Sanjeevaiah colony, Mancherial District Mancherial … Petitioner/A5

// And //

The State of Telangana represented through SHO, PS Mancherial

.. Respondent/Complainant

This petition is coming on 12.05.2026 for hearing in the presence of Sri Chitla Ramesh, Advocate for petitioner and the Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State and having stood over for consideration, this Court made the following:-

::ORDER::

The Petitioner/A5 filed this anticipatory bail application under

Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagari Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) in Cr.No.215 of 2026 of PS Mancherial for the offences punishable under Sections 109(1), 118(1) read with 3(5) of BNS, stating that he did not commit the alleged offence, he is ready to face the trial to prove his innocence, he has nothing to do with the offence and he was falsely implicated in this case, he is the poor person, meanwhile, if the petitioner arrested by the police, he will lose his reputation in the society and hence prayed to grant anticipatory bail.

2.The learned Public Prosecutor opposed bail and filed counter stating that the investigation is under progress, and finally, requested to dismiss the petition.

3.Heard on both sides and perused the record.

2

4.Now the point for consideration is:

‘Whether the petitioner/A5 is entitled for grant of anticipatory bail as prayed for’?

Point:-

5.A perusal of the remand case diary and other material available on record prima facie shows that the petitioner/A1 with the support of A2 to

A6 and other accused attacked on Panasa Rajender with empty beer bottles and sticks with an intention to kill him, resulting he received bleeding injuries on his head and face, so also Anvesh received bleeding injuries on his head, by keeping old grudges in the mind. The case diary further discloses that the investigation is still in progress for examination of some more witnesses. Further, if the petitioner/A5 released on anticipatory bail, he may influenced and threatened material witnesses.

The investigation is at crucial stage and if the petitioner/A5 is released on anticipatory bail, it has impact on the phase of investigation, so also there is a bad signal going into the society.

6.By considering the facts and circumstances of the case, and arguments advanced by the learned Public prosecutor for the prosecution, and also taking into consideration the gravity of the offence, and the custodial interrogation of the petitioner/A5 is necessary to unearth and resolve the entire crime. Therefore, this Court is not inclined to consider the request of the petitioner/A5 to grant him anticipatory bail.

7.In the result, the petition is dismissed.

Typed to my dictation by the Stenographer, corrected and pronounced by me in the open Court, on this the 13th day of May 2026.

Sd/-

I ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE

MANCHERIAL

I/C PRINCIPAL SESSIONS JUDGE

MANCHERIAL

3

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SESSIONS JUDGE, MANCHERIAL

Present:- Sri Lalsingh Sreenivasa Naik, I-Addl. Sessions Judge, Mancherial I/C Prl. Sessions Judge, Mancherial

Wednesday, this the 13th day of May, 2026

Crl.M.P. No.142 of 2026

in Cr.No.215 of 2026 of PS Mancherial Between:-

Dasari Bharath @ Babulu @ Bharath Kumar S/o Sudhakar, 27 years, Private employee, R/o H.No.13-756, Sanjeevaiah colony, Mancherial District Mancherial … Petitioner/A5 // And // The State of Telangana represented through SHO, PS Mancherial

.. Respondent/Complainant

This petition is coming on 12.05.2026 for hearing in the presence of Sri Chitla Ramesh, Advocate for petitioner and the Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State and having stood over for consideration, this Court made the following:- ::ORDER::

The Petitioner/A5 filed this anticipatory bail application under

Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagari Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) in Cr.No.215 of 2026 of PS Mancherial for the offences punishable under Sections 109(1), 118(1) read with 3(5) of BNS, stating that he did not commit the alleged offence, he is ready to face the trial to prove his innocence, he has nothing to do with the offence and he was falsely implicated in this case, he is the poor person, meanwhile, if the petitioner arrested by the police, he will lose his reputation in the society and hence prayed to grant anticipatory bail.

2.The learned Public Prosecutor opposed bail and filed counter stating that the investigation is under progress, and finally, requested to dismiss the petition.

3.Heard on both sides and perused the record.

2

4.Now the point for consideration is:

‘Whether the petitioner/A5 is entitled for grant of anticipatory bail as prayed for’?

Point:-

5.A perusal of the remand case diary and other material available on record prima facie shows that the petitioner/A1 with the support of A2 to

A6 and other accused attacked on Panasa Rajender with empty beer bottles and sticks with an intention to kill him, resulting he received bleeding injuries on his head and face, so also Anvesh received bleeding injuries on his head, by keeping old grudges in the mind. The case diary further discloses that the investigation is still in progress for examination of some more witnesses. Further, if the petitioner/A5 released on anticipatory bail, he may influenced and threatened material witnesses. The investigation is at crucial stage and if the petitioner/A5 is released on anticipatory bail, it has impact on the phase of investigation, so also there is a bad signal going into the society.

6.By considering the facts and circumstances of the case, and arguments advanced by the learned Public prosecutor for the prosecution, and also taking into consideration the gravity of the offence, and the custodial interrogation of the petitioner/A5 is necessary to unearth and resolve the entire crime. Therefore, this Court is not inclined to consider the request of the petitioner/A5 to grant him anticipatory bail.

7.In the result, the petition is dismissed.

Typed to my dictation by the Stenographer, corrected and pronounced by me in the open Court, on this the 13th day of May 2026.

sd/-

I ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE

MANCHERIAL

I/C PRINCIPAL SESSIONS JUDGE

MANCHERIAL

3