Sri B.Babu Naik

JFCM,ADDATEEGALA

JFCM Addateegala · East Godavari · Andhra Pradesh

Sri B.Babu Naik, JFCM,ADDATEEGALA, is posted at JFCM Addateegala, East Godavari, Andhra Pradesh, India. 671 court orders on record since 2017. 3 judgments with full text available. Primarily handles CC, PRC, DVC cases.

671

Total Orders

Judgments

Orders/Month

Postings

Featured Judgments

CC/64/2016 Acquitted

SHO YETAPAKA P.S. vs A1.Aalakunta Baiu

09 Aug 2018

IN THE COURT OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS:

RAMPACHODAVARAM

Present: Sri B. Babu Naik.,

Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Rampachodavaram

Thursday, this the 09th day of August, 2018

C.C.No.64/2016

Between:

The State being represented by Sub-Inspector of Police, Yetapaka Police Station. … Complainant

And

1. Aalakunta Balu, Son of Linga Swamy @ Kondanna, Aged 24 Years, Kotla Veedhi, Subhash Chandra Bose Colony, Pentlavalli village, Kollapur Mandal of Mahaboob Nagar District.

2. Ookey Rambabu, Son of Narayana, Aged 30 Years, Gommu Kothagudem village, Yetapaka Mandal of East Godavari District. … Accused

This case came before me on 08.08.2018 for final hearing in the presence of Prosecution for complainant and of Sri M.V.R.Prakash, Advocate for accused and the matter having stood over till this day for consideration and the Court delivered the following:

JUDGMENT

1. The Sub-Inspector of Police, Yetapaka Police Station filed charge sheet against accused in Crime No.75/2015 for the offence punishable

U/Sec.379 of I.P.C..

2.The case of the Prosecution in brief is that on 15.10.2015 A1 went to sand ramp as per instructions of his owner and loaded the sand in his lorry on 17.10.2015 for that a dispute is going on at sand ramp. In this connection the way bills were not issued to him on that he stayed at ramp and developed friendship with A2 who is the supervisor of sand 2 ramp. The both accused hatched a plan to take the sand load without any bill with a view to sale at Kothagudem for more price. Accordingly both accused took loaded sand lorry without any way bill towards

Kothagudem at about 04:00 P.M. on 28.10.2015 with a view to sell away the sand and when reached Kapavaram village on seeing the police both accused tried to skulk away by leaving with sand load lorry.

When, the Head Constable (L.W.6) chased them with the help of staff (L.W.1 to L.W.3) and caught hold the both accused red-handedly in the presence of mediators (L.W.4 and L.W.5) as they have no permit, license or any authorization. Later, L.W.6 seized the property and arrested both accused in the presence of mediators under the cover of mediators report and returned to the police station. At about 07:00 P.M.

he registered the mediators report as a case in Cr.No.75/2015,

U/Sec.379 of I.P.C. and investigated into the matter. During the course of investigation he visited scene of offence, prepared rough sketch, examined the witnesses (L.W.1 to L.W.3) and recorded their statements, sent both accused for judicial custody. Later, on 30.10.2015 the Sub-

Inspector of Police (L.W.7) took up the further investigation, during the course of investigation he handed over the crime vehicle i.e. Lorry bearing registration No.AP27TT5293 to its owner namely Pothaneni

Venkata Rao as per orders in Crl.M.P.No.2053/2015, Dt.16.11.2015 in the presence of panch witnesses after taking proper receipts and photographs. The seized sand was auctioned on 22.01.2016 at 01:00

P.M. in the premises of Yetapaka Police Station before panch witnesses 3 and the auctioned of sand amount of Rs.5,700/- was deposited to the

Government vide Challan No.4589, Dt.25.01.2016 as per orders of the court vide Crl.M.P.No.2053/2015, Dt.16.11.2015. After completion of investigation he filed charge sheet.

3.Cognizance of offence U/Sec.379 of I.P.C. was taken against A1 and A2.

4.On appearance of accused, copies of required documents were furnished to them U/Sec.207 of Cr.P.C..

5.The accused are examined U/Sec.239 of Cr.P.C. and denied the offence. Charge U/Sec.379 of I.P.C. has been framed, read over and explained to them in Telugu. They are pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried the case.

6.In order to prove the case, the prosecution has examined P.W.1 and P.W.2 and got marked Exs.P1 and Ex.P4.

7.After closure of prosecution side evidence, the accused were examined U/Sec.313 of Cr.P.C. on the incriminating material available against the accused from the evidence of prosecution witnesses for which they denied the same. Accused are reported no defence evidence as such defence side evidence is closed.

8. Heard the arguments.

9.Now the point for determination is:-

Whether the prosecution has proved the guilt of accused for

the offence punishable U/Sec.379 of I.P.C. beyond all reasonable

doubt?

10.It is case of the prosecution that the accused have stolen sand from Godavari River at Gommukothagudem sand ramp and illegally transporting the same on the lorry without having any permit or license.

11.The prosecution in order to prove the case, has examined P.W.1 and P.W.2. As seen from the material on record, it goes to show that

P.W.1 is the Village Revenue Officer of Rayannapeta village and he also worked as in-charge Village Revenue Officer of Gommukothagudem village between September 2015 and December 2015. On 28.10.2015 at about 03:30 P.M. while he was present at Mandal Revenue Officer of

Yetapaka on being called by Head Constable of Yetapaka police station he along with Jetti Ramakrishna (L.W.5) went to the police station.

Thereafter, they have proceeded to sand ramp of Gommukothagudem village along with police where they have noticed one lorry which was coming from Gommukothagudem village towards Bhadrachalam. The police have stopped the vehicle on suspicion and inspected the same where they have found sand. They also noticed the accused persons in the lorry and when the police have interrogated both accused individually in their presence about permission to transport the sand on that the accused confessed as they are not having any permission to transport the sand. They further confessed that the sand contained in lorry was transporting from Gommukothagudem village to sell away the same. Then the police have drafted a mediators report in their presence on that he along with L.W.5 signed as mediators. Ex.P1 is the mediators report. Later the police brought both accused with lorry 5 contained with sand to the police station. The bearing number of lorry is AP27TT5239 and Ex.P2 is the mediators report along with photos four in number in which showing the lorry.

12.As seen from the evidence of P.W.2, it also shows that on 28.10.2015 at about 03:00 P.M. he received the information regarding illegal transportation of sand at Gommukothagudem from Godavari

River and he secured P.W.1 and Jetti Ramakrishna (L.W.5) as mediators and staff proceeded to Gommukothagudem village where they have noticed one lorry bearing number AP27TT5239 which was coming. On seeing the lorry they stopped it wherein found two persons. On interrogation both accused disclosed their identity and voluntarily confessed that they have committed theft of sand and illegally transporting on the lorry. Then, in pursuance of their confession he got drafted Ex.P1 mediators report and on inspection he found full of sand in the lorry. Then, he seized the lorry under cover of Ex.P1 mediators report and also arrested both accused and brought them to the police station with lorry. Thereafter, he registered Ex.P1 as a case in

Cr.No.75/2015, U/Sec.379 of I.P.C. and issued Ex.P3 First Information

Report, examined his staff (L.W.1 to L.W.3) and recorded their statements, again proceeded to scene of offence where he prepared

Ex.P4 rough sketch. On the same day he produced both accused for judicial custody. It further shows that the Sub-Inspector of Police (L.W.7) verified his investigation and as per orders in

Crl.M.P.No.2053/2015, Dt.16.11.2015 he handed over the vehicle to its

6 owner under cover of mediators report Dt.22.01.2016 for interim custody and also auctioned the sand and same proceeds were deposited to the Government.

13.On reading the evidence of P.W.1 and P.W.2, it indicates that they stopped the lorry bearing No.AP27TT5239 while it was coming from

Gommukothagudem village towards Bhadrachalam but, it is not their evidence that they have noticed above vehicle at the time of committing theft of sand from the Godavari river as alleged by the prosecution.

Further appears even the sand was auctioned by the Sub-Inspector of

Police (L.W.7) and deposited the sale proceeds to the Government, no material is placed by the prosecution to show that the sand was auctioned and sale proceeds were deposited. On perusal of the evidence of P.W.2, he expressed ignorance that whether any proceedings are submitted regarding the auction of sand. He also expressed ignorance that he does not know whether the Sub-Inspector of Police (L.W.7) obtained any permission either from the Court or

Revenue Department for conducting auction of sand. Even, the accused confessed before P.W.2 about their commission of offence that they have committed theft of sand and transporting illegally on lorry and the same was seized, the confession made by accused before the police about commission of offence is in admissible in the eye of Law.

14.Even though, the prosecution has placed the evidence of P.W.1 and P.W.2, failed to establish the offence against the accused as they have committed the sand from Godavari River at Gommukothagudem 7 village and no material is placed about committing theft of sand by accused except stray allegation that the accused were transporting sand illegally without having any license or permit. Moreover, the prosecution has failed to place any material regarding the seizure of case property as stated supra and also has not chosen to examine the

Sub-Inspector of Police (L.W.7) who conducted auction of sand and deposited the sale proceeds. In view of discrepancies and inconsistency material placed, it is not safe to believe the version of prosecution to connect the charge leveled against them.

15.Thus, in view of reasons stated above, I am of the opinion that the prosecution has failed to prove the guilt of accused beyond all reasonable doubt and they are entitled for benefit of doubt.

16.In the result, A1 and A2 are found not guilty for the offence punishable U/Sec.379 of I.P.C. and they are acquitted U/Sec.248 (1) of

Cr.P.C.. The bail bonds and sureties of accused shall remain in force for further period of six months as per Sec.437-A of Cr.P.C.. The seized vehicle i.e. Lorry bearing registration No.AP27TT5239 which was given for interim custody of its owner as per orders in

Crl.M.P.No.2053/2015, Dt.16.11.2015 is made absolute after appeal

time is over.

Typed to my dictation by the Personal Assistant, corrected and

pronounced by me in the open Court this the 09th day of August, 2018.

Sd/- B. Babu Naik.

Judicial First Class Magistrate,

Rampachodavaram.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

(Witnesses examined for)

FOR PROSECUTION:

P.W.1 : Vanjum Kannarao, mediator.

P.W.2 : K. Sathibabu, Head Constable.

FOR DEFENCE: ...None...

DOCUMENTS MARKED FOR PROSECUTION

Ex.P1 : 28.10.20105 Mediators report at about 04:00 P.M..

Ex.P2 : 22.01.2016 Mediators report at about 01:00 P.M..

Ex.P3 :28.10.2015 First Information Report.

Ex.P4 :28.10.2015 Rough Sketch.

DOCUMENTS MARKED FOR DEFENCE

...NIL...

MATERIAL OBJECTS.

… NIL…

Sd/- B. Babu Naik.

Judicial First Class Magistrate,

Rampachodavaram.

CALENDER

SUBMITTED BY THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS

RAMPACHODAVARAM.

C.C.No.64/2016. (Cr.No.75/2015 of Yetapaka P.S) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Date of Offence: 28.10.2015.

Date of Complaint: 28.10.2015.

Apprehension of accused: 28.10.2015.

Released on bail: A1 and A2 on 29.10.2015.

Commencement of Trial: 27.06.2017.

Closure of trial: 02.02.2018.

Sentence or Order: 09.08.2018.

Complainant: The State being represented by Sub-Inspector of Police, Yetapaka Police Station.

Accused: 1. Aalakunta Balu, Son of Linga Swamy @ Kondanna, Aged 24 Years, Kotla Veedhi, Subhash Chandra Bose Colony, Pentlavalli village, Kollapur Mandal of Mahaboob Nagar District.

2. Ookey Rambabu, Son of Narayana, Aged 30 Years, Gommu Kothagudem village, Yetapaka Mandal of East Godavari District.

Finding: Found Not Guilty.

Sentence : In the result, A1 and A2 are found not guilty for the offence punishable U/Sec.379 of I.P.C. and they are acquitted U/Sec.248 (1) of Cr.P.C.. The bail bonds and sureties of accused shall remain in force for further period of six months as per Sec.437-A of Cr.P.C.. The seized vehicle i.e. Lorry bearing registration No.AP27TT5239 which was given for interim custody of its owner as per orders in Crl.M.P.No.2053/2015, Dt.16.11.2015 is made absolute after appeal time is over.

Remarks: Delay caused due to non production of witnesses by the prosecution.

Sd/- B. Babu Naik.

Judicial First Class Magistrate,

Rampachodavaram.

CC/253/2016 Acquitted

S.H.O.Rampachodavaram P.S vs Katru Naeen Kumar

16 Aug 2018

IN THE COURT OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS:

RAMPACHODAVARAM

Present: Sri B. Babu Naik.,

Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Rampachodavaram

Thursday, this the 16th day of August, 2018

C.C.No.253/2016

Between:

The State being represented by Sub-Inspector of Police, Rampachodavaram Police Station. … Complainant

And

Katru Naveen Kumar, Son of Johny Babu, Aged 22 Years, Coolie, Resident of Irlapalli village, Seethapalli, R & R Colony, I.Polavaram panchayat, Rampachodavaram Mandal of East Godavari District. … Accused

This case came before me on 13.08.2018 for final hearing in the presence of Prosecution for complainant and of Sri Y. Srinivasa Rao, Advocate for accused and the matter having stood over till this day for consideration and the Court delivered the following:

JUDGMENT

1. The Sub-Inspector of Police, Rampachodavaram Police Station filed charge sheet against accused in Crime No.36/2016 for the offence punishable U/Sec.354 (c), 506, 509 r/w 34 of I.P.C..

2.The case of the Prosecution in brief is that Mallina Kalarani (L.W.1) is living by means of working as Tailor and her husband is doing cultivation. About 20 years ago some men belongs to Katru John

Babu filed SCs and STs case against her husband Ramakrishna and others namely Eleti Veerababu and Pedagada Apparao. On 06.07.2016 at about 12:30 P.M. Express Channel, press reporters came to the 2 village and while asking about above case issue she along with Kandula

Sesharatnam, Eleti Padmavathi, Kandula Seetha and Pedagada

Ramakrishna (L.W.2 to L.W.5) giving interview to them. In the meantime the accused came to the spot and taking video with his cell phone while she was giving interview and the Juvenile conflict with

Law recorded her entire interview. On witnessed the same herself and others caught hold Juvenile conflict with Law and asked him while he was taking video as to who arranged him. Then, the Juvenile conflict with Law informed them as the son of Katru Jahn Babu namely Naveen

Kumar @ Pandu i.e. accused entrusted him to take video. The press reporters took the cell phone of Juvenile conflict with Law and in turn handed over the same to constable who attending duty at that place.

The accused tried to insult L.W.1 to L.W.5, made fear them and insulted even not to come outside. Thereafter, basing on the report presented by

L.W.1, the Sub-Inspector of Police (L.W.10) registered case in

Cr.No.36/2016, U/Secs.354 (c), 506, 509 r/w 34 of I.P.C. and took up investigation. During the course of investigation he examined L.W.1 at police station and recorded her statement, visited scene of offence, secured Samsung Galaxy J5 white coloured cell phone from R.V.

Ratnam, Police constable (L.W.9), examined him, prepared a rough sketch, examined the witnesses (L.W.2 to L.W.6) and recorded their statements. On the same day on credible information he arrested the accused in the presence of mediators (L.W.7 and L.W.8) in pursuance of confessional statement recorded in the presence of mediators, served 3 notice to accused U/Sec.41-A of Cr.P.C. and after completion of investigation he filed charge sheet by Sub-Inspector of Police (L.W.11).

3.Cognizance of offence U/Secs.354 (c), 506, 509 r/w 34 of I.P.C.

was taken against accused.

4.On appearance of accused, copies of required documents were furnished to him U/Sec.207 of Cr.P.C..

5.The accused is examined U/Sec.239 of Cr.P.C. and denied the offence. Charge U/Secs.354 (c), 509 of I.P.C. has been framed, read over and explained to him in Telugu. He is pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried the case.

6.In order to prove the case, the prosecution has examined P.W.1 to

P.W.4 got marked Exs.P1 and Ex.P4.

7.After closure of prosecution side evidence the accused was examined U/Sec.313 of Cr.P.C. on the incriminating material available against the accused from the evidence of prosecution witnesses for which he denied the same. Accused is reported no defence evidence as such defence side evidence is closed.

8. Heard the arguments.

9.Now the point for determination is:-

Whether the prosecution has proved the guilt of accused for

the offence punishable U/Secs.354 (c), 509 of I.P.C. beyond all

reasonable doubt?

10.It is case of the prosecution that the accused got captured video of interview giving by P.W.1 from his cell phone without her consent and also made her fear and threatened.

11.In order to establish the case, the prosecution has examined the defacto complainant as P.W.1. As seen from the material on record, it goes to show that P.W.1 is a resident of Seethapalli village and doing

Tailoring works. She knows the accused who is her neighbour. On 25.06.2016 the father of accused lodged complaint under Atrocity against her husband namely Ramakrishna and others K. Rambabu, K.

Saibabu, N. Veerababu and Apparao. While so on 06.07.2016 at about 12:00 Noon to 12:30 P.M. the Express channel media interview her,

P.W.2 to P.W.4 and Pedagada Ramakrishna (L.W.5) at her residence regarding case under SCs and STs which was pending. At that time one

Srinubabu came there and recording their interview in media channel.

On observing it she along with P.W.2 to P.W.4 and L.W.5 questioned about recording of interview by him in the cell phone. Then, he stated that he was recording it on the instructions of accused. At the same time they handed over said Srinubabu along with cell phone to one police constable who was present near her house. Thereafter, they proceeded to Police station along with said Srinu and constable and lodged report to the police by them and it is Ex.P1.

12.Even though, the above evidence appears that while Express channel media interviewed P.W.1, P.W.2 to P.W.4 and L.W.5 one Srinu

Babu came there and recording their interview in his cell phone, it is not the evidence of P.W.1 that their interview is recorded by the accused. Admittedly the accused or his father never presented in surrounding place of interview where it was covering by Bommisetti 5

Nagababu (L.W.6). Even, according to P.W.1 she could not identify the cell phone as she has not observed specifically. It is pertinent to note that P.W.1 gave self contradictory version that the entire case facts are known to her husband by name Ramakrishna and on his instructions only she deposed in her examination in chief as admitted by her. She further deposed that no police constable and others seized any cell phone from anybody in her presence and since one Suribabu was not present in their village the covering of interview does not arise. As per her own admission that her husband obtained her signature and signatures of P.W.2 to P.W.4 on blank papers and handed over the same to the police and moreover her husband Ramakrishna was not present in the village on 06.07.2016 and no interview was conducted to her and

P.W.2 to P.W.4. Therefore, the entire evidence of P.W.1 is itself contradictory and creates doubt whether really the alleged incident occurred on 06.07.2016 as stated by the prosecution.

13.Moreover, P.W.1 is also not supported by P.W.2 to P.W.4. As seen from their evidence, goes to appear that they know the accused who is their neighbour but, they did not witness any incident. The police did not examine them and nor record any statement. Since, P.W.2 to P.W.4 have not supported to the case, the prosecution declared them as hostile witnesses and cross-examined. Even though they were cross-examined by the learned A.P.P., nothing was elicited from them except denial suggestions that they have stated before the police as in Exs.P2 to P4

Sec.161 of Cr.P.C. statements.

14.Since, P.W.1 gave self contradictory version and P.W.2 to P.W.4 are not supported to the case, the learned A.P.P. gave up the remaining witnesses (L.W.5 to L.W.11) as no purpose will be served even to examine them. Absolutely the prosecution has failed to place any material to prove the charge leveled against the accused and therefore in view of un-reliable testimony of P.W.1 and not supported by P.W.2 to

P.W.4, it is not safe to believe the version of prosecution against the accused.

15.Hence, in view of reasons stated above, I am of the opinion that the prosecution has failed to prove the guilt of accused beyond all reasonable doubt and he is entitled for benefit of doubt.

16.In the result, the accused is found not guilty for the offence punishable U/Sec.354 (c), 509 of I.P.C. and he is acquitted U/Sec.248 (1) of Cr.P.C.. The bail bonds and sureties of accused shall remain in force for further period of six months as per Sec.437-A of Cr.P.C..

Typed to my dictation by the Personal Assistant, corrected and

pronounced by me in the open Court this the 16th day of August, 2018.

Sd/- B. Babu Naik.

Judicial First Class Magistrate,

Rampachodavaram.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

(Witnesses examined for)

FOR PROSECUTION:

P.W.1 : Malina Kalarani.

P.W.2 : Kandula Sesharatnam.

P.W.3 : Eleti Padmavathi.

P.W.4 : Kandula Seetha.

FOR DEFENCE: ...None...

DOCUMENTS MARKED FOR PROSECUTION

Ex.P1 : 06.07.2016 Report given by P.W.1.

Ex.P2 : 06.07.2016 Sec.161 of Cr.P.C. statement of P.W.2.

Ex.P3 :06.07.2016 Sec.161 of Cr.P.C. statement of P.W.3.

Ex.P4 :06.07.2016 Sec.161 of Cr.P.C. statement of P.W.4.

DOCUMENTS MARKED FOR DEFENCE

...NIL...

MATERIAL OBJECTS.

… NIL…

Sd/- B. Babu Naik.

Judicial First Class Magistrate,

Rampachodavaram.

CALENDER

SUBMITTED BY THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS

RAMPACHODAVARAM.

C.C.No.253/2016. (Cr.No.36/2016 of Rampachodavaram P.S) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Date of Offence: 06.07.2016.

Date of Complaint: 06.07.2016.

Apprehension of accused: ---

Released on bail: ---

Commencement of Trial: 24.03.2017.

Closure of trial: 10.08.2018

Sentence or Order: 06.08.2018.

Complainant: The State being represented by Sub-Inspector of Police, Rampachodavaram Police Station.

Accused: Katru Naveen Kumar, Son of Johny Babu, Aged 22 Years, Coolie, Resident of Irlapalli village, Seethapalli, R & R Colony, I.Polavaram panchayat, Rampachodavaram Mandal of East Godavari District.

Finding: Found Not Guilty.

Sentence : In the result, the accused is found not guilty for the offence punishable U/Sec.354 (c), 509 of I.P.C. and he is acquitted U/Sec.248 (1) of Cr.P.C.. The bail bonds and sureties of accused shall remain in force for further period of six months as per Sec.437-A of Cr.P.C..

Remarks: Delay caused due to non production of witnesses by the prosecution.

Sd/- B. Babu Naik.

Judicial First Class Magistrate,

Rampachodavaram.

CC/259/2017

S.H.O.Yetapaka PS vs KOdime Lakshmaiah

03 Aug 2018

Order Record 665 total

Case No.	Parties	Date	Type	Outcome
CC/253/2016	S.H.O.Rampachodavaram P.S vs Katru Naeen Kumar	16 Aug 2018	Judgement	Acquitted
CC/64/2016	SHO YETAPAKA P.S. vs A1.Aalakunta Baiu	09 Aug 2018	Judgement	Acquitted
CC/7/2018	Thotempudy Rajasekar vs Pallala Sri Lakshmi Srinivasa Raddy	07 Aug 2018	Order	—
CC/259/2017	S.H.O.Yetapaka PS vs KOdime Lakshmaiah	03 Aug 2018	Order	—
STC/57/2017	The Sub Inspector of police Dutcherthi Ps vs A1 Vedulla Chinnareddy	31 Jul 2018	Order	—
CC/80/2016	SHO, RAMPACHODAVARAM P.S. vs A1.Pallapu Narasinga RAo	30 Jul 2018	Judgement	—
CC/304/2017	S.H.O.Chintoor PS vs Kalumula Veeraju	30 Jul 2018	Judgement	—
CC/306/2017	S.H.O.Yetapaka PS vs Thiruveedhula Mallikarjuna Rao	26 Jul 2018	Judgement	—
CC/289/2017	S.H.O.Rampachodavaram PS vs Panda Ammiraju	25 Jul 2018	Judgement	—
CC/68/2017	The Sub Inspector of police Adadteegala PS vs Chandaka Ramu @ Ramlal	24 Jul 2018	Judgment	—
CC/77/2018	S.H.O.Maredumilli PS vs Shaik Dadavalli @ Nanaji	23 Jul 2018	Judgement	—
CC/346/2017	S.H.O.Gangavaram PS vs Madakam Malleswara Rao	23 Jul 2018	Judgement	—
DVC/17/2016	Anubhavam.Veera kumari vs Anubhavam.Durgapavan kumar and 1 other	18 Jul 2018	Order	—
STC/35/2018	The Sub Inspector of police Addateegala P.S. vs Motukuri Durga	17 Jul 2018	Order	—
CC/35/2016	SHO CHINTOOR P.S. vs A1 BHUKYA JAGAN AND 4 OTHERS	16 Jul 2018	Judgement	—
CC/229/2016	SHO Devipatnam P.S. vs A1. Tikala Sathish @ Chinna Sathish	16 Jul 2018	Judgement	—
CC/10/2018	The Sub Inspector of police Adddateegala P.S. vs Vommangi Appanna	14 Jul 2018	Decree	—
CC/67/2018	The Sub-Insepctor of police Jaddangi Ps vs Londa Thrimurthulu	14 Jul 2018	Decree	—
CC/79/2018	The Sub Inspector of police Addateegala P.S. vs Jartha Ramababu	14 Jul 2018	Decree	—
CC/80/2018	The Sub Inspector of police Rajavommangi PS vs A1 Mortha Apparao @ Bujji	14 Jul 2018	Decree	—
CC/81/2018	The Sub Inspector of police Rajavommangi PS vs A1 Kundhuru Apparao	14 Jul 2018	Decree	—
CC/84/2018	The Sub Inspector of police Addategala vs Madakam Nageswara Rao	14 Jul 2018	Decree	—
CC/85/2018	The Sub Inspector of police Dutcharathi P.S. vs Kurasam Bapannadora	14 Jul 2018	Decree	—
CC/87/2018	The Sub Inspector of police Addateegala P.S. vs Chodi Balu Dora	14 Jul 2018	Decree	—
CC/88/2018	The Sub Inspector of police Addateegala P.S vs Kurasam Nagababu	14 Jul 2018	Decree	—
CC/90/2017	The Sub inspector of police Jaddangi PS vs Geddam Musalayya	14 Jul 2018	Decree	—
CC/93/2018	The Sub inspector of police Rajavommangi P.S. vs Vishamsetti Jusaraju @ Rajababu	14 Jul 2018	Decree	—
CC/94/2018	The Sub Inspector of police Rajavommangi P.S. vs Pyla suryanarayna,	14 Jul 2018	Decree	—
CC/6/2017	SHO YETAPAKA P.S. vs Shaik Kamal Valli	14 Jul 2018	Order	—
CC/10/2017	SHO MAREDUMILLI P.S. vs Kundla Sivaprasadreddy	14 Jul 2018	Order	—
CC/13/2018	Pro and Excise Rampachodavaram vs Bada Devid raju	14 Jul 2018	Order	—
CC/14/2018	Pro and Excise Rampachodavaram vs Gubbala Subba Rao	14 Jul 2018	Order	—
CC/31/2016	The Sub- Inspector of police Chintoor PS vs Darmula Kannarao	14 Jul 2018	Order	—
CC/49/2018	Pro and Excise Rampachodavaram PS vs Matta Vara Lakshmi	14 Jul 2018	Order	—
CC/51/2018	Pro and Excise Rampachodavaram PS vs Karu Parvathi	14 Jul 2018	Order	—
CC/55/2018	Pro and Excise Rampachodavaram vs Gudla China	14 Jul 2018	Order	—
CC/60/2018	Pro and Excise Rampachodavaram PS vs Boina Suggereddy	14 Jul 2018	Order	—
CC/102/2018	S.H.O.Gangavaram PS vs Peetha Appala Raju	14 Jul 2018	Order	—
CC/106/2018	S.H.O.Gangavaram PS vs Nelli Saibabu @ Sai	14 Jul 2018	Order	—
CC/118/2018	S.H.O.Chintoor PS vs Polouju Saida Chari	14 Jul 2018	Order	—
CC/120/2018	S.H.O.Maredumilli PS vs Chedupudi Vara Prasad	14 Jul 2018	Order	—
CC/123/2018	S.H.O.Chintoor PS vs Garapati Krishna Prasad	14 Jul 2018	Order	—
CC/125/2018	S.H.O.GangavaramPS vs Kadimi Dasu	14 Jul 2018	Order	—
CC/127/2018	S.H.O.Chintoor PS vs Chintapalli Naga Srikanth	14 Jul 2018	Order	—
CC/128/2018	S.H.O.yetapaka PS vs Yallamilli Naveen	14 Jul 2018	Order	—
CC/180/2017	S.H.O.Chintoor PS vs Maganti Rama Krishna	14 Jul 2018	Order	—
CC/220/2016	SHO Donkarai vs Bangaram.praveen kumar	14 Jul 2018	Order	—
CC/232/2016	S.H.O.Rampachodavaram vs Illa.Venkanna babu	14 Jul 2018	Order	—
CC/294/2017	S.H.O.Rampachodavaram PS vs Kunjam Venkata Rama @ Ramana	14 Jul 2018	Order	—
CC/331/2017	S.H.o.Rampachodavaram PS vs Gudditi Arjun	14 Jul 2018	Order	—
CC/340/2017	S.H.O.Yetapaka PS vs Padigela Srinivasa Rao @ Likkar Narayana	14 Jul 2018	Order	—
CC/125/2017	The Sub Inspector of police Jaddangi Ps vs Budi Divya Jyothi	10 Jul 2018	Judgment	—
CC/582/2015	The Sub-inspector of police Rampachodavaram PS vs Kesireddy Naresh,	09 Jul 2018	Judgement	—
PRC/13/2018	S.H.O.Rampachodavaram PS vs Kotam Sathibabu Dora	05 Jul 2018	Order	—
CC/106/2017	Station House Officer Y. Ramavaram PS vs Kuntru Anandharaju	03 Jul 2018	Judgment	—
STC/26/2018	The Sub Inspector of police Addateegala P.S. vs Ullem Rambabu	03 Jul 2018	Order	—
STC/27/2018	The Sub - Inspector of police Addateegala P.S. vs Bellapu Arjuna Reddy	03 Jul 2018	Order	—
STC/28/2018	The Inspector of police Jaddangi PS vs Murla Rambabu	03 Jul 2018	Order	—
CC/145/2015	The Sub Inspector of police maredumilli PS vs A1 Jerri Suresh and one others	02 Jul 2018	Judgement	—
CC/332/2017	S.H.O.Kunavaram PS vs A1.Gondhi Muthayya and one other	29 Jun 2018	Judgement	—
CC/46/2016	SHO YETAPAKA P.S. vs Sariyam balaraju	28 Jun 2018	Judgement	—
PRC/11/2018	S.H.O.Mothugudem PS vs Dudi Srinivas	28 Jun 2018	Order	—
CC/435/2015	FRO, LAKKAVARAM RANGE vs A1 NAROTHAM SARKAR	27 Jun 2018	Judgement	—
CC/471/2015	SHO CHINTOOR P.S. vs MADAKAM RAMANA	27 Jun 2018	Judgement	—
CC/151/2017	Tuniguntla Sriramamurthy vs Tirumala Venkata Narasimharayal	26 Jun 2018	Order	—
STC/22/2018	The Sub Inspection of police Addateegala vs Dindi Jyothi	26 Jun 2018	Order	—
STC/23/2018	The Sub Inspector of police Addateegala PS vs Kandepalli Ramakrishna	26 Jun 2018	Order	—
STC/24/2018	The Sub Inspection of police Y.Ramvaram P.S. vs Chintha Veerababu	26 Jun 2018	Order	—
STC/25/2018	The sub Inspection of police Addateegala PS vs Chintalapati Prasad	26 Jun 2018	Order	—
CC/223/2017	S.H.O.yetapaka PS vs Kathula Suresh	25 Jun 2018	Judgement	—
CC/224/2017	S.H.O Yetapaka PS vs A1. Kathula Suresh and two others	25 Jun 2018	Judgement	—
CC/225/2017	S.H.O.yetapaka P.S vs A1.Kathula Suresh	25 Jun 2018	Judgement	—
CC/226/2017	S.H.O.yetapaka PS vs A1.Kathula Suresh	25 Jun 2018	Judgement	—
CC/461/2015	SHO CHINTOOR P.S. vs KODI VENKATESH	22 Jun 2018	Judgement	—
DVC/16/2016	Tokala. singarapu.jyothy vs Vssingarapu nagaraju	20 Jun 2018	Order	—
CC/79/2016	SHO YETAPAKA P.S. vs Madineni.manoj	15 Jun 2018	Judgement	—
CC/8/2016	The Sub Inspector of police Yetapaka P.S. vs Nalla palli Srinivas	14 Jun 2018	Judgement	—
CC/126/2016	SHO YETAPAKA P.S. vs Nunavath Bhaskar	14 Jun 2018	Judgement	—
CC/139/2016	SHO Kunavaram P.S. vs Madakam Mada aliash mahesh	13 Jun 2018	Judgement	—
PRC/10/2018	S.H.O.Maredumilli PS vs Pallala Suggireddy	13 Jun 2018	Judgement	—
STC/21/2018	The Sub Inspector police Y.Ramavaram P.S. vs Varada Balayai	12 Jun 2018	Order	—
CC/480/2015	SHO KUNAVARAM P.S. vs SOYAM KAMESHWAR RAO	11 Jun 2018	Judgement	—
PRC/9/2018	S.H.O.Yetapaka PS vs A1 Chebrolu Jivan Durga chary @ Jivan and one other	11 Jun 2018	Order	—
CC/501/2015	The Sub- Inspector of police Kunavaram Ps vs Koyya Vinod	08 Jun 2018	Judgement	—
CC/4/2016	The Sub Inspector of police Yetapaka P.S. vs Gudapati pulla Rao	21 May 2018	Judgement	—
CC/50/2016	SHO YETAPAKA P.S. vs Pusam Satyanarayana	21 May 2018	Judgement	—
CC/169/2017	S.H.O.Rampachodavaram P.S vs Rekapalli Raghu veer Kumar	21 May 2018	Judgement	—
CC/315/2017	S.H.O.RampachodavaramPS vs Manyam Satyanarayana Murthy @ Victor Immanuel	21 May 2018	Judgement	—
CC/343/2015	SHO YETAPAKA P.S. vs A1 UKE SAYAMMA AND 2 OTHERS	21 May 2018	Judgement	—
CC/438/2015	SHO CHINTOOR P.S. vs JOGA RAVI	18 May 2018	Judgement	—
CC/188/2016	SHO V.R.PURAM P.S. vs Parsika venkatesh and 4others	17 May 2018	Judgement	—
CC/296/2017	Gorle Ramana RAo vs Veedhi Lakshmi Narayana	17 May 2018	Order	—
CC/376/2015	SHO YETAPAKA P.S. vs MIDDHE CHANDRA SEKHAR	16 May 2018	Judgement	—
CC/1/2018	The Sub Inspector of police Jaddangi P.S vs Dooripalli Bujji Babu	15 May 2018	Judgment	—
CC/93/2016	The Sub-Inspector of P.S. Dutcherthi P.S. vs Kanem Ganga Raju	15 May 2018	Order	—
CC/162/2016	suraboina surya prabakara rao vs R.Uma Maheswara rao	14 May 2018	Judgement	—
CC/163/2016	suraboina surya prabakara rao vs R Uma maheswara rao	14 May 2018	Order	—
CC/509/2015	The Sub Inspectors of police V.R. puram P.S. vs Kadiveti Rangaiah	14 May 2018	Judgement	—
CC/12/2015	The Sub-Inspector of Police Gangavaram PS vs Kakarla Veer Venkatra Rao	11 May 2018	Judgement	—
CC/49/2017	SHO GANGAVARAM P.S. vs A1.Jadhubar.Sadik and 1 others	09 May 2018	Judgement	—

Showing 100 of 665 orders — Log in to browse all pages.

Monthly Orders (Last 12 Months)

Aug 2018		4
Jul 2018		55
Jun 2018		25
May 2018		20
Apr 2018		69
Mar 2018		38
Feb 2018		92
Jan 2018		25
Dec 2017		123
Nov 2017		46
Oct 2017		21
Sep 2017		60

Frequently Asked Questions

How many cases has Sri B.Babu Naik handled?

Sri B.Babu Naik has handled 671 court orders since 2017 at JFCM Addateegala. The average disposal rate is 44 orders per month.

What types of cases does Sri B.Babu Naik hear?

Based on available records, Sri B.Babu Naik primarily handles Criminal matters (Criminal Cases, Domestic Violence Cases) at JFCM Addateegala.

Where is Sri B.Babu Naik currently posted?

Sri B.Babu Naik is posted as JFCM,ADDATEEGALA at JFCM Addateegala, East Godavari, Andhra Pradesh.

Are judgments by Sri B.Babu Naik available online?

Yes. 3 judgments by Sri B.Babu Naik are available on Legistro with full text, outcome, and sections cited.

How fast does Sri B.Babu Naik dispose cases?

Sri B.Babu Naik disposes approximately 44 cases per month, based on 671 orders handled over their tenure at JFCM Addateegala.

Since when is Sri B.Babu Naik serving?

Sri B.Babu Naik has been serving at JFCM Addateegala since 2017.

Case Types

CC 76%

PRC 16%

DVC 3%

STC 3%

MC 1%

CA 0%

Posting History

Sep 2017 — Aug 2018

JFCM,ADDATEEGALA · 175 orders
May 2017 — Aug 2018

J.F.C.MAGISTRATE · 496 orders

Outcomes on Record

Acquitted 2

Other Judges at this Court

M.Murali Gangadhara Rao

JFCM,ADDATEEGALA

363 orders

← View all judges at JFCM Addateegala

Sri B.Babu Naik

RAMPACHODAVARAM

C.C.No.64/2016

JUDGMENT

the offence punishable U/Sec.379 of I.P.C. beyond all reasonable

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

(Witnesses examined for)

DOCUMENTS MARKED FOR PROSECUTION

DOCUMENTS MARKED FOR DEFENCE

...NIL...

MATERIAL OBJECTS.

… NIL…

CALENDER

SUBMITTED BY THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS

RAMPACHODAVARAM.

RAMPACHODAVARAM

C.C.No.253/2016

JUDGMENT

the offence punishable U/Secs.354 (c), 509 of I.P.C. beyond all

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

(Witnesses examined for)

DOCUMENTS MARKED FOR PROSECUTION

DOCUMENTS MARKED FOR DEFENCE

...NIL...

MATERIAL OBJECTS.

… NIL…

CALENDER

SUBMITTED BY THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS

RAMPACHODAVARAM.

RAMPACHODAVARAM.

C.C.No.259/2017.

ORDER