Sri.B.Devendra Reddy

1

IN THE COURT OF ADDITIONAL. JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF I CLASS::

PILER

PRESENT: Sri G. Suresh Babu, Addl. Judl., Magistrate of I Class, Piler.

Tuesday, the Twenty Sixth (26th) day of March, 2019

PRC No.168 of 2018

Between: The State represented by The Inspector of Police, Piler Rural Circle, (Cr.No.50 of 2018 of Bhakarapeta Police Station).

….Complainant. And:

1. Lepakshi Baba Fakrudhin, aged 47 years s/o.Late Masthan Saheb, Molakalacheruvu village Now residing at Door No.13-7-791, Vinayakanagar Colony Back side of Municipal office, Tirupati

2. Tiruveedhi Ramesh aged 38 years, s/o.Late T.Rajanna Cherlopalle village, Gurramkonda mandal Now residing at Yasoda Nagar, Near Huzur office KT Road, Tirupati

3. Tiruveedhi Ramesh aged 28 year , s/o.Late T.Rajanna Cherlopalle village, Gurramkonda mandal Now residing at Kotakommala Street, Opp:Sridevi Complex Near Elementary School, Tirupati. …. A.1 to A.3

This case is coming before me for hearing today i.e., 27,.03.2019 in the presence of Assistant Public Prosecutor for the state and Sri T.Niranjan, advocate for A.1 to A.3 upon hearing both sides, and upon duly considering the matter, this court made the following:

O R D E R

The Inspector of Police, Piler Rural Circle filed a charge sheet against A.1 to A.3 in Cr.No.50/2018 of Bhakarapeta Police Station for the offences under Sec. 302, 328, 120-B and 201 r/w 34 of IPC.

.

2. The brief averments of the charge sheet are as follows:- one Kondakamarla Baba

Fakrudhin is the deceased in this case and he is residing at Nehru Nagar, Tirupati by doing real estate business with LW-.6 Gali Venkata Gajendra LW-.6 as partner under the name and style of “Sree Gali Brothers Real Estate Consultancy” at LIC road Tirupati. A.1 is native of

Moalakalacheruvu village and after the death of his first wife Ammaji he married one LP

Nageena as second marriage and they settled at Tirupati by doing vegetable business. The deceased is the paternal uncle of second wife of A.1 and due to their relationship A.1 has been visited the real estate office. But A.1 gained heavy loss in his vegetable business and borrowed

Rs.10,30,000/- as debt with interest at Rs.1.5/- in three times from deceased during the year 2016 and he did not give any surety documents to the deceased. But his second wife Nageena has given to Two SBI blank cheques Nos. 513310 513311 in account No.30728171013. and since the date of obtaining the debt amount A1 did not pay interest amount till date.

2

(a) It is the further case of prosecution that at about 3 months back prior to offence the deceased went to the house of A.1 and demanded to refund his debt, but A.1 failed to pay interest or debt amount. And again deceased went to the house of A.1 prior to 20 days of the offence, abused him and his family members in filthy language and strongly warned to see their end. Due to that A1 decided to embezzle debt amount to the deceased and prepared a pre-plan to eliminate the deceased by committing murder. In pursuance of his plan he secured

A.2 and A.3 and induced them that he will give second hand auto to A.2 and paid cash of

Rs.50,000/- to A.1 after implementation of his pre-plan, both A.2 and A.3 accepted for the same and in pursuance of their plan on 27.7.18 the accused hired one auto bearing No.AP03-

TH-0437 from A.Munirathnam (LW-.11) and on the next day i.e. on 28.7.2018 A.1 contacted with the deceased over cell phone and requested him to come over to Central Park on the next day for discussing the repayment of interest amount. Then both are met at Central park,

Tirupati between 10.00 a.m to 11.00 a.m on 29.7.18 and A.1 induced him with delusion words as he will paid a portion of debt amount of Rs.1,00,000/- to him on that day evening at

Srinivasamangapuram. On the same day they met at GRT jewelry shop, Tirupati at 6.00 p.m to 7.00 p.m and A.1 gave Badam Milk mixed with sleeping pills to the deceased and brought him towards Srinivasamangapuram on the Bajaj pulsar motor cycle No.AP03-BV-7712 of deceased and A.2 and A.3 followed them in hired auto and all reached near Narayana school situated near Kaluru cross between 7.30 and 8.00 p.m and deceased went unconscious stage, as per the directions of A.1, A.2 kept the cell hone of deceased under a bridge for concealing the same, then A.2 and A3 shifted him from motor cycle to hired auto and brought him under the mango tree situated at Raja garden, Back side of under constructions subramanyam

Reddy’s Kalayanamandapam buildings, Tirupati NH71 near Bhakarapeta Chinnagottigallu mandal enroot in between scene of offence and Narayana school A1 has been piloting by wearing helmet of deceased and drove the motor cycle of deceased. A.3 drove the auto and A.2 seated back by keeping the body of deceased and after reached they laid down him from the auto removed his shirt and banian and caught hold of his both legs by A.3 and caught hold of his both hands by A.2 and A.1 beat with a round shape stone on the chest, private parts of deceased by keeping shirt and banian on his parts until his death and they damaged the number plate of motor cycle, throw them in well water situated at northern side of scene of offence and also left the motor cycle of deceased, helmet, shirt, baniyan and kerchief of A1 at the scene of offence and flee away from the spot in the auto.

(b). Basing on the written report of LW-3 D.Sriramulu VRO a case in Cr.No.50/2018 under section 174 Cr.P.C and took up investigation by M.Ravi Naick, LW.18 SI of police

Bhakarapeta Police Station. During the course of investigation on 4.8.2018 A.1 and A.2 were arrested and recorded their confessional statements and later produced before court for remand.

On 22.11.2018 A,.3 was arrested and sent him for remand. Hence the charge.

3. This case was taken on file for the offences under Sec. 302, 328, 120-B and 201 r/w 34 of IPC against A.1 to A.3.

3

4. On appearance of A.1 to A.3 copies of documents, on which the prosecution wants to rely, was furnished to them as required under Sec. 208 Cr.P.C.

5. The offences under Sec. 302, 328, 120-B and 201 r/w 34 of IPC which prima-facie found against A.1 to A.3 is exclusively triable by the court of Sessions. Hence this case is committed to the Hon’ble Court of Sessions, Chittoor Division, Chittoor for trial under Sec.

209(a) Cr.P.C.

6. When A.1 to A.3 are questioned with regard to means to engage an advocate to defend them in the Court of Sessions, they submitted that they have means to engage a counsel.

7. In the result, this case against A.1 to A.3 is committed to the Hon’ble Court of

Sessions, Chittoor Division, Chittoor as the offences punishable under sections 302, 328, 120-B

and 201 r/w. 34 of IPC which prima-facie found against A.1 to A.3 is exclusively triable by the

Court of Sessions. Since A.1 to A.3 are on bail, they are ordered to be continued on bail till the conclusion of trial in the court of Sessions u/sec. 209(b) Cr.P.C. The office is directed to submit the entire case records and property, if any, to the court of Sessions, Chittoor Division, Chittoor and notify u/sec. 209(d) Cr.P.C. to the Public Prosecutor about the commitment of the case to the court of Sessions, Chittoor Division, Chittoor, u/sec. 209(d) Cr.P.C.

Pronounced by me in open court, this the 26th day of March, 2019.

Sd/-G.Suresh Babu

Addl. Judicial Magistrate of I Class Piler.

//true copy// 4

1

O.S.No.01/2019 PJCJ Court, Piler.

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE : PILER

PRESENT : B.DEVENDRA REDDY Junior Civil Judge, Pakala. FAC, Principal Junior Civil Judge, Piler.

Tuesday, the Nineteenth (19th ) day of March, 2019.

O.S.No. 01 OF 2019

Between :

1. Yarapa Narasimhulu

2. Yarapa Krishnaiah.. Plaintiffs

And :

1. Yerrapapannagari Krishnaiah

2. Yerrapannagari Sekhar

3. Yarrapapannagari Narayanamma.. Defendants

This suit is coming before me for hearing on 12.03.2019 in the presence of Sri K.Sudhakar Reddy, Advocate for Plaintiff, the defendants 1 to 3 were called absent and set exparte, upon hearing the counsel for plaintiff, upon perusing the material papers on record and having stood over for consideration till this day, this court delivered the following :

J U D G M E N T

1.This is a suit filed by plaintiff for grant of permanent injunction restraining the defendants, their men and followers from in any way interfering with the plaintiff’s possession and enjoyment of the suit schedule property and for costs of the suit.

2.The brief averments in the plaint are as follows :

The plaint schedule properties originally succeeded by Y.Kadirappa and he has been in possession and enjoyment of the same from more than 70 years by raising crops regularly with absolute rights. Considering the right, title and possession of Y.Kadirappa over the plaint schedule properties besides other properties, the government on due enquiry issued pattadar pass book and title deed under patta No.345 of Thimmana­ 2

O.S.No.01/2019 PJCJ Court, Piler.

yunipalli revenue village. While being in possession of the plaint schedule properties and other properties, the said Y.Kadirappa availed a crop loan in Indian Bank, Sodam and pattadar pass book is pledged with the Bank.

The said Y.Kadirappa while being in possession and enjoyment of the plaint schedule properties with absolute rights, out of love and affection on plaintiffs being his sons, has gifted an extent of Ac 0.22 cents to 1st plaintiff which is item No.1 of plaint schedule property besides other properties and an extent of Ac 0.23 cents to 2nd defendant which is item

No.2 of plaint schedule properties besides other properties under a gift settlement deed, dt.06.12.2017 and put them in possession of the their respective share of properties. The plaintiffs accepted the said gift and continued to be in possession of their respective extents with absolute rights. The government represented by the Tahsildar, Sodam on due enquiry, considering the plaintiff’s right, title and possession to the plaint schedule properties issued title deed and pattadar pass books under patta

Nos.907 and 833 of Thimmanayunipalli Revenue village by sub­dividing the survey number as 336/5A and 336/5B. Thus the plaintiffs and their donor have perfected their right and title to the plaint schedule properties by adverse possession also. It is the further contention of the plaintiffs that the defendants are nothing to do with the plaint schedule properties and they have no right, title and possession tot he same. Being aggrieved for the progress of the plaintiffs while the plaintiffs ploughing and showing the jawar in the plaint schedule lands, the defendants highhandedly came and illegally objection the plaintiffs from ploughing and sowing jawar crop.

Hence, the plaintiff filed this suit for permanent injunction.

3.Perused the record, summons were served on defendants 1 to 3. On 04.02.2019, the Defendants 1 to 3 were called absent, no representation and D.1 to D.3 were set exparte.

3

O.S.No.01/2019 PJCJ Court, Piler.

4.The plaintiff filed chief examination affidavit as P.W.1 by reiterating the contents of plaint. The original title deed and pattadar pass book stands in the name of Y.Kadirappa is marked as Ex.A.1. Original gift settlement deeds, dt.06.12.2007 executed by Y.Kadirappa in favour of 1st plaintiff is marked as Ex.A.2, in favour of 2nd plaintiff is marked as Ex.A.3 respectively. Title deed and pattadar pass book stands in the name of 1st plaintiff is marked as Ex.A.4. The title deed and pattadar pass book stands in the name of 2nd plaintiff is marked as Ex.A.5. 1­B namuna, dt.21.12.2018 in favour of 1st plaintiff is marked as Ex.A.6. 1­B namuna, dt.21.12.2018 in favour of 2nd plaintiff is marked as Ex.A.7.

5.Heard the learned counsel for plaintiff, perused the record.

6.Now the point for consideration is :

Whether the plaintiff is entitled for grant of permanent injunction in respect of suit schedule property ?

7.POINT :

To prove suit claim, the 1st plaintiff is examined as P.W.1 and marked Exs.A.1 to A.7. Ex.A.1 is the title deed and pattadar pass book stands in the name of Y.Kadirappa. Exs.A.2 and A.3 are gift settlement deeds shows that the father of the plaintiffs Y.Kadirappa gifted the suit schedule properties along with other properties to the plaintiffs 1 and 2.

Ex.A.4 and A.5 are the title deeds and pattadar pass books, and Exs.A.6 and A.7 1­B namunas stands in the name of plaintiffs 1 and 2 shows the possession of plaintiffs 1 and 2 over item Nos.1 and 2 of plaint schedule properties. After filing of the suit also, defendants have not shown any interest to contest the suit filed by plaintiff and they remained exparte.

Hence, the evidence of P.W.1 and Ex.As.1 to A.7 remained unchallenged and they are taken into consideration in toto. Exs.A.1 to A.7 also 4

O.S.No.01/2019 PJCJ Court, Piler.

supported the evidence of P.W.1. Therefore, plaintiffs proved the suit claim against defendant and they are entitled for decree. The point is answered in favour of plaintiffs and against the defendants.

8.In the result, the suit is decreed with costs granting permanent injunction restraining the defendants, their men and followers from in any way interfering with the plaintiff’s peaceful possession and enjoyment of the suit schedule property.

Typed to my dictation to Personal Assistant, corrected and pronounced by me in open Court on this the 19 th day of March, 2019.

Sd/­ Sri B.Devendra Reddy.

JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE, PAKALA.

FAC, PRINCIPAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

PILER.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED FOR 

PLAINTIFFS : DEFENDANTS :

P.W.1 : Y.NarasimhuluNone (Exparte).

EXHIBITS MARKED FOR 

PLAINTIFFS :

Ex.A.1 : Title deed and pattadar pass book stands in the name of Y.Kadirappa. Ex.A.2 : Gift settlement deed, dt.06.12.2007 executed by Y.Kadirappa in favour of 1st plaintiff. Ex.A.3 : Gift settlement deed, dt.06.12.2007 executed by Y.Kadirappa in favour of 2nd plaintiff. Ex.A.4 : Title deed and pattadar pass book stands in the name of 1st plaintiff. Ex.A.5 : Title deed and pattadar pass book stands in the name of 2nd plaintiff. Ex.A.6 : 1­B namuna stands in the name of 1st plaintiff. Ex.A.7 : 1­B namuna stands in the name of 2nd plaintiff.

DEFENDANTS : Nil. (Exparte).

Id/­ Sri B.Devendra Reddy.

FAC, P.JCJ.

1

O.S.No.44/2019 PJCJ Court, Piler.

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE : PILER

PRESENT : B.DEVENDRA REDDY Junior Civil Judge, Pakala. FAC, Principal Junior Civil Judge, Piler.

Tuesday, the Nineteenth (19th ) day of March, 2019.

O.S.No. 44 OF 2019

Between :

Shaik Mahaboob Basha.. Plaintiff

And :

1. Shaik Asia

2. Shiak Chand Basha.. Defendants

This suit is coming before me for hearing on 05.03.2019 in the presence of Sri P.Showkath Ali, Advocate for Plaintiff, the defendant was called absent and set exparte, upon hearing the counsel for plaintiff, upon perusing the material papers on record and having stood over for consideration till this day, this court delivered the following :

J U D G M E N T

1.This is a suit filed by plaintiff for grant of permanent injunction restraining the defendants, their men, friends, relatives, associates and agents from in any way interfering with the plaintiff’s possession and enjoyment of the suit schedule house property and for costs of the suit.

2.The brief averments in the plaint are as follows :

The suit schedule property originally belonged to Patan

Khadeerunnisa, W/o P.Nyamath Khan of Bhakarapeta village and the said

Khadeerunnisa purchased the suit schedule house property from its rightful owners i.e., Guditi Kanthamma, W/o Late Mekala Deva Prasad and her son Mekala Sandeep, S/o Late Mekala Deva Prasad on 05.01.2015 duly registered document No.07/2015 of S.R.O,

Chinnagottigallu. Since the date of purchase the said Khadeerunnisa is in 2

O.S.No.44/2019 PJCJ Court, Piler.

peaceful possession and enjoyment of the same by paying house tax due to the panchayat regularly. The said Khadeerunnisa got divorced with above said P.Nyamath Khan on 23.08.2015 and married the plaintiff i.e.,

Shaik Mahaboob Basha, S/o Masthan Saheb, resident of Deendarlapalli on 18.02.2016. Since then, said Khadeerunnisa living along with her husband i.e., the plaintiff in the suit schedule house property. In turn the said Khadeerunnisa who is none other than the wife of plaintiff, gifted the suit schedule house property to the plaintiff under a registered at Sub

Registrar Office, Chinnagottigallu. The defendants who have no right and title over the suit schedule house property, since one year threatening the plaintiff to vacate the suit house. The plaintiff and his wife

Khadeerunnisa preferred complaint against the defendants before the

Station House Officer, Bhakarapeta and the matter was mediated betweent he parties. After the execution of gift deed, the said

Khadeerunnisa went to Kuwait on 27.10.2018 for her livelihood. Since then, the plaintiff is in possession and enjoyment of the suit schedule house property without any interruption by anybody at any time by paying house tax to the government. The panchayat authorities had also mutated the name of the plaintiff in the concerned records after perusing the records submitted by the plaintiff. The suit schedule property is being the old house roofed with stones at ground floor, the plaintiff intended to build a RCC building in the place of the stone terraced house. When the plaintiff engaged JCB and tractors to the suit schedule property for demolition of house to construct RCC building, the defendants and their henchmen highhandedly obstructed the plaintiff. Hence, the plaintiff filed this suit for for permanent injunction.

3

O.S.No.44/2019 PJCJ Court, Piler.

3.Perused the record, summons were served on defendants 1 and 2.

On 05.03.2019, the defendants 1 and 2 were present and stated that they have no objection to decree the suit.

4.The plaintiff filed chief examination affidavit as P.W.1 by reiterating the contents of plaint. The original registered sale deed, dt.05.01.2015 executed in favour of Khadeerunnisa, dt.05.01.2015. Original gift deed, dt.28.09.2018 executed by Khadeerunnisa in favour of plaintiff. Ex.A.3 is original house tax receipt issued in favour of plaintiff, dt.12.02.2019.

Ex.A.4 is original ownership certificate, dt.13.02.2019 issued by

Panchayat Secretary, Bhakarapeta in favour of plaintiff.

5.Heard the learned counsel for plaintiff, perused the record.

6.Now the point for consideration is :

Whether the plaintiff is entitled for permanent injunction in respect of suit schedule property ?

7.POINT :

To prove suit claim, the plaintiff himself is examined as P.W.1 and marked the original registered sale deed, dt.05.01.2015, which shows that the Smt.Patan Khadeerunnisa purchased the suit schedule house property from Guditi Kanthamma for a valid consideration. Ex.A.2 is the gift deed executed by Smt.Khadeerunnisa in favour of plaintiff, dt.28.09.2018 with regard to plaint schedule property. Ex.A.3 is the house tax receipt and Ex.A.4 is the ownership certificate issued by

Panchayat Secretary, Bhakarapeta in favour of plaintiff. Exs.A.1 and A.2 shows the title of the plaintiff over the plaint schedule property and

Exs.A.3 and A.4 shows that the plaintiff is in possession and enjoyment of the plaint schedule house. After filing of the suit, defendants 1 and 2 were present before the court and stated that they have no objection to 4

O.S.No.44/2019 PJCJ Court, Piler.

decree the suit, and the same is endorsed on docket, dt.05.03.2019.

Hence, the evidence of P.W.1 and Ex.As.1 to A.4 remained unchallenged and they are taken into consideration in toto. Ex.As.1 to A.4 supported the evidence of P.W.1. Therefore, plaintiff proved the suit claim against defendant and he is entitled for decree. The point is answered in favour of plaintiff and against the defendant.

8.In the result, the suit is decreed with costs granting permanent injunction restraining the defendants, their men, friends, relatives, associates and agents from in any way interfering with the plaintiff’s peaceful possession and enjoyment of the suit schedule house property.

Typed to my dictation to Personal Assistant, corrected and pronounced by me in open Court on this the 19 th day of March, 2019.

Sd/­ Sri B.Devendra Reddy.

JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE, PAKALA.

FAC, PRINCIPAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

PILER.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED FOR 

PLAINTIFF : DEFENDANTS :

P.W.1 : Shaik Mahaboob BashaNone (Exparte).

EXHIBITS MARKED FOR 

PLAINTIFF :

Ex.A.1 : Original regd. Sale deed, dt.05.01.2015 executed in favour of Smt.Khadeerunnisa. Ex.A.2 : Original gift deed, dt.28.09.2018 executed by Khadeerunnisa in favour of plaintiff. Ex.A.3 : Original house tax receipt, dt.12.02.2019 issued in favour of plaintiff. Ex.A.4 : Ownership certificate, dt.13.02.2019 issued by Panchayat Secretary, Bhakarapeta.

DEFENDANTS : Nil. (Exparte).

Id/­ Sri B.Devendra Reddy.

FAC, P.JCJ.

1

IN THE COURT OF THE JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE, VAYALPAD

Present : Sri.B.Devendra Reddy Junior Civil Judge, Pakala FAC Junior Civil Judge Vayalpad Thursday, the Fourteenth (14th) day of March, 2019

O.S.No.8 of 2019

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Between :

1) Seshadri Parvathamma @ Parvathi w/o Seshadri Nagaraja, aged about 61 years, native of Vayalpad, residing at D.No.12/5/322, Sri Vani Nilayam, SCI Colony, Anantapur Town and District.

2) Aluganti Vasundaramma w/o Aluganti Narasimhulu, aged about 69 years, Hindu, Landlady, Cultivation, native of Vayalpad, now residing at D.No.20/21, RVS Colony, Adoni Town and Post, Kurnool District.

Plaintiffs 1 and 2 are represented by their General Power of Attorney Seshadri Mallikarjuna s/o Lakshmaiah, aged about 63 years, Hindu, Cultivation, residing at Thota veedhi, Vayalpad Post and Mandal, Chittoor District. ….PLAINTIFFS And :

Medikurthi Akbar Hussain, s/o Pakeer Saheb, aged about 55 years, Muslim, Cultivation, Contractor, residing at Near Seetharam Talkies, Gundlur Road, Vayalpad Post and Mandal, Chittoor District.

….DEFENDANT

This suit coming on 28.02.2019 before me for final hearing in the presence of Sri K.Sivasankar Reddy, Advocate for the Plaintiffs and the defendant set exparte, and this matter having stood over for consideration till this day, this Court delivered the following:

J U D G M E N T

1)This suit is filed by the plaintiffs against the defendant for grant of permanent injunction restraining the defendant, his men and agents from interfering with their peaceful possession and enjoyment over the suit ‘A’ and ‘B’ schedule properties and for costs.

2)The brief facts of the plaint are : - The plaintiffs 1 and 2 are native of Vayalpad and the 1st plaintiff is residing at Anantapur and 2nd plaintiff residing at Adoni and so the plaintiffs 1 and 2 have separately executed registered General Power of Attorney on 05.12.2018 in favour of one Seshadri 2

Mallikarjuna s/o Lakshmaiah to prosecute the above case pertaining to suit ‘A’ and ‘B’ schedule properties. The 1st plaintiff purchased the suit ‘A’ schedule property, which is a vacant site, from its rightful owner namely Biddala

Lakshmamma w/o Biddala Venkataswamy Reddy under registered sale deed dt.24.04.1986 for valid consideration and with specific boundaries and took possession of the property. Likewise, the 2nd plaintiff purchased the suit ‘B’ schedule property which is a vacant site, from its rightful owner namely

Biddala Lakshmamma w/o Billala Venkataswamy Reddy under registered sale deed dt.24.04.1986 for valid consideration and with specific boundaries and took possession of the property. It is stated that the defendant has no interest over the suit properties, but he is unnecessarily interfering with the plaintiffs’ possession and enjoyment taking advantage that the plaintiffs are ladies and they are residing at a distance place. On 28.12.2018 the defendant objected the plaintiffs when they are reclaiming the suit ‘A’ and ‘B’ schedule properties and when the plaintiffs questioned the same, the defendant left the place saying that he will not allow the plaintiffs to enjoy their properties peacefully. Hence the plaintiffs are constrained to file the present suit.

3)Defendant refused to receive summons through R.P. Hence service of summons on Defendant is sufficient. Defendant is called absent. No representation. Hence, defendant is set exparte.

4)In support of their case, their General Power of Attorney Holder got examined himself as PW.1 and exhibited four documents. Ex.A.1 is the

Certified Copy of Registered sale deed, dt.24.04.1986 pertaining to ‘A’ schedule property. Ex.A.2 is the Certified Copy of Registered sale deed, dt.24.04.1986 pertaining to ‘B’ schedule property. Ex.A.3 is the General

Power of Attorney, dt.05.12.2018 pertaining to ‘A’ schedule property. Ex.A4 is the General Power of Attorney, dt.05.12.2018 pertaining to ‘B’ schedule property. The evidence of PW.1 and the documents clearly shows that the plaintiffs are in possession and enjoyment of suit ‘A’ and ‘B’ schedule properties as on the date of filing of the suit. As the evidence of PW.1 and the documents remained unchallenged by the defendant, this court opines that the plaintiffs are entitled for the relief of permanent injunction against the defendant.

3

5)In the result, the suit is decreed with costs and permanent injunction is granted in favour of plaintiffs restraining the defendant, his men and agents from interfering with the plaintiffs’ possession and enjoyment over suit ‘A’ and ‘B’ schedule properties.

Typed to my dictation by the Typist, corrected, signed and pronounced by me in the open court, on this the 14 th day of March, 2019.

JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE, PAKALA

FAC JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE

VAYALPAD

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

Witness examined for : PlaintiffDefendants

PW.1S.Mallikarjuna Exparte

Exhibits marked for the Plaintiff :

Ex.A.124.04.1986 Certified copy of Registered Sale Deed executed by Biddala Lakshmamma w/o Venkataswamy Reddy in favour of 1st plaintiff pertaining to plaint ‘A’ schedule property.

Ex.A.224.04.1986 Certified copy of Registered Sale Deed executed by Biddala Lakshmamma w/o Venkataswamy Reddy in favour of 2nd plaintiff pertaining to plaint ‘B’ schedule property.

Ex.A.305.12.2018 General Power of Attorney executed by 1st plaintiff in favour of S.Mallikarjuna pertaining to plaint ‘A’ schedule property.

Ex.A.405.12.2018 General Power of Attorney executed by 2nd plaintiff in favour of S.Mallikarjuna pertaining to plaint ‘B’ schedule property.

Exhibits marked for Defendants : NIL

JCJ, PAKALA,

FAC JCJ VLD

4

Fair Judgment in

O.S.No.8/2019

Dt.14.03.2019 5

1

O.S.No.252/2018 PJCJ Court, Piler.

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE : PILER

PRESENT : B.DEVENDRA REDDY Junior Civil Judge, Pakala. FAC, Principal Junior Civil Judge, Piler.

Tuesday, the Nineteenth (19th ) day of March, 2019.

O.S.No. 252 OF 2018

Between :

Thimmadi Obulamma.. Plaintiff

And :

Raya Sahadevaiah.. Defendant

This suit is coming before me for hearing on 12.03.2019 in the presence of Sri Y.Singa Reddy, Advocate for Plaintiff, the defendant was called absent and set exparte, upon hearing the counsel for plaintiff, upon perusing the material papers on record and having stood over for consideration till this day, this court delivered the following :

J U D G M E N T

1.This is a suit filed by plaintiff for grant of permanent injunction restraining the defendant, his men and agents from in any way interfering with the plaintiff’s possession and enjoyment of the suit schedule property and for costs of the suit.

2.The brief averments in the plaint are as follows :

The plaint schedule property with an extent of Ac 2.47 cents dry land situated in Sy.No.1501/3 of Tsattevaripalem Revenue Village of

Chinnagottigallu Mandal originally belonged to the Government who is the paramount owner of the same and originally it was with ups and downs and of boulders and shrubs and that the plaintiff along with her husband by name Yarram Reddy occupied and made the plaint schedule property fit for cultivation and cultivating the same. Considering the uninterrupted 2

O.S.No.252/2018 PJCJ Court, Piler.

possession and enjoyment of the plaintiff and her husband over the plaint schedule property for long period of time, the then Revenue Authorities granted D­Namuna bearing AM No.76/4/87 in the name of plaintiff’s husband over the plaint schedule property, and also issued pattadar pass book and title deed in his favour. The plaintiff’s husband Yerram Reddy was died on 02.08.2017 leaving behind him, his wife i.e., the plaintiff herein. After the demise of plaintiff’s husband, plaintiff’s name was mutated in revenue records. The plaintiff planted 50 mango trees in plaint schedule property which are now aged 3 years and she has been regularly raising rainfed crops in plaint schedule property. The defendant has no iota of right, possession and interest over the plaitn schedule property at any time. But the defendant along with his henchmen came and tried to interfere with the plaint schedule property highhandedly for getting unlawful gain. Hence, the plaintiff filed this suit for for permanent injunction.

3.Perused the record, summons were served on defendant. On 20.12.2018, the defendant was present. Subsequently, the defendant was called absent, no representation, hence he was set exparte and the case was posted for plaintiff side evidence.

4.The plaintiff filed chief examination affidavit as P.W.1 by reiterating the contents of plaint. The original pattadar pass book is marked as

Ex.A.1. 1­B extract obtained through mee­Seva, dt.16.11.2018 is marked as Ex.A.2. Adangal, dt.16.11.2018 is marked as Ex.A.3. Certificate issued by the Manager, Andhra Bank, Chinnagottigallu is marked as

Ex.A.4. True copy of D­form issued by the Tahsildar in the name of

T.Yerram Reddy is marked as Ex.A.5.

3

O.S.No.252/2018 PJCJ Court, Piler.

5.Heard the learned counsel for plaintiff, perused the record.

6.Now the point for consideration is :

Whether the plaintiff is entitled for grant of permanent injunction in respect of suit schedule property ?

7.POINT :

To prove suit claim, the plaintiff herself is examined as P.W.1 and marked Exs.A.1 to A.5. Ex.A.1 is the pattadar pass book, Ex.A.2 and A.3 are 1­B extract and adangal stands in the name of plaintiff, shows the possession of plaintiff over the plaint schedule property. Ex.A.5 is the

D­form patta issued in favour of plaintiff’s husband T.Yerram Reddy.

Exs.A.1 to A.3 and Ex.A.5 shows the possession and title of the plaintiff over the plaint schedule property. After filing of the suit also, defendant has not shown any interest to contest the suit filed by plaintiff and he remained exparte. Hence, the evidence of P.W.1 and Ex.As.1 to A.5 remained unchallenged and they are taken into consideration in toto.

Exs.A.1 to A.5 also supported the evidence of P.W.1. Therefore, plaintiff proved the suit claim against defendant and she is entitled for decree.

The point is answered in favour of plaintiff and against the defendant.

8.In the result, the suit is decreed with costs granting permanent injunction restraining the defendant, his men and agents from in any way interfering with the plaintiff’s peaceful possession and enjoyment of the suit schedule property.

Typed to my dictation to Personal Assistant, corrected and pronounced by me in open Court on this the 19 th day of March, 2019.

Sd/­ Sri B.Devendra Reddy.

JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE, PAKALA.

FAC, PRINCIPAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

PILER.

4

O.S.No.252/2018 PJCJ Court, Piler.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED FOR 

PLAINTIFF : DEFENDANTS :

P.W.1 : T.ObulammaNone (Exparte).

EXHIBITS MARKED FOR 

PLAINTIFF :

Ex.A.1 : Pattadar pass book issued in favour of plaintiff. Ex.A.2 : 1­B extract obtained through mee­Seva, dt.16.11.2018. Ex.A.3 : Adangal obtained through mee­Seva Center, dt.16.11.2018. Ex.A.4 : Certificate issued by the Manager, Andhra Bank, Chinnagottigallu. Ex.A.5 : True copy of D­form issued in the name of T.Yerram Reddy.

DEFENDANTS : Nil. (Exparte).

Id/­ Sri B.Devendra Reddy.

FAC, P.JCJ.