Smt B kalpana

C.C.No.48/2021 1 Dt: 30-05-2022

IN THE COURT OF THE I- ADDITIONAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE CUM SPECIAL

JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE AT MEDAK

Dated this the 30 th day of May, 2022.

Present:- Smt.B.Kalpana

I-Additional Junior Civil Judge-Cum- Spl Judicial Magistrate of First Class (Mobile) Court, Medak.

C.C.No. 48 OF 2021

Between :

The State - Rep., through the Sub-Inspector of Police, P.S. Chegunta.

…..Complainant.

A N D

A1. Bethi Nandu, S/o. Satyanarayana, Age: 19 years, Caste: Mudiraj, Occ: Student R/o. Manoharabad of Medak District. A2. Karamthod Sreenu, S/o. Sathaiah, R/o H.No.6-67/2 Sahajadi Guda village of Ravalkonbda of Medchal.

….. Accused

This Case is coming before me on 30-05-2022 for final hearing in the presence of learned Public Prosecutor, for the Complainant; and Sri.K.Subhash Chandra Goud Advocate for the accused and after perusing the material on record and having stood over for consideration till this day, this court delivered the following:

: : J U D G M E N T : :

1.The Sub-Inspector of Police, PS. Chegunta filed charge sheet in Crime No.

205 of 2020 for the offence punishable under Section 304(A) of Indian penal code and U/Sec. 3/181, 5/180, 196 of MV Act.

2. The case of prosecution in brief are as follows: On 08-09-2020 at 10.30 hours, the defacto complainant/Yeruva Swamy lodged complaint stating that on 08-09-2020 at 06-30 pm, his grand father/Deceased by name Arikela

Laxmaiah and his younger father’s son/Brother/Accused No.1 by name Bethi

Nandhu went to Biknoor village, and started from Biknoor village proceeding towards Manoharabad by Passion plus Motor cycle bearing

No.AP28BJ2140, on midway morning around 06.30 hours while they

C.C.No.48/2021 2 Dt: 30-05-2022 reached at “Reddypally T Junction” then Accused No.1 drove motor cycle in rash and negligence manner and tried to avoid the front side vehicle, by that his motor cycle was uncontrolled and went down to the road dashed to a stone. As a result motorcycle front side got damaged, his grandfather/Deceased received bleeding injuires on head and nose,

Accused No.1 received the injuries over right side of the body and while shifting the injured pesons to Hospital through Ambulance on the midway

Complainant’s grandfather died at around 07.40 hours. As such complaint was lodged. Based on the complaint, LW10/SI of Police PS Chegunta was registered as Cr. No 205/2020 for the offence under Section 304-A, 337

Indian Penal Code and LW-9 commenced investigation. LW-9 examined and recorded the statement of witnesses, visited scene of offence and drafted scene of offence panchanama in the presence of mediators, conducted inquest panchanama in the presence of mediators and subjected the dead body of the deceased for Post Mortem Examination. The Medical officer held autopsy over the dead body of the deceased. LW9 then collected the

Medical Certificate and subjected the crime vehicle for inspection and collected MVI Report.

3.The accused was produced before LW-09 and on interrogation he confessed to have committed this offence and accused.No.1 submitted Xerox copy of

Crime vehicle passion plus Motor cycle bearing No.AP28BJ2140 and found the Crime vehicle in the name of Accused No.2. After completion of investigation, charge sheet was filed for the offence under Section 304-A

Indian Penal Code, Under Section3/181 against Accused.No.1 and for the offece under Section 5/180, 196 Motor Vehicle Act against Accused No.2.

C.C.No.48/2021 3 Dt: 30-05-2022

4.The case was taken on file for the offence under Section 304-A Indian Penal

Code, Under Section3/181 against Accused.No.1 and for the offece under

Section 5/180, 196 Motor Vehicle Act against Accused No.2.

5.After appearance of the Accused.No.1 and 2, copies of documents were furnished under section 207 of Criminal Procedure Code.

6.The Accused.No.1 and 2 were examined under Section 251 of Criminal

Procedure Code by explaining the substance of accusation in vernacular, for which they denied the allegations and pleaded not guilty. He claimed to be tried.

7.In order to prove the case of the prosecution, the prosecution got examined

PW-1 to PW-3 and got marked Ex P-1 to P-8. The details of the document marked are mentioned in the appendix of evidence. LW10 examined as

PW3. The evidence of LW-3/Erva Narsinga Rao, LW-4/Singam Mahesh,

LW-5/Sugunala Karthik, LW-6/Dr.Praveen Kumar, LW-7/Dr.Adepu

Gyaneshwar Medical officer of Ganesh Hospital, LW-8/G.Megha Gandhi,

MVI Medak, LW-9/K.N.Murthy ASI of Police Chegunta were given by learned APP.

8.The accused was examined under Section 313 Criminal Procedure Code on the incriminating evidence adduced by the prosecution witness. The accused denied the same and reported no defense evidence. Hence, defense evidence was closed.

9.Heard both sides. Perused the record.

10. Now the point for determination is:

1) Whether the prosecution could able to establish the guilt of the

accused.No.1 for the offence under Section 304-A of Indian Penal

C.C.No.48/2021 4 Dt: 30-05-2022

Code and under Section 3/181 of Motor vehicle act beyond all

reasonable doubts?

2) Whether the prosecution could able to establish the guilt of the

accused.No.2 for the offence under Section 5/180 and 196 of Motor

Vehicle Act beyond all reasonable doubts?

11. POINT.No.1:. In the present case, the prosecution should prove that the accused.No.1 drove his vehicle in rash and negligent manner, which resulted in death of the deceased. Only if the ingredients of the offence charged is proved, the accused shall be held guilty of the offence charged.

12. POINT.No.2:. In the present case, the prosecution should prove that the accused.No.2 being the owner in charge of a motor vehicle, permited

Accused No.1 to drive the vehicle without having valid driving licence and

Valid vehicle insurance, which resulted in death of the deceased. Only if the ingredients of the offence charged is proved, the accused.No.2 shall be held guilty of the offence charged.

13. The case of the prosecution is that the deceased was on motor bike and that the accused drove bike in rash and negligent manner and tried to avoid the front side vehicle, caused his motor cycle was uncontrolled and went down to the road, dashed to a stone. Due to which front side of the Motor cycle damaged and deceased received the bleeding injuries on head and Nose and accused also sustained injuries over right side of the body and pillion rider succumbed to death. However, the complainant who examined himself as PW-1 and Ex.P1 marked, deposed that he received information through phone by one unknown person and rushed to the place of accident and saw that his grandfather fell in a pit with bleeding injury on the head and accused was in unconscious stage and he engaged pvt. Vehicle and shifted them to

C.C.No.48/2021 5 Dt: 30-05-2022 the Ganesh Hospital, Chegunta and from there his grandfather was sent for better treatment to Rush Hospital, Medchal and while shifting he died.

Further he is not aware of the contents of the complaint. Thus, the evidence of PW-1 is of no help to the prosecution.

14. The prosecution also examined PW-2 and he deposed that the he received information through one unknown person that his father/deceased met with an accident and died while shifting to Hospital, but did not depose anything to connect the accused with the present crime. Thus, the evidence of PW-2 is of no help to the prosecution.

15. As per the investigation, Accused.No.1 surrender before PW3 and on interrogation he confessed the committal of offence and on verification they found the crime vehicle in in the name of Accused.No.2 and he has no valid insurance certificate and Accused No.1 is not having driving license.

16. The evidence of LW10 as per the prosecution, who is examined as PW3 the investigating officer deposed that on receipt of complaint, examined and recorded the statement of witnesses and then visited scene of offence panchanama and drafted the same and also inquest panchanama in presence of LW-4/S.Mahesh and LW5/S.Karthik. Ex.P2 to Ex.P-8 are marked by PW3, also does not establish that accused is the driver of the crime vehicle at the time of accident, as he is not an eyewitness to the incident. Thus, the evidence of PW3 also of no help to prove the accusation against accused. That apart, the prosecution did not examine any other witnesses to prove the case against the accused.

17. Thus, from the above, it is clear that the prosecution failed to prove the guilt of the accused.No.1 and 2 for the offence charged and thus, the

C.C.No.48/2021 6 Dt: 30-05-2022 accused.No.1 and 2 are entitled for acquittal. Accordingly, the point.No.1 and 2 are answered.

18. In the result, the accused.No.1 and Accused No.2 are found not guilty for the offence under Section 304-A Indian Penal Code, Under Section3/181 against Accused.No.1 and for the offece under Section 5/180, 196 Motor

Vehicle Act against Accused No.2. and accordingly accused.No.1 and 2 are acquitted under Section 255[1] Criminal Procedure Code for the above offence. The surety bonds of the accused executed earlier shall stand cancelled after lapse of appeal time.

(Typed to my dictation by Typist, corrected and pronounced by me in the open Court on this the 30th day of May, 2022)

I Addl. Junior Civil Judge-Cum- Spl.Judicial Magistrate of First Class (Mobile) Court, Medak

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

FOR PROSECUTION:FOR DEFENCE: PW-1: Dt:13-04-2022 E.Swamy -None- PW-2: Dt: 13-04-2022 Kalama PW-3: Dt: 05-05-2022 B.Subhash Goud

EXHIBITS MARKED

FOR PROSECUTION: FOR DEFENCE:

Ex P-1: Signature of PW-1 on complaint -Nil- Ex P-2: Complaint Ex P-3: FIR Ex P-4: CDF includes rough sketch Ex P-5: inquest panchanama Ex P-6: Medical Certificate Ex P-7: PME reported Ex P-8: MVI report

MATERIAL OBJECTS

- NIL -

I Addl. Junior Civil Judge-Cum- Spl. Judicial Magistrate of First Class (Mobile) Court, Medak

C.C.No.48/2021 7 Dt: 30-05-2022

CALENDER AND JUDGMENT

IN THE COURT OF THE I ADDL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE-CUM-SPL.JUDICIAL

MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS (MOBILE) COURT, MEDAK:

C.C No. 48/2021

1Name of the Complainant State of Telangana through Sub- Inspector of Police, Chegunta 2Name of the AccusedA1) Bethi Nandu, S/o. Satyanarayana, A2) Karamthod Sreenu, S/o.Sathaiah 3Date of Offence and Time08-09-2020 at about 06.30 p.m.

4Date of Report08-09-2020 at 10.30 p.m.

5Offence U/sec304-A IPC, 3/181, 5/180, 196 of M.V.Act 6Date of arrest of Accused09-10-2020 7Date of release of Accused09-10-2020 8Date of Appearance09-02-2021 9Commencement of Trial13-04-2022 10Closure of Trial05-05-2022 11Date of Argument23-05-2022 12Date of Judgment30-05-2022 13Plea of AccusedTotal denial of offence 14FindingNot Guilty 15ResultIn the result, the accused.No.1 and Accused No.2 are found not guilty for the offence under Section 304-A Indian Penal Code, Under Section3/181 against Accused.No.1 and for the offece under Section 5/180, 196 Motor Vehicle Act against Accused No.2. and accordingly accused.No.1 and 2 are acquitted under Section 255[1] Criminal Procedure Code for the above offence. The surety bonds of the accused executed earlier shall stand cancelled after lapse of appeal time. 16Remarks ----

I Addl. Junior Civil Judge-Cum- Spl. Judicial Magistrate of First Class, (Mobile) Court, Medak. To

The Hon'ble I Addl. Dist & Sessions Judge, Medak at Sangareddy.

C.C.No.193/2020 1 Dt: 26-05-2022

IN THE COURT OF THE I ADDL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE­ CUM­JUDICIAL

MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS (MOBILE) COURT, MEDAK 

Dated this the 26 th day of May, 2022.

Present:­ Smt. B.Kalpana

 I Addl Junior Civil Judge­cum­ Spl. Judicial Magistrate of First Class (Mobile) Court, Medak

C.C.No. 193 OF 2020

Between :

The State –Rep., through the Sub­Inspector of Police, P.S. Chegunta. …Complainant

A N D

A1­ Soma Shiva Koti S/o Nagaraju, Age: 22 years, Occ: Pvt. Employee, R/o. Chegunta village. A2­ Mittapally Chandramouli S/o Shanker (Died) …Accused.No.1 and 2.

This Case is coming before me on 26­05­2022 for final hearing in the presence of learned Public Prosecutor, for the Complainant; and Sri. K.Madhu

Kiran, Advocate for the Accused No.1 and Accused No.2 died and the case against the A2 is abated and after perusing the material on record and having stood over for consideration till this day, this Court delivered the following: 

: : J U D G M E N T : : 

1.The Sub­Inspector of Police, PS. Chegunta, Medak filed charge sheet in

Crime No. 21 of 2020 for the offence punishable under Section 304­A, 338 of Indian Penal Code and under Section 196 Motor Vehicle Act. 

2. The brief averments of the prosecution case is that :

 The defacto­complainant/Karre Swamy lodged complaint stating that on 13­01­2020 at 22.15 hours his relative brother Karre Swamy S/o

Mallaiah along with his friend Golla Ramesh started from Chegunta town by the Motor cycle bearing No.TS 35 A 4879 and proceeding towards

Pollampally on the way when they reached at the Polampally X road

C.C.No.193/2020 2 Dt: 26-05-2022 around 22.30 hours mean time one rider of the Motor cycle bearing

No.AP25Q5621 has come on opposite direction and drove his motor cycle in rash and negligence manner and dashed to Karre Swamy motor cycle due to which rider of the vehicle and pillion rider received bleeding injuries on head and the complainant received the information through road passengers over phone call and rushed to the spot and immediately shifted both to Gandhi Hospital by the ambulance.

As such complaint was lodged and case was registered as

Cr.No.21/2020 for the offence under Section 337 Indian Penal Code and investigation was commenced.

During investigation, LW­14 issued FIR, examined and recorded the statement of witnesses, visited scene of offence and drafted scene of offence panchanama, and conducted scene of offence panchanama in the presence of mediators and during the investigation on 21.01.2020 at 07.00 LW14 received a call as rider of the Motor vehicle of above

Cr.No.21/2020 has died on 20.04.2020 at 18.04 hours while undergoing treatment. On that information LW14 altered Section of Law

U/Sec.304(A), 338 and deputed LW13/K.N.Murthy, ASI of Police

Chegunta PS and LW13 conducted inquest panchanama over the dead body of the deceased and subjected the dead body for Post Mortem

Examination. After completion of investigation, charge sheet was filed against the Accused.No.1 for the offence under Section 304­A Indian

Penal Code and Accused.No.2 for the offence under Section 196 of Motor

Vehicle Act. 

3.During Further course of investigation on 22­05­2020 at 15.00 hours the accused.No.1 by name Soma Shiva Koti came to Police station and surrendered before LW14 and on interrogation the accused.No.1 admitted his guilty of offence, Subsequently the accused.No.1 submitted Vehicle R.C.

C.C.No.193/2020 3 Dt: 26-05-2022 vide bearing No.AP 25 Q5621 and the same is found in the name of

Accused No.2 Mittapally Chandramouli and found no insurance to the crime vehicle, also he allowed to drove his vehicle in negligent manner and

LW14 filed case against the accused No.2 for the offence under Section 196 of Motor Vehicle Act.

4.The case was taken on file for the offence under Section 304­A, 338 Indian

Penal Code against Accused.No.1 and under Section 196 of Motor Vehicle

Act against Accused No.2.

5.After appearance of the Accused.No.1, copies of documents were furnished under section 207 of Criminal Procedure Code.

6.The Accused.No.1 was examined under Section 251 of Criminal Procedure

Code by explaining the substance of accusation in vernacular, for which he pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried. Accused.No.2 died Death

Certificate filed, Hence the case is abated against Accused.No.2.

7.In order to prove the case of the prosecution, the prosecution got examined

PW­1 to PW­4 and got marked Ex P­1 to P­8. The details of the documents marked are mentioned in the appendix of evidence. Further, The learned

A.P.P. given up the evidence of LW­3/Karre Dasu, LW­4/Jangidi

Shyamala, LW­6/Boini Srishailam, LW­7/Muradi Adivaiah, LW­ 8/Mannepally Sathyam, LW­9/Yeta Naresh, LW­10/Dr.B.Vasanth Naik,

Assist Professor of Gandhi Medical College, LW11/Dr.Shruthi, CAS of

Govt. area hospital Medak, LW12/Venkat Suresh, Asst Motor vehicle

Inspector, LW13/K.N.Murthy, ASI of Police Chegunta PS.

8.The accused was examined under Section 313 Criminal Procedure Code on the incriminating evidence adduced by the prosecution witness. The accused denied the same and reported no defense evidence. Hence, defense evidence was closed. 

9.Heard both sides. Perused the record.

C.C.No.193/2020 4 Dt: 26-05-2022

10. Now the point for consideration is 

Whether the prosecution could prove the guilt of the accused.No.1

for the offence under Section 304­A, 338 Indian Penal Code beyond

all reasonable doubts?

11. POINT NO 1:  Here the prosecution should prove that the accused.No.1 had caused the death of the deceased by rash or negligent act not amounting to culpable homicide. Only if the ingredients of Section 304­A

Indian Penal Code is proved, then the accused.No.1 can be held guilty of the offence charged. 

12. The case of the prosecution as per investigation is that the Accused.No.1 and deceased are friends on 13­01­2020 at 22:15 hours they were started from Chegunta town by the Motor vehicle bearing No.TS35A4879 and proceeded towards Pollampally on the way when they reached at the

Polampally X road around 22:30 hours, mean time One rider of the Motor

Cycle bearing No.AP25Q5621 came in opposite direction, drove vehicle in rash and negligent manner and dashed to Complainant’s brother/Deceased motor cycle due to which Complainant’s brother received bleeding injury on head and Pillion rider received blood injury on the head and Complainant received the information through road passengers over phone call and rushed to the spot and immediately the injured were shifted to Gandhi Hospital, Hyderabad in ambulance. On 21.01.2020 at 07.00 Complainant’s brother died while undergoing treatment.

13. PW1 deposed that he received information through Police Chegunta when he was at his home stating that LW5/Ramesh and Karre Swamy S/o

Mallaiah/his brother met with an accident and shifted to Government

Hospital, Medak and he along with his family members rushed to said hospital and Karre Swamy/Deceased and LW5/Ramesh received injuries

C.C.No.193/2020 5 Dt: 26-05-2022 and were in unconscious stage and Karre Swamy was suggested to shift to

Gandhi Hospital, Hyderabad and he died while shifting to Gandhi Hospital,

Hyderabad and he do not know how the accident took place, however his evidence could not connect the accused to the present crime.

14. The next evidence as per the prosecution, who are examined as PW­2 and

PW­3 did not depose anything about the case and that they do not know as how the accident occurred. Thus, the evidence of PW­2 and PW­3 is of no help to the prosecution. Hence, it is clear that the prosecution could not prove the guilt of the accused.No.1 for the offence charged. As the

Accused No.2 is died and case against the Accused No.2 is abated on 16­09­2021. 

15. The evidence of LW­14 as per the prosecution, who is examined as PW4 the investigating officer and Ex.P2 to P8 marked, also does not establish that accused is the driver of the crime vehicle at the time of accident, as he is not an eye witness to the incident. He also did not place any record

before the court to show that accused is the owner of the crime vehicle and

that he was driving the crime vehicle at the time of accident. Hence, it is clear that the prosecution could not prove the guilt of the accused for the offence charged. Hence, the accused is entitled for acquittal. Hence, the

Accused.No.1 is entitled for acquittal.

16. In the result, the accused. No.1 is acquitted under Section 255(1) Criminal

Procedure Code for the offence under Section 304­A, 338 Indian Penal

Code against Accused.No.1. The surety bonds shall remain in force for a period of six months. 

(Typed to my dictation by my Typist, corrected and pronounced by me in the open Court on this the 26th day of May, 2022)

I Addl Junior Civil Judge­cum­ Spl. Judicial Magistrate of First Class (Mobile) Court, Medak

C.C.No.193/2020 6 Dt: 26-05-2022

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED 

FOR PROSECUTION:FOR DEFENCE: 

PW­1: Dt:28­04­2022, Karre Swamy ­None­ PW­2: Dt:28­04­2022, Karre Yadamma PW­3: Dt:28­04­2022, Maraboina Ramesh PW­4: Dt:05­05­2022, B.Subhash Goud

EXHIBITS MARKED 

FOR PROSECUTION: FOR DEFENCE: 

Ex P­1: Dt:28­04­2022, is Signature on report, ­Nil­ Ex.P­2: Dt:05­05­2022, is report, Ex.P­3: Dt:05­05­2022, is FIR, Ex.P­4: Dt:05­05­2022, is Crime Detail Form, Ex.P­5: Dt:05­05­2022, is inquest panchanama, Ex.P­6: Dt:05­05­2022, is injury Certificate, Ex.P­7: Dt:05­05­2022, is PME report, Ex.P­8: Dt:05­05­2022, is MVI report.

MATERIAL OBJECTS

­ NIL­

 I Addl Junior Civil Judge­cum­ Spl. Judicial Magistrate of First Class (Mobile) Court, Medak

C.C.No.193/2020 7 Dt: 26-05-2022

CALENDER AND JUDGMENT

IN THE COURT OF THE SPL.JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST

CLASS (MOBILE) COURT AT MEDAK

C.C No. 193/2020

1. Name of the Complainant : State through S.I of Police, Chegunta

2. Name of the Accused: A1-Soma Shiva Koti A2-Mittapally Chandramouli (Died)

3. Date of Offence & Time: 14-01-2020

4. Date of Report: 14-01-2020

5. Offence U/Sec.: 304(A), 338 of IPC against A1, 196 Mv Act against A2.

6. Date of Arrest of Accused: 22-05-2020

7. Date of Release of Accused. : 22-05-2020

8. Date of appearance: 11-02-2021

9. Commencement of Trial: 28-04-2022

10. Closure of Trial: 05-05-2022

11. Date of Argument : 23-05-2022

12. Date of Judgment : 26-05-2022

13. Plea of Accused: Total denial of offence

14. Finding: Not guilty

15. Result : In the result, the accused. No.1 is acquitted under Section 255(1) Criminal Procedure Code for the offence under Section 304­A, 338 Indian Penal Code against Accused.No.1. The surety bonds shall remain in force for a period of six months. 

16. Remarks : ---

I Addl. Junior Civil Judge-Cum- Spl. Judicial Magistrate of First Class(Mobile) Court, Medak

To The Hon’ble I Addl. Dist. & Sessions Judge, Medak at Sangareddy

C.C.No.193/2020 1 Dt: 26-05-2022

IN THE COURT OF THE I ADDL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE­ CUM­JUDICIAL

MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS (MOBILE) COURT, MEDAK 

Dated this the 26 th day of May, 2022.

Present:­ Smt. B.Kalpana

 I Addl Junior Civil Judge­cum­ Spl. Judicial Magistrate of First Class (Mobile) Court, Medak

C.C.No. 193 OF 2020

Between :

The State –Rep., through the Sub­Inspector of Police, P.S. Chegunta. …Complainant

A N D

A1­ Soma Shiva Koti S/o Nagaraju, Age: 22 years, Occ: Pvt. Employee, R/o. Chegunta village. A2­ Mittapally Chandramouli S/o Shanker (Died) …Accused.No.1 and 2.

This Case is coming before me on 26­05­2022 for final hearing in the presence of learned Public Prosecutor, for the Complainant; and Sri. K.Madhu

Kiran, Advocate for the Accused No.1 and Accused No.2 died and the case against the A2 is abated and after perusing the material on record and having stood over for consideration till this day, this Court delivered the following: 

: : J U D G M E N T : : 

1.The Sub­Inspector of Police, PS. Chegunta, Medak filed charge sheet in

Crime No. 21 of 2020 for the offence punishable under Section 304­A, 338 of Indian Penal Code and under Section 196 Motor Vehicle Act. 

2. The brief averments of the prosecution case is that :

 The defacto­complainant/Karre Swamy lodged complaint stating that on 13­01­2020 at 22.15 hours his relative brother Karre Swamy S/o

Mallaiah along with his friend Golla Ramesh started from Chegunta town by the Motor cycle bearing No.TS 35 A 4879 and proceeding towards

Pollampally on the way when they reached at the Polampally X road

C.C.No.193/2020 2 Dt: 26-05-2022 around 22.30 hours mean time one rider of the Motor cycle bearing

No.AP25Q5621 has come on opposite direction and drove his motor cycle in rash and negligence manner and dashed to Karre Swamy motor cycle due to which rider of the vehicle and pillion rider received bleeding injuries on head and the complainant received the information through road passengers over phone call and rushed to the spot and immediately shifted both to Gandhi Hospital by the ambulance.

As such complaint was lodged and case was registered as

Cr.No.21/2020 for the offence under Section 337 Indian Penal Code and investigation was commenced.

During investigation, LW­14 issued FIR, examined and recorded the statement of witnesses, visited scene of offence and drafted scene of offence panchanama, and conducted scene of offence panchanama in the presence of mediators and during the investigation on 21.01.2020 at 07.00 LW14 received a call as rider of the Motor vehicle of above

Cr.No.21/2020 has died on 20.04.2020 at 18.04 hours while undergoing treatment. On that information LW14 altered Section of Law

U/Sec.304(A), 338 and deputed LW13/K.N.Murthy, ASI of Police

Chegunta PS and LW13 conducted inquest panchanama over the dead body of the deceased and subjected the dead body for Post Mortem

Examination. After completion of investigation, charge sheet was filed against the Accused.No.1 for the offence under Section 304­A Indian

Penal Code and Accused.No.2 for the offence under Section 196 of Motor

Vehicle Act. 

3.During Further course of investigation on 22­05­2020 at 15.00 hours the accused.No.1 by name Soma Shiva Koti came to Police station and surrendered before LW14 and on interrogation the accused.No.1 admitted his guilty of offence, Subsequently the accused.No.1 submitted Vehicle R.C.

C.C.No.193/2020 3 Dt: 26-05-2022 vide bearing No.AP 25 Q5621 and the same is found in the name of

Accused No.2 Mittapally Chandramouli and found no insurance to the crime vehicle, also he allowed to drove his vehicle in negligent manner and

LW14 filed case against the accused No.2 for the offence under Section 196 of Motor Vehicle Act.

4.The case was taken on file for the offence under Section 304­A, 338 Indian

Penal Code against Accused.No.1 and under Section 196 of Motor Vehicle

Act against Accused No.2.

5.After appearance of the Accused.No.1, copies of documents were furnished under section 207 of Criminal Procedure Code.

6.The Accused.No.1 was examined under Section 251 of Criminal Procedure

Code by explaining the substance of accusation in vernacular, for which he pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried. Accused.No.2 died Death

Certificate filed, Hence the case is abated against Accused.No.2.

7.In order to prove the case of the prosecution, the prosecution got examined

PW­1 to PW­4 and got marked Ex P­1 to P­8. The details of the documents marked are mentioned in the appendix of evidence. Further, The learned

A.P.P. given up the evidence of LW­3/Karre Dasu, LW­4/Jangidi

Shyamala, LW­6/Boini Srishailam, LW­7/Muradi Adivaiah, LW­ 8/Mannepally Sathyam, LW­9/Yeta Naresh, LW­10/Dr.B.Vasanth Naik,

Assist Professor of Gandhi Medical College, LW11/Dr.Shruthi, CAS of

Govt. area hospital Medak, LW12/Venkat Suresh, Asst Motor vehicle

Inspector, LW13/K.N.Murthy, ASI of Police Chegunta PS.

8.The accused was examined under Section 313 Criminal Procedure Code on the incriminating evidence adduced by the prosecution witness. The accused denied the same and reported no defense evidence. Hence, defense evidence was closed. 

9.Heard both sides. Perused the record.

C.C.No.193/2020 4 Dt: 26-05-2022

10. Now the point for consideration is 

Whether the prosecution could prove the guilt of the accused.No.1

for the offence under Section 304­A, 338 Indian Penal Code beyond

all reasonable doubts?

11. POINT NO 1:  Here the prosecution should prove that the accused.No.1 had caused the death of the deceased by rash or negligent act not amounting to culpable homicide. Only if the ingredients of Section 304­A

Indian Penal Code is proved, then the accused.No.1 can be held guilty of the offence charged. 

12. The case of the prosecution as per investigation is that the Accused.No.1 and deceased are friends on 13­01­2020 at 22:15 hours they were started from Chegunta town by the Motor vehicle bearing No.TS35A4879 and proceeded towards Pollampally on the way when they reached at the

Polampally X road around 22:30 hours, mean time One rider of the Motor

Cycle bearing No.AP25Q5621 came in opposite direction, drove vehicle in rash and negligent manner and dashed to Complainant’s brother/Deceased motor cycle due to which Complainant’s brother received bleeding injury on head and Pillion rider received blood injury on the head and Complainant received the information through road passengers over phone call and rushed to the spot and immediately the injured were shifted to Gandhi Hospital, Hyderabad in ambulance. On 21.01.2020 at 07.00 Complainant’s brother died while undergoing treatment.

13. PW1 deposed that he received information through Police Chegunta when he was at his home stating that LW5/Ramesh and Karre Swamy S/o

Mallaiah/his brother met with an accident and shifted to Government

Hospital, Medak and he along with his family members rushed to said hospital and Karre Swamy/Deceased and LW5/Ramesh received injuries

C.C.No.193/2020 5 Dt: 26-05-2022 and were in unconscious stage and Karre Swamy was suggested to shift to

Gandhi Hospital, Hyderabad and he died while shifting to Gandhi Hospital,

Hyderabad and he do not know how the accident took place, however his evidence could not connect the accused to the present crime.

14. The next evidence as per the prosecution, who are examined as PW­2 and

PW­3 did not depose anything about the case and that they do not know as how the accident occurred. Thus, the evidence of PW­2 and PW­3 is of no help to the prosecution. Hence, it is clear that the prosecution could not prove the guilt of the accused.No.1 for the offence charged. As the

Accused No.2 is died and case against the Accused No.2 is abated on 16­09­2021. 

15. The evidence of LW­14 as per the prosecution, who is examined as PW4 the investigating officer and Ex.P2 to P8 marked, also does not establish that accused is the driver of the crime vehicle at the time of accident, as he is not an eye witness to the incident. He also did not place any record

before the court to show that accused is the owner of the crime vehicle and

that he was driving the crime vehicle at the time of accident. Hence, it is clear that the prosecution could not prove the guilt of the accused for the offence charged. Hence, the accused is entitled for acquittal. Hence, the

Accused.No.1 is entitled for acquittal.

16. In the result, the accused. No.1 is acquitted under Section 255(1) Criminal

Procedure Code for the offence under Section 304­A, 338 Indian Penal

Code against Accused.No.1. The surety bonds shall remain in force for a period of six months. 

(Typed to my dictation by my Typist, corrected and pronounced by me in the open Court on this the 26th day of May, 2022)

I Addl Junior Civil Judge­cum­ Spl. Judicial Magistrate of First Class (Mobile) Court, Medak

C.C.No.193/2020 6 Dt: 26-05-2022

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED 

FOR PROSECUTION:FOR DEFENCE: 

PW­1: Dt:28­04­2022, Karre Swamy ­None­ PW­2: Dt:28­04­2022, Karre Yadamma PW­3: Dt:28­04­2022, Maraboina Ramesh PW­4: Dt:05­05­2022, B.Subhash Goud

EXHIBITS MARKED 

FOR PROSECUTION: FOR DEFENCE: 

Ex P­1: Dt:28­04­2022, is Signature on report, ­Nil­ Ex.P­2: Dt:05­05­2022, is report, Ex.P­3: Dt:05­05­2022, is FIR, Ex.P­4: Dt:05­05­2022, is Crime Detail Form, Ex.P­5: Dt:05­05­2022, is inquest panchanama, Ex.P­6: Dt:05­05­2022, is injury Certificate, Ex.P­7: Dt:05­05­2022, is PME report, Ex.P­8: Dt:05­05­2022, is MVI report.

MATERIAL OBJECTS

­ NIL­

 I Addl Junior Civil Judge­cum­ Spl. Judicial Magistrate of First Class (Mobile) Court, Medak

C.C.No.193/2020 7 Dt: 26-05-2022

CALENDER AND JUDGMENT

IN THE COURT OF THE SPL.JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST

CLASS (MOBILE) COURT AT MEDAK

C.C No. 193/2020

1. Name of the Complainant : State through S.I of Police, Chegunta

2. Name of the Accused: A1-Soma Shiva Koti A2-Mittapally Chandramouli (Died)

3. Date of Offence & Time: 14-01-2020

4. Date of Report: 14-01-2020

5. Offence U/Sec.: 304(A), 338 of IPC against A1, 196 Mv Act against A2.

6. Date of Arrest of Accused: 22-05-2020

7. Date of Release of Accused. : 22-05-2020

8. Date of appearance: 11-02-2021

9. Commencement of Trial: 28-04-2022

10. Closure of Trial: 05-05-2022

11. Date of Argument : 23-05-2022

12. Date of Judgment : 26-05-2022

13. Plea of Accused: Total denial of offence

14. Finding: Not guilty

15. Result : In the result, the accused. No.1 is acquitted under Section 255(1) Criminal Procedure Code for the offence under Section 304­A, 338 Indian Penal Code against Accused.No.1. The surety bonds shall remain in force for a period of six months. 

16. Remarks : ---

I Addl. Junior Civil Judge-Cum- Spl. Judicial Magistrate of First Class(Mobile) Court, Medak

To The Hon’ble I Addl. Dist. & Sessions Judge, Medak at Sangareddy

IN THE COURT OF

I Additional Junior Civil Judge -cum- Special Judicial Magistrate of I Class (Mobile) Court, Medak

CC/771/2022

State of Telangana Vs Chakali prashanth

ORDER

(Delivered on 23-03-2023)

Accused is present and they are examined U/Sec. 251 Cr.P.C., for the offence punishable U/Sec. 447, 427, 323 504 of IPC and the accusation explained to the accused in his vernacular language and they are admitted and pleaded guilty for the offences punishable U/Secs. 447, 427, 323 504 of IPC voluntarily. As such the accused are convicted

U/Sec. 252 Cr.P.C. Accordingly, the accused is sentenced are pay a fine of Rs.500/- each only) in default of payment of fine simple imprisonment for a period of ( 2 ) days for the offence U/Sec. 447 of IPC Accordingly, the Accused sentenced is pay a fine of Rs.500/- each only) in default of payment of fine simple imprisonment for a period of ( 2 ) days for the offence U/Sec. 427of IPC Accordingly, the Accused sentenced is pay a fine of Rs.1000/- each only) in default of payment of fine simple imprisonment for a period of ( 2 ) days for the offence U/Sec. 323 of IPC Accordingly, the Accused sentenced is pay a fine of Rs. 500/- each only) in default of payment of fine simple imprisonment for a period of ( 2 ) days for the offence U/Sec. 504 of IPC Total Amount: 2500/-.

Sd/-

I Additional Junior Civil Judge -cum-Special

Judicial Magistrate of I Class (Mobile) Court, Medak

IN THE COURT OF

I Additional Junior Civil Judge -cum- Special Judicial Magistrate of I Class (Mobile) Court, Medak

CC/950/2022

Ps Manoharabad Vs Bakka Kistaiah

ORDER

(Delivered on 23-03-2023)

A1 died D/c filed by the police hence cc is abeted A1 Accused A2 to A6 are present and they are examined U/Sec. 251 Cr.P.C., for the offence punishable U/Sec. 447, 427, 504 of IPC and the accusation explained to the accused in his vernacular language and they are admitted and pleaded guilty for the offences punishable U/Secs. 447, 427, 504 of IPC voluntarily. As such the accused are convicted U/Sec. 252 Cr.P.C. Accordingly, the accused

A2 to A6 sentenced are pay a fine of Rs.500/- each only) in default of payment of fine simple imprisonment for a period of ( 2 ) days for the offence U/Sec. 447 of IPC

Accordingly, the Accused sentenced A2 to A6 are pay a fine of Rs. 100 /- each only) in default of payment of fine simple imprisonment for a period of ( 2 ) days for the offence

U/Sec. 427of IPC Accordingly, the Accused sentenced A2 to A6 are pay a fine of Rs. 200 /- each only) in default of payment of fine simple imprisonment for a period of ( 2 ) days for the offence U/Sec. 504 of IPC Total Amount: 4000 /-.

Sd/-

I Additional Junior Civil Judge -cum-Special

Judicial Magistrate of I Class (Mobile) Court, Medak