B. Soujanya

Prl Junior Civil Judge

Bodhan, V ADJ Court Complex · Nizamabad · Telangana

B. Soujanya, Prl Junior Civil Judge, is posted at Bodhan, V ADJ Court Complex, Nizamabad, Telangana, India. 363 court orders on record since 2015. 5 judgments with full text available. Primarily handles CC, OS, MC cases.

363

Total Orders

Judgments

Orders/Month

Posting

Featured Judgments

OS/38/2016

Venkatreddy vs K.Narayana

26 Apr 2017

1 OS.38 of 2016

IN THE COURT OF THE PRL.JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT BODHAN.

Present: SMT.B.SOUJANYA, Prl.Junior Civil Judge, Bodhan

Dated this the 27th day of April, 2017

OS.No.38 of 2016

Between:- P.Venkat Reddy, S/o Sura Reddy, Caste:Hindu, Aged about 54 years, Occ:Business, R/o H.No.4-2-112 Venkateshwar Colony, Bodhan town and Mandal, Dist. Nizamabad(T.S.) …Plaintiff AND

1. K.Naryana, S/o Ramulu, Caste:Hindu, Aged about 31 years, Occ:Agriculture, R/o H.No.1-42, Post:Kistapur, Maldal Pitlam, Dist. Nizamabad(T.S.).

2. Chippa Narayana, S/o Ramulu, Caste:Hindu, Aged about 43 years, Occ:Agriculture, R/o H.No.1-2, Post:Kistapur, Maldal Pitlam, Dist. Nizamabad(T.S.). …Defendants

This suit coming on this day before me on 11-4-2017 for hearing and disposal in the presence of Sri P.Ramulu, Advocate for plaintiff and the defendants are set exparte, and having stood over for consideration the court delivered the following.

JUDGMENT

1.The present suit is filed by the plaintiff for recovery of amount of

Rs.1,71,333/- against the defendants on the basis of promissory note executed by defendant no.1 on 6-5-2013.

2.The plaintiff submitted in the plaint that the Plaintiff and defendants are known to each other. That out of the said acquaintance defendant no.1 approached plaintiff on 6.5.2013 and borrowed an amount of Rs,1,00,000/- for his personal and agricultural necessities and executed a promissory note in favour of plaintiff in the presence of 2 witnesses and agreed to repay the said sum along with interest @ 2% per month either to the plaintiff or on his order.

Defendant No.2 stood as guarantor for the loan transaction and agreed that if the defendant no.1 failed to repay the amount defendant No.1 will repay on his behalf and signed on the said promissory note as guarantor. Subsequently inspite of several requests and demands and also inspite of issuance of legal 2 OS.38 of 2016 notice on 15.4.2016 the defendants did not respond. Hence the plaintiff filed the suit for recovery of Rs.1,71,333/- which includes interest.

3. On registration of suit summons were served on defendant no.1 and 2 who appeared through their counsel but subsequently failed to file written statement within stipulated time as such the right of filing written statement was forfeited by the court and the case is posted for plaintiff evidence on 4.11.2016.

4.The plaintiff examined himself as PW1 and got marked Ex.A1 to Ex.A5.

Ex.A1 is original promissory note dt.6-5-2013, Ex.A2 is office copy of legal notice, dt.12-1-2016, Ex.A3 is the postal receipt dt. 15-4-2016 of defendant no.1 and Ex.A4 is the postal acknowledgment of defendant no.2.

5.Heard the counsel for the plaintiff. Perused the record.

6. i)Now the point for consideration is whether the plaintiff is entitled for recovery of amount of Rs.1.71,333/-from the defendants?

ii)To what relief?

6.Point No.1:The chief evidence affidavit filed by PW1 in lieu of his chief examination is almost on the same lines as that of plaint pleadings and he relied on Ex.A1 promissory note executed by defendant no.1 in his favour agreeing to repay the borrowed amount of Rs.1,00,000/- along with interest @ 2% per month and defendant no.2 stood as guarantor for the said transaction under

Ex.A1.

7.Ex.A1 is the original promissory note dt:6.5.2013 which clearly proves that the defendant no.1 has borrowed the said amount of Rs.1,00,000/- and agreed to repay the same with interest @2% per month and has not been repaid till date inspite of several requests and demands made by the plaintiff and also issuance of legal notice under Ex.A2. To rebut the same, the defendants neither choose to enter into the witness box nor filed written statement as such their right of filing writing statement was forfeited and also has not cross examined PW1 on 3 OS.38 of 2016 plaint pleadings. Therefore, the court is convinced with the pleadings of plaintiff and Ex.A1 to A4. Plaintiff proved that defendants are indebted to him and failed to pay the borrowed amount of Rs.1,00,000/- along with interest of Rs.71,333/- total due amount comes to rs.1,71,333/-.

Point No.2:

8.IN THE RESULT, the suit is decreed for Rs.1,71,333/- with costs and interest @ 12 % per annum from the date of suit till date of decree and thereafter @ 6% per annum from the date of decree till realization on the

principal amount of Rs.1,00,000/-.

Typed to my dictation, corrected and pronounced by me in open Court on this the 27th day of April, 2017.

sd/-

PRL.JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

BODHAN.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

FOR PLAINTIFF: FOR DEFENDANT: Pw1:P.Venkat Reddy EXPARTE

EXHIBITS MARKED

FOR PLAINTIFF: FOR DEFENDANT:

Ex.A1 is original promissory note dt.6-5-2013,

Ex.A2 is office copy of legal notice, dt.12-1-2016,

Ex.A3 is the postal receipt dt. 15-4-2016 of defendant no.1

Ex.A4 is the postal acknowledgment of defendant no.2.

sd/-

PRL.JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

BODHAN.

OS/88/2015

Korba Dattu vs Nemala Lalu

26 Apr 2017

1 OS.88 of 2015

IN THE COURT OF THE PRL.JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT BODHAN.

Present: SMT.B.SOUJANYA, Prl.Junior Civil Judge, Bodhan

Dated this the 26th day of April, 2017

OS.No.88 of 2015

Between:- Korba.Dattu, S/o Korba Pedda Sayanna, Caste:Hindu, Aged about524 years, Occ:Agriculture, R/o Raikur village of Revenue Mandal Kotigir, Dist. Nizamabad(T.S.) …Plaintiff AND

1. Nemala Lalu, S/o Naga Rao, Caste:Hindu, Aged about 45 years, Occ:Agriculture, R/o H.No.1-31, Raikur village of Revenue Mandal Kotigir, Dist. Nizamabad(T.S.). …Defendant

2. Namdev, S/o Yadu, Caste:Hindu, Aged about 55 years, Occ:Agriculture, R/o H.No.1-30, Raikur village of Revenue Mandal Kotgir, Dist. Nizamabad(T.S.).

This suit coming on this day before me on 18-4-2017 for hearing and disposal in the presence of Sri G.Shyam Rao, Advocate for plaintiff and the defendants are set exparte, and having stood over for consideration the court delivered the following.

JUDGMENT

1.The present suit is filed by the plaintiff for recovery of amount of

Rs.43,000/- against the defendants on the basis of promissory note executed by defendant no.1 on 29-8-2012.

2.The plaintiff submitted in the plaint that the Plaintiff and defendants are known to each other. That out of the said acquaintance defendant no.1 approached plaintiff on 29.8.2012 and borrowed an amount of Rs,25,000/- for his personal and family needs and executed a promissory note in favour of plainitff in the presence of 2 witnesses and agreed to repay the said sum along with interest @ 2% per month either to the plaintiff or on his order. Defendant

No.2 stood as guarantor for the loan transaction and agreed that if the defendant no.1 failed to repay the amount defendant No.2 will repay on his behalf and signed on the said promissory note as guarantor. Subsequently inspite of several requests and demands and also inspite of issuance of legal notice on 2 OS.88 of 2015 29.7.2015 the defendants did not respond. Hence the plaintiff filed the suit for recovery of Rs.43,000/- which includes interest.

3. On registration of suit summons were served on defendant no.1 and 2 who failed to appear before the court as such they were set exparte and the case posted for plaintiff evidence on 27.1.2017.

4.The plaintiff examined himself as PW1 and got marked Ex.A1 to Ex.A3.

Ex.A1 is original promissory note dt.29-8-2012, Ex.A2 is office copy of legal notice, dt.29-7-2015, Ex.A3 is the postal acknowledgment of defendant no.2.

5.Heard the counsel for the plaintiff. Perused the record.

6. i)Now the point for consideration is whether the plaintiff is entitled for recovery of amount of Rs.43,000/-from the defendants?

ii)To what relief?

7.Point No.1:The chief evidence affidavit filed by PW1 in lieu of his chief examination is almost on the same lines as that of plaint pleadings and he relied on Ex.A1 promissory note executed by defendant no.1 in his favour agreeing to repay the borrowed amount of Rs.25,000/- along with interest @ 2% per month and defendant no.2 stood as guarantor for the said transaction under Ex.A1.

8.Ex.A1 is the original promissory note dt:29.8.2012 which clearly proves that the defendant no.1 has borrowed the said amount of Rs.25,000/- and agreed to repay the same with interest @2% per month and has not been repaid till date inspite of several requests and demands made by the plaintiff and also issuance of legal notice under Ex.A2. To rebut the same, the defendants neither choose to enter into the witness box nor filed written statement and remained exparte Therefore, the court is convinced with the pleadings of plaintiff and

Ex.A1 to A3. Plaintiff proved that defendants are indebted to him and failed to pay the borrowed amount of Rs.25,000/- along with interest of Rs.18,000/- total due amount comes to Rs.43,000/-.

3 OS.88 of 2015

Point No.2:

9.IN THE RESULT, the suit is decreed for Rs.43,000/- with costs and interest @ 12 % per annum from the date of suit till date of decree and thereafter @ 6% per annum from the date of decree till realization on the principal amount of

Rs.25,000/-.

Typed to my dictation, corrected and pronounced by me in open Court on this the 26th day of April, 2017.

sd/-

PRL.JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

BODHAN.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

FOR PLAINTIFF: FOR DEFENDANT: Pw1:Korba Dattu EXPARTE

EXHIBITS MARKED

FOR PLAINTIFF: FOR DEFENDANT:

Ex.A1 is original promissory note dt.29-8-2012, NIL

Ex.A2 is office copy of legal notice, dt.29-7-2015,

Ex.A3 is the postal acknowledgment of defendant no.2.

sd/-

PRL.JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

BODHAN.

OS/128/2016

Y. Peri Reddy vs Abdul Ahmed Khadeer

26 Apr 2017

1 OS.128 of 2016

IN THE COURT OF THE PRL.JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT BODHAN.

Present: SMT.B.SOUJANYA, Prl.Junior Civil Judge, Bodhan

Dated this the 27th day of April, 2017

OS.No.128 of 2016

Between:- Y.Peri Reddy, S/o Venkateshwar Reddy, Aged about:33 years, Occ:Business, R/o H.No.4-2-99 Anil taklies road, Bodhan, Dist. Nizamabad(T.S.) …Plaintiff AND

Abdul Ahmed Khadar, S/o Ahmed Abdul Aziz, Aged about 46 years, Occ:Head master, c/o Darul Uloom High School Alliabad of Renjal base, Bodhan, Dist. Nizamabad(T.S.). …Defendant

This suit coming on this day before me on 17-4-2017 for hearing and disposal in the presence of Sri C.Gopal Reddy, Advocate for plaintiff and the defendants are set exparte, and having stood over for consideration the court delivered the following.

JUDGMENT

1.The present suit is filed by the plaintiff for recovery of amount of

Rs.1.82,071/- against the defendant on the basis of promissory note executed by defendant on 9-1-2016.

2.The plainitff submitted in the plaint that the Plaintiff and defendant are known to each other. That out of the said acquaintance defendant approached plainitff on 9.1.2016 and borrowed an amount of Rs,1.50,000/- for his personal and family needs and executed a promisory note in favour of plainitff in the presence of 2 witnesses and agreed to repay the said sum along with interest @ 2% per month either to the plainitff or on his order. Subsequently inspite of several requests and demands and also inspite of issuance of legal notice on 29.8.2016 the defendants did not respond. Hence the plainitff filed the suit for recovery of Rs.1,82,071/- which includes interes.

3. On registration of suit summons were served on defendant who appeared through his counsel but subsequently failed to file written statement within stipulated time as such the right of filing written statement was forfeited by the 2 OS.128 of 2016 court and the case is posted for plaintiff evidence on 3.4.2017.

4.The plaintiff examined himself as PW1 and got marked Ex.A1 to Ex.A3.

Ex.A1 is original promissory note dt.9-1-2016, Ex.A2 is office copy of legal notice, dt.29-8-2016, Ex.A3 is the postal acknowledgment of defendant .

5.Heard the counsel for the plaintiff. Perused the record.

6. i)Now the point for consideration is whether the plaintiff is entitled for recovery of amount of Rs.1,82,071/-from the defendant?

ii)To what relief?

6.Point No.1:The chief evidence affidavit filed by PW1 in lieu of his chief examination is almost on the same lines as that of plaint pleadings and he relied on Ex.A1 promissory note executed by defendant in his favour agreeing to repay the borrowed amount of Rs.1,50,000/- along with interest @ 2% per month for the said transaction under Ex.A1.

7.Ex.A1 is the original promissory note dt:9.1.2016 which clearly proves that the defendant has borrowed the said amount of Rs.1,50,000/- and agreed to repay the same with interest @2% per month and has not been repaid till date inspite of several requests and demands made by the plaintiff and also issuance of legal notice under Ex.A2. To rebut the same, the defendant neither choose to enter into the witness box nor filed written statement and remained set exparte

Therefore, the court is convinced with the pleadings of plaintiff and Ex.A1 to A3.

Plaintiff proved that defendant is indebted to him and failed to pay the borrowed amount of Rs.1,50,000/- along with interest of Rs.32,071/- total due amount comes to Rs.1,82,071/-.

Point No.2:

8.IN THE RESULT, the suit is decreed for Rs.1,82,071/- with costs and interest @ 12 % per annum from the date of suit till date of decree and thereafter @ 6% per annum from the date of decree till realization on the 3 OS.128 of 2016

principal amount of Rs.1,50,000/-.

Typed to my dictation, corrected and pronounced by me in open Court on this the 26th day of April, 2017.

sd/-

PRL.JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

BODHAN.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

FOR PLAINTIFF: FOR DEFENDANT: Pw1:Smt.Telagamshetty Susheela EXPARTE

EXHIBITS MARKED

FOR PLAINTIFF: FOR DEFENDANT:

Ex.A1:Original promissory note,dt.23-4-2013 NIL

Ex.A2:Office copy of legal notice, dt.2-5-2016

Ex.A3:Postal receipt dt. 2-5-2016

Ex.A4:Postal acknowledgment.

sd/-

PRL.JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

BODHAN.

OS/26/2016

Kasula Parvaiah vs Gunala Anja Goud

27 Apr 2017

1 OS.26 of 2016

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT BODHAN.

Present: SMT.B.SOUJANYA, Prl.Junior Civil Judge, Bodhan

Dated this the 27th day of April, 2017

OS.No.26 of 2016

Between:- Kasula Parvaiah, S/o Kasula Yellappa, Caste:Hindu, Aged about 59 years, Occ:Agriculture, R/o H.No.2-38/3, Rudrur village of Varni Mandal, Dist. Nizamabad(T.S.) …Plaintiff AND

Gunala Anja Goud, S/o Venka Goud, Caste:Hindu, Aged about 48 years, Occ: Sendhi business, R/o H.No.4-51/4-82, Chintakunta village Varni Mandal, Dist. Nizamabad(T.S.). …Defendant

This suit coming on this day before me on 18-4-2017 for hearing and disposal in the presence of Sri V.R.Desai, Advocate for plaintiff and the defendant is set exparte, and having stood over for consideration the court delivered the following.

JUDGMENT

1.The present suit is filed by the plaintiff for recovery of amount of Rs.68,533/- against the defendant on the basis of promissory note executed by defendant on 30-3-2013.

2.The plaintiff submitted in the plaint that the Plaintiff and defendant are known to each other. That out of the said acquaintance defendant approached plaintiff on 30.3.2013 and borrowed an amount of Rs,40,000 /- to sendhi business and executed a promissory note in favour of plaintiff in the presence of 2 witnesses and agreed to repay the said sum along with interest @ 2% per month either to the plaintiff or on his order. Subsequently inspite of several requests and demands made by plaintiff defendant had not repaid the same.

Hence the plaintiff filed the suit for recovery of Rs.68,533/- which includes interest.

3. On registration of suit summons were served on defendant who failed to appear before the court as such he was set exparte and the case posted for 2 OS.26 of 2016 plaintiff evidence on 10.11.2016.

4.The plaintiff examined himself as PW1 and got marked Ex.A1 and examined the scribe of Ex.A1 as PW2. Ex.A1 is original promissory note dt.30-3- 2013.

5.Heard the counsel for the plaintiff. Perused the record.

6. i)Now the point for consideration is whether the plaintiff is entitled for recovery of amount of Rs.68,533/-from the defendants?

ii)To what relief?

7.Point No.1:The chief evidence affidavit filed by PW1 in lieu of his chief examination is almost on the same lines as that of plaint pleadings and he relied on Ex.A1 promissory note executed by defendant in his favour agreeing to repay the borrowed amount of Rs.40,000/- along with interest @ 2% per month under

Ex.A1.

8.Ex.A1 is the original promissory note dt:30.3.2013 which clearly proves that the defendant has borrowed the said amount of Rs.40,000/- and agreed to repay the same with interest @2% per month and has not been repaid till date inspite of several requests and demands made by the plaintiff. To rebut the same, the defendants neither choose to enter into the witness box nor filed written statement and remained exparte. The plaintiff examined the scribe of

Ex.A1 who clearly deposed with regard to the loan transaction and admitted that he scribed Ex.A1 and also identified the signature of PW1, defendant and 2 attesters. Therefore, the court is convinced with the pleadings of plaintiff, oral evidence of PW1 and 2 and Ex.A1. Plaintiff proved that defendant is indebted to him and failed to pay the borrowed amount of Rs.40,000/- along with interest of

Rs.28,533/- total due amount comes to Rs.68,533/-.

3 OS.26 of 2016

Point No.2:

9.IN THE RESULT, the suit is decreed for Rs.68,533/- with costs and interest @ 12 % per annum from the date of suit till date of decree and thereafter @ 6% per annum from the date of decree till realization on the principal amount of

Rs.40,000/-.

Typed to my dictation, corrected and pronounced by me in open Court on this the 27th day of April, 2017.

sd/-

PRL.JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

BODHAN.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

FOR PLAINTIFF: FOR DEFENDANT: Pw1:K. Parvaiah EXPARTE Pw2: M.Narsaiah

EXHIBITS MARKED

FOR PLAINTIFF: FOR DEFENDANT:

Ex.A1 is original promissory note dt.30-3-2013, NIL

sd/-

PRL.JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

BODHAN.

OS/86/2016

Kolli Prasad vs Vemuri Venkateshwar Rao

27 Apr 2017

1 OS.86 of 2016

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT BODHAN.

Present: SMT.B.SOUJANYA, Prl.Junior Civil Judge, Bodhan

Dated this the 27th day of April, 2017

OS.No.86 of 2016

Between:- kolli Prasad, S/o K.Laxmi Narsaiah, Aged about 47 years, R/o H.No.10-73/2-A, Chandoor village of Varni Mandal, Dist. Nizamabad(T.S.) …Plaintiff AND

V.Venkateshwar Rao, S/o Tatabai, Aged about 38 years, R/o H.No.1-70, Bhavanipet village Bodhan Mandal, Dist. Nizamabad(T.S.). …Defendant

This suit coming on this day before me on 11-4-2017 for hearing and disposal in the presence of Sri M.Srinivas Rao, Advocate for plaintiff and the defendant is set exparte, and having stood over for consideration the court delivered the following.

JUDGMENT

1.The present suit is filed by the plaintiff for recovery of amount of Rs.86,000/- against the defendant on the basis of promissory note executed by defendant on 03-7-2013.

2.The plaintiff submitted in the plaint that the Plaintiff and defendant are known to each other. That out of the said acquaintance defendant approached plaintiff on 3.7.2013 and borrowed an amount of Rs,50,000 /- to his family needs and executed a promissory note in favour of plaintiff in the presence of 2 witnesses and agreed to repay the said sum along with interest @ 2% per month either to the plaintiff or on his order. Subsequently inspite of several requests and demands made by plaintiff defendant had not repaid the same. Hence the plaintiff filed the suit for recovery of Rs.86,000/- which includes interest.

3. On registration of suit summons were served on defendant who failed to appear before the court as such he was set exparte and the case posted for plaintiff evidence on 03.11.2016.

2 OS.86 of 2016

4. The plaintiff examined himself as PW1 and got marked Ex.A1. Ex.A1 is original promissory note dt.3-7-2013.

5.Heard the counsel for the plaintiff. Perused the record.

6. i)Now the point for consideration is whether the plaintiff is entitled for recovery of amount of Rs.86,000/-from the defendant?

ii)To what relief?

7.Point No.1:The chief evidence affidavit filed by PW1 in lieu of his chief examination is almost on the same lines as that of plaint pleadings and he relied on Ex.A1 promissory note executed by defendant in his favour agreeing to repay the borrowed amount of Rs.50,000/- along with interest @ 2% per month under

Ex.A1.

8.Ex.A1 is the original promissory note dt:3.7.2013 which clearly proves that the defendant has borrowed the said amount of Rs.50,000/- and agreed to repay the same with interest @2% per month and has not been repaid till date inspite of several requests and demands made by the plaintiff. To rebut the same, the defendants neither choose to enter into the witness box nor filed written statement and remained exparte. Therefore, the court is convinced with the pleadings of plaintiff, oral evidence of PW1 and Ex.A1. Plaintiff proved that defendant is indebted to him and failed to pay the borrowed amount of

Rs.50,000/- along with interest of Rs.36,000/- total due amount comes to

Rs.86,000/-.

Point No.2:

9.IN THE RESULT, the suit is decreed for Rs.86,000/- with costs and interest @ 12 % per annum from the date of suit till date of decree and thereafter @ 6% per annum from the date of decree till realization on the principal amount of

Rs.50,000/-.

Typed to my dictation, corrected and pronounced by me in open Court on this the 27th day of April, 2017.

3 OS.86 of 2016

sd/-

PRL.JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

BODHAN.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

FOR PLAINTIFF: FOR DEFENDANT: Pw1:K. Prasad EXPARTE

EXHIBITS MARKED

FOR PLAINTIFF: FOR DEFENDANT:

Ex.A1 is original promissory note dt.3-7-2013, NIL

sd/-

PRL.JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

BODHAN.

Order Record 362 total

Case No.	Parties	Date	Type	Outcome
OS/26/2016	Kasula Parvaiah vs Gunala Anja Goud	27 Apr 2017	Judgment	—
OS/86/2016	Kolli Prasad vs Vemuri Venkateshwar Rao	27 Apr 2017	Judgment	—
OS/38/2016	Venkatreddy vs K.Narayana	26 Apr 2017	Judgment	—
OS/88/2015	Korba Dattu vs Nemala Lalu	26 Apr 2017	Judgment	—
OS/128/2016	Y. Peri Reddy vs Abdul Ahmed Khadeer	26 Apr 2017	Judgment	—
CC/100107/2011	Syed Basheer vs Md. Sikander Pasha	25 Apr 2017	Judgment	—
CC/188/2016	PS Yedapally vs Daram Naveen @ Chaianya	24 Apr 2017	Judgment	—
OS/56/2012	Bhumaiah vs Mekala Gundaram Poshani	22 Apr 2017	Judgment	—
OS/100111/2005	Khamrulla Sha vs Fareed Ahmed	21 Apr 2017	Judgment	—
CC/100252/2010	Neha Farheen vs Ahmed Hussain	20 Apr 2017	Judgment	—
CC/100512/2012	Smt. Panchal Swapna @ Parikipandla Swapna vs Panchal Balraj,	19 Apr 2017	Judgment	—
CC/100280/2011	Smt.Shedpally Anjamma vs Sk.Sajid	18 Apr 2017	Judgment	—
CC/100490/2008	bodhan ps vs Akash singh	18 Apr 2017	Judgment	—
CC/124/2016	Maddela Divya vs Edibidi Poshetty	17 Apr 2017	Judgment	—
CC/127/2016	Jakira Nzneen vs Edibidy Poshetty	17 Apr 2017	Judgment	—
CC/132/2016	Sk. Faheem Unnisa vs Edibidy Poshetty	17 Apr 2017	Judgment	—
CC/100333/2008	Kumari Chennagoni Malathi vs Shaik Abbas and Others	17 Apr 2017	Judgment	—
CC/100349/2011	Shivarathri Vasantha vs Orsu Sugunamma	17 Apr 2017	Judgment	—
OS/189/2012	Baby vs Kommana Srinu	15 Apr 2017	Judgment	—
OS/100062/2012	Naseem Begum vs Salam Chaush	15 Apr 2017	Judgment	—
OS/62/2011	The Nizam Sugars Ltd. vs Gruru Padam	13 Apr 2017	Judgment	—
CC/100269/2012	Buddolla Bhumanna vs Mithun Bosle	13 Apr 2017	Judgment	—
CC/100271/2009	Pasha Miya vs Baburao Bosle @Mithun Bosle	13 Apr 2017	Judgment	—
OS/16/2017	Smt. Tondapu Rojarani vs Tondapu Bhaskar Rao	12 Apr 2017	Judgment	—
OS/56/2016	TelagamShetty Susheela vs Rathod Gabbar Singh	12 Apr 2017	Judgment	—
CC/66/2017	Kokkidigelli Ramulu vs Syed Saleem	12 Apr 2017	Judgment	—
CC/112/2017	Pabba Murali vs Gaini Srinivas	12 Apr 2017	Judgment	—
CC/100206/2011	Parthi Raju vs Kante Shankar	12 Apr 2017	Judgment	—
OS/12/2017	Smt. P. Sulochana vs Smt. Shajahan Parveen	11 Apr 2017	Judgment	—
OS/40/2015	Smt. Nagaram Saraswathi vs Sri. Abid Ahmed Mohammed	11 Apr 2017	Judgment	—
OS/100125/2012	Shaik Osman vs Shaik Gaffer	11 Apr 2017	Judgment	—
CC/100183/2011	Onigonda Godavari vs Syed Nisar	11 Apr 2017	Judgment	—
OS/129/2016	Penumarthi Ram Chander Rao vs Mondi Ramulu	10 Apr 2017	Judgment	—
OS/133/2016	M/s Vijayalaxmi Finance through its Managing partner Smt. G. Vijaya vs Chiluka Abhishekar	10 Apr 2017	Judgment	—
OS/134/2016	M/s Vijayalaxmi Finance through its Managing Partner Smt. G. Vijaya vs Jarpla Ramulu	10 Apr 2017	Judgment	—
CC/100048/2011	P.S.Yedapally vs Mohammed Bilal	10 Apr 2017	Judgment	—
CC/100269/2011	Yesala Shanker vs Yesala Pedda Sailu	10 Apr 2017	Judgment	—
OS/11/2017	Smt. Wasima Begum vs Shaik Asrar	07 Apr 2017	Judgment	—
OS/103/2016	Patnam Ravi vs Pokala Ranjith	07 Apr 2017	Judgment	—
OS/132/2016	M/S. Vijayalaxmi Finance through its Managing Partner Smt. G. Vijaya vs Sri Chiluka Abhishekar	07 Apr 2017	Judgment	—
CC/100202/2011	Md. Yousuf vs Shaik Iliyas	07 Apr 2017	Judgment	—
CC/100209/2012	Doddi Srinivas vs Peddolla Ravi	07 Apr 2017	Judgment	—
CC/100169/2011	Neeradi Sanjeev Kumar vs Veeradi Shanker	06 Apr 2017	Judgment	—
DVC/9/2015	Anjum Begum vs Shaik Imtiaz	06 Apr 2017	Order	—
MC/19/2015	Smt. Anjum Begum vs Shaik Imtiaz	06 Apr 2017	Judgment	—
CC/100032/2012	P.S.Yedapally vs Pothula Lasmaiah	04 Apr 2017	Judgment	—
CC/100431/2011	Gajvi Anasuya vs Yennam Sailoo Subbadu	04 Apr 2017	Judgment	—
CC/100186/2011	M Shanker vs Lakka Srinivas	03 Apr 2017	Judgment	—
CC/100276/2010	Rayakoor Lalaiah vs Sankolla Saidulu	03 Apr 2017	Judgment	—
CC/100456/2013	Vijaya Laxmi Chits vs Buryanwary Hanmanth Rao	03 Apr 2017	Judgment	—
CC/100457/2013	Ms Vijaya laxmi Chits vs Buryanwary Hanmanth Rao	03 Apr 2017	Judgment	—
CC/100554/2012	Syed Ayaz Ahmed vs Pola lMalla reddy	03 Apr 2017	Judgment	—
CC/100595/2012	Sri Pabba Rakesh, vs Sri Buyyanwary Hanmanth rao	03 Apr 2017	Judgment	—
DVC/100007/2015	Smt. Nazia Sulthana vs Zia Hussain	03 Apr 2017	Order	—
MC/11/2015	Smt. Nazia Sulthana vs Zia Husain	03 Apr 2017	Order	—
CC/100461/2011	Akam Chinna reddy vs Shaike Faheem	28 Mar 2017	Judgment	—
CC/100599/2008	Singadi Naga Rathanamma vs Singadi Ervanth	28 Mar 2017	Judgment	—
CC/100208/2011	Neelam Sailoo vs Jedala Mahender	27 Mar 2017	Judgment	—
CC/100321/2010	Abdul Razak vs Md. Jaffar	27 Mar 2017	Judgment	—
CC/100350/2011	Mammai Pedda Sailu vs Neelam Raju	27 Mar 2017	Judgment	—
CC/100185/2011	MIrza Baig vs MIrza Masaddiq	24 Mar 2017	Judgment	—
CC/100186/2014	Gandham Shanker vs Mamidi Devaiah	24 Mar 2017	Judgment	—
CC/100194/2012	Poilice Station Yedapally vs Illendula Yesu Rathnam	24 Mar 2017	Judgment	—
CC/100100/2010	Ippidiwar Peeravva vs Pulkanti Bagaiah	22 Mar 2017	Judgment	—
CC/100427/2011	Nelli Yamuna vs Bobbili Dasbabu @ haridas	22 Mar 2017	Judgment	—
CC/100346/2011	Anwar vs Lakkawath Shankar	21 Mar 2017	Judgment	—
CC/100320/2012	B.Rajeshwar goud vs Pancha reddy Naveen	20 Mar 2017	Judgment	—
CC/100101/2014	Gone Lasmaiah vs Gaddam Pedda Laxman	17 Mar 2017	Judgment	—
CC/100166/2011	Neeradi Sanjeev Kumar vs Khaja Pasha	17 Mar 2017	Judgment	—
CC/100021/2012	P.S.Yedapally vs Katkam Shanker	16 Mar 2017	Judgment	—
CC/100277/2009	Singam Bagaiah vs Syed Maqbool	15 Mar 2017	Judgment	—
CC/100278/2012	Peta Mallaiah vs Teku Sailu	15 Mar 2017	Judgment	—
CC/100209/2013	S.Rajeshwar, vs Syed Naseer and another	14 Mar 2017	Judgment	—
CC/100301/2011	Jangam Gangadhar vs Kachakayala Hanmandloo	14 Mar 2017	Judgment	—
OS/100022/2014	C.Ravinder Raj Kumar vs G.Damodaran	13 Mar 2017	Judgment	—
CC/100261/2011	Md.Ahmed Hussain vs Singadi Pandu	10 Mar 2017	Judgment	—
CC/235/2016	PS Bodhan vs Mohd. Shareef @ Baba Dhan	09 Mar 2017	Judgment	—
CC/236/2016	PS Bodhan vs Mohd.Shareef @ Baba Khan	09 Mar 2017	Judgment	—
CC/237/2016	PS Bodhan vs Mohd. Shareef @ Baba Khan	09 Mar 2017	Judgment	—
CC/100314/2012	Shaik Sajeed vs Pasuleti Kumar	09 Mar 2017	Judgment	—
CC/100199/2014	S.Jagan goud vs L.Ravindhar	06 Mar 2017	Judgment	—
OS/6/2016	Venkat Rao vs Diyavath Bheemudu	04 Mar 2017	Judgment	—
OS/81/2015	P.Bagaiah vs N.Jagadeeshwar	04 Mar 2017	Judgment	—
OS/86/2015	Kanuri Amani vs Kanuri Saibabu	04 Mar 2017	Judgment	—
OS/87/2016	Gundla Chinna Gangaram vs Lakmapur Gangaram @ Gangaram Patel	04 Mar 2017	Judgment	—
OS/88/2016	Veerabhadra Rao vs Dlli Hanmandlu	04 Mar 2017	Judgment	—
OS/89/2016	Awula Vittal vs Annam Hanmandlu	04 Mar 2017	Judgment	—
OS/117/2012	Arla Pedda Saya Reddy vs D.Anil	04 Mar 2017	Judgment	—
CC/100084/2015	Mohd Wasim vs Shaik Zameer Ahmed	03 Mar 2017	Judgment	—
CC/100571/2012	G.Vijaya vs Abdul Waheed	03 Mar 2017	Judgment	—
CC/100463/2010	Sk. Rafi vs Asad	01 Mar 2017	Judgment	—
CC/100146/2011	Banoth Shanker vs Bunga Praveen	27 Feb 2017	Judgment	—
CC/100585/2012	N.Kiran kumar vs Bomma Anji reddy	27 Feb 2017	Judgment	—
OS/94/2016	Telagamshetty Appana Dora vs Kummari Gangadhar	25 Feb 2017	Judgment	—
OS/104/2016	Telagamshety Appana Dora vs Arukula @ Banswada Gopi @ Gopal Reddy	25 Feb 2017	Judgment	—
OS/105/2016	Telagamshetty Appana Dora vs Rathod Chander	25 Feb 2017	Judgment	—
DVC/12/2016	Nasreen Begum vs Shadul Panjari	24 Feb 2017	Judgment	—
MC/9/2016	Nasreen Begum vs Shadul Panjari	24 Feb 2017	Judgment	—
CC/173/2015	PS Bodhan vs Satya Prakash	23 Feb 2017	Judgment	—
CC/100125/2011	Aluru Venkat Reddy vs Donakanti Sanjeeva Reddy	22 Feb 2017	Judgment	—

Showing 100 of 362 orders — Log in to browse all pages.

Monthly Orders (Last 12 Months)

Apr 2017		55
Mar 2017		36
Feb 2017		32
Jan 2017		31
Oct 2016		21
Sep 2016		15
Aug 2016		9
Jul 2016		6
Jun 2016		14
May 2016		7
Apr 2016		28
Mar 2016		30

Frequently Asked Questions

How many cases has B. Soujanya handled?

B. Soujanya has handled 363 court orders since 2015 at Bodhan, V ADJ Court Complex. The average disposal rate is 20 orders per month.

What types of cases does B. Soujanya hear?

Based on available records, B. Soujanya primarily handles Criminal matters (Criminal Cases) and Civil matters (Original Suits, Execution Petitions) at Bodhan, V ADJ Court Complex.

Where is B. Soujanya currently posted?

B. Soujanya is posted as Prl Junior Civil Judge at Bodhan, V ADJ Court Complex, Nizamabad, Telangana.

Are judgments by B. Soujanya available online?

Yes. 5 judgments by B. Soujanya are available on Legistro with full text, outcome, and sections cited.

How fast does B. Soujanya dispose cases?

B. Soujanya disposes approximately 20 cases per month, based on 363 orders handled over their tenure at Bodhan, V ADJ Court Complex.

Since when is B. Soujanya serving?

B. Soujanya has been serving at Bodhan, V ADJ Court Complex since 2015.

Case Types

CC 66%

OS 30%

MC 2%

DVC 2%

EP 0%

Posting History

Oct 2015 — May 2017

Prl Junior Civil Judge · 363 orders

Other Judges at this Court

Smt. D.varoodhini

V Additional District and Sessions Judge, Bodhan

56 orders

Ms. Markal Poojitha

Prl Junior Civil Judge

85 orders

Smt A.Kanchana Reddy

Senior Civil Judge

250 orders

Essampelli Sai Shiva

Addl Junior Civil Judge Bodhan

294 orders

← View all judges at Bodhan, V ADJ Court Complex