Ms. B.Srivalli Sailaja

IN THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST

CLASS, PARKAL

Monday, this the 30th day of March, 2026

PRESENT: Ms.B.Srivalli Sailaja, Addl. Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Parkal.

P.R.C.NO.21 OF 2024

BETWEEN:

The State of Telangana represented by the Sub-Inspector of Police, PS Damera.

...Complainant

AND

A1 Oddepally Rajender, S/o.Ramaswamy, Age: 60 yrs, Caste: SC-Madiga, Occ: Agriculture, R/o.Singarajupally (v), Damera (M), Hanumakonda Dt.

A2 Oddepally Suresh, S/o.Saraiah, Age: 30 yrs, Caste: SC-Madiga, Occ: Agriculture, R/o.Singarajupally (v), Damera (M), Hanumakonda Dt.

A3 Oddepally Ravi, S/o.Poshalu, Age: 35 yrs, Caste: SC-Madiga, Occ: Agriculture, R/o.Singarajupally (v), Damera (M), Hanumakonda Dt.

A4 Oddepally Sagar @ Ramakanth, S/o.Rajender, Age: 30 yrs, Caste: SC- Madiga, Occ: Private employee, R/o.singarajupally (v), Damera (M), Hanumakonda Dt.

A5 Pamula Subbaiah (Died) ...A1 to A4

This case is coming before me in the presence of Assistant Public Prosecutor, representing the prosecution and of Sri Md.Sabeer, Advocate

for the accused having heard and stood over, till this day for consideration,

this Court passed the following:

COMMITAL ORDER:: ::

1.The Sub-Inspector of Police, PS Damera, has filed a charge sheet against the accused Nos.1 to 4 in Cr.No.112/2023 of Damera PS, for the offences under Sections 323,427,447,420,386,506 r/w 34 of Indian Penal Code.

2.The brief facts are that the complainant/LW1 Addaguda Sadashivudu had land to an extent of Ac.2.15 guntas in Sy.No.170/C at the outskirts of Singarajupally village, which he obtained hereditarily from his father. Later in the year, 2014 he purchased land to an extent of Ac.1.28 guntas land in Sy.No.170/D from Vendor Uppula Yakambaram. In the year 2013, he 2 purchased land to an extent of Ac.1.07 guntas in Sy.No.170/B-1 from vendor Malluri Shiva Leelalu and land to an extent of Ac.1.07 guntas in Sy.No.170/B-2 from vendor Malluri Venkateshwarlu and registered the land in the name of his wife Sridevi. Whereas, in the year 2006-2007 by colluding with the then Patwari named Rajiah, A1 mutated the land of LW1 to an extent of Ac.5.33 guntas upon his name at M.R.O Office by changing the names of in pahani and obtained patta pass book. Later, he questioned the authorities that why they enrolled his land upon the name of A1. On that, the revenue authorities enquired into the issue and restored the land upon his name by cancelling the name of A1 from pahani and patta pass books. Since then, A1 developed grudge upon him, illegally trespassing into his land and threatened him with dire consequences to kill if he enters into the land. Due to fear, the LW1 stopped cultivating the land.

Later, in the year 2013, A1 illegally trespassed into the house of LW1, threatened LWs 1 to 3 with dire consequences to kill them, forced them to register the land upon his name and forcibly made the LW1 to put his signatures upon a white and unknown agreement paper i.e., on 14.07.2023 at about 10.30 hours, when the LWs 1 to 3/Addaguda Sadashivudu, Addaguda Sridevi and Addaguda Ravi went to their land to sow and cultivate red grams crop, A1 along with A2 to A4 along with other Accused /A5 (died) trespassed into his fields, damaged the crop by trampled with legs, obstructed them on going on to their land and attacked them with sticks and stones by stating that, they will kill them in the spot. On that, Lws 1 to 3 fled away from the spot. Due to which, LW1 caused loss of Rs.50,000/-.

LW1 delays in lodging the petition with an intention to settle the matter

before the village elders. However, on 05.08.2023 at about 10.00 hours,

while he going on to cultivate his land, A1 to A4 along with other Accused/A5(died) created hooliganism against them, claiming themselves by stating that the land belongs to them here on wards, threatened them with dire consequences by stating that, they will kill them if enters into the land and followed by carrying sticks.

3.On perusal of the record, this Court has taken cognizance for the offences punishable under Sections 323,427,447,420,386,506 r/w 34 of IPC against the accused. On appearance of the accused, copies were furnished to them. Since, the offence under Section 386 of Indian Penal Code is exclusively triable by the Hon’ble Court of Session, Hanumakonda along with other offences. Hence the case is committed to the Hon’ble Court of Session, Hanumakonda under Section 209(a) of The Code of Criminal Procedure.

4.The accused Nos.1 to 4 who are on bail shall continue to be on bail on furnishing bond for Rs.10,000/- each with two sureties for a like sum each under Section 209(b) of The Code of Criminal Procedure..

5.The office is directed to submit the case records and the property if any to the Hon’ble Court of Session, Hanumakonda under Section 209(c) of The Code of Criminal Procedure.

3

6.Notice to be given to the learned Public Prosecutor, Hanumakonda about the committal of the case to the Hon’ble Sessions Court, Hanumakonda under Section 209(d) of The Code of Criminal Procedure.

7.When questioned, the accused submitted that they have got sufficient means to engage a lawyer in the Hon’ble Court of Session, Hanumakonda.

8.Accused Nos.1 to 4 are executed committal bonds. The Accused are directed to appear before the Hon’ble Court of Session, Hanumakonda, on 20.04.2026.

(Typed to my dictation, corrected and pronounced by me, in the open Court on this the 30th day of March, 2026)

sd/-

ADDL. JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS,

PARKAL

CC. No. 916 of 2021 1 of 2 04-05-2026

IN THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS :

AT: PARKAL.

Monday, this the 04th day of May, 2026. Present:- Ms. B. Srivalli Sailaja, Addl. Judicial Magistrate of First Class. Parkal.

C.C. No. 916 of 2021

Between: Telangana State Police through represented by Sub-Inspector of Police, Police Station, Parkal.

...Petitioners

And

Chukka Shankar, S/o. Saraiah, Age 41 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o. H.No: 3-41, Kowkonda Village of Nadikuda Mandal, Hanamkonda District.

...Respondent.

-0o0- This case is coming up before me for final hearing in the presence of learned Assistant Public Prosecutor, and Accused as party in person, and having stood over for consideration till this day this Court delivered the following:-

O R D E R

[1].Case is taken on file for the offence U/sec. 180, 196 of M.V Act against

Accused.

[2].Accused is examined U/s 251 Cr.P.C explaining the substance of accusation appearing against him in the charge sheet and when questioned, the Accused voluntarily admitted the offence and Accused pleaded guilty for committing the offence u/sec. 180, 196 of MV Act. The admission made by the accused is taken as true, voluntary and correct. Hence the Accused is found guilty for the offence u/sec. 180, 196 of MV Act. Having found the Accused guilty, the is questioned with regard to the sentence likely to be imposed on him. The Accused pleaded mercy and submitted that he is poor person and requested to take a lenient view in awarding the sentence.

CC. No. 916 of 2021 2 of 2 04-05-2026

In the result, the Accused is found guilty U/Sec. 252 Cr.P.C, and Accused is convicted for the offence u/sec. 180, 196 of M.V Act, and he is convicted for the offence u/sec. 180 of M.V Act, and he is sentenced to pay a fine of Rs.2000/- and he is convicted for the offence u/sec. 196 of M.V Act, and he is sentenced to pay a fine of Rs.1000/- and on default of payment of fine he is directed to undergo simple imprisonment for period of one week. Total amount of fine to be paid is Rs.3000/-.

There is no case property seized and deposited, therefore there is no order as to case property.

Dictated to my Typist on my computer and corrected and pronounced by me in open court,

this the 04 th day of May, 2026.

Sd/-

AddL. Judl. Magistrate of First Class, Parkal.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

(WITNESS EXAMINED)

For Prosecution:- For defence: -None--None-

EXHIBITS MARKED

For Prosecution: For defence: -Nil--Nil- MOs marked: - NIL -

Sd/-

Addl. Judl. Magistrate of First Class, Parkal.

CC. No. 03 of 2025 1 of 2 17-04-2026

IN THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS :

AT: PARKAL.

Wednesday, this the 17th day of April, 2026. Present:- Ms. B. Srivalli Sailaja, Addl. Judicial Magistrate of First Class. Parkal.

C.C. No. 03 of 2025

Between: Telangana State Police through represented by Sub-Inspector of Police, Police Station, Parkal.

...Petitioners

And

Surabu Srikanth, S/o. Laxman Rao, Age 30 years, Occ: PVT Job, R/o. H.No: 1-13/1, Puligilla Village of Nadikuda Mandal.

...Respondent.

-0o0- This case is coming up before me for final hearing in the presence of learned Assistant Public Prosecutor, and Accused as party in person, and having stood over for consideration till this day this Court delivered the following:-

O R D E R

[1].Case is taken on file for the offence U/sec. 329(3), 324(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya

Sanhita against Accused.

[2].Accused is examined U/s 239 Cr.P.C. explaining the substance of accusation appearing against him in the charge sheet and when questioned, the Accused voluntarily admitted the offence and pleaded guilty for committing the offence u/sec. 329(3), 324(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The admission made by the accused is taken as true, voluntary and correct. Hence the Accused is found guilty for the offence u/sec. 329(3), 324(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. Having found the

Accused guilty, the Accused is questioned with regard to the sentence likely to be imposed on him. The Accused pleaded mercy and submitted that he is poor person and requested to take a lenient view in awarding the sentence.

CC. No. 03 of 2025 2 of 2 17-04-2026

In the result, the Accused is found guilty U/Sec. 275 Cr.P.C for the offence u/sec. 329(3), 324(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and he is convicted U.Sec. 329(3) of

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and sentenced to pay a fine of Rs.500/- and he is convicted

U.Sec. 324(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and sentenced to pay a fine of Rs.5000/- and on default of payment of fine he is directed to undergo simple imprisonment for period of one week. Total amount of fine to be paid is Rs. 5500/-. There is no case property seized and deposited, therefore there is no order as to case property.

Dictated to my Typist on my computer and corrected and pronounced by me in open court,

this the 17 th day of April, 2026.

Sd/-

AddL. Judl. Magistrate of First Class, Parkal.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

(WITNESS EXAMINED)

For Prosecution:- For defence: -None--None-

EXHIBITS MARKED

For Prosecution: For defence: -Nil--Nil- MOs marked: - NIL -

Sd/-

Addl. Judl. Magistrate of First Class, Parkal.

CC. No. 88 of 2024 1 of 2 17-04-2026

IN THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS :

AT: PARKAL.

Friday, this the 17th day of April, 2026. Present:- Ms. B. Srivalli Sailaja, Addl. Judicial Magistrate of First Class. Parkal.

C.C. No. 88 of 2024

Between: Telangana State Police through represented by Sub-Inspector of Police, Police Station, Parkal.

...Petitioners

And

Doggela Karunakar, S/o. Komuraiah, Age 38 years, Occ: Tractor owner and driver, R/o. Varikole Village of Nadikuda Mandal.

...Respondent.

-0o0- This case is coming up before me for final hearing in the presence of learned Assistant Public Prosecutor, and Accused as party in person, and having stood over for consideration till this day this Court delivered the following:-

O R D E R

[1].Case is taken on file for the offence U/sec. 379 of Indian Penal Code Accused.

[2].Accused is examined U/s 239 Cr.P.C. explaining the substance of accusation appearing against him in the charge sheet and when questioned, the Accused voluntarily admitted the offence and pleaded guilty for committing the offence u/sec. 379 IPC. The admission made by the accused is taken as true, voluntary and correct. Hence the Accused is found guilty for the offence u/sec. 379 IPC. Having found the Accused guilty, the Accused is questioned with regard to the sentence likely to be imposed on them. The Accused pleaded mercy and submitted that he is poor person and requested to take a lenient view in awarding the sentence.

In the result, the Accused found guilty U/Sec. 241 Cr.PC, Accused is convicted for the offence u/sec. 379 IPC and sentenced to pay fine of Rs. 3500/- and on default of payment of fine he is directed to undergo simple imprisonment for

CC. No. 88 of 2024 2 of 2 17-04-2026

period of one week. The unmarked case property which is seized and deposited vide C.P.R. No. 73 of 2023 ie., Mahindra Yuva Tractor bearing No. TS258449 along with trolley bearing No. AP15AC6918 which is returned to its owner for interim custody shall be made absolute after lapse of appeal time.

Dictated to my Typist on my computer and corrected and pronounced by me in open court,

this the 17 th day of April, 2026.

Sd/-

AddL. Judl. Magistrate of First Class, Parkal.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

(WITNESS EXAMINED)

For Prosecution:- For defence: -None--None-

EXHIBITS MARKED

For Prosecution: For defence: -Nil--Nil- MOs marked: - NIL -

Sd/-

Addl. Judl. Magistrate of First Class, Parkal.