Mr. Bathala Ravi Kumar

Page Nos.1 of 7 C.C.No.970 of 2024

IN THE COURT OF THE III ADDL. JUDL. MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS AT

(CRIMINAL COURT FOR AGENCY AREAS) AT KOTHAGUDEM.

Dated this, the 21st day of November, 2025.

Present: Sri. B.RAVI KUMAR, II Addl.Judl.Magistrate of I Class, Kothagudem.

FAC: III Addl. Judicial Magistrate of I Class, Criminal Court for Agency Areas, Kothagudem.

C.C.No.970 of 2024

in

(Crime No.58 of 2024 of P.S Palvoncha Town)

Between:

The State through S.I of Police, P.S. Palvoncha Town

......Complainant

And

Bommanaboina Veeraiah, S/o. Ramaiah, Age: 46 years, Rider of Hero Honda

CD-100 SS, R/o. H.No.8-141, Punukula, Payakari Yanambile, Palvoncha Mandal.

... Accused

@ @ @

This case is coming before me for final hearing on 21.11.2025 in the presence of Learned A.P.P.O for complainant and Sri. A.Ramesh, Advocate

for the accused person; upon perusal of material papers on record, upon

hearing the arguments on both sides and having stood over for consideration till this day, this court delivered the following:-

:: J U D G M E N T ::

1. The State represented by its Sub-Inspector of Police, Palvoncha Town,

Police Station filed a charge sheet against the Accused in Cr.No.58/2024 for the offence punishable under Sections 304-A of IPC and Sec.181, 192, 196 of MV

Page Nos.2 of 7 C.C.No.970 of 2024

Act.

2. The brief facts of the case of the prosecution are as follows:-

On 16.02.2024 at 17.00 hours, the complainant/LW-1/Bhukyua Vinod, came to police station and lodged a report in P.S Palvoncha Town, stating that “ on 06.02.2024 night his elder brother Bhukya Mohan left house from Banjara colony while proceeding towards Punukula village to his relative house by walking by the side of road, on the way when reached at the outskirts of

Banjara colony at about 21.30 hours, meanwhile one rider of Hero Honda CD- 100 SS, Engine No.02H13E00549 coming from Palvoncha proceeding towards

Punukula village drove the motor cycle in a rash and negligent manner and dashed Bhukya Mohan from rear side, due to which he fell down on the road and sustained severe bleeding injuries on his forehead and lower lip. On receipt of the information, the complainant along with his sister-in-law rushed to the spot and shifted his brother to government hospital, Palvoncha for treatment, later for better treatment shifted to Government Hospital,

Kothagudem and after providing treatment, as per advice of doctor shifted his brother to MGM Hospital, Warangal for better treatment where he succumbed on 16.02.2024 morning at 09.00 hours, while undergoing treatment. Hence he requested to take necessary action against the accused.

3. On receipt of report, the L.W.13/H.C of police registered a case in

Cr.No.58/2024 for the offense U/secs.304-A of IPC and Sec.181, 192, 196 of MV

Page Nos.3 of 7 C.C.No.970 of 2024

Act and submitted FIR to all the concerned officers and took up the investigation.

4. Basing on the charge sheet and on perusal of other material available on record, the case was taken on file for the offence punishable U/secs.304-A of

IPC and Sec.181, 192, 196 of MV Act.

5. On appearance of Accused the relevant copies of documents were furnished to him as contemplated U/sec.207 Cr.P.C.

6. The Accused is examined U/Sec.251 Cr.P.C and the substance of accusation against the accused for the offence punishable U/secs.304-A of IPC and Sec.181, 192, 196 of MV Act read over and explained to him in Telugu, for which the accused pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried.

7. In trial, prosecution has examined P.Ws-1 to 6 and got marked Exs.P.1 to

P.12. The learned APP has given up the evidence of the remaining witnesses.

8. After closure of prosecution evidence, the Accused is examined U/Sec.313

Cr.P.C, the incriminating material available in the prosecution evidence is read over and explained to him in Telugu for which he denied and reported no defence evidence. Heard both sides.

9. Now, the point that arises for consideration is:

“Whether the prosecution is able to prove the guilt of

Page Nos.4 of 7 C.C.No.970 of 2024

the Accused for the offence punishable U/secs.304-A of

IPC and Sec.181, 192, 196 of MV Act against the Accused

beyond any reasonable doubt?”

10.POINT:-

In order to prove the case against the accused, the prosecution has examined P.W.1 to 6 and got marked Exs.P.1 to 12. Learned APP given up the evidences of remaining witnesses.

11.P.W.1 who is the defacto complainant has deposed that she did not know anything about the case and he do not know how his brother died. About one year back when he went to police station on his personal work, police obtained his signature on some white papers. PW.2 to 5 who are the material witnesses to the case did not supporting the prosecution and turned hostile.

12.Further, PW.6 is the only witness who depose in chief examination that on 16.02.2024 at about 1700 hours, he received the complaint from PW.1, basing on which he registered FIR vide Cr.No.58/2024 for the offence U/sec.304-A of

IPC against the accused and issued FIR. On the same day he recorded the statements of PW.1. on 17.02.2024 he rushed to the MGM hospital, Warangal, secured the presence of Lws.7 and 8 and conducted inquest panchana of the dead-body of deceased and got photographs of the dead-body through LW.5 and handed over the the dead-body to LW.11 for PME and also examined and

Page Nos.5 of 7 C.C.No.970 of 2024 recorded the statements of Pws.2 to 4 and Lws.3 and 5. Later, he rushed to the scene of offense and drafted the rough sketch of scene of offense in the presence of PW.5 and LW.9. Later he handed over the CD file to

LW.14/B.Ramu/S.I of police, Palvoncha. He verified the investigation and fond on correct lines. On 20.02.2025 the accused voluntarily surrendered before him and admitted his guilt. On verifying the documents, the accused do not have driving license and R.C insurance. Upon which LW.14 added Secs 181, 192, 196 of MV Act against the accused. On 23.02.2024 LW.14 sent requisition to

LW.12/M.Nirmala for inspection of crime vehicle. Later, he collected the MVI report, PME report from LW.12 and 11 respectively. After completion of investigation LW.14 filed charge sheet against the accused. Ex.P.7 is the

Report. Ex.P.8 is the FIR. Ex.P.9 is the CDF. Ex.P.10 is the inquest. Ex.P.11 is the PME report. Ex.P.12 is the MVI report.

13.Except the PW.6, no other witnesses who are examined on behalf of prosecution, did not support the prosecution case. Hence, solely relied on the evidence of PW.6 the court cannot comes to conclusion that the accused persons committed the offense in the absence of corroborative evidence.

Hence, the accused persons are deserved to be acquitted.

12.IN THE RESULT, the Accused is found not guilty for the offence punishable U/secs.304-A of IPC and Sec.181, 192, 196 of MV Act against the accused. Accordingly, the accused is acquitted U/sec.248 (1) of Cr.P.C. The bail bonds of the accused person shall remain in force for a period of six months as

Page Nos.6 of 7 C.C.No.970 of 2024 envisaged under section 437-A Cr.PC. There is no order as to case property as no property was deposited before this court.

Typed to my dictation by the Stenographer, corrected and pronounced by me in the open court on this the 21st day of November, 2025.

sd/xxx FAC: III Addl. Judicial Magistrate of I Class, Criminal Court for Agency Areas, Kothagudem.

:: Appendix of Evidence ::

Witnesses examined:

For prosecution:- For Defence:-

PW.1:B.Vinod-NIL-

PW.2:B.Suma

PW.3:B.Bheema

PW.4:A.Mahesh

PW.5:A.Mahesh

PW.6:B.Venkateswar Rao

Documents marked:

For prosecution:- For Defence:-

Ex.P.1: is the signature of PW.1 on report -Nil-

Ex.P.2: is the Sec.161 Cr.P.C statement of PW.1

Ex.P.3: is the Sec.161 Cr.P.C statement of PW.2

Ex.P.4: is the Sec.161 Cr.P.C statement of PW.3

Ex.P.5: is the Sec.161 Cr.P.C statement of PW.4

Ex.P.6: is the Signature of PW.5 on CDF

Ex.P.7: is the Report.

Page Nos.7 of 7 C.C.No.970 of 2024

Ex.P.8: is the First Information Report

Ex.P.9: is the Crime Detail Form

Ex.P.10: is the inquest panchanama.

Ex.P.11: is the PME report.

Ex.P.12: is the MVI report.

Material objects marked:

- Nil – sd/xxx FAC: III Addl. Judicial Magistrate of I Class, Criminal Court for Agency Areas, Kothagudem.

O.S.No.244/2025 Dated: 12.12.2025

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE – CUM -

JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS AT KOTHAGUDEM

FRIDAY THE TWELFTH DAY OF DECEMBER

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT : B.RAVI KUMAR,

II Addl.Judl.Magistrate of First Class, Kothagudem, FAC.Principal Junior Civil Judge – cum -

Judicial Magistrate of First Class

Kothagudem.

O.S.No. 244 OF 2025

BETWEEN:

1Vasumalla Janardhan Rao, S/o.Kanakaiah, Age.48 years, Occ.Agriculture, R/o.H.No.4-115/1, Jublipuram, Karukonda, Laxmidevipally Mandal, Bhadradri Kothagudem District. 2Vasumalla Nireekshana, W/o.Janardhan Rao, age.36 years, Occ.House hold, R/o.H.No.4-115/1, Jublipuram, Karukonda, Laxmidevipally Mandal, Bhadradri Kothagudem District.

…PLAINTIFFS AND 1Banoth Hari Prasad, S/o.Bucha, age.33 years, Occ.Driver, R/o.H.No.6-48, Gopathanda, Sarvaram, Sujathanagar Mandal, Bhadradri Kothagudem District. 2Banoth Haritha, W/o.Hari Prasad, age.32 years, Occ.House wife, R/o.H.No.6-48, Gopathanda, Sarvaram, Sujathanagar Mandal, Bhadradri Kothagudem District. .

...DEFENDANTS

This suit is coming on 11.12.2025 before me for hearing in the presence of Sri G. Ram Murthy, counsel for the plaintiff and of Sri P.Nageswara Rao, counsel for the defendant and upon hearing arguments, upon considering the material available on record and the matter having stood over for consideration, till this day, the Court deliver the following:-

Page 1 of 5

O.S.No.244/2025 Dated: 12.12.2025

:: J U D G M E N T ::

(Under Order-XII Rule-6 of CPC)

1.This suit is filed by the plaintiffs for declaration to declare them as adoptive father and mother of Vasumalla Jhanvika, aged about (81) days.

2.Averments of plaint, in brief, are that defendants No.1 & 2 are husband and wife and they both got married on 04.07.2024 and out of the wedlock, they were blessed with no issues. As such, plaintiff No.2 proposed with the defendants for adoption of their third daughter i.e.,

Banoth Jhanvika, who is aged about (81) days. The defendants, who are natural parents of Jhanvika, agreed to give their daughter in adoption to the plaintiffs.

3.It is further averred that the plaintiff No.1 is an agriculturist and having good relationship with defendants and their family members.

The defendants have three children, out of which they are willing to entrust their 3rd daughter Jhanvika to the plaintiffs and she shall be continued to be as their daughter in future. It is further case of plaintiffs that the physical act of giving and taking of Jhanvika is performed on 05.10.2025 at Ramalayam Temple of Kothagudem and performed the religious ceremonies as per the customs prevailed in their community in the presence of relatives and friends. As such, the defendants voluntarily given up their daughter Jhanvika to the plaintiffs and in this regard, the plaintiffs and defendants came to an

Page 2 of 5

O.S.No.244/2025 Dated: 12.12.2025

understanding that the plaintiffs will perform her marriage and that the defendants do not have any kind of right, relation or demand over the adopted child.

4.It is further averred that the defendants given their daughter voluntarily in adoption to the plaintiffs out of their won free will and consent and in the interest of their female child with sound mind and without any pressure or consideration. In pursuance of the same, on 05.10.2025 a ceremony of Dattahomam was performed i.e., giving and taking at Ramalayam Temple, Kothagudem. From the date of adoption, i.e., giving and taking at Ramalayam Temple, Kothagudem, the plaintiffs shall have full rights and privileges over adopted daughter and the defendants shall cease to be the natural parents of the minor daughter.

Subsequently, the defendants No.1 and 2 are refusing to give the adopted daughter to the plaintiffs. Hence the suit.

5. After registering the suit, summons were issued to the defendants. The defendants made their appearance through counsel and filed written statement admitting that they gave their second daughter Jhanvika in adoption to the plaintiffs and conducted physical act of giving and taking of adoption on 05.10.2025 at Ramalayam

Temple, Kothagudem. They have no objection to declare the plaintiffs as adopted parents of Jhanvika.

6.No oral or documentary evidence is let in on either side.

Page 3 of 5

O.S.No.244/2025 Dated: 12.12.2025

7.Heard. Perused the material available on record.

8.Now the point germane for my determination is “whether the plaintiffs are entitled to be declared them as adopted parents of Jhanvika as prayed for” ?

9. It is the case of the plaintiffs that plaintiff No.1 and 2 and the defendants No.1 and 2 are acquainted with each other. The Defendants

No.1 and 2, who are husband and wife, were blessed with three female children and that as the plaintiffs No.1 and 2, who are husband and wife, were not blessed with any children, as such, the defendants agreed to give their third daughter Jhanvika to plaintiffs in adoption and accordingly, on 05.10.2025 giving and taking ceremony was conducted at Ramalayam Temple of Kothagudem and subsequently, the defendants denying to get Aadhar card of the adopting daughter i.e.,

Jhanvika with the surname of the plaintiff. The defendants filed written statement admitting the claim of plaintiffs in toto. Under these circumstances, the plaintiffs proved that they are adopted parents of

Banoth Jhanvika. The point is answered accordingly.

10.IN THE RESULT, the suit of the plaintiff is decreed declaring that the plaintiffs No.1 and 2 are adopted father and mother of Vasumalla

Jhanvika. There shall be no order as to costs.

Typed to my dictation, corrected and pronounced by me, in the open Court on this the 12th day of December, 2025.

FAC.PRL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE-CUM-

JUDL. MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS

KOTHAGUDEM

Page 4 of 5

O.S.No.244/2025 Dated: 12.12.2025

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

-NIL-

FAC.PRL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE-CUM-

JUDL. MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS

KOTHAGUDEM

Page 5 of 5

PRC No. 47 of 2025 Dated : 12.08.2025

IN THE COURT OF I ADDL. JUDL. MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS – CUM –

I ADDL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT KOTHAGUDEM

Tuesday, this the 12th day of August, 2025.

Present: K. SAI SRI

I ADDL. JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF I CLASS – CUM -

I ADDITIONAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE

PRC No. 47 OF 2025

(Cr.No.150 of 2024 of PS Julurupad)

BETWEEN:

The State of Telangana, rep. by Sub Inspector of Police, PS. Julurupad Police Station. …Prosecution

And

1.Kunja Praveen S/o Radhaiah, Age: 29 years, Caste: Koya, Occ: JCB Driver, R/o Rachabandla Koyagudem, Julurupad Mandal.

2.Malakam Gangaiah S/o Ramulu, Age: 36 years, Caste: Koya, Occ: Colie, R/o Rachabandla Koyagudem, Julurupad Mandal. …Accused No.1 and 2

This case is coming on 12.08.2025 before me for hearing and committal in the presence of Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor for complainant and of Sri. V. Venkateswar Rao, counsel for accused No.1 and 2, upon hearing and the matter having stood over for consideration, till this day, the Court delivered the following:

:: COMMITTAL ORDER ::

1. The Sub Inspector of Police, Julurupad filed charge sheet against Accused

No.1 and 2 in Cr.No.150/2024, for the offence punishable under Sec.103(1), 238 r/w 3(5) BNS.

2. The brief facts of the prosecution case are that,

On 21.10.2024 at 6.00 hours the complainant came to PS and lodged a written telugu report stating that, on 20.10.2024 at about 8.45 PM Accused

No.1 and 2 came to the complainant house and took the deceased/K. Bixam

Page 1 of 3

PRC No. 47 of 2025 Dated : 12.08.2025

from his house on their motor cycle on the pretext of consuming alcohol and at about 10.30 PM as the deceased not returned to home, deceased brother's son called to accused No.2 phone then he stated that they were present at the out skirts of the village and went to the field of Banoth Chandulal for consuming alcohol and also invited him to consume alcohol but he denied the same. On their request, at about 10.45 PM he went there and asked the accused persons about his uncle/deceased on that they replied they killed deceased and threw away the body in Vepalavagu. When he questioned why they kill the deceased, on that both accused persons replied that the deceased performed black Magic/sorcery on the mother of accused No.1 and caused her ill health as such both the accused persons beat the deceased with a stone and hands due to which deceased succumbed to injuries. Finally, the complainant requested to take necessary action against the accused persons.

3.This case was taken on file for offence under Sec. 103(1), 238 r/w 3(5)

BNS against Accused No.1 and 2. On appearance of accused persons before this Court, copies of the case documents were furnished to them as contemplated under Sec.230 BNSS. On enquiry accused No.1 and 2 submitted that they have means to engage a counsel before the Hon’ble Court of

Sessions.

4. The offence Sec. 103(1), 238 r/w 3(5) BNS is exclusively triable by the

Court of Sessions. Therefore, the case against accused No.1 and 2 are committed to the Hon’ble Court of Sessions, Bhadradri Kothagudem U/Sec.

232(a) of BNSS for being tried.

Page 2 of 3

PRC No. 47 of 2025 Dated : 12.08.2025

5.Accused No.1 and 2 are on bail and they shall be continued so, during and until conclusion of trial at the discretion of the Hon’ble Court of Sessions,

Bhadradri Kothagudem, under Sec.232(b) BNSS.

6.All the case documents are being submitted to the Hon’ble Court of

Sessions as required u/Sec.232(c) BNSS. The commitment of the case is

notified to the Public Prosecutor, Bhadradri Kothagudem, as per Sec. 232(d)

BNSS through Assistant Public Prosecutor.

7.Accused No.1 and 2 are directed to attend before the Court of Hon’ble

Prl. District and Sessions Judge, Bhadradri Kothagudem on receiving summons.

Typed to my dictation, corrected and pronounced by me in the open court on this the 12thday of August, 2025.

sd/xxx

I ADDL. JUDL. MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS

- CUM – I ADDL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE

KOTHAGUDEM

Page 3 of 3

TSBK020032242025

Presented on : 09-12-2025 Registered on : 09-12-2025 Decided on : 09-12-2025 Duration : 0 years, 0 months, 0 days

IN THE COURT OF

Principal Junior Civil Judge -cum - Judicial Magistrate of First Class,

Bhadradri Kothagudem.

(Presided Over by Mr. BATHALA RAVI KUMAR)

CC/2070/2025

Exhibit No. (PROSECUTION):

STATE OF TELANGANA,P..SMULAKALAPALLY

Through Police Station Officer Mulakalapally 183, Mulkalapalli Palvoncha Circle Igp, Warangal Region Bhadradri Kothagudem

KHAMMAM

STATE OF TELANGANA,P..SMULAKALAPALLY

VERSUS : Narendra Babu Midiyam Age: 21 Occupation : 23-3- 54/1Kuntinagulagudem,Kuntinagulagudem,Kuntinagulagudem,Palwancha,BHADR

ADRI KOTHAGUDEM,TELANGAN

2:Ramakrishna Bhadavath Age: 37 Occupation : 22-2-168Nehrunagar Nehrunagar Nehrunagar

Palwancha

BHADRADRI KOTHAGUDEM

TELANGAN

----------------------------------------------------------------------------- APP for State }: , Advocate for appearing for Narendra Babu Midiyam Advocate appearing for , 2 respectively. -----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Offence punishable under : 329(3) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 329(3),303(2) of Bharatiya Nyaya

Sanhita,

ORDER

In view of National Lok Adalath, this case is called today. Accused is called present and he is identified by the Police Constable concerned. Copies of case documents are furnished to the Accused. He is examined under Sec.274 of BNSS. The substance of accusation made for the offence under Sec.329(3) and 303(2) of BNS of P.S.Mulakalapalli, read over and explained to the Accused in Telugu, for which, Accused pleaded guilty. This court warned the accused and informed them about the punishment prescribed for the offence committed by them. Even then the Accused admitted the guilt. Hence, this court feels that the guilt pleaded by the Accused is true andvoluntary. Accused heard with regard to the quantum of sentence to the imposed against him. He prayed the Court to take lenient view as it was first offence. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and Voluntary admission of Accused this court feels that if fine amount is imposed against the Accused it would meet the ends of sentence. IN THE RESULT, A-1 is found guilty for the offence under Sec.329(3) and 303(2) of BNS. Accordingly, the accused is sentenced to pay fine of Rs................/ for the offence under Sec.329(3) BNS and sentenced to pay fine of -----------/- for the offense U/sec.303(2) of BNS In default of payment of fine, he shall undergo simple imprisonment for a period of (1 ) month. Total Rs................../.. A-2 is found guilty for the offence under Sec.329(3) and 303(2) of BNS. Accordingly, the accused is sentenced to pay fine of Rs................/ for the offence under Sec.329(3) BNS and sentenced to pay fine of -----------/- for the offense U/sec.303(2) of BNS In default of payment of fine, he shall undergo simple imprisonment for a period of (1 ) month. Total Rs.5000./.. The case property is CPR No.120/2025 Tractor Bearing No.AP-20-TC-5876, and Truck bearing No..AP-20-TC-5877, Seized in this case shall be given to its original owner of the property on proper identification and acknowledgment. Total fine comes to_Rs.6000/-

Date : 09-12-2025 (Mr. BATHALA RAVI KUMAR)

Principal Junior Civil Judge -cum - Judicial

Magistrate of First Class, Bhadradri Kothagudem.

TSBK020001862026

Presented on : 28-01-2026 Registered on : 28-01-2026 Decided on : 31-01-2026 Duration : 0 years, 0 months, 3 days

IN THE COURT OF

I Additional Junior Civil Judge - Cum- I Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class ( Juvenile Court), Bhadradri Kothagudem.

AT ,BHADRADRI KOTHAGUDEM

(Presided Over by Mr. BATHALA RAVI KUMAR)

CRLMP.BAIL/16/2026

Exhibit No. (PROSECUTION): Kapati Kampati Kamal Through Police Station Officer , Seetharampatanam,Paloncha Mandal, BhadradriKothagudem District

BHADRADRI KOTHAGUDEM

Kapati Kampati Kamal VERSUS : he State through P S Paloncha Town Through Spl Public Prosecutor Kothagudem Age: 0 Occupation : he State through P.S. PalonchaTownThrough Spl. Public Prosecutor, Kothagudem...

----------------------------------------------------------------------------- APP for State }: KASANI RAMESH, Advocate for appearing for he State through P S Paloncha Town Through Spl Public Prosecutor Kothagudem Advocate appearing for , respectively. -----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Offence punishable under : U/S480 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha

Sanhita,

of , of , of ,

ORDER

(Delivered on 31-01-2026)

This is the Second bail petition is filed U/s.12 of JJ Act, by petitioners/Juvenile with a prayer to grant bail. The offence involved in Cr.No.212/2025 for the offence U/Sec.8(c) r/w 20(b)(ii)(B) NDPS Act of PS Palvoncha Town. Notice given to learned APP seen and pray time for counter. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioners/Juvenile submitted that he is falsely implicated in this case, and produced before the court on 19.01.2026 for judicial custody. He was falsely implicated in this crime. Further submitted that the juvenile undertakes to abide by the conditions imposed by this Court. The entire investigation of the case has been completed. He further submitted that, he shall attend before the court on every adjournment without fail. Hence, the petition. 3. Learned APP received notice and counter not filed and given several opportunities. Hence, they right to file counter is forfeited. 4. Perused the petition and material available on record. The juvenile is sent to observation home for boys on 19.01.2026 As per the record material witnesses are examined. If the JCL is at Observation Home, there is every possibility of developing the criminal tendency, by mingling with other JCL. Hence, in view of best interest of the JCL , and considering the period of stay of the JCL at observation home, the JJB is inclined to release JCL from Observation Home, by enabling him to go to his house. 5. Hence, the petition is allowed accordingly, the petitioner/JCL shall be released from observation home and permitted to go only with their parents on execution of parental bond to the satisfaction of this board. In the result, this petition is allowed.

(Mr. BATHALA RAVI KUMAR)I Additional Junior

Civil Judge - Cum- I Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class ( Juvenile

Court), Bhadradri Kothagudem.

BHADRADRI KOTHAGUDEM