Smt.Bypa Madhuri Rathna Prasanna Latha

I Addl. Junior Civil Judge Court Tiruvuru

Prl. Junior Civil Judge Court, Tiruvur · Krishna · Andhra Pradesh

Smt.Bypa Madhuri Rathna Prasanna Latha, I Addl. Junior Civil Judge Court Tiruvuru, is posted at Prl. Junior Civil Judge Court, Tiruvur, Krishna, Andhra Pradesh, India. 50 court orders on record since 2014. 5 judgments with full text available. Primarily handles CC cases.

Total Orders

Judgments

Orders/Month

Postings

Featured Judgments

CC/200141/2015 Acquitted

AP State S.H.O Prohibition and Excise Sub-Inspector Vissnnapeta vs Nagula Subba Rao

23 Apr 2015

C.C.No. 141/2015 J.M.F.C.Tiruvur

CALENDAR AND JUDGMENT

IN THE COURT OF THE JUDL. MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS: TIRUVURU

C.C. No. 141/2015

1.Offence : 4.7.2014

2.Complaint : 4.7.2014

3.Apprehension of Accused: 4.7.2014

4.Commencement of Trial: 17.4.2015

5.Close of Trial: 22.4.2015

6.Judgment: 23.4.2015

7.Complainant: The State, rep. by Prohibition & Excise Sub Inspector, Vissannapeta P.S.

8.Name of the Accused: Nagula Subba Rao, S/o. Sathyanarayana, Age 54 Years, Gowda, R/o. Chinnampeta Village, Chatrai Mandal

9.Offence: U/Sec. 7(A) r/w. 8(b) of A.P. Prohibition Act, 1995

10.Plea of Accused: NOT GUILTY

11.Finding: NOT GUILTY

12.Result: In the result, the Sole Accused is found acquitted under section 248(1) of Cr.P.C. of the charges under sections 7(a) r/w 8(e) of Andhra Pradesh Prohibition Act 1995 leveled against him. The bail bond of the Sole Accused shall stand canceled after 6 months period of appeal time as contemplated under Section 437A of Cr.P.C. The M.O.1 nonvaluable property shall be destroyed after appeal time is over. The Accused has undergone remand from 4.7.2014 to 9.7.2014.

13.Explanation for delay: The case was taken on file on 6.3.2015. Trial commenced on 17.4.2015 and closed on 22.4.2015. The Judgment was pronounced on 23.4.2015. Hence the delay.

Judicial Magistrate of First Class,

Tiruvuru.

Copy submitted to:

The Hon’ble I Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Krishna, Machilipatnam.

Corrections Page No. 1 of 5

C.C.No. 141/2015 J.M.F.C.Tiruvur

IN THE COURT OF THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS

TIRUVUR

Present: Mr. PATTAN SHIYAZ KHAN; LL.B.,

Judicial Magistrate of First Class

Tiruvur

Thursday, this the Twenty Third (23rd) day of April, 2015

C.C.No. 141/2015

Between:

The State, rep. by Prohibition & Excise SubInspector, Vissannapeta P.S.

...Complainant

And

Nagula Subba Rao, S/o. Sathyanarayana, Age 54 Years, Gowda, R/o. Chinnampeta Village, Chatrai Mandal.

...Accused.

This case is coming up before me today i.e. 22.4.2015 for final hearing in the presence of Assistant Public Prosecutor on behalf of State and Sri K. Venkateswar Rao, Advocate for Accused, and upon perusal of the material papers available on record, and having stood over for consideration till this day, the Court delivered the following:

J U D G M E N T

The Prohibition and Excise SubInspector, Vissannapeta filed Final Report as per Section 173 of Criminal Procedure Code in Cr. No.225/201415 against the Sole

Accused for the offences punishable under sections 7(A) r/w 8(e) of Andhra Pradesh

Prohibition Act 1995, alleging, in brief, as follows:

On 4.7.2014 at about 6.00 a.m, LW.1 (T. Niranjan RaoP&E, SI) along with staff while conducting search for prohibition offences reached near RTC Bus Stop of

Chinampeta Village and found a person carrying black polythene cover and after seeing them he was trying to skulk away then he surrounded him and asked his name and he revealed his identity and stated that he purchased 5 liters of ID liquor; that he tried to secure mediators but in vain, seized the ID liquor and collected 300 ML of liquor as a sample and sealed it by affixing identity slips; that after informing of carrying of ID is an offence as no mediators available he prepared special report and seized the cover and arrested the Sole Accused; that after coming to P.S he registered FIR in Cr.No.

225/201415 under section 7A r/w.8(b) of APP Act and produced the Sole Accused before this court for remand; later he sent the sample to the Director, Excise laboratory and after receiving the chemical analysis report he submitted his final report.

Corrections Page No. 2 of 5

C.C.No. 141/2015 J.M.F.C.Tiruvur

2.Cognizance of offence was taken on file against the Sole Accused for the offences punishable under sections 7(a) r/w 8(e) of Andhra Pradesh Prohibition Act 1995.

3.Copies of case documents were supplied to Sole Accused as contemplated under section 207 of Cr.P.C. when examined under section 239 of Cr.P.C. the Accused denied the accusation against him. Hence, under section 240 of Cr.P.C. charges under sections 7(A) r/w 8(e) of Andhra Pradesh Prohibition Act 1995 were framed against the Sole

Accused and read over and explained to him in Telugu and when questioned the Sole

Accused pleaded not guilty of the charge and claimed to be tried.

4.To prove the charges, the Prosecution examined PW1 and marked Ex. P1 to Ex.

P4 and MO.1. The learned A.P.P has given up the evidence of LW2 to avoid repetition of evidence. On the closure of the evidence on the side of the prosecution, the Sole

Accused was examined under section 313 of Cr.P.C. and he denied the incriminating material available against him in the evidence of prosecution witnesses. For the defence no witness is examined and no document is marked.

5.Arguments of both sides are heard.

6.Now, the point for determination is whether the Prosecution has established the guilt of the Sole Accused of the charges under sections 7(A) r/w 8(e) of Andhra Pradesh Prohibition Act 1995, beyond reasonable doubt?

POINT

7.It is the case of the prosecution that the Sole Accused was in illegal possession and found trying to sell ID liquor after purchasing it from an unknown person nearby his Village. Charge for the offence punishable under section 7(A) r/w 8(e) of Andhra

Pradesh Prohibition Act 1995 is framed against the Sole Accused. The defence of the

Sole Accused is that he did not commit the offence and he is innocent. To prove the case against the Sole Accused prosecution examined PW.1.

8.Regarding the commission of offence PW.1 in his evidence deposed that on 4.7.2014 at about 6.00 a.m. he along with his staff Mr. B. Balakrishna, P&EC went to

Chinampeta Village and found a person was carrying black polythene cover and after seeing them he was trying to skulk away, then he along with his staff surrounded him and asked his name then he refused to answer and on further questioning he confessed

Corrections Page No. 3 of 5

C.C.No. 141/2015 J.M.F.C.Tiruvur his name as Nagula Subba Rao, S/o. Sathyanarayana, Age 54 Years, Gowda, R/o.

Chinnampeta Village, Chatrai Mandal. He stated that since long time he used to purchase I.D arrack nearby his Village and sell it near his house and it is his livelihood, then he asked him about the cover for which he stated that today in the morning he purchased 5 liters of arrack and filled it in cover, when he opened the cover it was filled with arrack; then he collected 300 ML of arrack as a sample and pasted a slip on the sample as no mediators available he prepared occurrence report and seized the cover and arrested the Sole Accused and after coming to P.S. he registered a FIR in Cr. No.

225/201415 under Section 7(A) r/w. 8(e) of APP Act , later sent the sample bottle MO1 for chemical examination and after receipt of analysis report he filed Final Report.

9.Section 100(4) of Cr.P.C contemplates “before making a search under this chapter, the officer or other person about to make it shall call upon two are more independent and respectable inhabitants of the locality in which the place to be searched is situate or of any other locality if no such inhabitant of the said locality is available or is willing to be a witness to the search, to attend and witness the search and may issue an order in writing to them or any of them so to do. The evidence of PW1 reveals that PW1 has not made any attempts to secure respectable inhabitants of the locality where the Sole Accused was caught. Hence, PW1 violated the mandatory provisions of section 100(4) of Cr.P.C. Coming to the confession made by the Sole

Accused. The confession made before a Police Officer is inadmissible as per Section 25 of Indian Evidence Act and this is not the case where the property was seized in pursuance of confession so that the confession made by the Sole Accused may be considered as per Section 27 of Indian Evidence Act.

10.Coming to the seizure and sending the sample for chemical analysis, it is the evidence of PW.1 that the sample was seized by him on 4.7.2014, whereas it was received by the Govt. Chemical Examiner of Proh. & Excise Regional Proh. & Excise

Laboratory, Kakinada on 15.9.2014 and there is a delay of 72 days in forwarding the sample to the chemical examiner and that this delay in sending sample is fatal to the case of the Prosecution. No doubt, as per Rule 24 of A.P. Excise (Arrack and Toddy

Corrections Page No. 4 of 5

C.C.No. 141/2015 J.M.F.C.Tiruvur

Licences General Conditions) Rules, 1969, the samples shall be sent to the Court with a requisition to send one of the samples expeditiously to the chemical examiner. Hence, the delay is fatal to the case of the prosecution.

11.In these circumstances, it is quite unsafe to place reliance on the testimony of

PW1. The Sole Accused is entitled to benefit of doubt. For the aforementioned reasons, this Court holds that the Prosecution failed to establish the guilt of the Sole Accused of the charges under section 7(a) r/w 8(e) of Andhra Pradesh Prohibition Act 1995 beyond reasonable doubt. Thus, the Sole Accused is found not guilty of the charges under

Sections 7(a) r/w 8(e) of Andhra Pradesh Prohibition Act 1995.

In the result, the Sole Accused is found acquitted under section 248(1) of Cr.P.C.

of the charges under sections 7(a) r/w 8(e) of Andhra Pradesh Prohibition Act 1995 leveled against him. The bail bond of the Sole Accused shall stand canceled after 6 months period of appeal time as contemplated under Section 437A of Cr.P.C. The

M.O.1 nonvaluable property shall be destroyed after appeal time is over. The Accused has undergone remand period from 4.7.2014 to 9.7.2014.

Typed on dictation by Personal Assistant on dual computer, corrected and

pronounced by me in the Open Court on this the 23rd day of April, 2015.

Judicial Magistrate Of First Class,

Tiruvuru.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED FOR

Prosecution side Defence side

PW1:T. Niranjan RaoNil

EXHIBITS MARKED FOR

Ex.P1:Special Report Ex.P2:Printed F.I.R Ex.P3:Letter of AdviceNil Ex.P4:Analysis Report

MO. 1: Sample Bottle

Judicial Magistrate Of First Class,

Tiruvuru. Copy submitted to:

1)The First Additional District & Sessions Judge Machilipatnam

2)The Superintendent Of Police Krishna/Machilipatnam.

3)The Assistant Public Prosecutor.

Corrections Page No. 5 of 5

CC/200143/2015 Acquitted

AP State S.H.O Prohibition and Excise Sub-Inspector Vissnnapeta vs Rajulapati Ramulu

23 Apr 2015

C.C.No. 143/2015 J.M.F.C.Tiruvur

CALENDAR AND JUDGMENT

IN THE COURT OF THE JUDL. MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS: TIRUVURU

C.C. No. 143/2015

1.Offence : 13.8.2014

2.Complaint : 13.8.2014

3.Apprehension of Accused: 13.8.2014

4.Commencement of Trial: 8.4.2015

5.Close of Trial: 22.4.2015

6.Judgment: 23.4.2015

7.Complainant: The State, rep. by Prohibition & Excise Sub Inspector, Vissannapeta P.S.

8.Name of the Accused: Rajulapati Ramulu, S/o. Late Krishnaiah, Age 55 Years, Gowda, R/o. Burugugudem Village, Chatrai Mandal

9.Offence: U/Sec. 7(A) r/w. 8(b) of A.P. Prohibition Act, 1995

10.Plea of Accused: NOT GUILTY

11.Finding: NOT GUILTY

13.Explanation for delay: The case was taken on file on 6.3.2015. Trial commenced on 8.4.2015 and closed on 22.4.2015. The Judgment was pronounced on 23.4.2015. Hence the delay.

Judicial Magistrate of First Class,

Tiruvuru.

Copy submitted to:

The Hon’ble I Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Krishna, Machilipatnam.

Corrections Page No. 1 of 5

C.C.No. 143/2015 J.M.F.C.Tiruvur

IN THE COURT OF THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS

TIRUVUR

Present: Mr. PATTAN SHIYAZ KHAN; LL.B.,

Judicial Magistrate of First Class

Tiruvur

Thursday, this the Twenty Third (23rd) day of April, 2015

C.C.No. 143/2015

Between:

The State, rep. by Prohibition & Excise SubInspector, Vissannapeta P.S.

...Complainant

And

Rajulapati Ramulu, S/o. Late Krishnaiah, Age 55 Years, Gowda, R/o. Burugugudem Village, Chatrai Mandal.

...Accused.

This case is coming up before me today i.e. 22.4.2015 for final hearing in the presence of Assistant Public Prosecutor on behalf of State and Sri M. Kumar, Advocate

for Accused, and upon perusal of the material papers available on record, and having

stood over for consideration till this day, the Court delivered the following:

J U D G M E N T

The Prohibition and Excise SubInspector, Vissannapeta filed Final Report as per Section 173 of Criminal Procedure Code in Cr. No.328/201415 against the Sole

Accused for the offences punishable under sections 7(A) r/w 8(e) of Andhra Pradesh

Prohibition Act 1995, alleging, in brief, as follows:

On 138.2014 at about 7.00 p.m, LW.1 (T. Niranjan RaoP&E, SI) along with staff while conducting search for prohibition offences reached near YSR Statue at

Borakagudem Village and found a person carrying black polythene cover and after seeing them he was trying to skulk away then he surrounded him and asked his name and he revealed his identity and stated that he purchased 5 liters of ID liquor; that he tried to secure mediators but in vain, seized the ID liquor and collected 300 ML of liquor as a sample and sealed it by affixing identity slips; that after informing of carrying of ID is an offence as no mediators available he prepared special report and seized the cover and arrested the Sole Accused; that after coming to P.S he registered

FIR in Cr.No. 328/201415 under section 7A r/w.8(b) of APP Act and produced the Sole

Accused before this court for remand; later he sent the sample to the Director, Excise laboratory and after receiving the chemical analysis report he submitted his final report.

Corrections Page No. 2 of 5

C.C.No. 143/2015 J.M.F.C.Tiruvur

2.Cognizance of offence was taken on file against the Sole Accused for the offences punishable under sections 7(a) r/w 8(e) of Andhra Pradesh Prohibition Act 1995.

Accused and read over and explained to him in Telugu and when questioned the Sole

Accused pleaded not guilty of the charge and claimed to be tried.

4.To prove the charges, the Prosecution examined PW1 and marked Ex. P1 to Ex.

P4 and MO.1. The learned A.P.P has given up the evidence of LW2 to avoid repetition of evidence. On the closure of the evidence on the side of the prosecution, the Sole

5.Arguments of both sides are heard.

POINT

Pradesh Prohibition Act 1995 is framed against the Sole Accused. The defence of the

Sole Accused is that he did not commit the offence and he is innocent. To prove the case against the Sole Accused prosecution examined PW.1.

8.Regarding the commission of offence PW.1 in his evidence deposed that on 3.8.2014 at about 7.00 p.m. he along with his staff Mr. Ch. Jagdeesh, P&EC went to

Borakagudem Village and found a person was carrying black polythene cover and after seeing them he was trying to skulk away, then he along with his staff surrounded him

Corrections Page No. 3 of 5

C.C.No. 143/2015 J.M.F.C.Tiruvur and asked his name then he refused to answer and on further questioning he confessed his name as Rajulapati Ramulu, S/o. Late Krishnaiah, Age 55 Years, Gowda, R/o.

Burugugudem Village, Chatrai Mandal. He stated that since long time he used to purchase I.D arrack nearby his Village and sell it near his house and it is his livelihood, then he asked him about the cover for which he stated that today in the morning he purchased 5 liters of arrack and filled it in cover, when he opened the cover it was filled with arrack; then he collected 300 ML of arrack as a sample and pasted a slip on the sample as no mediators available he prepared occurrence report and seized the cover and arrested the Sole Accused and after coming to P.S. he registered a FIR in Cr. No.

328/201415 under Section 7(A) r/w. 8(e) of APP Act , later sent the sample bottle MO1 for chemical examination and after receipt of analysis report he filed Final Report.

10.Coming to the seizure and sending the sample for chemical analysis, it is the evidence of PW.1 that the sample was seized by him on 13.8.2014, whereas it was received by the Govt. Chemical Examiner of Proh. & Excise Regional Proh. & Excise

Laboratory, Kakinada on 15.9.2014 and there is a delay of 31 days in forwarding the sample to the chemical examiner and that this delay in sending sample is fatal to the

Corrections Page No. 4 of 5

C.C.No. 143/2015 J.M.F.C.Tiruvur case of the Prosecution. No doubt, as per Rule 24 of A.P. Excise (Arrack and Toddy

11.In these circumstances, it is quite unsafe to place reliance on the testimony of

Sections 7(a) r/w 8(e) of Andhra Pradesh Prohibition Act 1995.

In the result, the Sole Accused is found acquitted under section 248(1) of Cr.P.C.

M.O.1 nonvaluable property shall be destroyed after appeal time is over. The Accused has undergone remand period from 14.8.2014 to 16.8.2014.

Typed on dictation by Personal Assistant on dual computer, corrected and

pronounced by me in the Open Court on this the 23rd day of April, 2015.

Judicial Magistrate Of First Class,

Tiruvuru.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED FOR

Prosecution side Defence side

PW1:T. Niranjan RaoNil

EXHIBITS MARKED FOR

Ex.P1:Special Report Ex.P2:Printed F.I.R Ex.P3:Letter of AdviceNil Ex.P4:Analysis Report

MO. 1: Sample Bottle

Judicial Magistrate Of First Class,

Tiruvuru. Copy submitted to:

1)The First Additional District & Sessions Judge Machilipatnam

2)The Superintendent Of Police Krishna/Machilipatnam.

3)The Assistant Public Prosecutor.

Corrections Page No. 5 of 5

CC/200144/2015 Acquitted

AP State S.H.O Prohibition and Excise Sub-Inspector Vissnnapeta vs Muvva Prasad

23 Apr 2015

C.C.No. 144/2015 J.M.F.C.Tiruvur

CALENDAR AND JUDGMENT

IN THE COURT OF THE JUDL. MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS,

Tiruvuru

C.C. No. 144/2015

1.Offence : 14.8.2014

2.Complaint : 14.8.2014

3.Apprehension of Accused: 14.8.2014

4.Commencement of Trial: 21.4.2015

5.Close of Trial: 22.4.2015

6.Judgment: 23.4.2015

7.Complainant: The State, rep. by Prohibition & Excise Sub Inspector, Vissannapeta P.S.

8.Name of the Accused: Muvva Prasad, S/o. Late Yesu, Age 35 Years, Madiga, R/o. Tatakuntla Village, Vissannapeta Mandal

9.Offence: U/Sec. 7(A) r/w. 8(b) of A.P. Prohibition Act, 1995

10.Plea of Accused: NOT GUILTY

11.Finding: NOT GUILTY

13.Explanation for delay: The case was taken on file on 6.3.2015. Trial commenced on 21.4.2015 and closed on 22.4.2015. The Judgment was pronounced on 23.4.2015. Hence the delay.

Judicial Magistrate of First Class,

Tiruvuru.

Copy submitted to:

The Hon’ble I Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Krishna, Machilipatnam.

Corrections Page No. 1 of 5

C.C.No. 144/2015 J.M.F.C.Tiruvur

IN THE COURT OF THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS

TIRUVUR

Present: Mr. PATTAN SHIYAZ KHAN; LL.B.,

Judicial Magistrate of First Class

Tiruvur

Thursday, this the Twenty Third (23rd) day of April, 2015

C.C.No. 144/2015

Between:

The State, rep. by Prohibition & Excise SubInspector, Vissannapeta P.S.

...Complainant

And

Muvva Prasad, S/o. Late Yesu, Age 35 Years, Madiga, R/o. Tatakuntla Village, Vissannapeta Mandal.

...Accused.

This case is coming up before me today i.e. 22.4.2015 for final hearing in the presence of Assistant Public Prosecutor on behalf of State and Sri M. Kumar, Advocates

for Accused, and upon perusal of the material papers available on record, and having

stood over for consideration till this day, the Court delivered the following:

J U D G M E N T

The Prohibition and Excise SubInspector, Vissannapeta filed Final Report as per Section 173 of Criminal Procedure Code in Cr. No.329/201415 against the Sole

Accused for the offences punishable under sections 7(A) r/w 8(e) of Andhra Pradesh

Prohibition Act 1995, alleging, in brief, as follows:

On 14.8.2014 at about 5.00 a.m, LW.1 (T. Niranjan RaoP&E, SI) along with staff while conducting search for prohibition offences reached near Ambedkar Statue at

Tatakuntla Village and found a person carrying black polythene cover and after seeing them he was trying to skulk away then he surrounded him and asked his name and he revealed his identity and stated that he purchased 5 liters of ID liquor; that he tried to secure mediators but in vain, seized the ID liquor and collected 300 ML of liquor as a sample and sealed it by affixing identity slips; that after informing of carrying of ID is an offence as no mediators available he prepared special report and seized the cover and arrested the Sole Accused; that after coming to P.S he registered FIR in Cr.No.

329/201415 under section 7A r/w.8(b) of APP Act and produced the Sole Accused before this court for remand; later he sent the sample to the Director, Excise laboratory and after receiving the chemical analysis report he submitted his final report.

Corrections Page No. 2 of 5

C.C.No. 144/2015 J.M.F.C.Tiruvur

2.Cognizance of offence was taken on file against the Sole Accused for the offences punishable under sections 7(a) r/w 8(e) of Andhra Pradesh Prohibition Act 1995.

Accused and read over and explained to him in Telugu and when questioned the Sole

Accused pleaded not guilty of the charge and claimed to be tried.

4.To prove the charges, the Prosecution examined PW1 and marked Ex. P1 to Ex.

P4 and MO.1. The learned A.P.P has given up the evidence of LW2 to avoid repetition of evidence. On the closure of the evidence on the side of the prosecution, the Sole

5.Arguments of both sides are heard.

POINT

Pradesh Prohibition Act 1995 is framed against the Sole Accused. The defence of the

Sole Accused is that he did not commit the offence and he is innocent. To prove the case against the Sole Accused prosecution examined PW.1.

8.Regarding the commission of offence PW.1 in his evidence deposed that on 14.8.2014 at about 5.00 a.m. he along with his staff Mr. Ch. Jagdeesh, P&EC went to

Tatakuntla Village and found a person was carrying black polythene cover and after seeing them he was trying to skulk away, then he along with his staff surrounded him and asked his name then he refused to answer and on further questioning he confessed

Corrections Page No. 3 of 5

C.C.No. 144/2015 J.M.F.C.Tiruvur his name as Muvva Prasad, S/o. Late Yesu, Age 35 Years, Madiga, R/o. Tatakuntla

Village, Vissannapeta Mandal. He stated that since long time he used to purchase I.D arrack nearby his Village and sell it near his house and it is his livelihood, then he asked him about the cover for which he stated that today in the morning he purchased 5 liters of arrack and filled it in cover, when he opened the cover it was filled with arrack; then he collected 300 ML of arrack as a sample and pasted a slip on the sample as no mediators available he prepared occurrence report and seized the cover and arrested the Sole Accused and after coming to P.S. he registered a FIR in Cr. No.

329/201415 under Section 7(A) r/w. 8(e) of APP Act , later sent the sample bottle MO1 for chemical examination and after receipt of analysis report he filed Final Report.

10.Coming to the seizure and sending the sample for chemical analysis, it is the evidence of PW.1 that the sample was seized by him on 14.8.2014, whereas it was received by the Govt. Chemical Examiner of Proh. & Excise Regional Proh. & Excise

Laboratory, Kakinada on 15.9.2014 and there is a delay of 30 days in forwarding the sample to the chemical examiner and that this delay in sending sample is fatal to the case of the Prosecution. No doubt, as per Rule 24 of A.P. Excise (Arrack and Toddy

Corrections Page No. 4 of 5

C.C.No. 144/2015 J.M.F.C.Tiruvur

11.In these circumstances, it is quite unsafe to place reliance on the testimony of

Sections 7(a) r/w 8(e) of Andhra Pradesh Prohibition Act 1995.

In the result, the Sole Accused is found acquitted under section 248(1) of Cr.P.C.

M.O.1 nonvaluable property shall be destroyed after appeal time is over. The Accused has undergone remand period from 14.8.2014 to 21.8.2014.

Typed on dictation by Personal Assistant on dual computer, corrected and

pronounced by me in the Open Court on this the 23rd day of April, 2015.

Judicial Magistrate Of First Class,

Tiruvuru.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED FOR

Prosecution side Defence side

PW1:T. Niranjan RaoNil

EXHIBITS MARKED FOR

Ex.P1:Special Report Ex.P2:Printed F.I.R Ex.P3:Letter of AdviceNil Ex.P4:Analysis Report

MO. 1: Sample Bottle

Judicial Magistrate Of First Class,

Tiruvuru. Copy submitted to:

1)The First Additional District & Sessions Judge Machilipatnam

2)The Superintendent Of Police Krishna/Machilipatnam.

3)The Assistant Public Prosecutor.

Corrections Page No. 5 of 5

CC/200142/2015 Acquitted

AP State S.H.O Prohibition and Excise Sub-Inspector Vissnnapeta vs Dharavathu Arjun

23 Apr 2015

C.C.No. 142/2015 J.M.F.C.Tiruvur

CALENDAR AND JUDGMENT

IN THE COURT OF THE JUDL. MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS: TIRUVURU

C.C. No. 142/2015

1.Offence : 18.7.2014

2.Complaint : 18.7.2014

3.Apprehension of Accused: 18.7.2014

4.Commencement of Trial: 9.4.2015

5.Close of Trial: 22.4.2015

6.Judgment: 23.4.2015

7.Complainant: The State, rep. by Prohibition & Excise Sub Inspector, Vissannapeta P.S.

8.Name of the Accused: Dharavathu Arjun, S/o. Durga Rao, Age 25 Years, Lambadi, R/o. Tatakuntla Thanda, Vissannapeta

9.Offence: U/Sec. 7(A) r/w. 8(b) of A.P. Prohibition Act, 1995

10.Plea of Accused: NOT GUILTY

11.Finding: NOT GUILTY

13.Explanation for delay: The case was taken on file on 6.3.2015. Trial commenced on 9.4.2015 and closed on 22.4.2015. The Judgment was pronounced on 23.4.2015. Hence the delay.

Judicial Magistrate of First Class,

Tiruvuru.

Copy submitted to:

The Hon’ble I Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Krishna, Machilipatnam.

Corrections Page No. 1 of 5

C.C.No. 142/2015 J.M.F.C.Tiruvur

IN THE COURT OF THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS

TIRUVUR

Present: Mr. PATTAN SHIYAZ KHAN; LL.B.,

Judicial Magistrate of First Class

Tiruvur

Thursday, this the Twenty Third (23rd) day of April, 2015

C.C.No. 142/2015

Between:

The State, rep. by Prohibition & Excise SubInspector, Vissannapeta P.S.

...Complainant

And

Dharavathu Arjun, S/o. Durga Rao, Age 25 Years, Lambadi, R/o. Tatakuntla Thanda, Vissannapeta Mandal.

...Accused.

This case is coming up before me today i.e. 22.4.2015 for final hearing in the presence of Assistant Public Prosecutor on behalf of State and Sri M. Kumar, Advocate

for Accused, and upon perusal of the material papers available on record, and having

stood over for consideration till this day, the Court delivered the following:

J U D G M E N T

The Prohibition and Excise SubInspector, Vissannapeta filed Final Report as per Section 173 of Criminal Procedure Code in Cr. No.259/201415 against the Sole

Accused for the offences punishable under sections 7(A) r/w 8(e) of Andhra Pradesh

Prohibition Act 1995, alleging, in brief, as follows:

On 18.7.2014 at about 5.00 a.m, LW.1 (T. Niranjan RaoP&E, SI) along with staff while conducting search for prohibition offences reached near Govt. Primary School,

Tatakuntla Village and found a person carrying black polythene cover and after seeing them he was trying to skulk away then he surrounded him and asked his name and he revealed his identity and stated that he purchased 10 liters of ID liquor; that he tried to secure mediators but in vain, seized the ID liquor and collected 300 ML of liquor as a sample and sealed it by affixing identity slips; that after informing of carrying of ID is an offence as no mediators available he prepared special report and seized the cover and arrested the Sole Accused; that after coming to P.S he registered FIR in Cr.No.

259/201415 under section 7A r/w.8(b) of APP Act and produced the Sole Accused before this court for remand; later he sent the sample to the Director, Excise laboratory and after receiving the chemical analysis report he submitted his final report.

Corrections Page No. 2 of 5

C.C.No. 142/2015 J.M.F.C.Tiruvur

2.Cognizance of offence was taken on file against the Sole Accused for the offences punishable under sections 7(a) r/w 8(e) of Andhra Pradesh Prohibition Act 1995.

Accused and read over and explained to him in Telugu and when questioned the Sole

Accused pleaded not guilty of the charge and claimed to be tried.

4.To prove the charges, the Prosecution examined PW1 and marked Ex. P1 to Ex.

P4 and MO.1. The learned A.P.P has given up the evidence of LW2 to avoid repetition of evidence. On the closure of the evidence on the side of the prosecution, the Sole

5.Arguments of both sides are heard.

POINT

Pradesh Prohibition Act 1995 is framed against the Sole Accused. The defence of the

Sole Accused is that he did not commit the offence and he is innocent. To prove the case against the Sole Accused prosecution examined PW.1.

8.Regarding the commission of offence PW.1 in his evidence deposed that on 18.7.2014 at about 5.00 a.m. he along with his staff Mr. P. Nagaraju, P&EC went to

Corrections Page No. 3 of 5

C.C.No. 142/2015 J.M.F.C.Tiruvur his name as Rajulapati Ramulu, S/o. Late Krishnaiah, Age 55 Years, Gowda, R/o.

Burugugudem Village, Chatrai Mandal. He stated that since long time he used to purchase I.D arrack nearby his Village and sell it near his house and it is his livelihood, then he asked him about the cover for which he stated that today in the morning he purchased 10 liters of arrack and filled it in cover, when he opened the cover it was filled with arrack; then he collected 300 ML of arrack as a sample and pasted a slip on the sample as no mediators available he prepared occurrence report and seized the cover and arrested the Sole Accused and after coming to P.S. he registered a FIR in Cr.

No. 259/201415 under Section 7(A) r/w. 8(e) of APP Act , later sent the sample bottle

MO1 for chemical examination and after receipt of analysis report he filed Final

Report.

10.Coming to the seizure and sending the sample for chemical analysis, it is the evidence of PW.1 that the sample was seized by him on 18.7.2014, whereas it was received by the Govt. Chemical Examiner of Proh. & Excise Regional Proh. & Excise

Laboratory, Kakinada on 15.9.2014 and there is a delay of 57 days in forwarding the sample to the chemical examiner and that this delay in sending sample is fatal to the

Corrections Page No. 4 of 5

C.C.No. 142/2015 J.M.F.C.Tiruvur case of the Prosecution. No doubt, as per Rule 24 of A.P. Excise (Arrack and Toddy

11.In these circumstances, it is quite unsafe to place reliance on the testimony of

Sections 7(a) r/w 8(e) of Andhra Pradesh Prohibition Act 1995.

In the result, the Sole Accused is found acquitted under section 248(1) of Cr.P.C.

M.O.1 nonvaluable property shall be destroyed after appeal time is over. The Accused has undergone remand period from 18.7.2014 to 23.7.2014.

Typed on dictation by Personal Assistant on dual computer, corrected and

pronounced by me in the Open Court on this the 23rd day of April, 2015.

Judicial Magistrate Of First Class,

Tiruvuru.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED FOR

Prosecution side Defence side

PW1:T. Niranjan RaoNil

EXHIBITS MARKED FOR

Ex.P1:Special Report Ex.P2:Printed F.I.R Ex.P3:Letter of AdviceNil Ex.P4:Analysis Report

MO. 1: Sample Bottle

Judicial Magistrate Of First Class,

Tiruvuru. Copy submitted to:

1)The First Additional District & Sessions Judge Machilipatnam

2)The Superintendent Of Police Krishna/Machilipatnam.

3)The Assistant Public Prosecutor.

Corrections Page No. 5 of 5

CC/200145/2015 Acquitted

AP State S.H.O Prohibition and Excise Sub-Inspector Vissnnapeta vs Pilli Padma

23 Apr 2015

C.C.No. 145/2015 J.M.F.C.Tiruvur

CALENDAR AND JUDGMENT

IN THE COURT OF THE JUDL. MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS: TIRUVURU

C.C. No. 145/2015

1.Offence : 8.10.2014

2.Complaint : 8.10.2014

3.Apprehension of Accused: 8.10.2014

4.Commencement of Trial: 17.4.2015

5.Close of Trial: 22.4.2015

6.Judgment: 23.4.2015

7.Complainant: The State, rep. by Prohibition & Excise Sub Inspector, Vissannapeta P.S.

8.Name of the Accused: Pilli Padma, W/o. Venkateswara Rao, Age 30 Years, Mutharasulu, R/o. Putrela Village, Vissannapeta Mandal

9.Offence: U/Sec. 7(A) r/w. 8(b) of A.P. Prohibition Act, 1995

10.Plea of Accused: NOT GUILTY

11.Finding: NOT GUILTY

12.Result: In the result, the Sole Accused is found acquitted under section 248(1) of Cr.P.C. of the charges under sections 7(a) r/w 8(e) of Andhra Pradesh Prohibition Act 1995 leveled against her. The bail bond of the Sole Accused shall stand canceled after 6 months period of appeal time as contemplated under Section 437A of Cr.P.C. The M.O.1 nonvaluable property shall be destroyed after appeal time is over. The Accused did not undergo any remand period.

13.Explanation for delay: The case was taken on file on 6.3.2015. Trial commenced on 17.4.2015 and closed on 22.4.2015. The Judgment was pronounced on 23.4.2015. Hence the delay.

Judicial Magistrate of First Class,

Tiruvuru.

Copy submitted to:

The Hon’ble I Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Krishna, Machilipatnam.

Corrections Page No. 1 of 5

C.C.No. 145/2015 J.M.F.C.Tiruvur

IN THE COURT OF THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS

TIRUVUR

Present: Mr. PATTAN SHIYAZ KHAN; LL.B.,

Judicial Magistrate of First Class

Tiruvur

Thursday, this the Twenty Third (23rd) day of April, 2015

C.C.No. 145/2015

Between:

The State, rep. by Prohibition & Excise SubInspector, Vissannapeta P.S.

...Complainant

And

Pilli Padma, W/o. Venkateswara Rao, Age 30 Years, Mutharasulu, R/o. Putrela Village, Vissannapeta Mandal.

...Accused.

This case is coming up before me today i.e. 22.4.2015 for final hearing in the presence of Assistant Public Prosecutor on behalf of State and Sri P.V. Satish, Advocate

for Accused, and upon perusal of the material papers available on record, and having

stood over for consideration till this day, the Court delivered the following:

J U D G M E N T

The Prohibition and Excise SubInspector, Vissannapeta filed Final Report as per Section 173 of Criminal Procedure Code in Cr. No.471/201415 against the Sole

Accused for the offences punishable under sections 7(A) r/w 8(e) of Andhra Pradesh

Prohibition Act 1995, alleging, in brief, as follows:

On 8.10.2014 at about 6.00 p.m, LW.1 (T. Niranjan RaoP&E, SI) along with staff while conducting search for prohibition offences reached near Putrala Petrol Bunk,

Putrala Village and found a woman carrying a black polythene cover and after seeing them she was trying to skulk away then he surrounded her and asked her name and she revealed her identity and stated that she purchased 10 liters of ID liquor; that he tried to secure mediators but in vain, seized the ID liquor and collected 300 ML of liquor as a sample and sealed it by affixing identity slips; that after informing of carrying of ID is an offence as no mediators available he prepared special report and seized the cover and arrested the Sole Accused; that after coming to P.S he registered

FIR in Cr.No. 471/201415 under section 7A r/w.8(b) of APP Act; later sent the sample to the Director, Excise laboratory and after receiving the chemical analysis report he submitted his final report.

Corrections Page No. 2 of 5

C.C.No. 145/2015 J.M.F.C.Tiruvur

2.Cognizance of offence was taken on file against the Sole Accused for the offences punishable under sections 7(a) r/w 8(e) of Andhra Pradesh Prohibition Act 1995.

3.Copies of case documents were supplied to Sole Accused as contemplated under section 207 of Cr.P.C. when examined under section 239 of Cr.P.C. the Accused denied the accusation against her. Hence, under section 240 of Cr.P.C. charges under sections 7(A) r/w 8(e) of Andhra Pradesh Prohibition Act 1995 were framed against the Sole

Accused and read over and explained to her in Telugu and when questioned the Sole

Accused pleaded not guilty of the charge and claimed to be tried.

4.To prove the charges, the Prosecution examined PW1 and marked Ex. P1 to Ex.

P4 and MO.1. The learned A.P.P has given up the evidence of LW2 to avoid repetition of evidence. On the closure of the evidence on the side of the prosecution, the Sole

Accused was examined under section 313 of Cr.P.C. and she denied the incriminating material available against her in the evidence of prosecution witnesses. For the defence no witness is examined and no document is marked.

5.Arguments of both sides are heard.

POINT

7.It is the case of the prosecution that the Sole Accused was in illegal possession and found trying to sell ID liquor after purchasing it from an unknown person nearby her Village. Charge for the offence punishable under section 7(A) r/w 8(e) of Andhra

Pradesh Prohibition Act 1995 is framed against the Sole Accused. The defence of the

Sole Accused is that she did not commit the offence and she is innocent. To prove the case against the Sole Accused prosecution examined PW.1.

8.Regarding the commission of offence PW.1 in his evidence deposed that on 8.10.2014 at about 6.00 p.m. he along with his staff Mr. Ch. Jagdeesh, P&EC went to

Putrala Village and found a woman carrying black polythene cover and after seeing them she was trying to skulk away, then he along with his staff surrounded her and asked her name then she refused to answer and on further questioning she confessed

Corrections Page No. 3 of 5

C.C.No. 145/2015 J.M.F.C.Tiruvur her name as Pilli Padma, W/o. Venkateswara Rao, Age 30 Years, Mutharasulu, R/o.

Putrela Village, Vissannapeta Mandal. She stated that since long time she used to purchase I.D arrack nearby her Village and sell it near her house and it is her livelihood, then he asked her about the cover for which she stated that today in the morning she purchased 10 liters of arrack and filled it in cover, when he opened the covers it was filled with arrack; then he collected 300 ML of arrack as a sample and pasted a slip on the sample as no mediators available he prepared occurrence report and seized the cover and arrested the Sole Accused and after coming to P.S. he registered a FIR in Cr. No. 471/201415 under Section 7(A) r/w. 8(e) of APP Act, later sent the sample bottle MO1 for chemical examination and after receipt of analysis report he filed Final Report.

10.Coming to the seizure and sending the sample for chemical analysis, it is the evidence of PW.1 that the sample was seized by him on 8.10.2014, whereas it was received by the Govt. Chemical Examiner of Proh. & Excise Regional Proh. & Excise

Laboratory, Kakinada on 10.12.2014 and there is a delay of 62 days in forwarding the sample to the chemical examiner and that this delay in sending sample is fatal to the

Corrections Page No. 4 of 5

C.C.No. 145/2015 J.M.F.C.Tiruvur case of the Prosecution. No doubt, as per Rule 24 of A.P. Excise (Arrack and Toddy

11.In these circumstances, it is quite unsafe to place reliance on the testimony of

Sections 7(a) r/w 8(e) of Andhra Pradesh Prohibition Act 1995.

In the result, the Sole Accused is found acquitted under section 248(1) of Cr.P.C.

of the charges under sections 7(a) r/w 8(e) of Andhra Pradesh Prohibition Act 1995 leveled against her. The bail bond of the Sole Accused shall stand canceled after 6 months period of appeal time as contemplated under Section 437A of Cr.P.C. The

M.O.1 nonvaluable property shall be destroyed after appeal time is over. The Accused did not undergo any remand period.

Typed on dictation by Personal Assistant on dual computer, corrected and

pronounced by me in the Open Court on this the 23rd day of April, 2015.

Judicial Magistrate Of First Class,

Tiruvuru.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED FOR

Prosecution side Defence side

PW1:T. Niranjan RaoNil

EXHIBITS MARKED FOR

Ex.P1:Special Report Ex.P2:Printed F.I.R Ex.P3:Letter of AdviceNil Ex.P4:Analysis Report

MO. 1: Sample Bottle

Judicial Magistrate Of First Class,

Tiruvuru. Copy submitted to:

1)The First Additional District & Sessions Judge Machilipatnam

2)The Superintendent Of Police Krishna/Machilipatnam.

3)The Assistant Public Prosecutor.

Corrections Page No. 5 of 5

Order Record 45 total

Case No.	Parties	Date	Type	Outcome
CC/200141/2015	AP State S.H.O Prohibition and Excise Sub-Inspector Vissnnapeta vs Nagula Subba Rao	23 Apr 2015	Order On Exgibit	Acquitted
CC/200142/2015	AP State S.H.O Prohibition and Excise Sub-Inspector Vissnnapeta vs Dharavathu Arjun	23 Apr 2015	Order On Exgibit	Acquitted
CC/200143/2015	AP State S.H.O Prohibition and Excise Sub-Inspector Vissnnapeta vs Rajulapati Ramulu	23 Apr 2015	Order On Exgibit	Acquitted
CC/200144/2015	AP State S.H.O Prohibition and Excise Sub-Inspector Vissnnapeta vs Muvva Prasad	23 Apr 2015	Order On Exgibit	Acquitted
CC/200145/2015	AP State S.H.O Prohibition and Excise Sub-Inspector Vissnnapeta vs Pilli Padma	23 Apr 2015	Order On Exgibit	Acquitted
CC/200146/2015	AP State S.H.O Prohibition and Excise Sub-Inspector Vissnnapeta vs Yampati Lakshmi	23 Apr 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/200147/2015	AP State S.H.O Prohibition and Excise Sub-Inspector Vissnnapeta vs Cheku Nagamani	23 Apr 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/200148/2015	S.H.O Prohibition and Excise Vissannapeta vs Korra Raju	23 Apr 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/200149/2015	AP State S.H.O Prohibition and Excise Sub-Inspector Vissnnapeta vs Bokka Gannaiah	23 Apr 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/200150/2015	AP State S.H.O Prohibition and Excise Sub-Inspector Vissnnapeta vs Nakka Arjun	23 Apr 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/200151/2015	AP State S.H.O Prohibition and Excise Sub-Inspector Vissnnapeta vs Katuri Chenna Rao	23 Apr 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/200152/2015	AP State S.H.O Prohibition and Excise Sub-Inspector Vissnnapeta vs Modugumudi Venkateswara Rao	23 Apr 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/200153/2015	AP State S.H.O Prohibition and Excise Sub-Inspector Vissnnapeta vs Vadithya Bikshalus	23 Apr 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/200154/2015	AP State S.H.O Prohibition and Excise Sub-Inspector Vissnnapeta vs Vadithya Mangaiah	23 Apr 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/200155/2015	AP State S.H.O Prohibition and Excise Sub-Inspector Vissnnapeta vs Bhukya Vijayababu	23 Apr 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/200156/2015	AP State S.H.O Prohibition and Excise Sub-Inspector Vissnnapeta vs Katari Padma	23 Apr 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/200038/2014	state sub -inspector of police ,vissannapeta P.S vs Bollipogu Naga Raju	22 Apr 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/200158/2015	AP State S.H.O Prohibition and Excise Sub-Inspector Tiruvuru vs Thota Nagaraju	22 Apr 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/200159/2015	AP State S.H.O Prohibition and Excise Sub-Inspector Tiruvuru vs Kota Kusuma	22 Apr 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/200162/2015	AP State S.H.O Prohibition and Excise Sub-Inspector Tiruvuru vs Ranavathu Siva Parvathi	22 Apr 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/200168/2015	AP State S.H.O Prohibition and Excise Sub-Inspector Tiruvuru vs Chittipothula Anasuya	22 Apr 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/200172/2015	AP State S.H.O Prohibition and Excise Sub-Inspector Tiruvuru vs Maganti Balayya	22 Apr 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/200173/2015	AP State S.H.O Prohibition and Excise Sub-Inspector Tiruvuru vs Neelapala Gopiraju	22 Apr 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/200653/2014	A.Konduru P.S vs Bandaru Durgarao	22 Jan 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/200142/2013	Sub Inspector of police Tiruvuru p.s. vs Kasani Bullayya	21 Jan 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/200358/2013	SHO Tiruvuru PS vs Kommineni Rajeswara Rao	21 Jan 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/200595/2014	Sub-Inspector of police Vissannapeta P.S. vs Kokkirigadda Boraiah	21 Jan 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/200618/2014	A.Konduru P.S vs Banavath Nagaraju	21 Jan 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/200636/2011	Tiruvuru p.s. vs Boyana palli Madhu	21 Jan 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/200036/2009	Subinspector of police vissannapeta P.S vs Seelapureddy Umamaheswareddy and others	13 Jan 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/200425/2010	State S.H.O.Chatrai P.S. vs Nakka.Krishna	13 Jan 2015	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/200007/2014	sub inspector of police,Tiruvuru P.S vs Munuluntla Sreenu	24 Dec 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/201473/2012	SI Police Tiruvuru P.S. vs Marnati Brahma Reddy and Marnati Mangamma,	24 Dec 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/954/2014	A.Konduru P.S vs Nagula Nageswara Rao	22 Dec 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/202142/2012	Sub Inspector of Police Chatrai P.S. vs Marri Veeravenkaiah	22 Dec 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/200854/2014	Prohibition and Excise Inspector, Tiruvuru., vs Vangala Nageswara Rao	18 Dec 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/200855/2014	Prohibition and Excise Inspector, Tiruvuru. vs Alavaa Ravi	18 Dec 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/200856/2014	Prohibition and Excise Inspector, Tiruvuru. vs Bajjuri Ravi	18 Dec 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/200861/2014	Prohibition and Excise Inspector, Tiruvuru. vs Konakalla Koteswara Rao	18 Dec 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/200876/2014	Prohibition and Excise Inspector, Tiruvuru. vs Duggirala Srinu	18 Dec 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/200877/2014	Prohibition and Excise Inspector, Tiruvuru. vs Talluri Venkata Chalam	18 Dec 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/200878/2014	Prohibition and Excise Inspector, tiruvuru, vs Upputhala Krishna	18 Dec 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/200608/2011	S.H.O .A.Kondu P.S. vs Katuri Phaneedravarma	17 Dec 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/200314/2011	S.H.O, Tiruvuru P.S. vs Velanki Srinivasarao	12 Dec 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/200182/2013	Sub Inspector of police Gampalagudem p.s. vs Mogilicharla Jojibabu	10 Dec 2014	Order On Exgibit	—

Monthly Orders (Last 12 Months)

Apr 2015		25
Jan 2015		9
Dec 2014		16

Frequently Asked Questions

How many cases has Smt.Bypa Madhuri Rathna Prasanna Latha handled?

Smt.Bypa Madhuri Rathna Prasanna Latha has handled 50 court orders since 2014 at Prl. Junior Civil Judge Court, Tiruvur. The average disposal rate is 9 orders per month.

What types of cases does Smt.Bypa Madhuri Rathna Prasanna Latha hear?

Based on available records, Smt.Bypa Madhuri Rathna Prasanna Latha primarily handles Criminal matters (Criminal Cases) at Prl. Junior Civil Judge Court, Tiruvur.

Where is Smt.Bypa Madhuri Rathna Prasanna Latha currently posted?

Smt.Bypa Madhuri Rathna Prasanna Latha is posted as I Addl. Junior Civil Judge Court Tiruvuru at Prl. Junior Civil Judge Court, Tiruvur, Krishna, Andhra Pradesh.

Are judgments by Smt.Bypa Madhuri Rathna Prasanna Latha available online?

Yes. 5 judgments by Smt.Bypa Madhuri Rathna Prasanna Latha are available on Legistro with full text, outcome, and sections cited.

How fast does Smt.Bypa Madhuri Rathna Prasanna Latha dispose cases?

Smt.Bypa Madhuri Rathna Prasanna Latha disposes approximately 9 cases per month, based on 50 orders handled over their tenure at Prl. Junior Civil Judge Court, Tiruvur.

Since when is Smt.Bypa Madhuri Rathna Prasanna Latha serving?

Smt.Bypa Madhuri Rathna Prasanna Latha has been serving at Prl. Junior Civil Judge Court, Tiruvur since 2014.

Case Types

CC 100%

Posting History

Dec 2014 — May 2015

I Addl. Junior Civil Judge Court Tiruvuru · 50 orders
Dec 2014 — May 2015

II Addl. Civil Judge Junior Division-cum-JMFC Tiruvuru

Outcomes on Record

Acquitted 5

Other Judges at this Court

Ms Atluri Sindhura

Prl Junior Civil Judge Court, Tiruvuru

1 orders

Sri K Surya Teja

I Addl. Junior Civil Judge Court Tiruvuru

4 orders

← View all judges at Prl. Junior Civil Judge Court, Tiruvur

Smt.Bypa Madhuri Rathna Prasanna Latha

CALENDAR AND JUDGMENT

C.C. No. 141/2015

IN THE COURT OF THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS

TIRUVUR

Present:­ Mr. PATTAN SHIYAZ KHAN; LL.B.,

Tiruvur

C.C.No. 141/2015

J U D G M E N T

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED FOR

EXHIBITS MARKED FOR

CALENDAR AND JUDGMENT

C.C. No. 143/2015

IN THE COURT OF THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS

TIRUVUR

Present:­ Mr. PATTAN SHIYAZ KHAN; LL.B.,

Tiruvur

C.C.No. 143/2015

J U D G M E N T

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED FOR

EXHIBITS MARKED FOR

CALENDAR AND JUDGMENT

IN THE COURT OF THE JUDL. MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS,

Tiruvuru

C.C. No. 144/2015

IN THE COURT OF THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS

TIRUVUR

Present:­ Mr. PATTAN SHIYAZ KHAN; LL.B.,

Tiruvur

C.C.No. 144/2015

J U D G M E N T

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED FOR

EXHIBITS MARKED FOR

CALENDAR AND JUDGMENT

C.C. No. 142/2015

IN THE COURT OF THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS

TIRUVUR

Present:­ Mr. PATTAN SHIYAZ KHAN; LL.B.,

Tiruvur

C.C.No. 142/2015

J U D G M E N T

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED FOR

EXHIBITS MARKED FOR

CALENDAR AND JUDGMENT

C.C. No. 145/2015

IN THE COURT OF THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS

TIRUVUR

Present:­ Mr. PATTAN SHIYAZ KHAN; LL.B.,

Tiruvur

C.C.No. 145/2015

J U D G M E N T

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED FOR

EXHIBITS MARKED FOR

Present: Mr. PATTAN SHIYAZ KHAN; LL.B.,

Present: Mr. PATTAN SHIYAZ KHAN; LL.B.,

Present: Mr. PATTAN SHIYAZ KHAN; LL.B.,

Present: Mr. PATTAN SHIYAZ KHAN; LL.B.,

Present: Mr. PATTAN SHIYAZ KHAN; LL.B.,