C. Vikram

1

IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, AT SATHUPALLI

Present: Smt.K.Maruthi Devi,

Senior Civil Judge

Sathupalli 

Dated this the 17th day of April, 2019

 H.M.O.P.No. 20 of 2019

Between:­ Eda Punyavathi, W/o. Rama Rao, D/o. Vutukuru Anjaneyulu Age: 36 yrs, Occ; House wife, R/o. Malkaram village, Dammapeta mandalam, Bhadradri Kothagudem District. ….Petitioner

AND

Eda Rama Rao, S/o.Raghavulu, Age: 39 yrs, Occ: Sub Station operator, R/o. Malkapuram village, Dammapeta mandal, N/o. Tummalapalli village

Penuballi mandal, Khammam District......Respondent

This petition is coming on before me on 10­04­2019 for final hearing in the presence of Sri P.Janaki Rama Rao, Advocate for the petitioner and respondent remained exparte, upon perusing the material on record and after hearing on petitioner side, this Court made the following:­

O R D E R

1.This petition is filed under Section 13(i­a) of Hindu Marriage Act, seeking divorce from the respondent.

2.The gist of the contents of the petition is as follows:­

The petitioner is the legally wedded wife of respondent, their marriage was performed on 20.04.1999 at Tummalapalli village of Penuballi Mandal, as per their rites and customs prevailing in their community. Their marriage was a love marriage. The petitioner joined with the company of respondent and both lead happy marital life at Tummalapalli village till recently and they were blessed with two female children. The elder daughter by name Krishnasri is studying Degree 1st year. The second daughter by name Niharika is studying 9th class. Shortly after the marriage, petitioner 2 realized that respondent is a short tempered man and lead life irresponsibly. Father of respondent died and mother is dependent on him.

The respondent got temporary employment in Electricity board at

Malkaram village and he has been working there as substation operator. He takes liquor and beats the petitioner for no valid reason. Several times, he beat the petitioner with belt and sticks causing bleeding injuries. The petitioner requested the respondent to change his behaviour as the children growing up, but the respondent never cared the words of petitioner or his mother. Petitioner reported the matter to elders and caste men, but the respondent never cared them. On 2nd January, 2018, the respondent in intoxication, beat the petitioner mercilessly and bused her most filthy language. The petitioner suspected the danger to her life and limb in the hands of respondent, hence on the next day i.e. on 01­01­2018, she got convened a panchayath at Malkaram village in the presence of elders and explained the harassment of respondent. Even though the respondent did not care the elders and left the place without responding. The petitioner realized that respondent is very cruel towards her and she cannot live anymore in his company and from then onwards, the petitioner and her children are living separately from the respondent. Hence, she filed this petition against the respondent seeking divorce.

3.The respondent remained exparte.

4.To prove the claim of the petitioner, P.W.1 was examined and got marked Ex.P.1 & Ex.P.2.

5. P.W.1 filed her chief­examination affidavit, wherein she stated in support of all the contents of petition. She stated about marriage of petitioner with the respondent which took place on 20.04.1999 at

Tummalapalli village, Penuballi mandal. The petitioner joined the respondent but they were blessed with two daughters namely Krishnasri and Niharika, who are studying 1st year degree and 9th class respectively.

Thereafter, the respondent developed disinterest towards the petitioner and 3 he is a short tempered man and irresponsible and spends money lavishly for himself. The respondent got temporary employment as substation operator in electricity board at Malkaram village and living there. The respondent gets angry very often and take liquor and beats the petitioner for no valid reason. Due to unbearable torture, the petitioner reported the matter to the village elders, but the respondent never cared them. On 2nd January, 2018, respondent returned home in intoxication and beat the petitioner mercilessly. Petitioner suspected danger in the hands of respondent, as such on the next day i.e. on 03­01­2018, she got convened a panchayath at

Malkaram village and in the presence of elders, she explained the harassment of respondent and the elders advised the respondent to mend his behaviour and treat the petitioner with love, but the respondent never cared the elders and left the place without responding. From then onwards, the petitioner and her children are living separately from the respondent and she cannot lead marital life with him and hence, as such the petitioner filed this petition seeking decree of divorce.

6.Heard the counsel for petitioner.

7.Perused the entire material on record and the contents of the petition, chief­examination affidavit of P.W.1. and Ex.P­1 & P.2. After careful examination of the material on record and after considering arguments of counsel for petitioner, I find sufficient merits in the petition claim. The oral and documentary evidence adduced by the petitioner sufficiently establish the claim of the petitioner. Petition claim is proved.

8.In the result, this petition is allowed without costs. The decree of divorce granted by dissolving the marriage of petitioner with respondent, which took place on 20.04.1999. 

Typed to my dictation by the Stenographer, corrected and pronounced by me in the open Court on this the 17th day of April, 2019.

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

SATHUPALLI. 

4

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

Petitioner:­ Respondent:

PW.1: E.Punyavathi – NONE–

EXHIBITS MARKED

For Petitioner: For Respondent:

Ex.P.1 : Aadhar card of petitioner ­­ Nil ­­ (compared with original)

Ex.P.2 : Photographs of petitioner and respondent

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

SATHUPALLI.

TSKH020007832017

Presented on : 19-12-2017 Registered on : 19-12-2017 Decided on : 19-08-2020 Duration : 2 years, 8 months, 0 days

IN THE COURT OF

Senior Civil Judge AT ,KHAMMAM

Presided Over by Sri. Md. Afroz Akthar

OS/100517/2017

Exhibit No.:

: Fthimunnisa and another Age: 50 Occupation : Address: occ household r/o nadamuri nagar colony mahabubabbad

VERSUS : mashooq bee and 4 others Age: 75 Occupation : Address: occ household h.no 5-5-15. mustafa nagar khammam ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Advocate for : m.d.m.irshad Advocate for : appearing for mashooq bee and 4 others: Advocate appearing for respectively.

Claim :

JUDGMENT

(Delivered on 19-08-2020 )

ORDER

Plaintiffs and defendants present and appeared through Whatsapp Video Call through BC whatsapp No.6300281335 and Sri K.Rajeswara Rao, Advocate Whatsapp No.9866481984. In view of orders passed in

IA.No.441/2020, this matter is advanced to today i.e., 19.08.2020. In view

of memo filed seeking permission to withdraw the suit. Having gone through the record, in view of the memo filed, the plaintiff is permitted to withdraw the suit. Hence, this suit is permitted to be withdrawn. Therefore, suit is dismissed as withdrawn. The order passed in IA.No.442/2020 is as follows: Plaintiffs and defendants present and appeared through Whatsapp video call through BC whatsapp No.6300281335 and Sri K.Rajeswara Rao, Advocate whatsapp No.9866481984. Heard gone through the record. In view of the circumstances stated in the petition, this court is of opinion that the petitioner deserves an opportunity to put up his case for the purpose of complete adjudication over the claim of the suit. However, in view of the delay of the proceedings that took place, this petition is allowed by setting aside exparte order, dt.07.03.2018.

Date : 19-08-2020 (Sri. Md. Afroz Akthar)

Senior Civil Judge

KHAMMAM

Dictated on :

Transcribed on : checked on : Signed on :

(Sri. Md. Afroz Akthar) {JUDGE_DESIGNATION_NAME}

,KHAMMAM

Visit ecourts.gov.in for updates or download mobile app “eCourts Services ” from Android or iOS

TSKH020007832017

Presented on : 19-12-2017 Registered on : 19-12-2017 Decided on : 19-08-2020 Duration : 2 years, 8 months, 0 days

IN THE COURT OF

Senior Civil Judge AT ,KHAMMAM

Presided Over by Sri. Md. Afroz Akthar

OS/100517/2017

Exhibit No.:

: Fthimunnisa and another Age: 50 Occupation : Address: occ household r/o nadamuri nagar colony mahabubabbad

VERSUS : mashooq bee and 4 others Age: 75 Occupation : Address: occ household h.no 5-5-15. mustafa nagar khammam ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Advocate for : m.d.m.irshad Advocate for : appearing for mashooq bee and 4 others: Advocate appearing for respectively.

Claim :

JUDGMENT

(Delivered on 19-08-2020 )

ORDER

Plaintiffs and defendants present and appeared through Whatsapp Video Call through BC whatsapp No.6300281335 and Sri K.Rajeswara Rao, Advocate Whatsapp No.9866481984. In view of orders passed in

IA.No.441/2020, this matter is advanced to today i.e., 19.08.2020. In view

of memo filed seeking permission to withdraw the suit. Having gone through the record, in view of the memo filed, the plaintiff is permitted to withdraw the suit. Hence, this suit is permitted to be withdrawn. Therefore, suit is dismissed as withdrawn. The order passed in IA.No.442/2020 is as follows: Plaintiffs and defendants present and appeared through Whatsapp video call through BC whatsapp No.6300281335 and Sri K.Rajeswara Rao, Advocate whatsapp No.9866481984. Heard gone through the record. In view of the circumstances stated in the petition, this court is of opinion that the petitioner deserves an opportunity to put up his case for the purpose of complete adjudication over the claim of the suit. However, in view of the delay of the proceedings that took place, this petition is allowed by setting aside exparte order, dt.07.03.2018.

Date : 19-08-2020 (Sri. Md. Afroz Akthar)

Senior Civil Judge

KHAMMAM

Dictated on :

Transcribed on : checked on : Signed on :

(Sri. Md. Afroz Akthar) {JUDGE_DESIGNATION_NAME}

,KHAMMAM

Visit ecourts.gov.in for updates or download mobile app “eCourts Services ” from Android or iOS

TSKH020009352012

Presented on : 17-10-2012 Registered on : 23-02-2015 Decided on : 17-07-2020 Duration : 7 years, 9 months, 0 days

IN THE COURT OF

Senior Civil Judge AT ,KHAMMAM

Presided Over by Sri. Md. Afroz Akthar

OS/100738/2014

Exhibit No.:

: M Nageswar Rao and other Age: 0 Occupation : Address: age49yrs occc mechanic Bank colony khanapuram haveli khammam

VERSUS : P Ramesh Age: 0 Occupation : Address: age40yrs occ agriculture burhanapuram locality khammam ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Advocate for : S Rameh kumar Advocate for : appearing for P Ramesh: Advocate appearing for respectively.

Claim :

JUDGMENT

(Delivered on 17-07-2020 )

ORDER

In view of orders passed in IA, this matter is advanced to today i.e., 17.07.2020. Plaintiff No.1 and 2 appeared through Whatsapp Video call through numbers 98661383809 of clerk and 9440528983 of plaintiff No.1 and 2 and 7032179848 of defendant at 2.20 pm. Plaintiff submitted contents of FS memo and reported not pressing suit. Hence, this suit is dismissed as not pressed.

Date : 17-07-2020 (Sri. Md. Afroz Akthar)

Senior Civil Judge

,KHAMMAM

Dictated on :

Transcribed on : checked on : Signed on :

(Sri. Md. Afroz Akthar) {JUDGE_DESIGNATION_NAME}

,KHAMMAM

Visit ecourts.gov.in for updates or download mobile app “eCourts Services ” from Android or iOS

TSKH020008212017

Presented on : 24-06-2017 Registered on : 28-06-2017 Decided on : 15-07-2020 Duration : 3 years, 0 months, 21 days

IN THE COURT OF

Senior Civil Judge AT ,KHAMMAM

Presided Over by Sri. Md. Afroz Akthar

OS/100271/2017

Exhibit No.:

: Nelluri Prasad Rao Age: 56 Occupation : Address: SRC towers, Dwaraka nagar

VERSUS : M.Ventaka Narasama and other Age: 55 Occupation : Address: Maddirala village, Suryapeta ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Advocate for : Advocate for : appearing for M.Ventaka Narasama and other: Advocate appearing for respectively.

Claim :

JUDGMENT

(Delivered on 15-07-2020 )

ORDER

In view of orders passed in IA.No.359/2020, this suit is restored to its original number. Since, both parties appeared through Whastapp Video Call and submitted contents of Full Satisfaction memo filed by plaintiff. The is recorded and the suit is dismissed.

Date : 15-07-2020 (Sri. Md. Afroz Akthar)

Senior Civil Judge

,KHAMMAM

Dictated on :

Transcribed on : checked on : Signed on :

(Sri. Md. Afroz Akthar) {JUDGE_DESIGNATION_NAME}

,KHAMMAM

Visit ecourts.gov.in for updates or download mobile app “eCourts Services ” from Android or iOS