Sri Ch.V. Rama Krishna

Addl. Junior Civil Judge

Court of Senior Civil Judge, Mangalagiri (Taluka) · Guntur · Andhra Pradesh

Sri Ch.V. Rama Krishna, Addl. Junior Civil Judge, is posted at Court of Senior Civil Judge, Mangalagiri (Taluka), Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, India. 1,550 court orders on record since 2023. 5 judgments with full text available. Primarily handles OS, CC, EP cases.

1,550

Total Orders

Judgments

128

Orders/Month

Postings

Featured Judgments

OS/263/2024

Namathoti Veeraiah vs Bathula Kishore

14 Feb 2025

OS No.263 of 2024 1 PCJ (JD), MNGL,

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE (JUNIOR DIVISION)

MANGALAGIRI

PRESENT: CH.V.RAMAKRISHNA

PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE (JUNIOR DIVISION)

FRIDAY, THIS THE 14 th DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025.

ORIGINAL SUIT No.263/2024

BETWEEN: Namathoti Veeraiah, S/o. Late Venkateswarlu, aged about 45 years, Hindu, Business, R/o. Gundimeda Village, Tadepalli Mandal, Guntur District.

...PLAINTIFF

and

Bathula Kishore, S/o. Venkataramana, aged about 40 years, Hindu, Real Estate Business, 0 line, Swarna Bharathi Nagar, Behind Dakshinayam, Adavi Takkellapadu, Pattabhipuram, Guntur – 522 006. …DEFENDANT

-oo0oo-

This suit came up before me for final hearing on 12-02-2025 in the presence of Sri N. Kaleswara Rao, Advocate for Plaintiff, and the defendant is set ex parte as having been remained absent when called, and upon hearing the counsel for plaintiff and upon perusing the material on record, and this matter having stood over for consideration till this day, this Court delivered the following:

//J U D G M E N T//

This is a suit for recovery of Rs.18,87,000/- being the principal and interest due on a promissory note dt.19-08-2023 executed by the defendant in favour of the plaintiff for Rs.15,00,000/-, agreeing to repay the said amount together with interest at 24% p.a., and for costs.

2. The averments, in brief, of the plaint are that, the defendant borrowed an amount of Rs.15,00,000/- from the plaintiff on 19-08-2023 to meet his family necessities and in evidence thereof on the date the defendant executed a demand promissory note in favour of the plaintiff at the house of plaintiff in Gundimeda Village agreeing to repay the same with yearly compounding interest @24% per annum either to the plaintiff

PCJ (JD) MNGL.

OS No.263 of 2024 2 PCJ (JD), MNGL,

or to his order on demand. Later, inspite of repeated demands made by the plaintiff personally as well as through mediators for repayment of the debt due under the aforesaid promissory note, the defendant did not choose to repay the same, except making empty promises from time to time on one pretext or other and gaining time. On 18-07-2024, the plaintiff issued a legal notice to the defendant demanding him to discharge the debt due under afore promissory note for which the defendant received the said notice and kept quiet and thereby failed to comply with demands of the said notice. Hence, the suit.

3. The suit summons on the defendant through post returned with endorsement “addressee absent, intimation served” which is deemed service and, on 22-01-2025, which is the day fixed for his appearance, the defendant was called and as he remained absent and as there was no representation for him, the defendant was set ex parte. The suit was posted for plaintiff side evidence.

4. In support of his case, the plaintiff got examined himself as PW1 and got marked Ex.A1 to Ex.A3.

5.Heard the counsel for plaintiff. Perused the material on record.

6.Now the point that arise for consideration is whether the plaintiff is entitled to recover the suit amount from the defendant as prayed for ?

POINT:

7.The plaintiff, as PW1, in his chief examination affidavit, reiterated all the averments made in the plaint. He got marked Ex.A1 to Ex.A3. Ex.A1 is Promissory Note dt.19-08-2023 for Rs.15,00,000/- executed by the defendant in favour of plaintiff. Ex.A2 is office copy of legal notice dt.18- 07-2024. Ex.A3 is postal acknowledgment of defendant dt.23-07-2024.

PCJ (JD) MNGL.

OS No.263 of 2024 3 PCJ (JD), MNGL,

8. In view of the unchallenged testimony of the plaintiff, as PW1, coupled with the documentary evidence Ex.A1 to Ex.A3, I hold that the plaintiff has successfully proved his claim against the defendant. So, I hold that the plaintiff is entitled to recover the suit amount from the defendant as prayed for. The point is answered accordingly.

9.In the result, the suit is decreed with costs directing the defendant to pay to the plaintiff a sum of Rs.18,87,000/- together with interest at 12% per annum from the date of filing of the suit till the date of decree on the principal amount of Rs.15,00,000/- and, thereafter, with future interest at 6% per annum from the date of decree till the date of realization on the said principal amount.

Typed to my dictation by the Stenographer Gr-III, corrected, signed and pronounced by me, in open Court, on this the 14th day of February, 2025.

Sd/-Ch.V.Ramakrishna

Principal Civil Judge (Junior Division)

Mangalagiri

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

For Plaintiff: For Defendant:

PW1: Namathoti Veeraiah -NONE-

DOCUMENTS MARKED

For Plaintiff: Ex.A1 : Promissory Note dt.19-08-2023 for Rs.15,00,000/- executed by the defendant in favour of plaintiff. Ex.A2 : office copy of legal notice dt.18-07-2024. Ex.A3 : postal acknowledgment of defendant dt.23-07-2024. For Defendant: -NIL-

Sd/-Ch.V.Ramakrishna

Principal Civil Judge (Junior Division)

Mangalagiri

PCJ (JD) MNGL.

OS/279/2020

K.Sarada, Rep. by GPA Holder K.Babu Rao vs Balineni Ajay

13 Feb 2025

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE(JUNIOR DIVISION):

MANGALAGIRI

Present: SRI Ch.V.Rama Krishna

Principal Civil Judge (Junior Division), Mangalagiri

Thursday, the 13 th day of February, 2025

O.S.No.279/2020

Between:

K. Sarada, W/o. D.V.Rama Krishna, Hindu, aged about 49 years, C/o. K. Babu Rao, R/o. 1st floor, R.R.Towers, LIC Colony, ITI College Road, Vijayawada, represented by GPA Holder K. Babu Rao, S/o. K. Subba Rao, Hindu, aged about 80 years, R/o. 1st Floor, R.R.Towers, LIC Colony, ITI College Road, Vijayawada.

.... Plaintiff

Vs.,

Balineni Ajay, S/o. Nagarjuna, Hindu, aged about 35 years, R/o.Ummadevarapalli Post, Gapalagudem Mandal, Krishna District. …. Defendant

This suit coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri S. Koteswara Rao and Sri P. Seshu Mohan, Advocates for the plaintiff; Sri N. Venkata Raju, Advocate for defendant and having stood over for consideration till this day, this court delivered the following:

J U D G M E N T

{ This is a suit filed for a direction to the defendant to pay

Rs.3,72,000/- towards arrears of rent and Rs.79,200/- towards interest on arrears of rent at 24%; by directing the defendant to vacate and deliver the possession of the plaint schedule property in vacant condition to the plaintiff; by directing the defendant to pay Rs.2,50,000/- per month towards damages from the date of suit till the defendant vacates and deliver the plaint schedule property and for costs of the suit.

Plaintiff represented by her GPA holder and the counsel for plaintiff are present. Defendant and his counsel Sri NMV are present. Sri

PSM, counsel for plaintiff filed a memo duly signed by the plaintiff submitting that as the defendant had enhanced the rent with a condition for continuing the tenancy upto 30-04-2027 and undertook not to conduct serving of food to the students from 01-05-2027 to till 30-04-2028 and as such, the purpose of suit become infructuous and hence, the plaintiff is withdrawing the suit in view of the terms of compromise agreed between them. It is further submitted that there are no dues as arrears of rent and that the defendant is paying Rs.1,30,000/- as monthly rent from 01-07-2024 onwards with a condition to reduce the rent to Rs.1,25,000/- per month from the month of stoppage of service of food is intimated to the plaintiff by the defendant as per the understanding between them by fixing the rent to

Rs.1,25,000/- from then onwards. It is further submitted that the defendant had agreed not to interfere with the possession and enjoyment of the portion in the ground floor of the building which is in occupation of the GPA holder of the plaintiff. It is further submitted that an amount of Rs.3,90,000/- which is lying as advance amount with the GPA holder is agreed to be returned to the defendant at the time of vacating the tenant schedule property under proper acknowledgment. It is further submitted that in view of the above clauses, the plaintiff prays the court to dismiss the suit as withdrawn by recording the memo in the interest of justice. The memo is read over to both parties and both parties accepted the same and Sri NMV, counsel for defendant made an endorsement reporting no objection in respect of the said memo. Hence, the said memo is recorded.

Consequently, the suit is dismissed as withdrawn without costs recording the terms mentioned in the memo.

Pronounced by me in open court, on this the 13th day of February, 2025.

Sd/- Ch.V.Rama Krishna

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE ( JUNIOR DIVISION),

MANGALAGIRI.

Appendix of Evidence

Witnesses examined

For plaintiff: For defendant:

PW1 – K. Babu Rao-NIL-

Exhibits marked

For plaintiff:

Ex.A1 is office copy of the legal notice dt.16-09-2020 issued by the plaintiff to the defendant.

Ex.A2 is reply notice dt.07-10-2020 issued by the defendant to the plaintiff.

Ex.A3 is interim rejoinder dt.14-10-2020 issued by the plaintiff to the defendant.

Ex.A4 is rejoinder dt.20-10-2020 issued to the defendant by the plaintiff.

Ex.A5 is served copy of plaint in OS.No.186/2020 on the file of the court of

Principal Junior Civil Judge, Mangalagiri.

For defendant: NIL.

Sd/- Ch.V.Rama Krishna

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE ( JUNIOR DIVISION),

MANGALAGIRI.

OS/111/2023

China Hanumantha Rao vs Gummadidala Lakshmi Kumari

14 Feb 2025

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE(JUNIOR DIVISION):

MANGALAGIRI

Present: SRI Ch.V.Rama Krishna

Principal Civil Judge (Junior Division), Mangalagiri

Friday, the 14 th day of February, 2025

O.S.No.111/2023

Between:

Gummadidala China Hanumantha Rao, S/o. Subbaiah, aged about 52 yars, Hindu, agriculturist, R/o. Motadaka Village, Tadikonda Mandal, Guntur District.

.... Plaintiff

Vs.,

1. Gummadidala Lakshmi Kumari, W/o. China Hanumantha Rao, aged about 50 years, Hindu, Housewife, R/o.D.No. 2-14/A, Mothadaka Village, Tadikonda Mandal, Guntur District.

2. Gottam Krishna Murthy, S/o.Srinivasulu, aged about 45 years, Hindu, Business, R/o. D.No.37-1-406M, 1st line, Bhagya Nagar, Ongole, Prakasam District. …. Defendants

This suit coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri M. Satish Babu, Advocates for the plaintiff; Sri D. Suresh Kumar,

Advocate for defendants No.1 to 4 and having stood over for consideration till this day, this court delivered the following:

J U D G M E N T

{ This is a suit filed for cancellation of the sale deed

No.1012/2019, dt.09-05-2019 registered before Sub-Registrar Office,

Pedakurapadu, Guntur District which was executed by the 1st defendant in favour of the 2nd defendant and for costs of the suit.

The hearing of the suit is advanced and adjourned to today as per the orders in IA.No.258/2025, dt.14-02-2025. Plaintiff is present along with his counsel. Defendants 1 and 2 are absent. No representation for defendant No.1 as no notice is issued either on the defendant No.1 or his counsel. Heard the counsel for plaintiff. Perused the record. Sri KKR, counsel for plaintiff filed a memo informing that the plaintiff filed the present suit against the defendants seeking cancellation of the sale deed which was executed between the defendants in respect of the plaint schedule property and that the suit is pending for settlement of terms under Sec.89 CPC. It is further submitted that, at this stage, the plaintiff intends to not to proceed further in the suit proceedings. It is also submitted that, apart from the present suit, the plaintiff filed two other suits vide OS.No.139/2019 and

OS.No.333/2019 against the defendants herein on the file of this court and

both the said suits were clubbed together and those two suits were dismissed for default due to non appearance of the plaintiff and that the plaintiff did not choose to take any steps to get those two suits restored to file. It is submitted that the plaintiff intends not to proceed legally against the defendants herein and also agrees not to file any other case against the defendants with the same cause of action and with the similar relief. The memo is read over and explained to the plaintiff and he accepted the same and the counsel for plaintiff requested to record the same and dismiss the suit as not pressed. Hence, the said submissions as well as the memo are recorded. Hence, the suit is dismissed without costs as not pressed.

Pronounced by me in open court, on this the 14th day of February, 2025.

Sd/- Ch.V.Rama Krishna

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE ( JUNIOR DIVISION),

MANGALAGIRI.

Appendix of Evidence

NIL.

Sd/- Ch.V.Rama Krishna

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE ( JUNIOR DIVISION),

MANGALAGIRI.

OS/109/2020

Vaddeswaram Joseph Raju vs Vaddeswaram Bujji

11 Feb 2025

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE(JUNIOR DIVISION):

MANGALAGIRI

Present: SRI Ch.V.Rama Krishna

Principal Civil Judge (Junior Division), Mangalagiri

Tuesday, the 11 th day of February, 2025

O.S.No.109/2020

Between:

Vaddeswaram Joseph Raju, S/o. Aseervadam, Christian, aged about 50 years, R/o.D.No.4-83, Vaddeswaram Village, Tadepalli Mandal, Guntur District.

.... Plaintiff

Vs.,

1. Vaddeswaram Bujji, S/o. Pitchaiah, Hindu, aged about 52 years

2. Vaddeswaram Punnaiah, S/o. Koteswara Rao, Hindu, aged about 74 years.

3. Vaddeswaram Babu Rao, S/o. Jogaiah, Hindu, aged about 60 years.

4. Kanapala Mariyadasu, S/o. Luther, Christian, aged about 35 years. All the defendants are R/o. Vaddeswaram Village, Tadepalli Mandal, Guntur District. …. Defendants

This suit coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri M. Satish Babu, Advocates for the plaintiff; Sri D. Suresh Kumar,

Advocate for defendants No.1 to 4 and having stood over for consideration till this day, this court delivered the following:

J U D G M E N T

{ This is a suit filed for permanent injunction restraining the defendants and their men from constructing any compound wall over the plaint schedule pathway and also from causing any obstructions to the plaintiff in using the plaint schedule pathway and for costs of the suit.

Plaintiff / PW1 is absent. No representation for plaintiff though the matter is called twice today. Even for the earlier four adjournments the plaintiff remained absent and there was no representation for him. Further, the plaintiff failed to pay the costs as ordered to the other. Hence, it is clear that the plaintiff is not interested to prosecute the suit. Hence, the suit is dismissed for non prosecution with costs.

Pronounced by me in open court, on this the 11th day of February, 2025.

Sd/- Ch.V.Rama Krishna

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE ( JUNIOR DIVISION),

MANGALAGIRI.

Appendix of Evidence

Witnesses examined

For plaintiff:For defendants:

PW1 – Vaddeswaram Joseph Raju.NIL.

Exhibits marked

For plaintiff :

Ex.A1 is a copy of plaint in OS.No.394/2017 on the file of this Court.

Ex.A2 is the copy of FIR in Cr.No.237/2018 of Tadepalli Police station along with private complaint filed by the plaintiff.

Ex.A3 is the copy of charge sheet filed by Tadepalli Police station in connection with Cr.No.237/2018.

Ex.A4 is the copy of complaint given by the plaintiff to SHO., Tadepalli Police station dt.29-05-2020.

For defendants: NIL.

Sd/- Ch.V.Rama Krishna

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE ( JUNIOR DIVISION),

MANGALAGIRI.

OS/186/2020

Balineni Ajay vs K.Sharada

13 Feb 2025

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE(JUNIOR DIVISION):

MANGALAGIRI

Present: SRI Ch.V.Rama Krishna

Principal Civil Judge (Junior Division), Mangalagiri

Thursday, the 13 th day of February, 2025

O.S.No.186/2020

Between:

Balineni Ajay, S/o. Nagarjuna, Hindu, aged about 35 years, R/o.Ummadevarapalli Post, Gapalagudem Mandal, Krishna District.

.... Plaintiff

Vs.,

1. K. Sarada, W/o. D.V.Rama Krishna, Hindu, aged about 40 years, C/o. K. Babu Rao, R/o. 1st floor, R.R.Towers, LIC Colony, ITI College Road, Vijayawada

2. K. Babu Rao, S/o. K. Subba Rao, Hindu, aged about 75 years, R/o. 1st Floor, R.R.Towers, LIC Colony, ITI College Road, Vijayawada. …. Defendant

This suit coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri N. Venkata Raju, Advocates for the plaintiff; Sri P. Seshu Mohan,

Advocate for defendants No.1 and 2 and having stood over for consideration till this day, this court delivered the following:

J U D G M E N T

{ This is a suit filed for permanent injunction restraining the defendants, their men, associates, agents, representatives etc., from in any way interfering with plaintiff’s peaceful possession and enjoyment of the plaint schedule property in any manner whatsoever except under due process of

Law and for costs of the suit.

Plaintiff represented by his counsel Sri NMV is present. The defendant represented by her GPA holder along with her counsel Sri PSM is present. The counsel for plaintiff filed a memo duly signed by the plaintiff reporting that in view of the settlement of the disputes and the defendant having got the suit OS.No.279/2020 withdrawn, the plaintiff is not pressing the present suit and requested to dismiss the suit without costs in the interest of justice. The memo is read over to both the parties and both parties accepted for the same. Hence, the said memo is recorded.

Consequently, the suit is dismissed without costs as not pressed.

Pronounced by me in open court, on this the 13th day of February, 2025.

Sd/- Ch.V.Rama Krishna

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE ( JUNIOR DIVISION),

MANGALAGIRI.

Appendix of Evidence

NIL.

Sd/- Ch.V.Rama Krishna

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE ( JUNIOR DIVISION),

MANGALAGIRI.

Order Record 1,459 total

Case No.	Parties	Date	Type	Outcome
OS/111/2023	China Hanumantha Rao vs Gummadidala Lakshmi Kumari	14 Feb 2025	Judgment	—
OS/263/2024	Namathoti Veeraiah vs Bathula Kishore	14 Feb 2025	Judgment	—
CC/61/2020	SHO., Tadepalli P.S., vs Muppalla Sambasiva Rao	14 Feb 2025	Order	—
OS/186/2020	Balineni Ajay vs K.Sharada	13 Feb 2025	Judgment	—
OS/279/2020	K.Sarada, Rep. by GPA Holder K.Babu Rao vs Balineni Ajay	13 Feb 2025	Judgment	—
EP/22/2024	Kolla Sankara Rao, vs Bandari Mohana Rao	11 Feb 2025	Others	—
EP/43/2022	Kolla Sankara Rao vs Lanka Srinivasa Rao	11 Feb 2025	Others	—
OS/109/2020	Vaddeswaram Joseph Raju vs Vaddeswaram Bujji	11 Feb 2025	Judgment	—
OS/317/2024	Kalavakunta alias Moram Jyothi vs Katragadda Haribabu	11 Feb 2025	Others	—
OS/504/2023	Udarapu Krishna Kumari vs Nallagona Nageswara Rao	11 Feb 2025	Others	—
OS/349/2021	Tenali Koteswara Rao vs Chiluvuru Naveen alias Naveen Kumar	10 Feb 2025	Judgment	—
OS/437/2022	Kovvuru Sivaiah vs Pasupuleti Naga Raju	07 Feb 2025	Judgment	—
OS/509/2023	Sajjula Srinivasa Reddy vs Bukya Yesubabu	07 Feb 2025	Judgment	—
CC/247/2020	SHO, Tadepalli PS vs Garika Prasad and another	07 Feb 2025	Others	—
OS/123/2019	Veeranki Sridevi vs Pilla Vijaya Bhaskar	06 Feb 2025	Judgment	—
OS/174/2024	Nalluri Uma Pallavi vs Kanda Bhavani Sankara Lingam	06 Feb 2025	Judgment	—
OS/409/2022	Potluri Siva Sanjeeva Janardhana Murthy rep. Potluri Bhaskara Murthy vs Tallam Nagamalleswari	06 Feb 2025	Judgment	—
OS/427/2023	Ramanadham Venkata Ramana vs Chintakrindi Seshagiri Rao	06 Feb 2025	Judgment	—
OS/454/2022	Garlapati Narendra Babu vs Garlapati Satyavathi	06 Feb 2025	Judgment	—
OS/455/2022	Challa Samba Siva Rao vs Mannava Ashok Kumar	06 Feb 2025	Judgment	—
OS/697/2022	State Bank of India, Mothadaka Branch rep. by its Branch Manager, B. Ramesh vs Kallagunta Parameswara Rao	06 Feb 2025	Judgment	—
OS/167/2022	State Bank of India rep. by Branch Manager Peram Ashok Kumar vs Alla Rama Swamy Reddy	05 Feb 2025	Judgment	—
OS/363/2023	Sanghvi Aarya vs Sanghvi Rajesh Kumar	05 Feb 2025	Judgment	—
OS/56/2023	Shaik Ameer Basha vs Nandam Venkat Kotaiah	04 Feb 2025	Judgment	—
OS/425/2022	Katta Samba Siva Rao vs Panchayat Secretary	04 Feb 2025	Judgment	—
OS/16/2020	Katlagunta Venkateswara Rao vs Katlagunta Sankar	03 Feb 2025	Judgment	—
CC/44/2020	Sub-inspector of police, Tadepalli P.S. vs Shaik Rafi	31 Jan 2025	Judgment	—
OS/157/2024	Markapudi Yakobu vs Nagendla Bhaskar Rao	30 Jan 2025	Judgment	—
EP/65/2024	Nelakurthi Srinivasa rao vs Boyapati Raghu Babu	29 Jan 2025	Judgment	—
OS/363/2022	Potturu Sai Pradeep vs Chandrapati Sriram Sateesh	29 Jan 2025	Order	—
OS/579/2022	Mohammad Gousia Begum alias Gousiya Begum vs Mohammad alias Pathan Salimunnisa	29 Jan 2025	Judgment	—
OS/27/2020	Narne Venkateswaera Rao vs Maripudi Veeraiah and 5 others	28 Jan 2025	Judgment	—
OS/84/2021	Chandra Sekhar vs Municipal Commissioner	28 Jan 2025	Judgment	—
OS/193/2022	Gandham Venkateswara Rao vs Uppe Venkataratnam	28 Jan 2025	Judgment	—
OS/353/2021	Shaik Ahmad Sharieff vs Veepuri Surya Chandra Rao	28 Jan 2025	Judgment	—
OS/210/2018	Chintamareddi Kondamma @ Konda vs Gadde Tirupati Rao and another	23 Jan 2025	Judgment	—
OS/365/2023	Kallam Kishore Reddy vs Chaganti Sambi Reddy	22 Jan 2025	Judgment	—
OS/166/2017	Kalakoti Rajani vs Kattepogu Ramesh and two others	21 Jan 2025	Judgment	—
OS/25/2017	Karnatapu Mahalakshmi vs Vinnakota Durga Prasad and another	20 Jan 2025	Judgment	—
OS/39/2023	Union Bank of India vs Patchimiriyam Seetha Ramaiah	20 Jan 2025	Judgment	—
OS/72/2019	Kaka Nageeswara Rao vs Kommineni Purnachandra Mani Kumari	20 Jan 2025	Judgment	—
OS/98/2020	Nimmagadda Narasimha Rao vs Buradagunta Koteswara Rao	20 Jan 2025	Judgment	—
OS/100/2024	State Bank of India rep by Dokara Kalyani vs Inukollu Ramesh Babu	20 Jan 2025	Judgment	—
OS/137/2015	Puvvada Subba Rao vs Puvvada Apparao and 2 others.	20 Jan 2025	Judgment	—
OS/299/2022	Bhupathi Satyam Babu vs Bhupathi Gangaiah alias Gangadhara Rao	20 Jan 2025	Judgment	—
OS/299/2024	Adusumalli Bhanu Prasad vs Shiva Krishna Boyapati	20 Jan 2025	Judgment	—
OS/300/2022	Bhupathi Satyam Babu vs Gangaiah alias Gangadhara Rao	20 Jan 2025	Judgment	—
OS/352/2015	Kommineni Venkateswara Rao vs Kommineni Sambasivarao and two others	20 Jan 2025	Judgment	—
OS/568/2022	Katuri Samba Juva Sankar vs Kanapala Babu Peter	20 Jan 2025	Judgment	—
CC/494/2020	SHO., Women P.S., Guntur. vs Nelaturi Kiran Kumar	17 Jan 2025	Judgment	—
CC/551/2020	SHO, Women PS vs Bitra Venkaiah and 4 others	17 Jan 2025	Judgment	—
OS/61/2018	Jaladi Sudha Rani vs Bandla Mary Sarojini and two others	10 Jan 2025	Judgment	—
RCC/1/2024	Macharla Jalamma vs The Mangalagiri Weavers Cooperative Society Ltd rep. Damarla Mohan	10 Jan 2025	Others	—
EP/37/2024	Gaade Sambi Reddy vs Kurumeti Chiranjeevi	09 Jan 2025	Order	—
EP/51/2019	Penumutchu Rajan Babu vs Vippala Gurava Reddy	09 Jan 2025	Judgment	—
OS/88/2021	Gujarat Crop Science rep. by Reddam Koti Reddy vs Swarnala gopala Rao	09 Jan 2025	Judgment	—
OS/97/2024	Kommineni Satya Narayana vs Bejjam Sai Prasad	09 Jan 2025	Judgment	—
OS/102/2016	Puli Kamalamma and another. vs Puli Sayavedam and 3 others	09 Jan 2025	Judgment	—
OS/233/2024	The Hosanna (PATMAS) Christian Evangelical Trust, Bandaru Christopher vs Jyothula Kishor Kumar	09 Jan 2025	Judgment	—
OS/238/2022	CVhikkala Mariyamma vs Palle Prasad	09 Jan 2025	Judgment	—
OS/290/2023	Samala Venkat Rao vs Guntu Bala Bhargavi	09 Jan 2025	Judgment	—
OS/293/2024	Battu Srinivasa Rao vs Margampudi Guddiyya	09 Jan 2025	Judgment	—
OS/294/2024	Thati Chandramouleshwar Rao vs Meera Saheb	09 Jan 2025	Judgment	—
OS/297/2020	Sribhashyam Narasimha Murthy vs The Government of Andhra Pradesh	09 Jan 2025	Judgment	—
OS/298/2024	Marella Srilakshmi vs Bommu Venkatramireddy	09 Jan 2025	Judgment	—
OS/459/2023	Jonnadula Ravindra Rao vs Munagala Chandra Sekhar	09 Jan 2025	Judgment	—
OS/505/2022	Cheraku Jaideep vs Dhammu Ramanjineyulu	09 Jan 2025	Judgment	—
OS/20/2019	Tondapu Govardhana Rao vs Damaravarapu Sulochana	08 Jan 2025	Judgment	—
OS/65/2024	Palakayala Venkaiah vs Ramisetty Srinivasa Rao	08 Jan 2025	Judgment	—
OS/108/2024	Pasumarthy Sanath Kumar Sarma GPA Yogananda Srinivasa Sarma vs Pasumarthy Santh Kumar Sarma	08 Jan 2025	Judgment	—
OS/138/2024	Kolluri Mark vs Nelapati Siva Babu	08 Jan 2025	Judgment	—
OS/139/2024	Bandla Bhaskara Rao vs Maddi Venkateswara Rao	08 Jan 2025	Judgment	—
OS/179/2023	Chimata Chimata Rajyalakshmi vs Ammanamanchi Syam Prasad	08 Jan 2025	Judgment	—
OS/187/2019	Polu Tirumala Rao vs Polu Kirshtaiah	08 Jan 2025	Judgment	—
OS/390/2021	Udata Bhagya Lakshmi alias Panidapu Bhagya Lakshmi vs Panidapu Sakunthala	08 Jan 2025	Judgment	—
OS/565/2022	Garikapati Budigaiah vs Charlopalli Ramesh	08 Jan 2025	Judgment	—
EP/65/2023	Kancharla Prakasa Rao vs Kancharla Muttamma	07 Jan 2025	Order	—
OS/76/2024	Garikipati Satish Babu vs Gopi Desi Baji	07 Jan 2025	Judgment	—
OS/405/2021	Kancharla Neehanth Chaitanya being minor rep. by is father Kancharla Kiran Kumar vs Katari Vijaya Lakshmi and 2 others	07 Jan 2025	Judgment	—
OS/423/2023	Tirunampalli Swarjya Lakshmi vs Valaparla Gnananandam	07 Jan 2025	Judgment	—
OS/58/2024	Pandala Venkata Siva Rama Krishna vs Bodinapalli Satya Sreedhar	06 Jan 2025	Judgment	—
OS/70/2024	Pedaprolu Gopala Rao vs Kothapalli Gandhi	06 Jan 2025	Judgment	—
OS/153/2016	Palaparthi Suvartha vs Gochipatha Mariyadasu and 5 others	06 Jan 2025	Judgment	—
OS/172/2016	Metta Amarnadh vs Metta Sambasiva Rao and another	06 Jan 2025	Judgment	—
OS/210/2024	Nalluri Vijayalakshmi vs Penumuchu Vajramma	06 Jan 2025	Judgment	—
OS/220/2019	Seshamsetty Sitharavamma vs Muttampalli Sivaiah	06 Jan 2025	Judgment	—
OS/432/2023	Nari Prasad Babu vs Jala Papa Rao	06 Jan 2025	Judgment	—
OS/121/2024	Avuthu Prakash Reddy vs Manne Pavani alias Uppalapadi Pavani	03 Jan 2025	Judgment	—
OS/122/2024	Avuthu Prakash Reddy vs Manne Pavani alias Uppalapati Pavani	03 Jan 2025	Judgment	—
OS/123/2024	Avuthu Prakash Reddy vs Manne Pavani alias Uppalapati Pavani	03 Jan 2025	Judgment	—
OS/139/2019	Gummadidala China Hanumantha Rao vs Gummadidala Lakshmi Kumari	03 Jan 2025	Judgment	—
OS/139/2020	Ardala Sivaji vs Pluvadi Kasturi Devi	03 Jan 2025	Judgment	—
OS/154/2023	kalluri lakshmi Ganesh Kumar vs Rajaputra Suguna Bai and another	03 Jan 2025	Judgment	—
OS/333/2019	Gummadidala China Hanumantha Rao vs Gummadidala Lakshmi Kumari	03 Jan 2025	Judgment	—
OS/349/2024	Katragadda Purushotham vs Vishnumolakala Seetharamaiah	03 Jan 2025	Judgment	—
OS/358/2021	Canara Bank (E - Syndicate Bank) Mangalagiri Branch, Rep by its Branch Manager. vs Sampanna Lakshmi Medical and Fancy Rep by its Proprietor Sri Valluri Prasanna Kumar Mahanti	03 Jan 2025	Judgment	—
CC/399/2020	SHO, Tadepalli PS vs Siddela Rani @ Kumari and 31 others	03 Jan 2025	Others	—
OS/56/2024	Jarugu Rajesh vs Bhupathi Gangaiah	02 Jan 2025	Judgment	—
OS/91/2024	Nemalikanti Nagaraju vs Ejjada Apparao	02 Jan 2025	Judgment	—
OS/119/2024	Valiveti Lakshmi Narayana vs Potturi Mani Kanta	02 Jan 2025	Judgment	—

Showing 100 of 1,459 orders — Log in to browse all pages.

Monthly Orders (Last 12 Months)

Feb 2025		27
Jan 2025		90
Dec 2024		70
Nov 2024		80
Oct 2024		61
Sep 2024		93
Aug 2024		94
Jul 2024		90
Jun 2024		32
May 2024		29
Apr 2024		61
Mar 2024		65

Frequently Asked Questions

How many cases has Sri Ch.V. Rama Krishna handled?

Sri Ch.V. Rama Krishna has handled 1550 court orders since 2023 at Court of Senior Civil Judge, Mangalagiri (Taluka). The average disposal rate is 128 orders per month.

What types of cases does Sri Ch.V. Rama Krishna hear?

Based on available records, Sri Ch.V. Rama Krishna primarily handles Civil matters (Original Suits, Execution Petitions) and Criminal matters (Criminal Cases) at Court of Senior Civil Judge, Mangalagiri (Taluka).

Where is Sri Ch.V. Rama Krishna currently posted?

Sri Ch.V. Rama Krishna is posted as Addl. Junior Civil Judge at Court of Senior Civil Judge, Mangalagiri (Taluka), Guntur, Andhra Pradesh.

Are judgments by Sri Ch.V. Rama Krishna available online?

Yes. 5 judgments by Sri Ch.V. Rama Krishna are available on Legistro with full text, outcome, and sections cited.

How fast does Sri Ch.V. Rama Krishna dispose cases?

Sri Ch.V. Rama Krishna disposes approximately 128 cases per month, based on 1550 orders handled over their tenure at Court of Senior Civil Judge, Mangalagiri (Taluka).

Since when is Sri Ch.V. Rama Krishna serving?

Sri Ch.V. Rama Krishna has been serving at Court of Senior Civil Judge, Mangalagiri (Taluka) since 2023.

Case Types

OS 71%

CC 16%

EP 12%

ELECOP 0%

MC 0%

A 0%

RCC 0%

LPC 0%

Posting History

Apr 2024 — May 2024

Addl. Junior Civil Judge
May 2023 — Feb 2025

PRL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE · 1,550 orders

Other Judges at this Court

Smt M V seshamma

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, MANGALAGIRI

0 orders

M.Anjani Priya Darshini

Addl. Senior Civil Judge Mangalagiri

1 orders

Sri Suresh Babu Kalive

PRL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE

619 orders

M prasanna Lakshmi

Addl. Junior Civil Judge

222 orders

← View all judges at Court of Senior Civil Judge, Mangalagiri (Taluka)