Currently Serving

Ms. Chennu Leela Naga Susmitha

JFCM FOR RAILWAY CASES KAZIPET

Kazipet, JFCM Railway Court Complex · Hanumakonda · Telangana

Ms. Chennu Leela Naga Susmitha, JFCM FOR RAILWAY CASES KAZIPET, is posted at Kazipet, JFCM Railway Court Complex, Hanumakonda, Telangana, India. 1,979 court orders on record since 2023. 5 judgments with full text available. Primarily handles STC, CC, PRC cases.

1,979

Total Orders

Judgments

Orders/Month

Postings

Featured Judgments

OS/2327/2022

Bairi komuraiah vs Suthrapu Yadaiah

07 Jun 2024

IN THE COURT OF THE SPECIAL JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS

(MOBILE) UNDER PCR ACT-CUM-II ADDITIONAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

HANAMKONDA.

Friday, this the 7th day of June, 2024

Present: Ms. Chennu Leela Naga Susmitha Spl. J.M.F.C. (Mobile) under P.C.R. Act-cum- II-Addl Junior Civil Judge, Hanamkonda

O.S.No. 2327 of 2022

Between:-

1. Bairi Komuraiah, S/o. Kanakaiah, Age: 40 years, Occ: Agriculture,

2. Bairi Rajamma, W/o. Komuraiah, Age: 30 years, Occ: Agriculture, Both R/o. H.No.8-79/3, Velair Post and Mandal, Warangal Urban District. …Plaintiffs AND

1.Suthrapu Yadaiah, S/o. Late Komuraiah, Age: 55 years,

2.Suthrapu Sambaraju, S/o. Yadaiah, Age: 28 years,

3.Suthrapu Satheesh, S/o. Yadaiah, Age: 25 years, All are Agriculturist, R/o.H.No.8-56, Velair post and Mandal, Warangal Urban District. … Defendants .. @@@..

This suit is coming on 09-05-2024 for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri K. Ramesh Babu, Learned Counsel for the Plaintiff and Defendants having remained exparte and after hearing the arguments and having stood over for consideration till this day, the court delivers the following:-

: : J U D G M E N T : :

This is a Suit filed by the Plaintiff for grant of permanent injunction to restrain the defendants, their supporters, or any other persons acting on his behalf from interfering (or) in any way invading with their peaceful possession and enjoyment of plaintiff over the suit schedule property and for costs of the suit.

O.S.No. 2327 of 2022 2 Dt: 07-06-2024

2.The brief averments of the Plaint are as follows: Plaintiff No.1 is the owner, pattedar and possessor of agricultural land measuring Ac.0.33 gts out of

Sy.No.1605/C; Ac.5.37 gts out of Sy.No.1605/D; ac.0.30 gts out of Sy.No.1610/A1 totally measuring Ac.7.20 gts situated at velair village and mandal, Warangal

Urban District and Plaintiff No.2 who is the wife of Plaintiff No.2 is the owner, pattedar and possessor of the agricultural land measuring Ac.6.00 gts out of

Sy.No.1605/A situated at Velair village and mandal, Warangal Urban District. The said lands totally measuring Ac.13.20 gts is an agricultural land and form compact block (hereinafter mentioned as “Suit Schedule Property”).

ii)The Plaintiffs purchased the suit land from its erstwhile owner and possessor. After purchase on the applications made by the plaintiffs the then

Tahsildar, Dharmasagar following due procedure issued Pattadar pass book and

Title deeds and the Government has also issued digital pattedar pass book vide

T21100040645, Khata No.942 and T21100040644, Khata No.941.

Iii)The plaintiffs to cultivate paddy have laid paddy patch and it is the time for transplantation. The Defendant No.1 to Defendant No.3 being family members (Father and sons) holding land towards eastern side with an ill-motive to grab the land of plaintiff’s started interfering with the peaceful possession and tried to remove the boundary stones and disturb the bunds of the plaintiffs. On 3- 8-2020 and also on 5.8.2020 obstructed the plaintiffs from conducting transplantation. The plaintiffs resisted the acts of Defendants with the help of well wishers. The plaintiffs further submit that as the value of their land increased many folds the defendants to gain wrongfully are trying to dispossess plaintiffs.

O.S.No. 2327 of 2022 3 Dt: 07-06-2024

The plaintiffs under the apprehension of dispossession by the defendant inorder to safeguard their right and interest left with no other alternative is constrained to file the present suit.

3.After issuance of summons, defendants Nos. 1 to 3 appeared before the court but failed to file the Written Statement and did not contest the suit.

Hence, on 2-11-2023 the defendants were set exparte.

4.During the course of trial, the plaintiff No.1 filed his chief affidavit in lieu of his examination-in-chief and examined himself as PW-1 and got marked

Exs. A-1 to A-13, E. Raju is examined as PW.2 and Ch. Ilaiah is examined as

PW.3.

5.Heard the Learned counsel for the Plaintiff. Perused the record.

6.Now the point for consideration is :

i) “Whether the plaintiff is entitled for grant of Permanent

injunction against the defendant as prayed for?”

ii) “If so, as to what relief?”

7. POINT NO.1:In order to establish his contention, the plaintiff filed his chief examination affidavit and reiterated the entire contents of plaint in toto. PW-1 deposed that he and his wife are the owners and possessors of the suit land and they have purchased the suit land from Vennavaram Lal Bahadur

Reddy on 29-6-2017 and further deposed that since the date of purchase they have been in the possession and enjoyment of suit land and even got their names mutated in the revenue records and Plaintiff No.1 and Plaintiff No.2 were

O.S.No. 2327 of 2022 4 Dt: 07-06-2024

issued pattedar pass books marked as Ex.A-9 and Ex.A-10, A-13. PW-1/Plaintiff also relied on the entries in the revenue records i.e., Mee-seva extracts of pahani

Fasli year 2020, dt. 4.8.2020 for the plaintiff no.1 which are marked as Ex.A-2, A- 3 and A-4 and the entries in revenue records i.e., Mee-seva extracts of pahani

Fasli year 2020, dt. 4.8.2020 for the plaintiff no.2 which is marked as and Ex.A-12 and 1-B namunas relating to suit land of PW-1/Plaintiff No.1 and Plaintiff No.2 respectively marked as Ex.A-1 and Ex.A-11 which shows the names of

PW-1/Plaintiff No.1 and Plaintiff No.2 as owners and possessor of suit land.

8.PW-1 further relied on form-11 Namoona issued by the then

Tahsildar, Dharmasagar mandal marked as Ex.A-5 and Form-12 namoona issued by Tahsildar, Dharmasagar mandal marked as Ex.A-6 and report issued by

Revenue Inspector based on Exs. A-5 and A-6 which is marked as Ex.A-7. PW-1 also filed 13-C namoona marked as Ex.A-8 which establish that plaintiff no.2 has purchased the property from one V. Sanjeeva Reddy on 10-8-1996. PW-1 by his oral testimony coupled with documents Exs. A-1 to A-13 could establish that

Plaintiff Nos. 1 and 2 are the title holders and also in peaceful possession of the suit land.

Plaintiff in support of his case also got examined one Ettaboina Raju as PW-2 and one Choppari Ilaiah as PW-3.

9.PW-2 and PW-3 filed their examination-in-chief in lieu of their chief affidavit and deposed that they know Plaintiff no.1/PW-1 and Plaintiff No.2 and the suit land as well. PW-1/Plaintiff No.1 and Plaintiff No.2 are owners of the suit land and they are in peaceful possession and enjoyment. PW-2 and PW-3 also deposed that on 3.8.2020 and 5.8.2020 while the Plaintiffs conducting

O.S.No. 2327 of 2022 5 Dt: 07-06-2024

transplantation of paddy crops the Defendant Nos. 1 to 3 tried to dispossess the plaintiffs over the suit land and attempted to remove boundary stones and remove the bunds without any having any lawful right, title and interest over the suit land and Defendant No.1 to Defendant No.3 are in no way concerned with suit land.

10,The oral testimony of PW-1 to PW-3 and Exs. A-1 to A-13 marked through PW-1 corroborate the oral testimony of Pws 1 to 3 in all material aspects pertaining to ownership and possession of Plaintiff Nos. 1 and 2 over the suit land. As the Defendant Nos. 1 to 3 remained exparte the oral and documentary evidence adduced by the plaintiff stood unchallenged and unrebutted. Therefore, this court is inclined to draw adverse inference against all defendants. By virtue of oral testimonies and documentary evidence Exs. A-1 to A-13 as the plaintiffs have successfully established their possession and title over the suit land they are entitled to the relief of permanent injunction. Accordingly, this point is answered.

11. In the result, the Suit is decreed without costs and the Plaintiff No-1 and Plaintiff No.2 are hereby granted the relief of permanent injunction, restraining the defendant No-1 to Defendant No.3, their supporters, any other persons acting on their behalf from interfering (or) in any way invading with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the plaintiff over the suit land.

(Typed to my dictation by Stenographer, corrected and pronounced by me in open Court on this the 7th day of June, 2024)

Spl. JFCM (Mobile) under PCR Act-cum- II Addl Junior Civil Judge, Hanamkonda

O.S.No. 2327 of 2022 6 Dt: 07-06-2024

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

For Plaintiff: For Defendant:

PW-1: B. Komuraiah-None -

PW-2: E. Raju,

PW-3: Ch. Ilaiah,

: : EXHIBITS MARKED FOR PLAINTIFF : :

Ex.A-1: Mee-seva extract of 1-B form of Plaintiff No.1, dt. 4-8-2020, Ex.A-2: Mee-seva extract of pahani for the fasli year 2020, dt. 4-8-2020 of Plaintiff No.1 for the land in Sy.No.1605/C, Ex.A-3: Mee-seva extract of pahani for the fasli year 2020, dt. 4-8-2020 of Plaintiff No.1 for the land in Sy.No.1605/D, Ex.A-4: Mee-seva extract of pahani for the fasli year 2020, dt. 4-8-2020 of Plaintiff No.1 for the land in Sy.No.1610/A1, Ex.A-5:Attested copy of Form No.11 of Plaintiff No.1, dt. 7-5-2007, Ex.A-6:Attested copy of Form No.XII of Plaintiff No.1, dt. 7-5-2007, Ex.A-7:Attested copy of report of R.I. Velair Mandal of Plaintiff No.1, Ex.A-8:Attested copy of Form No.13-C of Plaintiff No.1, dt. 18-8-2008, Ex.A-9:Original pattedar pass book of Plaintiff No.1 vide patta No.942, Ex.A-10:Original pattedar pass book and title deed of Plaintiff No.2 bearing No. TS110004064, dt. 11-04-2018, Ex.A-11:Mee-seva extract of 1-B form of Plaintiff No.2, dt. 4-8-2020, Ex.A-12:Mee-seva extract of pahani for the fasly year 2020, dt. 4-8-2020 of plaintiff No.2 for the land in Sy.No.1605/A, Ex.A-13:Original pattedar pass book of Plaintiff No.2 vide patta No.941,

dt. 08-2008.

: : EXHIBITS MARKED FOR DEFENDANT : :

- NIL -

Spl. JFCM (Mobile) under PCR Act-cum- II Addl Junior Civil Judge, Hanamkonda

O.S.No. 2327 of 2022 7 Dt: 07-06-2024

: : D E C R E E : :

IN THE COURT OF THE SPECIAL JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS

(MOBILE) UNDER PCR ACT-CUM-II ADDITIONAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

HANAMKONDA.

Friday, this the 7th day of June, 2024

Present: Ms. Chennu Leela Naga Susmitha Spl. J.M.F.C. (Mobile) under P.C.R. Act-cum- II-Addl Junior Civil Judge, Hanamkonda

O.S.No. 2327 of 2022

Between:-

1. Bairi Komuraiah, S/o. Kanakaiah, Age: 40 years, Occ: Agriculture,

2. Bairi Rajamma, W/o. Komuraiah, Age: 30 years, Occ: Agriculture, Both R/o. H.No.8-79/3, Velair Post and Mandal, Warangal Urban District. …Plaintiffs AND

1.Suthrapu Yadaiah, S/o. Late Komuraiah, Age: 55 years,

2.Suthrapu Sambaraju, S/o. Yadaiah, Age: 28 years,

3.Suthrapu Satheesh, S/o. Yadaiah, Age: 25 years, All are Agriculturist, R/o.H.No.8-56, Velair post and Mandal, Warangal Urban District. … Defendants

CLAIM FOR:This Suit filed by the Plaintiff for grant of permanent injunction to restrain the defendants, their supporters, or any other persons acting on his behalf from interfering (or) in any way invading with their peaceful possession and enjoyment of plaintiff over the suit schedule property and for costs of the suit.

Date and place of Cause of action:Arose on 03-08-2020 and 05-08-2020 at

Velair village and mandal, Warangal urban District.

Valuation of the Suit:The suit is valued at Rs. 4,00,000/- notionally and a court fee of Rs. 6,426/- is paid U/s. 26 (c) of A.P.C.F. and S.V. Act, 1956 which is sufficient.

DECREE:This Suit is coming on 09-05-2024 for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri K. Ramesh Babu, Learned Counsel for the Plaintiff and

O.S.No. 2327 of 2022 8 Dt: 07-06-2024

Defendants having remained exparte; and this Court DOTH ORDER AND

DECREE that the :

This Suit is decreed without costs and the Plaintiff No-1 and Plaintiff

No.2 are hereby granted the relief of permanent injunction, restraining the defendant No-1 to Defendant No.3, their supporters, any other persons acting on their behalf from interfering (or) in any way invading with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the plaintiff over the suit land.

(Given under my hand and seal of the Court, this the 7th day of June, 2024)

Spl. JFCM (Mobile) under PCR Act-cum- II Addl Junior Civil Judge, Hanamkonda

PARTICULARS OF THE COSTS OF THE SUIT.

For Plaintiff For Defendant

1. Stamps on plaint.

2. Stamps for power.

3. Stamps on exhibits.

4. Advocate fee.

5. Commissioner's fee.

6. Service of process fee.

7. Subsistance allowances.

8. Miscellaneous fee. ------------------------------------------------------- Total: Rs. -------------------------------------------------------

Spl. JFCM (Mobile) under PCR Act-cum- II Addl Junior Civil Judge, Hanamkonda

O.S.No. 2327 of 2022 9 Dt: 07-06-2024

: : SCHEDULE : :

Agricultural lands measuring Ac.0.33 gts out of

Sy.No.1605/C; Ac.5.37 gts out of Sy.No.1605/D: Ac.0.30 gts out of

Sy.No.1610/A1 totally measuring Ac.7.20 gts and agricultural land measuring Ac.6.00 gts out of Sy.No.1605/A totally measuring Ac.13.20 gts situated at Velair village and mandal, Warangal Urban District forming compact block bounded by:

East :Agricultural land of Suthrapu Yadaiah,

West:Agricultural land of Vengala Aruna,

North:Agricultural land of Pittala Jeedaiah,

South :Agricultural land of Suthrapu Rajaiah and

Komuraiah.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Spl. JFCM (Mobile) under PCR Act-cum- II Addl Junior Civil Judge, Hanamkonda

PRC/10/2023

STATE OF TELANGANA vs Md Sonu

12 Jun 2024

PRC.No. 10 of 2023 1 Dt: 12-06-2024

IN THE COURT OF SPL. JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS

(MOBILE) UNDER PCR ACT-CUM-II ADDL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

HANAMKONDA

Present: Ms. Chennu Leela Naga Susmitha,

Spl. JMFC (Mobile) under PCR Act-cum- II-Addl. Junior Civil Judge, Hanamkonda

Wednesday, this the 12th day of June, 2024

P.R.C. No. 10 of 2023

Crime No. 510 of 2022 Between:

State: Sub Inspector of Police, P.S.Hanamkonda, …Complainant AND

A-1: Md. Sonu, S/o. Shareef, Age: 19 years, Occ: Fast food center, R/o. H.No.3-4-450, Sudhanagar, Hanamkonda. A-2: Md. Thasleema, W/o. Shareef, Age: 36 years, Occ: Cloth Business, R/o. H.No.3-4-450, Sudhanagar, HNK, A-3: Meerepalli Harish, S/o. Srinivas, Age: 26 years, Occ: Decoration, R/o. Mallampally of Mulugu District now at Kapuwada, Hanamkonda. …Accused

This case is coming before me for hearing in the presence of the Assistant

Public Prosecutor, for the complainant and of Sri E. Anand Mohan, Counsel for the A-1 to A-3 and upon perusing the material on record, the Court made the following:

: : COMMITTAL ORDER : :

The Sub - Inspector of police, P.S.Hanamkonda filed this case in

Crime No. 510 of 2022 alleging that the A-1 and A-2 have committed the offence punishable under Sections 370 (2) IPC, Sec. 3 & 4 of Immoral Traffic (Prevention

Act, 1956) and A-3 has committed the offences punishable U/s. 370 (A) (2) IPC,

Sec. 5 of Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956.

PRC.No. 10 of 2023 2 Dt: 12-06-2024

2.The case of prosecution, as culled out from the record is as follows:- On dt. 16.11.2022 at about 19.30 hours, the LW-1/Complainant G. Uma,

WSI of police along with other staff members while performing patrolling duty at

Sudhanagar Area at about 16.30 hours received credible information that some unknown persons are running the prostitution business in the house bearing

No.3-4-450, located at Sudhanagar, Hanamkonda.

ii)Accordingly, LW-1/G. Uma obtained Search Proceedings from ACP,

Hanamkonda vide C.No.2114/G/ACP-HNK/2022, Dt. 16-11-2022 through PC 3493, along with two mediators and rushed the scene and raided on H.No.3-4- 450, Sudhanagar, Hanamkonda and found some persons infront of the house.

On seeing the police party, A-1 and A-2 tried to escape, then police officials have apprehended them at about 17.15 hours and also found one male and female person in one room. On interrogation, A-1 and A-2 revealed their identity and also confessed their guilt. They also confessed that they took a house bearing

H.No.3-4-450, Sudhanagar, Hanamkonda and inorder to ear more money in a short period, they used to call the victims and male customers with her source and used to give Rs.500/- to the victim women and also supplies condoms.

iii)On the date of incident, A-1 and A-2, called three victims namely

Md. Ruksona, Md. Rubeena and Vana Soumya Sri with a promise that they will give an amount of rs.500/- for spending with one person, then A-1 and A-2 called

A-3 to that rented house and taken an amount of Rs.2000/- from him and send him along with victim to room and A-1, A-2 were waiting infront of the house. In the meantime the police raided the rented house and apprehended them along with victims. After recorded the confessional statement of A-1 to A-3, theyseized an amount of Rs.500X4 = 2000/-, 100 X 3 = 300, total Rs.2300/-, condoms and 4 smart phones, 2 key pad phones in presence of mediators under cover of confession and seizure panchanama. Later on, LW-1/G. Uma, WSI of police,

P.S.Hanamkonda lodged a complaint.

iv)On receipt of complaint from LW-1, LW-15/Ch. Srinivas Ji, Inspector of police has registered a case in Cr.No. 510 of 2022 for the offence U/s. 370 (2)

IPC, Sec. 3 & 4 of Immoral Traffic (Prevention Act, 1956) against A-1 and A-2

PRC.No. 10 of 2023 3 Dt: 12-06-2024 and for the offences punishable U/s. 370 (A) (2) IPC, Sec. 5 of Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 against A-3 and issued FIR to all concerned.

3.During investigation, on requisition, LW-15/Ch. Srinivas Ji,

Inspector of police, P.S.Hanamkonda has visited the scene of offence, observed the scene and conducted scene observation panchanama duly prepared rough sketch of the scene through crime detail form, addressed a letter of advice to the

ACP, Hanamkonda with a request to forward the Material examination and report. After obtaining medical reports and after obtaining all relevant papers and after completion of investigation, LW-15/Ch. Srinivas Ji, Inspector of police,

P.S.Hanamkonda filed charge sheet.

4.The Court has taken cognizance of the matter against the A-1 and

A-2 are punishable for the offences punishable U/s. 370 (2) IPC, Sec. 3 & 4 of

Immoral Traffic (Prevention Act, 1956) and A-3 is punishable for the offences punishable U/s. 370 (A) (2) IPC, Sec. 5 of Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956.

Case copies are furnished to the A-1 to A-3 as provided under Sec. 207 of

Cr.P.C.

5.Heard the A-1 to A-3 and the learned APP. Prima-facie case is made out against the A-1 and A-2 for the offence punishable U/s. 370 (2) IPC,

Sec. 3 & 4 of Immoral Traffic (Prevention Act, 1956) and against A-3 for the offences punishable U/s. 370 (A) (2) IPC, Sec. 5 of Immoral Traffic (Prevention)

Act, 1956. which are exclusively triable by the Hon’ble Court of Sessions,

Hanamkonda. Hence, case is committed to the Hon’ble Court of Sessions,

Hanamkonda, as provided under Sec. 209(b) of Cr.P.C.

6.Office is directed to transmit all the material papers and material objects to the Hon’ble Court of Sessions, Hanamkonda under Sec. 209(C)

Cr.P.C.

7.Notify to the Public Prosecutor about the committal of the case to the Hon’ble Court of Sessions, Hanamkonda under Sec. 209(d) of Cr.P.C.

8.When the A-1 to A-3 are questioned about their means, they stated that they have got means to engage an advocate to defend their case, during

PRC.No. 10 of 2023 4 Dt: 12-06-2024 trial at the Hon’ble Court of Sessions, Hanamkonda.

9.The office is directed to submit the entire case record to the

Hon’ble Court of Sessions, Hanamkonda immediately, without causing delay.

(Typed by my dictation by Stenographer, corrected and pronounced by me, in open Court, on this the 12th day of June, 2024)

Spl. JFCM (Mobile) under PCR Act-cum- II Addl Junior Civil Judge, Hanamkonda

Appendix of Evidence -Nil-

Spl. JFCM (Mobile) under PCR Act-cum- II Addl Junior Civil Judge, Hanamkonda

OS/2887/2022

Thallapally Seenaiah vs Chinthala Raja Komuraiah and 6 others

03 Jul 2024

IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS (MOBILE)

UNDER PCR ACT-CUM-II ADDITIONAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE, HANAMKONDA

Present: Ms. Chennu Leela Naga Susmitha, Spl. JFCM (Mobile) under PCR Act-cum- II Addl Junior Civil Judge, Hanamkonda

Dated, this the 03rd day of July, 2024

O.S.No. 2887 OF 2022

Between: Thallapally Seenaiah, S/o.Ramaswamy, Age: 62 years, Occu: Retd Employee, R/o. Bheemaram village, Hasanparthy mandal, Warangal dist. … Plaintif AND

1. Chinthala Raja Komuraiah, S/o. Yellaiah, Age: 49 years, Occu: Agriculture, R/o. H.No.3- 125, Bheemaram village, Hasanparthy Mandal, Warangal district.

2. Kadukuri Krishna murthy, S/o. Sambaiah, Age: 36 years, Ocu: Business, R/o. H.No.12- 122 Hasanparthy village & Mandal, Warangal District.

3. Sangala Ellamma, W/o. Late Mallaiah, Age: 69 years, Occu: House hold, r/o. H.No.2-18, Bheemaram village, Hasanparthy Mandal, Warangal District.

4. Sangala Komuramma, W/o. Late Komuraiah, Age: 54 years, Occu: Pvt employee, R/o.H.No.2-206, Bheemaram village, Hasanparthy mandal, Warangal District.

5. Sanda Ramesh, s/o. Bhadraiah, Age: 53 years, Occu: SCCL Employee, R/o. Q.No.T2- 1238, (old) 339 (new), VIII- Incline colony, Godavarikhani, Karimnagar District.

6. Sanda Venu, S/o. Nagendram, Age: 36 years, Occu: Business, R/o. H.No.18-4-239, Maruthinagar, Godavarikhani, Karimnagar District.

7. Cholleti Sriram Reddy, S/o.Devender Reddy, Age: 30 years, Occu: Pvt employee, R/o.H.No.4012, Pothireddypeta, Huzurabad mandal, Karimnagar district.

… Defendants &&&

This suit is fled by the plaintif Under section 26 r/w order IV Rule 1 & 2 of CPC praying the court to grant permanent injunction decree restraining the defendants, their family members, workers, agents, attorneys etc., all those persons acting for and on behalf of the defendants from in any way interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment over the suit schedule property and to award cost of the suit.

This petition is coming on this day for fnal hearing in the presence of Sri.P.V. Vidyadhar Raj, Learned Counsel for the Plaintif and Sri.S.Suni, learned counsel the D5 and D6, abated against D3 and D1, D2 and D4 are set exparte; and upon hearing the same, the court pass the following:

: : D O C K E T O R D E R : :

Dt: 03.07.2024

Plaintif absent. Plaintif counsel absent Defendant counsel present. In spite of giving several opportunities plaintif is not commencing the trial. Though several adjournments were given plaintif counsel did not take steps for commencing trial. After waiting till 04.45 PM as there is no representation on plaintifs side. The suit is dismissed for default.

(Ms. Chennu Leela Naga Susmitha) Spl. JMFC (Mobile) under PCR Act-cum-II Addl. Junior Civil Judge, Hanamkonda For FAC.Spl. JMFC (Mobile) under PCR Act-cum-II Addl. Junior Civil Judge, Hanamkonda

OS/2421/2022

Thoutam Jaihind vs Janjirala Komuraiah

19 Jun 2024

IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS (MOBILE)

UNDER PCR ACT-CUM-II ADDITIONAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE, HANAMKONDA

Present: Ms. Chennu Leela Naga Susmitha, Spl. JFCM (Mobile) under PCR Act-cum- II Addl Junior Civil Judge, Hanamkonda

Dated, this the 19th day of June, 2024

O.S.No. 2421 OF 2022

Between: Thotam Jaihing, S/o. Veeramallu, Aged about 62 years, Occu: Retd MRO, R/o. H.No.4-2- 18, Kothur, Hanamkonda Warangal dist. … Plaintif AND

1. Janjirala Komuraiah, S/o. Narsaiah, aged about 70 years, Occu: Retd Govt service

2. Janjirala Vijay Kumar, S/o. Komuraiah, Aged about 40 years, Occu: Business Both are R/o. H.No.4-2-17, Kothur, Hanamkonda Warangal District. … Defendants &&&

This suit is fled by the plaintif Under section 26 r/w order IV Rule 1 of CPC praying the court to pass a decree for permanent injunction restraining the defendants, their agents, workmen, women folk or any other person or persons claiming under them from interfering with the peaceful possession over the suit schedule house or causing any injury to any part thereto and to award cost of the suit.

This petition is coming on this day for fnal hearing in the presence of Sri.P.Sadasiva Rao, Learned Counsel for the Plaintif and Sri.N.Chandrashekar, learned counsel the D1 and D2; and upon hearing the same, the court pass the following:

: : D O C K E T O R D E R : :

Dt: 19.06.2024

Plaintif counsel present. Plaintif counsel fled a memo with death certifcate of plaintif stating plaintif expired on 10.10.2023 and the legal heirs of plaintif don’t want to continue to suit against defendants. The son of late plaintif is present along with counsel and he stated that he don’t want to continue the suit fled by his father. Hence at request in view of not press memo this suit is dismissed as not pressed against D1 and

D2. In the result the suit is dismissed as not pressed.

(Ms. Chennu Leela Naga Susmitha) Spl. JMFC (Mobile) under PCR Act-cum-II Addl. Junior Civil Judge, Hanamkonda For FAC.Spl. JMFC (Mobile) under PCR Act-cum-II Addl. Junior Civil Judge, Hanamkonda

OS/4171/2022

Vijaya Bank Hanamakonda Branch,rep by K.Nagendra Kumar vs Mohd.Ismail and 2 others

19 Jun 2024

IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS (MOBILE)

UNDER PCR ACT-CUM-II ADDITIONAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE, HANAMKONDA

Present: Ms. Chennu Leela Naga Susmitha, Spl. JFCM (Mobile) under PCR Act-cum- II Addl Junior Civil Judge, Hanamkonda

Dated, this the 19th day of June, 2024

O.S.No. 4171 OF 2022

Between: Bank of Baroda erstwhile known as Vijaya Bank, rep by its Bank Manager, … Plaintif AND

1. Mohd Ismail, S/o. Abdul Nabi, Aged: 64 years, Occu: Retd employee, R/o.H.No.2-2-53, Rjajinagar, Naimnagar, Hanamkonda, Warnagal city and District.

2. Safa Mansoor, W/o. Late Dr. Azeemuddin Khan, Aged: 50 years, Occu: House hold, R/o. H.No.2-1-541, Lashkarsingaram, Naimnagar, Hanamkonda Warangal city & district.

3. Beepasha W/o. Mohd. Ismail, Aged: 55 years, Occu: Hose hold, R/o.2-2-53, Rajajinagar, Naimnagar, Hanamkonda Warangal city & District. … Defendants &&&

This suit is fled by the plaintif Under section 26 r/w order VII Rule 1 of CPC praying the court to pass money decree against the defendant No.1 to 3 for a sum of Rs.80,655/- against the defendants No.1 to 3 jointly and severally to award pendent lit interest at 13.5% per annum in the suit claim with monthly rests thereon and to award the cost of the suit.

This petition is coming on this day for fnal hearing in the presence of Sri.B.Sheshadri, Learned Counsel for the Plaintif and Sri.MD.Abdulaleem, learned counsel the defendant Nos.1 to 3; and upon hearing the same, the court pass the following:

: : D O C K E T O R D E R : :

Dt: 19.06.2024

Plaintif counsel present, fled full satisfaction memo stating the matter between plaintif and defendant was settled outside the court and the defendants paid full amount to plaintiffs bank and loan account was closed. In view of full satisfaction memo this suit is dismissed as not pressed against D1 to D3.

(Ms. Chennu Leela Naga Susmitha) Spl. JMFC (Mobile) under PCR Act-cum-II Addl. Junior Civil Judge, Hanamkonda For FAC.Spl. JMFC (Mobile) under PCR Act-cum-II Addl. Junior Civil Judge, Hanamkonda

Order Record 1,938 total

Case No.	Parties	Date	Type	Outcome
CC/87/2026	RPF BHADRACHALAM vs Koram Ganesh	15 May 2026	Order	—
CC/105/2026	RPF RAMAGUNDAM vs Methe Thirupathi	15 May 2026	Order	—
CC/106/2026	RPF WARANGAL vs Guguloth Roop Lal	15 May 2026	Order	—
CC/138/2026	RPF WARANGAL vs Posani Srinivas	15 May 2026	Order	—
CC/146/2026	RPF Ramagundam vs Bommineni Giri Babu	15 May 2026	Order	—
CC/151/2026	RPF WARANGAL vs Guguloth Chandu	15 May 2026	Order	—
CC/174/2026	RPF WARANGAL vs Thota Padma	15 May 2026	Order	—
CC/184/2026	RPF WARANGAL vs Nathi Srihari	15 May 2026	Order	—
CC/188/2026	RPF WARANGAL vs Mende Rama	15 May 2026	Order	—
CC/96/2023	RPF Ramagundam vs Pittala Ramesh	13 May 2026	Order	—
CC/346/2024	RPF Ramagundam vs Sampangi Shankar alias Ramesh	13 May 2026	Order	—
CC/16/2026	RPF KHAMMAM vs Banothu Shivaji	12 May 2026	Order	—
CC/49/2026	RPF KHAMMAM vs Rentala Sathvik	12 May 2026	Order	—
CC/90/2026	RPF RAMAGUNDAM vs Bhukya Ganapathi	12 May 2026	Order	—
CC/91/2026	RPF RAMAGUNDAM vs Ram Singh	12 May 2026	Order	—
CC/73/2026	RPF RAMAGUNDAM vs Markam Chandrakath	11 May 2026	Order	—
CC/86/2026	RPF RAMAGUNDAM vs Pulluri Venkateshwarlu	11 May 2026	Order	—
CC/134/2026	RPF KHAMMAM vs Chilaka Saidulu	08 May 2026	Order	—
CC/146/2019	RPF RAMAGUNDAM vs D. Mahesh	06 May 2026	Order	—
CC/48/2026	RPF KHAMMAM vs Vadde Janaradhan	30 Apr 2026	Order	—
CC/84/2026	RPF KAZIPET vs R. satish Kumar	29 Apr 2026	Order	—
CC/105/2025	RPF SIRPUR KAGHAZNAGAR vs Harinath	29 Apr 2026	Order	—
CC/92/2026	RPF RAMAGUNDAM vs Ramtenki Krishna	28 Apr 2026	Order	—
CC/108/2026	RPF RAMAGUNDAM vs MAKKALA MAHESH	27 Apr 2026	Order	—
CC/185/2025	RPF SIRPURKAGHAZNAGAR vs Gajula Sai krishna	27 Apr 2026	Order	—
CC/61/2023	RPF Bhadrachalam Road vs Bose Venkatesh	21 Apr 2026	Judgement	—
CC/249/2024	RPF KAZIPET vs KEMSARAPU ODELU	21 Apr 2026	Judgement	—
CC/178/2020	RPF RAMAGUNDAM vs A-1. ISHAHAK SHEKH	20 Apr 2026	Judgement	—
CC/300/2023	RPF, BHADRACHALAM ROAD vs AKKINAPALLI RAJESH	20 Apr 2026	Judgement	—
CC/19/2026	RPF RAMAGUNDAM vs Parameswar Singh	17 Apr 2026	Order	—
CC/270/2017	GRP Kazipet vs Vsvallepu venkatalaxmi	15 Apr 2026	Judgement	—
CC/1/2026	RPF RAMAGUNDAM vs Kachakayala Ravi	13 Apr 2026	Order	—
CC/268/2018	GRP - Mancherial vs Garrepalli tirupathi	09 Apr 2026	Judgement	—
CC/66/2024	RPF KAZIPET vs JAMTHU SATISH	08 Apr 2026	Judgement	—
CC/65/2025	RPF Kazipet vs Kadamanchi Yadamma	07 Apr 2026	Judgement	—
CC/165/2023	RPF KAZIPET vs Vemula Ram Babu	07 Apr 2026	Judgement	—
CC/171/2025	RPF SIRPUR KAGHAZNAGAR vs Shaik Saddiam Hussain	07 Apr 2026	Order	—
CC/192/2023	RPF, KHAMMAM vs OLLAPU SHANKAR	07 Apr 2026	Judgement	—
CC/386/2024	RPF Khammam vs Bhukya Ramulu	07 Apr 2026	Judgement	—
CC/187/2025	RPF BHADRACHALAM vs Korra Swami	31 Mar 2026	Order	—
CC/141/2025	RPF SIRPUR KAGHAZNAGAR vs Ganapathi Biswas	30 Mar 2026	Order	—
CC/371/2014	GRP mancherial vs Vsnarender kumar	30 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
CC/16/2023	RPS WARANGAL vs Shivaratri Venkatesh	28 Mar 2026	Order	—
CC/82/2024	RPS, MANCHERIAL vs ELASANI RAJU	28 Mar 2026	Order	—
CC/126/2026	GRP KHAMMAM vs NAGELLI VARAKUMAR	28 Mar 2026	Order	—
CC/127/2026	GRP KHAMMAM vs SAYYAD IMAM	28 Mar 2026	Order	—
CC/128/2026	GRP KHAMMAM vs NAGELLI VARAKUMAR	28 Mar 2026	Order	—
CC/131/2026	GRP KHAMMAM vs NAGELLI VARAKUMAR	28 Mar 2026	Order	—
CC/140/2026	RPS DORNAKAL vs Thamballa Nithin	28 Mar 2026	Order	—
CC/141/2026	RPS KHAMMAM vs Molli Ganesh Venkata Siva	28 Mar 2026	Order	—
CC/167/2023	Sub-Inspector, RPS KaZIPET vs Goni Narendra @ Nagendra	28 Mar 2026	Order	—
CC/168/2022	RPS KHAMMAM vs A-1. NAGELLI VARAKUMAR	28 Mar 2026	Order	—
CC/6/2023	RPF Kazipet vs MD Rafi	26 Mar 2026	Order	—
CC/49/2023	RPS Kazipet vs Deepak Singh Rajabath	26 Mar 2026	Order	—
CC/51/2023	RPS Kazipet vs Deepak Singh Rajabath	26 Mar 2026	Order	—
CC/58/2024	RPF, BELLAMPALLI POST vs POLIVENI RAKESH	26 Mar 2026	Order	—
CC/62/2025	RPF Post Ramagundam vs Sothuku Nagaraju	26 Mar 2026	Order	—
CC/161/2022	RPF RAMAGUNDAM vs PERA RAMESH	26 Mar 2026	Order	—
CC/161/2025	GRP WARANGAL vs Vadthya Chandu Naik	26 Mar 2026	Order	—
CC/211/2022	RPF RAMAGUNDAM vs PALLAPU NARESH @ NARENDER	26 Mar 2026	Order	—
CC/212/2022	RPF RAMAGUNDAM vs PERA RAMESH	26 Mar 2026	Order	—
CC/213/2025	RPS Dornakal vs Thambala Nithin	26 Mar 2026	Order	—
CC/248/2023	RPF, BELLAMPALLI vs CHATRAPAL RAMESH	26 Mar 2026	Order	—
STC/2675/2026	RPF KHAMMAM vs B BALU	26 Mar 2026	Order	—
STC/2676/2026	RPF KHAMMAM vs A GANESH	26 Mar 2026	Order	—
STC/2677/2026	RPF KHAMMAM vs D NARESH	26 Mar 2026	Order	—
STC/2678/2026	RPF KHAMMAM vs D KRISHNA	26 Mar 2026	Order	—
STC/2679/2026	RPF KHAMMAM vs J BUJJI	26 Mar 2026	Order	—
STC/2680/2026	RPF KHAMMAM vs B PADMA	26 Mar 2026	Order	—
STC/2681/2026	RPF KHAMMAM vs T LAXMI	26 Mar 2026	Order	—
STC/2682/2026	RPF KHAMMAM vs B DEVI	26 Mar 2026	Order	—
STC/2683/2026	RPF KHAMMAM vs B NARESH	26 Mar 2026	Order	—
STC/2684/2026	RPF KHAMMAM vs B NARESH	26 Mar 2026	Order	—
STC/2685/2026	RPF KHAMMAM vs V KISHAN	26 Mar 2026	Order	—
STC/2686/2026	RPF KHAMMAM vs B LALU	26 Mar 2026	Order	—
STC/2687/2026	RPF KHAMMAM vs B CHINNA	26 Mar 2026	Order	—
STC/2688/2026	RPF KHAMMAM vs N SRI RAM	26 Mar 2026	Order	—
STC/2689/2026	RPF KHAMMAM vs L BHASKER	26 Mar 2026	Order	—
STC/2690/2026	RPF KHAMMAM vs N SRIRAM	26 Mar 2026	Order	—
STC/2691/2026	RPF KHAMMAM vs B SATISH	26 Mar 2026	Order	—
STC/2692/2026	RPF KHAMMAM vs B BHASKER	26 Mar 2026	Order	—
STC/2693/2026	RPF KHAMMAM vs B LALU	26 Mar 2026	Order	—
STC/2694/2026	RPF KHAMMAM vs B MOHAN	26 Mar 2026	Order	—
STC/2695/2026	RPF KHAMMAM vs B KAMLI	26 Mar 2026	Order	—
STC/2696/2026	RPF KHAMMAM vs V NANDA	26 Mar 2026	Order	—
STC/2697/2026	RPF KHAMMAM vs E SAI PRIYA	26 Mar 2026	Order	—
STC/2698/2026	RPF KHAMMAM vs B SHOBA	26 Mar 2026	Order	—
STC/2699/2026	RPF KHAMMAM vs V DURGA	26 Mar 2026	Order	—
STC/2700/2026	RPF KHAMMAM vs B HEMA	26 Mar 2026	Order	—
STC/2701/2026	RPF KHAMMAM vs B GANESH	26 Mar 2026	Order	—
STC/2702/2026	RPF KHAMMAM vs B MAJEE	26 Mar 2026	Order	—
STC/2703/2026	RPF KHAMMAM vs B CHINNA	26 Mar 2026	Order	—
STC/2704/2026	RPF KHAMMAM vs B SATISH NAIK	26 Mar 2026	Order	—
STC/2705/2026	RPF KHAMMAM vs B NARESH	26 Mar 2026	Order	—
STC/2706/2026	RPF KHAMMAM vs B MOTI	26 Mar 2026	Order	—
STC/2707/2026	RPF KHAMMAM vs G BUJJI	26 Mar 2026	Order	—
STC/2708/2026	RPF KHAMMAM vs B KOUSLYA	26 Mar 2026	Order	—
STC/2709/2026	RPF KHAMMAM vs B RAVI	26 Mar 2026	Order	—
STC/2710/2026	RPF KHAMMAM vs B MALLA	26 Mar 2026	Order	—
STC/2711/2026	RPF KHAMMAM vs D RAJU	26 Mar 2026	Order	—

Showing 100 of 1,938 orders — Log in to browse all pages.

Monthly Orders (Last 12 Months)

May 2026		19
Apr 2026		20
Mar 2026		1,813
Feb 2026		14
Jan 2026		15
Dec 2025		17
Nov 2025		10
Oct 2025		13
Sep 2025		11
Jun 2025		7
May 2025		4
Apr 2025		4

Frequently Asked Questions

How many cases has Ms. Chennu Leela Naga Susmitha handled?

Ms. Chennu Leela Naga Susmitha has handled 1979 court orders since 2023 at Kazipet, JFCM Railway Court Complex. The average disposal rate is 62 orders per month.

What types of cases does Ms. Chennu Leela Naga Susmitha hear?

Based on available records, Ms. Chennu Leela Naga Susmitha primarily handles Criminal matters (Summary Trial Cases, Criminal Cases) and Civil matters (Original Suits) at Kazipet, JFCM Railway Court Complex.

Where is Ms. Chennu Leela Naga Susmitha currently posted?

Ms. Chennu Leela Naga Susmitha is posted as JFCM FOR RAILWAY CASES KAZIPET at Kazipet, JFCM Railway Court Complex, Hanumakonda, Telangana.

Are judgments by Ms. Chennu Leela Naga Susmitha available online?

Yes. 5 judgments by Ms. Chennu Leela Naga Susmitha are available on Legistro with full text, outcome, and sections cited.

How fast does Ms. Chennu Leela Naga Susmitha dispose cases?

Ms. Chennu Leela Naga Susmitha disposes approximately 62 cases per month, based on 1979 orders handled over their tenure at Kazipet, JFCM Railway Court Complex.

Since when is Ms. Chennu Leela Naga Susmitha serving?

Ms. Chennu Leela Naga Susmitha has been serving at Kazipet, JFCM Railway Court Complex since 2023. and is currently posted there.

Case Types

STC 88%

CC 11%

PRC 1%

OS 1%

Posting History

Apr 2025 — Present

JFCM FOR RAILWAY CASES KAZIPET · 1,947 orders
Feb 2024 — Jul 2024

Spl Judicial Magistrate of First Class(Mobile) under PCR Act-cum-II Addl. Junior Civil Judge ,Hanumakonda · 32 orders
Oct 2023 — Oct 2023

Spl Judicial Magistrate of First Class(Mobile) under PCR Act-cum-II Addl. Junior Civil Judge ,Hanumakonda

← View all judges at Kazipet, JFCM Railway Court Complex