Ms.D.B.Sheetal

Senior Civil Judge,Vikarabad

Vikarabad, PDJ Court Complex · Vikarabad · Telangana

Ms.D.B.Sheetal, Senior Civil Judge,Vikarabad, is posted at Vikarabad, PDJ Court Complex, Vikarabad, Telangana, India. 745 court orders on record since 2022. 5 judgments with full text available. Primarily handles OS, H, SC cases.

745

Total Orders

Judgments

Orders/Month

Posting

Featured Judgments

OS/6/2022

Chilukuri Bhaskar vs Gottimukla Nagaiah

18 Oct 2024

Pg.1 of 6

OS.No.06 of 2022

IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, AT: VIKARABAD

On Friday, this the 18th day of October, 2024

Present:- SHEETAL D.B.

Senior Civil Judge

Vikarabad.

O.S.No. 06 of 2022

Between:-

1. Chilukuri Bhaskar S/o. Ch. Prabhakar, Aged about 42 Years, Occ: Business, R/o. H.No.1-5-486, Bakaram, Musheerabad, Hyderabad-500 020.

2. G. Naresh Kumar S/o. G. Narsing Rao, Aged about 38 Years, Occ: Business, R/o. H.No.4-7-226/129/1, Saketh Nagar, Yennepally Village, Vikarabad Municipality, Vikarabad District.

... Plaintiffs

AND

1. Gottimukla Nagaiah S/o. Chandraiah, Aged about 52 Years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o. H.No.5-69, Naskal Village, Pargi Mandal, Vikarabad District.

2. Balla Ananthamma W/o. Late Balla Chandraiah, Aged about 75 Years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o. H.No. 57/12,, Ramaiahguda, Vikarabad Municipality, Vikarabad District. … Defendants

This suit is coming before me for final hearing in the presence of Sri

Akula Mahesh Kumar, Counsel for the Plaintiffs and the defendants having been set exparte and having stood over for consideration till this day this Court delivered the following:-

JUDGMENT

1. This suit is filed by the plaintiffs No.1 and 2 against the defendants No.1 and 2, seeking the relief of Specific Performance of Agreement of Sale dated 24-04-2021 in respect of all that land admeasuring Ac.01-27 gts. in Survey No.70/1/AA/1 and land admeasuring Ac.01-27 gts. in Survey No.70/1/AA/1, total admeasuring Ac.03- 14 gts., situated at Naskal Village, Pargi Mandal, Vikarabad District (hereinafter

Pg.2 of 6

OS.No.06 of 2022

referred to as suit schedule property), alternatively for refund of the advance money paid by the plaintiffs under the Agreement of Sale dated 24-04-2021 with interest @ 24% per annum in the event of this Court coming to a conclusion that the plaintiffs are not entitled to the relief of specific performance.

2. The brief averments of the plaint are that:

The defendants being the absolute owners and possessors of the suit schedule property, entered into an agreement of sale dated 24-04-2021 agreeing to alienate the same for a total sale consideration of Rs.33.50,000/- @ Rs.10,00,000/- per acre and the same is accepted by the plaintiffs and on the said day the plaintiffs paid an amount of Rs.4,00,000/- by way of cash towards part sale consideration and the receipt of the same is acknowledged by the defendants by passing a separate receipt to that effect. At the time of entering into above said agreement of sale, the defendants represented that a wrong entry with regard to the nature of land as lavani patta crept in the revenue records for the year 1994-1995 and the existence of said survey number is not reflected in the village map and as such they will take appropriate steps for the same, and also agreed to get the suit property measured by an authenticated surveyor with regard to the land physically available on the ground. Thus, the condition precedent for the plaintiffs for paying balance sale consideration is subject to the defendants getting deleted the name of lavani patta from the revenue records; conducting survey and taking steps for inclusion of Survey Number in the village map and getting Occupancy Rights

Certificate from the concerned authority as agreed by the defendants under the said agreement of sale and that as such, time was strictly agreed to be not the essence of contract. The plaintiffs since the date of agreement of sale have always been ready and willing to perform their part of contract subject to the defendants complying their obligation and they have been approaching the defendants to perform their part of obligation but they dodged the matter on one pretext or the

Pg.3 of 6

OS.No.06 of 2022

other. Recently it has come to the knowledge of the plaintiffs that the defendants by suppressing factum of the above said agreement of sale are making efforts to alienate the suit schedule property in favour of third parties, for enhanced consideration behind the back of plaintiffs to defeat the right of plaintiffs. Being fed up with the indifferent attitude of the defendants, the plaintiffs were constrained to issue legal notice dated 25-10-2021, calling upon the defendants to come forward and execute registered sale deed by complying all the objections as stipulated under Clause-2 of the agreement of sale dated 24-04-2021. Though the said legal notice is served to the defendants on 02-11-2021 and 03-11-2021 respectively, they neither gave any reply nor came forward to execute registered sale deed by complying their obligations, thereby constraining the plaintiffs to file the present suit. Hence, this suit.

3. Though the summons to defendants No.1 and 2 were served, they did not choose to file written statement within stipulated period of time and hence the right of defendants to file written statement stood forfeited.

4. Heard learned counsel for plaintiffs. Perused the record.

5. Now the points for consideration are:

(1). Whether the plaintiffs are entitled to the relief of Specific

Performance of Agreement of Sale dated 24-04-2021 against the

defendants in respect of suit schedule property as prayed for?

(2). To what relief?

Point No.1: 6.

The plaintiffs in support of their case, examined the plaintiff No.1 herein as PW1 and he filed chief affidavit in lieu of his chief-examination, by reiterating the contents of the plaint and got marked Exs.A1 to A5. Ex.A1 is the original

Agreement of Sale dated 24-04-2021 executed by the defendants No.1 and 2 in favour of plaintiffs No.1 and 2, agreeing to sell the suit property in favour of the

Pg.4 of 6

OS.No.06 of 2022

plaintiffs for total sale consideration of Rs.33,50,000/- (Rupees Thirtythree Lakhs and Fifty thousand only). The contents of Ex.A1 also discloses that out of the total consideration of Rs.33,50,000/-, the plaintiffs have paid an amount of Rs.4,00,000/- (Rupees Four Lakhs only) towards part sale consideration and also agreed that the time is not essence of the contract. Ex.A2 is the receipt dated 24-04-2021 executed by the defendants, acknowledging receipt of Rs.4,00,000/- from the plaintiffs towards part sale consideration in respect of the suit schedule property.

Ex.A3 is the office copy of the legal notice dated 25-10-2021 got issued by the plaintiffs through their counsel, calling upon the defendants to receive balance sale consideration and execute registered sale deed in favour of plaintiffs, within seven days from the date of receipt of the legal notice. Ex.A4 is the postal receipt which proves the dispatch of the legal notice to the defendants. Ex.A5 is the postal acknowledgment which shows that the defendants received legal notice (Ex.A3) got issued by the plaintiffs. The defendants though received summons, did not choose to file written statement within stipulated period of time and hence the right of defendants to file written statement stood forfeited.

7. It is to be noted here that, albeit as per the terms under Ex.A1 it is agreed between the parties that time is not essence of contract, but the fact that the plaintiffs got issued legal notice to the defendant on 25-10-2021 i.e. six months from the date of the agreement of sale (Ex.A1) expressing their readiness and willingness to pay the balance sale consideration amount and calling upon the defendants to receive the same and execute registered sale deed in their favour in respect of the suit schedule property, invariably shows the readiness and willingness of the plaintiffs to perform their part of contract since the date of execution of Ex.A1. The fact that the defendants having received legal notice got issued by the plaintiffs calling upon them to receive balance sale consideration and execute registered sale deed in their favour in respect of the suit schedule

Pg.5 of 6

OS.No.06 of 2022

property, neither replied the said legal notice nor came forward to perform their part of contract, makes me to draw an adverse inference against the defendants.

Therefore, the ocular evidence of PW1 coupled with Exs.A1 to A5 prove the claim of the plaintiffs and the same remained unchallenged and unrebutted. Therefore, the plaintiffs proved their case and hence, they are entitled to the relief of specific performance of agreement of sale dated 24-04-2021 against the defendants in respect of the suit schedule property as prayed for.

. Point No.1 is answered accordingly.

8. Point No.2:

In the result, the suit is decreed with costs in favour of the plaintiffs

No.1 and 2 and against the defendants No.1 and 2 for Specific Performance

of Agreement of Sale dated 24-04-2021. Accordingly, the plaintiffs are

directed to deposit the balance sale consideration amount of Rs. 29,50,000/-

(Rupees Twentynine Lakhs and Fifty thousand only) within two months from

the date of this Judgment and upon deposit of the said amount, the

defendants No.1 and 2 are directed to execute Registered Sale Deed in

favour of plaintiffs in respect of the suit schedule property, failing which, the plaintiffs are at liberty to proceed under due process of law.

Typed to my direct dictation by the Stenographer I, corrected and

pronounced by me in open Court, on this the 18 th day of October, 2024..

Senior Civil Judge,

Vikarabad.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

For Plaintiffs:

PW-1 : Chilukuri Bhaskar.

For Defendants: -None-

Pg.6 of 6

OS.No.06 of 2022

EXHIBITS MARKED

For Plaintiffs:

Ex.A-1 : Original Agreement of Sale dated 24-04-2021 (impounded).

Ex.A-2 : Original Receipt, dated 24-04-2021.

Ex.A-3 : Office copy of legal office dated 25-10-2021.

Ex.A-4 : Postal receipt dated 25-10-2021.

Ex.A-5 : Postal acknowledgment.

For Defendants: -Nil-

Senior Civil Judge,

Vikarabad.

OS/6/2022

Chilukuri Bhaskar vs Gottimukla Nagaiah

18 Oct 2024

Pg.1 of 6

OS.No.06 of 2022

IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, AT: VIKARABAD

On Friday, this the 18th day of October, 2024

Present:- SHEETAL D.B.

Senior Civil Judge

Vikarabad.

O.S.No. 06 of 2022

Between:-

1. Chilukuri Bhaskar S/o. Ch. Prabhakar, Aged about 42 Years, Occ: Business, R/o. H.No.1-5-486, Bakaram, Musheerabad, Hyderabad-500 020.

2. G. Naresh Kumar S/o. G. Narsing Rao, Aged about 38 Years, Occ: Business, R/o. H.No.4-7-226/129/1, Saketh Nagar, Yennepally Village, Vikarabad Municipality, Vikarabad District.

... Plaintiffs

AND

1. Gottimukla Nagaiah S/o. Chandraiah, Aged about 52 Years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o. H.No.5-69, Naskal Village, Pargi Mandal, Vikarabad District.

2. Balla Ananthamma W/o. Late Balla Chandraiah, Aged about 75 Years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o. H.No. 57/12,, Ramaiahguda, Vikarabad Municipality, Vikarabad District. … Defendants

This suit is coming before me for final hearing in the presence of Sri

Akula Mahesh Kumar, Counsel for the Plaintiffs and the defendants having been set exparte and having stood over for consideration till this day this Court delivered the following:-

JUDGMENT

Pg.2 of 6

OS.No.06 of 2022

2. The brief averments of the plaint are that:

Pg.3 of 6

OS.No.06 of 2022

4. Heard learned counsel for plaintiffs. Perused the record.

5. Now the points for consideration are:

(1). Whether the plaintiffs are entitled to the relief of Specific

Performance of Agreement of Sale dated 24-04-2021 against the

defendants in respect of suit schedule property as prayed for?

(2). To what relief?

Point No.1: 6.

Agreement of Sale dated 24-04-2021 executed by the defendants No.1 and 2 in favour of plaintiffs No.1 and 2, agreeing to sell the suit property in favour of the

Pg.4 of 6

OS.No.06 of 2022

Pg.5 of 6

OS.No.06 of 2022

property, neither replied the said legal notice nor came forward to perform their part of contract, makes me to draw an adverse inference against the defendants.

. Point No.1 is answered accordingly.

8. Point No.2:

In the result, the suit is decreed with costs in favour of the plaintiffs

No.1 and 2 and against the defendants No.1 and 2 for Specific Performance

of Agreement of Sale dated 24-04-2021. Accordingly, the plaintiffs are

directed to deposit the balance sale consideration amount of Rs. 29,50,000/-

(Rupees Twentynine Lakhs and Fifty thousand only) within two months from

the date of this Judgment and upon deposit of the said amount, the

defendants No.1 and 2 are directed to execute Registered Sale Deed in

favour of plaintiffs in respect of the suit schedule property, failing which, the plaintiffs are at liberty to proceed under due process of law.

Typed to my direct dictation by the Stenographer I, corrected and

pronounced by me in open Court, on this the 18 th day of October, 2024..

Senior Civil Judge,

Vikarabad.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

For Plaintiffs:

PW-1 : Chilukuri Bhaskar.

For Defendants: -None-

Pg.6 of 6

OS.No.06 of 2022

EXHIBITS MARKED

For Plaintiffs:

Ex.A-1 : Original Agreement of Sale dated 24-04-2021 (impounded).

Ex.A-2 : Original Receipt, dated 24-04-2021.

Ex.A-3 : Office copy of legal office dated 25-10-2021.

Ex.A-4 : Postal receipt dated 25-10-2021.

Ex.A-5 : Postal acknowledgment.

For Defendants: -Nil-

Senior Civil Judge,

Vikarabad.

OS/6/2022

Chilukuri Bhaskar vs Gottimukla Nagaiah

18 Oct 2024

Pg.1 of 6

OS.No.06 of 2022

IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, AT: VIKARABAD

On Friday, this the 18th day of October, 2024

Present:- SHEETAL D.B.

Senior Civil Judge

Vikarabad.

O.S.No. 06 of 2022

Between:-

1. Chilukuri Bhaskar S/o. Ch. Prabhakar, Aged about 42 Years, Occ: Business, R/o. H.No.1-5-486, Bakaram, Musheerabad, Hyderabad-500 020.

2. G. Naresh Kumar S/o. G. Narsing Rao, Aged about 38 Years, Occ: Business, R/o. H.No.4-7-226/129/1, Saketh Nagar, Yennepally Village, Vikarabad Municipality, Vikarabad District.

... Plaintiffs

AND

1. Gottimukla Nagaiah S/o. Chandraiah, Aged about 52 Years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o. H.No.5-69, Naskal Village, Pargi Mandal, Vikarabad District.

2. Balla Ananthamma W/o. Late Balla Chandraiah, Aged about 75 Years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o. H.No. 57/12,, Ramaiahguda, Vikarabad Municipality, Vikarabad District. … Defendants

This suit is coming before me for final hearing in the presence of Sri

Akula Mahesh Kumar, Counsel for the Plaintiffs and the defendants having been set exparte and having stood over for consideration till this day this Court delivered the following:-

JUDGMENT

Pg.2 of 6

OS.No.06 of 2022

2. The brief averments of the plaint are that:

Pg.3 of 6

OS.No.06 of 2022

4. Heard learned counsel for plaintiffs. Perused the record.

5. Now the points for consideration are:

(1). Whether the plaintiffs are entitled to the relief of Specific

Performance of Agreement of Sale dated 24-04-2021 against the

defendants in respect of suit schedule property as prayed for?

(2). To what relief?

Point No.1: 6.

Agreement of Sale dated 24-04-2021 executed by the defendants No.1 and 2 in favour of plaintiffs No.1 and 2, agreeing to sell the suit property in favour of the

Pg.4 of 6

OS.No.06 of 2022

Pg.5 of 6

OS.No.06 of 2022

property, neither replied the said legal notice nor came forward to perform their part of contract, makes me to draw an adverse inference against the defendants.

. Point No.1 is answered accordingly.

8. Point No.2:

In the result, the suit is decreed with costs in favour of the plaintiffs

No.1 and 2 and against the defendants No.1 and 2 for Specific Performance

of Agreement of Sale dated 24-04-2021. Accordingly, the plaintiffs are

directed to deposit the balance sale consideration amount of Rs. 29,50,000/-

(Rupees Twentynine Lakhs and Fifty thousand only) within two months from

the date of this Judgment and upon deposit of the said amount, the

defendants No.1 and 2 are directed to execute Registered Sale Deed in

favour of plaintiffs in respect of the suit schedule property, failing which, the plaintiffs are at liberty to proceed under due process of law.

Typed to my direct dictation by the Stenographer I, corrected and

pronounced by me in open Court, on this the 18 th day of October, 2024..

Senior Civil Judge,

Vikarabad.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

For Plaintiffs:

PW-1 : Chilukuri Bhaskar.

For Defendants: -None-

Pg.6 of 6

OS.No.06 of 2022

EXHIBITS MARKED

For Plaintiffs:

Ex.A-1 : Original Agreement of Sale dated 24-04-2021 (impounded).

Ex.A-2 : Original Receipt, dated 24-04-2021.

Ex.A-3 : Office copy of legal office dated 25-10-2021.

Ex.A-4 : Postal receipt dated 25-10-2021.

Ex.A-5 : Postal acknowledgment.

For Defendants: -Nil-

Senior Civil Judge,

Vikarabad.

OS/6/2022

Chilukuri Bhaskar vs Gottimukla Nagaiah

18 Oct 2024

Pg.1 of 6

OS.No.06 of 2022

IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, AT: VIKARABAD

On Friday, this the 18th day of October, 2024

Present:- SHEETAL D.B.

Senior Civil Judge

Vikarabad.

O.S.No. 06 of 2022

Between:-

1. Chilukuri Bhaskar S/o. Ch. Prabhakar, Aged about 42 Years, Occ: Business, R/o. H.No.1-5-486, Bakaram, Musheerabad, Hyderabad-500 020.

2. G. Naresh Kumar S/o. G. Narsing Rao, Aged about 38 Years, Occ: Business, R/o. H.No.4-7-226/129/1, Saketh Nagar, Yennepally Village, Vikarabad Municipality, Vikarabad District.

... Plaintiffs

AND

1. Gottimukla Nagaiah S/o. Chandraiah, Aged about 52 Years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o. H.No.5-69, Naskal Village, Pargi Mandal, Vikarabad District.

2. Balla Ananthamma W/o. Late Balla Chandraiah, Aged about 75 Years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o. H.No. 57/12,, Ramaiahguda, Vikarabad Municipality, Vikarabad District. … Defendants

This suit is coming before me for final hearing in the presence of Sri

Akula Mahesh Kumar, Counsel for the Plaintiffs and the defendants having been set exparte and having stood over for consideration till this day this Court delivered the following:-

JUDGMENT

Pg.2 of 6

OS.No.06 of 2022

2. The brief averments of the plaint are that:

Pg.3 of 6

OS.No.06 of 2022

4. Heard learned counsel for plaintiffs. Perused the record.

5. Now the points for consideration are:

(1). Whether the plaintiffs are entitled to the relief of Specific

Performance of Agreement of Sale dated 24-04-2021 against the

defendants in respect of suit schedule property as prayed for?

(2). To what relief?

Point No.1: 6.

Agreement of Sale dated 24-04-2021 executed by the defendants No.1 and 2 in favour of plaintiffs No.1 and 2, agreeing to sell the suit property in favour of the

Pg.4 of 6

OS.No.06 of 2022

Pg.5 of 6

OS.No.06 of 2022

property, neither replied the said legal notice nor came forward to perform their part of contract, makes me to draw an adverse inference against the defendants.

. Point No.1 is answered accordingly.

8. Point No.2:

In the result, the suit is decreed with costs in favour of the plaintiffs

No.1 and 2 and against the defendants No.1 and 2 for Specific Performance

of Agreement of Sale dated 24-04-2021. Accordingly, the plaintiffs are

directed to deposit the balance sale consideration amount of Rs. 29,50,000/-

(Rupees Twentynine Lakhs and Fifty thousand only) within two months from

the date of this Judgment and upon deposit of the said amount, the

defendants No.1 and 2 are directed to execute Registered Sale Deed in

favour of plaintiffs in respect of the suit schedule property, failing which, the plaintiffs are at liberty to proceed under due process of law.

Typed to my direct dictation by the Stenographer I, corrected and

pronounced by me in open Court, on this the 18 th day of October, 2024..

Senior Civil Judge,

Vikarabad.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

For Plaintiffs:

PW-1 : Chilukuri Bhaskar.

For Defendants: -None-

Pg.6 of 6

OS.No.06 of 2022

EXHIBITS MARKED

For Plaintiffs:

Ex.A-1 : Original Agreement of Sale dated 24-04-2021 (impounded).

Ex.A-2 : Original Receipt, dated 24-04-2021.

Ex.A-3 : Office copy of legal office dated 25-10-2021.

Ex.A-4 : Postal receipt dated 25-10-2021.

Ex.A-5 : Postal acknowledgment.

For Defendants: -Nil-

Senior Civil Judge,

Vikarabad.

OS/6/2022

Chilukuri Bhaskar vs Gottimukla Nagaiah

18 Oct 2024

Pg.1 of 6

OS.No.06 of 2022

IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, AT: VIKARABAD

On Friday, this the 18th day of October, 2024

Present:- SHEETAL D.B.

Senior Civil Judge

Vikarabad.

O.S.No. 06 of 2022

Between:-

1. Chilukuri Bhaskar S/o. Ch. Prabhakar, Aged about 42 Years, Occ: Business, R/o. H.No.1-5-486, Bakaram, Musheerabad, Hyderabad-500 020.

2. G. Naresh Kumar S/o. G. Narsing Rao, Aged about 38 Years, Occ: Business, R/o. H.No.4-7-226/129/1, Saketh Nagar, Yennepally Village, Vikarabad Municipality, Vikarabad District.

... Plaintiffs

AND

1. Gottimukla Nagaiah S/o. Chandraiah, Aged about 52 Years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o. H.No.5-69, Naskal Village, Pargi Mandal, Vikarabad District.

2. Balla Ananthamma W/o. Late Balla Chandraiah, Aged about 75 Years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o. H.No. 57/12,, Ramaiahguda, Vikarabad Municipality, Vikarabad District. … Defendants

This suit is coming before me for final hearing in the presence of Sri

Akula Mahesh Kumar, Counsel for the Plaintiffs and the defendants having been set exparte and having stood over for consideration till this day this Court delivered the following:-

JUDGMENT

Pg.2 of 6

OS.No.06 of 2022

2. The brief averments of the plaint are that:

Pg.3 of 6

OS.No.06 of 2022

4. Heard learned counsel for plaintiffs. Perused the record.

5. Now the points for consideration are:

(1). Whether the plaintiffs are entitled to the relief of Specific

Performance of Agreement of Sale dated 24-04-2021 against the

defendants in respect of suit schedule property as prayed for?

(2). To what relief?

Point No.1: 6.

Agreement of Sale dated 24-04-2021 executed by the defendants No.1 and 2 in favour of plaintiffs No.1 and 2, agreeing to sell the suit property in favour of the

Pg.4 of 6

OS.No.06 of 2022

Pg.5 of 6

OS.No.06 of 2022

property, neither replied the said legal notice nor came forward to perform their part of contract, makes me to draw an adverse inference against the defendants.

. Point No.1 is answered accordingly.

8. Point No.2:

In the result, the suit is decreed with costs in favour of the plaintiffs

No.1 and 2 and against the defendants No.1 and 2 for Specific Performance

of Agreement of Sale dated 24-04-2021. Accordingly, the plaintiffs are

directed to deposit the balance sale consideration amount of Rs. 29,50,000/-

(Rupees Twentynine Lakhs and Fifty thousand only) within two months from

the date of this Judgment and upon deposit of the said amount, the

defendants No.1 and 2 are directed to execute Registered Sale Deed in

favour of plaintiffs in respect of the suit schedule property, failing which, the plaintiffs are at liberty to proceed under due process of law.

Typed to my direct dictation by the Stenographer I, corrected and

pronounced by me in open Court, on this the 18 th day of October, 2024..

Senior Civil Judge,

Vikarabad.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

For Plaintiffs:

PW-1 : Chilukuri Bhaskar.

For Defendants: -None-

Pg.6 of 6

OS.No.06 of 2022

EXHIBITS MARKED

For Plaintiffs:

Ex.A-1 : Original Agreement of Sale dated 24-04-2021 (impounded).

Ex.A-2 : Original Receipt, dated 24-04-2021.

Ex.A-3 : Office copy of legal office dated 25-10-2021.

Ex.A-4 : Postal receipt dated 25-10-2021.

Ex.A-5 : Postal acknowledgment.

For Defendants: -Nil-

Senior Civil Judge,

Vikarabad.

Order Record 712 total

Case No.	Parties	Date	Type	Outcome
OS/6/2022	Chilukuri Bhaskar vs Gottimukla Nagaiah	18 Oct 2024	Judgement	—
OS/6/2022	Chilukuri Bhaskar vs Gottimukla Nagaiah	18 Oct 2024	order	—
OS/34/2016	Dudyala Srinivas vs S Janardhan reddy	17 Oct 2024	Judgement	—
H.M.O.P/11/2024	Konda Prashanth Reddy vs Sushmitha	17 Oct 2024	order	—
SC/152/2011	PS Kulkecherla vs Indramma	10 Oct 2024	Judgement	—
SC/133/2022	The State of Telangana through PS Kodangal vs Anagoth Srikanth	09 Oct 2024	Judgement	—
OS/97/2019	Vadla Surender vs V.Kavitha	04 Oct 2024	Others	—
OS/310/2007	Syed Salar vs Smt. Ramulamma (died per LRs)	04 Oct 2024	Judgement	—
CC/1/2023	Marpally PS vs Dappu Mahendar and 4 others	04 Oct 2024	Judgement	—
SC/2/2020	PS KULKACHERLA vs Nattala Ramesh	03 Oct 2024	Judgement	—
H.M.O.P/130/2022	Mitakodi Lakshmi @ Mangamma vs Edigi Narsimulu	03 Oct 2024	order	—
OS/45/2016	Chandrakala vs Edigi Pandu	01 Oct 2024	Judgement	—
OS/49/2011	Shankarpally Shoba Rani vs Sirganagari Srinivas reddy	01 Oct 2024	Judgement	—
OS/184/2016	Dudyala Narsimulu vs Lalamma	01 Oct 2024	Judgement	—
OS/139/2019	Patel Kistappa vs Talari Anthappa	27 Sep 2024	Others	—
H.M.O.P/102/2022	Krishnaiah vs Padmamma alias Dasari Rajamma	25 Sep 2024	Others	—
H.M.O.P/3/2024	Ramaswamy Nava Mohan Reddy vs Salla Sravya @ Nithya Reddy	23 Sep 2024	order	—
OS/294/2006	NIZAMUDDIN vs DISTRICT COOPERATIVE MARKETING SOCIETY	20 Sep 2024	Judgement	—
OS/61/2019	D.Balraj vs D.Narsimulu	19 Sep 2024	Others	—
OS/90/2013	P.Channa Reddy vs P.Lal Reddy	19 Sep 2024	Others	—
OS/162/2016	Talari Ramulammma vs Talari Yellaiah	18 Sep 2024	Judgement	—
OS/96/2016	K.Sharada vs Mohd.Jaber	17 Sep 2024	Judgement	—
SC/92/2021	State of Telangana vs Ayyarapu Ravinder	04 Sep 2024	Judgement	—
OS/157/2014	M.Venkatram Reddy vs C.Madhavi	03 Sep 2024	Judgement	—
OS/102/2009	p parvathamma vs Vsb yenkanna	02 Sep 2024	Judgement	—
OS/18/2023	P. Anasuya Devi vs P. Ramkrishna Reddy	30 Aug 2024	Others	—
OS/98/2013	C.Hanmaiah vs Bheemaiah	30 Aug 2024	Others	—
H.M.O.P/47/2023	Chedaguntala Pentaiah vs Smt. Naskanti Bujjamma @ Aruna	30 Aug 2024	Others	—
OS/54/2016	D Ravi Kumar vs D Ramulu	28 Aug 2024	Others	—
OS/105/2006	P. SHOBA DEVI vs KAMALA AI	27 Aug 2024	Judgement	—
H.M.O.P/1/2024	Ch. Vinay Kumar Reddy vs Smt. Punyavathi Reddy	27 Aug 2024	order	—
OS/24/2018	Shailaja vs M/s Sri Maheswari Finance and Chits Funds	23 Aug 2024	Others	—
OS/203/2014	P Srinivas vs A Shailaja	23 Aug 2024	Others	—
H.M.O.P/52/2023	P. Dinesh vs Budala Sravani	23 Aug 2024	Others	—
H.M.O.P/109/2022	Kodicherla Venkatappa @ K.Venkatappa Alias Venkatappa vs Kodicherla Srujana Alias Sujana	23 Aug 2024	order	—
SC/73/2022	The State of Telangana through PS Basheerabad vs Kurva Srisailam	22 Aug 2024	Judgement	—
S.O.P/6/2020	Smt. S. Kalpana vs The Municipal Commissioner, Tandur, Vikarabad District, Telangana State - 501101	22 Aug 2024	Others	—
SC/69/2018	PS Tandur vs Vanarasi Venkatesh	21 Aug 2024	Judgement	—
SC/139/2021	The State of Telangana Through PS Karankote vs Bharthakai Rangappa	20 Aug 2024	Judgement	—
H.M.O.P/107/2022	Smt. Swapnanjali vs Narayana Alias Kindigeri Narayana	14 Aug 2024	Others	—
OS/237/2006	G.Sravan Kumar @ Edgi Sravan Kumar vs Edgi Shivaiah	12 Aug 2024	Judgement	—
SC/67/2018	PS Kulkacherla vs Vaditya Amith	09 Aug 2024	Judgement	—
SC/99/2022	The State of Telangana through PS Peddemul vs Chawan Hari Naik	09 Aug 2024	Judgement	—
SC/12/2023	PS Marpally, vs Garela Srikanth	08 Aug 2024	Judgement	—
SC/70/2018	P S Pargi vs Padmaram Narsimulu @ Bala Narsimulu	07 Aug 2024	Judgement	—
OS/63/2015	Srikanth Goud @ P.Srikanth Kumar vs Goundla Kamala @ Kamalamma	02 Aug 2024	Others	—
OS/116/2019	Nadirga Ashok Reddy vs Nadirga Raghupathi reddy	02 Aug 2024	Others	—
OS/154/2013	Umakanth Kshirsagar vs Prem Kumar Chauhan	02 Aug 2024	Judgement	—
SC/69/2017	PS Chengumol vs Bansilal	01 Aug 2024	Judgement	—
H.M.O.P/53/2023	Ananthreddy vs Someshwari	30 Jul 2024	order	—
EP/5/2010	Neelgar Samaj , Charitable trust vs Kalka Rajeshwari	26 Jul 2024	Others	—
OS/105/2021	Modugu Syamala Rao vs Chavan Sevya	26 Jul 2024	Others	—
SC/63/2019	PS TANDUR vs Chakali Srinivas	26 Jul 2024	Judgement	—
OS/36/2014	Syed Rasool vs Syed Sadat	25 Jul 2024	Others	—
SC/17/2017	Basheerabad PS vs Vadde Srikanth	25 Jul 2024	Judgement	—
SC/67/2017	PS Marpally vs P.Nagabhushnam	24 Jul 2024	Judgement	—
OS/7/2017	Arun Kumar vs Shakunthala	23 Jul 2024	Others	—
SC/84/2019	PS YALAL vs Dandu Lalappa	23 Jul 2024	Judgement	—
SC/41/2021	The State of Telangana through PS Nawabpet vs Aloori Gopaiah @ Gopal	22 Jul 2024	Others	—
SC/55/2021	The State of Telangana through PS Bantwaram vs Patnam Venkataiah	22 Jul 2024	Judgement	—
H.M.O.P/2/2024	R. Jaya Sree vs Pradeep Singh	22 Jul 2024	order	—
SC/106/2021	The State of Telangana Through PS Doma. vs Kukkali Ramesh	19 Jul 2024	Judgement	—
IP/1/2022	Andhelwal Balraj Chary vs State Bank of India, Vikarabad Main Branch	18 Jul 2024	Others	—
OS/70/2010	T.Radhamma vs M.Manik Reddy	18 Jul 2024	Others	—
SC/50/2021	The state of Telangana through PS Kulakcherla vs Chedhurupally Venkatramulu @ Cheruvumundali Venkatramulu	18 Jul 2024	Judgement	—
SC/80/2017	SHO, P.S. MARPALLY vs Y. Ranjith	18 Jul 2024	Judgement	—
SC/138/2021	The State of Telangana Through PS Kotpally vs Madde Narsimulu	16 Jul 2024	Judgement	—
SC/15/2021	PS - KOTPALLY vs Boini Baswaraju	15 Jul 2024	Judgement	—
H.M.O.P/41/2023	Kummari Ramesh vs Smt. Kummari Pavani @ Manasa	12 Jul 2024	order	—
SC/21/2019	PS NAWABPET vs Gangyada Sakku	11 Jul 2024	Judgement	—
SC/126/2022	The State through Police Bomraspet vs Ampally Ramesh	10 Jul 2024	Judgement	—
OS/71/2013	Syed Shafiuddin vs Syed Sadath	09 Jul 2024	Judgement	—
OS/15/2017	Syed Ather Ali vs K.C Jaayanth	08 Jul 2024	Judgement	—
OS/164/2019	K.Shankaramma vs Smt. Kotha Narsingamma	05 Jul 2024	Others	—
H.M.O.P/40/2023	Smt. Mangali Saraswathi @ Ashwini vs Mangali Bal Raj	05 Jul 2024	order	—
OS/31/2019	D.Veerabhadraiah vs Edigi Pandu	04 Jul 2024	Others	—
H.M.O.P/128/2022	Krishna Kalva vs Chaitanaya @ Chaitanaya Deepa	04 Jul 2024	Others	—
OS/298/2019	Patlolla Karthik Reddy vs Soli Raghavendhar Reddy	03 Jul 2024	Others	—
OS/114/2017	B.Yella Reddy vs Smt. Sarasamma	27 Jun 2024	Others	—
OS/34/2015	P Kista reddy vs P Buchi reddy	26 Jun 2024	Others	—
H.M.O.P/54/2023	Chakali Venkataiah vs Chakali Rajitha	26 Jun 2024	Others	—
SC/80/2019	PS MOMINPET vs Talari Narahari	21 Jun 2024	Judgement	—
H.M.O.P/55/2023	Yamsani Kishore vs Smt. K. Shirisha	21 Jun 2024	order	—
OS/302/2019	Sharada vs Nagamani	20 Jun 2024	Others	—
H.M.O.P/46/2023	Smt. Akhila vs K. Ramesh Yadav	20 Jun 2024	Others	—
EP/19/2018	Md.Maqbool vs Abdul Khaleed	14 Jun 2024	Others	—
OS/2/2011	p veerareddy vs Vssuryaprakashreddy	14 Jun 2024	Judgement	—
OS/18/2020	B.Pedda Bharatamma vs Midde Venkatayya	14 Jun 2024	Others	—
SC/63/2018	Mominpet PS vs Dandu Narsimulu	14 Jun 2024	Judgement	—
OS/131/2016	Mohammed Tajammul Hussain vs G Shantha	13 Jun 2024	Others	—
H.M.O.P/59/2020	Smt. Kammari Sushmitha @ Lavanya W/o. K. Sivaramulu Chary vs Sri. Kammari Sivaramulu	13 Jun 2024	order	—
OS/106/2017	Lakamgari Yella Reddy vs Lakamgari Peeramma	12 Jun 2024	Judgement	—
H.M.O.P/27/2022	Kalaskar Naresh Kumar vs Kalaskar Laxmi	12 Jun 2024	Others	—
SC/50/2019	PS - PEDDEMUL vs Rathod Gopal	10 Jun 2024	Judgement	—
OS/56/2022	Sri. Lanka Veera Reddy vs Sri. Mohd. Aftab Uzair Baig	08 Jun 2024	Others	—
OS/62/2022	Smt. Challa Narsamma vs Sri. Mohd. Aftab Uzair Baig	08 Jun 2024	Others	—
SC/66/2018	PS Pargi vs Permolla Mala Balraj	07 Jun 2024	Judgement	—
H.M.O.P/48/2023	Pathi Srinivas vs Pathi Mamatha	07 Jun 2024	order	—
H.M.O.P/36/2023	Dubba Naveen Kumar vs Smt. Maheshwari	06 Jun 2024	Others	—
OS/42/2009	a kulasathish kumar vs Vskalal agamaiah	05 Jun 2024	Judgement	—

Showing 100 of 712 orders — Log in to browse all pages.

Monthly Orders (Last 12 Months)

Oct 2024		17
Sep 2024		11
Aug 2024		24
Jul 2024		29
Jun 2024		23
May 2024		15
Apr 2024		26
Mar 2024		34
Feb 2024		33
Jan 2024		35
Dec 2023		21
Nov 2023		28

Frequently Asked Questions

How many cases has Ms.D.B.Sheetal handled?

Ms.D.B.Sheetal has handled 745 court orders since 2022 at Vikarabad, PDJ Court Complex. The average disposal rate is 29 orders per month.

What types of cases does Ms.D.B.Sheetal hear?

Based on available records, Ms.D.B.Sheetal primarily handles Civil matters (Original Suits, Execution Petitions) and Criminal matters (Sessions Cases) at Vikarabad, PDJ Court Complex.

Where is Ms.D.B.Sheetal currently posted?

Ms.D.B.Sheetal is posted as Senior Civil Judge,Vikarabad at Vikarabad, PDJ Court Complex, Vikarabad, Telangana.

Are judgments by Ms.D.B.Sheetal available online?

Yes. 5 judgments by Ms.D.B.Sheetal are available on Legistro with full text, outcome, and sections cited.

How fast does Ms.D.B.Sheetal dispose cases?

Ms.D.B.Sheetal disposes approximately 29 cases per month, based on 745 orders handled over their tenure at Vikarabad, PDJ Court Complex.

Since when is Ms.D.B.Sheetal serving?

Ms.D.B.Sheetal has been serving at Vikarabad, PDJ Court Complex since 2022.

Case Types

OS 38%

H 28%

SC 23%

EP 7%

OP 1%

IP 1%

S 1%

RCA 1%

Posting History

Aug 2022 — Oct 2024

Senior Civil Judge,Vikarabad · 745 orders

Other Judges at this Court

Sri M.Naga Raju

Principal District and Sessions Judge,Vikarabad

1 orders

Sri P.Pradeep Naik

I Addl District and Sessions Judge-cum-Special Ses...

0 orders

Rallabandi Santhi Latha

Principal Junior Civil Judge

351 orders

Ms. S.Vaishnavi

I Addl Junior Civil Judge, Vikarabad

181 orders

Sri. M. Venkateswarlu

Senior Civil Judge,Vikarabad

403 orders

← View all judges at Vikarabad, PDJ Court Complex