D Keerthi Chandrika Reddy

1

EP.No. 23 of 2025 in O.S.No.67/2022

IN THE COURT OF THE PRL.JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE -CUM- JUDICIAL

MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS AT YELLANDU

Dated this, the 23rd day of April, 2026

Present:-Smt.D.Keerthi Chandrika Reddy Prl.Junior Civil Judge-Cum

Judicial Magistrate of First Class,

Yellandu

E.P.No. 23 of 2025

in

O.S.No.67 of 2022

Between: - Kasaraboina Sailu, S/o.Venkataiah, Age:63 years, Occu:Retd.SCCL Employee, R/o.H.No.5-6-59, Station Basthi, Yellandu Town and Mandal, Bhadradri Kothagudem District. ...D.Hr/Plaintiff. A N D 1.Thatikonda Rayamallu @ Rajamallu, S/o.Mallesh, Age:56 years, Occu:Retd.SCCL Employee, 2.Thatikonda Padma, W/o.Rayamallu @ Rajamallu, Age:55 years, Occu:House hold, Both are R/o.Nurse Colony, S.C.C.L Main Hospital Area, Kothagudem, Bhadradri Kothagudem District. ....J.Drs/Defendants.

This Execution Petition is coming on for final hearing on 23.04.2026 in the presence of Sri.T.Maheswara Rao Advocate for the plaintiff/decree holder and Sri.Dantala Anand Advocate for the defendants/Judgment debtor and upon hearing counsel for plaintiff/DHR, and on perusal of the material on record and the matter having stood over for consideration till this day, the court delivered the following:

:: O R D E R ::

1.This is an application filed under Order 21 Rule 46 A of CPC., seeking the court to call for the attached amount of Rs.4,84,600/- pertaining to the retirement benefits of JDR No.1/Thatikonda Rayamallu @ Rajamallu in I.A.No.114/2022 in

O.S.No.67/2022 from the DDO/Employer/Garnishee of JDR No.1 i.e. General

Manager Singareni Collieries Company ltd., Kothagudem Area, Bhadradri

Kothagudem District.

2

EP.No. 23 of 2025 in O.S.No.67/2022

BRIEF FACTS OF THE CASE:-

2.It is the contention of decree holder/plaintiff/Kasaraboina Sailu that this court is pleased to pass a decree and judgment in his favour in O.S.No.67/2022 on 09.08.2024 directing the JDR No.1/Defendant No.1/Thatikonda Rayamallu to pay

Rs.4,84,800/- along with future interest @ 24 % P.A, starting from the date of the suit till the date of decree and subsequent interest @ 6 % P.A on the principal amount starting from the date of decree till the date of realization. He further submitted that in O.S.No.67/2022 during its pendency he had filed

I.A.No.114/2022 seeking for attachment before judgment by praying the court to attach an amount of Rs.4,84,600/- from and out of the retirement benefits of JDR

No.1/Thatikonda Rayamallu and the same was effected. He further submitted that inspite of passing decree and judgment in his favour this JDR No.1/Thatikonda

Rayamallu and the other defendant No.2/Thatikonda Padma in O.S.No.67/2022 did not obey the decree and they fell due of Rs.6,95,408/- towards the full satisfaction of decretal amount to DHR/plaintiff. He further submitted that the JDRs fell due of Rs.6,95,408/- and relevant calculations are shown as here under.

Decree amount :Rs.4,84,800/- Interest on Rs.4,00,000/-Rs.1,76,000/- from28.09.2022to 09.08.2024 at the rate of 24 % P.A Interest on Rs.4,00,000/-Rs.26,000/- from10.08.2024to 10.09.2025 at the rate of 6 % P.A Costs awarded in the decreeRs.7,769/- 3

EP.No. 23 of 2025 in O.S.No.67/2022

E.P Costs :

Stamps on petitionRs.2/- Stamps on decreeRs.2/- Process.Rs.35/- Advocate feeRs.500/- Type and Miscellaneous Rs.300/- TotalRs.839/- Grand Total of E.P AmountRs.6,95,408/- (Rupees six lakhs ninety five thousand four hundred and eighty only).

3.DHR further submitted that he is not having hope that JDR No.1/Thatikonda

Rayamallu and defendant No.2/Thatikonda Padma in O.S.No.67/2022 will repay their due amounts to him. Hence having no other option he approached the court by filing this E.P to call for the attached amount of Rs.4,84,600/- in

I.A.No.114/2022 in O.S.No.67/2022 pertaining to the retirement benefits of JDR

No.1/Defendant No.1/Thatikonda Rayamallu from his employer/DDO/Garnishee i.e. The General Manager Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., Kothagudem Area,

Bhadradri Kothagudem District, and to deposit such amount into the credit of this

Hon'ble Court with respect to this E.P. Hence, he prayed the court to allow the E.P.

4.Notices has been served on JDR No.1/Thatikonda Rayamallu and this E.P is filed only against JDR No.1. JDR No.1 made his appearance and filed counter.

AVERMENTS OF COUNTER :-

5. JDR No.1 contended that this E.P is not maintainable in law. He further submitted that he had paid total due amounts to the DHR/plaintiff and there is nothing to be paid by him. He further contended that this DHR/plaintiff suppressed the above said payment and filed this E.P only to harass him. He 4

EP.No. 23 of 2025 in O.S.No.67/2022

further contended that the calculation shown in the E.P is not correct. Hence, he prayed the court to dismiss this E.P.

6.During the course of enquiry DHR examined himself as Pw.1 and filed his chief examination affidavit by reiterating the contents of his petition in toto. JDR

No.1 did not lead any defense evidence.

7.Heard arguments of both sides and framed the following point for determination.

POINT:-

8. “Whether DHR is entitled to call for the attached amounts of

Rs.4,84,600/- in I.A.No.114/2022 in O.S.No.67/2022 from the

employer/DDO/Garnishee of JDR No.1 or not ?”.

9.DHR/Plaintiff filed his chief examination affidavit and deposed that he obtained a decree and judgment in his favour in O.S.No.67/2022 on 09.08.2024 against this JDR No.1 and defendant No.2/Thatikonda Padma. He further deposed that as per the decree he is entitled to receive Rs.4,84,800/- along with interest @ 24 % P.A., starting from the suit to till the date of decree and subsequent interest @ 6 % P.A starting from the date of decree to till the date of realization. He further submitted that this JDR No.1 and defendant No.2 did not obey the decree. And as per the decree he is entitled to receive the decree amount of Rs.4,84,800/- including interest on Rs.4,00,000/- from 28.09.2022 to 09.08.2024 @ 24 % P.A, i.e.

Rs.1,76,000/- and subsequent interest on Rs.4,00,000/- from 10.08.2024 to 10.09.2025 @ 6 % interest P.A, i.e. Rs.26,000/-. He also deposed that he is entitled to receive the costs awarded in the decree i.e. Rs.7,769/- and also the E.P costs that comes to Rs.839/-. However DHR/Pw.1 testified that an amount of Rs.4,84,600/- were already attached in I.A.No.114/2022 in O.S.No.67/2022 from the retirement benefits of JDR/Defendant No.1. As JDR No.1 is not repaying the decretal amount 5

EP.No. 23 of 2025 in O.S.No.67/2022

he sought for the attached amounts to be deposited before this court. Lr.Counsel for the JDR No.1 cross examined DHR/Plaintiff.

10.During the course of cross examination Lr.Counsel for JDR No.1 tried to establish before the court that this DHR/Pw.1 lent an amount of Rs.10,000/- to

JDR No.1 and obtained a blank pronote and later this DHR/Pw.1 failed to return the pronote inspite of receiving Rs.10,000/- from JDR No.1. However, DHR/Pw.1 denied all these suggestions. JDR No.1 in the counter contended that he had repaid entire amounts to DHR/Plaintiff. But no proof is filed before the court to prove his contentions. JDR No.1/Thatikonda Rayamallu did not furnish any bank statement or any receipt to prove that he had repaid all the decretal amount to

DHR/Plaintiff. So, there is no proof of satisfaction of the decree by JDR No.1. Since there is no rebuttal evidence from JDR No.1, this court is inclined to conclude that

JDR No.1 failed to satisfy the decree. Since an amount of Rs.4,84,600/- is already attached in I.A.No.114/2022 in O.S.No.67/2022 which are the retirement benefits of JDR No.1/Thatikonda Rayamallu the same are called for by this court from the

General Manager Singareni Collieries Company ltd., Kothagudem Area, Bhadradri

Kothagudem District, for credit into the above E.P before this court.

11.In the result, this E.P is allowed and an amount of Rs.4,84,600/- attached in

I.A.No.114/2022 in O.S.No.67/2022 are to be called for from the employer/DDO/Garnishee of JDR No.1/Thatikonda Rayamallu i.e. The General

Manager Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., Kothagudem Area, Bhadradri

Kothagudem District. for credit into the E.P before this court.

Dictated to Stenographer transcribed by him and corrected and pronounced by

me in the open Court on this the 23rd day of April, 2026.

PRL.JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE-CUM-

JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF I CLASS,

YELLANDU.

6

EP.No. 23 of 2025 in O.S.No.67/2022

::Appendix of Evidence::

Witnesses examined on behalf

For Plaintiff: For Defendant: Pw.1 : Kasaraboina Sailu - None -

:: Documents Marked ::

- Nil -

PRL.JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE-CUM-

JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF I CLASS,

YELLANDU.

1

O.S.No.04/2026

IN THE COURT OF THE PRL.JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE -CUM- JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE

OF FIRST CLASS, YELLANDU

Dated this, the 21st day of April, 2026

Present:-Smt.D.Keerthi Chandrika Reddy Prl.Junior Civil Judge-cum

Judicial Magistrate of First Class,

Yellandu

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 04 of 2026

Between: - Pallagani Kondal Rao, S/o.Venkateswar Rao late, Age:59 years, R/o.Sub-Jail Basthi, Yellandu Town and Mandal, Bhadradri-Kothagudem District.

...Plaintiff.

A N D

Vankdoth Balu, S/o.Gopa, Age:Ault, Occ:Employee, R/o.Qr.No.BF-25, I.M Colony, KTPS Paloncha, Town and Mandal Bhadradri-Kothagudem District.

...Defendant.

This suit is coming on for final hearing on 21.04.2026 in the presence of Sri.P.Gopinadh, Advocate for the plaintiff and the defendant remained ex-parte and upon hearing counsel for plaintiff, and on perusal of the material on record and the matter having stood over for consideration till this day, the court delivered the following:

:: J U D G M E N T ::

1.This is a suit for recovery of money of Rs.6,90,000/- with future interest @ 24 %

P.A. from the defendant basing on the strength of the promissory note.

BRIEF FACTS OF THE CASE:-

2.It is the case of plaintiff that he had got good acquaintance with defendant. Out of such good acquaintance defendant approached plaintiff and requested to lend an amount of Rs.5,00,000/- (Rupees five lakhs only) for his family needs and accordingly plaintiff has lent Rs.5,00,000/- amount to defendant on 05.05.2024 at his residence and defendant had executed a demand promissory note in favor of plaintiff for an amount of

Rs.5,00,000/- @ Rs.2/- interest per hundred per month. Plaintiff further submitted that 2

O.S.No.04/2026

the said pronote was executed by defendant in the presence of scribe and attetsors.

Inspite of several demands, defendant failed to repay the amounts and avoiding the repayment on one pretext or the other. He had demanded the defendant on 25.11.2025 to repay the amount. Till the date of filing this suit there is no response from the defendant. Hence, plaintiff had filed the suit.

3.Summons are served on defendant. The service was held sufficient and as defendant failed to appear he was set-exparte as per docket order dt:-02.04.2026.

4.During the course of trail plaintiff himself was examined as Pw.1 and got marked

Ex-A.1.

5.Heard learned counsel for the plaintiff and framed the following point for determination.

6. "Whether plaintiff is entitled for the recovery of amount of Rs.6,90,000/- with future interest @ 24% P.A. from the date of suit, till realization and along with costs from defendant or not?"

7.In order to substantiate his case plaintiff got himself examined as P.W.1 and he filed his chief examination affidavit by reiterating the contents of his plaint in toto.

Original Promissory note Dt:05.05.2024 is marked Ex-A1.

8.The testimony of P.W.1 coupled with documentary evidences remained unchallenged. From Ex-A1, plaintiff is able to establish that Defendant had taken an amount of Rs.5,00,000/ -(Rupees five lakhs only) @ Rs.2/- interest per hundred per month from P.W.1 and he had executed pronote/EX-A1 and from the evidence of P.W.1, it is evident that defendant failed to repay the borrowed amount to P.W.1 in spite of making demand. Defendant failed to repay the amount till date having knowledge about the debt. The evidence of PW1 remained unrebutted. From EX-A1 plaintiff is able to establish his claim. Since plaintiff is able to establish his claim, and as defendant failed to rebutt the case, the plaintiff is entitled to recover the amounts from the defendant.

3

O.S.No.04/2026

9.In the result, the suit is decreed and plaintiff is entitled to recover an amount of

Rs.6,90,000/- with future interest @ 24 % P.A. from the date of suit to till the date of decree and subsequent interest @ 6% P.A on principal amount from the date of decree to till the date of realization.

Dictated to stenographer transcribed by him, corrected and pronounced by me in

the open Court on this the 21st day of April, 2026.

PRL.JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE-CUM-

JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF I CLASS,

YELLANDU.

:: Appendix of evidence ::

Witnesses examined

For Plaintiff: For Defendant: Pw.1 : P.Kondal Rao. - None -

:: Documents marked ::

For Plaintiff: For Defendant: Ex.A.1 : Original promissory note Dt.05.05.2024. - Nil -

PRL.JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE-CUM-

JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF I CLASS,

YELLANDU.

TSBK030000712026

Presented on : 27-01-2026 Registered on : 30-01-2026 Decided on : 21-04-2026 Duration : 0 years, 2 months, 25 days

IN THE COURT OF

Principal Junior Civil Judge-cum-Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Yellandu.

AT , Bhadradri Kothagudem (Presided Over by Smt.D.Keerthi Chandrika Reddy)

CC/21/2026

Between: SHO of P.S.Yellandu Through Police Station Officer PS-YELLANDU 14, Yellandu - Igp, Warangal Region Bhadradri Kothagudem Bhadradri Kothagudem

VERSUS

Yakub Shaik Age: 21 Occupation : 5-2-109/ALBS Nagar Yellandu,Harijana Basthi,Yellandu,BHADRADRI

KOTHAGUDEM,TELANGANA

----------------------------------------------------------------------------- APP for State }: APPO, Advocate for appearing for Yakub Shaik Advocate appearing for , respectively. -----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Offence punishable under : 303(2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita,

JUDGMENT

(Delivered on 21-04-2026)

Accused is produced from District Jail, Khammam. Accused is examined U/Sec.262 of B.N.S.S., Charges U/Sec.303(2) of B.N.S., is framed against the accused, read over and explained to accused in Telugu. For which the accused voluntarily pleaded guilty and accused submitted that he is having old aged parents and he is the only earning member in the family by working as auto driver and prayed the court to show mercy in imposing sentence. Hence, in view of the voluntary admission of the accused, accused is convicted U/Sec. 271(2) of B.N.S.S., Heard about the quantum of sentence, the accused represented that he was languishing in jail for the past (3) months and he is having old aged parents and they are depending upon him hence requested the court to take lenient view in imposing sentence. Considering the representation made by the accused and the facts and circumstances of the case on hand, the accused is convicted U/Sec. 271(2) B.N.S.S., for the offence U/Sec.303(2) B.N.S., and sentenced to undergo Simple Imprisonment for a period of (3) months. The remand period of accused i.e. from 27.01.2026 to 21.04.2026 (Total 85 days) shall be set off U/Sec. 468 B.N.S.S., The Glamour Motor Cycle bearing No.TS.04.EK.3843 which was given to its registered owner vide orders in

Crl.M.P.No.25/2026 dt.21.01.2026 shall be made absolute.

Date : 21-04-2026 (Smt.D.Keerthi Chandrika Reddy)

Principal Junior Civil Judge-cum-Judicial

Magistrate of First Class, Yellandu.

TSBK030003532026

Presented on : 22-04-2026 Registered on : 22-04-2026 Decided on : 22-04-2026 Duration : 0 years, 0 months, 0 days

IN THE COURT OF

Principal Junior Civil Judge-cum-Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Yellandu.

AT ,Bhadradri Kothagudem Presided Over by D Keerthi Chandrika Reddy

OS/34/2026 Between: Kambhampati Prabhanjan Rao Age: 45 Occupation : Address: RR Colony, Yellandu Town Mandal, BhadradriKothagudem District

VERSUS

Maloth Lalu Age: 42 Occupation : Address: H.No.5-61, Harilal Thanda, Sarvaram H/o, Kothagudem Mandal,Kothagudem Bhadrdri District. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Advocate for : SATHYAPRAKASH MAMIDI Advocate for : appearing for Maloth Lalu: Advocate appearing for respectively.

JUDGMENT

(Delivered on 22-04-2026)

Both parties present and filed terms of compromise. Their compromise is recorded and award is passed. suit is deposed off accordingly.

Date : 22-04-2026 (D Keerthi Chandrika Reddy)

Principal Junior Civil Judge-cum-

Judicial Magistrate of First Class,

Yellandu.

TSBK030003542026

Presented on : 22-04-2026 Registered on : 22-04-2026 Decided on : 22-04-2026 Duration : 0 years, 0 months, 0 days

IN THE COURT OF

Principal Junior Civil Judge-cum-Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Yellandu.

AT ,Bhadradri Kothagudem Presided Over by D Keerthi Chandrika Reddy

OS/35/2026 Between: Kambhampati Prabhanjan Rao Age: 45 Occupation : Address: RR Colony, Yellandu Town Mandal, BhadradriKothagudem District

VERSUS : Maloth Lalu Age: 42 Occupation : Address: H.No.5-61, Harilal Thanda, Sarvaram H/o, Kothagudem Mandal,Kothagudem Bhadrdri District. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Advocate for : SATHYAPRAKASH MAMIDI Advocate for : appearing for Maloth Lalu: Advocate appearing for respectively.

JUDGMENT

(Delivered on 22-04-2026)

Both parties present and filed terms of compromise. Their compromise is recorded and award is passed. Suit is disposed off accordingly.

Date : 22-04-2026 (D Keerthi Chandrika Reddy)

Principal Junior Civil Judge-cum-Judicial

Magistrate of First Class, Yellandu.