Smt. D. Varoodhini

Senior Civil Judge-cum-Assistant Sessions Judge, Godavarikhani

Godavarikhani, ADJ Court Complex · Peddapalli · Telangana

Smt. D. Varoodhini, Senior Civil Judge-cum-Assistant Sessions Judge, Godavarikhani, is posted at Godavarikhani, ADJ Court Complex, Peddapalli, Telangana, India. 1,123 court orders on record since 2021. 12 judgments with full text available. Primarily handles H, OS, SC cases.

1,123

Total Orders

Judgments

Orders/Month

Postings

Featured Judgments

H.M.O.P/150/2022

Perugu Likhitha vs Perugu Ganesh Raj

10 Aug 2022

HMOP No.150/2022 Page 1 of 12

IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE-CUM-ASSISTANT

SESSIONS JUDGE, AT GODAVARIKHANI

PRESENT : Smt D. Varoodhini,

Senior Civil Judge-cum-

Assistant Sessions Judge,

Peddapalli.

FAC : Senior Civil Judge-cum-

Assistant Sessions Judge,

Godavarikhani.

Wednesday, this the 10th day of August, 2022

H.M.O.P. No.150 OF 2022

(Old H.M.O.P. No.91 OF 2018)

Between:

Perugu Likhitha, W/o. Ganesh Raj, D/o. Akinapalli Visheshwar, Age: 21 years, Occ: Home Maker, R/o. H.No.16-10-33/3, Kalyannagar, Godavarikhani Village, Ramagundam Mandal, Peddapalli District. … Petitioner A n d

Perugu Ganesh Raj, S/o. Satyam, Age: 28 years, Occ: Private Employee, R/o. H.No.15-9-01/1, Ramannapet Village and Mandal, Warangal Urban District. …Respondent

This petition having come before me on 05.08.2022for final hearing in the presence of Sri K.Sanjeeva Reddy and

Sri B.Shanthan Kumar, Advocates for Petitioner and Sri

K.Manoj Kumar, Advocate for Respondent,upon perusing the material papers on record, upon hearing arguments and the matter having stood over for consideration till this day, this court delivered the following:-

Senior Civil Judge-cum-

Assistant Sessions Judge, Peddapalli. FAC: SCJ-cum-ASJ, Godavarikhani.

HMOP No.150/2022 Page 2 of 12

:: O R D E R ::

This is a petition filed Under Section 13(1)(ia)(ib) of the

Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 by the petitioner seeking dissolution of her marriage dated 08-09-2016,with the respondent on the ground of cruelty and desertion.

2. The averments of the petition filed by the petitioner in brevity are to the effect that, the petitioner is the legally wedded wife of the respondent and their marriage was solemnized on 08-09-2016 at Sri Laxminarsimha Swamy Temple at Kommala Village, Geesukonda Mandal, Warangal District.

Their marriage is love marriage and their marriage is not approved by their elders and they got married in the said temple. They lead marital life hardly for a period of two weeks.

Thereafter, respondent and his parents started demanding dowry of Rs.10,00,000/- (Rupees Ten Lakhs only) and stated that if the respondent married another woman, he would have got more amount as dowry. When the petitioner stated that she cannot get any amount from her parents, respondent snatched

Senior Civil Judge-cum-

Assistant Sessions Judge, Peddapalli. FAC: SCJ-cum-ASJ, Godavarikhani.

HMOP No.150/2022 Page 3 of 12

her gold chain, pledged with Mannapuram gold and obtained loan. However he failed to repay the loan amount. Respondent and his parents started harassing her by not even serving food to her and beating and abusing her and the respondent poured hot tea on her hands causing severe burns and they have torn her chappals from wearing footwear. They made her to walk bare foot to her college by walk from Hanamkonda to Warangal when they did not give auto charges inspite of her requests.

When she asked for examination fee, they refused to pay and on the other hand asked her to bring money from her parents.

They wrongfully confined the petitioner in a room asking her not to pursue further studies and snatched her mobile so as to prevent her to speak to any others including her parents and brother. On 16-11-2016, petitioner approached the Women

Police Station, Warangal City and lodged a report with police, upon which police were counseled the respondent and his parents, wherein the respondent agreed to live amicably, but they did not do so. Respondent used to come home in drunken condition and beat her indiscriminately and he used to threaten her to eliminate her as failed to bring demanded dowry from her

Senior Civil Judge-cum-

Assistant Sessions Judge, Peddapalli. FAC: SCJ-cum-ASJ, Godavarikhani.

HMOP No.150/2022 Page 4 of 12

parents. The respondent threatened and blackmailed her that he had her nude photos and would upload them in face book, thereby damaging her prestige in society. He obtained her signatures on blank papers. In the month of January, 2017, respondent at the instance of his parents indiscriminately beat her and necked her out from their house and ever since, petitioner is residing at her parental house. Petitioner got convened panchayaths in presence of elders, wherein the elders advised the respondent to lead marital life with her, but the respondent insisted that unless the petitioner brings the dowry demanded by him, he would not allow her to live with him. On 17-05-2018, respondent approached her at her parental house while she was going by walk and snatched her cell phone and threatened to kill her, hence she lodged report to police

Godavarikhani I Town, police did not take any action. As there is no possibility of reunion of the petitioner with the respondent, the petitioner filed this petition seeking dissolution of her marriage with the respondent on the ground of cruelty and desertion.

Senior Civil Judge-cum-

Assistant Sessions Judge, Peddapalli. FAC: SCJ-cum-ASJ, Godavarikhani.

HMOP No.150/2022 Page 5 of 12

3.On the contrary, Respondent filed counter denying all the material allegations made in the petition, but the marriage of the respondent with the petitioner is admitted. It is denied by respondent that he harassed the petitioner demanding dowry. It is contended for the respondent that the parents of the respondent looked after the petitioner with love, affection and most respectable manner. It is further denied for the respondent that the respondent took gold ornaments of petitioner and took loan by pledging the same, that the petitioner herself with her own consent obtained loan to fulfill her luxurious needs, that the respondent encouraged the higher studies of the petitioner by paying all academic as well as examination fees. Further contended that the petitioner herself went to her parental house several times without intimating to respondent or his family members and the petitioner lodged several complaints in various police stations against the respondent and his parents and that the respondent visited

Godavarikhani in the month of May, 2018 to get back the petitioner into his marital fold, but not to picked up quarrel with her, that the father of the petitioner threatened the respondent

Senior Civil Judge-cum-

Assistant Sessions Judge, Peddapalli. FAC: SCJ-cum-ASJ, Godavarikhani.

HMOP No.150/2022 Page 6 of 12

that he would eliminate him, hence respondent has life threat with the father of the petitioner. Hence, prayed to dismiss the petition.

4.To substantiate her contentions, petitioner filed evidence affidavit in lieu of her examination in chief as PW.1 and got exhibited Ex.P1 Attested Photostat copy of Aadhaar card of Petitioner (Compared with original).

5.On the other hand, respondent did not chose to adduce evidence on his behalf despite conditional orders, hence respondent’s evidence was treated as Nil.

6.Heard the both the learned Counsel and perused the material available on record.

7.Now the point that emerges for consideration is:

“Whether the petitioner is entitled for decree of divorce, as prayed for?”

POINT:-

8.Originally, a petition under section 13(1)(ia)(ib) of

Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 was filed by the petitioner herein in

Senior Civil Judge-cum-

Assistant Sessions Judge, Peddapalli. FAC: SCJ-cum-ASJ, Godavarikhani.

HMOP No.150/2022 Page 7 of 12

the Court of Senior Civil Judge, Peddapalli and the same was numbered as H.M.O.P.No.91/2018. Subsequently, as per the

Orders of Hon’ble Prl. District and Sessions Judge, Karimnagar (Erstwhile) vide Letter Dis.No.6746/PR.No.107/2019/ADM/DCK,

dated: 23-11-2021, the entire case record was transmitted to

the Court of Senior Civil Judge, Godavarikhani on the point of jurisdiction. Thereafter the same is renumbered as

H.M.O.P.No.150/2022, on the file of this Court.

9.A perusal of evidence on record reflects that, the petitioner in order to prove her contention filed evidence affidavit in lieu of examination in chief as PW.1. The contents of her evidence affidavit is the reiteration of contents of the petition. Ex.P1 is Attested Photostat copy of Aadhaar card of

Petitioner (Compared with original). The case of the petitioner in a nutshell as per her evidence is that, the marriage of petitioner with the respondent was solemnized on 08-09-2016 at Sri Laxminarsimha Swamy Temple at Kommala Village,

Geesukonda Mandal, Warangal District. Their marriage is love marriage and their marriage is not approved by their elders and

Senior Civil Judge-cum-

Assistant Sessions Judge, Peddapalli. FAC: SCJ-cum-ASJ, Godavarikhani.

HMOP No.150/2022 Page 8 of 12

they got married in the said temple. They lead marital life hardly for a period of two weeks. Thereafter, respondent and his parents started demanding dowry of Rs.10,00,000/- (Rupees

Ten Lakhs only) and stated that if the respondent married another woman, he would have got more amount as dowry.

When the petitioner stated that she cannot get any amount from her parents, respondent snatched her gold chain, pledged with Mannapuram gold and obtained loan. However he failed to repay the loan amount. Respondent and his parents started harassing her by not even serving food to her and beating and abusing her and the respondent poured hot tea on her hands causing severe burns. They wrongfully confined the petitioner in a room asking her not to pursue further studies and snatched her mobile so as to prevent her to speak to any others including her parents and brother. On 16-11-2016, petitioner approached the Women Police Station, Warangal City and lodged a report with police, upon which police were counseled the respondent and his parents, wherein the respondent agreed to live amicably, but they did not do so. Respondent used to come home in drunken condition and beat her indiscriminately and he

Senior Civil Judge-cum-

Assistant Sessions Judge, Peddapalli. FAC: SCJ-cum-ASJ, Godavarikhani.

HMOP No.150/2022 Page 9 of 12

used to threaten her to eliminate her as failed to bring demanded dowry from her parents. The respondent threatened and blackmailed her that he had her nude photos and would upload them in face book, thereby damaging her prestige in society. Petitioner got convened panchayaths in presence of elders, wherein the elders advised the respondent to lead marital life with her, but the respondent insisted that unless the petitioner brings the dowry demanded by him, he would not allow her to live with him. On 17-05-2018, respondent approached her at her parental house while she was going by walk and snatched her cell phone and threatened to kill her, hence she lodged report to police Godavarikhani I Town, police did not take any action.

10.Per contra, respondent filed counter denying all the allegations averred in the petition. The petitioner adduced her evidence by way of affidavit in lieu of examination in chief. On the other hand, respondent did not chose to tender any evidence on his behalf, despite availing reasonable opportunities, hence respondent’s evidence was closed.

Senior Civil Judge-cum-

Assistant Sessions Judge, Peddapalli. FAC: SCJ-cum-ASJ, Godavarikhani.

HMOP No.150/2022 Page 10 of 12

11.It is borne on record that the contentions of the petitioner/PW.1 remained unchallenged and unrebutted. There is nothing patent on record to disprove or discard the evidence of the petitioner. It is alleged by the respondent in his counter that the petitioner herself obtained loan by pledging her gold ornaments to fulfill her luxurious needs and that the respondent encouraged higher studies of the petitioner by remitting all academic as well as examination fees. It is further alleged that the petitioner herself went to her parental house several times without intimating to respondent or his family members and the petitioner lodged several complaints in various police stations against them. In order to prove the said allegations, respondent neither chose to cross-examine the petitioner nor tendered any evidence on his behalf. Hence, whatever is filed, stated or deposed before this Court assumes significance and becomes the evidence and it is evident that PW.1 evidence on record remained unchallenged and unrebutted. From the discussion supra, having regard to the facts and circumstances and the evidence on record, this Court is of view that the

Senior Civil Judge-cum-

Assistant Sessions Judge, Peddapalli. FAC: SCJ-cum-ASJ, Godavarikhani.

HMOP No.150/2022 Page 11 of 12

marriage between the petitioner and respondent is irretrievably broken and there is no ray of hope for their reunion, under aforementioned compelled circumstances, there is no option except to grant divorce as prayed by the petitioner. Hence it is suffice to grant divorce by dissolving the marriage of the petitioner with the respondent. In view of the circumstances put forth by the petitioner, the petitioner is entitled for divorce as prayed for. Accordingly, this point is answered in favour of the petitioner.

12.In the result, petition is allowed, granting decree of divorce by dissolving the marriage of petitioner and respondent, with effect from 10-08-2022, which took place on 08-09-2016. Parties to bear their own costs.

Dictated to the Stenographer, transcribed by her, corrected and

pronounced by me in the open Court on this the 10th day of August, 2022.

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE-CUM-

ASSISTANT SESSIONS JUDGE,

PEDDAPALLI.

FAC: SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE-CUM-

ASSISTANT SESSIONS JUDGE,

GODAVARIKHANI.

Senior Civil Judge-cum-

Assistant Sessions Judge, Peddapalli. FAC: SCJ-cum-ASJ, Godavarikhani.

HMOP No.150/2022 Page 12 of 12

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

For the Petitioner : For the Respondent :

PW.1Perugu Likhitha ---None---

EXHIBITS MARKED

For the Petitioner :

Ex.P1Attested Photostat copy of Aadhaar card of Petitioner (Compared with original)

For the Respondent :

– Nil --

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE-CUM-

ASSISTANT SESSIONS JUDGE,

PEDDAPALLI.

FAC: SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE-CUM-

ASSISTANT SESSIONS JUDGE,

GODAVARIKHANI.

Senior Civil Judge-cum-

Assistant Sessions Judge, Peddapalli. FAC: SCJ-cum-ASJ, Godavarikhani.

H.M.O.P/129/2022

Pasupuleti Shashikala @ Chamakurthi Gayathri Shashikala vs Pasupuleti Sridhar

08 Aug 2022

HMOP No.129/2022 Page 1 of 9

IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE-CUM-ASSISTANT

SESSIONS JUDGE, AT GODAVARIKHANI

PRESENT : Smt D. Varoodhini,

Senior Civil Judge-cum-

Assistant Sessions Judge,

Peddapalli.

FAC : Senior Civil Judge-cum-

Assistant Sessions Judge,

Godavarikhani.

Monday, this the 8th day of August, 2022

H.M.O.P. No.129 OF 2022

(Old H.M.O.P. No.118 OF 2020)

Between:

Pasupuleti Shashikala @ Chamakurthi Gayathri Shashikala, W/o. Sridhar, D/o. Chamakurthi Ramesh Babu, Age: 35 years, Caste: Munnur Kapu, Occ: Home Maker, R/o.Q.No.MD-18A, Jayshankarnagar, 8 Incline Colony, Ramagundam Mandal, Peddapalli District. … Petitioner A n d

Pasupuleti Sridhar, S/o. Srinivasa Rao, Age: 40 years, Caste: Munnur Kapu, Occ: SCCL Employee, R/o.Q.No.SC2-116, Sharadhanagar, Godavarikhani, Ramagundam Mandal, Peddapalli District.

…Respondent

This petition having come before me on 05.08.2022for final hearing in the presence of Sri Velpula Muralidhar Yadav, Advocate for Petitioner and Respondent remained exparte, upon perusing the material papers on record, upon hearing arguments and the matter having stood over for consideration till this day, this court delivered the following:-

Senior Civil Judge-cum-

Assistant Sessions Judge, Peddapalli. FAC: SCJ-cum-ASJ, Godavarikhani.

HMOP No.129/2022 Page 2 of 9

:: O R D E R ::

This is a petition filed Under Section 13(1)(ia) of the

Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 by the petitioner seeking dissolution of her marriage dated 26-04-2001,with the respondent on the ground of cruelty.

2. The averments of the petition filed by the petitioner in brevity are to the effect that, the petitioner is the legally wedded wife of the respondent and their marriage was solemnized on 26-04-2001, as per the Hindu rites and customs prevailing in their community, at PK-1 Center, Manugur. Parents of the petitioner presented dowry of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One

Lakh only) and 2 tulas of gold and other household articles on the demand of the respondent and his parents. Post-marriage, petitioner joined the conjugal society of the respondent at 8

Incline Colony, Ramagundam Mandal, Peddapalli District and their marriage was consummated and a male child was born out of their wedlock on 23-11-2005, who is presently age 15 years, studying 10th standard and the child is living with the petitioner.

Senior Civil Judge-cum-

Assistant Sessions Judge, Peddapalli. FAC: SCJ-cum-ASJ, Godavarikhani.

HMOP No.129/2022 Page 3 of 9

Post-marraige, they lead marital life hardly for a period of five years. Subsequently, respondent started harassing the petitioner on one pretext or other and used to abuse the petitioner in filthy language. Respondent also used to pick up quarrels with her parents with additional demands. Respondent suspected her character and harassed her mentally and physically. Respondent is addicted of drinking alcohol and due to which, he started taking debts. He demanded amounts from the parents of the petitioner, and when they were unable to arrange the same, he used to beat the petitioner indiscriminately. Petitioner and her parents several times requested the respondent and his parents to change their attitude, but the respondent never changed his attitude and continued the harassment. On 08-03-2019, respondent necked out the petitioner along with child from his house, taking all her belongings including gold and ever since she is residing separately. Respondent failed to make any attempts to get back the petitioner into his marital fold. Petitioner and her family members along with elders went to the respondent, but the respondent and his parents assaulted and manhandled the

Senior Civil Judge-cum-

Assistant Sessions Judge, Peddapalli. FAC: SCJ-cum-ASJ, Godavarikhani.

HMOP No.129/2022 Page 4 of 9

petitioner and her parents. Petitioner has been suffering untold misery and agony due to the desertion of the respondent.

Having no other alternative, petitioner filed this petition seeking dissolution of her marriage with the respondent on the ground of cruelty.

3.Having received notice from this Court, respondent failed to make his appearance and hence respondent was set exparte on 22-07-2022 and remained exparte all through the proceedings.

4.During the course of evidence, petitioner filed her evidence affidavit in lieu of her examination in chief as PW.1 and got marked Ex.P1 and P2.

5.Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the material available on record.

6.Now the point that emerges for consideration is:

“Whether the petitioner is entitled for decree of divorce, as prayed for?”

Senior Civil Judge-cum-

Assistant Sessions Judge, Peddapalli. FAC: SCJ-cum-ASJ, Godavarikhani.

HMOP No.129/2022 Page 5 of 9

POINT:-

7. Originally, a petition under section 13(1)(ia) of Hindu

Marriage Act, 1955 was filed by the petitioner herein in the

Court of Senior Civil Judge, Peddapalli and the same was numbered as H.M.O.P.No.118/2020. Subsequently, as per the

Orders of Hon’ble Prl. District and Sessions Judge, Karimnagar (Erstwhile) vide Letter Dis.No.6746/PR.No.107/2019/ADM/DCK,

dated: 23-11-2021, the entire case record was transmitted to

the Court of Senior Civil Judge, Godavarikhani on the point of jurisdiction. Thereafter the same is renumbered as

H.M.O.P.No.129/2022, on the file of this Court.

8.The petitioner in order to prove her contention filed evidence affidavit in lieu of examination in chief as PW.1. The contents of her evidence affidavit is the reiteration of contents of the petition. Ex.P1 is Original Wedding Card, dated 26-04- 2001 and Ex.P2 is Attested Photostat copy of Aadhaar card of

Petitioner (Compared with original).

Senior Civil Judge-cum-

Assistant Sessions Judge, Peddapalli. FAC: SCJ-cum-ASJ, Godavarikhani.

HMOP No.129/2022 Page 6 of 9

9.The case of the petitioner in a nutshell as per her evidence is that, the marriage of petitioner with the respondent was solemnized on 26-04-2001, as per the Hindu rites and customs prevailing in their community, at PK-1 Center,

Manugur. Parents of the petitioner presented dowry of

Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh only) and 2 tulas of gold and other household articles on the demand of the respondent and his parents. Post-marriage, petitioner joined the conjugal society of the respondent at 8 Incline Colony, Ramagundam

Mandal, Peddapalli District and their marriage was consummated and a male child was born out of their wedlock on 23-11-2005, who is presently age 15 years, studying 10th standard and the child is living with the petitioner. Post- marraige, they lead marital life hardly for a period of five years.

Subsequently, respondent started harassing the petitioner on one pretext or other and used to abuse the petitioner in filthy language. Respondent also used to pick up quarrels with her parents with additional demands. Respondent suspected her character and harassed her mentally and physically. Petitioner

Senior Civil Judge-cum-

Assistant Sessions Judge, Peddapalli. FAC: SCJ-cum-ASJ, Godavarikhani.

HMOP No.129/2022 Page 7 of 9

and her parents several times requested the respondent and his parents to change their attitude, but the respondent never changed his attitude and continued the harassment. On 08-03- 2019, respondent necked out the petitioner along with child from his house, taking all her belongings including gold and ever since she is residing separately. Respondent failed to make any attempts to get back the petitioner into his marital fold. Petitioner and her family members along with elders went to the respondent, but the respondent and his parents assaulted and manhandled the petitioner and her parents.

Petitioner has been suffering untold misery and agony due to the desertion of the respondent.

10.Respondent though, received the notice remained exparte. The petitioner adduced her evidence by way of affidavit in lieu of examination in chief and as the respondent failed to cross-examine the petitioner, the contents of her evidence affidavit remained unchallenged and unrebutted.

There is nothing patent on record to disprove or discard the evidence of the petitioner. Hence the petitioner by way of her

Senior Civil Judge-cum-

Assistant Sessions Judge, Peddapalli. FAC: SCJ-cum-ASJ, Godavarikhani.

HMOP No.129/2022 Page 8 of 9

ocular and documentary evidence proved her claim. From the discussion supra, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and the evidence on record, this Court is of view that the marriage between the petitioner and respondent is irretrievably broken and there is no ray of hope for their reunion. Hence, the petitioner is entitled for divorce as prayed for. Accordingly, this point is answered in favour of the petitioner.

11.In the result, petition is allowed, granting decree of divorce by dissolving the marriage of petitioner and respondent, with effect from 08-08-2022, which took place on 26-04-2001. Parties to bear their own costs.

Dictated to the Stenographer, transcribed by her, corrected and

pronounced by me in the open Court on this the 8th day of August, 2022.

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE-CUM-

ASSISTANT SESSIONS JUDGE,

PEDDAPALLI.

FAC: SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE-CUM-

ASSISTANT SESSIONS JUDGE,

GODAVARIKHANI.

Senior Civil Judge-cum-

Assistant Sessions Judge, Peddapalli. FAC: SCJ-cum-ASJ, Godavarikhani.

HMOP No.129/2022 Page 9 of 9

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

For the Petitioner : For the Respondent :

PW.1Pasupuleti Shashikala @ ---None--- Chamakurthi Gayathri Shashikala

EXHIBITS MARKED

For the Petitioner :

Ex.P1Original Wedding card, dated 26-04-2001 Ex.P2Attested Photostat copy of Aadhaar card of Petitioner (Compared with original)

For the Respondent :

– Nil --

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE-CUM-

ASSISTANT SESSIONS JUDGE,

PEDDAPALLI.

FAC: SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE-CUM-

ASSISTANT SESSIONS JUDGE,

GODAVARIKHANI.

Senior Civil Judge-cum-

Assistant Sessions Judge, Peddapalli. FAC: SCJ-cum-ASJ, Godavarikhani.

H.M.O.P/39/2022

Chittavena @ Rajam Ashwini vs Chittavena Ramesh

08 Aug 2022

HMOP No.39/2022 Page 1 of 8

IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE-CUM-ASSISTANT

SESSIONS JUDGE, AT GODAVARIKHANI

PRESENT : Smt D. Varoodhini,

Senior Civil Judge-cum-

Assistant Sessions Judge,

Peddapalli.

FAC : Senior Civil Judge-cum-

Assistant Sessions Judge,

Godavarikhani.

Monday, this the 8th day of August, 2022

H.M.O.P. No.39 OF 2022

(Old H.M.O.P. No.178 OF 2021)

Between:

Chittavena @ Rajam Ashwini, W/o. Chittavena Ramesh, D/o. Rajam Thirupathi, Age: 29 years, Occ: Coolie, R/o. H.No.21-1-16, Chandrababu Naidu Colony, Godavarikhani, Ramagundam Mandal, Peddapalli District. … Petitioner A n d

Chittavena Ramesh, S/o. Late Hanmanthu, Age: 38 years, Occ: Nil, R/o. C/o. Chittavena Ramulu, H.No.2-18/A, Behind Laxminarshimha Kiranam, Suglampalli Village, Sultanabad Mandal, Peddapalli District. …Respondent

This petition having come before me on 05.08.2022for final hearing in the presence of Sri Gosika Prakash, Advocate

for Petitioner and Respondent remained exparte, upon

perusing the material papers on record, upon hearing arguments and the matter having stood over for consideration till this day, this court delivered the following:-

Senior Civil Judge-cum-

Assistant Sessions Judge, Peddapalli. FAC: SCJ-cum-ASJ, Godavarikhani.

HMOP No.39/2022 Page 2 of 8

:: O R D E R ::

This is a petition filed Under Section 13(1)(ia)(ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 by the petitioner seeking dissolution of her marriage dated 27-03-2008,with the respondent on the ground of cruelty and desertion.

2. The averments of the petition filed by the petitioner in brevity are to the effect that, the petitioner is the legally wedded wife of the respondent and their marriage was solemnized on 27-03-2008 at the parental house of the petitioner at Godavarikhani, as per the Hindu rites and customs.

During marriage, parents of the petitioner presented cash of

Rs.2,00,000/- (Rupees Two Lakhs only), 2 tulas of gold ornaments and household articles worth of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees

Fifty thousand only) to the respondent towards dowry. Post three months of marriage, respondent started harassing the petitioner mentally and physically, upon which parents of the petitioner convened a panchayath and sent the petitioner to the house of the respondent. Petitioner gave birth to baby boy namely

Sanjay Krishna, who is presently aged 10 years. Respondent

Senior Civil Judge-cum-

Assistant Sessions Judge, Peddapalli. FAC: SCJ-cum-ASJ, Godavarikhani.

HMOP No.39/2022 Page 3 of 8

got addicted to liquor every day and used to harass the petitioner physically and mentally. He neither provided treatment to their son nor provided basic needs to the petitioner and their child. He suspected her character and insulted her in the presence of her relatives and neighbours. Respondent demanded additional dowry of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh only). Parents and elders of the petitioner approached the respondent several times and requested him not to harass the petitioner and the child and not to expend money for his vices.

On 20-03-2014, respondent abused and beat the petitioner and necked her and child out from the house demanding

Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh only) additional dowry. Since then the petitioner is residing separately doing coolie work.

Even the respondent used to go to her work place and abused her in filthy language suspecting her character. Respondent never valued the love and affection of the petitioner and tortured her with unlawful demands. Petitioner endured all the tortures with a fond of hope that the respondent would mend his ways at one point or other, but all her hopes went futile.

Having no other alternative, petitioner filed this petition seeking

Senior Civil Judge-cum-

Assistant Sessions Judge, Peddapalli. FAC: SCJ-cum-ASJ, Godavarikhani.

HMOP No.39/2022 Page 4 of 8

dissolution of her marriage with the respondent on the ground of cruelty and desertion.

3.Having received notice respondent appeared, but failed to file counter despite conditional orders. Hence respondent was set exparte on 22-07-2022 and remained exparte all through the proceedings.

4.During the course of evidence, petitioner filed her evidence affidavit in lieu of her examination in chief as PW.1 and got marked Ex.P1 to P3.

5.Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the material available on record.

6.Now the point that emerges for consideration is:

“Whether the petitioner is entitled for decree of divorce, as prayed for?”

POINT:-

7.Originally, a petition under section 13(1)(ia)(ib) of

Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 was filed by the petitioner herein in the Court of Senior Civil Judge, Peddapalli and the same was

Senior Civil Judge-cum-

Assistant Sessions Judge, Peddapalli. FAC: SCJ-cum-ASJ, Godavarikhani.

HMOP No.39/2022 Page 5 of 8

numbered as H.M.O.P.No.178/2021. Subsequently, as per the

Orders of Hon’ble Prl. District and Sessions Judge, Karimnagar (Erstwhile) vide Letter Dis.No.6746/PR.No.107/2019/ADM/DCK,

dated: 23-11-2021, the entire case record was transmitted to

the Court of Senior Civil Judge, Godavarikhani on the point of jurisdiction. Thereafter the same is renumbered as

H.M.O.P.No.39/2022, on the file of this Court.

8.The petitioner in order to prove her contention filed evidence affidavit in lieu of examination in chief as PW.1. The contents of her evidence affidavit is the reiteration of contents of the petition. Ex.P1 is Original Wedding card, dated 27-03- 2008, Ex.P2 is Marriage photograph with CD and Ex.P3 is

Attested Photostat copy of Aadhaar card of Petitioner (Compared with original).

9.The case of the petitioner in a nutshell as per her evidence is that, the marriage of petitioner with the respondent was solemnized on 27-03-2008 at the parental house of the petitioner at Godavarikhani, as per the Hindu rites and

Senior Civil Judge-cum-

Assistant Sessions Judge, Peddapalli. FAC: SCJ-cum-ASJ, Godavarikhani.

HMOP No.39/2022 Page 6 of 8

customs. During marriage, parents of the petitioner presented cash of Rs.2,00,000/- (Rupees Two Lakhs only), 2 tulas of gold ornaments and household articles worth of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees

Respondent got addicted to liquor every day and used to harass the petitioner physically and mentally. He neither provided treatment to their son nor provided basic needs to the petitioner and their child. He suspected her character and insulted her in the presence of her relatives and neighbours.

Respondent demanded additional dowry of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh only). On 20-03-2014, respondent abused and beat the petitioner and necked her and child out from the house demanding Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh only)

additional dowry. Since then the petitioner is residing

separately doing coolie work. Petitioner endured all the

Senior Civil Judge-cum-

Assistant Sessions Judge, Peddapalli. FAC: SCJ-cum-ASJ, Godavarikhani.

HMOP No.39/2022 Page 7 of 8

tortures with a fond of hope that the respondent would mend his ways at one point or other, but all her hopes went futile.

10.Respondent remained exparte. The petitioner adduced her evidence by way of affidavit in lieu of examination in chief and as the respondent failed to cross-examine the petitioner, the contents of her evidence affidavit remained unchallenged and unrebutted. There is nothing patent on record to disprove or discard the evidence of the petitioner. Hence the petitioner by way of her ocular and documentary evidence proved her claim. From the discussion supra, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and the evidence on record, this Court is of view that the marriage between the petitioner and respondent is irretrievably broken and there is no ray of hope for their reunion. Hence, the petitioner is entitled for divorce as prayed for. Accordingly, this point is answered in favour of the petitioner.

11.In the result, petition is allowed, granting decree of divorce by dissolving the marriage of petitioner and

Senior Civil Judge-cum-

Assistant Sessions Judge, Peddapalli. FAC: SCJ-cum-ASJ, Godavarikhani.

HMOP No.39/2022 Page 8 of 8

respondent, with effect from 08-08-2022, which took place on 27-03-2008. Parties to bear their own costs.

Dictated to the Stenographer, transcribed by her, corrected and

pronounced by me in the open Court on this the 8th day of August, 2022.

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE-CUM-

ASSISTANT SESSIONS JUDGE,

PEDDAPALLI.

FAC: SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE-CUM-

ASSISTANT SESSIONS JUDGE,

GODAVARIKHANI.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

For the Petitioner : For the Respondent :

PW.1Chittavena @ Rajam Aswhini ---None---

EXHIBITS MARKED

For the Petitioner :

Ex.P1Original Wedding card, dated 27-03-2008 Ex.P2Marriage photograph with CD Ex.P3Attested Photostat copy of Aadhaar card of Petitioner (Compared with original)

For the Respondent :

– Nil --

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE-CUM-

ASSISTANT SESSIONS JUDGE,

PEDDAPALLI.

FAC: SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE-CUM-

ASSISTANT SESSIONS JUDGE,

GODAVARIKHANI.

Senior Civil Judge-cum-

Assistant Sessions Judge, Peddapalli. FAC: SCJ-cum-ASJ, Godavarikhani.

H.M.O.P/184/2022

Katla Keerthi @ Maddela Keerthi vs Maddela Ramakrishna

08 Aug 2022

HMOP No.184/2022 Page 1 of 8

IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE-CUM-ASSISTANT

SESSIONS JUDGE, AT GODAVARIKHANI

PRESENT : Smt D. Varoodhini,

Senior Civil Judge-cum-

Assistant Sessions Judge,

Peddapalli.

FAC : Senior Civil Judge-cum-

Assistant Sessions Judge,

Godavarikhani.

Monday, this the 8th day of August, 2022

H.M.O.P. No.184 OF 2022

(Old H.M.O.P. No.111 OF 2021)

Between:

Katla Keerthi @ Maddela Keerthi, D/o. Gopal, Age: 29 years, Occ: Home Maker, R/o.H.No.G-8, Basanthnagar, Ramagundam Mandal, Peddapalli District. … Petitioner A n d

Maddela Ramakrishna, S/o. Venkataiah, Age: 32 years, Occ: Private Employee, R/o. Kolanoor Village, Odela Mandal, Peddapalli District.

…Respondent

This petition having come before me on 05.08.2022for final hearing in the presence of Sri K.Anjaneyulu, Advocate

for Petitioner and Respondent remained exparte, upon

perusing the material papers on record, upon hearing arguments and the matter having stood over for consideration till this day, this court delivered the following:-

Senior Civil Judge-cum-

Assistant Sessions Judge, Peddapalli. FAC: SCJ-cum-ASJ, Godavarikhani.

HMOP No.184/2022 Page 2 of 8

:: O R D E R ::

This is a petition filed Under Section 13(1)(ia) of the

Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 by the petitioner seeking dissolution of her marriage dated 13-03-2020,with the respondent on the ground of cruelty.

2. The averments of the petition filed by the petitioner in brevity are to the effect that, the petitioner is the legally wedded wife of the respondent and their marriage is love marriage and they were married on 13-03-2020, as per the

Hindu rites and customs, at Seetha Ramachandra Swamy

Temple, Illanthakunta Village, Jammikunta Mandal, Karimnagar

District. Post-marriage, both the parties started their marital life at the house of parents of respondent at Kolanoor Village, Odela

Mandal, Peddapalli District. Respondent used to harass the petitioner and treated her like servant. Respondent demanded

Rs.10,00,000/- (Rupees Ten Lakhs only) as dowry and if the petitioner failed to fulfill his demands, he threatened the petitioner that they would perform another marriage to the

Senior Civil Judge-cum-

Assistant Sessions Judge, Peddapalli. FAC: SCJ-cum-ASJ, Godavarikhani.

HMOP No.184/2022 Page 3 of 8

respondent and the same was informed by the petitioner to her parents and the parents of the petitioner satisfied the respondent by presenting cash of Rs.10,00,000/- (Rupees Ten

Lakhs only) as dowry on 01-06-2020 and requested him to look after their daughter with love and affection. Respondent never allowed the parents of the petitioner to visit their house and on one occasion, respondent tried to attempt on the life of the petitioner by holding her neck and fisted on her nose which caused bleeding injury. He behaved cruelly with the petitioner on petty issues and harassed her mentally and physically in the presence of his friends and relatives. Further, the respondent was acting in very abnormal manner, as he abruptly gets very aggressive and suspicious in nature. On 02-05-2020, respondent took the petitioner with him and left her at her parental house and ever since the respondent never made a phone call to the petitioner nor he attended her phone call. Respondent made her life miserable. Thereafter on 27-06-2020, petitioner and respondent mutually agreed to take divorce before the caste elders and they executed a customary divorce deed. Having no other alternative, petitioner filed this petition seeking

Senior Civil Judge-cum-

Assistant Sessions Judge, Peddapalli. FAC: SCJ-cum-ASJ, Godavarikhani.

HMOP No.184/2022 Page 4 of 8

dissolution of her marriage with the respondent on the ground of cruelty.

3.Respondent was set exparte on 10-06-2022 as he failed to file counter despite conditional orders and remained exparte all through the proceedings.

4.During the course of evidence, petitioner filed evidence affidavit in lieu of her examination in chief as PW.1 and got marked Ex.P1.

5.Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the material available on record.

6.Now the point that emerges for consideration is:

“Whether the petitioner is entitled for decree of divorce, as prayed for?”

POINT:-

7.Originally, a petition under section 13(1)(ia) of Hindu

Marriage Act, 1955 was filed by the petitioner herein in the

Senior Civil Judge-cum-

Assistant Sessions Judge, Peddapalli. FAC: SCJ-cum-ASJ, Godavarikhani.

HMOP No.184/2022 Page 5 of 8

Court of Senior Civil Judge, Peddapalli and the same was numbered as H.M.O.P.No.111/2021. Subsequently, as per the

Orders of Hon’ble Prl. District and Sessions Judge, Karimnagar (Erstwhile) vide Letter Dis.No.6746/PR.No.107/2019/ADM/DCK,

dated: 23-11-2021, the entire case record was transmitted to

the Court of Senior Civil Judge, Godavarikhani on the point of jurisdiction. Thereafter the same is renumbered as

H.M.O.P.No.184/2022, on the file of this Court.

8.Petitioner in order to prove her contention filed evidence affidavit in lieu of examination in chief as PW.1. The contents of her evidence affidavit is the reiteration of contents of the petition. Ex.P1 is Attested Photostat copy of Aadhaar card of Petitioner (Compared with original).

9.The case of the petitioner in a nutshell as per her evidence is that, the marriage of petitioner with the respondent was solemnized on 13-03-2020, as per the Hindu rites and customs, at Seetha Ramachandra Swamy Temple, Illanthakunta

Village, Jammikunta Mandal, Karimnagar District. Post-

Senior Civil Judge-cum-

Assistant Sessions Judge, Peddapalli. FAC: SCJ-cum-ASJ, Godavarikhani.

HMOP No.184/2022 Page 6 of 8

marriage, both the parties started their marital life at the house of parents of respondent at Kolanoor Village, Odela Mandal,

Peddapalli District. Respondent used to harass the petitioner and treated her like servant. Respondent demanded

Rs.10,00,000/- (Rupees Ten Lakhs only) as dowry and if the petitioner failed to fulfill his demands, he threatened the petitioner that they would perform another marriage to the respondent and the same was informed by the petitioner to her parents and the parents of the petitioner satisfied the respondent by presenting cash of Rs.10,00,000/- (Rupees Ten

Lakhs only) as dowry on 01-06-2020 and requested him to look after their daughter with love and affection. On one occasion, respondent tried to attempt on the life of the petitioner by holding her neck and fisted on her nose which caused bleeding injury. He behaved cruelly with the petitioner on petty issues and harassed her mentally and physically in the presence of his friends and relatives. Further, the respondent was acting in very abnormal manner, as he abruptly gets very aggressive and suspicious in nature. On 02-05-2020, respondent took the petitioner with him and left her at her parental house and ever

Senior Civil Judge-cum-

Assistant Sessions Judge, Peddapalli. FAC: SCJ-cum-ASJ, Godavarikhani.

HMOP No.184/2022 Page 7 of 8

since the respondent never made a phone call to the petitioner nor he attended her phone call.

11.In the result, petition is allowed, granting decree of divorce by dissolving the marriage of petitioner and

Senior Civil Judge-cum-

Assistant Sessions Judge, Peddapalli. FAC: SCJ-cum-ASJ, Godavarikhani.

HMOP No.184/2022 Page 8 of 8

respondent, with effect from 08-08-2022, which took place on 13-03-2020. Parties to bear their own costs.

Dictated to the Stenographer, transcribed by her, corrected and

pronounced by me in the open Court on this the 8th day of August, 2022.

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE-CUM-

ASSISTANT SESSIONS JUDGE,

PEDDAPALLI.

FAC: SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE-CUM-

ASSISTANT SESSIONS JUDGE,

GODAVARIKHANI.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

For the Petitioner : For the Respondent :

PW.1Katla Keerthi @ ---None--- Maddela Keerthi

EXHIBITS MARKED

For the Petitioner :

Ex.P1Attested Photostat copy of Aadhaar card of Petitioner (Compared with original)

For the Respondent :

– Nil --

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE-CUM-

ASSISTANT SESSIONS JUDGE,

PEDDAPALLI.

FAC: SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE-CUM-

ASSISTANT SESSIONS JUDGE,

GODAVARIKHANI.

Senior Civil Judge-cum-

Assistant Sessions Judge, Peddapalli. FAC: SCJ-cum-ASJ, Godavarikhani.

H.M.O.P/212/2022

Marri Ramesh @ Shanker vs Marri Lavanya @ Malyala Swarna

08 Aug 2022

HMOP No.212/2022 Page 1 of 7

IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE-CUM-ASSISTANT

SESSIONS JUDGE, AT GODAVARIKHANI

PRESENT : Smt D. Varoodhini,

Senior Civil Judge-cum-

Assistant Sessions Judge,

Peddapalli.

FAC : Senior Civil Judge-cum-

Assistant Sessions Judge,

Godavarikhani.

Monday, this the 8th day of August, 2022

H.M.O.P. No.212 OF 2022

Between:

Marri Ramesh @ Shankar, S/o. Rajaiah, Age: 33 years, Occ: Pvt. Employee, R/o. H.No.16-3-252, L.B.Nagar, Godavarikhani, Ramagundam Mandal, Peddapalli District. … Petitioner A n d

Marri Lavanya @ Malyala Swarna, W/o. Ramesh @ Shankar, Occ: Ration Dealer, Shop No.44, M.L.A. Colony, 3rd Zone, Mandamarri Town and Mandal, Mancherial District – 504 231.

…Respondent

This petition having come before me on 05.08.2022for final hearing in the presence of Sri Gurrala Rajender, Advocate for Petitioner and Respondent remained exparte, upon perusing the material papers on record, upon hearing arguments and the matter having stood over for consideration till this day, the court delivered the following:-

:: O R D E R ::

This is a petition filed Under Section 13(1)(ia) of the

Senior Civil Judge-cum-

Assistant Sessions Judge, Peddapalli. FAC: SCJ-cum-ASJ, Godavarikhani.

HMOP No.212/2022 Page 2 of 7

Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 by the petitioner seeking dissolution of his marriage dated 09-03-2008,with the respondent on the ground of cruelty.

2.The averments of the petition filed by the petitioner in brevity are to the effect that, the marriage of the petitioner with the respondent was solemnized on 09-03-2008, as per

Hindu rites and customs. They lead happy marital life for a period of 4 years at Godavarikhani and are blessed with two children namely 1) Sai Reshika and 2) Sai Krushi. Thereafter, respondent went to her parents house and stayed their for one year. Subsequently, respondent neglected to do domestic works and when the petitioner questioned about the same, she abused the petitioner and his parents. Respondent developed hatred towards the petitioner for no reason and used to leave the society of the petitioner for months together uninformed. In this regard, caste elders advised the respondent to mend her ways and to join the conjugal society of the petitioner, but the respondent gave a deaf ear. On 13-01-2018, respondent left the society of the petitioner without information, even after the

Senior Civil Judge-cum-

Assistant Sessions Judge, Peddapalli. FAC: SCJ-cum-ASJ, Godavarikhani.

HMOP No.212/2022 Page 3 of 7

advise of the caste elders and since 4 years respondent has been living separately. When the petitioner requested and approached the respondent to join his society, she bluntly refused to do so. Hence the petitioner got issued legal notice on 07-01-2022 intimating the respondent to join his society, but the respondent refused the notice. Further, the respondent deserted the petitioner and she treated him with cruelty causing mental and physical agony. In the circumstances, petitioner came to a conclusion that their marriage is irretrievably broken and hence sought for dissolution of his marriage with the respondent.

3.Having received notice from this Court, respondent failed to make her appearance and hence she was set exparte on 22-07-2022 and remained exparte all through the proceedings.

4.During the course of evidence, petitioner filed evidence affidavit in lieu of his examination in chief as PW.1 and got marked Exs.P1 to P4.

Senior Civil Judge-cum-

Assistant Sessions Judge, Peddapalli. FAC: SCJ-cum-ASJ, Godavarikhani.

HMOP No.212/2022 Page 4 of 7

5.Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the material available on record.

6.Now the point that emerges for consideration is:

“Whether the petitioner is entitled for decree of divorce, as prayed for?”

POINT:-

7.The petitioner in order to prove his contentions filed evidence affidavit in lieu of examination in chief as PW.1. The contents of his evidence affidavit is the reiteration of contents of the petition. Ex.P1 is Original Wedding card, dated 09-03- 2008, which proves the marriage of the petitioner with the respondent, Ex.P2 are Marriage Photographs (3 in number) with

C.D., Ex.P3 is Return postal cover with acknowledgement card and Ex.P4 is Attested Photostat copy of Aadhaar card of

Petitioner (Compared with original).

8.The case of the petitioner in a nutshell as per the

Senior Civil Judge-cum-

Assistant Sessions Judge, Peddapalli. FAC: SCJ-cum-ASJ, Godavarikhani.

HMOP No.212/2022 Page 5 of 7

evidence on record is that,the respondent is legally wedded wife of the petitioner and their marriage was solemnized on 09-03-2008, as per Hindu rites and customs. They lead happy marital life for a period of 4 years at Godavarikhani and are blessed with two children namely 1) Sai Reshika and 2) Sai

Krushi. Thereafter, respondent went to her parents house and stayed their for one year. Subsequently, respondent neglected to do domestic works and when the petitioner questioned about the same, she abused the petitioner and his parents.

Respondent developed hatred towards the petitioner for no reason and used to leave the society of the petitioner for months together uninformed. On 13-01-2018, respondent left the society of the petitioner without information, even after the advise of the caste elders and since 4 years respondent has been living separately. When the petitioner requested and approached the respondent to join his society, she bluntly refused to do so. Hence the petitioner got issued legal notice on 07-01-2022 intimating the respondent to join his society, but the respondent refused the notice. Further, the respondent deserted the petitioner and she treated him with cruelty

Senior Civil Judge-cum-

Assistant Sessions Judge, Peddapalli. FAC: SCJ-cum-ASJ, Godavarikhani.

HMOP No.212/2022 Page 6 of 7

causing mental and physical agony.

9.Respondent though, received the notice remained exparte. The petitioner adduced his evidence by way of affidavit in lieu of examination in chief and as the respondent failed to cross-examine the petitioner, the contents of his evidence affidavit remained unchallenged and unrebutted.

There is nothing patent on record to disprove or discard the evidence of the petitioner. Hence the petitioner by way of his ocular and documentary evidence proved his claim. From the discussion supra, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and the evidence on record, this Court is of view that the marriage between the petitioner and respondent is irretrievably broken and there is no ray of hope for their reunion. Hence, the petitioner is entitled for divorce as prayed for. Accordingly, this point is answered in favour of the petitioner.

10.In the result, petition is allowed, granting decree of divorce by dissolving the marriage of petitioner and

Senior Civil Judge-cum-

Assistant Sessions Judge, Peddapalli. FAC: SCJ-cum-ASJ, Godavarikhani.

HMOP No.212/2022 Page 7 of 7

respondent, with effect from 08-08-2022, which took place on 09-03-2008. Parties to bear their own costs.

Dictated to the Stenographer, transcribed by her, corrected and

pronounced by me in the open Court on this the 8th day of August, 2022.

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE-CUM-

ASSISTANT SESSIONS JUDGE,

PEDDAPALLI.

FAC: SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE-CUM-

ASSISTANT SESSIONS JUDGE,

GODAVARIKHANI.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

For the Petitioner : For the Respondent :

PW.1 Marri Ramesh @ Shankar ---None---

EXHIBITS MARKED

For the Petitioner :

Ex.P1Original Wedding card, dated 09-03-2008 Ex.P2Marriage Photographs (3 in number) with C.D. Ex.P3Return postal cover with acknowledgement card Ex.P4Attested Photostat copy of Aadhaar card of Petitioner (Compared with original)

For the Respondent :

– Nil --

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE-CUM-

ASSISTANT SESSIONS JUDGE,

PEDDAPALLI.

FAC: SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE-CUM-

ASSISTANT SESSIONS JUDGE,

GODAVARIKHANI.

Senior Civil Judge-cum-

Assistant Sessions Judge, Peddapalli. FAC: SCJ-cum-ASJ, Godavarikhani.

Order Record 1,119 total

Case No.	Parties	Date	Type	Outcome
SC/381/2018	jadi Laxmi vs Gomasa Rajakar,	25 Aug 2022	other	—
OS/65/2018	Algendula Vidyasagar vs Algendula Devaiah	23 Aug 2022	order	—
OS/113/2011	Bandameedi Ammakka vs Thokala Lingaiah	23 Aug 2022	order	—
OS/95/2019	Andhra Bank Dharmaram Br. Its Chief Manager VBNS Venkateshwar Rao vs Madasu Latha	20 Aug 2022	order	—
OS/101/2013	Devampalli Sudhakar vs Dharmaji Rajesham	20 Aug 2022	order	—
H.M.O.P/59/2021	Bandari Manohar vs Bandari @ Chippa Sushma @Meghana	18 Aug 2022	order	—
OS/146/2013	PUrella Padma vs Gurram alias Maddi Ramaswamy	17 Aug 2022	order	—
OS/6/2017	Garrala Saritha vs Kakarlamudi Lathasri	17 Aug 2022	judgment	—
SC/64/2017	P.S. JULAPALLI vs A.1 Vemula Jangaiah	16 Aug 2022	Judgement	—
OS/1/2022	Ravikanti Aravind vs Machidi Sujatha	16 Aug 2022	order	—
OS/2/2019	Medi Eshwaramma vs Thokala Narsaiah	13 Aug 2022	other	—
H.M.O.P/31/2015	Meenugu Ramulu alias Pedda Ramulu vs Meenugu Laxmi	11 Aug 2022	other	—
OS/171/2013	ADAPA SHANKAR vs ADAPA CHANDRAKALA	10 Aug 2022	order	—
H.M.O.P/26/2022	Penta Kurapati Kalpana vs Penta Gangaiah	10 Aug 2022	order	—
H.M.O.P/129/2017	Bontha Ramesh vs Bontha Sumalatha @ Porsu Sumalatha	10 Aug 2022	order	—
H.M.O.P/150/2022	Perugu Likhitha vs Perugu Ganesh Raj	10 Aug 2022	Order	—
OS/41/2016	Puskuru Rama Rao vs Palkurthy Rajesham Goud	08 Aug 2022	order	—
H.M.O.P/21/2022	Goli Rajesh Kumar, vs Goli @ Vemula Swapna,	08 Aug 2022	order	—
H.M.O.P/211/2019	Shanigarapu Yugender vs Shanigarapu Ramya @ Rama @ Ramadevi	08 Aug 2022	order	—
H.M.O.P/212/2021	Perka Kalpana vs Perka Praveen Kumar	08 Aug 2022	order	—
H.M.O.P/39/2022	Chittavena @ Rajam Ashwini vs Chittavena Ramesh	08 Aug 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/129/2022	Pasupuleti Shashikala @ Chamakurthi Gayathri Shashikala vs Pasupuleti Sridhar	08 Aug 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/184/2022	Katla Keerthi @ Maddela Keerthi vs Maddela Ramakrishna	08 Aug 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/212/2022	Marri Ramesh @ Shanker vs Marri Lavanya @ Malyala Swarna	08 Aug 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/263/2022	Saram Satynarayana vs Saram Srilatha	08 Aug 2022	Order	—
OS/7/2022	Kokkirala Srinivas vs Mogili Mohan Rao	05 Aug 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/1/2021	Neelapu Gouri Shankar vs Neelapu Lalitha @ Danala Lalitha	05 Aug 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/11/2021	Mekala Raj Kumar vs Mekala Vyshnavi @ V.Devendra	05 Aug 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/20/2021	Mateti Shiva Prasad vs Mateti @ Bhairi Harika	05 Aug 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/196/2022	Goundla Matham Chanderashekar vs Goundla Matham Rajitha	05 Aug 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/227/2022	Keerthi Chandrashekar vs Madishetti @ Keerthi Sravanthi @ Dhana Laxmi	05 Aug 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/38/2022	Kodiganti @ Kaluvala Akshaya @ Jhansi Rani vs Kodiganti Rajesh	04 Aug 2022	other	—
H.M.O.P/130/2021	Merugu @ Sirishetti Theja vs Merugu Pradeep	03 Aug 2022	order	—
OS/73/2016	Kasarla Narsamma vs Vs1. Kasarla Shankar	01 Aug 2022	order	—
OS/80/2015	mohd. Sarver Miya vs Bandari Rajaiah	01 Aug 2022	order	—
H.M.O.P/103/2022	Mekala Ramesh vs Mekala Ravali	01 Aug 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/159/2022	Maram Rajesh vs Maram @ Ganta Kalpana	01 Aug 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/191/2022	Mekala Mallesh(Mallesh Yadav) vs Mekala Aswini @ Narla Aswini	01 Aug 2022	Order	—
OS/49/2019	Allenki Venu Madhav vs Bade Anjaiah	30 Jul 2022	order	—
H.M.O.P/7/2021	Dasari Raju vs Dasari Vijayalaxmi	22 Jul 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/18/2021	Malyala Anusha vs Malyala Shiva Prasad Rao @ Shiva Prasad Chary	20 Jul 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/18/2022	Rayabaram Raju vs Rayabaram Thejaswini	20 Jul 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/21/2021	Busanavena Pavan vs Thodeti Ruchita @ Busanavena Ruchita	20 Jul 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/190/2022	Akula Sai Teja vs Akula Sucharitha	20 Jul 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/229/2022	Ellandula Ashok vs Ellandula @ Bongoni Supriya	20 Jul 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/27/2022	Golle Srinivas vs Golle Sudha	19 Jul 2022	order	—
OS/59/2017	GASIGANTI NARESH vs DANALAKOTA SHANKAR	18 Jul 2022	order	—
H.M.O.P/2/2022	Mahankali Anjaiah vs Mahankali @ Neruvatla Srilatha	18 Jul 2022	order	—
H.M.O.P/3/2022	Macha Vinod Kumar vs Macha @ Bale Lavanya	18 Jul 2022	order	—
H.M.O.P/60/2019	Bhashyam Harish Kumar vs Monica Roy @ Bhashyam Vandana	18 Jul 2022	order	—
SC/422/2016	THE STATE THROUGH PS POTHKAPALLY vs Gopanaveni Pochalu	16 Jul 2022	order	—
SC/52/2022	SHO Dharmaram PS vs Muthyala Kalavathi	13 Jul 2022	Judgement	—
SC/57/2022	SHO Dharmaram PS vs Mandapalli Srinivas	13 Jul 2022	Judgement	—
SC/127/2017	P.S. JULAPALLI vs A.1 KONDA SATYAM	13 Jul 2022	Judgement	—
H.M.O.P/82/2021	Akari Ramesh vs Bupathi Chabanthi	13 Jul 2022	order	—
H.M.O.P/159/2019	Shetti @ Mashadasam Rajitha @ Rajani vs Shetti Ravinder	13 Jul 2022	order	—
H.M.O.P/123/2022	Ch.Vijender Reddy vs Ch.Prathyusha Reddy	13 Jul 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/155/2022	Manthena @ Muniganti Akanksha vs Manthena Sri Nag	13 Jul 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/197/2022	Boina @Ramilla Susmitha vs Ramilla sai teja	13 Jul 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/1/2022	Deekonda Venkatesham vs Deekonda Renuka	12 Jul 2022	order	—
H.M.O.P/144/2022	Kambala Swarun Kumar vs Kolipaka @ Nune Sravanthi @ Harika	12 Jul 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/192/2022	Mudderaboina Rajitha @ Bodige Rajitha vs Mudderaboina Abhilash	12 Jul 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/30/2019	Eruguralla Prem Kumar vs Eruguralla Sharada	11 Jul 2022	order	—
H.M.O.P/196/2021	Vegolapu Uday Kumar vs Vegolapu @ Moluguri Swapna	11 Jul 2022	order	—
H.M.O.P/10/2021	Rajula Ramaswamy vs Rajula Sravanthi	08 Jul 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/15/2021	Arkuti Venkatesh vs Arkuti@Mothuku Rajitha	08 Jul 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/73/2022	Narsingoju Sridivya @ Kondaparthi Srividya vs Narsingoju Naveen Kumar	08 Jul 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/154/2022	Veera Nagesh vs Aparadhi @ Veera Rama Devi	08 Jul 2022	Order	—
SC/240/2015	P.S.Sulthana bad vs Bayya Odelu	06 Jul 2022	Judgement	—
H.M.O.P/36/2021	Kampelli Sanjeev Kumar vs Kampelli Vani @ Suddala Deepthi	05 Jul 2022	order	—
EP/23/2019	Banothu Rajeshwari vs The Superintending Engineer, TSNPDCL, Peddapalli	04 Jul 2022	order	—
H.M.O.P/77/2019	Thota Ramulu vs Thota Sathemma	04 Jul 2022	order	—
H.M.O.P/106/2022	Gadi Srikanth vs Gadi Nanditha @ Maidam Manasa	01 Jul 2022	Order	—
OS/10/2016	Nalapu Vanaja vs Bayyapu Kamalakar Reddy	30 Jun 2022	other	—
H.M.O.P/57/2020	Bingi Srinivas vs Bingi Keerthana	30 Jun 2022	other	—
H.M.O.P/78/2019	Adicherla Kumara Swamy vs Adicherla Sandya Rani @ Kavya	30 Jun 2022	order	—
H.M.O.P/9/2022	Meesa Rajesh vs Meesa Lalitha @ Bodakunti Mounika	29 Jun 2022	order	—
OS/87/2016	M.s Sri Sai Poultry and Feed Mixing Plant vs Branch Manager	28 Jun 2022	order	—
OS/118/2014	NOMULA INDRA REDDY vs KOTA UMAPATHI REDDY	28 Jun 2022	order	—
OS/41/2022	Utnuri Anjaiah vs Kavvampalli Laxmaiah	24 Jun 2022	Judgement	—
OS/134/2022	Adloori Mallesham vs K.Srinivasa Rao	24 Jun 2022	Judgement	—
H.M.O.P/17/2021	Gandla Amulya @ Vijaya vs Gandla Kishan	24 Jun 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/85/2022	Beerakayala @Boge Mamatha vs Beerakayala Kalyan	24 Jun 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/95/2022	Narsingoju Naveen Kumar vs Narsingoju Srividya	24 Jun 2022	Order	—
EP/2/2019	Madaka Pratap Reddy, vs Thoyajakshi	21 Jun 2022	other	—
H.M.O.P/200/2021	Mekala Madhavi vs Mekala Sathish	14 Jun 2022	order	—
OS/30/2014	NITTURI @ CHAKALI KRISHNA vs NITTURI RAJAIAH	13 Jun 2022	order	—
H.M.O.P/208/2021	Kanukuntla Satyanarayana vs Kanukuntla Mounika	13 Jun 2022	order	—
H.M.O.P/60/2022	Ippa Akhila @ Madari Akhila vs Ippa Kranthi Sagar	10 Jun 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/100/2022	Bathula Suman vs Bathula Srilatha @ Jakkani Srilatha	10 Jun 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/121/2022	Pusala Praveen vs Pusala Swapna	10 Jun 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/124/2022	Thegala @ Polu Radha vs Thegala Thirupathi	10 Jun 2022	Order	—
SC/108/2020	Jangama Chenchamma(SHO GDK II Town) vs Janagama Santhosh	09 Jun 2022	order	—
H.M.O.P/54/2020	Sarla@Undati Manasa@Niroja vs Sarla Anil Kumar	09 Jun 2022	order	—
H.M.O.P/75/2019	Burri Srinivas Goud vs Burri Maneesha	09 Jun 2022	order	—
OS/94/2018	Bhukya Rajender Naik vs Banothu Ramesh	08 Jun 2022	order	—
H.M.O.P/195/2021	Ammula Anil vs Ammula Ramya	08 Jun 2022	order	—
H.M.O.P/199/2021	Katukuri @ Rentala Swetha vs Katukuri Sagar Reddy	08 Jun 2022	order	—
H.M.O.P/207/2021	Challa Ramya vs Challa Vamshi Krishna	08 Jun 2022	order	—
H.M.O.P/211/2021	Penchala @ Panuganti Sowjanya vs Penchala Vamshi Krishna	08 Jun 2022	order	—

Showing 100 of 1,119 orders — Log in to browse all pages.

Monthly Orders (Last 12 Months)

Aug 2022		38
Jul 2022		35
Jun 2022		182
May 2022		77
Apr 2022		173
Mar 2022		50
Feb 2022		108
Jan 2022		292
Dec 2021		97
Nov 2021		22
Oct 2021		31
Sep 2021		18

Frequently Asked Questions

How many cases has Smt. D. Varoodhini handled?

Smt. D. Varoodhini has handled 1123 court orders since 2021 at Godavarikhani, ADJ Court Complex. The average disposal rate is 96 orders per month.

What types of cases does Smt. D. Varoodhini hear?

Based on available records, Smt. D. Varoodhini primarily handles Civil matters (Original Suits, Appeal Suits) and Criminal matters (Sessions Cases) at Godavarikhani, ADJ Court Complex.

Where is Smt. D. Varoodhini currently posted?

Smt. D. Varoodhini is posted as Senior Civil Judge-cum-Assistant Sessions Judge, Godavarikhani at Godavarikhani, ADJ Court Complex, Peddapalli, Telangana.

Are judgments by Smt. D. Varoodhini available online?

Yes. 12 judgments by Smt. D. Varoodhini are available on Legistro with full text, outcome, and sections cited.

How fast does Smt. D. Varoodhini dispose cases?

Smt. D. Varoodhini disposes approximately 96 cases per month, based on 1123 orders handled over their tenure at Godavarikhani, ADJ Court Complex.

Since when is Smt. D. Varoodhini serving?

Smt. D. Varoodhini has been serving at Godavarikhani, ADJ Court Complex since 2021.

Case Types

H 40%

OS 28%

SC 15%

AS 10%

CMA 4%

L 2%

IP 1%

EP 0%

Posting History

Nov 2021 — Aug 2022

Senior Civil Judge-cum-Assistant Sessions Judge, Godavarikhani · 40 orders
Sep 2021 — Aug 2022

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE · 865 orders
Sep 2021 — Aug 2022

Senior Civil Judge, Manthani · 218 orders

Other Judges at this Court

Smt Suneetha Kunchala

Chairman cum Addl. District Judge

0 orders

Sri Jeevan Suraj Singh

Senior Civil Judge-cum-Assistant Sessions Judge, G...

461 orders

← View all judges at Godavarikhani, ADJ Court Complex