D.Venkata Ramana

N IHE GQURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL

PITHAPURAM.

PRESENTo Sri R.V.V.S.Murali R.V.V.s.MOR CIVIL JUDGE::

B.Com, M.A., LLM.,

SENIOR rali Krishna,

CIvIL JUDGE.

onday, the 1

H.May of December, 2013

/

H.M.O.P17/2013

ween, :

p utamba Petitioner

And

Eepu Satya Lakshmana Swamy . Respondent

spetion is coming before mo for hearing in the presence or s D

Srinivasa Rao, Sri K RK. Reddy, K KS Sanarayana, Advocates for petitionera espondent set exparte and the matter having stood over for consideldd

today this Court delivered the following:

ORDER

is is a petition filed by the petitioner under section 13 (1) (ia) & (ib) of Hindu Marriage Act with a prayer to grant divorce by dissolving the marriage between the petitioner and respondent and grant costs of the proceedings and such other reliefs. The brief averments in the petition are that the petitioner is legally wedded wife of the respondent and their marriage was performed on 30-04-2008 at the house of petitioner's father at Chebrolu as per Hindu rites and caste custom At the time of marriage the petitiner's father paid the dowry to the respondent and his sister and also paid the marriage expenses and after marriage they lived

Thereafter the respondent harassed the petitioner by happily for 8 months. demand1ng dowry along with his parents The petitioner submit that later on the pretext of her pregnancy the

Detitioner was sent to her parents house. Ihe respondernt used to visit the petitioner

H ta5ionally or for testivals, when ever he visited the hoUse of petitioner's oarents ed to harass the petitoner for dowry Or tor one acre land and when the re rits erptes ,od ther inability he useu to Deat he petitioner indiscrminately and

th ay mef y. due to his il theatment by the time of petitiner delivery a boy

erert btit died ven alter de Y e 1espndent and hs sister Used to 178!i patt!rr at al the insta e or the eiters the petitioner was sent to yVaetwhethe fesF1fent TIhg There alo the respondent used ta fertitrner ihy demaning dow arid 5ecd to abuse n filthy language in a n 5ed f heat the pet" The netitinrngt went to her parents ,n thespokient de,erted the petitioner ly 2010 thespoinnHence # 3 Notice to the respondent seed personally but he failed to appear

before this court and remained set expae

in supportof petitioner's Cabe, petitioner herself examined as PWI and got marked Ex P 1 and closed her evideKe

Heard arguments on petitioner side

Now the point for consideration is

Whether the petitioner is entitled for decree of divorce as prayed fo

POINT:

In support of the petitioner's case she herself examined as P W1 and Sthe reiterated the petition averments in her chiet examination affidavit ther Marriage was pertormed on 30-04-2008 at the house of petitioners 1ather at Chebrolu as per Hindu rites and caste custom At the time of marriage the petitioner's father paid the dowry to the respondent and his sister and als0 paid the

marriage expenses and after marriage they lived happily for 8 months

Thereafter the respondent harassed the petitioner by demanding dowry along with his parents

The petitioner submit that later on the pretext of her pregnancy the petitioner was sent to her parents house, The respondent used to visit the petitioner occasionally or for festivals, when ever he visited the house of petitioner's parents he used to harass the petitoner lor dowry or for one ace land and when the parents expressed their inability he used to beat the petitioner indiscriminately and without any mercy, due to his ill treatment by the lime of petitiner's deliyery, a boy was delivered but died. Even after delivery the respondent and is Sister used to harass the petitioner. Later al the instane or the elders the petitioner was sent to taggayyapeta where the respondent is working There alo the respondent used to harass the petitioner by demanding dowiy and used to abuSe in tilthy languaqe m dranken state and used to beat the petitioner, The petitioner went to her parents

Since July 2010 t espondent deserted Ihe pet tioner The house In July 2010 nariaqe n tetweern the petitioner and epondent was inetievably break down and there are 10 Cha es of e-union r the abve uuslances, tl tst ad proper to grant deuee of dvore tby ssolving the matrIage of pettoner and tesponterl to mret thhe ents of justi e

Accordngly, thi5 point is answered

in the result. the petition is allowed by go

On is allowed by granting decree of divorce by

dissolving the marriage between the Detitaner and respondernt dded

n the circumstances there is no order for costs

Pronounced by me in the open Court, on this the 16" day of December, 201l3

sd R.V.v.s.MURALIKRISHNNA

SENTOR CIVIL JUDGE,

PITHAPURAM.

Appendix of evidence

Witness examined

For petitioner

For respondent

PWI Eepu Jyothi@ Atchutamba (Chief)

-NIL

Documents marked

For petitioner:

EPL Wedding invitation

For respondent:

Sd R.V.v.s.MURALIKRISHi

N

S.C.

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE: KAKINADA

PRESENT: Sri.D.Venkataramana,

Principal Senior Civil Judge,

Tuesday, this the 25th day of August, 2015

OS.No.441/2015

Between:

DVVS.Prakasam Address - Business,Dno.8-24-A12,Madhavarao Street,Kakinada ….. Plaintif

Pasala Satyanarayana Address - Business,Flat no.103,Zoha Residency,Dno.13-2-9,Lachirajuvari street,Kakinada

….. Defendant

This suit coming on 25-8-2015 for final hearing before me in the presence of both counsels and the matter having stood over for consideration till this day, this Court delivered the following:-

O R D E R

Plaintiff present. Filed chief examination affidavit. Examined as P.W.1.

Exs.A.1 to A.3 marked. Heard the counsel for the plaintiff. Perused the material available on record. Since the defendant choose to remain exparte and set exparte, the evidence adduced by the plaintiff and the documents Exs.A.1 to A.3 filed bythe plaintiff are remained unchallenged, as such the claim of the plaintiff has been proved. In the result, the suit is decreed with costs for a sum of Rs. 3,42,166/- (Rupees three lakhs forty two thousand one hundred and sixty six only) with subsequent interest at the rate of 12 p.c.p.a. from the date of the suit till the date of decree and thereafter at the rate of 6 p.c.p.a from the date of the decree till the date of realization on principal amount of Rs.

2,50,000/- against the defendant.

Pronounced by me, in the Open Court, on this the 25th day of August, 2015.

PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

KAKINADA.

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE: KAKINADA

PRESENT: Sri.D.Venkata Ramana

Principal Senior Civil Judge,

Wednesday, this the 2nd day of September, 2015

SC 129/2015

Between:

Sub Inspector of Police Address - Coringa Police station. Advocate- APP … petitioner

A N D

Nagabathula Sivaji and 4 others Address - 19 years, Srinivasanagar, Indrapalem, Kakinada … Accused

This suit coming on 2-9-2015 for final hearing before me in the presence of both counsels and the matter having stood over for consideration till this day, this Court delivered the following:-

Judgment

Accused Nos. 1 to 5 present. Police present. Judgment

pronounced. (VSO) In the result, I find the accused No.1 is not guilty for

the offences U/S 341 and 307 IPC and A2 to A5 are not guilty for the offence under Sec. 307 r/w 34 IPC. Accordingly, they are acquitted u/sec 235 (1) Cr.P.C. The bail bonds of the accused shall stand cancelled after 6 months from the date of Judgment as per amended act U/Sec. 437-A

Cr.P.C. M.Os. 1 and 2 shall be destroyed after expiry of appeal time.

Pronounced by me, in the Open Court, on this the 2nd day of September, 2015.

PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

KAKINADA.

1

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE: KAKINADA

PRESENT: Sri D.Venkata Ramana, Principal Senior Civil Judge,

Tuesday, this the 15th day of September, 2015

O.S.No.564/2014

Between:

Kalla Trimurthulu Address - 52 years, business, D.No8-1-38, Balla market, Samalkot.

… Plaintiff A N D Vadaparthi Veerabbai Address - 58 years, Revenue inspector, Peddapuram.

…Defendant The above Suit coming on 15-9-2015 before me for final hearing, in the presence of both side Advocate for Petitioner and the respondent and the matter having stood over for consideration till this day, the court made the following:

J U D G E M E NT

Both parties are present before lok Adlat and the matter is settled before

Lok Adalat.

Typed to my dictation, corrected and pronounced by me in the Open court, this the 15th day of September, 2015.

Sd/- Sri D.Venkata Ramana

Principal Senior Civil Judge,

Kakinada.

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE: KAKINADA

PRESENT: Sri.D.Venkataramana,

Principal Senior Civil Judge,

Friday, this the 18th day of September, 2015

OS.No.6/2014

Between:

Dwarampudi Kodandarama Chandrareddy Address - 57 years, cultivation, D.No.3-1, G. Mamidada. Advocate- Karra Venu … Petitioner/Decree Holder

A N D

Padala Venkata Krishna Reddy Address - 52 years,Head Master, Oo U.P.School, Uppara Colony, Dowlaiswaram.

…Respondent/Judgment debtor

This suit coming on 18-9-2015 for final hearing before me in the presence of both counsels and the matter having stood over for consideration till this day, this Court delivered the following:-

O R D E R

Both parties are present and the matter is settled

before Lok Adalat.

Pronounced by me, in the Open Court, on this the 18th day of September 2015.

PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

KAKINADA.