Mrs. Deepti Vemula

IN THE COURT OF THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS AT MADHIRA.

Dated this the 8th day of May, 2026.

PRESENT: Smt. DEEPTI VEMULA,

Judicial Magistrate of First Class,

Madhira.

C.C. No.242 of 2026

Between: The State of Telangana, through PS Yerrupalem. … Complainant. AND

A1: Mulpuri Gopinath, S/o. Chandra Shekar Rao, 47 years, Coolie, R/o.Jamalapuram village. A2: Bhukya Venkatesh, S/o. Bhikshalu, 29 years, Business, R/o.Jamalapuram village. A3: Gajula Pradeep, S/o. Murali Krishna, 43 years, Private job, R/o.Kondaparva village, A4: Vaddi Manikanta, S/o. Madhusudhan rao, 30 years, Business, R/o.Bhavanipuram. A5: Kondathri Jaya Akhil, S/o. Sesha Giri Rao, 29 years, Private job, R/o.Bhavanipuram. A6: Bayana Vihari, S/o. Laxmi Baba, 30 years, Photographer,R/o. Bhavanipuram. A7: Peddishetti Saiprasad, S/o. Satyanarayana, 26 years, Hotel work, R/o.Bhavanipuram. A8: Velivala Srinivasa Rao, S/o. Suryanarayana, 45 years, Dairy form,R/o.Goapalapuram. A9: Lavuri Venkata Rambabu, S/o. Dheepla, 30 years, Auto driver, R/o.Seethapuram Thanda. A10: Bhukya Gopichandh, S/o. Rayudu, 22 years, Student, R/o.Seethapuram Thanda. A11: Korra Ravi Kumar, S/o. Krishna, 21 years, Student, R/o.Seethapuram Thanda. A12: Nallabothula Venkata Ramarao, S/o. Narasimha Rao, 32 years,Coolie, R/o.Pedda gopavaram. A13: Kavati Prabhakar, S/o. Venkateswarlu, 42 years, Coolie, R/o.Pedda gopavaram. A14: Thejavath Govindarao, S/o. Koteswara Rao, 37 years, Coolie, R/o.Jamalapuram. A15: Eevuri Rajashekar, S/o. Subbarao, 31 years, Coolie, R/o.Penugolanu village. A16: Duddukuri Shyam, S/o. Hanumantha Rao, 27 years, Private job, R/o.Remidicharla village. A17: Malla Poorna Chand, S/o. Srinivasa Rao, 30 years, Private job, R/o.Jamalapuram village. A18: Banavath Arjun, S/o. Venkateswara Rao, 30 years, Coolie, R/o.Banjara village. A19: Boddu Babu Rao, S/o. Raja Rao, 28 years, Coolie, R/o. Pedda gopavaram village. A20: Cheepu Saipurna Kanth, S/o.Nageswara Rao, 31 years, Student, Thiruvuru village and Mandal. A21: Nallabothu Nageswara Rao, S/o. Apparao, 50 years, Coolie, R/o.Chinthalapadu village. A22: Chittimoju Chenna Rao, S/o. Bullaiah, 33 years, Coolie, R/o. Thiruvuru village and Mandal. A23:Sunkara Krishna, S/o. Seetha Ramaiah, 30 years, Bike Mechanic, R/o.Gurrajupalem village. (Died).

A24: Gudavalli Naga Hanuman S/o.Ravi, 27 years, Coolie, R/o. Thiruvuru village. A25: Akkasani Ramesh Babu S/o.Anjaiah, 41 years, Car Driver, R/o.A-Konduru Village. A26: Rayala Chenna Rao S/o.Krishna, 46 years, Lorry Driver, R/o.Vellaturu Village. A27:Neelagiri Tharun Kumar S/o.Markendaya, 28 years, Coolie, R/o. Thiruvuru village. A28:Sagarala Shva Rama Krishna S/o.Venkateswara Rao, 37 years, Coolie, R/o.Ganginenipalem. A29: Gosi Nagaraju S/o.Krishna, 28 years, Coolie, R/o.Kambhampadu Village. A30: Ulasa Bhudiayya S/o.Rama Rao, 28 years, Coolie, R/o.Kambhampadu Village. A31:Devarapu Krishnaiah S/o. Venkateswara rao, 50 years, Agriculture, R/o.Ramachandrapuram. A32: Devarapalli Srikanth S/o. Venkateswara Rao, 24 years, Agriculture, R/o.Lingala Village. A33: Burri Sanjeeva Rao S/o.Goppaiah, 40 years, Coolie, R/o.Lingala Village. A34: Mokkalakatti Nageswara Rao S/o.Venkatarathnam, 28 years, Coolie, R/o.Cheemalapadu. A35: Seelam Venkateswara Rao S/o.Venkatarao, 35 years, Coolie, R/o.Banjara Village. A36: Podila Vinaychandu S/o.Venkateswara rao, 26 years, Car Driver, R/o.Rangarao Banjira. A37: Shaik Baji S/o.Karimulla, 34 years, Coolie, R/o. Jangalapalli Village. A38: Banavathu Seetharamudu S/o.Basha, 35 years, Coolie, R/o. Cheruvumadhavaram. A39: Ulliboyina Naga Surendra Babu S/o Srinu, 27 years, Coolie, R/o. Kothagudem village . A:40:Ulliboyina Naga Raju S/o Peddajamlaiah, 40 years, Coolie, R/o. Kothagudem village . A41: Jarapala Ranga S/o Hemla , 50 years, Coolie,R/o.Pondugula village. A42: Thalluri Venkateswra Rao S/o Srinivasa Rao , 26 years, Coolie, R/o Chilukuru village. A43: Chittibommala Venkateswara Rao, S/o Ramu , 34 years, Coolie, R/o Narayanapuram village. A44: Sarkaparapu. Venkata Nageswara Rao, S/o Krishna, 32 Years, Auto Driver, R/o Morusumalli. A45:Sarkaparapu. Ashok S/Sambaiah, 30 Years, Rajaka, Painter, R/o.Morusumalli. A46:Yilasarapu Venkat Vivek S/o Nagabhusanam , 32 years, Privet Job, R/o Ibrhahimpatanam. .. A1 to A22 and A23 to A46.

This case coming on this day before me in the presence of Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor, for the Complainant and in the presence of A1 to A22 and A23 to A46 and having stood over for consideration, the Court delivered the following :

:: J U D G M E N T ::

1.The Sub-Inspector of Police, PS Yerrupalem laid a charge sheet against A1 to A22 and A23 to A46 for the offence under section 9(2) of TS Gaming Act in Cr.No.19 of 2026 alleging that on 14.02.2026, at 06:00 hours at Lakkireddy Krishna Reddy Mango garden at Outskirts of Jamalapuram Village of Yerrupalem Mandal, Khammam District, A1 to A22 and A23 to A46 found playing cock fight by betting with money. Thus, A1 to A22 and A23 to A46 are liable for punishment under the above provisions of law.

2. This Court has taken cognizance for the offence under section 9(2) of TS Gaming Act against A1 to A22 and A23 to A46.

3. Case copies were furnished to A1 to A22 and A23 to A46 as contemplated under Section 230 BNSS.

4. A1 to A22 and A23 to A46 are examined U/Sec.274 BNSS for the offence U/Sec.9(2) of TS Gaming Act and the substance of accusation for the aforesaid offence was explained to them in their known language for which they pleaded guilty and admitted the offence.

5. It appears that the admission of A1 to A22 and A23 to A46 is voluntarily and free from any coercion. Since A1 to A22 and A23 to A46 admitted the offence voluntarily, this Court is inclined to accept the plea of guilt of A1 to A22 and A23 to A46. Hence, A1 to A22 and A23 to A46 are convicted U/Sec.275 BNSS.

6. In the facts and circumstances of the case, A1 to A22 and A23 to A46 not entitled for the benefits of Probation of Offenders Act.

7. Heard A1 to A22 and A23 to A46 on quantum of sentence. A1 to A22 and A23 to A46 submitted that they cannot do this type of mistake again and they have responsibility to look after their families and prayed the Court to take lenient view while imposing the sentence.

8. Having considering the facts and circumstances of the case and in view of the submission made by A1 to A22 and A23 to A46 this Court is inclined to take lenient view in imposing sentence which will meet the ends of justice.

9. In the result, In the result, I find A1 to A22 and A24 to A46 are guilty and convicted them U/Sec.275 BNSS. I sentenced A1 to A22 and A24 to A46 to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/- each (Rupees One Thousand Only) for the offence U/Sec.9(2) of TS Gaming Act. In default of payment of fine, A1 to A22 and A24 to A46 shall suffer Simple imprisonment (S.I.) for a period of one month. The unmarked case property vide CPR No.06 of 2026 viz., (1) total cash of Rs.43,300/- shall be confiscated to the state and (2)motor cycles, cars and auto rickshaw the vehicles which were not returned by the parties are shall be handed over to their respective owners on proper identification acknowledgement and receipt and two small knives shall be destroyed after expiry of appeal time. The unmarked case property viz., cocks were already auctioned and sale proceeds Rs.27,500/- was confiscated to State vide Challan No.6504399865, dt.20.02.2026.

(Typed to my dictation by typist, corrected and pronounced by me in open Court, this the 8th day of May, 2026).

Sd/-

Judicial Magistrate of First Class,

Madhira

IN THE COURT OF THE ADDL. JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS,

AT MADHIRA

Present:Smt. Deepti Vemula, Judl. Magistrate of First Class, Madhira. FAC: Addl. Judl. Magistrate of I Class, Madhira.

Dated the 30th day of April, 2026.

Crl. M.P.No.22 of 2026 in F.I.R.No.62 of 2026 (P.S. Bonakal) Between:- A4: Chintha Suryanarayana, S/o. Suribabu, Age: 36 years, Occ: Tipper owner, R/o.7th line, Guntru Vari Thota, Guntur district, A.P.

A5:Mukthavarapu Shikamani, S/o. Krishna Murthy, Age:40 years, Occ: Sri Vaishnava Tipper owner, R/o. Ramakrishnapuram village of Chinthakani mandal, Khammam district.

A6:Katrala Gopi, S/o. Nagaiah, Age:25 years, Occ: Driver, R/o. Pandregupalli village, Mudigonda mandal, Khammam district.

...Petitioners/accused No.4, 5 and 6

And

The State through P.S., Bonakal. … Respondent/Complainant.

This petition coming before me on this day for hearing in the presence of Sri. D. Subramanyam, learned counsel for petitioners and learned Assistant Public Prosecutor for the respondent and the matter having stood over for consideration, this Court delivered the following:

:: O R D E R ::

1.This is a petition filed U/s.480 of BNSS praying to enlarge the petitioners/A4 to A6 on bail. The petitioners/A4 to A6 are remanded to judicial custody on 27.04.2026 on PT warrant for the offence punishable U/sec.318(4) r/w 3(5) of BNS against A4 to A6.

2.Notice given to the Learned Asst. Public Prosecutor. Counter filed by the learned A.P.P.

3.Heard on both sides.

4.The learned counsel for the petitioners had strenuously submitted that the petitioners/A4 to A6 are falsely implicated in this case and petitioners would co-operate with investigation and abide the conditions imposed by this Court and they will not tamper the evidence nor abscond. The learned counsel

for the petitioners/A4 to A6 further submitted that if petitioners/A4 to A6 are

continued in judicial custody it will cause much hardship and starvation to their family members and sought for grant of bail to the petitioners/A4 to A6. The learned APP submitted that petitioners/A4 to A6 are habitual offenders and if petitioners/A4 to A6 are released on bail, there is every possibility of committing the same offence and the accused persons may threaten the witnesses or tamper the evidence and there is a chance of abscond by accused persons and accordingly, prayed to dismiss the petition.

5.A perusal of the record discloses the material part of investigation was completed. Since material part of investigation is completed, it seems there is no possibility of tampering the evidence or influencing/intimidating the witnesses. At the stage of assessing whether a case is fit for the grant for bail, the Court is not required to enter into a detailed analysis of the evidence on record to establish the commission of the crime by the accused persons beyond reasonable doubt and that is a matter for trail and the complicity of the accused persons shall have to be established in the trial.

6.Hence, taking into account the date of remand of the petitioners/A4 to A6, in view of the discussion made supra, taking into consideration of the facts and circumstances, if the petitioners/A4 to A6 are enlarged on bail, it would not cause any prejudice to the investigating agency and the prospect of his interfering with the course of investigation also may not arise. Hence, this Court is of the opinion that the petitioners/A4 to A6 are entitled to be granted on bail.

7.In the result, this petition is allowed with the following conditions and the petitioners/A4 to A6 are enlarged on bail on executing a personal bond for Rs.10,000/- with two sureties for like sum to the satisfaction of this Court.

1). Further, the petitioners/A4 to A6 are directed to appear before the S.H.O., of PS. Bonakal on every Sunday between 9.00 a.m., to 4.00 p.m., for a period of three months or till filing of charge sheet whichever is earlier.

2). Further more, the petitioners/A4 to A6 shall not commit the offences similar to the offences of accused persons and they shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

3). They shall also not leave the state without prior permission of this Court and shall co-operate with the investigation.

4). If breach of any of the above conditions is committed, the bail shall stand canceled automatically. Typed to my dictation, corrected and pronounced by me in open Court on this the 30th day of April, 2026.

Sd/-

FAC:Addl. Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Madhira.

Copy to: The Superintendent/Officer In-charge, District Jail, Khammam.

IN THE COURT OF THE ADDL. JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS

AT MADHIRA.

PRESENT: SMT. DEEPTI VEMULA,

Judicial Magistrate of First Class,

Madhira. FAC. Addl. Judicial Magistrate of I Class, Madhira.

Dated the 22nd day of April, 2026.

MC . No. 27 of 2025

Between:

1. Bhukya Prasanna Latha, W/o. Bhukya Venkateswarlu, D/o. Dharavath Thavurya, Age:30 years, Occ: Home Maker, R/o. Bonakal village and Mandal, Khammam District.

2. Bhukya Sai Ram, S/o. Bhukya Venkateswralu, Age:11 years, Occ: Student, R/o. Bonakal village and Mandal, Khammam District.

3. Bhukya Nani, S/o. Bhukya Venkateswarlu, Age:9 years, Occ: Student, R/o. Bonakal village and Mandal, Khammam District. (Petitioner No.2 and 3 being minors represented by their mother and natural guardian i.e., petitioner No.1). … Petitioner No.1 to 3.

AND

Bhukya Venkateswarlu, S/o. Bhukya Sathram, Age:32 years, Occ: Hotel worker, R/o. Nandigama village and Mandal, N.T.R. District. . . . Respondent.

This case coming on this day before me in the presence of Sri. N. Janardhana Rao, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri. S. Venkateswara Rao, in the presence of respondent and after having stood over for consideration, the Court delivered the following:

:: O R D E R ::

In view of the not pressed memo, the case is advanced to today that is 22.04.2026 from 25.05.2026. Petitioner present. The learned counsel for petitioner present. Petitioner filed a memo and submitted that she compromised the matter with respondent outside of the court and that she is not interested to proceed with this case. Accordingly, she endorsed on petition as not pressed and also filed a not pressed memo. In the result, this case is dismissed as not pressed.

(Typed to my dictation by Typist, corrected and pronounced by me in open Court, this the 22nd day of April, 2026).

Sd/-

FAC. Addl. Judl. Magistrate of I Class,

Madhira.

IN THE COURT OF THE ADDL. JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS

AT MADHIRA.

PRESENT: SMT. DEEPTI VEMULA,

Judicial Magistrate of First Class,

Madhira. FAC. Addl. Judicial Magistrate of I Class, Madhira.

Dated, this the 22nd day of April, 2026.

DVC No.12 of 2025

Between: Bhukya Prasanna Latha, W/o. Bhukya Venkateswarlu, Age:30 years, Occ: Home Maker, R/o. Bonakal village and Mandal, Khammam District. … Petitioner.

AND

1. Bhukya Venkateswarlu, S/o. Bhukya Srinu Nayak, Age:32 years, Occ: Hotel worker.

2. Bhukya Srinu Nayak, S/o. Bhukya Sathram, Age: 55 years, Occ: Coolie.

3. Bhukya Nagamani, W/o. Srinu Nayak, Age:45 years, Occ: Home Maker.

4. Bhukya Narasimha Nayak, S/o. Srinu Nayak, Age:30 years, Occ: Internet center. All are N/o. Nandigama village and Mandal, N.T.R. District.

… Respondent No.1 to 4.

This case coming on this day before me in the presence of Sri. N. Janardhana Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri. S. Venkateswara Rao, learned counsel

for respondents and having stood over for consideration, the Court delivered the

following:

:: O R D E R ::

In view of the not pressed memo, the case is advanced to today that is 22.04.2026 from 25.05.2026. Petitioner present. The learned counsel for petitioner present. Petitioner filed a memo and submitted that she compromised the matter with respondents outside of the court and that she is not interested to proceed with this case. Accordingly, she endorsed on petition as not pressed and also filed a not pressed memo. In the result, this case is dismissed as not pressed.

(Typed to my dictation by typist, corrected and pronounced by me in open court, this the 22 nd day of April, 2026).

Sd/-

FAC.Addl. Judicial Magistrate of I Class,

Madhira.

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE

AT MADHIRA.

PRESENT: SMT. DEEPTI VEMULA,

Prl. Junior Civil Judge, Madhira.

Monday, the 11 th day of May, 2026.

O.S. No. 267 of 2022

Between: Guduru Ramana Reddy, S/o. Sangi Reddy, Age:49 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o.Rajupalem village, Yerrupalem Mandal, Khammam District. …Plaintiff.

AND

Pallivela Padmavathi, W/o. Ranga Kumar, Age:37 years, Occ: Employee, R/o. D.No.141, Vambe colony, Ward No.56, Ajithsingh Nagar,

Vijayawada Urban, NTR District. ...Defendant.

This case coming before me on this day for final hearing in the presence of Sri. V.Koteswara Rao, learned counsel for plaintiffand Sri. D. Jagan Mohan Rao , learned counsel for the defendant and having been heard and stood over for consideration, the Court delivered the following:

O R D E R

Plaintiff, defendant and their counsels are present. Both parties reported compromise and requested to refer the matter to Lok Adalath. In view of the compromise petition filed by the plaintiff and defendant, the suit is referred to Lok Adalath for recording compromise. Both parties filed petition stating that the plaintiff compromised this case with the defendant and as per the terms of compromise, the defendant paid an amount of Rs. 10,00,000/- to the plaintiff. Accordingly, the suit is disposed off and terms of compromise are recorded.

Typed to my dictation by Typist, corrected and pronounced by me in open Court, this the11th day of May, 2026.

Sd/-

Principal Junior Civil Judge,

Madhira.