Currently Serving

Smt G. Akhila

I Addl. Junior Civil Judge -cum- I Addl. Judicial Magistrate of First ClassJuvenile Court Bhupalapally

JS Bhupalapally, PDJ Court Complex · Jayashankar Bhupalapally · Telangana

SMT G. AKHILA, I Addl. Junior Civil Judge -cum- I Addl. Judicial Magistrate of First ClassJuvenile Court Bhupalapally, is posted at JS Bhupalapally, PDJ Court Complex, Jayashankar Bhupalapally, Telangana, India. 730 court orders on record since 2024. 6 judgments with full text available. Primarily handles CC, OS, MC cases.

730

Total Orders

Judgments

Orders/Month

Postings

Featured Judgments

OS/50/2026

Arukala Laxmi vs Thallapelli Karthik

13 May 2026

O.S.No.50 of 2026 1 of 7 Dt.13.05.2026

IN THE COURT OF THE I ADDITIONAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE-CUM

I ADDL.JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS(JUVENILE COURT)

AT JAYASHANKAR BHUPALPALLY

Present : Smt G. Akhila, I Addl.Junior Civil Judge-cum I Addl.Judicial Magistrate of First Class, (Juvenile Court), JS Bhupalpally.

Wednesday, this the 13th day of May, 2026.

O.S.No.50 of 2026

Between:

Arukala Laxmi W/o. Late Rajaiah, Age: 61 years, Occu:Kirana Business,R/o. H.No.17-378, Jawahar Nagar Colony, Bhupalpally Town and Mandal, Jayashankar Bhupalpally District.

...Plaintiff.

A N D

1.Thallapelli Karthik, S/o. Late Rajaiah, Age: 28 years, Occu: Private Employee, R/o. H.No.4-42, Mallampally Village, Malhar Rao Mandal, Jayashankar Bhupalpally District.

2.Thallapelli Niharika, W/o. Medipally Ravindhar, Age: 26 years, Occu: House wife, R/o. H.No.2-60, Navabpet Village, Chityal Mandal, Jayashankar Bhupalpally District.

...Defendants No.1 and 2.

This suit came before me on 12.05.2026 for final hearing in the presence of Sri. K. Suresh Kumar, counsel for the Plaintiff and the

Defendants No.1 and 2 remained exparte. Having heard and stood over for consideration till this day this court delivered the following:-

O.S.No.50 of 2026 2 of 7 Dt.13.05.2026

:: J U D G M E N T ::

1.This is a suit filed by plaintiff under section 26 order VII Rule 1 and 2 of Civil Procedure Code against the defendants for recovery of

Rs.1,16,950/-(Rupees One Lakh Sixteen Thousand Nine Hundred and

Fifty Only) which includes the principal amount and interest due under the promissory note dated 16.04.2025.

2.The brief averments of the plaint are as follows:

The plaintiff submits that, Plaintiff and father of Defendants No.1 and 2 are well acquainted with each other. The father of Defendant No.1 and 2 showing his family necessities approached the plaintiff and borrowed Rs.1,00,000/- on 16.04.2025 from the plaintiff and agreed to repay the amount together with interest @1.5 % per month. The father of defendants also executed promissory note on the same day.

Subsequently, the Plaintiff made several demands to the father of defendant No.1 and 2 to repay the amount borrowed with interest, but he has not paid single pie and went on dodging the matter on the pretext of his ill health. The plaintiff came to know that the father of defendant No.1 and 2 died on 31.12-2025. Subsequently, the Plaintiff

O.S.No.50 of 2026 3 of 7 Dt.13.05.2026

again made several demands to the defendant No.1 and 2 being his legal heirs to repay the amount borrowed with interest, but they have not paid single pie. The plaintiff submits that the defendant No.1 and 2 have jointly succeeded to the estate of late Thallapelli Rajaiah. The

Plaintiff came to know that the defendants are also trying to alienate the estates of deceased i.e., residential house bearing No.4-42 situated at mallampally village, malhar mandal, bhupalpally district to evade the payment covered under the promissory note. Thus the plaintiff filed the present suit.

3. Following the institution of suit, the summons were duly served on the Defendants No.1 and 2. However, Defendant No.1 and 2 did not appear before this court as such they were set–exparte on 08.05.2026 and the said order remained unchallenged.

4.Plaintiff himself got examined as PW1 and got marked Exhibit A1.

Heard the learned Counsel for the Plaintiff and perused the material available on record. From averments in the Plaint, the point that arises for determination is :

“Whether the plaintiff is entitled to recover the suit amount as prayed for”?

O.S.No.50 of 2026 4 of 7 Dt.13.05.2026

5. POINT: It is to be noted that the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Ramesh

Chand Ardawatiya v Anil Panjwani reported in (2003) 7 SCC 350 held that even if the suit proceeded exparte the Court was not absolved of its duty of deciding the case in accordance with law.

Therefore the burden is on the Plaintiff to prove that he is entitled to recover the suit amount.

6.In order to discharge the said burden, the Plaintiff filed chief examination affidavit and reiterated all the averments made in the plaint and got himself examined as PW1. Further Plaintiff relied on

Ex.A1 i.e.,the suit promissory note dated 16.04.2025 executed by

Thallapelly Rajaiah in favour of plaintiff for Rs.1,00,000/-. It is the evidence of the plaintiff that the father of defendants No.1 and 2 borrowed an amount of Rs.1,00,000/-and executed Ex.A1.

7.On perusal of the oral and documentary evidence, it is evident that the father of Defendants No.1 and 2 borrowed an amount of Rs.1,00,000/- and executed the Exhibit A1. Further, as defendants No.1 and 2 remained Exparte, the evidence of PW1 remained undisputed and unquestioned. Hence, in view of the unchallenged testimony of the plaintiff as PW1 coupled with documentary evidence from Exhibits.A1

O.S.No.50 of 2026 5 of 7 Dt.13.05.2026

the plaintiff proved his claim that the father of defendant no.1 and 2 executed the said promissory note in favour of PW1.

It is pertinent to mention here that, since the father of the defendants has passed away, they, being his legal heirs, are liable to the extent of the estate of Late Sri Thallapelli Rajaiah inherited by them and which are lying in their hands

8. In view of the above discussion, Plaintiff has proved his case with preponderance of probabilities. Hence, this Court holds that the plaintiff is entitled to recover the suit amount with costs from the defendants No.1 and 2 as prayed for. Accordingly, the point is answered in favour of the plaintiff.

9. In the result, the suit is decreed with costs in favour of the plaintiff by directing the defendants No.1 and 2 to pay an amount of Rs.1,16,950/- (One Lakh Sixteen Thousand Nine Hundred and Fifty Only) to the plaintiff with simple interest @ 12 % per annum on Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh Only) from the date of suit till the date of decree and simple interest @ 6% per annum on principal sum of

Rs.1,00,000/-(Rupees One Lakh Only) from the date of decree till the date of realization. The Defendants No.1 and 2 being legal heirs are

O.S.No.50 of 2026 6 of 7 Dt.13.05.2026

liable to the extent of estate of late Sri.Thallapelli Rajaiah inherited by them and which are lying in their hands.

(Typed by me, corrected and pronounced in the open Court on this the 13th day of

May, 2026).

Sd/-

I Addl.Junior Civil Judge-cum I Addl.Judicial Magistrate of First Class (Juvenile Court),JS Bhupalapally.

O.S.No.50 of 2026 7 of 7 Dt.13.05.2026

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

FOR PLAINTIFF: FOR DEFENDANTs:

PW1:Arukala Laxmi -None -

EXHIBITS MARKED

FOR PLAINTIFF/PW1:

Ex.A1 is the Original Promissory note dated:16.04.2025

FOR DEFENDANTs:

- Nil -

Sd/-

I Addl.Junior Civil Judge-cum I Addl.Judicial Magistrate of First Class (Juvenile Court),JS Bhupalapally.

CC/1619/2025 Convicted

STATE OF TELANGANA SHO PS MAHADEVPUR vs Madhu Jakkula

15 Nov 2025

IN THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE-CUM ADDL.JUDICIAL

MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS(JUVENILE COURT)AT JS BHUPAPALLY.

PRESENT: Smt. G. Akhila Addl.Junior Civil Judge–cum Addl.Judicial Magistrate of First Class, (Juvenile Court), JS Bhupalpally.

Saturday, this the 15th day of November, 2025. CALENDAR CASE NO. 1619 OF 2025

Between:-

The State of Telangana through Sub-Inspector of Police, P.S. Mahadepvur.

... Complainant.

AND

Accused No.1: Jakkula Madhu, S/o. Gattaiah, Age: 28 yrs, R/o. Beglur (v), Accused No.2: Challa Mahesh, S/o. Sathaiah, Age: 35 yrs, R/o. Suraram (v), Accused No.3: Somanapalli Prabhakar Reddy, S/o. Raji Reddy, Age: 45 yrs, R/o. Bommapur

(v), Accused No.4: Somanapalli Sudhakar, S/o. Bakkaiah, Age: 38 yrs, R/o. Bommapur (v), Accused No.5: Burri Ranjith, S/o. Posam, Age: 20 yrs, R/o. Beglur (v), Accused No.6: Lingampalli Vishnu Vrdhan Rao, S/o. Shankar Rao, Age: 34 yrs, R/o. Bommapur (v), Accused No.7: Vemunuri Rajashekar, S/o. Sambam, Age: 28 yrs, R/o. Bommapur (v). Accused No.8: Rathna Maheshwar Reddy, S/o. Mondaiah, Age: 50 yrs, R/o. Suraram (v). Accused No.9: Erni Parvathalu, S/o. Gattaiah, Age: 50 yrs, R/o. Beglur (v).

...Accused No.1 to 9.

This case is coming up before me today i.e. on 15.11.2025 for hearing and disposal

before me in the presence of Police, Mahadevpur and the Accused No.1 to 9 having been

heard and having stood over for consideration to this day, this Court delivered the following:- -:: J U D G M E N T ::- 1]. This is a case filed by the Sub-Inspector of Police, P.S. Mahadevpur against the Accused No.1 to 9 for the offence punishable U/sec. 9(i) of TS Gaming Act.

2]. Brief facts of the case are that on 16.12.2024 at about 07:00 hours the complainant/LW1/K. Pavan Kumar, SI PS Mahadevpur and registered a suo-motto case in which he stated that on credible information he along with PCs rushed and raided at out skirts of Beglur village on seeing the Police Party you/Accused No.1 to 9 fled away with leaving Accused No.1 to 9 cards from the place and apprehended you/Accused No.1 to 9. Immediately he secured the two mediators and seized an amount of Rs. 30,110/- and 52 playing card from Accused No.1 to 9 from under cover of seizure and confessional Panchanama in the presence of two mediators. Hence the Complainant requested to take necessary action against Accused No.1 to 9.

3].on receipt of complaint the LW-6 registered case in Cr.No.221/2024 under Sections 9(i) of TS Gaming Act and issued FIR to all the concerned and took up the investigation and on completion of entire investigation, he filed charge sheet against the Accused No.1 to 9 for the offences punishable U/sec. 9(i) of TS Gaming Act.

4].This Court took cognizance of the case for the offences U/sec. 9(i) of TS Gaming Act against the Accused No.1 to 9. On appearance of Accused No.1 to 9 the copies of all relevant documents furnished to the accused No.1 to 9 as contemplated U/sec. 230 of BNSS.

5].Accused No.1 to 9 called present. Copies furnished to Accused No.1 to 9 U/sec. 230 BNSS. and examined U/sec. 274 of BNSS. explaining the substance of the accusation levelled against the Accused No.1 to 9 for the offence U/sec. 9(i) of Gaming Act and they voluntarily admitted the offence and pleaded guilty. This Court accepts the plea of the Accused No.1 to 9 as true and voluntary one without there being any threat, coercion or duress.

6] IN THE RESULT, the Accused No.1 to 9 found guilty for the offence. U/sec. 9(i) of Telangana Gaming Act convict for the same U/sec.275 of BNSS for the said offence. Heard the Accused No.1 to 9 and on the quantum of sentence, they pleaded mercy on the ground that they are having family and they are the only earning member of their family and now they are repenting for the mistake. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of this case and considering the representation made by the Accused No.1 to 9 convicted U/sec. 275 BNSS accordingly the Accused No.1 to 9 are sentenced to pay a fine of Rs.2000/-(Rupees Two Thousand Only) for the offence punishable U/Sec.9(i) of Telangana Gaming Act of IPC in default of payment of fine they shall suffer simple imprisonment for a period of one month.

Total fine of Rs.18,000/-(Rupees Eighteen Thousand Only).

The un-marked case valuable property which was deposited (Vide CPR No. 132/2025 dated: 15.11.2025 in this Court) i.e., item No.1 the cash of Rs.30,110/-(Rupees Thirty Thousand One Hundred Ten Only) seized from the Accused No.1 to 9 shall be confiscated to the state. Item No.2. 52 playing cards seized from the Accused No.1 to 9 shall be destroyed forth with.

(Typed to my dictation by Typist corrected and pronounced by me in the open Court on this the 15th day of November, 2025).

Sd/-

AJCJ-Cum-AJMFC, JS Bhupalpally.

:: APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE :: -NIL-

Sd/-

AJCJ-Cum-AJMFC, JS Bhupalpally.

CC/1332/2023 Convicted

STATE OF TELANGANA SHO PS KATARAM vs Thulsegari Srinivas

15 Nov 2025

IN THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE-CUM ADDL.JUDICIAL

MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS(JUVENILE COURT)AT JS BHUPAPALLY.

PRESENT: Smt. G. Akhila Addl.Junior Civil Judge–cum Addl.Judicial Magistrate of First Class, (Juvenile Court), JS Bhupalpally.

Saturday, this the 15th day of November, 2025. CALENDAR CASE NO. 1332 OF 2023

Between:-

The State of Telangana through Sub-Inspector of Police, P.S. Kataram.

... Complainant.

AND

Accused No.1: Thulsegari Srinivas, S/o. Balaiah, Age: 55 yrs, R/o. Dhanwada (v), Accused No.2: Bheemuni Sammaiah, S/o. Mallaiah, Age: 37 yrs, R/o. Dhanwada (v), Accused No.3: Maragoni Devender, S/o. Rajaiah, Age: 29 yrs, R/o. Dhanwada (v), Accused No.4: Athukuri Pavan @ Pravin, S/o. Lingaiah, Age: 31 yrs, R/o. Dhanwada (v), Accused No.5:Mudurukola Suresh, S/o. Rajesham, Age: 27 yrs, R/o. Dhanwada (v),

...Accused No.1 to 5.

This case is coming up before me today i.e. on 15.11.2025 for hearing and disposal

before me in the presence of Police, Kataram and the Accused No.1 to 5 having been heard

and having stood over for consideration to this day, this Court delivered the following:- -:: J U D G M E N T ::- 1]. This is a case filed by the Sub-Inspector of Police, P.S. Kataram against the Accused No.1 to 5 for the offence punishable U/sec. 9(i) of TS Gaming Act.

2]. Brief facts of the case are that 15.09.2023 at about 20:00 hours the complainant/LW1/K. Venkatesham, HC came to PS Kataram and lodged a Petition in which he stated that on credible information he along with PCs rushed the outskirts of Dhanwada village and apprehended Accused No.1 to 5. Then he secured two panchas and seized 52 plying cards, two mobile pones and Rs. 1,500/- net cash from sceene of offence under cover of seizure and confessional Panchanama of Accused No.1 and 2. Hence the Complainant requested to take necessary action against Accused No.1 to 5.

3].on receipt of complaint LW1, the LW-6 registered case in Cr.No.163/2023 under Sections 9(i) of TS Gaming Act and issued FIR to all the concerned and took up the investigation and on completion of entire investigation, he filed charge sheet against the Accused No.1 to 5 for the offences punishable U/sec. 9(i) of TS Gaming Act.

4].This Court took cognizance of the case for the offences U/sec. 9(i) of TS Gaming Act against the Accused No.1 to 5. On appearance of Accused No.1 to 5 the copies of all relevant documents furnished to the accused No.1 to 5 as contemplated U/sec. 207 of Cr.P.C.

5].Accused No.1 to 5 called present. Copies furnished to Accused No.1 to 5 U/sec. 207 Cr.P.C. and examined U/sec.251 of Cr.P.C. explaining the substance of the accusation levelled against the Accused No.1 to 5 for the offence U/sec. 9(i) of Gaming Act and they voluntarily admitted the offence and pleaded guilty. This Court accepts the plea of the Accused No.1 to 5 as true and voluntary one without there being any threat, coercion or duress.

6] IN THE RESULT, the Accused No.1 to 5 found guilty for the offence. U/sec. 9(i) of Telangana Gaming Act convict for the same U/sec. 252 of Cr.P.C for the said offence. Heard the Accused No.1 to 5 and on the quantum of sentence, they pleaded mercy on the ground that they are having family and they are the only earning member of their family and now they are repenting for the mistake. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of this case and considering the representation made by the Accused No.1 to 5 convicted U/sec. 252 of Cr.P.C accordingly the Accused No.1 to 5 are sentenced to pay a fine of Rs.2,000/(Rupees Two Thousand Only) each for the offence punishable U/Sec. 9(i) of Telangana Gaming Act of IPC in default of payment of fine they shall suffer simple imprisonment for a period of one month.

Total fine of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only).

The un-marked case valuable property which was deposited (Vide CPR No. 33/2024 dated: .10.2023 in this Court) i.e., item No.1 the cash of Rs.1,500/-(Rupees One Thousand Five Hundred Only) seized from the Accused No.1 and 2 shall be confiscated to the state.

Item No.2. Nokia key pad mobile and Item No. 3. Oppo touch mobile phone seized from the Accused No.1 and 2 shall be returned to its original owner on their petition on proper identification and acknowledgment after receipt of release order from this court as they are not used as gaming instruments

Item No.4. 52 playing cards seized from the Accused No.1 and 2 shall be destroyed forth with.

(Typed to my dictation by Typist corrected and pronounced by me in the open Court on this the 15th day of November, 2025).

Sd/-

AJCJ-Cum-AJMFC, JS Bhupalpally.

:: APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE :: -NIL-

Sd/-

AJCJ-Cum-AJMFC, JS Bhupalpally.

CC/479/2025 Convicted

STATE OF TELANGANA SHO PS KATARAM vs Ashwanth Katla

15 Nov 2025

IN THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE-CUM- ADDL.JUDICIAL

MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS(JUVENILE COURT) AT JS BHUPAPALLY.

PRESENT: Smt. G.Akhila Addl.Junior Civil Judge–cum- Addl.Judicial Magistrate of First Class, (Juvenile Court), JS Bhupalpally. Saturday, this the 15th day of November, 2025. CALENDAR CASE NO. 479 OF 2025

Between:- The State of Telangana through Sub-Inspector of Police, P.S. Kataram.

... Complainant.

AND

Accused No.1: Katla Aswanth, S/o. Mallesh, Age: 19 yrs, R/o. Vilasagar Village. Accused No.2: Kandikonda Sammaiah @ Chinna Sammaiah, S/o. Banaiah, Age: 37 yrs, R/o. Vilasagar Village.

..Accused No.1 and 2.

This case is coming up before me today i.e. on 15.11.2025 for hearing and disposal before me in the presence of Police, Kataram and the Accused No.1 and 2 having been heard and having stood over for consideration to this day, this Court delivered the following:- -:: J U D G M E N T ::- 1]. This is a case filed by the Sub-Inspector of Police, P.S. Kataram, against the Accused

No.1 and 2 for the offence punishable U/sec. 303 (2) of BNS.

2]. Brief facts of the case are that on 18.02.2025 at 17:30 hours, the Complainant/LW1/D.

Krishna, HC came to PS Kataram and lodged a Petition in which he stated that, on 18.02.2025 at 16:30 hrs on credible information about illegal sand transport, as per the superior officer instructions he along with PCs were proceeded to Gangaram cross road.

There they found one without number plate tractor loaded with sand coming from Gangaram village side under suspicious circumstances, immediately they were stopped that tractor and asked the driver to produce sand permit document but the driver failed to produce permit document, then interrogated you/Accused No.1. On interrogation Accused No.1 confessed that Accused No.1 colluded with Accused No.2 who is the owner of the tractor are transporting sand illegally from Maneru river without any permit and sell the same sand to new house builders on more profit. Hence the Complainant/LW-1 requested to take necessary action against the Accused No.1 and 2.

3].On receipt of the complaint LW-1, LW-7 registered a case in Cr.No. 27/2025 U/sec.

303 (2) of BNS, and issued FIR to all the concerned and took up the investigation and on completion of entire investigation, he filed charge sheet against the Accused No.1 and 2 for the offences punishable U/sec. 303 (2) of BNS.

4].This Court took cognizance of the case for the offences U/sec. 303 (2) of BNS against the Accused No.1 and 2. On appearance of Accused No.1 and 2 the copies of all relevant documents furnished to the Accused No.1 and 2 as contemplated U/sec. 230 of BNSS.

5].Accused No.1 and 2 called present. Copies furnished to Accused No.1 and 2 U/sec. 230

BNSS and are examined U/s. 262 of BNSS and charges are framed against Accused No.1 and 2 for the offences U/s. 303 (2) of BNS and he/she/they voluntarily admitted the offence and pleaded guilty. This Court accepts the plea of the Accused No.1 and 2 as true and voluntary one without there being any threat, coercion or duress.

6] IN THE RESULT, the Accused No.1 and 2 found guilty for the offence. U/s. 303 (2) of

BNS and convict for the same U/sec. 264 of BNSS for the said offence. Heard the Accused

No.1 and 2 on the quantum of sentence,he/she/they pleaded mercy on the ground that they are having family and he/she/they are the only earning member(s) of his/her/their family and now he/she/they is/are repenting for the mistake. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of this case and considering the representation made by the Accused convicted

U/sec. 264 of BNSS and accordingly the Accused No.1 and 2 are sentenced to pay a fine of

Rs.2000/-(Rupees Two Thousand Only), each for the offence punishable U/Sec. 303 (2) of

BNS in default of payment of fine he/she/they shall suffer simple imprisonment for a period of one month. Total fine of Rs.4,000/- (Rupees Four Thousand Only).

(Typed to my dictation by Typist corrected and pronounced by me in the open Court on this the 15th day of November, 2025). Sd/-

AJCJ-Cum-AJMFC, JS Bhupalpally.

:: APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE :

-NIL-

Sd/-

AJCJ-Cum-AJMFC, JS Bhupalpally.

CC/634/2022 Convicted

Shirushetti Ashok(PS Mahadevpur) vs Jagiri Naresh

15 Nov 2025

IN THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE-CUM

ADDL.JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS(JUVENILE COURT)AT JS

BHUPAPALLY.

PRESENT: Smt. G. Akhila Addl.Junior Civil Judge–cum Addl.Judicial Magistrate of First Class, (Juvenile Court), JS Bhupalpally.

Saturday, this the 15th day of November, 2025. CALENDAR CASE NO. 634 OF 2022 OLD CALENDAR CASE NO. 450 OF 2016

Between:-

The State of Telangana through Sub-Inspector of Police, P.S. Mahadevpur.

... Complainant.

AND

Accused No.1: Jagari Naresh, S/o. Thirupathi, Age: 26 yrs, R/o. Bayyaram (v), Accused No.2: Jagari Thirupathi, S/o. Ragyyulu, Age: 45 yrs, R/o. Bayyaram (v), Accused No.3: Shirushetti Rajeshwarai, W/o. Srinivas, Age: 25 yrs, R/o. Sarvaipet (v), Accused No.4: Shirushetti Rajalingam @ Rajanna, S/o. Lachimallu, Age: 45 yrs, R/o. Sarvaipet (v), Accused No.5: Shirushetti Mahesh, S/o. Lachimallu, Age: 28 yrs, R/o.Sarvaipet (v), (died)

...Accused No.1 to 5.

This case is coming up before me today i.e. on 15.11.2025 for hearing and disposal

before me in the presence of Police, Mahadevpur and the Accused No.1 to 5 having been

heard and having stood over for consideration to this day, this Court delivered the following:- -:: J U D G M E N T ::- 1]. This is a case filed by the Sub-Inspector of Police, P.S. Mahadevpur against the Accused No.1 to 5 for the offence punishable U/sec. 506 r/w 34 of IPC.

2]. Brief facts of the case are that on 19.07.2016 the complainant/LW1/Shirushetti Ashok came to PS Mahadevpur and lodged a Petition in which he stated Since some days you/Accused No.1 was contact him by cell phone call to his phone and threatened him to kill him by saying unnecessarily not involvement his younger sister in law matter. He has life threat from Accused No.1 to 5. Hence the Complainant requested to take necessary action against Accused No.1 to 5.

3].on receipt of complaint LW1, the LW-5 registered case in Cr.No.93/2016 under Sections 506 r/w 34 of IPC and issued FIR to all the concerned and took up the investigation and on completion of entire investigation, he filed charge sheet against the Accused No.1 to 5 for the offences punishable U/sec. 506 r/w 34 of IPC.

4].This Court took cognizance of the case for the offences U/sec. 506 r/w 34 of IPC against the Accused No.1 to 5. On appearance of Accused No.1 to 5 the copies of all relevant documents furnished to the Accused No.1 to 5 as contemplated U/sec. 207 of Cr.P.C.

5].Death Certificate of Accused No.5 is filed and the case against Accused No.5 is abated. Accused No.1 to 4 called present. Copies furnished to Accused No.1 to 4 U/sec. 207 Cr.P.C. and are examined U/s. 251 of Cr.P.C. explaining the substance of the accusation levelled against the Accused No.1 to 4 for the offences U/s. 506 r/w 34 of IPC and he/she/they voluntarily admitted the offence and pleaded guilty. This Court accepts the plea of the Accused No.1 to 4 as true and voluntary one without there being any threat, coercion or duress.

6] IN THE RESULT, the Accused No.1 to 4 found guilty for the offence. U/s. 506 r/w 34 of IPC and convict for the same U/sec. 252 of Cr.P.C. for the said offence. Heard the Accused No.1 to 4 on the quantum of sentence, he/she/they pleaded mercy on the ground that they are having family and he/she/they are the only earning member(s) of his/her/their family and now he/she/they is/are repenting for the mistake. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of this case and considering the representation made by the Accused No.1 to 4 convicted U/sec. 252 of Cr.P.C. and accordingly the Accused No.1 to 4 are sentenced to pay a fine of R. 1000./- (Rupees Four Thousand Only),each for the offence punishable U/Sec. 506 r/w 34 of IPC in default of payment of fine he/she/they shall suffer simple imprisonment for a period of one month.

Total fine of Rs.4,000/- (Rupees Four Thousand Only).

(Typed to my dictation by Typist corrected and pronounced by me in the open Court on this the 15th day of November, 2025).

Sd/-

AJCJ-Cum-AJMFC, JS Bhupalpally.

:: APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE :: -NIL-

Sd/-

AJCJ-Cum-AJMFC, JS Bhupalpally.

Order Record 724 total

Case No.	Parties	Date	Type	Outcome
OS/50/2026	Arukala Laxmi vs Thallapelli Karthik	13 May 2026	Judgement	—
CC/479/2025	STATE OF TELANGANA SHO PS KATARAM vs Ashwanth Katla	15 Nov 2025	Judgement	Convicted
CC/634/2022	Shirushetti Ashok(PS Mahadevpur) vs Jagiri Naresh	15 Nov 2025	Judgement	Convicted
CC/664/2025	STATE OF TELANGANA SHO PS KATARAM vs Sammaiah Konda	15 Nov 2025	Judgement	Convicted
CC/1332/2023	STATE OF TELANGANA SHO PS KATARAM vs Thulsegari Srinivas	15 Nov 2025	Judgement	Convicted
CC/1619/2025	STATE OF TELANGANA SHO PS MAHADEVPUR vs Madhu Jakkula	15 Nov 2025	Judgement	Convicted
CC/1603/2025	STATE OF TELANGANA SHO PS KATARAM vs Deelip Bachala	14 Nov 2025	Judgement	—
CC/1604/2025	STATE OF TELANGANA SHO PS KATARAM vs Kumar Kattekola	14 Nov 2025	Judgement	—
CC/1605/2025	STATE OF TELANGANA SHO PS KATARAM vs Thirupathi Orsu	14 Nov 2025	Judgement	—
CC/1606/2025	STATE OF TELANGANA SHO PS KATARAM vs Thirupathi Bhukya	14 Nov 2025	Judgement	—
CC/1608/2025	STATE OF TELANGANA THE SHO PS MAHADEVPUR vs Madaka Prathap Reddy	14 Nov 2025	Judgement	—
CC/1814/2022	Ganta Ankaiah(PS KATARAM) vs Velupula Surendar	14 Nov 2025	Judgement	—
CC/79/2022	State of Telangana PS Koyyur vs Vsnaramalla sadanandam	13 Sep 2025	Judgement	—
CC/312/2025	STATE OF TELANGANA SHO PS KOYYUR vs Erikilla Shekar	13 Sep 2025	Judgement	—
CC/314/2025	STATE OF TELANGANA SHO PS KOYYUR vs Paliyad Santhosh	13 Sep 2025	Judgement	—
CC/721/2022	Thurpati Laxmi @ Buchamma (PS Kaleshwaram) vs Motam Saraiah @ Thupaki Ramudu	13 Sep 2025	Judgement	—
CC/851/2025	STATE OF TELANGANA SHO PS KOYYUR vs Sammaiah Lavudya	13 Sep 2025	Judgement	—
CC/1057/2022	Md.Zaheer Khan, SI of Police, PS Kataram. vs Bandela Rajabapu @ Rajababu	13 Sep 2025	Judgement	—
CC/1097/2022	SHO PS ADAVI MUTHARAM vs A1.KALVACHERLA RAJESH	13 Sep 2025	Judgement	—
CC/1151/2025	STATE OF TELANGANA SHO PS MAHADEVPUR vs Ranjeeth Balne	13 Sep 2025	Judgement	—
CC/1157/2025	STATE OF TELANGANA SHO PS MAHADEVPUR vs Mallaiah Karu	13 Sep 2025	Judgement	—
CC/1159/2025	STATE OF TELANGANA SHO PS ADAVIMUTHARAM vs Laxmi Swamy Aliyas Laxmana Swamy Rathnam	13 Sep 2025	Judgement	—
CC/1160/2023	STATE OF TELANGANA SHO PS MAHADEVPUR vs Maduri Rajkumar	13 Sep 2025	Judgement	—
CC/1170/2025	STATE OF TELANGANA SHO PS KATARAM vs Hari krishana Nishani	13 Sep 2025	Judgement	—
CC/1172/2025	STATE OF TELANGANA SHO PS KATARAM vs Kotesh Bellamkonda	13 Sep 2025	Judgement	—
CC/1182/2025	STATE OF TELANGANA SHO PS KOYYUR vs Sammaiah Kota	13 Sep 2025	Judgement	—
CC/1307/2025	STATE OF TELANGANA SHO PS PALIMELA vs Ravinder Kaviri	13 Sep 2025	Judgement	—
CC/1308/2025	STATE OF TELANGANA SHO PS MAHADEVPUR vs Rajeshwar Godishela	13 Sep 2025	Judgement	—
CC/1367/2022	Chiguru Ramesh (PS Kataram) vs Bomma Thirupathi	13 Sep 2025	Judgement	—
CC/1440/2024	STATE OF TELANGANA SHO PS KOYYUR vs Raju Choppadandi	13 Sep 2025	Judgement	—
CC/1469/2024	STATE OF TELANGANA SHO PS KOYYUR vs Krishna Jodu	13 Sep 2025	Judgement	—
CC/1470/2022	Muskula Srilatha (PS KATARAM) vs Kasipeta Rajini	13 Sep 2025	Judgement	—
CC/1563/2024	STATE OF TELANGANA SHO PS ADAVIMUTHARAM vs Praveen Nathi	13 Sep 2025	Judgement	—
CC/1797/2022	Azmeera Mogili(PS Koyyur) vs Azmeera Bujji Nayak	13 Sep 2025	Judgement	—
CC/1819/2024	STATE OF TELANGANA SHO PS KATARAM vs Santhosh Polam	13 Sep 2025	Judgement	—
CC/244/2022	Chidrala Swarupa(PS Koyyur) vs Chidrala Venkatesham	12 Sep 2025	Judgement	—
CC/771/2022	PS KATARAM vs Vssanti . laxmaiah @ laxman	12 Sep 2025	Judgement	—
CC/1089/2025	STATE OF TELANGANA SHO PS PALIMELA vs Rajanna Sirishetti	12 Sep 2025	Judgement	—
CC/1112/2025	STATE OF TELANGANA SHO PS KOYYUR vs Sangem laxmi	12 Sep 2025	Judgement	—
CC/1167/2025	STATE OF TELANGANA SHO PS KATARAM vs Rajaiah Jakkula	12 Sep 2025	Judgement	—
CC/1174/2025	STATE OF TELANGANA SHO PS KATARAM vs Santhosh Dhagama	12 Sep 2025	Judgement	—
CC/1303/2025	STATE OF TELANGANA THE SHO PS MAHADEVPUR vs Sudhakar Kodela	12 Sep 2025	Judgement	—
CC/1468/2024	STATE OF TELANGANA SHO PS KOYYUR vs Raju Kodari	12 Sep 2025	Judgement	—
CC/927/2025	STATE OF TELANGANA PALIMELA vs Vssrinivas mekala	11 Sep 2025	Judgement	—
CC/1104/2025	STATE OF TELANGANA SHO PS KATARAM vs Papaiah Mogili	11 Sep 2025	Judgement	—
CC/1124/2025	STATE OF TELANGANA SHO PS ADAVIMUTHARAM vs Saduvali Aliyas Sadvali Mulkala	11 Sep 2025	Judgement	—
CC/1300/2025	STATE OF TELANGANA SHO PS PALIMELA vs Ramesh Mandula	11 Sep 2025	Judgement	—
CC/1301/2025	STATE OF TELANGANA THE SHO PS KALESHWARAM vs Rohith saini	11 Sep 2025	Judgement	—
CC/546/2024	STATE OF TELANGANA PS KOYYURU vs Thundla Laxmi	10 Sep 2025	Judgement	—
CC/589/2025	STATE OF TELANGANA THE SHO PS MAHADEVPUR vs Sathish Nalla	10 Sep 2025	Judgement	—
CC/936/2025	STATE OF TELANGANA SHO PS MAHADEVPUR vs Dilepkumar Patel	10 Sep 2025	Judgement	—
CC/938/2025	STATE OF TELANGANA SHO PS MAHADEVPUR vs Sunil Kwat	10 Sep 2025	Judgement	—
CC/943/2025	STATE OF TELANGANA SHO PS MAHADEVPUR vs Amith Kumar Yadav	10 Sep 2025	Judgement	—
CC/944/2025	STATE OF TELANGANA SHO PS MAHADEVPUR vs Deendyal Kwat	10 Sep 2025	Judgement	—
CC/1119/2025	STATE OF TELANGANA SHO PS ADAVIMUTHARAM vs Sanjeev Kodi	10 Sep 2025	Judgement	—
CC/1154/2025	STATE OF TELANGANA SHO PS MAHADEVPUR vs Sranand Kumar Neerla	10 Sep 2025	Judgement	—
CC/1178/2025	STATE OF TELANGANA SHO PS KATARAM vs Thirupathi Dharangula	10 Sep 2025	Judgement	—
CC/1297/2025	STATE OF TELANGANA SHO PS PALIMELA vs Ashok Durgam	10 Sep 2025	Judgement	—
CC/1298/2025	STATE OF TELANGANA SHO PS KALESHWARAM vs Rajender Porandla	10 Sep 2025	Judgement	—
CC/1658/2024	STATE OF TELANGANA SHO PS KATARAM vs Shankar Vavilla	10 Sep 2025	Judgement	—
CC/440/2022	Gujjula Ugender(PS Mahadevpur) vs Polam Isthari	09 Sep 2025	Judgement	—
CC/1294/2025	STATE OF TELANGANA SHO PS KOYYUR vs Arun kumar Orsu	09 Sep 2025	Judgement	—
CC/1295/2025	STATE OF TELANGANA SHO PS KOYYUR vs Vssammaiah orsu	09 Sep 2025	Judgement	—
CC/1296/2025	STATE OF TELANGANA SHO PS MAHADEVPUR vs Laxman Mallela	09 Sep 2025	Judgement	—
CC/929/2025	STATE OF TELANGANA SHO PS KALESHWARAM vs Amarender Kekkerla	08 Sep 2025	Judgement	—
CC/405/2022	Nagavath Kranthi (PS Adavimutharam) vs Gudepu Shanker	04 Sep 2025	Judgement	—
CC/931/2025	STATE OF TELANGANA SHO PS KALESHWARAM vs Ashok Chekka	03 Sep 2025	Judgement	—
CC/933/2025	STATE OF TELANGANA SHO PS KALESHWARAM vs Shankar Bandela	03 Sep 2025	Judgement	—
CC/934/2025	STATE OF TELANGANA SHO PS KALESHWARAM vs MD Iqubal Ansari	03 Sep 2025	Judgement	—
CC/1088/2025	STATE OF TELANGANA SHO PS PALIMELA vs Pocham Peddi	03 Sep 2025	Judgement	—
CC/1700/2024	STATE OF TELANGAN SHO PS KATARAM vs Kumar Kattekola	03 Sep 2025	Judgement	—
CC/801/2025	STATE OF TELANGANA THE SHO PS KALESHWARAM vs Anusha Nisturi	02 Sep 2025	Judgement	—
CC/937/2025	STATE OF TELANGANA SHO PS MAHADEVPUR vs Dileep Chaowdary Boyapati	02 Sep 2025	Judgement	—
OS/331/2023	Rachamalla Sampath Reddy @ Sampath vs Bandari Devender	27 Jun 2025	Judgement	—
OS/425/2022	Pullela Sanjeev vs Koravena Mallikarjuna	27 Jun 2025	Judgement	—
CC/802/2022	SHO PS KATARAM vs A1.VEERAGONI KIRAN	27 Jun 2025	Judgement	—
CC/1623/2022	Revelli Srinivas(PS Kaleshwaram) vs Mekala Sammaiah	27 Jun 2025	Judgement	—
CC/1990/2022	FOREST RANGE OFFICER, MAHADEVPUR vs RATHNA RAJI REDDY	27 Jun 2025	Judgement	—
CC/2123/2022	SHO PS KATARAM vs A1.CHIGURU SRINIVAS	27 Jun 2025	Judgement	—
OS/181/2023	Durgam Sudha Rani vs Durgam Rajitha	26 Jun 2025	Judgement	—
OS/220/2024	Padi Rajakka vs Padi Rajeshwari	26 Jun 2025	Judgement	—
OS/1185/2022	CHILUVERU THIRUPATHI vs RATHNA SADAIAH @ SADANANDAM	25 Jun 2025	Judgement	—
CC/777/2022	The SHOPS Kataram vs A1 Gattu Ramesh	25 Jun 2025	Judgement	—
CC/293/2022	The SHOPS Adavimutharam vs Dumpala Komraiah	24 Jun 2025	Judgement	—
OS/71/2024	Made Devika vs Erra Sammaiah	20 Jun 2025	Judgement	—
OS/247/2022	Muduthanapalli Sampath vs Sunka Mogili @ Rajamouli	20 Jun 2025	Judgement	—
OS/1234/2022	KORRA PRATHAP vs MAMIDI RAVI	20 Jun 2025	Judgement	—
OS/66/2023	Rasamalla Ravinder vs Midimalapu Aadhi Reddy	19 Jun 2025	Judgement	—
CC/105/2022	SHO MAHAMUTHARAM PS vs A1 LOKE DURGAIAH	18 Jun 2025	Judgement	—
CC/841/2022	SHO KATARAM PS vs GALI NARESH	18 Jun 2025	Judgement	—
CC/948/2022	SHO KATARAM PS vs MUTHYALA LAXMAN	18 Jun 2025	Judgement	—
CC/144/2022	Palakurthi Sammaiah(PS Mahadevpur) vs Korra Govind Nayak	17 Jun 2025	Judgement	—
CC/828/2022	The SHOPS Mahadevpur vs A1-Vasam Shekhar	17 Jun 2025	Judgement	—
CC/58/2025	STATE OF TELANGANA SHO PS KATARAM vs Vssagar Durgam	14 Jun 2025	Judgement	—
CC/310/2025	STATE OF TELANGANA SHO PS KOYYUR vs Kusahena Pochaiah	14 Jun 2025	Judgement	—
CC/548/2025	STATE OF TELANGANA SHO PS KOYYUR vs Boda Edukondalu	14 Jun 2025	Judgement	—
CC/644/2025	STATE OF TELANGANA THE SHO PS KALESHWARAM vs Rasheed syed	14 Jun 2025	Judgement	—
CC/784/2025	STATE OF TELANGANA THE SHO PS KATARAM vs Santhosham Srinivas	14 Jun 2025	Judgement	—
CC/785/2025	STATE OF TELANGANA THE SHO PS KATARAM vs Shaik khaja	14 Jun 2025	Judgement	—
CC/975/2024	STATE OF TELANGANA SHO PS KATARAM vs Mahesh Kumbam	14 Jun 2025	Judgement	—

Showing 100 of 724 orders — Log in to browse all pages.

Monthly Orders (Last 12 Months)

May 2026		1
Nov 2025		11
Sep 2025		62
Jun 2025		67
May 2025		17
Apr 2025		22
Mar 2025		81
Feb 2025		18
Jan 2025		18
Dec 2024		56
Nov 2024		5
Oct 2024		3

Frequently Asked Questions

How many cases has SMT G. AKHILA handled?

SMT G. AKHILA has handled 730 court orders since 2024 at JS Bhupalapally, PDJ Court Complex. The average disposal rate is 26 orders per month.

What types of cases does SMT G. AKHILA hear?

Based on available records, SMT G. AKHILA primarily handles Criminal matters (Criminal Cases) and Civil matters (Original Suits, Execution Petitions) at JS Bhupalapally, PDJ Court Complex.

Where is SMT G. AKHILA currently posted?

SMT G. AKHILA is posted as I Addl. Junior Civil Judge -cum- I Addl. Judicial Magistrate of First ClassJuvenile Court Bhupalapally at JS Bhupalapally, PDJ Court Complex, Jayashankar Bhupalapally, Telangana.

Are judgments by SMT G. AKHILA available online?

Yes. 6 judgments by SMT G. AKHILA are available on Legistro with full text, outcome, and sections cited.

How fast does SMT G. AKHILA dispose cases?

SMT G. AKHILA disposes approximately 26 cases per month, based on 730 orders handled over their tenure at JS Bhupalapally, PDJ Court Complex.

Since when is SMT G. AKHILA serving?

SMT G. AKHILA has been serving at JS Bhupalapally, PDJ Court Complex since 2024. and is currently posted there.

Case Types

CC 85%

OS 11%

MC 2%

EP 1%

PRC 1%

DVC 0%

Posting History

May 2026 — Present

I Addl. Junior Civil Judge -cum- I Addl. Judicial Magistrate of First ClassJuvenile Court Bhupalapally · 1 orders
May 2026 — Present

III Addl. Junior Civil Judge -cum- III Addl. Judicial Magistrate of First Class Bhupalapally
Feb 2024 — Nov 2025

Addl. Junior Civil Judge-cum-Judicial Magistrate of First Class(Juvenile Court), bhupalapally · 729 orders

Outcomes on Record

Convicted 5

Other Judges at this Court

Mr. Dilip Kumar Naik Sr

Principal Junior civil Judge-cum- judicial Magistr...

129 orders

S.V.P.Surya Chandra Kala

Fast Track Special Court for Expeditous disposal o...

0 orders

Sri T.Kanhyalal

Senior Civil Judge-cum- Assistant Sessions Judge,...

0 orders

← View all judges at JS Bhupalapally, PDJ Court Complex