G.Bhupal Reddy

Senior Civil Judge Kovur

Senior Civil Judge`s Court, Kovur (Taluka) · Nellore · Andhra Pradesh

G.Bhupal Reddy, Senior Civil Judge Kovur, is posted at Senior Civil Judge`s Court, Kovur (Taluka), Nellore, Andhra Pradesh, India. 589 court orders on record since 2014. 8 judgments with full text available. Primarily handles OS, EP, H cases.

589

Total Orders

Judgments

Orders/Month

Postings

Featured Judgments

OS/493/2015

Chellagundal Prasad Rao vs Chennareddy Kiranmayi

22 Jul 2016

1 O.S.No. 493/2015 dt. 22-7-2016

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE: NELLORE

Friday, the Twenty-Second(22nd) day of July, 2016.

Present: Sri T.V.Subba Rao

Principal Senior Civil Judge,

Nellore.

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 493/2015

Chellagundla Prasad Rao .. Plaintif

Vs.

Chennareddy Kiranmayi .. Defendant

This suit coming on this day i.e., 18-7-2016 before me for hearing in the presence of Sri N.Sudheer Reddy, Advocate for the

Plaintif and of Sri P.Uma Maheswar, Advocate filed vakalath for defendant and the defendant having remained exparte and upon hearing counsel for the plaintif, and the matter having stood over for consideration till this day, this court delivered the following:- -

J U D G M E N T

The plaintif filed the suit against the defendant for recovery of suit amount based on Ex.A-1 suit promissory note dated 25-11-2012 with costs and subsequent interest.

2.(i)The case of the plaintif is that the defendant borrowed a sum of Rs. 3,00,000/- from the plaintif on 25-11-2012 for her necessities and in consideration thereof, she executed a promissory note in favour of the plaintif on the even date, agreeing to repay the same with interest at 24% p.a yearly compoundable rests either to the plaintif or his order on demand.

(ii)It is further submitted that inspite of repeated demands made by the plaintif, the defendant did not repay any portion of the amount due under the promissory note. Hence, the plaintif got issued legal notice dated 6-11-2015 to the defendant to repay the amount due under the promissory note within seven days from the date of receipt of notice. The defendant received the said notice and issued reply notice 2 O.S.No. 493/2015 dt. 22-7-2016 with false allegations that taking advantage of typographical mistake of the year that the promissory note is fabricated and forged the signatures of the defendant The defendant herself scribed the promissory note and she herself after receipt of the amount before the witness and executed promissory note while they are residing at Fathekhanpet, Nellore. The defendant is not an agriculturist and studied B.Tech course as admitted by the defendant in the notice and utilized the money for her personal and prosecuting the studies and there is no exemption of contract rate of interest. Hence the suit.

3.As per record, the defendant was set exparte on 11-7-2016

4.On behalf of the plaintif, he himself was examined as Pw.1 and got marked Exs.A-1 to A-3. Ex.A-1 is Original promissory note dated 25-11-2012 executed by the defendant in favour of plaintif for

Rs.3,00,000/-. Ex.A-2 is the Office copy of legal notice dated 6-11-2015 and Ex.A-3 is the Reply notice issued by the defendant dated 11-11-2015.

5.Heard the plaintif counsel.

6. Now, the point for consideration is:

“Whether the plaintiff is entitled for a decree as prayed for?”

7.Since the defendant was set exparte, Pw.1 was not cross- examined and no witness is examined and no documents are marked on behalf of the defendant.

8.The plaint, unrebuttal and unchallenged evidence of Pw.1 and

Ex.A-1 to Ex.A-3 proved and established the suit claim against the defendant. Hence, the plaintif is entitled for a decree against the defendant as prayed for in the plaint.

Point is answered in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendant.

3 O.S.No. 493/2015 dt. 22-7-2016

9.In the result, the suit is decreed for Rs. 5,72,987/- in favour of the plaintif and against the defendant with costs and subsequent interest at 12% p.a., on the principal amount of Rs. 3,00,000/- from the date of the suit till the date of decree and thereafter at 6% per annum till the date of realization.

Typed to my dictation by the Personal Assistant, corrected and

pronounced by me in the Open Court, this the 22nd day of July, 2016.

Principal Senior Civil Judge

NELLORE.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

For Plaintiff: For Defendant:

Pw.1: Chellagundla Prasad Rao Exparte.

DOCUMENTS MARKED

For Plaintiff:

Ex.A-1:Original promissory note dated 25-11-2012 executed by the defendant in favour of plaintif for Rs.3,00,000/-. Ex.A-2: Office copy of legal notice dated 6-11-2015 got issued by the counsel for the plaintif to the defendant. Ex.-3: Reply notice dated 11-11-2015 issued by the defendant to the plaintif.

For Defendant: – NIL –

Principal Senior Civil Judge

NELLORE

4 O.S.No. 493/2015 dt. 22-7-2016

OS/179/2015

Nellipudi Jayaprakash Babu vs Bungatavula Hari Narayana

11 Aug 2015

1 O.S.No.179/2015 dt.11-8-2015

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE: NELLORE

Dated, this the 11th day of August, 2015.

Present: Smt K.Sunitha,

Principal Senior Civil Judge, Nellore.

ORIGINAL SUIT No.179/2015

Nellipudi Jayaprakash Babu.. Plaintif

Vs.

B. Harinarayana.. Defendant

his suit coming on 11-8-2015 before me for hearing in the presence of Sri T.V.subba Rao, advocate for the Plaintif, and the defendant having remained exparte, upon hearing counsel for the plaintif, and the matter having stood over for consideration, till this day, this court delivered the following:- -

J U D G M E N T

This is a suit filed for recovery of Rs.3,44,000/- with costs and subsequent interest allegedly due under a promissory note.

2. It is the case of the plaintif that the defendant borrowed an amount of Rs. 2,00,000/- from the plaintif on 11-4-2012 for his necessities and executed a promissory note, agreeing to repay the amount with interest at 24% p.a.

(ii)It is further stated that the defendant failed to discharge the above said promissory note debt even after the repeated demands made by the plaintif personally and through messengers and inspite of the legal notice dated 28-10-2014 got issued by him . It is stated that the defendant got issued Reply notice dated 10-11-2014 with false allegations. Hence the suit.

3. The defendant remained exparte.

4. The plaintif is examined as Pw.1 and marked Exs.A-1 to A-4.

5. Heard the counsel for the plaintif.

2 O.S.No.179/2015 dt.11-8-2015

6.In support of the suit claim, having examined himself as Pw.1, the plaintif filed his chief-affidavit, reiterating the plaint averments that the defendant borrowed an amount of Rs. 2,00,000/- from the plaintif on 11-4-2012 for his necessities and executed a promissory note, agreeing to repay the amount with interest at 24% p.a. The defendant failed to discharge the above said promissory note debt even after the repeated demands made by the plaintif personally and through messengers and inspite of the legal notice dated 28-10-2014 got issued by him . It is stated that the defendant got issued Reply notice dated 10-11-2014 with false allegations.

7.He also got marked Ex.A-1 Promissory note dated 11-4-2012 for Rs.2,00,000/-executed by the defendant in favour of the plaintif,

Ex.A-2 Office copy of legal notice dated 28-10-2014, Ex.A-3 Postal acknowledgements of the defendant (2 in no.) and A-4 Reply notice of the defendant dated 10-11-2014 in support of his oral testimony.

8.Since the defendant remained exparte, the oral evidence adduced by Pw.1 coupled with the documentary evidence under Exs.A-1 to A-4 remains unchallenged and unrebutted to substantiate the suit claim laid by the plaintif. Hence, the plaintif is entitled the suit claim amount.

9.In the result, the suit is decreed for a sum of Rs.

Rs.3,44,000/- with costs and subsequent interest at the rate of 12% p.a., on the principal amount of Rs. 2,00,000/- from the date of filing of the suit till the date of decree, and thereafter at the rate of 6% per annum till the date of realization.

Typed to my dictation by the personal assistant, corrected and pronounced by me in the Open Court, this the 11th day of August, 2015.

Principal Senior Civil Judge

NELLORE

3 O.S.No.179/2015 dt.11-8-2015

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

For Plaintiff: For Defendant:

Pw.1: Nellipudi Jayaprakash Babu Exparte

DOCUMENTS MARKED

For Plaintiff:

Ex.A-1: Ex.A-1 Promissory note dated 11-4-2012 for Rs.2,00,000/-executed by the defendant in favour of the plaintif,,

Ex.A-2: Office copy of legal notice dated 28-10-2014 got issued by the plaintif to the defendant. Ex.A-3: Postal acknowledgements of the defendant (2 in no.)

Ex.A-4: Reply notice of the defendant dated 10-11-2014

For Defendant: – NIL –

Principal Senior Civil Judge

NELLORE

OS/323/2015

Dholu Harikrishna vs Thalluri Ruthamma

15 Jun 2016

1 O.S.No. 323/2015 dt. 15-6-2016

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE: NELLORE

Wednesday, the Fifteenth(15 th ) day of June, 2016.

Present: Sri T.V.Subba Rao

Principal Senior Civil Judge,

Nellore.

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 323/2015

Dholu Hari Krishna .. Plaintif

Vs.

Thalluri Ruthamma .. Defendant

This suit coming on this day i.e., 7-6-2016 before me for hearing in the presence of Sri Veluru Ravi, Advocate for the Plaintif and of Sri P. Suresh Kumar, Advocate for defendant and the defendant having remained exparte and upon hearing counsel for the plaintif, and the matter having stood over for consideration till this day, this court delivered the following:- -

J U D G M E N T

The plaintif filed the suit against the defendant for recovery of suit amount based on Ex.A-1 suit promissory note dated 21-2-2013 with costs and subsequent interest.

2.(i)The case of the plaintif is that the defendant borrowed a sum of Rs.2,00,000/- from the plaintif on 21-2-2013 for her necessities and executed a promissory note in favour of the plaintif on the even date, agreeing to repay the same with interest at 24% p.a.,

(ii)It is further submitted that inspite of repeated demands made by the plaintif, the defendant did not pay any amount to the plaintif. Hence the suit.

(iii)The defendant is not agriculturist and he is not entitled for the benefits of Act IV of 1938, Act VII of 1977 and Act 45 of 1987.

3.As per record, the defendant was set exparte on 27-11-2015.

4.The chief-affidavit of Pw.1 was filed on 2-6-2016. Ex.A-1 was got marked on behalf of the plaintif. Ex.A-1 is Original promissory note 2 O.S.No. 323/2015 dt. 15-6-2016

dated 21-2-2013 executed by the defendant in favour of plaintif for

Rs.2,00,000/-.

5.Heard the plaintif counsel.

6. Now, the point for consideration is:

“Whether the plaintiff is entitled for a decree as prayed for?”

7.Since the defendant was set exparte, Pw.1 was not cross- examined and no witness is examined and no documents are marked on behalf of the defendant.

8.The plaint, unrebuttal and unchallenged evidence of Pw.1 and

Ex.A-1 proved and established the suit claim against the defendant.

Hence, the plaintif is entitled for a decree against the defendant as prayed for in the plaint.

Point is answered in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendant.

9.In the result, the suit is decreed for Rs. 3,16,000/- in favour of the plaintif and against the defendant with costs and subsequent interest at 12% p.a., on the principal amount of Rs. 2,00,000/- from the date of the suit till the date of decree and thereafter at 6% per annum till the date of realization.

Typed to my dictation by the Personal Assistant, corrected and

pronounced by me in the Open Court, this the 15th day of June, 2016.

Principal Senior Civil Judge

NELLORE.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

For Plaintiff: For Defendant:

Pw.1: Dholu Hari Krishna Exparte.

3 O.S.No. 323/2015 dt. 15-6-2016

DOCUMENTS MARKED

For Plaintiff:

Ex.A-1:Original promissory note dated 22-2-2013 executed by the defendant in favour of plaintif for Rs.2,00,000/-.

For Defendant: – NIL –

Principal Senior Civil Judge

NELLORE

4 O.S.No. 323/2015 dt. 15-6-2016

OS/100486/2015

Kalluri Uma Mahesh vs Dr. D.Vijayalakshmi

17 Apr 2017

IN THE COURT OF I ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, NELLORE.

Monday, this the 17th day of April, 2017.

PRESENT: - Sri G.Bhupal Reddy,

I ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

NELLORE.

***

Original Suit No.486/2015

Kalluri Uma Mahesh ...Plaintif

Vs.

Dr. D.Vijayalakshmi...Defendant

This suit is coming on 23.03.2017 before me for final hearing in the presence of Sri Ch. Sri Hari Narayana Rao, advocate for Plaintif and defendant remained exparte and having stood over till this day for consideration, this Court delivered the following:-

J U D G M E N T

This suit is filed by the plaintif against the defendant for recovery of

Rs.7,74,000/- basing on a promissory note.

2.The brief facts of the Plaint are as follows:

The defendant borrowed a sum of Rs.4,50,000/- on 28.11.2012 from plaintif by executing suit promissory note agreeing to repay the same with interest at the rate of 24% per annum either to the plaintif or to his order on demand. On repeated demands made by the plaintif, the defendant on 26.11.2015 issued a cheque bearing No.829964 drawn on Allhabad Bank, Nellore

Branch for Rs.7,50,000/- and the same was dishonoured for the reason “Funds

Insufficient”. The defendant is not a small farmer and she is not entitled for the benefits under any Debt Relief Acts. Hence, the plaintif is constrained to file this suit.

3.The defendant after receiving summons, failed to appear before this

Court and she was set exparte on 20.4.2016.

4.The plaintif examined himself as PW1 and Ex.A1 marked.

5.Heard the counsel for plaintif.

6.Now the point for consideration is:- “ Whether the plaintiff is entitled for suit claim as prayed for ?”

OS 486/2015 2 17/04/2017

POINT:-

7.The unchallenged evidence of PW1 coupled with Ex.A1 proves the case of plaintif against the defendant. Hence, the plaintif is entitled for suit claim with interest.

8.In the result, this suit is decreed with costs in favour of the plaintif against the defendant for a sum of Rs.7,74,000/- with interest at the rate of 12% per annum from the date of filing of the suit till the date of decree and thereafter at the rate of interest 6% per annum till the date of realization on the principal amount of Rs.4,50,000/-.

Typed to my dictation by the Stenographer, corrected and

pronounced by me in the open Court on this the 17th day of April, 2017.

I ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

NELLORE.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

Witnesses examined For Plaintif: For Defendant: Exparte PW1: Kalluri Uma Mahesh.

Documents marked

For Plaintif: For Defendant : Nil.

Ex.A1Promissory note, dt.28.11.2012 for Rs.4,50,000/-.

I A.S.C.J.,Nellore.

OS/100290/2016

Ms. Canara Bank vs Katteti Mohan Krishna

26 Apr 2017

Order Record 585 total

Case No.	Parties	Date	Type	Outcome
EP/100016/2015	Yaramakala Nirmala vs Muchala Sreenivasulu Reddy	27 Apr 2017	Order	—
OS/100290/2016	Ms. Canara Bank vs Katteti Mohan Krishna	26 Apr 2017	Judgment	—
OS/100330/2015	Kathi Peda Penchalaiah vs Darisigunta Santhi	26 Apr 2017	Judgment	—
EP/100158/2016	Adapala Sekhar Reddy vs Sk. Jaffer	25 Apr 2017	Order	—
OS/100348/2011	Pasupuleti Nirmala vs Gadireddy PrasadRao	25 Apr 2017	Judgment	—
EP/100155/2015	Kapil chit funds Pvt. Ltd., Nellore vs Suryadevara vekata Raman	21 Apr 2017	Order	—
EP/100248/2016	Shriram chits pvt. Ltd., vs N.Sudhakar	18 Apr 2017	Order	—
H.M.O.P/100050/2016	Mukku Sreekanth vs Vs---	18 Apr 2017	Order	—
EP/100005/2017	Vs	17 Apr 2017	Order	—
OS/100486/2015	Kalluri Uma Mahesh vs Dr. D.Vijayalakshmi	17 Apr 2017	Judgment	—
IP/100056/2016	Karamsetty Vinod Kumar vs Vanamala Janardhan Rao	13 Apr 2017	Order	—
OS/100314/2016	Bandla Surendra Babu vs Sarvabotla Ramgopal	13 Apr 2017	Judgment	—
OS/100326/2016	KandukuriSridhar vs Atmakuru Prasanna Lakshmi,	10 Apr 2017	Judgment	—
EP/100056/2017	Vs	08 Apr 2017	Order	—
OS/100090/2015	B.Murali vs MS Marble Estate India Ltd.,	07 Apr 2017	Judgment	—
OS/100360/2012	Modem Venkataramana Reddy vs Yeturu Srinivasulu Reddy	07 Apr 2017	Judgment	—
H.M.O.P/100056/2016	Harikrishna Soundarya vs Murugan Harikrishnan	07 Apr 2017	Order	—
OS/100414/2014	Singam setty Madhavi vs Varikuti Janakiramireddy	06 Apr 2017	Judgment	—
OS/100602/2012	State Bank of India, Main Branch vs Chadalavada Eswaraiah	04 Apr 2017	Judgment	—
EP/100187/2016	M..Venugopal vs Thuraka Madhusudhan Rao	03 Apr 2017	Order	—
OS/100236/2012	B.G.M Constructions Developers vs Kandimalla Kistaiah	03 Apr 2017	Judgment	—
OS/100350/2009	Tirupathi Prasad vs Gandlapalli Prasuna	03 Apr 2017	Judgment	—
OS/100626/2012	Chinatha sreenivasukluk vs Mahammad Gouse basha	03 Apr 2017	Judgment	—
H.M.O.P/100054/2016	Kudumula Nagendra vs Kudumula Indraja	03 Apr 2017	Order	—
EP/100055/2016	Bijjam Raghurami reddy vs Thirumalasetty Ramanaiah	31 Mar 2017	Order	—
OS/100102/2011	State Bank of India, Town Branch Nellore vs Magunta Amarnadh reddy	31 Mar 2017	Judgment	—
OS/100196/2016	Vellanti Sudhakar, vs Jyothi Somasekharqa vara prasad	31 Mar 2017	Judgment	—
OS/100508/2012	Branch Manager vs Devineni Eswaraiah	31 Mar 2017	Judgment	—
OS/100608/2012	Ms State Bank of Hyderabad vs Thanigunta Siva Kumar	31 Mar 2017	Judgment	—
EP/100184/2016	M.Wilson vs S.Jayamma	30 Mar 2017	Order	—
OS/100208/2016	Andhra Sankar Reddy, vs Gurram Menaka devi	30 Mar 2017	Judgment	—
OS/100266/2016	Jarugumalli Venkatesubbaiah vs Vetagiri Seshagiri rao	30 Mar 2017	Judgment	—
OS/100318/2012	A.S.Reddy vs Madamanchi Venkata Subbaiah	30 Mar 2017	Judgment	—
H.M.O.P/100052/2015	Athipati Mallikarjuna vs Athipati Divya	30 Mar 2017	Order	—
OS/100280/2016	Penaka Sudhakar reddy vs Nagireddy Gnana Swetha,	28 Mar 2017	Judgment	—
OS/100070/2013	Ms Srairam Raghavendara chits Pvt. Ltd., vs Konka Gopi	27 Mar 2017	Judgment	—
OS/100086/2014	Yerrannagari Krishna Reddy vs Kotakonda Venkaiah	27 Mar 2017	Judgment	—
OS/100110/2016	Daggumati Krishna Reddy vs Shaik Masthan	27 Mar 2017	Judgment	—
OS/100144/2013	Indian Overseas Bank, vs Chundillil sailaja	27 Mar 2017	Judgment	—
OS/100596/2012	Syndicate Bank vs Arumulla Jamuna	27 Mar 2017	Judgment	—
OS/100580/2009	Shaik Hameedunnisa vs Pattan Nizimunnisa Begum @ Nizimunnisa	24 Mar 2017	Judgment	—
OS/100638/2014	Ms State Bank of India vs Chepuri Haribabu	23 Mar 2017	Judgment	—
OS/200264/2008	K.Bhanumathi vs M.Mallikharjunarao	23 Mar 2017	Judgment	—
OS/100424/2012	Gangula Janardhan vs Commissioner	22 Mar 2017	Judgment	—
H.M.O.P/100030/2016	Nellore Janardan vs Vs--	21 Mar 2017	Order	—
OS/100044/2016	Yarrangangu Thirupathi vs Pathipati Srinivasulu	20 Mar 2017	Judgment	—
OS/100046/2016	Yarrangangu Aruna vs Pathipati Srinivasulu	20 Mar 2017	Judgment	—
OS/100552/2012	Muchala Sreelatha vs Kadivety Sridhar Reddy	20 Mar 2017	Judgment	—
H.M.O.P/100040/2016	Batturi Viswanadh vs Vs-	15 Mar 2017	Order	—
OS/100248/2016	Dasari Srikanth vs Sana penchala Narasimhulu	14 Mar 2017	Judgment	—
H.M.O.P/100046/2016	Siga Sudheer Babu vs Vs--	13 Mar 2017	Order	—
EP/100002/2016	Sarabu Venkata Kalyan Kumar vs Thummala Surendra	10 Mar 2017	Order	—
EP/100046/2015	Ms Kapil chit funds Pvt Ltd., vs K.Harikrishna	10 Mar 2017	Order	—
OS/100420/2011	Shaik Kalesha vs Ms Food corporation of India	07 Mar 2017	Judgment	—
H.M.O.P/100046/2015	Sanna Reddy Suresh reddy vs Sannareddy Poornima @ Ponguru Poornima	03 Mar 2017	Order	—
OS/100654/2012	Chandragiri Mohan vs Ch.Bhaskaran	02 Mar 2017	Judgment	—
EP/100024/2008	Branch Manager vs Jakkampudi Balaiah	28 Feb 2017	Order	—
EP/100140/2016	J.Venkata Subbaiah vs B.Ramanaiah	28 Feb 2017	Order	—
EP/100226/2016	Gokula Mammula vs Penugonda Lakshmanana	28 Feb 2017	Order	—
OS/100310/2008	Seji Haribabu vs Senji Sundaramma	28 Feb 2017	Judgment	—
OS/100800/2011	Mallipudi Sarada vs Gundala Usha	28 Feb 2017	Judgment	—
OS/100282/2015	Ms Oriental Bank of Commerce vs Aduru Bhadrinath	27 Feb 2017	Judgment	—
OS/100292/2012	Varikuti Venkata reddy vs Vinnamala Chandrasekhar reddy	27 Feb 2017	Judgment	—
OS/100398/2016	Sk.Zuber vs Thalpagiri Ranghanadha Devasthanams	27 Feb 2017	Judgment	—
OS/100400/2016	Anumalasetty Harinaryana vs Thalpagiri Ranghanadha Devasthanams	27 Feb 2017	Judgment	—
OS/100474/2012	MS Margadarsi chit fund pvt Ltd., vs Manchikanti sudhakar	27 Feb 2017	Judgment	—
OS/100116/2016	Mannan Lakshmi Prasad vs Dasari Rama mohan	23 Feb 2017	Judgment	—
H.M.O.P/100002/2016	Devireddy sankara Bhaskar reddy vs Devireddy Audi Lakshmi	22 Feb 2017	Order	—
EP/100179/2016	Daggumati Krishna Reddy vs Vanam Venkata subrahmanyam	21 Feb 2017	Order	—
SC/100185/2015	Sub Inspecto of Police vs Gadde Sudhakar	21 Feb 2017	Judgment	—
H.M.O.P/100028/2015	Mungara Vasu@ Vasudevarao vs Mungara Manaoja @ Challakoluchu Manoja	21 Feb 2017	Order	—
OS/100098/2012	Gadamsetty Sreeramulu vs Auduru Brahmmanandam	17 Feb 2017	Judgment	—
OS/100566/2012	Dukddukuruk Raghuramaiah vs Gundala Madhusudhan reddyk	15 Feb 2017	Judgment	—
OS/100640/2012	Bollineni Ramasubba Naidu vs Gollapudi Balachandra	15 Feb 2017	Judgment	—
OS/100576/2011	Bejawada Audiseshaiah vs Dabbugunta Sulochanamma	13 Feb 2017	Judgment	—
OS/100786/2010	Ponnadi subramanayam vs Ponnadi Venkaih	10 Feb 2017	Judgment	—
OS/100048/2013	Ms Margadarsi Chit Fund Ltd., vs Kopparthi Chandra Mohan	06 Feb 2017	Judgment	—
OS/100556/2012	Gunji Padmaja vs Chilakapati Venkaiah	06 Feb 2017	Judgment	—
OS/100352/2010	Jethmull Chordia vs The Nellore Dt. Co-Operative Marketing Society V	02 Feb 2017	Judgment	—
EP/100003/2016	Muga Prakasam vs Nannam Chinnaiah	30 Jan 2017	Order	—
EP/100090/2016	Ms Sreeram Chits Pvt. Ltd vs Saathapati Chinnaiah	30 Jan 2017	Order	—
OS/100792/2010	Pydimani Venkateswarlu vs Dachuru Ravi Kumar	30 Jan 2017	Judgment	—
H.M.O.P/100022/2016	Alluru Harshavardhan reddy vs Vs---	30 Jan 2017	Order	—
IP/100048/2011	Chinthalapudi Vijaykumar vs Akula Venkatasuresh	27 Jan 2017	Order	—
SC/100285/2015	State rep. by the SHO, TP Gudur P.S vs Netrambaka Sivakumar	27 Jan 2017	Judgment	—
EP/100108/2016	Ms Sreeram Chits Pvt. Ltd vs Sk. Juber	25 Jan 2017	Order On Exgibit	—
EP/100109/2016	Devalam Prathap Singh vs Murthy Narendranadh	25 Jan 2017	Order	—
OS/686/2010	Konduru Sunil Kumar Reddy vs Yakasiri Madhu @ Madhusudhan Rao	25 Jan 2017	Judgment	—
OS/100258/2014	Arani Anuradha vs Pigilam Krishnaiah	25 Jan 2017	Judgment	—
OS/100140/2013	Billa Raghuramaiah vs Yaratapalli Venkata Sivakumar Reddy	24 Jan 2017	Judgment	—
OS/100278/2016	Noorsha Khan vs Sode Mallikarjuna raoi	23 Jan 2017	Judgment	—
OS/100700/2011	Akkem Raghava Reddy vs Katamreddy Parandhami Reddy	23 Jan 2017	Judgment	—
EP/100127/2014	C.V.Krishnaiah Naidu - Died vs Superintending Engineer	18 Jan 2017	Order	—
OS/100134/2016	Alluru Sudhakar Reddy vs Daggumati Sreedhar Rao	06 Jan 2017	Order On Exgibit	—
EP/100057/2015	Thummala Chenchu Sreedhar Naidu vs Yallanti Sreekanthreddy	05 Jan 2017	Order	—
OS/100586/2010	Panasala Krishnavenamm vs Thuraka Srinivasulu	28 Dec 2016	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/100214/2014	State Bank of India vs Pasam Penchala Rao	27 Dec 2016	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/100452/2014	Musunuru Balananda Chowdary vs Eswarawaka Sreenivasa reddy	27 Dec 2016	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/100454/2014	Yedem Tirupathi reddy vs Eswarawaka Sreenivasa reddy	27 Dec 2016	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/100458/2014	Kaliki Mahesh reddy alias Maheswara reddy vs Eswarawaka Sreenivasa reddy	27 Dec 2016	Order On Exgibit	—

Showing 100 of 585 orders — Log in to browse all pages.

Monthly Orders (Last 12 Months)

Apr 2017		24
Mar 2017		32
Feb 2017		23
Jan 2017		16
Dec 2016		23
Nov 2016		10
Oct 2016		4
Sep 2016		6
Aug 2016		16
Jul 2016		5
Jun 2016		2
Apr 2016		18

Frequently Asked Questions

How many cases has G.Bhupal Reddy handled?

G.Bhupal Reddy has handled 589 court orders since 2014 at Senior Civil Judge`s Court, Kovur (Taluka). The average disposal rate is 44 orders per month.

What types of cases does G.Bhupal Reddy hear?

Based on available records, G.Bhupal Reddy primarily handles Civil matters (Original Suits, Execution Petitions) and Criminal matters (Sessions Cases) at Senior Civil Judge`s Court, Kovur (Taluka).

Where is G.Bhupal Reddy currently posted?

G.Bhupal Reddy is posted as Senior Civil Judge Kovur at Senior Civil Judge`s Court, Kovur (Taluka), Nellore, Andhra Pradesh.

Are judgments by G.Bhupal Reddy available online?

Yes. 8 judgments by G.Bhupal Reddy are available on Legistro with full text, outcome, and sections cited.

How fast does G.Bhupal Reddy dispose cases?

G.Bhupal Reddy disposes approximately 44 cases per month, based on 589 orders handled over their tenure at Senior Civil Judge`s Court, Kovur (Taluka).

Since when is G.Bhupal Reddy serving?

G.Bhupal Reddy has been serving at Senior Civil Judge`s Court, Kovur (Taluka) since 2014.

Case Types

OS 64%

EP 28%

H 6%

IP 1%

SC 1%

L 0%

OP 0%

Posting History

May 2015 — May 2015

Senior Civil Judge Kovur
Apr 2014 — May 2017

I Addl.Senior Civil Judge Nellore · 586 orders
Apr 2014 — May 2017

II Addl.Senior Civil Judge Nellore · 3 orders

Other Judges at this Court

S.shiva Namratha

Principal Junior Civil Judge Kovur

0 orders

Smt P.Chaitanya

Senior Civil Judge Kovur

0 orders

← View all judges at Senior Civil Judge`s Court, Kovur (Taluka)

G.Bhupal Reddy

Friday, the Twenty-Second(22nd) day of July, 2016.

Present: Sri T.V.Subba Rao

Nellore.

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 493/2015

J U D G M E N T

NELLORE.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

For Plaintiff: For Defendant:

DOCUMENTS MARKED

NELLORE

J U D G M E N T

NELLORE

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

For Plaintiff: For Defendant:

DOCUMENTS MARKED

NELLORE

Wednesday, the Fifteenth(15 th ) day of June, 2016.

Present: Sri T.V.Subba Rao

Nellore.

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 323/2015

J U D G M E N T

NELLORE.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

For Plaintiff: For Defendant:

DOCUMENTS MARKED

NELLORE

IN THE COURT OF I ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, NELLORE.

I ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

NELLORE.

Original Suit No.486/2015

J U D G M E N T

I ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

NELLORE.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

Documents marked

IN THE COURT OF I ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, NELLORE.

I ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

NELLORE.

***

Original Suit No.290/2016

J U D G M E N T

I ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

NELLORE.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

Witnesses examined

*******