Currently Serving

Smt G C Asifa Sulthana

Additional Senior Civil Judge FTC, Badvel

Addl SCJ Court Complex Badvel · Kadapa · Andhra Pradesh

SMT G C ASIFA SULTHANA, Additional Senior Civil Judge FTC, Badvel, is posted at Addl SCJ Court Complex Badvel, Kadapa, Andhra Pradesh, India. 488 court orders on record since 2024. 12 judgments with full text available. Primarily handles OS, H, AS cases.

488

Total Orders

Judgments

Orders/Month

Postings

Featured Judgments

H.M.O.P/36/2025 Compromised

Derangula Suresh Babu vs Paruchuri Aruna Kumari

05 May 2026

H.M.O.P.No.36 of 2025 Addl.Civil Judge (Senior.Division),

Kadapa, Dt.05.05.2026

APKD010001902025

IN THE COURT OF ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, KADAPA.

Present:- Smt G.C. Asifa Sulthana,

Additional Civil Judge,

(Senior Division), Kadapa.

Dated: Tuesday, this the 5 th day of May, 2026.

H.M.O.P.No.36 of 2025

Derangula Suresh Babu, S/o. Venkateswarulu, aged about 37 years, working as an employee in Union Bank of India, residing at D.No.4-2-147, Madhuri Ice Factory, Ankalammapeta, Pulivendula Post, Pulivendula Mandal.

… Petitioner

Vs.

Paruchuri Aruna Kumari, W/o. Derangula Suresh Babu, D/o. Paruchuri Sreenivasulu, House wife, aged about 27 years, residing at Thurupu Yerraballi, Velam Bazar, Kondapuram, Nellore District. … Respondent.

This petition coming on dt.30.04.2026 before me for final hearing in the presence of Sri Kommineni Venu Gopal, learned counsel for the Petitioner and

Sri G.Siva Kumar, learned counsel for the Respondent and after hearing both the counsels on record and having stood over, till this day for consideration, this court made the following:-

O R D E R S

The petitioner (husband) filed the present petition under Section 13(1) (1a) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 against the respondent / wife herein to grant 2

H.M.O.P.No.36 of 2025 Addl.Civil Judge (Senior.Division),

Kadapa, Dt.05.05.2026.

decree of divorce by dissolving the marriage in between the petitioner and respondent which was solemnized on dt.12.04.2024 and also to grant decree of divorce on the grounds of cruelty and any other relief which are fit and proper in the circumstances of the petition.

2. As per the brief averments of the petition :-

(a) The petitioner herein submits that the respondent is legally wedded wife of the petitioner and their marriage was solemnized on 12-04-2024 at Sri

Swamy Hathiramjee Mutt, Tirupathi-Tirumala in the presence of both family members, well wishers and friends and immediately after the marriage, the respondent joined at her matrimonial home at Pulivendula. After one month the respondent used to harass the petitioner to keep family separately by leaving his sister, mother lonely and quarrelling with the petitioner even for small things, abusing the petitioner, his sister, mother in filthy language loudly, on hearing the filthy language of the respondent, the neighbours came to their house and warned the respondent to lead happy life with the petitioner, but the respondent paid deaf ear. Meanwhile elections were intervened, due to casting her votes the respondent went to Thurupu Yerraballi and stayed there till the completion of elections and she returned after ten days of the completion of the elections.

Thereafter due to Ashadamasam, the respondent went to her parents' house in a bus, during her entire traveling time, the respondent continuously making calls and talking with the petitioner by warning to put up separate family by leaving the family members of the petitioner and the respondent stayed there for a period of one and half month and returned to her matrimonial home, ever since then the respondent repeating her desire in putting separate family, quarrelling with the petitioner without any fault on the part of the petitioner and his family members.

(b) It is further submitted that on one occasion the respondent thrown hot upma bowl on the leg of the petitioner's mother, due to which she caused 3

H.M.O.P.No.36 of 2025 Addl.Civil Judge (Senior.Division),

Kadapa, Dt.05.05.2026.

injury over her leg and hands and took the mother of the petitioner and given treatment and when the petitioner questioned about her attitude, the respondent abused the petitioner in filthy language loudly and quarrelling with the petitioner.

Later, the petitioner also reported certain issue which occurred on Vinayaka

Chavithi festival. While during the stay period of the respondent at Pulivendula, she revealed that she is suffering with hand pain On that the petitioner gave treatment in Pulivendula Rama Thulasamma Hospital, doctor gave medicines.

After few days she went to her house for her father as his health condition is not good, at that time she taken treatment in Ongole and every day she roaring, crying that she is not willing to stay with the family members of the petitioner and demanding to put up separate family but the petitioner rejected due to aged parents and un-married sister. Thereafter some un-compromised misunderstandings arose in between the petitioner and the respondent on 02-01- 2025 the father of the respondent called the petitioner by phone call to come on the occasion of festival while the respondent staying at her parents' house. The petitioner replied that to send the respondent to her matrimonial home and warned the petitioner to finalize the matter.

(c) It is further submitted that thereafter on 02.02.2025 the parents of the respondent and herself came to the house of the petitioner and quarreled with the petitioner and his family members, the respondent abused the petitioner and his family members by using un-parliamentary words loudly, due to which the good reputation of the petitioner in the said locality was spoiled. Finally all of them went away to their village. Finally on 03-03-2025 the respondent called him by phone and warned that "whether you will take me or not to your house the petitioner replied that first you come to your matrimonial home” for that the petitioner cut the call of the respondent. Thereafter on 04.03.2025 the petitioner received one phone call from Mahila Police Station, Nellore by saying that the respondent 4

H.M.O.P.No.36 of 2025 Addl.Civil Judge (Senior.Division),

Kadapa, Dt.05.05.2026.

lodged a complaint against the petitioner as he is not allowing the respondent to lead happy marital life and harassing her and to talk with the C.I. of Police. On 08.03.2025 the petitioner and his family members went to Mahila Police station and talked with the CI after leaving the respondent from her matrimonial home, she will not come to join at her matrimonial home inspite of several mediations, personal requests. Hence the petitioner lost all his hopes that the respondent will come and join at her matrimonial home and to discharge her matrimonial obligations. Due to her deliberate conduct, character and the continuous un- bearable torture, physical violence made by her against the petitioner and his family members, the petitioner is filing this petition for seeking dissolution of the marriage. It is further submitted that the respondent voluntarily left the matrimonial house without any reason and excuse in the month of December, 2024 and since then she is living separately with her parents house, there is no possibility of reconciliation between the petitioner and respondent and therefore prays the

Hon'ble court to allow the present petition and prays to pass decree and order by

way of granting decree of divorce by dissolving their marriage in between the petitioner and respondent which was solemnized on dt.12.04.2024 in the circumstances of this petition.

3. When the petition is coming for filing of counter, both the parties appeared before the court and requested the court to refer the case to mediation.

Then this court referred the matter for mediation. Later both the parties appeared

before the mediator and they voluntarily compromised and settled the matter on

mediation. On16.03.2026, this court received mediation report along with mediation agreement and the terms of compromise from the mediation center,

Kadapa wherein Sri M.Ranga Balaji, Advocate, Kadapa is appointed as mediator.

4. Both the parties have entered into mediation before the Mediation

Centre, Kadapa with the following terms 5

H.M.O.P.No.36 of 2025 Addl.Civil Judge (Senior.Division),

Kadapa, Dt.05.05.2026.

1. That the Petitioner has filed the Divorce Petition

before the Hon'ble Additional Senior Civil Judge,

Kadapa.

2. That the Petitioner and the Respondent were living separately for the past one year and they don't have any children.

3. That as they were unable to lead their matrimonial life. Both the petitioner and the respondent had decided to dissolve their marriage, in the mediation held by the presence of two elders namely 1. Bandi Rama Sura Reddy, 2. Mode palli Sreekanth, as likewise.

4. That the petitioner has agreed to pay an amount of Rs.21,50,000/-(Twenty One lakh fifty thousand Rupees) only as future alimony to the respondent towards the full and final settlement. Later on, 23-02-2026 the Petitioner has paid the 1/4th amount from the total settled amount as part payment and that amount of Rs.5,37,500/- (Five lakhs thirty seven thousand five hundred Rupees) only to the elders ad mentioned above and the said part payment will be given to the respondent by the elders as mentioned above and the said part payment will be given to the respondent by the elders, at the time of final disposal of the Petition. The remaining 3/4th of amount i.e., 16,12500/- (Sixteen lakhs twelve thousand five hundred Rupees) only, will be transferred by the petitioner to the respondent, in the of Demand Draft after final disposal of the petition.

5. That the ornaments which are there with the petitioner will be given back to the respondent, at the time of final disposal of the Petition. 1. Poosala Haram 2. Necklace 3. Buttakammalu 4.

H.M.O.P.No.36 of 2025 Addl.Civil Judge (Senior.Division),

Kadapa, Dt.05.05.2026.

Chempasaralu 5. Matilu 6. Papatibilla 7. Bracelate 8. White Stone Ring 9. Black Stone Kammalu 10. White stone ring 11. White stone Ring 12. Chain.

6. The ornaments which are there with the respondent, will be given back to the Petitioner at the time of final disposal of the Petition. 1.Black beads Chain, 2. Thaali bottu disk.

7. In future the petitioner and the respondent are at liberty to live their lives freely without any future obligations.

8. That the respondent didn't claim any future properties of the petitioner.

9. That the petitioner and the respondent can marry as their wish and both the parties will not interfere with each other in any manner.

10. That the compromise arrived at by the petitioner and respondent is free and voluntary and there is no coercion or any compulsion to this effect.

5. That the both the parties out of their own volition agreed and settled the matter as per the above stated terms and conditions with their free will and consent, in a fit state of mind. The terms of mediation agreement are neither opposed to public policy nor forbidden by law hence this court, recorded the mediation agreement and its terms. Further, the remaining terms towards payment of remaining settled amount also paid by petitioner to respondent and the gold ornaments also returned and received by them. Accordingly, the petition is disposed off in terms of settlement arrived through mediation.

6. In the result, the petition is disposed off as per terms of settlement in mediation and accordingly divorce is granted dissolving the 7

H.M.O.P.No.36 of 2025 Addl.Civil Judge (Senior.Division),

Kadapa, Dt.05.05.2026.

marriage of the petitioner with the respondent dt. 12.04.2024. No costs ordered.

Typed to my dictation by the Stenographer, corrected and pronounced by me in open court, this the 5 th day of May, 2026.

Sd/- G.C. Asifa Sulthana,

Addl. Civil Judge (Senior Division) Kadapa.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

- Nil -

Sd/- G.C.A.S,

A.C.J.(S.D.),

Kdp.

H.M.O.P.No.36 of 2025 Addl.Civil Judge (Senior.Division),

Kadapa, Dt.05.05.2026.

Petition presented on 09.05.2025. Petition filed on 24.06.2025

IN THE COURT OF ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE (SENIOR DIVISION),

KADAPA.

Present:- Smt G.C. Asifa Sulthana,

Additional Civil Judge,

(Senior Division), Kadapa.

Dated: Tuesday, this the 5 th day of May, 2026.

H.M.O.P.No. 36 of 2025

… Petitioner

Vs.

The petitioner (husband) filed the present petition under Section 13 (1)(1a) of Hindu Marriage Act 1955, against the respondent (wife) seeking for dissolution of his marriage with the respondent, performed on 12.04.2024 by way of decree of divorce on the grounds of cruelty.

Value of the petition for the purpose of Court Fee and Jurisdiction: A fixed court fee of Rs.30/- is paid Schedule I Article VII (iii) of A.P.C.F. & S.V. Act.

This petition came before me for final hearing today in the presence of Sri Sri Kommineni Venu Gopal, learned counsel for the Petitioner and Sri G.Siva Kumar, learned counsel for the Respondent and after hearing both the counsels on record and having stood over till this day for consideration, this Court doth Order and Decree:- 9

H.M.O.P.No.36 of 2025 Addl.Civil Judge (Senior.Division),

Kadapa, Dt.05.05.2026.

1. That the petition be and the same is hereby allowed;

2. That the petition is disposed off as per terms of settlement in mediation and accordingly divorce is granted dissolving the marriage of the peitioner with the respondnet dt. 12.04.2024. No costs ordered.

Given under my hand and seal of this Court, on this the 5 th day, May, 2026

Sd/- G.C. Asifa Sulthana,

Addl. Civil Judge (Senior Division), Kadapa.

Memorandum of costs: nil

Sd/- G.C.A.S,

A.C.J.(S.D.),

Kdp.

H.M.O.P/32/2025

Macha Narendra Babu vs Kotha Kavya alias Macha Kavya

07 May 2026

H.M.O.P.No.32 of 2025 Addl.Civil Judge (Senior Division),

Kadapa, Dt.07.05.2026

APKD010001852025

IN THE COURT OF ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE (SENIOR DIVISION),

KADAPA.

Present:- Smt G.C.Asifa Sulthana,

Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division),

Kadapa.

Thursday, the 7 th day of May, 2026.

H.M.O.P.No. 32 of 2025

Between ;

Macha Narendra Babu, S/o. Narasimhulu, aged about 32 years, Residing at D.No.3/131, Bhakarapuram Village, Vallur Mandal, Kadapa District. . . . Petitioner

And

Kotha Kavya @ Macha Kavya, W/o. Macha Narendra Babu, D/o. Venkata Siva, aged about 30 years, Residing at D.No.6-219, Nakarekal Village and Mandal, Palnadu District, Andhra Pradesh. . . . Respondent

This petition came up on 29.04.2026 for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri R.Maruthi Prasad, Advocate for the petitioner and respondent was set exparte and after hearing both sides and having stood over till this day for consideration, this court made the following:-

:: O R D E R ::

1.Petitioner (husband) filed the petition u/Section 9 of the Hindu

Marriage Act, 1955 against the respondent (wife), seeking to grant decree for restitution of conjugal rights against the respondent.

H.M.O.P.No.32 of 2025 Addl.Civil Judge (Senior Division),

Kadapa, Dt.07.05.2026

2. In brief, the averments of the petition filed by the petitioner are that he married the respondent on 21.05.2023 as per Hindu rights and customs of

Usage at the house of the petitioner at Bhakarapuram Village, Vallur Mandal,

Kadapa District. At the time of marriage the parents of the respondent presented 8 savories gold to the respondent and all the gold articles are kept in the hands of the respondent and during their wedlock, they had no issues. It is further submitted that the parents of the petitioner had incurred expenditure nearly

Rs.5,00,000/- towards marriage expenses. On the other hand the parents of the petitioner presented nearly 5 tulas of gold to the respondent at the time of fixation of the marriage. After the marriage the respondent behaved cruelly against the petitioner and the respondent have developed hostile attitude and tendency ego against the petitioner as well as his parents and family members. The respondent frequently went to her parents house without informing either to the petitioner nor the parents of the petitioner also and the respondent attitude is like has to lead luxurious life and also the respondent dominating character and the respondent unnecessarily harassing to the petitioner as well as the parents of the petitioner.

(b) He further submitted that the respondent suspected the character of the petitioner and the respondent left the matrimonial life in the month of February, 2025. Since then the respondent is residing at her parents house and the respondent oftenly quarreled with the petitioner without any reasonable cause and went to her parents house and residing at her parents house even till today and the petitioner tolerated the respondent arrogant nature and the respondent failed to lead the matrimonial life with the petitioner and at present the respondent carrying pregnancy. He further submitted that, she deserted the matrimonial life with the petitioner and went to her parents house in the month of February, 2025.

Later the respondent preferred a complaint before the police at Nekarekal of

Palnadu District against the petitioner and his parents and near and dear 3

H.M.O.P.No.32 of 2025 Addl.Civil Judge (Senior Division),

Kadapa, Dt.07.05.2026 relatives. Then the police got registered the case in Crime No.53 of 2025, dated 19-03-2025 punishable under Section 85 of B.N.S Act, 2023 In fact the petitioner never demanded any additional dowry either to the respondent nor her parents.

The respondent purposefully and intentionally invented the reason and preferred a complaint before the police station. The petitioner and some of the alleged accused in Crime No.53 of 2025 were obtained station bail. The respondent made false and untenable allegations against the petitioner as well as the petitioner's parents and near and dear relatives.

(c) It is submitted that the petitioner and his elders went to at the house of the respondent and requested to lead the matrimonial life with the petitioner, but the respondent bluntly refused to do so to lead the marital life with the petitioner.

The petitioner also on number of occasion talked the respondent through mobile, but the respondent did not responded properly. The petitioner personally requested to come and join with the petitioner to lead the matrimonial life. Even now there is no response from the respondent's side as well as her parents and finally he approached the Court by filing the petition for restitution of conjugal rights.

3. Notice served on the respondent through Court and when the respondent was called she remained absent and no representation on the date of appearance, she was set exparte.

4.During the enquiry, the petitioner got examined himself as P.W.1 and got marked Exs.P.1 to P.3 on his behalf.

5. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

6. Now the points for consideration are:

Whether the petitioner is entitled for decree of restitution of conjugal rights against the respondent, as prayed for ?

H.M.O.P.No.32 of 2025 Addl.Civil Judge (Senior Division),

Kadapa, Dt.07.05.2026

POINT:-

7. In order to prove the contention of the petitioner herein who is the husband of the respondent has filed his affidavit as PW1 and got marked Ex.P1 to

Ex.P3 and on quick perusal of the said Ex.P1 to Ex.P3, he reiterated the averments of his pleadings of the petition and Ex.P1 to Ex.P3 are marriage invitation card of the petitioner and respondent, dt. 21.05.2023, marriage positive photographs of the petitioner and respondent and marriage identification certificate issued by gazetted officer herein to prove that their marriage was performed dt.21.05.2023 according to Hindu rights and customs of usage at his house at Bhakarapuram Village of Vallur Mandal, Kadapa District.

8. There is no dispute that the petitioner and respondent are the legally wedded couple and their marriage was solemnized on 21.05.2023 as per Hindu rights and customs. The further undisputed fact from both parties that the respondent left the matrimonial life in the month of February, 2025 prior to filing the present petition.

9. As per explanation to Section 9 of Hindu Marriage Act, where a question arises whether there has been reasonable excuse for withdrawal from the society, the burden of proving reasonable excuse shall be on the person who has withdrawn from the society. Therefore, the burden is on the respondent to show whether there is any reasonable excuse for withdrawing the society from the petitioner.

10. As per the averments of the pleadings of the petition as well as the affidavit, PW1 has strongly contended that the respondent who is his wife left the petitioner and in the month of February, 2025 and the respondent used to quarrel with the petitioner without any reasonable cause and went to her parents house and residing at her parents house even till today and the petitioner tolerate the 5

H.M.O.P.No.32 of 2025 Addl.Civil Judge (Senior Division),

Kadapa, Dt.07.05.2026 respondent arrogant nature, the respondent failed to lead the matrimonial life with him and further it is brought to the notice of the Hon'ble court that at present the respondent is carrying pregnancy and the respondent preferred a complaint

before the police at Nekarekal of Palnadu District against the petitioner and his

parents and near and dear relatives and the police were registered the case in

Crime No.53 of 2025, dated 19-03-2025 punishable under Section 85 of B.N.S,

Act, 2023 but the petitioner contention is that he never demanded any additional dowry either to the respondent nor her parents and the respondent purposefully and intentionally invented the reason and preferred a complaint before the police station and the petitioner and some of the alleged accused in Crime No.53 of 2025 were obtained a station bail and the respondent made false and untenable allegations against the petitioner as well as the petitioner's parents and near and dear relatives. He further submitted that the petitioner and his elders went to at the house of the respondent and requested to lead the matrimonial life with the petitioner, but the respondent bluntly refused to do so to lead the marital life with the petitioner, but the petitioner also on number of occasion talked the respondent through mobile, but the respondent did not respond properly. The petitioner further personally requested to come and join with the petitioner to lead the matrimonial life and hence prays the Hon'ble court for restitution of conjugal rights.

11. As rightly contended the respondent who is the wife of the petitioner herein did not appear before the Hon'ble court and on perusal of Ex.P1 to Ex.P3, the marriage is established by the petitioner and as per the evidence of PW1 which stands uncontradicted and same is corroborated with the evidence placed on record that the respondent left his company and she had been living with her parents without any justifiable cause and thereby withdrawn herself from matrimonial society without any reasonable cause. Hence, the petitioner is entitled 6

H.M.O.P.No.32 of 2025 Addl.Civil Judge (Senior Division),

Kadapa, Dt.07.05.2026 for restitution of conjugal rights. Accordingly, the point is answered in favour of the petitioner and against the respondent.

12. In the result, this petition is allowed, granting decree of restitution of conjugal rights in favour of the petitioner by directing the respondent to join the company of the petitioner to lead conjugal life, within three months from the date of this Order, failing which, the petitioner is at liberty to proceed as per law.

Typed to my dictation by the Stenographer, corrected and pronounced by me in open court, this the 07 th day of May, 2026.

Sd/- G.C.Asifa Sulthana,

Addl. Civil Judge (Senior Division), Kadapa.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

For Petitioner: For Respondent:

P.W.1: Macha Narendra Babu - None -

Exhibits marked for Petitioner:

Ex.P.1: Marriage invitation card of the petitioner and the respondent dt.

21.05.2023

Ex.P.2: Marriage positive photographs of the petitioner and respondent.

Ex.P.3: Marriage identification certificate issued by gazetted officer

Exhibits marked for Respondent

- N I L -

Material Objects Marked

- N I L -

Sd/- G.C.Asifa Sulthana,

A.C.J. (S.D.),

Kdp.

H.M.O.P.No.32 of 2025 Addl.Civil Judge (Senior Division),

Kadapa, Dt.07.05.2026

Petition presented on 08.05.2025. Petition filed on 19.06.2025

IN THE COURT OF ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE (SENIOR DIVISION),

KADAPA.

Present:- Smt G.C.Asifa Sulthana

Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division),

Kadapa.

Thursday, the 7 th day of May, 2026.

H.M.O.P.No. 32 of 2025.

Between ; Macha Narendra Babu, S/o. Narasimhulu, aged about 32 years, Residing at D.No.3/131, Bhakarapuram Village, Vallur Mandal, Kadapa District. . . . Petitioner

And

Petitioner (husband) filed the petition u/Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 against the respondent (wife), seeking to grant decree for restitution of conjugal rights against the respondent.

Value of the petition for the purpose of Court Fee and Jurisdiction: A fixed court fee of Rs.10/- is paid under Art.1 (vi), Schedule II of A.P.C.F. & S.V. Act.

This petition came up before me for final hearing today in the presence of

Sri R.Maruthi Prasad, Advocate for the petitioner and respondent was set exparte. On perusal of the material papers on record and upon hearing both sides and having stood over for consideration till this day, this Court doth Order and

Decree:-

1. That the petition be and the same is hereby allowed; 8

H.M.O.P.No.32 of 2025 Addl.Civil Judge (Senior Division),

Kadapa, Dt.07.05.2026

2. That the decree of restitution of conjugal rights in favour of the petitioner is hereby granted by directing the respondent to join the company of the petitioner to lead conjugal life, within three months from the date of this

Order, failing which, the petitioner is at liberty to proceed as per law.

3. That there be no costs.

Given under my hand and seal of this Court, on this the 07 th day, May, 2026.

Sd/- G.C.Asifa Sulthana,

Addl. Civil Judge (Senior Division), Kadapa.

Memorandum of costs:

- N I l -

Sd/- G.C.Asifa Sulthana,

A.C.J.(S.D.),

Kdp.

Note:- The parties should apply as soon as possible for the return of all documents which they may wish to preserve as records otherwise they will be destroyed after three years from this date.

H.M.O.P/82/2025

Mopuru Raveendra Reddy vs K.Gayatri

08 May 2026

1

H.M.O.P.No.82 of 2025 Addl.Civil Judge (Senior Division),

Kadapa, dt.08.05.2026

APKD010003652025

IN THE COURT OF ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE (SENIOR DIVISION),

KADAPA

Present:- Smt G.C.Asifa Sulthana,

Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division),

Kadapa.

Dated: Friday, this the 8 th day of May, 2026

H.M.O.P.No.82 of 2025

Mopuru Raveendra Reddy, S/o. M.Dastagiri Reddy, aged about 42 years, Resident of D.No.6/96, Brahmana Street, Kamalapuram, Kadapa. . . . Petitioner

Vs.

K.Gayatri, D/o. Sri Ram, aged about 44 years, Resident of H.No.990, Kalasiguda Near Contonment Hospital, Bollarum, Secundrabad, Telangana . . . Respondent

This petition has come up today on 07.05.2026 for final hearing before me in the presence of Smt K.Haseena, Advocate for the petitioner and the respondent was set exparte and after hearing the petitioner side and having stood over till this day for consideration, this court made the following:-

:: O R D E R ::

1.The petitioner filed the petition against the respondent under Section 13(1)(1a)(1b) of the Hindu Marriage Act 1955, seeking to grant decree of divorce by dissolving the marriage of the petitioner solemnized with the respondent on 11.11.2011 on the grounds of cruelty and desertion.

H.M.O.P.No.82 of 2025 Addl.Civil Judge (Senior Division),

Kadapa, Dt.08.05.2026.

2. In brief, the averments of the petition filed on behalf of the petitioner is that, the marriage of the petitioner was solemnized with the respondent on 11.11.2011 at Arya Samaj Mandir, Vyas Nagar, Warasiguda, Secunderabad in accordance with Vedic rites and customs in the presence of friends, and officiated by purohit Shri D.Jaya Raj Arya and their marriage was consummated and out of the wedlock a male child by name Mopuru Nidhish Reddy was born on 04-02- 2013, who is presently residing with the respondent. At the time of marriage both families opposed the marriage but later accepted it. It is further submitted that after marriage the petitioner and respondent resided at Pune as the petitioner was employed there and they lived happily for one year, but thereafter the respondent began quarreling on trivial issues, frequently threatened to commit suicide, and blackmailed the petitioner to fulfilling her unreasonable demands and she repeatedly created unpleasant situations, thereby petitioner suffered severe mental stress and loss of peace and the petitioner, though distressed, continued to bear her behavior out of love for her and their child.

(b) It is further submitted that on several occasions the respondent attempted suicide or threatened the same and she once locked the petitioner and child inside the house and tried to jump from the terrace but was prevented by neighbors and on another occasion when the child was 11 months old, she left the house with the child and was found at a railway station attempting suicide, but she was rescued by constable and she often insisted that the petitioner take loans based on SMS offers and if he refused she would blackmail him with threats of self-harm and she also forced the petitioner to take leave from work without reason. After the birth of the grandson, the petitioner's parents accepted the marriage and invited the couple to Kamalapuram and the petitioner and respondent stayed there but the respondent behaved rudely towards his parents, 3

H.M.O.P.No.82 of 2025 Addl.Civil Judge (Senior Division),

Kadapa, Dt.08.05.2026.

causing them grief. In 2015, when the petitioner's mother came to Pune for medical treatment, the respondent ill-treated her, neglected her food and medicine, and quarreled continuously, forcing the petitioner's ailing mother to leave without completing her treatment. He further submitted that when their son was around 1 year old, the petitioner took the respondent to a psychiatrist for consultation and marital counseling and the doctor treated both the petitioner and the respondent separately and after examination doctor prescribed medicines for the respondent while advising that the petitioner did not require any medication and doctor also gave counseling to both parties. However, when they came out and the petitioner was purchasing the prescribed medicines for the respondent, she suddenly became aggressive, picked up a quarrel with the petitioner, shouted loudly in public, and even tore the petitioner's shirt in front of everyone and this kind of incidents happening in their daily life.

(c) He further submitted that the respondent repeatedly pressurized the petitioner to choose between his mother or her, and when the petitioner refused to abandon his mother, she consumed an overdose of sleeping pills given by the psychiatrist and called the petitioner home and the petitioner found her unconscious with their son crying nearby. He admitted her in hospital and after discharge insisted on returning to her parental house. Accordingly, on 26-12-2015 petitioner left the matrimonial home along with the child. Later, when the petitioner went to her parental house and brought his son to Kadapa, the respondent followed with relatives, stayed for a week, then filed a police complaint against the petitioner. In the police station, the respondent categorically stated she did not want to continue the marital relationship and consented that the petitioner could seek divorce, while she would take custody of the child and permit visitation rights.

Thereafter, she left with the child to her parental house and from 26-12-2015 till 4

H.M.O.P.No.82 of 2025 Addl.Civil Judge (Senior Division),

Kadapa, Dt.08.05.2026.

date they are living separately i.e. for more than 9 years and the elders from the petitioner's side attempted mediation but the respondent refused to resume cohabitation and more than nine years have elapsed in separation and the petitioner lost all hope of reunion and has realized that the marital relationship has broken down completely and the respondent's persistent quarrels, blackmailing, suicide attempts, and desertion have caused the petitioner immense mental cruelty, depriving him of peace and making it impossible for him to lead a normal married life. Henceforth, the petitioner has come up with the present petition with a prayer that the marriage in between the petitioner and the respondent to be declared as null and void by grant of decree of divorce in between them basing on the grounds of cruelty and desertion and also any other orders which are fit and proper in their circumstances of the case.

3.Notice served on the respondent through Court and when the respondent was called she remained absent and no representation on the date of appearance, she was set exparte.

4.During enquiry, the petitioner himself is examined as P.W.1 and got marked Ex.P1 to Ex.P3 on his behalf.

5. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.

6. Now the points for consideration is:

Whether the petitioner is entitled for decree of

divorce on the grounds of cruelty and desertion as

prayed for to dissolve his marriage with respondent

? POINT :-

7. In order to prove the contention of the petitioner herein who is the husband of the respondent has filed his affidavit as PW1 and got marked Ex.P1 to

Ex.P3 and on quick perusal of the said Ex.P1 to Ex.P3, he reiterated the 5

H.M.O.P.No.82 of 2025 Addl.Civil Judge (Senior Division),

Kadapa, Dt.08.05.2026.

averments of his pleadings of the petition and Ex.P1 to Ex.P3 are original marriage certificate issued by Arya Samaj, self attested Aadhaar card of the petitioner and marriage photograph herein to prove that their marriage was performed dt.11.11.2011 at Arya Samaj Mandir, Vyas Nagar, Warasiguda,

Secunderabad in accordance with vedic rites and customs.

8. As per the averments of the pleadings of the petition as well as the affidavit, PW1 has strongly contended that the respondent who is his wife is not taking care of the petitioner and his children herein and inspite of many mediations which were held there was no element of reunion and all the said mediations went in futile and further it is brought to the notice of the Hon'ble court that the respondent used to harass the petitioner and the respondent is not showing any interest with the petitioner and hence there is no element of reunion and hence prays the Hon'ble court that on the grounds of cruelty and desertion in order to allow the present petition and to grant decree of divorce.

9. As rightly contended the respondent who is the wife of the petitioner herein did not appear before the Hon'ble court and on perusal of Ex.P1 to Ex.P3, the marriage is established by the petitioner and as per the evidence of PW1 which stands uncontradicted and same is corroborated with the evidence placed on record that the respondent harassed the petitioner and she is not showing any interest in the marital life and respondent and the petitioner are living away from each other which becomes a ground for cruelty and desertion let in by the petitioner herein to undergo mental suffering and emotional distress leading his life and under such circumstances there is no element of re-union and no scope of re-establishing marital ties and hence their marriage had became irretrievable break down and this court is inclined to allow the present petition to grant decree of divorce basing on the grounds of cruelty and desertion.

H.M.O.P.No.82 of 2025 Addl.Civil Judge (Senior Division),

Kadapa, Dt.08.05.2026.

10.In the result, the petition is allowed, granting decree of divorce between the petitioner and respondent on the grounds of cruelty and desertion and accordingly their marriage dt.11.11.2011 is hereby gets dissolved. No costs ordered.

Typed to my dictation by the Stenographer, corrected and pronounced by me in open court, this the 8 th day of May, 2026.

Sd/- G.C.Asifa Sulthana,

Addl. Civil Judge (Senior Division),

Kadapa.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

For Petitioner: For Respondent:

P.W.1: Mopuru Raveendra Reddy - N I L -

Exhibits marked for Petitioner:

Ex.P1 : Original Marriage certificate issued by Arya Samaj

Ex.P2 : Self attested Aadhaar card of the petitioner

Ex.P3 : Marriage photograph

Material Objects Marked: - NIL -

Sd/- G.C.Asifa Sulthana,

A.C.J. (S.D.),

Kdp.

H.M.O.P.No.82 of 2025 Addl.Civil Judge (Senior Division),

Kadapa, Dt.08.05.2026.

Petition presented on 22.10.2025 Petition filed on 24.10.2025

IN THE COURT OF ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE (SENIOR DIVISION),

KADAPA.

Present:- Smt G.C. Asifa Sulthana,

Additional Civil Judge,

(Senior Division), Kadapa.

Dated: Friday, this the 8 th day of May, 2026.

H.M.O.P.No. 82 of 2025

Mopuru Raveendra Reddy, S/o. M.Dastagiri Reddy, aged about 42 years, Resident of D.No.6/96, Brahmana Street, Kamalapuram, Kadapa. . . . Petitioner

Vs.

K.Gayatri, D/o. Sri Ram, aged about 44 years, Resident of H.No.990, Kalasiguda Near Contonment Hospital, Bollarum, Secundrabad, Telangana . . . Respondent

The petitioner filed the petition against the respondent under Section 13(1) (ia)(ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act 1955, seeking to grant decree of divorce by dissolving the marriage of the petitioner solemnized with the respondent on 11.11.2011 on the grounds of cruelty and desertion.

Value of the petition for the purpose of Court Fee and Jurisdiction: A fixed court fee of Rs.10/- is paid under Article I Schedule II of A.P.C.F. & S.V. Act.

This petition coming before me for final hearing on this day in the presence of Smt K.Haseena, Advocate for the petitioner and the respondent was set exparte and after hearing the petitioner side and having stood over till this day for consideration, this Court doth Order and Decree:-

1. That the petition be and the same is hereby allowed; 8

H.M.O.P.No.82 of 2025 Addl.Civil Judge (Senior Division),

Kadapa, Dt.08.05.2026.

2. That the decree of divorce between the petitioner and respondent is hereby granted on the grounds of cruelty and desertion and accordingly their marriage dt.11.11.2011 is hereby dissolved; and

3. That there be no orders as to costs.

Given under my hand and seal of this Court, on this the 8 th day, May, 2026

Sd/- G.C.Asifa Sulthana,

Addl. Civil Judge (Senior Division), Kadapa.

Memorandum of costs: nil

Sd/- G.C.Asifa Sulthana,

A.C.J.(S.D.),

Kdp.

H.M.O.P/78/2025

Dasari Hari Obul Reddy vs S.Gubbala Nagalakshmi

08 May 2026

1

H.M.O.P.No.78 of 2025 Addl.Civil Judge (Senior Division),

Kadapa, dt.08.05.2026

APKD010003582025

IN THE COURT OF ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE (SENIOR DIVISION),

KADAPA

Present:- Smt G.C.Asifa Sulthana,

Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division),

Kadapa.

Dated: Friday, this the 8 th day of May, 2026

H.M.O.P.No.78 of 2025

Dasari Hari Obul Reddy, S/o. D.Bala Gangi Reddy, aged about 35 years, Residing at D.No.1-76, Ankireddypalli Village, Vedurthy Post, V.N.Pali Mandal, YSR Kadapa District. . . . Petitioner

Vs.

S.Gubbala Nagalakshmi, W/o. Dasari Hari Obul Reddy, D/o. S.Seshagiri Rao, aged about 23 years, Residing at D.No.15/38, Vaddera Street, Rajupeta Village, Tiruvuru Mandal, NTR District. . . . Respondent

This petition has come up today on 06.05.2026 for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri M.Ramanjaneya Reddy, Sri P.Srikanth Reddy, Sri

T.Srinivasulu Reddy, Sri M.Kiran Kumar, Advocates for the petitioner and the respondent was set exparte and after hearing the petitioner side and having stood over till this day for consideration, this court made the following:-

:: O R D E R ::

1.The petitioner filed the petition against the respondent under Section 13(1)(1a)(1b) of the Hindu Marriage Act 1955, seeking to grant decree of divorce 2

H.M.O.P.No.78 of 2025 Addl.Civil Judge (Senior Division),

Kadapa, Dt.08.05.2026.

by dissolving the marriage of the petitioner solemnized with the respondent on 05.01.2024 on the grounds of cruelty and desertion.

2. In brief, the averments of the petition filed on behalf of the petitioner is that, the marriage of the petitioner was solemnized with the respondent on 05.01.2024 at Veyyi Nootala Kona of Pendlimarry Mandal as per Hindu rites and customs in the presence of both side parents, relatives and friends and the marriage was consummated but no issues. It is submitted that after the marriage, the respondent joined with the petitioner in Ankireddypalli village, consisting of his old parents and after three months of marriage, the respondent started pressurizing the petitioner to keep his parents out of the house and the respondent was not caring her in-laws and not taking care of them and she was not providing food and other needs to her old in-laws and the petitioner though advised the respondent to treat his parents properly but she did not care and behaved adamantly. It is further submitted that as the petitioner did not agree to throw his parents out of the house, the respondent refused to co-habit with the petitioner. The respondent was not co-operating with the petitioner in doing house hold work. The respondent used to spend much time on cell phone with several persons and openly insulting the petitioner with abusive language. It is further submitted that the petitioner being a respectable person brought the conduct of the respondent to the notice of her parents but they too supported her instead of advising her to run the family properly. It is further submitted that the respondent used to demand the petitioner, for purchase of gold Items, knowing that the petitioner has no financial capacity. The respondent used to pick up quarrels unnecessarily with the petitioner and made the petitioner sleepless nights caused much mental agony and cruelty.

H.M.O.P.No.78 of 2025 Addl.Civil Judge (Senior Division),

Kadapa, Dt.08.05.2026.

(b) It is further submitted that the respondent expressed her opinion that she has no interest in the petitioner and further expressed that she has no interest to have children. The respondent used to mis-behave, used to insult on the ground of age difference between them. It is further submitted that in the month of

June, 2024, without any prior intimation, the respondent left him and went to her native place. It is further submitted that though the petitioner tried to contact her on phone but she did not lift and ultimately she expressed her intention not to live with the petitioner. It is further submitted that on 10-07-2024, the petitioner along with other elders visited the native place of the respondent and conducted a mediation in the house of her parents. In the mediation the petitioner and the elders tried to convince the respondent to join the petitioner but she refused. The parents of the respondent also did not advice her to join the petitioner. It is further submitted from the month of June, 2024 the respondent deserted the petitioner and has been living with her parents without any reason and the petitioner is made to suffer living lonely, without the company of the respondent, the act and conduct of the respondent made the petitioner to suffer from mental ill, no peace of mind. The conduct and behaviour of the respondent caused much cruelty against the petitioner and since the object of the marriage is defeated and broken down irreparably, the petitioner is compelled to file this petition for seeking divorce. Henceforth, the petitioner has come up with the present petition with a prayer that the marriage in between the petitioner and the respondent to be declared as null and void by grant of decree of divorce in between them basing on the grounds of cruelty and desertion and also any other orders which are fit and proper in their circumstances of the case.

H.M.O.P.No.78 of 2025 Addl.Civil Judge (Senior Division),

Kadapa, Dt.08.05.2026.

3.Notice served on the respondent through Court and when the respondent was called she remained absent and no representation on the date of appearance, she was set exparte.

4.During enquiry, the petitioner himself is examined as PW1 and got marked Ex.P1 to Ex.P3 on his behalf.

5. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.

6. Now the points for consideration is:

Whether the petitioner is entitled for decree of

divorce on the grounds of cruelty and desertion as

prayed for to dissolve his marriage with respondent

as prayed for ? POINT :-

7. In order to prove the contention of the petitioner herein who is the husband of the respondent has filed his affidavit as PW1 and got marked Ex.P1 to

Ex.P3 and on quick perusal of the said Ex.P1 to Ex.P3, he reiterated the averments of his pleadings of the petition and Ex.P1 to Ex.P3 are original wedding card of the petitioner and respondent, marriage certificate issued by Gazetted officer along with photograph and self attested Aadhaar card of the petitioner herein to prove that their marriage was performed dt.05.01.2024 at Veyyi Nootala

Kona of Pendlimarry Mandal, as per Hindu rites and customs.

H.M.O.P.No.78 of 2025 Addl.Civil Judge (Senior Division),

Kadapa, Dt.08.05.2026.

and hence prays the Hon'ble court that on the grounds of cruelty and desertion in order to allow the present petition and to grant decree of divorce.

9. As rightly contended the respondent who is the wife of the petitioner herein did not appear before the Hon'ble court and on perusal of Ex.P1 to Ex.P3, the marriage is established by the petitioner and as per the evidence of PW1 which stands uncontradicted and same is corroborated with the evidence placed on record that the respondent harassed the petitioner and she is not showing any interest in the marital life and respondent and the petitioner are living away from each other and further petitioner filed a memo along with bank statements showing that he was depositing amount to respondent towards benefit of their child inspite of it, the respondent did not come forward which becomes a ground for cruelty and desertion let in by the petitioner herein to undergo mental suffering and emotional distress leading his life and under such circumstances there is no element of re-union and no scope of re-establishing marital ties and hence their marriage becomes irretrievable break down and this court is inclined to allow the present petition to grant decree of divorce basing on the grounds of cruelty and desertion.

10.In the result, the petition is allowed, granting decree of divorce between the petitioner and respondent on the grounds of cruelty and desertion and accordingly their marriage dt.05.01.2024 is hereby gets dissolved. No costs ordered.

Typed to my dictation by the Stenographer, corrected and pronounced by me in open court, this the 8 th day of May, 2026.

Sd/- G.C.Asifa Sulthana,

Addl. Civil Judge (Senior Division),

Kadapa.

H.M.O.P.No.78 of 2025 Addl.Civil Judge (Senior Division),

Kadapa, Dt.08.05.2026.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

For Petitioner: For Respondent:

P.W.1: Dasari Hari Obul Reddy - N I L -

Exhibits marked for Petitioner:

Ex.P1 : Original wedding card of the petitioner and respondent

Ex.P2 : Marriage certificate issued by Gazetted officer along with photograph

Ex.P3 : Self attested Aadhaar card of the petitioner.

Material Objects Marked: - NIL -

Sd/- G.C.Asifa Sulthana,

A.C.J. (S.D.),

Kdp.

H.M.O.P.No.78 of 2025 Addl.Civil Judge (Senior Division),

Kadapa, Dt.08.05.2026.

Petition presented on 10.10.2025 Petition filed on 14.10.2025

IN THE COURT OF ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE (SENIOR DIVISION),

KADAPA.

Present:- Smt G.C. Asifa Sulthana,

Additional Civil Judge,

(Senior Division), Kadapa.

Dated: Friday, this the 8 th day of May, 2026.

H.M.O.P.No. 78 of 2025

Dasari Hari Obul Reddy, S/o. D.Bala Gangi Reddy, aged about 35 years, Residing at D.No.1-76, Ankireddypalli Village, Vedurthy Post, V.N.Pali Mandal, YSR Kadapa District. . . . Petitioner

Vs.

The petitioner filed the petition against the respondent under Section 13(1) (ia)(ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act 1955, seeking to grant decree of divorce by dissolving the marriage of the petitioner solemnized with the respondent on 05.01.2024 on the grounds of cruelty and desertion.

Value of the petition for the purpose of Court Fee and Jurisdiction: A fixed court fee of Rs.30/- is paid under Article I (vi) Schedule II of A.P.C.F. & S.V. Act.

This petition coming before me for final hearing on this day in the presence of Sri M.Ramanjaneya Reddy, Sri P.Srikanth Reddy, Sri T.Srinivasulu Reddy, Sri M.Kiran Kumar, Advocates for the petitioner and the respondent was set exparte and after hearing the petitioner side and having stood over till this day for consideration, this Court doth Order and Decree:- 8

H.M.O.P.No.78 of 2025 Addl.Civil Judge (Senior Division),

Kadapa, Dt.08.05.2026.

1. That the petition be and the same is hereby allowed;

2. That the decree of divorce between the petitioner and respondent is hereby granted on the grounds of cruelty and desertion and accordingly their marriage dt.05.01.2024 is hereby dissolved; and

3. That there be no orders as to costs.

Given under my hand and seal of this Court, on this the 8 th day, May, 2026

Sd/- G.C.Asifa Sulthana,

Addl. Civil Judge (Senior Division), Kadapa.

Memorandum of costs: nil

Sd/- G.C.Asifa Sulthana,

A.C.J.(S.D.),

Kdp.

PRC/44/2022

S.H.O Rayachoty U/G P.S vs A5. Kalyani and 9 others

21 Nov 2024

IN THE COURT OF THE ADDL. JUDL. MAGISTRATE OF I CLASS ::

RAYACHOTY ::

Present: Smt.G.C.ASIFA SULTHANA,

Judicial Magistrate of I Class, Rayachoty.

F.A.C. Addl. Judicial Magistrate of I Class, Rayachoty.

Thursday, the 21th (Twenty first) day of November, 2024.

P.R.C. No. 44 of 2022

State: Represented by the Inspector of Police, Rayachoty U/G Police Station. … Complainant

Kunchala Venkataiah @ Venkatramana, age 26 Yrs., caste by Vadde, S/o Chinnappa, Diguva Vaddepalli, H/o Guntimadugu village, Rayachoty mandal. (A15)

... Accused No.15

N O T E:

1) The case against A5, A7, A8, A10, A12, A13, A15, A19, A25, A28, A30, A31 are separated from Original P.R.C.No.02 of 2009 and numbered as P.R.C.No.32/2013.

2) The case against A5, A7, A8, A10, A12, A13, A15, A28, A30 and A31 are separated and split up from P.R.C.No.32/2013 and numbered as P.R.C. No.44 of 2022.

3) Now, the case against A5, A7, A8, A10, A12, A13, A28, A30 and A31 are separated and split up from existing P.R.C.No.44 of 2022 and numbered as P.R.C.No. 15 of 2024.

This case is coming before me for final hearing in the presence of learned

A.P.P. for Prosecution and learned counsel for accused No.15 by Sri P.Reddaiah,

Advocate for the accused No. 15 and having stood over for consideration till this date, this Court made the following:

O R D E R

1. The State represented by Inspector of Police, Rayachoty U/G Police

Station filed charge sheet against the accused for the offence punishable Under

Sections 147, 148, 395, 397, 302, 384 R/w 149 of Indian Penal Code,1860 and 2

Section 27 of Arms Act and Section 8 of Andhra Pradesh Public Security Act, 1992 in Cr.No.65 of 2003 of Rayachoty U/G Police Station .

2. That L.W.1/Sykam Basamma is resident of Sykamvandlapalli, H/o

Madhavaram, Rayachoty Mandal is the wife of deceased and L.W.2/Sykam

Jayachandra Reddy is the son of deceased. That the deceased was a political party supporter and that he was involved in several criminal cases and that accused threatened the deceased as he is getting contracts on his name by colluding with Government and that the deceased was alerted by the police to leave his village for safe. That on 19.05.2003 in between 10.00 PM to 12.00 AM,

A2 to A31 under the leadership of A1 found themselves into an unlawful assembly and that they were armed with deadly weapons and that they criminally trespassed into the house of deceased by covering their faces with masks along with some others of Pincha Dalam and Palakonda Dalam wear Olive Green

Uniform, armed with weapons and about 40 members of Sympathizers/Militants who covered their faces with pieces of clothes formed themselves into an unlawful assembly armed with sticks and deadly weapons criminally trespassed ransacked to the house of L.W.7/Jarugu Prabhavathi brought out L.W.1 and deceased,

Senior T.D.P. leader who were asleep at the first floor L.W.1's house threatened

L.W.1 and the deceased on the point of fire arms into the road, snatched away 10 bags of Paddy, four bags of Rice, four bags of Ground Nut seeds belong to L.W.1, fifty bags of food for work rice pertaining to L.W.7, robbed golden talibottu chain,

Mangala Sutram, four golden bangles of L.W.1 heaped the clothes, wooden furniture and set fire to them by pouring petrol brought by the accused and blasted the domestic articles in the house by placing landmines causing wrongful loss to them by damaging them and partly damaged the house. The P.W.G.

Naxalites brutally murdered the deceased by opening fire over the deceased chest 3 and alleging that the deceased a land lord, harassing the poor people by colluding with police and Government getting contracts on deceased's name, foisting false case against deceased opponent, who opposed deceased. The Naxalites took away rifle of the deceased along with cartridge. The accused evade from the scene along with booty in two tractors.

3. Basing on the report of L.W1, a case was registered by late

Sri.Venkataratnam, Inspector of Police, U/Sections 147, 148, 395, 398, 302, 384

R/w 149 of I.P.C., Section 27 of Arms Act and Section 8 of Andhra Pradesh Public

Security Act, 1992 of Rayachoty U/G P.S as in Crime No.65 of 2003 and that he also seized a letter addressed by the accused in the name of People's War Group (Extremists).

4. That on 20.05.2003 in between 08.30 AM to 11.00 AM, late

Sri.Venkataratnam, Inspector of Police conducted inquest over the dead body of the deceased in the presence of inquestdars and that seized the blood stained clothes of the deceased and sent the body for autopsy to know the exact cause for the death of the deceased and that during autopsy L.W.19/Medical Officer seized the bullet shell during P.M. Examination.

5. That on 20.05.2003 at about 10.30 A.M, Sri. Venkatartnam, Inspector of Police visited the scene of offence, examined the same and seized blood stained clothes of the deceased, controlled earth and other incriminating material under cover of observation Mahazarnama and that forwarded the seized properties to

Regional Director, R.F.S.L., Ananthapuram, Andhra Pradesh for chemical examination and report.

6. During the course of further investigation, on 10.06.2003 at about 04.00 PM, late Sri.Venkataratnam, Inspector of Police along with L.W.15/Devara

Reddenna, L.W.16/Vadlathala Venkatrama Reddy went to Mandvya River, near

Masapet of Rayachoty town and found A17 and A18 arrested and seized one steel 4 carrier, provisions, sarees and other articles from A17 and one petromax light articles and other items from A18 and recorded their statements and sent them for Judicial Remand.

7. That on 07.11.2003 at about 11.00 AM, L.W22/P.Venkatrama Reddy

Sub Divisional Police Officer, Pulivendula apprehended A22 near Harinath

Temple on Rayachoty Galiveedu Road and upon interrogation he voluntarily admitted the commission of offence, arrested him and sent him for Judicial

Remand. That on 10.11.2003, L.W.21 arrested A20 and sent him for Judicial

Remand. That on 24.11.2003 at about 10.00 AM, L.W.21 arrested Accused No.15 at on the mud road leading to Thummaginjalavandlapalli near Vaddepalli village of Madhavaram and sent him to Judicial Remand. That after completion of investigation, L.W.23/J.Mallikarjuna Varma, Inspector of Police, Rayachoty U/G police station filed charge sheet against accused.

8. This case was taken cognizance for the offences U/Section 147, 148, 395, 397, 398, 302, 384 R/w 149 of I.P.C., Section 27 Arms Act and Section 8 of

A.P.P.S. Act of in Cr.No.65 of 2003 of Rayachoty U/G P.S. against accused.

9. On appearance of the accused No.15 before this court, copies of documents as contemplated U/Section 207 of Cr.P.C were furnished, A15 is enlarged on bail as per the orders of Hon'ble V Additional District and Sessions

Judge, Rayachoty vide in Crl.M.P.No.76 of 2024 dated 20.09.2024 U/Section 439

of Cr.P.C. and when the accused is questioned with regard to his means to engage counsel to defend them, he stated that he has got sufficient means to engage a counsel to defend his case before the Hon'ble Sessions Court.

10.Having heard the learned counsels on either side and upon perusing the material on record and keeping in view the fact that the offence under

Sec.147, 148, 395, 397, 398, 302, 384 R/w 149 of I.P.C, Section 27 of Arms Act and Section 8 of A.P.P.S Act is exclusively triable by the Hon'ble Court of Sessions, 5 this Court is of the view that it is a fit case to commit the case to the Hon'ble

Court of Sessions, Kadapa Division, Kadapa.

11. In the result, the case is committed to the Hon'ble Court of Sessions,

Kadapa Division, Kadapa under Sec. 209(a) Cr.P.C which is equivalent to Section 232 (a) of B.N.S.S. Act, 2023. Accused No.15 who is on bail, shall continue to be on the same terms and conditions under Sec. 209(b) Cr.P.C which is equivalent to Section 232 (b) of B.N.S.S Act, 2023 and he shall appear before the Hon'ble

Court of Sessions as and when summons are received. The office is directed to submit the entire case records duly indexed along with the case property if any to the Hon'ble Court of Sessions under Sec. 209(c) Cr.P.C which is equivalent to

Section 232 (c) of B.N.S.S. Act, 2023 and Notify the Public Prosecutor about the committal of the case to the Hon'ble Court of Sessions under Sec.209 (d) Cr.P.C which is equivalent to Section 232 (d) of B.N.S.S. Act, 2023.

Typed to my Dictation directly on office computer by Stenographer Grade

III, corrected and pronounced by me in open court on this the 21st day of

November, 2024.

Sd/

Judl. Magistrate of I Class,

Rayachoty.

F.A.C. Judl. Magistrate of I Class,

Rayachoty.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

N I L

Sd/

Judl. Magistrate of I Class,

Rayachoty.

F.A.C. Judl. Magistrate of I Class,

Rayachoty.

Order Record 454 total

Case No.	Parties	Date	Type	Outcome
H.M.O.P/78/2025	Dasari Hari Obul Reddy vs S.Gubbala Nagalakshmi	08 May 2026	JUDGEMENT	—
H.M.O.P/82/2025	Mopuru Raveendra Reddy vs K.Gayatri	08 May 2026	JUDGEMENT	—
H.M.O.P/32/2025	Macha Narendra Babu vs Kotha Kavya alias Macha Kavya	07 May 2026	JUDGEMENT	—
IP/60/2024	Gali Srinivasula Reddy vs Sheelam Prabhakar Reddy	06 May 2026	ORDER	—
H.M.O.P/36/2025	Derangula Suresh Babu vs Paruchuri Aruna Kumari	05 May 2026	JUDGEMENT	Compromised
H.M.O.P/70/2025	Palle Anusha vs Nil	05 May 2026	JUDGEMENT	—
H.M.O.P/80/2025	Adineni Balanjaneyulu vs Nil.	05 May 2026	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/46/2023	Gangireddy Veeranarayana Reddy vs N.Uday Kumar	30 Apr 2026	JUDGEMENT	—
H.M.O.P/10/2026	Mekala Kiran Kumar vs Nil	30 Apr 2026	JUDGEMENT	—
H.M.O.P/24/2026	Suda Maneesh Kumar Reddy vs Nil	30 Apr 2026	JUDGEMENT	—
H.M.O.P/48/2025	Chimmalapenta Nagamunnemma vs Chimalapendta Madhu	30 Apr 2026	JUDGEMENT	—
H.M.O.P/68/2025	Pendluru Venkata Ramana vs Sabada Naga Lakshmi	30 Apr 2026	JUDGEMENT	—
H.M.O.P/76/2025	Raachagolla Varalu alias Lakshmi Varalu vs Nil	30 Apr 2026	JUDGEMENT	—
H.M.O.P/84/2025	Venkataswamygarla Venkta Sudhakar vs Boggili Venkata Sarada alias Venkatasamygarla Sarada	30 Apr 2026	ORDER	—
H.M.O.P/86/2025	Sandula Siva Prasad Reddy vs Nil	30 Apr 2026	JUDGEMENT	—
H.M.O.P/2/2026	Thammisetty Venugopal vs Devandla Jayanthi alias Lakshmi Jayanthi	28 Apr 2026	JUDGEMENT	—
EP/34/2017	Arava Lakshmi Devi vs Malepati Pratap	06 Apr 2026	ORDER	—
OS/30/2021	Rajala Venkata Swamy vs Aadisetti Prasad	06 Apr 2026	JUDGEMENT	—
IP/14/2024	Kodidela Nayab Rasool vs Global Medical Agency, proprietor S. Mohammed Sikander	01 Apr 2026	ORDER	—
OS/80/2022	Muthukuru Sreenivasulu vs M. Eeswaramma	01 Apr 2026	JUDGEMENT	—
H.M.O.P/56/2025	Krishnammagari Vijaya Bhaskar Reddy vs Nil	31 Mar 2026	ORDER	—
H.M.O.P/66/2022	Derangula Siva Kumari vs Vikash Jain Bafnaj	31 Mar 2026	JUDGEMENT	—
H.M.O.P/90/2025	Pendlimarry Padmavathi vs Koppoli Srikanth	31 Mar 2026	JUDGEMENT	—
EP/42/2022	Munagapati Nagaveni vs Tupakula Ghousia	30 Mar 2026	ORDER	—
OS/63/2020	Shaik Jaheerabee vs Shaik Ishaq Basha	30 Mar 2026	JUDGEMENT	—
SC/66/2025	Andhra Pradesh vs Devarakonda Ramesh	24 Mar 2026	JUDGEMENT	—
H.M.O.P/18/2023	Chinnapureddy Srinivasulu Reddy vs C.Reddemma @ B.Reddemma	24 Mar 2026	JUDGEMENT	—
H.M.O.P/60/2025	Mantrigarla Gayathri vs Nil	24 Mar 2026	JUDGEMENT	—
SC/16/2025	S.H.O. S.I of Police Taluk P.S. vs Shaik Mahammad Ajees alias Ajeej	18 Mar 2026	JUDGEMENT	—
SC/26/2025	Andhra Pradesh vs Somu Siva Prashanth alias Prashanth	17 Mar 2026	JUDGEMENT	—
EP/8/2025	P. Prabhakar Reddy vs Y. Padmavathi Reddy	14 Mar 2026	OTHER	—
EP/46/2022	P. Raghunatha Reddy vs A. Sanjeeva Reddy	14 Mar 2026	OTHER	—
OS/58/2025	Polepalli Nagaraju vs Gosula Venkata Ramana	14 Mar 2026	OTHER	—
OS/76/2025	Kalluru Yella Reddy vs Ramireddy Vijaya Bhaskar Reddy	14 Mar 2026	OTHER	—
OS/330/2018	G. Venkata Krishna Reddy vs G.Rama Subba Reddy	10 Mar 2026	JUDGEMENT	—
AS/9/2024	Proddatur Nagaraju vs Rupanagaudu Subbarayudu @ Subhan	06 Mar 2026	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/120/2023	Bojja Subba Reddy vs B. Rama Devi	06 Mar 2026	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/16/2024	D. Sujath Ali Khan vs Panjagala Murali	05 Mar 2026	JUDGEMENT	—
AS/126/2024	Karamalla Shankar Reddy vs The Kadapa District Non-Gazetted Officer Co-operative House Building Society Limited,	03 Mar 2026	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/22/2018	The Kadapa District Non Gazetted Co.op. House Building Society Ltd. vs A.Sai Sankar	27 Feb 2026	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/42/2025	Mullangi Gopala Krishna Murthy vs Makam Anand	27 Feb 2026	JUDGEMENT	—
H.M.O.P/62/2025	Gajjala Hemalatha vs Nil	27 Feb 2026	JUDGEMENT	—
EP/61/2024	Kalluri Nagi Reddy vs Chenna Raghuntah	25 Feb 2026	ORDER	—
IP/60/2019	Katterapalli Chenchi Reddy alias K. Chenchaiah vs Dhandana Raja Gopal Reddy and 62 others	20 Feb 2026	JUDGEMENT	—
H.M.O.P/58/2025	Bukke Prathyusha vs Mude Arun Kumar Nayak	20 Feb 2026	JUDGEMENT	—
SC/24/2019	Represented by the Sub-Inspector of Police Pendlimarri PS vs Vennapusa Venkata Chandra Reddy	19 Feb 2026	JUDGEMENT	—
SC/307/2018	The Sub Inspector of Police, Pendlimarri P.S. vs Perla Eswar Reddy and 8 others.	19 Feb 2026	JUDGEMENT	—
SC/1/2026	State rep by the Sub Inspector of Police, Pendlimary P.S. vs Vennapusa Subbrayudu Subbarayudu	17 Feb 2026	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/248/2016	S. Lavanya vs K. Sree Rama Raju	12 Feb 2026	JUDGEMENT	—
H.M.O.P/54/2025	Kataru Kavya Amrutha vs Kataru Ramesh Reddy	12 Feb 2026	JUDGEMENT	—
IP/30/2024	Devireddy Sambasivareddy vs Upparapalle Pullaiah	10 Feb 2026	JUDGEMENT	—
SC/163/2024	S.H.O., Represented by Inspector of police, Kadapa I Town P.S. vs Baig Mahaboob Basha	10 Feb 2026	JUDGEMENT	—
H.M.O.P/74/2025	M.Sree lakshmi alias Nunepalle Sree Lakshmi vs Nunepalle Brahmaiah	10 Feb 2026	JUDGEMENT	—
H.M.O.P/6/2025	Rajula Maheswara Reddy vs Kethireddy Sunitha	30 Jan 2026	JUDGEMENT	—
H.M.O.P/110/2025	Peerla Obulesu vs Smt. Sattiveti Swathi	30 Jan 2026	JUDGEMENT	—
EP/16/2020	Yerraguntla Satya Narayana Reddy vs Mallireddy Sreedhar Reddy	29 Jan 2026	ORDER	—
OS/70/2025	Gouru Rama devi vs Muli Lakshmi Narayan Reddy	28 Jan 2026	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/98/2025	Shaik Subhan Basha vs K.R.Jagadeesh Kumar	28 Jan 2026	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/294/2018	Dadireddy Venkata Subba Reddy and 7 others. vs Gosula Pulla Reddy and 2 others.	28 Jan 2026	JUDGEMENT	—
SC/232/2019	SHO Kondapuram PS vs M. Rajasekhar	28 Jan 2026	JUDGEMENT	—
H.M.O.P/58/2022	Smt. Peddamallu Pavitra Devi alias Vangireddy Pavitra Devi vs P. Ramanjula Reddy	28 Jan 2026	ORDER	—
AS/63/2024	Pothu Naga Malla Reddy vs Pothu Obulreddy	27 Jan 2026	JUDGEMENT	—
IP/60/2022	S. Kadirun vs Shabana and 9 others	22 Jan 2026	JUDGEMENT	—
H.M.O.P/46/2025	Pandillapalli Siva Prasad Reddy vs Parapatireddy Akhila	22 Jan 2026	ORDER	—
AS/60/2024	Vurimi Venkata Rajaa @ Raja vs Thallam Amarnath	20 Jan 2026	JUDGEMENT	—
AS/131/2024	Chappidi Yerikala Reddy vs Rajula Sreenivasula Reddy	19 Jan 2026	JUDGEMENT	—
IP/26/2021	Bareddy Mysura Reddy vs Thirumalasetty Rani Madhuri	19 Jan 2026	JUDGEMENT	—
H.M.O.P/64/2025	Gangireddy Chairanya Kumar vs Nil	09 Jan 2026	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/30/2025	Alamuri Moula Ali Basha vs Chilamakuru Naga Phaneendra Reddy	08 Jan 2026	JUDGEMENT	—
EP/1/2023	G. Rama Chandraiah vs S. Yella reddy	06 Jan 2026	ORDER	—
OS/340/2017	The Kadapa District Non Gazetted Officers Co.Op.House Building Society Ltd. vs S.Rami Reddy	31 Dec 2025	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/358/2017	The Kadapa Dist.Non Gazetted Officers Co.op.House Building Society Ltd. vs V.Ayyavaru	31 Dec 2025	JUDGEMENT	—
H.M.O.P/108/2025	Maccha Preethi alias Dhoparthi Preethi vs Nil	31 Dec 2025	JUDGEMENT	—
EP/23/2025	Guthikonda Ravindranath vs Smt Y.Anjali Devi	30 Dec 2025	ORDER	—
OS/72/2025	Sanivarapu Balakrishna Reddy vs Yerrasani Chandrayudu	30 Dec 2025	JUDGEMENT	—
H.M.O.P/28/2025	Goturu Anil Kumar vs Nil	30 Dec 2025	JUDGEMENT	—
H.M.O.P/34/2025	Yerragorla Ramachandra vs Nil	30 Dec 2025	JUDGEMENT	—
AS/6/2024	Gandi Ravindra Prasad vs Kakarla Malleswari Devi	22 Dec 2025	JUDGEMENT	—
EP/11/2023	T. Venkata Ramana vs C. Anil Kumar	22 Dec 2025	ORDER	—
AS/50/2024	Shaik Sharfuddin @ Shaik Sheku vs P.Khader Basha	19 Dec 2025	JUDGEMENT	—
EP/74/2024	Sambeta Lakshmi Kalpana vs Devarasetty Indumathi	19 Dec 2025	ORDER	—
H.M.O.P/98/2025	Rajupalem Chanteiah vs Nil	19 Dec 2025	JUDGEMENT	—
SC/220/2024	Andhra Pradesh vs Ankena Sivanjaneyulu	18 Dec 2025	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/26/2020	Shaik Riyaz vs Smt. Shaik Rahamathunnisa	16 Dec 2025	JUDGEMENT	—
SC/262/2018	SHO.Khajipet Police Station vs Nallagondu Venkataiah and 8 others.	16 Dec 2025	JUDGEMENT	—
SC/332/2018	SHO Khajipet P.S. vs Nigineni Pullaiah Naidu and 13 others.	16 Dec 2025	JUDGEMENT	—
H.M.O.P/60/2024	Pilli Venkata Subba Reddy vs Muthuru Vijaya Lakshmi	15 Dec 2025	ORDER	—
OS/16/2023	Shaik Noorjahan @ Syedpula Noorjahan vs Syed Pula Shameera and 4 others	13 Dec 2025	OTHER	—
AS/154/2024	Palagiri Munaiah vs Giuttireddy Saraswathamma	12 Dec 2025	JUDGEMENT	—
SC/65/2023	S.H.O, S.I of police, Simhadripuram P.S. vs Komma Soma Sekhar Reddy	12 Dec 2025	JUDGEMENT	—
SC/168/2024	S.H.O., S.I. of police, C.K. Dinne P.S. vs Prabakula Venkata Ramanjaneyulu	12 Dec 2025	JUDGEMENT	—
H.M.O.P/6/2024	Kole Chinna Sanjeeva Rayudu vs Tanguturu Sanjeeva Sathvika	10 Dec 2025	ORDER	—
AS/12/2024	Vennapusa Balarami Reddy vs Vennapusa Chandra Mohan Reddy, died	09 Dec 2025	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/16/2025	Kuppireddy Nagi reddy vs Tamatam Bala Krishna Reddy	09 Dec 2025	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/96/2023	Yeduguru Gangi Reddy vs Shaik Abdul Rehman	09 Dec 2025	JUDGEMENT	—
AS/81/2024	Ambavaram Uma Maheswari @ Uma vs The Kadapa Municipal Corporation, Represented by its Commissioner,	05 Dec 2025	JUDGEMENT	—
OS/108/2025	Muppala Kesava Raju vs Shaik Rahamthulla	04 Dec 2025	JUDGEMENT	—
IP/22/2023	Chella Suresh Babu vs M.Ramesh	03 Dec 2025	ORDER	—
AS/98/2024	Sanapalli Venkata Reddy vs Palem Mallaiah	02 Dec 2025	JUDGEMENT	—
AS/67/2024	Shaik Mustafa Dowla vs Shaik Fatima Ashraf	28 Nov 2025	JUDGEMENT	—

Showing 100 of 454 orders — Log in to browse all pages.

Monthly Orders (Last 12 Months)

May 2026		7
Apr 2026		13
Mar 2026		23
Feb 2026		15
Jan 2026		17
Dec 2025		34
Nov 2025		21
Oct 2025		37
Sep 2025		45
Aug 2025		16
Jul 2025		33
Jun 2025		19

Frequently Asked Questions

How many cases has SMT G C ASIFA SULTHANA handled?

SMT G C ASIFA SULTHANA has handled 488 court orders since 2024 at Addl SCJ Court Complex Badvel. The average disposal rate is 20 orders per month.

What types of cases does SMT G C ASIFA SULTHANA hear?

Based on available records, SMT G C ASIFA SULTHANA primarily handles Civil matters (Original Suits, Appeal Suits) and Criminal matters (Criminal Cases, Sessions Cases) at Addl SCJ Court Complex Badvel.

Where is SMT G C ASIFA SULTHANA currently posted?

SMT G C ASIFA SULTHANA is posted as Additional Senior Civil Judge FTC, Badvel at Addl SCJ Court Complex Badvel, Kadapa, Andhra Pradesh.

Are judgments by SMT G C ASIFA SULTHANA available online?

Yes. 12 judgments by SMT G C ASIFA SULTHANA are available on Legistro with full text, outcome, and sections cited.

How fast does SMT G C ASIFA SULTHANA dispose cases?

SMT G C ASIFA SULTHANA disposes approximately 20 cases per month, based on 488 orders handled over their tenure at Addl SCJ Court Complex Badvel.

Since when is SMT G C ASIFA SULTHANA serving?

SMT G C ASIFA SULTHANA has been serving at Addl SCJ Court Complex Badvel since 2024. and is currently posted there.

Case Types

OS 41%

H 18%

AS 9%

CC 9%

SC 9%

EP 8%

IP 6%

PRC 0%

Posting History

May 2026 — Present

Additional Senior Civil Judge FTC, Badvel
May 2026 — Present

Senior Civil Judge Badvel
Feb 2026 — May 2026

Principal Senior Civil Judge, Rajampet
Feb 2025 — Present

Additional Senior Civil Judge, Kadapa · 321 orders
Nov 2024 — Nov 2024

Junior Civil Judge, Rajampet · 1 orders
Sep 2024 — Feb 2025

Additional Junior Civil Judge Rayachoty · 1 orders
May 2024 — Feb 2025

Principal Junior Civil Judge Rayachoty · 165 orders

Outcomes on Record

Compromised 1

Dismissed As Settled Out Of Court Disposal Date: 20-11-2024 1

Other Judges at this Court

Smt.Y.Saritha

Principal Junior Civil Judge Badvel

566 orders

Sri P.Mukesh Kumar

Additional Junior Civil Judge, Badvel

108 orders

← View all judges at Addl SCJ Court Complex Badvel