G. Deena Fac

Senior Civil Judge

Court of Senior Civil Judge,, Dharmavaram (Taluka) · Ananthapur · Andhra Pradesh

G. Deena Fac, Senior Civil Judge, is posted at Court of Senior Civil Judge,, Dharmavaram (Taluka), Ananthapur, Andhra Pradesh, India. 73 court orders on record since 2022. 5 judgments with full text available. Primarily handles H, OP, AS cases.

Total Orders

Judgments

Orders/Month

Posting

Featured Judgments

H.M.O.P/47/2022

P. Latha vs Poola Ramana Reddy

15 Jul 2022

IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

DHARMAVARAM

Present:- Smt.G.Deena,

Principal Senior Civil Judge, Ananthapuramu,

(FAC) Senior Civil Judge, Dharmavaram .

Friday, the 15th day of July, 2022.

H.M.O.P.No.47/2022

Between:

P.Latha ... Petitioner

And

P.Ramana Reddy ...Respondent

This petition is coming on 08.07.2022 for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri A.Krishna Mohan, Advocate for the petitioner and the respondent is being remained exparte, and the matter having stood over for consideration till this day, this court made the following:

O R D E R

1. This is a petition filed by the petitioner against the respondent under Section 13 (1)(ia)(ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 praying for dissolution of her marriage with Respondent by a decree of divorce on the grounds of cruelty and desertion.

2. The facts of the petition in brief are as follows:

The petitioner is legally wedded wife of the respondent and their marriage was solemnized on 17.11.2006 as per Hindu Marriage rites and customs prevailed in their community, at Tirumala Tirupathi

Devasthanam, at Tirumala, after the marriage she went to Matrimonial home at Dharmavaram and lived happily for a three months, due to wedlock no children were born, at the time of marriage her parents gave Rs.50,000/- cash and 10 thulas of gold ornaments as per the demand made by the parents of the respondent, she joined the respondent with a pond hope to lead marital life but her desires had 2 gone to winds, from the beginning the respondent is having drinking habit and daily come to the house in late hours with drunken mood and used to beat her by suspecting her character, the respondent is having illegal intimacy with one Ramulamma, of Kethireddy Colony,

Dharmavaram, they put up separate family from the respondent’s parents at Shantinagar, Dharmavaram and on the instigation of his parents, used to harass and beat the petitioner that she is unable to get pregnancy and she is a barren woman.

3. The petitioner further submitted that she bared all the tortures, the respondent sold the gold ornaments for his bad vices, respondent always used to think about his concubine Ramulamma, and on listening her words the respondent used to beat the petitioner in drunken mood without any reasonable cause, respondent always demanded for additional dowry and as her parents are not in a position to give additional dowry the respondent and his parents bore grudge against the petitioner and harassed her physically and mentally.

4. The petitioner further submitted that as per the advice of the elders the respondent joined with her at her parent’s house at

Dharmavaram, there also the respondent tortured her by suspecting her character, and by saying that she is looking fat and black in colour, and without intimation to her or to her parents, for the last one and half year left her company and went to his parent’s house, he did not heed the words of the petitioner and her parents.

5. The petitioner further submitted that as the respondent and his parents demanded to get additional dowry, for that she except no other way, given a complaint under section 498-A read with 34 of IPC 3 and section 3 and 4 of D.P.Act at Dharmavaram (U) P.S. which was registered in crime No.44/2022, against the respondent and his family members and afore said Ramulamma and the said case is pending

before Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Dharmavaram.

6. The petitioner further submitted that she suffered all the tortures with a pond hope that on one day or the other the respondent will change his attitude and will lead happy marital life with her but her hopes had gone to winds and the petitioner is not in a position to resist the high handed acts of respondent and hence she has no other option to get the dissolution of the matrimonial life between them.

There is absolutely no collusion between the petitioner and respondent and no similar application is filed before this Honourable Court or any courts earlier by the petitioner or by the respondent for similar or any other matrimonial reliefs. Hence, the petition.

7. The respondent is remained exparte.

8. On behalf of the petitioner, the petitioner herself examined as

PW.1 and got marked Exhibits P.1 and P.2. Ex.P.1 is Marriage

Wedding Card of the petitioner and respondent dt.17.11.2006 and

Ex.P.2 is Marriage Photograph the petitioner and respondent along with

CD.

9. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, perused the record.

10. The point for determination is:

Whether the petitioner is entitled to get the decree of

divorce as prayed for ?

POINT:

11. Perused the oral and documentary evidence adduced by the petitioner. The petitioner has filed this petition Under Section 4 13(1)(ia)(ib) of Hindu Marriage Act seeking divorce from the respondent on the grounds of cruelty and desertion. On the other hand, the respondent did not turn up to contest the matter, called absent and he was set exparte. Therefore, this court proceeds with the material available on record that whether the petitioner has made out a case for grant of divorce on the grounds of cruelty and desertion. Even the respondent is not contesting the matter and remained exparte, it is bounden duty cast upon the petitioner to establish his case by producing cogent and convincing evidence before the court.

12. As per contents of petition affidavit and the evidence of P.W.1, about one and half year back respondent left the company of the petitioner and went to his parents house. As per Sec.13(1)(ib) of Hindu marriage Act the period of desertion must be not less than for continuous period of two years. Hence, the desertion cannot be a ground for divorce in the present petition.

13. Petitioner who was examined as P.W.1 in her evidence categorically deposed the acts of cruelty of respondent which were not challanged by him. P.W.1 categorically deposed at the time of marriage her parents gave Rs.50,000/- cash and 10 thulas of gold ornaments as per the demand made by the parents of the respondent. She joined the respondent with a pond hope to lead marital life but her desires had gone to winds, from the beginning the respondent is having drinking habit and daily come to the house in late hours with drunken mood and used to beat her by suspecting her character. Further respondent is having illegal intimacy with one Ramulamma, of Kethireddy Colony,

Dharmavaram. On instigation of his parents, respondent used to harass and beat the petitioner that she is unable to get pregnancy and she is a barren woman. She further deposed, respondent sold away gold 5 ornaments of her for his bad vices. Respondent always used to think about his concubine Ramulamma, and on listening her words the respondent used to beat the petitioner in drunken mood without any reasonable cause. Respondent always demanded for additional dowry, harassed her physically and mentally. Respondent used to abuse her, that she is looking fat and black in colour. Finally without intimation to her or to her parents, for the last one and half year left her company and went to his parent’s house, he did not heed the words of the petitioner and her parents.

14. On a careful consideration of the evidence on record, this Court holds that the petitioner has been able to establish that the respondent by her conduct, has caused mental cruelty upon the petitioner. It is a fit case to grant divorce on ground of cruelty. So, the petitioner is entitled to decree of divorce as prayed for. The marriage between the spouses shall be dissolved by decree of divorce with effect from the date of the order.

15. In the result, petition is allowed, the marriage of the petitioner with respondent dated 17.11.2006 is dissolved by way of decree of divorce with effect from 15.07.2022. No costs.

Typed to my dictation by the Typist, corrected and pronounced by me in open Court, this the 15th day of July, 2022.

Sd/- G. Deena,

Prl. Senior Civil Judge, Anantapuramu (FAC) Senior Civil Judge, Dharmavarm

Appendix of evidence

Witnesses examined for

Petitioner: Respondent:

PW.1: P.Latha -None- 6

Exhibits marked for Petitioner:

Ex.P1:Wedding Card of petitioner and respondent dt.17.11.2006

Ex.P.2: Marriage Photograph the petitioner and respondent along with CD

Exhibits marked for Respondent:

-Nil- Id/- G.D.N.,

(FAC) S.C.J.

H.M.O.P/41/2022

Khande Sreenath vs K. Lakshmi Padmavathi

15 Jul 2022

IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

DHARMAVARAM

Present:- Smt.G.DEENA,

Principal Senior Civil Judge, Ananthapuramu,

(FAC) Senior Civil Judge, Dharmavaram .

Friday, this the 15th day of July, 2022

H.M.O.P.No.41/2022

Between:

K.Sreenath ... Petitioner

And

K.Lakshmi Padmavathi ... Respondent

This petition is coming on 08.07.2022 for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri B.Noor Mohammad, Advocate for the petitioner and the respondent is being remained exparte, and the matter having stood over for consideration till this day, this court made the following:

O R D E R

1. This is a petition filed by the petitioner against the respondent under Section 13 (1)(ia)(ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 praying for dissolution of his marriage with Respondent by a decree of divorce on the grounds of cruelty and desertion.

2. The facts of the petition in brief are as follows:

The respondent is legally wedded wife of the petitioner and their marriage was solemnized on 15.05.2019 at Sri Amaranarayana Swamy

Temple, at Basampalli village, C.K.palli mandal, at the time of marriage the parents of the respondent presented 10 thulas of gold ornaments, and marriage expenses spent by respondent’s parents, immediately, after the marriage the respondent joined with him at matrimonial home, and started to discharge her duties as a house wife at Dharmavaram.

3. The petitioner further submitted that since the date of marriage her behaviuor is not good and used to quarrel with him for no cause, demanded him to put up separate family at her parent’s village, but he refused for the same, as his parents are having various health diseases, she used to insult the petitioner and his parents in the presence of relatives at number of times, as such he bared all the tortures, the respondent is having high desires and wants to live with luxuries, but the petitioner is unable to satisfy her desires, he advised to change her attitude, but she did not change her attitude, and gradually develop the ill feelings against him and used to quarrel with the petitioner and oppose the petitioner stating that she is not interested marital life with him and not having any affection on the petitioner.

4. The petitioner further submitted that the respondent intentionally went to her parent’s house without informing him or his parents and avoiding to do any work, he took up steps for taking back respondent for marital life but in vain, the respondent willfully deserted him and made miserable life in the society, under these circumstances there is highly discrepancy to continue matrimonial of with the respondent.

5. The petitioner further submitted that number of times he requested the respondent and her family members to make amicable solution byway of joining her with him to lead marital life but all the efforts had became in vain and also respondent never heard his words and even the parents of the respondent are also not advised her in a good manner, she went away while taking gold ornaments and also with cash and other valuables and wearing clothes for her necessities.

6. The petitioner further submitted that he suffered all the tortures with a pond hope that on one day or the other the respondent will change her attitude and will lead happy marital life with him but his hopes had gone to winds and she is having ill feelings against him and the petitioner is not in a position to resist the high handed acts of respondent and hence he has no other option to get the dissolution of the matrimonial life between them. There is absolutely no collusion between the petitioner and respondent and no similar application is filed before this Honourable Court or any courts earlier by the petitioner or by the respondent for similar or any other matrimonial reliefs. Hence, the petition.

7. The respondent is remained exparte.

8. On behalf of the petitioner, the petitioner himself examined as

PW.1 and got marked Exhibits P.1 and P.2. Ex.P.1 is Marriage

Wedding Card of the petitioner and respondent dt.15.5.2019 and

Ex.P.2 is Marriage Photograph the petitioner and respondent along with

CD.

9. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, perused the record.

10. The point for determination is:

Whether the petitioner is entitled to get the decree of

divorce as prayed for ?

POINT:

11. Perused the oral and documentary evidence adduced by the petitioner. The petitioner/husband has filed this petition Under Section 13(1)(ia)(ib) of Hindu Marriage Act seeking divorce from the respondent /wife on the grounds of cruelty and desertion. On the other hand, the 4 respondent did not turn up to contest the matter, called absent and she was set exparte. Therefore, this court proceeds with the material available on record that whether the petitioner has made out a case for grant of divorce on the grounds of cruelty and desertion. Even the respondent is not contesting the matter and remained exparte, it is bounden duty cast upon the petitioner to establish his case by producing cogent and convincing evidence before the court.

12. As per the petition affidavit and evidence of P.W.1, it is not clearly mentioned on which date or since how much period respondent deserted the petitioner. As there is no specific pleading regarding period of desertion and evidence thereon, present petition on the ground of desertion is not maintainable.

13. In his evidence P.w.1 categorically deposed the acts of cruelty made against him by the respondent. P.W.1 categorically deposed since the date of marriage respondent’s behavior is not good and used to quarrel with him for no cause, demanded him to put up separate family at her parent’s village, but he refused for the same. As his parents are having various health diseases, respondent used to insult the petitioner and his parents in the presence of relatives at number of times, as such he bared all the tortures. The respondent is having high desires and wants to live with luxuries, but the petitioner is unable to satisfy her desires. He advised to change her attitude, but she did not change her attitude, and gradually develop the ill feelings against him and used to quarrel with the petitioner. She oppose the petitioner stating that she is not interested in marital life with him and not having any affection on the petitioner. Pw1 further deposed, respondent intentionally went to her parent’s house without informing him or his 5 parents, he took up steps for taking back respondent for marital life but in vain. The respondent only willfully deserted him and made miserable life in the society.

14. Pw1 further deposed, number of times he requested the respondent and her family members to make amicable solution by way of joining her with him to lead marital life but all the efforts had became in vain and also respondent never heard his words and even the parents of the respondent are also not advised her in a good manner. He further deposed, she is having ill feelings against him and the petitioner is not in a position to resist the high handed acts of respondent.

15. On a careful consideration of the evidence on record, this Court holds that the petitioner has been able to establish that the respondent by her conduct, has caused mental cruelty upon the petitioner. This is a fit case to grant divorce on ground of cruelty. So, the petitioner is entitled to decree of divorce as prayed for. The marriage between the spouses shall be dissolved by decree of divorce with effect from the date of the order.

16. In the result, petition is allowed, the marriage of the petitioner with respondent dated 15.05.2019 is dissolved by way of decree of divorce with effect from 15.07.2022. No costs.

Typed to my dictation by the Typist, corrected and pronounced by me in open Court, this the 15th day of July, 2022.

Sd/- G. Deena,

Prl. Senior Civil Judge, Ananthapuramu. (FAC) Senior Civil Judge, Dharmavaram 6

Appendix of evidence

Witnesses examined for

Petitioner: Respondent:

PW.1: Khande Sreenath -None-

Exhibits marked for Petitioner:

Ex.P1:Wedding Card of petitioner and respondent dt.15.5.2019

Ex.P.2: Marriage Photograph the petitioner and respondent along with CD

Exhibits marked for Respondent:

-Nil-

Id/- G.D.N.

(FAC)S.C.J.

H.M.O.P/64/2022

Madanapalli Veena Alias Lakshmi vs Bontha Narasimha Reddy

15 Jul 2022

IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

DHARMAVARAM

Present:- Smt.G.DEENA,

Principal Senior Civil Judge, Ananthapuramu,

(FAC) Senior Civil Judge, Dharmavaram.

Friday, the 15th day of July, 2022.

H.M.O.P.No.64/2022

Between:

Madanapalli Veena alias Lakshmi ….Petitioner

And

Bontha Narasimha Reddy ...Respondent

This petition is coming on 08.07.2022 for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri K.Naresh, Advocate for the petitioner and Sri

D.L.N.Murthy, Advocate for the respondent, and the matter having stood over for consideration till this day, this court made the following:

O R D E R

1. This is a petition filed by the petitioner against the respondent under Section 13 (1) (ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 praying for dissolution of her marriage with Respondent by a decree of divorce on the ground of desertion.

2. The facts of the petition in brief are as follows:

The petitioner is legally wedded wife of the respondent and their marriage was solemnized on 15.1.2021 as per Hindu Marriage rites and customs prevailed in their community, in Paradise Function Hall,

Dharmavaram town, and during wedlock no children were born to them.

Immediately, after the marriage she joined respondent at Talamaria village of Kothacheruvu mandal and stayed with the respondent only 2 one month, one week after marriage respondent started harassment, and quarreled with her by stating that her parents and relatives did not give respect to him on the wedding day, and the food prepared by the petitioner was not good, one month after the marriage on her request she went to her parent’s house, and three days after she returned to the matrimonial home, but the respondent did not allow her and necked out without any reason, since then she has been residing with her parents at Ravulacheruvu village of Dharamavaram

Mandal.

3. The petitioner further submitted that many panchayats were conducted between them to join the respondent, but the respondent did not accept to allow her and the respondent openly stated he has no interest on the petitioner and he is ready to give divorce to her, since then the petitioner and respondent are residing separately and the marriage between them has irreparably broken and the petitioner has no option except filing of the petition for divorce. Hence, the petition.

4. The respondent filed counter stating no objection to give divorce to the petitioner, submitting from the beginning of marriage, they did not lead happy marital life as wife and husband, and several disputes and differences arose between them, as a result, they did not lead happy marital life, the respondent tried a lot to lead together as wife and husband at advice of the elders but the said problems had been increased day to day due to which both parties of the family members have been suffering from mental agony and since February 2021 they have been living separately and hence he wants to settle the matter amicably and he has no objection to give divorce.

5. On behalf of the petitioner, the petitioner herself examined as PW.1 and got marked Exhibits P.1 and P.2. Ex.P.1 is Marriage Wedding Card of the petitioner and respondent dt.15.1.2021 and Ex.P.2 is Marriage

Photograph. On the other side, the respondent himself examined as

R.W.1 and no document got marked.

6. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, perused the record.

7. The point for determination is:

Whether the petitioner is entitled to get the decree of

divorce as prayed for ?

POINT:

8. This petition is filed by the petitioner/wife under Sec.13(1)(ia) of

Hindu Marriage Act seeking divorce from her husband on the ground of cruelty.

9. This is no dispute as to performance of the marriage between petitioner and respondent on 15.01.2021 and their relationship as wife and husband. To prove her allegations against respondent for divorce, petitioner produced evidence of P.W.1 and documentary evidence

Exs.P1 and P2. Ex.P1 is the Wedding Card, Ex.P2 is marriage photo, both two documents establishes the marriage in between petitioner and respondent.

10. In her petition affidavit and also in her evidence as P.W.1 deposed the following, 4

1. One week after the marriage respondent started harassing the petitioner he used to quarrel with the petitioner stating that her parents and her relatives did not give respect to the respondent on wedding day.

2. On the next day of the quarrel respondent assaulted the petitioner on the reason that the food prepared by the petitioner was not good.

3. On request of the petitioner, respondent send the petitioner to her parents house, after three days petitioner returned to her matrimonial house, but respondent did not allow her to join him and necked out her without any reason, since then the petitioner as residing with her parents.

11. Respondent filed counter submitting his contention. He denied the allegations made in para 4 and 5. Further pleaded from the beginning of the marriage they did not lead happy marital life as several disputes and differences arouse in between them. Though they have tried to live together but the problems increasing day by day. Hence since 2021 they have been living separately. And also he reported no objections for grant of divorce.

12. P.W.1 in his evidence categorically deposed and alleged above said points. But respondent did not challenge the said evidence of

P.W.1. But in the cross-examination he posed questions regarding the compromise held in between them. In his evidence as RW.1 also respondent deposed, from the beginning they could live happily as wife and husband, several disputes and differences arose in between them.

They tried to live together on the advise of elders, but the problems had 5 been increasing day by day, hence since one year they have been living separately.

13. A clear perusal evidence of R.W.1 cross-examination of both

P.W.1 and P.W.2, it is clear that the matter was finally settled between petitioner and respondent in the presence of elders, they both decided to live separately, both reported no objection to obtain divorce.

14. The present petition is filed by the petitioner seeking divorce from the respondent on the ground of cruelty. The evidence of P.W.1 were admitted by the respondent, they were no where challanged by the respondent. It shows that petitioner with her evidence categorically proved that the respondent with his conduct acted cruelly against petitioner and subjected her to physical and mental cruelty. It is a fit case to grant divorce. Hence the marriage between the spouses shall be dissolved by decree of divorce with effect from the date of the order.

15. In the result, petition is allowed, the marriage of the petitioner with respondent dated 15.01.2021 is dissolved by way of decree of divorce with effect from 15.07.2022. No costs.

Typed to my dictation by the Typist, corrected and pronounced by me in open Court, this the 15th day of July, 2022.

Sd/- G. Deena,

Prl. Senior Civil Judge, Ananthapuram (FAC) Senior Civil Judge Dharmavaram.

Appendix of evidence

Witnesses examined for

Petitioner: Respondent:

PW.1:M.Veena @ Lakshmi B.Narasimha Reddy

Exhibits marked for Petitioner:

Ex.P1:Wedding Card of petitioner and respondent dt.15.1.2021

Ex.P.2: Marriage Photograph

Exhibits marked for Respondent:

-Nil- Id/- G.D.N., Prl. Senior Civil Judge, Ananthapuram (FAC) Senior Civil Judge, Dharmavaram

H.M.O.P/25/2021

B. Eswaraiah vs B. Lakshmi Devi

15 Jul 2022

EP/8/2022 Dismissed As Not Pressed

M. Radha vs B.P. Prakash Reddy @ J. Prakash Reddy

15 Jul 2022

Order Record 73 total

Case No.	Parties	Date	Type	Outcome
EP/8/2022	M. Radha vs B.P. Prakash Reddy @ J. Prakash Reddy	15 Jul 2022	Order	Dismissed As Not Pressed
H.M.O.P/25/2021	B. Eswaraiah vs B. Lakshmi Devi	15 Jul 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/41/2022	Khande Sreenath vs K. Lakshmi Padmavathi	15 Jul 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/47/2022	P. Latha vs Poola Ramana Reddy	15 Jul 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/64/2022	Madanapalli Veena Alias Lakshmi vs Bontha Narasimha Reddy	15 Jul 2022	Order	—
AS/1/2019	C.Eswaramma vs A.Nagabhushanam	08 Jul 2022	Judgement	—
AS/2/2019	C.Eswaramma vs C.Sreenivasa Reddy	08 Jul 2022	Judgement	—
AS/3/2019	C.Eswaramma vs Malapati Nagaraju	08 Jul 2022	Judgement	—
EP/20/2019	C.Chinna Krishnamma vs A.Dhanunjaya	08 Jul 2022	Order	—
IP/10/2017	R.Rajasekar vs P.Neelamma	08 Jul 2022	Order	—
OP/102/2019	V. Naresh vs V. Sai Neela @ Sai	08 Jul 2022	Order	—
OS/15/2022	S. Ramanjineyulu vs D. Suguna	08 Jul 2022	Judgement	—
OS/28/2021	Varalakshmi vs Jyothi Harinath	08 Jul 2022	Judgement	—
H.M.O.P/54/2022	Chehmi Samba Siva vs Bandi Divya Bharathi	08 Jul 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/71/2021	J. Sukanya vs M. Sivanarayana	08 Jul 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/77/2021	Gujjala Venkatesulu vs Gujjala Bharathi	08 Jul 2022	Order	—
AS/16/2017	K.Venkata Lakshmi and three others vs K.Akkamma and 30 others	01 Jul 2022	Judgement	—
AS/23/2018	P.Yasodamma vs Harijana Muthyalamma	01 Jul 2022	Judgement	—
CMA/2/2017	Chittibala Obi Reddy vs Gujjala Narayanamma	01 Jul 2022	Order	—
IP/14/2019	Jampala Lingamaiah vs Radhamani	01 Jul 2022	Order	—
CC/1/2019	Sub Inspector ofpolice, Tadimarri P.S. vs Mallagundla Mallikarjuna	01 Jul 2022	Judgement	—
SC/443/2016	Sub Inspector of Police vs Mallagundla Mallikarjuna	01 Jul 2022	Judgement	—
H.M.O.P/21/2021	M. Sindura Bai vs B. Ramamurthy Naik	01 Jul 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/57/2022	M. Sai Sreeja vs B. Subramanyam	01 Jul 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/80/2021	D. Kiran Kumar vs Vs- Nil -	01 Jul 2022	Order	—
S.O.P/3/2022	Muddanur Murali vs Vs- Nil -	01 Jul 2022	Order	—
EP/14/2018	Avuku Pattabhi Ramaiah vs K.Bayanna	26 Jun 2022	Order	—
OP/44/2018	Official Receiver vs N.Maseed Ismail	24 Jun 2022	Order	—
OP/47/2017	S.Saraswathi vs S.Venkata Ramana	24 Jun 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/21/2022	Kowdiki Lathavaram Sowrinath vs Kowdiki Lathavaram Krishnaveni	24 Jun 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/43/2022	Jinka Maheedhar vs Vardhi Bharathi	24 Jun 2022	Order	—
CMA/1/2020	Chelimi Anjaneyaswamy Temple Improvement Committee,Dharmavaram vs Pagala Aswartha Narayana Swamy	17 Jun 2022	Order	—
OP/67/2018	Sulankala Harish vs C.Sarada	17 Jun 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/52/2022	Chintha Swathi vs Gattu Vijay Kumar	17 Jun 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/73/2021	B. Lakshmidevi vs B. Nagabhushanam	17 Jun 2022	Order	—
AS/3/2015	N.Nagi Reddy vs N.Lakshma Reddy	06 May 2022	Judgement	—
EP/10/2018	Daduluru Anjaneyulu vs A.Mohammad Shafi	06 May 2022	Order	—
EP/13/2019	Badiginjala Balaraju vs Pamisetty Chinna Eswaraiah	06 May 2022	Order	—
OP/54/2020	Aenikekalva Geethanjali vs Aenikekalva Narasimha Reddy	06 May 2022	Order	—
OP/61/2020	P. Jyotheeswari vs Pujari Lakshminarayana	06 May 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/4/2021	Gujjala Durga Bhavani vs Gujjala Nagaraju	06 May 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/20/2021	Annagowni Kesavaiah @ Chenna Kesavulu vs Annagowni Gowri @ lakshmi	06 May 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/30/2022	D. Chennnakesavulu vs D. Sirisha	06 May 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/37/2022	K. Silpa vs K. Sreenivasa Reddy	06 May 2022	Order	—
IP/2/2020	T.S. Noormohammad vs B. Harinarayana	29 Apr 2022	Order	—
OP/57/2020	Mondi Paramesh vs Mondi Sunitha @ Lakshmi	29 Apr 2022	Order	—
OP/125/2018	V.Janaki Ramudu vs Velpula Lakshmi	29 Apr 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/22/2022	G. Sudharani vs Bestha Ramakrishna	29 Apr 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/25/2022	Battala Rajasree vs Battala Harish	29 Apr 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/79/2021	P.R. Naveen Kumar vs Vs- Nil -	29 Apr 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/101/2021	Mandala Anitha @ Kothareddy Anitha vs Mandala Siva Reddy	29 Apr 2022	Order	—
AS/9/2020	G. Ramakrishna Reddy vs G. Ramana Reddy	22 Apr 2022	Judgement	—
OP/13/2020	M. Vennala vs M. Himavanth Chowdary	22 Apr 2022	Order	—
OS/55/2015	Sutrave Vijayalakshmi vs Kunte Siva Prasad Rao	22 Apr 2022	Judgement	—
H.M.O.P/3/2022	Eddigotta Mamatha vs Vadde Akhil	22 Apr 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/83/2021	Elluru Hari Prasad vs S. Kavitha	22 Apr 2022	Order	—
EP/4/2021	T. Narayana a Reddy vs A. Dhanunjaya	08 Apr 2022	Order	—
OP/47/2016	M.Nagaraju vs M.Umadevi @ Nandini	08 Apr 2022	Order	—
OP/67/2020	Aswini vs Bestha Rajasekhar	08 Apr 2022	Order	—
SC/122/2021	State rep. by the Sub-Inspector of Police, Kanaganapalli PS vs Boya Vasantha	08 Apr 2022	Judgement	—
H.M.O.P/18/2022	Gosala Vanaja vs M. Naresh	08 Apr 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/106/2021	Malyavantham Sai Divya vs S. Sudhakar	08 Apr 2022	Order	—
S.O.P/1/2022	K. Nagarathna vs Vs- Nil -	08 Apr 2022	Order	—
SC/209/2021	State represented by Sub-Inspector of Police, Ramagiri PS i/c C.K.Palli PS vs Yerra Obulesu aliyas Mondigatla Obulesu	01 Apr 2022	Judgement	—
SC/256/2019	S.H.O. C.K.Palli P.S. vs Matta Mahesh, age 28 years,	01 Apr 2022	Judgement	—
H.M.O.P/23/2021	K. Kamala vs K. Sudhakar	01 Apr 2022	Order	—
OP/12/2020	Sangala Narayana Swamy vs Kukkala Madhuri	25 Mar 2022	Order	—
OP/100/2019	Golla Ramesh vs G. Anasuyamma	25 Mar 2022	Order	—
OP/70/2020	Poosala Naresh vs Kolla Radhamma alias Poosala Radhamma	12 Mar 2022	Order	—
OS/5/2019	C.Saraswathi vs P.Awsartha Reddy	12 Mar 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/28/2021	B. Ramanjineyulu vs B. Lakshmi Devi	12 Mar 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/91/2021	T. Ramana Kumar vs V.K. Lakshmi Prasanna	12 Mar 2022	Order	—
OP/112/2018	M.Sandeep Kumar vs M.Sreelalitha	10 Mar 2022	Order	—

Monthly Orders (Last 12 Months)

Jul 2022		26
Jun 2022		9
May 2022		9
Apr 2022		22
Mar 2022		7

Frequently Asked Questions

How many cases has G. Deena Fac handled?

G. Deena Fac has handled 73 court orders since 2022 at Court of Senior Civil Judge,, Dharmavaram (Taluka). The average disposal rate is 17 orders per month.

What types of cases does G. Deena Fac hear?

Based on available records, G. Deena Fac primarily handles Civil matters (Original Petitions, Appeal Suits) and Criminal matters (Sessions Cases) at Court of Senior Civil Judge,, Dharmavaram (Taluka).

Where is G. Deena Fac currently posted?

G. Deena Fac is posted as Senior Civil Judge at Court of Senior Civil Judge,, Dharmavaram (Taluka), Ananthapur, Andhra Pradesh.

Are judgments by G. Deena Fac available online?

Yes. 5 judgments by G. Deena Fac are available on Legistro with full text, outcome, and sections cited.

How fast does G. Deena Fac dispose cases?

G. Deena Fac disposes approximately 17 cases per month, based on 73 orders handled over their tenure at Court of Senior Civil Judge,, Dharmavaram (Taluka).

Since when is G. Deena Fac serving?

G. Deena Fac has been serving at Court of Senior Civil Judge,, Dharmavaram (Taluka) since 2022.

Case Types

H 41%

OP 21%

AS 10%

EP 9%

OS 6%

SC 6%

IP 4%

CMA 3%

Posting History

Mar 2022 — Jul 2022

Senior Civil Judge · 73 orders

Outcomes on Record

Dismissed As Not Pressed 1

Other Judges at this Court

Sri T.venkateswarlu

Senior Civil Judge

294 orders

Ms. J.nandini

Prl. Junior Civil Judge

822 orders

Sri Prakya Venkata Harish

Addl. Junior Civil Judge

791 orders

← View all judges at Court of Senior Civil Judge,, Dharmavaram (Taluka)