Currently Serving

Smt. G.Kavitha

Prl. Junior Civil Judge

Mancherial, SCJ Court Complex · Mancherial · Telangana

Smt. G.Kavitha, Prl. Junior Civil Judge, is posted at Mancherial, SCJ Court Complex, Mancherial, Telangana, India. 2,909 court orders on record since 2025. 26 judgments with full text available. Primarily handles STC, EP, CC cases.

2,909

Total Orders

Judgments

225

Orders/Month

Postings

Featured Judgments

OS/224/2023

Nagula Gopal vs Garrepalli Srinivas

21 Aug 2025

OS No. 224 of 2023 Page 1 of 9

IN THE COURT OF THE PRL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE : MANCHERIAL

Present:- Smt. G. Kavitha I Addl. Junior Civil Judge FAC:Principal Junior Civil Judge Mancherial

Thursday, the 21 st day of August , 2025

OS.No. 224 of 2023

Between:-

Nagula Gopal S/o. Lachaiah, Age: 50 years, Occ: Govt. Employee, R/o. 15- 60/1, Old Mancherial, Dist: Mancherial. ….Plaintiff //AND//

1.Garrepalli Srinivas S/o. Nagabushanam, Age: 51 years, Occ: Business, R/o. H.No. 16-10-339, Kalyan Nagar Chowrasta to Ramanvara, Godavarikhani.

2.Sriram City Union Finance Ltd., Mancherial, Rep. by its Divisional Manager, Mancherial. …Defendants

This suit came before me on 05.08.2025 for final hearing in the presence of Sri. Manohar Rao Dandanayakula, Advocate for the plaintiff and Sri. T. Bala Bhaskar, Advocate for the defendant no.2 and the defendant no.1 is set exparte and having heard and stood over for consideration, this court delivered the following:

:: J U D G M E N T ::

1.This is a suit filed by the plaintiff for recovery of an amount of

Rs.4,38,481/- (Rupees Four Lakhs Thirty Eight Thousand Four Hundred and

Eighty One Only) from defendant no.1 along with future interest.

21.08.2025

OS No. 224 of 2023 Page 2 of 9

2. The case of the plaintiff as per averments made in the plaint as follows:- 2.1.It is submitted that the plaintiff and the defendant no.1 are known to each other the defendant no.1 availed the loan of Rs.5,00,000/- (Rupees

Five Lakhs Only) from the defendant no.2 company vide Agreement No.

MNCRLTF1311250005 on 25.11.2013 agreeing to repay the loan amount with interest @ 19.99% per annum amounting to Rs.2,99,992/- in 36 installments and total amount payable is Rs.7,99,992/- and the plaintiff herein stood as one of the security for the said transaction. It is further submitted that the monthly installment for the said loan was fixed at

Rs.22,222/-. Thereafter, the defendant no.1 failed to repay the said amount and the defendant no.2 company filed an Arbitration case before the Arbitral Tribunal of Sole Arbitrator at Karimnagar Town and District vide Arbitration case No. 343/2015 and the Arbitral Tribunal passed an award in favour of the defendant no.2 entitling the defendant no.2 to recover an amount of Rs.6,80,599/- along with interest @ 10% p.a. on the due amount from the date of petition till the date of Award and interest @ 18% p.a. from the date of Award till the realization of the entire amount from the plaintiff. Further a cost of Rs.12,358/- and cost for Non-Judicial

Stamp Paper worth of Rs.250/- is also awarded in favour of the defendant no.2 company.

21.08.2025

OS No. 224 of 2023 Page 3 of 9

2.2.It is further submitted that the defendant no.1 failed to obey the

Award of the Tribunal and therefore, the defendant no.2 has filed E.P.No.

60 of 2018 in Arbitration O.P. No. 343/2015 on the file of the III Addl.

District Judge as Asifabad. Subsequently, the matter was transferred to the

II Addl. District and Sessions Judge at Mancherial and the Hon’ble II Addl.

District and Sessions Judge at Mancherial has passed an order under Order

XXI Rule 48 of CPC executing the above said Award for recovery of

Rs.8,76,962/-.

2.3.It is further submitted that in pursuance of the said execution proceedings, the Hon’ble II Addl. District and Sessions Judge at Mancherial has directed the employer of the plaintiff herein to recover an amount of

Rs.4,38,481/- from the plaintiff and since January, 2022, the plaintiff is paying the amount of Rs.15,000/- towards the debt of the defendant no.1 and the plaintiff has to pay total amount of Rs.4,38,481/-. The plaintiff stood as security in the transaction between the defendants no.1 & 2, an amount of Rs.15,000/- is being paid by the plaintiff to the defendant no.2 company and the defendant no.1 being the Principal Debtor is liable to pay the said amount to the Plaintiff herein to compensate the loss suffered by him.

2.4.It is further submitted that the plaintiff has approached the defendant no.1 on 10.01.2021 and requested him to repay the total amount due to the defendant no.2, as the plaintiff is paying the same to 21.08.2025

OS No. 224 of 2023 Page 4 of 9

the defendant no.2, but the defendant no.1 intentionally to cause loss to the plaintiff herein is not paying the due amount to the defendant no.2 as a result, the plaintiff suffered a loss of Rs.4,38,481/- which would be recovered from the salary of the plaintiff, besides he has also suffered mental agony. It is submitted that the employer of the plaintiff is deducting the salary of the plaintiff to pay an amount of Rs.4,38,481/- to the defendant no.1, which in fact is due by the defendant no.1 to the defendant no.2 company, therefore, the plaintiff is entitled to recover the said amount from the defendant no.1 and the defendant no.1 is liable to pay the said amount along with future interest. It is further submitted that the plaintiff to extend help to the defendant no.1 during his financial needs stood as security to the defendant no.1, but the defendant no.1 has cheated and played fraud upon the plaintiff and now refusing to compensate the loss suffered by the plaintiff. Hence, the suit.

3.The defendant no.1 inspite of receiving summons did not appear

before the Court, hence, defendant no.1 is set ex-parte by my learned

predecessor. The learned counsel for defendant no.2 reported no written statement on behalf of defendant no.2. Hence, written statement of defendant no.2 treated as nil.

4.The plaintiff is examined as PW1 and got marked Ex.A1 to Ex.A35.

5.Heard the learned counsel for the plaintiff and perused the record.

21.08.2025

OS No. 224 of 2023 Page 5 of 9

6. Now the point for determination that arose is: “Whether the

plaintiff is entitled for recovery of an amount of Rs.4,38,481/-

(Rupees Four Lakhs Thirty Eight Thousand Four Hundred and Eighty

One Only) with interest @ 24% per annum on the suit amount from

the date of filing the suit till the realization as prayed for?”

POINT:

7.It is a simple case of the plaintiff that the defendant no.1 and plaintiff are known to each other and it is further submitted that the defendant no.1 availed the loan of Rs.5,00,000/- (Rupees Five Lakhs Only) from the defendant no.2 company vide Agreement No. MNCRLTF1311250005 on 25.11.2013 agreeing to repay the loan amount with interest @ 19.99% per annum amounting to Rs.2,99,992/- in 36 installments and total amount payable is Rs.7,99,992/- and the plaintiff herein stood as one of the security for the said transaction. Thereafter, the defendant no.1 failed to repay the said amount and the defendant no.2 company filed an Arbitration case before the Arbitral Tribunal of Sole Arbitrator at Karimnagar Town and

District vide Arbitration case No. 343/2015 and the Arbitral Tribunal passed an award in favour of the defendant no.2 entitling the defendant no.2 to recover an amount of Rs.6,80,599/- along with interest @ 10% p.a. on the due amount from the date of petition till the date of Award and interest @ 18% p.a. from the date of Award till the realization of the entire amount from the plaintiff. Hence, prayed the Court to decree the suit.

8.The plaintiff in support of his case, got examined as PW1 and got marked Ex.A1 to A35. Ex.A1 is the CC of the EP. No. 60 of 2018 dated 21.08.2025

OS No. 224 of 2023 Page 6 of 9

03.02.2018, Ex.A2 is the CC of ARB OP.No. 343 of 2015 dt. 31.08.2016,

Ex.A3 is the CC of notice in order 21 rule 22, dt. 31.08.2016, Ex.A4 is CC of notice in order 21 rule 48, dt. 03.02.2018, Ex.A5 is the online computerized copy of salary slip of December, 2021, Ex.A6 is the online computerized copy of salary slip of January, 2022, Ex.A7 is the online computerized copy of salary slip of February, 2022. Ex.A8 is the online computerized copy of salary slip of March, 2022, Ex.A9 is the online computerized copy of salary slip of April, 2022, Ex.A10 is the online computerized copy of salary slip of May, 2022, Ex.A11 is the online computerized copy of salary slip of June, 2022, Ex.A12 is the online computerized copy of salary slip of July, 2022, Ex.A13 is the online computerized copy of salary slip of August, 2022, Ex.A14 is the online computerized copy of salary slip of September, 2022, Ex.A15 is the online computerized copy of salary slip of October, 2022, Ex.A16 is the online computerized copy of salary slip of November, 2022, Ex.A17 is the online computerized copy of salary slip of December, 2022, Ex.A18 is the online computerized copy of salary slip of January, 2023, Ex.A19 is the online computerized copy of salary slip of February, 2023, Ex.A20 is the online computerized copy of salary slip of March, 2023, Ex.A21 is the online computerized copy of salary slip of April, 2023, Ex.A22 is the online computerized copy of salary slip of May, 2023, Ex.A23 is the online computerized copy of salary slip of June, 2023, Ex.A24 is the online computerized copy of salary slip of July, 2023, Ex.A25 is the online 21.08.2025

OS No. 224 of 2023 Page 7 of 9

computerized copy of salary slip of August, 2023, Ex.A26 is the online computerized copy of salary slip of September, 2023, Ex.A27 is the online computerized copy of salary slip of October, 2023, Ex.A28 is the online computerized copy of salary slip of November, 2023, Ex.A29 is the online computerized copy of salary slip of December, 2023, Ex.A30 is the online computerized copy of salary slip of January, 2024, Ex.A31 is the online computerized copy of salary slip of February, 2024, Ex.A32 is the online computerized copy of salary slip of March, 2024, Ex.A33 is the online computerized copy of salary slip of April, 2024, Ex.A34 is the online computerized copy of salary slip of May, 2024, Ex.A35 is the online computerized copy of salary slip of June, 2024.

9.The chief of PW1 is replication of averments of plaint. The documents

Ex.A1 to Ex.A35 establishes the case of plaintiff, moreover, since the defendant no.1 is set ex-parte and defendant no.2 did not choose to contest the matter. The chief of PW1 coupled with Ex.A1 to Ex.A35 remained unchallenged. In view of unchallenged testimony of PW1 and documents Ex.A1 to Ex.A35, this Court finds no reason to disbelieve the case of plaintiff.

10.In view of above reasons, it is concluded plaintiff is entitled for recovery of an amount of Rs.4,38,481/- (Rupees Four Lakhs Thirty Eight

Thousand Four Hundred and Eighty One Only) with interest as prayed for.

Accordingly, the point is answered in favour of plaintiff.

21.08.2025

OS No. 224 of 2023 Page 8 of 9

11.In the result, the suit is decreed with cost directing the defendant no.1 to pay Rs.4,38,481/- (Rupees Four Lakhs Thirty Eight Thousand Four

Hundred and Eighty One Only) with interest @ 24 % P.A. on the principal amount of Rs.5,00,000/- (Rupees Five Lakhs Only) from the date of the suit to till realization of amount.

Typed to my dictation by the Stenographer, corrected and

pronounced by me in the open court on this the 21 st day of August,

2025.

I Addl. Junior Civil Judge, FAC: Prl. Junior Civil Judge, Mancherial.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

FOR PLAINTIFF FOR DEFENDANTS

PW1: Nagula Gopal -None-

EXHIBITS MARKED FOR PLAINTIFF

Ex.A1:CC of EP. No. 60 of 2018 dated 03.02.2018. Ex.A2:CC of ARB OP.No. 343 of 2015 dt. 31.08.2016. Ex.A3:CC of notice in order 21 rule 22, dt. 31.08.2016. Ex.A4:CC of notice in order 21 rule 48, dt. 03.02.2018. Ex.A5:Online computerized copy of salary slip of December, 2021. Ex.A6:Online computerized copy of salary slip of January, 2022. Ex.A7:Online computerized copy of salary slip of February, 2022. Ex.A8:Online computerized copy of salary slip of March, 2022. Ex.A9:Online computerized copy of salary slip of April, 2022. Ex.A10:Online computerized copy of salary slip of May, 2022. Ex.A11:Online computerized copy of salary slip of June, 2022. Ex.A12:Online computerized copy of salary slip of July, 2022. Ex.A13:Online computerized copy of salary slip of August, 2022. Ex.A14:Online computerized copy of salary slip of September, 2022.

21.08.2025

OS No. 224 of 2023 Page 9 of 9

Ex.A15:Online computerized copy of salary slip of October, 2022. Ex.A16:Online computerized copy of salary slip of November, 2022. Ex.A17:Online computerized copy of salary slip of December, 2022. Ex.A18:Online computerized copy of salary slip of January, 2023. Ex.A19:Online computerized copy of salary slip of February, 2023. Ex.A20:Online computerized copy of salary slip of March, 2023. Ex.A21:Online computerized copy of salary slip of April, 2023. Ex.A22:Online computerized copy of salary slip of May, 2023. Ex.A23:Online computerized copy of salary slip of June, 2023. Ex.A24:Online computerized copy of salary slip of July, 2023. Ex.A25:Online computerized copy of salary slip of August, 2023. Ex.A26:Online computerized copy of salary slip of September, 2023. Ex.A27:Online computerized copy of salary slip of October, 2023. Ex.A28:Online computerized copy of salary slip of November, 2023. Ex.A29:Online computerized copy of salary slip of December, 2023. Ex.A30:Online computerized copy of salary slip of January, 2024. Ex.A31:Online computerized copy of salary slip of February, 2024. Ex.A32:Online computerized copy of salary slip of March, 2024. Ex.A33:Online computerized copy of salary slip of April, 2024. Ex.A34:Online computerized copy of salary slip of May, 2024. Ex.A35:Online computerized copy of salary slip of June, 2024.

FOR DEFENDANTS

-Nil-

I Addl. Junior Civil Judge, FAC: Prl. Junior Civil Judge, Mancherial.

21.08.2025

OS/198/2020

Union Bank of India vs Kunduru Sujatha

11 May 2026

OS No. 198 of 2020 Page 1 of 8

IN THE COURT OF THE PRL. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE :: MANCHERIAL

Present:- Smt. G. Kavitha

Principal Junior Civil Judge

Mancherial

Monday, this the 11 th day of May, 2026

O.S. No. 198 of 2020

Between: Union Bank of India, a Body corporate constituted under Banking Companies (Acquisition & Transfer of undertakings) Act, 1970 having it's Head Office at 239, Vidhan Bhavan Marg, Nariman Point, Mumbai 400 021 and having a branch at I.B. Chowrastha Mancherial, represented by it's Branch Manager Sri S.Balakrishna S/o. Bala Swamy, aged: 34 years, R/o. Mancherial.

… PLAINTIFF //AND//

Kunduru Sujatha, W/o. Ashok Reddy, Aged: 48 years, Occ: Business, R/o. H.No. 20-606, Gayatri Matha Temple Area, Sri Sai Boys Hostel & Kiranam, College Road, Garmilla, Mancherial.

… DEFENDANT

This suit came before me on 06.05.2026 for hearing in the presence of Sri. Sanjay Kumar Jain, Advocate for plaintiff and Sri. T.Bala Bhasker, advocate for defendant and having heard and stood over for consideration, this court delivered the following:

:: J U D G M E N T ::

1.This is a suit filed for recovery of an amount of Rs.2,20,449/-(Rupees

Two Lakhs Twenty Thousand Four Hundred and Forty Nine Only) from the defendant with future interest @ 14% per annum from the date of suit to till realization.

11.05.2026

OS No. 198 of 2020 Page 2 of 8

2.The case of the plaintiff as per the averments made in the plaint as follows:- 2.1.In plaint, it is submitted that the plaintiff is a banking institution carrying on banking business and the defendant is doing business. The defendant approached the plaintiff bank and requested for sanction of a term loan of

Rs.3,00,000/-(Rupees Three Lakhs Only) for the purpose of her business. The plaintiff-bank, after considering the request of the defendant, sanctioned the said loan. In pursuance of the sanction of the loan, the defendant executed necessary documents in favour of the plaintiff bank, namely letter of Sanction,

Promissory Note, Term Loan agreement, Agreement on rate of interest,

Hypothecation(Goods) Agreement, and letter of undertaking. The rate of interest was fixed at 14% per annum with monthly rests. The loan is repayable in (60) installments at the rate of Rs. 5876/- plus interest. The plaintiff bank opened a loan account in the name of the defendant and allowed him to operate the same. The defendant availed the loan facility but failed to discharge her liability. Despite several demands made by the plaintiff bank, the defendant failed to repay the loan amount. Subsequently, the plaintiff bank issued a legal notice dated 26.05.2020 calling upon the defendant to clear the outstanding amount. Even after receipt of the said notice, the defendant failed to repay the loan amount. As per the statement of account maintained by the plaintiff bank in the ordinary course of business, a sum of Rs.2,20,449/- became due and payable by the defendant as on 11.09.2020 Hence, the plaintiff filed the present suit seeking recovery of the said amount with future interest and costs. Hence, the suit.

11.05.2026

OS No. 198 of 2020 Page 3 of 8

3.The case of the defendants as per the averments made in the written statement as follows:- 3.1. In written statement, defendant specifically admitted to true and rest of the contents of the plaint are false, baseless and concocted the same are denied in toto. The defendant admitted that he approached the plaintiff bank for sanction of Rs. 3,00,000/- and made application for her business purpose and accordingly the plaintiff bank sanctioned loan of Rs. 3,00,000/- with interest @14 % per annum which is to be paid in 60 monthly installments @

Rs.5,876/- per month. Defendant admitted that the plaintiff bank opened a loan account in the name of defendant and she sued to pay installments regularly to the plaintiff bank but it is denied that the same is entered into the ledger extract as contemplated under the bankers book evidence and the said extract is totally false and the amount paid by the defendant is not shown in the said ledger. With regard to the said issue, defendant questioned the plaintiff bank authorities wherein they did not give proper reply. Then the defendant stopped repayig the regular installments and requested the plaintiff bank to show all her repayments wherein the bank authorities bluntly refused to show her ledger extract. With regard to the said issue, the defendant stooped paying installments. It is denied that this defendant felt due of Rs.

2,20,449/- as on 11.09.2020 and the plaintiff is called upon to prove the same.

It is further denied that this defendant did not discharge her liability of repayment of regular installments inspite of several demands made by the bank authorities. It is further denied that defendant received legal notice, 11.05.2026

OS No. 198 of 2020 Page 4 of 8

dated: 26.05.2020. It is further submitted that the defendant is not the willful

defaulter and when the plaintiff bank did not entered her regular payments in the ledger maintained by them, she stopped repaying the installments. It is further stated in written statement she approached the bank several times but the plaintiff bank did not respond for her request. The ledger extract filed by the plaintiff bank is totally false and the same is not compared with the original ledger as contemplated under the banker book evidence Act. The defendant paid an amount of Rs. 30,000/- on 25.09.2020 which is not shown in the ledger extract and on such date, there is due of Rs. 1,58,067/- as per the statement given by the plaintiff bank authorities. It is further stated in written statement but without showing any such adjustments, they have falsely claimed excess amount of Rs. 2,20,449/- in the present suit without any record. Thus, the calculation filed the plaintiff bank is totally false. Hence, prayed to dismiss the suit with exemplary costs.

4.My learned predecessor framed the following issues for trial:-

(i) Whether the loan agreement dated 09.02.2016 executed by defendant in favour of the plaintiff is true, valid and binding on defendant ?

(ii) Whether the plaintiff bank is entitled for recovery of an amount of

Rs.2,20,449/- (Rupees Two lakhs Twenty Thousand Four Hundred and Forty

Nine only) from the defendant as prayed for?

(iii) If so, to what relief?

11.05.2026

OS No. 198 of 2020 Page 5 of 8

5.On behalf of the Plaintiff, Plaintiff got examined PW1 and got marked

Ex.A1 to Ex.A9. No evidence was adduced on behalf of Defendant and

Defendant evidence was closed.

6.Heard the learned counsel for the plaintiff and defendant.

7. Now, the issues re-framed as follows:-

(i) Whether the plaintiff proves that the defendant obtained loan

from the plaintiff bank by executing the loan documents?

(ii) Whether the plaintiff proves that the defendant is liable to pay a sum of Rs.2,20,449/- to the plaintiff?

(iii) Whether the plaintiff is entitled to future interest and costs?

(iv) To what relief?

8.The plaintiff in support of his case, got examined as PW1 and got marked

Ex.A1 to Ex.A9. Ex.A1 is the original copy of loan application form,

dated:09.02.2016, Ex.A2 is the promissory note, dated: 10.02.2016, Ex.A3 is

the General Term Loan Agreement, dated:10.02.2016, Ex.A4 is the

Hypothecation Agreement, dated:10.02.2016, Ex.A5 is the Composite Debt balance confirmation, dated: 09.11.2018, Ex.A6 is the statement of account,

dated: 11.09.2020, Ex.A7 is the Office copy of legal notice, dated:26.05.2020,

Ex.A8 is the postal receipt, dated: 26.05.2020 and Ex.A9 is the Returned RP cover.

11.05.2026

OS No. 198 of 2020 Page 6 of 8

Issue No.1 & 2:

9.PW1, who is the Branch Manager of the plaintiff bank, deposed in support of the averments made in the plaint. Through his evidence, the plaintiff has produced Ex.A1 to Ex.A4, which clearly show that the defendant applied for the loan and executed the necessary loan documents in favour of the plaintiff bank. Ex.A1, the loan application form, establishes that the defendant approached the plaintiff bank for financial assistance. Ex.A2, the promissory note, shows that the defendant promised to repay the loan amount with interest. Ex.A3 and Ex.A4 are the General Loan agreement and hypothecation agreement executed by the defendant in favour of the plaintiff bank. The Plaintiff has also produced Ex.A5 is the composite debt balance confirmation and plaintiff has also produced Ex.A6, the statement of account, which is maintained in the ordinary course of banking business. The said statement shows that a sum of Rs.2,20,449/- is due from the defendant as on 11.09.2020. Further, Ex.A7, Ex.A8 and Ex.A9 establish that the plaintiff bank issued a legal notice to the defendant demanding payment of the outstanding amount. It is significant to note that PW1 was not cross-examined by the defendant. When the testimony of a witness remains unchallenged in cross- examination, the same can be safely relied upon.

10.The defendant, though filed written statement denying the claim, did not step into the witness box to substantiate his defence. No documentary evidence was also produced on behalf of the defendant. It is a settled principle of law that mere denial in the written statement without supporting evidence is 11.05.2026

OS No. 198 of 2020 Page 7 of 8

not sufficient to disprove the plaintiff’s case. In the present case, the evidence of PW1 and the documentary evidence marked as Ex.A1 to Ex.A9 clearly establish that the defendant obtained loan from the plaintiff bank and failed to repay the same. Therefore, this Court holds that the plaintiff has successfully proved that the defendant is liable to pay Rs.2,20,449/- to the plaintiff.

Accordingly, Issue Nos.1 and 2 are answered in favour of the plaintiff.

Issue No.3:

11.The plaintiff has claimed future interest at 14% per annum as per the loan agreement. Considering the nature of the transaction and the documents placed on record, this Court is of the opinion that the plaintiff is entitled to future interest at the agreed rate. Therefore, the plaintiff is entitled to future interest at 14% per annum from the date of suit till realization along with costs of the suit. Accordingly, Issue No.3 is answered in favour of the plaintiff.

Issue No.4:

12. In the result, suit is decreed with costs, for recovery of an amount of

Rs.2,20,449/-(Rupees Two Lakhs Twenty Thousand Four Hundred and Forty

Nine Only) with interest @ 14% per annum on principal amount from the date of suit to till realization.

Typed to my dictation by the Typist, corrected and pronounced by me in the open court on this the 11 th day of May, 2026.

Prl. Junior Civil Judge, Mancherial.

11.05.2026

OS No. 198 of 2020 Page 8 of 8

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

FOR PLAINTIFF FOR DEFENDANT

PW1: Banoth Praveen Kumar - None -

EXHIBITS MARKED FOR PLAINTIFF

Ex.A1:Loan application form, dated: 09.02.2016.

Ex.A2:Promissory note, dated: 10.02.2016

Ex.A3:General Term Loan Agreement, dated: 10.02.2016

Ex.A4:Hypothecation Agreement, dated:10.02.2016

Ex.A5:Composite Debt Balance Confirmation, dated: 09.11.2018

Ex.A6:Statement of account, dated: 11.09.2020

Ex.A7:Office copy of legal notice, dated:26.05.2020

Ex.A8:Postal receipt, dated: 26.05.2020

Ex.A9:Returned RP cover.

FOR DEFENDANT

-Nil-

Prl. Junior Civil Judge, Mancherial.

11.05.2026

CC/985/2024 Acquitted

State of Telangana vs Goutham Rao Musale

06 May 2026

CC. No. 985 of 2024Page 1 of 8

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF

FIRST CLASS, MANCHERIAL

Present: Smt. G. Kavitha, Prl. Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Mancherial.

Wednesday, this the 6th day of May, 2026

CC.No. 985 of 2024

Between:

The State of Telangana through Sub Inspector of Police, Ramakrishnapur. …Complainant //And//

Musale Gowtham Rao, S/o. Late Srinivasa Rao, Aged: 38 years, Occ: Business, R/o. H.No. 17-1-229-11, flot No.303, Siva Sai Residency Venugopal Nagar AnthapurDist: Andhrapradesh State. Now at Sree nilyam jonna Iron Mart Back Side, Kalyanadurga Road, Ananthapuram.

…Accused Person

This case is coming before me for final hearing on 05.05.2026 in the presence of Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor for the State and Sri. M.Nagendra, Learned Counsel for Accused person and having been heard and having stood over for consideration till this day, the Court delivered the following:-

J U D G M E N T

1.Sub-Inspector of Police, Ramakrishnpur has filed charge sheet against accused person for the offences punishable U/Sec. 85 of BNS and Sec. 3 & 4 of DP Act.

2.Brief facts of the prosecution-case is that on 03.10.2024 at 14.00 hours the Informant Akula Padma came to PS and lodged a Telugu written petition stating that on 15.08.2012, she got love marriage with her 06.05.2026

CC. No. 985 of 2024Page 2 of 8

husband M.Goutham Rao in the presence of both their family members with consent of them. At the time of their marriage, her parents gave net cash of Rs. 1,50,000/- besides 7 1/2 tulas gold to her husband as dowry.

She lead marriage life happily for few days. Later, her husband used to came home in drunken state and tortured her in mentally and physically to bring additional dowry Rs. 15 lakhs from her parents. Deue to their wedlock, she blessed two children but her husband did not changed his behaviour and continued tortured her, due to his harassment, in the year 2021, her parents gave 10 tulas gold ornaments for her including her husband and their children, even meted such demand, her husband did not stop the torture and continued the same. Due to reason, she narrated the matter to her parents, upon which, her parents sent Rs. 10 lakhs to her bank account, her husband taken Rs. 7,50,000/- from her account and spent the money for his needs, after that again, her husband started torture her for Rs. 5 Lakhs. Unbearable his torture, serveral times, when she was came to her parent's house. Later her husband had taken her back with him by assuring that he will not do torture her and in the month of February, 2024, her husband beat her with a wooden roti stick over her head indiscriminately as a result she sustained bleeding injuries again on 09.08.2024 at 23.30 hours, accused picked up quarrel with her unnecessarily, later her husband beat her with slipper, abused and threatened her with dire consequences to kill her, due to fear of her 06.05.2026

CC. No. 985 of 2024Page 3 of 8

husband, she came to her parent's house at Ramakrishnapur. Since then, she is staying with her parents. On 13.08.2024, accused came to

Ramakrishnapur and quarrelled with her and went away. As such she requested to take necessary action.

3.On receipt of the above complaint, the LW11/G. Rajashekar, has registered a case in Cr.No. 149 of 2024 U/Sec. 85 of BNS, Sec. 3 & 4 of

DP Act and took up the investigation. During the course of the investigation, the LW11 has examined the LW1 and recorded her statement in part-II CD in detail U/Sec. 180 BNSS and LW1 submitted wedding card and marriage's photos. Later, LW11 has visited the scene of offence i.e., house of LW1 situated at Bhagathsingh Nagar,

Ramakrishnapur. Later LW11 has examined and recorded the statements of LWs. 2 to 5 namely Akula Kalavathi, Akula Naganna, Akula Ashok and

Pulisetti LInganna in part-II CD U/Sec. 180 BNSS. Later LW11 secured presence of two mediators i.e., Lws 9 & 10 namely Orimetla Bhaskar and

Ponaganti Srinivas observed scene, drew the rough sketch of the scene incorporated the same in CDF. On 05.10.2024, LW11 has examined and recorded the statements of LW6 to LW8 namely Y.Shakunthala, Vishnu

Vandana and Kommu Ganga.

4.It is further stated that on 21.10.2024, the LW11 served the 35(3)(4) (5)(6) BNSS notice to the accused with instructions to appear before the 06.05.2026

CC. No. 985 of 2024Page 4 of 8

LW11. Accordingly, on 25.10.2024 the accused came to Police Station and appeared before the LW11. Upon which the LW11 received undertaking from accused with instructions to appear before the

Honourable Court. Subsequently, after completion of investigation, LW11

filed charge sheet against accused person for the offences punishable

U/Sec. 85 of BNS, Sec. 3 & 4 of DP Act.

5.Cognizance is taken for the offence U/Sec. 85 of BNS, Sec. 3 & 4 of DP Act against accused person.

6.After service of summons, accused person appeared before the court and he was furnished with the copies of documents U/Sec. 230 of

BNSS and thereafter, examined under Sec.262 BNSS for the accusation levelled against them under Sec. 85 of BNS, Sec. 3 & 4 of DP Act, for which, he pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried.

7.In order to prove the guilt of the accused person, prosecution had examined Pw1 to PW4 and got marked Ex.P1 to Ex.P8. Ex.P1 is the signature of PW1 on report. Ex.P2 is the Sec. 180 of BNSS statement of

PW1. Ex.P3 is the Sec. 180 of BNSS statement of PW2. Ex.P4 is the

Sec. 180 of BNSS statement of PW3. Ex.P5 is the report, Ex.P6 is the

FIR, Ex.P7 is the Scene of Offence Panchanama, Ex.P8 is the rough sketch.

06.05.2026

CC. No. 985 of 2024Page 5 of 8

8.After closure of prosecution-evidence, the incriminating circumstances found against the accused person were explained to the accused person under section 351 of BNSS, for which, he denied and reported no defence evidence.

9.Heard both sides and perused the material record.

10.Now the point for determination that arose is: “Whether the

prosecution has proved the guilt of accused person for the offences

punishable under Section 85 of BNS, Sec. 3 & 4 of DP Act beyond all

reasonable doubt?

11.Point: To prove the case, prosecution examined Pw1 to PW4 and got marked Ex.P1 to Ex.P8.

12.PW1 being complainant turned hostile and did not support the case of prosecution. Though PW1 is cross examined by Learned APP, nothing is elicited during cross examination. Therefore, the evidence of PW1 is noway helpful to the case of prosecution.

13.PW2 and PW3 are turned hostile and did not support the case of prosecution. Though PW2 and PW3 are cross examined by Learned APP, nothing is elicited during cross examination. Therefore, the evidence of

PW2 and 3 are noway helpful to the case of prosecution.

06.05.2026

CC. No. 985 of 2024Page 6 of 8

14.PW4 deposed that on 03.10.2024, he received report from PW1 based in it, he registered a case in Cr.No. 149 of 2024 for the offence punishable U/Sec. 85 of BNS, Sec. 3 & 4 of DP Act and issued FIR to all the concerned. Ex.P5 is the report, Ex.P6 is the FIR. He further stated that during the course of investigation, he examined the PW1 and recorded her statement and collected marriage photos and wedding card of Accused and PW1. Later PW4 have visited the scene of offence i.e.,

House of PW1, which is situated at Bhagath Singh Nagar,

Ramakrishnapur. Thereafter, he examined PW2, PW3, LW4 and LW5 and recorded their statements. Thereafter he have conducted scene of offence panchanama and drew the rough sketch in the presence of

LW9/Orimetla Bhaskar and LW10/Ponaganti Srinivas and in their presence, he conducted Scene of Offence Panchanama and drew rough sketch. Ex.P7 is Scene of Offence Panchanama and Ex.P8 is rough sketch. On 21.10.2024, he served 35(3)(4)(5)(6) BNSS notice to the accused. After completion of entire investigation, he filed the charge sheet against the accused.

14.As stated earlier, in this case PW1 being victim herself turned hostile and did not support the case of prosecution. It appears that matter is compromised out of the Court, hence, PW1 did not put-forth real facts

before the Court.

06.05.2026

CC. No. 985 of 2024Page 7 of 8

15.As seen from the evidence of PW4, PW4 being Investigation

Officer, examined witnesses and filed charge sheet against accused person. Except it, he did not state anything incriminating against accused person.

16.Having regard to facts and circumstances, it is concluded that the prosecution miserably failed to establish its case against the accused person for the said offences. Hence, the accused person is entitled for acquittal. The point is answered, accordingly.

17.In the result, Accused is found not guilty for the offences punishable U/Sec. 85 of BNS, Sec. 3 & 4 of DP Act. Accordingly,

Accused is acquitted Under Sec.271(1) of BNSS. for the above said offences. The bail bonds of Accused person, if any, shall stand cancelled, after expiry of appeal time. There is no case property.

Typed to my dictation by the Typist, corrected and pronounced by me in the open court on this 6 th day of May, 2026.

Prl. Judl. Magistrate of First Class, Mancherial.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED FOR

PROSECUTION: DEFENCE:

PW-1: A.Padma - None - PW-2: A.Kalavathi PW-3: A.Naganna PW-4: G. Rajashekar 06.05.2026

CC. No. 985 of 2024Page 8 of 8

EXHIBITS MARKED FOR : PROSECUTION:

Ex.P1: Signature of PW1 on report. Ex.P2: Sec. 180 BNSS statement of PW1 Ex.P3: Sec. 180 BNSS statement of PW2 Ex.P4: Sec. 180 BNSS statement of PW3 Ex.P5: Report Ex.P6: FIR Ex.P7: Scene of Offence Panchanama Ex.P8: Rough Sketch

EXHIBITS MARKED FOR : DEFENCE: -Nil-

MATERIAL OBJECTS MARKED

-Nil-

Prl. Judl. Magistrate of First Class, Mancherial.

06.05.2026

CC. No. 985 of 2024Page 9 of 8

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF

FIRST CLASS, MANCHERIAL

CC No. 306 of 2025

1Calendar Case No.:306 of 2025 2Name of the P.S.:Ramakrishnapur 3Section of Law:U/Sec. 85 & 118(1) BNS 4Crime No.:48 of 2025 5Name and description ofMarri Srinivas S/o. Komuraiah, Age: 35 years, Occ: accusedSCCL Employee, R/o. Q.No. SD-523, Shivajinagar, Ramakrishanapur.

6Date of offence:26.03.2025 7Date of complaint:27.03.2025 8Date of Apprehension:03.04.2025 9Released on bail:- 10Commencement of trial:19.09.2025 11Close of Trial:19.09.2025 12Date of Judgment:25.09.2025 13Reasons for delay:- 14Sentence of order:IN THE RESULT:- Accused is found not guilty for the offences punishable U/Sec. 85 and 118(1) BNS. Accordingly, Accused is acquitted Under Sec.271(1) of BNSS. for the above said offences. The bail bonds of Accused person, if any, shall stand cancelled, after expiry of appeal time. There is no case property.

Prl. Judl. Magistrate of First Class, Mancherial.

06.05.2026

CC/985/2024 Acquitted

State of Telangana vs Goutham Rao Musale

06 May 2026

CC. No. 985 of 2024Page 1 of 8

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF

FIRST CLASS, MANCHERIAL

Present: Smt. G. Kavitha, Prl. Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Mancherial.

Wednesday, this the 6th day of May, 2026

CC.No. 985 of 2024

Between:

The State of Telangana through Sub Inspector of Police, Ramakrishnapur. …Complainant //And//

…Accused Person

J U D G M E N T

1.Sub-Inspector of Police, Ramakrishnpur has filed charge sheet against accused person for the offences punishable U/Sec. 85 of BNS and Sec. 3 & 4 of DP Act.

CC. No. 985 of 2024Page 2 of 8

CC. No. 985 of 2024Page 3 of 8

husband, she came to her parent's house at Ramakrishnapur. Since then, she is staying with her parents. On 13.08.2024, accused came to

Ramakrishnapur and quarrelled with her and went away. As such she requested to take necessary action.

3.On receipt of the above complaint, the LW11/G. Rajashekar, has registered a case in Cr.No. 149 of 2024 U/Sec. 85 of BNS, Sec. 3 & 4 of

Ramakrishnapur. Later LW11 has examined and recorded the statements of LWs. 2 to 5 namely Akula Kalavathi, Akula Naganna, Akula Ashok and

Pulisetti LInganna in part-II CD U/Sec. 180 BNSS. Later LW11 secured presence of two mediators i.e., Lws 9 & 10 namely Orimetla Bhaskar and

Vandana and Kommu Ganga.

4.It is further stated that on 21.10.2024, the LW11 served the 35(3)(4) (5)(6) BNSS notice to the accused with instructions to appear before the 06.05.2026

CC. No. 985 of 2024Page 4 of 8

LW11. Accordingly, on 25.10.2024 the accused came to Police Station and appeared before the LW11. Upon which the LW11 received undertaking from accused with instructions to appear before the

Honourable Court. Subsequently, after completion of investigation, LW11

filed charge sheet against accused person for the offences punishable

U/Sec. 85 of BNS, Sec. 3 & 4 of DP Act.

5.Cognizance is taken for the offence U/Sec. 85 of BNS, Sec. 3 & 4 of DP Act against accused person.

6.After service of summons, accused person appeared before the court and he was furnished with the copies of documents U/Sec. 230 of

PW1. Ex.P3 is the Sec. 180 of BNSS statement of PW2. Ex.P4 is the

Sec. 180 of BNSS statement of PW3. Ex.P5 is the report, Ex.P6 is the

FIR, Ex.P7 is the Scene of Offence Panchanama, Ex.P8 is the rough sketch.

06.05.2026

CC. No. 985 of 2024Page 5 of 8

9.Heard both sides and perused the material record.

10.Now the point for determination that arose is: “Whether the

prosecution has proved the guilt of accused person for the offences

punishable under Section 85 of BNS, Sec. 3 & 4 of DP Act beyond all

reasonable doubt?

11.Point: To prove the case, prosecution examined Pw1 to PW4 and got marked Ex.P1 to Ex.P8.

PW2 and 3 are noway helpful to the case of prosecution.

06.05.2026

CC. No. 985 of 2024Page 6 of 8

House of PW1, which is situated at Bhagath Singh Nagar,

Ramakrishnapur. Thereafter, he examined PW2, PW3, LW4 and LW5 and recorded their statements. Thereafter he have conducted scene of offence panchanama and drew the rough sketch in the presence of

before the Court.

06.05.2026

CC. No. 985 of 2024Page 7 of 8

15.As seen from the evidence of PW4, PW4 being Investigation

Officer, examined witnesses and filed charge sheet against accused person. Except it, he did not state anything incriminating against accused person.

17.In the result, Accused is found not guilty for the offences punishable U/Sec. 85 of BNS, Sec. 3 & 4 of DP Act. Accordingly,

Typed to my dictation by the Typist, corrected and pronounced by me in the open court on this 6 th day of May, 2026.

Prl. Judl. Magistrate of First Class, Mancherial.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED FOR

PROSECUTION: DEFENCE:

PW-1: A.Padma - None - PW-2: A.Kalavathi PW-3: A.Naganna PW-4: G. Rajashekar 06.05.2026

CC. No. 985 of 2024Page 8 of 8

EXHIBITS MARKED FOR : PROSECUTION:

EXHIBITS MARKED FOR : DEFENCE: -Nil-

MATERIAL OBJECTS MARKED

-Nil-

Prl. Judl. Magistrate of First Class, Mancherial.

06.05.2026

CC. No. 985 of 2024Page 9 of 8

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF

FIRST CLASS, MANCHERIAL

CC No. 306 of 2025

Prl. Judl. Magistrate of First Class, Mancherial.

06.05.2026

OS/194/2022

Anumandla Sridhar Reddy vs Muthoju Sathish

20 Aug 2025

OS No. 194 of 2022 Page 1 of 7

IN THE COURT OF I ADDITIONAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT

MANCHERIAL

PRESENT: Smt. G. Kavitha I Addl. Junior Civil Judge, Mancherial

Wednesday, this the 20th day of August, 2025

OS.No. 194 of 2022

Between:-

Anumandla Sridhar Reddy S/o. Raji Reddy, Age: 45 years, Occ: Business, R/o. Qr.No. SD-1012, Hanuman Nagar, Ramakrishnapur, R/m. Mandamarri, Dist: Mancherial. ….Plaintiff //AND//

Muthoju Sathish S/o. Satyanarayana, Age: 38 years, Occ: Business, R/o. H.No. 27-338, Hamaliwada, Mancherial Town and District.

…Defendant

This suit came before me on 30.07.2025 for final hearing in the presence of Sri. D. Thirupathi, Advocate for the plaintiff and Sri. G. Ravi Kumar, Advocate for the defendant and having heard and stood over for consideration, this court delivered the following:

:: J U D G M E N T ::

1.This is a suit filed for recovery of amount of Rs. 9,47,200/- (Rupees

Nine Lakhs Fourty Seven Thousand Two Hundred Only) from the defendant with future interest from the date of suit to till realization.

2. The case of the plaintiff as per averments made in the plaint as follows:- 2.1.In plaint, it is submitted that the plaintiff and defendant are acquainted with each other and out of said acquaintance, the defendant in 20.08.2025

OS No. 194 of 2022 Page 2 of 7

the month of December, 2019 approached and requested the plaintiff to arrange a loan of Rs.6,00,000/- (Rupees Six Lakhs Only) to meet his business and family necessities and he also promised to repay the same within six months. It is further stated that on considering his request, the plaintiff arranged said amount out of his savings, accordingly, on 06.01.2020, the defendant borrowed an amount of Rs.6,00,000/- (Rupees

Six Lakhs Only) from the plaintiff at plaintiff’s house in the presence of witnesses namely Krishna Murthy and Boga Suresh and after receiving said amount the defendant executed a promissory note in favour of plaintiff agreeing to repay the loan amount along with interest @ Rs.2/- per month per hundred on his demand or order in the presence of same witnesses.

2.2.It is further submitted that the plaintiff demanded the defendant several times for repayment of loan amount orally along with accrued interest thereon, but the defendant postponed the repayment on one pretext or the other. In the meanwhile, Government of India imposed Lock

Down due to Covid-19 and since then the defendant have been intentionally avoiding the repayment of loan amount and accrued interest thereon. In the month of January, 2022 also the plaintiff demanded the defendant for repayment of loan amount in the presence of witnesses but the defendant postponed the repayment on one pretext or the other and finally he failed to repay the loan amount to the plaintiff. As such, having vexed with his attitude, the plaintiff got issued the demand notice to the 20.08.2025

OS No. 194 of 2022 Page 3 of 7

defendant demanding the repayment along with accrued interest thereon on 04.05.2022 and the defendant having received the demand notice failed to repay the loan amount or gave any reply. Hence, the suit.

3.Defendant filed written statement. In written statement filed by

Defendant, it is stated that defendant had no such requirement of such a huge amount and never approached the plaintiff for the said amount or any amount. The defendant is a business man as such he never borrowed any amount, much less the alleged amount of Rs.6,00,000/- (Rupees Six Lakhs

Only) on 06.01.2020 from the plaintiff’s house in the presence of witnesses namely Krishna Murthy and Boga Suresh. It is further stated that defendant never executed any document in favour of plaintiff and alleged promissory note dt. 06.01.2020 is forged one, fabricated one in order to gain money falsely from the defendant. In written statement, it is further stated that suit claim is false and the same is created for the purpose of filing the present suit.

4.In written statement, it is stated that defendant is the business man and leading respectful life in the society without any financial hardship. The plaintiff who is doing private chit business in the locality in the habit of creating fabricate pro-notes against the innocent persons and habit of claiming huge amounts, the plaintiff created the alleged pro-note and filed present suit without any transaction. As such, the suit is liable for dismissal.

20.08.2025

OS No. 194 of 2022 Page 4 of 7

5.My learned predecessor framed the following issues for trial:

(1) Whether the promissory note dt. 06.01.2020 executed by defendant in favour of plaintiff is true, valid and binding on defendant?

(2) Whether the plaintiff is entitled for recovery of an amount of Rs.

9,47,200/- (Rupees Nine Lakhs Fourty Seven Thousand Two Hundred Only) from the defendant, as prayed for?

(3) If so? To what relief?

6.The plaintiff examined himself as PW1 and got marked Ex.A1 to

Ex.A4. The defendant failed to cross-examine PW1 inspite of taking considerable adjournments hence, the cross examination of PW1 is closed.

Defendant failed to adduce evidence, inspite of taking considerable time.

Hence, defendant’s evidence is closed.

7.Heard the learned counsel for the plaintiff and perused the record.

Defendant did not turn up, inspite of conditional order. Hence, defendant’s arguments treated as nil.

8. Issues:

(1) Whether the promissory note dt. 06.01.2020 executed by defendant in favour of plaintiff is true, valid and binding on defendant?

(2) Whether the plaintiff is entitled for recovery of an amount of 9,47,200/- (Rupees Nine Lakhs Fourty Seven Thousand Two Hundred Only) from the defendant as prayed for?

20.08.2025

OS No. 194 of 2022 Page 5 of 7

(3) If so? To what relief?

Issue No.1 & 2:

9.It is a simple case of plaintiff that the defendant approached the plaintiff for a hand loan of Rs.6,00,000/- (Rupees Six Lakhs Only) to meet his business and family necessities and he also promised to repay same within six months, as such, plaintiff advanced the said amount on 06.01.2020 in the presence of witnesses namely Krishna Murthy and Boga

Suresh. It is further case of plaintiff that the defendant executed a promissory note in favour of plaintiff agreeing to repay the loan amount along with interest @ Rs.2/- per month when demanded by plaintiff. It is further case of the plaintiff that the plaintiff demanded the defendant for repayment of loan amount in the presence of witnesses but the defendant postponed the repayment on one pretext or the other and finally defendant failed to repay the loan amount to the plaintiff. The plaintiff got issued the demand notice to the defendant demanding the repayment along with accrued interest thereon 04.05.2022, and the defendant, having received the demand notice, neither repaid the loan amount nor gave any reply.

Hence, prayed the Court to decree the suit.

10.The plaintiff in support of his case, got examined PW1 and got marked Ex.A1 to Ex.A4. Ex.A1 is the promissory note, dated 06.01.2020,

Ex.A2 is legal notice, dated 04.05.2022, Ex.A3 is the postal receipt, dated 04.05.2022, Ex.A4 is the service proof of demand notice.

20.08.2025

OS No. 194 of 2022 Page 6 of 7

11.The chief of PW1 is replication of averments of plaint. Coming to documentary evidence, on perusal of Ex.A1/promissory note dt.

06.01.2020, it reveals that plaintiff has lent an amount of Rs. 6,00,000/- (Rupees Six Lakhs Only) to the defendant for interest @ 2% per month.

Further, the document Ex.A2/legal notice, dated 04.05.2022, reveals that plaintiff has demanded for repayment of the loan amount by issuing legal notice to defendant. Further documents Ex.A3/Postal receipt dt.

04.05.2022 and Ex.A4/Service proof of Demand Notice show that the defendant inspite of receiving notice did not pay the amount. As such, the chief of PW1 and documents Ex.A1 to A4 clearly establishes, the case of plaintiff.

12.Since the defendant failed to cross examined PW1, the chief of PW1 coupled with Ex.A1 to Ex.A4 remained unchallenged. In view of unchallenged testimony of PW1 and documents Ex.A1 to Ex.A4, this Court finds no reasons to disbelieve the case of plaintiff.

13.In view of above reasons, it is concluded that plaintiff is entitled for recovery of an amount of Rs.9,47,200/- (Rupees Nine Lakhs Fourty Seven

Thousand Two Hundred only) with interest @ 12% per annum on the

principal amount of Rs.6,00,000/- (Rupees Six Lakhs Only) from the date

of suit to till realization. Accordingly, Issue No.1 and 2 are answered in favour of plaintiff.

20.08.2025

OS No. 194 of 2022 Page 7 of 7

Issue No.3

14.In the result, suit is decreed with cost directing defendant to pay an amount of Rs.9,47,200/- (Rupees Nine Lakhs Fourty Seven Thousand Two

Hundred Only) to plaintiff with interest @ 12% per annum on principal amount of Rs.6,00,000/- (Rupees Six Lakhs Only) from the date of suit to till date of realization.

Typed to my dictation by the Stenographer, corrected and

pronounced by me in the open court on this the 20 th day of August,

2025.

I Addl. Junior Civil Judge, Mancherial.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

FOR PLAINTIFF FOR DEFENDANT

PW1: Anumandla Sridhar Reddy -None-

EXHIBITS MARKED FOR PLAINTIFF

Ex.A1: Promissory note, dated 06.01.2020.

Ex.A2: Legal Notice, dated 04.05.2022.

Ex.A3: Postal receipt, dated 04.05.2022.

Ex.A4: Service proof of Demand Notice.

FOR DEFENDANT

-Nil-

I Addl. Junior Civil Judge, Mancherial.

20.08.2025

Order Record 2,862 total

Case No.	Parties	Date	Type	Outcome
EP/144/2021	Mahithi Chits India Pvt.Ltd, Mancherial vs MD Gouse Pasha	13 May 2026	other	—
EP/206/2025	Purandla Purushotham, S/o. Mallaiah vs Sirimalla Rajesham, S/o. Mallaiah	13 May 2026	other	—
EP/471/2022	M/s Mayura chit funds Pvt.ltd, Mancherial vs Gadapa Srinivas	13 May 2026	Order	—
OS/133/2021	Gunta Mallesh vs Legalla Laxmi	12 May 2026	Order	—
OS/31/2025	Suddula Naresh vs Boge Ramesh	11 May 2026	judgment	—
OS/91/2024	Bavandlapelli Saroja vs Narapuram Jyothi	11 May 2026	Order	—
OS/198/2020	Union Bank of India vs Kunduru Sujatha	11 May 2026	judgment	—
CC/931/2023	State of Telangana Ramakrishnapur vs Kunusothu Shankar	11 May 2026	Order	—
DVC/14/2023	Lingala Thirumala vs Lingala Shankaraiah	08 May 2026	Order	—
STC.NI/202/2023	Palthe Ravi Kumar vs Bondila Ashok Singh	08 May 2026	Order	—
OS/169/2024	Kaiyethi Yadagiri vs Kondu @ Bhaskari Jalaja	07 May 2026	judgment	—
OS/308/2023	Gopathi Mallaiah vs Muthe Mallesh	07 May 2026	judgment	—
CC/344/2023	State of Telanganan Ramakrishnapur vs Rangu Thirupathi @ Bandari Thirupathi	07 May 2026	Order	—
EP/94/2024	Bonala Srinivas vs Kola Maheshwar Rao	06 May 2026	Order	—
EP/156/2022	M/S Shriram Chits pvt.Ltd., Mancherial vs V Triyambakeshwar	06 May 2026	other	—
EP/233/2025	Ms Saradhi Chit Funds Pvt Ltd, Br. Mancherial vs Gopi Krishna Senigarapu, S/o. Senigarapu Chandraiah	06 May 2026	Order	—
OS/179/2020	Eerla a/s Thuti Thirumala vs Thuti Laxmi	06 May 2026	Order	—
CC/985/2024	State of Telangana vs Goutham Rao Musale	06 May 2026	judgment	Acquitted
EP/32/2026	Gajji Ravi, S/o. Komuraiah vs Regala Rajesh, S/o. Laxmaiah	05 May 2026	other	—
OS/173/2020	Sathamsetti Mallaiah vs Sathyamsetti Vanitha	05 May 2026	Order	—
OS/168/2020	Parvathi Padma vs Mandala Sathish	04 May 2026	Order	—
STC.NI/127/2024	Moluguri Prem Sagar vs Ram Thirupathi	01 May 2026	Order	—
EP/194/2023	Shanigarapu Kiran Kumar vs Emula Rajam	29 Apr 2026	Order	—
OS/136/2025	Konda Srinivas vs Durgam Sujatha	29 Apr 2026	Order	—
OS/288/2022	Nagawath Raju vs Nagawath Kamala	29 Apr 2026	judgment	—
OS/1/2026	Mangalagiri Pothu Raju, S/o. Devudu vs Jakkula Mallesh, S/o. Rajanna	28 Apr 2026	judgment	—
OS/19/2026	Salla Srinivas Reddy, S/o. Laxma Reddy vs Maloth Kishore, S/o. Jamla	28 Apr 2026	Order	—
OS/132/2021	Ponaganti Durga Rajendra Prasad vs Macharla Rajanarsu	28 Apr 2026	judgment	—
OS/229/2025	Nimmathi Sampath vs Gadila Vijay Kumar	28 Apr 2026	judgment	—
OS/235/2025	Canara Bank vs Raparthi Venkateshwar	28 Apr 2026	Order	—
CC/356/2023	State of Telangana Ramakrishnapur vs Ramesh Kumar bais	28 Apr 2026	judgment	—
CC/639/2023	State of Telangana rkp vs Bairi Rajendra Prasad	28 Apr 2026	judgment	—
MC/23/2024	KUDIKALA INDIRA PRIYA DARSHINI @ GURRAM INDIRA PRIYA DARSHINI vs SHYAM SUNDAR KUDIKALA	28 Apr 2026	Order	—
OS/314/2021	Ravikanti Srinivas vs Tadishetti Gayathri	24 Apr 2026	Order	—
EP/243/2023	Dorishetti Kranthi Kumar vs Kuthuru Gopal	23 Apr 2026	Order	—
OS/62/2021	Md. Gouse vs Thetakula Shankar	23 Apr 2026	Order	—
OS/86/2020	Polaveni @ Mabbu Ramakka vs Polaveni Mallamma	17 Apr 2026	Order	—
STC.NI/87/2024	Pathipaka Rajesham vs Chindam Anil	17 Apr 2026	Order	—
EP/20/2024	Vadhuri Ramesh vs Muddasani Murali	15 Apr 2026	other	—
OS/15/2020	Ambadi Sammaiah vs Ponnam Naresh	15 Apr 2026	other	—
OS/191/2021	Syed Wasim Raza vs S.I.K Rehmman	10 Apr 2026	judgment	—
OS/67/2024	Maidam Santhosh vs Nara Vamshi	09 Apr 2026	judgment	—
EP/81/2022	Sri Ramadithya Chit funds, Mancherial vs Md Badiuddin Siddique	08 Apr 2026	Order	—
EP/257/2025	Ms Manyasree Chits Pvt Ltd vs Jadi Rakesh Kumar	08 Apr 2026	Order	—
OS/322/2025	Thuti Ramesh, S/o. Bheemaiah vs Mulkalla Ravinder, S/o. Gangaiah	08 Apr 2026	judgment	—
EP/276/2024	M/S. Shiram Chits India Pvt. Ltd., Br. Mancherial vs Neelaboina Santhosh	06 Apr 2026	other	—
OS/55/2024	Kuriminidia @ Siliveri Malleshwari vs Union Bank of India	31 Mar 2026	judgment	—
OS/276/2021	Cheruku Chandra Shekar Reddy vs Kambala Narsaiah	31 Mar 2026	judgment	—
OS/353/2022	Union Bank of India vs Chunchu Madhan	31 Mar 2026	other	—
MC/20/2023	Gangadari Sunitha Rani vs Gangadari Giridhar	31 Mar 2026	Order	—
OS/316/2022	Palakurthi Shiva Kumar vs Kotte Bhaskar	30 Mar 2026	judgment	—
CC/186/2026	State of Telangana of PS Ramakrishnapur vs Saicharan Sadaram	30 Mar 2026	Order	—
CC/35/2025	State of Telangana PS Ramakrishnapur vs Jeevan Manda	28 Mar 2026	Order	—
CC/160/2024	State of Telangana Police Station Ramakrishnapur vs Ramtenki Pavan Kalyan	28 Mar 2026	Order	—
CC/677/2023	State of Telangana rkp vs Kamera Prabhanjan	28 Mar 2026	Order	—
CC/756/2025	State of Telangana through SHO PS Ramakrishnapur vs Ajay Bandari	28 Mar 2026	Order	—
STC/516/2026	State of Telangana of PS Ramakrishnapur vs Aggu Kumar, S/o. Ramulu	28 Mar 2026	Order	—
STC/517/2026	State of Telangana of PS Ramakrishnapur vs Azmeera Pavan Kumar, S/o. Kishan	28 Mar 2026	Order	—
STC/518/2026	State of Telangana of PS Ramakrishnapur vs Gajji Swami, S/o. Ellaiah	28 Mar 2026	Order	—
STC/519/2026	State of Telangana of PS Ramakrishnapur vs Cherukula Charan, S/o. Mallesh	28 Mar 2026	Order	—
STC/520/2026	State of Telangana of PS Ramakrishnapur vs Gunda Dileep Reddy, S/o. Bhuma Reddy	28 Mar 2026	Order	—
STC/521/2026	State of Telangana of PS Ramakrishnapur vs Akula Shailendhar, S/o. Ravinder	28 Mar 2026	Order	—
STC/522/2026	State of Telangana of PS Ramakrishnapur vs Manda Anil, S/o. Rajalingu	28 Mar 2026	Order	—
STC/523/2026	State of Telangana of PS Ramakrishnapur vs Babum, S/o. Bapu	28 Mar 2026	Order	—
STC/524/2026	State of Telangana of PS Ramakrishnapur vs Shiva Krishna Gudi Kandula, S/o. Vanakanna	28 Mar 2026	Order	—
STC/525/2026	State of Telangana of PS Ramakrishnapur vs Posala Sagar, S/o. Chandraiah	28 Mar 2026	Order	—
STC/535/2026	State of Telangana of PS Ramakrishnapur vs Vainala Surender, S/o. Samabaiah	28 Mar 2026	Order	—
STC/536/2026	State of Telangana of PS Ramakrishnapur vs Arun, S/o. Srinivas	28 Mar 2026	Order	—
STC/551/2026	State of Telangana of PS Ramakrishnapur vs Thodeti Rajender, S/o. Rajaiah	28 Mar 2026	Order	—
STC/553/2026	State of Telangana of PS Ramakrishnapur vs Madugula Charan, S/o. Kumar	28 Mar 2026	Order	—
STC/554/2026	State of Telangana of PS Ramakrishnapur vs Seelam Madhu, s/o. Laxminarayana	28 Mar 2026	Order	—
STC/555/2026	State of Telangana PS Ramakrishnapur vs Boddupalli Saitrinath, S/o. Chandraiah	28 Mar 2026	Order	—
STC/556/2026	State of Telangana PS Ramakrishnapur vs Namarapu Vineeth, S/o. Lenin	28 Mar 2026	Order	—
STC/557/2026	State of Telangana PS Ramakrishnapur vs Dasari Ravinder, S/o. Laxmaiah	28 Mar 2026	Order	—
STC/558/2026	State of Telangana PS Ramakrishnapur vs Shashikumar, S/o. Mallaiah	28 Mar 2026	Order	—
STC/559/2026	State of Telangana of PS Ramakrishnapur vs Kunarapu Bapanna, S/o. Laxminarayana	28 Mar 2026	Order	—
STC/560/2026	State of Telangana PS Ramakrishnapur vs Thoufiq Mohammad, S/o. Nazeer	28 Mar 2026	Order	—
STC/561/2026	State of Telangana of PS Ramakrishnapur vs Sandeep Kampelli, S/o. Shankar	28 Mar 2026	Order	—
STC/562/2026	State of Telangana of PS Ramakrishnapur vs Prathipati Chetan Raju, S/o. Venkatrao	28 Mar 2026	Order	—
STC/563/2026	State of Telangana of PS Ramakrishnapur vs Katikam Hareesh Kumar, S/o. Lachanna	28 Mar 2026	Order	—
STC/564/2026	State of Telangana of PS Ramakrishnapur vs P. Suresh, S/o. Bhanayya	28 Mar 2026	Order	—
STC/565/2026	State of Telangana of PS Ramakrishnapur vs Merla Nagesh, S/o. Lachaiah	28 Mar 2026	Order	—
STC/566/2026	State of Telangana of PS Ramakrishnapur vs Lalkorka Ramesh, S/o. Vinayaka	28 Mar 2026	Order	—
STC/567/2026	State of Telangana of PS Ramakrishnapur vs Jally Vinay, S/o. Lachaiah	28 Mar 2026	Order	—
STC/568/2026	State of Telangana of PS Ramakrishnapur vs Lashetty Raghu, s/o. Thirupathi	28 Mar 2026	Order	—
STC/569/2026	State of Telangana of PS Ramakrishnapur vs Vangarala Anil Kumar, S/o. Lingamurthy	28 Mar 2026	Order	—
STC/570/2026	State of Telangana of PS Ramakrishnapur vs Gogarla Sai Kiran, S/o. Durgaiah	28 Mar 2026	Order	—
STC/594/2026	State of Telangana of PS Ramakrishnapur vs Konkati Prudvinetra, S/o. Ramesh	28 Mar 2026	Order	—
STC/596/2026	State of Telangana of PS Ramakrishnapur vs Pallem Mallesh, S/o. Venkat	28 Mar 2026	Order	—
STC/599/2026	State of Telangana of PS Ramakrishnapur vs Olapu Rajkumar, s/o. Rajesh	28 Mar 2026	Order	—
STC/603/2026	State of Telangana of PS Ramakrishnapur vs Evnugopal Alusa, S/o. Sanker	28 Mar 2026	Order	—
STC/606/2026	State of Telangana of PS Ramakrishnapur vs Chelukure Rajesh, S/o. Satyanarayana	28 Mar 2026	Order	—
STC/608/2026	State of Telangana of PS Ramakrishnapur vs Enuunti Venkatesh, S/o. Sathyam	28 Mar 2026	Order	—
STC/609/2026	State of Telangana of PS Ramakrishnapur vs Boddu Ravi, S/o. Narsayya	28 Mar 2026	Order	—
STC/610/2026	State of Telangana of PS Ramakrishnapur vs MD Shafi, S/o. Kalid	28 Mar 2026	Order	—
STC/612/2026	State of Telangana of PS Ramakrishnapur vs Sowadi Shiva, S/o. Rambeer	28 Mar 2026	Order	—
STC/614/2026	State of Telangana of PS Ramakrishnapur vs Katta Shankar, S/o. Sanker	28 Mar 2026	Order	—
STC/617/2026	State of Telangana of PS Ramakrishnapur vs Umesh Shtam, S/o. Rajam	28 Mar 2026	Order	—
STC/618/2026	State of Telangana of PS Ramakrishnapur vs MD Afshan, S/o. Jaleel	28 Mar 2026	Order	—
STC/620/2026	State of Telangana of PS Ramakrishnapur vs Umesh Shtam, S/o. Rajam	28 Mar 2026	Order	—

Showing 100 of 2,862 orders — Log in to browse all pages.

Monthly Orders (Last 12 Months)

May 2026		23
Apr 2026		25
Mar 2026		566
Feb 2026		98
Jan 2026		64
Dec 2025		343
Nov 2025		342
Oct 2025		25
Sep 2025		518
Aug 2025		32
Jul 2025		40
Jun 2025		827

Frequently Asked Questions

How many cases has Smt. G.Kavitha handled?

Smt. G.Kavitha has handled 2909 court orders since 2025 at Mancherial, SCJ Court Complex. The average disposal rate is 225 orders per month.

What types of cases does Smt. G.Kavitha hear?

Based on available records, Smt. G.Kavitha primarily handles Criminal matters (Summary Trial Cases, Criminal Cases) and Civil matters (Execution Petitions, Original Suits) at Mancherial, SCJ Court Complex.

Where is Smt. G.Kavitha currently posted?

Smt. G.Kavitha is posted as Prl. Junior Civil Judge at Mancherial, SCJ Court Complex, Mancherial, Telangana.

Are judgments by Smt. G.Kavitha available online?

Yes. 26 judgments by Smt. G.Kavitha are available on Legistro with full text, outcome, and sections cited.

How fast does Smt. G.Kavitha dispose cases?

Smt. G.Kavitha disposes approximately 225 cases per month, based on 2909 orders handled over their tenure at Mancherial, SCJ Court Complex.

Since when is Smt. G.Kavitha serving?

Smt. G.Kavitha has been serving at Mancherial, SCJ Court Complex since 2025. and is currently posted there.

Case Types

STC 79%

EP 7%

CC 7%

OS 5%

JCC 0%

DVC 0%

PRC 0%

MC 0%

Posting History

Aug 2025 — Present

Prl. Junior Civil Judge · 884 orders
Aug 2025 — Present

I Addl. Junior Civil Judge · 976 orders
May 2025 — Nov 2025

Spl. JFCM · 302 orders
Apr 2025 — Aug 2025

Prl. Junior Civil Judge · 161 orders
Apr 2025 — Aug 2025

I Addl. Junior Civil Judge · 586 orders

Outcomes on Record

Acquitted 5

Admission Of Claim Disposal Date: 15-11-2025 Spl 2

Settled Before Lok Adalat Disposal Date: 14-11-2025 Spl 2

Other Judges at this Court

Ms K. Nirosha

II Addl. Junior Civil Judge

0 orders

Smt. Angadi Nirmala

Prl. Senior Civil Judge-cum-Asst.Sessions Judge

211 orders

Sri. D.Rama Mohan Reddy

Addl Senior Civil Judge-cum-AsstSessions Judge

304 orders

← View all judges at Mancherial, SCJ Court Complex