Smt.G.Kavitha

I AJCJ cum XV Addl.Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad at Rajendrangar

Rajendra Nagar, ADJ Court Complex · Rangareddy · Telangana

Smt.G.Kavitha, I AJCJ cum XV Addl.Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad at Rajendrangar, is posted at Rajendra Nagar, ADJ Court Complex, Rangareddy, Telangana, India. 164 court orders on record since 2017. 5 judgments with full text available. Primarily handles OS, CC, STC cases.

164

Total Orders

Judgments

Orders/Month

Postings

Featured Judgments

OS/210/2020

Tahera Begum and 4 others vs The Tahsildar, Gandipet

18 Jan 2021

Page 1 of 4 OS No.210/2020 I AJCJ-cum-XV AMM

IN THE COURT OF THE I ADDITIONAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE

CUM- XV ADDITIONAL METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE

CYBERABAD: AT RAJENDRANAGAR.

Present: Smt. G. Kavitha I Addl. Junior Civil Judge –cum- XV Addl. Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad at Rajendranagar.

Monday, the 18 thday of January, 2021.

O.S. No. 210 of 2020

Between:

1. Tahera Begum W/o. Late Shaik Khajamiya Aged about 59 years, Occ: Household, Resident of H.No.3-42, Gandipet Village, Narsingi Municipality, Gandipet Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.

2. Shaik Afsar S/o. Late Shaik Khajamiya Aged about 40 years, Occ: Pvt. Employee, Resident of H.No.3-42, Gandipet Village, Narsingi Municipality, Gandipet Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.

3. Shaik Hussain bee D/o. Late Shaik Khajamiya Aged about 33 years, Occ: Household, Resident of H.No.3-42, Gandipet Village, Narsingi Municipality, Gandipet Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.

4. Shaik Sarwar S/o. Late Shaik Khajamiya Aged about 31 years, Occ: Pvt. Employee, Resident of H.No.3-42, Gandipet Village, Narsingi Municipality, Gandipet Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.

5. Shaik Umar Ali S/o. Late Shaik Khajamiya Aged about 29 years, Occ: Worker, Resident of H.No.3-42, Gandipet Village, Narsingi Municipality, Gandipet Mandal,

Ranga Reddy District. ......Plaintiffs.

AND

1. The Tahsildar, Gandipet Mandal Ranga Reddy District.

2. All concerned. ....Defendants.

This suit is coming before me for final hearing in the presence of M/s. Mungi Jayapal Reddy, Counsel for the Plaintiffs and Defendants are set exparte and the matter having been stood over for consideration till this day, this Court made the following:

Page 2 of 4 OS No.210/2020 I AJCJ-cum-XV AMM

:: J U D G M E N T ::

The suit has been filed by the Plaintiffs praying the Court to declare them as legal heirs of the deceased Late Shaik Khajamiya.

2. The case of the Plaintiffs as per the plaint averments is that the Plaintiff No.1 is the wife, Plaintiffs No.2, 4 and 5 are the sons and

Plaintiff No.3 is the only daughter of the deceased Late Shaik Khajamiya, who died on 26.10.2019 intestate leaving the Plaintiffs No.1 to 5 as his legal heirs. It is further submitted that said deceased Late Shaik

Khajamiya during his lifetime acquired the suit schedule of property i.e.

part and parcel of house bearing H.No.3-42, admeasuring 100 Square

Yards situated in Gandipet Village and Mandal, Ranga Reddy District- 500075, bounded by North: Neighbour’s House, South: Neighbour’s

House, East: Road and West: Neighbour’s House. After death of said

Shaik Khajamiya, when the Plaintiff No.1 approached Municipal

Corporation, Narsingi, Gandipet Village to get their names mutated, the

Municipal officials asked for legal heirs certificate. Thereafter, on 08.01.2020 the Plaintiffs approached the Defendant No.1 for issuance of legal heirs certificate, but the Defendant No.1 has refused to issue the same and further advised to approach the concerned Civil Court.

Therefore, having no other option, the Plaintiffs approached this Court by filing the present suit. Hence the suit.

3.The Defendant No.1, inspite of receiving summons, did not appear before the Court, hence he is set exparte. On Defendant No.2, summons were served by way of paper publication, but no one appeared

before the Court objecting the claim of Plaintiffs. Hence, Defendant No.2

set exparte.

4.On behalf of Plaintiffs, PW-1 is examined. Through her, Ex.A1 to Ex.A7 are marked.

Page 3 of 4 OS No.210/2020 I AJCJ-cum-XV AMM

5.Heard the learned counsel for the Plaintiffs and perused the record.

6.Now the point for determination that arose is:

Whether the Plaintiffs are entitled to be declared as legal heirs of deceased Late Shaik Khajamiya, as prayed for?

7.Point:

The Plaintiffs in support of their contention, examined PW-1 and got marked Ex.A1 to A7. Ex.A1 is the Original Aadhar Card of

Plaintiff No.1, Ex.A2 is the Original Aadhar Card of Plaintiff No.2, Ex.A3 is the Original Aadhar Card of Plaintiff No.3, Ex.A4 is the Original

Aadhar Card of Plaintiff No.4, Ex.A5 is the Original Aadhar Card of

Plaintiff No.5, Ex.A6 is the Original Death Certificate, dated10.12.2019 and Ex.A7 is the Original Postal Receipt along with Requisition sent to the MRO, Gandipet Mandal.

8.The chief of PW-1 is the replication of plaint averments.

Coming to documentary evidence, Ex.A6 reveals that the said Late Shaik

Khajamiya died on 26.10.2019. Further, Ex.A1 reveals the identity of

Plaintiff No.1 and shows her relationship with said Late Shaik Khajamiya as his wife. Ex.A2, Ex.A4 and Ex.A5 show that the father name of Plaintiff

No.2, Plaintiff No.4 and Plaintiff No.5 recorded as Shaik Khajamiya, which goes to show that deceased Shaik Khajamiya is father of Plaintiff

No.2, Plaintiff No.4 and Plaintiff No.5. As per the version of the Plaintiffs, the Plaintiff No.3 is the only daughter of said Lake Shaik Khajamiya and

Plaintiff No.1. Further as per version of Plaintiffs, except Plaintiff No.1 to 5 there are no other legal heirs of deceased Late Shaik Khajamiya.

9. Even otherwise, since the Defendants Nos.1 and 2 are set exparte, the chief of PW-1 coupled with Ex.A1 to Ex.A7, remained unrebutted and unchallenged. In view of unchallenged testimony of PW-1

Page 4 of 4 OS No.210/2020 I AJCJ-cum-XV AMM coupled with Ex.A1 to Ex.A7, this Court finds nothing to disbelieve the version of Plaintiffs.

10. Having regard to facts and circumstances of case and for the reasons stated above, it is concluded that Plaintiffs No.1 to 5 are entitled to be declared as legal heirs of said Late Shaik Khajamiya. Accordingly point is answered.

11.In the result, the suit is decreed by declaring the Plaintiffs

No.1 to 5 as legal heirs of Late Shaik Khajamiya.

Dictated to Stenographer, transcribed by her, corrected and pronounced

by me in the open Court on this the 18 th day of January, 2021.

I ADDI. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE –CUM-

XV ADDL. METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE,

CYBERABAD, AT RAJENDRANAGAR.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED FOR

PLAINTIFFS DEFENDANTS

PW-1 – Tahera Begum - NIL -

EXHIBITS MARKED FOR

PLAINTIFFS :-

Ex.A1- is the Original Aadhar Card of Plaintiff No.1.

Ex.A2 - is the Original Aadhar Card of Plaintiff No.2.

Ex.A3 - is the Original Aadhar Card of Plaintiff No.3.

Ex.A4 - is the Original Aadhar Card of Plaintiff No.4.

Ex.A5 - is the Original Aadhar Card of Plaintiff No.5.

Ex.A6 - is the Original Death Certificate, dated10.12.2019

Ex.A7 - is the Original Postal Receipt along with Requisition sent to the MRO, Gandipet Mandal.

DEFENDANTS

- NIL - I ADDI. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE –CUM-

XV ADDL. METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE,

CYBERABAD, AT RAJENDRANAGAR.

OS/260/2020

Mukkala Archana and 2 others vs The Tahsildar, Gandipet, R.R.Dist

18 Jan 2021

Page 1 of 4 OS No.260/2020 I AJCJ-cum-XV AMM

IN THE COURT OF THE I ADDITIONAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE

CUM- XV ADDITIONAL METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE

CYBERABAD: AT RAJENDRANAGAR.

Present: Smt. G. Kavitha I Addl. Junior Civil Judge –cum- XV Addl. Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad at Rajendranagar.

Monday, the 18 thday of January, 2021.

O.S. No. 260 of 2020

Between:

1. Mukkala Archana W/o. Late M. Srinivas Aged about 33 years, Occ: Housewife R/o. H.No.1-2, Kokapet Village, Gandipet Mandal, R.R. District.

2. Mukkala Pranavi D/o. Late M. Srinivas Aged about 11 years, Occ: Student R/o. H.No.1-2, Kokapet Village, Gandipet Mandal, R.R. District.

3. Mukkala Karthik S/o. Late M. Srinivas Aged about 10 years, Occ: Student R/o. H.No.1-2, Kokapet Village, Gandipet Mandal, R.R. District.

(Plaintiffs No.2 and 3 are being minors, represented by their mother i.e. Plaintiff No.1 as natural guardian)

......Plaintiffs.

AND

1. The Tahsildar, Gandipet Mandal Ranga Reddy District.

2. All concerned. ....Defendants.

:: J U D G M E N T ::

The suit has been filed by the Plaintiffs praying the Court to declare them as legal heirs of the deceased Late Mukkala Srinivas.

2. The case of the Plaintiffs as per the plaint averments is that the Plaintiff No.1 is the wife, Plaintiffs No.2 is the daughter and Plaintiff

Page 2 of 4 OS No.260/2020 I AJCJ-cum-XV AMM

No.3 is the son of deceased Late Mukkala Srinivas, who died on 25.10.2018, intestate leaving the Plaintiffs No.1 to 3 as his legal heirs. It is further submitted that said deceased deceased Mukkala Srinivas during his lifetime along with his brother acquired the suit schedule of property i.e. the house bearing No.1-2 situated at Kokapet Village,

Gandipet Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, bounded by East: Neighbours

House, West: Mungi Ramchandra Reddy’s House, North: Road and

South: Neighbours House, from their father Koti Lingam. After death of said deceased Mukkala Srinivas, when the Plaintiff No.1 approached

Municipal Corporation, Narsingi, Kokapet Village to mutate her name, the Municipal officials asked for legal heirs certificate. Thereafter, on 28.08.2020 the Plaintiff No.1 approached the Defendant No.1 for issuance of legal heirs certificate, but the Defendant No.1 has refused to issue the same and further advised to approach the concerned Civil

Court. Therefore, having no other option, the Plaintiffs approached this

Court by filing the present suit. Hence the suit.

3.The Defendant No.1, inspite of receiving summons, did not appear before the Court, hence he is set exparte. On Defendant No.2, summons were served by way of paper publication, but no one appeared

before the Court objecting the claim of Plaintiffs. Hence, Defendant No.2

set exparte.

4.On behalf of Plaintiffs, PW-1 is examined. Through her, Ex.A1 to Ex.A6 are marked.

5.Heard the learned counsel for the Plaintiffs and perused the record.

6.Now the point for determination that arose is:

Whether the Plaintiffs No.1 to 3 are entitled to be declared as legal heirs of deceased Late Mukala Srinivas, as prayed for?

Page 3 of 4 OS No.260/2020 I AJCJ-cum-XV AMM

7.Point:

The Plaintiffs in support of their contention, examined PW-1 and got marked Ex.A1 to A6. Ex.A1 is the Original Aadhar Card of

Plaintiff No.1, Ex.A2 is the Original Aadhar Card of Plaintiff No.2, Ex.A3 is the Original Aadhar Card of Plaintiff No.3, Ex.A4 is the Certified Copy of Death Certificate of deceased Mukkala Srinivas, dated 22.11.2018,

Ex.A5 is the Original Property Tax bearing Receipt No.341534, dated 20.06.2020 and Ex.A6 is the copy of requisition made by the Plaintiff

No.1 to the Mandal Revenue Officer, Gandipet Mandal, Ranga Reddy

District, dated 28.08.2020 for issuance of legal heirs certificate.

8.The chief of PW-1 is the replication of plaint averments.

Coming to documentary evidence, Ex.A4 reveals that the said Late

Mukkala Srinivas died on 25.10.2018. Further, Ex.A1 reveals the identity of Plaintiff No.1 and shows her relationship with said Late Mukkala

Srinivas as his wife. Ex.A2 and Ex.A3 reveal that the father name of

Plaintiffs No.2 and 3 recorded as Mukkala Srinivas, which goes to show that the deceased Mukkala Srinivas is father of Plaintiffs No.2 and 3.

Ex.A5 reveals that the deceased Late Mukkala Srinivas and his brother

Shiva Kumar have paid Property Tax with respect to the House bearing

No.1-2. Further, Ex.A6 show that the Plaintiff No.1 had approached

Revenue officials on 28.08.2020 for issuance of legal heirs certificate.

9. Even otherwise, since the Defendants Nos.1 and 2 are set exparte, the chief of PW-1 coupled with Ex.A1 to Ex.A6, remained unrebutted and unchallenged. In view of unchallenged testimony of PW-1 coupled with Ex.A1 to Ex.A6, this Court finds nothing to disbelieve the version of Plaintiffs.

10. Having regard to facts and circumstances of case and for the reasons stated above, it is concluded that Plaintiffs No.1 to 5 are entitled to be declared as legal heirs of said deceased Late Mukkala Srinivas.

Page 4 of 4 OS No.260/2020 I AJCJ-cum-XV AMM

Accordingly, point is answered.

11.In the result, the suit is decreed by declaring the Plaintiffs

No.1 to 3 as legal heirs of Late Mukkala Srinivas.

Dictated to Stenographer, transcribed by her, corrected and pronounced

by me in the open Court on this the 18 th day of January, 2021.

I ADDI. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE –CUM-

XV ADDL. METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE,

CYBERABAD, AT RAJENDRANAGAR.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED FOR

PLAINTIFFS DEFENDANTS

PW-1 – Mukkala Archana - NIL -

EXHIBITS MARKED FOR

PLAINTIFFS :-

Ex.A1 - is the Original Aadhar Card of Plaintiff No.1.

Ex.A2 - is the Original Aadhar Card of Plaintiff No.2.

Ex.A3 - is the Original Aadhar Card of Plaintiff No.3.

Ex.A4 - is the Certified Copy of Death Certificate of deceased Mukkala Srinivas, dated 22.11.2018.

Ex.A5 - is the Original Property Tax bearing Receipt No.341534,

dated 20.06.2020.

Ex.A6 - is the copy of requisition made by the Plaintiff No.1 to the Mandal Revenue Officer, Gandipet Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, dated 28.08.2020.

DEFENDANTS

- NIL -

I ADDI. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE –CUM-

XV ADDL. METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE,

CYBERABAD, AT RAJENDRANAGAR.

OS/195/2020

Gopala Mallesh and another vs The Tahsildar Gandipet and another

18 Jan 2021

Page 1 of 4 OS No.195/2020 I AJCJ-cum-XV AMM

IN THE COURT OF THE I ADDITIONAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE

CUM- XV ADDITIONAL METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE

CYBERABAD: AT RAJENDRANAGAR.

Present: Smt. G. Kavitha I Addl. Junior Civil Judge –cum- XV Addl. Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad at Rajendranagar.

Monday, the 18 thday of January, 2021.

O.S. No. 195 of 2020

Between:

1. Gopala Mallesh S/o. Late Gopala Venkaiah Aged about 37 years, Occ: Business R/o. H.No.3-90, Kokapet Village, Gandipet Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.

2. Gopala Srinivas S/o. Late Gopala Venkaiah Aged about 27 years, Occ: Business, R/o. H.No.3-90, Kokapet Village, Gandipet Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.

......Plaintiffs.

AND

1. The Tahsildar, Gandipet Mandal Ranga Reddy District.

2. All concerned. ....Defendants.

:: J U D G M E N T ::

The suit has been filed by the Plaintiffs praying the Court to declare them as legal heirs of the deceased Late Gopala Sathamma

W/o. Late Gopala Venkaiah.

2. The case of the Plaintiffs as per the plaint averments is that the Plaintiff No.1 is the elder son and Plaintiff No.2 is the younger son of deceased Late Gopala Sathamma, who died on 05.07.2014, intestate leaving the Plaintiffs No.1 and 2 as her legal heirs. The husband of said deceased Late Gopala Sathamma died long back. It is further

Page 2 of 4 OS No.195/2020 I AJCJ-cum-XV AMM submitted that the said deceased Late Gopala Sathamma during her lifetime had acquired the suit schedule of property i.e. all the scheduled property in Survey No.100 admeasuring Ac.0-04 Gts., in

Survey No.102/A admeasuring Ac.3-02 Gts., in Survey No.102/AA admeasuring Ac.2-35 Gts., in Survey No.103 admeasuring Ac.0-18 Gts., and Survey No.103/AA admeasuring Ac.3-20 Gts., totally admeasuring

Ac.10-17 Gts., situated at Edulapally Village, Gram Panchayath, Kothur

Mandal, Mahaboobnagar District, bounded by East: other’s land, West:

Government land, North: Survey No. 100 and South: other’s land. After death of said Late Gopala Sathamma, when the Plaintiff No.1 approached Edulapally MRO to mutate their names in revenue records with respect to the suit schedule of property, he was advised to bring the legal heirs certificate. Then the Plaintiffs approached Defendant

No.1 who has refused to issue the said Certificate. Therefore, having no other option, the Plaintiffs approached this Court by filing the present suit. Hence the suit.

3.The Defendant No.1, inspite of receiving summons, did not appear before the Court, hence he is set exparte. On Defendant No.2, summons were served by way of paper publication, but no one appeared before the Court objecting the claim of Plaintiffs. Hence,

Defendant No.2 set exparte.

4.On behalf of Plaintiffs, Plaintiff No.1 is examined as PW-1, through him Ex.A1 to Ex.A4 are marked.

5.Heard the learned counsel for the Plaintiffs and perused the record.

6.Now the point for determination that arose is:

Whether the Plaintiffs No.1 and 2 are entitled to be declared as legal heirs of deceased deceased Late Gopala Sathamma, as prayed for?

Page 3 of 4 OS No.195/2020 I AJCJ-cum-XV AMM

7.Point:

The Plaintiffs in support of their contention, examined

PW-1 and got marked Ex.A1 to A4. Ex.A1 is the Original Aadhar Card

No.805566272801 of Plaintiff No.1, Ex.A2 is the Original Aadhar Card

No.227990164628 of Plaintiff No.2, Ex.A3 is the Certified Copy of

Death Certificate of Late Gopala Sathamma, dated 01.06.2020 and

Ex.A4 is the copy of requisition to the Mandal Revenue Officer,

Gandipet Mandal, R.R. District, dated 24.06.2020.

8.The chief of PW-1 is the replication of plaint averments.

Coming to documentary evidence, Ex.A3/Death Certificate of Late

Gopala Sathamma reveals that the said Gopala Sathamma died on 05.07.2014. Further Ex.A3 is reflecting her husband’s name as Late

Gopala Yenkaiah. Ex.A1 and Ex.A2 Aadhar Cards of Plaintiffs No.1 and 2 respectively, show their father’s name is recorded as Late Gopala

Venkaiah. As per the version of the Plaintiffs, Plaintiffs No.1 and 2 are the children of deceased Late Gopala Sathamma and Late Gopala

Yenkaiah. Ex.A4 reveals that the Plaintiff No.1 had made a requisition

before the Defendant No.1 for issuance of legal heirs certificate.

Further, As per version of Plaintiffs, except Plaintiffs, there are no other legal heirs of said Late Gopala Sathamma.

9. Even otherwise, since the Defendants Nos.1 and 2 are set exparte, the chief of PW-1 coupled with Ex.A1 to Ex.A4, remained unrebutted and unchallenged. In view of unchallenged testimony of

PW-1 coupled with Ex.A1 to Ex.A4, this Court finds nothing to disbelieve the version of Plaintiffs.

10. Having regard to facts and circumstances of case and for the reasons stated above, it is concluded that Plaintiffs No.1 and 2 are entitled to be declared as legal heirs of said Late Gopala Sathamma

Page 4 of 4 OS No.195/2020 I AJCJ-cum-XV AMM

W/o. Late Gopala Yenkaiah. Accordingly, point is answered.

11.In the result, the suit is decreed by declaring the Plaintiffs

No.1 and 2 as legal heirs of Late Gopala Sathamma W/o. Late Gopala

Yenkaiah.

Dictated to Stenographer, transcribed by her, corrected and

pronounced by me in the open Court on this the 18 th day of January, 2021.

I ADDI. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE –CUM-

XV ADDL. METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE,

CYBERABAD, AT RAJENDRANAGAR.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED FOR

PLAINTIFFS DEFENDANTS

PW-1 – Gopala Mallesh - NIL -

EXHIBITS MARKED FOR

PLAINTIFFS :-

Ex.A1- is the Original Aadhar Card No.805566272801 of Plaintiff No.1.

Ex.A2 - is the Original Aadhar Card No.227990164628 of Plaintiff No.2.

Ex.A3 -is the Certified Copy of Death Certificate of Late Gopala Sathamma, dated 01.06.2020.

Ex.A4 - is the copy of requisition to the Mandal Revenue Officer, Gandipet Mandal, R.R. District,

dated 24.06.2020.

DEFENDANTS

- NIL -

I ADDI. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE –CUM-

XV ADDL. METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE,

CYBERABAD, AT RAJENDRANAGAR.

OS/259/2020

G.Sravanthi vs The Tahsildar Gandipet Mandal R.R.Dist

18 Jan 2021

Page 1 of 4 OS No.259/2020 I AJCJ-cum-XV AMM

IN THE COURT OF THE I ADDITIONAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE

CUM- XV ADDITIONAL METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE

CYBERABAD: AT RAJENDRANAGAR.

Present: Smt. G. Kavitha I Addl. Junior Civil Judge –cum- XV Addl. Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad at Rajendranagar.

Monday, the 18 thday of January, 2021.

O.S. No. 259 of 2020

Between:

G. Sravanthi W/o. Late Gopala Bikshapathi Aged about 35 years, Occ: Home Maker R/o. Kokapet Villate, the then Rajendra Nagar Mandal, Now Gandipet Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.

......Plaintiff.

AND

1. The Tahsildar, Gandipet Mandal Ranga Reddy District.

2. All concerned. ....Defendants.

This suit is coming before me for final hearing in the presence of M/s. Mungi Jayapal Reddy, Counsel for the Plaintiff and Defendants are set exparte and the matter having been stood over for consideration till this day, this Court made the following:

:: J U D G M E N T ::

The suit has been filed by the Plaintiff praying the Court to declare her as legal heir of the deceased Late Gopala Bikshapathi.

2. The case of the Plaintiff as per the plaint averments is that she is the wife of deceased Late Gopala Bikshapathi, who died on 21.10.2015 intestate leaving the Plaintiff as his legal heir. It is further submitted that said deceased Late Gopala Bikshapathi during his lifetime acquired the suit schedule of property i.e. agricultural land in

Survey No.381/E to an extent of Ac.0-39 at Narkuda Village,

Shamshabad Mandal, Chevella Revenue Division, Ranga Reddy

Division, bounded by North: Neighbours Land, South: Neighbours

Land, East: Road and West: Neighbours Land. It is further submitted

Page 2 of 4 OS No.259/2020 I AJCJ-cum-XV AMM that after death of said Gopala Bikshapathi, when the Plaintiff approached Municipal Corporation, Narsingi, Gandipet Village to mutate her name with respect to the suit schedule of property, the

Municipal officials asked for legal heir certificate. Thereafter, on 24.06.2020 the Plaintiff approached the Defendant No.1 for issuance of legal heirs certificate, but the Defendant No.1 has refused to issue the same on the ground that the deceased was not a Government

Employee. Therefore, having no other option, the Plaintiff approached this Court by filing the present suit. Hence the suit.

Defendant No.2 set exparte.

4.On behalf of Plaintiff, Plaintiff herself examined as PW-1.

Through her, Ex.A1 to Ex.A3 are marked.

5.Heard the learned counsel for the Plaintiff and perused the record.

6.Now the point for determination that arose is:

Whether the Plaintiff is entitled to be declared as legal heir of deceased Late Gopala Bikshapathi, as prayed for?

7.Point:

The Plaintiff in support of her contention, examined herself as PW-1 and got marked Ex.A1 to A3. Ex.A1 is the Original Aadhar

Card No.898985612429 of Plaintiff, Ex.A2 is the Certified Copy of

Death Certificate of Gopala Bikshapathi, dated 03.12.2015 and Ex.A3 is the copy of requisition letter to the Mandal Revenue Officer,

Gandipet Mandal, R.R. District, dated 24.06.2020.

Page 3 of 4 OS No.259/2020 I AJCJ-cum-XV AMM

8.The chief of PW-1 is the replication of plaint averments.

Coming to documentary evidence, Ex.A2 shows that the said deceased

Late Gopala Bikshapathi died on 21.10.2015. Further, Ex.A1 reveals the identity of Plaintiff and shows her relationship with said deceased

Late Gopala Bikshapathi as his wife. Ex.A3 reveals that the Plaintiff had made a requisition before the Defendant No.1 for issuance of legal heir certificate to mutate her name into revenue records with respect to the suit schedule of property. As per version of Plaintiff, except Plaintiff there are no other legal heirs of said deceased Late

Gopala Bikshapathi.

9. Since the Defendants Nos.1 and 2 are set exparte, the chief of PW-1 coupled with Ex.A1 to Ex.A3, remained unrebutted and unchallenged. In view of unchallenged testimony of PW-1 coupled with Ex.A1 to Ex.A3, this Court finds nothing to disbelieve the version of Plaintiff.

10. Having regard to facts and circumstances of case and for the reasons stated above, it is concluded that Plaintiff is entitled to be declared as legal heir of said deceased Late Gopala Bikshapathi.

Accordingly, point is answered.

11.In the result, the suit is decreed by declaring the Plaintiff as legal heir of Late Gopala Bikshapathi.

Dictated to Stenographer, transcribed by her, corrected and pronounced

by me in the open Court on this the 18 th day of January, 2021.

I ADDI. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE –CUM-

XV ADDL. METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE,

CYBERABAD, AT RAJENDRANAGAR.

Page 4 of 4 OS No.259/2020 I AJCJ-cum-XV AMM

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED FOR

PLAINTIFF DEFENDANTS

PW-1 – Gopala Sravanthi - NIL -

EXHIBITS MARKED FOR

PLAINTIFF :-

Ex.A1 - is the Original Aadhar Card No.898985612429 of Plaintiff.

Ex.A2 - is the Certified Copy of Death Certificate of Gopala Bikshapathi, dated 03.12.2015.

Ex.A3 - is the copy of requisition letter to the Mandal Revenue Officer, Gandipet Mandal, R.R. District, dated 24.06.2020.

DEFENDANTS

- NIL -

I ADDI. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE –CUM-

XV ADDL. METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE,

CYBERABAD, AT RAJENDRANAGAR.

OS/259/2020

G.Sravanthi vs The Tahsildar Gandipet Mandal R.R.Dist

18 Jan 2021

Page 1 of 4 OS No.259/2020 I AJCJ-cum-XV AMM

IN THE COURT OF THE I ADDITIONAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE

CUM- XV ADDITIONAL METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE

CYBERABAD: AT RAJENDRANAGAR.

Present: Smt. G. Kavitha I Addl. Junior Civil Judge –cum- XV Addl. Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad at Rajendranagar.

Monday, the 18 thday of January, 2021.

O.S. No. 259 of 2020

Between:

G. Sravanthi W/o. Late Gopala Bikshapathi Aged about 35 years, Occ: Home Maker R/o. Kokapet Villate, the then Rajendra Nagar Mandal, Now Gandipet Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.

......Plaintiff.

AND

1. The Tahsildar, Gandipet Mandal Ranga Reddy District.

2. All concerned. ....Defendants.

:: J U D G M E N T ::

The suit has been filed by the Plaintiff praying the Court to declare her as legal heir of the deceased Late Gopala Bikshapathi.

Survey No.381/E to an extent of Ac.0-39 at Narkuda Village,

Shamshabad Mandal, Chevella Revenue Division, Ranga Reddy

Division, bounded by North: Neighbours Land, South: Neighbours

Land, East: Road and West: Neighbours Land. It is further submitted

Employee. Therefore, having no other option, the Plaintiff approached this Court by filing the present suit. Hence the suit.

Defendant No.2 set exparte.

4.On behalf of Plaintiff, Plaintiff herself examined as PW-1.

Through her, Ex.A1 to Ex.A3 are marked.

5.Heard the learned counsel for the Plaintiff and perused the record.

6.Now the point for determination that arose is:

Whether the Plaintiff is entitled to be declared as legal heir of deceased Late Gopala Bikshapathi, as prayed for?

7.Point:

The Plaintiff in support of her contention, examined herself as PW-1 and got marked Ex.A1 to A3. Ex.A1 is the Original Aadhar

Card No.898985612429 of Plaintiff, Ex.A2 is the Certified Copy of

Death Certificate of Gopala Bikshapathi, dated 03.12.2015 and Ex.A3 is the copy of requisition letter to the Mandal Revenue Officer,

Gandipet Mandal, R.R. District, dated 24.06.2020.

Page 3 of 4 OS No.259/2020 I AJCJ-cum-XV AMM

8.The chief of PW-1 is the replication of plaint averments.

Coming to documentary evidence, Ex.A2 shows that the said deceased

Late Gopala Bikshapathi died on 21.10.2015. Further, Ex.A1 reveals the identity of Plaintiff and shows her relationship with said deceased

Gopala Bikshapathi.

Accordingly, point is answered.

11.In the result, the suit is decreed by declaring the Plaintiff as legal heir of Late Gopala Bikshapathi.

Dictated to Stenographer, transcribed by her, corrected and pronounced

by me in the open Court on this the 18 th day of January, 2021.

I ADDI. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE –CUM-

XV ADDL. METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE,

CYBERABAD, AT RAJENDRANAGAR.

Page 4 of 4 OS No.259/2020 I AJCJ-cum-XV AMM

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED FOR

PLAINTIFF DEFENDANTS

PW-1 – Gopala Sravanthi - NIL -

EXHIBITS MARKED FOR

PLAINTIFF :-

Ex.A1 - is the Original Aadhar Card No.898985612429 of Plaintiff.

Ex.A2 - is the Certified Copy of Death Certificate of Gopala Bikshapathi, dated 03.12.2015.

Ex.A3 - is the copy of requisition letter to the Mandal Revenue Officer, Gandipet Mandal, R.R. District, dated 24.06.2020.

DEFENDANTS

- NIL -

I ADDI. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE –CUM-

XV ADDL. METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE,

CYBERABAD, AT RAJENDRANAGAR.

Order Record 160 total

Case No.	Parties	Date	Type	Outcome
OS/195/2020	Gopala Mallesh and another vs The Tahsildar Gandipet and another	18 Jan 2021	Copy of Judgement	—
OS/210/2020	Tahera Begum and 4 others vs The Tahsildar, Gandipet	18 Jan 2021	Copy of Judgement	—
OS/259/2020	G.Sravanthi vs The Tahsildar Gandipet Mandal R.R.Dist	18 Jan 2021	Copy of Judgement	—
OS/260/2020	Mukkala Archana and 2 others vs The Tahsildar, Gandipet, R.R.Dist	18 Jan 2021	Copy of Judgement	—
OS/200027/2018	Karnataka Bank Ltd Rep SM Arif Hussain vs Mr.Nandhigam Ravinder	18 Jan 2021	Copy of Judgement	—
OS/12/2020	Pernelly Vital vs The Tahasildar Rajendranagar	07 Jan 2021	Copy of Judgement	—
OS/349/2019	B.Vinod Kumar vs Gowragiri Srikanth	04 Jan 2021	Copy of Judgement	—
CC/200127/2014	PS Raidurgam vs T.Suresh@Suri	16 Dec 2020	Copy of Judgement	—
CC/200064/2014	Rajendernagar vs Bagayari Jaipal	14 Dec 2020	Copy of Judgement	—
OS/200278/2018	Sure Kumari vs All concerned	11 Dec 2020	Copy of Judgement	—
CC/200838/2009	PS Rajendra Nagar vs Smt.M.Varma	30 Nov 2020	Copy of Judgement	—
OS/258/2019	Yatakari Anu Suja vs Tahasildar Gandipet	11 Nov 2020	Copy of Judgement	—
CC/200494/2014	PS Narsingi vs Nampally Yadaiah	09 Nov 2020	Copy of Judgement	—
CC/200446/2014	Shivarampally vs Kondam Praveen Kumar	06 Nov 2020	Copy of Judgement	—
OS/192/2019	Mohd Khaja vs Narsing Rao	05 Nov 2020	Copy of Judgement	—
RCC/200001/2015	A.Venkat Reddy vs Smt.Bharathi Lavanya Alias B.Lavanya	06 Oct 2020	Copy of Order	—
OS/336/2019	K.Raj Kumar vs S.Veerabhadrudu	09 Sep 2020	Copy of Judgement	—
OS/200489/2009	Smt.NNafeesunnisa vs Mr.Shaik Chand	09 Sep 2020	Copy of Judgement	—
OS/299/2019	S.Sahithi Rep by GPA Holder S.Narayan Reddy vs Shamshabad Municipality	08 Sep 2020	Copy of Judgement	—
OS/200047/2014	M. Krishnaveni vs Kashola Anasuya	08 Sep 2020	Copy of Judgement	—
OS/200489/2009	Smt.NNafeesunnisa vs Mr.Shaik Chand	08 Sep 2020	Copy of Judgement	—
OS/200168/2017	M.Srinivas vs Velociity Education Soeicty	26 Jun 2020	Copy of Judgement	—
OS/200276/2018	A.Pushpavathi vs Myakala Venkataiah	26 Jun 2020	Copy of Judgement	—
OS/172/2019	Gopu Vernoica vs Corporation Bank	25 Jun 2020	Copy of Judgement	—
OS/246/2019	Borra Gnaneshwar vs The Tahsildhar Gandipet	25 Jun 2020	Copy of Judgement	—
OS/200046/2018	K.Anand Kumar vs G.V.Noha Sunil Kumar	25 Jun 2020	Copy of Judgement	—
OS/200120/2017	P.Udaya Latha vs C.Govind Reddy	25 Jun 2020	Copy of Judgement	—
OS/200194/2017	Syndicate Bank Rep its manager vs Nakshtra Podupu Sangam	25 Jun 2020	Copy of Judgement	—
OS/42/2019	Weakers Communities Development Society, Rep by MD.Abdul Majeed vs Habeeb Mohiuddin	24 Jun 2020	Copy of Judgement	—
OS/56/2019	Indian Overseas Bank Rep by J.Karthik Reddy vs M/s.Samskruthi Botique Ladies Tailors, Rep K.Manjula	24 Jun 2020	Copy of Judgement	—
OS/334/2019	Budidha Deepika vs The Tahsildar, Gandipet	24 Jun 2020	Copy of Judgement	—
CC/200468/2014	PS Narsingi vs Bangari Prakash and others	18 Mar 2020	Copy of Judgement	—
OS/165/2019	Parvathalu vs The Commissioner Rajendranagar Muncipality Circle - II, R.R.Dist	28 Feb 2020	Copy of Judgement	—
CC/200008/2011	A.Yadagiri vs Srisailam Reddy	26 Feb 2020	Copy of Judgement	—
CC/200260/2014	PS Rajendra Nagar vs N. Dayanand	26 Feb 2020	Copy of Judgement	—
CC/200464/2014	PS RGIA vs K. Bheemraj Goud	26 Feb 2020	Copy of Judgement	—
CC/200517/2014	Rajendernagar vs E.Chitti Babu	26 Feb 2020	Copy of Judgement	—
OS/200062/2017	P.Golla Mallesha vs T.Chidambaram	18 Feb 2020	Copy of Judgement	—
OS/200088/2015	N.Swaroopa vs B.Ratnamma	18 Feb 2020	Copy of Judgement	—
OS/191/2019	Khaja Begum vs Sadthullah Khan	13 Feb 2020	Copy of Judgement	—
OS/200154/2016	Viqarunnisa and others vs Md Farooq	13 Feb 2020	Copy of Judgement	—
OS/200161/2017	J.Suresh vs Jelly anith	13 Feb 2020	Copy of Judgement	—
CC/200023/2012	PS Shivarampally vs Pramod Reddy and othrs	12 Feb 2020	Copy of Judgement	—
OS/87/2019	L.Fathe Singh @ Pathu Singh vs Tahsildar, Gandipet Mandal, R.R.Dist	10 Feb 2020	Copy of Judgement	—
OS/200055/2018	M.Jayapal Reddy vs The Panchayat Secretary	10 Feb 2020	Copy of Judgement	—
OS/200229/2018	Syndicate Bank, Rep by E.Ramalingeshwara Swamy vs P.Anandam	07 Feb 2020	Copy of Judgement	—
OS/200090/2018	Shaik Basheer Ahmed vs N.Raghavendra Rao	06 Feb 2020	Copy of Judgement	—
OS/284/2019	K.Shivamma vs The Tahsildar, Gandipet Mandal, R.R.Dist	05 Feb 2020	Copy of Judgement	—
CC/200277/2014	PS Rajendra Nagar vs Akkem Srinivas Yadav	05 Feb 2020	Copy of Judgement	—
OS/200185/2016	Ms Neem Apartment Owners vs G.Srinadh Choudary	03 Feb 2020	Copy of Judgement	—
OS/200204/2017	K.Yadgonda vs K.Amreshwar Goud	03 Feb 2020	Copy of Judgement	—
CC/200714/2011	PS Rajendra Nagar vs K Indira and others	20 Jan 2020	Copy of Judgement	—
CC/200246/2014	PS RGIA vs K. Gangadhar	17 Jan 2020	Copy of Judgement	—
CC/200407/2011	PS Rajendra Nagar vs Sama Subash Reddy	13 Jan 2020	Copy of Judgement	—
OS/6/2019	Vittollu Bhagyamma vs The Tahsildar, Rajendranagar	29 Apr 2019	Copy of Judgement	—
OS/200069/2018	Mir Hafeezuddin vs Ghouse khan and another	29 Apr 2019	Copy of Judgement	—
OS/200137/2016	P.Yadaiah vs G.Yadagiri	29 Apr 2019	Copy of Judgement	—
OS/200032/2018	Syndicate Bank Rep.N.Joshi vs Durga Bai Podupu Sangam	24 Apr 2019	Copy of Judgement	—
OS/200033/2018	Syndicate Bank vs Mylaram Madhav	24 Apr 2019	Copy of Judgement	—
CC/200163/2014	Shivarampally vs Faiz Ahmed and another	18 Apr 2019	Copy of Judgement	—
OS/200081/2010	K.Vishnu Vardhan Reddy,repbyhisGPAhodlerN.Narahari vs E.Ravinder Reddy	10 Apr 2019	Copy of Judgement	—
CC/200380/2014	PS RGIA vs D. Venkateshwarlu	02 Apr 2019	Copy of Judgement	—
CC/200466/2014	Moinabad vs Ningishetty Amrutha and another	02 Apr 2019	Copy of Judgement	—
CC/200527/2014	PS Shamshabad vs K.Madhusudhan Reddy and others	02 Apr 2019	Copy of Judgement	—
OS/200190/2018	K.Prasanth Kumar Reddy vs M.Sanjeeva Reddy	27 Mar 2019	Copy of Judgement	—
CC/200483/2014	PS Shamshabad vs A1. M. Chandra Shekar	26 Mar 2019	Copy of Judgement	—
CC/200503/2014	PS Mailardevpally vs P. Krishna	26 Mar 2019	Copy of Judgement	—
CC/200973/2011	PS RGIA vs Siddulu and others	25 Mar 2019	Copy of Judgement	—
OS/200175/2018	Gogarla Amrutha vs The Thaisildar	18 Mar 2019	Copy of Judgement	—
OS/200325/2009	M.Sham Bai vs M.Pedda Pentaiah	18 Mar 2019	Copy of Judgement	—
OS/200199/2018	Sara Anasuja vs The Mandal Revenue Officer, Rajendranagar	30 Jan 2019	Copy of Judgement	—
OS/200200/2018	Sara Janardhan vs The Mandal Revenue Officer, Rajendranagar	30 Jan 2019	Copy of Judgement	—
CC/200386/2014	PS Rajendra Nagar vs Karingula Dathathreya	28 Jan 2019	Copy of Judgement	—
OS/200070/2018	M.Laxmi vs The Village Secretary, Kokapet	24 Jan 2019	Copy of Judgement	—
OS/200105/2017	K.Chinna Jangaiah and others vs K.Pedda Jangaiah and others	24 Jan 2019	Copy of Judgement	—
OS/200108/2014	Uppu Eshwaraiah vs Yadagiri and others	24 Jan 2019	Copy of Judgement	—
OS/200147/2018	Ghousia Begum vs Ramulu and another	24 Jan 2019	Copy of Judgement	—
OS/200154/2018	Mohammeed Gafur Sharif vs Mir Waris Ali (Parvez)	24 Jan 2019	Copy of Judgement	—
OS/200249/2018	Mohammed Bin Naser Yamani vs Mohammed Ismail Khan	24 Jan 2019	Copy of Judgement	—
OS/200024/2018	Forturne Green Homes Rep.S.Venkata Suresh vs Venkata Rami Reddy	24 Dec 2018	Copy of Judgement	—
OS/200149/2017	D.Lakshmi vs Mekala Praveen Yadav	24 Dec 2018	Copy of Judgement	—
OS/200174/2018	V.Bharathamma vs The Tahasildar, Rajendranagar	24 Dec 2018	Copy of Judgement	—
OS/200178/2018	Sanvellay LAxmi vs The MRO/Tahsildar, Rajendranagar	24 Dec 2018	Copy of Judgement	—
OS/200192/2018	K.Venu Babu vs P.Aruna	24 Dec 2018	Copy of Judgement	—
OS/200198/2018	Resu Malla Reddy vs The Deputy Collector and Tahasildar, Rajendranagar	24 Dec 2018	Copy of Judgement	—
CC/200980/2011	PS RGIA vs Eesa Bin Masdoos and anather	24 Dec 2018	Copy of Judgement	—
OS/200092/2017	Sri.G.J.Douglas vs G.Krishna	20 Dec 2018	Copy of Judgement	—
OS/200125/2018	Bollapragada Prema vs The Tahsildar, Rajendranagar	20 Dec 2018	Copy of Judgement	—
OS/200135/2018	Eltam Jangaiah vs The Tahsildhar, Rajendranagar	20 Dec 2018	Copy of Judgement	—
OS/200188/2018	Munagapati Srinivas vs The Thahsildar	20 Dec 2018	Copy of Judgement	—
OS/200187/2018	K.Venkat Reddy vs C.R.Subramanyam	19 Dec 2018	Copy of Judgement	—
STC/200023/2014	PS Narsingi vs Kyatham Ashok Yadav aand others	18 Dec 2018	Copy of Judgement	—
OS/200016/2016	Chepyala Hemalatha vs Manda Premraj	12 Dec 2018	Copy of Judgement	—
OS/200198/2017	P.Yadaiah vs J.Parameshwar	12 Dec 2018	Copy of Judgement	—
OS/200238/2018	P.Jangaiah vs N.Rajkumar	12 Dec 2018	Copy of Judgement	—
CC/200174/2014	PS Mailardevpally vs A1. Mohd Basheer @ Giddu	10 Dec 2018	Copy of Judgement	—
OS/200068/2017	K.Mallesh vs R.Nirmala	06 Dec 2018	Copy of Judgement	—
OS/200093/2017	Smt.Hannah Joseph vs Rachamala Das	06 Dec 2018	Copy of Judgement	—
CC/200257/2014	Shivarampally vs Mohd.Rafeeq	04 Dec 2018	Copy of Judgement	—
CC/200258/2011	PS Rajendra Nagar vs Mohd.sarwar and others	04 Dec 2018	Copy of Judgement	—

Showing 100 of 160 orders — Log in to browse all pages.

Monthly Orders (Last 12 Months)

Jan 2021		8
Dec 2020		3
Nov 2020		5
Oct 2020		1
Sep 2020		7
Jun 2020		10
Mar 2020		1
Feb 2020		19
Jan 2020		3
Apr 2019		10
Mar 2019		6
Jan 2019		9

Frequently Asked Questions

How many cases has Smt.G.Kavitha handled?

Smt.G.Kavitha has handled 164 court orders since 2017 at Rajendra Nagar, ADJ Court Complex. The average disposal rate is 4 orders per month.

What types of cases does Smt.G.Kavitha hear?

Based on available records, Smt.G.Kavitha primarily handles Civil matters (Original Suits) and Criminal matters (Criminal Cases, Summary Trial Cases) at Rajendra Nagar, ADJ Court Complex.

Where is Smt.G.Kavitha currently posted?

Smt.G.Kavitha is posted as I AJCJ cum XV Addl.Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad at Rajendrangar at Rajendra Nagar, ADJ Court Complex, Rangareddy, Telangana.

Are judgments by Smt.G.Kavitha available online?

Yes. 5 judgments by Smt.G.Kavitha are available on Legistro with full text, outcome, and sections cited.

How fast does Smt.G.Kavitha dispose cases?

Smt.G.Kavitha disposes approximately 4 cases per month, based on 164 orders handled over their tenure at Rajendra Nagar, ADJ Court Complex.

Since when is Smt.G.Kavitha serving?

Smt.G.Kavitha has been serving at Rajendra Nagar, ADJ Court Complex since 2017.

Case Types

OS 71%

CC 28%

STC 1%

RCC 1%

Posting History

Sep 2021 — Sep 2021

I AJCJ cum XV Addl.Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad at Rajendrangar
Mar 2019 — Mar 2019

PJCJ cum XIV Addl.Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad at Rajendrangar
Mar 2019 — Aug 2020

II AJCJ cum XVI Addl.Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad at Rajendranagar
Dec 2017 — Oct 2021

I AJCJ cum XV Addl.Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad at Rajendrangar · 164 orders

Other Judges at this Court

Smt. Ch. Narmada

Principal Junior Civil Judge-cum-XI Addl.Judicial...

0 orders

Sri P.Naresh

I Additional Junior Civil Judge-cum-XII Addl. Judi...

318 orders

Mr. Daravath Uday Naik

II Additional Junior Civil Judge-cum-XIII Addl. Ju...

18 orders

Ms. T.Rathna Kumari

III Additional Junior Civil Judge-cum-XXV Addl Jud...

0 orders

Srinivas Thumkunta

Fast Track Special Judge for Trial and Disposal of...

15 orders

Smt.B.Aparna Devi

X Additional District and Sessions Judge RangaRedd...

3 orders

E.Sucharitha

Principal Senior Civil Judge Rajendranagar

9 orders

← View all judges at Rajendra Nagar, ADJ Court Complex