Ms. G Nishka Patrudu

IN THE COURT OF THE III ADDITIONAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE-CUM-

XXV ADDITIONAL JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS

R.R.DISTRICT: AT RAJENDRANAGAR

Present: Ms. Nishka Patrudu, II Addl. Junior Civil Judge cum, XIII Addl. Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Rajendranagar, R.R. Dist. FAC: III Addl. Junior Civil Judge cum, XXV Addl. Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Rajendranagar, R.R. Dist.

Tuesday , the 10th day of June , 2025

O.S. No. 145 of 202 5

Between:

1.Ingrow RGIA Ventures Private Limited, Having its registered office at Flat No. 705, Sy.No. 6, White Field, Kondapur, Hyderabad, Telangana – 50003 Represented by its authorized representative Sri Hari Pulagam.

2.Incor Infrastructure Private Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, and having its registered office at Plot No. 69 and 70, Opposite Lane to Madhapur Police Station, Kavuri Hills, Madhapur, Hyderabad, Telangana – 500033, Represented by its authorized representatives, Sri Hari Pulagam. …. Plaintiffs

A N D

1.GMR Hyderabad Aerotropolis Limited, Having its registered office at GMR Aero Towers, Rajiv Gandhi International Airport, Shamshabad, Hyderabad – 500108.

2.GMR Hydereabad International Airport Limited, Having its registered office at GMR Aero Towers, Rajiv Gandhi International Airport, Shamshabad, Hyderabad – 500108.

3.RAXA Security Services Limited, Having its registered office at 25/1, Skip House, Museum Road, Bangalore, Karnataka – 560025.

…..Defendants

This suit is coming before me for final hearing in presence of Mr. A. Satyasiri, Advocate for plaintiff, G. Rajender reddy, Advocate for defendant no. 1 upon perusing the material papers on record, upon hearing and having stood over for consideration till this day, this court delivered the following:

:: J U D G M E N T ::

The Learned Counsel for the plaintiff and that of Defendant No.1 is present and represented that the matter is compromised in between the parties as per the memorandum of compromise Dt. 08.05.2025. The suit against Defendant No. 2 and Defendant No. 3 is withdrawn as per the petition dt. 08.05.2025. Both the plaintiff and defendant No.1 present along with their ID Proof and they are duly identified by their counsels on record. The plaintiff counsels filed a petition U/o. XXIII Rule 3 CPC vide IA No. 117/2025, IA No.

116/2025 and the same is allowed in view of their voluntary compromise. The terms of compromise which are produced in writing in between the parties as per the memo of compromise Dt. 08.05.2025 were read over and explained to both the parties on which they affirmed the correctness of the same and further stated that the compromise is voluntary out of their free will.

Hence the suit is hereby decreed in terms of memo of compromise Dt. 08.05.2025 between Plaintiff and Defendant No. 1 and withdrawn against D2 and D3. The memo of compromise Dt. 08.05.2025 forms part and parcel of the decreed. The parties shall bear their own costs in view of compromise.

Typed to my dictation by the Typist, corrected and pronounced by me in the open Court on this the 10 th day of June, 2025).

FAC III ADDI. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE –CUM-

XXV ADDL. JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS,

RR DIST., AT RAJENDRANAGAR.