Ms. Govinda Laxmi

CC/260/20151 / 1Dt: 06-04-2016

IN THE COURT OF THE Junior Civil Judge: UTNOOR

Present: Junior Civil Judge, UTNOOR ____ day, this the __ day of ____, 20__

CC/260/2015

Between:

Sable Manoj Address: ro Darmasagar of Indravelly.

… Plaintiff/Petitioner AND

Bassi Santhosh Address: ro Darmasagar of Indravelly.

… Defendent/Respondent

Counsel for : ,Advocate

Counsel for : ,Advocate

This (case type) having come before me for hearing today, having heard and considered the record, this court delivered the following :

ORDER

This case is suomotto advanced to this date i.e., on 13-02-2016 in view of lok adalth A1 and A3 and police present A1 and defacto complainant Sable Manoj,injured-Bassi PUja and sable Sainabai present and filed a petition u/sec 20(1) of lok adalath act to refer their case to lok adalath as they both compromised out of court petition filed u/sec 321cr.p.c. by APP to withdraw sec 290 IPC and allowed as per the citation referred in 2015(1)ALDCrl) 280 of honable High court of Judicature at HYderabad I refer to lok adalath and permitted to compound as offence u/sec 324, IPC compoundable in nature the case is referred to lok adalath i have gone

CC/260/20151 / 1Dt: 06-04-2016 through the record placed before me it appears to me that there are bright chances to settlement of the matter by lok adalath accordingly excising my power u/sec 19 and 20 of Legal Services Authority Act,1987 i referred the matter to klok adalath and matter may be placed before the Mandal Legal Services Committee for settlement. (Before Lok Adalath) A1 and A3 and Defacto complainant Sable Manoj, injured-Bassi PUja and Sable Sainabai present before lok adalath on inquiry defacto complainant Sable Manoj, injured-Bassi Puja and Sable Sainabai stated tyhat they voluntarily Hence A1 and A3 acquitted u/sec 320(8)cr.p.c. for the offence u/sec 320(8)cr.p.c. for the offence u/sec 324,323,506 IPC the bail bonds of A1 and A3 shall stand cancelled the unmarked property if any shall be destroyed after appear time is over.

This Order Generated in Case Information System (CIS) on 06-04-2016 Junior Civil Judge UTNOOR (Visit ecourts.gov.in for updates or download mobile app “eCourts Services” from Android or iOS)

CC/180/20151 / 1Dt: 05-01-2016

IN THE COURT OF THE Junior Civil Judge: UTNOOR

Present: Junior Civil Judge, UTNOOR ____ day, this the __ day of ____, 20__

CC/180/2015

Between:

Gunta Renuka Address: Ro Hanumannagar, Utnoor … Plaintiff/Petitioner AND

Gunta Mallesh Address: Ro Hanumanagar utnoor … Defendent/Respondent

Counsel for : ,Advocate

Counsel for : ,Advocate

This (case type) having come before me for hearing today, having heard and considered the record, this court delivered the following :

ORDER

This case is suomotto advance to this date i.e., on 12-03-2016 in view of lok adalth A1 and A2 and police present accused and defacto complainant chohan Sangeetha present and filed a petition u/sec 20(1) of lok adalath Act to refer their case to lok adalath as they both compromised out of court as per the citation referred in 2015(1) ALD(Crl) 280 of honble High court of judicature at Hyderabad i refer to lok adalath and permitted to compound as offence u/sec 324, IPC compoundable in nature the case is referred to lok adalath i have gone through the record placed before me it appears to me that there are bright chances to settlement of the matter by LOk Adalath accordingly excising my powers u/sec 19 and

CC/180/20151 / 1Dt: 05-01-2016 20 of legal services Authority Act, 1987 i referred the matter to lok adalath and matter may be placed before the mandal legal services committe for settlement. (Before Lok Adalath) A1 and A2 and defacto complainant Chohan Sangeetha present before lok adalath they filed a petition to permit them to compromise the matter before lok adalath on inquiry defacto complainant Chohan Sangeetha stated that they voluntarily intends to compromise the matter with A1 and A2 without any compromise appears to be voluntarily hence the accused acquitted u/sec 320(8) Cr.p.c. for the offence u/sec 324 IPC the bail bonds of accused shall stand cancelled the unmarked property if any shall be destroyed after appeal time is over.

This Order Generated in Case Information System (CIS) on 05-01-2016 Junior Civil Judge UTNOOR (Visit ecourts.gov.in for updates or download mobile app “eCourts Services” from Android or iOS)

CC/259/20151 / 1Dt: 04-04-2016

IN THE COURT OF THE Junior Civil Judge: UTNOOR

Present: Junior Civil Judge, UTNOOR ____ day, this the __ day of ____, 20__

CC/259/2015

Between:

Pendur Jangu Address: ro Gourapur … Plaintiff/Petitioner AND

Pendur Shravan Address: ro Gourapur … Defendent/Respondent

Counsel for : ,Advocate

Counsel for : ,Advocate

This (case type) having come before me for hearing today, having heard and considered the record, this court delivered the following :

ORDER

This case is suomoto advanced to this date ie 15-02-2016 accused and defacto complainant Pendur Jangu and injured-Pendur Laxmi bai present and filed a petition u/sec 20(1) of LOk Adalath Act to refer their case to Lok Adalath as they both compromised our of court.as per the certain referred in 2015(1) ALD crl 280 of honable HIgh Court of Judicature at Hyderabad i refer to lok adalth and permitted to compound on offence u/sec 324 IPC is compoundable is nature the case is referred to Lok adalth i have gone through the pleaded before me if appears to me that there as being chances to settlement of the matter by lok adalath accordingly by ecising my power sec 19 nand 20 of legal services authority Act 1987 i reffred

CC/259/20151 / 1Dt: 04-04-2016 the matter to lok adalath and matter may be placed before the madal legal serices committee for settlement. Before lok adalath accused and default compalinant Pendur Jangu and injured-Pendur Laxmi bai present before lok adalth. they filed a petition of permit them to compromise the matter before lok adalath on inquory the defacto Pendur Jangu and injured-Pendur Laxmi bai started that they voluantary involvs to compromise the matter with accused without any threat and concision and their compromise appaer to be voluantary hence accused in permitted u/sec 320(8) cr.p.c. for the offence u/sec 324 IPC the bail bonds of accused shall stands cancelled the unmarked property if any shall be destroyed after appeal time is over

This Order Generated in Case Information System (CIS) on 04-04-2016 Junior Civil Judge UTNOOR (Visit ecourts.gov.in for updates or download mobile app “eCourts Services” from Android or iOS)

CC/266/20151 / 1Dt: 06-04-2016

IN THE COURT OF THE Junior Civil Judge: UTNOOR

Present: Junior Civil Judge, UTNOOR ____ day, this the __ day of ____, 20__

CC/266/2015

Between:

Pawar Sulochana Address: ro Gopalpur … Plaintiff/Petitioner AND

Pawar Prathibai Address: ro Gopalapur … Defendent/Respondent

Counsel for : ,Advocate

Counsel for : ,Advocate

This (case type) having come before me for hearing today, having heard and considered the record, this court delivered the following :

ORDER

This case is suomotto advanced to this date i.e., on 13-02-2016 in view of lok adalth A1 and A2 and police present A1 and defacto complainant Pawar sulochana present and filed a petition u/sec 20(1) of lok adalath act to refer their case to lok adalath as they both compromised out of court petition filed u/sec 321cr.p.c. by APP to withdraw sec 290 IPC and allowed as per the citation referred in 2015(1)ALDCrl) 280 of honable High court of Judicature at HYderabad I refer to lok adalath and permitted to compoundable in nature the case is referred to lok adalath i have gone through the record placed before me it appears to me that there are bright chances kto settlement of the matter by lok adalath accordingly

CC/266/20151 / 1Dt: 06-04-2016 excising my power u/sec 19 and 20 of Legal Services Authority Act,1987 i referred the matter to klok adalath and matter may be placed before the Mandal Legal Services Committee for settlement. (Before Lok Adalath) A1 and A2 and Defacto complainant Pawar Sulochana present before lok adalath on inquiry defacto complainant Pawar Sulochana stated tyhat they voluntarily Hence A1 and A2 acquitted u/sec 320(8)cr.p.c. for the offence u/sec 320(8)cr.p.c. for the offence u/sec 324 r/w 34 IPC the bail bonds of A1 and A2 shall stand cancelled the unmarked property if any shall be destroyed after appea time is over.

This Order Generated in Case Information System (CIS) on 06-04-2016 Junior Civil Judge UTNOOR (Visit ecourts.gov.in for updates or download mobile app “eCourts Services” from Android or iOS)

CC/132/20141 / 1Dt: 07-04-2016

IN THE COURT OF THE Junior Civil Judge: UTNOOR

Present: Junior Civil Judge, UTNOOR ____ day, this the __ day of ____, 20__

CC/132/2014

Between:

Veera Buchaiah Address: Age 49 yrs Caste Munnu Kapu Occ MPDO Indravelly Ro. Ramnagar Karimnagar, … Plaintiff/Petitioner AND

A-1 Rekha Shyam Naik Address: Age 39 yrs Caste Lambada Occ MLA Candidate of Khanapur constituency Ro. Khanapur of Adilabad dist 2:A-2 Kanaka Lakkerao Age: 45 Occupation :

3:A-3 Gundala Rajaram Age: 40 Occupation :

4:A-4 Komram Eshwaribai Age: 40 Occupation :

5:A-5 SK Sufiyan Age: 32 Occupation :

CC/132/20141 / 1Dt: 07-04-2016 6:A-6 Pendur Krishna Age: 40 Occupation :

7:A-7 Chende Balaji Age: 40 Occupation :

8:A-8 Padval Balsingh Age: 50 Occupation :

9:A-9 Kezgiri Ravi Age: 32 Occupation :

10:A-10 Devkathe Prakash Age: 32 Occupation :

11:A-11 Arelly Ramdas Age: 36 Occupation :

12:A-12 Devbonde Ramnivas Age: 38 Occupation :

13:A-13 Kendre Shyam Age: 28 Occupation :

CC/132/20141 / 1Dt: 07-04-2016 14:A-14 Lokende Sunil Age: 34 Occupation … Defendent/Respondent Counsel for : APPO, Utnoor,Advocate Counsel for : No Advocate,Advocate

This (case type) having come before me for hearing today, having heard and considered the record, this court delivered the following :

ORDER

This case is transfered to Spl. Judl. Magistrate of First Class (PCR) Court, Adilabad.

This Order Generated in Case Information System (CIS) on 07-04-2016 Junior Civil Judge UTNOOR (Visit ecourts.gov.in for updates or download mobile app “eCourts Services” from Android or iOS)