Smt.K.Madhavi B.A., LL.M.,

IN THE COURT OF THE I ADDITIONAL JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF I CLASS:

TADEPALLIGUDEM.

Present: Smt K.Madhavi, I Addl. Judl. Magistrate of I Class, Tadepalligudem.

Monday, this the 13th day of May, 2015.

C.C.No. 318/ 2015

Between

State Rep. By Sub Inspector of Police,

Tadepalligudem Town Police Station, W.G.Dt., ...Complainant

And

1.Mohamed Usman. 2.Sk. Basha @ Sameem Basha. 3.Adapa Veeranna. 4.Cheesala Sreenivasarao. 5.Md. Nazeer.

6. Md.Abdul Sattaz. 7.Tirumala Jaya Raju. 8.KondapalliAyyappa. 9.Sk.Khader. 10.Puppala Veera Venkata Sivaji. 11.Rayapureddy Ayyappa. …Accused

The complainant/prosecution filed this case against the accused U/s. 3 and 4 of

A.P. Gaming Act.

This case is coming before me on this day in the presence of the

Assistant Public Prosecutor for the State and of Sri K.Venkateswara Rao, Counsel for A.1 to A.5, A.7 and A.10 and of Sri K.V.V.Satyanarayana, Counsel for A.6 and of

Sri N.V.V.Satyanarayana, Counsel for A.11. This Court delivered the following:

J U D G M E N T

A.1 to A.11 are present. Copies furnished under section 207 Cr.P.C. and they are examined under section 251 Cr.P.C. by reading over substance of accusation on them in

Telugu in which they admitted inspite they are informed about the prescribed punishment of alleged offence under section 4 of A.P. Gaming Act, hence their admission is deemed as voluntarily without any threat, coercion and force.

In the result, they are convicted under section 252 Cr.P.C. for the offence under section 4 of A.P. Gaming Act, and sentenced to pay fine of Rs. 500/- each in default to suffer two months (simple imprisonment) each.

The unmarked case property i.e., cash of Rs.8,600/- shall be confiscated to state by way of challan and police are directed to hand over 8 cell phones to A.1, A.2, A.5,

A.6, A.7, A.8, A.9 and A.10 on proper identification and police are directed to file photos of property and delivery acknowledgment forthwith.

No appeal lies informed to accused.

Pronounced by me in the open Court, this the 13th day of May, 2015.

Sd/- Smt K.Madhavi,

I ADDL. JUDL. MAGISTRATE OF I CLASS,

TADEPALLIGUDEM.

-No oral or documentary evidence is adduced on either side-

Id/- KMD

I AJMFC,

T.P.G.

IN THE COURT OF THE I ADDITIONAL JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF I CLASS:

TADEPALLIGUDEM.

Present: Smt K.Madhavi, I Addl. Judl. Magistrate of I Class, Tadepalligudem.

Monday, this the 18th day of May, 2015.

C.C.No. 328/ 2015

Between

State Rep. By Sub Inspector of Police,

Tadepalligudem Town Police Station, W.G.Dt., ...Complainant

And

Munikuti Naga Venkata Vigna Kumar @ Naga Kumar, S/o. Nukaraju, Aged: 24 Yrs., Padmasali Veegetable Business, R/o. Near Nukalamma Temple, Seetharampeta, Tadepalligudem. …Accused

The complainant/prosecution filed this case against the accused under section 324 of IPC.

This case is coming before me on this day in the presence of the

Assistant Public Prosecutor for the Prosecution and of Sri T.Leela Madhav, Advocate for accused. This Court delivered the following:

J U D G M E N T

Accused called present. He is examined under section 239 Cr.P.C. by reading over accusation on him levelled by prosecution and a charge is framed under section 324 of IPC read over, explained to him in Telugu in which he admitted the offence and pleaded mercy of the Court. Warning is given to the accused as to the sentence he is going to receive by this Court for the admitted offence. In spite he admitted the guilt of offence voluntarily. Hence, the accused found guilty for the offence under section 324 of IPC and he is convicted under Section 241 of Cr.P.C. and sentenced to pay fine amount of Rs. 1,500/- (Rupees One Thousand and Five Hundred Only) for the offence under section 324 of IPC and in default he has to undergo simple imprisonment for 3 months. The bail bonds of the accused if any remains in force for six months.

Pronounced by me in the open Court, this the 18th day of May, 2015.

Sd/- Smt K.Madhavi,

I ADDL. JUDL. MAGISTRATE OF I CLASS,

TADEPALLIGUDEM.

-No oral or documentary evidence is adduced on either side-

Id/- KMD

I AJMFC,

T.P.G.

In the Court of :I Additional Junior Civil Judge -cum- I Additional Judicial Magistrate Of I

Class, Tadepalligudem

Case No. :CC. 138/2015 Tadepalligudem Town P.S. Vs Kilani. Appanna

Date : 09-03-2015

Business: Accused produced from Sub Jail Tadepalligudem. He is examined. U/sec.239 Cr.P.C. By reading over accusation on him leveled by prosecution and a charge is framed. U/sec.411 of IPC read over explained to him in Telugu in which he admitted the offence and pleaded mercy of the court. Warning is given to the accused as to the sentence he is going to receive by this court for the admitted offence in spite he admitted the guilt of offence voluntarily. Hence, accused is found guilty for the charged offence u/sec.411 of IPC and accordingly he is convicted. U/sec.241 Cr.P.C. For a period of two months. The remand period from 23-02-2015, to till date 15 days, shall be set off u/sec.428 Cr.P.C. And he shall undego remaining period of sentence. The unmarked property I.e, cash of Rs.880-00 shall be given to lw-1 sunkara nagaveni immediately. Police is directed to handover to lw-1 on proper identification and directed to file photos of property and delivery acknowledgment forthwith. No appeal lies on admission informed to accused. Nature of Disposal : ADMISSION OF CLAIM Disposal Date: 09-03-2015

Sd/-

I Additional Junior Civil Judge -cum- I Additional

Judicial Magistrate Of I Class, Tadepalligudem

IN THE COURT OF THE I ADDITIONAL JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF I CLASS

TADEPALLIGUDEM.

Present: Smt K.Madhavi, I Addl. Judl. Magistrate of I Class, Tadepalligudem.

Thursday, this the 14th day of May, 2015.

C.C.No. 447/ 2014

Between

State Rep. By Forest Range Officer,

Wildlife Management, Eluru., W.G.Dt., ...Complainant

And

A.K.H.S.Rama Raju, S/o. A.S.Raju Satyanarayana, Director of the Kolleru Food Product Pvt Ltd., R/o. Hyderabad. …Accused

The complainant/prosecution filed this case against the accused under section 55 of Wild Life Act, 1972.

This case is coming before me on this day in the presence of the Assistant Public Prosecutor for the Prosecution and of Sri M.Suresh Reddy, Advocate

for accused. This Court delivered the following:

J U D G M E N T

Accused absent. Petition filed and allowed. Crl.M.P. disposed off and the said

M.P. is allowed and this accused is discharged from this C.C. Under Section 239 of

Cr.P.C. as there is no primafacie accusation to proceed with.

Pronounced by me in the open Court, this the 14th day of May, 2015.

Sd/- Smt K.Madhavi,

I ADDL. JUDL. MAGISTRATE OF I CLASS,

TADEPALLIGUDEM.

-No oral or documentary evidence is adduced on either side-

Id/- KMD

I AJMFC,

T.P.G.

IN THE COURT OF THE I ADDL. JUDL. MAGISTRATE OF I CLASS :: TADEPALLIGUDEM.

Present: Smt K.Madhavi, I Addl. Judl. Magistrate of I Class, Tadepalligudem.

Friday, this the 15th day of May, 2015.

C.C.No. 832 / 2013

Between

Indana Suryachandra Rao. ...Complainant

And

Sheth Aruna Kumar. …Accused.

The complainant filed this case against the accused that he committed the offence under section 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act.

This case is coming before me on this day. Sri K.V.V.Satyanarayana, Counsel for the complainant and of Sri Kankata Srinivasa Rao, Counsel for the accused. This Court delivered the following:

J U D G M E N T

Both parties present. Complainant has withdrawn the case against accused.

Hence C.C. is dismissed. Accused is discharged hereby. Proceedings closed accordingly.

Pronounced by me in the open Court, this the 15th day of May, 2015.

Sd/- Smt K.Madhavi,

I ADDL. JUDL. MAGISTRATE OF I CLASS,

TADEPALLIGUDEM.

-No oral or documentary evidence is adduced on either side-

Id/- KMD

I AJMFC,

T.P.G.