Sri K.P.Sai Ram

Additional Junior Civil Judge

III Addl District Complex, Nandyal · Kurnool · Andhra Pradesh

Sri K.P.Sai Ram, Additional Junior Civil Judge, is posted at III Addl District Complex, Nandyal, Kurnool, Andhra Pradesh, India. 480 court orders on record since 2017. 6 judgments with full text available. Primarily handles OS, EP, CC cases.

480

Total Orders

Judgments

Orders/Month

Postings

Featured Judgments

CC/609/2012 Acquitted

SHO OF ISVI PS vs Kuruva Rangareddy and 3 others

13 Oct 2017

1/7C.C.No.609 of 2012

IN THE COURT OF THE I ADDL. JUDL. MAGISTRATE OF I CLASS ::

ADONI.

Present:-Sri K.P. Sai Ram,

I Addl. Judicial Magistrate of I Class, Adoni. FAC/II Addl.Judicial Magistrate of I Class, Adoni

Friday, the 13th (Thirteenth) day of October 2017.

C.C. No. 609 of 2012

State represented by the Sub Inspector of Police, Isvi Police Station. … Complainant

1. Kuruva Ranga Reddy, 40 years, S/o Udda Linga Reddy.

2. Kuruva Uchiramma, 35 years, W/o Ranga Reddy.

3. Kuruva Lakshmi, 25 years, W/o YerigerappA

4. Kuruva Nagappa, age 22 years, S/o Thikka Mallaiah.

All are of Narayanapuram village, Adoni mandal.

...Accused

This case is coming on 04/10/2017 for final hearing before me and upon perusing the entire material available on record and upon hearing the arguments of learned APP for the prosecution and of Sri K.Venkatesha, Advocate for the A1 to A4 and having stood over for consideration till this date, this Court delivered the following:-

J U D G M E N T

1.The Sub Inspector of Police, Isvi Police Station filed charge sheet against A1 to A4 in Cr.No.81 of 2012 for the offences punishable under

Sec.323, 324 read with Sec.34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short ’IPC’).

2.The brief averments of the charge sheet are as follows:-

(a)A1 to A4 are residents of Narayanapuram village of Adoni mandal. There are money disputes between Pw.1 and A1. On 09/07/2012 at about 4.00 PM a galata took place in between A1 to A4 and Pw.1 wherein all the accused beat Pw.1 with sticks, hands and legs and caused injuries. The motive for the incident is non-payment of hand-loan taken by Pw.1 from A1.

On the report of Pw.1, the above case was registered and investigated into.

2/7C.C.No.609 of 2012

(b)During investigation Pw.4 visited the scene of offence, observed the scene, drawn rough sketch of the scene of offence and examined Pws.1 and 2 and recorded their statements. On 24/07/2012 at 10.00 AM Pw.4 arrested A1 to A4 and forwarded to Court for remand.

3.This case was taken cognizance for the offences under Sec.323, 324 read with Sec.34 of IPC and issued summons to A1 to A4.

4.On appearance of A1 to A4 before this court, copies of documents as contemplated under Sec.207 of the Code of Criminal

Procedure, 1973 (in short 'Cr.P.C') were furnished and when they were examined under Sec.239 Cr.P.C about the substance of allegations leveled in the charge-sheet, they denied the same and hence charges under Sec.323, 324 read with Sec.34 of IPC were framed, read over and explained to them in

Telugu, for which they pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried.

5.On behalf of prosecution, Pws.1 to 4 were examined and Exs.P1 to P6 and were got marked.

6.After the closure of prosecution evidence, A1 to A4 were examined under Sec.313 Cr.P.C. explaining the incriminating circumstances appearing against them in the evidence of prosecution witnesses, for which they denied and further stated that they did not commit any offence and were implicated in a false case. A1 to A4 did not choose to examine any defence witnesses but marked Exs.D1 and D2 during cross-examination of

Pw.1.

7.Heard arguments of learned APP for the prosecution and the learned counsel for A1 to A4.

8.Now the point that arose for determination is as follows:

Whether prosecution brought home the guilt of A1 to A4 beyond reasonable doubt for the offences under Sec.323, 324 read with Sec.34 of IPC?

9.POINT: The gravamen of the allegations against A1 to A4 is that

Pw.1 borrowed an amount of Rs.10,000/- from A1 and when he failed to repay 3/7C.C.No.609 of 2012 the same in spite of repeated demands, A1 to A4 beat Pw.1 on 09/07/2012 at 4.00 PM with sticks, hands and legs and caused bleeding injuries.

10. The prosecution in order to prove its case got examined the de facto complainant as Pw.1.

(a)According to Pw.1, about 3 years back at about 11.00 AM while he was present in his house A1 to A4 came and dragged him to outside by catching hold of his tuft and beat him. Pw.1 claimed that A1 stabbed him with a knife on his left hand, A2 and A3 caught hold of his tuft and dragged him to outside while A4 beat him with hands. Pw.1 claimed that after the incident he went to the police station in an auto and lodged Ex.P1 report.

(b)The alleged independent eyewitness to the incident was examined as Pw.2, but he failed to support the case of prosecution and turned hostile. Pw.2 claimed that he did not witness any incident and does not know how and in what manner Pw.1 sustained injuries in this case. In view of the above evidence of Pw.2, the learned APP declared him as hostile and put questions in the nature of cross-examination, however with permission of the Court, but except marking his 161 Cr.P.C statement as

Ex.P2 nothing could be elicited to show that he is deposing false to help the accused.

(c)The Medical Officer was examined as Pw.3 and he deposed that on 09/07/2012 at about 4.45 PM he examined Pw.1 and found a laceration of 2 x 1/8 x 1 cm on left dorsal aspect of left hand and that he issued Ex.P3 wound certificate opining that the injury is in simple in nature, might have been caused 0 to 6 hours prior to his examination.

(d)The investigating officer was examined as Pw.4 and he deposed that on 09/07/2012 at about 6.20 PM he received Ex.P4 MLC intimation from

Government Area Hospital, Adoni and immediately he went and recorded the statement of Pw.1 under Ex.P1, basing on which he registered a case in

Cr.No.81 of 2012 for the offences under Secs.323, 324 read with Sec.34 IPC and issued Ex.P5 FIR. Pw.4 claimed that he examined Pws.1 and 2 in the 4/7C.C.No.609 of 2012 hospital, recorded their statements and on the next day morning he went to the scene of offence situate at Narayanapuram village, observed the scene and drawn Ex.P6 rough sketch of the scene of offence. Pw.4 claimed that though he tried to secure independent witnesses at the scene of offence, nobody came forward to give statement due to fear of accused. According to

Pw.4, on 24/07/2012 at about 10.00 AM he arrested A1 to A4 at

Narayanapuram bus-stop and forwarded to the Court for remand.

11. A careful perusal of Ex.P1 report, it clearly go to show that there are money transactions between Pw.1 and A1. As per Ex.P1 statement, Pw.1 appear to have borrowed a sum of Rs.10,000/- from A1 and did not repay the same in spite of repeated demands. As per Ex.P1, on 09/07/2012 in the evening at about 4.00 PM when A1 came to her house in drunken state and demanded her to return the amount, she claimed to have directed A1 to bring demand promissory note and to collect money, for that A1 initially slapped her and thereafter beat her with a stick and caused injuries on her left-hand wrist joint. As per Ex.P1, A1 again beat her with a stick on her back and caused dumb injuries and in the mean time A2 to A4 came and beat her with hands and legs. The above version of Pw.1 has materially changed during evidence. In the chief examined, Pw.1 claimed that on the date of incident,

A1 to A4 came to her house, A1 stabbed her with a knife on his left hand; A2 and A3 caught hold of her tuft and dragged her and A4 beat her. During cross-examination, she claimed that she stated before the police about A1 stabbing her with a knife. Pw.1 admitted in the cross-examination that except sustaining dumb injury to her left hand, she did not sustain any other injury.

Pw.1 claimed that she did not state before the police that on the date of incident A1 came to her house in drunken state and further claimed that she did not state before the police that A1 beat her with a stick and caused bleeding injuries on her left-hand wrist joint and the said contradictions were marked as Exs.D1 and D2. It is not as if Pw.1 stating the facts covered under

Exs.D1 and D2 for the first time before the police. Even in her statement under Ex.P1, Pw.1 claimed that on 09/07/2012 at about 4.00 PM A1 came to 5/7C.C.No.609 of 2012 her house in drunken state, slapped her and beat her with a stick and caused bleeding injuries on her left wrist joint. The investigating officer Pw.4 admitted in the cross-examination that Pw.1 stated before him as in Ex.D.1 and D.2. Therefore, the evidence of Pw.1 before the Court, is inconsistent with her own statement made under Ex.P1 and before the police.

12. To support the case of prosecution, the prosecution cited Pw.2 as an independent witness. As already stated above, Pw.2 failed to support the case of prosecution and turned hostile. Therefore, the evidence of Pw.1 remained uncorroborated. If the evidence of Pw.1 is believed, she should have sustained some stab injuries on her left hand but the medical evidence clearly go to show that Pw.3 has observed a laceration on left dorsal aspect of left-hand of Pw.1. A laceration is highly impossible with a knife. Pw.3 admitted in the cross-examination that if any person attacks with a stick, the injury as mentioned in Ex.P3 is possible. Further as per Ex.P1, Pw.1 has sustained a bleeding injury on her left-hand and a dumb injury on her back but the medical officer did not observe any bleeding injury on the left hand of

Pw.1 nor dumb injury on her back. Therefore, the evidence of Pw.4 is also not corroborated with medical evidence. As already discussed, the evidence of

Pw.1 is not cogent and consistent with her own statement made under Ex.P1 and before the police. In view of inconsistencies in the evidence of Pw.1, her sole interested testimony cannot be made basis to record conviction of the accused for the offence with which he was charged. Probably when A1 demanded Pw.1 to repay the hand-loan of Rs.10,000/-, to evade payment

Pw.1 might have given Ex.P1 with false allegations.

13. Coming to the complicity of A2 to A4 in committing the offence, the evidence of Pw.1 is as hallow as it could be. In Ex.P1 statement Pw.1 claimed that A2 to A4 came and beat her with hands and legs but during evidence, she claimed that A2 and A3 caught hold of her tuft while A4 beat her and caused injuries. The above evidence of Pw.1 is inconsistent with her statement before the police and remained uncorroborated. Therefore, the evidence of Pw.1 with regard to the overt acts of A2 to A4 towards her, is 6/7C.C.No.609 of 2012 highly unbelievable. In view of the above facts and circumstances, this Court holds that the prosecution miserably failed to prove the guilt of accused beyond reasonable doubt for the offences under Sec.323, 324 read with

Sec.34 IPC and hence the A1 to A4 are entitled for acquittal.

14. In the result, A1 to A4 are found not guilty for the offences under Secs.323, 324 read with Sec.34 IPC and hence they are acquitted of the same under Sec.248(1) Cr.P.C. The bail bonds of accused shall be in force for a period of six months under Sec.437-A of Cr.PC.

Dictated to personal assistant, transcribed, corrected and pronounced

by me in open court on this the 13th day of October 2017.

I ADDL. JUDL. MAGISTRATE OF I CLASS, ADONI.

FAC/II ADDL. JUDL. MAGISTRATE OF I CLASS, ADONI.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESES EXAMINED

Prosecution:Defence: None. P.W.1 : AGarjamma P.W.2 : AChinna Shivamma P.W.3 : Dr.C.Padma Kumar P.W.4 : L.Shivanjal, S.I. of Police

EXHIBITS MARKED:

Prosecution: Ex.P1: Complaint of Pw.1. Ex.P2: 161 Cr.P.C. Statement of Pw.2. Ex.P3: Wound certificate of Pw.1. Ex.P4: MLC intimation. Ex.P5: FIR. Ex.P6: Rough sketch of the scene.

Defence: Nil.

Ex.D.1:Under line portion in 161 Cr.P.C. statement of Pw.1. Ex.D.2: Under line portion in 161 Cr.P.C. statement of Pw.1.

I ADDL. JUDL. MAGISTRATE OF I CLASS, ADONI.

FAC/II ADDL. JUDL. MAGISTRATE OF I CLASS, ADONI.

7/7C.C.No.609 of 2012

CALENDER AND JUDGMENT

IN THE COURT OF THE I ADDITIONAL JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF I

CLASS, ADONI

FAC/II ADDL.JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF I CLASS, ADONI

C.C.NO.609/2012

1Date of offence09.07.2012 2Date of complaint09.07.2012 3Date of apprehension of the accused24.07.2012 4Date of release on bail24.07.2012 5Date of commencement of trial25.07.2017 6Date of close of trial04.10.2017 7Date of Judgment 13.10.2017

Calender and Judgment in C.C.NO.609/2012

On the file of the I Additional Judicial Magistrate of I Class,

Adoni.

FAC/II Addl.Judicial Magistrate of I Class, Adoni

ComplainantState represented by the Sub-Inspector of Police, Isvi Police Station. Accused1. Kuruva Ranga Reddy, 40 years, S/o Udda Linga Reddy.

2. Kuruva Uchiramma, 35 years, W/o Ranga Reddy.

3. Kuruva Lakshmi, 25 years, W/o YerigerappA

4. Kuruva Nagappa, age 22 years, S/o Thikka Mallaiah.

All are of Narayanapuram village, Adoni mandal.

OffenceVoluntarily caused hurt.

Section of LawU/S 323, 324 r/w 34 IPC FindingA1 to A4 are found not guilty Sentence or orderIN THE RESULT, A1 to A4 are found not guilty for the offences under Secs.323, 324 read with Sec.34 IPC and hence they are acquitted of the same under Sec.248(1) Cr.P.C. The bail bonds of accused shall be in force for a period of six months under Sec.437-A of Cr.PC.

I ADDITIONAL JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF I CLASS,

ADONI. FAC/II ADDL.JUDL.MAGISTRATE OF I CLASS, ADONI.

Copy submitted to: The Hon'ble Chief-Judicial Magistrate-cum-

Principal Assistant Sessions Judge,

Kurnool.

OS/691/2019 Compromised

Corporation Bank a body having its head office at Mangaladevi Temple Road, Pandeshwar, Manglore vs Patan Salam Khan and another

13 Apr 2022

APKU090020382019 1/2 O.S. No.691 of 2019

Presented on : 08-07-2019 Registered on : 08-07-2019 Decided on : 12-04-2022 Duration :2 years, 9 months, 5 days

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE:: NANDYAL

Present:- Sri K.P. SAI RAM,

Principal Junior Civil Judge, Nandyal.

Wednesday, this the 13th (Thirteenth) day of April, 2022

O.S.691 of 2019

Between:

Corporation bank a body corporate constituted under the banking companies (Acquisition and Transfer of undertakings) Act, 1980 having its head office at Mangaldevi) Temple Road, Pandeshwar, Mangalore and having its branch at D.No.25/684-12, TTD Road, Srinivasa Nagar, Nandyal represented

.. Plaintiff

And

1. Patan Salam Khan, S/o Sofi Khan, aged 68 years, Agriculturist, R/o H.No.3-106-1, OC Colony, Manchalakatta Village, Gadivemula Mandal, Kurnool district,

2. Vani Venkateswara Cold Storage, Sy.No.238, Maseedupuram Metta, Chabolu village, Nandyal Mandal, represented by its Managing Partner Aitha Siva Shankaraiah, S/o Ramachandraiah, aged 33 years, R/o H.No.28-768-19-A1-1, Lalitha Nagar, NGO Colony, Nandyal Town and Mandal, Kurnool district … Defendant

This suit is coming on this day before me for hearing in the presence of Sri Smt. T. Yamuna, Advocate for the Plaintiff, and Sri N. Jagan Mohan Reddy, Advocate for defendant No.2 and defendant No.1 remained exparte, and having perused the material available on record, this Court passed the following:

J U D G M E N T

This is a suit for hyphotecation of agreement of loan. The defendants have approached the plaintiff bank for grant of loan basing on the produce receipt No.0433 issued by the 2nd defendant for the value of 74 bags of red chillies was Rs.4,08,480/- The plaintiff bank issued arrangement letter and the same was agreed by the defendants in respect of the loan amount. The plaintiff bank sanctioned loan an amount of Rs.2,93,000/- under account No.CAPL/01/152140 basing on the receipt of Vani Venkateswara Cold storage i.e., 2nd defendant. The application of the 1st defendant for credit facility against pledger of warehouse receipt and appraisal-cum-approval note for the advance against warehouse receipt. The warehouse receipt issued by the 2nd defendant is filed. The 1st defendant has executed agreement with regard to the pledge of red chilli under Vani Venkateswara Cold Storage receipt, demand promissory note agreeing to repay the loan amount with interest at 9.65 per annum (basing 0.00% over and above the base rate, rising or falling therewith, compounded monthly/quarterly/annually for value receive). The entire loan amount with interest has to be repaid within 12 months. The agreement, the demand promissory note executed by the 1st defendant dated 15.3.2016 in favour of plaintiff bank. Furthermore the 1st defendant being borrower had also executed DP note delivery letter, letter of authorization cum undertaking and letter of undertaking/declaration in favour of the plaintiff bank. And the said documents are filed. As per the letter of authorization cum

APKU090020382019 2/2 O.S. No.691 of 2019 undertaking executed by the 1st defendant in favour of the plaintiff bank to the affect out of 11.25% per annum, 1.00 % per annum charges are to be paid to NCMSL on monthly basis, since the same is acting as mediator in between bank and godown. Further the 1st defendant executed agreement with regard to pledge of red chilli under Vani Venkateswara Cold Storage receipt bearing NO.0433 dated 13.3.2016. As per the rates prevailing in the market the value of Pledged Red Chilli was Rs.4,08,480/-. The amount elgible as per bank. Norms was Rs.3,06,000/- so the amount availed by the defendant was Rs.2,93,000/-. As the defendants failed to adhere to the loan documents executed by them in favour of the plaintiff bank in relation to discharging of the loan amount due to the plaintiff bank. The defendants never kept up the promise to repayment of loan availed by them from the plaintiff bank inspite of repeated demands made by the plaintiff bank. The defendants miserably failed to discharge the loan amount due to the plaintiff bank. On 12.7.2018 the plaintiff bank under forced circumstances sold away the pledged red chilly in auction after taking all precautions in securing the good price prevailing as on the said dated and realised Rs.2,42,763.75 ps. After adjustment of the sale proceeds, the defendants still became due of Rs.1,55,800/- as on dated 5.2.2019. Later the plaintiff bank issued notice on after deducting of public auction of red chilli pledged by the 1st defendant and insisted to pay the balance amount of Rs.1,55,800/- and the notice is filed. The 1st defendant received the said notice. The defendants failed to respond to the notice of plaintiff nor paid any amount due by them to the plaintiff bank. Though the defendants are jointly and severally liable to pay the same. Hence the suit.

Memo filed on behalf of plaintiff stating that the suit claim is settled out of court. Memo is recorded. Hence the suit is dismissed as settled out of court. No costs.

Pronounced by me on this the 13 th day of April, 2022.

Principal Junior Civil Judge,

NANDYAL.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

Witnesses examined:None

Exhibits Marked on behalf of either side:

- Nil -

Principal Junior Civil Judge,

NANDYAL.

OS/5/2022

Payala Padmalatha vs Payala Vara Lakshmi and two others

13 Apr 2022

APKU090000062022 1/1 O.S. No.05 of 2022

Presented on : 07-01-2022 Registered on : 07-01-2022 Decided on : 13-04-2022 Duration :0 years, 3 months, 6 days

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE:: NANDYAL

Present:- Sri K.P. SAI RAM,

Principal Junior Civil Judge, Nandyal.

Wednesday, this the 13th (Thirteenth day of April, 2022

O.S.05 of 2022

Between: Payala Padmalatha, aged 40 years, W/o Kumar, Hindu, Tailor, R/o H.No.3-95, Byrmal Street, Nandyal town and

Mandal, Kurnool district .. Plaintiff

And

1. Payala Vara Lakshmi, aged 58 years, W/o Venugopal, Hindu, House wife, R/o H.No.3-95, Byrmal Street, Nandyal town and Mandal, Kurnool district,

2. Bulleddula Rupa, aged 36 years, W/o Prasad, Hindu, House wife, R/o Near Satyanarayana Swamy Temple, Atmakur Bus Stand, Nandyal town and mandal, Kurnool district, 3.Payala Purnima, aged 38 years, Wife of Bala Hussain Reddy, Hindu, House wife, R/o Kadamalakalva Village, Bandi Atmakur Mandal, Kurnool district … Defendants

This suit is coming on this day before me for hearing in the presence of Sri A. Sreenivasa Sharma, Advocate for the Plaintiff, Sri S. Obul Reddy, Advocate for defendants, and having perused the material available on record, this Court passed the following:

J U D G M E N T

This is a suit for partition and separate possession of the plaintiff’s 1/4th share in the plaint schedule property by division of the same into four shares and allot one such share to the plaintiff and one such share to the each of the defendants 1 to 3 by metes and bounds and for costs of the suit.

In view of the orders passed in I.A.No.902 of 2022, the suit is advanced from 21.4.2022 to this date. Memo filed on behalf of plaintiff not pressing the suit. Memo is recorded. Hence the suit is dismissed as not pressed. No costs.

Pronounced by me on this the 13 th day of April, 2022.

Principal Junior Civil Judge,

NANDYAL.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

Witnesses examined:None

Exhibits Marked on behalf of either side:

- Nil -

Principal Junior Civil Judge,

NANDYAL.

OS/776/2016

Yerralingannagari Ramalingeswara Naidu vs Yerralingannagari Sivalingam

11 Apr 2022

APKU090009122016

1/2 O.S. No.776 of 2016

Presented on : 22-09-2016 Registered on : 29-11-2016 Decided on : 11-04-2022 Duration :5 years, 6 months, 19 days

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE:: NANDYAL

Present:- Sri K.P. SAI RAM,

Principal Junior Civil Judge, Nandyal.

Monday, this the 11th (Eleventh day of April, 2022

O.S.776 of 2016

Between:

Yerralingannagari Ramalingeswara Naidu, aged 42 years, S/o Late Linganna, Hindu, Employee, r/o quarter No.A32, KIOCL, Township, Kavoor Street, Mangaluru Post, Dakshina Kannada District, Karnataka State,

.. Plaintiff

And

1. Yerralingannagari Sivalingam, aged 45 years, S/o late Linganna. Hindu, driver, r/o H.No.28/1052-1C3, Teachers Colony, Nandyal, Kurnool district,

2. Yerralingannagari Lingamaiah, aged 40 years, S/o late Linganna, Hindu, driver,

3. Yerralingannagari Bhaskar, aged 33 years, Son of Late Linganna, Hindu, Employee,

No.2 and 3 are residents of H.No.28/1050-105, Deva Nagar, Nandyal Kurnool district … Defendants

This suit is coming on this day before me for hearing in the presence of Sri R.

Nataraj, Advocate for the Plaintiff, and Sri A. Sreenivasa Sharma, Advocate for D1, and defendants 2 and 3 remained expartem and having perused the material available on

record, this Court passed the following:

J U D G M E N T

This is a suit for cancellation of the registered gift deed bearing document

No.5307/2008 dated 29.8.2008 in favour of 1st defendant executed by Yerra Linganna in

respect of the plaint schedule properties and for costs of the suit.

Costs not paid. No representation on behalf of plaintiff. Plaintiff is called absent. As seen from the docket, the suit is coming up for trial since from 12.12.2019 and the plaintiff is no showing any interest to proceed with trial inspite of passing conditional

orders and imposing costs. Hence the suit is dismissed for default. No costs.

Pronounced by me on this the 11 th day of April, 2022.

Principal Junior Civil Judge,

NANDYAL.

APKU090009122016

2/2 O.S. No.776 of 2016

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

Witnesses examined:None

Exhibits Marked on behalf of either side:

- Nil -

Principal Junior Civil Judge,

NANDYAL.

OS/760/2021

T. Ameer Khan vs Rumana Khatoon

12 Apr 2022

Order Record 464 total

Case No.	Parties	Date	Type	Outcome
EP/12/2020	K.Venkata Ramana vs G.Guravaiah	13 Apr 2022	Copy of Order	—
OS/5/2022	Payala Padmalatha vs Payala Vara Lakshmi and two others	13 Apr 2022	Copy Judgment	—
OS/691/2019	Corporation Bank a body having its head office at Mangaladevi Temple Road, Pandeshwar, Manglore vs Patan Salam Khan and another	13 Apr 2022	Copy Judgment	Compromised
OS/760/2021	T. Ameer Khan vs Rumana Khatoon	12 Apr 2022	Copy Judgment	—
OS/776/2016	Yerralingannagari Ramalingeswara Naidu vs Yerralingannagari Sivalingam	11 Apr 2022	Copy Judgment	—
OS/7/2017	Katuri Krishnamoorthy vs Mulla Yakub	08 Apr 2022	Copy Judgment	—
OS/9/2021	Jogi Rama Subbaiah vs G.Tayaramma	08 Apr 2022	Copy Judgment	—
OS/141/2016	Vadala Saramma vs Nasari alias Esari Ramanjaneyulu	08 Apr 2022	Copy Judgment	—
EP/9/2022	M/s Shriram Chits Pvt Ltd. Nandyal branch. rep by its Manager legal cum GPA Dudekula Moulali vs Shaik Thouhid Khanam and 2 others	07 Apr 2022	Copy of Order	—
EP/27/2020	D.Sreedhar Reddy vs B.Chandra Sekhar Reddy	07 Apr 2022	Copy of Order	—
EP/86/2019	Boreddy Narayana Reddy vs Seelam Chennaiah	07 Apr 2022	Copy of Order	—
EP/97/2019	B.Nagaraja Reddy vs K.Brahma Reddy	07 Apr 2022	Copy of Order	—
OS/172/2016	vijaya Bank, Rep by its Branch manager, Nandyal vs Smt. B.Adilakshmi	07 Apr 2022	Copy Judgment	—
OS/226/2022	Pabbati Sudharshanam and one other vs Ponnapati Bojjal	07 Apr 2022	Copy Judgment	—
OS/446/2021	B.Akki Reddy vs K.Radha Krishna	07 Apr 2022	Copy Judgment	—
EP/75/2019	Kopparu Satyavathi vs Koppunuru Sunithamma	04 Apr 2022	Copy of Order	—
OS/554/2021	Bareddy Venkata Lakshmi Kanthareddy vs M.Bala Venkata Reddy	04 Apr 2022	Copy Judgment	—
EP/34/2021	Dodda Murali Krishna Reddy vs Mohammad Latheef	01 Apr 2022	Copy of Order	—
EP/45/2019	V.Ananth vs C.Vijayanna	01 Apr 2022	Copy of Order	—
EP/89/2020	S.Rama Krishna Goud vs B.Yellamma @ Radhamma	01 Apr 2022	Copy of Order	—
EP/92/2018	Puduru Lakshmi Devi vs Sathi Prathap Reddy	01 Apr 2022	Copy of Order	—
EP/96/2020	M/s Shriram Raghavendra Chits Pvt., Ltd., Nandyal rep., by its Foreman/Branch Manager, Ndl vs G.Sreenivasulu and 4 others	01 Apr 2022	Copy of Order	—
OS/26/2017	Nowle Ananda Rao vs Gopireddy Venkata Rami Reddy	01 Apr 2022	Copy Judgment	—
OS/187/2014	Chittaluru Abhimanya alias Abhimanyudu Setty vs J.Swamy Reddy	01 Apr 2022	Copy Judgment	—
OS/280/2018	Chakali Narayana vs Kuruva Govardhanaiah @ Govardhan	01 Apr 2022	Copy Judgment	—
OS/522/2019	Nakka Ranganayakulu vs P.Venkateswarlu	01 Apr 2022	Copy Judgment	—
EP/70/2018	Poluru Bhaskaraiah vs REddypogula Jamali	31 Mar 2022	Copy of Order	—
EP/97/2018	Ambati Siva Rami Reddy vs K.Narasimhulu	31 Mar 2022	Copy of Order	—
EP/180/2018	M.Shanmukha Rao vs Gajjala Prabhakar Reddy	29 Mar 2022	Copy of Order	—
OS/158/2021	N.Rama Krishna Reddy vs M.Chinna Venkata	29 Mar 2022	Copy Judgment	—
EP/125/2020	B.Siva Rami Reddy vs Suryapogu Amurtha Raj	28 Mar 2022	Copy of Order	—
EP/52/2018	M.Venkata Ramudu vs Kottam Sankaraiah	24 Mar 2022	Copy of Order	—
EP/59/2019	M.Sujatha vs K.Ashabee	24 Mar 2022	Copy of Order	—
EP/240/2019	P.Harinath vs Akkala Rama Krishna	24 Mar 2022	Copy of Order	—
OS/177/2021	B.Rami Reddy vs A.Suresh Kumar	23 Mar 2022	Copy Judgment	—
OS/295/2021	Canara Bank, Nandyal rep., by its Branch Manager vs A.Narayana Reddy	23 Mar 2022	Copy Judgment	—
OS/467/2020	N.Jagan Mohan Reddy vs A.Surya Maddulety Reddy	23 Mar 2022	Copy Judgment	—
CC/341/2015	A.Rajesh Kumar Reddy vs T.Venkata pathi	23 Mar 2022	Copy Judgment	—
CC/629/2018	Y.Naga Bhusanam vs C.Ragjavendramma@Raghavamma	23 Mar 2022	Copy Judgment	—
OS/219/2020	Bank of Baroda vs M/s Bhuvaneswari Enterprises rep., by its Proprietor K.Sri Latha	21 Mar 2022	Copy Judgment	—
EP/229/2016	Addanki Venkateswarlu vs Mekala Pedda Khaderaiah	16 Mar 2022	Copy of Order	—
OS/319/2021	M.Vijaya Kumari vs M.Satya Babu and another	16 Mar 2022	Copy Judgment	—
OS/619/2018	Chilakala Rangaiah vs Aineni Sreenath	16 Mar 2022	Copy Judgment	—
OS/1219/2019	Canara Bank, Nandyal rep., by its Branch Manager,Nandyal vs S.Nageswara Reddy	16 Mar 2022	Copy Judgment	—
EP/5/2019	Mekala Rama Subbaiah vs Mandla Venkata Swamy	15 Mar 2022	Copy of Order	—
EP/229/2019	M/s Shri Ram Chits Pvt., Ltd., rep., by its power of Attorney Holder vs V.Siva Sankar and 3 others	15 Mar 2022	Copy of Order	—
OS/128/2017	Sri Lakshmi Iron Company, rep by its sole Proprietor, Chittuluri Abimanyudu Setty vs Parvathaneni Ramachandra Rao	15 Mar 2022	Copy Judgment	—
OS/418/2020	Chukka Chinna Rama Pullaiah vs G.Guruvaiah and 2 others	15 Mar 2022	Copy Judgment	—
OS/446/2015	Patan Kamal bi vs P. Hussain Bi	15 Mar 2022	Copy Judgment	—
OS/646/2021	Bacham Venkatesxwara Reddy vs Bacham Venkata Krishna Reddy	15 Mar 2022	Copy Judgment	—
OS/55/2021	Shaik Mohammad Shafi vs G.Jamal Basha	14 Mar 2022	Copy Judgment	—
OS/81/2019	Batchu Sivaiah vs Nitchenametla Venkata Sesha Chalamaiah	14 Mar 2022	Copy Judgment	—
OS/244/2015	Telugu Nadipi LaKshmanna vs K. Pedda swamy	14 Mar 2022	Copy Judgment	—
OS/352/2021	ramireddy Venkateswara Reddy vs Nallamalla Sunkanna	14 Mar 2022	Copy Judgment	—
OS/459/2020	A.C.Hussain Reddy vs D.Shareef	14 Mar 2022	Copy Judgment	—
EP/2/2022	Gandu Gorantla vs Maddugari Bala Krishna	11 Mar 2022	Copy of Order	—
EP/73/2020	M.Trilingeswari vs K.Hussain Basha	11 Mar 2022	Copy of Order	—
EP/146/2019	K.Venkateswarluu vs D.Jayaraju	11 Mar 2022	Copy of Order	—
OS/32/2017	Gudupala Balaram vs Smt Madam Jaya Rani	11 Mar 2022	Copy of Order	—
OS/92/2016	Panyam Pedda Dastagiri vs Ayyaluru alias Panyam Golla Venkata Subbamma	11 Mar 2022	Copy Judgment	—
OS/118/2022	Perumalla Chennaiah vs Velugoti Jamal Reddy and one other	11 Mar 2022	Copy Judgment	—
OS/316/2017	M. Vasantha Kumari vs Pula Naga Maddilety	11 Mar 2022	Copy Judgment	—
OS/369/2021	Challa Suresh vs Sampangi Nagendra @ S.V.Nagendra	11 Mar 2022	Copy Judgment	—
OS/581/2016	Bommana Siva Lakshamma vs Bommana Jaya Ranga Reddy	11 Mar 2022	Copy Judgment	—
EP/62/2019	Dasari Chenna Redddy vs Shabbir Hussain	10 Mar 2022	Copy of Order	—
EP/157/2017	Etta Narayana Goud vs Edige Sreenivasulu	10 Mar 2022	Copy of Order	—
EP/167/2018	Jinkala Nageswara Reddy died rep by his LRs. Jinkala Puspavathamma vs Edige Venkata Pullaiah	10 Mar 2022	Copy of Order	—
OS/184/2021	Avulasetty Chandra Sekhar vs Shaik Hafijabee and 3 others	10 Mar 2022	Copy Judgment	—
OS/266/2020	P.Ranjith Kumar vs M.Siva Sankar	10 Mar 2022	Copy Judgment	—
OS/376/2021	A.Mahanandi Reddy vs Alvakonda Chinna Pullaiah	10 Mar 2022	Copy Judgment	—
OS/384/2021	Bareddy Savithramma vs G.Venkateswarlu	10 Mar 2022	Copy Judgment	—
OS/430/2021	Revanuru Pushpavathi vs Chennuru Chinnanna	10 Mar 2022	Copy Judgment	—
OS/645/2021	Pedda Yenumala Lakshmi devi vs Pedda Yenumala Nagamani	10 Mar 2022	Copy Judgment	—
CC/158/2017	B.Raja Sekar Reddy vs Nada Gouni Anantha Reddy	10 Mar 2022	Copy Judgment	—
OS/434/2021	Dandu Pullanna vs Shaik Yakoob Basha and another	09 Mar 2022	Copy Judgment	—
OS/568/2020	M.Rama Chandraiah vs D.Subramanya Sharma	09 Mar 2022	Copy Judgment	—
OS/1218/2019	Canara Bank, Nandyal rep., by its Branch Manager,Nandyal vs V.Rosi Reddy	09 Mar 2022	Copy Judgment	—
OS/517/2018	Canara Bank, Nandyal vs Boddu Vara Lakshmi	08 Mar 2022	Copy Judgment	—
EP/217/2019	N.Bhaskara Reddy @ V.Vijaya Bhaskara Reddy vs M.Nagaraju	07 Mar 2022	Copy of Order	—
OS/49/2020	Karur Vysya Bank Ltd., Nandyal Branch, Kurnool rep., by its Manager by name C.Sekhar vs Y.Narayana Reddy	07 Mar 2022	Copy Judgment	—
OS/55/2020	Karur Vysya Bank Ltd., Nandyal Branch, Kurnool rep., by its Manager by name C.Sekhar vs B.Nageswara Reddy	07 Mar 2022	Copy Judgment	—
OS/198/2021	T.Ravindra Sharma vs Smt.B.Sanjeeva Rani	07 Mar 2022	Copy Judgment	—
OS/427/2020	G.Rathnalu vs K.Sreerama Chandrudu	07 Mar 2022	Copy Judgment	—
OS/477/2018	Byreddy Subba Reddy vs Nookala Ramesh	07 Mar 2022	Copy Judgment	—
OS/1231/2019	Canara Bank, Nandyal rep., by its Chief Manager, Nandyal vs S.Nagi Reddy	07 Mar 2022	Copy Judgment	—
OS/1234/2019	Canara Bank, Nandyal rep., by its Chief Manager, Nandyal vs U.Venkata Subbaiah	07 Mar 2022	Copy Judgment	—
EP/178/2019	M/s Shriram Raghavendra Chits Pvt Ltd., Nandyal rep., by J.Ravi Kumar, vs S.Nirmala and 3 others	04 Mar 2022	Copy of Order	—
OS/17/2020	K.Rameswaramma vs S.Pulla Reddy	04 Mar 2022	Copy Judgment	—
OS/179/2021	K.Babu vs K.Astami	04 Mar 2022	Copy Judgment	—
OS/323/2015	Sri Ramanuja Dasari Seva Sangham Annadana satram vs J. Velukondaiah	04 Mar 2022	Copy Judgment	—
OS/616/2016	Beerala Raja Sekhar Reddy vs Pogula Parvathi Devi	04 Mar 2022	Copy Judgment	—
EP/4/2021	Meda Buddudu vs Akumalla Manohar	03 Mar 2022	Copy of Order	—
EP/216/2019	N.Bhaskara Reddy @ V.Vijaya Bhaskara Reddy vs M.Nagaraju	03 Mar 2022	Copy of Order	—
EP/218/2016	Annapureddy Siva Nagendra Reddy vs Shaik Hussainsa	03 Mar 2022	Copy of Order	—
OS/10/2019	Kalvatala Chinna Naganna vs Maddugari Bala Krishna	03 Mar 2022	Copy Judgment	—
OS/468/2021	K.Vasundara vs Shaik Abdul Salam	03 Mar 2022	Copy Judgment	—
OS/559/2021	Battu Nagabhushanamma vs Seelam Chinna Pullaiah	03 Mar 2022	Copy Judgment	—
OS/91/2019	Natukula Venkateswarlu Guptha vs Nitchenametla Venkata Sesha Chalamaiah	02 Mar 2022	Copy Judgment	—
OS/261/2015	R. Deva kumar vs P. Chinna Chandraiah	02 Mar 2022	Copy Judgment	—
OS/270/2020	M.Ramalinga Reddy vs Y.Kasaiah	02 Mar 2022	Copy Judgment	—

Showing 100 of 464 orders — Log in to browse all pages.

Monthly Orders (Last 12 Months)

Apr 2022		27
Mar 2022		74
Feb 2022		44
Jan 2022		30
Dec 2021		113
Nov 2021		103
Oct 2021		45
Sep 2021		39
Oct 2017		5

Frequently Asked Questions

How many cases has Sri K.P.Sai Ram handled?

Sri K.P.Sai Ram has handled 480 court orders since 2017 at III Addl District Complex, Nandyal. The average disposal rate is 9 orders per month.

What types of cases does Sri K.P.Sai Ram hear?

Based on available records, Sri K.P.Sai Ram primarily handles Civil matters (Original Suits, Execution Petitions) and Criminal matters (Criminal Cases) at III Addl District Complex, Nandyal.

Where is Sri K.P.Sai Ram currently posted?

Sri K.P.Sai Ram is posted as Additional Junior Civil Judge at III Addl District Complex, Nandyal, Kurnool, Andhra Pradesh.

Are judgments by Sri K.P.Sai Ram available online?

Yes. 6 judgments by Sri K.P.Sai Ram are available on Legistro with full text, outcome, and sections cited.

How fast does Sri K.P.Sai Ram dispose cases?

Sri K.P.Sai Ram disposes approximately 9 cases per month, based on 480 orders handled over their tenure at III Addl District Complex, Nandyal.

Since when is Sri K.P.Sai Ram serving?

Sri K.P.Sai Ram has been serving at III Addl District Complex, Nandyal since 2017.

Case Types

OS 66%

EP 28%

CC 5%

A 1%

RCC 0%

Posting History

Oct 2021 — Oct 2021

Additional Junior Civil Judge
Sep 2021 — Apr 2022

Prl.Junior Civil Judge · 475 orders
Jul 2021 — Aug 2021

Prl.Junior Civil Judge
Aug 2017 — Nov 2017

II Addl Junior Civil Judge, Adoni · 5 orders

Outcomes on Record

Acquitted 1

Compromised 1

Other Judges at this Court

Sri.D.Ammanna Raja

III Addl.District Judge,Nandyal

895 orders

Sri N.Sirish

Prl.Senior Civil Judge

0 orders

Smt S.thangamani

I Addl.Senior Civil Judge-FTC

0 orders

Sri Suribhatla Srinivasu

Prl.Junior Civil Judge

548 orders

Smt S. Lakshmi Karri

Additional Junior Civil Judge

36 orders

Sri M.yesuratnam

Special Magistrate Court, Nandyal

957 orders

← View all judges at III Addl District Complex, Nandyal