Kum K.Sailaja, Junior Civil Judge

Junior Civil Judge

Court of Junior Civil Judge,, Kalyandurg (Taluka) · Ananthapur · Andhra Pradesh

Kum K.Sailaja, Junior Civil Judge, Junior Civil Judge, is posted at Court of Junior Civil Judge,, Kalyandurg (Taluka), Ananthapur, Andhra Pradesh, India. 700 court orders on record since 2010. 5 judgments with full text available. Primarily handles CC, OS, EP cases.

700

Total Orders

Judgments

Orders/Month

Posting

Featured Judgments

OS/141/2012

S.J.Sheriff vs P.Gangulappa

03 Apr 2014

IN THE COURT OF THE JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE: KALYANDURG

Present: Miss. Sailaja Kampalle, B.A., LL.B., Junior Civil Judge, Kalyandurg. Thursday, the 3rd day of April, 2014 Original Suit No .141 of 2012 Between:- S.J.Sheriff …Plaintiff

1. P.Gangulappa

2. P.Prabhavathi …Defendant

This suit came before me for final hearing on 01-04-2014 for final hearing in the presence of Sri G.Ramgopal, Advocate for the plaintiff and defendants being remained exparte, the matter having stood over for consideration till this day this Court delivered the following:-

J U D G M E N T

1 This suit is filed for recovery of Rs.82,655/- being the sale consideration amount, charges and for costs.

2 The case of the plaintiff as per the plaint in brief is that:

The defendants 1 and 2 are husband and wife. Both of them colluded together and created a document styled as gift deed in respect of suit schedule property on 5-5-2010. Under that fabricated document 2nd defendant had gifted over the suit schedule property in favour of 1st defendant Gangulappa. Thereafter by playing fraud on the plaintiff the 1st defendant made plaintiff to believe that he is the absolute owner of the suit schedule property under that fabricated gift deed and accordingly he made the plaintiff to purchase the same under the registered sale deed dated 5-5-2010 for valid consideration of Rs.59,000/-. Infact both the defendants have no valid right, title, interest, possession and enjoyment over the suit schedule property. Recently i.e., 5 months back when the plaintiff intended to construct the building in the suit schedule property he came to know the fact that the defendants have no title, right, interest, possession and enjoyment over the suit schedule property covered under his sale deed dated 5-5-2010. Thereafter also the plaintiff made further enquiry in the town and learnt about the collusion of defendants and the fraud playing by them against him. As per the terms of his sale deed the 1st defendant has to produce the valid document about his title over the 2 suit schedule property. Subsequently the plaintiff approached the defendants and questioned about their fraud and demanded to repay the sale consideration of

Rs.59,000/-. For that the defendants admitted their liability to refund the sale consideration. But they have not keep up their words. Hence the plaintiff issued a legal notice to the defendants and demanded them to confirm their title with a valid document over the suit schedule property. But they have not responded either by giving a reply or by coming forward to remove the clouds on their title in respect of the suit schedule property. In these circumstances, the plaintiff obliged to file this suit seeking recovery of sale consideration of Rs.59,000/- , registration fee of

Rs.295/- and an amount of Rs.4,910/- towards the charges of stamps means for the sale deed dated 5-5-2010 and interest at the rate of 18% p.a. by way of damages.

3.To prove his case, the plaintiff himself got examined as PW1 by filing his chief affidavit and got marked Exs.A.1 to A.5. Ex.A.1 is the registered gift deed

dated 5-5-2010, Ex.A.2 is the registered sale deed dated 5-5-2010, Ex.A.3 is the

office copy of legal notice issued by the plaintiff to defendants, Exs.A.4 and A.5 are the postal receipts addressed to 1st and 2nd defendants in respect of Ex.A.3 legal notice.

4 . The plaintiff as PW.1 had reiterated his case against the defendants in his chief evidence. His evidence goes to show that the 2nd defendant executed a gift deed i.e., Ex.A.1 in favour of 1st defendant on 5-5-2010 and the same was registered and thereafter on the same day i.e.,5-5-2010 the 1st defendant sold the same to the plaintiff under Ex.A.2 sale deed for valid consideration of Rs.59,000/-.

It is the further case of the plaintiff that subsequently to that purchase i.e., 5 months prior to the suit he intends to construct a building in the suit schedule property and during that time he learnt that the defendants had no valid title towards the suit schedule property and they cheated him by playing fraud on him and make him to believe that they are the absolute owners of the suit schedule property and made him to purchase the same under Ex.A.2. On his further enquiry he confirmed about the fraud played by the defendants on him and inspite of his oral demands as well as legal notice to show the valid title or to refund the sale 3 consideration including stamp charges and registration charges, the defendants had not properly responded. Hence the suit.

5. As seen from the pleadings as well as the evidence of plaintiff it is clear that though he is alleged that without valid title over the suit schedule property, the 2nd defendant executed Ex.A.1 in favour of first defendant and though fully aware of defective title of his wife over the suit schedule property, the 1st defendant wantonly got created Ex.A.1 and made the plaintiff to believe that he is having right over the suit schedule property under Ex.A.1 gift deed and sold the suit schedule property to plaintiff under Ex.A.2, except giving his oral evidence he had not put forth any other convincing evidence about the alleged defective title of defendants over the suit schedule property. The contents of Ex.A.1 goes to show that the 2nd defendant being the absolute owner of suit schedule property she gifted over the same to 1st defendant under Ex.A.1 and the contents of Ex.A.2 goes to show that being the absolute right holder over the suit schedule property by virtue of Ex.A.1, the 1st defendant sold the suit schedule property to plaintiff under that document.

6. When the case of plaintiff is that both the defendants played fraud on him, it is for him to prove that allegation of fraud with clear details and with convincing evidence. He can prove the alleged defective title of the defendants over the suit schedule property by placing convincing documentary evidence to show that the suit schedule property not belongs to defendants, but belongs to other persons or

Government etc, but he had not filed any such documentary proof. Moreover the plaintiff can prove his case by examining any of the persons who know about the defective title of defendants over the suit schedule property, but he was not done so.

7. Moreover it is pertinent to note that though the plaintiff says that he paid an amount of Rs.59,000/- to the defendants under Ex.A.2 document he had not put forth the evidence of any other witness, he can prove that fact of passing of consideration by examining either the scribe or the attestors of Ex.A.2, but it is also not done so. It is also important to mention that, the alleged gift deed stands in the name of 1st defendant and the alleged suit document i.e., sale deed Ex.A.2 is admittedly executed on one and the same day. But surprisingly the plaintiff is silent about the clear facts which made him to believe the alleged title of defendants over 4 the suit schedule property and which promises of defendants made him to purchase the suit schedule property under Ex.A.2.

8. In the absence of this material convincing evidence, it is difficult to believe the mere oral evidence of plaintiff about his allegations against the defendants.

Though the defendants remained exparte in the suit and though the defendants failed to give reply for the legal notice of plaintiff, it cannot be assumed or presumed that the defendants are having defective title over the suit schedule property and they have received an amount of Rs.59,000/-, in the absence of convincing evidence by the plaintiff. Since there is no convincing evidence on record from the plaintiff, this court is of the considered opinion that the plaintiff had not discharged his burden of proof in proving his case against the defendants with convincing evidence. Hence he is not entitled for the decree. Accordingly, the suit is liable to be dismissed.

9. In the result, the suit is dismissed without costs.

Dictated to the Personal Assistant, transcribed by her, corrected and

pronounced by me in open court on this the 3rd day of April, 2014.

Junior Civil Judge, Kalyanadurg.

Appendix of evidence Witnesses examined for Plaintiff Defendant PW.1: S.J.Shariff None

Exhibits marked on PlaintiffDefendant.

Ex.A.1 is the registered gift deed dated 5-5-2010, -Nil-

Ex.A.2 is the registered sale deed dated 5-5-2010,

Ex.A.3 is the office copy of legal notice issued by the plaintiff to defendants,

Exs.A.4 and A.5 are the postal receipts addressed to 1st and 2nd defendants in respect of Ex.A.3 legal notice.

Junior Civil Judge, Kalyanadurg.

OS/17/2014

Moddulaband Boya siva Chitha vs Pulakunta suresh

07 Apr 2014

IN THE COURT OF THE JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE: KALYANDURG

Present: Miss. Sailaja Kampalle, B.A., LL.B., Junior Civil Judge, Kalyandurg. Monday, the 7th day of April, 2014 Original Suit No .17 of 2014 Between:- Moddulaband Boya Sivachitha …Plaintiff

Pulakunt Suresh …Defendant

This suit came before me on today i.e., 07-04-2014 for final hearing in the presence of Sri Y.V. Pattabhi, Advocate for the plaintiff and defendant being remained exparte and the matter having stood over for consideration till this day this Court delivered the following:-

J U D G M E N T

1 This suit is filed for grant of permanent injunction restraining the defendant, his men, agents, relatives, friends, servant, assignees, servants etc., from interfering with plaintiff’s peaceful possession and enjoyment over the suit schedule property.

2 The case of the plaintiff as per the plaint in brief is that:

Originally the suit schedule property belongs to Gram Panchayat and the same is in continuous possession and enjoyment of the plaintiff and his family members and the Tahsildar, Bramhasamudram after making due enquiry and considering the eligibility of the plaintiff has issued possession certificate in favour of plaintiff vide PC.Dis.No.273/2009 dated 15-06-2009 and later the plaintiff got

Indiramma house at 3rd phase of Racha Banda programme and issued beneficiary identity card and that the plaintiff also paid electricity bill for the same. It is further averred that the plaintiff demolished old house and laid foundation in the suit schedule property by spending huge amount.

The defendant without any manner of right, title, possession and enjoyment over the suit schedule site trying to to interfere with the plaintiff’s peaceful possession and enjoyment and trying to dispossess him. In order to resist the high handedness of defendant, the plaintiff obliged to file this suit for permanent injunction.

3.To prove her case, the plaintiff himself got examined as PW1. As PW.1 the plaintiff has reiterated his case in respect of suit schedule property and got marked Exs.A.1 to A.3. Ex.A.1 is the original possession certificate issued by

Tahsildar, Bramhasamudram dated 15-6-2009, Ex.A.2 is three original electricity bills and Ex.A.3 is beneficiary identity card dt 23-11-2013.

4 . The evidence of plaintiff is clearly proving his case against the defendant in respect of suit schedule property and the documents i.e., Exs.A.1 to A.3 were also supporting the case of plaintiff. Since Ex.A.1 possession certificate clearly showing the possession of plaintiff over the plaint schedule property, this court feels that the plaintiff is able to prove his possession over plaint schedule property as on the date of the suit and since the plaintiff giving evidence to the effect that the defendant is trying to interfere with his possession and enjoyment, this court inclined to decree the suit in favour of the plaintiff. Accordingly, the suit is decreed.

5. In the result, the suit is decreed without costs, the defendant is hereby restrained by way of permanent injunction, from interfering with the plaintiff’s peaceful possession and enjoyment over the plaint schedule property.

Typed to my dictation by the Personal Assistant, corrected and

pronounced by me in open court on this the 7th day of April, 2014.

Junior Civil Judge, Kalyanadurg.

Appendix of evidence Witnesses examined for Plaintiff Defendant PW.1: M.Boya Siva Chita None

Exhibits marked on PlaintiffDefendant.

Ex.A.1 is the original possession certificate issued by Tahsildar, Bramhasamudram

dated 15-6-2009,

Ex.A.2 is three original electricity bills, Ex.A.3 is beneficiary identity card dt 23-11-2013.

Junior Civil Judge, Kalyanadurg.

OS/16/2014

Moddulaband Boya Earanna vs Pulakuntalinganna

07 Apr 2014

IN THE COURT OF THE JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE: KALYANDURG

Present: Miss. Sailaja Kampalle, B.A., LL.B., Junior Civil Judge, Kalyandurg. Monday, the 7th day of April, 2014 Original Suit No .16 of 2014 Between:- Moddulaband Boya Eeranna …Plaintiff

Pulakunt Linganna …Defendant

J U D G M E N T

2 The case of the plaintiff as per the plaint in brief is that:

Originally the suit schedule property belongs to Gram Panchayat and the same is in continuous possession and enjoyment of the plaintiff and his family members and the Tahsildar, Bramhasamudram after making due enquiry and considering the eligibility of the plaintiff has issued possession certificate in favour of plaintiff vide D.R.Dis.No.(B) 261/1999 dated 11-06-2009 and since then the plaintiff using the same as hayrick yard by putting agricultural things and grass etc.

The plaintiff got Indiramma house at 3rd phase of Racha Banda programme and he dug foundation pit and laid foundation and collected material for construction of house.

Tahsildar, Bramhasamudram dated 11-6-2009.

4 . The evidence of plaintiff is clearly proving his case against the defendant in respect of suit schedule property and the document i.e., Ex.A.1 is also supporting the case of plaintiff. Since Ex.A.1 possession certificate clearly showing the possession of plaintiff over the plaint schedule property, this court feels that the plaintiff is able to prove his possession over plaint schedule property as on the date of the suit and since the plaintiff giving evidence to the effect that the defendant is trying to interfere with his possession and enjoyment, this court inclined to decree the suit in favour of the plaintiff. Accordingly, the suit is decreed.

Typed to my dictation by the Personal Assistant, corrected and

pronounced by me in open court on this the 7th day of April, 2014.

Junior Civil Judge, Kalyanadurg.

Appendix of evidence Witnesses examined for Plaintiff Defendant PW.1: M.Boya Eeranna None

Exhibits marked on PlaintiffDefendant.

Ex.A.1 is the original possession certificate issued by Tahsildar, Bramhasamudram

dated 11-6-2009.

Junior Civil Judge, Kalyanadurg.

EP/24/2012 Dismissed Disposal Date: 04-04-2014 Junior Civil Judge

Sri.Anjaneyaswamy temple vs Kristayyagari.Ramaswamy

04 Apr 2014

EP/35/2013 Dismissed For Default

K.Kotuur Swamy alias K.M.Kotturswamy vs N.Rangappa

03 Apr 2014

Order Record 688 total

Case No.	Parties	Date	Type	Outcome
OS/16/2014	Moddulaband Boya Earanna vs Pulakuntalinganna	07 Apr 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/17/2014	Moddulaband Boya siva Chitha vs Pulakunta suresh	07 Apr 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
EP/24/2012	Sri.Anjaneyaswamy temple vs Kristayyagari.Ramaswamy	04 Apr 2014	Copy of Order	Dismissed Disposal Date: 04-04-2014 Junior Civil Judge
EP/35/2013	K.Kotuur Swamy alias K.M.Kotturswamy vs N.Rangappa	03 Apr 2014	Copy of Order	Dismissed For Default
OS/141/2012	S.J.Sheriff vs P.Gangulappa	03 Apr 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/157/2013	S.H.O. Bramhasamudram P.S vs Golla thippeswamy	03 Apr 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/159/2013	Pujari Govindappa vs Chinnaiah	02 Apr 2014	Copy of Order	—
MC/1/2014	Dasari Maheswari vs Dasari Sri Venkataramana	29 Mar 2014	Copy of Order	—
OS/11/2013	G.Narayana Setty vs P.Lakshmipathi	28 Mar 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/12/2013	M.Kondlappa alias K.Kondapalla vs M.Vijay Kumar	28 Mar 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/112/2008	G.Chenna Basappa alias G.Basappa vs Yerrapagari Hanumantharayudu	28 Mar 2014	Copy of Order	—
EP/22/2013	Shriram cIty Union Finance Limited Anantpur vs S.Sardhar Vali	27 Mar 2014	Copy of Order	—
EP/79/2012	M.Surya Narayana vs G.Nagireddy	27 Mar 2014	Copy of Order	—
OS/71/2013	Manuru Krisnaiah Setty vs Anke Channaiah	26 Mar 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/118/2013	Nallabothula Sarojamma vs Vadde Santhamma	26 Mar 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/334/2011	S.H.O.Bramhasamudram P.S. vs Kuruba Siddaiah alias kuruba Peddinti siddappa	26 Mar 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
EP/18/2013	Shriram cIty Union Finance Limited Anantpur vs B.P.Thirupalreddy	25 Mar 2014	Copy of Order	—
OS/99/2012	R.Thippaiah vs K.Govinda Reddy	25 Mar 2014	judgent	—
OS/119/2013	Chowli Bai vs H.Anjinappa	25 Mar 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/135/2013	K.Thippeswamy vs G.K.Srinivasulu	25 Mar 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/163/2013	A. Govinda Rajulu vs Rampuram Neelakantappa	25 Mar 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/72/2011	S.H.O.Settur P.S. vs Harijana Ranganath A-1	25 Mar 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/5/2014	Golla Samanthi Lakshmanna alias Lakshmi Narayana vs Chinna Anjinaiah	24 Mar 2014	Copy of Order	—
CC/111/2013	S.H.O.Kalyandurg Rural PS vs Harijana.Vannurswamy	24 Mar 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/159/2010	S.H.O. Kalyandurg Town P.S. vs Lingayath.Sekhar	24 Mar 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/50/2012	G.Narayana Setty vs K.Venkatesh Naik	22 Mar 2014	Copy of Order	—
OS/51/2012	G.Narayana Setty vs B.Hanumantha Naik	22 Mar 2014	Copy of Order	—
EP/9/2013	M.Padmavathi vs B.Hanumantharaidu	21 Mar 2014	Copy of Order	—
EP/58/2013	K.Radha Krishna Murthy vs A.Rajagopal	18 Mar 2014	Copy of Order	—
OS/133/2009	Dudekula Moulalappa vs Dudekula Babamma	18 Mar 2014	Copy of Order	—
CC/89/2013	S.H.O.Settur P.S. vs Makodiki Thimmanna	18 Mar 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/288/2012	S.H.O. Bramhasamudram P.S vs Golla.Lingappa @ Ninganna	18 Mar 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/407/2012	S.H.O. Kalyandurg Rural P.S. vs Mulla Fakruddin	18 Mar 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/34/2014	S.H.O. Kalyandurg Rural P.S. vs P.Sunil	15 Mar 2014	Copy of Order	—
CC/225/2012	S.H.O. Kalyandurg Town P.S. vs Harijana.Sarojamma	15 Mar 2014	Copy of Order	—
CC/260/2013	S.H.O. Kalyandurg Rural P.S. vs Balaji Raju	15 Mar 2014	Copy of Order	—
EP/7/2013	J.Madan Mohan vs B.Vannareddy	14 Mar 2014	Copy of Order	—
OS/101/2013	Golla Narasamma vs Golla Sakri Eranna	13 Mar 2014	Copy of Order	—
OS/144/2013	Nese Sreenivasulu vs V.Hanumantha Rayudu	13 Mar 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/15/2013	D.Hajeebee vs D.Noor Basha	12 Mar 2014	Copy of Order	—
CC/132/2012	S.H.O. Settur P.S. vs Golla Govindappa A1	12 Mar 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/163/2013	BRAHASAMUDRAM PS vs Golla Ramanji	12 Mar 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/321/2010	S.H.O. Bramhasamudram P.S vs Kuruba Chinna Channappa A-1	12 Mar 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/30/2014	S.H.O. Kalyandurg Town P.S. vs Chitra Mallesh	11 Mar 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/84/2010	S.H.O. Beluguppa PS. vs Kongara.Kondlappa	11 Mar 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/85/2010	S.H.O. Beluguppa P.s. vs K.Hanumantharaidu	11 Mar 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/264/2011	S.H.O. Kalyandurg Rural P.S. vs Kuraba Mallappa	11 Mar 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
EP/24/2013	M.Krishnaiah Setty vs Pinjari Babaiah	10 Mar 2014	Copy of Order	—
CC/258/2013	S.H.O. Kalyandurg Rural P.S. vs T.Narayanamurthy	10 Mar 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/314/2012	S.H.O. Kalyandurg Town P.S. vs Boya Ruddagatla Satyanarayana	10 Mar 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/405/2012	S.H.O. Kalyandurg Rural P.S. vs Boya Ramanjaneyulu	10 Mar 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
PRC/6/2014	S.H.O. Kalyandurg Rural P.S. vs Harijana Naveen Kumar alias Harijana Naveen	10 Mar 2014	Copy of Order	—
OS/75/2013	Maddili Pamanna vs M.Muthyualu	07 Mar 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/96/2013	Golla Harikrishna vs Golla Avulappa	07 Mar 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/445/2011	S.H.O. Kambadur P.S. vs Golla Mallikarjuna	07 Mar 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/182/2008	Mudini Lakshmidevi vs Mudini Narayana Reddy	06 Mar 2014	Copy of Order	—
CC/246/2010	S.H.O. Kalyandurg Town P.S. vs Bandi Raja Reddy	06 Mar 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
PRC/1/2014	S.H.O. Bramhasamudram P.S vs P.Sreerami Reddy	06 Mar 2014	Copy of Order	—
PRC/3/2014	S.H.O. Beluguppa PS. vs Vadde Dhanunjaya	06 Mar 2014	Copy of Order	—
CC/49/2009	S.H.O. Beluguppa PS. vs Ganesham Chennakesava Reddy,	05 Mar 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/69/2013	S.H.O. Beluguppa P.s. vs Malapati Venkateswara Reddy	05 Mar 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/265/2013	S.H.O. Bramhasamudram P.S vs Golla Jagannath alias Jagan	05 Mar 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/266/2013	S.H.O. Bramhasamudram P.S vs Golla Srinivasulu	05 Mar 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
EP/49/2013	Shriram cIty Union Finance Limited Anantpur vs V.Sanna Eranna	04 Mar 2014	Copy of Order	—
EP/61/2012	Pedda Narasimhappa vs Boya Ramanji	04 Mar 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/133/2013	B.Muniswamy vs Kuruba Kullayswamy	04 Mar 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/292/2012	S.H.O.Settur P.S. vs Golla.Raju	04 Mar 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/130/2013	B.V.Ravindra Babu vs R.Sreenivasulu	03 Mar 2014	Copy of Order	—
OS/153/2013	Maddipati Sanna Thimmappa vs K.M.Ramesh	03 Mar 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/80/2012	S.H.O. Kalyandurg Town P.S. vs Harijana Idukallu Vannuraswamy	03 Mar 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/117/2012	S.H.O. Kalyandurg TownP.S. vs Vadde Chittamma	03 Mar 2014	Copy of Order	—
CC/147/2012	S.H.O.Kalyandurg Taluk PS vs Kamma Garikipati Kishore	03 Mar 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/148/2012	S.H.O. Kalyandurg Town P.S. vs Sugali Vadthe Devamma	03 Mar 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/161/2012	S.H.O. KAMABADUR P.S. vs SUGALI VADTHE DEVAMMA	03 Mar 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/263/2011	S.H.O. Kalyandurg Rural P.S. vs S.Mahaboob Basha	03 Mar 2014	Copy of Order	—
CC/369/2012	Beluguppa P.S. vs Boya Vannurswamy	03 Mar 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/376/2012	S.H.O. Kalyandurg Town P.S. vs Boya Ramanjineyulu alias Ramanji	03 Mar 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/24/2013	P.Venkatesulu vs P.Sreeramulu	28 Feb 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/33/2013	M.Venugopal vs D.Balaramappa	28 Feb 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/149/2013	Dhandu Karegowd vs Dhoolappagari Ramachandrappa	28 Feb 2014	Copy of Order	—
OS/157/2013	G.S.Hanumanthappa vs S.Khaleel	28 Feb 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/69/2012	P.Sivakumar Shirdi vs T.Venkataiah	26 Feb 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/96/2012	B.Pedda Sakre Naik vs B.Eswar Naik	26 Feb 2014	Copy of Order	—
OS/136/2009	Boya Sannakka vs J.Raghuramulu	26 Feb 2014	Copy of Order	—
OS/143/2013	Gudipudi Thimmappa vs Kaparlapalli Marriswamy	26 Feb 2014	Copy of Order	—
CC/70/2012	S.H.O. Kalyandurg Rural P.S. vs Bestha Nagaraju	26 Feb 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/205/2011	S.H.O. Bramhasamudram P.S vs Kuruba Anjineyulu	26 Feb 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/206/2011	S.H.O.Bramhasamudram P.S. vs Kuntla Thippeswamy	26 Feb 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/378/2012	S.H.O. KAMABADUR P.S. vs Bagepalli.Nagarju	26 Feb 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/379/2012	S.H.O. KAMABADUR P.S. vs Nelli.Mallesappa	26 Feb 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
MC/11/2012	Kammara.Kalavathi vs Kammra.Ramudu @ Kodandaramudu	26 Feb 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
OS/181/2012	Sunchula Ramu alias Chunchula Ramu vs Y.Anjineyulu	25 Feb 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/66/2013	S.H.O. Settur P.S. vs Vadde Marriswamy	25 Feb 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/147/2013	S.H.O.Settur P.S. vs Golla Linganna	25 Feb 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/148/2013	S.H.O.Settur P.S. vs Golla Badeddula Earanna	25 Feb 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/150/2013	S.H.O.Settur P.S. vs Golla Kasuvappa	25 Feb 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/219/2012	S.H.O.Settur P.S. vs Boya.Prahalada	25 Feb 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
CC/243/2010	S.H.O. Kalyandurg Town P.S. vs Poosala Nidiginti Manjunath A-1	25 Feb 2014	Order On Exgibit	—
PRC/10/2014	S.H.O.Settur P.S. vs Boya Lakshmanamurthy	25 Feb 2014	Copy of Order	—
OS/45/2013	Ediga.Nagalakshmamma vs Kuruba.Makara.Ramalakshmamamma	24 Feb 2014	Order On Exgibit	—

Showing 100 of 688 orders — Log in to browse all pages.

Monthly Orders (Last 12 Months)

Apr 2014		7
Mar 2014		70
Feb 2014		82
Jan 2014		44
Dec 2013		26
Nov 2013		61
Oct 2013		25
Aug 2013		12
Jul 2013		90
Jun 2013		50
May 2013		23
Apr 2013		72

Frequently Asked Questions

How many cases has Kum K.Sailaja, Junior Civil Judge handled?

Kum K.Sailaja, Junior Civil Judge has handled 700 court orders since 2010 at Court of Junior Civil Judge,, Kalyandurg (Taluka). The average disposal rate is 15 orders per month.

What types of cases does Kum K.Sailaja, Junior Civil Judge hear?

Based on available records, Kum K.Sailaja, Junior Civil Judge primarily handles Criminal matters (Criminal Cases, Summary Trial Cases) and Civil matters (Original Suits, Execution Petitions) at Court of Junior Civil Judge,, Kalyandurg (Taluka).

Where is Kum K.Sailaja, Junior Civil Judge currently posted?

Kum K.Sailaja, Junior Civil Judge is posted as Junior Civil Judge at Court of Junior Civil Judge,, Kalyandurg (Taluka), Ananthapur, Andhra Pradesh.

Are judgments by Kum K.Sailaja, Junior Civil Judge available online?

Yes. 5 judgments by Kum K.Sailaja, Junior Civil Judge are available on Legistro with full text, outcome, and sections cited.

How fast does Kum K.Sailaja, Junior Civil Judge dispose cases?

Kum K.Sailaja, Junior Civil Judge disposes approximately 15 cases per month, based on 700 orders handled over their tenure at Court of Junior Civil Judge,, Kalyandurg (Taluka).

Since when is Kum K.Sailaja, Junior Civil Judge serving?

Kum K.Sailaja, Junior Civil Judge has been serving at Court of Junior Civil Judge,, Kalyandurg (Taluka) since 2010.

Case Types

CC 42%

OS 28%

EP 11%

PRC 8%

STC 6%

MC 4%

CRLMP 1%

Posting History

Jun 2010 — Apr 2014

Junior Civil Judge · 700 orders

Outcomes on Record

Dismissed Disposal Date: 04-04-2014 Junior Civil Judge 1

Dismissed For Default 1

Other Judges at this Court

K.bhanu

Junior Civil Judge

1,839 orders

← View all judges at Court of Junior Civil Judge,, Kalyandurg (Taluka)