Miss K. Sailaja

VI Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Markapur

VI Addl District Court, Markapur · Prakasham · Andhra Pradesh

Miss K. Sailaja, VI Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Markapur, is posted at VI Addl District Court, Markapur, Prakasham, Andhra Pradesh, India. 293 court orders on record since 2025. 5 judgments with full text available. Primarily handles CRLMP cases.

293

Total Orders

Judgments

Orders/Month

Postings

Featured Judgments

CRLMP.BAIL/40/2026

Gopanaboina Mangamma A4 vs Andhra Pradesh State SHO Ongole taluk Police station, rep by spl public prosecutor, Ongole

18 May 2026

IN THE COURT OF THE SPECIAL COURT FOR SPEEDY TRIAL OF OFFENCES UNDER

PROTECTION OF CHILDREN FROM SEXUAL OFFENCES ACT, 2012, (POCSO), ACT,

PRAKASAM DISTRICT AT ONGOLE.

Present: Miss K. Sailaja,

Special Judge for Speedy Trial of Offences Under

Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, Prakasam District, Ongole.

Monday, this the Eighteenth (18th) day of May, 2026.

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No. 40 of 2026

in Crime No.78 of 2026 of Ongole Taluk Police Station Between:

1. Gopanaboina Mangamma, [A4] w/o.Koteswara Rao, age 43 years, R/o.Vaddepalem, Gantapalem, Ongole town

2. Kukatla Venkata Ramana @ Ramana, [A.6], w/o.Narasimha Rao, R/o.D.No.4-61, near ZP School, Main road, Lakkavaram, Thallur Mandal, Prakasam District,

3. Vipparla Venkata Rao, [A.7] s/o.Lingaiah, age 44 years R/o.D.No.4-87, SC Colony main road, Lakkavaram, Thallur Mandal, Prakasam District. …. Petitioners/ Accused 4, 6 & 7

And

The State: SHO., Ongole Taluk P.S., Rep. by Special Public Prosecutor, Ongole. … Respondent/Complainant

The above numbered Criminal Miscellaneous Petition presented before me on this day for final hearing in the presence of Sri N.Srinivasa Rao, Learned Counsel for the Petitioners/ Accused 4, 6 & 7 and of Sri G. Srinivasa Rao, Learned Special Public Prosecutor for the State –Complainant/Respondent, and the matter having stood over for consideration till this day, the Court made the following:-

// O R D E R //

This is the anticipatory bail application filed by the petitioners/ Accused No.3 & 8 under Section 482 of BNSS., praying this Court to grant them anticipatory bail that they have been falsely implicated in a case registered as Crime No.78 of 2026 of Ongole Taluk Police

Station for the offences punishable under Section 65 (1), 351 (2) of Bharatiya Nyaya

Sanhitha and Section 6 r/w.Section 5 (l), 17 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences

Act, 2012 and Section 10 of Prohibition of Child Marriage Act.

2.The brief averments of the petition is that__

The prosecution case is that, Accused 1 to 7 took the victim girl in a car to

Mallavaram dam, forcefully conducted the complainant’s marriage threatening that Accused

No.1 would kill the victim girl if she refuses the marriage, the Accused No.1 and 8 and some other took the complainant to Thirupaty, there the Accused No.1 committed rape on the victim girl under the guise of first night. Accused No.1 forcefully committed rape on the victim girl. Basing on the report of the victim girl, a case was registered, now the police are trying to arrest the petitioners. The petitioners are seeking pre-arrest bail. The petitioners submitted that they were falsely implicated by the mother of the complainant, entire report of the girl reveals nothing culpability of the petitioners, except their presence. The petitioners neither induced the victim girl nor participated in the commission of offence. Hence, requested to grant anticipatory bail.

3.Notice given to the victim girl, she along with her mother present and they opposed to grant bail.

4.The Special P.P., opposed to grant bail stating that, if the anticipatory bail is granted they may influence the victim girl, her family members, the accused will influence the witnesses and the victim girl. RFSL report is pending.

5. Heard both sides.

6.Now the point for consideration is:

Whether the petitioners/Accused No.4, 6 & 7 are entitled for grant of

anticipatory bail?

7.POINT:

The petitioners/Accused No.4,6 & 7 sought for pre-arrest bail. The counsel for the petitioners/Accused No.4,6 & 7 submitted that the petitioners/Accused No.4,6 & 7 were falsely implicated in this crime. Except the presence of the petitioners, no overt act was scribed and detailed report given by the victim girl shows that the action may be taken as against the accused No.1 only. The learned Special P.P., opposed to grant pre-arrest bail.

3 This is a case of aggravated penetrative sexual assault and child marriage, which is said to be occurred prior to 11-02-2026, a report has been given by the victim girl before

Ongole Taluka Police Station that her father, grand-mother, maternal aunt took her to

Mallavaram dam, there they made arrangements of marriage secretly and later, they performed the marriage of the victim girl, later, they took her to Thirupati and returned to

Darsi and from Darsi returned to Ongole and reached to the house of her maternal aunt/A.4 and on that day, Accused No.4, 5 and 6 made arrangements for first night of the victim girl with the accused No.1, later, Accused No.1 committed rape on the victim girl. Thus, the allegations against the petitioners/Accused No.4,6 & 7 are relatives and they abetted the

Accused No.1 to commit the offence. As per the record, the marriage was performed against the will of the victim girl, who is the minor girl and the accused abetted the Accused No.1 to commit the offence.

The record shows that the Accused No.1 was already arrested and released on bail on 01-04-2026. The record shows that Section 183 BNSS statement was already recorded.

The record shows that the report was given on 04-02-2026. So far, the Investigating Officer examined ‘8’ witnesses. The record further shows that the potency test is also conducted against the Accused No.1. The record further shows that except pending RFSL report, entire investigation is completed. The petitioners/Accused No.4,6 & 7 are relatives. There is nothing on record whether any custodial interrogation of the petitioners/Accused No.4,6 & 7 is necessary. The C.D file does not disclose about the custodial interrogation of the petitioners/Accused No.4,6 & 7. Apart from that the report was given on 11-02-2026. Entire investigation is completed. Further the petitioners/Accused No.4,6 are women and the allegations against the petitioners/Accused No.4,6 & 7 are that, they abetted the commission of offence and performed the marriage of the victim girl. The prime accused in this case is

Accused No.1 and he was released on bail, since long back. Though the Special P.P., submitted that the petitioners/Accused No.4,6 & 7 are in absconding, there is nothing on record, any efforts have been made by the Investigating Officer to make arrest of the 4 petitioners/Accused No.4,6 & 7. Apart from that the case was registered on 11-02-2026 and nothing indicates the presence of the petitioners/Accused No.4,6 & 7 for custodial interrogation. Therefore, considering the said facts and circumstances, I feel it is a fit case to enlarge the petitioners/Accused No.4,6 & 7 on anticipatory bail.

8.In the result, the petition for anticipatory bail is allowed by granting pre-arrest bail toIn the result, the petition for anticipatory bail is allowed by granting pre-arrest bail to the petitioners/Accused No.4,6 & 7 the petitioners/Accused No.4,6 & 7 on on their their surrender before surrender before Ongole Taluka Ongole Taluka police station on police station on or before 25-05-2026 or in the event of arrest of petitioners/Accused No.4,6 & 7or before 25-05-2026 or in the event of arrest of petitioners/Accused No.4,6 & 7, on, on execution of personal bond for Rs.25,000/- each with two sureties to the like sum each to hisexecution of personal bond for Rs.25,000/- each with two sureties to the like sum each to his satisfaction and with a condition to attend before Ongole Taluka Police Station on everysatisfaction and with a condition to attend before Ongole Taluka Police Station on every

Thursday in between 10.30 a.m., to 5.00 p.m., for a period of two months or till the chargeThursday in between 10.30 a.m., to 5.00 p.m., for a period of two months or till the charge sheet is filed whichever is earlier. Further the petitioners/Accused No.4,6 & 7 are directed tosheet is filed whichever is earlier. Further the petitioners/Accused No.4,6 & 7 are directed to cooperate the investigation.cooperate the investigation.

Typed my dictation, corrected and pronounced by me, this the 18th day of May, 2026.

Sd/-Miss K.Saialaja

Special Judge for Speedy Trial of Offences Under

Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, Prakasam District, Ongole. Copies to The SHO., Ongole Taluk Police Station, The counsel for the petitioner.

// t. c. f. b. o. //

Chief Administrative Officer, Speedy Trial of Offences Under Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 Prakasam District, Ongole.

CRLMP.BAIL/39/2026

Thottempudi Bullemma (A3) vs Andhra Pradesh State SHO Ongole taluku PS rep by spl Public prosecutor, Ongole

18 May 2026

IN THE COURT OF THE SPECIAL COURT FOR SPEEDY TRIAL OF OFFENCES UNDER

PROTECTION OF CHILDREN FROM SEXUAL OFFENCES ACT, 2012, (POCSO), ACT,

PRAKASAM DISTRICT AT ONGOLE.

Present: Miss K. Sailaja,

Special Judge for Speedy Trial of Offences Under

Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, Prakasam District, Ongole.

Monday, this the Eighteenth (18th) day of May, 2026.

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No. 39 of 2026

in Crime No.78 of 2026 of Ongole Taluk Police Station Between:

1. Thottempudi Bullemma, [A.3] w/o.Anjaiah, age 65 years, R/o.Vempadu village, Mundlamur Mandal,

2. Pamba Sujatha, [A8] w/o.Babu Rao, age 41 years, R/o.Kellampalli, Mundlamur Mandal, Prakasam District. [As per docket orders dated 29-04-2026, the petition against A.3 is dismissed, as not pressed] …. Petitioners/ Accused No.3 & 8

And

The State: SHO., Ongole Taluk P.S., Rep. by Special Public Prosecutor, Ongole. … Respondent/Complainant

The above numbered Criminal Miscellaneous Petition presented before me on this day for final hearing in the presence of Sri N.Srinivasa Rao, Learned Counsel for the Petitioners/ Accused No.3 and 8 and of Sri G. Srinivasa Rao, Learned Special Public Prosecutor for the State –Complainant/Respondent, and the matter having stood over for consideration till this day, the Court made the following:-

// O R D E R //

01.This is the anticipatory bail application filed by the petitioners/ Accused No.3 & 8 under Section 482 of BNSS., praying this Court to grant them anticipatory bail that they have been falsely implicated in a case registered as Crime No.78 of 2026 of Ongole Taluk Police

Station for the offences punishable under Section 65 (1), 351 (2) of Bharatiya Nyaya

Sanhitha and Section 6 r/w.Section 5 (l), 17 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences

Act, 2012 and Section 10 of Prohibition of Child Marriage Act.

2.The brief averments of the petition is that__ The prosecution case is that, Accused 1 to 7 took the victim girl in a car to Mallavaram dam, forcefully conducted the complainant’s marriage threatening that Accused No.1 would kill the victim girl if she refuses the marriage, the Accused No.1 and 8 and some other took the complainant to Thirupaty, there the Accused No.1 committed rape on the victim girl under the guise of first night. Accused No.1 forcefully committed rape on the victim girl. Basing on the report of the victim girl, a case was registered, now the police are trying to arrest the petitioners. The petitioners are seeking pre-arrest bail. The petitioners submitted that they were false implicated by the mother of the complainant, entire report of the girl reveals nothing culpability of the petitioners, except their presence. The petitioners neither induced the victim girl nor participated in the commission of offence. Hence, requested to grant anticipatory bail.

3.Notice given to the victim girl, she along with her mother present and they opposed to grant bail.

5. Heard both sides.

6.Now the point for consideration is:

Whether the petitioner/Accused No.8 is entitled for grant of anticipatory bail?

7.POINT:

The petitioner/Accused No.8 sought for pre-arrest bail. Initially, the petition is filed by

Accused No.3 and 8 and during pendency of the petition, the petition against petitioner/A.3 was not pressed. Hence, the petition against the Accused No.3 is dismissed. The counsel for the petitioner/A.8 submitted that the Accused No.8 was falsely implicated in this crime.

Except the presence of the petitioner, no overt act was scribed and detailed report given by the victim girl shows that the action may be taken as against the accused No.1 only. The learned Special P.P., opposed to grant bail.

This is a case of aggravated penetrative sexual assault and child marriage, which is said to be occurred prior to 11-02-2026. A report has been given by the victim girl before

Ongole Taluka Police Station that her father, grand-mother, maternal aunt took her to 3 Mallavaram dam, there they made arrangements of marriage secretly and later, they performed the marriage of the victim girl, later, they took her to Thirupati and returned to

Darsi and from Darsi returned to Ongole and reached to the house of her maternal aunt/A.4 and on that day, Accused No.4, 5 and 6 made arrangements for first night of the victim girl with the accused No.1, later, Accused No.1 committed rape on the victim girl. Thus, the allegations against the Accused No.8 is that the marriage of the victim girl was forcefully performed with the accused No.1 and she abetted the Accused No.1 to commit the offence.

As per the record, the marriage was performed against the will of the victim girl, who is the minor girl and Accused No.8 abetted the Accused No.1 to commit the offence.

The record shows that the Accused No.1 was already arrested and released on bail on 01-04-2026. The record shows that Section 183 BNSS statement was already recorded.

The record shows that The record shows that the report was given on 04-02-2026. So far, the Investigating Officer examined ‘8’ witnesses. The record further shows that the potency test is also conducted against the Accused No.1. The record further shows that except pending RFSL report, entire investigation is completed. There is nothing on record whether any custodial interrogation of the accused No.8 is necessary. The C.D file does not disclose about the custodial interrogation of the accused No.8. Apart from that the report was given on 11-02-2026. Entire investigation is completed. Further, the petitioner/Accused No.8 is woman and the allegations against the accused No.8 is that, she abetted the commission of offence and performed the marriage of the victim girl. The prime accused in this case is

Accused No.1 and he was released on bail long back. Though the Special P.P., submitted that the accused No.8 is in absconding, there is nothing on record, any efforts have been made by the Investigating Officer to make arrest of the Accused no.8. Apart from that the case was registered on 11-02-2026 and nothing indicates the presence of the accused No.8 for custodial interrogation. Therefore, considering the said facts and circumstances, I feel it is a fit case to enlarge the petitioner/Accused No.8 on anticipatory bail.

8.In the result, the petition for anticipatory bail is allowed by granting pre-arrest 4 bail to the petitioner/Accused No.8 on her surrender before Ongole Taluka police station on or before 25-05-2026 or in the event of arrest of Accused no.8, on execution of personal bond for Rs.25,000/- each with two sureties to the like sum each to his satisfaction and with a condition to attend before Ongole Taluka Police Station on every Thursday in betweenin between 10.30 a.m., to 5.00 p.m., for a period of two months or till the charge sheet is filed whichever10.30 a.m., to 5.00 p.m., for a period of two months or till the charge sheet is filed whichever is earlier. Further the petitioner/ accused No.8 is directed to cooperate the investigation. is earlier. Further the petitioner/ accused No.8 is directed to cooperate the investigation.

Dictated to the Stenographer, transcribed by him, corrected and pronounced by me,

this the 18th day of May, 2026.

Sd/-Miss K.Sailaja

Special Judge for Speedy Trial of Offences Under

Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, Prakasam District, Ongole. Copies to The SHO., Ongole Taluk Police Station, The counsel for the petitioner. // t. c. f. b. o. //

Chief Administrative Officer, Speedy Trial of Offences Under Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 Prakasam District, Ongole.

CRLMP.BAIL/47/2026

Chidithoti Suresh vs Andhra Pradesh State Rep by SHO .S.Konda PS rep by spl Public prosecutor, Ongole

18 May 2026

IN THE COURT OF THE SPECIAL COURT FOR SPEEDY TRIAL OF OFFENCES UNDER

PROTECTION OF CHILDREN FROM SEXUAL OFFENCES ACT, 2012, (POCSO), ACT,

PRAKASAM DISTRICT AT ONGOLE.

Present: Miss K. Sailaja,

Special Judge for Speedy Trial of Offences Under

Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, Prakasam District, Ongole.

Monday, this the Eighteenth (18th) day of May, 2026.

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No. 47 of 2026

in Crime No.48 of 2026 of Singarayakonda Police Station Between:

Chidithoti Suresh, s/o.Yesuratnam, age 38 years, R/o.Sanampudi village, Singarayakonda Mandal, …. Petitioner/ Accused

And

The State: SHO., S.Konda P.S., Rep. by Special Public Prosecutor, Ongole. … Respondent/Complainant

The above numbered Criminal Miscellaneous Petition presented before me on this day for final hearing in the presence of Sri K.Venkateswarlu, Learned Counsel for the Petitioner/ Accused and of Sri G. Srinivasa Rao, Learned Special Public Prosecutor for the State –Complainant/Respondent, and the matter having stood over for consideration till this day, the Court made the following:-

// O R D E R //

01.This is 2nd the bail application filed by the petitioner/ Accused under Section 483 of BNSS., praying this Court to grant him bail that he has been falsely implicated in a case registered as Crime No.48 of 2026 of S.Konda Police Station for the offences punishable under Section 64 (1), r/w.Section 62 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhitha and Section 8 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 and that he has been remanded to judicial custody on 13.04.2026.

2.The brief averments of the petition is that__ On 02-04-2026 at 11-30 hours, the de-facto complainant, who sat on the bed watching the TV, at that time, the petitioner came to the house and misbehaved with the victim girl and tried to use criminal force on her. The accused is an innocent and he did not commit any offence. The de-facto complainant fell in love with her maternal uncle, who is aged about 34 years, the same was accepted by the de-facto complainant mother without the consent of the petitioner/accused. His wife Srilatha ready to arrange of the victim girl with her brother, but the petitioner is not 2 willing to perform the marriage without attaining majority. The wife of the accused hatched a plan with her brother and insisted the de-facto complainant to give a false report. The petitioner is having movable and immovable properties. The petitioner is ready to produce solvent sureties and the entire investigation is completed.

3.The Special P.P., filed opposed to grant bail stating that investigation is pending and some more witnesses have to be examined.

4. Heard both sides.

5.Now the point for consideration is: Whether the petitioner/Accused is entitled for grant of bail?

6.POINT:

The petitioner/Accused filed this Petition to enlarge him on bail. The Special P.P., opposed to grant bail. The case against the accused is that, he misbehaved with the victim girl. Apart from that, the record shows that most part of the investigation is completed. Though, it is mentioned in the C.D file that section 183 BNSS statement is to be recorded, but here in this case, the report was given on 12-04-2026, almost one month completed. It is for the prosecution to take steps to record the 183 BNSS., statement of the victim girl. Simply because, Section 183 BNSS of the victim girl is not recorded, it is not a ground to reject the bail. The record shows that the accused having fixed abode. The accused has been in judicial custody since 13-04-2026 Therefore, considering the said circumstances of the case, I feel it is desirable to enlarge the petitioner/Accused on bail, however, with certain conditions.

8.In the result, the petition is allowed, accordingly, the petitioner/Accused is ordered to be released on bail on execution of self bond for Rs.25,000/- with two sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of this Court. The petitioner/ accused is directed to attend before the concerned Station HouseThe petitioner/ accused is directed to attend before the concerned Station House Officer on every Thursday and Saturday in between 10.30 a.m., to 5.00 p.m., for a period ofOfficer on every Thursday and Saturday in between 10.30 a.m., to 5.00 p.m., for a period of two months or till the charge sheet is filed whichever is earlier. Further the petitioner/two months or till the charge sheet is filed whichever is earlier. Further the petitioner/ accused is directed to cooperate the investigation. accused is directed to cooperate the investigation.

Dictated to the Stenographer, transcribed by him, corrected and pronounced by me,

this the 18th day of May, 2026.

Sd/-Miss K.Sailaja

Special Judge for Speedy Trial of Offences

Under Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, Prakasam District, Ongole. Copies to:-

1. The Station House Officer, Singarayakonda Police Station.

2. The counsel for the petitioner. // t. c. f. b. o. //

Chief Administrative Officer, Speedy Trial of Offences Under Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 Prakasam District, Ongole.

CRIME NO/40/2026

Andhra Pradesh State rep by Dy.Superintendent of police, women PS, Prakasam District, Ongole vs Devarakonda Nagaraju alias Gunna

18 May 2026

CRIME NO/41/2026

Andhra Pradesh State Sub Divisional police officer, Chirala sub division vs Galaba Renuka Nirmal alias Nirmal

18 May 2026

Order Record 291 total

Case No.	Parties	Date	Type	Outcome
CRIME NO/40/2026	Andhra Pradesh State rep by Dy.Superintendent of police, women PS, Prakasam District, Ongole vs Devarakonda Nagaraju alias Gunna	18 May 2026	Order	—
CRIME NO/41/2026	Andhra Pradesh State Sub Divisional police officer, Chirala sub division vs Galaba Renuka Nirmal alias Nirmal	18 May 2026	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/39/2026	Thottempudi Bullemma (A3) vs Andhra Pradesh State SHO Ongole taluku PS rep by spl Public prosecutor, Ongole	18 May 2026	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/40/2026	Gopanaboina Mangamma A4 vs Andhra Pradesh State SHO Ongole taluk Police station, rep by spl public prosecutor, Ongole	18 May 2026	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/47/2026	Chidithoti Suresh vs Andhra Pradesh State Rep by SHO .S.Konda PS rep by spl Public prosecutor, Ongole	18 May 2026	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/48/2026	Kondaboina Sunil Kumar vs Andhra Pradesh State SHO Tarulpadu (Tadivaripalli) PS rep by PP, Ongole	15 May 2026	Order	—
SC (POCSO)/61/2025	Andhra Pradesh State Rep by the Dy Superintendent of police, women PS, Prakasam District vs Vanneboyina Neethiraju	15 May 2026	Judgement	—
SC (POCSO)/84/2025	Andhra Pradesh State Rep by the Dy Superintendent of police, Woman PS prakasam Dt, Ongole vs Pathan Mabhu Subhani alias subhani	15 May 2026	Judgement	—
CRLMP.BAIL/45/2026	Shaik Riyaz vs Andhra Pradesh State Inspector of police, Ongole II town PS Rep by spl PP, Ongole	14 May 2026	Order	—
SC (POCSO)/119/2025	Andhra Pradesh State Sub Inspector of Police of Maddipadu PS vs Danam Jagadeesh	13 May 2026	Judgement	—
SC (POCSO)/30/2025	Andhra Pradesh State Sub Inspector of police, Chinnaganjam PS vs Chatla Anjaiah	12 May 2026	Judgement	—
CRLMP.BAIL/43/2026	Sannapureddy Venkatesh alias Venkateswara reddy vs Andhra Pradesh State Rep by Dy.Superintendent of police, WPC, Ongole, rep by spl.PP Ongole,	11 May 2026	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/44/2026	Kotta Gani alias Ramanjaneyulu alias Banni vs Andhra Pradesh State SHO Chimakurthy PS rep by spl PP, Ongole	11 May 2026	Order	—
SC (POCSO)/77/2020	Andhra Pradesh State Sub Inspector of Police, I town PS, Ongole vs Yasin Najuk Shaik	11 May 2026	Judgement	—
CRLMP.BAIL/38/2026	Devarakonda Nagaraju alias Gunna vs Andhra Pradesh State Dy.Superintendent of Police, women PS Ongole rep by Spl PP Ongole	07 May 2026	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/41/2026	Pathakamuri Subramanyam alias Subbu (A1) vs Andhra Pradesh State SHO women PS Rep by its Addl. PP Ongole	07 May 2026	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/42/2026	Galaba Renuka Nrimal alias Nirmal vs Andhra Pradesh State SHO Chirala PS rep by publicprosecutor, Ongole	07 May 2026	Order	—
SC (POCSO)/92/2019	Sub Inspector of Police, Martur PS vs Murikipudi Ravi	07 May 2026	Judgement	—
SC (POCSO)/68/2018	Inspector of Police, Inkollu Circle vs Tanniru Venkateswarlu alias Chanti	06 May 2026	Judgement	—
CRLMP.BAIL/35/2026	Chidithoti Suresh vs Andhra Pradesh State Rep by SHO .S.Konda PS rep by spl Public prosecutor, Ongole	04 May 2026	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/36/2026	Dudekula Mastan vali vs Andhra Pradesh State SHO Markapur town PS rep by spl Addl PP Ongole	04 May 2026	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/37/2026	Guntur Venkata Praveen Krishna alias Praveen (A2) vs Andhra Pradesh State Superintendent of police, women PS, Ongole rep by Public prosecutor	04 May 2026	Order	—
CRIME NO/78/2026	Andhra Pradesh State Rep by Sub Division police officer, Ongole vs Tottempudi Venkata Rao	29 Apr 2026	Order	—
SC (POCSO)/10/2025	Andhra Pradesh State Rep by Sub Divisional Police Officer, Darsi vs Gopu alias Gopi Butchi Babu	29 Apr 2026	Judgement	—
SC (POCSO)/42/2023	Andhra Pradesh State rep by Sub Divisional Police Officer, Markapur vs Nara alias Narce Srinivasa reddy	23 Apr 2026	Judgement	—
CRLMP.BAIL/31/2026	Thottempudi Venkata rao(A2) vs Andhra Pradesh State SHO Ongole taluk Police station, rep by spl public prosecutor, Ongole	21 Apr 2026	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/34/2026	Thottempudi Venkata Rao (A2) vs Andhra Pradesh State SHO Ongole taluk PS Rep by spl public prosecutor, Ongole	21 Apr 2026	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/32/2026	Devarakonda Nagaraju alias Gunna vs Andhra Pradesh State Dy.Superintendent of police women PS, Ongole Rep by spl pp Ongole	17 Apr 2026	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/33/2026	Galaba Renuka Nrimal alias Nirmal vs Andhra Pradesh State SHO chirala PS rep by Public prosecutor, Ongole	17 Apr 2026	Order	—
SC (POCSO)/29/2025	Andhra Pradesh State rep by the Sub Inspector of Police, Inkollu PS vs Chappidi Bulli Punnaiah	17 Apr 2026	Judgement	—
SC (POCSO)/68/2024	Andhra Pradesh State Sub inspector of police, Markapur town PS vs Varra Sai Kiran	17 Apr 2026	Judgement	—
SC (POCSO)/32/2025	Andhra Pradesh State Sub Inspector of Police, Women PS Ongole vs Jangala Ashok Kumar	16 Apr 2026	Judgement	—
SC (POCSO)/49/2024	Andhra Pradesh StateRep by Sub Inspector of police, Ongole I town PS vs Nanganam Rohit	10 Apr 2026	Judgement	—
CRLMP.BAIL/29/2026	Rajala Jagadeeshwara Reddy alias Jagadeesh Reddy vs Andhra Pradesh State of AP, rep by its PP, through KKMitla PS, PrakasamDt	07 Apr 2026	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/30/2026	Devara Murali Krishna alias Murali vs Andhra Pradesh State SHO Kanigiri PS rep by spl Addl PP Ongole	07 Apr 2026	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/24/2026	Garlapati Galaiah alias Ganesh vs Andhra Pradesh State SHO Donakonda PS rep by spl pp, Ongole	06 Apr 2026	Order	—
SC (POCSO)/8/2026	Andhra Pradesh State Rep by Sub Divisional Police Officer, Kanigiri vs Dharnasi Suri Babu	06 Apr 2026	Judgement	—
SC (POCSO)/65/2025	Andhra Pradesh State Sub Inspector of Police, yerragondapalem PS vs Karna Rajesh	02 Apr 2026	Judgement	—
CRLMP.BAIL/28/2026	Pamba Srikanth vs Andhra Pradesh State SHO taluka PS ongole	01 Apr 2026	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/26/2026	Duddela Chenna Krishna vs Andhra Pradesh State SHO Maddipadu PS Rep. by Public Prosecutor, Ongole	30 Mar 2026	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/27/2026	Devarala Vamsi vs Andhra Pradesh State SHO Maddipadu PS Rep. by Public Prosecutor, Ongole	30 Mar 2026	Order	—
SC (POCSO)/8/2025	Andhra Pradesh State Sub Divisional Police Officer, Chirala vs Avula Venkata Prasad	30 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
SC (POCSO)/14/2022	Andhra Pradesh State Sub Divisional Police officer, Markapur vs Nallabothula Ravi Teja	30 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
SC (POCSO)/102/2025	Andhra Pradesh State Sub Inspector of Police, Martur PS vs Shaik Nagur Rabbani alias Rabbani	23 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
CRLMP.BAIL/25/2026	Devara Murali Krishna alias Murali vs Andhra Pradesh State SHO Kanigiri PS rep by spl Addl PP Ongole	20 Mar 2026	Order	—
SC (POCSO)/21/2025	Andhra Pradesh State rep by the Inspector of Police, Martur Urban PS vs Marella Nagarju	20 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
CRLMP.BAIL/22/2026	Kunchala Venkata Phanindra alias Venkata Fhanendra vs Andhra Pradesh State SHO Jarugumalli PS Rep by APP Ongole	18 Mar 2026	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/23/2026	Rajala Jagadeeshwara Reddy alias Jagadeesh Reddy vs Andhra Pradesh State of AP, rep by its PP, through KKMitla PS, PrakasamDt	18 Mar 2026	Order	—
SC (POCSO)/62/2023	Andhra Pradesh State Rep Dy.Superintendent of Police, Disha women PS, Prakasam District, Ongole vs Yandrapati alias Marpudi china Venkatesh alias Chinna	18 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
SC (POCSO)/99/2023	Andhra Pradesh State Sub Inspector of Police chirala rural PS vs NallaKondalu Sai alias Hema Sai	18 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
SC (POCSO)/4/2026	Andhra Pradesh State The Sub Divisional Police Officer, Chirala vs Bitla alias Pitla Suri Babu	17 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
CRLMP.BAIL/15/2026	Devarala Vamsi vs Andhra Pradesh State SHO Maddipadu PS Rep. by Public Prosecutor, Ongole	16 Mar 2026	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/16/2026	Duddela Chenna Krishna vs Andhra Pradesh State SHO Maddipadu PS Rep. by Public Prosecutor, Ongole	16 Mar 2026	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/21/2026	Juttuga Raju vs Andhra Pradesh State SHO Ongole women PS rep by spl Public prosecutor, Ongole	13 Mar 2026	Order	—
SC (POCSO)/123/2018	Inspector of Police, Giddalur Circle vs Pamula Srinivasulu-A1	11 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
SC (POCSO)/47/2024	Andhra Pradesh State Sub inspector of police, Mahila Police station, Ongole vs Damavarapu Suresh	09 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
SC (POCSO)/14/2025	Andhra Pradesh State Sub Inspector of police, Parchur PS vs Dasari Nagaraju	05 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
SC (POCSO)/36/2024	Andhra Pradesh State Dy. Superintendent of Police, Disha women ps, Ongole vs Rebbavarapu Ramji leeela Ambedkar	03 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
CRLMP.BAIL/20/2026	Mota Naveen vs Andhra Pradesh State SDPO, Disha Women PS, Ongole rep by the SPl. PP	02 Mar 2026	Order	—
SC (POCSO)/18/2024	Andhra Pradesh State Sub Inspector of police, Yaddanapudi PS vs Kakani Rosaiah	02 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
SC (POCSO)/70/2024	Andhra Pradesh State Sub Inspector of Police, Mundlamur PS vs Chopparapu Brahmaiah	02 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
CRLMP.BAIL/18/2026	Mankena Venkateswarlu vs Andhra Pradesh State SHO women PS rep by spl PP Ongole	26 Feb 2026	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/19/2026	Thunga Venkateswara Reddy vs Andhra Pradesh State SHO of Giddalur PS rep by spl Public prosecutor, Ongole	26 Feb 2026	Order	—
SC (POCSO)/97/2017	The State Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Kandukur vs Chundi Samson	24 Feb 2026	Judgement	—
CRLMP.BAIL/17/2026	Jada Dinesh Babu vs Andhra Pradesh State SHO Chirala II town PS rep by its Public prosecutor, Ongole	20 Feb 2026	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/14/2026	Pikkili Anjaneyulu vs Andhra Pradesh State SHO Y.Palem PS rep by Spl. PP, Ongole	16 Feb 2026	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/12/2026	Mankena Venkateswarlu vs Andhra Pradesh State SHO women PS rep by spl PP Ongole	13 Feb 2026	Order	—
SC (POCSO)/9/2025	Andhra Pradesh State Sub Inspector of POlice, HM Padu PS vs Yarramreddy Jagadeeswar Reddy	13 Feb 2026	Judgement	—
CRLMP.BAIL/11/2026	Mota Naveen vs Andhra Pradesh State SDPO, Disha PS rep by spl pp , Ongole	12 Feb 2026	Order	—
SC (POCSO)/16/2024	Andhra Pradesh State Sub Divisional Police officer, Kanigiri vs Gayam Brahma Reddy	10 Feb 2026	Judgement	—
SC (POCSO)/146/2022	Andhra Pradesh State Sub Inspector police, Ponnalur PS vs Dupati Suresh	09 Feb 2026	Judgement	—
CRLMP.BAIL/13/2026	Gopathoti Prema Raju vs Andhra Pradesh State SHO Karamchedu PS rep by spl Public prosecutor, Ongole	06 Feb 2026	Order	—
SC (POCSO)/83/2022	Andhra Pradesh State Inspector of police, Inkollu circle vs Gogumalla Rajesh	06 Feb 2026	Judgement	—
CRLMP.BAIL/10/2026	Devarala Vamsi vs Andhra Pradesh State SHO Maddipadu PS rep by PP, Ongole	04 Feb 2026	Order	—
SC (POCSO)/13/2023	Andhra Pradesh State Sub Divisional Police Officer, chirala vs Dasari Siva Rama Raju alias Sivaram	04 Feb 2026	Judgement	—
SC (POCSO)/69/2021	Andhra Pradesh State Sub Inspector of police, Komarole PS vs Gudipati Suneel	03 Feb 2026	Judgement	—
CRLMP.BAIL/6/2026	Ragula Srinivasa Rao alias Srinu vs Andhra Pradesh State SHO Kurichedu PS rep by spl PP Ongole	02 Feb 2026	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/7/2026	Chandaluri Narendra vs Andhra Pradesh State SHO Darsi PS rep by public prosecutor, Prakasam District, Ongole	02 Feb 2026	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/9/2026	Kandula Brahmananda Reddy vs Andhra Pradesh State SHO, Tumkur Sub Dvision police station womenPS rep by spl.PP Ongole	02 Feb 2026	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/3/2026	Pikkili Anjaneyulu vs Andhra Pradesh State SHO Y.Palem PS rep by Spl. PP, Ongole	30 Jan 2026	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/5/2026	Mota Naveen vs Andhra Pradesh State SDPO, Disha PS rep by spl PP, Ongole	30 Jan 2026	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/8/2026	Thunga Venkateswara reddy vs Andhra Pradesh State SHO of Giddalur PS rep by Spl. Public prosecutor, Ongole	30 Jan 2026	Order	—
SC (POCSO)/2/2019	State Sub Inspector of Police, Pullalacheruvu PS vs Parimi Venkaiah-A1	30 Jan 2026	Judgement	—
SC (POCSO)/24/2023	Andhra Pradesh State rep by Sub Divisional Police Officer, Chirala vs Sk. Abdul Mazeed alias Mazeed alias Abdul Majitha	30 Jan 2026	Judgement	—
CRLMP.BAIL/2/2026	Pathakamuri Srihari vs Andhra Pradesh State Dy.Supdt of police, women PS, Prakasam Dt, Ongole rep by Spl PP	29 Jan 2026	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/4/2026	Mondithoka Viswanadh vs Andhra Pradesh StateRep by Dy.Superintendent of Police women PS, Ongole	29 Jan 2026	Order	—
SC (POCSO)/104/2020	Andhra Pradesh State Sub Divisional Police Officer, Ongole vs Kallagunta Hari	29 Jan 2026	Judgement	—
CRLMP.BAIL/1/2026	Thunga Venkateswara reddy vs Andhra Pradesh State SHO of Giddalur PS rep by Spl. Public prosecutor, Ongole	12 Jan 2026	Order	—
SC (POCSO)/166/2018	Sub Divisional Police Officer, Chirala, Vetapalem PS vs Vallabojja Sathish	12 Jan 2026	Judgement	—
CRLMP.BAIL/187/2025	Chandaluri Narendra vs Andhra Pradesh State SHO Darsi PS rep by public prosecutor, Prakasam District, Ongole	08 Jan 2026	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/190/2025	Dharnasi Suri Babu vs Andhra Pradesh StateSub Divisional Police Officer, Kanigiri rep by Public prosecutor, Ongole	08 Jan 2026	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/191/2025	Manda Israel vs Andhra Pradesh State SHO Komarole PS Rep by its PP , Ongole	08 Jan 2026	Order	—
SC (POCSO)/158/2022	Andhra Pradesh State Sub Inspector of police, Ballikurava PS vs Shaik. Mabu Johny	07 Jan 2026	Judgement	—
CRLMP.BAIL/188/2025	Gudimetla Nagaraju vs Andhra Pradesh State SHO Markapur town PS rep by spl APP Ongole	05 Jan 2026	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/189/2025	Chilakabathina Pavan Kumar alias Pavan Kalyan vs Andhra Pradesh State the sub Divisional Police Officer, Markapur	05 Jan 2026	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/186/2025	Pathakamuri Srihari vs Andhra Pradesh State Dy.Supdt of police, women PS, Prakasam Dt, Ongole rep by Spl PP	31 Dec 2025	Order	—
SC (POCSO)/7/2019	State Sub Inspecstor of Police, Singarayakonda PS vs Neerukonda Manohar	30 Dec 2025	Judgement	—
SC (POCSO)/19/2018	Inspector of police, Addanki Circle vs Kanaparthi Raghavendra Rao @ Raghava	30 Dec 2025	Judgement	—
CRLMP.BAIL/185/2025	Chilakabathina Pavan Kumar alias Pavan Kalyan vs Andhra Pradesh State the sub Divisional Police Officer, Markapur	23 Dec 2025	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/182/2025	Gudimetla Nagaraju vs Andhra Pradesh State SHO Markapur town PS rep by spl APP Ongole	22 Dec 2025	Order	—

Showing 100 of 291 orders — Log in to browse all pages.

Monthly Orders (Last 12 Months)

May 2026		22
Apr 2026		17
Mar 2026		22
Feb 2026		18
Jan 2026		16
Dec 2025		14
Nov 2025		17
Oct 2025		14
Sep 2025		10
Aug 2025		28
Jul 2025		24
Jun 2025		17

Frequently Asked Questions

How many cases has Miss K. Sailaja handled?

Miss K. Sailaja has handled 293 court orders since 2025 at VI Addl District Court, Markapur. The average disposal rate is 20 orders per month.

What types of cases does Miss K. Sailaja hear?

Based on available records, Miss K. Sailaja primarily handles CRLMP cases at VI Addl District Court, Markapur.

Where is Miss K. Sailaja currently posted?

Miss K. Sailaja is posted as VI Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Markapur at VI Addl District Court, Markapur, Prakasham, Andhra Pradesh.

Are judgments by Miss K. Sailaja available online?

Yes. 5 judgments by Miss K. Sailaja are available on Legistro with full text, outcome, and sections cited.

How fast does Miss K. Sailaja dispose cases?

Miss K. Sailaja disposes approximately 20 cases per month, based on 293 orders handled over their tenure at VI Addl District Court, Markapur.

Since when is Miss K. Sailaja serving?

Miss K. Sailaja has been serving at VI Addl District Court, Markapur since 2025.

Case Types

CRLMP 100%

Posting History

May 2026 — May 2026

VI Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Markapur
Feb 2025 — Present

Spl. Judge for speedy trial of offences under the POCSO Act 2012 Ongole · 293 orders

Other Judges at this Court

Smt. Velpula Bhavani

VI Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Markapur

0 orders

Sri B.Devendra Reddy

Senior Civil Judge, Markapur

2,031 orders

Sri M.Balaji

Addl.Junior Civil Judge, Markapur

1,939 orders

Sri J.Kishore Kumar

Prl. Junior Civil Judge, Markapur

1,610 orders

← View all judges at VI Addl District Court, Markapur

Miss K. Sailaja

PRAKASAM DISTRICT AT ONGOLE.

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No. 40 of 2026

// O R D E R //

Whether the petitioners/Accused No.4, 6 & 7 are entitled for grant of

PRAKASAM DISTRICT AT ONGOLE.

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No. 39 of 2026

// O R D E R //

Whether the petitioner/Accused No.8 is entitled for grant of anticipatory bail?

PRAKASAM DISTRICT AT ONGOLE.

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No. 47 of 2026

// O R D E R //

(POCSO), ACT, PRAKASAM DISTRICT AT ONGOLE.

CRIME . No. 40 of 2026

// DOCKET ORDER //

(POCSO), ACT, PRAKASAM DISTRICT AT ONGOLE.

CRIME . No. 41 of 2026

// DOCKET ORDER //