Smt.K.Vijaya Kalyani

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, AVANIGADDA.

Senior Civil Judge Court, Avanigadda · Krishna · Andhra Pradesh

Smt.K.Vijaya Kalyani, SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, AVANIGADDA., is posted at Senior Civil Judge Court, Avanigadda, Krishna, Andhra Pradesh, India. 753 court orders on record since 2021. 5 judgments with full text available. Primarily handles H, OS, EP cases.

753

Total Orders

Judgments

Orders/Month

Posting

Featured Judgments

H.M.O.P/38/2024 Compromised

Katari @ Yadala Bhargavi vs NIL

10 Apr 2024

1 FAIR

IN THE COURT OF THE CIVIL JUDGE (SENIOR DIVISION),

AVANIGADDA

Present: Smt. K.Vijaya Kalyani,

Civil Judge (Senior Division), Avanigadda.

Wednesday, this the 10th day of April, 2024

H.M.O.P.No.38/2024

Between:-

1. Katari @ Yadala Bhargavi, W/o Bava Hari, D/o Yadala Srinivasa Rao, aged about 25 years, R/o Ismailbegpeta, H/o Koduru Village of Koduru Mandal.

2. Katari Bava Hari, S/o late Surya Chandra Mohan, aged about 27 years, Business, R/o Ismailbegpeta, H/o Koduru Village of Koduru Mandal.

....Petitioners

And

Nil. ….Respondent.

This petition coming before me on 08.04.2023 for hearing in the presence of Sri N.Eswara Rao, Advocate for petitioners and having stood over for consideration till this day, this court made the following:-

ORDER

1. The present Order is the result of the petition filed by the petitioners under Section 13-B of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, praying this court to pass a decree of divorce by dissolving their marriage; for costs and other reliefs.

2. Brief averments of the petition are as follows:-

Petitioners are wife and husband. Their marriage was performed on 19.11.2020 as per Hindu Rites and Caste Customs. As per their will and wish of both families of petitioners, no dowry or lanchanas were taken place by the time of their marriage. Immediately after marriage, 2nd petitioner set up a family at Koduru Village, Koduru Mandal at his parents’ house and their marriage was consummated. Due to their wedlock, no children were born to them. One week after marriage, some disputes and misunderstandings arose in between petitioners and their families. They have been living separately at their respective places since 1st week of January, 2021. The elders of both side families mediated to settle the disputes and tried their level best to reunion of the petitioners but in vain as the petitioners are not interested to lead marital life. Inspite of best efforts of elders, petitioners expressed their 2 FAIR unwillingness and unhappiness to lead matrimonial life. Finally elders advised them to take divorce by mutual consent. 2nd petitioner agreed to pay an amount of Rs.19,00,000/- to the 1st petitioner towards full and final settlement of her permanent alimony of maintenance and 1st petitioner agreed the same as full and final settlement of her permanent maintenance. 2nd petitioner paid an amount of Rs.19,00,000/ to 1st petitioner on 01.03.2024 and 1st petitioner received the same and given up all her rights over 2nd petitioner including maintenance of her permanent alimony after receiving the said amount and she further agreed not to claim any rights in the self and ancestral properties of 2nd petitioner through process of law in future. Both petitioners agreed that they will not file any cases against each other in future with regard to their marriage. As there is no ray of hope for reunion between parties, both petitioners obliged to file this petition for grant of decree of divorce by mutual consent. Hence, present petition has been filed.

3. Subsequent to numbering the present petition, matter posted after 6 months of statutory period to 14.10.2024, but both the petitioners appeared before the court on 08.04.2024 with an application under Rule109(2) of Civil Rules of Practice to advance the matter and petition under Section 13B(2) of H.M.Act to waive the statutory period of 6 months. Considering the circumstances narrated in the petitions, both were allowed. Matter advanced to 08.04.2024 by dispensing statutory period of 6 months.

4.Now the point for consideration is:- “Whether divorce can be granted by dissolving the marriage solemnized on 19.11.2020 in between the petitioners as prayed for?”

5.Heard arguments.

6.In support of their pleadings, petitioners 1 and 2 examined themselves as PWs.1 and 2 and got marked Exs.P1 and P2.

Point:-

7. There is no dispute with regard to the relationship and date of marriage. To prove their case, 1st petitioner examined herself as PW.1.

She filed her chief affidavit and the same was admitted in lieu of chief examination. Her chief affidavit is replica of petition averments. Exs.P1 3 FAIR and P2 were marked through her which are Wedding Card and marriage photo along with CD. 2nd petitioner examined himself as PW.2 and he followed the footsteps of PW.1 and agreed for divorce.

8. Further 1st and 2nd petitioners in their chief affidavits admitted that 2nd petitioner paid an amount of Rs.19,00,000/- to the 1st petitioner on 01.03.2024 towards full and final settlement of her permanent alimony of maintenance and 1st petitioner received the same and given up all her rights over 2nd petitioner including maintenance of her permanent alimony and his properties if any. Both petitioners agreed that they will not file any cases against each other in future with regard to their marriage. Therefore, from their admissions, it disclose that both petitioners compromised each other by fulfilling their agreed terms.

9. As there is no chance for reunion of both parties and both parties compromised as per the advice of elders upon the terms and conditions deposed in evidence and narrated in their pleadings, this court feels that divorce can be granted by dissolving the marriage solemnized in between the petitioners as prayed for. Accordingly this point is answered.

In the result, petition is allowed. The marriage of petitioners

dt. 19.11.2020 is hereby dissolved by way of decree of divorce under

Hindu Marriage Act.

Typed to my dictation by Steno, corrected and pronounced by me in open court, this the 10th day of April, 2024.

Civil Judge (Senior Division),

Avanigadda.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

Witnesses examined

For petitioners: For respondent

PW.1: Katari@Yadala Bhargavi. None. PW.2: Katari Bava Hari.

Exhibits marked

For petitioners: For respondent

Ex.P1 : Wedding Card. Nil Ex.P2 : Marriage photo along with CD.

Civil Judge (Senior Division),

Avanigadda.

IN THE COURT OF THE CIVIL JUDGE (SENIOR DIVISION),

AVANIGADDA

Present: Smt. K.Vijaya Kalyani,

Civil Judge (Senior Division), Avanigadda.

Wednesday, this the 10th day of April, 2024

H.M.O.P.No.38/2024

Between:-

1. Katari @ Yadala Bhargavi, W/o Bava Hari, D/o Yadala Srinivasa Rao, aged about 25 years, R/o Ismailbegpeta, H/o Koduru Village of Koduru Mandal.

2. Katari Bava Hari, S/o late Surya Chandra Mohan, aged about 27 years, Business, R/o Ismailbegpeta, H/o Koduru Village of Koduru Mandal.

....Petitioners

And

Nil. ….Respondent.

The present Order is the result of the petition filed by the petitioners under Section 13-B of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, praying this court to pass a decree of divorce by dissolving their marriage; for costs and other reliefs.

DECRETAL ORDER

i.that petition be and the same is hereby allowed; ii. that the marriage of petitioners dt. 19.11.2020 is hereby dissolved by way of decree of divorce under Hindu Marriage Act. ; iii. that there be no order as to costs;

Given under my hand and the seal of this court, on this the 10th day of April, 2024.

Civil Judge (Senior Division),

Avanigadda.

MEMORANDUM OF COSTS

Nil

Civil Judge (Senior Division),

Avanigadda.

IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, AVANIGADDA

Present: Smt. K.Vijaya Kalyani,

Senior Civil Judge, Avanigadda.

Thursday, this the 17th day of November, 2022.

HMOP No.116/2022

Between:-

1. Thota Anil Kumar, S/o late Venkateswara Vara Prasad, Hindu, aged about 35 years, Private employee, R/o Sivarama Durgapuram, Challapalli Mandal, Krishna District.

2. Thota @ Damerla Siva Naga Pavani Devi, W/o Anil Kumar, D/o Damerla Srinivasa Rao, Hindu, aged about 30 years, Private employee, R/o Swatantrapuram village, Koduru Mandal, Krishna District.

.... Petitioners

And

Nil. …. Respondent.

The present petition filed by the petitioners under Section 13-B of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, praying this court to pass a decree of divorce by dissolving their marriage; for costs and other reliefs.

This petition coming before me on 16.11.2022 for hearing in the presence of Sri N. Eswara Rao, Advocate for petitioners and having stood over for consideration till this day, this court made the following:-

DECRETAL ORDER

i) that petition be and the same is hereby allowed; ii) that the marriage of petitioners dt. 22.8.2021 is hereby dissolved by way of decree of divorce under Hindu Marriage Act; iii) that there be no order as to costs;

Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 17th day of November, 2022.

Senior Civil Judge,

Avanigadda.

MEMORANDUM OF COSTS

Nil

SCJ, AVG.

H.M.O.P/39/2024 Compromised

Tata Giridhar vs NIL.

12 Apr 2024

IN THE COURT OF THE CIVIL JUDGE (SENIOR DIVISION),

AVANIGADDA

Present: Smt. K.Vijaya Kalyani,

Civil Judge (Senior Division), Avanigadda.

Friday, this the 12th day of April, 2024

H.M.O.P.No.39/2024

Between:-

1. Tata Giridhar, S/o Nancharaiah, aged about 29 years, Private Employee, R/o Door No.28, Ayyanki Village, Movva Mandal.

2. Bellamkonda Divya Jyothi, W/o Tata Giridhar, D/o Bellamkonda Koteswara Rao, aged about 22 years, Parents protection, R/o Door No.4-78, Pedagowdapalem, H/o Parrachivara Village of Nagayalanka Mandal.

....Petitioners

And

Nil. ….Respondent.

This petition coming before me on 10.04.2024 for hearing in the presence of Sri Ch.Nagamalleswara Rao, Advocate for petitioners and having stood over for consideration till this day, this court made the following:-

ORDER

2. Brief averments of the petition are as follows:-

Petitioners are husband and wife. Their marriage was performed on 03.02.2022 as per Hindu Rites and Caste Customs.

Immediately after consummation of marriage, 2nd petitioner joined with 1st petitioner to lead marital life at his house at Ayyanki Village of Movva

Mandal. During their wedlock, no children were born. They lead happy marital life hardly for a period of two months, thereafter, psychological disputes arose between them, but the same were not pacified inspite of intervention of elders. Since then the differences became wide and there is a gulf created between them. Accordingly, 2nd petitioner left to her parents house in the first week of April, 2022 and since then she used to 2 reside at her parents house. The elders and well wishers tried their level best to convince the petitioners, but their efforts proved futile. As there is no ray of hope for reunion between parties at the intervention of elders, they intend to live separately and 1st petitioner paid

Rs.2,00,000/- to the 2nd petitioner towards her permanent alimony and 2nd petitioner received the same and agreed to relinquish all her rights of maintenance and other rights towards 1st petitioner. 2nd petitioner returned the Gold Nanuthadu to the 1st petitioner, which was given at the time of marriage. Finally both petitioners obliged to file this petition for grant of decree of divorce by mutual consent. Hence present petition been filed.

3. Subsequent to numbering the present petition, matter posted after 6 months of statutory period to 14.10.2024, but both the petitioners appeared before the court on 10.04.2024 with an application under Rule109(2) of Civil Rules of Practice to advance the matter and petition under Section 13B(2) of H.M.Act to waive the statutory period of 6 months. Considering the circumstances narrated in the petitions, both were allowed. Matter advanced to 10.04.2024 by waiving statutory period of 6 months.

4. Now the point for consideration is:- “Whether divorce can be granted by dissolving the marriage solemnized on 03.02.2022 in between the petitioners as prayed for?”

5. Heard arguments.

6. In support of their pleadings, petitioners 1 and 2 examined themselves as PWs.1 and 2 and got marked Ex.P1 and Ex.P.2.

Point:-

7.There is no dispute with regard to the relationship and date of marriage. To prove their case, 1st petitioner examined himself as PW.1.

He filed his chief affidavit and the same was admitted in lieu of chief examination. His chief affidavit is replica of petition averments. Ex.P1 and Ex.P.2 were marked through him which are Wedding Card of 1st petitioner and marriage photo along with CD. 2nd petitioner examined 3 herself as PW.2 and she followed the footsteps of PW.1 and agreed for divorce.

8. Further 1st and 2nd petitioners in their chief affidavits admitted that 1st petitioner paid an amount of Rs.2,00,000/- to the 2nd petitioner towards her permanent alimony and 2nd petitioner received the same and agreed to relinquish her rights of maintenance and other rights towards 1st petitioner. 2nd petitioner returned gold nanuthadu to the 1st petitioner, which was given at the time of marriage. Therefore, from their admissions, it disclose that both petitioners compromised each other by fulfilling their agreed terms.

10.In the result, petition is allowed. The marriage of petitioners

dt. 03.02.2022 is hereby dissolved by way of decree of divorce under

Hindu Marriage Act.

Typed to my dictation by Steno, corrected and pronounced by me in open court, this the 12th day of April, 2024.

Civil Judge (Senior Division),

Avanigadda.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

Witnesses examined

For petitioners: For respondent

PW.1: Tata Giridhar. None. PW.2: Bellamkonda Divya Jyothi.

Exhibits marked

For petitioners: For respondent

Ex.P.1: Wedding card of 1st petitioner. Nil Ex.P.2: Marriage photo along with CD.

Civil Judge (Senior Division),

Avanigadda.

IN THE COURT OF THE CIVIL JUDGE (SENIOR DIVISION),

AVANIGADDA

Present: Smt. K.Vijaya Kalyani,

Civil Judge (Senior Division), Avanigadda.

Friday, this the 12th day of April, 2024

H.M.O.P.No.39/2024

Between:-

1. Tata Giridhar, S/o Nancharaiah, aged about 29 years, Private Employee, R/o Door No.28, Ayyanki Village, Movva Mandal.

....Petitioners

And

Nil. ….Respondent.

DECREETAL ORDER

i.that petition be and the same is hereby allowed; ii. that the marriage of petitioners dt.03.02.2022 is hereby dissolved by way of decree of divorce under Hindu Marriage Act; iii. that there be no order as to costs;

Given under my hand and the seal of this court, on this the 12th April , 2024.

Civil Judge (Senior Division),

Avanigadda.

MEMORANDUM OF COSTS

Nil

Civil Judge (Senior Division),

Avanigadda.

IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, AVANIGADDA

Present: Smt. K.Vijaya Kalyani,

Senior Civil Judge, Avanigadda.

Thursday, this the 17th day of November, 2022.

HMOP No.116/2022

Between:-

1. Thota Anil Kumar, S/o late Venkateswara Vara Prasad, Hindu, aged about 35 years, Private employee, R/o Sivarama Durgapuram, Challapalli Mandal, Krishna District.

2. Thota @ Damerla Siva Naga Pavani Devi, W/o Anil Kumar, D/o Damerla Srinivasa Rao, Hindu, aged about 30 years, Private employee, R/o Swatantrapuram village, Koduru Mandal, Krishna District.

.... Petitioners

And

Nil. …. Respondent.

DECRETAL ORDER

Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 17th day of November, 2022.

Senior Civil Judge,

Avanigadda.

MEMORANDUM OF COSTS

Nil

H.M.O.P/13/2024

Mahali Gnaneswari @ Penumacha Gnaneswari vs Penumatcha Venkata Sri Ranga Manikanta Subrmanya Varma

10 Apr 2024

IN THE COURT OF THE CIVIL JUDGE (SENIOR DIVISION),

AVANIGADDA

Present: Smt. K.Vijaya Kalyani,

Civil Judge (Senior Division), Avanigadda.

Wednesday, this the 10th day of April, 2024

H.M.O.P.No.13/2024

Between: Mahali Gnaneswari @ Penumatcha Gnaneswari, W/o Penumatcha Venkata Sri Ranga Manikanta Subramanya Varma, S/o Venu Gopala Raju, S/o Mahali Venkata Subbaraju, aged about 32 years, Housewife, Resident of Pedamuthevi Village of Movva Mandal, Krishna District.

...Petitioner

And:

Penumatcha Venkata Sri Ranga Manikanta Subramanya Varma, S/o Venu Gopala Raju, aged about 38 years, Private Employee, Resident of Yampa Village, Bheemavaram Mandal, West Godavari District. …Respondent.

This Petition is coming before me for hearing on 08.04.2024 in the presence of Sri I.Subba Rao, Advocate for Petitioner and the respondent set exparte, and having stood over for consideration till this day, this Court made the following:

ORDER

1.The present order is the result of the petition filed by the petitioner under Sec.13 (1) (ia) of Hindu Marriage Act 1955, praying this court to pass a decree of divorce by dissolving the marriage dt.10.02.2022; for costs and other reliefs.

2. Brief averments of the petition are as follows:

Petitioner and respondent are wife and husband. Their marriage took place on 10.02.2022 as per Hindu rites and Caste customs. At the time of marriage, parents of petitioner gifted Ac.0-50 cents of wet land and Rs.5,00,000/- cash towards pasupukumkuma and entrusted the same to the respondent for development of their family 2 and they also presented 3 sovereigns of gold chain and one sovereign of gold ring to the respondent. After marriage, they set up kapuram at

Yampa Village of Bheemavaram Mandal. On the first day when she went to Kapuram respondent took an amount of Rs.1,00,000/- from her pasupukumkuma and lost the said amount in gambling and that petitioner questioned him, then he answered that he is ‘Sukshatriyudu’ that is common to him in his day to day life. By this way he spent away all the amount and his parents also supported him. Respondent and his parents insulted her that she is low status woman and she is unable to stand before them. They also harassed her physically and mentally to bring additional dowry of Rs.3,00,000/- from her parents. Sometimes respondent beat her blue and black. She bore all their harassment with a fond hope that they will mend their attitude, but there is no change in their behaviour and finally they beat her and driven her out from the matrimonial home in the month of May, 2022 and threatened to kill her.

Having no other alternative, she went to her parents house and narrated the same to them. Though several mediations held by parents of petitioner respondent and his family members did not head their words and demanded additional dowry. She made a report before

Kuchipudi Police Station against respondent and his family members.

Respondent also attended before Disa Police Station and promised to take back her for kapuram, but he did not fulfill his promise. Having no alternative she also issued a registered notice to the respondent on 30.11.2023 demanding him for divorce, but he refused to receive the same. Therefore, without having any option and as there is no ray of hope for reunion, petitioner obliged to file this petition.

3.RP notice of respondent returned as ‘addressee refused’, service held sufficient. Respondent called absent and remained ex parte on 02.04.2024.

4.Now the point for consideration is:

“Whether divorce can be granted by dissolving the marriage 3 solemnized on 10.02.2022 in between the petitioner and respondent as prayed for?”

5.Heard the counsel for the petitioner.

6.To prove her contest, petitioner herself examined as PW.1 and got marked Exs. P1 to P4.

Point:

7.It is the contest of the petitioner that she married respondent on 10.02.2022 and at the time of marriage her parents gave Ac.0-50 cents of land and Rs.5,00,000/- towards pasupukumkuma and also gold ornaments and the same was entrusted to the respondent. After marriage she joined the respondent for leading kapuram. From the beginning respondent and his family members harassed her physically and mentally for additional dowry and respondent addicted to bad vices and spent all pasupu kumkuma amount for his vices. Ultimately respondent necked her out from matrimonial home in the month of May, 2022. Having no other alternative she went to her parents’ house and living with them.

Though several mediations held respondent did not mend his behaviour. Having no other alternative, she was constrained to file the present petition.

8.To prove her case, petitioner examined herself as PW.1. She filed her chief affidavit and the same was admitted in lieu of chief examination. Her chief affidavit is replica of petition pleadings.

Through her, Exs.P1 to P4 were marked, which are wedding card, marriage photo along with CD, office copy of legal notice got issued by her to respondent dt.30.11.2023 and original returned notice.

9.On the other hand, respondent remained exparte which draws an adverse presumption against him. The contents in the 4 petition as well as the evidence of PW.1 and Exs.P.1 to P.4 were not challenged by the respondent. The unchallenged evidence of PW.1 coupled with Exs.P.1 to P.4 proves the case of the petitioner that she is legally wedded wife of respondent and she was subjected to cruelty and finally deserted by the respondent and there is no chance for their reunion. Hence, petitioner is entitled for divorce as prayed for.

Accordingly this point is answered.

In the result, petition is allowed. The marriage of petitioner and respondent dt.10.02.2022 is hereby dissolved by way of decree of divorce under Hindu Marriage Act.

Typed to my dictation by steno, corrected and pronounced by me in open court, this the 10th day of April, 2024.

Civil Judge (Senior Division),

Avanigadda.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

Witnesses examined

For petitioner:

PW.1: Mahali Gnaneswari @ Penumatcha Gnaneswari.

For respondent:

None(Exparte)

Exhibits marked

For petitioner: For respondent.

Ex.P1: Wedding Card . Nil Ex.P2: Marriage photo along with CD. Ex.P3: Office copy of legal notice got issued by her to respondent dt.30.11.2023. Ex.P4: Original returned notice.

Civil Judge (Senior Division),

Avanigadda.

IN THE COURT OF THE CIVIL JUDGE (SENIOR DIVISION),

AVANIGADDA

Present: Smt. K.Vijaya Kalyani,

Civil Judge (Senior Division), Avanigadda.

Wednesday, this the 10th day of April, 2024

H.M.O.P.No.13/2024

...Petitioner

And:

The present order is the result of the petition filed by the petitioner under Sec.13 (1) (ia) of Hindu Marriage Act 1955, praying this court to pass a decree of divorce by dissolving the marriage dt.10.02.2022; for costs and other reliefs.

DECRETAL ORDER

i.that the petition be and the same is hereby allowed; ii. that the marriage of petitioner and respondent dt.10.02.2022 is hereby dissolved by way of decree of divorce under Hindu Marriage Act; iii. that there be no order as to costs;

Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 10th day of April, 2024.

Civil Judge (Senior Division),

Avanigadda.

MEMORANDUM OF COSTS

Nil

Civil Judge (Senior Division),

Avanigadda.

H.M.O.P/17/2024

Vallurupalli Hari Krishna vs NIL

10 Apr 2024

IN THE COURT OF THE CIVIL JUDGE (SENIOR DIVISION),

AVANIGADDA

Present: Smt. K.Vijaya Kalyani,

Civil Judge (Senior Division), Avanigadda.

Wednesday, this the 10th day of April, 2024

H.M.O.P.No.17/2024

Between:-

1. Vallurupalli Hari Krishna, S/o Vallurupalli Bala Srinivasa Rao, aged about 30 years, Private Employee, resident of Plot No.95, Saradarpatel Nagar, Kukatpally, Near JNTU, Hyderabad, Telangana State.

2. Kotha Reshma Sai, W/o Vallurupalli Hari Krishna, D/o Kotha Venkata Ramana, aged about 26 years, Private Employee, resident of Door No.17-50/5, Komala Nagar, Challapalli Village, Challapalli Mandal, Krishna District, A.P.

....Petitioners

And

Nil. ….Respondent.

This petition coming before me on 08.04.2024 for hearing in the presence of Sri T.Prasad, Advocate for petitioners and having stood over for consideration till this day, this court made the following:-

ORDER

2. Brief averments of the petition are as follows:-

Petitioners are husband and wife. Their marriage was performed on 13.08.2021 as per Hindu Rites and Caste Customs. . Immediately after marriage, 2nd petitioner joined 1st petitioner at Kukatpally,

Hyderabad and lead happy marital life for a period of one year. During their wedlock no children were born. Subsequently, some family disputes arose between them, which created gap between them, which were not patched up and not sorted out, since then, both petitioners residing separately since August, 2022. When the elders and relatives tried at 2 their level best for their reunion, both of them expressed their unwillingness for the same and decided to dissolve their marriage. As there is no ray of hope for reunion between parties, both petitioners obliged to file this petition for grant of decree of divorce by mutual consent. Hence present petition has been filed.

3. Subsequent to numbering the present petition, matter posted after 6 months of statutory period to 23.08.2024, but both the petitioners appeared before the court on 08.04.2024 with an application under Rule109(2) of Civil Rules of Practice to advance the matter and petition under Section 13B(2) of H.M.Act to waive the statutory period of 6 months. Considering the circumstances narrated in the petitions, both were allowed. Matter advanced to 08.04.2024 by dispensing statutory period of 6 months.

4.Now the point for consideration is:- “Whether divorce can be granted by dissolving the marriage solemnized on 13.08.2021 in between the petitioners as prayed for?”

5.Heard arguments.

6.In support of their pleadings, petitioners 1 and 2 examined themselves as PWs.1 and 2 and got marked Exs.P1 to P3.

Point:-

7. There is no dispute with regard to the relationship and date of marriage. To prove their case, 1st petitioner examined himself as PW.1.

He filed his chief affidavit and the same was admitted in lieu of chief examination. His chief affidavit is replica of petition averments. Exs.P1 to

P3 were marked through him which are Wedding Card of 1st petitioner, wedding card of 2nd petitioner and marriage photo along with CD. 2nd petitioner examined herself as PW.2 and she followed the footsteps of

PW.1 and agreed for divorce. Hence, petitioners are entitled for divorce as prayed for. As there is no chance for reunion of both parties this court feels that divorce can be granted by dissolving the marriage solemnized in between the petitioners as prayed for. Accordingly this point is answered.

In the result, petition is allowed. The marriage of petitioners

dt. 13.08.2021 is hereby dissolved by way of decree of divorce under

Hindu Marriage Act.

Typed to my dictation by Steno, corrected and pronounced by me in open court, this the 10th day of April, 2024.

Civil Judge (Senior Division),

Avanigadda.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

Witnesses examined

For petitioners: For respondent

PW.1: Vallurupalli Hari Krishna. None. PW.2: Vallurupalli Reshma Sai.

Exhibits marked

For petitioners: For respondent

Ex.P1 : Wedding Card of 1st petitioner.Nil Ex.P2 : Wedding card of 2nd petitioner. Ex.P3 : Marriage photo along with CD.

Civil Judge (Senior Division),

Avanigadda.

IN THE COURT OF THE CIVIL JUDGE (SENIOR DIVISION),

AVANIGADDA

Present: Smt. K.Vijaya Kalyani,

Civil Judge (Senior Division), Avanigadda.

Wednesday, this the 10th day of April, 2024

H.M.O.P.No.17/2024

Between:-

....Petitioners

And

Nil. ….Respondent.

DECRETAL ORDER

i.that petition be and the same is hereby allowed; ii. that the marriage of petitioners dt. 13.08.2021 is hereby dissolved by way of decree of divorce under Hindu Marriage Act. ; iii. that there be no order as to costs;

Given under my hand and the seal of this court, on this the 10th day of April, 2024.

Civil Judge (Senior Division),

Avanigadda.

MEMORANDUM OF COSTS

Nil

Civil Judge (Senior Division),

Avanigadda.

IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, AVANIGADDA

Present: Smt. K.Vijaya Kalyani,

Senior Civil Judge, Avanigadda.

Thursday, this the 17th day of November, 2022.

HMOP No.116/2022

Between:-

1. Thota Anil Kumar, S/o late Venkateswara Vara Prasad, Hindu, aged about 35 years, Private employee, R/o Sivarama Durgapuram, Challapalli Mandal, Krishna District.

2. Thota @ Damerla Siva Naga Pavani Devi, W/o Anil Kumar, D/o Damerla Srinivasa Rao, Hindu, aged about 30 years, Private employee, R/o Swatantrapuram village, Koduru Mandal, Krishna District.

.... Petitioners

And

Nil. …. Respondent.

DECRETAL ORDER

Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 17th day of November, 2022.

Senior Civil Judge,

Avanigadda.

MEMORANDUM OF COSTS

Nil

SCJ, AVG.

EP/100038/2011

Devabhaktuni.Sankara Rao vs Maddipatla.Siva Sankara Prasad

12 Apr 2024

IN THE COURT OF THE CIVIL JUDGE (SENIOR DIVISION), AVANIGADDA

Present: Smt. K.Vijaya Kalyani,

Civil Judge (Senior Division), Avanigadda.

Friday, this the 12th day of April, 2024

E.P.No.38/2011 in O.S.11/2003

Between:

1. Devabhaktuni Sankara Rao, S/o. Seetha Ramaiah, Hindu, aged about 62 Years, Properties, R/o. Kaptanupalem H/o. Pedaprolu village of Mopidevi Mandal, Krishna District.

2. Devabhaktuni Nagarajakumari,W/o.Sankara Rao, Hindu, aged about 75 Years, Properties, R/o. D.No.8-75, Kaptanupalem H/o. Pedaprolu village of Mopidevi Mandal, Krishna District.

3. Kesani Adi Lakshmi, W/o. kesani Ramesh Babu, Hindu, aged 54 Years, Properties, R/o. D.No.3-8-143, Road No.5, Chandra Puri Colony, L B Nagar, Ranga Reddy District.

4. Devabhaktuni Srinivasa Rao, S/o. Sankara Rao, Hindu, aged 50 Years, Properties, R/o. Flat No.503, Green Leaves Apartment, Hariharapuram, Vanasthalipuram, Hayatnagar, Ranga Reddy District.

5. Nadella Deepa, W/o. Nadella Subba Rao, Hindu, aged about 47 Years, Properties, R/o. D.No.12-192, Mulpuri Street, Ramanagaram, H/o. Lakshmipuram village, Challapalli Mandal, Krishna District.

(DHrs.2 to 5 are added as per orders in E.A.No.4/2024 and E.A.No.5/2024 om E.P.No.38/2011 dated 08.02.2024). ...Decree Holders And:

Maddipatla Siva Sankara Prasad, S/o. Seetha Ramaiah, Hindu, aged 47 Years, properties, R/o. Kaptanupalem, H/o. pedaprolu village of Mopidevi Mandal, Krishna District.

….Judgment Debtors.

This petition coming before me on this day for compromise in the presence of Sri T.Tandava Krishna, Advocate for Decree holder and of Sri V.Rama Rao, Advocate for Judgment Debtor and F.S.Memo filed and upon consideration, this Court made this following:-

O R D E R

F.S.Memo filed on behalf of Decree Holders 2 to 5 stating that Decree Holders 2 to 5 received an amount of Rs.1,90,000/- (Rupees one lakh and ninety thousand only) from the Judgment Debtor towards full satisfaction of the EP amount. F.S.Memo recorded. In view of F.S.memo, EP is terminated.

Pronounced by me in open court, this the 12th day of April, 2024.

Civil Judge (Senior Division),

Avanigadda.

Appendix of Evidence

Nil.

Civil Judge (Senior Division),

Avanigadda.

Order Record 729 total

Case No.	Parties	Date	Type	Outcome
EP/100038/2011	Devabhaktuni.Sankara Rao vs Maddipatla.Siva Sankara Prasad	12 Apr 2024	Order	—
H.M.O.P/39/2024	Tata Giridhar vs NIL.	12 Apr 2024	Order	Compromised
H.M.O.P/13/2024	Mahali Gnaneswari @ Penumacha Gnaneswari vs Penumatcha Venkata Sri Ranga Manikanta Subrmanya Varma	10 Apr 2024	Order	—
H.M.O.P/17/2024	Vallurupalli Hari Krishna vs NIL	10 Apr 2024	Order	—
H.M.O.P/38/2024	Katari @ Yadala Bhargavi vs NIL	10 Apr 2024	Order	Compromised
H.M.O.P/20/2024	Naragam Dhana Lakshmi vs Naragam Adisheshu	08 Apr 2024	Order	—
H.M.O.P/27/2024	Simhadri Rajesh vs NIL	08 Apr 2024	Order	—
H.M.O.P/29/2024	Murari Veeranjaneyulu vs NIL	08 Apr 2024	Order	—
H.M.O.P/32/2024	Govardhangiri @ Bonam Sindhu vs NIL.	08 Apr 2024	Order	—
H.M.O.P/53/2023	Nadakuditi Seeta Rama Raju vs Nadakuditi Jyothi Swaroopa	08 Apr 2024	Order	—
EP/33/2018	Bhavireddi Hemalatha vs Ambati Srinivasa Rao	02 Apr 2024	Order	—
H.M.O.P/39/2022	Golla Chandra Mohan vs Golla @ Adapa Geeta Bhagya Sri	16 Mar 2024	Order	—
CMA/6/2022	A.P.S.R.T.C represented by its Regional Manager, Vijayawada. vs Kureti Suresh	07 Mar 2024	Order	—
IP/5/2021	Angadala China Nageswara Rao vs Renduchintala Venkata Siva Rama Anjaneya Prasad	07 Mar 2024	Order	—
H.M.O.P/6/2024	Pulavarthi Naga Lakshmi @ Pandraka Naga Lakshmi vs NIL.	07 Mar 2024	Order	—
H.M.O.P/107/2023	Badugu Venkata Surendra vs Badugu Naga Sumalatha	06 Mar 2024	Order	—
H.M.O.P/79/2023	Thota Ram Prasad vs NIL	05 Mar 2024	Order	—
H.M.O.P/19/2024	Golla Manikanta vs NIL	04 Mar 2024	Order	—
H.M.O.P/8/2023	Avanigadda Nageswara Rao vs Eluru Mahalakshmi	29 Feb 2024	Order	—
H.M.O.P/9/2024	Garikapati Anil /Kumar vs Akisetti Mounika	29 Feb 2024	Order	—
H.M.O.P/10/2024	Kambala @ Kosuru Navya Sri vs Kosuru Naga Renuka Surya Chandra Venkata Maharaj	29 Feb 2024	Order	—
H.M.O.P/40/2023	Madivada Sivaji vs Madivada @ Akuthota Venkata Naga Ramya Mounika	29 Feb 2024	Order	—
H.M.O.P/138/2022	Pere Lakshmi Rama Krishna vs Pere Devi Sri Lakshmi Sirisha	29 Feb 2024	Order	—
H.M.O.P/18/2024	Tatineni Srinivasa Rao vs NIL	28 Feb 2024	Order	—
IP/5/2022	Boddu Venu vs Nadakuditi Punnaiah Sastrulu	27 Feb 2024	Order	—
OS/100010/2018	Talasila Rajya Lakshmi vs Sabbineni Padmavathi	27 Feb 2024	Judgement	—
OS/100028/2015	Naraharasetti Bhagyalakshmi vs Darapureddi Gajendra Rao	27 Feb 2024	Judgement	—
H.M.O.P/11/2024	Nadakuditi Sambasiva Rao vs NIL	27 Feb 2024	Order	—
H.M.O.P/12/2024	Vakkapatla Siva Prasad vs NIL	27 Feb 2024	Order	—
H.M.O.P/15/2024	Karnatapu Vinod Kumar vs NIL	27 Feb 2024	Order	—
IP/100004/2018	Kurapati Kutumba Sambasiva Rao vs Kurapati Venkata Ratnamma	26 Feb 2024	Order	—
H.M.O.P/20/2020	Kondaveeti Baby Nancharamma vs Medisetti Raja Kumar	26 Feb 2024	Order	—
OS/5/2020	Simhadri Sree Rama Kumar vs Simhadri Akhilandeswari	21 Feb 2024	Judgement	—
H.M.O.P/7/2024	Mutte Lakshmi Poojitha @ Tulabandula Lakshmi Pujitha vs NIL	21 Feb 2024	Order	—
H.M.O.P/145/2022	Sakhamuri Suman vs Jampani @ Sakhamuri lakshmi Bala Saraswathi @ Lakshmi	21 Feb 2024	Order	—
H.M.O.P/114/2023	Jarugu Navya @ Garikipati Navya vs Garikipati Venugopal	20 Feb 2024	Order	—
EP/44/2019	Pirati Sreenivasa Rao vs Dasari Ammaji Sri	19 Feb 2024	Order	—
OS/100021/2013	Boppana VeerendraKumar so Kasivisweswara rao Hind vs BoppAna Lakshminarayana Prasad	19 Feb 2024	Judgement	—
H.M.O.P/111/2023	Ammula Mamamatha @ Pula Mamatha vs Ammula Ram Murthy	19 Feb 2024	Order	—
SC/31/2023	The Sub Inspector of Police, Kuchipudi P.S vs Pagolu Nageswara Rao	16 Feb 2024	Judgement	—
H.M.O.P/5/2024	Bhupathi Ramesh vs NIL	14 Feb 2024	Order	—
CMA/9/2022	Repalle Venkata Narayana vs Viswanadhapalli Srinivasa Rao	13 Feb 2024	Order	—
AS/5/2019	Bhogireddy Subba Rao vs Sanaka Niranjana Rao	12 Feb 2024	Judgement	—
H.M.O.P/120/2023	Ande Atchuta Rani vs Ande Ramanjaneyulu	12 Feb 2024	Order	—
AS/10/2019	Arundhati Seva Samiti vs Chilaka Shadrak	08 Feb 2024	Judgement	—
H.M.O.P/112/2023	Bolla @ Veeranki Anusha vs Bolla Hari Krishna	07 Feb 2024	Order	—
OS/100105/2016	Alapati DhanaLakshmi vs Adanki Padmavathi	06 Feb 2024	Judgement	—
H.M.O.P/2/2024	Mothukuri Gopi Krishna vs NIL	02 Feb 2024	Order	—
H.M.O.P/93/2023	Perumalla Kanaka Prasad vs NIL	02 Feb 2024	Order	—
CMA/10/2022	Yalavarthi Seshagiri Rao vs Viswanadhapalli Srinivasa Rao	31 Jan 2024	Order	—
OS/94/2018	Katragadda Veera Venkatachalam vs Katragadda Suri Babu	31 Jan 2024	Order	—
H.M.O.P/122/2023	Arumbaka vana Kishore vs Bandela Roshini	31 Jan 2024	Order	—
AS/14/2018	Jujjavarapu Rama Swamy vs Jujjavarapu Gopala Rao	30 Jan 2024	Judgement	—
AS/15/2018	Jujjavarapu Rama Swamy vs Jujjavarapu Gopalam @ Gopi	30 Jan 2024	Judgement	—
H.M.O.P/117/2023	Meda Venkateswaramma vs Meda Ramanjaneyulu	30 Jan 2024	Order	—
H.M.O.P/30/2023	Parise Srinivasa Rao vs NIL.	29 Jan 2024	Order	—
EP/100079/2015	Davuluri Raani vs Gantapadmakara Rao	25 Jan 2024	Order	—
EP/100037/2011	Nadella Subba Rao vs Maddipatla Siva Sankara Prasad	24 Jan 2024	Order	—
SC/25/2023	The Sub Inspector of Police, Challapalli P.S. vs Mutchu Naganjaneyulu @ Veeranjaneyulu @ Swamy	18 Jan 2024	Judgement	—
H.M.O.P/85/2023	Gunturu Chinnari vs Gunturu Veera Babu	12 Jan 2024	Order	—
H.M.O.P/1/2024	Gudivaka @ Tungala Tulasi vs NIL	11 Jan 2024	Order	—
H.M.O.P/113/2023	Gudivaka Srikanth vs Tungala @ Gudivaka Tulasi	03 Jan 2024	Order	—
EP/35/2018	Bondalapati Raghava Farid Mastan vs Yannam Venkateswara Rao	02 Jan 2024	Order	—
AS/19/2018	Vissamsetti Veeraiah vs Sirvisetti Srinivasa Rao	22 Dec 2023	Judgement	—
SC/90/2023	Sub Inspector of Police, Challapalli P.S. vs Matangi Prasad	22 Dec 2023	Judgement	—
H.M.O.P/69/2023	Kondaveeti Bharath Kumar vs Kondaveeti Venkatarahalu @ Krishna	22 Dec 2023	Order	—
H.M.O.P/81/2023	Maddamsetti Anusha vs Maddamsetti Rajababu	22 Dec 2023	Order	—
H.M.O.P/109/2022	Kolapalli Savithri vs Kolapalli Nagaraju	22 Dec 2023	Order	—
H.M.O.P/121/2023	Uppala @ Arepalli Tulasi Naga Lakshmi vs NIL	22 Dec 2023	Order	—
H.M.O.P/50/2022	Tata Naga Pavan Kumar vs Tata Sudha Rani	20 Dec 2023	Order	—
AS/100016/2017	Lebaka Koteswara Rao vs Mandali Naga Basaveswari	18 Dec 2023	Judgement	—
H.M.O.P/132/2022	Cheboyina Yesu Babu vs Cheyboyina Swapna	18 Dec 2023	Order	—
H.M.O.P/31/2022	Chennu Nagendram @ Nagendra Rao vs Chennu Lakshmi Tirupatamma	14 Dec 2023	Order	—
H.M.O.P/36/2022	Jonnalagadda Lavanya @ Mutyala Lavanya vs Mutyala Sreenivas	14 Dec 2023	Order	—
H.M.O.P/61/2020	Pilli Jaya Kumar vs Pilli Sri Saileswari	14 Dec 2023	Order	—
EP/100053/2011	Ms.Sreenilaya Chit Pvt.Ltd,Sri A.B. Shankara Rao vs Smt.Jaya lakshmi	13 Dec 2023	Order	—
OS/100131/2016	Chamarthi IndiraDevi vs Govindaraju venkata Rama Krishsna Rao	13 Dec 2023	Judgement	—
H.M.O.P/1/2022	Tata Mainikanta vs Tata Subbamma@ Venkata Subbamma	13 Dec 2023	Order	—
H.M.O.P/109/2023	Kota Venkata Prasad @ Leela Prasad vs NIL	13 Dec 2023	Order	—
IP/100006/2018	Mahali Venkata Sudhakar vs Guntupalli Seetharamaiah	11 Dec 2023	Order	—
H.M.O.P/46/2023	Chinnam Anil Kumar vs NIL.	11 Dec 2023	Order	—
EP/100002/2017	Vadlamudi Chandra sekharaRao vs Chanduri AShoka rao	09 Dec 2023	Order	—
OS/82/2018	Nadakuditi Suresh Babu vs Nadakuditi Satyamurthy	09 Dec 2023	Order	—
OS/48/2018	Sri Sitaramanjaneya Samkeerthana Samaja Mandiram, vs Sanaka Adiseshu	08 Dec 2023	Judgement	—
H.M.O.P/78/2023	Pothula Suresh vs Pothula Gayathri	06 Dec 2023	Order	—
H.M.O.P/104/2023	Ambati @ Garikapati Baby Sravani vs NIL	06 Dec 2023	Order	—
EP/10/2019	Duggirala Siva Prasada Rao vs Mamidi Venkateswara Rao	30 Nov 2023	Order	—
OS/100011/2017	Chalasani Ananatha Padmanabhaiah vs Chalasani Venkata Ratnam	30 Nov 2023	Judgement	—
OS/100076/2017	Puthaboyina Aashrith vs Puthaboyina Venkata Seshagiri Rao	29 Nov 2023	Judgement	—
OS/100016/2012	Boddula Krishna vs Boddula Jagannadham	28 Nov 2023	Judgement	—
OS/100094/2014	Boddula Veera chandra kumari vs Boddula Krishna	28 Nov 2023	Judgement	—
SC/92/2022	The Sub Inspector of Police, Challapalli P.S. vs Kandru Sumanth @ Jyothi	28 Nov 2023	Judgement	—
IP/3/2023	Yakkati Veeranajneyulu vs Kotapati Srinivasa Rao	27 Nov 2023	Order	—
SC/26/2023	The Sub Inspector of Police, Challapalli P.S. vs Matta Nagaiah	27 Nov 2023	Judgement	—
AS/22/2018	Peddiboyina Subba Rao (died) vs Nidumolu Venkateswara Rao	24 Nov 2023	Judgement	—
IP/1/2023	Thota Mamatha Maheswari vs Kotapati Srinivasa Rao	24 Nov 2023	Order	—
H.M.O.P/105/2023	Vissamsetti @ Jalluri Susmitha vs NIL	24 Nov 2023	Order	—
EP/2/2022	Nadakuditi Adi Vishnu vs Marumudi Amrutha Rao	17 Nov 2023	Order	—
H.M.O.P/100/2023	Vemula Veera Babu vs NIL	17 Nov 2023	Order	—
OS/16/2023	Thota Siva Sankar vs Kokkiligadda Parameswara Rao	15 Nov 2023	Judgement	—

Showing 100 of 729 orders — Log in to browse all pages.

Monthly Orders (Last 12 Months)

Apr 2024		11
Mar 2024		7
Feb 2024		31
Jan 2024		14
Dec 2023		25
Nov 2023		25
Oct 2023		13
Sep 2023		41
Aug 2023		29
Jul 2023		32
Jun 2023		30
May 2023		10

Frequently Asked Questions

How many cases has Smt.K.Vijaya Kalyani handled?

Smt.K.Vijaya Kalyani has handled 753 court orders since 2021 at Senior Civil Judge Court, Avanigadda. The average disposal rate is 23 orders per month.

What types of cases does Smt.K.Vijaya Kalyani hear?

Based on available records, Smt.K.Vijaya Kalyani primarily handles Civil matters (Original Suits, Execution Petitions) and Criminal matters (Sessions Cases) at Senior Civil Judge Court, Avanigadda.

Where is Smt.K.Vijaya Kalyani currently posted?

Smt.K.Vijaya Kalyani is posted as SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, AVANIGADDA. at Senior Civil Judge Court, Avanigadda, Krishna, Andhra Pradesh.

Are judgments by Smt.K.Vijaya Kalyani available online?

Yes. 5 judgments by Smt.K.Vijaya Kalyani are available on Legistro with full text, outcome, and sections cited.

How fast does Smt.K.Vijaya Kalyani dispose cases?

Smt.K.Vijaya Kalyani disposes approximately 23 cases per month, based on 753 orders handled over their tenure at Senior Civil Judge Court, Avanigadda.

Since when is Smt.K.Vijaya Kalyani serving?

Smt.K.Vijaya Kalyani has been serving at Senior Civil Judge Court, Avanigadda since 2021.

Case Types

H 53%

OS 21%

EP 11%

SC 5%

AS 4%

IP 3%

FDP 1%

S 1%

Posting History

Jul 2021 — Apr 2024

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, AVANIGADDA. · 753 orders

Outcomes on Record

Compromised 2

Other Judges at this Court

Sri. CH.Yugandhar

CIVIL JUDGE SENIOR DIVISION AVANIGADDA

1 orders

Smt. Swarnalatha Volga Marka

PRINCIPAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE, AVANIGADDA.

576 orders

Sri P Panduranga Reddy

VI Additional District and Sessions Judge Avanigad...

300 orders

← View all judges at Senior Civil Judge Court, Avanigadda