Ms. Kavya Jada

Prl JCJ cum JMFC

Nagarkurnool, PDJ Court Complex · Nagarkurnool · Telangana

Ms. KAVYA JADA, Prl JCJ cum JMFC, is posted at Nagarkurnool, PDJ Court Complex, Nagarkurnool, Telangana, India. 2,965 court orders on record since 2023. 10 judgments with full text available. Primarily handles CC, OS, STC cases.

2,965

Total Orders

Judgments

116

Orders/Month

Postings

Featured Judgments

CC/34/2025 Acquitted

Proh. and Excise SI, Nagarkurnool vs Chinnapaga Eswaramma

18 Jun 2025

1 Of 6 C.C. No. 34 of 2025

IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST

CLASS AT: NAGARKURNOOL.

ON THIS 18th DAY OF JUNE, 2025

Present: Smt. Kavya Jada,

Junior Civil Judge, Kalwakurthy. FAC. Prl.Junior Civil Judge, Nagarkurnool.

C.C.No: 34 OF 2025

Between:

The State of Telangana through Prohibition & Excise Station, Nagarkurnool.

…Complainant.

AND

Chinnapaga Eswaramma W/o Srinivasulu, Aged 58 years, Occ: Labour, R/o Peddamuddunoor Village, Nagarkurnool Mandal.

... Accused.

This case came up before me for final hearing on 11-06-2025 in the presence of the Learned APP for the Prosecution and Sri. Bonasi

Ramchandraiah, Defense Counsel for the Accused and having stood over for consideration, this Court made the following.,

J U D G M E N T

1.This case is filed by Prohibition and Excise Sub-Inspector, Nagarkurnool under section 7(A) r/w 8(e) of T.S. Prohibition Act, 1995 against the Accused.

2.The facts of the case is that on 23-07-2024 Lw3, Prohibition and Excise

Sub-Inspector, DTF Nagarkurnool on receipt of complaint regarding the illegal sale and possession of illicitly distilled liquor had secured the presence of Lws 1 and 2 namely Bushiapaga Shiva and Nallakanti Goutham as mediators and 2 Of 6 C.C. No. 34 of 2025 proceeded and reached the suspected place at house of one person situated at Peddamuddunoor Village of Nagarkurnool Mandal at around 10:30 AM and found one person. On enquiry they came to know her name as Chinnapaga

Eswaramma and issued search memo to her and entered into her house. And upon search of her house they found two plastic bottles containing 03 ltrs of illicitly distilled liquor which was possessed by the said person illegally.

Then they have drawn two samples under cover of panchnama in the presence of two mediators i.e., Lw1 and Lw2 and seized the remaining contraband. Thereafter, Lw4 registered a case vide PCOR No: 102 of 2024 for the offence under section 7(A) r/w 8(e) of T.S.Prohibition Act, 1995. Hence, this case.

3.Basing upon the charge-sheet filed by the Prohibiton and Excise Sub-

Inspector, Nagarkurnool, this Court has taken cognizance for the offence under section 7(A) r/w 8(e) of T.S.Prohibition Act, 1995 against the Accused.

Summons were issued to the Accused.

4.On appearance the Accused was furnished with case copies as required under Section-207 Cr.P.C and was examined under Section 239 of Cr.P.C. The charges under section 7(A) r/w 8(e) of T.S.Prohibition Act, 1995 were framed, readover and explained to her for which she has pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried.

3 Of 6 C.C. No. 34 of 2025

5.In order to establish the guilt of the Accused, the Prosecution has examined Pws. 1 to Pws.4 and got marked Ex.P1 to P6. After examining the

Prosecution witnesses the Accused was examined under Section 313 Cr.P.C.

The incriminating material available against the Accused is readover and explained to her for which she denied the same.

6.Heard learned APP for the state and learned Counsel for the Accused.

7.Now the point for determination is.,

A) Whether Prosecution could able to prove the guilt of the Accused for the offence punishable under section 7(A) r/w 8(e) of T.S.Prohibition Act, 1995 beyond reasonable doubt ?

The above point will be determined in the following way.,

ON POINT A: Whether Prosecution could able to prove the guilt of the Accused for the offence punishable under section 7(A) r/w 8(e) of T.S.Prohibition Act, 1995 beyond reasonable doubt ?

(i)It is the case of the Prosecution that on 23-07-2024 at around 10:30 AM basing upon the reliable information that the Accused is illegally possessing and selling the illicitly distilled liquor, Pw3 has secured the presence of Pw1 and Pw2 and proceeded to Peddamuddoor Village of Nagarkurnool Mandal. On reaching the house of the Accused she issued search memo upon her and conducted search upon her house. Upon search of her house, Pw1 to Pw3 4 Of 6 C.C. No. 34 of 2025 have found two plastic bottles containing 03 ltrs of illicitly distilled liquor which was possessed by the Accused illegally.

(ii)To prove this Prosecution has examined Pw1 to Pw4. Pw1 & Pw2 were cited as a mediators in whose presence panchnama was conducted. But, nothing was elicited from the evidence of Pw1 & Pw2 regarding the seizure of contraband from the possession of the Accused. Hence, by the evidence of

Pw1 & Pw2, it can be concluded that Prosecution has failed to prove that it has seized contraband from the possession of the Accused.

(iii)When seizure itself is not proved by the Prosecution, considering the contents of exhibit P6 i.e., Laboratory analysis report acquires less importance. Apart from Pw1 & Pw2, Pw3 i.e., Prohibition and Excise Sub-

Inspector, Nagarkurnool was also examined. Pw3 has deposed that on 23-07- 2024 on receipt of complaint, Pw3 along with Pw1 and Pw2 has raided the

Accused and found two plastic bottles containing 03 ltrs of illicitly distilled liquor which was possessed by her. Later, she conducted panchnama in the presence of Pw1 & Pw2 and on the same day Pw3 handed over case papers to

Pw4 and Pw4 deposed that basing upon panchnama he registered PCOR.

Later, he deposited samples in the court and sent to FSL for examination.

Later, after receiving CE report and after completion of investigation, Pw4 has filed the charge sheet.

5 Of 6 C.C. No. 34 of 2025

(iv)On considering the evidence of Pw3 & Pw4, it is observed by this Court that their evidence is not corroborated with the other independent witnesses i.e., Pw1 and Pw2 in whose presence Pw3 has conducted search of the house of the Accused.

Hence, their evidence cannot be considered in holding the guilt of the Accused whose evidence is not corroborated with the other

Prosecution witnesses. Hence, upon considering the evidence of Pw3 &

Pw4 as their evidence is not supported by the other independent witnesses it can be safely concluded that Prosecution has failed to prove the guilt of the Accused beyond reasonable doubt.

8.In the result, the Accused found not guilty for the offence punishable

U/s. 7(A) r/w 8(e) of T.S. Prohibition Act, 1995 and accordingly she is acquitted under Section 248(1) Cr.P.C. The bail bonds of the Accused shall stand canceled U/s. 437-A Cr.P.C. i.e., after the expiry of the appeal period. The property if any deposited shall be destroyed after the expiry of the appeal period.

Typed by Stenographer, corrected and pronounced by me in open Court on this 18th day of June, 2025.

Junior Civil Judge, Kalwakurthy. FAC.Prl. Junior Civil Judge, Nagarkurnool.

6 Of 6 C.C. No. 34 of 2025

Appendix of Evidence.

Witnesses examined

For Prosecution: For Defence:

PW.1 Bushiapaga Shiva. None. PW.2 Nallakanti Goutham. PW.3 B. Aruna. PW.4 Naveen Reddy.

Exhibits Marked.

For Prosecution: For Defence:

Ex.P1 Signature of Pw1 on Panchnama. NIL. Ex.P2 Signature of Pw2 on Panchnama. Ex.P3 Search Memo. Ex.P4 Seizure Panchnama. Ex.P5 PCOR. Ex.P6 C.E. Report.

MO’s marked.

Samples.

Junior Civil Judge, Kalwakurthy. FAC.Prl. Junior Civil Judge, Nagarkurnool.

CC/37/2025 Acquitted

Proh. and Excise SI, Nagarkurnool vs Musapally Madhusudhan

18 Jun 2025

1 Of 6 C.C. No. 37 of 2025

IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST

CLASS AT: NAGARKURNOOL.

ON THIS 18th DAY OF JUNE, 2025

Present: Smt. Kavya Jada,

Junior Civil Judge, Kalwakurthy. FAC. Prl.Junior Civil Judge, Nagarkurnool.

C.C.No: 37 OF 2025

Between:

The State of Telangana through Prohibition & Excise Station, Nagarkurnool.

…Complainant.

AND

Masupally Madhusudhan S/o Kurmaiah, Aged 37 years, Occ: Coolie, R/o Thudukurthy Village, Nagarkurnool Mandal.

... Accused.

This case came up before me for final hearing on 11-06-2025 in the presence of the Learned APP for the Prosecution and Sri. O.Ramesh, Defense

Counsel for the Accused and having stood over for consideration, this Court made the following.,

J U D G M E N T

1.This case is filed by Prohibition and Excise Sub-Inspector, Nagarkurnool under section 7(A) r/w 8(e) of T.S. Prohibition Act, 1995 against the Accused.

2.The facts of the case is that on 53-11-2024 Lw3, Prohibition and Excise

Sub-Inspector, SHO Nagarkurnool on receipt of complaint regarding the illegal sale and possession of illicitly distilled liquor had secured the presence of Lws 1 and 2 namely Kavali Paramesh and Guttameedi Arjun as mediators and 2 Of 6 C.C. No. 37 of 2025 proceeded and reached the suspected place at house of one person situated at Thudukurthy Village of Nagarkurnool Mandal at around 05:00 PM and found one person. On enquiry they came to know his name as Masupally

Madhusudhan and issued search memo to him and entered into his house.

And upon search of his house they found one green plastic bottle containing 02 ltrs of illicitly distilled liquor which was possessed by the said person illegally.

Then they have drawn two samples under cover of panchnama in the presence of two mediators i.e., Lw1 and Lw2 and seized the remaining contraband. Thereafter, Lw3 registered a case vide PCOR No: 132 of 2024 for the offence under section 7(A) r/w 8(e) of T.S.Prohibition Act, 1995. Hence, this case.

3.Basing upon the charge-sheet filed by the Prohibiton and Excise Sub-

Inspector, Nagarkurnool, this Court has taken cognizance for the offence under section 7(A) r/w 8(e) of T.S.Prohibition Act, 1995 against the Accused.

Summons were issued to the Accused.

4.On appearance the Accused was furnished with case copies as required under Section-207 Cr.P.C and was examined under Section 239 of Cr.P.C. The charges under section 7(A) r/w 8(e) of T.S.Prohibition Act, 1995 were framed, readover and explained to him for which he has pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried.

3 Of 6 C.C. No. 37 of 2025

5.In order to establish the guilt of the Accused, the Prosecution has examined Pws. 1 to Pws.3 and got marked Ex.P1 to P6. After examining the

Prosecution witnesses the Accused was examined under Section 313 Cr.P.C.

The incriminating material available against the Accused is readover and explained to him for which he denied the same.

6.Heard learned APP for the state and learned Counsel for the Accused.

7.Now the point for determination is.,

A) Whether Prosecution could able to prove the guilt of the Accused for the offence punishable under section 7(A) r/w 8(e) of T.S.Prohibition Act, 1995 beyond reasonable doubt ?

The above point will be determined in the following way.,

ON POINT A: Whether Prosecution could able to prove the guilt of the Accused for the offence punishable under section 7(A) r/w 8(e) of T.S.Prohibition Act, 1995 beyond reasonable doubt ?

(i)It is the case of the Prosecution that on 25-11-2024 at around 05:00 PM basing upon the reliable information that the Accused is illegally possessing and selling the illicitly distilled liquor, Pw3 has secured the presence of Pw1 and Pw2 and proceeded to Thudukurthy Village of Nagarkurnool Mandal. On reaching the house of the Accused he issued search memo upon him and conducted search upon his house. Upon search of his house, Pw1 to Pw3 have 4 Of 6 C.C. No. 37 of 2025 found one green plastic bottle containing 02 ltrs of illicitly distilled liquor which was possessed by the Accused illegally.

(ii)To prove this Prosecution has examined Pw1 to Pw3. Pw1 & Pw2 were cited as a mediators in whose presence panchnama was conducted. But, nothing was elicited from the evidence of Pw1 & Pw2 regarding the seizure of contraband from the possession of the Accused. Hence, by the evidence of

Pw1 & Pw2, it can be concluded that Prosecution has failed to prove that it has seized contraband from the possession of the Accused.

Inspector, Nagarkurnool was also examined. Pw3 has deposed that on 25-11- 2024 on receipt of complaint, Pw3 along with Pw1 and Pw2 has raided the

Accused and found one plastic bottle containing 02 ltrs of illicitly distilled liquor which was possessed by him. Later, he conducted panchnama in the presence of Pw1 & Pw2 and basing upon panchnama he registered PCOR.

Later, he deposited samples in the court and sent to FSL for examination.

Later, after receiving CE report and after completion of investigation, he filed the charge sheet.

(iv)On considering the evidence of Pw3, it is observed by this Court that his evidence is not corroborated with the other independent witnesses i.e., 5 Of 6 C.C. No. 37 of 2025

Pw1 and Pw2 in whose presence Pw3 has conducted search of the house of the Accused.

Hence, his evidence cannot be considered in holding the guilt of the Accused whose evidence is not corroborated with the other

Prosecution witnesses. Hence, upon considering the evidence of Pw3 as his evidence is not supported by the other independent witnesses it can be safely concluded that Prosecution has failed to prove the guilt of the Accused beyond reasonable doubt.

8.In the result, the Accused found not guilty for the offence punishable

U/s. 7(A) r/w 8(e) of T.S. Prohibition Act, 1995 and accordingly he is acquitted under Section 248(1) Cr.P.C. The bail bonds of the Accused shall stand canceled U/s. 437-A Cr.P.C. i.e., after the expiry of the appeal period. The property if any deposited shall be destroyed after the expiry of the appeal period.

Typed by Stenographer, corrected and pronounced by me in open Court on this 18th day of June, 2025.

Junior Civil Judge, Kalwakurthy. FAC.Prl. Junior Civil Judge, Nagarkurnool.

6 Of 6 C.C. No. 37 of 2025

Appendix of Evidence.

Witnesses examined

For Prosecution: For Defence:

PW.1 Kavali Paramesh. None. PW.2 Guttameedi Arjun. PW.3 D. Naveen Reddy.

Exhibits Marked.

For Prosecution: For Defence:

Ex.P1 Signature of Pw1 on Panchnama. NIL. Ex.P2 Signature of Pw2 on Panchnama. Ex.P3 Search Memo. Ex.P4 Seizure Panchnama. Ex.P5 PCOR. Ex.P6 C.E. Report.

MO’s marked.

Samples.

Junior Civil Judge, Kalwakurthy. FAC.Prl. Junior Civil Judge, Nagarkurnool.

CC/690/2022 Acquitted

State of Telangana vs Karvanga Kishore Goud

02 Apr 2026

1 C.C.No.690 of 2022

IN THE COURT OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS, AT

KALWAKURTHY.

Thursday, on this the 02nd day of April, 2026.

PRESENT: Smt.Kavya Jada,

Judicial Magistrate of First Class,

Kalwakurthy.

C.C. No. 690 of 2022

Between:

The Telangana State through Police of PS, Kalwakurthy.

...Complainant.

AND

Karvanga Kishore Goud S/o Bala Krishna Goud, Age: 30 years, Occ: Photographer, R/o H.No.4-128, Subashnagar of Kalwakurthy Town.

…Accused.

***

This case coming before me on this day for final hearing and disposal in the presence of the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor for the complainant and

Sri.B.Mallesh Yadav, Advocate for the Accused and having heard and stood over for consideration, till this day the Court delivered the following:

-:: J U D G M E N T ::-

1.Accused has been prosecuted in FIR.No.270/2022 on the file of Kalwakurthy

Police Station, for the offence punishable under Section 498(A), 323 IPC.

2.The brief facts of the prosecution case are that on 19.09.2022 at about 10:00 hours, LW-11 received a written complaint from LW-1, Smt. Karvanga Anjali, aged 22 years, resident of Subashnagar Colony, Kalwakurthy Mandal. She stated that her marriage with accused Karvanga Kishore was performed about 7 years ago and they have two children. After one year of marriage, the accused became 2 C.C.No.690 of 2022 addicted to alcohol, neglected her welfare, and started harassing her both mentally and physically by suspecting her fidelity.

Despite intervention by elders through a panchayat, the accused did not change his behavior. Due to continuous harassment, the complainant started residing at her parental house at Bharath Nagar, L.B. Nagar, Hyderabad. On 07.09.2022 at about 6:30 PM, the accused came to her parental house and asked her to return with him. When she refused, stating that she would return only if he changed his behavior, the accused caught hold of her throat, pushed her to the ground, and assaulted her. The incident was witnessed by neighbors.

Based on the complaint, LW-11 registered a case in Crime No. 270/2022 under Sections 498-A and 323 IPC and took up investigation

3. On 26-03-2021, U/S.41-A Cr.P.C notice was issued to the accused.

4. Whether the prosecution proved the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt?

5.P.W.1 who is Complainant/Victim deposed that she do not know the facts of the case and she did not lodge any complaint before police and police never examined and recorded her statement.

Learned Additional Public Prosecutor declared P.W.1 as hostile and during her cross examination, nothing was elicited by the Learned Additional Public

Prosecutor.

6.From the evidence available on record, it is evident that the sole material witness, P.W.1, who is also the complainant, has completely turned hostile and denied the prosecution case in toto. She categorically stated that she never gave any complaint to the police and that her signatures were taken on some papers without her knowledge.

3 C.C.No.690 of 2022

7.Despite being declared hostile and cross-examined by the prosecution, nothing material was elicited from her to support the case. The prosecution did not examine any independent witnesses or investigating officer to substantiate the allegations.

In the absence of corroboration and in view of the hostile testimony of the complainant, the entire case of the prosecution becomes doubtful. There is no substantive or trustworthy evidence to hold the accused guilty for the offences alleged.

8.From the above evidence it is evident that prosecution failed to prove the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt and neither of the prosecution witness has supported the prosecution case.

In the result, accused found not guilty and he is acquitted U/S.232 Cr.P.C for the offence U/s.498(A), 323 IPC. Bail bonds if any shall be canceled after expiry of appeal time. The unmarked property if any shall be destroyed after appeal time is over.

Typed to my dictation by Stenographer, corrected and pronounced by me in open Court on this the 02nd day of April, 2026.

Sd/-

Judicial Magistrate Of First Class,

Kalwakurthy.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

(WITNESSES EXAMINED ON BEHALF OF)

PROSECUTION DEFENCE

PW.1: K.Anjali. Nil.

4 C.C.No.690 of 2022

EXHIBITS MARKED

PROSECUTION DEFENCE

Ex.P1: is signature on report. Nil. Ex.P2: is 161 Cr.P.C Statement.

MATERIAL OBJECTS

Nil.

Sd/-

Judicial Magistrate Of First Class,

Kalwakurthy.

CC/3/2021 Convicted

State of Telangana vs Buddula Niranjan

14 Jun 2025

IN THE COURT OF I-ADDL.JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE-CUM-SPECIAL

MOBILE COURT :: AT NAGARKURNOOL

Dated on this the 14th day of June , 2025. PRESENT: Smt.Kavya Jada, Junior Civil Judge, Kalwakurthy, FAC. I Addl.JCJ-cum-Spl.JMFC(mobile) Nagarkurnool.

CC No. 03 of 2021

BETWEEN:- The State Police, through SHO, PS Telkapally, Address - Back side of the Bus stand,Telkapally, Nagar Kurnool District,Telangana.

.......Complainant

AND A1) Sri. Buddula Niranjan S/o Mogulaiah, Age:40 Yrs, Caste:SC-Madiga, Occ: Hamali Coolie, R/o Telkapally mandal, Nagarkurnool Dist.

A2) Smt. Buddula Renuka W/o Niranjan, Age: 35 Yrs, Caste: SC-Madiga, Occ: Coolie, R/o Telkapally mandal, Nagarkurnool Dist,

A3) Sri. Darshanam Yellaswamy S/o Salaiah, Age:42 Yrs, Caste: SC-Madiga, Occ: Coolie, R/o Telkapally mandal, Nagarkurnool Dist,

A4) Sri. Darshanam Anjaneyulu S/o Salaiah, Age: 36 Yrs, Caste:SC-Madiga, Occ: Auto Driver, R/o Telkapally mandal, Nagarkurnool Dist,

A5) Smt. Buddula Manemma @ Bikshapathi W/o Venkataiah, Age:45 Yrs, Caste:SC-Madiga, Occ: Coolie, R/o Telkapally mandal, Nagarkurnool Dist,

A6) Smt. Darshanam Maisamma W/o Ramaswamy, Age:40 yrs, Caste: SC-Madiga, Occ: Coolie, R/o Telkapally mandal, Nagarkurnool Dist.

A7) Smt. Buddula Ramulamma W/o Anjaiah, Age:65 Yrs, Caste: SC-Madiga. Occ: House Wife R/o Telkapally mandal, Nagarkurnool Dist,

A8) Smt. Darshanam Parvathamma W/o Yellaswamy, Age:36 Yrs, Caste: SC-Madiga, Occ: House Wife R/o Telkapally mandal, Nagarkurnool Dist,

A9) Smt. Darshanam Anitha W/o Anjaneyulu, Age:30 Yrs, Caste: SC-Madiga, Occ: House Wife R/o Telkapally mancial, Nagarkurnool Dist,

..........Accused

*****

The suit coming before me in the presence of Aap for the Complainant and Sri. U.Shanthaiah, Advocate for the Accused, having stood over for consideration, the court delivered the following :

DOCKET ORDER

Accused Nos. 1 to 9 are called present and they are examined U/Sec. 251 Cr.P.C. upon which Accused Nos.1 to 2 have voluntarily pleaded guilty for the offence U/S 341, 323 504 r/w 34 IPC. Hence Accused Nos. 1 to 9 are convicted U/s 252 Cr.P.C.Hence, I sentenced the Accused to 9 to pay a fine of Nos. 1 Rs. 1500 /- each for the offence punishable U/S 341, 323 504 r/w 34 IPC in default of payment of fine Accused Nos.1 to 9 shall undergo simple imprisonment for 15 days. The Bail bonds of Accused Nos. 1 to 9 shall stand cancelled. The unmarked case property if any shall be destroyed after appeal time is over. Total fine amount of Rs. 13,500/-.

Pronounced by me in the open court on this the 14th day of June , 2025.

Sd/-

Junior Civil Judge, Kalwakurthy FAC.I-Addl.JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

NAGARKURNOOL.

CC/1/2019 Convicted

K.Gopiram Naik vs Maliga Sriailam

28 Mar 2026

TSNG050000012019

Presented on : 03-01-2019 Registered on : 05-01-2019 Decided on : 28-03-2026 Duration : 7 years, 2 months, 25 days

IN THE COURT OF

prl. Junior Civil Judge

AT KALWAKURTHY ,MAHABOOBNAGAR

(Presided Over by Smt Kavya Jada)

CC/1/2019

Exhibit No. (PROSECUTION): K.Gopiram Naik Through Police Station Officer CHARAKONDA PS 5, R/o.. H.No. 1-101, Macharam Village of Jadcherla Mandal.

KALWAKURTHY MAHABOOBNAGAR

K.Gopiram Naik VERSUS : Maliga Sriailam Age: 0 Occupation : R/o. Plot no.107, Madhuranagar colonry, Mansoorabad, LB Nagar, Saroor nagar, R.R. Dist 2:Nadidal Lapathi Reddy Age: 0 Occupation : R/o. H.No. 2-20-5/59 Adarsh Nagar Chilaka Nagar Ghatkesar R.R. dist 3:Upppu Ramesh Age: 0 Occupation : R/o. H.No. 4-63/10/1 Balapur vlg Saroornagar Mandal.

4:Kumbham Srisailam Age: 0 Occupation : R/o. Kurmida villlage of Chintaplly mandal NGKL Dist.

5:Manchagonii Bhasker goud Age: 30 Occupation : R/o. Pocharam village of Ibrahimpatnam mandal R.R. Dist.

6:Kasani Mallesh Age: 0 Occupation : R/o. Madgul village and mandal 7:Kottagollu yadaiah Age: 0 Occupation : R/o. Champapet village sultanihalwa HYD 8:Siramoni Bhasker Age: 0 Occupation : R/o. Kurmedu NGK ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- APP for State }: APPO, Advocate for appearing for Maliga Sriailam Advocate , -----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Offence punishable under : 379 of INDIAN PENAL CODE,

JUDGMENT

(Delivered on 28-03-2026)

Accused are called present. In view of National Lok Adalat. The accused is examined under sec.239 Cr.P.C. They admitted their guilt for the accusation leveled against him in the charge sheet, on consideration charge U/S.239 Cr.P.C, was framed read over and explained to them in Telugu for which the accused are pleaded guilty. The plea of guilty by the accused are voluntarily one. Hence, the accused are found guilty for the offence U/S.379 IPC and convict him U/S.248(1) Cr.P.C. On questioning the accused on the quantum of sentence, accused to pleaded mercy of the court stating that his family members are depending on him and he will not involve in similar offences in future and requested the court to take lenient view, while imposing sentence. In view of the nature of offence, this court is not inclined to take lenient view in imposing the sentence. In the result, accused are found guilty for the offences 379 IPC and convicted them to pay a fine of Rs.1000/- each, total Rs.8000/-. In default to suffer simple imprisonment for a period of one month.

(Smt Kavya Jada) prl. Junior Civil Judge

KALWAKURTHY

Order Record 2,944 total

Case No.	Parties	Date	Type	Outcome
CC/690/2022	State of Telangana vs Karvanga Kishore Goud	02 Apr 2026	Judgement	Acquitted
OS/86/2024	Kudumula Chandrakala and Others vs Mucharla Sri Ramulamma and Others	28 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
OS/570/2021	Jakku Janga Late Anthi Reddy vs B. Venkataiah S/o B. Chinna Nagaiah	28 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
CC/1/2019	K.Gopiram Naik vs Maliga Sriailam	28 Mar 2026	Judgement	Convicted
CC/7/2025	SHO Kalwakurthy vs Chinna Nagaiah Pothugannti	28 Mar 2026	Judgement	Convicted
CC/14/2026	SHO Vangoor vs Sathyanari Mekala	28 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
CC/17/2025	SHO Kalwakurthy vs Muthhyalu Kota	28 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
CC/28/2025	SHO Vangoor vs Raghuma Reddy Ragi	28 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
CC/37/2025	SHO Kalwakurthy vs Kanthamma Polemoni	28 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
CC/38/2026	SHO Vangoor vs Vinod Reddamoni	28 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
CC/46/2026	SHO Kalwakurthy vs Srinu Boda	28 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
CC/47/2026	SHO Kalwakurthy vs Kurumaiah Kommu	28 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
CC/98/2024	State of Telangana vs Niranjan Kolle	28 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
CC/105/2026	SHO Kalwakurthy vs Srinivas Panuganti	28 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
CC/108/2026	SHO Kalwakurthy vs Shiva Gopala	28 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
CC/115/2026	SHO Veldanda vs Laxmaiah Guduri	28 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
CC/116/2026	SHO Veldanda vs Siddaiah Gunde	28 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
CC/129/2025	State of Telangana vs Shankar Arra	28 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
CC/206/2022	State of Telangana vs Meghavath Gopal	28 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
CC/219/2025	SHO Kalwakurthy vs Thalla Suresh Goud	28 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
CC/228/2021	State of Telangana vs Munavath Devadasu	28 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
CC/231/2024	State of Telangana SI OF POLICE KALWAKURTHY vs Adupula Narsimha	28 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
CC/256/2025	SHO Vangoor vs Boya Nagesh Raju Karre	28 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
CC/257/2025	SHO Charakonda vs Nagesh Raj Karre @v Boya	28 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
CC/302/2025	State of Telangana vs Md Nadim Nadim Khan	28 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
CC/341/2025	SHO Kalwakurthy vs Venkataiah Palle	28 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
CC/405/2024	PS Kalwakurthy vs Vadla Venu Gopal	28 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
CC/408/2024	PS Vangoor vs Keshamoni Mallaiah	28 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
CC/454/2024	SHO Veldanda vs Bathuka Vamshi	28 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
CC/456/2021	State of Telangana vs Derengula Mallesh	28 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
CC/479/2025	SHO Charakonda vs Mahesh Chittari	28 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
CC/486/2025	SHO Kalwakurthy vs Anjaiah Bandla	28 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
CC/514/2021	State of Telangana vs Gannoju Sadanandam	28 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
CC/518/2025	SHO Kalwakurthy vs Ayaz Khan Mohamad	28 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
CC/522/2023	PS, Kalwakurthy vs A.Balaiah	28 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
CC/537/2025	SHO Veldanda vs Saikumar Koppula	28 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
CC/540/2025	SHO Kalwakurthy vs Srikanth Bongarla	28 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
CC/646/2022	State of Telangana vs Eerapakula Mallesh	28 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
CC/662/2019	Puppala Venkataiah S/o Kashanna vs Kotla Sridhar Rao S/o Thirupathi Rao	28 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
CC/666/2024	State of Telangana vs Jangi Reddy Bathini	28 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
CC/701/2022	State of Telangana urkonda vs Vsbolagam Ramana goud	28 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
CC/942/2019	Manjoor Hadi S/o Late shaik Ali vs Sadiya Begam W/o Khaja Moinoddin	28 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
CC/1056/2021	State of Telangana vs Buddaram Ramulu	28 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
CC/100505/2018	Boorela Mahesh vs Surakarapu Pavan Goud	28 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
CC/100506/2018	Surkarapu Pavan goud vs Boorela Mahesh	28 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
OS/341/2021	Goli Narsimha Reddy S/o Late G. Mohan reddy vs Goli Sharada W/o Late Shekar reddy	26 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
CC/40/2026	SHO Kalwakurthy vs Mahesh Vadala	26 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
CC/43/2026	SHO Urkonda vs Cheruku Manikanta	26 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
CC/44/2025	SHO Veldanda vs Ravinder Eslavath	26 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
CC/44/2026	SHO Urkonda vs Sammireddy Thirupathi Reddy	26 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
CC/49/2026	SHO Kalwakurthy vs Srinivasulu Gannoju	26 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
CC/65/2026	SHO Veldanda vs Ramesh Banavath	26 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
CC/102/2026	SHO Kalwakurthy vs Venkataiah Goud Kakunuri	26 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
CC/103/2026	SHO Kalwakurthy vs Gopal Banavath	26 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
CC/104/2026	SHO Kalwakurthy vs Bharathi Kodela	26 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
CC/106/2026	SHO Kalwakurthy vs Jangaiah Goud Kakunuri	26 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
CC/107/2023	Kodari Saidamma W/o.Srinu vs Yalaka Venkat Reddy S/o.Late Narayana Reddy	26 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
CC/107/2026	SHO Kalwakurthy vs Bharathamma Kenche	26 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
CC/113/2026	SHO Kalwakurthy vs Sai Varikuppala	26 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
CC/114/2026	SHO Kalwakurthy vs Abhilash Reddy Sampathi	26 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
CC/135/2021	State of Telangana vs Yerrasani Paramesh	26 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
CC/137/2023	Pathalavath Gopal S/o Bichya vs Cdhalamalla Venkataiah S/o Krishnaiah	26 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
CC/281/2025	SHO Kalwakurthy vs Srisailam Thurpati	26 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
CC/284/2020	State of Telangana vs Jarpulavath Shanker s/o Gansya	26 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
CC/449/2023	PS, Kalwakurthy vs Ravappa Rampur	26 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
CC/523/2024	SHO Kalwakurthy vs P.Zecharaiah Nelson @ PZ Nelson	26 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
CC/531/2024	SHO Veldanda vs Mudavath Raju	26 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
CC/538/2024	SHO Veldanda vs Jarpula @Jarpulavath Jayender	26 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
CC/662/2022	State of Telangana vs P.Z. Nelson	26 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
CC/674/2022	State of Telangana vs Kundella Ramesh	26 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
CC/886/2020	State of Telangana vs Vstupuda Subhash	26 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
CC/1000/2021	State of Telangana vs Marepakula Mahesh	26 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
CC/1136/2021	State of Telangana vs Maripakula Mahesh Goud	26 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
OS/178/2021	Jiyauddin s/o Late Khaja Mohinoddin vs Khaja Rahimoddin s/o Late Md.Khaja Mohinoddin	25 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
CC/42/2026	SHO Kalwakurthy vs Srikanth Chinthapally	25 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
CC/45/2026	SHO Kalwakurthy vs Sathya Nayudu Komara	25 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
CC/48/2026	SHO Kalwakurthy vs Balaswami Karne	25 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
CC/95/2026	SHO Vangoor vs Venkataiah Nagilla	25 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
CC/96/2026	SHO Veldanda vs Ramesh Kudumula	25 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
CC/171/2023	PS, Kalwakurthy vs Ausali Shashidhar	25 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
CC/290/2025	SHO Veldanda vs Ramakrishna Varikuppala	25 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
CC/298/2025	PS, Kalwakurthy vs Mallesh Kalvapally	25 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
CC/492/2019	NALLA RAGHUMAREDDY S/O. JANGA REDDY vs NARAYAN NARSIMHA REDDY S/O. KESHAVA REDDY	25 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
DVC/3/2023	Avusali alias Chepuru Kavya W/o Avusali Shashidhar and D/o Chepuru Brahmachary vs Avusali Shashidhar S/o Avusali Lingamiah	25 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
MC/1/2023	Avusali alias Chepru Kavya W/o Avusali Shashidhar vs Avusali Shashidhar S/o Avusali Lingamiah	25 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
CC/39/2026	SHO Kalwakurthy vs Shivakumar Masala	24 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
CC/58/2026	SHO Kalwakurthy vs Krishnaiah Thottapally	24 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
CC/68/2026	SHO Vangoor vs Shiva Prasad Durgam	24 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
CC/81/2026	SHO Vangoor vs Akhil Goud Chinthapally	24 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
CC/82/2025	Dannedi Srinivasulu vs Dannedi Lavakusha	24 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
CC/134/2020	State of Telangana vs Govind Singh Ram Singh	24 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
CC/195/2025	SHO Charakonda vs Raju Nakkapothu	24 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
CC/220/2025	SHO Urkonda vs Kanugula Chandra Shekar alias Chandu	24 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
CC/328/2025	SHO Kalwakurthy vs Rajitha Botte	24 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
CC/365/2025	State of Telangana vs Shekar Potharapally	24 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
CC/367/2025	SHO Kalwakurthy vs Emmaiah Madgula	24 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
CC/380/2024	PS.Kalwakurthy vs Sk.Driver Baba	24 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
CC/680/2024	PS, Vangoor vs Ramesh Jilakara	24 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
CC/691/2022	State of Telangana vs N.Pandurangaiah	24 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
CC/709/2022	State of Telangana kalwakurhty vs Konduri venkata ramana	24 Mar 2026	Judgement	—

Showing 100 of 2,944 orders — Log in to browse all pages.

Monthly Orders (Last 12 Months)

Apr 2026		1
Mar 2026		133
Feb 2026		44
Jan 2026		30
Dec 2025		112
Nov 2025		74
Oct 2025		39
Sep 2025		137
Aug 2025		28
Jul 2025		61
Jun 2025		233
May 2025		35

Frequently Asked Questions

How many cases has Ms. KAVYA JADA handled?

Ms. KAVYA JADA has handled 2965 court orders since 2023 at Nagarkurnool, PDJ Court Complex. The average disposal rate is 116 orders per month.

What types of cases does Ms. KAVYA JADA hear?

Based on available records, Ms. KAVYA JADA primarily handles Criminal matters (Criminal Cases, Summary Trial Cases) and Civil matters (Original Suits, Execution Petitions) at Nagarkurnool, PDJ Court Complex.

Where is Ms. KAVYA JADA currently posted?

Ms. KAVYA JADA is posted as Prl JCJ cum JMFC at Nagarkurnool, PDJ Court Complex, Nagarkurnool, Telangana.

Are judgments by Ms. KAVYA JADA available online?

Yes. 10 judgments by Ms. KAVYA JADA are available on Legistro with full text, outcome, and sections cited.

How fast does Ms. KAVYA JADA dispose cases?

Ms. KAVYA JADA disposes approximately 116 cases per month, based on 2965 orders handled over their tenure at Nagarkurnool, PDJ Court Complex.

Since when is Ms. KAVYA JADA serving?

Ms. KAVYA JADA has been serving at Nagarkurnool, PDJ Court Complex since 2023.

Case Types

CC 76%

OS 17%

STC 2%

PRC 2%

MC 1%

DVC 1%

EP 1%

ELECOP 0%

Posting History

Feb 2025 — Jun 2025

Prl JCJ cum JMFC · 86 orders
Feb 2025 — Jun 2025

I Addl JCJ cum JMFC Mobile Judge · 80 orders
Feb 2025 — Jun 2025

Junior Civil Judge · 110 orders
May 2023 — Apr 2026

prl. Junior Civil Judge · 2,689 orders

Outcomes on Record

Acquitted 4

Convicted 3

Other Judges at this Court

Sri D.ramakanth

Principal District and Sessions Judge Nagarkurnool

399 orders

Naseem Sultana

Fast Track Special Court for Rape and POCSO Act ca...

55 orders

Ms. Nadigottu Srinidhi

Prl JCJ cum JMFC

53 orders

Smt A Sreedevi

Senior Civil Judge-cum-Assistant Sessions Judge,Na...

102 orders

← View all judges at Nagarkurnool, PDJ Court Complex