L.Annapurnasri

BEFORE LOK ADALAT ANAKAPALLE 

(Constituted by Mandal Legal Services Authority, Anakapalle Under Section 19 of Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987)

On Tuesday, 30th day of April, Two Thousand Nineteen 

L.S.A. No. /2019 in

 O.S.No.79/2013

(In the Hon’ble Court of Principal Junior Civil Judge at Anakapalle)

Present:1. Ms.L. Annapurnasri Presiding Judge­cum­Principal Junior Civil Judge Anakapalle 

2. Sri K.Chandra Sekhar Advocate­cum­Member, Lok Adalat Bench.

3. Sri T.V.N.Setty Advocate­cum­Member, Lok Adalat Bench.

Between:

Koppisetty Veera Venkata Subhash, S/o Late Radha Krishna, Hindu, aged 45 years, Business, residing at D.No.12­3­61/1, Sarada Colony, Anakapalle.

… Plaintiff

And:

1. Malla Ganeswara Rao, S/o Adinarayana, Hindu, aged 54 years, Tea Stall, residing at D.No.2­3, Opposite to Satyamamba Filling Station, Kotturu Village, Anakapalle Mandal.

2. Malla Varalakshmi, W/o Ganeswara Rao, aged 46 years, Tea Stall, residing at D.No.2­3, Opposite to Satyamamba Filling Station, Kotturu Village, Anakapalle Mandal.

3. Malla Adi Vishnu, W/o Ganeswara Rao, aged 29 years, Tea Stall, residing at D.No.2­3, Opposite to Satyamamba Filling Station, Kotturu Village, Anakapalle Mandal.

4. Malla Koti, W/o Ganeswara Rao, Hindu, aged 26 years, Tea Stall, residing at D.No.2­3, Opposite to Satyamamba Filling Station, Kotturu Village, Anakapalle Mandal.

… Defendants

BRIEF FACTS OF THE CASE

Suit filed by the plaintiff for eviction of plaint schedule property.

A fixed court fee of Rs.906/­ is paid U/Sec 20 (c) of A.P.Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1956.

The suit was referred to Lok Adalat at the request of both parties by Principal Junior Civil judge, Anakapalle.

The suit is coming on this day for final settlement in the presence of the plaintiff and defendant and Sri K.P.V.Ramanaiah, Advocate for the plaintiff and Sri M.Jayaram, Advocate for defendants.

Both parties to the suit have agreed for amicable settlement and filed terms of compromise with free will and volition. Hence, compromise is recorded and the following award is passed as per the settlement arrived by the parties.

AWARD U/S. 21 OF LEGAL SERVICES AUTHORITIES ACT, 1987 &

AMENDMENT ACT, 1994

plaintiff and defendants along with their respective counsels present. After due mediation and conciliation, the matter is settled before Lok Adalat with the following:

TERMS OF COMPROMISE

1.The plaintiff (owner) and the defendants (tenants) agreed to settle the matter and in terms of the settlement, the defendants (tenants) agreed to vacate and deliver/hand over the vacant plaint schedule property to the plaintiff (owner) on or

before 31st October, 2019 and if the defendants (tenants) failed to do so, the

plaintiff (owner) is at liberty to vacate the defendants (tenants) from petition schedule property under due process of law and the defendants (tenants) in whatever manner will not object the plaintiff (owner) to obtain vacant possession of plaint schedule property.

2.The plaintiff (owner) agreed to pay Rs.3,00,000/­ at the timer of vacating and deliver/hand over the vacant plaint schedule property to the plaintiff to wards expenses of shifting the tin raked shed situated in plaint schedule property.

3.The defendants (tenants) agreed not to make any objection to the plaintiff to withdraw the amount deposited by the Judgment defendants (tenants) in

OS.No.154/2011 towards rent and the plaintiff (owner) agreed not to demand the 

defendants (tenants) any rent or arrears of rent and there are no claims against each other.

4. Both parties agreed to bear their own costs.

Both parties agreed for the above terms of compromise.

Award is passed accordingly in terms of compromise.

The court fee of Rs.906/­ paid by the plaintiff shall be refunded to the plaintiff by the court before which the proceedings have been pending U/Sec 21 (1) read with Section 25 of the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 and it shall not form part of the costs payable by the defendant.

Both parties have affixed their signatures in evidence of their consent for the terms of Award.

Signature of the plaintiffs Signature of the Defendant

Advocate for the PlaintiffAdvocate for the Defendant

Give under our hands and the seal of Lok Adalat on this the 30th day of April, 2019 at Mandal Legal Services Authority, Anakapalle.

1.

2.

MEMBERS PRESIDING OFFICER

IN THE HONOURABLE COURT OF PRINCIPAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE

AT ANAKAPALLE

OS.No.79/2013

Between:

Koppisetty Veera Venkata Subhash, S/o Late Radha Krishna, Hindu, aged 45 years, Business, residing at D.No.12­3­61/1, Sarada Colony, Anakapalle.

… plaintiff

And:

1. Malla Ganeswara Rao, S/o Adinarayana, Hindu, aged 54 years, Tea Stall, residing at D.No.2­3, Opposite to Satyamamba Filling Station, Kotturu Village, Anakapalle Mandal.

2. Malla Varalakshmi, W/o Ganeswara Rao, aged 46 years, Tea Stall, residing at D.No.2­3, Opposite to Satyamamba Filling Station, Kotturu Village, Anakapalle Mandal.

3. Malla Adi Vishnu, W/o Ganeswara Rao, aged 29 years, Tea Stall, residing at D.No.2­3, Opposite to Satyamamba Filling Station, Kotturu Village, Anakapalle Mandal.

4. Malla Koti, W/o Ganeswara Rao, Hindu, aged 26 years, Tea Stall, residing at D.No.2­3, Opposite to Satyamamba Filling Station, Kotturu Village, Anakapalle Mandal.

… defendants

JOINT MEMO FILED BY BOTH PARTIES

Both parties agreed to settle the above matter with the following terms of compromise. Hence, this memo.

TERMS OF COMPROMISE

1.The plaintiff (owner) and the defendants (tenants) agreed to settle the matter and in terms of the settlement, the defendants (tenants) agreed to vacate and deliver/hand over the vacant plaint schedule property to the plaintiff (owner) on or

before 31st October, 2019 and if the defendants (tenants) failed to do so, the

plaintiff (owner) is at liberty to vacate the defendants (tenants) from petition schedule property under due process of law and the defendants (tenants) in whatever manner will not object the plaintiff (owner) to obtain vacant possession of plaint schedule property.

2.The plaintiff (owner) agreed to pay Rs.3,00,000/­ at the timer of vacating and deliver/hand over the vacant plaint schedule property to the plaintiff to wards expenses of shifting the tin raked shed situated in plaint schedule property.

3.The defendants (tenants) agreed not to make any objection to the plaintiff to withdraw the amount deposited by the Judgment defendants (tenants) in

OS.No.154/2011 towards rent and the plaintiff (owner) agreed not to demand the 

defendants (tenants) any rent or arrears of rent and there are no claims against each other.

4. Both parties agreed to bear their own costs.

We request the Lok Adalat Bench to pass an Award in terms of compromise.

Signature of the plaintiff Signature of the defendant

Advocate for the plaintiff Advocate for the defendant

1

IN THE COURT OF X ADDL. METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE CUM

PRINCIPAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE

Present : L.Annapurnasri

Prl. Junior Civil Judge

Anakapalle

Monday, the 29 th day of April 2019

ORIGINAL SUIT NO.164/2017

Between:

Koviri Chinna Somulu, S/o. Durgalu,Hindu, aged 58 years, fisherman, residing at D.NO. 4-231, Dibbapalem, H/o. Cheepurupalli east, Paravada mandal, Visakhapatnam district … Plaintiff

And:

Koviri Mahesh, S/o. China Maseenu, Hindu, aged 26 years, Electrician, , residing at Mutyalammapalem, Venkatapathipalem post, Vada Cheepurupalli east, Paravada mandal, Visakhapatnam district … defendant

This suit came up on 29-4-2019 for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri L.Jagannadham and L.Parvateeswar, Learned Counsels for plaintiff and defendant is set exparte and upon hearing the learned counsel for plaintiff and having stood over for consideration till this day, the court delivered the following:

JUDGMENT

This suit is filed for recovery of sum of Rs.85,900/- being the balance of principal and interest due on a promissory note dated 27-10- 2014 executed by defendant in favour of plaintiff for Rs.50,000/-agreeing to repay the same with subsequent interest @ 24% per annum and costs of the suit.

2.The case of the plaintiff, in brief, is that, 2

The defendant borrowed an amount of Rs.50,000/- from him on 27- 10-2014 for his house and executed a promissory note in favour of plaintiff with interest at 24% p.a.

Subsequently, in spite of repeated demands made by the plaintiff, the defendant failed to pay debt amount and postponing the same on one pretext or other. More over, the defendant gave false police report against the plaintiff. Hence, plaintiff filed this suit.

3. Sri A.Sudhakar, Advocate filed vakalat on behalf of defendant.

Even stipulated period is over, the defendant did not file written statement. Hence, he was set exparte.

4.To substantiate the case of plaintiff, plaintiff examined himself as

Pw 1 and exhibited Ex.A1.

5.Heard.

6.Point for consideration is :

Whether the plaintiff is entitled for recovery of suit amount as prayed for ?

Point :

7. The defendant borrowed an amount of Rs.50,000/- from him on 27-10-2014 for his house and executed a promissory note in favour of plaintiff with interest at 24% p.a. Subsequently, in spite of repeated demands made by the plaintiff, the defendant failed to pay debt amount and postponing the same one one pretext or other.

8. To substantiate the case of plaintiff, plaintiff examined himself as

Pw 1 and exhibited Ex.A1.

9.PW1 reiterated the averments of plaint in his chief affidavit. The evidence of PW1 coupled with Ex.A1 proves that the defendant borrowed an amount of Rs.50,000/- from the plaintiff and executed 3 promissory note/Ex.A1. Therefore, it is hold that the plaintiff is entitled for decree for an amount of Rs.85,900/-. Accordingly, this point is answered in favour of plaintiff.

10.In the result, the suit is decreed with costs in favour of plaintiff against the defendant for a sum of Rs.85,900/- (Rupees eighty five thousand nine hundred only) with subsequent interest at the rate of 12% per annum from the date of filing of the suit to till the date of decree and thereafter at the rate of 6% per annum till the date of realization on the

principal amount of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees fifty thousand only)

Typed to my dictation by Personal Assistant, corrected and

pronounced by me in open court, this the 29th day of April 2019.

Principal Junior Civil Judge,

Anakapalli

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

Witnesses Examined

For Plaintiff For Defendant

PW1 : K.China Somulu None

Exhibits Marked For Plaintiff

Ex.A1 : Suit promissory note dt.27-10-2014

For Defendant:- None

Principal Junior Civil Judge,

Anakapalli

Date of presentation : 25-10-2017 Date of filing : 8-11-2017 1

IN THE COURT OF X ADDL. METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE CUM

PRINCIPAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE

Present : L.Annapurnasri

Prl. Junior Civil Judge

Anakapalle

Monday, the 29 th day of April 2019

ORIGINAL SUIT NO.164/2017

Between:

Koviri Chinna Somulu, S/o. Durgalu,Hindu, aged 58 years, fisherman, residing at D.NO. 4-231, Dibbapalem, H/o. Cheepurupalli east, Paravada mandal, Visakhapatnam district … Plaintiff

And:

Koviri Mahesh, S/o. China Maseenu, Hindu, aged 26 years, Electrician, , residing at Mutyalammapalem, Venkatapathipalem post, Vada Cheepurupalli east, Paravada mandal, Visakhapatnam district … defendant

This is a suit to recover a sum of Rs.85,900/- for subsequent interest @ 24% per annum and for costs of the suit.

Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction is

Rs.85,900/- and court fee of Rs.3106/- is paid U/sec.20 Art 1(b) & (C) of

Sch.I of APCF & SV Act.

This suit came up on 29-4-2019 for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri L.Jagannadham and L.Parvateeswar, Learned Counsels for plaintiff and defendant is set exparte and upon hearing the learned counsel for plaintiff and having stood over for consideration till this day,, the court doth order ; and

DECREE

1) that the defendant do pay to the plaintiff a sum of Rs.85,900/- (Rupees eighty five thousand nine hundred only) with subsequent interest at the rate of 12% per annum from the date of filing of the suit i.e. 25-10-2017 to till the date of decree and thereafter at 2 the rate of 6% per annum till the date of realization on the

principal amount of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees fifty thousand only)

2) that the defendant do pay to the plaintiff a sum of

Rs.3158/-towards institution costs of the suit.

Given under my hand and seal of this court, this the 29th day of

April 2019

Principal Junior Civil Judge,

Anakapalle

Memorandum of Costs plaintiff defendant vakalat 2.00No costs memo filed plaint fee 3106.00 type charges 50.00 --------------- costs allowed 3158.00 --------------

Principal Junior Civil Judge,

Anakapalle

Note : The parties should apply as soon as possible for the return of all exhibits which they may wish to preserve, as the record will be liable to be destroyed after three (3) years from this date.

 In the Court of the X Addl. Metropolitan Magistrate – cum ­

Principal Junior Civil Judge at Anakapalle

Present :  Ms. L.Annapurnasri, 

 X Addl. Metropolitan Magistrate – cum ­ Principal Junior Civil Judge

Tuesday, the 30 th day of April, 2019

O.S.No.154/2011

Between:

1. Malla Ganeswara Rao, S/o Adinarayana, Hindu, aged 52 years, Tea Stall, residing at D.No.2­3, Opp.Satyamamba Filling Station, G.N.T.Road, Kotturu Village, Anakapalle Mandal.

2. Malla Varalaxmi, W/o Ganeswara Rao, Hindu, aged 44 years, Tea Stall, residing at D.No.2­3, Opp.Satyamamba Filling Station, G.N.T.Road, Kotturu Village, Anakapalle Mandal.

3. Malla Adi Vishnu, S/o Ganeswara Rao, Hindu, aged 27 years, residing at D.No.2­3, Opp.Satyamamba Filling Station, G.N.T.Road, Kotturu Village, Anakapalle Mandal.

4. Malla Koti, S/o Ganeswara Rao, Hindu, aged 24 years, residing at D.No.2­3, Opp.Satyamamba Filling Station, G.N.T.Road, Kotturu Village, Anakapalle Mandal.

.….. Plaintiffs

And: 

1. Vuppala Subrahmanyeswara Nooka Raju, S/o Late Chandra Sekhara Rao, Hindu, aged 63 years, business, residing at D.No.10­7­34, Vuppalavari Street, Anakapalle.

2. Vuppala Venkata Ratnam, S/o Late Chandra Sekhara Rao, Hindu, aged 58 years, business, residing at D.No.9­20­14, Laxminarayananagar, Anakapalle.

3. Koppisetti Veera Venkata Subash, S/o Late Radha Krishna, Hindu, aged about 43 years, business, residing at D.No.12­3­61/1, Sarada Colony, Anakapalle.

.... Defendants

This suit coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri M.Jayaram and Sri B.S.V.Raja Gopal, Advocates for the plaintiffs and Sri K.P.V.Ramanaiah, Advocate for the defendants and the matter having been stood over for consideration till this day, this Court delivered the following:

J U D G M E N T

This suit is filed for issue of permanent injunction against the defendant and their men from ever interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the plaint schedule property, to evict the plaintiffs to due process of law and for costs.

Plaintiffs are present, memo filed and recorded. In the result, suit is dismissed as not pressed and no costs.

pronounced by me in open Court, this the 30th day of April, 2019.

Principal Junior Civil Judge,

Anakapalle.

Appendix of evidence

Witness examined for

Plaintiffs: Defendants: Nil PW1 : Malla Geneswara Rao

No.of exhibits marked for

Plaintiffs: Ex.A1… Receipts issued in respect of licence for industries and factories ( 8 in No.) Ex.A2… Electricity consumption charges demand notice Ex.A3/21.03.2011… Certificate issued by Sarpanch. Ex.A4… 7 photographs corresponding negatives. Ex.A5… Returned RP cover sent by Advocate of 1st defendant (2 in No.) Ex.A6/31.07.2011… Receipt. Ex.A7… 6 photographs corresponding CD.

Principal Junior Civil Judge,

Anakapalle.

Date of presentation: 26.07.2011

Date of filing: 26.07.2011

In the Court of the Principal Junior Civil Judge :: Anakapalle

Present: Ms L. Annapurnasri,

Principal Junior Civil Judge,

Tuesday, the 30 th day of April, 2019.

O.S.No.154/2011

Between:

1. Malla Ganeswara Rao, S/o Adinarayana, Hindu, aged 52 years, Tea Stall, residing at D.No.2­3, Opp.Satyamamba Filling Station, G.N.T.Road, Kotturu Village, Anakapalle Mandal.

2. Malla Varalaxmi, W/o Ganeswara Rao, Hindu, aged 44 years, Tea Stall, residing at D.No.2­3, Opp.Satyamamba Filling Station, G.N.T.Road, Kotturu Village, Anakapalle Mandal.

3. Malla Adi Vishnu, S/o Ganeswara Rao, Hindu, aged 27 years, residing at D.No.2­3, Opp.Satyamamba Filling Station, G.N.T.Road, Kotturu Village, Anakapalle Mandal.

4. Malla Koti, S/o Ganeswara Rao, Hindu, aged 24 years, residing at D.No.2­3, Opp.Satyamamba Filling Station, G.N.T.Road, Kotturu Village, Anakapalle Mandal.

…Plaintiffs A n d:

1. Vuppala Subrahmanyeswara Nooka Raju, S/o Late Chandra Sekhara Rao, Hindu, aged 63 years, business, residing at D.No.10­7­34, Vuppalavari Street, Anakapalle.

2. Vuppala Venkata Ratnam, S/o Late Chandra Sekhara Rao, Hindu, aged 58 years, business, residing at D.No.9­20­14, Laxminarayananagar, Anakapalle.

3. Koppisetti Veera Venkata Subash, S/o Late Radha Krishna, Hindu, aged about 43 years, business, residing at D.No.12­3­61/1, Sarada Colony, Anakapalle. …Defendants

This suit is filed for issue of permanent injunction against the defendant and their men from ever interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the plaint schedule property, to evict the plaintiffs to due process of law and for costs.

Value of the suit for the purpose of Court fee and jurisdiction is Rs.6,000/­ and a Court fee of Rs.486/­ is paid therein U/Sec 26(c) of Art.1, Sch.I1 of

A.P.C.F and S.V.Act. 

 This suit coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri M.Jayaram and Sri B.S.V.Raja Gopal, Advocates for the plaintiffs and Sri

K.P.V.Ramanaiah, Advocate for the defendants and the matter having stood over for consideration till this day, this Court doth order; and 

D E C R E E

1. that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed as not pressed; and 

2. that there be no costs.

(Copy of plaint schedule is hereto attached)

Given under my hand and the seal of the Court, this the 30th day of April, 2019.

Principal Junior Civil Judge,

Anakapalle.

Memorandum of costs

No costs memo filed on either side.

Principal Junior Civil Judge,

Anakapalle.

 In the Court of the X Addl. Metropolitan Magistrate – cum ­

Principal Junior Civil Judge at Anakapalle

Present :  Ms. L.Annapurnasri, 

 X Addl. Metropolitan Magistrate – cum ­ Principal Junior Civil Judge

Tuesday, the 30 th day of April, 2019

O.S.No.154/2011

Between:

1. Malla Ganeswara Rao, S/o Adinarayana, Hindu, aged 52 years, Tea Stall, residing at D.No.2­3, Opp.Satyamamba Filling Station, G.N.T.Road, Kotturu Village, Anakapalle Mandal.

2. Malla Varalaxmi, W/o Ganeswara Rao, Hindu, aged 44 years, Tea Stall, residing at D.No.2­3, Opp.Satyamamba Filling Station, G.N.T.Road, Kotturu Village, Anakapalle Mandal.

3. Malla Adi Vishnu, S/o Ganeswara Rao, Hindu, aged 27 years, residing at D.No.2­3, Opp.Satyamamba Filling Station, G.N.T.Road, Kotturu Village, Anakapalle Mandal.

4. Malla Koti, S/o Ganeswara Rao, Hindu, aged 24 years, residing at D.No.2­3, Opp.Satyamamba Filling Station, G.N.T.Road, Kotturu Village, Anakapalle Mandal.

.….. Plaintiffs

And: 

1. Vuppala Subrahmanyeswara Nooka Raju, S/o Late Chandra Sekhara Rao, Hindu, aged 63 years, business, residing at D.No.10­7­34, Vuppalavari Street, Anakapalle.

2. Vuppala Venkata Ratnam, S/o Late Chandra Sekhara Rao, Hindu, aged 58 years, business, residing at D.No.9­20­14, Laxminarayananagar, Anakapalle.

3. Koppisetti Veera Venkata Subash, S/o Late Radha Krishna, Hindu, aged about 43 years, business, residing at D.No.12­3­61/1, Sarada Colony, Anakapalle.

.... Defendants

This suit coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri M.Jayaram and Sri B.S.V.Raja Gopal, Advocates for the plaintiffs and Sri K.P.V.Ramanaiah, Advocate for the defendants and the matter having been stood over for consideration till this day, this Court delivered the following:

J U D G M E N T

This suit is filed for issue of permanent injunction against the defendant and their men from ever interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the plaint schedule property, to evict the plaintiffs to due process of law and for costs.

Plaintiffs are present, memo filed and recorded. In the result, suit is dismissed as not pressed and no costs.

pronounced by me in open Court, this the 30th day of April, 2019.

Principal Junior Civil Judge,

Anakapalle.

Appendix of evidence

Witness examined for

Plaintiffs: Defendants: Nil PW1 : Malla Geneswara Rao

No.of exhibits marked for

Plaintiffs: Ex.A1… Receipts issued in respect of licence for industries and factories ( 8 in No.) Ex.A2… Electricity consumption charges demand notice Ex.A3/21.03.2011… Certificate issued by Sarpanch. Ex.A4… 7 photographs corresponding negatives. Ex.A5… Returned RP cover sent by Advocate of 1st defendant (2 in No.) Ex.A6/31.07.2011… Receipt. Ex.A7… 6 photographs corresponding CD.

Principal Junior Civil Judge,

Anakapalle.

Date of presentation: 26.07.2011

Date of filing: 26.07.2011

In the Court of the Principal Junior Civil Judge :: Anakapalle

Present: Ms L. Annapurnasri,

Principal Junior Civil Judge,

Tuesday, the 30 th day of April, 2019.

O.S.No.154/2011

Between:

1. Malla Ganeswara Rao, S/o Adinarayana, Hindu, aged 52 years, Tea Stall, residing at D.No.2­3, Opp.Satyamamba Filling Station, G.N.T.Road, Kotturu Village, Anakapalle Mandal.

2. Malla Varalaxmi, W/o Ganeswara Rao, Hindu, aged 44 years, Tea Stall, residing at D.No.2­3, Opp.Satyamamba Filling Station, G.N.T.Road, Kotturu Village, Anakapalle Mandal.

3. Malla Adi Vishnu, S/o Ganeswara Rao, Hindu, aged 27 years, residing at D.No.2­3, Opp.Satyamamba Filling Station, G.N.T.Road, Kotturu Village, Anakapalle Mandal.

4. Malla Koti, S/o Ganeswara Rao, Hindu, aged 24 years, residing at D.No.2­3, Opp.Satyamamba Filling Station, G.N.T.Road, Kotturu Village, Anakapalle Mandal.

…Plaintiffs A n d:

1. Vuppala Subrahmanyeswara Nooka Raju, S/o Late Chandra Sekhara Rao, Hindu, aged 63 years, business, residing at D.No.10­7­34, Vuppalavari Street, Anakapalle.

2. Vuppala Venkata Ratnam, S/o Late Chandra Sekhara Rao, Hindu, aged 58 years, business, residing at D.No.9­20­14, Laxminarayananagar, Anakapalle.

3. Koppisetti Veera Venkata Subash, S/o Late Radha Krishna, Hindu, aged about 43 years, business, residing at D.No.12­3­61/1, Sarada Colony, Anakapalle. …Defendants

This suit is filed for issue of permanent injunction against the defendant and their men from ever interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the plaint schedule property, to evict the plaintiffs to due process of law and for costs.

Value of the suit for the purpose of Court fee and jurisdiction is Rs.6,000/­ and a Court fee of Rs.486/­ is paid therein U/Sec 26(c) of Art.1, Sch.I1 of

A.P.C.F and S.V.Act. 

 This suit coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri M.Jayaram and Sri B.S.V.Raja Gopal, Advocates for the plaintiffs and Sri

K.P.V.Ramanaiah, Advocate for the defendants and the matter having stood over for consideration till this day, this Court doth order; and 

D E C R E E

1. that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed as not pressed; and 

2. that there be no costs.

(Copy of plaint schedule is hereto attached)

Given under my hand and the seal of the Court, this the 30th day of April, 2019.

Principal Junior Civil Judge,

Anakapalle.

Memorandum of costs

No costs memo filed on either side.

Principal Junior Civil Judge,

Anakapalle.

 In the Court of the Principal Junior Civil Judge at Anakapalle

Present :  Ms. L.Annapurnasri, 

Principal Junior Civil Judge

Thursday, the 25 th day of April, 2019

E.P.19/2014 in OS.No.7/2013

Between:

1. Budireddi Eswara Rao, S/o Late Ramunaidu, Hindu, aged 32 years, Cultivation, residing at D.No.4­49/1, Kothapalli Village, Ugginapalem post, Kasimkota Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.

2. Budireddi Lakshmi Santhoshi Kumar, W/o Eswara Rao, Hindu, aged 25 years, residing at D.No.4­49/1, Kothapalli Village, Ugginapalem post, Kasimkota Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.

.….. Decree holders And: 

Nimmadala Krishna @ Gollodu, S/o Namminaidu @ Naidu, Hindu, aged 35 years, residing at D.No.5­38, othapalli Village, Ugginapalem post, Kasimkota Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.

.... Judgment debtor

This petition is coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri S.D.Jagannadha Raju, Advocate for Dhrs and Sri Y.Sairam, Advocate for Jdr and the matter having been stood over for consideration till this day, this Court delivered the following:

O R D E R

Petitioner/Dhr prays to sell the attached property before Judgment in IA 41/2013 in OS.No.7/2013, dt.06.02.2013 under order 21 Rule 64 and 66 CPC to realize the EP amount with subsequent interest and costs as stated in the EP.

Memo filed. Heard, recorded. EP is dismissed, but the attachment is in substituting. Accordingly it is disposed off. 

pronounced by me in open Court, this the 25thday of April, 2019.

Principal Junior Civil Judge,

Anakapalle.