Currently Serving

Smt. M. Indira Priayadarsini

POCSO COURT, TENALI

XI Addl. District Court (FTC), Tenali (Taluka) · Guntur · Andhra Pradesh

Smt. M. INDIRA PRIAYADARSINI, POCSO COURT, TENALI, is posted at XI Addl. District Court (FTC), Tenali (Taluka), Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, India. 293 court orders on record since 2024. 5 judgments with full text available. Primarily handles SC, CRLMP, CRL cases.

293

Total Orders

Judgments

Orders/Month

Posting

Featured Judgments

CRLMP.BAIL/65/2026

Doki Yelamanda Reddy vs The State, SHO, Bapatla Rural P.S.

18 Apr 2026

IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL JUDGE FOR TRIAL OF OFFENCES UNDER THE

PROTECTION OF CHILDREN FROM SEXUAL OFFENCES ACT (POCSO ACT),

TENALI.

Present :: Sri D. Srinivasulu,

XI Addl.Dist.&Sessions (FTC) Judge Tenali

FAC Spl.Judge, POCSO Court, Tenali

Saturday, this the 17 th day of April, 2026.

CRL.M.P.No.65 of 2026

Crime No.35 of 2026 of Bapatla Rural Police Station.

Between: Doki Yelamanda Reddy S/o Venkateswarlu, 20 years, Coolie, resident of Dr.No:2- 54, Light House, Vadarevu, Bapatla, Bapatla District. …. Petitioner/ Accused

and

The State, SHO, Bapatla Rural P.S., Bapatla represented by it’s Public Prosecutor, Bapatla.

...Respondent/complainant

This petition came before me on this day for hearing and consideration in the presence of Sri S. Ravindra Babu, S. Samsher Basha, Advocates for the petitioner/Accused and the Learned Spl. Additional Public Prosecutor for the State/Respondent/Complainant and upon perusing the material available on record, this Court made the following:

O R D E R

This is the fourth bail application filed by the Petitioner/Accused under

Sections 448 and 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhitha praying the court to enlarge him on bail in Cr.No.35/2026 for the offences punishable under Sections 78(1)(i), 137(2) of BNS, Section 12 of POCSO Act, 2012 of Bapatla Rural Police

Station.

2.Notice given to the Learned Spl. Additional Public Prosecutor, who opposed the petition. Notice also given to defacto-complainant.

3.In brief, the case of the prosecution is that, the defacto-complainant is the mother of the victim girl and the victim girl is aged about 17 years, completed intermediate in Women’s college, Chirala and whenever she is going to the college, the petitioner/accused used to talk with the victim and on coming to know about the same, her parents admonished the Petitioner/Accused warned him not to disturb the victim and they also admonished the victim. For some time,

Petitioner/Accused kept quiet and later continued to talk with the victim who remained at her house used to chit chat over phone and on 18.03.2026 the parents of victim went to attend agricultural works and after their return to the house at evening hours, they noticed the victim was not in the house and on enquiry they came to know that that the Petitioner/Accused kidnapped the victim , married her and while he was taking her to the police station, the parents of the victim stopped them and brought the victim to the police station. Basing on the report of mother of victim a case in No:35/2026 registered under sections 78(1)(i), 137(2) of BNS and section 12 read with 11 of POCSO Act, 2012 against the

Petitioner/Accused.

4.Heard both sides, perused the FIR., remand report together with Case diary

Part-I.

5.The Learned counsel for the Petitioner/Accused submitted that the

Petitioner/Accused is innocent and he has not committed any alleged offence alleged by the Respondent/Complainant and the case was registered against the

Petitioner/Accused due to political rivalry. No similar application is filed or pending in any other court except the present Petition before the Honourable Court for the same relief and the ingredients of Sections 78(1)(i), 137(2) of BNS and section 12 3 of POCSO Act, 2012 are not attracted to the present case. The Petitioner/Accused is sole bread winner of his family, the Petitioner/Accused is having fixed abode at

Vadarevu, Bapatla, Bapatla District and he will produced sufficient solvent sureties for his release on bail and he undertakes that he will attend for each and every adjournment before the Honourable court. As per the remand report the

Investigation is completed and the Investigation agency is ready to file final Report, hence, there is no chance of tampering of prosecution witnesses by the

Petitioner/Accused. The Petitioner/Accused is suffering with chronic decease and he is taking medical treatment. The victim represented before the

Petitioner/Accused that she is major and if the Petitioner/Accused not married her, she will commit suicide. So, the Petitioner/Accused gave consent to marry the

Petitioner/Accused. Hence, prayed to enlarge the Petitioner/Accused on bail.

6.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that, investigation in this case is not yet completed, some more witness are yet to be examined. Hence he prayed to dismiss the petition against the petitioner/Accused. The defacto- complainant did not choose to oppose the Bail application.

7. The Point for consideration is:

“Whether the petitioner/Accused is entitled for grant of bail as prayed for?”

P O I N T-

8. Perused the record i.e., the contents of FIR, remand report together with

Case diary Part I. The learned counsel for the Petitioner/Accused submits that the petitioner has not committed any offence and he is falsely implicated in this case.

He further submits that most of the investigation in this case completed and the 4 petitioner is ready and willing to furnish sufficient sureties for his release on bail and orally undertakes to cooperate with the investigation without causing any hurdles. As seen from the record, the Petitioner/Accused is in Jail since 21.03.2026. As can be seen from the record, charge sheet was filed in this case for the offences under sections 78(1)(i), 137(2) of BNS, section 12 read with 11 of

POCSO Act, 2012 and Section 9 of Child Marriage Restraint Act, 1929. The alleged offences are not punishable with death sentence or life imprisonment. So by considering the representation of the learned counsel for the petitioner and the remand period of the petitioner/accused and in view of the circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant bail to the petitioner / accused on certain conditions.

Accordingly, the point is answered.

9.In the result, the petition is allowed, and the petitioner/ Accused is ordered to be released on bail, on his executing a bond for Rs.20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand only) with two sureties, for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the

Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Bapatla.

Typed to my dictation by the Stenographer, corrected and pronounced by me on this the 17th day of April, 2026.

XI Addl.Dist.&Sessions Judge, Tenali FAC Special Judge for POCSO Act cases Tenali. Copy to The S.H.O., Bapatla Rural P.S. Sri S. Ravindra Babu, Advocate for the petitioner/ Accused. The Additional Junior Civil Judge, Bapatla.

CRLMP.BAIL/84/2026

Pamidipati Prem Kumar alias Prem alias Chinni vs State Sub-Divisional Police Officer,Tenali

06 May 2026

IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL JUDGE FOR TRIAL OF OFFENCES UNDER

THE PROTECTION OF CHILDREN FROM SEXUAL OFFENCES ACT

(POCSO ACT), TENALI.

Present :: Smt. M. Indira Priyadarshini,

Spl.Judge, POCSO Court, Tenali

Wednesday, this the 06 th day of May, 2026.

CRL.M.P.No.84 of 2026 in Cr.No:293/2025 of Tenali III Town P.S.

Between: Pamidipati Prem Kumar @ Prem @ Chinni, S/o late Babu Rao, 23 years, near RCM Church, Bonthapadu village, Guntur Rural Mandal, Guntur District. …. Petitioner/ Accused

and

The State:Sub-Divisional Police Officer,

Tenali. ...Respondent/complainant

This petition came before me on this day for final hearing on 05.05.2026 in the presence of Sri A. Srinivasa Sai, Advocate for the petitioner/Accused andtheLearnedSpecialPublicProsecutorforthe State/Respondent/Complainant and upon perusing the material available on record, this Court made the following:

O R D E R

This is an application filed by the Petitioner/Accused under Section 480 and 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhitha praying the court to enlarge him on bail in Cr.No.293/2025 for the offences punishable under Section 64(2)

(m), 127(4) of BNS and section 6 read with 5(l) of POCSO Act, 2012 of Tenali

III town P.S..

2.Notice given to the Learned Special Public Prosecutor as well as to the victim.

3. The averments in the petition in brief is that, the victim girl aged 17 years studying II year intermediate MPC Group in NRI college, Tenali and 8 months before when the victim attended marriage function in Kancharlapalem village, accused also attended that marriage and thereafter they used to talk frequently and fell in love each other and on 15.12.2025 accused asked the victim girl to come to Kativaram village, on that victim informed her mother that 2 she is going to college, but went to Kativaram village met the accused and on that accused with his deceitful words took the victim to Gunadala Church and forcibly kept black bead chain in the neck of victim saying that he loves her and later took the victim to Guntur and at Railway station took room in Darshan lodge, Guntur and again took the victim to Vijayawada sold the gold ring for

Rs.25,000/-. Thereafter accused and victim went to Chennai and Nagapatnam

Church and both of them returned to Guntur on 18.12.2025 and accused took a room in Iswarya Grand Lodge and stayed in that room and at that time accused forcibly committed penetrative sexual assault against the victim girl and accused sold the silver anklets of the victim for Rs.15,000/- and confined her in that room nor alleged her phone calls to her family members On 20.12.2025 accused took a room for rent in 8th line Nallacheruvu, Guntur stayed there.

Initially basing on the report of mother of victim on 15.12.2025 a case in

Cr.No:293/2025 registered under the head of ‘ girl missing’. On 20.01.2026 victim was traced and her statement was recorded. Basing on her statement the section of law in this case was altered to Section 64(2)(m), 127(4) of BNS,

Section 6 read with 5(l) of POCSO Act, 2102 investigated into. On 25.01.2026 accused was arrested by the respondent police and produced before the

Honourable court for Judicial remand and he was detained in District Jail,

Guntur.

The averments of the bail petition mainly is that the allegations leveled against the petitioner/accused are false, he is innocent and he is no way connected with the alleged offence and that the substantial part of investigation is completed, all the material witnesses were examined, charge sheet also filed and that he is having fixed abode at Bonthapadu village and he is ready and willing to comply with any conditions imposed by the Honourable court and he is having sufficient solvent sureties for his release on bail. Further the family members of the petitioner/accused are depending upon him for daily needs and there are no ingredients which attract the accused section in FIR, remand part and finally he prayed the Honourable Court to enlarge the petitioner/Accused on bail.

4. The learned Special Public Prosecutor fairly conceded across the bench that the investigation is completed, charge sheet also filed and left to the discretion of the Honourable court.

5. Heard on both sides. Perused the record.

6. The Point for consideration is:

“Whether the petitioner/Accused is entitled for grant of bail

as prayed for?”

P O I N T-

i) It is argued by the learned counsel for the petitioner/Accused that the allegations levelled against the petitioner/accused false, he is innocent and he is no way connected with the alleged offence and that substantial part of investigation is completed, all the material witnesses were examined, charge sheet also filed and that the petitioner/Accused is having fixed abode at

Bonthapadu village and he is ready and willing to comply with any conditions imposed by the Honourable court and that he is having sufficient solvent sureties for his release on bail. Hence, prayed to enlarge the petitioner/accused on bail.

ii). The learned Special Public Prosecutor fairly conceded across the bench that the investigation in this is completed and charge sheet also filed.

Iii) Perused the record i.e., the FIR, remand report together with the case diary part-1. As could be seen from the records the charge sheet is filed. It seems that the investigation is completed and the petitioner/Accused is no longer required in jail. Considering the circumstances of the case, since the investigation is completed moreover charge sheet also filed in this case, this court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner/Accused upon imposing certain conditions. Accordingly, the point is answered.

7. In the result, the petition is allowed, and the petitioner/ Accused ordered to be released on bail, on his executing his personal bond for Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty thousand only) with two sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned I Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Tenali.

Typed to my dictation by the Stenographer, corrected and pronounced by me on this the 06th day of May, 2026.

Special Judge for POCSO Act cases

Tenali.

Copy to The S.H.O., Tenali III town P.S. Sri A. Srinivasa Sai, Advocate for the petitioner/accused The I Additional Judicial Magistrate of I Class, Tenali.

CRLMP.BAIL/86/2026

Angadi Sai Kumar vs The State Inspector of Police,Bapatla Rural Circle

07 May 2026

IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL JUDGE FOR TRIAL OF OFFENCES UNDER THE

PROTECTION OF CHILDREN FROM SEXUAL OFFENCES ACT (POCSO ACT),

TENALI.

Present :: Smt. M. Indira Priyadarsini,

Spl.Judge, POCSO Court, Tenali

Thursday, this the 07 th day of May, 2026.

CRL.M.P.No.86 of 2026

in

S.C.No:08/2024

Between: Angadi Sai Kumar S/o Ramesh, 19 years, resident of Stuvartpuram, Bapatla Mandal and District. …. Petitioner/ Accused

and

The State, Inspector of Police, Bapatla Rural Circle.

...Respondent/complainant

This petition came before me on this day for hearing and consideration in the presence of Sri. K. Koteswara Rao, advocate for the petitioner/Accused and of Learned Spl. Additional Public Prosecutor for the State/Respondent/Complainant and upon perusing the material available on record, this Court made the following:

O R D E R

This is the bail application filed by the Petitioner/Accused under Sections 448 and 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhitha praying the court to enlarge him on bail in

SC No:08/2024 connected with Cr.No.09/2017 for the offences punishable under

Sections 366-A, 376, 109 of IPC and Section 4 of POCSO Act, 2012 of Vedullapalli

Police Station.

2.Notice given to the Learned Spl. Additional Public Prosecutor, who did not choose to file counter.

3.In brief, the averments of the Bail Application are that:

The Respondent/Complainant arrested the Petitioner/Accused (A1) for the offences punishable under sections 366-A, 376, 109 of IPC and Section 4 of POCSO Act, 2012.

As the Accused No:1 absconded, this POCSO Court, Tenali issued NBW against the petitioner/Accused No:1 on 22.09.2024 and the case was split up and renumbered as SC

No:08/2024. Since, then NBW pending against the petitioner/Accused No:1 and later he was produced before this Honourable court on execution of PT warrant and he was in

Judicial Custody from 08.10.2025. Hence, this bail Application.

It is further averred by the Learned counsel for the petitioner/Accused No:1 that the petitioner/Accused No:1 is innocent of the alleged offences much less the allegations levelled against him and he did not commit any other offence. The FIR is belated and concocted one and the ingredients of remand report does not attract to the prosecution case and the respondent/police arrested the Accused No:1 for statistical purpose, the petitioner/Accused No:1 is law abiding citizen and hails from the respectable family without any bad remarks from him and he is Judicial custody since 08.10.2025 and he undertakes that he will be appeared before the trial Court for each and every adjournment without fail and that the petitioner/Accused No:1 is ready and willing to comply the conditions if any imposed by this Honourable Court while granting bail to him and hence, prayed to allow the bail application.

05. The learned Special Public Prosecutor did not choose to oppose the bail application.

06.The Point for consideration is:

“Whether the petitioner/Accused No:1 is entitled for grant of bail as prayed for?”

P O I N T-

07. On hearing both counsel arguments and upon perusal of the records, the matter is posted for arguments. It is the contention of the petitioner/Accused No.1, that he is having no previous criminal history of this type of offences and he was produced before the Honourable court on execution of PT warrant and bail was granted in that case and 3 there is no wilful negligence on his part in not attending before the court and that he is ready to furnish sufficient sureties for his release on bail. The learned Special Public

Prosecutor did not choose to oppose the bail application. Considering the above all circumstances, since there is no investigation is pending against the accused, this court is inclined to allow this petition on certain conditions. Accordingly, the point is answered.

08. In the result, the petition is allowed.

1) The petitioner/Accused shall be released on bail upon execution of his personal bond for Rs.10,000/- with two fresh sureties for like sum each to the satisfaction of this court.

2) On his release the petitioner/Accused shall attend before the court for each and every adjournment without fail.

Typed to my dictation by the Stenographer, corrected and pronounced by me on this the 07th day of May, 2026.

Special Judge for POCSO Act cases

Tenali.

Copy to The S.H.O., Vedullapalli P.S. Sri K. Koteswara Rao, Advocate for the petitioner/Accused No.1.

4 // true copy // // B.O.C.//

C.A.O., POCSO COURT, Tenali

CRLMP.BAIL/85/2026

Velpula Avinash vs Sub Divisional Police Officer, Tenali

06 May 2026

IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL JUDGE FOR TRIAL OF OFFENCES UNDER

THE PROTECTION OF CHILDREN FROM SEXUAL OFFENCES ACT (POCSO

ACT), TENALI.

Present :: Smt. M. Indira Priyadarshini,

Spl.Judge, POCSO Court, Tenali

Wednesday, this the 06 th day of May, 2026.

CRL.M.P.No.85 of 2026 in SC.No.43/2025

Between: Velpula Avinash S/o Borraiah, 19 years, Door No:17-103/1, Mylavaram village and mandal, Krishna District. …. Petitioner/ Accused

and

The State : Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Tenali.

...Respondent/complainant

This petition came before me on 07.04.2026 for hearing in the presence of Sri M. Ananda Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner/Accused and the Learned Special Public Prosecutor for the State/Respondent/Complainant and upon perusing the material available on record, this Court made the following:

O R D E R

This is an application filed by the Petitioner/Accused under Section 447 & 439 of Cr.P.C. read with 480 and 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhitha praying the court to enlarge him on bail in SC.No.43/2025 connected in Cr.No.73/2025 for the offences punishable under Sections 64(2)(m), 64(1) of BNS and section 6 of POCSO Act of Tenali I town P.S..

2.Notice given to the Learned Special Public Prosecutor.

3. The averments in the petition in brief is that, the Honourable Court granted bail to the petitioner/Accused on 23.04.2025 and after enlarging him on bail, he attended the Honourable court on each and every adjournment. When the matter is posted on 16.01.2026 on that day the petitioner/Accused suffered with viral fever and as such he could not attend before the Honourable court and this Honourable court issued NBW against the petitioner/Accused. The respondent/Complainant arrested the petitioner/Accused and produced him before the Honourable court on 01.04.2026 and the Honourable Court remanded him into Judicial Custody. The learned counsel for the Petitioner/Accused submitted that the FIR in this case is belated and concocted, there is no cohabitation taken place in between the minor girl and the petitioner/Accused and investigation in this case is completed and charge sheet also filed. So, the question of tampering and threatening of witnesses does not arise. There are no prior cases pending against the petitioner/Accused. The petitioner/Accused is permanent resident of Mylavaram 2 village & mandal, Krishna District, the Petitioner/Accused is law abiding law citizen and he will abide by the conditions imposed by the Honourable if any imposed, the petitioner/Accused is in Jail for the last 34 days and he is prepared to furnish sufficient sureties to the satisfaction of this Honourable court and finally he prayed to enlarge the Accused on bail.

4.Heard both sides.

5.The learned Special Public Prosecutor reported no counter and left to the discretion of the Honourable court.

6. The Point for consideration is:

“Whether the petitioner/Accused is entitled for grant of bail as

prayed for?”

P O I N T-

7.On hearing both counsel arguments and upon perusal of the records, the matter is posted for hearing on charges. It is the contention of the petitioner/Accused, that he is having no previous criminal history of this type of offences and due to viral fever he could not attend before this Honourable court on the given date of adjournment and there is no wilful negligence on his part in not attending before the court and that he is ready to furnish sufficient sureties for his release on bail. The learned Special Public Prosecutor did not choose to oppose the bail application. Considering the above all circumstances, since there is no investigation is pending against the accused, this court is inclined to allow this petition on certain conditions. Accordingly, the point is answered.

08. In the result, the petition is allowed.

1) The petitioner/Accused shall be released on bail upon execution of his personal bond for Rs.10,000/- with two sureties for like sum each to the satisfaction of this court.

2) On his release the petitioner/Accused shall attend before the court for each and every adjournment without fail. Typed to my dictation by the Stenographer, corrected and pronounced by me on this the 06th day of May, 2026.

Special Judge for POCSO Act cases

Tenali.

Copy to The S.H.O., Tenali I town P.S. Sri R. Daya Kiran, Advocate for the petitioner/accused

SC/200008/2025

The Sub Divisional Police Officer, Bapatla. vs Badugu Lakshmi Pavan Kumar, Pavan Kumar

06 May 2026

Order Record 291 total

Case No.	Parties	Date	Type	Outcome
CRLMP.BAIL/86/2026	Angadi Sai Kumar vs The State Inspector of Police,Bapatla Rural Circle	07 May 2026	Order	—
SC/200008/2025	The Sub Divisional Police Officer, Bapatla. vs Badugu Lakshmi Pavan Kumar, Pavan Kumar	06 May 2026	Judgement	—
CRLMP.BAIL/84/2026	Pamidipati Prem Kumar alias Prem alias Chinni vs State Sub-Divisional Police Officer,Tenali	06 May 2026	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/85/2026	Velpula Avinash vs Sub Divisional Police Officer, Tenali	06 May 2026	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/65/2026	Doki Yelamanda Reddy vs The State, SHO, Bapatla Rural P.S.	18 Apr 2026	Order	—
SC/200062/2023	Sub Divisional Police Officer, Tenali Sub Division, Tenali vs Nuthalapati Naveen Kumar @ Nani	09 Apr 2026	Judgement	—
CRLMP.BAIL/62/2026	Mullamudi Surendra vs The Station House Officer, Tenali Rural P.S.	01 Apr 2026	Order	—
SC/200052/2025	The Sub Inspector of Police, Chandolu P.S vs Perumani Srinu Babu Reddy alias Kanna	25 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
SC/200034/2025	Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Bapatla vs Dokka Ramesh alias Vamsi and another	20 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
SC/200048/2025	Sub-Inspector of Police, Duggirala P.S. vs Malavath Kalyan Kumar Nayak	12 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
CRLMP.BAIL/42/2026	Jetipati Siva Nageswara Rao vs The State S.H.O.Tenali II Town P.S.	12 Mar 2026	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/30/2026	Pamidipati Prem Kumar alias Prem alias Chinni vs State sub-Divisional Police Officer, Tenali	06 Mar 2026	Order	—
SC/200104/2023	Sub Divisional Police Officer, Tenali Sub Division vs Pelleti Bangarayya	05 Mar 2026	Judgement	—
SC/200042/2025	The Sub Divisional Police Officer, Bapatla. vs Savanasm Venkata Subba Reddy alias Subba Reddy	27 Feb 2026	Judgement	—
SC/200240/2023	Sub Divisional Police officer, Bapatla. vs Manchala Srikanth, Bannu	27 Feb 2026	Judgement	—
SC/200047/2025	Sub-Inspector of Police, Bapatla P.S vs Guntagani Pradeep Kumar alias Joseph	26 Feb 2026	Judgement	—
SC/200231/2023	Inspector of Police, Bapatla Town P.S. vs Bommisetty Rama Satya Sridhar, Sridhar	26 Feb 2026	Judgement	—
SC/200009/2025	The Sub Inspector of Police, Tenali III Town P.S. vs Pathan Khasim	24 Feb 2026	Judgement	—
SC/124/2023	Sub Divisional Police Officer, Repalle. vs Thanneru Anilkumar	23 Feb 2026	Judgement	—
SC/200022/2025	The Sub Inspector of Police, Bapatla Rural P.S. vs Mopidevi Durga Ajay alias Peetha Ajay and 2 others	20 Feb 2026	Judgement	—
CRLMP.BAIL/20/2026	Jetipati Siva Nageswararao vs INSPECTOR OF POLICE TENALI II TOWN PS	20 Feb 2026	Order	—
SC/200024/2025	The Sub Divisional Police Officer, Bapatla vs Nakka Radha	19 Feb 2026	Judgement	—
SC/200012/2024	The Sub Inspector of Police, Vemuru P.S. vs Dasari Phani	18 Feb 2026	Judgement	—
CRLMP.BAIL/31/2026	Tatapudi Jyothi (A6) vs The State Inspector of Police,Tenali I Town P.S.	18 Feb 2026	Order	—
SC/200170/2023	Sub Inspector of Police, Karlapalem P.S vs Vari Srinivasa Reddy	17 Feb 2026	Judgement	—
SC/200149/2023	Inspector of Police, Bapatla Rural Circle, Bapatla District. vs Macha Ayyappa Reddy	11 Feb 2026	Judgement	—
SC/200060/2025	The Sub Divisional Police Officer, Tenali. vs Bethapudi Nageswara Rao	10 Feb 2026	Judgement	—
SC/200058/2025	State Sub-Inspector of Police, Duggirala P.S. vs Kancharla Ravi Kumar	04 Feb 2026	Judgement	—
SC/200039/2025	The Sub Inspector of Police, Tenali I Town P.S vs Shaik Bara Shaheed alias Bari	30 Jan 2026	Judgement	—
SC/200049/2025	Sub-Inspector of Police, Duggirala P.S. vs Gudipalli Sankar	28 Jan 2026	Judgement	—
SC/200220/2023	Sub Divisional Police Officer, Bapatla. vs Tanniru, Thanneru Venkatesh	27 Jan 2026	Judgement	—
SC/200080/2023	SHO Tenali II Town PS vs Balla Koteswara Rao @ Koti	23 Jan 2026	Judgement	—
CRLMP.BAIL/4/2026	Keethi Durgarao vs Inspector of Police, Tenali Rural P.S.,Guntur District.	09 Jan 2026	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/343/2025	Mallidi Venkata Punyavathy alias Punyavathi(A4) vs The State Inspector of Police, Tenali I Town P.S.	08 Jan 2026	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/344/2025	Tatapudi Gopi (A5) vs The State rep. by Inspector of Police ,Tenali I Town P.S.	08 Jan 2026	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/346/2025	Podili Siva Nagaraju alias Raju vs The Inspector of Police, Tenali I Town P.S	08 Jan 2026	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/350/2025	Chavali Hymavathi (A1) vs The Inspector of Police, Tenali I Town P.S.	08 Jan 2026	Order	—
SC/200020/2025	The Sub Inspector of Police, Bapatla Town P.S vs Mikkili China Babu, chintutalli	07 Jan 2026	Judgement	—
SC/200221/2023	Sub Divisional Police Officer, Bapatla. vs Kokkiligadda, Kokiligadda Anilkumar Anil	07 Jan 2026	Judgement	—
SC/200183/2023	Sub Inspector of Police, Tsuduru P.S., Bapatla District. vs Gummadi Suresh	30 Dec 2025	Judgement	—
SC/200206/2023	Sub Inspector of Police, Tenali III Town P.S. vs Thammisetty Vinay	30 Dec 2025	Judgement	—
SC/200018/2025	The Sub Inspector of Police, Duggirala P.S vs Myla Sarath Kumar, Sarath	29 Dec 2025	Judgement	—
SC/200043/2023	SDPO, Bapatla vs Latchi Naga Babu	29 Dec 2025	Judgement	—
SC/200116/2023	Sub Inspector Of Police, Vedullapalli P.S vs Kunchala Vasu	29 Dec 2025	Judgement	—
SC/200200/2023	Sub Divisional Police Officer, Bapatla. vs Sareti Mohana Krishna Krishna	23 Dec 2025	Judgement	—
CRLMP.BAIL/332/2025	Yemineni Rakesh vs The State S.H.O., Kollipara P.S.	23 Dec 2025	Order	—
SC/200002/2024	Sub Inspector of Police, Cherukupalli P.S, Bapatla Discrict. vs Doma Thirupatha Reddy	19 Dec 2025	Judgement	—
SC/200004/2025	Inspector of Police, Bapatla Town P.S. vs Gorremutchu John Vilson	19 Dec 2025	Judgement	—
CRLMP.BAIL/329/2025	Madili Venkata Punyavathy alias Punyavathi (A4) vs The State Inspector of Police,Tenali I Town P.S.	19 Dec 2025	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/333/2025	Chavali Hymavathi vs The State Station House Officer, Tenali I Town P.S.	19 Dec 2025	Order	—
SC/200006/2025	The Sub Divisional Police Officer, Tenali Sub Division, Guntur district. vs Thumati Bujji	18 Dec 2025	Judgement	—
CRLMP.BAIL/324/2025	Keerthi Durga Rao vs The Sub Inspector of Police, Tenali Rural P.S	18 Dec 2025	Order	—
SC/200001/2025	The Inspector of Police, Tenali II Town P.S vs Yedla Ratna Babu	16 Dec 2025	Judgement	—
SC/200068/2023	Superintendent of Police, DISHA Women P.S. Guntur Rural Distict vs Nallamalam Gopi	15 Dec 2025	Judgement	—
SC/200006/2024	Sub Divisional Police Officer, South Sub Division, Guntur District. vs Seelam Rohith	11 Dec 2025	Judgement	—
SC/200130/2023	Sub Divisional Police Officer, Bapatla. vs Ambati Mariyababu	09 Dec 2025	Judgement	—
SC/200089/2023	The Sub Division Police Office, Tenali Sub Division, kolluru PS, Tenali vs Kommu Prasanth	05 Dec 2025	Judgement	—
CRLMP.BAIL/293/2025	Yemineni Rakesh vs The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Tenali	04 Dec 2025	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/324/2025	Keerthi Durga Rao vs The Sub Inspector of Police, Tenali Rural P.S	04 Dec 2025	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/291/2025	Thalavarsa Vijay Babu alias Apanu vs The State Station House officer, Tenali III Town P.S.	03 Dec 2025	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/286/2025	Chavali Hymavathi vs The State Inspector of Police, Tenali I Town P.S.	02 Dec 2025	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/305/2025	Madili Venkata Punyavathy vs The Inspector of Police, Tenali I Town P.S	02 Dec 2025	Order	—
SC/200012/2025	The Sub Inspector of Police, Tenali III Town P.S vs Mathangi Bharath, Surya	28 Nov 2025	Judgement	—
SC/200035/2025	The Sub Divisional Police Officer, Repalle. vs Uppala Vamsee Krishna	28 Nov 2025	Judgement	—
SC/200015/2024	Sub Divisional Police officer, Bapatla. vs Immedisetty Srinivasa Rao	27 Nov 2025	Judgement	—
SC/200168/2023	Sub Divisional Police Officer, Bapatla. vs Kamala Dayarathnam @ Daya	27 Nov 2025	Judgement	—
CRLMP.BAIL/292/2025	Kaluvakollu Gopaiah alias Gopi vs Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Tenali	27 Nov 2025	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/293/2025	Yemineni Rakesh vs The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Tenali	27 Nov 2025	Order	—
SC/200014/2024	Sub Divisional Police Officer, Bapatla. vs Katta Yohan, Ashok, DJ	25 Nov 2025	Judgement	—
SC/200070/2023	Superntendent of Police, DISHA Women P.S, Guntur Rural, Narasaraopet. vs Billa David Raju	21 Nov 2025	Judgement	—
SC/200201/2023	Sub Divisional Police Officer, Bapatla. vs Nuthi Ashok Babu Ashok	19 Nov 2025	Judgement	—
SC/200026/2025	The Sub Divisional Police Officer, Tenali vs Shaik Rahamtulla alias Mehdulla	13 Nov 2025	Judgement	—
SC/200065/2023	State Represented by the Deputy Supdt. of Police, SC and ST Cell, Guntur (R) Dist. vs Vari Sivaramakrishna Reddy	06 Nov 2025	Judgement	—
SC/200034/2023	SHO, Tsunduru PS vs Sajja Ramu @ Ram Sai	31 Oct 2025	Order	—
SC/200229/2023	Sub Inspector of Police, Pedanandipadu P.S. vs Tamalapakula Kartheek	29 Oct 2025	Judgement	—
SC/200017/2023	SHO, Repalle Town PS vs Puli Jagadesh	27 Oct 2025	Judgement	—
SC/200182/2023	Sub Divisional Police Officer, Repalle, Bapatla District. vs Mannava Udaykumar	27 Oct 2025	Judgement	—
SC/200153/2023	Sub Divisional Police Offiecer, Bapatla. vs Mopidevi Sivakumar @ Babi	24 Oct 2025	Judgement	—
SC/200003/2024	Inspector of Police, Tenali I Town P.S vs Madapati Sai Kumar @ Baba	18 Oct 2025	Judgement	—
SC/200148/2023	Sub Divisional Police Officer, Bapatla. vs A. Sakthi Velu	18 Oct 2025	Judgement	—
SC/200222/2023	Sub Divisional Police Officer, Repalle Sub Division, Repalle. vs Velu Srikanth	17 Oct 2025	Judgement	—
SC/200203/2023	Sub Inspector of Police, Cherukupalli P.S. vs Donthiboina Brahmareddy	16 Oct 2025	Judgement	—
CRLMP.BAIL/256/2025	Sikha Raviteja vs The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Mahila Police Station, Guntur	13 Oct 2025	Order	—
CRLMP.BAIL/262/2025	Nannepamula Ravindra vs The S.H.O. Repalle P.S.	10 Oct 2025	Order	—
SC/200014/2025	The Sub Inspector of Police, Tenali Rural P.S vs Madasu Peda Pitchaiah, Pitchaiah	09 Oct 2025	Judgement	—
SC/200119/2023	Sub Inspector of Police, Nagaram P.S vs Gurram Gudarankaiah	07 Oct 2025	Judgement	—
SC/200097/2023	Sub Inspector Of Police, Nagaram PS vs Mogalturu Srinivasa Rao	06 Oct 2025	Judgement	—
CRLMP.BAIL/237/2025	Eesa Gopala Krishna vs The SHO Pedanandipadu P.S	24 Sep 2025	Order	—
SC/13/2023	SHO, Tenali III Town PS vs Shaik Rehman	12 Sep 2025	Judgement	—
SC/200118/2023	Inspector Of Police, Bapatla Rural Circle, Guntur Rural District. vs Gudipudi Nagaraju	12 Sep 2025	Judgement	—
SC/200147/2023	Sub Divisional Police Officer, Bapatla. vs Pothupogu Vamsi @ Boyaz	11 Sep 2025	Judgement	—
SC/200194/2023	The Sub Divisional Police Officer, Bapatla. vs Vallepu Ramakrishna	11 Sep 2025	Judgement	—
SC/200127/2023	Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Bapatla. vs Katta Dinesh	10 Sep 2025	Judgement	—
SC/200030/2025	The Sub Divisional Police Officer, Repalle. vs Vallabhaneni Venkateswara Rao	08 Sep 2025	Judgement	—
SC/200082/2023	Sub Division Police Officer, Bapatla vs Dakkumalla Dilip	04 Sep 2025	Judgement	—
CRLMP.BAIL/243/2025	Vari Srinivasa Reddy vs The SHO, Karlapalem P.S	04 Sep 2025	Order	—
SC/200144/2023	Sub Divisional Police Officer, Bapatla. vs Gummadi Gopi Reddy @ Gopi	02 Sep 2025	Judgement	—
SC/200084/2023	Supdt. Of Police, DISHA Women PS, Guntur Rural DIST. Narasaraopet. vs Devarakonda Yeliah	01 Sep 2025	Judgement	—
CRLMP.BAIL/232/2025	Yatham Vidya Sagar vs The Sub Inspector of Police, Bapatla Rural P.S.	01 Sep 2025	Order	—
SC/200003/2025	The Sub Divisional Police Officer, Bapatla. vs Gotti Tirupathi Reddy	28 Aug 2025	Judgement	—

Showing 100 of 291 orders — Log in to browse all pages.

Monthly Orders (Last 12 Months)

May 2026		4
Apr 2026		3
Mar 2026		6
Feb 2026		15
Jan 2026		11
Dec 2025		23
Nov 2025		11
Oct 2025		14
Sep 2025		12
Aug 2025		10
Jul 2025		27
Jun 2025		22

Frequently Asked Questions

How many cases has Smt. M. INDIRA PRIAYADARSINI handled?

Smt. M. INDIRA PRIAYADARSINI has handled 293 court orders since 2024 at XI Addl. District Court (FTC), Tenali (Taluka). The average disposal rate is 16 orders per month.

What types of cases does Smt. M. INDIRA PRIAYADARSINI hear?

Based on available records, Smt. M. INDIRA PRIAYADARSINI primarily handles Criminal matters (Sessions Cases, CRL) at XI Addl. District Court (FTC), Tenali (Taluka).

Where is Smt. M. INDIRA PRIAYADARSINI currently posted?

Smt. M. INDIRA PRIAYADARSINI is posted as POCSO COURT, TENALI at XI Addl. District Court (FTC), Tenali (Taluka), Guntur, Andhra Pradesh.

Are judgments by Smt. M. INDIRA PRIAYADARSINI available online?

Yes. 5 judgments by Smt. M. INDIRA PRIAYADARSINI are available on Legistro with full text, outcome, and sections cited.

How fast does Smt. M. INDIRA PRIAYADARSINI dispose cases?

Smt. M. INDIRA PRIAYADARSINI disposes approximately 16 cases per month, based on 293 orders handled over their tenure at XI Addl. District Court (FTC), Tenali (Taluka).

Since when is Smt. M. INDIRA PRIAYADARSINI serving?

Smt. M. INDIRA PRIAYADARSINI has been serving at XI Addl. District Court (FTC), Tenali (Taluka) since 2024. and is currently posted there.

Case Types

SC 64%

CRLMP 35%

CRL 1%

Posting History

Nov 2024 — Present

POCSO COURT, TENALI · 293 orders

Other Judges at this Court

D Srinivasulu

XI Addl. District Sessions Judge

1,043 orders

S.Venkateswara Reddy

Prl. Senior Civil Judge

0 orders

Shaik Abdul Shariff B.com, B.l.

Addl. Senior Civil Judge

314 orders

Pavan Kumar Aka

Prl. Junior Civil Judge, Tenali

1,453 orders

P. Vivek Vardhan

I Addl. Junior Civil Judge, Tenali

61 orders

Ch Pavan Kumar

II Addl. Junior Civil Judge.

0 orders

← View all judges at XI Addl. District Court (FTC), Tenali (Taluka)

Smt. M. Indira Priayadarsini

PROTECTION OF CHILDREN FROM SEXUAL OFFENCES ACT (POCSO ACT),

TENALI.

XI Addl.Dist.&Sessions (FTC) Judge Tenali

FAC Spl.Judge, POCSO Court, Tenali

Saturday, this the 17 th day of April, 2026.

Crime No.35 of 2026 of Bapatla Rural Police Station.

O R D E R

P O I N T-

IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL JUDGE FOR TRIAL OF OFFENCES UNDER

THE PROTECTION OF CHILDREN FROM SEXUAL OFFENCES ACT

(POCSO ACT), TENALI.

Spl.Judge, POCSO Court, Tenali

Wednesday, this the 06 th day of May, 2026.

O R D E R

“Whether the petitioner/Accused is entitled for grant of bail

P O I N T-

Tenali.

PROTECTION OF CHILDREN FROM SEXUAL OFFENCES ACT (POCSO ACT),

TENALI.

Spl.Judge, POCSO Court, Tenali

Thursday, this the 07 th day of May, 2026.

in

S.C.No:08/2024

O R D E R

P O I N T-

Tenali.

IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL JUDGE FOR TRIAL OF OFFENCES UNDER

THE PROTECTION OF CHILDREN FROM SEXUAL OFFENCES ACT (POCSO

ACT), TENALI.

Spl.Judge, POCSO Court, Tenali

Wednesday, this the 06 th day of May, 2026.

O R D E R

“Whether the petitioner/Accused is entitled for grant of bail as

P O I N T-

Tenali.

IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL JUDGE FOR TRIAL OF OFFENCES

UNDER THE PROTECTION OF CHILDREN FROM SEXUAL

OFFENCES ACT (POCSO ACT), TENALI.

J U D G M E N T

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE