Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE (SENIOR DIVISION)
X Addl District Court Anakapalle · Visakapatnam · Andhra Pradesh
Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao, PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE (SENIOR DIVISION), is posted at X Addl District Court Anakapalle, Visakapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India. 32 court orders on record since 2017. 5 judgments with full text available. Primarily handles OS, EP, SC cases.
Featured Judgments
In the Court of :Prl Senior Civil Judge
Case No. :EP/0000006/2016 Alla Nooka Appa Rao Vs I.Raju
Date : 20-06-2017
Business: Batta not paid.DHR called absent. No representation . Hence this E.P.is dismissed for default without costs. Nature of Disposal: DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT Disposal Date: 20-06-2017 Prl Senior Civil Judge
In the Court of :Prl Senior Civil Judge
Case No. :S.O.P/0000326/2012 Koyikala Varalakshmi Vs Nil
Date : 20-03-2018
Business: PW1 called absent No further evidence is filed No representation hence the matter is dismissed for default. Nature of Disposal: DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT Disposal Date: 20-03-2018 Prl Senior Civil Judge
In the Court of :Prl Senior Civil Judge
Case No. :H.M.O.P/0000018/2016 Gudepu Manikyala Rao Vs --
Date : 18-09-2017
Business: PW1 and PW2 called present. A memo filed by the counsel
for petitioner stating PW1 and PW2 lived together and the
petitioner is not pressing this petition. Heard . Memo is recorded. This petition is dismissed as not pressed. Nature of Disposal: DISMISSED AS NOT PRESSED
In the Court of :Prl Senior Civil Judge
Case No. :OS/0000237/2013 Kollimalla Apparao Vs Bagidi Appa Rao
Date : 23-01-2018
Business: Costs not paid. PW.1 called absent No representation for the plaintiff side hence the suit is dismissed for default.
IA218/2016 As the main suit is dismissed for default this IA
is also dismissed for default. Nature of Disposal: DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT Disposal Date: 23-01-2018 Prl Senior Civil Judge
In the Court of :Prl Senior Civil Judge
Case No. :IP/0000003/2016 Seeram Rama Krishna Vs Karri Bangarunaidu
Date : 27-04-2017
Business: In the result, the petition is allowed by adjudicating the petitioner as insolvent. Six months time is granted for discharge. Nature of Disposal: ALLOWED Disposal Date: 27-04-2017 Prl Senior Civil Judge
In the Court of :Prl Senior Civil Judge
Case No. :OS/0000168/2015 Gorli Appa Rao Vs Bokam Sreenu
Date : 09-09-2017
Business: Both parties are called present.and filed terms of compromise. Terms of compromise read over and explained to them in Telugu and admitted by them to be correct and accordingly terms are recorded. Award is passed (Vide separate Award) by incorporating the terms of compromise. Nature of Disposal: SETTLED BEFORE LOK ADALAT Disposal Date: 09-09-2017 Prl Senior Civil Judge
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Wednesday, this the 22nd day of November, 2017
HMOP.NO.03/2014
Between: Payala Jyothi, W/o Srilnivasu, C/o. Palli Rajeswara Rao, Hindu, age 24 years, House holdl dutiles, residing at 4-15. Ummalada village, Munagapaka Mandal,l Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner And: Payala Srilnivasu, S/o Rajeswara Rao, age 35 yealrs, Residing at Door No.3-4- 26/1, Telephone Exchange street, Narasingaraopeta, Anakapalle, Visakhapatnam District. Respondent This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of SriK.Chandra Sekhar,K.Gangadhararao, Advocates for petitioner and of Sri V.Rajasekhar, Advocate for Respondent. Both parties called present.Petitioner filed memo not pressing this petition in view of the compromise arrived between the parties before the elders. Memo is recoraded and this Court delivered the following:
ORDER
Petition filed under Sec.9 of Hindu marriage Act. This is a petition filed by the petitioner-wife against the respondent-Husband to directing the respondent to come to the house of the petitioner and live with him for discharging her conjugal obligations and for costs of the petition. Both parties called present. Petitioner filed memo not pressing this petition inveiw of the compromise arrived between the parties before the elders. Heard. Memo is recorded. Accordingly this petition is dismissed without costs as not pressed.
Pronounced by me in open court, thisthe 22nd day of November, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Tuesday, this the 24 th day of October, 2017
HMOP.NO.49/2013
Between: Alla Swarulpa @ Varaha Lalitha Sawarupa,W/o Rama Chandra Prasad, Hindu, age 19 years, Household duties, residing at Door No.19-4-17, Buddha Prakasa Rao Naidu gari street, Gavarapalem, Anakapalle. Petitioner And: Alla Rama Chandra Prasad, S/o China Apparao, Hindu, age 30 years, physically handicapped, residing at Door No.50-83-10, Madhura Nagar, Visakhapatnam- 16. Respondent This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of SriBuddha Thrinadha Rao, Advocate for petitioner and of Sri K.Chandra Sekhar, Advocate for Respondent. Both parties called absent.No representation. Hence the matter is dismissed for default and this Court delivered the following:
ORDER
Petition filed under Sec.11 of Hindu marriage Act. This is a petition filed by the petitioner against the respondent for dissolution of the marriage in between the petitioner and respondent performed on 13.02.2013 due to non consummation of marriage as null and void and for costs of the petition. Both parties calasled absent. No representation on either side .Hence the matter is dismissed for default.
Pronounced by me in open court, thisthe 24
th day of October, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle
Wednesday, this the 22nd day of November, 2017
HMOP.NO.03/2014
Between: Payala Jyothi, W/o Srilnivasu, C/o. Palli Rajeswara Rao, Hindu, age 24 years, House holdl dutiles, residing at 4-15. Ummalada village, Munagapaka Mandal,l Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner And: Payala Srilnivasu, S/o Rajeswara Rao, age 35 yealrs, Residing at Door No.3-4- 26/1, Telephone Exchange street, Narasingaraopeta, Anakapalle, Visakhapatnam District. Respondent
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of SriK.Chandra Sekhar,K.Gangadhararao, Advocates for petitioner and of Sri V.Rajasekhar, Advocate for Respondent. Both parties called present.Petitioner filed memo not pressing this petition in view of the compromise arrived between the parties before the elders. Memo is recoraded and this Court delivered the following:
ORDER
Petition filed under Sec.9 of Hindu marriage Act. This is a petition filed by the petitioner-wife against the respondent-Husband to directing the respondent to come to the house of the petitioner and live with him for discharging her conjugal obligations and for costs of the petition. Both parties called present. Petitioner filed memo not pressing this petition inveiw of the compromise arrived between the parties before the elders. Heard. Memo is recorded. Accordingly this petition is dismissed without costs as not pressed.
Pronounced by me in open court, thisthe 22nd day of November, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
In the Court of :Prl Senior Civil Judge
Case No. :EP/0000083/2016 Pentakota Meena Devi Vs Kolli Rambabu
Date : 30-08-2017
Business: Both parties called absent. No representation. Hence EP is dismissed for default. Nature of Disposal: DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT Disposal Date: 30-08-2017 Prl Senior Civil Judge
In the Court of :Prl Senior Civil Judge
Case No. :OS/0000314/2012 Koilada Ganesh Vs Smt. Yellapu Kanaka Maha Lakshmi
Date : 07-09-2017
Business: Costs not paid. No evidence is filed both parties called absent. No representation .Hence the suit is dismissed for default. I.A.1028/2012 In view of main suit is dismissed for default This I.A also dismissed for default. Nature of Disposal: DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT Disposal Date: 07-09-2017 Prl Senior Civil Judge
In the Court of :Prl Senior Civil Judge
Case No. :EP/0000104/2014 srimath Tirumala peddinti Managatayaru Vs Indraganti Surynarayana
Date : 20-06-2017
Business: Batta for JDrs 2 and 3 not filed. DHR called absent. No representation. Hence the EP is dismissed for default without costs. Nature of Disposal: DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT Disposal Date: 20-06-2017 Prl Senior Civil Judge
In the Court of :Prl Senior Civil Judge
Case No. :H.M.O.P/0000005/2016 Palisetti Venkata Satya Uma Vs --
Date : 09-08-2017
Business: Petitioner and respondent called absent . Hence this petition is dismissed for default. Nature of Disposal: DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT Disposal Date: 09-08-2017 Prl Senior Civil Judge
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Wednesday, this the 31st day of January, 2018.
O.S.No.199/2012
Between:
Vennela Pydamma,W/o Somulu, Hindu, age 65 years, household duties, resildilng at D.No.8-4, Mettapalem village, lH/o Vada Cheepurupalli, Paraawada Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
Plaintiff. And:
1.Eerla Sreeramulu,S/o Musalayya, Hindu, age 52 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.7-56,Sriram Nagar, T.Devada, Steet project Office, Visakhapatnam-31.
2.Eerla Suryanarayana, S/o Musalayya, Hindu, age 50 years, cultivation, residilng at D.No.7-55, Sriram Nagar, T.Devada, Steel project Office, Visakhapatnam-31.
3.Eerla Vonumulu, S/o Musalayya, Hindu, age 48 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.30-71-1, Appikonda RH colonyll, Vadlapudi, Gajuwakal Mandal, Visakhapatnam-46.
4. Kundrapu Somulamma, W/o Mutyalu, Hindu, age 62 years, housewife, residing at D.No.30-7-1, Appikonda RH colony, Vadlapudi, Gajuwaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam-46.
5.Kundrapu Simhachalam W/o Appalanaidu, Hindu, age 86 years, residing at Door No.7-5, Sriram Nagar, T.Devada, Steel project office, Visakhapatnam-31.
6. Geddam Kpentamma, W/o Simhachalam, age 58 years, Hindu, Housewife, D.No.5-4, Hastinapuram, H/o Vada Cheepurupalli, Parawada mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
7. Ramineni Venkateswararao, S/o Basavayya, Hindu, age 45 years, business, resilding at D.No.10-32-6, Visalakshmi Nagar, Visakhapatnam.
Defendants.
This suit coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri V.V.Jogayya and Sri M.Srinivasarao, Advocates for the plaintiff and of Sri A.V.S.Bhavani Prasad, Advocate for defendant No.7 and defendants 1,3,4,6 remind exparte and suit against defendant 2 and 5 dismissed for default and this Court delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
Suit for partition of the plaint schedule properties at metes and bounds into seven equal shares and allot one such share to the plaintiff and such equal shares dto thedefendants 1 to 6, and deliver separate possession ofk such share so allotted to the plaintiff and defendants 1 to 6 on converting the joint possession into separate possession; for profits that can be determined by way of separate application; and for costs of the suit.
PW.1 called absent No representation. Hence the matter is dismissed for default.
Pronounced by me in open court, this lthe 31st day of January, 2018.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
FOR PLAINTIFF:-
P.W.1/ dt.8.12.2017 - Vennela Pydamma W/o Somulu.(Chief examination only)
FOR DEFENDANT:- NIL
LIST OF DOCUMENTS
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation: 16-08-2012
Date of Filing:16-08-2012
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Wednesday, this the 31st day of January, 2018.
O.S.No.199/2012
Between:
Vennela Pydamma,W/o Somulu, Hindu, age 65 years, household duties, resildilng at D.No.8-4, Mettapalem village, lH/o Vada Cheepurupalli, Paraawada Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
Plaintiff. And:
1.Eerla Sreeramulu,S/o Musalayya, Hindu, age 52 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.7-56, Sriram Nagar, T.Devada, Steet project Office, Visakhapatnam-31.
2.Eerla Suryanarayana, S/o Musalayya, Hindu, age 50 years, cultivation, residilng at D.No.7-55, Sriram Nagar, T.Devada, Steel project Office, Visakhapatnam-31.
3.Eerla Vonumulu, S/o Musalayya, Hindu, age 48 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.30-71-1, Appikonda RH colonyll, Vadlapudi, Gajuwakal Mandal, Visakhapatnam-46.
4. Kundrapu Somulamma, W/o Mutyalu, Hindu, age 62 years, housewife, residing at D.No.30-7-1, Appikonda RH colony, Vadlapudi, Gajuwaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam-46.
5.Kundrapu Simhachalam W/o Appalanaidu, Hindu, age 86 years, residing at Door No.7-5, Sriram Nagar, T.Devada, Steel project office, Visakhapatnam-31.
6. Geddam Kpentamma, W/o Simhachalam, age 58 years, Hindu, Housewife, D.No.5-4, Hastinapuram, H/o Vada Cheepurupalli, Parawada mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
7. Ramineni Venkateswararao, S/o Basavayya, Hindu, age 45 years, business, resilding at D.No.10-32-6, Visalakshmi Nagar, Visakhapatnam.
Defendants.
Suit for partition of the plaint schedule properties at metes and bounds into seven equal shares and allot one such share to the plaintiff and such equal shares dto thedefendants 1 to 6, and deliver separate possession ofk such share so allotted to the plaintiff and defendants 1 to 6 on converting the joint possession into separate possession; for profits that can be determined by way of separate application; and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and Jurisdiction of this court
Valuel of the plaint schedule property consisting of Ac.5.00 cents and @
Rs.15,00,000/- per acre as per basic value register Rs. 16,05,000-00
Plaintiff’s 1/7th share Rs. 10,71,428-00 3/4th value share Rs. 8,03,571-00
C.F. of Rs.10,826-00 is payable, but a fixed court fee of Rs.200/- is paid under
Sec.34(2) of A.P.C.F. Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri V.V.Jogayya and Sri M.Srinivasarao, Advocates for the plaintiff and of Sri
A.V.S.Bhavani Prasad, Advocate for defendant No.7 and defendants 1,3,4,6 remind exparte and suit against defendant 2 and 5 dismissed for default and this Court doth order and ;
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed for default;
2) that there be no order as to costs;
Given under my hand and theseal of this court, this the 31st day of January, 2018.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PLAINTIFF; FOR DEFENDANTS;
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Friday, this the 23rd day of February, 2018.
O.S.No.189/2017
Between: Chekuri Ramaraju S/o Venkata Raju @ Venkatarao, Hindu, age 38 years, cultivation, resident of D.No.1-38, Melupaka village and post, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Plaintiff. And:
Gogula Srinivas S/o Narayana Murthy, Hindu, age 49 years, resident of D.No.1- 113, Melupaka village and post, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
Defendant.
This suit coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri M.Jayaram & Sri BSVRajagopal,Advocates for plaintiff. Plaintiff filed memo not press the suit . Memo is recorded and this Court delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
Suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for recovery oif
Rs.6,84,333/- being the principal and interest due under a promissory note
dated 05.06.2016 for Rs.5,00,000/- executed by the defendant in favour of
plaintiff agreeing to repay the same with interest at 24% p.a., and for costs of the suit.
I.A59 /2018 is allowed. Accordingly the matter is advanced to today from 23.02.2018.
The plaintiff is present. Plaintiff filed memo not pressing the suit as matter was settled out of court. Heard. Memo is recorded. Accordingly suit is dismissed without costs as not pressed.
Pronounced by me in open court, this lthe 1st day of February, 2018.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
LIST OF DOCUMENTS
NIL PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:19-12-2017
Date of Filing:19-12-2017
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Friday, this the 23rd day of February, 2018.
O.S.No.189/2017
Between:
Chekuri Ramaraju S/o Venkata Raju @ Venkatarao, Hindu, age 38 years, cultivation, resident of D.No.1-38, Melupaka village and post, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Plaintiff. And:
Gogula Srinivas S/o Narayana Murthy, Hindu, age 49 years, resident of D.No.1- 113, Melupaka village and post, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
Defendant.
Suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for recovery oif
Rs.6,84,333/- being the principal and interest due under a promissory note
dated 05.06.2016 for Rs.5,00,000/- executed by the defendant in favour of
plaintiff agreeing to repay the same with interest at 24% p.a., and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and Jurisdiction is
Rs.6,84,333/- and a court fee of Rs.9,326/- is paid under Section 20 r/w Art.I(a) of A.P.C.F. and S.V.Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri M.Jayaram & Sri B.S.V.Rajagopal, Advocates for plaintiff. Plaintiff filed memo not press the suit . Memo is recorded and this Court doth order and:
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed as not pressed;
2) that there be no costs;
Pronounced by me in open court, this the 1st day of February, 2018.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PLAINTIFF; FOR DEFENDANT;
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Thursday, this the 8th day of February, 2018.
O.S.No.255/2013
Between: Panduri Satyarao S/o Simhachalam, Hindu, age 69 years, retired MPDO, Sabbavaram, N/o Venkatapuram village Munagapaka Mandal, presently, residing at D.No.14-38-1/A, Plot No.303, Viswanadh Residency, Maharanipeta, Visakhapatnam-2.
Plaintiff. And:
1. Panduri Kanaka Apparao,s/o Late Nookaiah, Hindu, age 45 years, Resident of Venkatapuram village, Via: Paravada, Thanam Post, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
2. Panduri Ramalakshmi W/o Kanaka Apparao, Hindu, age 40 years, resident of Venkatapuram village, Via: Paravada, Thanam Post, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
3. Chinni China Appalanaidu @ Innabbai,S/o Sanyasi, Hindu, age 69 yearls, resident of Venkatapuram village, via; Paravada, Thanam post, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
Defendants.
This suit coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri B.V.R.Joga rao and Mr.R.Atchutharamaiah, Advocates for plaintiff and of Sri K.P.Naidu, Advocate of defendants. Costs not paid. PW.1 called absent. No representation. Hence the suit is dismissed for default and this Court delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
This is a suit for declaration that the plaintiff is the absolute owner of item No.6 of plaint schedule property, and for recovery of possession of the item No.6 of plaint schedule property after evicting the defendants their men, agents servants there from; for future profits till the delivaery of the possession of item No.6 of schedule property as to be determined in a separate enquiry under order 20 R.12 of CPC; (b) for a permanent injunction restraining the defendants their men, agents, servants, and representatives from ever interfering with plaintiff’s peaceful possession and enjoyment of items 1 to 5 of plaint schedule property in any manner and for costs of the suit.
Costs not paid. PW1 called absent. No representation. Hence the suilt is dismissed for default.
Pronounced by me in open court, this the 8th day of February, 2018.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
FOR PLAINTIFF:-
PW1/ Dt.9-6-2017/Panduri Satya Rao, S/o Simhachalam (chief affidavit only)
FOR DEFENDANT: NIL
LIST OF DOCUMENTS
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation: 26-12-2013 Date of Filing: 26-12-2013
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Thursday, this the 8th day of February, 2018.
O.S.No.255/2013
Between: Panduri Satyarao S/o Simhachalam, Hindu, age 69 years, retired MPDO, Sabbavaram, N/o Venkatapuram village Munagapaka Mandal, presently, residing at D.No.14-38-1/A, Plot No.303, Viswanadh Residency, Maharanipeta, Visakhapatnam-2. Plaintiff. And:
1. Panduri Kanaka Apparao,s/o Late Nookaiah, Hindu, age 45 years, Resident of Venkatapuram village, Via: Paravada, Thanam Post, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
2. Panduri Ramalakshmi W/o Kanaka Apparao, Hindu, age 40 years, resident of Venkatapuram village, Via: Paravada, Thanam Post, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
3. Chinni China Appalanaidu @ Innabbai,S/o Sanyasi, Hindu, age 69 yearls, resident of Venkatapuram village, via; Paravada, Thanam post, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
Defendants.
This is a suit for declaration that the plaintiff is the absolute owner of item No.6 of plaint schedule property, and for recovery of possession of the item No.6 of plaint schedule property after evicting the defendants their men, agents servants there from; for future profits till the delivaery of the possession of item No.6 of schedule property as to be determined in a separate enquiry under order 20 R.12 of CPC; (b) for a permanent injunction restraining the defendants their men, agents, servants, and representatives from ever interfering with plaintiff’s peaceful possession and enjoyment of items 1 to 5 of plaint schedule property in any manner and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suilt for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction is
Rs.10,000/- for relief of permanent injunction and Rs.1,20,000/- being 3/4th market value for relief of declaration and possession and CF of Rs.4,412/- is paid under Sec.26 (c) & 24(a) of A.P.C.F. and S.V.Act.
Total value of item-6 property Rs. 1,60,000-00 3/4th of the Market value is Rs. 1,20,000-00
Notional value of items 1 to 5 Rs. 10,000-00
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri B.V.R.Joga rao and Mr.R.Atchutharamaiah, Advocates for plaintiff and of
Sri K.P.Naidu, Advocate of defendants. Costs not paid. PW.1 called absent. No representation. Hence the suit is dismissed for default and this Court doth order and :
DECREE
1) that the suilt be and the same is hereby dismissed for default;
2) that there be no order as to costs; ( Copy of plaint schedule and valuation slip hereto enclosed)
Pronounced by me in open court, this the 8th day of February, 2018.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PLAINTIFF; FOR DEFENDANTS;
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Tuesday, this the 23rd day of January, 2018.
O.S.No.221/2013
Between:
Gulla Sreeram Murthy S/o Chellanna Dora, Hindu, age 33 years, cultivation, resident of Door No.3-16, Buddibanda village H/o Kovagunta village, Vommali Jagannadhapuram post, Ravikamatham Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
Plaintiff. And:
1.Konathala Radhabhai, W/o Seetharam, Hindu, age years, House wife, resident of Door No.2-95, Sampathipuram village, Anakapalle Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
2. Central Bank of India, Main branch, Visakhapatnam represented by its Chief Manager, Visakhapatnam.
Defendants.
This suit coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Venkateswara Rao, Advocate for plaintiff and of Sri Ch.S.S.Ramachandrarao, Advocate for defendant No.2 and defendant No.1 remained exparte. Costs not paid. PW.1 called absent No representation on either side.Hence the suilt is dismissed for default and this Court delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
This is a suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant (a) for specific performance of the sale agreement dated 27.05.2005 by directing thedefendant to execute a regular sale deed on a proper stamp paper and register the samek in respect of the plaint schedule property in favoudr of the plaintiff and to do all the acts necaessary to put the plaintiff in possession with such time as the court fixes, ilf the 1st defendant, fails to execute the regular sale deed, the court may execute the same at the costs of the plaintiffl and recover the same from thedefendant (b) for an alternative relief foir refund of the advance amount of Rs.4,00,000/- with subsequent interest at the rate of 24% p.a. from the 1st defendant and for costs of the suilt.
Costs not paid. PW1 called absent. No representation on either side.
Hence the suit is dismissed for default.
Pronounced by me in open court, this the 23rd day of January, 2018.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIl
LIST OF DOCUMENTS
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
Date of presentation:22-11-2013 Date of Filing :22-11-2013
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Tuesday, this the 23rd day of January, 2018.
O.S.No.221/2013
Between: Gulla Sreeram Murthy S/o Chellanna Dora, Hindu, age 33 years, cultivation, resident of Door No.3-16, Buddibanda village H/o Kovagunta village, Vommali Jagannadhapuram post, Ravikamatham Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
Plaintiff. And:
1.Konathala Radhabhai, W/o Seetharam, Hindu, age years, House wife, resident of Door No.2-95, Sampathipuram village, Anakapalle Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
2. Central Bank of India, Main branch, Visakhapatnam represented by its Chief Manager, Visakhapatnam.
Defendants.
This is a suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant (a) for specific performance of the sale agreement dated 27.05.2005 by directing thedefendant to execute a regular sale deed on a proper stamp paper and register the samek in respect of the plaint schedule property in favoudr of the plaintiff and to do all the acts necaessary to put the plaintiff in possession with such time as the court fixes, ilf the 1st defendant, fails to execute the regular sale deed, the court may execute the same at the costs of the plaintiffl and recover the same from thedefendant (b) for an alternative relief foir refund of the advance amount of Rs.4,00,000/- with subsequent interest at the rate of 24% p.a. from the 1st defendant and for costs of the suilt.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and Jurisdiction is
Rs.4,00,000/- and a court fee of Rs.6,426/- is paid under Sec.39 of A.P.C.F. and
S.V.Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri G.Venkateswara Rao, Advocate for plaintiff and of Sri
Ch.S.S.Ramachandrarao, Advocate for defendant No.2 and defendant No.1 remained exparte. Costs not paid. PW.1 called absent No representation on either side. Hence the suilt is dismissed for default and this Court doth order and:
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed for default;
2) that there be no order as to costs; ( Copy of Plaint schedule hereto enclosed)
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 23rd day of January, 2018.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PLAINTIFF; FOR DEFENDANTS;
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
Prl.Senior Civil Judge’s Court, Anakapalle, dt.07-04-2018 From Sril S.Srinivasarao, To Prl.Senior Civil Judge, The Hon’ble Principal District Judge, Anakapalle VISAKHAPATNAM.
Honoured Madam
Sub:- Pauper suits-Statement showing the court fee awarded to the Government in pauper suits for the I quarter, 2018 ending by 31.03.2018. ***
I have the Honour to submit herewith the quarterly statement of pauper suits for the 1st quarter ending i.e. on 31.03.2018 relating to the Prl.Senior Civil Judge’s Court, Anakapalle for the period from 01-01-2018 to 31-03-2018.
Yours faithfully
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
Encl: Statement ANAKAPALLE
STATEMENT SHOWING THE REALIZATION OF COURT FEE IN PAUPER SUITS
RELATING TO PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE’S COURT, ANAKAPALLE FOR THE
1ST QUARTER ENDING BY 31-03-2018.
S.No.Suit NumberDate ofAmount of C.F.Payable byWhen sent District decreeAwarded towhomCollector, GovernmentVisakhapatnam Dis.N.& Date. ---NIL---
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
Date of Presentatio:23-01-2014 Date of Filing: 24-01-2014
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Wednesday, this the 22nd day of November, 2017
HMOP.NO.03/2014
Between: Payala Jyothi, W/o Srilnivasu, C/o. Palli Rajeswara Rao, Hindu, age 24 years, House holdl dutiles, residing at 4-15. Ummalada village, Munagapaka Mandal,l Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner And:
Payala Srilnivasu, S/o Rajeswara Rao, age 35 yealrs, Residing at Door No.3-4- 26/1, Telephone Exchange street, Narasingaraopeta, Anakapalle, Visakhapatnam District.
Respondent
Petition filed under Sec.9 of Hindu marriage Act.
This is a petition filed by the petitioner-wife against the respondent-
Husband to directing the respondent to come to the house of the petitioner and live with him for discharging her conjugal obligations and for costs of the petition.
A fixed court fee of Rs.10-00 is paid under Sch.II Art.I(vii) of A.P.C.F. and
S.V.Act.
This petition coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri K.Chandra Sekhar,K.Gangadhararao, Advocates for petitioner and of Sri V.Rajasekhar, Advocate for Respondent. Both parties called present.Petitioner filed memo not pressing this petition in view of the compromise arrived between the parties before the elders. Memo is recoraded and this Court doth order and:
DECREE
1) that the petition be and the same is hereby dismissed as not pressed;
2) that there be no costs
Given under my hand and theseal of this court, this the 22nd day of November, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PETITIONER: FOR RESPONDENT;
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Thursday, this the 30 th day of November, 2017
HMOP.NO.3/2012
Between: Pasupuletil Jyothi, W/o Chandrarao, Hindu, age 23 years, housewife, residing at D.No.9-47, C/o Kudirella Sanyasirao, Munagapaka village and Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner And:
Pasupuleti Chandrarao,S/o Nooka Raju , Hindu, age 26 years, employee, Command Musician office, Head quarters Eastern Naval Command, Naval Base(P.O) D.Nop.15-7-12/2, Visakhapatnam-14.
Respondent
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of SriV.V.Jogayya and M.Srilnivasarao, Advocates for petitioner and of Sri A.S.V.Prasad, Advocate for Respondent. Both parties called petitioner absent. Respondent is present. No representation for petitioner side .The counsel for the Respondent filed ecourts copy of orders in OP33/2012.No representation. Hence the matter is dismissed for default and this Court delivered the following:
ORDER
Petition filed under Sec.9 of Hindu marriage Act.
This is a petition filed by the petitioner-wife against the respondent-husband lfor restitution of conjugal life of the petitio;ner with the rekskpondent, directing the respondent to laead happy marital lifle lwilth the petiltioner and lfor costs of the petition.
Objectio;nsl not filed. Both parties called. Petitioner absent. Respondent is present. No rsepresentation for petitioner side. The counsel for the
Respondent filed ecourts copy of orders in O.P.33/2012 on the file of Additional
Family Court, visakhapatnam allowing the application and granting decree of divorce on the ground of cruelty under these circumstlances dthis petition is dilsmissed in view of the orders passed by Honourable in O.P.33/2012 abetween the same parties grant ldecree of divorce.
Pronounced by me in open court, thisthe 30th day of November, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
Datae of Presentation:24-02-2012 Date of Filing:24-02-2012
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Thursday, this the 30 th day of November, 2017
HMOP.NO.3/2012
Between: Pasupuletil Jyothi, W/o Chandrarao, Hindu, age 23 years, housewife, residing at D.No.9-47, C/o Kudirella Sanyasirao, Munagapaka village and Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner And:
Pasupuleti Chandrarao,S/o Nooka Raju , Hindu, age 26 years, employee, Command Musician office, Head quarters Eastern Naval Command, Naval
Base(P.O) D.Nop.15-7-12/2, Visakhapatnam-14.
Respondent
Petition filed under Sec.9 of Hindu marriage Act.
This is a petition filed by the petitioner-wife against the respondent-husband lfor restitution of conjugal life of the petitio;ner with the rekskpondent, directing the respondent to laead happy marital lifle lwilth the petiltioner and lfor costs of the petition.
A fixed court fee of Rs.10-00 is paid under Art.I (vii) ,Sch.II of Sec.10 of
A.P.C.F and S.V.Act.
This petition coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of SriV.V.Jogayya and M.Srilnivasarao, Advocates for petitioner and of
Sri A.S.V.Prasad, Advocate for Respondent. Both parties called petitioner absent. Respondent is present. No representation for petitioner side .The counsel for the Respondent filed ecourts copy of orders in OP33/2012 on the file of Addl.Family Court, Visakhapatnam allowing the applickation and lgrantaing decree of divorce on the ground of cruelty under these circumstances this petition is dismissed in view of the orders passed by the
Honourable Addl.Family Court, Visakhapatnam in OP33/2012 abetween the
same parties grant decree of divorce hence this Court doth order and:
DECREE
1) that the petition be and the same is hereby dismissed
2) that there be no costs;
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 30th day of November, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PETITIONER; FOR RESPONDENT:
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Tuesday, this the 24 th day of October, 2017
HMOP.NO.49/2013
Between: Alla Swarulpa @ Varaha Lalitha Sawarupa,W/o Rama Chandra Prasad, Hindu, age 19 years, Household duties, residing at Door No.19-4-17, Buddha Prakasa Rao Naidu gari street, Gavarapalem, Anakapalle.
Petitioner And:
Alla Rama Chandra Prasad, S/o China Apparao, Hindu, age 30 years, physically handicapped, residing at Door No.50-83-10, Madhura Nagar, Visakhapatnam- 16.
Respondent
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of SriBuddha Thrinadha Rao, Advocate for petitioner and of Sri K.Chandra Sekhar, Advocate for Respondent. Both parties called absent.No representation. Hence the matter is dismissed for default and this Court delivered the following:
ORDER
Petition filed under Sec.11 of Hindu marriage Act.
This is a petition filed by the petitioner against the respondent for dissolution of the marriage in between the petitioner and respondent performed on 13.02.2013 due to non consummation of marriage as null and void and for costs of the petition.
Both parties calasled absent. No representation on either side .Hence the matter is dismissed for default.
Pronounced by me in open court, thisthe 24th day of October, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Wednesday, this the 22nd day of November, 2017
HMOP.NO.03/2014
Between: Payala Jyothi, W/o Srilnivasu, C/o. Palli Rajeswara Rao, Hindu, age 24 years, House holdl dutiles, residing at 4-15. Ummalada village, Munagapaka Mandal,l Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner And:
Payala Srilnivasu, S/o Rajeswara Rao, age 35 yealrs, Residing at Door No.3-4- 26/1, Telephone Exchange street, Narasingaraopeta, Anakapalle, Visakhapatnam District.
Respondent
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of SriK.Chandra Sekhar,K.Gangadhararao, Advocates for petitioner and of Sri V.Rajasekhar, Advocate for Respondent. Both parties called present.Petitioner filed memo not pressing this petition in view of the compromise arrived between the parties before the elders. Memo is recoraded and this Court delivered the following:
ORDER
Petition filed under Sec.9 of Hindu marriage Act.
This is a petition filed by the petitioner-wife against the respondent-Husband to directing the respondent to come to the house of the petitioner and live with him for discharging her conjugal obligations and for costs of the petition.
Both parties called present. Petitioner filed memo not pressing this petition inveiw of the compromise arrived between the parties before the elders. Heard. Memo is recorded. Accordingly this petition is dismissed without costs as not pressed.
Pronounced by me in open court, thisthe 22nd day of November, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Tuesday, this the 24 th day of October, 2017
HMOP.NO.49/2013
Between: Alla Swarulpa @ Varaha Lalitha Sawarupa,W/o Rama Chandra Prasad, Hindu, age 19 years, Household duties, residing at Door No.19-4-17, Buddha Prakasa Rao Naidu gari street, Gavarapalem, Anakapalle.
Petitioner And:
Alla Rama Chandra Prasad, S/o China Apparao, Hindu, age 30 years, physically handicapped, residing at Door No.50-83-10, Madhura Nagar, Visakhapatnam- 16.
Respondent
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of SriBuddha Thrinadha Rao, Advocate for petitioner and of Sri K.Chandra Sekhar, Advocate for Respondent. Both parties called absent.No representation. Hence the matter is dismissed for default and this Court delivered the following:
ORDER
Petition filed under Sec.11 of Hindu marriage Act.
This is a petition filed by the petitioner against the respondent for dissolution of the marriage in between the petitioner and respondent performed on 13.02.2013 due to non consummation of marriage as null and void and for costs of the petition.
Both parties calasled absent. No representation on either side .Hence the matter is dismissed for default.
Pronounced by me in open court, thisthe 24th day of October, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Wednesday, this the 22nd day of November, 2017
HMOP.NO.03/2014
Between: Payala Jyothi, W/o Srilnivasu, C/o. Palli Rajeswara Rao, Hindu, age 24 years, House holdl dutiles, residing at 4-15. Ummalada village, Munagapaka Mandal,l Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner
And:
Payala Srilnivasu, S/o Rajeswara Rao, age 35 yealrs, Residing at Door No.3-4- 26/1, Telephone Exchange street, Narasingaraopeta, Anakapalle, Visakhapatnam District.
Respondent
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of SriK.Chandra Sekhar,K.Gangadhararao, Advocates for petitioner and of Sri V.Rajasekhar, Advocate for Respondent. Both parties called present.Petitioner filed memo not pressing this petition in view of the compromise arrived between the parties before the elders. Memo is recoraded and this Court delivered the following:
ORDER
Petition filed under Sec.9 of Hindu marriage Act.
This is a petition filed by the petitioner-wife against the respondent-Husband to directing the respondent to come to the house of the petitioner and live with him for discharging her conjugal obligations and for costs of the petition.
Both parties called present. Petitioner filed memo not pressing this petition inveiw of the compromise arrived between the parties before the elders. Heard. Memo is recorded. Accordingly this petition is dismissed without costs as not pressed.
Pronounced by me in open court, thisthe 22nd day of November, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Tuesday, this the 24 th day of October, 2017
HMOP.NO.49/2013
Between:
Alla Swarulpa @ Varaha Lalitha Sawarupa,W/o Rama Chandra Prasad, Hindu, age 19 years, Household duties, residing at Door No.19-4-17, Buddha Prakasa Rao Naidu gari street, Gavarapalem, Anakapalle.
Petitioner And:
Alla Rama Chandra Prasad, S/o China Apparao, Hindu, age 30 years, physically handicapped, residing at Door No.50-83-10, Madhura Nagar, Visakhapatnam- 16.
Respondent
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of SriBuddha Thrinadha Rao, Advocate for petitioner and of Sri K.Chandra Sekhar, Advocate for Respondent. Both parties called absent.No representation. Hence the matter is dismissed for default and this Court delivered the following:
ORDER
Petition filed under Sec.11 of Hindu marriage Act.
This is a petition filed by the petitioner against the respondent for dissolution of the marriage in between the petitioner and respondent performed on 13.02.2013 due to non consummation of marriage as null and void and for costs of the petition.
Both parties calasled absent. No representation on either side .Hence the matter is dismissed for default.
Pronounced by me in open court, thisthe 24th day of October, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:19-11-2013 Date of Filing:25-11-2013
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Tuesday, this the 24 th day of October, 2017
HMOP.NO.49/2013
Between: Alla Swarulpa @ Varaha Lalitha Sawarupa,W/o Rama Chandra Prasad, Hindu, age 19 years, Household duties, residing at Door No.19-4-17, Buddha Prakasa Rao Naidu gari street, Gavarapalem, Anakapalle.
Petitioner And:
Alla Rama Chandra Prasad, S/o China Apparao, Hindu, age 30 years, physically handicapped, residing at Door No.50-83-10, Madhura Nagar, Visakhapatnam- 16.
Respondent
Petition filed under Sec.11 of Hindu marriage Act.
This is a petition filed by the petitioner against the respondent for dissolution of the marriage in between the petitioner and respondent performed on 13.02.2013 due to non consummation of marriage as null and void and for costs of the petition.
A fixed court fee of Rs.10-00 ils paid under Sch.II Art.I (Vii) of A.P.C.F. and
S.V.Act.
This petition coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of SriBuddha Thrinadha Rao, Advocate for petitioner and of Sri
K.Chandra Sekhar, Advocate for Respondent. Both parties called absent.No representation. Hence the matter is dismissed for default and this Court doth order and:
DECREE
1) that the petition be and the same is hereby dismissed for default;
2) that there be no order as to costs;
Given under my hand and the seal of thi court, this the 24th day of October, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PETITIONER: FOR RESPONDSENT;
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Tuesday, this the 24 th day of October, 2017
HMOP.NO.49/2013
Between: Alla Swarulpa @ Varaha Lalitha Sawarupa,W/o Rama Chandra Prasad, Hindu, age 19 years, Household duties, residing at Door No.19-4-17, Buddha Prakasa Rao Naidu gari street, Gavarapalem, Anakapalle.
Petitioner And:
Alla Rama Chandra Prasad, S/o China Apparao, Hindu, age 30 years, physically handicapped, residing at Door No.50-83-10, Madhura Nagar, Visakhapatnam- 16.
Respondent
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of SriBuddha Thrinadha Rao, Advocate for petitioner and of Sri K.Chandra Sekhar, Advocate for Respondent. Both parties called absent.No representation. Hence the matter is dismissed for default and this Court delivered the following:
ORDER
Petition filed under Sec.11 of Hindu marriage Act.
This is a petition filed by the petitioner against the respondent for dissolution of the marriage in between the petitioner and respondent performed on 13.02.2013 due to non consummation of marriage as null and void and for costs of the petition.
Both parties calasled absent. No representation on either side .Hence the matter is dismissed for default.
Pronounced by me in open court, thisthe 24th day of October, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentatioin:22-11-2010 Date of Fililng: 22-11-2010
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Wednesday, this the 27 th day of December, 2017
LAOP.NO.125/2012 Between:
1) Sri Karaka Kalyanam S/o late Jaggunaidu, Jamudulapalem village, Bayyavaram ,Kasimkota Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
2) Karaka Sambhamurthy, S/o late Jagunaidu, Jamudulapalem village, Bayyavaram, Kasimkota Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
Claimants And:
Special Tahsildar, Land Acquisition officer, Revenue Division, Visakhapatnam Bayyavaram, Kasimkota, Visakhapatnam District.
Referring officer.
This is a reference made under Sec.30 &31 of Land Acquisition Act by the Special Tahasildar Land Acquisition Revenue Division Visakhapatnam for formation of Left canal to reservoir across Rangabolupgedda in Bayyavaram village for an extent of Ac.0.063/4 cents iln S.No.664/4B, 664/10/A ,Bayyavaram village of Kasimkota Mandal.
In this reference there are 2 (two) claimants.
The LAO deposited an amount of Rs.11,03,066-00 towards compensation amount for the Award No.22/2006 dated 20-12-2005 and the same was kept in
FDR of State Bank of India, Anakapalle.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in person and of Sri Asst.Government Pleader for Referring officer. Claimant called absent.
Claim statement not filed. No representation. Hence reference is closed and this Court doth order and:
DECREE
1) that L.A.O.P petition be and thesame is hereby closed as claimant called absent No representation;
2) that there be no order as to costs.
Given under my handk and the seal of this court, this the 27th day of December, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR CLAIMANTS: FOR REFERING OFFICER;
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Wednesday, this the 27 th day of December, 2017
LAOP.NO.125/2012 Between:
1) Sri Karaka Kalyanam S/o late Jaggunaidu, Jamudulapalem village, Bayyavaram ,Kasimkota Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
2) Karaka Sambhamurthy, S/o late Jagunaidu, Jamudulapalem village, Bayyavaram, Kasimkota Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
Claimants And:
Special Tahsildar, Land Acquisition officer, Revenue Division, Visakhapatnam Bayyavaram, Kasimkota, Visakhapatnam District.
Referring officer.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in person and of Sri Asst.Government Pleader for Referring officer. Claimant called absent.
Claim statement not filed. No representation. Hence reference ils closed and this Court delivered the following:
ORDER
This is a reference made under Sec.30 &31 of Land Acquisition Act by the Special Tahasildar Land Acquisition Revenue Division Visakhapatnam for formation of Left canal to reservoir across Rangabolupgedda in Bayyavaram village for an extent of Ac.0.063/4 cents iln S.No.664/4B, 664/10/A ,Bayyavaram village of Kasimkota Mandal.
In this reference there are 2 (two) claimants.
The LAO deposited an amount of Rs.11,03,066-00 towards compensation amount for the Award No.22/2006 dated 20-12-2005 and the same was kept in
FDR of State Bank of India, Anakapalle.
Claim statement not filed. Claimant called absent. No representation.
Perusal of record reveals the claimant present in person on 28.08.2012 thereafter matter ils posted for time to time for filing claim statement. So far no claim statement ils filled till today. Today also clailmant calaled absent. No representation. Hence reference is closed consign the record toi record room.
Pronounced by me in open court, thisthe 27th day of December, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
LIST OF DOCUMENTS
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle
Friday, this the 5th day of January, 2018
SOP.NO.74/2017 Between: 1)Ganta Venkatesh,S/o late Neeladri Rao,lHilndu, age 21 years, unemployee, residing at D.No.3-3-69, NTR colony, Sirasapalli (village) Narasingaraopeta (PO) Visakhapatnam District.
2) Ganta Satyadevi,D/o Neeladri Rao, Hilndu, age 22 years, residing at D.No. 3-3-69, NTR colonyl, Sirasapalli village, Narasingaraopeta P.O. Visakhapatnam District. Petitioners And:
The Depot Manager, A.P.S.R.T.C, Visakha Steel City Depot, Kurmannapalem, Visakhapatnam-5300046.
Respondant
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri V.Apparao, Advocate for Petitioners. Petitioner called absent No representation and this Court delivered the following:
ORDER
This is a petition filed under 372 of the Indian Succession Act, 1954.
This is a petition filed by the petitioners to issue succession certificate in favour of the petitioners to receive the amounts as shown in the schedule from the respondent and for other reliefs.
Petitioner called absent No representation hence petition is dismissed for default.
Pronounced by me in open court, this the 5th day of January, 2018.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
LIST OF DOCUMENTS
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:25-11-2017
Date of Filing:01-12-2017
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Friday, this the 5th day of January, 2018
SOP.NO.74/2017 Between: 1)Ganta Venkatesh,S/o late Neeladri Rao,lHilndu, age 21 years, unemployee, residing at D.No.3-3-69, NTR colony, Sirasapalli (village) Narasingaraopeta (PO) Visakhapatnam District.
2) Ganta Satyadevi,D/o Neeladri Rao, Hilndu, age 22 years, residing at D.No. 3-3-69, NTR colonyl, Sirasapalli village, Narasingaraopeta P.O. Visakhapatnam District. Petitioners And:
The Depot Manager, A.P.S.R.T.C, Visakha Steel City Depot, Kurmannapalem, Visakhapatnam-5300046.
Respondant
This is a petition filed under 372 of the Indian Succession Act, 1954.
This is a petition filed by the petitioners to issue succession certificate in favour of the petitioners to receive the amounts as shown in the schedule from the respondent and for other reliefs.
A court fee of Rs.10/- is paid under Art.VII of Sch.I of APCF and SVAct.
This petition coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri V.Apparao, Advocate for Petitioners. Petitioner called absent No representation and this Court doth order and:
DECREE
1) that the petition be and the same is hereby dismissed for default;
2) that there be no order as to costs;
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 5th day of January, 2018.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PETITIONER: FOR RESPONDENT;
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:19-04-2014 Date of Filing:30-04-2014
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Friday, this the 19th day of January, 2018
HMOP.NO.26/2014
Between: Nanibilli Nookaraju,S/o late Baburao, Hindu, age 30 years, Driver, resident of Door No. Tegada village, Kasimkota Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
Petitioner And:
Nanibilli Nagalakshmi,lW/o Nookaraju, Hindu, age 22 years, housewife, residing at C/o Pasupuleti Eswararao, Door No. Kandipudi villlage, Butchiyyapeta and Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
Respondant
This is a petition filed under Sec.13(1) (ia) and (ib) of H.M.Act.
This is a petition filed by the petitioners (a) for grant of decree of divorce by dissolving the marriage between the petitioner and respondent on 12.11.2011 on the ground of cruelty and desertion and for costs of the suit.
A fixed court fee of Rs.10/- is paid under Art.IL (vii) Sch.II of A.P.C.F. and
S.V.Act.
This petition coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri K.S.Achari and Sri G.Krilshnaveni, Advocates for Petitioner and of Sri K.David, Advocate for Respondent. Both parties called absent No representation on either side hence this Court doth order and :
DECREE
1) that the petition be and the same is hereby dismissed for defaualt;
2) that there be no order as to costs;
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 19th day of January, 2018.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PETITIONER: FOR RESPONDENT;
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Friday, this the 19th day of January, 2018
HMOP.NO.26/2014
Between: Nanibilli Nookaraju,S/o late Baburao, Hindu, age 30 years, Driver, resident of Door No. Tegada village, Kasimkota Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
Petitioner And:
Nanibilli Nagalakshmi,lW/o Nookaraju, Hindu, age 22 years, housewife, residing at C/o Pasupuleti Eswararao, Door No. Kandipudi villlage, Butchiyyapeta and Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
Respondant
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri K.S.Achari and Sri G.Krilshnaveni, Advocates for Petitioner and of Sri K.David, Advocate for Respondent. Both parties called absent No representation on either side hence this Court delivered the following:
ORDER
This is a petition filed under Sec.13(1) (ia) and (ib) of H.M.Act.
This is a petition filed by the petitioners (a) for grant of decree of divorce by dissolving the marriage between the petitioner and respondent on 12.11.2011 on the ground of cruelty and desertion and for costs of the suit.
Both parties called absent No representation on either side hence the petition is dismissed for default.
Pronounced by me in open court, this the 19th day of January, 2018.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
LIST OF DOCUMENTS
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:02-11-2005 Date of Filing:29-11-2005
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Thursday, this the 31st day of August, 2017
I.P.No.13/2005 Between: Naga Manikyam wife of Tatayyalu, age 70 years, Hindu, No occupation, residing at Nagavamsam Veedhi, Anakapalle.
Petitioner. And:
1. Ravi Seshukumari, wife of Sreenivasarao, age 25 yearsl, Hindu, Household duties, residing at Dondaparthi, Visakhapatnam-16.
2. Naga Laxmikantam, wife of Ramana,l age 35 years, Hindu, residing near Santabyalu, Vaddadi village, Visakhapatnam District.
3. Yelugula Ramana, son of Apparao, age 40 years, Allikhanudupalem, Anakapalle Mandal.
4. Rayi Bullemma, wife of Jagannadham, age 50 years, hindu, Lokavari veedhi, Anakapalle.
5.Nagumalla Sanyasamma, wife of Venkatarao, age 60 years, Hindu, Maturu village, Anakakpalle Mandal.
6.Kolluru Pramod Kumar, son of Narasingarao, age 35 years, Hindu, Main road,Anakapalle.
7.Palukuril Kamaraju, son of Sreeramamurthy,l age 35 years, Hindu, business, residing at Anjayya colony, Anakapalle.
Respondants.
This is a petition filed by the petitioner against the respondents(a) to declare the petitioner as an insolvent and discharge her from her creditors and for costs of the petition.
A fixed court fees of Rs.50/- is paid on this petition under Sch.II.Article II of ACF and S.V.;Act. An amount of Rs.1500/- paid towards administrative charges and publication by way of challan No.2081, dated 28.10.2005.
This petiltion coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri P.S.Kumar and Sri P.A.Narasimham, Advocates for Petitioner . As memo filed vide GR.No.1563/dt.07.07.2017 petitioner died and this Court doth order and:
DECREE
1) that the Insolvent petition be and the same is hereby closed as petitioner died;
2) that there be no order as to costs; ( copy of petition A and B schedule hereto enclosed)
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 31st day of August,2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PETITIONER: FOR RESPONDENTS;
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Thursday, this the 31st day of August, 2017
I.P.No.13/2005 Between: Naga Manikyam wife of Tatayyalu, age 70 years, Hindu, No occupation, residing at Nagavamsam Veedhi, Anakapalle.
Petitioner. And:
1. Ravi Seshukumari, wife of Sreenivasarao, age 25 yearsl, Hindu, Household duties, residing at Dondaparthi, Visakhapatnam-16.
2. Naga Laxmikantam, wife of Ramana,l age 35 years, Hindu, residing near Santabyalu, Vaddadi village, Visakhapatnam District.
3. Yelugula Ramana, son of Apparao, age 40 years, Allikhanudupalem, Anakapalle Mandal.
4. Rayi Bullemma, wife of Jagannadham, age 50 years, hindu, Lokavari veedhi, Anakapalle 5.Nagumalla Sanyasamma, wife of Venkatarao, age 60 years, Hindu, Maturu village, Anakakpalle Mandal. 6.Kolluru Pramod Kumar, son of Narasingarao, age 35 years, Hindu, Main road,Anakapalle. 7.Palukuril Kamaraju, son of Sreeramamurthy,l age 35 years, Hindu, business, residing at Anjayya colony, Anakapalle.
Respondants.
This petiltion coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri P.S.Kumar and Sri P.A.Narasimham, Advocates for Petitioner . As memo filed vide GR.No.1563/dt.07.07.2017 petitioner died and this Court delivered the following:
ORDER
This is a petition filed by the petitioner against the respondents(a) to declare the petitioner as an insolvent and discharge her from her creditors and for costs of the petition.
As memo filed vide GR.No.1563/dt.07.07.2017 as petitioner/insolvent died the petition is closed.
Pronounced by me in open court, this the 31st day of August, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
LIST OF DOCUMENTS
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation: 30-10-2012/15-11-2012 Date of Fililng: 15-11-2012
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Thursday, this the 22nd day of December,2017
I.P.No.04/2012 Between: 1.Vaddi Raju, S/o Appalaraju, age 35 years, residing at D.No.1-169, Ramakpuram colony, A.M.A.L.College road, Kothuru village andl panchayat, Anakapalle Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
Petitioner. And:
1. Afoz Bhanu,W/o Muzzafer Shariff, age 35 years, Muslim, residing at Flat No.F.2, K.C. Apartments, near Saibaba Temple, Sarada Nagar, Anakapalle,Visakhapatnam District. 2.Md.Fathilma, husband’s namek not known to the petitioner, C/o Afoz Bhanu, W/o Muzzafer Shariff, age 28 ayears, Hindu, residing at Flat No.F.2, K.C.Akpartments, near Saibaba Temple, Sarada Nagar, Anakapalle, Visakhapatnam District.
3. Md. Ahamad, S/o Md.Abdul Rawoof, age 30 years, Muslim, residing at D.No. 7-48/1, Muslims steet, Pedda Bazar, Kasimkota village and mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
4. M.Sameema, W/o Md.Abdul Rawoof, age 40 years, Muslim, residing at D.No.7-48/1, Muslims street, Pedda Bazar, Kasimkota village and mandal, Visakhapatnam District. 5.Zameela Begum, D/o Md.Abdul Rawoof, age 25 years, Muslim, resilding at D.No.7-48/1, Muslims street, Pedda Bazar,l Kasimkota village and mandal, Visakhapatnam District. 6.Shaik Halima, W/o Mohaddin,l age 30 years, Muslim care of M.Swarna Lakshmi, Teacher, opposite Ramalayam, D.No.12-4-105, Pudimadaka raod, Anakapalle, Visakhapatnam District. 7.Karim, father’s name not known to the petitioner,l age 28 years, Muslim, residing at care of M.Swarna Lakshmi, Teacher, opposite Ramalayam, D.No.12-4-105, pudimadaka road, Anakapalle, Vilsakhapatnam Dilstrict.
8.A.Arjunarao, father’s name not known to the petitioner, age 32 years, Teacher in A.M.A.A. High School, residing at D.No.2-139, near K.L.N.Parlour, A.M.A.L. college road, Kothuru village, Anakapalle mandal, Visakhapatnam District. 9.Bobbili Anatha Lakshmi W/o Bobbilil Appalaraju, age 25 years, Hindu, Teacher,l residing at Vijayaramarajupeta, Anakapalle, Visakhapatnam District.
Respondants.
Petitioner to declare the as insolvent person ( indigent person) and discharge him from all of theliabilities and debts due to the respondents and or costs of the petition.
A court fee of Rs.10/- is paid under Art.11(L)2(ili) of Sch.ILI of A.P.C.F. and
S.V.Act.
This petiltion coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri S.Narasingarao, I.R.Gangadhar, Advocates for Petitioner and petitioner called present filed memo not pressing the petition. Memo is recorded and this Court doth order and :
DECREE
1) that the Insolvent petition be and the same is hereby dismissed as not pressed;
2) that there be no order as to costs; ( copy of petition A and B schedule hereto enclosed)
Pronounced by me in open court, this the 22nd day of December,2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PETITIONER: FOR RESPONDENTS;
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Thursday, this the 22nd day of December,2017
I.P.No.04/2012 Between: 1.Vaddi Raju, S/o Appalaraju, age 35 years, residing at D.No.1-169, Ramakpuram colony, A.M.A.L.College road, Kothuru village andl panchayat, Anakapalle Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
Petitioner. And:
1. Afoz Bhanu,W/o Muzzafer Shariff, age 35 years, Muslim, residing at Flat No.F.2, K.C. Apartments, near Saibaba Temple, Sarada Nagar, Anakapalle,Visakhapatnam District. 2.Md.Fathilma, husband’s namek not known to the petitioner, C/o Afoz Bhanu, W/o Muzzafer Shariff, age 28 ayears, Hindu, residing at Flat No.F.2, K.C.Akpartments, near Saibaba Temple, Sarada Nagar, Anakapalle, Visakhapatnam District.
3. Md. Ahamad, S/o Md.Abdul Rawoof, age 30 years, Muslim, residing at D.No. 7-48/1, Muslims steet, Pedda Bazar, Kasimkota village and mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
4. M.Sameema, W/o Md.Abdul Rawoof, age 40 years, Muslim, residing at D.No.7-48/1, Muslims street, Pedda Bazar, Kasimkota village and mandal, Visakhapatnam District. 5.Zameela Begum, D/o Md.Abdul Rawoof, age 25 years, Muslim, resilding at D.No.7-48/1, Muslims street, Pedda Bazar,l Kasimkota village and mandal, Visakhapatnam District. 6.Shaik Halima, W/o Mohaddin,l age 30 years, Muslim care of M.Swarna Lakshmi, Teacher, opposite Ramalayam, D.No.12-4-105, Pudimadaka raod, Anakapalle, Visakhapatnam District. 7.Karim, father’s name not known to the petitioner,l age 28 years, Muslim, residing at care of M.Swarna Lakshmi, Teacher, opposite Ramalayam, D.No.12-4-105, pudimadaka road, Anakapalle, Vilsakhapatnam Dilstrict. 8.A.Arjunarao, father’s name not known to the petitioner, age 32 years, Teacher in A.M.A.A. High School, residing at D.No.2-139, near K.L.N.Parlour, A.M.A.L. college road, Kothuru village, Anakapalle mandal, Visakhapatnam
District. 9.Bobbili Anatha Lakshmi W/o Bobbilil Appalaraju, age 25 years, Hindu, Teacher,l residing at Vijayaramarajupeta, Anakapalle, Visakhapatnam District.
Respondants.
This petiltion coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri S.Narasingarao, I.R.Gangadhar, Advocates for Petitioner and petitioner called present filed memo not pressing the petition. Memo is recorded and this Court delivered the following:
ORDER
Petitioner to declare the as insolvent person ( indigent person) and discharge him from all of theliabilities and debts due to the respondents; and or costs of the suit.
Petitioner called present filed memo not pressing the petition. Heard.
Memo is recorded. This petition dismissed as not pressed.
Pronounced by me in open court, this the 22nd day of December,2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
LIST OF DOCUMENTS
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentatioin:21-03-2012
Date of Filing:09-04-2012
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Wednesday, this thw 24th day of January, 2018.
I.P.No.01/2012 Between: 1.Doddi Naga Mophana Rao, S/o late Appa Rao, Hindu, age 32 years, cultivation, residing at Nagulapalli village, Munagapaka Mandal. 2.Polamarasetty Adi Murthy, S/o Apparao, Hindu, age 35 yealrs, cultivation, residing at Teacher’s colonyl, 3rd line, Nagulapalli village, Munagapaka Mandal.
3.Yellapu Sasi Bhushanam Rao, S/o late Kondala Rao, Hindu, age 47 years, residing at D.No.15-19-6, P.V.R.Naidu street, Opp. Women college, Gavarapalem, Anakapalli. Petitioners. And:
1.Yellapu Mangayyamma,W/o late Appa Rao, Hindu, age 48 years, business, residing at D.No.2-13-13,l Bo;ddeda vari veedhi,l Vijayaramarajupeta, Anakapalli. 2.Yellapu Venkata Nooka Apparao, S/o late Apparao, Hindu, age 30 years, business, rest-do-
3. Yellapu Vani, W/o Venkata Nooka Appa Rao, Hindu, age 23 years, business, C/o Pentakota Ramana, D.No.6-42-4, TVN colony,besides drivaer’s colony, Old Gajuwaka, Visakhapatnam District.
4. Adari Tilak, W/o Srinivasa Rao, Hindu, age 23 years, Business, residing at C/o Adari Rama Ra;o, Door No.14-13, Opp. Pada Gas Godown Court veedhi, Gandhinagaram, Anakapalli.
5. Yellapu Rama Krishna, S/o late Nooka Raju, Hindu, age 42 years, employee, residing at Door No.2-13-13 rest -do-.
Respondants.
This is a petition filed U/Sec.9 of provincial Insolvency Act praying to adjudge the respondent No.1 as insolvent ;(b) to appoint an interim receiver in respect of the estate of 1st respondent i.e. “B” schedule property; (c) to make an order directing the official receiver to take actual physical possession over the”B” schedule property.
A fixed court fee of Rs.10-00 is paid thereon under Sectilon 20 ScheduleI
Art.II(a) of APCF and S.V.Act. Administrative charges of Rs.2000/- is paid vide challan No.6604 dated 29.03.2012.
This petiltion coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri Budha Trinadha Rao, Advocate for Petiltioners and No evidence isfiled the petitioners called absent No representatilon and this Court doth order and :
DECREE
1) that the Insolvency petition be and the same is hereby dismissed for default;
2) that there be no order as to costs; ( Copy of petition A and B schedule hereto enclosed)
Given under my hand and the seal of this court this the 24th day of January, 2018.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PETITIONERS: FOR RESPONDENTS;
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Wednesday, this thw 24th day of January, 2018.
I.P.No.01/2012 Between: 1.Doddi Naga Mophana Rao, S/o late Appa Rao, Hindu, age 32 years, cultivation, residing at Nagulapalli village, Munagapaka Mandal. 2.Polamarasetty Adi Murthy, S/o Apparao, Hindu, age 35 yealrs, cultivation, residing at Teacher’s colonyl, 3rd line, Nagulapalli village, Munagapaka Mandal.
3.Yellapu Sasi Bhushanam Rao, S/o late Kondala Rao, Hindu, age 47 years, residing at D.No.15-19-6, P.V.R.Naidu street, Opp. Women college, Gavarapalem, Anakapalli. Petitioners. And:
1.Yellapu Mangayyamma,W/o late Appa Rao, Hindu, age 48 years, business, residing at D.No.2-13-13,l Bo;ddeda vari veedhi,l Vijayaramarajupeta, Anakapalli. 2.Yellapu Venkata Nooka Apparao, S/o late Apparao, Hindu, age 30 years, business, rest-do-
3. Yellapu Vani, W/o Venkata Nooka Appa Rao, Hindu, age 23 years, business, C/o Pentakota Ramana, D.No.6-42-4, TVN colony,besides drivaer’s colony, Old Gajuwaka, Visakhapatnam District.
4. Adari Tilak, W/o Srinivasa Rao, Hindu, age 23 years, Business, residing at C/o Adari Rama Ra;o, Door No.14-13, Opp. Pada Gas Godown Court veedhi, Gandhinagaram, Anakapalli.
5. Yellapu Rama Krishna, S/o late Nooka Raju, Hindu, age 42 years, employee, residing at Door No.2-13-13 rest -do-.
Respondants.
This petiltion coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri Budha Trinadha Rao, Advocate for Petiltioners and No evidence isfiled the petitioners called absent No representatilon and this Court delivered the following:
ORDER
This is a petition filed U/Sec.9 of provincial Insolvency Act praying to adjudge the respondent No.1 as insolvent ;(b) to appoint an interim receiver in respect of the estate of 1st respondent i.e. “B” schedule property; (c) to make an order directing the official receiver to take actual physical possession over the”B” schedule property.
No evidence is filed the petitioner called absent No representation. Hence petition is dismissed for default.
Pronounced by me in open court, this the 24th day of January, 2018.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
LIST OF DOCUMENTS
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation: 20-10-2014 Date of Filing:20-04-2014
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Thursday, this the 1st day of February, 2018.
O.S.No.263/2014
Between: Penmetsa Vishnukumar Raju S/o Satyanarayana Raju, age 53 years, residing at Plot No.A-19, D.No.50-104-1/9, Seeethammadhara N.E.Layout, Visakhapatnam-13. Plaintiff. And:
1.Karri Bangarunaidu S/o Ramunaidu, age 52 years, residing at Asakapalli village, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
2.Karri Ramprasad S/o Ramunaidu, age 44 years, residing at Asakapalli village, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
Defendants.
Suit filed by the plaintilff against the defendants(a) to pass a decree to directilng the defendants to execute the register a sale deed in favour of the plaintiff in respect of the plaintk kschedule property interms of the agreement of sale executed by the defendants in favour of the plaintiff within time fixed by the court (b) in case if the defendants fail to execute and register a sale deed, the court may itself execute and register a sale deed for aand on behalf of the defendants in respect of theplailant schedule at the expenses of the plaintiff
(c) to put the plaiantiff’s in possessilon of the plailnt schedule after evicting the defendants therefrom (d) alternatively, if the court feels that for any reason, the relief of specific performance could not be awarded, directing the defendants to refund the advance sale consideration of Rs.5,24,160/- paid by the plaintiff under the agreement of sale dtogether with interest at 24% p.a. from the date of the agreement of sale till date of full land final reliazation and for costs of the suilt.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and Jurisdiction is valued at
Rs.5,24,160-00 and a court fee of Rs.7726/- is being paid under Sec.39, r/w
Sch.I Art.I (b) & (c) of A.P.C.F. and S.V.Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Smt. A.Bhanumathi and Sri V.Viswanadham,Advocates for plaintiff and of Sri
M.Srinivasarao and M.V.R.Bhupathirao, Advocates for 1st defendant and of Sri
S.P.Naidu and R.Appalanaidu, Advocates for 2nd defendant . Plaintiff filed memo not press the suit claim. Memo is recorded and this Court doth order and:
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed as not pressed;
2) that there be no costs; ( Copy of plaint schedule hereto enclosed)
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 01st day of February, 2018.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PLAINTIFF; FOR DEFENDANTS;
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Thursday, this the 1st day of February, 2018.
O.S.No.263/2014
Between: Penmetsa Vishnukumar Raju S/o Satyanarayana Raju, age 53 years,residing at Plot No.A-19, D.No.50-104-1/9, Seeethammadhara N.E.Layout, Visakhapatnam-13. Plaintiff. And:
1.Karri Bangarunaidu S/o Ramunaidu, age 52 years, residing at Asakapalli village, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
2.Karri Ramprasad S/o Ramunaidu, age 44 years, residing at Asakapalli village, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
Defendants.
This suit coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Smt. A.Bhanumathi and Sri V.Viswanadham,Advocates for plaintiff and of Sri M.Srinivasarao and M.V.R.Bhupathirao, Advocates for 1st defendant and of Sri S.P.Naidu and R.Appalanaidu, Advocates for 2nd defendant . Plaintiff filed memo not press the suit claim. Memo is recorded and this Court delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
Suit filed by the plaintilff against the defendants(a) to pass a decree to directilng the defendants to execute the register a sale deed iln favour of the plailntiff in respect of the plaintk kschedule property ilnterms of the agreement of sale executed by the defendants in favour of the plaintiff withiln time fixed by the court (b) in case if the defendants fail to execute and register a sale deed, the court may itself execute and register a sale deed for aand on behalf of the defendants in respect of theplailant schedule at the expenses of the plaintiff (c) to put the plaiantiff’s in possessilon of the plailnt schedule after evicting the defendants therefrom (d) alternatively, if the court feels that for any reason, the relief of specific performance could not be awarded, directing the defendants to refund the advance sale consideration of Rs.5,24,160/- paid by the plaintiff under the agreement of sale dtogether with interest at 24% p.a. from the date of the agreement of sale till date of full land final reliazattion and for costs of the suilt.
Plaintiff filed a memo not press the suit claim as matter was settled out of court. Hence memo is recorded the suilt is dismissed without costs as not pressed.
Pronounced by me in open court, this lthe 1st day of February, 2018.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
LIST OF DOCUMENTS
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Wednesday, this the 31st day of January, 2018.
O.S.No.199/2012
Between: Vennela Pydamma,W/o Somulu, Hindu, age 65 years, household duties, resildilng at D.No.8-4, Mettapalem village, lH/o Vada Cheepurupalli, Paraawada Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
Plaintiff. And:
1.Eerla Sreeramulu,S/o Musalayya, Hindu, age 52 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.7-56,Sriram Nagar, T.Devada, Steet project Office, Visakhapatnam-31.
2.Eerla Suryanarayana, S/o Musalayya, Hindu, age 50 years, cultivation, residilng at D.No.7-55, Sriram Nagar, T.Devada, Steel project Office, Visakhapatnam-31.
3.Eerla Vonumulu, S/o Musalayya, Hindu, age 48 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.30-71-1, Appikonda RH colonyll, Vadlapudi, Gajuwakal Mandal, Visakhapatnam-46.
4. Kundrapu Somulamma, W/o Mutyalu, Hindu, age 62 years, housewife, residing at D.No.30-7-1, Appikonda RH colony, Vadlapudi, Gajuwaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam-46.
5.Kundrapu Simhachalam W/o Appalanaidu, Hindu, age 86 years, residing at Door No.7-5, Sriram Nagar, T.Devada, Steel project office, Visakhapatnam-31.
6. Geddam Kpentamma, W/o Simhachalam, age 58 years, Hindu, Housewife, D.No.5-4, Hastinapuram, H/o Vada Cheepurupalli, Parawada mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
7. Ramineni Venkateswararao, S/o Basavayya, Hindu, age 45 years, business, resilding at D.No.10-32-6, Visalakshmi Nagar, Visakhapatnam.
Defendants.
This suit coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri V.V.Jogayya and Sri M.Srinivasarao, Advocates for the plaintiff and of Sri A.V.S.Bhavani Prasad, Advocate for defendant No.7 and defendants 1,3,4,6 remind exparte and suit against defendant 2 and 5 dismissed for default and this Court delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
Suit for partition of the plaint schedule properties at metes and bounds into seven equal shares and allot one such share to the plaintiff and such equal shares dto thedefendants 1 to 6, and deliver separate possession ofk such share so allotted to the plaintiff and defendants 1 to 6 on converting the joint possession into separate possession; for profits that can be determined by way of separate application; and for costs of the suit.
PW.1 called absent No representation. Hence the matter is dismissed for default.
Pronounced by me in open court, this lthe 31st day of January, 2018.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
FOR PLAINTIFF:-
P.W.1/ dt.8.12.2017 - Vennela Pydamma W/o Somulu.(Chief examination only)
FOR DEFENDANT:- NIL
LIST OF DOCUMENTS
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation: 16-08-2012
Date of Filing:16-08-2012
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Wednesday, this the 31st day of January, 2018.
O.S.No.199/2012
Between: Vennela Pydamma,W/o Somulu, Hindu, age 65 years, household duties, resildilng at D.No.8-4, Mettapalem village, lH/o Vada Cheepurupalli, Paraawada Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
Plaintiff. And:
1.Eerla Sreeramulu,S/o Musalayya, Hindu, age 52 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.7-56, Sriram Nagar, T.Devada, Steet project Office, Visakhapatnam-31.
2.Eerla Suryanarayana, S/o Musalayya, Hindu, age 50 years, cultivation, residilng at D.No.7-55, Sriram Nagar, T.Devada, Steel project Office, Visakhapatnam-31.
3.Eerla Vonumulu, S/o Musalayya, Hindu, age 48 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.30-71-1, Appikonda RH colonyll, Vadlapudi, Gajuwakal Mandal, Visakhapatnam-46.
4. Kundrapu Somulamma, W/o Mutyalu, Hindu, age 62 years, housewife, residing at D.No.30-7-1, Appikonda RH colony, Vadlapudi, Gajuwaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam-46.
5.Kundrapu Simhachalam W/o Appalanaidu, Hindu, age 86 years, residing at Door No.7-5, Sriram Nagar, T.Devada, Steel project office, Visakhapatnam-31.
6. Geddam Kpentamma, W/o Simhachalam, age 58 years, Hindu, Housewife, D.No.5-4, Hastinapuram, H/o Vada Cheepurupalli, Parawada mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
7. Ramineni Venkateswararao, S/o Basavayya, Hindu, age 45 years, business, resilding at D.No.10-32-6, Visalakshmi Nagar, Visakhapatnam.
Defendants.
Suit for partition of the plaint schedule properties at metes and bounds into seven equal shares and allot one such share to the plaintiff and such equal shares dto thedefendants 1 to 6, and deliver separate possession ofk such share so allotted to the plaintiff and defendants 1 to 6 on converting the joint possession into separate possession; for profits that can be determined by way of separate application; and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and Jurisdiction of this court
Valuel of the plaint schedule property consisting of Ac.5.00 cents and @
Rs.15,00,000/- per acre as per basic value register Rs. 16,05,000-00
Plaintiff’s 1/7th share Rs. 10,71,428-00 3/4th value share Rs. 8,03,571-00
C.F. of Rs.10,826-00 is payable, but a fixed court fee of Rs.200/- is paid under
Sec.34(2) of A.P.C.F. Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri V.V.Jogayya and Sri M.Srinivasarao, Advocates for the plaintiff and of Sri
A.V.S.Bhavani Prasad, Advocate for defendant No.7 and defendants 1,3,4,6 remind exparte and suit against defendant 2 and 5 dismissed for default and this Court doth order and ;
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed for default;
2) that there be no order as to costs;
Given under my hand and theseal of this court, this the 31st day of January, 2018.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PLAINTIFF; FOR DEFENDANTS;
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Friday, this the 23rd day of February, 2018.
O.S.No.189/2017
Between: Chekuri Ramaraju S/o Venkata Raju @ Venkatarao, Hindu, age 38 years, cultivation, resident of D.No.1-38, Melupaka village and post, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Plaintiff. And:
Gogula Srinivas S/o Narayana Murthy, Hindu, age 49 years, resident of D.No.1- 113, Melupaka village and post, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
Defendant.
This suit coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri M.Jayaram & Sri BSVRajagopal,Advocates for plaintiff. Plaintiff filed memo not press the suit . Memo is recorded and this Court delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
Suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for recovery oif
Rs.6,84,333/- being the principal and interest due under a promissory note
dated 05.06.2016 for Rs.5,00,000/- executed by the defendant in favour of
plaintiff agreeing to repay the same with interest at 24% p.a., and for costs of the suit.
I.A59 /2018 is allowed. Accordingly the matter is advanced to today from 23.02.2018.
The plaintiff is present. Plaintiff filed memo not pressing the suit as matter was settled out of court. Heard. Memo is recorded. Accordingly suit is dismissed without costs as not pressed.
Pronounced by me in open court, this lthe 1st day of February, 2018.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
LIST OF DOCUMENTS
NIL PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:19-12-2017
Date of Filing:19-12-2017
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Friday, this the 23rd day of February, 2018.
O.S.No.189/2017
Between: Chekuri Ramaraju S/o Venkata Raju @ Venkatarao, Hindu, age 38 years, cultivation, resident of D.No.1-38, Melupaka village and post, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Plaintiff. And:
Gogula Srinivas S/o Narayana Murthy, Hindu, age 49 years, resident of D.No.1- 113, Melupaka village and post, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
Defendant.
Suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for recovery oif
Rs.6,84,333/- being the principal and interest due under a promissory note
dated 05.06.2016 for Rs.5,00,000/- executed by the defendant in favour of
plaintiff agreeing to repay the same with interest at 24% p.a., and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and Jurisdiction is
Rs.6,84,333/- and a court fee of Rs.9,326/- is paid under Section 20 r/w Art.I(a) of A.P.C.F. and S.V.Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri M.Jayaram & Sri B.S.V.Rajagopal, Advocates for plaintiff. Plaintiff filed memo not press the suit . Memo is recorded and this Court doth order and:
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed as not pressed;
2) that there be no costs;
Pronounced by me in open court, this the 1st day of February, 2018.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PLAINTIFF; FOR DEFENDANT;
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Thursday, this the 8th day of February, 2018.
O.S.No.255/2013
Between: Panduri Satyarao S/o Simhachalam, Hindu, age 69 years, retired MPDO, Sabbavaram, N/o Venkatapuram village Munagapaka Mandal, presently, residing at D.No.14-38-1/A, Plot No.303, Viswanadh Residency, Maharanipeta, Visakhapatnam-2. Plaintiff. And:
1. Panduri Kanaka Apparao,s/o Late Nookaiah, Hindu, age 45 years, Resident of Venkatapuram village, Via: Paravada, Thanam Post, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
2. Panduri Ramalakshmi W/o Kanaka Apparao, Hindu, age 40 years, resident of Venkatapuram village, Via: Paravada, Thanam Post, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
3. Chinni China Appalanaidu @ Innabbai,S/o Sanyasi, Hindu, age 69 yearls, resident of Venkatapuram village, via; Paravada, Thanam post, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
Defendants.
This suit coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri B.V.R.Joga rao and Mr.R.Atchutharamaiah, Advocates for plaintiff and of Sri K.P.Naidu, Advocate of defendants. Costs not paid. PW.1 called absent. No representation. Hence the suit is dismissed for default and this Court delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
This is a suit for declaration that the plaintiff is the absolute owner of item No.6 of plaint schedule property, and for recovery of possession of the item No.6 of plaint schedule property after evicting the defendants their men, agents servants there from; for future profits till the delivaery of the possession of item No.6 of schedule property as to be determined in a separate enquiry under order 20 R.12 of CPC; (b) for a permanent injunction restraining the defendants their men, agents, servants, and representatives from ever interfering with plaintiff’s peaceful possession and enjoyment of items 1 to 5 of plaint schedule property in any manner and for costs of the suit.
Costs not paid. PW1 called absent. No representation. Hence the suilt is dismissed for default.
Pronounced by me in open court, this the 8th day of February, 2018.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
FOR PLAINTIFF:-
PW1/ Dt.9-6-2017/Panduri Satya Rao, S/o Simhachalam (chief affidavit only)
FOR DEFENDANT: NIL
LIST OF DOCUMENTS
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation: 26-12-2013 Date of Filing: 26-12-2013
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Thursday, this the 8th day of February, 2018.
O.S.No.255/2013
Between: Panduri Satyarao S/o Simhachalam, Hindu, age 69 years, retired MPDO, Sabbavaram, N/o Venkatapuram village Munagapaka Mandal, presently, residing at D.No.14-38-1/A, Plot No.303, Viswanadh Residency, Maharanipeta, Visakhapatnam-2. Plaintiff. And:
1. Panduri Kanaka Apparao,s/o Late Nookaiah, Hindu, age 45 years, Resident of Venkatapuram village, Via: Paravada, Thanam Post, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
2. Panduri Ramalakshmi W/o Kanaka Apparao, Hindu, age 40 years, resident of Venkatapuram village, Via: Paravada, Thanam Post, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
3. Chinni China Appalanaidu @ Innabbai,S/o Sanyasi, Hindu, age 69 yearls, resident of Venkatapuram village, via; Paravada, Thanam post, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
Defendants.
This is a suit for declaration that the plaintiff is the absolute owner of item No.6 of plaint schedule property, and for recovery of possession of the item No.6 of plaint schedule property after evicting the defendants their men, agents servants there from; for future profits till the delivaery of the possession of item No.6 of schedule property as to be determined in a separate enquiry under order 20 R.12 of CPC; (b) for a permanent injunction restraining the defendants their men, agents, servants, and representatives from ever interfering with plaintiff’s peaceful possession and enjoyment of items 1 to 5 of plaint schedule property in any manner and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suilt for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction is
Rs.10,000/- for relief of permanent injunction and Rs.1,20,000/- being 3/4th market value for relief of declaration and possession and CF of Rs.4,412/- is paid under Sec.26 (c) & 24(a) of A.P.C.F. and S.V.Act.
Total value of item-6 property Rs. 1,60,000-00 3/4th of the Market value is Rs. 1,20,000-00
Notional value of items 1 to 5 Rs. 10,000-00
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri B.V.R.Joga rao and Mr.R.Atchutharamaiah, Advocates for plaintiff and of
Sri K.P.Naidu, Advocate of defendants. Costs not paid. PW.1 called absent. No representation. Hence the suit is dismissed for default and this Court doth order and :
DECREE
1) that the suilt be and the same is hereby dismissed for default;
2) that there be no order as to costs; ( Copy of plaint schedule and valuation slip hereto enclosed)
Pronounced by me in open court, this the 8th day of February, 2018.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PLAINTIFF; FOR DEFENDANTS;
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Tuesday, this the 23rd day of January, 2018.
O.S.No.221/2013
Between: Gulla Sreeram Murthy S/o Chellanna Dora, Hindu, age 33 years, cultivation, resident of Door No.3-16, Buddibanda village H/o Kovagunta village, Vommali Jagannadhapuram post, Ravikamatham Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
Plaintiff. And:
1.Konathala Radhabhai, W/o Seetharam, Hindu, age years, House wife, resident of Door No.2-95, Sampathipuram village, Anakapalle Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
2. Central Bank of India, Main branch, Visakhapatnam represented by its Chief Manager, Visakhapatnam.
Defendants.
This suit coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Venkateswara Rao, Advocate for plaintiff and of Sri Ch.S.S.Ramachandrarao, Advocate for defendant No.2 and defendant No.1 remained exparte. Costs not paid. PW.1 called absent No representation on either side.Hence the suilt is dismissed for default and this Court delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
This is a suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant (a) for specific performance of the sale agreement dated 27.05.2005 by directing thedefendant to execute a regular sale deed on a proper stamp paper and register the samek in respect of the plaint schedule property in favoudr of the plaintiff and to do all the acts necaessary to put the plaintiff in possession with such time as the court fixes, ilf the 1st defendant, fails to execute the regular sale deed, the court may execute the same at the costs of the plaintiffl and recover the same from thedefendant (b) for an alternative relief foir refund of the advance amount of Rs.4,00,000/- with subsequent interest at the rate of 24% p.a. from the 1st defendant and for costs of the suilt.
Costs not paid. PW1 called absent. No representation on either side.
Hence the suit is dismissed for default.
Pronounced by me in open court, this the 23rd day of January, 2018.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIl
LIST OF DOCUMENTS
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
Date of presentation:22-11-2013 Date of Filing :22-11-2013
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Tuesday, this the 23rd day of January, 2018.
O.S.No.221/2013
Between: Gulla Sreeram Murthy S/o Chellanna Dora, Hindu, age 33 years, cultivation, resident of Door No.3-16, Buddibanda village H/o Kovagunta village, Vommali Jagannadhapuram post, Ravikamatham Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
Plaintiff. And:
1.Konathala Radhabhai, W/o Seetharam, Hindu, age years, House wife, resident of Door No.2-95, Sampathipuram village, Anakapalle Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
2. Central Bank of India, Main branch, Visakhapatnam represented by its
Chief Manager, Visakhapatnam.
Defendants.
This is a suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant (a) for specific performance of the sale agreement dated 27.05.2005 by directing thedefendant to execute a regular sale deed on a proper stamp paper and register the samek in respect of the plaint schedule property in favoudr of the plaintiff and to do all the acts necaessary to put the plaintiff in possession with such time as the court fixes, ilf the 1st defendant, fails to execute the regular sale deed, the court may execute the same at the costs of the plaintiffl and recover the same from thedefendant (b) for an alternative relief foir refund of the advance amount of Rs.4,00,000/- with subsequent interest at the rate of 24% p.a. from the 1st defendant and for costs of the suilt.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and Jurisdiction is
Rs.4,00,000/- and a court fee of Rs.6,426/- is paid under Sec.39 of A.P.C.F. and
S.V.Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri G.Venkateswara Rao, Advocate for plaintiff and of Sri
Ch.S.S.Ramachandrarao, Advocate for defendant No.2 and defendant No.1 remained exparte. Costs not paid. PW.1 called absent No representation on either side. Hence the suilt is dismissed for default and this Court doth order and:
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed for default;
2) that there be no order as to costs; ( Copy of Plaint schedule hereto enclosed)
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 23rd day of January, 2018.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PLAINTIFF; FOR DEFENDANTS;
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:22-11-2010 Date of Filing: 22-11-2010
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle
Wednesday, this the 27 th day of December, 2017
LAOP.NO.125/2012 Between:
1) Sri Karaka Kalyanam S/o late Jaggunaidu, Jamudulapalem village, Bayyavaram ,Kasimkota Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
2) Karaka Sambhamurthy, S/o late Jagunaidu, Jamudulapalem village, Bayyavaram, Kasimkota Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
Claimants And:
Special Tahsildar, Land Acquisition officer, Revenue Division, Visakhapatnam Bayyavaram, Kasimkota, Visakhapatnam District.
Referring officer.
This is a reference made under Sec.30 &31 of Land Acquisition Act by the Special Tahasildar Land Acquisition Revenue Division Visakhapatnam for formation of Left canal to reservoir across Rangabolupgedda in Bayyavaram village for an extent of Ac.0.063/4 cents iln S.No.664/4B, 664/10/A ,Bayyavaram village of Kasimkota Mandal.
In this reference there are 2 (two) claimants.
The LAO deposited an amount of Rs.11,03,066-00 towards compensation amount for the Award No.22/2006 dated 20-12-2005 and the same was kept in
FDR of State Bank of India, Anakapalle.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in person and of Sri Asst.Government Pleader for Referring officer. Claimant called absent.
Claim statement not filed. No representation. Hence reference is closed and this Court doth order and:
DECREE
1) that L.A.O.P petition be and the same is hereby closed as claimant called absent No representation;
2) that there be no order as to costs.
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 27th day of December, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR CLAIMANTS: FOR REFERING OFFICER;
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Wednesday, this the 27 th day of December, 2017
LAOP.NO.125/2012 Between:
1) Sri Karaka Kalyanam S/o late Jaggunaidu, Jamudulapalem village, Bayyavaram ,Kasimkota Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
2) Karaka Sambhamurthy, S/o late Jagunaidu, Jamudulapalem village, Bayyavaram, Kasimkota Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
Claimants And:
Special Tahsildar, Land Acquisition officer, Revenue Division, Visakhapatnam Bayyavaram, Kasimkota, Visakhapatnam District.
Referring officer.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in person and of Sri Asst.Government Pleader for Referring officer. Claimant called absent. Claim statement not filed. No representation. Hence reference ils closed and this Court delivered the following:
ORDER
This is a reference made under Sec.30 &31 of Land Acquisition Act by the Special Tahasildar Land Acquisition Revenue Division Visakhapatnam for formation of Left canal to reservoir across Rangabolupgedda in Bayyavaram village for an extent of Ac.0.063/4 cents iln S.No.664/4B, 664/10/A ,Bayyavaram village of Kasimkota Mandal.
In this reference there are 2 (two) claimants.
The LAO deposited an amount of Rs.11,03,066-00 towards compensation amount for the Award No.22/2006 dated 20-12-2005 and the same was kept in
FDR of State Bank of India, Anakapalle.
Claim statement not filed. Claimant called absent. No representation.
Perusal of record reveals the claimant present in person on 28.08.2012 thereafter matter ils posted for time to time for filing claim statement. So far no claim statement ils filled till today. Today also clailmant calaled absent. No representation. Hence reference is closed consign the record toi record room.
Pronounced by me in open court, thisthe 27th day of December, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
LIST OF DOCUMENTS
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Friday, this the 5th day of January, 2018
SOP.NO.74/2017 Between: 1)Ganta Venkatesh,S/o late Neeladri Rao,lHilndu, age 21 years, unemployee, residing at D.No.3-3-69, NTR colony, Sirasapalli (village) Narasingaraopeta (PO) Visakhapatnam District.
2) Ganta Satyadevi,D/o Neeladri Rao, Hilndu, age 22 years, residing at D.No. 3-3-69, NTR colonyl, Sirasapalli village, Narasingaraopeta P.O. Visakhapatnam District. Petitioners And:
The Depot Manager, A.P.S.R.T.C, Visakha Steel City Depot, Kurmannapalem, Visakhapatnam-5300046.
Respondant
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri V.Apparao, Advocate for Petitioners. Petitioner called absent No representation and this Court delivered the following:
ORDER
This is a petition filed under 372 of the Indian Succession Act, 1954.
This is a petition filed by the petitioners to issue succession certificate in favour of the petitioners to receive the amounts as shown in the schedule from the respondent and for other reliefs.
Petitioner called absent No representation hence petition is dismissed for default.
Pronounced by me in open court, this the 5th day of January, 2018.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
LIST OF DOCUMENTS
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:25-11-2017
Date of Filing:01-12-2017
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Friday, this the 5th day of January, 2018
SOP.NO.74/2017 Between: 1)Ganta Venkatesh,S/o late Neeladri Rao,lHilndu, age 21 years, unemployee, residing at D.No.3-3-69, NTR colony, Sirasapalli (village) Narasingaraopeta (PO) Visakhapatnam District.
2) Ganta Satyadevi,D/o Neeladri Rao, Hilndu, age 22 years, residing at D.No. 3-3-69, NTR colonyl, Sirasapalli village, Narasingaraopeta P.O. Visakhapatnam District. Petitioners And:
The Depot Manager, A.P.S.R.T.C, Visakha Steel City Depot, Kurmannapalem, Visakhapatnam-5300046.
Respondant
This is a petition filed under 372 of the Indian Succession Act, 1954.
This is a petition filed by the petitioners to issue succession certificate in favour of the petitioners to receive the amounts as shown in the schedule from the respondent and for other reliefs.
A court fee of Rs.10/- is paid under Art.VII of Sch.I of APCF and SVAct.
This petition coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri V.Apparao, Advocate for Petitioners. Petitioner called absent No representation and this Court doth order and:
DECREE
1) that the petition be and the same is hereby dismissed for default;
2) that there be no order as to costs;
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 5th day of January, 2018.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PETITIONER: FOR RESPONDENT;
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:19-04-2014 Date of Filing:30-04-2014
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Friday, this the 19th day of January, 2018
HMOP.NO.26/2014
Between: Nanibilli Nookaraju,S/o late Baburao, Hindu, age 30 years, Driver, resident of Door No. Tegada village, Kasimkota Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
Petitioner And:
Nanibilli Nagalakshmi,lW/o Nookaraju, Hindu, age 22 years, housewife, residing at C/o Pasupuleti Eswararao, Door No. Kandipudi villlage, Butchiyyapeta and Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
Respondant
This is a petition filed under Sec.13(1) (ia) and (ib) of H.M.Act.
This is a petition filed by the petitioners (a) for grant of decree of divorce by dissolving the marriage between the petitioner and respondent on 12.11.2011 on the ground of cruelty and desertion and for costs of the suit.
A fixed court fee of Rs.10/- is paid under Art.IL (vii) Sch.II of A.P.C.F. and
S.V.Act.
This petition coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri K.S.Achari and Sri G.Krilshnaveni, Advocates for Petitioner and of Sri K.David, Advocate for Respondent. Both parties called absent No representation on either side hence this Court doth order and :
DECREE
1) that the petition be and the same is hereby dismissed for defaualt;
2) that there be no order as to costs;
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 19th day of January, 2018.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PETITIONER: FOR RESPONDENT;
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Friday, this the 19th day of January, 2018
HMOP.NO.26/2014
Between: Nanibilli Nookaraju,S/o late Baburao, Hindu, age 30 years, Driver, resident of Door No. Tegada village, Kasimkota Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
Petitioner And:
Nanibilli Nagalakshmi,lW/o Nookaraju, Hindu, age 22 years, housewife, residing at C/o Pasupuleti Eswararao, Door No. Kandipudi villlage, Butchiyyapeta and Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
Respondant
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri K.S.Achari and Sri G.Krilshnaveni, Advocates for Petitioner and of Sri K.David, Advocate for Respondent. Both parties called absent No representation on either side hence this Court delivered the following:
ORDER
This is a petition filed under Sec.13(1) (ia) and (ib) of H.M.Act.
This is a petition filed by the petitioners (a) for grant of decree of divorce by dissolving the marriage between the petitioner and respondent on 12.11.2011 on the ground of cruelty and desertion and for costs of the suit.
Both parties called absent No representation on either side hence the petition is dismissed for default.
Pronounced by me in open court, this the 19th day of January, 2018.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
LIST OF DOCUMENTS
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:02-11-2005 Date of Filing:29-11-2005
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Thursday, this the 31st day of August, 2017
I.P.No.13/2005 Between: Naga Manikyam wife of Tatayyalu, age 70 years, Hindu, No occupation, residing at Nagavamsam Veedhi, Anakapalle.
Petitioner. And:
1. Ravi Seshukumari, wife of Sreenivasarao, age 25 yearsl, Hindu, Household duties, residing at Dondaparthi, Visakhapatnam-16.
2. Naga Laxmikantam, wife of Ramana,l age 35 years, Hindu, residing near Santabyalu, Vaddadi village, Visakhapatnam District.
3. Yelugula Ramana, son of Apparao, age 40 years, Allikhanudupalem, Anakapalle Mandal.
4. Rayi Bullemma, wife of Jagannadham, age 50 years, hindu, Lokavari veedhi, Anakapalle.
5.Nagumalla Sanyasamma, wife of Venkatarao, age 60 years, Hindu, Maturu village, Anakakpalle Mandal.
6.Kolluru Pramod Kumar, son of Narasingarao, age 35 years, Hindu, Main road,Anakapalle.
7.Palukuril Kamaraju, son of Sreeramamurthy,l age 35 years, Hindu, business, residing at Anjayya colony, Anakapalle.
Respondants.
This is a petition filed by the petitioner against the respondents(a) to declare the petitioner as an insolvent and discharge her from her creditors and for costs of the petition.
A fixed court fees of Rs.50/- is paid on this petition under Sch.II.Article II of ACF and S.V.;Act. An amount of Rs.1500/- paid towards administrative charges and publication by way of challan No.2081, dated 28.10.2005.
This petiltion coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri P.S.Kumar and Sri P.A.Narasimham, Advocates for Petitioner . As memo filed vide GR.No.1563/dt.07.07.2017 petitioner died and this Court doth order and:
DECREE
1) that the Insolvent petition be and the same is hereby closed as petitioner died;
2) that there be no order as to costs; ( copy of petition A and B schedule hereto enclosed)
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 31st day of August,2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PETITIONER: FOR RESPONDENTS;
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Thursday, this the 31st day of August, 2017
I.P.No.13/2005 Between: Naga Manikyam wife of Tatayyalu, age 70 years, Hindu, No occupation, residing at Nagavamsam Veedhi, Anakapalle.
Petitioner. And:
1. Ravi Seshukumari, wife of Sreenivasarao, age 25 yearsl, Hindu, Household duties, residing at Dondaparthi, Visakhapatnam-16.
2. Naga Laxmikantam, wife of Ramana,l age 35 years, Hindu, residing near Santabyalu, Vaddadi village, Visakhapatnam District.
3. Yelugula Ramana, son of Apparao, age 40 years, Allikhanudupalem, Anakapalle Mandal.
4. Rayi Bullemma, wife of Jagannadham, age 50 years, hindu, Lokavari veedhi, Anakapalle 5.Nagumalla Sanyasamma, wife of Venkatarao, age 60 years, Hindu, Maturu village, Anakakpalle Mandal. 6.Kolluru Pramod Kumar, son of Narasingarao, age 35 years, Hindu, Main road,Anakapalle. 7.Palukuril Kamaraju, son of Sreeramamurthy,l age 35 years, Hindu, business, residing at Anjayya colony, Anakapalle.
Respondants.
This petiltion coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri P.S.Kumar and Sri P.A.Narasimham, Advocates for Petitioner . As memo filed vide GR.No.1563/dt.07.07.2017 petitioner died and this Court delivered the following:
ORDER
This is a petition filed by the petitioner against the respondents(a) to declare the petitioner as an insolvent and discharge her from her creditors and for costs of the petition.
As memo filed vide GR.No.1563/dt.07.07.2017 as petitioner/insolvent died the petition is closed.
Pronounced by me in open court, this the 31st day of August, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
LIST OF DOCUMENTS
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation: 30-10-2012/15-11-2012 Date of Fililng: 15-11-2012
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Thursday, this the 22nd day of December,2017
I.P.No.04/2012 Between: 1.Vaddi Raju, S/o Appalaraju, age 35 years, residing at D.No.1-169, Ramakpuram colony, A.M.A.L.College road, Kothuru village andl panchayat, Anakapalle Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
Petitioner. And:
1. Afoz Bhanu,W/o Muzzafer Shariff, age 35 years, Muslim, residing at Flat No.F.2, K.C. Apartments, near Saibaba Temple, Sarada Nagar, Anakapalle,Visakhapatnam District. 2.Md.Fathilma, husband’s namek not known to the petitioner, C/o Afoz Bhanu, W/o Muzzafer Shariff, age 28 ayears, Hindu, residing at Flat No.F.2, K.C.Akpartments, near Saibaba Temple, Sarada Nagar, Anakapalle, Visakhapatnam District.
3. Md. Ahamad, S/o Md.Abdul Rawoof, age 30 years, Muslim, residing at D.No. 7-48/1, Muslims steet, Pedda Bazar, Kasimkota village and mandal,
Visakhapatnam District.
4. M.Sameema, W/o Md.Abdul Rawoof, age 40 years, Muslim, residing at D.No.7-48/1, Muslims street, Pedda Bazar, Kasimkota village and mandal, Visakhapatnam District. 5.Zameela Begum, D/o Md.Abdul Rawoof, age 25 years, Muslim, resilding at D.No.7-48/1, Muslims street, Pedda Bazar,l Kasimkota village and mandal, Visakhapatnam District. 6.Shaik Halima, W/o Mohaddin,l age 30 years, Muslim care of M.Swarna Lakshmi, Teacher, opposite Ramalayam, D.No.12-4-105, Pudimadaka raod, Anakapalle, Visakhapatnam District. 7.Karim, father’s name not known to the petitioner,l age 28 years, Muslim, residing at care of M.Swarna Lakshmi, Teacher, opposite Ramalayam, D.No.12-4-105, pudimadaka road, Anakapalle, Vilsakhapatnam Dilstrict. 8.A.Arjunarao, father’s name not known to the petitioner, age 32 years, Teacher in A.M.A.A. High School, residing at D.No.2-139, near K.L.N.Parlour, A.M.A.L. college road, Kothuru village, Anakapalle mandal, Visakhapatnam District. 9.Bobbili Anatha Lakshmi W/o Bobbilil Appalaraju, age 25 years, Hindu, Teacher,l residing at Vijayaramarajupeta, Anakapalle, Visakhapatnam District.
Respondants.
Petitioner to declare the as insolvent person ( indigent person) and discharge him from all of theliabilities and debts due to the respondents and or costs of the petition.
A court fee of Rs.10/- is paid under Art.11(L)2(ili) of Sch.ILI of A.P.C.F. and
S.V.Act.
This petiltion coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri S.Narasingarao, I.R.Gangadhar, Advocates for Petitioner and petitioner called present filed memo not pressing the petition. Memo is recorded and this Court doth order and :
DECREE
1) that the Insolvent petition be and the same is hereby dismissed as not pressed;
2) that there be no order as to costs; ( copy of petition A and B schedule hereto enclosed)
Pronounced by me in open court, this the 22nd day of December,2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PETITIONER: FOR RESPONDENTS;
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Thursday, this the 22nd day of December,2017
I.P.No.04/2012 Between: 1.Vaddi Raju, S/o Appalaraju, age 35 years, residing at D.No.1-169, Ramakpuram colony, A.M.A.L.College road, Kothuru village andl panchayat, Anakapalle Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
Petitioner. And:
1. Afoz Bhanu,W/o Muzzafer Shariff, age 35 years, Muslim, residing at Flat No.F.2, K.C. Apartments, near Saibaba Temple, Sarada Nagar, Anakapalle,Visakhapatnam District. 2.Md.Fathilma, husband’s namek not known to the petitioner, C/o Afoz Bhanu, W/o Muzzafer Shariff, age 28 ayears, Hindu, residing at Flat No.F.2, K.C.Akpartments, near Saibaba Temple, Sarada Nagar, Anakapalle, Visakhapatnam District.
3. Md. Ahamad, S/o Md.Abdul Rawoof, age 30 years, Muslim, residing at D.No. 7-48/1, Muslims steet, Pedda Bazar, Kasimkota village and mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
4. M.Sameema, W/o Md.Abdul Rawoof, age 40 years, Muslim, residing at D.No.7-48/1, Muslims street, Pedda Bazar, Kasimkota village and mandal,
Visakhapatnam District. 5.Zameela Begum, D/o Md.Abdul Rawoof, age 25 years, Muslim, resilding at D.No.7-48/1, Muslims street, Pedda Bazar,l Kasimkota village and mandal, Visakhapatnam District. 6.Shaik Halima, W/o Mohaddin,l age 30 years, Muslim care of M.Swarna Lakshmi, Teacher, opposite Ramalayam, D.No.12-4-105, Pudimadaka raod, Anakapalle, Visakhapatnam District. 7.Karim, father’s name not known to the petitioner,l age 28 years, Muslim, residing at care of M.Swarna Lakshmi, Teacher, opposite Ramalayam, D.No.12-4-105, pudimadaka road, Anakapalle, Vilsakhapatnam Dilstrict. 8.A.Arjunarao, father’s name not known to the petitioner, age 32 years, Teacher in A.M.A.A. High School, residing at D.No.2-139, near K.L.N.Parlour, A.M.A.L. college road, Kothuru village, Anakapalle mandal, Visakhapatnam District. 9.Bobbili Anatha Lakshmi W/o Bobbilil Appalaraju, age 25 years, Hindu, Teacher,l residing at Vijayaramarajupeta, Anakapalle, Visakhapatnam District.
Respondants.
This petiltion coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri S.Narasingarao, I.R.Gangadhar, Advocates for Petitioner and petitioner called present filed memo not pressing the petition. Memo is recorded and this Court delivered the following:
ORDER
Petitioner to declare the as insolvent person ( indigent person) and discharge him from all of theliabilities and debts due to the respondents; and or costs of the suit.
Petitioner called present filed memo not pressing the petition. Heard.
Memo is recorded. This petition dismissed as not pressed.
Pronounced by me in open court, this the 22nd day of December,2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
LIST OF DOCUMENTS
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentatioin:21-03-2012
Date of Filing:09-04-2012
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Wednesday, this thw 24th day of January, 2018.
I.P.No.01/2012 Between: 1.Doddi Naga Mophana Rao, S/o late Appa Rao, Hindu, age 32 years, cultivation, residing at Nagulapalli village, Munagapaka Mandal. 2.Polamarasetty Adi Murthy, S/o Apparao, Hindu, age 35 yealrs, cultivation, residing at Teacher’s colonyl, 3rd line, Nagulapalli village, Munagapaka Mandal.
3.Yellapu Sasi Bhushanam Rao, S/o late Kondala Rao, Hindu, age 47 years, residing at D.No.15-19-6, P.V.R.Naidu street, Opp. Women college, Gavarapalem, Anakapalli. Petitioners. And:
1.Yellapu Mangayyamma,W/o late Appa Rao, Hindu, age 48 years, business, residing at D.No.2-13-13,l Bo;ddeda vari veedhi,l Vijayaramarajupeta, Anakapalli. 2.Yellapu Venkata Nooka Apparao, S/o late Apparao, Hindu, age 30 years, business, rest-do-
3. Yellapu Vani, W/o Venkata Nooka Appa Rao, Hindu, age 23 years, business, C/o Pentakota Ramana, D.No.6-42-4, TVN colony,besides drivaer’s colony, Old Gajuwaka, Visakhapatnam District.
4. Adari Tilak, W/o Srinivasa Rao, Hindu, age 23 years, Business, residing at C/o Adari Rama Ra;o, Door No.14-13, Opp. Pada Gas Godown Court veedhi, Gandhinagaram, Anakapalli.
5. Yellapu Rama Krishna, S/o late Nooka Raju, Hindu, age 42 years, employee, residing at Door No.2-13-13 rest -do-.
Respondants.
This is a petition filed U/Sec.9 of provincial Insolvency Act praying to adjudge the respondent No.1 as insolvent ;(b) to appoint an interim receiver in respect of the estate of 1st respondent i.e. “B” schedule property; (c) to make an order directing the official receiver to take actual physical possession over the”B” schedule property.
A fixed court fee of Rs.10-00 is paid thereon under Sectilon 20 ScheduleI
Art.II(a) of APCF and S.V.Act. Administrative charges of Rs.2000/- is paid vide challan No.6604 dated 29.03.2012.
This petiltion coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri Budha Trinadha Rao, Advocate for Petiltioners and No evidence isfiled the petitioners called absent No representatilon and this Court doth order and :
DECREE
1) that the Insolvency petition be and the same is hereby dismissed for default;
2) that there be no order as to costs; ( Copy of petition A and B schedule hereto enclosed)
Given under my hand and the seal of this court this the 24th day of January, 2018.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PETITIONERS: FOR RESPONDENTS;
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Wednesday, this thw 24th day of January, 2018.
I.P.No.01/2012 Between: 1.Doddi Naga Mophana Rao, S/o late Appa Rao, Hindu, age 32 years, cultivation, residing at Nagulapalli village, Munagapaka Mandal. 2.Polamarasetty Adi Murthy, S/o Apparao, Hindu, age 35 yealrs, cultivation, residing at Teacher’s colonyl, 3rd line, Nagulapalli village, Munagapaka Mandal.
3.Yellapu Sasi Bhushanam Rao, S/o late Kondala Rao, Hindu, age 47 years, residing at D.No.15-19-6, P.V.R.Naidu street, Opp. Women college, Gavarapalem, Anakapalli. Petitioners. And:
1.Yellapu Mangayyamma,W/o late Appa Rao, Hindu, age 48 years, business, residing at D.No.2-13-13,l Bo;ddeda vari veedhi,l Vijayaramarajupeta, Anakapalli. 2.Yellapu Venkata Nooka Apparao, S/o late Apparao, Hindu, age 30 years, business, rest-do-
3. Yellapu Vani, W/o Venkata Nooka Appa Rao, Hindu, age 23 years, business, C/o Pentakota Ramana, D.No.6-42-4, TVN colony,besides drivaer’s colony, Old Gajuwaka, Visakhapatnam District.
4. Adari Tilak, W/o Srinivasa Rao, Hindu, age 23 years, Business, residing at C/o Adari Rama Ra;o, Door No.14-13, Opp. Pada Gas Godown Court veedhi, Gandhinagaram, Anakapalli.
5. Yellapu Rama Krishna, S/o late Nooka Raju, Hindu, age 42 years, employee, residing at Door No.2-13-13 rest -do-.
Respondants.
This petiltion coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri Budha Trinadha Rao, Advocate for Petiltioners and No evidence isfiled the petitioners called absent No representatilon and this Court delivered the following:
ORDER
This is a petition filed U/Sec.9 of provincial Insolvency Act praying to adjudge the respondent No.1 as insolvent ;(b) to appoint an interim receiver in respect of the estate of 1st respondent i.e. “B” schedule property; (c) to make an order directing the official receiver to take actual physical possession over the”B” schedule property.
No evidence is filed the petitioner called absent No representation. Hence petition is dismissed for default.
Pronounced by me in open court, this the 24th day of January, 2018.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
LIST OF DOCUMENTS
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation: 20-10-2014 Date of Filing:20-04-2014
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Thursday, this the 1st day of February, 2018.
O.S.No.263/2014
Between: Penmetsa Vishnukumar Raju S/o Satyanarayana Raju, age 53 years, residing at Plot No.A-19, D.No.50-104-1/9, Seeethammadhara N.E.Layout, Visakhapatnam-13. Plaintiff.
And:
1.Karri Bangarunaidu S/o Ramunaidu, age 52 years, residing at Asakapalli village, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
2.Karri Ramprasad S/o Ramunaidu, age 44 years, residing at Asakapalli village, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
Defendants.
Suit filed by the plaintilff against the defendants(a) to pass a decree to directilng the defendants to execute the register a sale deed in favour of the plaintiff in respect of the plaintk kschedule property interms of the agreement of sale executed by the defendants in favour of the plaintiff within time fixed by the court (b) in case if the defendants fail to execute and register a sale deed, the court may itself execute and register a sale deed for aand on behalf of the defendants in respect of theplailant schedule at the expenses of the plaintiff
(c) to put the plaiantiff’s in possessilon of the plailnt schedule after evicting the defendants therefrom (d) alternatively, if the court feels that for any reason, the relief of specific performance could not be awarded, directing the defendants to refund the advance sale consideration of Rs.5,24,160/- paid by the plaintiff under the agreement of sale dtogether with interest at 24% p.a. from the date of the agreement of sale till date of full land final reliazation and for costs of the suilt.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and Jurisdiction is valued at
Rs.5,24,160-00 and a court fee of Rs.7726/- is being paid under Sec.39, r/w
Sch.I Art.I (b) & (c) of A.P.C.F. and S.V.Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Smt. A.Bhanumathi and Sri V.Viswanadham,Advocates for plaintiff and of Sri
M.Srinivasarao and M.V.R.Bhupathirao, Advocates for 1st defendant and of Sri
S.P.Naidu and R.Appalanaidu, Advocates for 2nd defendant . Plaintiff filed memo not press the suit claim. Memo is recorded and this Court doth order and:
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed as not pressed;
2) that there be no costs; ( Copy of plaint schedule hereto enclosed)
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 01st day of February, 2018.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PLAINTIFF; FOR DEFENDANTS;
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Thursday, this the 1st day of February, 2018.
O.S.No.263/2014
Between:
Penmetsa Vishnukumar Raju S/o Satyanarayana Raju, age 53 years,residing at Plot No.A-19, D.No.50-104-1/9, Seeethammadhara N.E.Layout, Visakhapatnam-13. Plaintiff. And:
1.Karri Bangarunaidu S/o Ramunaidu, age 52 years, residing at Asakapalli village, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
2.Karri Ramprasad S/o Ramunaidu, age 44 years, residing at Asakapalli village, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
Defendants.
This suit coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Smt. A.Bhanumathi and Sri V.Viswanadham,Advocates for plaintiff and of Sri M.Srinivasarao and M.V.R.Bhupathirao, Advocates for 1st defendant and of Sri S.P.Naidu and R.Appalanaidu, Advocates for 2nd defendant . Plaintiff filed memo not press the suit claim. Memo is recorded and this Court delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
Suit filed by the plaintilff against the defendants(a) to pass a decree to directilng the defendants to execute the register a sale deed iln favour of the plailntiff in respect of the plaintk kschedule property ilnterms of the agreement of sale executed by the defendants in favour of the plaintiff withiln time fixed by the court (b) in case if the defendants fail to execute and register a sale deed, the court may itself execute and register a sale deed for aand on behalf of the defendants in respect of theplailant schedule at the expenses of the plaintiff (c) to put the plaiantiff’s in possessilon of the plailnt schedule after evicting the defendants therefrom (d) alternatively, if the court feels that for any reason, the relief of specific performance could not be awarded, directing the defendants to refund the advance sale consideration of Rs.5,24,160/- paid by the plaintiff under the agreement of sale dtogether with interest at 24% p.a. from the date of the agreement of sale till date of full land final reliazattion and for costs of the suilt.
Plaintiff filed a memo not press the suit claim as matter was settled out of court. Hence memo is recorded the suilt is dismissed without costs as not pressed.
Pronounced by me in open court, this lthe 1st day of February, 2018.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
LIST OF DOCUMENTS
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Wednesday, this the 31st day of January, 2018.
O.S.No.199/2012
Between: Vennela Pydamma,W/o Somulu, Hindu, age 65 years, household duties, resildilng at D.No.8-4, Mettapalem village, lH/o Vada Cheepurupalli, Paraawada Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
Plaintiff. And:
1.Eerla Sreeramulu,S/o Musalayya, Hindu, age 52 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.7-56,Sriram Nagar, T.Devada, Steet project Office, Visakhapatnam-31.
2.Eerla Suryanarayana, S/o Musalayya, Hindu, age 50 years, cultivation, residilng at D.No.7-55, Sriram Nagar, T.Devada, Steel project Office, Visakhapatnam-31.
3.Eerla Vonumulu, S/o Musalayya, Hindu, age 48 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.30-71-1, Appikonda RH colonyll, Vadlapudi, Gajuwakal Mandal, Visakhapatnam-46.
4. Kundrapu Somulamma, W/o Mutyalu, Hindu, age 62 years, housewife, residing at D.No.30-7-1, Appikonda RH colony, Vadlapudi, Gajuwaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam-46.
5.Kundrapu Simhachalam W/o Appalanaidu, Hindu, age 86 years, residing at Door No.7-5, Sriram Nagar, T.Devada, Steel project office, Visakhapatnam-31.
6. Geddam Kpentamma, W/o Simhachalam, age 58 years, Hindu, Housewife, D.No.5-4, Hastinapuram, H/o Vada Cheepurupalli, Parawada mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
7. Ramineni Venkateswararao, S/o Basavayya, Hindu, age 45 years, business, resilding at D.No.10-32-6, Visalakshmi Nagar, Visakhapatnam.
Defendants.
This suit coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri V.V.Jogayya and Sri M.Srinivasarao, Advocates for the plaintiff and of Sri A.V.S.Bhavani Prasad, Advocate for defendant No.7 and defendants 1,3,4,6 remind exparte and suit against defendant 2 and 5 dismissed for default and this Court delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
Suit for partition of the plaint schedule properties at metes and bounds into seven equal shares and allot one such share to the plaintiff and such equal shares dto thedefendants 1 to 6, and deliver separate possession ofk such share so allotted to the plaintiff and defendants 1 to 6 on converting the joint possession into separate possession; for profits that can be determined by way of separate application; and for costs of the suit.
PW.1 called absent No representation. Hence the matter is dismissed for default.
Pronounced by me in open court, this lthe 31st day of January, 2018.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
FOR PLAINTIFF:-
P.W.1/ dt.8.12.2017 - Vennela Pydamma W/o Somulu.(Chief examination only)
FOR DEFENDANT:- NIL
LIST OF DOCUMENTS
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation: 16-08-2012
Date of Filing:16-08-2012
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Wednesday, this the 31st day of January, 2018.
O.S.No.199/2012
Between:
Vennela Pydamma,W/o Somulu, Hindu, age 65 years, household duties, resildilng at D.No.8-4, Mettapalem village, lH/o Vada Cheepurupalli, Paraawada Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
Plaintiff. And:
1.Eerla Sreeramulu,S/o Musalayya, Hindu, age 52 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.7-56, Sriram Nagar, T.Devada, Steet project Office, Visakhapatnam-31.
2.Eerla Suryanarayana, S/o Musalayya, Hindu, age 50 years, cultivation, residilng at D.No.7-55, Sriram Nagar, T.Devada, Steel project Office, Visakhapatnam-31.
3.Eerla Vonumulu, S/o Musalayya, Hindu, age 48 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.30-71-1, Appikonda RH colonyll, Vadlapudi, Gajuwakal Mandal, Visakhapatnam-46.
4. Kundrapu Somulamma, W/o Mutyalu, Hindu, age 62 years, housewife, residing at D.No.30-7-1, Appikonda RH colony, Vadlapudi, Gajuwaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam-46.
5.Kundrapu Simhachalam W/o Appalanaidu, Hindu, age 86 years, residing at Door No.7-5, Sriram Nagar, T.Devada, Steel project office, Visakhapatnam-31.
6. Geddam Kpentamma, W/o Simhachalam, age 58 years, Hindu, Housewife, D.No.5-4, Hastinapuram, H/o Vada Cheepurupalli, Parawada mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
7. Ramineni Venkateswararao, S/o Basavayya, Hindu, age 45 years, business, resilding at D.No.10-32-6, Visalakshmi Nagar, Visakhapatnam.
Defendants.
Suit for partition of the plaint schedule properties at metes and bounds into seven equal shares and allot one such share to the plaintiff and such equal shares dto thedefendants 1 to 6, and deliver separate possession ofk such share so allotted to the plaintiff and defendants 1 to 6 on converting the joint possession into separate possession; for profits that can be determined by way of separate application; and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and Jurisdiction of this court
Valuel of the plaint schedule property consisting of Ac.5.00 cents and @
Rs.15,00,000/- per acre as per basic value register Rs. 16,05,000-00
Plaintiff’s 1/7th share Rs. 10,71,428-00 3/4th value share Rs. 8,03,571-00
C.F. of Rs.10,826-00 is payable, but a fixed court fee of Rs.200/- is paid under
Sec.34(2) of A.P.C.F. Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri V.V.Jogayya and Sri M.Srinivasarao, Advocates for the plaintiff and of Sri
A.V.S.Bhavani Prasad, Advocate for defendant No.7 and defendants 1,3,4,6 remind exparte and suit against defendant 2 and 5 dismissed for default and this Court doth order and ;
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed for default;
2) that there be no order as to costs;
Given under my hand and theseal of this court, this the 31st day of January, 2018.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PLAINTIFF; FOR DEFENDANTS;
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Friday, this the 23rd day of February, 2018.
O.S.No.189/2017
Between: Chekuri Ramaraju S/o Venkata Raju @ Venkatarao, Hindu, age 38 years, cultivation, resident of D.No.1-38, Melupaka village and post, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Plaintiff. And:
Gogula Srinivas S/o Narayana Murthy, Hindu, age 49 years, resident of D.No.1- 113, Melupaka village and post, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
Defendant.
This suit coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri M.Jayaram & Sri BSVRajagopal,Advocates for plaintiff. Plaintiff filed memo not press the suit . Memo is recorded and this Court delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
Suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for recovery oif
Rs.6,84,333/- being the principal and interest due under a promissory note
dated 05.06.2016 for Rs.5,00,000/- executed by the defendant in favour of
plaintiff agreeing to repay the same with interest at 24% p.a., and for costs of the suit.
I.A59 /2018 is allowed. Accordingly the matter is advanced to today from 23.02.2018.
The plaintiff is present. Plaintiff filed memo not pressing the suit as matter was settled out of court. Heard. Memo is recorded. Accordingly suit is dismissed without costs as not pressed.
Pronounced by me in open court, this lthe 1st day of February, 2018.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
LIST OF DOCUMENTS
NIL PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:19-12-2017
Date of Filing:19-12-2017
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Friday, this the 23rd day of February, 2018.
O.S.No.189/2017
Between:
Chekuri Ramaraju S/o Venkata Raju @ Venkatarao, Hindu, age 38 years, cultivation, resident of D.No.1-38, Melupaka village and post, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Plaintiff. And:
Gogula Srinivas S/o Narayana Murthy, Hindu, age 49 years, resident of D.No.1- 113, Melupaka village and post, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
Defendant.
Suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for recovery oif
Rs.6,84,333/- being the principal and interest due under a promissory note
dated 05.06.2016 for Rs.5,00,000/- executed by the defendant in favour of
plaintiff agreeing to repay the same with interest at 24% p.a., and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and Jurisdiction is
Rs.6,84,333/- and a court fee of Rs.9,326/- is paid under Section 20 r/w Art.I(a) of A.P.C.F. and S.V.Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri M.Jayaram & Sri B.S.V.Rajagopal, Advocates for plaintiff. Plaintiff filed memo not press the suit . Memo is recorded and this Court doth order and:
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed as not pressed;
2) that there be no costs;
Pronounced by me in open court, this the 1st day of February, 2018.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PLAINTIFF; FOR DEFENDANT;
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Thursday, this the 8th day of February, 2018.
O.S.No.255/2013
Between: Panduri Satyarao S/o Simhachalam, Hindu, age 69 years, retired MPDO, Sabbavaram, N/o Venkatapuram village Munagapaka Mandal, presently, residing at D.No.14-38-1/A, Plot No.303, Viswanadh Residency, Maharanipeta, Visakhapatnam-2.
Plaintiff. And:
1. Panduri Kanaka Apparao,s/o Late Nookaiah, Hindu, age 45 years, Resident of Venkatapuram village, Via: Paravada, Thanam Post, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
2. Panduri Ramalakshmi W/o Kanaka Apparao, Hindu, age 40 years, resident of Venkatapuram village, Via: Paravada, Thanam Post, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
3. Chinni China Appalanaidu @ Innabbai,S/o Sanyasi, Hindu, age 69 yearls, resident of Venkatapuram village, via; Paravada, Thanam post, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
Defendants.
This suit coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri B.V.R.Joga rao and Mr.R.Atchutharamaiah, Advocates for plaintiff and of Sri K.P.Naidu, Advocate of defendants. Costs not paid. PW.1 called absent. No representation. Hence the suit is dismissed for default and this Court delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
This is a suit for declaration that the plaintiff is the absolute owner of item No.6 of plaint schedule property, and for recovery of possession of the item No.6 of plaint schedule property after evicting the defendants their men, agents servants there from; for future profits till the delivaery of the possession of item No.6 of schedule property as to be determined in a separate enquiry under order 20 R.12 of CPC; (b) for a permanent injunction restraining the defendants their men, agents, servants, and representatives from ever interfering with plaintiff’s peaceful possession and enjoyment of items 1 to 5 of plaint schedule property in any manner and for costs of the suit.
Costs not paid. PW1 called absent. No representation. Hence the suilt is dismissed for default.
Pronounced by me in open court, this the 8th day of February, 2018.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
FOR PLAINTIFF:-
PW1/ Dt.9-6-2017/Panduri Satya Rao, S/o Simhachalam (chief affidavit only)
FOR DEFENDANT: NIL
LIST OF DOCUMENTS
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation: 26-12-2013 Date of Filing: 26-12-2013
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Thursday, this the 8th day of February, 2018.
O.S.No.255/2013
Between: Panduri Satyarao S/o Simhachalam, Hindu, age 69 years, retired MPDO, Sabbavaram, N/o Venkatapuram village Munagapaka Mandal, presently, residing at D.No.14-38-1/A, Plot No.303, Viswanadh Residency, Maharanipeta, Visakhapatnam-2. Plaintiff. And:
1. Panduri Kanaka Apparao,s/o Late Nookaiah, Hindu, age 45 years, Resident of Venkatapuram village, Via: Paravada, Thanam Post, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
2. Panduri Ramalakshmi W/o Kanaka Apparao, Hindu, age 40 years, resident of Venkatapuram village, Via: Paravada, Thanam Post, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
3. Chinni China Appalanaidu @ Innabbai,S/o Sanyasi, Hindu, age 69 yearls, resident of Venkatapuram village, via; Paravada, Thanam post, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
Defendants.
This is a suit for declaration that the plaintiff is the absolute owner of item No.6 of plaint schedule property, and for recovery of possession of the item No.6 of plaint schedule property after evicting the defendants their men, agents servants there from; for future profits till the delivaery of the possession of item No.6 of schedule property as to be determined in a separate enquiry under order 20 R.12 of CPC; (b) for a permanent injunction restraining the defendants their men, agents, servants, and representatives from ever interfering with plaintiff’s peaceful possession and enjoyment of items 1 to 5 of plaint schedule property in any manner and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suilt for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction is
Rs.10,000/- for relief of permanent injunction and Rs.1,20,000/- being 3/4th market value for relief of declaration and possession and CF of Rs.4,412/- is paid under Sec.26 (c) & 24(a) of A.P.C.F. and S.V.Act.
Total value of item-6 property Rs. 1,60,000-00 3/4th of the Market value is Rs. 1,20,000-00
Notional value of items 1 to 5 Rs. 10,000-00
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri B.V.R.Joga rao and Mr.R.Atchutharamaiah, Advocates for plaintiff and of
Sri K.P.Naidu, Advocate of defendants. Costs not paid. PW.1 called absent. No representation. Hence the suit is dismissed for default and this Court doth order and :
DECREE
1) that the suilt be and the same is hereby dismissed for default;
2) that there be no order as to costs; ( Copy of plaint schedule and valuation slip hereto enclosed)
Pronounced by me in open court, this the 8th day of February, 2018.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PLAINTIFF; FOR DEFENDANTS;
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Tuesday, this the 23rd day of January, 2018.
O.S.No.221/2013
Between:
Gulla Sreeram Murthy S/o Chellanna Dora, Hindu, age 33 years, cultivation, resident of Door No.3-16, Buddibanda village H/o Kovagunta village, Vommali Jagannadhapuram post, Ravikamatham Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
Plaintiff. And:
1.Konathala Radhabhai, W/o Seetharam, Hindu, age years, House wife, resident of Door No.2-95, Sampathipuram village, Anakapalle Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
2. Central Bank of India, Main branch, Visakhapatnam represented by its Chief Manager, Visakhapatnam.
Defendants.
This suit coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Venkateswara Rao, Advocate for plaintiff and of Sri Ch.S.S.Ramachandrarao, Advocate for defendant No.2 and defendant No.1 remained exparte. Costs not paid. PW.1 called absent No representation on either side.Hence the suilt is dismissed for default and this Court delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
This is a suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant (a) for specific performance of the sale agreement dated 27.05.2005 by directing thedefendant to execute a regular sale deed on a proper stamp paper and register the samek in respect of the plaint schedule property in favoudr of the plaintiff and to do all the acts necaessary to put the plaintiff in possession with such time as the court fixes, ilf the 1st defendant, fails to execute the regular sale deed, the court may execute the same at the costs of the plaintiffl and recover the same from thedefendant (b) for an alternative relief foir refund of the advance amount of Rs.4,00,000/- with subsequent interest at the rate of 24% p.a. from the 1st defendant and for costs of the suilt.
Costs not paid. PW1 called absent. No representation on either side.
Hence the suit is dismissed for default.
Pronounced by me in open court, this the 23rd day of January, 2018.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIl
LIST OF DOCUMENTS
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
Date of presentation:22-11-2013 Date of Filing :22-11-2013
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Tuesday, this the 23rd day of January, 2018.
O.S.No.221/2013
Between: Gulla Sreeram Murthy S/o Chellanna Dora, Hindu, age 33 years, cultivation, resident of Door No.3-16, Buddibanda village H/o Kovagunta village, Vommali Jagannadhapuram post, Ravikamatham Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
Plaintiff. And:
1.Konathala Radhabhai, W/o Seetharam, Hindu, age years, House wife, resident of Door No.2-95, Sampathipuram village, Anakapalle Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
2. Central Bank of India, Main branch, Visakhapatnam represented by its Chief Manager, Visakhapatnam.
Defendants.
This is a suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant (a) for specific performance of the sale agreement dated 27.05.2005 by directing thedefendant to execute a regular sale deed on a proper stamp paper and register the samek in respect of the plaint schedule property in favoudr of the plaintiff and to do all the acts necaessary to put the plaintiff in possession with such time as the court fixes, ilf the 1st defendant, fails to execute the regular sale deed, the court may execute the same at the costs of the plaintiffl and recover the same from thedefendant (b) for an alternative relief foir refund of the advance amount of Rs.4,00,000/- with subsequent interest at the rate of 24% p.a. from the 1st defendant and for costs of the suilt.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and Jurisdiction is
Rs.4,00,000/- and a court fee of Rs.6,426/- is paid under Sec.39 of A.P.C.F. and
S.V.Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri G.Venkateswara Rao, Advocate for plaintiff and of Sri
Ch.S.S.Ramachandrarao, Advocate for defendant No.2 and defendant No.1 remained exparte. Costs not paid. PW.1 called absent No representation on either side. Hence the suilt is dismissed for default and this Court doth order and:
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed for default;
2) that there be no order as to costs; ( Copy of Plaint schedule hereto enclosed)
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 23rd day of January, 2018.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PLAINTIFF; FOR DEFENDANTS;
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation: 20-10-2014 Date of Filing:20-04-2014
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Thursday, this the 1st day of February, 2018.
O.S.No.263/2014
Between: Penmetsa Vishnukumar Raju S/o Satyanarayana Raju, age 53 years, residing at Plot No.A-19, D.No.50-104-1/9, Seeethammadhara N.E.Layout, Visakhapatnam-13. Plaintiff. And:
1.Karri Bangarunaidu S/o Ramunaidu, age 52 years, residing at Asakapalli village, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
2.Karri Ramprasad S/o Ramunaidu, age 44 years, residing at Asakapalli village, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
Defendants.
Suit filed by the plaintilff against the defendants(a) to pass a decree to directilng the defendants to execute the register a sale deed in favour of the plaintiff in respect of the plaintk kschedule property interms of the agreement of sale executed by the defendants in favour of the plaintiff within time fixed by the court (b) in case if the defendants fail to execute and register a sale deed, the court may itself execute and register a sale deed for aand on behalf of the defendants in respect of theplailant schedule at the expenses of the plaintiff
(c) to put the plaiantiff’s in possessilon of the plailnt schedule after evicting the defendants therefrom (d) alternatively, if the court feels that for any reason, the relief of specific performance could not be awarded, directing the defendants to refund the advance sale consideration of Rs.5,24,160/- paid by the plaintiff under the agreement of sale dtogether with interest at 24% p.a. from the date of the agreement of sale till date of full land final reliazation and for costs of the suilt.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and Jurisdiction is valued at
Rs.5,24,160-00 and a court fee of Rs.7726/- is being paid under Sec.39, r/w
Sch.I Art.I (b) & (c) of A.P.C.F. and S.V.Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Smt. A.Bhanumathi and Sri V.Viswanadham,Advocates for plaintiff and of Sri
M.Srinivasarao and M.V.R.Bhupathirao, Advocates for 1st defendant and of Sri
S.P.Naidu and R.Appalanaidu, Advocates for 2nd defendant . Plaintiff filed memo not press the suit claim. Memo is recorded and this Court doth order and:
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed as not pressed;
2) that there be no costs; ( Copy of plaint schedule hereto enclosed)
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 01st day of February, 2018.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PLAINTIFF; FOR DEFENDANTS;
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Thursday, this the 1st day of February, 2018.
O.S.No.263/2014
Between: Penmetsa Vishnukumar Raju S/o Satyanarayana Raju, age 53 years,residing at Plot No.A-19, D.No.50-104-1/9, Seeethammadhara N.E.Layout, Visakhapatnam-13. Plaintiff. And:
1.Karri Bangarunaidu S/o Ramunaidu, age 52 years, residing at Asakapalli village, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
2.Karri Ramprasad S/o Ramunaidu, age 44 years, residing at Asakapalli village, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
Defendants.
This suit coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Smt. A.Bhanumathi and Sri V.Viswanadham,Advocates for plaintiff and of Sri M.Srinivasarao and M.V.R.Bhupathirao, Advocates for 1st defendant and of Sri S.P.Naidu and R.Appalanaidu, Advocates for 2nd defendant . Plaintiff filed memo not press the suit claim. Memo is recorded and this Court delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
Suit filed by the plaintilff against the defendants(a) to pass a decree to directilng the defendants to execute the register a sale deed iln favour of the plailntiff in respect of the plaintk kschedule property ilnterms of the agreement of sale executed by the defendants in favour of the plaintiff withiln time fixed by the court (b) in case if the defendants fail to execute and register a sale deed, the court may itself execute and register a sale deed for aand on behalf of the defendants in respect of theplailant schedule at the expenses of the plaintiff (c) to put the plaiantiff’s in possessilon of the plailnt schedule after evicting the defendants therefrom (d) alternatively, if the court feels that for any reason, the relief of specific performance could not be awarded, directing the defendants to refund the advance sale consideration of Rs.5,24,160/- paid by the plaintiff under the agreement of sale dtogether with interest at 24% p.a. from the date of the agreement of sale till date of full land final reliazattion and for costs of the suilt.
Plaintiff filed a memo not press the suit claim as matter was settled out of court. Hence memo is recorded the suilt is dismissed without costs as not pressed.
Pronounced by me in open court, this lthe 1st day of February, 2018.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
LIST OF DOCUMENTS
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Wednesday, this the 31st day of January, 2018.
O.S.No.199/2012
Between: Vennela Pydamma,W/o Somulu, Hindu, age 65 years, household duties, resildilng at D.No.8-4, Mettapalem village, lH/o Vada Cheepurupalli, Paraawada Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
Plaintiff. And:
1.Eerla Sreeramulu,S/o Musalayya, Hindu, age 52 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.7-56,Sriram Nagar, T.Devada, Steet project Office, Visakhapatnam-31.
2.Eerla Suryanarayana, S/o Musalayya, Hindu, age 50 years, cultivation, residilng at D.No.7-55, Sriram Nagar, T.Devada, Steel project Office, Visakhapatnam-31.
3.Eerla Vonumulu, S/o Musalayya, Hindu, age 48 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.30-71-1, Appikonda RH colonyll, Vadlapudi, Gajuwakal Mandal, Visakhapatnam-46.
4. Kundrapu Somulamma, W/o Mutyalu, Hindu, age 62 years, housewife, residing at D.No.30-7-1, Appikonda RH colony, Vadlapudi, Gajuwaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam-46.
5.Kundrapu Simhachalam W/o Appalanaidu, Hindu, age 86 years, residing at Door No.7-5, Sriram Nagar, T.Devada, Steel project office, Visakhapatnam-31.
6. Geddam Kpentamma, W/o Simhachalam, age 58 years, Hindu, Housewife, D.No.5-4, Hastinapuram, H/o Vada Cheepurupalli, Parawada mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
7. Ramineni Venkateswararao, S/o Basavayya, Hindu, age 45 years, business, resilding at D.No.10-32-6, Visalakshmi Nagar, Visakhapatnam.
Defendants.
This suit coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri V.V.Jogayya and Sri M.Srinivasarao, Advocates for the plaintiff and of Sri A.V.S.Bhavani Prasad, Advocate for defendant No.7 and defendants 1,3,4,6 remind exparte and suit against defendant 2 and 5 dismissed for default and this Court delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
Suit for partition of the plaint schedule properties at metes and bounds into seven equal shares and allot one such share to the plaintiff and such equal shares dto thedefendants 1 to 6, and deliver separate possession ofk such share so allotted to the plaintiff and defendants 1 to 6 on converting the joint possession into separate possession; for profits that can be determined by way of separate application; and for costs of the suit.
PW.1 called absent No representation. Hence the matter is dismissed for default.
Pronounced by me in open court, this lthe 31st day of January, 2018.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
FOR PLAINTIFF:-
P.W.1/ dt.8.12.2017 - Vennela Pydamma W/o Somulu.(Chief examination only)
FOR DEFENDANT:- NIL
LIST OF DOCUMENTS
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation: 16-08-2012
Date of Filing:16-08-2012
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Wednesday, this the 31st day of January, 2018.
O.S.No.199/2012
Between: Vennela Pydamma,W/o Somulu, Hindu, age 65 years, household duties, resildilng at D.No.8-4, Mettapalem village, lH/o Vada Cheepurupalli, Paraawada Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
Plaintiff. And:
1.Eerla Sreeramulu,S/o Musalayya, Hindu, age 52 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.7-56, Sriram Nagar, T.Devada, Steet project Office, Visakhapatnam-31.
2.Eerla Suryanarayana, S/o Musalayya, Hindu, age 50 years, cultivation, residilng at D.No.7-55, Sriram Nagar, T.Devada, Steel project Office, Visakhapatnam-31.
3.Eerla Vonumulu, S/o Musalayya, Hindu, age 48 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.30-71-1, Appikonda RH colonyll, Vadlapudi, Gajuwakal Mandal, Visakhapatnam-46.
4. Kundrapu Somulamma, W/o Mutyalu, Hindu, age 62 years, housewife, residing at D.No.30-7-1, Appikonda RH colony, Vadlapudi, Gajuwaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam-46.
5.Kundrapu Simhachalam W/o Appalanaidu, Hindu, age 86 years, residing at Door No.7-5, Sriram Nagar, T.Devada, Steel project office, Visakhapatnam-31.
6. Geddam Kpentamma, W/o Simhachalam, age 58 years, Hindu, Housewife, D.No.5-4, Hastinapuram, H/o Vada Cheepurupalli, Parawada mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
7. Ramineni Venkateswararao, S/o Basavayya, Hindu, age 45 years, business, resilding at D.No.10-32-6, Visalakshmi Nagar, Visakhapatnam.
Defendants.
Suit for partition of the plaint schedule properties at metes and bounds into seven equal shares and allot one such share to the plaintiff and such equal shares dto thedefendants 1 to 6, and deliver separate possession ofk such share so allotted to the plaintiff and defendants 1 to 6 on converting the joint possession into separate possession; for profits that can be determined by way of separate application; and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and Jurisdiction of this court
Valuel of the plaint schedule property consisting of Ac.5.00 cents and @
Rs.15,00,000/- per acre as per basic value register Rs. 16,05,000-00
Plaintiff’s 1/7th share Rs. 10,71,428-00 3/4th value share Rs. 8,03,571-00
C.F. of Rs.10,826-00 is payable, but a fixed court fee of Rs.200/- is paid under
Sec.34(2) of A.P.C.F. Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri V.V.Jogayya and Sri M.Srinivasarao, Advocates for the plaintiff and of Sri
A.V.S.Bhavani Prasad, Advocate for defendant No.7 and defendants 1,3,4,6 remind exparte and suit against defendant 2 and 5 dismissed for default and this Court doth order and ;
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed for default;
2) that there be no order as to costs;
Given under my hand and theseal of this court, this the 31st day of January, 2018.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PLAINTIFF; FOR DEFENDANTS;
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Friday, this the 23rd day of February, 2018.
O.S.No.189/2017
Between: Chekuri Ramaraju S/o Venkata Raju @ Venkatarao, Hindu, age 38 years, cultivation, resident of D.No.1-38, Melupaka village and post, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Plaintiff. And:
Gogula Srinivas S/o Narayana Murthy, Hindu, age 49 years, resident of D.No.1- 113, Melupaka village and post, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
Defendant.
This suit coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri M.Jayaram & Sri BSVRajagopal,Advocates for plaintiff. Plaintiff filed memo not press the suit . Memo is recorded and this Court delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
Suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for recovery oif
Rs.6,84,333/- being the principal and interest due under a promissory note
dated 05.06.2016 for Rs.5,00,000/- executed by the defendant in favour of
plaintiff agreeing to repay the same with interest at 24% p.a., and for costs of the suit.
I.A59 /2018 is allowed. Accordingly the matter is advanced to today from 23.02.2018.
The plaintiff is present. Plaintiff filed memo not pressing the suit as matter was settled out of court. Heard. Memo is recorded. Accordingly suit is dismissed without costs as not pressed.
Pronounced by me in open court, this lthe 1st day of February, 2018.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
LIST OF DOCUMENTS
NIL PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:19-12-2017
Date of Filing:19-12-2017
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Friday, this the 23rd day of February, 2018.
O.S.No.189/2017
Between: Chekuri Ramaraju S/o Venkata Raju @ Venkatarao, Hindu, age 38 years, cultivation, resident of D.No.1-38, Melupaka village and post, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Plaintiff. And:
Gogula Srinivas S/o Narayana Murthy, Hindu, age 49 years, resident of D.No.1- 113, Melupaka village and post, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
Defendant.
Suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for recovery oif
Rs.6,84,333/- being the principal and interest due under a promissory note
dated 05.06.2016 for Rs.5,00,000/- executed by the defendant in favour of
plaintiff agreeing to repay the same with interest at 24% p.a., and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and Jurisdiction is
Rs.6,84,333/- and a court fee of Rs.9,326/- is paid under Section 20 r/w Art.I(a) of A.P.C.F. and S.V.Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri M.Jayaram & Sri B.S.V.Rajagopal, Advocates for plaintiff. Plaintiff filed memo not press the suit . Memo is recorded and this Court doth order and:
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed as not pressed;
2) that there be no costs;
Pronounced by me in open court, this the 1st day of February, 2018.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PLAINTIFF; FOR DEFENDANT;
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Thursday, this the 8th day of February, 2018.
O.S.No.255/2013
Between: Panduri Satyarao S/o Simhachalam, Hindu, age 69 years, retired MPDO, Sabbavaram, N/o Venkatapuram village Munagapaka Mandal, presently, residing at D.No.14-38-1/A, Plot No.303, Viswanadh Residency, Maharanipeta, Visakhapatnam-2. Plaintiff. And:
1. Panduri Kanaka Apparao,s/o Late Nookaiah, Hindu, age 45 years, Resident of Venkatapuram village, Via: Paravada, Thanam Post, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
2. Panduri Ramalakshmi W/o Kanaka Apparao, Hindu, age 40 years, resident of Venkatapuram village, Via: Paravada, Thanam Post, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
3. Chinni China Appalanaidu @ Innabbai,S/o Sanyasi, Hindu, age 69 yearls, resident of Venkatapuram village, via; Paravada, Thanam post, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
Defendants.
This suit coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri B.V.R.Joga rao and Mr.R.Atchutharamaiah, Advocates for plaintiff and of Sri K.P.Naidu, Advocate of defendants. Costs not paid. PW.1 called absent. No representation. Hence the suit is dismissed for default and this Court delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
This is a suit for declaration that the plaintiff is the absolute owner of item No.6 of plaint schedule property, and for recovery of possession of the item No.6 of plaint schedule property after evicting the defendants their men, agents servants there from; for future profits till the delivaery of the possession of item No.6 of schedule property as to be determined in a separate enquiry under order 20 R.12 of CPC; (b) for a permanent injunction restraining the defendants their men, agents, servants, and representatives from ever interfering with plaintiff’s peaceful possession and enjoyment of items 1 to 5 of plaint schedule property in any manner and for costs of the suit.
Costs not paid. PW1 called absent. No representation. Hence the suilt is dismissed for default.
Pronounced by me in open court, this the 8th day of February, 2018.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
FOR PLAINTIFF:-
PW1/ Dt.9-6-2017/Panduri Satya Rao, S/o Simhachalam (chief affidavit only)
FOR DEFENDANT: NIL
LIST OF DOCUMENTS
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation: 26-12-2013 Date of Filing: 26-12-2013
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Thursday, this the 8th day of February, 2018.
O.S.No.255/2013
Between: Panduri Satyarao S/o Simhachalam, Hindu, age 69 years, retired MPDO, Sabbavaram, N/o Venkatapuram village Munagapaka Mandal, presently, residing at D.No.14-38-1/A, Plot No.303, Viswanadh Residency, Maharanipeta, Visakhapatnam-2. Plaintiff. And:
1. Panduri Kanaka Apparao,s/o Late Nookaiah, Hindu, age 45 years, Resident of Venkatapuram village, Via: Paravada, Thanam Post, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
2. Panduri Ramalakshmi W/o Kanaka Apparao, Hindu, age 40 years, resident of Venkatapuram village, Via: Paravada, Thanam Post, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
3. Chinni China Appalanaidu @ Innabbai,S/o Sanyasi, Hindu, age 69 yearls, resident of Venkatapuram village, via; Paravada, Thanam post, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
Defendants.
This is a suit for declaration that the plaintiff is the absolute owner of item No.6 of plaint schedule property, and for recovery of possession of the item No.6 of plaint schedule property after evicting the defendants their men, agents servants there from; for future profits till the delivaery of the possession of item No.6 of schedule property as to be determined in a separate enquiry under order 20 R.12 of CPC; (b) for a permanent injunction restraining the defendants their men, agents, servants, and representatives from ever interfering with plaintiff’s peaceful possession and enjoyment of items 1 to 5 of plaint schedule property in any manner and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suilt for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction is
Rs.10,000/- for relief of permanent injunction and Rs.1,20,000/- being 3/4th market value for relief of declaration and possession and CF of Rs.4,412/- is paid under Sec.26 (c) & 24(a) of A.P.C.F. and S.V.Act.
Total value of item-6 property Rs. 1,60,000-00 3/4th of the Market value is Rs. 1,20,000-00
Notional value of items 1 to 5 Rs. 10,000-00
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri B.V.R.Joga rao and Mr.R.Atchutharamaiah, Advocates for plaintiff and of
Sri K.P.Naidu, Advocate of defendants. Costs not paid. PW.1 called absent. No representation. Hence the suit is dismissed for default and this Court doth order and :
DECREE
1) that the suilt be and the same is hereby dismissed for default;
2) that there be no order as to costs; ( Copy of plaint schedule and valuation slip hereto enclosed)
Pronounced by me in open court, this the 8th day of February, 2018.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PLAINTIFF; FOR DEFENDANTS;
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Tuesday, this the 23rd day of January, 2018.
O.S.No.221/2013
Between: Gulla Sreeram Murthy S/o Chellanna Dora, Hindu, age 33 years, cultivation, resident of Door No.3-16, Buddibanda village H/o Kovagunta village, Vommali Jagannadhapuram post, Ravikamatham Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
Plaintiff. And:
1.Konathala Radhabhai, W/o Seetharam, Hindu, age years, House wife, resident of Door No.2-95, Sampathipuram village, Anakapalle Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
2. Central Bank of India, Main branch, Visakhapatnam represented by its Chief Manager, Visakhapatnam.
Defendants.
This suit coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Venkateswara Rao, Advocate for plaintiff and of Sri
Ch.S.S.Ramachandrarao, Advocate for defendant No.2 and defendant No.1 remained exparte. Costs not paid. PW.1 called absent No representation on either side.Hence the suilt is dismissed for default and this Court delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
This is a suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant (a) for specific performance of the sale agreement dated 27.05.2005 by directing thedefendant to execute a regular sale deed on a proper stamp paper and register the samek in respect of the plaint schedule property in favoudr of the plaintiff and to do all the acts necaessary to put the plaintiff in possession with such time as the court fixes, ilf the 1st defendant, fails to execute the regular sale deed, the court may execute the same at the costs of the plaintiffl and recover the same from thedefendant (b) for an alternative relief foir refund of the advance amount of Rs.4,00,000/- with subsequent interest at the rate of 24% p.a. from the 1st defendant and for costs of the suilt.
Costs not paid. PW1 called absent. No representation on either side.
Hence the suit is dismissed for default.
Pronounced by me in open court, this the 23rd day of January, 2018.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIl
LIST OF DOCUMENTS
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
Date of presentation:22-11-2013 Date of Filing :22-11-2013
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Tuesday, this the 23rd day of January, 2018.
O.S.No.221/2013
Between: Gulla Sreeram Murthy S/o Chellanna Dora, Hindu, age 33 years, cultivation, resident of Door No.3-16, Buddibanda village H/o Kovagunta village, Vommali Jagannadhapuram post, Ravikamatham Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
Plaintiff. And:
1.Konathala Radhabhai, W/o Seetharam, Hindu, age years, House wife, resident of Door No.2-95, Sampathipuram village, Anakapalle Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
2. Central Bank of India, Main branch, Visakhapatnam represented by its Chief Manager, Visakhapatnam.
Defendants.
This is a suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant (a) for specific performance of the sale agreement dated 27.05.2005 by directing thedefendant to execute a regular sale deed on a proper stamp paper and register the samek in respect of the plaint schedule property in favoudr of the plaintiff and to do all the acts necaessary to put the plaintiff in possession with such time as the court fixes, ilf the 1st defendant, fails to execute the regular sale deed, the court may execute the same at the costs of the plaintiffl and recover the same from thedefendant (b) for an alternative relief foir refund of the advance amount of Rs.4,00,000/- with subsequent interest at the rate of 24% p.a. from the 1st defendant and for costs of the suilt.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and Jurisdiction is
Rs.4,00,000/- and a court fee of Rs.6,426/- is paid under Sec.39 of A.P.C.F. and
S.V.Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri G.Venkateswara Rao, Advocate for plaintiff and of Sri
Ch.S.S.Ramachandrarao, Advocate for defendant No.2 and defendant No.1 remained exparte. Costs not paid. PW.1 called absent No representation on either side. Hence the suilt is dismissed for default and this Court doth order and:
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed for default;
2) that there be no order as to costs; ( Copy of Plaint schedule hereto enclosed)
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 23rd day of January, 2018.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PLAINTIFF; FOR DEFENDANTS;
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT
ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
Friday, this the 2th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.1062016
Between:
Sri Bharnikana Ramana Babu.
Plaintiff.
And:
Sri Karanam Naidu and 8 others.
Defendants.
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me
in the presence of Sri V.Venkata Rao, Advocate for the Plaintiff and
of Sri M.Jayaram and B.S.V. Rajagopal, Advocates for the defendants
and having stood over till this day this court settle the following:
ISSUES
1) Whether the plaintiff is entitle for decree for specific
performance of contract or
for alternative relief?
2) Whether the defendants are trying to alienate the plaint schedule
properties to
3rd parties?
3) To what relief?
List of witnesses and documents within 15 days .
For trial 19-06-2017.
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 2nd day of
June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL
JUDGE
VISAKHAPATNAM
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
Thursday, this the 8th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.131/2016
Between: Sri Molleti Bhuvaneswara Ramana Murthy
Plaintiff. And: Smt Genji Mahalaxmi, W/o late Sanyasinaidu and another.
Defendants.
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri Lanka Jagannadham, Lanka Parvaateeswar and K.R.Ramaesh babu, Advocates for the Plaintiff and of SriP.Hara Srinivasa Rao,Advocate for the defendants and having stood over till this day this court settle the following: ISSUES
1) Whether the suit promissory note is a fabricated and created one and not supported by consideration?
2) Whether the plaintiff is entitle for decree for the suit amount?
3) To what relief?
List of witnesses and documents within 15 days .
For trial 23-06-2017.
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 8th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL
JUDGE
VISAKHAPATNAM
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT
ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
Thursday, this the 8th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.141/2016
Between:
Sri G.V.Nageswararao S/o Venkata Rao
Plaintiff.
And:
Sri Palaparthi Apparao S/o Kondayya.
Defendant.
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me
in the presence of Sri Ch.V.Krishna, Advocate for the Plaintiff and of
Sri C.Sivaiah,Advocate for the defendant and having stood over till
this day this court settle the following:
ISSUES
1) Whether the suit promissory note is a fabricated and rank forged
one and the
same is not supported by consideration as contended by
defendant?
2) Whether the plaintiff is entitle for decree for the suit amount?
3) To what relief?
List of witnesses and documents within 15 days .
For trial 23-06-2017.
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 8th day of
June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR
CIVIL JUDGE
VISAKHAPATNAM
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT
ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
Wednesday, this the 7th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.178/2016
Between:
Sri Katari Demudu S/o late Adeyya.
Plaintiff.
And:
Sri Chenna Parvathi @ Pujaramma W/o Appalakonda and 6 others.
Defendants.
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me
in the presence of Sri Lanka Jagannadham, Lanka Parvaateeswar
and K.R.Ramaesh babu, Advocates for the Plaintiff and of
SriP.V.Patnaik,Advocate for the defendants and having stood over till
this day this court settle the following:
ISSUES
1) Whether the suit promissory note is a rank forged one as
contended by the defendants?
2) Whether the plaintiff is entitle for decree for the suit amount?
3) To what relief?
List of witnesses and documents within 15 days .
For trial 23-06-2017.
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 7th day of
June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR
CIVIL JUDGE
VISAKHAPATNAM
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT
ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
Friday, this the 2nd day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.156/2016
Between:
Smt. Gunisetti Lakshmi W/o Srinivas.
Plaintiff.
And:
Smt.Senapathi Lakshmi W/o late Satyam and 3 others
Defendants.
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me
in the presence of Sri Vaddadi Venkata Rao, Advocate for the
Plaintiff and of Sri M.Jayaram,Advocate for the defendants 1 and 2 .
Defendants 3 remained exparte and having stood over till this day
this court settle the following:
ISSUES
1) Whether the interest claimed by the plaintiff is usurious as
contended
by the defendants?
2) Whether the plaintiff is entitle for preliminary decree for the suit
amount?
3) To what relief?
List of witnesses and documents within 15 days .
For trial 16-06-2017.
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 2nd day of
June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR
CIVIL JUDGE
VISAKHAPATNAM
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT
ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
Thursday, this the 8th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.104/2016
Between:
Smt. Uppada Uma Santhi Kumari W/o Ramachandrarao and another.
Plaintiffs.
And:
Sri Gundapu Ganapathirao S/o Jaggarao and another.
Defendants.
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me
in the presence of Sri Lanka Jagannadham, Lanka Parvaateeswar
and K.R.Ramaesh babu, Advocates for the Plaintiff and of SriS.Ram
Babu, Advocate for the defendants and having stood over till this
day this court settle the following:
ISSUES
1) Whether the suit promissory note is a fabricated and rank forged
one and the
same is not supported by consideration as contended by
defendant?
2) Whether the plaintiff is entitle for decree for the suit amount?
3) To what relief?
List of witnesses and documents within 15 days .
For trial 23-06-2017.
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 8th day of
June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR
CIVIL JUDGE
VISAKHAPATNAM
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT
ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
Wednesday, this the 7th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.113/2016
Between:
Sri Madem Venkata Ramana S/o late Bangarayya.
Plaintiff.
And:
Sri Singampali Rama Rao,S/o late Appanna.
Defendant.
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me
in the presence of Sri K.P.Naidu, Advocate for the Plaintiff and of Sri
S.P.Naidu,Advocate for the defendant and having stood over till this
day this court settle the following:
ISSUES
1) Whether the suit promissory note is a fabricated and created one
as contended
by defendants?
2) Whether the plaintiff is entitle for decree for the suit amount?
3) To what relief?
List of witnesses and documents within 15 days .
For trial 23-06-2017.
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 7th day of
June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL
JUDGE
VISAKHAPATNAM
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT
ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
Thursday, this the 8th day of June,
2017.
O.S.No.116/2016
Between:
State Bank of India, Munagapaka Branch, Munagapaka.
Plaintiff.
And:
M/s Laxmiprasanth Digital Studios and Vedeos, Munagapaaka and 2
others.
Defendants.
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me
in the presence of Smt. A.Bhanumathi, Sri V.Viswaanadham,
Advocates for the Plaintiff and of Sri Y.Jagaish, Advocate for the
defendants and having stood over till this day this court settle the
following:
ISSUES
1) Whether the defendants are small farmers and they are entitled
to get relief
under debt relief Acts?
2) Whether the interest claimed by the plaintiff is usurious?
3) Whether the plaintiff is entitle for preliminary decree for the suit
amount?
4) To what relief?
List of witnesses and documents within 15 days .
For trial 23-06-2017.
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 8th day of
June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR
CIVIL JUDGE
VISAKHAPATNAM
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT
ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
Monday, this the 8th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.229/2015
Between:
Sri Malla Madhavarao S/o Narasimhamurthy.
Plaintiff.
And:
Smt.Doppalapudi Manjula W/o Busayya and another.
Defendants.
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me
in the presence of Sri M.Jayaram, Advocate for the Plaintiff and of
Sri Y.Sairam, Advocate for the defendants and having stood over till
this day this court settle the following:
ISSUES
1) Whether the suit promissory note is true, supported by
consideration and the same is binding on the defendants or not?
2) Whether the plaintiff is entitle for decree for the suit amount?
3) To what relief?
List of witnesses and documents within 15 days .
For trial 21-06-2017.
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 5th day of
June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL
JUDGE
VISAKHAPATNAM
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT
ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
Monday, this the 5th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.117/2016
Between:
Smt. Tainana Parvathamma W/o Sannibabu.
Plaintiffs.
And:
Smt. Gorle Ramanamma W/o late Satyanarayana.
Defendant.
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me
in the presence of Sri Lanka Jagannadham, Lanka Parvaateeswar
and K.R.Ramaesh babu, Advocates for the Plaintiff and of
SriP.A.Narasimham, Advocate for the defendants and having stood
over till this day this court settle the following:
ISSUES
1) Whether the suit promissory note is true valid and the same is
binding
on the defendant or not?
2) Whether the interest claimed by the plaintiff is penal and
usurious?
2) Whether the plaintiff is entitle for decree for the suit amount?
3) To what relief?
List of witnesses and documents within 15 days .
For trial 21-06-2017.
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 5th day of
June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR
CIVIL JUDGE
VISAKHAPATNAM
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT
ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
Friday, this the 2th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.112/2016
Between:
State Bank of India, Sabbavaram, represented by its Branch
Manager, Sabbavaram.
Plaintiff.
And:
Sri Rama Poultry Feeds Thavvanipalem and 3 others.
Defendants.
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me
in the presence of Smt A.Bhanumathi and Sri V.Viswanadham,
Advocates for the Plaintiff and of Sri S.P.Naidu, Advocate for the
defendants and having stood over till this day this court settle the
following:
ISSUES
1) Whether the interest claimed by the plaintiff is penal and
excessive as contended
by the defendant?
2) Whether the plaintiff is entitle for decree for the suit amount?
3) To what relief?
List of witnesses and documents within 15 days .
For trial 16-06-2017.
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 2nd day of
June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR
CIVIL JUDGE
VISAKHAPATNAM
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT
ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
Thursday, this the 1st day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.249/2015
Between:
State Bank of India, Anakapalle Branch, represented by its Chief
Manager,Anakapalle.
Plaintiff.
And:
Kum.Vajragottu Lavanya and 3 others.
Defendants.
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me
in the presence of Smt. A.Bhanumathi, Sri V.Viswanadham,
Advocates for the plaintiff and of Sri K.P.V.Ramanaiah, Advocate for
defendants and having stood over till this day this court settle the
following:
ISSUES
1) Whether the Education loan is entitle to interest waiver, as such
the suit amount
is excessive and penal in nature?
2) Whether the defendants are trying to alienate the plaint schedule
properties to
III rd parties?
3) To what relief?
List of witnesses and documents within 15 days .
For trial 16-06-2017.
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 1st day of
June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR
CIVIL JUDGE
VISAKHAPATNAM
+ O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
Date of presentation:06-09-2007 Date of Filing:28-09-2007 06-09-2007IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Tuesday this the 20th of June, 2017.
CMA.No.01/2007
Between: Sri Villuri Ramu, son of late Mahalakshmi Naidu, Hindu, age 45 years, cultivation, residing at Dr.No.15-22-6/1, Anakapalle, Visakhapatnam District. Appellant. And:
1) The State of Andhra Pradesh represented by its District Collector, Visakhapatnam.
2) The Collector under Section-47-A of Indian stamp Act and District Registrar of Assurances, Registration and Stamps, Visakhapatnam.
3) The Sub Registrar, Sub-Registrar office, Anakapalle.
Respondents
Petition filed under section 47-A (4 & 5) of Indian Stamp Act read with Rule-9 of A.P.Stamp (Prevention of under valuation of instruments) Rules, 1975 by the Petitioner/Appellant against the respondent District Registrar of Assurance Registration and stamps Visakhapatnam to set aside the proceedings No.595/G2/07,dt.27-06-2007 by allowing this Appeal with costs.
A fixed Court fee of Rs.5/- is paid under Section47-A of Indian Stamp Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri V.V.Jogayya,
Sri M.Sreenivasa Rao, Advocates for Appellant and of Sri Assistant Government Pleader, Advocate for Defendants. Counsel for appellants filed memo stating that not pressing the Civil Miscellaneous petition and having stood over till this day this court doth order and:
DECREE
1) that the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal be and the same is hereby dismissed as not pressed;
2) that there be no costs;
Given under my hand and the seal of this court this the 20th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
For APPELLANT FOR RESPONDENTS
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Tuesday this the 20th of June, 2017.
CMA.No.01/2007
Between: Sri Villuri Ramu, son of late Mahalakshmi Naidu, Hindu, age 45 years, cultivation, residing at Dr.No.15-22-6/1, Anakapalle, Visakhapatnam District. Appellant. And:
1) The State of Andhra Pradesh represented by its District Collector, Visakhapatnam.
2) The Collector under Section-47-A of Indian stamp Act and District Registrar of Assurances, Registration and Stamps, Visakhapatnam.
3) The Sub Registrar, Sub-Registrar office, Anakapalle.
Respondents
This suit coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri V.V.Jogayya,
Sri M.Sreenivasa Rao, Advocates for Appellant and of Sri Assistant Government Pleader, Advocate for Defendants. Counsel for appellants filed memo stating that not pressing the Civil Miscellaneous petition and having stood over till this day this court delivered the following:
ORDER
Petition filed under section 47-A (4 & 5) of Indian Stamp Act read with Rule-9 of A.P.Stamp (Prevention of under valuation of instruments) Rules, 1975 by the Petitioner/Appellant against the respondent District Registrar of Assurance Registration and stamps Visakhapatnam to set aside the proceedings No.595/G2/07,dt.27-06-2007 by allowing this Appeal with costs.
Counsel for Appellants filed memo stating that not pressing the CMA. Memo is recorded.
Hence this CMA is dismissed without costs.
Pronounced by me in open court, this the 20th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:12-09-12012 Date of Filing:12-09-2012
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Monday this the 19th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.223/2012
Between: Sri Pilli Manikumar,S/o late Somulu, Hindu, age 45 years, cultivation, residing at Door No.40-56- 16, Sanjeeviah colony, Near Logos Church, Tadichetlapalem, Visakhapatnam-4. Plaintiff. And:
1) Pilli Chellayyamma,W/o late Somulu, Hindu, age 67 years, house hold duties, residing at Pidiwada Agraharam Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
2) Ravada Saraswathi W/o late Appanna, Hindu, age 49 years, house hold duties, residing at Pydiwada Agraharam, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
3) Kannapalli Laxmi, W/o Ramulu, Hindu, age 46 years, household duties, residing at Ammulapalem villagae, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
4) andukuri Narasinga Rao, S/o late Apparao, Hindu, age 71 years, cultivation, D.No.8-7-10, Gajuwaka, Visakhapatnam Greater Municipal Corporation, Visakhapatnam District. Defendants
Suit for Preliminary decree for partition of the plaint schedule property into four equal shares with metes and bounds and allot one such equal separated share to the plaintiff after converting the joint possession into separate possession and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction is Rs.653063/- and a court fee of Rs.9026/- is payable but the schedule property is in joint possession and enjoyment of the plaintiff and the defendants a fixed court fee of Rs.200-00 is paid under Sec.34(2) of A.P.C.F. and
S.V.Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri
B.V.S.S.N.Murthy, Advocate for Plaintiff and of Sri A.V.S.Bhavani Prasad, Advocate for Defendant
No.4. Defendants 1 to 3 remained exparte. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court doth order and:
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed for default
2) that there be no costs:
( Copy of Plaint schedule and valuation slip hereto enclosed)
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Monday this the 19th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.223/2012
Between: Sri Pilli Manikumar,S/o late Somulu, Hindu, age 45 years, cultivation, residing at Door No.40-56- 16, Sanjeeviah colony, Near Logos Church, Tadichetlapalem, Visakhapatnam-4. Plaintiff. And:
1) Pilli Chellayyamma,W/o late Somulu, Hindu, age 67 years, house hold duties, residing at Pidiwada Agraharam Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
2) Ravada Saraswathi W/o late Appanna, Hindu, age 49 years, house hold duties, residing at Pydiwada Agraharam, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
3) Kannapalli Laxmi, W/o Ramulu, Hindu, age 46 years, household duties, residing at Ammulapalem villagae, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
4) Andukuri Narasinga Rao, S/o late Apparao, Hindu, age 71 years, cultivation, D.No.8-7-10, Gajuwaka, Visakhapatnam Greater Municipal Corporation, Visakhapatnam District. Defendants
This suit coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri
B.V.S.S.N.Murthy, Advocate for Plaintiff and of Sri A.V.S.Bhavani Prasad, Advocate for Defendant
No.4. Defendants 1 to 3 remained exparte. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
Suit for Preliminary decree for partition of the plaint schedule property into four equal shares with metes and bounds and allot one such equal separated share to the plaintiff after converting the joint possession into separate possession and for costs of the suit.
Costs not paid. Plaintiff called absent. No representation on behalf of plaintiff. Plaintiff failed to adduce evidence though granted several adjournments . Hence this suit is dismissed for default without costs.
Pronounced by me in open court, this the 19th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:12-09-12012 Date of Filing:12-09-2012
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Monday this the 19th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.223/2012
Between: Sri Pilli Manikumar,S/o late Somulu, Hindu, age 45 years, cultivation, residing at Door No.40-56- 16, Sanjeeviah colony, Near Logos Church, Tadichetlapalem, Visakhapatnam-4. Plaintiff. And:
1) Pilli Chellayyamma,W/o late Somulu, Hindu, age 67 years, house hold duties, residing at Pidiwada Agraharam Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
2) Ravada Saraswathi W/o late Appanna, Hindu, age 49 years, house hold duties, residing at Pydiwada Agraharam, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
3) Kannapalli Laxmi, W/o Ramulu, Hindu, age 46 years, household duties, residing at Ammulapalem villagae, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
4) andukuri Narasinga Rao, S/o late Apparao, Hindu, age 71 years, cultivation, D.No.8-7-10, Gajuwaka, Visakhapatnam Greater Municipal Corporation, Visakhapatnam District. Defendants
Suit for Preliminary decree for partition of the plaint schedule property into four equal shares with metes and bounds and allot one such equal separated share to the plaintiff after converting the joint possession into separate possession and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction is Rs.653063/- and a court fee of Rs.9026/- is payable but the schedule property is in joint possession and enjoyment of the plaintiff and the defendants a fixed court fee of Rs.200-00 is paid under Sec.34(2) of A.P.C.F. and
S.V.Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri
B.V.S.S.N.Murthy, Advocate for Plaintiff and of Sri A.V.S.Bhavani Prasad, Advocate for Defendant
No.4. Defendants 1 to 3 remained exparte. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court doth order and:
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed for default
2) that there be no costs:
( Copy of Plaint schedule and valuation slip hereto enclosed)
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:21-12-2015
Date of Filing:21-12-2015
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Wednesday this the 7th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.254/2015
Between: Sri Karri Bhasakara Rao, S/o Suryanarayana, Hindu, age 38 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.10- 63, Nagulapalli villagae, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Plaintiff. And: Sri Villuri Bhaskara Rao, S/o late Suribabu, Hindu, age 45 years, Business, residing at D.No.2-36 Ummalada village, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Defendant
Suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for specific performance of the plaint schedule property directing the defendant to execute the registered sale deed for the plaint schedule property in favour of the plaintiff and if the defendant do not do so, the court to register the sale deed; if for any reason the specific performance cannot be ordered, for the refund of the advance amount of Rs.5,00,000/- and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction is Rs.6,00,000/- and a court fee of Rs.8,426/- is paid under Sec.39 Sch.I ArtI(b) and (c) of A.P.C.F. and S.V.Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri Buddha
Thrinadha Rao Advocate for Plaintiff. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court doth order:
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed for default;
2) that there be no costs;
Give under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 7th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
For Plaintiff: For Defendant:
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And: 1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court delivered the following:
ORDER
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
Counter of R1 and R2 not filed. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court. Memo is recorded. Hence this petition is dismissed without costs as not pressed as settled out of court.
Pronounced by me in open court this the 8th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:31-08-2016 Date of Filing:15-09-2016
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And: 1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
A fixed Court fee of Re1/- is affixed on the petition.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court doth order and;
DECREETAL ORDER
1) that the petition be and the same is hereby dismissed as not pressed as settled out of Court.
2) that there be no costs; Given under my hand and the seal of this court this the 8th day of June,2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PETITIONER/PLAINTIFF FOR RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Wednesday this the 7th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.254/2015
Between: Sri Karri Bhasakara Rao, S/o Suryanarayana, Hindu, age 38 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.10- 63, Nagulapalli villagae, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Plaintiff. And: Sri Villuri Bhaskara Rao, S/o late Suribabu, Hindu, age 45 years, Business, residing at D.No.2-36 Ummalada village, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Defendant
This suit coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri Buddha
Thrinadha Rao Advocate for Plaintiff. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
Suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for specific performance of the plaint schedule property directing the defendant to execute the registered sale deed for the plaint schedule property in favour of the plaintiff and if the defendant do not do so, the court to register the sale deed; if for any reason the specific performance cannot be ordered, for the refund of the advance amount of Rs.5,00,000/- and for costs of the suit.
Publication not filed against defendant . Plaintiff called absent No representation on behalf of plaintiff. Hence this suit is dismissed for default without costs.
Pronounced by me in open court, this the 7th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:21-12-2015 Date of Filing:21-12-2015
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Wednesday this the 7th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.254/2015
Between: Sri Karri Bhasakara Rao, S/o Suryanarayana, Hindu, age 38 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.10- 63, Nagulapalli villagae, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Plaintiff. And: Sri Villuri Bhaskara Rao, S/o late Suribabu, Hindu, age 45 years, Business, residing at D.No.2-36 Ummalada village, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Defendant
Suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for specific performance of the plaint schedule property directing the defendant to execute the registered sale deed for the plaint schedule property in favour of the plaintiff and if the defendant do not do so, the court to register the sale deed; if for any reason the specific performance cannot be ordered, for the refund of the advance amount of Rs.5,00,000/- and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction is Rs.6,00,000/- and a court fee of Rs.8,426/- is paid under Sec.39 Sch.I ArtI(b) and (c) of A.P.C.F. and S.V.Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri Buddha
Thrinadha Rao Advocate for Plaintiff. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court doth order:
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed for default;
2) that there be no costs;
Give under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 7th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
For Plaintiff: For Defendant:
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And: 1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court delivered the following:
ORDER
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
Counter of R1 and R2 not filed. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court. Memo is recorded. Hence this petition is dismissed without costs as not pressed as settled out of court.
Pronounced by me in open court this the 8th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:31-08-2016 Date of Filing:15-09-2016
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And: 1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
A fixed Court fee of Re1/- is affixed on the petition.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for
Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court doth order and;
DECREETAL ORDER
1) that the petition be and the same is hereby dismissed as not pressed as settled out of Court.
2) that there be no costs; Given under my hand and the seal of this court this the 8th day of June,2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PETITIONER/PLAINTIFF FOR RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:21-12-2015 Date of Filing:21-12-2015
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Wednesday this the 7th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.254/2015
Between: Sri Karri Bhasakara Rao, S/o Suryanarayana, Hindu, age 38 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.10- 63, Nagulapalli villagae, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Plaintiff. And: Sri Villuri Bhaskara Rao, S/o late Suribabu, Hindu, age 45 years, Business, residing at D.No.2-36 Ummalada village, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Defendant
Suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for specific performance of the plaint schedule property directing the defendant to execute the registered sale deed for the plaint schedule property in favour of the plaintiff and if the defendant do not do so, the court to register the sale deed; if for any reason the specific performance cannot be ordered, for the refund of the advance amount of Rs.5,00,000/- and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction is Rs.6,00,000/- and a court fee of Rs.8,426/- is paid under Sec.39 Sch.I ArtI(b) and (c) of A.P.C.F. and S.V.Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri Buddha
Thrinadha Rao Advocate for Plaintiff. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court doth order:
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed for default;
2) that there be no costs;
Give under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 7th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
For Plaintiff: For Defendant:
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli
Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And: 1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court delivered the following:
ORDER
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
Counter of R1 and R2 not filed. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court. Memo is recorded. Hence this petition is dismissed without costs as not pressed as settled out of court.
Pronounced by me in open court this the 8th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:31-08-2016 Date of Filing:15-09-2016
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And: 1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
A fixed Court fee of Re1/- is affixed on the petition.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court doth order and;
DECREETAL ORDER
1) that the petition be and the same is hereby dismissed as not pressed as settled out of Court.
2) that there be no costs; Given under my hand and the seal of this court this the 8th day of June,2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PETITIONER/PLAINTIFF FOR RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Wednesday this the 7th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.254/2015
Between: Sri Karri Bhasakara Rao, S/o Suryanarayana, Hindu, age 38 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.10- 63, Nagulapalli villagae, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Plaintiff. And: Sri Villuri Bhaskara Rao, S/o late Suribabu, Hindu, age 45 years, Business, residing at D.No.2-36 Ummalada village, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Defendant
This suit coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri Buddha
Thrinadha Rao Advocate for Plaintiff. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
Suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for specific performance of the plaint schedule property directing the defendant to execute the registered sale deed for the plaint schedule property in favour of the plaintiff and if the defendant do not do so, the court to register the sale deed; if for any reason the specific performance cannot be ordered, for the refund of the advance amount of Rs.5,00,000/- and for costs of the suit.
Publication not filed against defendant . Plaintiff called absent No representation on behalf of plaintiff. Hence this suit is dismissed for default without costs.
Pronounced by me in open court, this the 7th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:21-12-2015 Date of Filing:21-12-2015
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Wednesday this the 7th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.254/2015
Between: Sri Karri Bhasakara Rao, S/o Suryanarayana, Hindu, age 38 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.10- 63, Nagulapalli villagae, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Plaintiff. And: Sri Villuri Bhaskara Rao, S/o late Suribabu, Hindu, age 45 years, Business, residing at D.No.2-36 Ummalada village, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Defendant
Suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for specific performance of the plaint schedule property directing the defendant to execute the registered sale deed for the plaint schedule property in favour of the plaintiff and if the defendant do not do so, the court to register the sale deed; if for any reason the specific performance cannot be ordered, for the refund of the advance amount of Rs.5,00,000/- and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction is Rs.6,00,000/- and a court fee of Rs.8,426/- is paid under Sec.39 Sch.I ArtI(b) and (c) of A.P.C.F. and S.V.Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri Buddha
Thrinadha Rao Advocate for Plaintiff. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court doth order:
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed for default;
2) that there be no costs;
Give under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 7th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
For Plaintiff: For Defendant:
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And:
1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court delivered the following:
ORDER
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
Counter of R1 and R2 not filed. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court. Memo is recorded. Hence this petition is dismissed without costs as not pressed as settled out of court.
Pronounced by me in open court this the 8th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:31-08-2016
Date of Filing:15-09-2016
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And: 1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
A fixed Court fee of Re1/- is affixed on the petition.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court doth order and;
DECREETAL ORDER
1) that the petition be and the same is hereby dismissed as not pressed as settled out of Court.
2) that there be no costs; Given under my hand and the seal of this court this the 8th day of June,2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PETITIONER/PLAINTIFF FOR RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:12-09-12012 Date of Filing:12-09-2012
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Monday this the 19th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.223/2012
Between:
Sri Pilli Manikumar,S/o late Somulu, Hindu, age 45 years, cultivation, residing at Door No.40-56- 16, Sanjeeviah colony, Near Logos Church, Tadichetlapalem, Visakhapatnam-4. Plaintiff. And:
1) Pilli Chellayyamma,W/o late Somulu, Hindu, age 67 years, house hold duties, residing at Pidiwada Agraharam Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
2) Ravada Saraswathi W/o late Appanna, Hindu, age 49 years, house hold duties, residing at Pydiwada Agraharam, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
3) Kannapalli Laxmi, W/o Ramulu, Hindu, age 46 years, household duties, residing at Ammulapalem villagae, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
4) andukuri Narasinga Rao, S/o late Apparao, Hindu, age 71 years, cultivation, D.No.8-7-10, Gajuwaka, Visakhapatnam Greater Municipal Corporation, Visakhapatnam District. Defendants
Suit for Preliminary decree for partition of the plaint schedule property into four equal shares with metes and bounds and allot one such equal separated share to the plaintiff after converting the joint possession into separate possession and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction is Rs.653063/- and a court fee of Rs.9026/- is payable but the schedule property is in joint possession and enjoyment of the plaintiff and the defendants a fixed court fee of Rs.200-00 is paid under Sec.34(2) of A.P.C.F. and
S.V.Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri
B.V.S.S.N.Murthy, Advocate for Plaintiff and of Sri A.V.S.Bhavani Prasad, Advocate for Defendant
No.4. Defendants 1 to 3 remained exparte. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court doth order and:
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed for default
2) that there be no costs:
( Copy of Plaint schedule and valuation slip hereto enclosed)
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Monday this the 19th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.223/2012
Between: Sri Pilli Manikumar,S/o late Somulu, Hindu, age 45 years, cultivation, residing at Door No.40-56- 16, Sanjeeviah colony, Near Logos Church, Tadichetlapalem, Visakhapatnam-4. Plaintiff. And:
1) Pilli Chellayyamma,W/o late Somulu, Hindu, age 67 years, house hold duties, residing at Pidiwada Agraharam Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
2) Ravada Saraswathi W/o late Appanna, Hindu, age 49 years, house hold duties, residing at Pydiwada Agraharam, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
3) Kannapalli Laxmi, W/o Ramulu, Hindu, age 46 years, household duties, residing at Ammulapalem villagae, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
4) andukuri Narasinga Rao, S/o late Apparao, Hindu, age 71 years, cultivation, D.No.8-7-10, Gajuwaka, Visakhapatnam Greater Municipal Corporation, Visakhapatnam District. Defendants
This suit coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri
B.V.S.S.N.Murthy, Advocate for Plaintiff and of Sri A.V.S.Bhavani Prasad, Advocate for Defendant
No.4. Defendants 1 to 3 remained exparte. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
Suit for Preliminary decree for partition of the plaint schedule property into four equal shares with metes and bounds and allot one such equal separated share to the plaintiff after converting the joint possession into separate possession and for costs of the suit.
Costs not paid. Plaintiff called absent. No representation on behalf of plaintiff. Plaintiff failed to adduce evidence though granted several adjournments . Hence this suit is dismissed for default without costs.
Pronounced by me in open court, this the 19th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:12-09-12012 Date of Filing:12-09-2012
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Monday this the 19th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.223/2012
Between: Sri Pilli Manikumar,S/o late Somulu, Hindu, age 45 years, cultivation, residing at Door No.40-56- 16, Sanjeeviah colony, Near Logos Church, Tadichetlapalem, Visakhapatnam-4. Plaintiff. And:
1) Pilli Chellayyamma,W/o late Somulu, Hindu, age 67 years, house hold duties, residing at Pidiwada Agraharam Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
2) Ravada Saraswathi W/o late Appanna, Hindu, age 49 years, house hold duties, residing at Pydiwada Agraharam, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
3) Kannapalli Laxmi, W/o Ramulu, Hindu, age 46 years, household duties, residing at Ammulapalem villagae, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
4) andukuri Narasinga Rao, S/o late Apparao, Hindu, age 71 years, cultivation, D.No.8-7-10, Gajuwaka, Visakhapatnam Greater Municipal Corporation, Visakhapatnam District. Defendants
Suit for Preliminary decree for partition of the plaint schedule property into four equal shares with metes and bounds and allot one such equal separated share to the plaintiff after converting the joint possession into separate possession and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction is Rs.653063/- and a court fee of Rs.9026/- is payable but the schedule property is in joint possession and enjoyment of the plaintiff and the defendants a fixed court fee of Rs.200-00 is paid under Sec.34(2) of A.P.C.F. and
S.V.Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri
B.V.S.S.N.Murthy, Advocate for Plaintiff and of Sri A.V.S.Bhavani Prasad, Advocate for Defendant
No.4. Defendants 1 to 3 remained exparte. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court doth order and:
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed for default
2) that there be no costs:
( Copy of Plaint schedule and valuation slip hereto enclosed)
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:21-12-2015 Date of Filing:21-12-2015
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Wednesday this the 7th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.254/2015
Between: Sri Karri Bhasakara Rao, S/o Suryanarayana, Hindu, age 38 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.10- 63, Nagulapalli villagae, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
Plaintiff. And: Sri Villuri Bhaskara Rao, S/o late Suribabu, Hindu, age 45 years, Business, residing at D.No.2-36 Ummalada village, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Defendant
Suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for specific performance of the plaint schedule property directing the defendant to execute the registered sale deed for the plaint schedule property in favour of the plaintiff and if the defendant do not do so, the court to register the sale deed; if for any reason the specific performance cannot be ordered, for the refund of the advance amount of Rs.5,00,000/- and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction is Rs.6,00,000/- and a court fee of Rs.8,426/- is paid under Sec.39 Sch.I ArtI(b) and (c) of A.P.C.F. and S.V.Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri Buddha
Thrinadha Rao Advocate for Plaintiff. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court doth order:
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed for default;
2) that there be no costs;
Give under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 7th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
For Plaintiff: For Defendant:
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And: 1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court delivered the following:
ORDER
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
Counter of R1 and R2 not filed. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court. Memo is recorded. Hence this petition is dismissed without costs as not pressed as settled out of court.
Pronounced by me in open court this the 8th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:31-08-2016 Date of Filing:15-09-2016
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And: 1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
A fixed Court fee of Re1/- is affixed on the petition.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court doth order and;
DECREETAL ORDER
1) that the petition be and the same is hereby dismissed as not pressed as settled out of Court.
2) that there be no costs; Given under my hand and the seal of this court this the 8th day of June,2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PETITIONER/PLAINTIFF FOR RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Wednesday this the 7th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.254/2015
Between: Sri Karri Bhasakara Rao, S/o Suryanarayana, Hindu, age 38 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.10- 63, Nagulapalli villagae, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Plaintiff. And: Sri Villuri Bhaskara Rao, S/o late Suribabu, Hindu, age 45 years, Business, residing at D.No.2-36 Ummalada village, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Defendant
This suit coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri Buddha
Thrinadha Rao Advocate for Plaintiff. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
Suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for specific performance of the plaint schedule property directing the defendant to execute the registered sale deed for the plaint schedule property in favour of the plaintiff and if the defendant do not do so, the court to register the sale deed; if for any reason the specific performance cannot be ordered, for the refund of the advance amount of Rs.5,00,000/- and for costs of the suit.
Publication not filed against defendant . Plaintiff called absent No representation on behalf of plaintiff. Hence this suit is dismissed for default without costs.
Pronounced by me in open court, this the 7th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:21-12-2015 Date of Filing:21-12-2015
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Wednesday this the 7th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.254/2015
Between: Sri Karri Bhasakara Rao, S/o Suryanarayana, Hindu, age 38 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.10- 63, Nagulapalli villagae, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Plaintiff. And: Sri Villuri Bhaskara Rao, S/o late Suribabu, Hindu, age 45 years, Business, residing at D.No.2-36 Ummalada village, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Defendant
Suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for specific performance of the plaint schedule property directing the defendant to execute the registered sale deed for the plaint schedule property in favour of the plaintiff and if the defendant do not do so, the court to register the sale deed; if for any reason the specific performance cannot be ordered, for the refund of the advance amount of Rs.5,00,000/- and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction is Rs.6,00,000/- and a court fee of Rs.8,426/- is paid under Sec.39 Sch.I ArtI(b) and (c) of A.P.C.F. and S.V.Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri Buddha
Thrinadha Rao Advocate for Plaintiff. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court doth order:
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed for default;
2) that there be no costs;
Give under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 7th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
For Plaintiff: For Defendant:
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And: 1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court delivered the following:
ORDER
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
Counter of R1 and R2 not filed. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court. Memo is recorded. Hence this petition is dismissed without costs as not pressed as settled out of court.
Pronounced by me in open court this the 8th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:31-08-2016 Date of Filing:15-09-2016
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And: 1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
A fixed Court fee of Re1/- is affixed on the petition.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court doth order and;
DECREETAL ORDER
1) that the petition be and the same is hereby dismissed as not pressed as settled out of Court.
2) that there be no costs; Given under my hand and the seal of this court this the 8th day of June,2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PETITIONER/PLAINTIFF FOR RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:21-12-2015 Date of Filing:21-12-2015
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Wednesday this the 7th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.254/2015
Between: Sri Karri Bhasakara Rao, S/o Suryanarayana, Hindu, age 38 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.10- 63, Nagulapalli villagae, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Plaintiff. And: Sri Villuri Bhaskara Rao, S/o late Suribabu, Hindu, age 45 years, Business, residing at D.No.2-36 Ummalada village, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Defendant
Suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for specific performance of the plaint schedule property directing the defendant to execute the registered sale deed for the plaint schedule property in favour of the plaintiff and if the defendant do not do so, the court to register the sale deed; if for any reason the specific performance cannot be ordered, for the refund of the advance amount of Rs.5,00,000/- and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction is Rs.6,00,000/- and a court fee of Rs.8,426/- is paid under Sec.39 Sch.I ArtI(b) and (c) of A.P.C.F. and S.V.Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri Buddha
Thrinadha Rao Advocate for Plaintiff. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court doth order:
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed for default;
2) that there be no costs;
Give under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 7th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
For Plaintiff: For Defendant:
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And:
1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court delivered the following:
ORDER
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
Counter of R1 and R2 not filed. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court. Memo is recorded. Hence this petition is dismissed without costs as not pressed as settled out of court.
Pronounced by me in open court this the 8th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:31-08-2016
Date of Filing:15-09-2016
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And: 1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
A fixed Court fee of Re1/- is affixed on the petition.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court doth order and;
DECREETAL ORDER
1) that the petition be and the same is hereby dismissed as not pressed as settled out of Court.
2) that there be no costs; Given under my hand and the seal of this court this the 8th day of June,2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PETITIONER/PLAINTIFF FOR RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Wednesday this the 7th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.254/2015
Between: Sri Karri Bhasakara Rao, S/o Suryanarayana, Hindu, age 38 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.10- 63, Nagulapalli villagae, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Plaintiff. And: Sri Villuri Bhaskara Rao, S/o late Suribabu, Hindu, age 45 years, Business, residing at D.No.2-36 Ummalada village, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Defendant
This suit coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri Buddha
Thrinadha Rao Advocate for Plaintiff. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
Suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for specific performance of the plaint schedule property directing the defendant to execute the registered sale deed for the plaint schedule property in favour of the plaintiff and if the defendant do not do so, the court to register the sale deed; if for any reason the specific performance cannot be ordered, for the refund of the advance amount of Rs.5,00,000/- and for costs of the suit.
Publication not filed against defendant . Plaintiff called absent No representation on behalf of plaintiff. Hence this suit is dismissed for default without costs.
Pronounced by me in open court, this the 7th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:21-12-2015 Date of Filing:21-12-2015
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Wednesday this the 7th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.254/2015
Between: Sri Karri Bhasakara Rao, S/o Suryanarayana, Hindu, age 38 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.10- 63, Nagulapalli villagae, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Plaintiff. And: Sri Villuri Bhaskara Rao, S/o late Suribabu, Hindu, age 45 years, Business, residing at D.No.2-36 Ummalada village, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Defendant
Suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for specific performance of the plaint schedule property directing the defendant to execute the registered sale deed for the plaint schedule property in favour of the plaintiff and if the defendant do not do so, the court to register the sale deed; if for any reason the specific performance cannot be ordered, for the refund of the advance amount of Rs.5,00,000/- and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction is Rs.6,00,000/- and a court fee of Rs.8,426/- is paid under Sec.39 Sch.I ArtI(b) and (c) of A.P.C.F. and S.V.Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri Buddha
Thrinadha Rao Advocate for Plaintiff. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court doth order:
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed for default;
2) that there be no costs;
Give under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 7th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
For Plaintiff: For Defendant:
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And: 1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for
Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court delivered the following:
ORDER
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
Counter of R1 and R2 not filed. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court. Memo is recorded. Hence this petition is dismissed without costs as not pressed as settled out of court.
Pronounced by me in open court this the 8th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:31-08-2016 Date of Filing:15-09-2016
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And: 1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
A fixed Court fee of Re1/- is affixed on the petition.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court doth order and;
DECREETAL ORDER
1) that the petition be and the same is hereby dismissed as not pressed as settled out of Court.
2) that there be no costs; Given under my hand and the seal of this court this the 8th day of June,2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PETITIONER/PLAINTIFF FOR RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP + O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
Date of presentation:06-09-2007 Date of Filing:28-09-2007 06-09-2007IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Tuesday this the 20th of June, 2017.
CMA.No.01/2007
Between: Sri Villuri Ramu, son of late Mahalakshmi Naidu, Hindu, age 45 years, cultivation, residing at Dr.No.15-22-6/1, Anakapalle, Visakhapatnam District. Appellant. And:
1) The State of Andhra Pradesh represented by its District Collector, Visakhapatnam.
2) The Collector under Section-47-A of Indian stamp Act and District Registrar of Assurances, Registration and Stamps, Visakhapatnam.
3) The Sub Registrar, Sub-Registrar office, Anakapalle.
Respondents
Petition filed under section 47-A (4 & 5) of Indian Stamp Act read with Rule-9 of A.P.Stamp (Prevention of under valuation of instruments) Rules, 1975 by the Petitioner/Appellant against the respondent District Registrar of Assurance Registration and stamps Visakhapatnam to set aside the proceedings No.595/G2/07,dt.27-06-2007 by allowing this Appeal with costs.
A fixed Court fee of Rs.5/- is paid under Section47-A of Indian Stamp Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri V.V.Jogayya,
Sri M.Sreenivasa Rao, Advocates for Appellant and of Sri Assistant Government Pleader, Advocate for Defendants. Counsel for appellants filed memo stating that not pressing the Civil Miscellaneous petition and having stood over till this day this court doth order and:
DECREE
1) that the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal be and the same is hereby dismissed as not pressed;
2) that there be no costs;
Given under my hand and the seal of this court this the 20th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
For APPELLANT FOR RESPONDENTS
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Tuesday this the 20th of June, 2017.
CMA.No.01/2007
Between: Sri Villuri Ramu, son of late Mahalakshmi Naidu, Hindu, age 45 years, cultivation, residing at Dr.No.15-22-6/1, Anakapalle, Visakhapatnam District. Appellant. And:
1) The State of Andhra Pradesh represented by its District Collector, Visakhapatnam.
2) The Collector under Section-47-A of Indian stamp Act and District Registrar of Assurances, Registration and Stamps, Visakhapatnam.
3) The Sub Registrar, Sub-Registrar office, Anakapalle.
Respondents
This suit coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri V.V.Jogayya,
Sri M.Sreenivasa Rao, Advocates for Appellant and of Sri Assistant Government Pleader, Advocate for Defendants. Counsel for appellants filed memo stating that not pressing the Civil Miscellaneous petition and having stood over till this day this court delivered the following:
ORDER
Petition filed under section 47-A (4 & 5) of Indian Stamp Act read with Rule-9 of A.P.Stamp (Prevention of under valuation of instruments) Rules, 1975 by the Petitioner/Appellant against the respondent District Registrar of Assurance Registration and stamps Visakhapatnam to set aside the proceedings No.595/G2/07,dt.27-06-2007 by allowing this Appeal with costs.
Counsel for Appellants filed memo stating that not pressing the CMA. Memo is recorded.
Hence this CMA is dismissed without costs.
Pronounced by me in open court, this the 20th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:12-09-12012 Date of Filing:12-09-2012
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Monday this the 19th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.223/2012
Between: Sri Pilli Manikumar,S/o late Somulu, Hindu, age 45 years, cultivation, residing at Door No.40-56- 16, Sanjeeviah colony, Near Logos Church, Tadichetlapalem, Visakhapatnam-4. Plaintiff. And:
1) Pilli Chellayyamma,W/o late Somulu, Hindu, age 67 years, house hold duties, residing at Pidiwada Agraharam Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
2) Ravada Saraswathi W/o late Appanna, Hindu, age 49 years, house hold duties, residing at Pydiwada Agraharam, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
3) Kannapalli Laxmi, W/o Ramulu, Hindu, age 46 years, household duties, residing at Ammulapalem villagae, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
4) andukuri Narasinga Rao, S/o late Apparao, Hindu, age 71 years, cultivation, D.No.8-7-10, Gajuwaka, Visakhapatnam Greater Municipal Corporation, Visakhapatnam District. Defendants
Suit for Preliminary decree for partition of the plaint schedule property into four equal shares with metes and bounds and allot one such equal separated share to the plaintiff after converting the joint possession into separate possession and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction is Rs.653063/- and a court fee of Rs.9026/- is payable but the schedule property is in joint possession and enjoyment of the plaintiff and the defendants a fixed court fee of Rs.200-00 is paid under Sec.34(2) of A.P.C.F. and
S.V.Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri
B.V.S.S.N.Murthy, Advocate for Plaintiff and of Sri A.V.S.Bhavani Prasad, Advocate for Defendant
No.4. Defendants 1 to 3 remained exparte. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court doth order and:
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed for default
2) that there be no costs:
( Copy of Plaint schedule and valuation slip hereto enclosed)
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Monday this the 19th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.223/2012
Between: Sri Pilli Manikumar,S/o late Somulu, Hindu, age 45 years, cultivation, residing at Door No.40-56- 16, Sanjeeviah colony, Near Logos Church, Tadichetlapalem, Visakhapatnam-4. Plaintiff. And:
1) Pilli Chellayyamma,W/o late Somulu, Hindu, age 67 years, house hold duties, residing at Pidiwada Agraharam Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
2) Ravada Saraswathi W/o late Appanna, Hindu, age 49 years, house hold duties, residing at Pydiwada Agraharam, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
3) Kannapalli Laxmi, W/o Ramulu, Hindu, age 46 years, household duties, residing at Ammulapalem villagae, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
4) Andukuri Narasinga Rao, S/o late Apparao, Hindu, age 71 years, cultivation, D.No.8-7-10, Gajuwaka, Visakhapatnam Greater Municipal Corporation, Visakhapatnam District. Defendants
This suit coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri
B.V.S.S.N.Murthy, Advocate for Plaintiff and of Sri A.V.S.Bhavani Prasad, Advocate for Defendant
No.4. Defendants 1 to 3 remained exparte. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
Suit for Preliminary decree for partition of the plaint schedule property into four equal shares with metes and bounds and allot one such equal separated share to the plaintiff after converting the joint possession into separate possession and for costs of the suit.
Costs not paid. Plaintiff called absent. No representation on behalf of plaintiff. Plaintiff failed to adduce evidence though granted several adjournments . Hence this suit is dismissed for default without costs.
Pronounced by me in open court, this the 19th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:12-09-12012 Date of Filing:12-09-2012
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Monday this the 19th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.223/2012
Between: Sri Pilli Manikumar,S/o late Somulu, Hindu, age 45 years, cultivation, residing at Door No.40-56- 16, Sanjeeviah colony, Near Logos Church, Tadichetlapalem, Visakhapatnam-4. Plaintiff. And:
1) Pilli Chellayyamma,W/o late Somulu, Hindu, age 67 years, house hold duties, residing at Pidiwada Agraharam Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
2) Ravada Saraswathi W/o late Appanna, Hindu, age 49 years, house hold duties, residing at Pydiwada Agraharam, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
3) Kannapalli Laxmi, W/o Ramulu, Hindu, age 46 years, household duties, residing at Ammulapalem villagae, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
4) andukuri Narasinga Rao, S/o late Apparao, Hindu, age 71 years, cultivation, D.No.8-7-10, Gajuwaka, Visakhapatnam Greater Municipal Corporation, Visakhapatnam District. Defendants
Suit for Preliminary decree for partition of the plaint schedule property into four equal shares with metes and bounds and allot one such equal separated share to the plaintiff after converting the joint possession into separate possession and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction is Rs.653063/- and a court fee of Rs.9026/- is payable but the schedule property is in joint possession and enjoyment of the plaintiff and the defendants a fixed court fee of Rs.200-00 is paid under Sec.34(2) of A.P.C.F. and
S.V.Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri
B.V.S.S.N.Murthy, Advocate for Plaintiff and of Sri A.V.S.Bhavani Prasad, Advocate for Defendant
No.4. Defendants 1 to 3 remained exparte. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court doth order and:
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed for default
2) that there be no costs:
( Copy of Plaint schedule and valuation slip hereto enclosed)
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:21-12-2015 Date of Filing:21-12-2015
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Wednesday this the 7th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.254/2015
Between: Sri Karri Bhasakara Rao, S/o Suryanarayana, Hindu, age 38 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.10- 63, Nagulapalli villagae, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Plaintiff. And: Sri Villuri Bhaskara Rao, S/o late Suribabu, Hindu, age 45 years, Business, residing at D.No.2-36 Ummalada village, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Defendant
Suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for specific performance of the plaint schedule property directing the defendant to execute the registered sale deed for the plaint schedule property in favour of the plaintiff and if the defendant do not do so, the court to register the sale deed; if for any reason the specific performance cannot be ordered, for the refund of the advance amount of Rs.5,00,000/- and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction is Rs.6,00,000/- and a court fee of Rs.8,426/- is paid under Sec.39 Sch.I ArtI(b) and (c) of A.P.C.F. and S.V.Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri Buddha
Thrinadha Rao Advocate for Plaintiff. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court doth order:
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed for default;
2) that there be no costs;
Give under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 7th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
For Plaintiff: For Defendant:
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And: 1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court delivered the following:
ORDER
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
Counter of R1 and R2 not filed. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court. Memo is recorded. Hence this petition is dismissed without costs as not pressed as settled out of court.
Pronounced by me in open court this the 8th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:31-08-2016 Date of Filing:15-09-2016
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And: 1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
A fixed Court fee of Re1/- is affixed on the petition.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court doth order and;
DECREETAL ORDER
1) that the petition be and the same is hereby dismissed as not pressed as settled out of Court.
2) that there be no costs; Given under my hand and the seal of this court this the 8th day of June,2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PETITIONER/PLAINTIFF FOR RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Wednesday this the 7th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.254/2015
Between: Sri Karri Bhasakara Rao, S/o Suryanarayana, Hindu, age 38 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.10- 63, Nagulapalli villagae, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Plaintiff. And: Sri Villuri Bhaskara Rao, S/o late Suribabu, Hindu, age 45 years, Business, residing at D.No.2-36 Ummalada village, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Defendant
This suit coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri Buddha
Thrinadha Rao Advocate for Plaintiff. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
Suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for specific performance of the plaint schedule property directing the defendant to execute the registered sale deed for the plaint schedule property in favour of the plaintiff and if the defendant do not do so, the court to register the sale deed; if for any reason the specific performance cannot be ordered, for the refund of the advance amount of Rs.5,00,000/- and for costs of the suit.
Publication not filed against defendant . Plaintiff called absent No representation on behalf of plaintiff. Hence this suit is dismissed for default without costs.
Pronounced by me in open court, this the 7th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:21-12-2015 Date of Filing:21-12-2015
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Wednesday this the 7th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.254/2015
Between: Sri Karri Bhasakara Rao, S/o Suryanarayana, Hindu, age 38 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.10- 63, Nagulapalli villagae, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Plaintiff. And: Sri Villuri Bhaskara Rao, S/o late Suribabu, Hindu, age 45 years, Business, residing at D.No.2-36 Ummalada village, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Defendant
Suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for specific performance of the plaint schedule property directing the defendant to execute the registered sale deed for the plaint schedule property in favour of the plaintiff and if the defendant do not do so, the court to register the sale deed; if for any reason the specific performance cannot be ordered, for the refund of the advance amount of Rs.5,00,000/- and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction is Rs.6,00,000/- and a court fee of Rs.8,426/- is paid under Sec.39 Sch.I ArtI(b) and (c) of A.P.C.F. and S.V.Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri Buddha
Thrinadha Rao Advocate for Plaintiff. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court doth order:
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed for default;
2) that there be no costs;
Give under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 7th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
For Plaintiff: For Defendant:
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And: 1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court delivered the following:
ORDER
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
Counter of R1 and R2 not filed. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court. Memo is recorded. Hence this petition is dismissed without costs as not pressed as settled out of court.
Pronounced by me in open court this the 8th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:31-08-2016 Date of Filing:15-09-2016
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And:
1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
A fixed Court fee of Re1/- is affixed on the petition.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court doth order and;
DECREETAL ORDER
1) that the petition be and the same is hereby dismissed as not pressed as settled out of Court.
2) that there be no costs; Given under my hand and the seal of this court this the 8th day of June,2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PETITIONER/PLAINTIFF FOR RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:21-12-2015 Date of Filing:21-12-2015
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Wednesday this the 7th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.254/2015
Between: Sri Karri Bhasakara Rao, S/o Suryanarayana, Hindu, age 38 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.10- 63, Nagulapalli villagae, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Plaintiff. And: Sri Villuri Bhaskara Rao, S/o late Suribabu, Hindu, age 45 years, Business, residing at D.No.2-36 Ummalada village, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Defendant
Suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for specific performance of the plaint schedule property directing the defendant to execute the registered sale deed for the plaint schedule property in favour of the plaintiff and if the defendant do not do so, the court to register the sale deed; if for any reason the specific performance cannot be ordered, for the refund of the advance amount of Rs.5,00,000/- and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction is Rs.6,00,000/- and a court fee of Rs.8,426/- is paid under Sec.39 Sch.I ArtI(b) and (c) of A.P.C.F. and S.V.Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri Buddha
Thrinadha Rao Advocate for Plaintiff. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court doth order:
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed for default;
2) that there be no costs;
Give under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 7th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
For Plaintiff: For Defendant:
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And: 1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court delivered the following:
ORDER
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
Counter of R1 and R2 not filed. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court. Memo is recorded. Hence this petition is dismissed without costs as not pressed as settled out of court.
Pronounced by me in open court this the 8th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:31-08-2016 Date of Filing:15-09-2016
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And: 1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
A fixed Court fee of Re1/- is affixed on the petition.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court doth order and;
DECREETAL ORDER
1) that the petition be and the same is hereby dismissed as not pressed as settled out of Court.
2) that there be no costs; Given under my hand and the seal of this court this the 8th day of June,2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PETITIONER/PLAINTIFF FOR RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Wednesday this the 7th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.254/2015
Between: Sri Karri Bhasakara Rao, S/o Suryanarayana, Hindu, age 38 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.10- 63, Nagulapalli villagae, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Plaintiff. And: Sri Villuri Bhaskara Rao, S/o late Suribabu, Hindu, age 45 years, Business, residing at D.No.2-36 Ummalada village, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Defendant
This suit coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri Buddha
Thrinadha Rao Advocate for Plaintiff. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
Suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for specific performance of the plaint schedule property directing the defendant to execute the registered sale deed for the plaint schedule property in favour of the plaintiff and if the defendant do not do so, the court to register the sale deed; if for any reason the specific performance cannot be ordered, for the refund of the advance amount of Rs.5,00,000/- and for costs of the suit.
Publication not filed against defendant . Plaintiff called absent No representation on behalf of plaintiff. Hence this suit is dismissed for default without costs.
Pronounced by me in open court, this the 7th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:21-12-2015 Date of Filing:21-12-2015
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Wednesday this the 7th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.254/2015
Between: Sri Karri Bhasakara Rao, S/o Suryanarayana, Hindu, age 38 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.10- 63, Nagulapalli villagae, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
Plaintiff. And: Sri Villuri Bhaskara Rao, S/o late Suribabu, Hindu, age 45 years, Business, residing at D.No.2-36 Ummalada village, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Defendant
Suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for specific performance of the plaint schedule property directing the defendant to execute the registered sale deed for the plaint schedule property in favour of the plaintiff and if the defendant do not do so, the court to register the sale deed; if for any reason the specific performance cannot be ordered, for the refund of the advance amount of Rs.5,00,000/- and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction is Rs.6,00,000/- and a court fee of Rs.8,426/- is paid under Sec.39 Sch.I ArtI(b) and (c) of A.P.C.F. and S.V.Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri Buddha
Thrinadha Rao Advocate for Plaintiff. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court doth order:
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed for default;
2) that there be no costs;
Give under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 7th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
For Plaintiff: For Defendant:
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And: 1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court delivered the following:
ORDER
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
Counter of R1 and R2 not filed. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court. Memo is recorded. Hence this petition is dismissed without costs as not pressed as settled out of court.
Pronounced by me in open court this the 8th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:31-08-2016 Date of Filing:15-09-2016
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And: 1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
A fixed Court fee of Re1/- is affixed on the petition.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court doth order and;
DECREETAL ORDER
1) that the petition be and the same is hereby dismissed as not pressed as settled out of Court.
2) that there be no costs; Given under my hand and the seal of this court this the 8th day of June,2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PETITIONER/PLAINTIFF FOR RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:12-09-12012 Date of Filing:12-09-2012
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Monday this the 19th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.223/2012
Between: Sri Pilli Manikumar,S/o late Somulu, Hindu, age 45 years, cultivation, residing at Door No.40-56- 16, Sanjeeviah colony, Near Logos Church, Tadichetlapalem, Visakhapatnam-4. Plaintiff. And:
1) Pilli Chellayyamma,W/o late Somulu, Hindu, age 67 years, house hold duties, residing at Pidiwada Agraharam Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
2) Ravada Saraswathi W/o late Appanna, Hindu, age 49 years, house hold duties, residing at Pydiwada Agraharam, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
3) Kannapalli Laxmi, W/o Ramulu, Hindu, age 46 years, household duties, residing at Ammulapalem villagae, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
4) andukuri Narasinga Rao, S/o late Apparao, Hindu, age 71 years, cultivation, D.No.8-7-10, Gajuwaka, Visakhapatnam Greater Municipal Corporation, Visakhapatnam District. Defendants
Suit for Preliminary decree for partition of the plaint schedule property into four equal shares with metes and bounds and allot one such equal separated share to the plaintiff after converting the joint possession into separate possession and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction is Rs.653063/- and a court fee of Rs.9026/- is payable but the schedule property is in joint possession and enjoyment of the plaintiff and the defendants a fixed court fee of Rs.200-00 is paid under Sec.34(2) of A.P.C.F. and
S.V.Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri
B.V.S.S.N.Murthy, Advocate for Plaintiff and of Sri A.V.S.Bhavani Prasad, Advocate for Defendant
No.4. Defendants 1 to 3 remained exparte. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court doth order and:
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed for default
2) that there be no costs:
( Copy of Plaint schedule and valuation slip hereto enclosed)
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Monday this the 19th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.223/2012
Between: Sri Pilli Manikumar,S/o late Somulu, Hindu, age 45 years, cultivation, residing at Door No.40-56- 16, Sanjeeviah colony, Near Logos Church, Tadichetlapalem, Visakhapatnam-4. Plaintiff. And:
1) Pilli Chellayyamma,W/o late Somulu, Hindu, age 67 years, house hold duties, residing at Pidiwada Agraharam Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
2) Ravada Saraswathi W/o late Appanna, Hindu, age 49 years, house hold duties, residing at Pydiwada Agraharam, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
3) Kannapalli Laxmi, W/o Ramulu, Hindu, age 46 years, household duties, residing at Ammulapalem villagae, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
4) andukuri Narasinga Rao, S/o late Apparao, Hindu, age 71 years, cultivation, D.No.8-7-10, Gajuwaka, Visakhapatnam Greater Municipal Corporation, Visakhapatnam District. Defendants
This suit coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri
B.V.S.S.N.Murthy, Advocate for Plaintiff and of Sri A.V.S.Bhavani Prasad, Advocate for Defendant
No.4. Defendants 1 to 3 remained exparte. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
Suit for Preliminary decree for partition of the plaint schedule property into four equal shares with metes and bounds and allot one such equal separated share to the plaintiff after converting the joint possession into separate possession and for costs of the suit.
Costs not paid. Plaintiff called absent. No representation on behalf of plaintiff. Plaintiff failed to adduce evidence though granted several adjournments . Hence this suit is dismissed for default without costs.
Pronounced by me in open court, this the 19th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:12-09-12012 Date of Filing:12-09-2012
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Monday this the 19th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.223/2012
Between: Sri Pilli Manikumar,S/o late Somulu, Hindu, age 45 years, cultivation, residing at Door No.40-56- 16, Sanjeeviah colony, Near Logos Church, Tadichetlapalem, Visakhapatnam-4. Plaintiff. And:
1) Pilli Chellayyamma,W/o late Somulu, Hindu, age 67 years, house hold duties, residing at Pidiwada Agraharam Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
2) Ravada Saraswathi W/o late Appanna, Hindu, age 49 years, house hold duties, residing at Pydiwada Agraharam, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
3) Kannapalli Laxmi, W/o Ramulu, Hindu, age 46 years, household duties, residing at Ammulapalem villagae, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
4) andukuri Narasinga Rao, S/o late Apparao, Hindu, age 71 years, cultivation, D.No.8-7-10, Gajuwaka, Visakhapatnam Greater Municipal Corporation, Visakhapatnam District. Defendants
Suit for Preliminary decree for partition of the plaint schedule property into four equal shares with metes and bounds and allot one such equal separated share to the plaintiff after converting the joint possession into separate possession and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction is Rs.653063/- and a court fee of Rs.9026/- is payable but the schedule property is in joint possession and enjoyment of the plaintiff and the defendants a fixed court fee of Rs.200-00 is paid under Sec.34(2) of A.P.C.F. and
S.V.Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri
B.V.S.S.N.Murthy, Advocate for Plaintiff and of Sri A.V.S.Bhavani Prasad, Advocate for Defendant
No.4. Defendants 1 to 3 remained exparte. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court doth order and:
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed for default
2) that there be no costs:
( Copy of Plaint schedule and valuation slip hereto enclosed)
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:21-12-2015 Date of Filing:21-12-2015
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Wednesday this the 7th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.254/2015
Between: Sri Karri Bhasakara Rao, S/o Suryanarayana, Hindu, age 38 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.10- 63, Nagulapalli villagae, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Plaintiff. And: Sri Villuri Bhaskara Rao, S/o late Suribabu, Hindu, age 45 years, Business, residing at D.No.2-36 Ummalada village, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Defendant
Suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for specific performance of the plaint schedule property directing the defendant to execute the registered sale deed for the plaint schedule property in favour of the plaintiff and if the defendant do not do so, the court to register the sale deed; if for any reason the specific performance cannot be ordered, for the refund of the advance amount of Rs.5,00,000/- and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction is Rs.6,00,000/- and a court fee of Rs.8,426/- is paid under Sec.39 Sch.I ArtI(b) and (c) of A.P.C.F. and S.V.Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri Buddha
Thrinadha Rao Advocate for Plaintiff. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court doth order:
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed for default;
2) that there be no costs;
Give under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 7th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
For Plaintiff: For Defendant:
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And: 1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court delivered the following:
ORDER
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
Counter of R1 and R2 not filed. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court. Memo is recorded. Hence this petition is dismissed without costs as not pressed as settled out of court.
Pronounced by me in open court this the 8th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:31-08-2016 Date of Filing:15-09-2016
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And: 1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
A fixed Court fee of Re1/- is affixed on the petition.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court doth order and;
DECREETAL ORDER
1) that the petition be and the same is hereby dismissed as not pressed as settled out of Court.
2) that there be no costs; Given under my hand and the seal of this court this the 8th day of June,2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PETITIONER/PLAINTIFF FOR RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Wednesday this the 7th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.254/2015
Between: Sri Karri Bhasakara Rao, S/o Suryanarayana, Hindu, age 38 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.10- 63, Nagulapalli villagae, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Plaintiff. And: Sri Villuri Bhaskara Rao, S/o late Suribabu, Hindu, age 45 years, Business, residing at D.No.2-36 Ummalada village, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Defendant
This suit coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri Buddha
Thrinadha Rao Advocate for Plaintiff. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
Suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for specific performance of the plaint schedule property directing the defendant to execute the registered sale deed for the plaint schedule property in favour of the plaintiff and if the defendant do not do so, the court to register the sale deed; if for any reason the specific performance cannot be ordered, for the refund of the advance amount of Rs.5,00,000/- and for costs of the suit.
Publication not filed against defendant . Plaintiff called absent No representation on behalf of plaintiff. Hence this suit is dismissed for default without costs.
Pronounced by me in open court, this the 7th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:21-12-2015 Date of Filing:21-12-2015
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Wednesday this the 7th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.254/2015
Between: Sri Karri Bhasakara Rao, S/o Suryanarayana, Hindu, age 38 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.10- 63, Nagulapalli villagae, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Plaintiff. And: Sri Villuri Bhaskara Rao, S/o late Suribabu, Hindu, age 45 years, Business, residing at D.No.2-36 Ummalada village, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Defendant
Suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for specific performance of the plaint schedule property directing the defendant to execute the registered sale deed for the plaint schedule property in favour of the plaintiff and if the defendant do not do so, the court to register the sale deed; if for any reason the specific performance cannot be ordered, for the refund of the advance amount of Rs.5,00,000/- and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction is Rs.6,00,000/- and a court fee of Rs.8,426/- is paid under Sec.39 Sch.I ArtI(b) and (c) of A.P.C.F. and S.V.Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri Buddha
Thrinadha Rao Advocate for Plaintiff. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court doth order:
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed for default;
2) that there be no costs;
Give under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 7th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
For Plaintiff: For Defendant:
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And: 1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court delivered the following:
ORDER
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
Counter of R1 and R2 not filed. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court. Memo is recorded. Hence this petition is dismissed without costs as not pressed as settled out of court.
Pronounced by me in open court this the 8th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:31-08-2016 Date of Filing:15-09-2016
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And: 1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
A fixed Court fee of Re1/- is affixed on the petition.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court doth order and;
DECREETAL ORDER
1) that the petition be and the same is hereby dismissed as not pressed as settled out of Court.
2) that there be no costs; Given under my hand and the seal of this court this the 8th day of June,2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PETITIONER/PLAINTIFF FOR RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:21-12-2015 Date of Filing:21-12-2015
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Wednesday this the 7th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.254/2015
Between: Sri Karri Bhasakara Rao, S/o Suryanarayana, Hindu, age 38 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.10- 63, Nagulapalli villagae, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Plaintiff. And: Sri Villuri Bhaskara Rao, S/o late Suribabu, Hindu, age 45 years, Business, residing at D.No.2-36 Ummalada village, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Defendant
Suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for specific performance of the plaint schedule property directing the defendant to execute the registered sale deed for the plaint schedule property in favour of the plaintiff and if the defendant do not do so, the court to register the sale deed; if for any reason the specific performance cannot be ordered, for the refund of the advance amount of Rs.5,00,000/- and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction is Rs.6,00,000/- and a court fee of Rs.8,426/- is paid under Sec.39 Sch.I ArtI(b) and (c) of A.P.C.F. and S.V.Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri Buddha
Thrinadha Rao Advocate for Plaintiff. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court doth order:
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed for default;
2) that there be no costs;
Give under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 7th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
For Plaintiff: For Defendant:
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And: 1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court delivered the following:
ORDER
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
Counter of R1 and R2 not filed. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court. Memo is recorded. Hence this petition is dismissed without costs as not pressed as settled out of court.
Pronounced by me in open court this the 8th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:31-08-2016 Date of Filing:15-09-2016
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And: 1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
A fixed Court fee of Re1/- is affixed on the petition.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court doth order and;
DECREETAL ORDER
1) that the petition be and the same is hereby dismissed as not pressed as settled out of Court.
2) that there be no costs; Given under my hand and the seal of this court this the 8th day of June,2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PETITIONER/PLAINTIFF FOR RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Wednesday this the 7th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.254/2015
Between: Sri Karri Bhasakara Rao, S/o Suryanarayana, Hindu, age 38 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.10- 63, Nagulapalli villagae, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Plaintiff. And: Sri Villuri Bhaskara Rao, S/o late Suribabu, Hindu, age 45 years, Business, residing at D.No.2-36 Ummalada village, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Defendant
This suit coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri Buddha
Thrinadha Rao Advocate for Plaintiff. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
Suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for specific performance of the plaint schedule property directing the defendant to execute the registered sale deed for the plaint schedule property in favour of the plaintiff and if the defendant do not do so, the court to register the sale deed; if for any reason the specific performance cannot be ordered, for the refund of the advance amount of Rs.5,00,000/- and for costs of the suit.
Publication not filed against defendant . Plaintiff called absent No representation on behalf of plaintiff. Hence this suit is dismissed for default without costs.
Pronounced by me in open court, this the 7th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:21-12-2015 Date of Filing:21-12-2015
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Wednesday this the 7th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.254/2015
Between: Sri Karri Bhasakara Rao, S/o Suryanarayana, Hindu, age 38 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.10- 63, Nagulapalli villagae, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Plaintiff. And: Sri Villuri Bhaskara Rao, S/o late Suribabu, Hindu, age 45 years, Business, residing at D.No.2-36 Ummalada village, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Defendant
Suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for specific performance of the plaint schedule property directing the defendant to execute the registered sale deed for the plaint schedule property in favour of the plaintiff and if the defendant do not do so, the court to register the sale deed; if for any reason the specific performance cannot be ordered, for the refund of the advance amount of Rs.5,00,000/- and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction is Rs.6,00,000/- and a court fee of Rs.8,426/- is paid under Sec.39 Sch.I ArtI(b) and (c) of A.P.C.F. and S.V.Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri Buddha
Thrinadha Rao Advocate for Plaintiff. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court doth order:
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed for default;
2) that there be no costs;
Give under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 7th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
For Plaintiff: For Defendant:
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And:
1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court delivered the following:
ORDER
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
Counter of R1 and R2 not filed. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court. Memo is recorded. Hence this petition is dismissed without costs as not pressed as settled out of court.
Pronounced by me in open court this the 8th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:31-08-2016
Date of Filing:15-09-2016
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And: 1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
A fixed Court fee of Re1/- is affixed on the petition.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court doth order and;
DECREETAL ORDER
1) that the petition be and the same is hereby dismissed as not pressed as settled out of Court.
2) that there be no costs; Given under my hand and the seal of this court this the 8th day of June,2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PETITIONER/PLAINTIFF FOR RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.229/2015
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
Date of presentation:06-09-2007 Date of Filing:28-09-2007 06-09-2007IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Tuesday this the 20th of June, 2017.
CMA.No.01/2007
Between: Sri Villuri Ramu, son of late Mahalakshmi Naidu, Hindu, age 45 years, cultivation, residing at Dr.No.15-22-6/1, Anakapalle, Visakhapatnam District. Appellant. And:
1) The State of Andhra Pradesh represented by its District Collector, Visakhapatnam.
2) The Collector under Section-47-A of Indian stamp Act and District Registrar of Assurances, Registration and Stamps, Visakhapatnam.
3) The Sub Registrar, Sub-Registrar office, Anakapalle.
Respondents
Petition filed under section 47-A (4 & 5) of Indian Stamp Act read with Rule-9 of A.P.Stamp (Prevention of under valuation of instruments) Rules, 1975 by the Petitioner/Appellant against the respondent District Registrar of Assurance Registration and stamps Visakhapatnam to set aside the proceedings No.595/G2/07,dt.27-06-2007 by allowing this Appeal with costs.
A fixed Court fee of Rs.5/- is paid under Section47-A of Indian Stamp Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri V.V.Jogayya,
Sri M.Sreenivasa Rao, Advocates for Appellant and of Sri Assistant Government Pleader, Advocate for Defendants. Counsel for appellants filed memo stating that not pressing the Civil Miscellaneous petition and having stood over till this day this court doth order and:
DECREE
1) that the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal be and the same is hereby dismissed as not pressed;
2) that there be no costs;
Given under my hand and the seal of this court this the 20th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
For APPELLANT FOR RESPONDENTS
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Tuesday this the 20th of June, 2017.
CMA.No.01/2007
Between: Sri Villuri Ramu, son of late Mahalakshmi Naidu, Hindu, age 45 years, cultivation, residing at Dr.No.15-22-6/1, Anakapalle, Visakhapatnam District. Appellant. And:
1) The State of Andhra Pradesh represented by its District Collector, Visakhapatnam.
2) The Collector under Section-47-A of Indian stamp Act and District Registrar of Assurances, Registration and Stamps, Visakhapatnam.
3) The Sub Registrar, Sub-Registrar office, Anakapalle.
Respondents
This suit coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri V.V.Jogayya,
Sri M.Sreenivasa Rao, Advocates for Appellant and of Sri Assistant Government Pleader, Advocate for Defendants. Counsel for appellants filed memo stating that not pressing the Civil Miscellaneous petition and having stood over till this day this court delivered the following:
ORDER
Petition filed under section 47-A (4 & 5) of Indian Stamp Act read with Rule-9 of A.P.Stamp (Prevention of under valuation of instruments) Rules, 1975 by the Petitioner/Appellant against the respondent District Registrar of Assurance Registration and stamps Visakhapatnam to set aside the proceedings No.595/G2/07,dt.27-06-2007 by allowing this Appeal with costs.
Counsel for Appellants filed memo stating that not pressing the CMA. Memo is recorded.
Hence this CMA is dismissed without costs.
Pronounced by me in open court, this the 20th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:12-09-12012 Date of Filing:12-09-2012
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Monday this the 19th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.223/2012
Between: Sri Pilli Manikumar,S/o late Somulu, Hindu, age 45 years, cultivation, residing at Door No.40-56- 16, Sanjeeviah colony, Near Logos Church, Tadichetlapalem, Visakhapatnam-4. Plaintiff. And:
1) Pilli Chellayyamma,W/o late Somulu, Hindu, age 67 years, house hold duties, residing at Pidiwada Agraharam Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
2) Ravada Saraswathi W/o late Appanna, Hindu, age 49 years, house hold duties, residing at Pydiwada Agraharam, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
3) Kannapalli Laxmi, W/o Ramulu, Hindu, age 46 years, household duties, residing at Ammulapalem villagae, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
4) andukuri Narasinga Rao, S/o late Apparao, Hindu, age 71 years, cultivation, D.No.8-7-10, Gajuwaka, Visakhapatnam Greater Municipal Corporation, Visakhapatnam District. Defendants
Suit for Preliminary decree for partition of the plaint schedule property into four equal shares with metes and bounds and allot one such equal separated share to the plaintiff after converting the joint possession into separate possession and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction is Rs.653063/- and a court fee of Rs.9026/- is payable but the schedule property is in joint possession and enjoyment of the plaintiff and the defendants a fixed court fee of Rs.200-00 is paid under Sec.34(2) of A.P.C.F. and
S.V.Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri
B.V.S.S.N.Murthy, Advocate for Plaintiff and of Sri A.V.S.Bhavani Prasad, Advocate for Defendant
No.4. Defendants 1 to 3 remained exparte. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court doth order and:
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed for default
2) that there be no costs:
( Copy of Plaint schedule and valuation slip hereto enclosed)
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Monday this the 19th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.223/2012
Between: Sri Pilli Manikumar,S/o late Somulu, Hindu, age 45 years, cultivation, residing at Door No.40-56- 16, Sanjeeviah colony, Near Logos Church, Tadichetlapalem, Visakhapatnam-4. Plaintiff. And:
1) Pilli Chellayyamma,W/o late Somulu, Hindu, age 67 years, house hold duties, residing at Pidiwada Agraharam Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
2) Ravada Saraswathi W/o late Appanna, Hindu, age 49 years, house hold duties, residing at Pydiwada Agraharam, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
3) Kannapalli Laxmi, W/o Ramulu, Hindu, age 46 years, household duties, residing at Ammulapalem villagae, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
4) Andukuri Narasinga Rao, S/o late Apparao, Hindu, age 71 years, cultivation, D.No.8-7-10, Gajuwaka, Visakhapatnam Greater Municipal Corporation, Visakhapatnam District. Defendants
This suit coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri
B.V.S.S.N.Murthy, Advocate for Plaintiff and of Sri A.V.S.Bhavani Prasad, Advocate for Defendant
No.4. Defendants 1 to 3 remained exparte. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
Suit for Preliminary decree for partition of the plaint schedule property into four equal shares with metes and bounds and allot one such equal separated share to the plaintiff after converting the joint possession into separate possession and for costs of the suit.
Costs not paid. Plaintiff called absent. No representation on behalf of plaintiff. Plaintiff failed to adduce evidence though granted several adjournments . Hence this suit is dismissed for default without costs.
Pronounced by me in open court, this the 19th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:12-09-12012 Date of Filing:12-09-2012
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Monday this the 19th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.223/2012
Between: Sri Pilli Manikumar,S/o late Somulu, Hindu, age 45 years, cultivation, residing at Door No.40-56- 16, Sanjeeviah colony, Near Logos Church, Tadichetlapalem, Visakhapatnam-4. Plaintiff. And:
1) Pilli Chellayyamma,W/o late Somulu, Hindu, age 67 years, house hold duties, residing at Pidiwada Agraharam Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
2) Ravada Saraswathi W/o late Appanna, Hindu, age 49 years, house hold duties, residing at Pydiwada Agraharam, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
3) Kannapalli Laxmi, W/o Ramulu, Hindu, age 46 years, household duties, residing at Ammulapalem villagae, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
4) andukuri Narasinga Rao, S/o late Apparao, Hindu, age 71 years, cultivation, D.No.8-7-10, Gajuwaka, Visakhapatnam Greater Municipal Corporation, Visakhapatnam District. Defendants
Suit for Preliminary decree for partition of the plaint schedule property into four equal shares with metes and bounds and allot one such equal separated share to the plaintiff after converting the joint possession into separate possession and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction is Rs.653063/- and a court fee of Rs.9026/- is payable but the schedule property is in joint possession and enjoyment of the plaintiff and the defendants a fixed court fee of Rs.200-00 is paid under Sec.34(2) of A.P.C.F. and
S.V.Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri
B.V.S.S.N.Murthy, Advocate for Plaintiff and of Sri A.V.S.Bhavani Prasad, Advocate for Defendant
No.4. Defendants 1 to 3 remained exparte. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court doth order and:
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed for default
2) that there be no costs:
( Copy of Plaint schedule and valuation slip hereto enclosed)
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:21-12-2015 Date of Filing:21-12-2015
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Wednesday this the 7th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.254/2015
Between: Sri Karri Bhasakara Rao, S/o Suryanarayana, Hindu, age 38 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.10- 63, Nagulapalli villagae, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Plaintiff. And: Sri Villuri Bhaskara Rao, S/o late Suribabu, Hindu, age 45 years, Business, residing at D.No.2-36 Ummalada village, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Defendant
Suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for specific performance of the plaint schedule property directing the defendant to execute the registered sale deed for the plaint schedule property in favour of the plaintiff and if the defendant do not do so, the court to register the sale deed; if for any reason the specific performance cannot be ordered, for the refund of the advance amount of Rs.5,00,000/- and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction is Rs.6,00,000/- and a court fee of Rs.8,426/- is paid under Sec.39 Sch.I ArtI(b) and (c) of A.P.C.F. and S.V.Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri Buddha
Thrinadha Rao Advocate for Plaintiff. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court doth order:
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed for default;
2) that there be no costs;
Give under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 7th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
For Plaintiff: For Defendant:
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And: 1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court delivered the following:
ORDER
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
Counter of R1 and R2 not filed. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court. Memo is recorded. Hence this petition is dismissed without costs as not pressed as settled out of court.
Pronounced by me in open court this the 8th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:31-08-2016 Date of Filing:15-09-2016
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And: 1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
A fixed Court fee of Re1/- is affixed on the petition.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court doth order and;
DECREETAL ORDER
1) that the petition be and the same is hereby dismissed as not pressed as settled out of Court.
2) that there be no costs; Given under my hand and the seal of this court this the 8th day of June,2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PETITIONER/PLAINTIFF FOR RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Wednesday this the 7th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.254/2015
Between: Sri Karri Bhasakara Rao, S/o Suryanarayana, Hindu, age 38 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.10- 63, Nagulapalli villagae, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Plaintiff. And: Sri Villuri Bhaskara Rao, S/o late Suribabu, Hindu, age 45 years, Business, residing at D.No.2-36 Ummalada village, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Defendant
This suit coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri Buddha
Thrinadha Rao Advocate for Plaintiff. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
Suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for specific performance of the plaint schedule property directing the defendant to execute the registered sale deed for the plaint schedule property in favour of the plaintiff and if the defendant do not do so, the court to register the sale deed; if for any reason the specific performance cannot be ordered, for the refund of the advance amount of Rs.5,00,000/- and for costs of the suit.
Publication not filed against defendant . Plaintiff called absent No representation on behalf of plaintiff. Hence this suit is dismissed for default without costs.
Pronounced by me in open court, this the 7th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:21-12-2015 Date of Filing:21-12-2015
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Wednesday this the 7th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.254/2015
Between: Sri Karri Bhasakara Rao, S/o Suryanarayana, Hindu, age 38 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.10- 63, Nagulapalli villagae, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Plaintiff. And: Sri Villuri Bhaskara Rao, S/o late Suribabu, Hindu, age 45 years, Business, residing at D.No.2-36 Ummalada village, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Defendant
Suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for specific performance of the plaint schedule property directing the defendant to execute the registered sale deed for the plaint schedule property in favour of the plaintiff and if the defendant do not do so, the court to register the sale deed; if for any reason the specific performance cannot be ordered, for the refund of the advance amount of Rs.5,00,000/- and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction is Rs.6,00,000/- and a court fee of Rs.8,426/- is paid under Sec.39 Sch.I ArtI(b) and (c) of A.P.C.F. and S.V.Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri Buddha
Thrinadha Rao Advocate for Plaintiff. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court doth order:
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed for default;
2) that there be no costs;
Give under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 7th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
For Plaintiff: For Defendant:
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And:
1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court delivered the following:
ORDER
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
Counter of R1 and R2 not filed. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court. Memo is recorded. Hence this petition is dismissed without costs as not pressed as settled out of court.
Pronounced by me in open court this the 8th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:31-08-2016
Date of Filing:15-09-2016
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And: 1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
A fixed Court fee of Re1/- is affixed on the petition.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court doth order and;
DECREETAL ORDER
1) that the petition be and the same is hereby dismissed as not pressed as settled out of Court.
2) that there be no costs; Given under my hand and the seal of this court this the 8th day of June,2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PETITIONER/PLAINTIFF FOR RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:21-12-2015 Date of Filing:21-12-2015
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Wednesday this the 7th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.254/2015
Between: Sri Karri Bhasakara Rao, S/o Suryanarayana, Hindu, age 38 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.10- 63, Nagulapalli villagae, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Plaintiff. And: Sri Villuri Bhaskara Rao, S/o late Suribabu, Hindu, age 45 years, Business, residing at D.No.2-36 Ummalada village, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Defendant
Suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for specific performance of the plaint schedule property directing the defendant to execute the registered sale deed for the plaint schedule property in favour of the plaintiff and if the defendant do not do so, the court to register the sale deed; if for any reason the specific performance cannot be ordered, for the refund of the advance amount of Rs.5,00,000/- and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction is Rs.6,00,000/- and a court fee of Rs.8,426/- is paid under Sec.39 Sch.I ArtI(b) and (c) of A.P.C.F. and S.V.Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri Buddha
Thrinadha Rao Advocate for Plaintiff. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court doth order:
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed for default;
2) that there be no costs;
Give under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 7th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
For Plaintiff: For Defendant:
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And: 1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court delivered the following:
ORDER
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
Counter of R1 and R2 not filed. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court. Memo is recorded. Hence this petition is dismissed without costs as not pressed as settled out of court.
Pronounced by me in open court this the 8th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:31-08-2016 Date of Filing:15-09-2016
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74,
Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And: 1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
A fixed Court fee of Re1/- is affixed on the petition.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court doth order and;
DECREETAL ORDER
1) that the petition be and the same is hereby dismissed as not pressed as settled out of Court.
2) that there be no costs; Given under my hand and the seal of this court this the 8th day of June,2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PETITIONER/PLAINTIFF FOR RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Wednesday this the 7th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.254/2015
Between:
Sri Karri Bhasakara Rao, S/o Suryanarayana, Hindu, age 38 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.10- 63, Nagulapalli villagae, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Plaintiff. And: Sri Villuri Bhaskara Rao, S/o late Suribabu, Hindu, age 45 years, Business, residing at D.No.2-36 Ummalada village, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Defendant
This suit coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri Buddha
Thrinadha Rao Advocate for Plaintiff. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
Suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for specific performance of the plaint schedule property directing the defendant to execute the registered sale deed for the plaint schedule property in favour of the plaintiff and if the defendant do not do so, the court to register the sale deed; if for any reason the specific performance cannot be ordered, for the refund of the advance amount of Rs.5,00,000/- and for costs of the suit.
Publication not filed against defendant . Plaintiff called absent No representation on behalf of plaintiff. Hence this suit is dismissed for default without costs.
Pronounced by me in open court, this the 7th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:21-12-2015 Date of Filing:21-12-2015
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Wednesday this the 7th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.254/2015
Between: Sri Karri Bhasakara Rao, S/o Suryanarayana, Hindu, age 38 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.10- 63, Nagulapalli villagae, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Plaintiff. And: Sri Villuri Bhaskara Rao, S/o late Suribabu, Hindu, age 45 years, Business, residing at D.No.2-36 Ummalada village, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Defendant
Suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for specific performance of the plaint schedule property directing the defendant to execute the registered sale deed for the plaint schedule property in favour of the plaintiff and if the defendant do not do so, the court to register the sale deed; if for any reason the specific performance cannot be ordered, for the refund of the advance amount of Rs.5,00,000/- and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction is Rs.6,00,000/- and a court fee of Rs.8,426/- is paid under Sec.39 Sch.I ArtI(b) and (c) of A.P.C.F. and S.V.Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri Buddha
Thrinadha Rao Advocate for Plaintiff. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court doth order:
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed for default;
2) that there be no costs;
Give under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 7th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
For Plaintiff: For Defendant:
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And: 1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court delivered the following:
ORDER
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
Counter of R1 and R2 not filed. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court. Memo is recorded. Hence this petition is dismissed without costs as not pressed as settled out of court.
Pronounced by me in open court this the 8th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:31-08-2016 Date of Filing:15-09-2016
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And: 1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
A fixed Court fee of Re1/- is affixed on the petition.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court doth order and;
DECREETAL ORDER
1) that the petition be and the same is hereby dismissed as not pressed as settled out of Court.
2) that there be no costs; Given under my hand and the seal of this court this the 8th day of June,2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PETITIONER/PLAINTIFF FOR RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:12-09-12012 Date of Filing:12-09-2012
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Monday this the 19th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.223/2012
Between: Sri Pilli Manikumar,S/o late Somulu, Hindu, age 45 years, cultivation, residing at Door No.40-56- 16, Sanjeeviah colony, Near Logos Church, Tadichetlapalem, Visakhapatnam-4. Plaintiff. And:
1) Pilli Chellayyamma,W/o late Somulu, Hindu, age 67 years, house hold duties, residing at Pidiwada Agraharam Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
2) Ravada Saraswathi W/o late Appanna, Hindu, age 49 years, house hold duties, residing at Pydiwada Agraharam, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
3) Kannapalli Laxmi, W/o Ramulu, Hindu, age 46 years, household duties, residing at Ammulapalem villagae, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
4) andukuri Narasinga Rao, S/o late Apparao, Hindu, age 71 years, cultivation, D.No.8-7-10, Gajuwaka, Visakhapatnam Greater Municipal Corporation, Visakhapatnam District. Defendants
Suit for Preliminary decree for partition of the plaint schedule property into four equal shares with metes and bounds and allot one such equal separated share to the plaintiff after converting the joint possession into separate possession and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction is Rs.653063/- and a court fee of Rs.9026/- is payable but the schedule property is in joint possession and enjoyment of the plaintiff and the defendants a fixed court fee of Rs.200-00 is paid under Sec.34(2) of A.P.C.F. and
S.V.Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri
B.V.S.S.N.Murthy, Advocate for Plaintiff and of Sri A.V.S.Bhavani Prasad, Advocate for Defendant
No.4. Defendants 1 to 3 remained exparte. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court doth order and:
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed for default
2) that there be no costs:
( Copy of Plaint schedule and valuation slip hereto enclosed)
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Monday this the 19th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.223/2012
Between: Sri Pilli Manikumar,S/o late Somulu, Hindu, age 45 years, cultivation, residing at Door No.40-56- 16, Sanjeeviah colony, Near Logos Church, Tadichetlapalem, Visakhapatnam-4. Plaintiff. And:
1) Pilli Chellayyamma,W/o late Somulu, Hindu, age 67 years, house hold duties, residing at Pidiwada Agraharam Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
2) Ravada Saraswathi W/o late Appanna, Hindu, age 49 years, house hold duties, residing at Pydiwada Agraharam, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
3) Kannapalli Laxmi, W/o Ramulu, Hindu, age 46 years, household duties, residing at Ammulapalem villagae, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
4) andukuri Narasinga Rao, S/o late Apparao, Hindu, age 71 years, cultivation, D.No.8-7-10, Gajuwaka, Visakhapatnam Greater Municipal Corporation, Visakhapatnam District. Defendants
This suit coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri
B.V.S.S.N.Murthy, Advocate for Plaintiff and of Sri A.V.S.Bhavani Prasad, Advocate for Defendant
No.4. Defendants 1 to 3 remained exparte. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
Suit for Preliminary decree for partition of the plaint schedule property into four equal shares with metes and bounds and allot one such equal separated share to the plaintiff after converting the joint possession into separate possession and for costs of the suit.
Costs not paid. Plaintiff called absent. No representation on behalf of plaintiff. Plaintiff failed to adduce evidence though granted several adjournments . Hence this suit is dismissed for default without costs.
Pronounced by me in open court, this the 19th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:12-09-12012 Date of Filing:12-09-2012
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Monday this the 19th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.223/2012
Between: Sri Pilli Manikumar,S/o late Somulu, Hindu, age 45 years, cultivation, residing at Door No.40-56- 16, Sanjeeviah colony, Near Logos Church, Tadichetlapalem, Visakhapatnam-4. Plaintiff. And:
1) Pilli Chellayyamma,W/o late Somulu, Hindu, age 67 years, house hold duties, residing at Pidiwada Agraharam Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
2) Ravada Saraswathi W/o late Appanna, Hindu, age 49 years, house hold duties, residing at Pydiwada Agraharam, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
3) Kannapalli Laxmi, W/o Ramulu, Hindu, age 46 years, household duties, residing at Ammulapalem villagae, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
4) andukuri Narasinga Rao, S/o late Apparao, Hindu, age 71 years, cultivation, D.No.8-7-10, Gajuwaka, Visakhapatnam Greater Municipal Corporation, Visakhapatnam District. Defendants
Suit for Preliminary decree for partition of the plaint schedule property into four equal shares with metes and bounds and allot one such equal separated share to the plaintiff after converting the joint possession into separate possession and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction is Rs.653063/- and a court fee of Rs.9026/- is payable but the schedule property is in joint possession and enjoyment of the plaintiff and the defendants a fixed court fee of Rs.200-00 is paid under Sec.34(2) of A.P.C.F. and
S.V.Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri
B.V.S.S.N.Murthy, Advocate for Plaintiff and of Sri A.V.S.Bhavani Prasad, Advocate for Defendant
No.4. Defendants 1 to 3 remained exparte. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court doth order and:
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed for default
2) that there be no costs:
( Copy of Plaint schedule and valuation slip hereto enclosed)
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:21-12-2015 Date of Filing:21-12-2015
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Wednesday this the 7th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.254/2015
Between: Sri Karri Bhasakara Rao, S/o Suryanarayana, Hindu, age 38 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.10- 63, Nagulapalli villagae, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Plaintiff. And: Sri Villuri Bhaskara Rao, S/o late Suribabu, Hindu, age 45 years, Business, residing at D.No.2-36 Ummalada village, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Defendant
Suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for specific performance of the plaint schedule property directing the defendant to execute the registered sale deed for the plaint schedule property in favour of the plaintiff and if the defendant do not do so, the court to register the sale deed; if for any reason the specific performance cannot be ordered, for the refund of the advance amount of Rs.5,00,000/- and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction is Rs.6,00,000/- and a court fee of Rs.8,426/- is paid under Sec.39 Sch.I ArtI(b) and (c) of A.P.C.F. and S.V.Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri Buddha
Thrinadha Rao Advocate for Plaintiff. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court doth order:
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed for default;
2) that there be no costs;
Give under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 7th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
For Plaintiff: For Defendant:
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And: 1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court delivered the following:
ORDER
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
Counter of R1 and R2 not filed. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court. Memo is recorded. Hence this petition is dismissed without costs as not pressed as settled out of court.
Pronounced by me in open court this the 8th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:31-08-2016 Date of Filing:15-09-2016
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And: 1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
A fixed Court fee of Re1/- is affixed on the petition.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court doth order and;
DECREETAL ORDER
1) that the petition be and the same is hereby dismissed as not pressed as settled out of Court.
2) that there be no costs; Given under my hand and the seal of this court this the 8th day of June,2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PETITIONER/PLAINTIFF FOR RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Wednesday this the 7th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.254/2015
Between: Sri Karri Bhasakara Rao, S/o Suryanarayana, Hindu, age 38 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.10- 63, Nagulapalli villagae, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Plaintiff. And: Sri Villuri Bhaskara Rao, S/o late Suribabu, Hindu, age 45 years, Business, residing at D.No.2-36 Ummalada village, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Defendant
This suit coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri Buddha
Thrinadha Rao Advocate for Plaintiff. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
Suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for specific performance of the plaint schedule property directing the defendant to execute the registered sale deed for the plaint schedule property in favour of the plaintiff and if the defendant do not do so, the court to register the sale deed; if for any reason the specific performance cannot be ordered, for the refund of the advance amount of Rs.5,00,000/- and for costs of the suit.
Publication not filed against defendant . Plaintiff called absent No representation on behalf of plaintiff. Hence this suit is dismissed for default without costs.
Pronounced by me in open court, this the 7th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:21-12-2015 Date of Filing:21-12-2015
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Wednesday this the 7th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.254/2015
Between: Sri Karri Bhasakara Rao, S/o Suryanarayana, Hindu, age 38 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.10- 63, Nagulapalli villagae, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Plaintiff. And: Sri Villuri Bhaskara Rao, S/o late Suribabu, Hindu, age 45 years, Business, residing at D.No.2-36 Ummalada village, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Defendant
Suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for specific performance of the plaint schedule property directing the defendant to execute the registered sale deed for the plaint schedule property in favour of the plaintiff and if the defendant do not do so, the court to register the sale deed; if for any reason the specific performance cannot be ordered, for the refund of the advance amount of Rs.5,00,000/- and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction is Rs.6,00,000/- and a court fee of Rs.8,426/- is paid under Sec.39 Sch.I ArtI(b) and (c) of A.P.C.F. and S.V.Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri Buddha
Thrinadha Rao Advocate for Plaintiff. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court doth order:
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed for default;
2) that there be no costs;
Give under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 7th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
For Plaintiff: For Defendant:
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And: 1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court delivered the following:
ORDER
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
Counter of R1 and R2 not filed. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court. Memo is recorded. Hence this petition is dismissed without costs as not pressed as settled out of court.
Pronounced by me in open court this the 8th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:31-08-2016 Date of Filing:15-09-2016
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And:
1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
A fixed Court fee of Re1/- is affixed on the petition.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court doth order and;
DECREETAL ORDER
1) that the petition be and the same is hereby dismissed as not pressed as settled out of Court.
2) that there be no costs; Given under my hand and the seal of this court this the 8th day of June,2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PETITIONER/PLAINTIFF FOR RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:21-12-2015 Date of Filing:21-12-2015
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Wednesday this the 7th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.254/2015
Between: Sri Karri Bhasakara Rao, S/o Suryanarayana, Hindu, age 38 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.10- 63, Nagulapalli villagae, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Plaintiff. And: Sri Villuri Bhaskara Rao, S/o late Suribabu, Hindu, age 45 years, Business, residing at D.No.2-36 Ummalada village, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Defendant
Suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for specific performance of the plaint schedule property directing the defendant to execute the registered sale deed for the plaint schedule property in favour of the plaintiff and if the defendant do not do so, the court to register the sale deed; if for any reason the specific performance cannot be ordered, for the refund of the advance amount of Rs.5,00,000/- and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction is Rs.6,00,000/- and a court fee of Rs.8,426/- is paid under Sec.39 Sch.I ArtI(b) and (c) of A.P.C.F. and S.V.Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri Buddha
Thrinadha Rao Advocate for Plaintiff. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court doth order:
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed for default;
2) that there be no costs;
Give under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 7th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
For Plaintiff: For Defendant:
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And: 1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court delivered the following:
ORDER
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
Counter of R1 and R2 not filed. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court. Memo is recorded. Hence this petition is dismissed without costs as not pressed as settled out of court.
Pronounced by me in open court this the 8th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:31-08-2016 Date of Filing:15-09-2016
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And: 1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
A fixed Court fee of Re1/- is affixed on the petition.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court doth order and;
DECREETAL ORDER
1) that the petition be and the same is hereby dismissed as not pressed as settled out of Court.
2) that there be no costs; Given under my hand and the seal of this court this the 8th day of June,2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PETITIONER/PLAINTIFF FOR RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Wednesday this the 7th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.254/2015
Between: Sri Karri Bhasakara Rao, S/o Suryanarayana, Hindu, age 38 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.10- 63, Nagulapalli villagae, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Plaintiff. And: Sri Villuri Bhaskara Rao, S/o late Suribabu, Hindu, age 45 years, Business, residing at D.No.2-36 Ummalada village, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Defendant
This suit coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri Buddha
Thrinadha Rao Advocate for Plaintiff. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
Suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for specific performance of the plaint schedule property directing the defendant to execute the registered sale deed for the plaint schedule property in favour of the plaintiff and if the defendant do not do so, the court to register the sale deed; if for any reason the specific performance cannot be ordered, for the refund of the advance amount of Rs.5,00,000/- and for costs of the suit.
Publication not filed against defendant . Plaintiff called absent No representation on behalf of plaintiff. Hence this suit is dismissed for default without costs.
Pronounced by me in open court, this the 7th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:21-12-2015 Date of Filing:21-12-2015
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Wednesday this the 7th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.254/2015
Between: Sri Karri Bhasakara Rao, S/o Suryanarayana, Hindu, age 38 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.10- 63, Nagulapalli villagae, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
Plaintiff. And: Sri Villuri Bhaskara Rao, S/o late Suribabu, Hindu, age 45 years, Business, residing at D.No.2-36 Ummalada village, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Defendant
Suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for specific performance of the plaint schedule property directing the defendant to execute the registered sale deed for the plaint schedule property in favour of the plaintiff and if the defendant do not do so, the court to register the sale deed; if for any reason the specific performance cannot be ordered, for the refund of the advance amount of Rs.5,00,000/- and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction is Rs.6,00,000/- and a court fee of Rs.8,426/- is paid under Sec.39 Sch.I ArtI(b) and (c) of A.P.C.F. and S.V.Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri Buddha
Thrinadha Rao Advocate for Plaintiff. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court doth order:
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed for default;
2) that there be no costs;
Give under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 7th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
For Plaintiff: For Defendant:
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And: 1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court delivered the following:
ORDER
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
Counter of R1 and R2 not filed. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court. Memo is recorded. Hence this petition is dismissed without costs as not pressed as settled out of court.
Pronounced by me in open court this the 8th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:31-08-2016 Date of Filing:15-09-2016
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And: 1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
A fixed Court fee of Re1/- is affixed on the petition.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court doth order and;
DECREETAL ORDER
1) that the petition be and the same is hereby dismissed as not pressed as settled out of Court.
2) that there be no costs; Given under my hand and the seal of this court this the 8th day of June,2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PETITIONER/PLAINTIFF FOR RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP Date of presentation:06-09-2007 Date of Filing:28-09-2007 06-09-2007IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Tuesday this the 20th of June, 2017.
CMA.No.01/2007
Between: Sri Villuri Ramu, son of late Mahalakshmi Naidu, Hindu, age 45 years, cultivation, residing at Dr.No.15-22-6/1, Anakapalle, Visakhapatnam District.
Appellant. And:
1) The State of Andhra Pradesh represented by its District Collector, Visakhapatnam.
2) The Collector under Section-47-A of Indian stamp Act and District Registrar ofAssurances, Registration and Stamps, Visakhapatnam.
3) The Sub Registrar, Sub-Registrar office, Anakapalle.
Respondents
Petition filed under section 47-A (4 & 5) of Indian Stamp Act read with Rule-9 of A.P.Stamp (Prevention of under valuation of instruments) Rules, 1975 by the Petitioner/Appellant against the respondent District Registrar of Assurance Registration and stamps Visakhapatnam to set aside the proceedings No.595/G2/07,dt.27-06-2007 by allowing this Appeal with costs.
A fixed Court fee of Rs.5/- is paid under Section47-A of Indian Stamp Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri V.V.Jogayya,
Sri M.Sreenivasa Rao, Advocates for Appellant and of Sri Assistant Government Pleader, Advocate for Defendants. Counsel for appellants filed memo stating that not pressing the Civil Miscellaneous petition and having stood over till this day this court doth order and:
DECREE
1) that the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal be and the same is hereby dismissed as not pressed;
2) that there be no costs;
Given under my hand and the seal of this court this the 20th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL
JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
For APPELLANT FOR RESPONDENTS
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Tuesday this the 20th of June, 2017.
CMA.No.01/2007
Between: Sri Villuri Ramu, son of late Mahalakshmi Naidu, Hindu, age 45 years, cultivation, residing at Dr.No.15-22-6/1, Anakapalle, Visakhapatnam District.
Appellant.
And:
1) The State of Andhra Pradesh represented by its District Collector, Visakhapatnam.
2) The Collector under Section-47-A of Indian stamp Act and District Registrar ofAssurances, Registration and Stamps, Visakhapatnam.
3) The Sub Registrar, Sub-Registrar office, Anakapalle.
Respondents
This suit coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri V.V.Jogayya,
Sri M.Sreenivasa Rao, Advocates for Appellant and of Sri Assistant Government Pleader, Advocate for Defendants. Counsel for appellants filed memo stating that not pressing the Civil Miscellaneous petition and having stood over till this day this court delivered the following:
ORDER
Petition filed under section 47-A (4 & 5) of Indian Stamp Act read with Rule-9 of A.P.Stamp (Prevention of under valuation of instruments) Rules, 1975 by the Petitioner/Appellant against the respondent District Registrar of Assurance Registration and stamps Visakhapatnam to set aside the proceedings No.595/G2/07,dt.27-06-2007 by allowing this Appeal with costs.
Counsel for Appellants filed memo stating that not pressing the CMA. Memo is recorded.
Hence this CMA is dismissed without costs.
Pronounced by me in open court, this the 20th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR
CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:12-09-12012 Date of Filing:12-09-2012
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Monday this the 19th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.223/2012
Between: Sri Pilli Manikumar,S/o late Somulu, Hindu, age 45 years, cultivation, residing at Door No.40-56- 16, Sanjeeviah colony, Near Logos Church, Tadichetlapalem, Visakhapatnam-4.
Plaintiff. And:
1) Pilli Chellayyamma,W/o late Somulu, Hindu, age 67 years, house hold duties, residing at Pidiwada Agraharam Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
2) Ravada Saraswathi W/o late Appanna, Hindu, age 49 years, house hold duties, residing at Pydiwada Agraharam, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
3) Kannapalli Laxmi, W/o Ramulu, Hindu, age 46 years, household duties, residing at Ammulapalem villagae, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
4) andukuri Narasinga Rao, S/o late Apparao, Hindu, age 71 years, cultivation, D.No.8-7-10, Gajuwaka, Visakhapatnam Greater Municipal Corporation, Visakhapatnam District.
Defendants
Suit for Preliminary decree for partition of the plaint schedule property into four equal shares with metes and bounds and allot one such equal separated share to the plaintiff after converting the joint possession into separate possession and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction is Rs.653063/- and a court fee of Rs.9026/- is payable but the schedule property is in joint possession and enjoyment of the plaintiff and the defendants a fixed court fee of Rs.200-00 is paid under Sec.34(2) of A.P.C.F. and
S.V.Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri
B.V.S.S.N.Murthy, Advocate for Plaintiff and of Sri A.V.S.Bhavani Prasad, Advocate for Defendant
No.4. Defendants 1 to 3 remained exparte. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court doth order and:
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed for default
2) that there be no costs:
( Copy of Plaint schedule and valuation slip hereto enclosed)
Given under my hand and the seal of this Court, this the 19th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR
CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
For Plaintiff: FOR
Defendants
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Monday this the 19th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.223/2012
Between: Sri Pilli Manikumar,S/o late Somulu, Hindu, age 45 years, cultivation, residing at Door No.40-56- 16, Sanjeeviah colony, Near Logos Church, Tadichetlapalem, Visakhapatnam-4.
Plaintiff. And:
1) Pilli Chellayyamma,W/o late Somulu, Hindu, age 67 years, house hold duties, residing at Pidiwada Agraharam Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
2) Ravada Saraswathi W/o late Appanna, Hindu, age 49 years, house hold duties, residing at Pydiwada Agraharam, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
3) Kannapalli Laxmi, W/o Ramulu, Hindu, age 46 years, household duties, residing at Ammulapalem villagae, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
4) Andukuri Narasinga Rao, S/o late Apparao, Hindu, age 71 years, cultivation, D.No.8-7-10, Gajuwaka, Visakhapatnam Greater Municipal Corporation, Visakhapatnam District.
Defendants
This suit coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri
B.V.S.S.N.Murthy, Advocate for Plaintiff and of Sri A.V.S.Bhavani Prasad, Advocate for Defendant
No.4. Defendants 1 to 3 remained exparte. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
Suit for Preliminary decree for partition of the plaint schedule property into four equal shares with metes and bounds and allot one such equal separated share to the plaintiff after converting the joint possession into separate possession and for costs of the suit.
Costs not paid. Plaintiff called absent. No representation on behalf of plaintiff. Plaintiff failed to adduce evidence though granted several adjournments . Hence this suit is dismissed for default without costs.
Pronounced by me in open court, this the 19th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR
CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPAL
LI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:12-09-12012 Date of Filing:12-09-2012
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Monday this the 19th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.223/2012
Between: Sri Pilli Manikumar,S/o late Somulu, Hindu, age 45 years, cultivation, residing at Door No.40-56- 16, Sanjeeviah colony, Near Logos Church, Tadichetlapalem, Visakhapatnam-4. Plaintiff. And:
1) Pilli Chellayyamma,W/o late Somulu, Hindu, age 67 years, house hold duties, residing at Pidiwada Agraharam Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
2) Ravada Saraswathi W/o late Appanna, Hindu, age 49 years, house hold duties, residing at Pydiwada Agraharam, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
3) Kannapalli Laxmi, W/o Ramulu, Hindu, age 46 years, household duties, residing at Ammulapalem villagae, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
4) andukuri Narasinga Rao, S/o late Apparao, Hindu, age 71 years, cultivation, D.No.8-7-10, Gajuwaka, Visakhapatnam Greater Municipal Corporation, Visakhapatnam District. Defendants
Suit for Preliminary decree for partition of the plaint schedule property into four equal shares with metes and bounds and allot one such equal separated share to the plaintiff after converting the joint possession into separate possession and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction is Rs.653063/- and a court fee of Rs.9026/- is payable but the schedule property is in joint possession and enjoyment of the plaintiff and the defendants a fixed court fee of Rs.200-00 is paid under Sec.34(2) of A.P.C.F. and
S.V.Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri
B.V.S.S.N.Murthy, Advocate for Plaintiff and of Sri A.V.S.Bhavani Prasad, Advocate for Defendant
No.4. Defendants 1 to 3 remained exparte. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court doth order and:
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed for default
2) that there be no costs:
( Copy of Plaint schedule and valuation slip hereto enclosed)
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
Date of Presentation:21-12-2015 Date of Filing:21-12-2015
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Wednesday this the 7th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.254/2015
Between: Sri Karri Bhasakara Rao, S/o Suryanarayana, Hindu, age 38 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.10- 63, Nagulapalli villagae, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Plaintiff. And: Sri Villuri Bhaskara Rao, S/o late Suribabu, Hindu, age 45 years, Business, residing at D.No.2-36 Ummalada village, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Defendant
Suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for specific performance of the plaint schedule property directing the defendant to execute the registered sale deed for the plaint schedule property in favour of the plaintiff and if the defendant do not do so, the court to register the sale deed; if for any reason the specific performance cannot be ordered, for the refund of the advance amount of Rs.5,00,000/- and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction is Rs.6,00,000/- and a court fee of Rs.8,426/- is paid under Sec.39 Sch.I ArtI(b) and (c) of A.P.C.F. and S.V.Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri Buddha
Thrinadha Rao Advocate for Plaintiff. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court doth order:
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed for default;
2) that there be no costs;
Give under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 7th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
For Plaintiff: For Defendant:
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And: 1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court delivered the following:
ORDER
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
Counter of R1 and R2 not filed. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court. Memo is recorded. Hence this petition is dismissed without costs as not pressed as settled out of court.
Pronounced by me in open court this the 8th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:31-08-2016 Date of Filing:15-09-2016
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli
Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And: 1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
A fixed Court fee of Re1/- is affixed on the petition.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court doth order and;
DECREETAL ORDER
1) that the petition be and the same is hereby dismissed as not pressed as settled out of Court.
2) that there be no costs; Given under my hand and the seal of this court this the 8th day of June,2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PETITIONER/PLAINTIFF FOR RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Wednesday this the 7th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.254/2015
Between: Sri Karri Bhasakara Rao, S/o Suryanarayana, Hindu, age 38 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.10- 63, Nagulapalli villagae, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Plaintiff. And: Sri Villuri Bhaskara Rao, S/o late Suribabu, Hindu, age 45 years, Business, residing at D.No.2-36 Ummalada village, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Defendant
This suit coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri Buddha
Thrinadha Rao Advocate for Plaintiff. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
Suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for specific performance of the plaint schedule property directing the defendant to execute the registered sale deed for the plaint schedule property in favour of the plaintiff and if the defendant do not do so, the court to register the sale deed; if for any reason the specific performance cannot be ordered, for the refund of the advance amount of Rs.5,00,000/- and for costs of the suit.
Publication not filed against defendant . Plaintiff called absent No representation on behalf of plaintiff. Hence this suit is dismissed for default without costs.
Pronounced by me in open court, this the 7th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:21-12-2015 Date of Filing:21-12-2015
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Wednesday this the 7th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.254/2015
Between: Sri Karri Bhasakara Rao, S/o Suryanarayana, Hindu, age 38 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.10- 63, Nagulapalli villagae, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Plaintiff. And: Sri Villuri Bhaskara Rao, S/o late Suribabu, Hindu, age 45 years, Business, residing at D.No.2-36 Ummalada village, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Defendant
Suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for specific performance of the plaint schedule property directing the defendant to execute the registered sale deed for the plaint schedule property in favour of the plaintiff and if the defendant do not do so, the court to register the sale deed; if for any reason the specific performance cannot be ordered, for the refund of the advance amount of Rs.5,00,000/- and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction is Rs.6,00,000/- and a court fee of Rs.8,426/- is paid under Sec.39 Sch.I ArtI(b) and (c) of A.P.C.F. and S.V.Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri Buddha
Thrinadha Rao Advocate for Plaintiff. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court doth order:
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed for default;
2) that there be no costs;
Give under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 7th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
For Plaintiff: For Defendant:
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And: 1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court delivered the following:
ORDER
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
Counter of R1 and R2 not filed. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court. Memo is recorded. Hence this petition is dismissed without costs as not pressed as settled out of court.
Pronounced by me in open court this the 8th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:31-08-2016 Date of Filing:15-09-2016
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And:
1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
A fixed Court fee of Re1/- is affixed on the petition.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court doth order and;
DECREETAL ORDER
1) that the petition be and the same is hereby dismissed as not pressed as settled out of Court.
2) that there be no costs; Given under my hand and the seal of this court this the 8th day of June,2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PETITIONER/PLAINTIFF FOR RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:21-12-2015 Date of Filing:21-12-2015
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Wednesday this the 7th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.254/2015
Between: Sri Karri Bhasakara Rao, S/o Suryanarayana, Hindu, age 38 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.10- 63, Nagulapalli villagae, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Plaintiff. And: Sri Villuri Bhaskara Rao, S/o late Suribabu, Hindu, age 45 years, Business, residing at D.No.2-36 Ummalada village, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Defendant
Suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for specific performance of the plaint schedule property directing the defendant to execute the registered sale deed for the plaint schedule property in favour of the plaintiff and if the defendant do not do so, the court to register the sale deed; if for any reason the specific performance cannot be ordered, for the refund of the advance amount of Rs.5,00,000/- and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction is Rs.6,00,000/- and a court fee of Rs.8,426/- is paid under Sec.39 Sch.I ArtI(b) and (c) of A.P.C.F. and S.V.Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri Buddha
Thrinadha Rao Advocate for Plaintiff. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court doth order:
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed for default;
2) that there be no costs;
Give under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 7th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
For Plaintiff: For Defendant:
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And: 1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court delivered the following:
ORDER
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
Counter of R1 and R2 not filed. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court. Memo is recorded. Hence this petition is dismissed without costs as not pressed as settled out of court.
Pronounced by me in open court this the 8th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:31-08-2016 Date of Filing:15-09-2016
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And: 1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
A fixed Court fee of Re1/- is affixed on the petition.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court doth order and;
DECREETAL ORDER
1) that the petition be and the same is hereby dismissed as not pressed as settled out of Court.
2) that there be no costs; Given under my hand and the seal of this court this the 8th day of June,2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PETITIONER/PLAINTIFF FOR RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Wednesday this the 7th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.254/2015
Between: Sri Karri Bhasakara Rao, S/o Suryanarayana, Hindu, age 38 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.10- 63, Nagulapalli villagae, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Plaintiff. And: Sri Villuri Bhaskara Rao, S/o late Suribabu, Hindu, age 45 years, Business, residing at D.No.2-36 Ummalada village, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Defendant
This suit coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri Buddha
Thrinadha Rao Advocate for Plaintiff. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
Suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for specific performance of the plaint schedule property directing the defendant to execute the registered sale deed for the plaint schedule property in favour of the plaintiff and if the defendant do not do so, the court to register the sale deed; if for any reason the specific performance cannot be ordered, for the refund of the advance amount of Rs.5,00,000/- and for costs of the suit.
Publication not filed against defendant . Plaintiff called absent No representation on behalf of plaintiff. Hence this suit is dismissed for default without costs.
Pronounced by me in open court, this the 7th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:21-12-2015 Date of Filing:21-12-2015
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Wednesday this the 7th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.254/2015
Between: Sri Karri Bhasakara Rao, S/o Suryanarayana, Hindu, age 38 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.10- 63, Nagulapalli villagae, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
Plaintiff. And: Sri Villuri Bhaskara Rao, S/o late Suribabu, Hindu, age 45 years, Business, residing at D.No.2-36 Ummalada village, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Defendant
Suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for specific performance of the plaint schedule property directing the defendant to execute the registered sale deed for the plaint schedule property in favour of the plaintiff and if the defendant do not do so, the court to register the sale deed; if for any reason the specific performance cannot be ordered, for the refund of the advance amount of Rs.5,00,000/- and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction is Rs.6,00,000/- and a court fee of Rs.8,426/- is paid under Sec.39 Sch.I ArtI(b) and (c) of A.P.C.F. and S.V.Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri Buddha
Thrinadha Rao Advocate for Plaintiff. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court doth order:
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed for default;
2) that there be no costs;
Give under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 7th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
For Plaintiff: For Defendant:
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And: 1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court delivered the following:
ORDER
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
Counter of R1 and R2 not filed. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court. Memo is recorded. Hence this petition is dismissed without costs as not pressed as settled out of court.
Pronounced by me in open court this the 8th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:31-08-2016 Date of Filing:15-09-2016
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And: 1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
A fixed Court fee of Re1/- is affixed on the petition.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court doth order and;
DECREETAL ORDER
1) that the petition be and the same is hereby dismissed as not pressed as settled out of Court.
2) that there be no costs; Given under my hand and the seal of this court this the 8th day of June,2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PETITIONER/PLAINTIFF FOR RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:12-09-12012 Date of Filing:12-09-2012
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Monday this the 19th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.223/2012
Between: Sri Pilli Manikumar,S/o late Somulu, Hindu, age 45 years, cultivation, residing at Door No.40-56- 16, Sanjeeviah colony, Near Logos Church, Tadichetlapalem, Visakhapatnam-4. Plaintiff. And:
1) Pilli Chellayyamma,W/o late Somulu, Hindu, age 67 years, house hold duties, residing at Pidiwada Agraharam Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
2) Ravada Saraswathi W/o late Appanna, Hindu, age 49 years, house hold duties, residing at Pydiwada Agraharam, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
3) Kannapalli Laxmi, W/o Ramulu, Hindu, age 46 years, household duties, residing at Ammulapalem villagae, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
4) andukuri Narasinga Rao, S/o late Apparao, Hindu, age 71 years, cultivation, D.No.8-7-10, Gajuwaka, Visakhapatnam Greater Municipal Corporation, Visakhapatnam District. Defendants
Suit for Preliminary decree for partition of the plaint schedule property into four equal shares with metes and bounds and allot one such equal separated share to the plaintiff after converting the joint possession into separate possession and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction is Rs.653063/- and a court fee of Rs.9026/- is payable but the schedule property is in joint possession and enjoyment of the plaintiff and the defendants a fixed court fee of Rs.200-00 is paid under Sec.34(2) of A.P.C.F. and
S.V.Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri
B.V.S.S.N.Murthy, Advocate for Plaintiff and of Sri A.V.S.Bhavani Prasad, Advocate for Defendant
No.4. Defendants 1 to 3 remained exparte. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court doth order and:
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed for default
2) that there be no costs:
( Copy of Plaint schedule and valuation slip hereto enclosed)
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Monday this the 19th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.223/2012
Between: Sri Pilli Manikumar,S/o late Somulu, Hindu, age 45 years, cultivation, residing at Door No.40-56- 16, Sanjeeviah colony, Near Logos Church, Tadichetlapalem, Visakhapatnam-4. Plaintiff. And:
1) Pilli Chellayyamma,W/o late Somulu, Hindu, age 67 years, house hold duties, residing at Pidiwada Agraharam Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
2) Ravada Saraswathi W/o late Appanna, Hindu, age 49 years, house hold duties, residing at Pydiwada Agraharam, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
3) Kannapalli Laxmi, W/o Ramulu, Hindu, age 46 years, household duties, residing at Ammulapalem villagae, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
4) andukuri Narasinga Rao, S/o late Apparao, Hindu, age 71 years, cultivation, D.No.8-7-10, Gajuwaka, Visakhapatnam Greater Municipal Corporation, Visakhapatnam District. Defendants
This suit coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri
B.V.S.S.N.Murthy, Advocate for Plaintiff and of Sri A.V.S.Bhavani Prasad, Advocate for Defendant
No.4. Defendants 1 to 3 remained exparte. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
Suit for Preliminary decree for partition of the plaint schedule property into four equal shares with metes and bounds and allot one such equal separated share to the plaintiff after converting the joint possession into separate possession and for costs of the suit.
Costs not paid. Plaintiff called absent. No representation on behalf of plaintiff. Plaintiff failed to adduce evidence though granted several adjournments . Hence this suit is dismissed for default without costs.
Pronounced by me in open court, this the 19th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:12-09-12012 Date of Filing:12-09-2012
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Monday this the 19th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.223/2012
Between: Sri Pilli Manikumar,S/o late Somulu, Hindu, age 45 years, cultivation, residing at Door No.40-56- 16, Sanjeeviah colony, Near Logos Church, Tadichetlapalem, Visakhapatnam-4. Plaintiff. And:
1) Pilli Chellayyamma,W/o late Somulu, Hindu, age 67 years, house hold duties, residing at Pidiwada Agraharam Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
2) Ravada Saraswathi W/o late Appanna, Hindu, age 49 years, house hold duties, residing at Pydiwada Agraharam, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
3) Kannapalli Laxmi, W/o Ramulu, Hindu, age 46 years, household duties, residing at Ammulapalem villagae, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
4) andukuri Narasinga Rao, S/o late Apparao, Hindu, age 71 years, cultivation, D.No.8-7-10, Gajuwaka, Visakhapatnam Greater Municipal Corporation, Visakhapatnam District. Defendants
Suit for Preliminary decree for partition of the plaint schedule property into four equal shares with metes and bounds and allot one such equal separated share to the plaintiff after converting the joint possession into separate possession and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction is Rs.653063/- and a court fee of Rs.9026/- is payable but the schedule property is in joint possession and enjoyment of the plaintiff and the defendants a fixed court fee of Rs.200-00 is paid under Sec.34(2) of A.P.C.F. and
S.V.Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri
B.V.S.S.N.Murthy, Advocate for Plaintiff and of Sri A.V.S.Bhavani Prasad, Advocate for Defendant
No.4. Defendants 1 to 3 remained exparte. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court doth order and:
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed for default
2) that there be no costs:
( Copy of Plaint schedule and valuation slip hereto enclosed)
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:21-12-2015 Date of Filing:21-12-2015
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Wednesday this the 7th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.254/2015
Between: Sri Karri Bhasakara Rao, S/o Suryanarayana, Hindu, age 38 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.10- 63, Nagulapalli villagae, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Plaintiff. And: Sri Villuri Bhaskara Rao, S/o late Suribabu, Hindu, age 45 years, Business, residing at D.No.2-36 Ummalada village, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Defendant
Suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for specific performance of the plaint schedule property directing the defendant to execute the registered sale deed for the plaint schedule property in favour of the plaintiff and if the defendant do not do so, the court to register the sale deed; if for any reason the specific performance cannot be ordered, for the refund of the advance amount of Rs.5,00,000/- and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction is Rs.6,00,000/- and a court fee of Rs.8,426/- is paid under Sec.39 Sch.I ArtI(b) and (c) of A.P.C.F. and S.V.Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri Buddha
Thrinadha Rao Advocate for Plaintiff. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court doth order:
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed for default;
2) that there be no costs;
Give under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 7th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
For Plaintiff: For Defendant:
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And: 1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court delivered the following:
ORDER
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
Counter of R1 and R2 not filed. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court. Memo is recorded. Hence this petition is dismissed without costs as not pressed as settled out of court.
Pronounced by me in open court this the 8th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:31-08-2016 Date of Filing:15-09-2016
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And: 1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
A fixed Court fee of Re1/- is affixed on the petition.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court doth order and;
DECREETAL ORDER
1) that the petition be and the same is hereby dismissed as not pressed as settled out of Court.
2) that there be no costs; Given under my hand and the seal of this court this the 8th day of June,2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PETITIONER/PLAINTIFF FOR RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Wednesday this the 7th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.254/2015
Between: Sri Karri Bhasakara Rao, S/o Suryanarayana, Hindu, age 38 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.10- 63, Nagulapalli villagae, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Plaintiff. And: Sri Villuri Bhaskara Rao, S/o late Suribabu, Hindu, age 45 years, Business, residing at D.No.2-36 Ummalada village, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Defendant
This suit coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri Buddha
Thrinadha Rao Advocate for Plaintiff. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
Suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for specific performance of the plaint schedule property directing the defendant to execute the registered sale deed for the plaint schedule property in favour of the plaintiff and if the defendant do not do so, the court to register the sale deed; if for any reason the specific performance cannot be ordered, for the refund of the advance amount of Rs.5,00,000/- and for costs of the suit.
Publication not filed against defendant . Plaintiff called absent No representation on behalf of plaintiff. Hence this suit is dismissed for default without costs.
Pronounced by me in open court, this the 7th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:21-12-2015 Date of Filing:21-12-2015
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Wednesday this the 7th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.254/2015
Between: Sri Karri Bhasakara Rao, S/o Suryanarayana, Hindu, age 38 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.10- 63, Nagulapalli villagae, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Plaintiff. And: Sri Villuri Bhaskara Rao, S/o late Suribabu, Hindu, age 45 years, Business, residing at D.No.2-36 Ummalada village, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Defendant
Suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for specific performance of the plaint schedule property directing the defendant to execute the registered sale deed for the plaint schedule property in favour of the plaintiff and if the defendant do not do so, the court to register the sale deed; if for any reason the specific performance cannot be ordered, for the refund of the advance amount of Rs.5,00,000/- and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction is Rs.6,00,000/- and a court fee of Rs.8,426/- is paid under Sec.39 Sch.I ArtI(b) and (c) of A.P.C.F. and S.V.Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri Buddha
Thrinadha Rao Advocate for Plaintiff. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court doth order:
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed for default;
2) that there be no costs;
Give under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 7th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
For Plaintiff: For Defendant:
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And: 1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court delivered the following:
ORDER
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
Counter of R1 and R2 not filed. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court. Memo is recorded. Hence this petition is dismissed without costs as not pressed as settled out of court.
Pronounced by me in open court this the 8th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:31-08-2016 Date of Filing:15-09-2016
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And: 1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
A fixed Court fee of Re1/- is affixed on the petition.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court doth order and;
DECREETAL ORDER
1) that the petition be and the same is hereby dismissed as not pressed as settled out of Court.
2) that there be no costs; Given under my hand and the seal of this court this the 8th day of June,2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PETITIONER/PLAINTIFF FOR RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:21-12-2015 Date of Filing:21-12-2015
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Wednesday this the 7th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.254/2015
Between: Sri Karri Bhasakara Rao, S/o Suryanarayana, Hindu, age 38 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.10- 63, Nagulapalli villagae, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Plaintiff. And: Sri Villuri Bhaskara Rao, S/o late Suribabu, Hindu, age 45 years, Business, residing at D.No.2-36 Ummalada village, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Defendant
Suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for specific performance of the plaint schedule property directing the defendant to execute the registered sale deed for the plaint schedule property in favour of the plaintiff and if the defendant do not do so, the court to register the sale deed; if for any reason the specific performance cannot be ordered, for the refund of the advance amount of Rs.5,00,000/- and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction is Rs.6,00,000/- and a court fee of Rs.8,426/- is paid under Sec.39 Sch.I ArtI(b) and (c) of A.P.C.F. and S.V.Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri Buddha
Thrinadha Rao Advocate for Plaintiff. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court doth order:
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed for default;
2) that there be no costs;
Give under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 7th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
For Plaintiff: For Defendant:
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And: 1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court delivered the following:
ORDER
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
Counter of R1 and R2 not filed. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court. Memo is recorded. Hence this petition is dismissed without costs as not pressed as settled out of court.
Pronounced by me in open court this the 8th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:31-08-2016 Date of Filing:15-09-2016
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And: 1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
A fixed Court fee of Re1/- is affixed on the petition.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court doth order and;
DECREETAL ORDER
1) that the petition be and the same is hereby dismissed as not pressed as settled out of Court.
2) that there be no costs; Given under my hand and the seal of this court this the 8th day of June,2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PETITIONER/PLAINTIFF FOR RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Wednesday this the 7th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.254/2015
Between:
Sri Karri Bhasakara Rao, S/o Suryanarayana, Hindu, age 38 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.10- 63, Nagulapalli villagae, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Plaintiff. And: Sri Villuri Bhaskara Rao, S/o late Suribabu, Hindu, age 45 years, Business, residing at D.No.2-36 Ummalada village, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Defendant
This suit coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri Buddha
Thrinadha Rao Advocate for Plaintiff. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
Suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for specific performance of the plaint schedule property directing the defendant to execute the registered sale deed for the plaint schedule property in favour of the plaintiff and if the defendant do not do so, the court to register the sale deed; if for any reason the specific performance cannot be ordered, for the refund of the advance amount of Rs.5,00,000/- and for costs of the suit.
Publication not filed against defendant . Plaintiff called absent No representation on behalf of plaintiff. Hence this suit is dismissed for default without costs.
Pronounced by me in open court, this the 7th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:21-12-2015 Date of Filing:21-12-2015
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Wednesday this the 7th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.254/2015
Between: Sri Karri Bhasakara Rao, S/o Suryanarayana, Hindu, age 38 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.10- 63, Nagulapalli villagae, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Plaintiff. And: Sri Villuri Bhaskara Rao, S/o late Suribabu, Hindu, age 45 years, Business, residing at D.No.2-36 Ummalada village, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Defendant
Suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for specific performance of the plaint schedule property directing the defendant to execute the registered sale deed for the plaint schedule property in favour of the plaintiff and if the defendant do not do so, the court to register the sale deed; if for any reason the specific performance cannot be ordered, for the refund of the advance amount of Rs.5,00,000/- and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction is Rs.6,00,000/- and a court fee of Rs.8,426/- is paid under Sec.39 Sch.I ArtI(b) and (c) of A.P.C.F. and S.V.Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri Buddha
Thrinadha Rao Advocate for Plaintiff. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court doth order:
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed for default;
2) that there be no costs;
Give under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 7th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
For Plaintiff: For Defendant:
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And: 1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court delivered the following:
ORDER
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
Counter of R1 and R2 not filed. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court. Memo is recorded. Hence this petition is dismissed without costs as not pressed as settled out of court.
Pronounced by me in open court this the 8th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:31-08-2016 Date of Filing:15-09-2016
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And: 1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
A fixed Court fee of Re1/- is affixed on the petition.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court doth order and;
DECREETAL ORDER
1) that the petition be and the same is hereby dismissed as not pressed as settled out of Court.
2) that there be no costs; Given under my hand and the seal of this court this the 8th day of June,2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PETITIONER/PLAINTIFF FOR RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Tuesday, this the 16th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No 165/2016
Between:
Sri Konatala Koteswara Rao, Late Ramu Naidu, Hindu, age 46 years, cultivation, resident at D.No.7-85, Munagapaka village, post and Mandal, near Sri Rama temple, Mandabayalu, Visakhapatnam . Plaintiff. And:
Sri Kandregula Nookaraju, S/o Sanyasi Naid, Hindu, age 47 years, cultivation resident at D.No.3-31, Vandrapalli village, post, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Defendant.
This suit coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri S.S.Chalam, Advocate for the Plaintiff and of Sri Lanka Jagannadham,Advocate for defendant and Counsel for plaintiff filed memo stating that the subject matter was settled out of court and having stood over till this day for consideration this court delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
Suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant (a) for a preliminary decree directing the defendant to pay the suit amount of Rs.10,03,333/- together with interest at the rate of Rs.24% per annum from the date of filing of the suit till the date of realization within the time stipulated by the court (b) if the defendant failed to pay the suit amount within the stipulated time, to pass a final decree ordering sale of the mortgaged property land for approaching such sale proceeds to the decretal amount (c) in the event, if the sale proceeds, are not balancing the decretal amount, permission may be granted to the plaintiff to sue the defendant personally and for costs of the suit.
Plaintiff and defendant present. Plaintiff filed memo stating that the subject matter of this suit was settled out of court and defendant paid entire mortgage debt and plaintiff prays the court may be pleased to dismiss the suit without costs. Memo is recorded. Hence this suit is dismissed without costs as settled out of court.
Pronounced by me in open court, this the 16th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation : 24-10-2016 Date of filing:24-10-2016
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Tuesday, this the 16th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No 165/2016
Between:
Sri Konatala Koteswara Rao, Late Ramu Naidu, Hindu, age 46 years, cultivation, resident at D.No.7-85, Munagapaka village, post and Mandal, near Sri Rama temple, Mandabayalu, Visakhapatnam . Plaintiff. And:
Sri Kandregula Nookaraju, S/o Sanyasi Naidul, Hindu, age 47 years, cultivation,resident at D.No.3-31, Vandrapalli village, post, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Defendant. Suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant (a) for a preliminary decree directing the defendant to pay the suit amount of Rs.10,03,333/- together with interest at the rate of Rs.24% per annum from the date of filing of the suit till the date of realization within the time stipulated by the court (b) if the defendant failed to pay the suit amount within the stipulated time, to pass a final decree ordering sale of the mortgaged property land for approaching such sale proceeds to the decretal amount (c) in the event, if the sale proceeds, are not balancing the decretal amount, permission may be granted to the plaintiff to sue the defendant personally and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction is
Rs.10,03,333-00 a court fee of Rs.12,626/- is paid under Sec.31(1) and Sec.20 of Sch.I Art.I (b) and(c) of A.P.C.F. and S.V.Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri S.S.Chalam, Advocate for the Plaintiff and of Sri Lanka Jagannadham, Advocate for defendant and Counsel for plaintiff filed memo stating that the subject matter was settled out of court and having stood over till this day for consideration this court doth order and:
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed as settled out of court;
2) that there be no costs; ( Copy of plaint schedule hereto enclosed)
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 16th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PLAINTIFF; FOR DEFENDANT;
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Tuesday, this the 16th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No 188/2014
Between:
State Bank of India,Anakapalli branch represented by its Chief Manager Sri A. Sai Prasad S/o Balaramaiah, age 50 years,Anakapalli, Visakhapatnam District. Plaintiff.
And:
Sri Patoju Vseerabhadra Rao S/o late Vioshnu Murthy, age 56 years, residing at H.No.1-23, Tuypuram village Butchayyapeta Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Defendant.
This suit coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Smt.A.Bhanumathi, Sri V.Viswanadham, Advocates for the Plaintiff Bank and of Sri M.Jaya Ram,Advocate for defendant. Costs not paid. Steps against deceased defendant not taken No representation on behalf of plaintiff and having stood over till this day for consideration this court delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
Suit filed by the plaintiff bank (herein after to be referred as plaintiff) against the defendant for recover of an amount of Rs.3,26,147/- (Rupees three lakhs twenty six thousand one hundred and forty seven only) along with subsequent interest thereon at 13.40% p.a. with monthly rests from the date of the ksuiltk till date of realization and for costs of the suit.
Costs not paid. Steps against deceased defendant not taken. No representation on behalf of plaintiff. Hence this suit defendant ils dismissed without costs as abated.
Pronounced by me in open court, this the 16th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
For Plaintiff:
PW1:16-12-2015: Sri P.Satya SaiSubrahmanyaraju
List of documents marked for Plaintiff:-
Ex.A1 is the Bio-data form.
Ex.A2 is the letter of arrangement issued by the plaintiff and acknowledged the defendant.
Ex.A3 is the agreement of loan cum hypothecation executed by defendant.
Ex.A4 is the letter by the defendant addressed by the plaintiff.
Ex.A5 is the notice to the defendant by Lok Adalat, Anakapalli in
PLC.N;o.1171/13.
Ex.A6 is the certified extract of statement of loan.
For Defendant:- NIL
PSCJ/AKP Date of Presentation : 04-07-2014 Date of filing:30-07-2014
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Tuesday, this the 16th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No 188/2014
Between:
State Bank of India,Anakapalli branch represented by its Chief Manager Sri A. Sai Prasad S/o Balaramaiah, age 50 years,Anakapalli, Visakhapatnam District.
Plaintiff. And:
Sri Patoju Vseerabhadra Rao S/o late Vioshnu Murthy, age 56 years, residing at H.No.1-23, Tuypuram village Butchayyapeta Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
Defendant.
Suit filed by the plaintiff bank (herein after to be referred as plaintiff) against the defendant for recover of an amount of Rs.3,26,147/- (Rupees three lakhs twenty six thousand one hundred and forty seven only) along with subsequent interest thereon at 13.40% p.a. with monthly rests from the date of the suilt till date of realization and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and Jurisdiction is valued at
Rs.3,26,147/- and a court fee of Rs.5,726/- is paid thereon under Sec.20 read with Art.I(b) and (c) of schedule I of A.P.C.F. and S.V.Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Smt.A.Bhanumathi, Sri V.Viswanadham, Advocates for the Plaintiff Bank and of Sri M.Jaya Ram,Advocate for defendant. Costs not paid. Steps against deceased defendant not taken No representation on behalf of plaintiff and having stood over till this day for consideration this court doth order and:
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed as no representation on behalf of plaintiff;
2) that the suit against defendant is dismissed without costs as abated;
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 16th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PLAINTIFF; FOR DEFENDANT;
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Tuesday, this the 13th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.43/2016
Between:
Sri Kanchumarthy Ravi Kanth, son of Mohana Rao, Hindu, age 47 years, working as Deputy Manager, State Bank of India, Sonthyam, Visakhapatnam, residing at Flat S-1, Premier paradise No.3, Official colony, 3rd lane, Maharanipeta,Visakhapatnam . Plaintiff. And:
Smt.Kanchumarthy Bharathi Devi, daughter of Yarasani Suri Babu, Hindu, age 46 years, working as Teacher (In charge/Pre Premier), D.A.V Public School, Anakapalli, Visakhapatnam District, residing at Flat No.T-1, Sri Sai Ganesh Villa, Near Commercial Tax office, New colony, Anakapalle, Visakhapatnam District. Defendant.
This suit coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri I.M.Ahmed, Advocate for the Plaintiff and of Sri K.Sunil Reddy,Advocate for defendant and Counsel for plaintiff filed memo stating that the subject matter was settled out of court and having stood over till this day for consideration this court delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
Suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant (a) to direct the defendant to vacate the schedule premises and deliver vacant possession of the same to the plaintiff in good condition as is given to the defendant and direct the defendant to pay Rs.4,32,000/- towards arrears of rent from February,2013 to
February,2016 with subsequent interest at 24% p.a. from the date of suit till the date of realization and to direct the defendant to pay monthly rents at 12,000/- from March,2016 till delivery of the same to the plaintiff and for costs of the suit.
Counsel for plaintiff filed memo stating that the subject matter of this suit was settled out of court and hence the plaintiff not pressing the suit and prays the court may be pleased to dismiss the suit. Memo is recorded. Hence this suit dismissed without costs as settled out of court.
Pronounced by me in open court, this the 13th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation : 28-3-2016 Date of filing:29-03-2016
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge,
Anakapalli
Tuesday, this the 13th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.43/2016
Between:
Sri Kanchumarthy Ravi Kanth, son of Mohana Rao, Hindu, age 47 years, working as Deputy Manager, State Bank of India, Sonthyam, Visakhapatnam, residing at Flat S-1, Premier paradise No.3, Official colony, 3rd lane, Maharanipeta,Visakhapatnam . Plaintiff. And:
Smt.Kanchumarthy Bharathi Devi, daughter of Yarasani Suri Babu, Hindu, age 46 years, working as Teacher (In charge/Pre Premier), D.A.V Public School, Anakapalli, Visakhapatnam District, residing at Flat No.T-1, Sri Sai Ganesh Villa, Near Commercial Tax office, New colony, Anakapalle, Visakhapatnam District.
Defendant.
Suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant (a) to direct the defendant to vacate the schedule premises and deliver vacant possession of the same to the plaintiff in good condition as is given to the defendant and direct the defendant to pay Rs.4,32,000/- towards arrears of rent from February,2013 to February,2016 with subsequent interest at 24% p.a. from the date of suit till the date of realization and to direct the defendant to pay monthly rents at 12,000/- from March,2016 till delivery of the same to the plaintiff and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and Jurisdiction is as follows: For eviction the suit is valued on one year rent i.e. Rs.12,000/-x12= Rs.1,44,000/- and a court fee of Rs.3,926/- is paid .For recovery of arrears of rents the suit is valued at Rs.4,32,000/- (Rs.12,000/-X36) and a court fee of Rs.6,826/- is paid U/Sec.40 and 20 Art.I(b&c) of APCF and S.V.Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri I.M.Ahmed, Advocate for the Plaintiff and of Sri K.Sunil Reddy, Advocate for defendant and Counsel for plaintiff filed memo stating that the subject matter was settled out of court and having stood over till this day for consideration this court doth order and;
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed as settled out of court;
2) that there be no costs; ( Copy of plaint schedule hereto enclosed)
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 13th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PLAINTIFF; FOR DEFENDANT;
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli
Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between:
Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
Petitioner/Plaintiff And:
1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendan ts.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri
M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court delivered the following:
ORDER
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt. 11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
Counter of R1 and R2 not filed. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court. Memo is recorded. Hence this petition is dismissed without costs as not pressed as settled out of court.
Pronounced by me in open court this the 8th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation : 31-08-2016 Date of Filing : 15-09-2016
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between:
Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
……..Petitioner/Plaintiff
And:
1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
…….Respondents/defendan ts
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt. 11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
A fixed Court fee of Rs.1/- is affixed on the petition.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri
M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court doth order and;
DECREETAL ORDER
1) that the petition be and the same is hereby dismissed as not pressed as settled out of Court.
2) that there be no costs; Given under my hand and the seal of this court this the 8th day of June,2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PETITIONER/PLAINTIFF FOR RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS
No costs memo is filed on either side. PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli
Wednesday, this the 7th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.254/2015
Between:
Sri Karri Bhaskara Rao,S/o Suryanarayana, Hindu, age 38 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.10-63, Nagulapalli village, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Plaintiff. And:
Sri Villuri Bhaskara Rao, S/o Late Suri babu, Hindu, age 45 years, Business, residing at D.No.2-36, Ummalada village, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Defendant.
This suit coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri B.Trinadha Rao, Advocate for the Plaintiff. Plaintiff called absent No representation and having stood over till this day for consideration this court delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
Suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for specific performance of the plaint schedule property directing the defendant to execute the registered sale deed for the plaint schedule property in favour of the plaintiff and if the defendant do not do so, the court to register the sale deed; if for any reason the specific performance cannot be ordered, for the refund of the advance amount of Rs.5,00,000/- and for costs of the suit.
Publication not filed against defendant. Plaintiff called absent No representation on behalf of plaintiff. Hence this suit is dismissed for default without costs.
Pronounced by me in open court, this the 7th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation : 21-12-2015 Date of filing:21-12-2015
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge,
Anakapalli
Wednesday, this the 7th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.254/2015
Between:
Sri Karri Bhaskara Rao,S/o Suryanarayana, Hindu, age 38 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.10-63, Nagulapalli village, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Plaintiff. And:
Sri Villuri Bhaskara Rao, S/o Late Suri babu, Hindu, age 45 years, Business, residing at D.No.2-36, Ummalada village, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Defendant.
Suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for specific performance of the plaint schedule property directing the defendant to execute the registered sale deed for the plaint schedule property in favour of the plaintiff and if the defendant do not do so, the court to register the sale deed; if for any reason the specific paerformance cannot be ordered, for the refund of the advance amount of Rs.5,00,000/- and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction is
Rs.6,00,000/- and a court fee of Rs.8,426/- is paid under Sec.39 Sch.I Art.I(b) and (c) of A.P.C.F.& S.V.ACT.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri B.Trinadha Rao, Advocate for the Plaintiff. Plaintiff called absent No representation and having stood over till this day for consideration this court doth order and:
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed for default;
2) that there be no costs;
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 7th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PLAINTIFF; FOR DEFENDANT;
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge,
Anakapalli
Tuesday, this the 13th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.69/2013
Between:
Sri Chapala Gopi,S/o Bandiyya,Hindu, age 38 years, catering business, residing at D.No.20-3-10, Ambedkar Nagar, Gavarapalem, Anakapalli village and Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Plaintiff. And:
1) Mogalapalli Parvathi, D/o late Venkataramana, Hindu, age 56 years, household duties, residing at D.No.11-1-8, Opp.Kanyaka parameswari temple shopping complex, main road, Anakapalli village and Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
2) Mogalapalli Appalaraju Kumari, D/o late Venkataramana, Hindu, age 53 years, house hold duties-rest-do-
3) Mogalapalli Venkata Bhanu Murthy, S/o late Venkataramana, Hindu, age 50 Years, -rest-do-. Defendants
This suit coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of
Sri B.Trinadha Rao, Advocate for the Plaintiff and of Sri A.V.S.Bhavani Prasad,
Advocate for defendants. Plaintiff called absent No representation and having stood over till this day for consideration this court delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
Suit filed for recover a sum of Rs.6,30,666/- being the principal of
Rs.5,00,000/- due on a promissory note dated 6-3-2012 executed by the defendants in favour of the plaintiff agreeing to repay the same with interest at 24% p.a. and with subsequent interest and for costs of the suit.
PW1 absent costs not paid. Plaintiff called absent. No representation on behalf of plaintiff. PW1 did not turn up to this court since long time though granted adjournments given on costs. Hence this suit is dismissed for default without costs.
Pronounced by me in open court, this the 13h day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation : 08-04-2013 Date of Filing:08-04-2013
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge,
Anakapalli
Tuesday, this the 13th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.69/2013
Between:
Sri Chapala Gopi,S/o Bandiyya,Hindu, age 38 years, catering business, residilng at D.No.20-3-10, Ambedkar Nagar, Gavarapalem, Anakapalli village and Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Plaintiff. And:
1) Mogalapalli Parvathi, D/o late Venkataramana, Hindu, age 56 years, household duties, residing at D.No.11-1-8, Opp.Kanyaka parameswari temple shopping complex, main road, Anakapalli village and Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
2) Mogalapalli Appalaraju Kumari, D/o late Venkataramana, Hindu, age 53 years, house hold duties-rest-do-
3) Mogalapalli Venkata Bhanu Murthy, S/o late Venkataramana, Hindu, Age 50 years, -rest-do-. Defendants
Suit filed for recover a sum of Rs.6,30,666/- being the principal of Rs.5,00,000/- due on a promissory note dated 6-3-2012 executed by the defendants in favour of the plaintiff agreeing to repay the same with interest at 24% p.a.and with subsequent interest and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction is Rs.6,30,666/- and a court fee of Rs.8,826/- is paid under Sec.20 Sch.I Art.I(b) and (c) of A.P.C.F.& S.V.ACT.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri B.Trinadha Rao, Advocate for the Plaintiff and of Sri A.V.S.Bhavani Prasad, Advocate for defendants. Plaintiff called absent No representation and having stood over till this day for consideration this court doth order
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed for default;
2) that there be no costs;
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 13th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PLAINTIFF; FOR DEFENDANT;
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
In the Court of :Prl Senior Civil Judge
Case No. :EP/0000128/2014 Padathala Suri Babu Vs Lalam Kondamma
Date : 21-06-2017
Business: Batta not filed for JDR. D.H.R. called absent. No representation on behalf of JDR. Hence this E.P. is dismissed without costs. Nature of Disposal: DISMISSED Disposal Date: 21-06-2017 Prl Senior Civil Judge
In the Court of :Prl Senior Civil Judge
Case No. :EP/0000003/2014 Abdul Rafiq Basha Vs KVSKT Suryanarayana
Date : 11-12-2017
Business: Both parties called absent No representation on either side EP is dismissed for default. Nature of Disposal: DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT Disposal Date: 11-12-2017 Prl Senior Civil Judge
In the Court of :Prl Senior Civil Judge
Case No. :H.M.O.P/0000005/2016 Palisetti Venkata Satya Uma Vs --
Date : 09-08-2017
Business: Petitioner and respondent called absent . Hence this petition is dismissed for default. Nature of Disposal: DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT Disposal Date: 09-08-2017 Prl Senior Civil Judge
In the Court of :Prl Senior Civil Judge
Case No. :EP/0000104/2014 srimath Tirumala peddinti Managatayaru Vs Indraganti Surynarayana
Date : 20-06-2017
Business: Batta for JDrs 2 and 3 not filed. DHR called absent. No representation. Hence the EP is dismissed for default without costs. Nature of Disposal: DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT Disposal Date: 20-06-2017 Prl Senior Civil Judge
In the Court of :Prl Senior Civil Judge
Case No. :OS/0000314/2012 Koilada Ganesh Vs Smt. Yellapu Kanaka Maha Lakshmi
Date : 07-09-2017
Business: Costs not paid. No evidence is filed both parties called absent. No representation .Hence the suit is dismissed for default. I.A.1028/2012 In view of main suit is dismissed for default This I.A also dismissed for default. Nature of Disposal: DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT Disposal Date: 07-09-2017 Prl Senior Civil Judge
In the Court of :Prl Senior Civil Judge
Case No. :EP/0000083/2016 Pentakota Meena Devi Vs Kolli Rambabu
Date : 30-08-2017
Business: Both parties called absent. No representation. Hence EP is dismissed for default. Nature of Disposal: DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT Disposal Date: 30-08-2017 Prl Senior Civil Judge
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Tuesday, this the 24 th day of October, 2017
HMOP.NO.49/2013
Between: Alla Swarulpa @ Varaha Lalitha Sawarupa,W/o Rama Chandra Prasad, Hindu, age 19 years, Household duties, residing at Door No.19-4-17, Buddha Prakasa Rao Naidu gari street, Gavarapalem, Anakapalle. Petitioner And: Alla Rama Chandra Prasad, S/o China Apparao, Hindu, age 30 years, physically handicapped, residing at Door No.50-83-10, Madhura Nagar, Visakhapatnam- 16. Respondent
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of SriBuddha Thrinadha Rao, Advocate for petitioner and of Sri
K.Chandra Sekhar, Advocate for Respondent. Both parties called absent.No representation. Hence the matter is dismissed for default and this Court delivered the following:
ORDER
Petition filed under Sec.11 of Hindu marriage Act. This is a petition filed by the petitioner against the respondent for dissolution of the marriage in between the petitioner and respondent performed on 13.02.2013 due to non consummation of marriage as null and void and for costs of the petition.
Both parties calasled absent. No representation on either side .Hence the matter is dismissed for default.
Pronounced by me in open court, thisthe 24th day of October, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Wednesday, this the 22nd day of November, 2017
HMOP.NO.03/2014
Between: Payala Jyothi, W/o Srilnivasu, C/o. Palli Rajeswara Rao, Hindu, age 24 years, House holdl dutiles, residing at 4-15. Ummalada village, Munagapaka Mandal,l Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner And: Payala Srilnivasu, S/o Rajeswara Rao, age 35 yealrs, Residing at Door No.3-4- 26/1, Telephone Exchange street, Narasingaraopeta, Anakapalle, Visakhapatnam District. Respondent
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of SriK.Chandra Sekhar,K.Gangadhararao, Advocates for petitioner and of Sri V.Rajasekhar, Advocate for Respondent. Both parties called present.Petitioner filed memo not pressing this petition in view of the compromise arrived between the parties before the elders. Memo is recoraded and this Court delivered the following:
ORDER
Petition filed under Sec.9 of Hindu marriage Act. This is a petition filed by the petitioner-wife against the respondent-Husband to directing the respondent to come to the house of the petitioner and live with him for discharging her conjugal obligations and for costs of the petition. Both parties called present. Petitioner filed memo not pressing this petition inveiw of the compromise arrived between the parties before the elders. Heard. Memo is recorded. Accordingly this petition is dismissed without costs as not pressed.
Pronounced by me in open court, thisthe 22nd day of November, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
In the Court of :Prl Senior Civil Judge
Case No. :EP/0000083/2016 Pentakota Meena Devi Vs Kolli Rambabu
Date : 30-08-2017
Business: Both parties called absent. No representation. Hence EP is dismissed for default. Nature of Disposal: DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT Disposal Date: 30-08-2017 Prl Senior Civil Judge
In the Court of :Prl Senior Civil Judge
Case No. :OS/0000314/2012 Koilada Ganesh Vs Smt. Yellapu Kanaka Maha Lakshmi
Date : 07-09-2017
Business: Costs not paid. No evidence is filed both parties called absent. No representation .Hence the suit is dismissed for default. I.A.1028/2012 In view of main suit is dismissed for default This I.A also dismissed for default. Nature of Disposal: DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT Disposal Date: 07-09-2017 Prl Senior Civil Judge
In the Court of :Prl Senior Civil Judge
Case No. :EP/0000104/2014 srimath Tirumala peddinti Managatayaru Vs Indraganti Surynarayana
Date : 20-06-2017
Business: Batta for JDrs 2 and 3 not filed. DHR called absent. No representation. Hence the EP is dismissed for default without costs. Nature of Disposal: DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT Disposal Date: 20-06-2017 Prl Senior Civil Judge
In the Court of :Prl Senior Civil Judge
Case No. :H.M.O.P/0000005/2016 Palisetti Venkata Satya Uma Vs --
Date : 09-08-2017
Business: Petitioner and respondent called absent . Hence this petition is dismissed for default. Nature of Disposal: DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT Disposal Date: 09-08-2017 Prl Senior Civil Judge
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Wednesday, this the 31st day of January, 2018.
O.S.No.199/2012
Between: Vennela Pydamma,W/o Somulu, Hindu, age 65 years, household duties, resildilng at D.No.8-4, Mettapalem village, lH/o Vada Cheepurupalli, Paraawada Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
Plaintiff. And:
1.Eerla Sreeramulu,S/o Musalayya, Hindu, age 52 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.7-56,Sriram Nagar, T.Devada, Steet project Office, Visakhapatnam-31.
2.Eerla Suryanarayana, S/o Musalayya, Hindu, age 50 years, cultivation, residilng at D.No.7-55, Sriram Nagar, T.Devada, Steel project Office, Visakhapatnam-31.
3.Eerla Vonumulu, S/o Musalayya, Hindu, age 48 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.30-71-1, Appikonda RH colonyll, Vadlapudi, Gajuwakal Mandal, Visakhapatnam-46.
4. Kundrapu Somulamma, W/o Mutyalu, Hindu, age 62 years, housewife, residing at D.No.30-7-1, Appikonda RH colony, Vadlapudi, Gajuwaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam-46.
5.Kundrapu Simhachalam W/o Appalanaidu, Hindu, age 86 years, residing at Door No.7-5, Sriram Nagar, T.Devada, Steel project office, Visakhapatnam-31.
6. Geddam Kpentamma, W/o Simhachalam, age 58 years, Hindu, Housewife, D.No.5-4, Hastinapuram, H/o Vada Cheepurupalli, Parawada mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
7. Ramineni Venkateswararao, S/o Basavayya, Hindu, age 45 years, business, resilding at D.No.10-32-6, Visalakshmi Nagar, Visakhapatnam.
Defendants.
This suit coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri V.V.Jogayya and Sri M.Srinivasarao, Advocates for the plaintiff and of Sri A.V.S.Bhavani Prasad, Advocate for defendant No.7 and defendants 1,3,4,6 remind exparte and suit against defendant 2 and 5 dismissed for default and this Court delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
Suit for partition of the plaint schedule properties at metes and bounds into seven equal shares and allot one such share to the plaintiff and such equal shares dto thedefendants 1 to 6, and deliver separate possession ofk such share so allotted to the plaintiff and defendants 1 to 6 on converting the joint possession into separate possession; for profits that can be determined by way of separate application; and for costs of the suit.
PW.1 called absent No representation. Hence the matter is dismissed for default.
Pronounced by me in open court, this lthe 31st day of January, 2018.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
FOR PLAINTIFF:-
P.W.1/ dt.8.12.2017 - Vennela Pydamma W/o Somulu.(Chief examination only)
FOR DEFENDANT:- NIL
LIST OF DOCUMENTS
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation: 16-08-2012
Date of Filing:16-08-2012
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Wednesday, this the 31st day of January, 2018.
O.S.No.199/2012
Between: Vennela Pydamma,W/o Somulu, Hindu, age 65 years, household duties, resildilng at D.No.8-4, Mettapalem village, lH/o Vada Cheepurupalli, Paraawada Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
Plaintiff. And:
1.Eerla Sreeramulu,S/o Musalayya, Hindu, age 52 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.7-56, Sriram Nagar, T.Devada, Steet project Office, Visakhapatnam-31.
2.Eerla Suryanarayana, S/o Musalayya, Hindu, age 50 years, cultivation, residilng at D.No.7-55, Sriram Nagar, T.Devada, Steel project Office, Visakhapatnam-31.
3.Eerla Vonumulu, S/o Musalayya, Hindu, age 48 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.30-71-1, Appikonda RH colonyll, Vadlapudi, Gajuwakal Mandal, Visakhapatnam-46.
4. Kundrapu Somulamma, W/o Mutyalu, Hindu, age 62 years, housewife, residing at D.No.30-7-1, Appikonda RH colony, Vadlapudi, Gajuwaka
Mandal, Visakhapatnam-46.
5.Kundrapu Simhachalam W/o Appalanaidu, Hindu, age 86 years, residing at Door No.7-5, Sriram Nagar, T.Devada, Steel project office, Visakhapatnam-31.
6. Geddam Kpentamma, W/o Simhachalam, age 58 years, Hindu, Housewife, D.No.5-4, Hastinapuram, H/o Vada Cheepurupalli, Parawada mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
7. Ramineni Venkateswararao, S/o Basavayya, Hindu, age 45 years, business, resilding at D.No.10-32-6, Visalakshmi Nagar, Visakhapatnam.
Defendants.
Suit for partition of the plaint schedule properties at metes and bounds into seven equal shares and allot one such share to the plaintiff and such equal shares dto thedefendants 1 to 6, and deliver separate possession ofk such share so allotted to the plaintiff and defendants 1 to 6 on converting the joint possession into separate possession; for profits that can be determined by way of separate application; and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and Jurisdiction of this court
Valuel of the plaint schedule property consisting of Ac.5.00 cents and @
Rs.15,00,000/- per acre as per basic value register Rs. 16,05,000-00
Plaintiff’s 1/7th share Rs. 10,71,428-00 3/4th value share Rs. 8,03,571-00
C.F. of Rs.10,826-00 is payable, but a fixed court fee of Rs.200/- is paid under
Sec.34(2) of A.P.C.F. Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri V.V.Jogayya and Sri M.Srinivasarao, Advocates for the plaintiff and of Sri
A.V.S.Bhavani Prasad, Advocate for defendant No.7 and defendants 1,3,4,6 remind exparte and suit against defendant 2 and 5 dismissed for default and this Court doth order and ;
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed for default;
2) that there be no order as to costs;
Given under my hand and theseal of this court, this the 31st day of January, 2018.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PLAINTIFF; FOR DEFENDANTS;
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Friday, this the 23rd day of February, 2018.
O.S.No.189/2017
Between: Chekuri Ramaraju S/o Venkata Raju @ Venkatarao, Hindu, age 38 years, cultivation, resident of D.No.1-38, Melupaka village and post, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Plaintiff. And:
Gogula Srinivas S/o Narayana Murthy, Hindu, age 49 years, resident of D.No.1- 113, Melupaka village and post, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
Defendant.
This suit coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri M.Jayaram & Sri BSVRajagopal,Advocates for plaintiff. Plaintiff filed memo not press the suit . Memo is recorded and this Court delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
Suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for recovery oif
Rs.6,84,333/- being the principal and interest due under a promissory note
dated 05.06.2016 for Rs.5,00,000/- executed by the defendant in favour of
plaintiff agreeing to repay the same with interest at 24% p.a., and for costs of the suit.
I.A59 /2018 is allowed. Accordingly the matter is advanced to today from 23.02.2018.
The plaintiff is present. Plaintiff filed memo not pressing the suit as matter was settled out of court. Heard. Memo is recorded. Accordingly suit is dismissed without costs as not pressed.
Pronounced by me in open court, this lthe 1st day of February, 2018.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
LIST OF DOCUMENTS
NIL PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:19-12-2017
Date of Filing:19-12-2017
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Friday, this the 23rd day of February, 2018.
O.S.No.189/2017
Between: Chekuri Ramaraju S/o Venkata Raju @ Venkatarao, Hindu, age 38 years, cultivation, resident of D.No.1-38, Melupaka village and post, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Plaintiff. And:
Gogula Srinivas S/o Narayana Murthy, Hindu, age 49 years, resident of D.No.1- 113, Melupaka village and post, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
Defendant.
Suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for recovery oif
Rs.6,84,333/- being the principal and interest due under a promissory note
dated 05.06.2016 for Rs.5,00,000/- executed by the defendant in favour of
plaintiff agreeing to repay the same with interest at 24% p.a., and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and Jurisdiction is
Rs.6,84,333/- and a court fee of Rs.9,326/- is paid under Section 20 r/w Art.I(a) of A.P.C.F. and S.V.Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri M.Jayaram & Sri B.S.V.Rajagopal, Advocates for plaintiff. Plaintiff filed memo not press the suit . Memo is recorded and this Court doth order and:
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed as not pressed;
2) that there be no costs;
Pronounced by me in open court, this the 1st day of February, 2018.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PLAINTIFF; FOR DEFENDANT;
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Thursday, this the 8th day of February, 2018.
O.S.No.255/2013
Between: Panduri Satyarao S/o Simhachalam, Hindu, age 69 years, retired MPDO, Sabbavaram, N/o Venkatapuram village Munagapaka Mandal, presently, residing at D.No.14-38-1/A, Plot No.303, Viswanadh Residency, Maharanipeta, Visakhapatnam-2. Plaintiff. And:
1. Panduri Kanaka Apparao,s/o Late Nookaiah, Hindu, age 45 years, Resident of Venkatapuram village, Via: Paravada, Thanam Post, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
2. Panduri Ramalakshmi W/o Kanaka Apparao, Hindu, age 40 years, resident of Venkatapuram village, Via: Paravada, Thanam Post, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
3. Chinni China Appalanaidu @ Innabbai,S/o Sanyasi, Hindu, age 69 yearls, resident of Venkatapuram village, via; Paravada, Thanam post, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
Defendants.
This suit coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri B.V.R.Joga rao and Mr.R.Atchutharamaiah, Advocates for plaintiff and of Sri K.P.Naidu, Advocate of defendants. Costs not paid. PW.1 called absent. No representation. Hence the suit is dismissed for default and this Court delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
This is a suit for declaration that the plaintiff is the absolute owner of item No.6 of plaint schedule property, and for recovery of possession of the item No.6 of plaint schedule property after evicting the defendants their men, agents servants there from; for future profits till the delivaery of the possession of item No.6 of schedule property as to be determined in a separate enquiry under order 20 R.12 of CPC; (b) for a permanent injunction restraining the defendants their men, agents, servants, and representatives from ever interfering with plaintiff’s peaceful possession and enjoyment of items 1 to 5 of plaint schedule property in any manner and for costs of the suit.
Costs not paid. PW1 called absent. No representation. Hence the suilt is dismissed for default.
Pronounced by me in open court, this the 8th day of February, 2018.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
FOR PLAINTIFF:-
PW1/ Dt.9-6-2017/Panduri Satya Rao, S/o Simhachalam (chief affidavit only)
FOR DEFENDANT: NIL
LIST OF DOCUMENTS
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation: 26-12-2013 Date of Filing: 26-12-2013
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Thursday, this the 8th day of February, 2018.
O.S.No.255/2013
Between: Panduri Satyarao S/o Simhachalam, Hindu, age 69 years, retired MPDO, Sabbavaram, N/o Venkatapuram village Munagapaka Mandal, presently, residing at D.No.14-38-1/A, Plot No.303, Viswanadh Residency, Maharanipeta, Visakhapatnam-2. Plaintiff. And:
1. Panduri Kanaka Apparao,s/o Late Nookaiah, Hindu, age 45 years, Resident of Venkatapuram village, Via: Paravada, Thanam Post, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
2. Panduri Ramalakshmi W/o Kanaka Apparao, Hindu, age 40 years, resident of Venkatapuram village, Via: Paravada, Thanam Post, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
3. Chinni China Appalanaidu @ Innabbai,S/o Sanyasi, Hindu, age 69 yearls, resident of Venkatapuram village, via; Paravada, Thanam post, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
Defendants.
This is a suit for declaration that the plaintiff is the absolute owner of item No.6 of plaint schedule property, and for recovery of possession of the item No.6 of plaint schedule property after evicting the defendants their men, agents servants there from; for future profits till the delivaery of the possession of item No.6 of schedule property as to be determined in a separate enquiry under order 20 R.12 of CPC; (b) for a permanent injunction restraining the defendants their men, agents, servants, and representatives from ever interfering with plaintiff’s peaceful possession and enjoyment of items 1 to 5 of plaint schedule property in any manner and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suilt for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction is
Rs.10,000/- for relief of permanent injunction and Rs.1,20,000/- being 3/4th market value for relief of declaration and possession and CF of Rs.4,412/- is paid under Sec.26 (c) & 24(a) of A.P.C.F. and S.V.Act.
Total value of item-6 property Rs. 1,60,000-00 3/4th of the Market value is Rs. 1,20,000-00
Notional value of items 1 to 5 Rs. 10,000-00
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri B.V.R.Joga rao and Mr.R.Atchutharamaiah, Advocates for plaintiff and of
Sri K.P.Naidu, Advocate of defendants. Costs not paid. PW.1 called absent. No representation. Hence the suit is dismissed for default and this Court doth order and :
DECREE
1) that the suilt be and the same is hereby dismissed for default;
2) that there be no order as to costs; ( Copy of plaint schedule and valuation slip hereto enclosed)
Pronounced by me in open court, this the 8th day of February, 2018.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PLAINTIFF; FOR DEFENDANTS;
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Tuesday, this the 23rd day of January, 2018.
O.S.No.221/2013
Between: Gulla Sreeram Murthy S/o Chellanna Dora, Hindu, age 33 years, cultivation, resident of Door No.3-16, Buddibanda village H/o Kovagunta village, Vommali Jagannadhapuram post, Ravikamatham Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
Plaintiff. And:
1.Konathala Radhabhai, W/o Seetharam, Hindu, age years, House wife, resident of Door No.2-95, Sampathipuram village, Anakapalle Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
2. Central Bank of India, Main branch, Visakhapatnam represented by its Chief Manager, Visakhapatnam.
Defendants.
This suit coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Venkateswara Rao, Advocate for plaintiff and of Sri
Ch.S.S.Ramachandrarao, Advocate for defendant No.2 and defendant No.1 remained exparte. Costs not paid. PW.1 called absent No representation on either side.Hence the suilt is dismissed for default and this Court delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
This is a suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant (a) for specific performance of the sale agreement dated 27.05.2005 by directing thedefendant to execute a regular sale deed on a proper stamp paper and register the samek in respect of the plaint schedule property in favoudr of the plaintiff and to do all the acts necaessary to put the plaintiff in possession with such time as the court fixes, ilf the 1st defendant, fails to execute the regular sale deed, the court may execute the same at the costs of the plaintiffl and recover the same from thedefendant (b) for an alternative relief foir refund of the advance amount of Rs.4,00,000/- with subsequent interest at the rate of 24% p.a. from the 1st defendant and for costs of the suilt.
Costs not paid. PW1 called absent. No representation on either side.
Hence the suit is dismissed for default.
Pronounced by me in open court, this the 23rd day of January, 2018.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIl
LIST OF DOCUMENTS
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
Date of presentation:22-11-2013 Date of Filing :22-11-2013
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Tuesday, this the 23rd day of January, 2018.
O.S.No.221/2013
Between: Gulla Sreeram Murthy S/o Chellanna Dora, Hindu, age 33 years, cultivation, resident of Door No.3-16, Buddibanda village H/o Kovagunta village, Vommali Jagannadhapuram post, Ravikamatham Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
Plaintiff. And:
1.Konathala Radhabhai, W/o Seetharam, Hindu, age years, House wife, resident of Door No.2-95, Sampathipuram village, Anakapalle Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
2. Central Bank of India, Main branch, Visakhapatnam represented by its Chief Manager, Visakhapatnam.
Defendants.
This is a suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant (a) for specific performance of the sale agreement dated 27.05.2005 by directing thedefendant to execute a regular sale deed on a proper stamp paper and register the samek in respect of the plaint schedule property in favoudr of the plaintiff and to do all the acts necaessary to put the plaintiff in possession with such time as the court fixes, ilf the 1st defendant, fails to execute the regular sale deed, the court may execute the same at the costs of the plaintiffl and recover the same from thedefendant (b) for an alternative relief foir refund of the advance amount of Rs.4,00,000/- with subsequent interest at the rate of 24% p.a. from the 1st defendant and for costs of the suilt.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and Jurisdiction is
Rs.4,00,000/- and a court fee of Rs.6,426/- is paid under Sec.39 of A.P.C.F. and
S.V.Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri G.Venkateswara Rao, Advocate for plaintiff and of Sri
Ch.S.S.Ramachandrarao, Advocate for defendant No.2 and defendant No.1 remained exparte. Costs not paid. PW.1 called absent No representation on either side. Hence the suilt is dismissed for default and this Court doth order and:
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed for default;
2) that there be no order as to costs; ( Copy of Plaint schedule hereto enclosed)
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 23rd day of January, 2018.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PLAINTIFF; FOR DEFENDANTS;
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
Prl.Senior Civil Judge’s Court, Anakapalle, dt.07-04-2018 From Sril S.Srinivasarao, To Prl.Senior Civil Judge, The Hon’ble Principal District Judge, Anakapalle VISAKHAPATNAM.
Honoured Madam
Sub:- Pauper suits-Statement showing the court fee awarded to the Government in pauper suits for the I quarter, 2018 ending by 31.03.2018. ***
I have the Honour to submit herewith the quarterly statement of pauper suits for the 1st quarter ending i.e. on 31.03.2018 relating to the Prl.Senior Civil Judge’s Court, Anakapalle for the period from 01-01-2018 to 31-03-2018.
Yours faithfully
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
Encl: Statement ANAKAPALLE
STATEMENT SHOWING THE REALIZATION OF COURT FEE IN PAUPER SUITS
RELATING TO PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE’S COURT, ANAKAPALLE FOR THE
1ST QUARTER ENDING BY 31-03-2018.
S.No.Suit NumberDate ofAmount of C.F.Payable byWhen sent District decreeAwarded towhomCollector, GovernmentVisakhapatnam Dis.N.& Date. ---NIL---
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
Date of Presentatio:23-01-2014 Date of Filing: 24-01-2014
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Wednesday, this the 22nd day of November, 2017
HMOP.NO.03/2014
Between: Payala Jyothi, W/o Srilnivasu, C/o. Palli Rajeswara Rao, Hindu, age 24 years, House holdl dutiles, residing at 4-15. Ummalada village, Munagapaka Mandal,l Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner And:
Payala Srilnivasu, S/o Rajeswara Rao, age 35 yealrs, Residing at Door No.3-4- 26/1, Telephone Exchange street, Narasingaraopeta, Anakapalle, Visakhapatnam District. Respondent
Petition filed under Sec.9 of Hindu marriage Act.
This is a petition filed by the petitioner-wife against the respondent-
Husband to directing the respondent to come to the house of the petitioner and live with him for discharging her conjugal obligations and for costs of the petition.
A fixed court fee of Rs.10-00 is paid under Sch.II Art.I(vii) of A.P.C.F. and
S.V.Act.
This petition coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri K.Chandra Sekhar,K.Gangadhararao, Advocates for petitioner and of Sri V.Rajasekhar, Advocate for Respondent. Both parties called present.Petitioner filed memo not pressing this petition in view of the compromise arrived between the parties before the elders. Memo is recoraded and this Court doth order and:
DECREE
1) that the petition be and the same is hereby dismissed as not pressed;
2) that there be no costs
Given under my hand and theseal of this court, this the 22nd day of November, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PETITIONER: FOR RESPONDENT;
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Thursday, this the 30 th day of November, 2017
HMOP.NO.3/2012
Between: Pasupuletil Jyothi, W/o Chandrarao, Hindu, age 23 years, housewife, residing at D.No.9-47, C/o Kudirella Sanyasirao, Munagapaka village and Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner And:
Pasupuleti Chandrarao,S/o Nooka Raju , Hindu, age 26 years, employee, Command Musician office, Head quarters Eastern Naval Command, Naval Base(P.O) D.Nop.15-7-12/2, Visakhapatnam-14.
Respondent
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of SriV.V.Jogayya and M.Srilnivasarao, Advocates for petitioner and of Sri A.S.V.Prasad, Advocate for Respondent. Both parties called petitioner absent. Respondent is present. No representation for petitioner side .The counsel for the Respondent filed ecourts copy of orders in OP33/2012.No representation. Hence the matter is dismissed for default and this Court delivered the following:
ORDER
Petition filed under Sec.9 of Hindu marriage Act.
This is a petition filed by the petitioner-wife against the respondent-husband lfor restitution of conjugal life of the petitio;ner with the rekskpondent, directing the respondent to laead happy marital lifle lwilth the petiltioner and lfor costs of the petition.
Objectio;nsl not filed. Both parties called. Petitioner absent. Respondent is present. No rsepresentation for petitioner side. The counsel for the
Respondent filed ecourts copy of orders in O.P.33/2012 on the file of Additional
Family Court, visakhapatnam allowing the application and granting decree of divorce on the ground of cruelty under these circumstlances dthis petition is dilsmissed in view of the orders passed by Honourable in O.P.33/2012 abetween the same parties grant ldecree of divorce.
Pronounced by me in open court, thisthe 30th day of November, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
Datae of Presentation:24-02-2012 Date of Filing:24-02-2012
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Thursday, this the 30 th day of November, 2017
HMOP.NO.3/2012
Between: Pasupuletil Jyothi, W/o Chandrarao, Hindu, age 23 years, housewife, residing at D.No.9-47, C/o Kudirella Sanyasirao, Munagapaka village and Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner And:
Pasupuleti Chandrarao,S/o Nooka Raju , Hindu, age 26 years, employee, Command Musician office, Head quarters Eastern Naval Command, Naval Base(P.O) D.Nop.15-7-12/2, Visakhapatnam-14.
Respondent
Petition filed under Sec.9 of Hindu marriage Act.
This is a petition filed by the petitioner-wife against the respondent-husband lfor restitution of conjugal life of the petitio;ner with the rekskpondent, directing the respondent to laead happy marital lifle lwilth the petiltioner and lfor costs of the petition.
A fixed court fee of Rs.10-00 is paid under Art.I (vii) ,Sch.II of Sec.10 of
A.P.C.F and S.V.Act.
This petition coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of SriV.V.Jogayya and M.Srilnivasarao, Advocates for petitioner and of
Sri A.S.V.Prasad, Advocate for Respondent. Both parties called petitioner absent. Respondent is present. No representation for petitioner side .The counsel for the Respondent filed ecourts copy of orders in OP33/2012 on the file of Addl.Family Court, Visakhapatnam allowing the applickation and lgrantaing decree of divorce on the ground of cruelty under these circumstances this petition is dismissed in view of the orders passed by the
Honourable Addl.Family Court, Visakhapatnam in OP33/2012 abetween the
same parties grant decree of divorce hence this Court doth order and:
DECREE
1) that the petition be and the same is hereby dismissed
2) that there be no costs;
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 30th day of November, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PETITIONER; FOR RESPONDENT:
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Tuesday, this the 24 th day of October, 2017
HMOP.NO.49/2013
Between: Alla Swarulpa @ Varaha Lalitha Sawarupa,W/o Rama Chandra Prasad, Hindu, age 19 years, Household duties, residing at Door No.19-4-17, Buddha Prakasa Rao Naidu gari street, Gavarapalem, Anakapalle.
Petitioner And:
Alla Rama Chandra Prasad, S/o China Apparao, Hindu, age 30 years, physically handicapped, residing at Door No.50-83-10, Madhura Nagar, Visakhapatnam- 16.
Respondent
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of SriBuddha Thrinadha Rao, Advocate for petitioner and of Sri K.Chandra Sekhar, Advocate for Respondent. Both parties called absent.No representation. Hence the matter is dismissed for default and this Court delivered the following:
ORDER
Petition filed under Sec.11 of Hindu marriage Act.
This is a petition filed by the petitioner against the respondent for dissolution of the marriage in between the petitioner and respondent performed on 13.02.2013 due to non consummation of marriage as null and void and for costs of the petition.
Both parties calasled absent. No representation on either side .Hence the matter is dismissed for default.
Pronounced by me in open court, thisthe 24th day of October, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Wednesday, this the 22nd day of November, 2017
HMOP.NO.03/2014
Between: Payala Jyothi, W/o Srilnivasu, C/o. Palli Rajeswara Rao, Hindu, age 24 years, House holdl dutiles, residing at 4-15. Ummalada village, Munagapaka Mandal,l Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner And:
Payala Srilnivasu, S/o Rajeswara Rao, age 35 yealrs, Residing at Door No.3-4- 26/1, Telephone Exchange street, Narasingaraopeta, Anakapalle, Visakhapatnam District.
Respondent
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of SriK.Chandra Sekhar,K.Gangadhararao, Advocates for petitioner and of Sri V.Rajasekhar, Advocate for Respondent. Both parties called present.Petitioner filed memo not pressing this petition in view of the compromise arrived between the parties before the elders. Memo is recoraded and this Court delivered the following:
ORDER
Petition filed under Sec.9 of Hindu marriage Act.
This is a petition filed by the petitioner-wife against the respondent-Husband to directing the respondent to come to the house of the petitioner and live with him for discharging her conjugal obligations and for costs of the petition.
Both parties called present. Petitioner filed memo not pressing this petition inveiw of the compromise arrived between the parties before the elders. Heard. Memo is recorded. Accordingly this petition is dismissed without costs as not pressed.
Pronounced by me in open court, thisthe 22nd day of November, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Tuesday, this the 24 th day of October, 2017
HMOP.NO.49/2013
Between: Alla Swarulpa @ Varaha Lalitha Sawarupa,W/o Rama Chandra Prasad, Hindu, age 19 years, Household duties, residing at Door No.19-4-17, Buddha Prakasa Rao Naidu gari street, Gavarapalem, Anakapalle.
Petitioner And:
Alla Rama Chandra Prasad, S/o China Apparao, Hindu, age 30 years, physically handicapped, residing at Door No.50-83-10, Madhura Nagar, Visakhapatnam- 16.
Respondent
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of SriBuddha Thrinadha Rao, Advocate for petitioner and of Sri K.Chandra Sekhar, Advocate for Respondent. Both parties called absent.No representation. Hence the matter is dismissed for default and this Court delivered the following:
ORDER
Petition filed under Sec.11 of Hindu marriage Act.
This is a petition filed by the petitioner against the respondent for dissolution of the marriage in between the petitioner and respondent performed on 13.02.2013 due to non consummation of marriage as null and void and for costs of the petition.
Both parties calasled absent. No representation on either side .Hence the matter is dismissed for default.
Pronounced by me in open court, thisthe 24th day of October, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Wednesday, this the 22nd day of November, 2017
HMOP.NO.03/2014
Between: Payala Jyothi, W/o Srilnivasu, C/o. Palli Rajeswara Rao, Hindu, age 24 years, House holdl dutiles, residing at 4-15. Ummalada village, Munagapaka Mandal,l Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner And:
Payala Srilnivasu, S/o Rajeswara Rao, age 35 yealrs, Residing at Door No.3-4- 26/1, Telephone Exchange street, Narasingaraopeta, Anakapalle, Visakhapatnam District.
Respondent
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of SriK.Chandra Sekhar,K.Gangadhararao, Advocates for petitioner and of Sri V.Rajasekhar, Advocate for Respondent. Both parties called present.Petitioner filed memo not pressing this petition in view of the compromise arrived between the parties before the elders. Memo is recoraded and this Court delivered the following:
ORDER
Petition filed under Sec.9 of Hindu marriage Act.
This is a petition filed by the petitioner-wife against the respondent-Husband to directing the respondent to come to the house of the petitioner and live with him for discharging her conjugal obligations and for costs of the petition.
Both parties called present. Petitioner filed memo not pressing this petition inveiw of the compromise arrived between the parties before the elders. Heard. Memo is recorded. Accordingly this petition is dismissed without costs as not pressed.
Pronounced by me in open court, thisthe 22nd day of November, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Tuesday, this the 24 th day of October, 2017
HMOP.NO.49/2013
Between: Alla Swarulpa @ Varaha Lalitha Sawarupa,W/o Rama Chandra Prasad, Hindu, age 19 years, Household duties, residing at Door No.19-4-17, Buddha Prakasa Rao Naidu gari street, Gavarapalem, Anakapalle.
Petitioner And:
Alla Rama Chandra Prasad, S/o China Apparao, Hindu, age 30 years, physically handicapped, residing at Door No.50-83-10, Madhura Nagar, Visakhapatnam- 16.
Respondent
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of SriBuddha Thrinadha Rao, Advocate for petitioner and of Sri K.Chandra Sekhar, Advocate for Respondent. Both parties called absent.No representation. Hence the matter is dismissed for default and this Court delivered the following:
ORDER
Petition filed under Sec.11 of Hindu marriage Act.
This is a petition filed by the petitioner against the respondent for dissolution of the marriage in between the petitioner and respondent performed on 13.02.2013 due to non consummation of marriage as null and void and for costs of the petition.
Both parties calasled absent. No representation on either side .Hence the matter is dismissed for default.
Pronounced by me in open court, thisthe 24th day of October, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:19-11-2013 Date of Filing:25-11-2013
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Tuesday, this the 24 th day of October, 2017
HMOP.NO.49/2013
Between: Alla Swarulpa @ Varaha Lalitha Sawarupa,W/o Rama Chandra Prasad, Hindu, age 19 years, Household duties, residing at Door No.19-4-17, Buddha Prakasa Rao Naidu gari street, Gavarapalem, Anakapalle.
Petitioner And:
Alla Rama Chandra Prasad, S/o China Apparao, Hindu, age 30 years, physically handicapped, residing at Door No.50-83-10, Madhura Nagar, Visakhapatnam- 16.
Respondent
Petition filed under Sec.11 of Hindu marriage Act.
This is a petition filed by the petitioner against the respondent for dissolution of the marriage in between the petitioner and respondent performed on 13.02.2013 due to non consummation of marriage as null and void and for costs of the petition.
A fixed court fee of Rs.10-00 ils paid under Sch.II Art.I (Vii) of A.P.C.F. and
S.V.Act.
This petition coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of SriBuddha Thrinadha Rao, Advocate for petitioner and of Sri
K.Chandra Sekhar, Advocate for Respondent. Both parties called absent.No representation. Hence the matter is dismissed for default and this Court doth order and:
DECREE
1) that the petition be and the same is hereby dismissed for default;
2) that there be no order as to costs;
Given under my hand and the seal of thi court, this the 24th day of October, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PETITIONER: FOR RESPONDSENT;
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Tuesday, this the 24 th day of October, 2017
HMOP.NO.49/2013
Between: Alla Swarulpa @ Varaha Lalitha Sawarupa,W/o Rama Chandra Prasad, Hindu, age 19 years, Household duties, residing at Door No.19-4-17, Buddha Prakasa Rao Naidu gari street, Gavarapalem, Anakapalle.
Petitioner And:
Alla Rama Chandra Prasad, S/o China Apparao, Hindu, age 30 years, physically handicapped, residing at Door No.50-83-10, Madhura Nagar, Visakhapatnam- 16.
Respondent
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of SriBuddha Thrinadha Rao, Advocate for petitioner and of Sri
K.Chandra Sekhar, Advocate for Respondent. Both parties called absent.No representation. Hence the matter is dismissed for default and this Court delivered the following:
ORDER
Petition filed under Sec.11 of Hindu marriage Act.
This is a petition filed by the petitioner against the respondent for dissolution of the marriage in between the petitioner and respondent performed on 13.02.2013 due to non consummation of marriage as null and void and for costs of the petition.
Both parties calasled absent. No representation on either side .Hence the matter is dismissed for default.
Pronounced by me in open court, thisthe 24th day of October, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentatioin:22-11-2010 Date of Fililng: 22-11-2010
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Wednesday, this the 27 th day of December, 2017
LAOP.NO.125/2012 Between:
1) Sri Karaka Kalyanam S/o late Jaggunaidu, Jamudulapalem village, Bayyavaram ,Kasimkota Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
2) Karaka Sambhamurthy, S/o late Jagunaidu, Jamudulapalem village, Bayyavaram, Kasimkota Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
Claimants And:
Special Tahsildar, Land Acquisition officer, Revenue Division, Visakhapatnam Bayyavaram, Kasimkota, Visakhapatnam District.
Referring officer.
This is a reference made under Sec.30 &31 of Land Acquisition Act by the Special Tahasildar Land Acquisition Revenue Division Visakhapatnam for formation of Left canal to reservoir across Rangabolupgedda in Bayyavaram village for an extent of Ac.0.063/4 cents iln S.No.664/4B, 664/10/A ,Bayyavaram village of Kasimkota Mandal.
In this reference there are 2 (two) claimants.
The LAO deposited an amount of Rs.11,03,066-00 towards compensation amount for the Award No.22/2006 dated 20-12-2005 and the same was kept in
FDR of State Bank of India, Anakapalle.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in person and of Sri Asst.Government Pleader for Referring officer. Claimant called absent.
Claim statement not filed. No representation. Hence reference is closed and this Court doth order and:
DECREE
1) that L.A.O.P petition be and thesame is hereby closed as claimant called absent No representation;
2) that there be no order as to costs.
Given under my handk and the seal of this court, this the 27th day of December, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR CLAIMANTS: FOR REFERING OFFICER;
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Wednesday, this the 27 th day of December, 2017
LAOP.NO.125/2012 Between:
1) Sri Karaka Kalyanam S/o late Jaggunaidu, Jamudulapalem village, Bayyavaram ,Kasimkota Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
2) Karaka Sambhamurthy, S/o late Jagunaidu, Jamudulapalem village, Bayyavaram, Kasimkota Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
Claimants And:
Special Tahsildar, Land Acquisition officer, Revenue Division, Visakhapatnam Bayyavaram, Kasimkota, Visakhapatnam District.
Referring officer.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in person and of Sri Asst.Government Pleader for Referring officer. Claimant called absent. Claim statement not filed. No representation. Hence reference ils closed and this Court delivered the following:
ORDER
This is a reference made under Sec.30 &31 of Land Acquisition Act by the Special Tahasildar Land Acquisition Revenue Division Visakhapatnam for formation of Left canal to reservoir across Rangabolupgedda in Bayyavaram village for an extent of Ac.0.063/4 cents iln S.No.664/4B, 664/10/A ,Bayyavaram village of Kasimkota Mandal.
In this reference there are 2 (two) claimants.
The LAO deposited an amount of Rs.11,03,066-00 towards compensation amount for the Award No.22/2006 dated 20-12-2005 and the same was kept in
FDR of State Bank of India, Anakapalle.
Claim statement not filed. Claimant called absent. No representation.
Perusal of record reveals the claimant present in person on 28.08.2012 thereafter matter ils posted for time to time for filing claim statement. So far no claim statement ils filled till today. Today also clailmant calaled absent. No representation. Hence reference is closed consign the record toi record room.
Pronounced by me in open court, thisthe 27th day of December, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
LIST OF DOCUMENTS
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Friday, this the 5th day of January, 2018
SOP.NO.74/2017 Between: 1)Ganta Venkatesh,S/o late Neeladri Rao,lHilndu, age 21 years, unemployee, residing at D.No.3-3-69, NTR colony, Sirasapalli (village) Narasingaraopeta (PO) Visakhapatnam District.
2) Ganta Satyadevi,D/o Neeladri Rao, Hilndu, age 22 years, residing at D.No. 3-3-69, NTR colonyl, Sirasapalli village, Narasingaraopeta P.O. Visakhapatnam District. Petitioners And:
The Depot Manager, A.P.S.R.T.C, Visakha Steel City Depot, Kurmannapalem, Visakhapatnam-5300046.
Respondant
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri V.Apparao, Advocate for Petitioners. Petitioner called absent No representation and this Court delivered the following:
ORDER
This is a petition filed under 372 of the Indian Succession Act, 1954.
This is a petition filed by the petitioners to issue succession certificate in favour of the petitioners to receive the amounts as shown in the schedule from the respondent and for other reliefs.
Petitioner called absent No representation hence petition is dismissed for default.
Pronounced by me in open court, this the 5th day of January, 2018.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
LIST OF DOCUMENTS
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:25-11-2017
Date of Filing:01-12-2017
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Friday, this the 5th day of January, 2018
SOP.NO.74/2017 Between: 1)Ganta Venkatesh,S/o late Neeladri Rao,lHilndu, age 21 years, unemployee, residing at D.No.3-3-69, NTR colony, Sirasapalli (village) Narasingaraopeta (PO) Visakhapatnam District.
2) Ganta Satyadevi,D/o Neeladri Rao, Hilndu, age 22 years, residing at D.No. 3-3-69, NTR colonyl, Sirasapalli village, Narasingaraopeta P.O. Visakhapatnam District. Petitioners And:
The Depot Manager, A.P.S.R.T.C, Visakha Steel City Depot, Kurmannapalem, Visakhapatnam-5300046.
Respondant
This is a petition filed under 372 of the Indian Succession Act, 1954.
This is a petition filed by the petitioners to issue succession certificate in favour of the petitioners to receive the amounts as shown in the schedule from the respondent and for other reliefs.
A court fee of Rs.10/- is paid under Art.VII of Sch.I of APCF and SVAct.
This petition coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri V.Apparao, Advocate for Petitioners. Petitioner called absent No representation and this Court doth order and:
DECREE
1) that the petition be and the same is hereby dismissed for default;
2) that there be no order as to costs;
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 5th day of January, 2018.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PETITIONER: FOR RESPONDENT;
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:19-04-2014 Date of Filing:30-04-2014
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Friday, this the 19th day of January, 2018
HMOP.NO.26/2014
Between: Nanibilli Nookaraju,S/o late Baburao, Hindu, age 30 years, Driver, resident of Door No. Tegada village, Kasimkota Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
Petitioner And:
Nanibilli Nagalakshmi,lW/o Nookaraju, Hindu, age 22 years, housewife, residing at C/o Pasupuleti Eswararao, Door No. Kandipudi villlage, Butchiyyapeta and Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
Respondant
This is a petition filed under Sec.13(1) (ia) and (ib) of H.M.Act.
This is a petition filed by the petitioners (a) for grant of decree of divorce by dissolving the marriage between the petitioner and respondent on 12.11.2011 on the ground of cruelty and desertion and for costs of the suit.
A fixed court fee of Rs.10/- is paid under Art.IL (vii) Sch.II of A.P.C.F. and
S.V.Act.
This petition coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri K.S.Achari and Sri G.Krilshnaveni, Advocates for Petitioner and of Sri K.David, Advocate for Respondent. Both parties called absent No representation on either side hence this Court doth order and :
DECREE
1) that the petition be and the same is hereby dismissed for defaualt;
2) that there be no order as to costs;
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 19th day of January, 2018.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PETITIONER: FOR RESPONDENT;
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Friday, this the 19th day of January, 2018
HMOP.NO.26/2014
Between: Nanibilli Nookaraju,S/o late Baburao, Hindu, age 30 years, Driver, resident of Door No. Tegada village, Kasimkota Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
Petitioner And:
Nanibilli Nagalakshmi,lW/o Nookaraju, Hindu, age 22 years, housewife, residing at C/o Pasupuleti Eswararao, Door No. Kandipudi villlage, Butchiyyapeta and Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
Respondant
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri K.S.Achari and Sri G.Krilshnaveni, Advocates for Petitioner and of Sri K.David, Advocate for Respondent. Both parties called absent No representation on either side hence this Court delivered the following:
ORDER
This is a petition filed under Sec.13(1) (ia) and (ib) of H.M.Act.
This is a petition filed by the petitioners (a) for grant of decree of divorce by dissolving the marriage between the petitioner and respondent on 12.11.2011 on the ground of cruelty and desertion and for costs of the suit.
Both parties called absent No representation on either side hence the petition is dismissed for default.
Pronounced by me in open court, this the 19th day of January, 2018.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
LIST OF DOCUMENTS
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:02-11-2005 Date of Filing:29-11-2005
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Thursday, this the 31st day of August, 2017
I.P.No.13/2005 Between: Naga Manikyam wife of Tatayyalu, age 70 years, Hindu, No occupation, residing at Nagavamsam Veedhi, Anakapalle.
Petitioner. And:
1. Ravi Seshukumari, wife of Sreenivasarao, age 25 yearsl, Hindu, Household duties, residing at Dondaparthi, Visakhapatnam-16.
2. Naga Laxmikantam, wife of Ramana,l age 35 years, Hindu, residing near Santabyalu, Vaddadi village, Visakhapatnam District.
3. Yelugula Ramana, son of Apparao, age 40 years, Allikhanudupalem, Anakapalle Mandal.
4. Rayi Bullemma, wife of Jagannadham, age 50 years, hindu, Lokavari veedhi, Anakapalle.
5.Nagumalla Sanyasamma, wife of Venkatarao, age 60 years, Hindu, Maturu village, Anakakpalle Mandal.
6.Kolluru Pramod Kumar, son of Narasingarao, age 35 years, Hindu, Main road,Anakapalle.
7.Palukuril Kamaraju, son of Sreeramamurthy,l age 35 years, Hindu, business, residing at Anjayya colony, Anakapalle.
Respondants.
This is a petition filed by the petitioner against the respondents(a) to declare the petitioner as an insolvent and discharge her from her creditors and for costs of the petition.
A fixed court fees of Rs.50/- is paid on this petition under Sch.II.Article II of ACF and S.V.;Act. An amount of Rs.1500/- paid towards administrative charges and publication by way of challan No.2081, dated 28.10.2005.
This petiltion coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri P.S.Kumar and Sri P.A.Narasimham, Advocates for Petitioner .
As memo filed vide GR.No.1563/dt.07.07.2017 petitioner died and this Court doth order and:
DECREE
1) that the Insolvent petition be and the same is hereby closed as petitioner died;
2) that there be no order as to costs; ( copy of petition A and B schedule hereto enclosed)
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 31st day of August,2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PETITIONER: FOR RESPONDENTS;
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Thursday, this the 31st day of August, 2017
I.P.No.13/2005 Between: Naga Manikyam wife of Tatayyalu, age 70 years, Hindu, No occupation, residing at Nagavamsam Veedhi, Anakapalle.
Petitioner. And:
1. Ravi Seshukumari, wife of Sreenivasarao, age 25 yearsl, Hindu, Household duties, residing at Dondaparthi, Visakhapatnam-16.
2. Naga Laxmikantam, wife of Ramana,l age 35 years, Hindu, residing near Santabyalu, Vaddadi village, Visakhapatnam District.
3. Yelugula Ramana, son of Apparao, age 40 years, Allikhanudupalem, Anakapalle Mandal.
4. Rayi Bullemma, wife of Jagannadham, age 50 years, hindu, Lokavari veedhi, Anakapalle 5.Nagumalla Sanyasamma, wife of Venkatarao, age 60 years, Hindu, Maturu village, Anakakpalle Mandal. 6.Kolluru Pramod Kumar, son of Narasingarao, age 35 years, Hindu, Main road,Anakapalle. 7.Palukuril Kamaraju, son of Sreeramamurthy,l age 35 years, Hindu, business, residing at Anjayya colony, Anakapalle.
Respondants.
This petiltion coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri P.S.Kumar and Sri P.A.Narasimham, Advocates for Petitioner . As memo filed vide GR.No.1563/dt.07.07.2017 petitioner died and this Court delivered the following:
ORDER
This is a petition filed by the petitioner against the respondents(a) to declare the petitioner as an insolvent and discharge her from her creditors and for costs of the petition.
As memo filed vide GR.No.1563/dt.07.07.2017 as petitioner/insolvent died the petition is closed.
Pronounced by me in open court, this the 31st day of August, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
LIST OF DOCUMENTS
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation: 30-10-2012/15-11-2012 Date of Fililng: 15-11-2012
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Thursday, this the 22nd day of December,2017
I.P.No.04/2012 Between:
1.Vaddi Raju, S/o Appalaraju, age 35 years, residing at D.No.1-169, Ramakpuram colony, A.M.A.L.College road, Kothuru village andl panchayat, Anakapalle Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
Petitioner. And:
1. Afoz Bhanu,W/o Muzzafer Shariff, age 35 years, Muslim, residing at Flat No.F.2, K.C. Apartments, near Saibaba Temple, Sarada Nagar, Anakapalle,Visakhapatnam District. 2.Md.Fathilma, husband’s namek not known to the petitioner, C/o Afoz Bhanu, W/o Muzzafer Shariff, age 28 ayears, Hindu, residing at Flat No.F.2, K.C.Akpartments, near Saibaba Temple, Sarada Nagar, Anakapalle, Visakhapatnam District.
3. Md. Ahamad, S/o Md.Abdul Rawoof, age 30 years, Muslim, residing at D.No. 7-48/1, Muslims steet, Pedda Bazar, Kasimkota village and mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
4. M.Sameema, W/o Md.Abdul Rawoof, age 40 years, Muslim, residing at D.No.7-48/1, Muslims street, Pedda Bazar, Kasimkota village and mandal, Visakhapatnam District. 5.Zameela Begum, D/o Md.Abdul Rawoof, age 25 years, Muslim, resilding at D.No.7-48/1, Muslims street, Pedda Bazar,l Kasimkota village and mandal, Visakhapatnam District. 6.Shaik Halima, W/o Mohaddin,l age 30 years, Muslim care of M.Swarna Lakshmi, Teacher, opposite Ramalayam, D.No.12-4-105, Pudimadaka raod, Anakapalle, Visakhapatnam District. 7.Karim, father’s name not known to the petitioner,l age 28 years, Muslim, residing at care of M.Swarna Lakshmi, Teacher, opposite Ramalayam, D.No.12-4-105, pudimadaka road, Anakapalle, Vilsakhapatnam Dilstrict. 8.A.Arjunarao, father’s name not known to the petitioner, age 32 years, Teacher in A.M.A.A. High School, residing at D.No.2-139, near K.L.N.Parlour, A.M.A.L. college road, Kothuru village, Anakapalle mandal, Visakhapatnam District. 9.Bobbili Anatha Lakshmi W/o Bobbilil Appalaraju, age 25 years, Hindu, Teacher,l residing at Vijayaramarajupeta, Anakapalle, Visakhapatnam District.
Respondants.
Petitioner to declare the as insolvent person ( indigent person) and discharge him from all of theliabilities and debts due to the respondents and or costs of the petition.
A court fee of Rs.10/- is paid under Art.11(L)2(ili) of Sch.ILI of A.P.C.F. and
S.V.Act.
This petiltion coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri S.Narasingarao, I.R.Gangadhar, Advocates for Petitioner and petitioner called present filed memo not pressing the petition. Memo is recorded and this Court doth order and :
DECREE
1) that the Insolvent petition be and the same is hereby dismissed as not pressed;
2) that there be no order as to costs; ( copy of petition A and B schedule hereto enclosed)
Pronounced by me in open court, this the 22nd day of December,2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PETITIONER: FOR RESPONDENTS;
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Thursday, this the 22nd day of December,2017
I.P.No.04/2012 Between:
1.Vaddi Raju, S/o Appalaraju, age 35 years, residing at D.No.1-169, Ramakpuram colony, A.M.A.L.College road, Kothuru village andl panchayat, Anakapalle Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
Petitioner. And:
1. Afoz Bhanu,W/o Muzzafer Shariff, age 35 years, Muslim, residing at Flat No.F.2, K.C. Apartments, near Saibaba Temple, Sarada Nagar, Anakapalle,Visakhapatnam District. 2.Md.Fathilma, husband’s namek not known to the petitioner, C/o Afoz Bhanu, W/o Muzzafer Shariff, age 28 ayears, Hindu, residing at Flat No.F.2, K.C.Akpartments, near Saibaba Temple, Sarada Nagar, Anakapalle, Visakhapatnam District.
3. Md. Ahamad, S/o Md.Abdul Rawoof, age 30 years, Muslim, residing at D.No. 7-48/1, Muslims steet, Pedda Bazar, Kasimkota village and mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
4. M.Sameema, W/o Md.Abdul Rawoof, age 40 years, Muslim, residing at D.No.7-48/1, Muslims street, Pedda Bazar, Kasimkota village and mandal, Visakhapatnam District. 5.Zameela Begum, D/o Md.Abdul Rawoof, age 25 years, Muslim, resilding at D.No.7-48/1, Muslims street, Pedda Bazar,l Kasimkota village and mandal, Visakhapatnam District. 6.Shaik Halima, W/o Mohaddin,l age 30 years, Muslim care of M.Swarna Lakshmi, Teacher, opposite Ramalayam, D.No.12-4-105, Pudimadaka raod, Anakapalle, Visakhapatnam District. 7.Karim, father’s name not known to the petitioner,l age 28 years, Muslim, residing at care of M.Swarna Lakshmi, Teacher, opposite Ramalayam, D.No.12-4-105, pudimadaka road, Anakapalle, Vilsakhapatnam Dilstrict. 8.A.Arjunarao, father’s name not known to the petitioner, age 32 years, Teacher in A.M.A.A. High School, residing at D.No.2-139, near K.L.N.Parlour, A.M.A.L. college road, Kothuru village, Anakapalle mandal, Visakhapatnam District. 9.Bobbili Anatha Lakshmi W/o Bobbilil Appalaraju, age 25 years, Hindu, Teacher,l residing at Vijayaramarajupeta, Anakapalle, Visakhapatnam District.
Respondants.
This petiltion coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri S.Narasingarao, I.R.Gangadhar, Advocates for Petitioner and petitioner called present filed memo not pressing the petition. Memo is recorded and this Court delivered the following:
ORDER
Petitioner to declare the as insolvent person ( indigent person) and discharge him from all of theliabilities and debts due to the respondents; and or costs of the suit.
Petitioner called present filed memo not pressing the petition. Heard.
Memo is recorded. This petition dismissed as not pressed.
Pronounced by me in open court, this the 22nd day of December,2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
LIST OF DOCUMENTS
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentatioin:21-03-2012
Date of Filing:09-04-2012
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Wednesday, this thw 24th day of January, 2018.
I.P.No.01/2012 Between: 1.Doddi Naga Mophana Rao, S/o late Appa Rao, Hindu, age 32 years, cultivation, residing at Nagulapalli village, Munagapaka Mandal. 2.Polamarasetty Adi Murthy, S/o Apparao, Hindu, age 35 yealrs, cultivation, residing at Teacher’s colonyl, 3rd line, Nagulapalli village, Munagapaka Mandal.
3.Yellapu Sasi Bhushanam Rao, S/o late Kondala Rao, Hindu, age 47 years, residing at D.No.15-19-6, P.V.R.Naidu street, Opp. Women college, Gavarapalem, Anakapalli. Petitioners. And:
1.Yellapu Mangayyamma,W/o late Appa Rao, Hindu, age 48 years, business, residing at D.No.2-13-13,l Bo;ddeda vari veedhi,l Vijayaramarajupeta, Anakapalli. 2.Yellapu Venkata Nooka Apparao, S/o late Apparao, Hindu, age 30 years, business, rest-do-
3. Yellapu Vani, W/o Venkata Nooka Appa Rao, Hindu, age 23 years, business, C/o Pentakota Ramana, D.No.6-42-4, TVN colony,besides drivaer’s colony, Old Gajuwaka, Visakhapatnam District.
4. Adari Tilak, W/o Srinivasa Rao, Hindu, age 23 years, Business, residing at C/o Adari Rama Ra;o, Door No.14-13, Opp. Pada Gas Godown Court veedhi, Gandhinagaram, Anakapalli.
5. Yellapu Rama Krishna, S/o late Nooka Raju, Hindu, age 42 years, employee, residing at Door No.2-13-13 rest -do-.
Respondants.
This is a petition filed U/Sec.9 of provincial Insolvency Act praying to adjudge the respondent No.1 as insolvent ;(b) to appoint an interim receiver in respect of the estate of 1st respondent i.e. “B” schedule property; (c) to make an order directing the official receiver to take actual physical possession over the”B” schedule property.
A fixed court fee of Rs.10-00 is paid thereon under Sectilon 20 ScheduleI
Art.II(a) of APCF and S.V.Act. Administrative charges of Rs.2000/- is paid vide challan No.6604 dated 29.03.2012.
This petiltion coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri Budha Trinadha Rao, Advocate for Petiltioners and No evidence isfiled the petitioners called absent No representatilon and this Court doth order and :
DECREE
1) that the Insolvency petition be and the same is hereby dismissed for default;
2) that there be no order as to costs; ( Copy of petition A and B schedule hereto enclosed)
Given under my hand and the seal of this court this the 24th day of January, 2018.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PETITIONERS: FOR RESPONDENTS;
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Wednesday, this thw 24th day of January, 2018.
I.P.No.01/2012 Between: 1.Doddi Naga Mophana Rao, S/o late Appa Rao, Hindu, age 32 years, cultivation, residing at Nagulapalli village, Munagapaka Mandal. 2.Polamarasetty Adi Murthy, S/o Apparao, Hindu, age 35 yealrs, cultivation, residing at Teacher’s colonyl, 3rd line, Nagulapalli village, Munagapaka Mandal.
3.Yellapu Sasi Bhushanam Rao, S/o late Kondala Rao, Hindu, age 47 years, residing at D.No.15-19-6, P.V.R.Naidu street, Opp. Women college, Gavarapalem, Anakapalli. Petitioners. And:
1.Yellapu Mangayyamma,W/o late Appa Rao, Hindu, age 48 years, business, residing at D.No.2-13-13,l Bo;ddeda vari veedhi,l Vijayaramarajupeta, Anakapalli. 2.Yellapu Venkata Nooka Apparao, S/o late Apparao, Hindu, age 30 years, business, rest-do-
3. Yellapu Vani, W/o Venkata Nooka Appa Rao, Hindu, age 23 years, business, C/o Pentakota Ramana, D.No.6-42-4, TVN colony,besides drivaer’s colony, Old Gajuwaka, Visakhapatnam District.
4. Adari Tilak, W/o Srinivasa Rao, Hindu, age 23 years, Business, residing at C/o Adari Rama Ra;o, Door No.14-13, Opp. Pada Gas Godown Court veedhi, Gandhinagaram, Anakapalli.
5. Yellapu Rama Krishna, S/o late Nooka Raju, Hindu, age 42 years, employee, residing at Door No.2-13-13 rest -do-.
Respondants.
This petiltion coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri Budha Trinadha Rao, Advocate for Petiltioners and No evidence isfiled the petitioners called absent No representatilon and this Court delivered the following:
ORDER
This is a petition filed U/Sec.9 of provincial Insolvency Act praying to adjudge the respondent No.1 as insolvent ;(b) to appoint an interim receiver in respect of the estate of 1st respondent i.e. “B” schedule property; (c) to make an order directing the official receiver to take actual physical possession over the”B” schedule property.
No evidence is filed the petitioner called absent No representation. Hence petition is dismissed for default.
Pronounced by me in open court, this the 24th day of January, 2018.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
LIST OF DOCUMENTS
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation: 20-10-2014 Date of Filing:20-04-2014
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Thursday, this the 1st day of February, 2018.
O.S.No.263/2014
Between: Penmetsa Vishnukumar Raju S/o Satyanarayana Raju, age 53 years, residing at Plot No.A-19, D.No.50-104-1/9, Seeethammadhara N.E.Layout, Visakhapatnam-13. Plaintiff. And:
1.Karri Bangarunaidu S/o Ramunaidu, age 52 years, residing at Asakapalli village, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
2.Karri Ramprasad S/o Ramunaidu, age 44 years, residing at Asakapalli village, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
Defendants.
Suit filed by the plaintilff against the defendants(a) to pass a decree to directilng the defendants to execute the register a sale deed in favour of the plaintiff in respect of the plaintk kschedule property interms of the agreement of sale executed by the defendants in favour of the plaintiff within time fixed by the court (b) in case if the defendants fail to execute and register a sale deed, the court may itself execute and register a sale deed for aand on behalf of the defendants in respect of theplailant schedule at the expenses of the plaintiff
(c) to put the plaiantiff’s in possessilon of the plailnt schedule after evicting the defendants therefrom (d) alternatively, if the court feels that for any reason, the relief of specific performance could not be awarded, directing the defendants to refund the advance sale consideration of Rs.5,24,160/- paid by the plaintiff under the agreement of sale dtogether with interest at 24% p.a. from the date of the agreement of sale till date of full land final reliazation and for costs of the suilt.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and Jurisdiction is valued at
Rs.5,24,160-00 and a court fee of Rs.7726/- is being paid under Sec.39, r/w
Sch.I Art.I (b) & (c) of A.P.C.F. and S.V.Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Smt. A.Bhanumathi and Sri V.Viswanadham,Advocates for plaintiff and of Sri
M.Srinivasarao and M.V.R.Bhupathirao, Advocates for 1st defendant and of Sri
S.P.Naidu and R.Appalanaidu, Advocates for 2nd defendant . Plaintiff filed memo not press the suit claim. Memo is recorded and this Court doth order and:
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed as not pressed;
2) that there be no costs; ( Copy of plaint schedule hereto enclosed)
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 01st day of February, 2018.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PLAINTIFF; FOR DEFENDANTS;
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Thursday, this the 1st day of February, 2018.
O.S.No.263/2014
Between: Penmetsa Vishnukumar Raju S/o Satyanarayana Raju, age 53 years,residing at Plot No.A-19, D.No.50-104-1/9, Seeethammadhara N.E.Layout, Visakhapatnam-13. Plaintiff. And:
1.Karri Bangarunaidu S/o Ramunaidu, age 52 years, residing at Asakapalli village, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
2.Karri Ramprasad S/o Ramunaidu, age 44 years, residing at Asakapalli village, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
Defendants.
This suit coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Smt. A.Bhanumathi and Sri V.Viswanadham,Advocates for plaintiff and of Sri M.Srinivasarao and M.V.R.Bhupathirao, Advocates for 1st defendant and of Sri S.P.Naidu and R.Appalanaidu, Advocates for 2nd defendant . Plaintiff filed memo not press the suit claim. Memo is recorded and this Court delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
Suit filed by the plaintilff against the defendants(a) to pass a decree to directilng the defendants to execute the register a sale deed iln favour of the plailntiff in respect of the plaintk kschedule property ilnterms of the agreement of sale executed by the defendants in favour of the plaintiff withiln time fixed by the court (b) in case if the defendants fail to execute and register a sale deed, the court may itself execute and register a sale deed for aand on behalf of the defendants in respect of theplailant schedule at the expenses of the plaintiff (c) to put the plaiantiff’s in possessilon of the plailnt schedule after evicting the defendants therefrom (d) alternatively, if the court feels that for any reason, the relief of specific performance could not be awarded, directing the defendants to refund the advance sale consideration of Rs.5,24,160/- paid by the plaintiff under the agreement of sale dtogether with interest at 24% p.a. from the date of the agreement of sale till date of full land final reliazattion and for costs of the suilt.
Plaintiff filed a memo not press the suit claim as matter was settled out of court. Hence memo is recorded the suilt is dismissed without costs as not pressed.
Pronounced by me in open court, this lthe 1st day of February, 2018.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
LIST OF DOCUMENTS
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Wednesday, this the 31st day of January, 2018.
O.S.No.199/2012
Between: Vennela Pydamma,W/o Somulu, Hindu, age 65 years, household duties, resildilng at D.No.8-4, Mettapalem village, lH/o Vada Cheepurupalli, Paraawada Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
Plaintiff. And:
1.Eerla Sreeramulu,S/o Musalayya, Hindu, age 52 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.7-56,Sriram Nagar, T.Devada, Steet project Office, Visakhapatnam-31.
2.Eerla Suryanarayana, S/o Musalayya, Hindu, age 50 years, cultivation, residilng at D.No.7-55, Sriram Nagar, T.Devada, Steel project Office, Visakhapatnam-31.
3.Eerla Vonumulu, S/o Musalayya, Hindu, age 48 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.30-71-1, Appikonda RH colonyll, Vadlapudi, Gajuwakal Mandal, Visakhapatnam-46.
4. Kundrapu Somulamma, W/o Mutyalu, Hindu, age 62 years, housewife, residing at D.No.30-7-1, Appikonda RH colony, Vadlapudi, Gajuwaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam-46.
5.Kundrapu Simhachalam W/o Appalanaidu, Hindu, age 86 years, residing at Door No.7-5, Sriram Nagar, T.Devada, Steel project office, Visakhapatnam-31.
6. Geddam Kpentamma, W/o Simhachalam, age 58 years, Hindu, Housewife, D.No.5-4, Hastinapuram, H/o Vada Cheepurupalli, Parawada mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
7. Ramineni Venkateswararao, S/o Basavayya, Hindu, age 45 years, business, resilding at D.No.10-32-6, Visalakshmi Nagar, Visakhapatnam.
Defendants.
This suit coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri V.V.Jogayya and Sri M.Srinivasarao, Advocates for the plaintiff and of Sri A.V.S.Bhavani Prasad, Advocate for defendant No.7 and defendants 1,3,4,6 remind exparte and suit against defendant 2 and 5 dismissed for default and this Court delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
Suit for partition of the plaint schedule properties at metes and bounds into seven equal shares and allot one such share to the plaintiff and such equal shares dto thedefendants 1 to 6, and deliver separate possession ofk such share so allotted to the plaintiff and defendants 1 to 6 on converting the joint possession into separate possession; for profits that can be determined by way of separate application; and for costs of the suit.
PW.1 called absent No representation. Hence the matter is dismissed for default.
Pronounced by me in open court, this lthe 31st day of January, 2018.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
FOR PLAINTIFF:-
P.W.1/ dt.8.12.2017 - Vennela Pydamma W/o Somulu.(Chief examination only)
FOR DEFENDANT:- NIL
LIST OF DOCUMENTS
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation: 16-08-2012
Date of Filing:16-08-2012
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Wednesday, this the 31st day of January, 2018.
O.S.No.199/2012
Between: Vennela Pydamma,W/o Somulu, Hindu, age 65 years, household duties, resildilng at D.No.8-4, Mettapalem village, lH/o Vada Cheepurupalli, Paraawada Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
Plaintiff. And:
1.Eerla Sreeramulu,S/o Musalayya, Hindu, age 52 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.7-56, Sriram Nagar, T.Devada, Steet project Office, Visakhapatnam-31.
2.Eerla Suryanarayana, S/o Musalayya, Hindu, age 50 years, cultivation, residilng at D.No.7-55, Sriram Nagar, T.Devada, Steel project Office, Visakhapatnam-31.
3.Eerla Vonumulu, S/o Musalayya, Hindu, age 48 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.30-71-1, Appikonda RH colonyll, Vadlapudi, Gajuwakal Mandal, Visakhapatnam-46.
4. Kundrapu Somulamma, W/o Mutyalu, Hindu, age 62 years, housewife, residing at D.No.30-7-1, Appikonda RH colony, Vadlapudi, Gajuwaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam-46.
5.Kundrapu Simhachalam W/o Appalanaidu, Hindu, age 86 years, residing at Door No.7-5, Sriram Nagar, T.Devada, Steel project office, Visakhapatnam-31.
6. Geddam Kpentamma, W/o Simhachalam, age 58 years, Hindu, Housewife, D.No.5-4, Hastinapuram, H/o Vada Cheepurupalli, Parawada mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
7. Ramineni Venkateswararao, S/o Basavayya, Hindu, age 45 years, business, resilding at D.No.10-32-6, Visalakshmi Nagar, Visakhapatnam.
Defendants.
Suit for partition of the plaint schedule properties at metes and bounds into seven equal shares and allot one such share to the plaintiff and such equal shares dto thedefendants 1 to 6, and deliver separate possession ofk such share so allotted to the plaintiff and defendants 1 to 6 on converting the joint possession into separate possession; for profits that can be determined by way of separate application; and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and Jurisdiction of this court
Valuel of the plaint schedule property consisting of Ac.5.00 cents and @
Rs.15,00,000/- per acre as per basic value register Rs. 16,05,000-00
Plaintiff’s 1/7th share Rs. 10,71,428-00 3/4th value share Rs. 8,03,571-00
C.F. of Rs.10,826-00 is payable, but a fixed court fee of Rs.200/- is paid under
Sec.34(2) of A.P.C.F. Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri V.V.Jogayya and Sri M.Srinivasarao, Advocates for the plaintiff and of Sri
A.V.S.Bhavani Prasad, Advocate for defendant No.7 and defendants 1,3,4,6 remind exparte and suit against defendant 2 and 5 dismissed for default and this Court doth order and ;
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed for default;
2) that there be no order as to costs;
Given under my hand and theseal of this court, this the 31st day of January, 2018.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PLAINTIFF; FOR DEFENDANTS;
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Friday, this the 23rd day of February, 2018.
O.S.No.189/2017
Between: Chekuri Ramaraju S/o Venkata Raju @ Venkatarao, Hindu, age 38 years, cultivation, resident of D.No.1-38, Melupaka village and post, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Plaintiff. And:
Gogula Srinivas S/o Narayana Murthy, Hindu, age 49 years, resident of D.No.1- 113, Melupaka village and post, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
Defendant.
This suit coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri M.Jayaram & Sri BSVRajagopal,Advocates for plaintiff. Plaintiff filed memo not press the suit . Memo is recorded and this Court delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
Suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for recovery oif
Rs.6,84,333/- being the principal and interest due under a promissory note
dated 05.06.2016 for Rs.5,00,000/- executed by the defendant in favour of
plaintiff agreeing to repay the same with interest at 24% p.a., and for costs of the suit.
I.A59 /2018 is allowed. Accordingly the matter is advanced to today from 23.02.2018.
The plaintiff is present. Plaintiff filed memo not pressing the suit as matter was settled out of court. Heard. Memo is recorded. Accordingly suit is dismissed without costs as not pressed.
Pronounced by me in open court, this lthe 1st day of February, 2018.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
LIST OF DOCUMENTS
NIL PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:19-12-2017
Date of Filing:19-12-2017
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Friday, this the 23rd day of February, 2018.
O.S.No.189/2017
Between: Chekuri Ramaraju S/o Venkata Raju @ Venkatarao, Hindu, age 38 years, cultivation, resident of D.No.1-38, Melupaka village and post, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Plaintiff. And:
Gogula Srinivas S/o Narayana Murthy, Hindu, age 49 years, resident of D.No.1- 113, Melupaka village and post, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
Defendant.
Suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for recovery oif
Rs.6,84,333/- being the principal and interest due under a promissory note
dated 05.06.2016 for Rs.5,00,000/- executed by the defendant in favour of
plaintiff agreeing to repay the same with interest at 24% p.a., and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and Jurisdiction is
Rs.6,84,333/- and a court fee of Rs.9,326/- is paid under Section 20 r/w Art.I(a) of A.P.C.F. and S.V.Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri M.Jayaram & Sri B.S.V.Rajagopal, Advocates for plaintiff. Plaintiff filed memo not press the suit . Memo is recorded and this Court doth order and:
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed as not pressed;
2) that there be no costs;
Pronounced by me in open court, this the 1st day of February, 2018.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PLAINTIFF; FOR DEFENDANT;
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Thursday, this the 8th day of February, 2018.
O.S.No.255/2013
Between: Panduri Satyarao S/o Simhachalam, Hindu, age 69 years, retired MPDO, Sabbavaram, N/o Venkatapuram village Munagapaka Mandal, presently, residing at D.No.14-38-1/A, Plot No.303, Viswanadh Residency, Maharanipeta, Visakhapatnam-2. Plaintiff. And:
1. Panduri Kanaka Apparao,s/o Late Nookaiah, Hindu, age 45 years, Resident of Venkatapuram village, Via: Paravada, Thanam Post, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
2. Panduri Ramalakshmi W/o Kanaka Apparao, Hindu, age 40 years, resident of Venkatapuram village, Via: Paravada, Thanam Post, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
3. Chinni China Appalanaidu @ Innabbai,S/o Sanyasi, Hindu, age 69 yearls, resident of Venkatapuram village, via; Paravada, Thanam post, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
Defendants.
This suit coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri B.V.R.Joga rao and Mr.R.Atchutharamaiah, Advocates for plaintiff and of Sri K.P.Naidu, Advocate of defendants. Costs not paid. PW.1 called absent. No representation. Hence the suit is dismissed for default and this Court delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
This is a suit for declaration that the plaintiff is the absolute owner of item No.6 of plaint schedule property, and for recovery of possession of the item No.6 of plaint schedule property after evicting the defendants their men, agents servants there from; for future profits till the delivaery of the possession of item No.6 of schedule property as to be determined in a separate enquiry under order 20 R.12 of CPC; (b) for a permanent injunction restraining the defendants their men, agents, servants, and representatives from ever interfering with plaintiff’s peaceful possession and enjoyment of items 1 to 5 of plaint schedule property in any manner and for costs of the suit.
Costs not paid. PW1 called absent. No representation. Hence the suilt is dismissed for default.
Pronounced by me in open court, this the 8th day of February, 2018.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
FOR PLAINTIFF:-
PW1/ Dt.9-6-2017/Panduri Satya Rao, S/o Simhachalam (chief affidavit only)
FOR DEFENDANT: NIL
LIST OF DOCUMENTS
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation: 26-12-2013 Date of Filing: 26-12-2013
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Thursday, this the 8th day of February, 2018.
O.S.No.255/2013
Between: Panduri Satyarao S/o Simhachalam, Hindu, age 69 years, retired MPDO, Sabbavaram, N/o Venkatapuram village Munagapaka Mandal, presently, residing at D.No.14-38-1/A, Plot No.303, Viswanadh Residency, Maharanipeta, Visakhapatnam-2. Plaintiff. And:
1. Panduri Kanaka Apparao,s/o Late Nookaiah, Hindu, age 45 years, Resident of Venkatapuram village, Via: Paravada, Thanam Post, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
2. Panduri Ramalakshmi W/o Kanaka Apparao, Hindu, age 40 years, resident of Venkatapuram village, Via: Paravada, Thanam Post, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
3. Chinni China Appalanaidu @ Innabbai,S/o Sanyasi, Hindu, age 69 yearls, resident of Venkatapuram village, via; Paravada, Thanam post, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
Defendants.
This is a suit for declaration that the plaintiff is the absolute owner of item No.6 of plaint schedule property, and for recovery of possession of the item No.6 of plaint schedule property after evicting the defendants their men, agents servants there from; for future profits till the delivaery of the possession of item No.6 of schedule property as to be determined in a separate enquiry under order 20 R.12 of CPC; (b) for a permanent injunction restraining the defendants their men, agents, servants, and representatives from ever interfering with plaintiff’s peaceful possession and enjoyment of items 1 to 5 of plaint schedule property in any manner and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suilt for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction is
Rs.10,000/- for relief of permanent injunction and Rs.1,20,000/- being 3/4th market value for relief of declaration and possession and CF of Rs.4,412/- is paid under Sec.26 (c) & 24(a) of A.P.C.F. and S.V.Act.
Total value of item-6 property Rs. 1,60,000-00 3/4th of the Market value is Rs. 1,20,000-00
Notional value of items 1 to 5 Rs. 10,000-00
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri B.V.R.Joga rao and Mr.R.Atchutharamaiah, Advocates for plaintiff and of
Sri K.P.Naidu, Advocate of defendants. Costs not paid. PW.1 called absent. No representation. Hence the suit is dismissed for default and this Court doth order and :
DECREE
1) that the suilt be and the same is hereby dismissed for default;
2) that there be no order as to costs; ( Copy of plaint schedule and valuation slip hereto enclosed)
Pronounced by me in open court, this the 8th day of February, 2018.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PLAINTIFF; FOR DEFENDANTS;
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Tuesday, this the 23rd day of January, 2018.
O.S.No.221/2013
Between: Gulla Sreeram Murthy S/o Chellanna Dora, Hindu, age 33 years, cultivation, resident of Door No.3-16, Buddibanda village H/o Kovagunta village, Vommali Jagannadhapuram post, Ravikamatham Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
Plaintiff. And:
1.Konathala Radhabhai, W/o Seetharam, Hindu, age years, House wife, resident of Door No.2-95, Sampathipuram village, Anakapalle Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
2. Central Bank of India, Main branch, Visakhapatnam represented by its Chief Manager, Visakhapatnam.
Defendants.
This suit coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Venkateswara Rao, Advocate for plaintiff and of Sri Ch.S.S.Ramachandrarao, Advocate for defendant No.2 and defendant No.1 remained exparte. Costs not paid. PW.1 called absent No representation on either side.Hence the suilt is dismissed for default and this Court delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
This is a suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant (a) for specific performance of the sale agreement dated 27.05.2005 by directing thedefendant to execute a regular sale deed on a proper stamp paper and register the samek in respect of the plaint schedule property in favoudr of the plaintiff and to do all the acts necaessary to put the plaintiff in possession with such time as the court fixes, ilf the 1st defendant, fails to execute the regular sale deed, the court may execute the same at the costs of the plaintiffl and recover the same from thedefendant (b) for an alternative relief foir refund of the advance amount of Rs.4,00,000/- with subsequent interest at the rate of 24% p.a. from the 1st defendant and for costs of the suilt.
Costs not paid. PW1 called absent. No representation on either side.
Hence the suit is dismissed for default.
Pronounced by me in open court, this the 23rd day of January, 2018.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIl
LIST OF DOCUMENTS
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
Date of presentation:22-11-2013 Date of Filing :22-11-2013
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Tuesday, this the 23rd day of January, 2018.
O.S.No.221/2013
Between: Gulla Sreeram Murthy S/o Chellanna Dora, Hindu, age 33 years, cultivation, resident of Door No.3-16, Buddibanda village H/o Kovagunta village, Vommali Jagannadhapuram post, Ravikamatham Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
Plaintiff. And:
1.Konathala Radhabhai, W/o Seetharam, Hindu, age years, House wife, resident of Door No.2-95, Sampathipuram village, Anakapalle Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
2. Central Bank of India, Main branch, Visakhapatnam represented by its Chief Manager, Visakhapatnam.
Defendants.
This is a suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant (a) for specific performance of the sale agreement dated 27.05.2005 by directing thedefendant to execute a regular sale deed on a proper stamp paper and register the samek in respect of the plaint schedule property in favoudr of the plaintiff and to do all the acts necaessary to put the plaintiff in possession with such time as the court fixes, ilf the 1st defendant, fails to execute the regular sale deed, the court may execute the same at the costs of the plaintiffl and recover the same from thedefendant (b) for an alternative relief foir refund of the advance amount of Rs.4,00,000/- with subsequent interest at the rate of 24% p.a. from the 1st defendant and for costs of the suilt.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and Jurisdiction is
Rs.4,00,000/- and a court fee of Rs.6,426/- is paid under Sec.39 of A.P.C.F. and
S.V.Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri G.Venkateswara Rao, Advocate for plaintiff and of Sri
Ch.S.S.Ramachandrarao, Advocate for defendant No.2 and defendant No.1 remained exparte. Costs not paid. PW.1 called absent No representation on either side. Hence the suilt is dismissed for default and this Court doth order and:
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed for default;
2) that there be no order as to costs; ( Copy of Plaint schedule hereto enclosed)
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 23rd day of January, 2018.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PLAINTIFF; FOR DEFENDANTS;
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:22-11-2010 Date of Filing: 22-11-2010
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle
Wednesday, this the 27 th day of December, 2017
LAOP.NO.125/2012 Between:
1) Sri Karaka Kalyanam S/o late Jaggunaidu, Jamudulapalem village, Bayyavaram ,Kasimkota Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
2) Karaka Sambhamurthy, S/o late Jagunaidu, Jamudulapalem village, Bayyavaram, Kasimkota Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
Claimants And:
Special Tahsildar, Land Acquisition officer, Revenue Division, Visakhapatnam Bayyavaram, Kasimkota, Visakhapatnam District.
Referring officer.
This is a reference made under Sec.30 &31 of Land Acquisition Act by the Special Tahasildar Land Acquisition Revenue Division Visakhapatnam for formation of Left canal to reservoir across Rangabolupgedda in Bayyavaram village for an extent of Ac.0.063/4 cents iln S.No.664/4B, 664/10/A ,Bayyavaram village of Kasimkota Mandal.
In this reference there are 2 (two) claimants.
The LAO deposited an amount of Rs.11,03,066-00 towards compensation amount for the Award No.22/2006 dated 20-12-2005 and the same was kept in
FDR of State Bank of India, Anakapalle.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in person and of Sri Asst.Government Pleader for Referring officer. Claimant called absent.
Claim statement not filed. No representation. Hence reference is closed and this Court doth order and:
DECREE
1) that L.A.O.P petition be and the same is hereby closed as claimant called absent No representation;
2) that there be no order as to costs.
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 27th day of December, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR CLAIMANTS: FOR REFERING OFFICER;
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Wednesday, this the 27 th day of December, 2017
LAOP.NO.125/2012 Between:
1) Sri Karaka Kalyanam S/o late Jaggunaidu, Jamudulapalem village, Bayyavaram ,Kasimkota Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
2) Karaka Sambhamurthy, S/o late Jagunaidu, Jamudulapalem village, Bayyavaram, Kasimkota Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
Claimants And:
Special Tahsildar, Land Acquisition officer, Revenue Division, Visakhapatnam Bayyavaram, Kasimkota, Visakhapatnam District.
Referring officer.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in person and of Sri Asst.Government Pleader for Referring officer. Claimant called absent. Claim statement not filed. No representation. Hence reference ils closed and this Court delivered the following:
ORDER
This is a reference made under Sec.30 &31 of Land Acquisition Act by the Special Tahasildar Land Acquisition Revenue Division Visakhapatnam for formation of Left canal to reservoir across Rangabolupgedda in Bayyavaram village for an extent of Ac.0.063/4 cents iln S.No.664/4B, 664/10/A ,Bayyavaram village of Kasimkota Mandal.
In this reference there are 2 (two) claimants.
The LAO deposited an amount of Rs.11,03,066-00 towards compensation amount for the Award No.22/2006 dated 20-12-2005 and the same was kept in
FDR of State Bank of India, Anakapalle.
Claim statement not filed. Claimant called absent. No representation.
Perusal of record reveals the claimant present in person on 28.08.2012 thereafter matter ils posted for time to time for filing claim statement. So far no claim statement ils filled till today. Today also clailmant calaled absent. No representation. Hence reference is closed consign the record toi record room.
Pronounced by me in open court, thisthe 27th day of December, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
LIST OF DOCUMENTS
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Friday, this the 5th day of January, 2018
SOP.NO.74/2017
Between: 1)Ganta Venkatesh,S/o late Neeladri Rao,lHilndu, age 21 years, unemployee, residing at D.No.3-3-69, NTR colony, Sirasapalli (village) Narasingaraopeta (PO) Visakhapatnam District.
2) Ganta Satyadevi,D/o Neeladri Rao, Hilndu, age 22 years, residing at D.No. 3-3-69, NTR colonyl, Sirasapalli village, Narasingaraopeta P.O. Visakhapatnam District. Petitioners And:
The Depot Manager, A.P.S.R.T.C, Visakha Steel City Depot, Kurmannapalem, Visakhapatnam-5300046.
Respondant
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri V.Apparao, Advocate for Petitioners. Petitioner called absent No representation and this Court delivered the following:
ORDER
This is a petition filed under 372 of the Indian Succession Act, 1954.
This is a petition filed by the petitioners to issue succession certificate in favour of the petitioners to receive the amounts as shown in the schedule from the respondent and for other reliefs.
Petitioner called absent No representation hence petition is dismissed for default.
Pronounced by me in open court, this the 5th day of January, 2018.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
LIST OF DOCUMENTS
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:25-11-2017
Date of Filing:01-12-2017
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle
Friday, this the 5th day of January, 2018
SOP.NO.74/2017 Between: 1)Ganta Venkatesh,S/o late Neeladri Rao,lHilndu, age 21 years, unemployee, residing at D.No.3-3-69, NTR colony, Sirasapalli (village) Narasingaraopeta (PO) Visakhapatnam District.
2) Ganta Satyadevi,D/o Neeladri Rao, Hilndu, age 22 years, residing at D.No. 3-3-69, NTR colonyl, Sirasapalli village, Narasingaraopeta P.O. Visakhapatnam District. Petitioners And:
The Depot Manager, A.P.S.R.T.C, Visakha Steel City Depot, Kurmannapalem, Visakhapatnam-5300046.
Respondant
This is a petition filed under 372 of the Indian Succession Act, 1954.
This is a petition filed by the petitioners to issue succession certificate in favour of the petitioners to receive the amounts as shown in the schedule from the respondent and for other reliefs.
A court fee of Rs.10/- is paid under Art.VII of Sch.I of APCF and SVAct.
This petition coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri V.Apparao, Advocate for Petitioners. Petitioner called absent No representation and this Court doth order and:
DECREE
1) that the petition be and the same is hereby dismissed for default;
2) that there be no order as to costs;
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 5th day of January, 2018.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PETITIONER: FOR RESPONDENT;
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:19-04-2014 Date of Filing:30-04-2014
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Friday, this the 19th day of January, 2018
HMOP.NO.26/2014
Between:
Nanibilli Nookaraju,S/o late Baburao, Hindu, age 30 years, Driver, resident of Door No. Tegada village, Kasimkota Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
Petitioner And:
Nanibilli Nagalakshmi,lW/o Nookaraju, Hindu, age 22 years, housewife, residing at C/o Pasupuleti Eswararao, Door No. Kandipudi villlage, Butchiyyapeta and Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
Respondant
This is a petition filed under Sec.13(1) (ia) and (ib) of H.M.Act.
This is a petition filed by the petitioners (a) for grant of decree of divorce by dissolving the marriage between the petitioner and respondent on 12.11.2011 on the ground of cruelty and desertion and for costs of the suit.
A fixed court fee of Rs.10/- is paid under Art.IL (vii) Sch.II of A.P.C.F. and
S.V.Act.
This petition coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri K.S.Achari and Sri G.Krilshnaveni, Advocates for Petitioner and of Sri K.David, Advocate for Respondent. Both parties called absent No representation on either side hence this Court doth order and :
DECREE
1) that the petition be and the same is hereby dismissed for defaualt;
2) that there be no order as to costs;
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 19th day of January, 2018.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PETITIONER: FOR RESPONDENT;
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Friday, this the 19th day of January, 2018
HMOP.NO.26/2014
Between: Nanibilli Nookaraju,S/o late Baburao, Hindu, age 30 years, Driver, resident of Door No. Tegada village, Kasimkota Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
Petitioner And:
Nanibilli Nagalakshmi,lW/o Nookaraju, Hindu, age 22 years, housewife, residing at C/o Pasupuleti Eswararao, Door No. Kandipudi villlage, Butchiyyapeta and Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
Respondant
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri K.S.Achari and Sri G.Krilshnaveni, Advocates for Petitioner and of Sri K.David, Advocate for Respondent. Both parties called absent No representation on either side hence this Court delivered the following:
ORDER
This is a petition filed under Sec.13(1) (ia) and (ib) of H.M.Act.
This is a petition filed by the petitioners (a) for grant of decree of divorce by dissolving the marriage between the petitioner and respondent on 12.11.2011 on the ground of cruelty and desertion and for costs of the suit.
Both parties called absent No representation on either side hence the petition is dismissed for default.
Pronounced by me in open court, this the 19th day of January, 2018.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
LIST OF DOCUMENTS
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:02-11-2005 Date of Filing:29-11-2005
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Thursday, this the 31st day of August, 2017
I.P.No.13/2005 Between: Naga Manikyam wife of Tatayyalu, age 70 years, Hindu, No occupation, residing at Nagavamsam Veedhi, Anakapalle.
Petitioner. And:
1. Ravi Seshukumari, wife of Sreenivasarao, age 25 yearsl, Hindu, Household duties, residing at Dondaparthi, Visakhapatnam-16.
2. Naga Laxmikantam, wife of Ramana,l age 35 years, Hindu, residing near Santabyalu, Vaddadi village, Visakhapatnam District.
3. Yelugula Ramana, son of Apparao, age 40 years, Allikhanudupalem, Anakapalle Mandal.
4. Rayi Bullemma, wife of Jagannadham, age 50 years, hindu, Lokavari veedhi, Anakapalle.
5.Nagumalla Sanyasamma, wife of Venkatarao, age 60 years, Hindu, Maturu village, Anakakpalle Mandal.
6.Kolluru Pramod Kumar, son of Narasingarao, age 35 years, Hindu, Main road,Anakapalle.
7.Palukuril Kamaraju, son of Sreeramamurthy,l age 35 years, Hindu, business, residing at Anjayya colony, Anakapalle.
Respondants.
This is a petition filed by the petitioner against the respondents(a) to declare the petitioner as an insolvent and discharge her from her creditors and for costs of the petition.
A fixed court fees of Rs.50/- is paid on this petition under Sch.II.Article II of ACF and S.V.;Act. An amount of Rs.1500/- paid towards administrative charges and publication by way of challan No.2081, dated 28.10.2005.
This petiltion coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri P.S.Kumar and Sri P.A.Narasimham, Advocates for Petitioner . As memo filed vide GR.No.1563/dt.07.07.2017 petitioner died and this Court doth order and:
DECREE
1) that the Insolvent petition be and the same is hereby closed as petitioner died;
2) that there be no order as to costs; ( copy of petition A and B schedule hereto enclosed)
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 31st day of August,2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PETITIONER: FOR RESPONDENTS;
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Thursday, this the 31st day of August, 2017
I.P.No.13/2005 Between: Naga Manikyam wife of Tatayyalu, age 70 years, Hindu, No occupation, residing at Nagavamsam Veedhi, Anakapalle.
Petitioner. And:
1. Ravi Seshukumari, wife of Sreenivasarao, age 25 yearsl, Hindu, Household duties, residing at Dondaparthi, Visakhapatnam-16.
2. Naga Laxmikantam, wife of Ramana,l age 35 years, Hindu, residing near Santabyalu, Vaddadi village, Visakhapatnam District.
3. Yelugula Ramana, son of Apparao, age 40 years, Allikhanudupalem, Anakapalle Mandal.
4. Rayi Bullemma, wife of Jagannadham, age 50 years, hindu, Lokavari veedhi, Anakapalle 5.Nagumalla Sanyasamma, wife of Venkatarao, age 60 years, Hindu, Maturu village, Anakakpalle Mandal. 6.Kolluru Pramod Kumar, son of Narasingarao, age 35 years, Hindu, Main road,Anakapalle. 7.Palukuril Kamaraju, son of Sreeramamurthy,l age 35 years, Hindu, business, residing at Anjayya colony, Anakapalle.
Respondants.
This petiltion coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri P.S.Kumar and Sri P.A.Narasimham, Advocates for Petitioner . As memo filed vide GR.No.1563/dt.07.07.2017 petitioner died and this Court delivered the following:
ORDER
This is a petition filed by the petitioner against the respondents(a) to declare the petitioner as an insolvent and discharge her from her creditors and for costs of the petition.
As memo filed vide GR.No.1563/dt.07.07.2017 as petitioner/insolvent died the petition is closed.
Pronounced by me in open court, this the 31st day of August, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
LIST OF DOCUMENTS
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation: 30-10-2012/15-11-2012 Date of Fililng: 15-11-2012
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Thursday, this the 22nd day of December,2017
I.P.No.04/2012 Between: 1.Vaddi Raju, S/o Appalaraju, age 35 years, residing at D.No.1-169, Ramakpuram colony, A.M.A.L.College road, Kothuru village andl panchayat, Anakapalle Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
Petitioner. And:
1. Afoz Bhanu,W/o Muzzafer Shariff, age 35 years, Muslim, residing at Flat No.F.2, K.C. Apartments, near Saibaba Temple, Sarada Nagar, Anakapalle,Visakhapatnam District. 2.Md.Fathilma, husband’s namek not known to the petitioner, C/o Afoz Bhanu, W/o Muzzafer Shariff, age 28 ayears, Hindu, residing at Flat No.F.2, K.C.Akpartments, near Saibaba Temple, Sarada Nagar, Anakapalle, Visakhapatnam District.
3. Md. Ahamad, S/o Md.Abdul Rawoof, age 30 years, Muslim, residing at D.No. 7-48/1, Muslims steet, Pedda Bazar, Kasimkota village and mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
4. M.Sameema, W/o Md.Abdul Rawoof, age 40 years, Muslim, residing at D.No.7-48/1, Muslims street, Pedda Bazar, Kasimkota village and mandal, Visakhapatnam District. 5.Zameela Begum, D/o Md.Abdul Rawoof, age 25 years, Muslim, resilding at D.No.7-48/1, Muslims street, Pedda Bazar,l Kasimkota village and mandal, Visakhapatnam District. 6.Shaik Halima, W/o Mohaddin,l age 30 years, Muslim care of M.Swarna Lakshmi, Teacher, opposite Ramalayam, D.No.12-4-105, Pudimadaka raod, Anakapalle, Visakhapatnam District. 7.Karim, father’s name not known to the petitioner,l age 28 years, Muslim, residing at care of M.Swarna Lakshmi, Teacher, opposite Ramalayam, D.No.12-4-105, pudimadaka road, Anakapalle, Vilsakhapatnam Dilstrict. 8.A.Arjunarao, father’s name not known to the petitioner, age 32 years, Teacher in A.M.A.A. High School, residing at D.No.2-139, near K.L.N.Parlour, A.M.A.L. college road, Kothuru village, Anakapalle mandal, Visakhapatnam District. 9.Bobbili Anatha Lakshmi W/o Bobbilil Appalaraju, age 25 years, Hindu, Teacher,l residing at Vijayaramarajupeta, Anakapalle, Visakhapatnam District.
Respondants.
Petitioner to declare the as insolvent person ( indigent person) and discharge him from all of theliabilities and debts due to the respondents and or costs of the petition.
A court fee of Rs.10/- is paid under Art.11(L)2(ili) of Sch.ILI of A.P.C.F. and
S.V.Act.
This petiltion coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri S.Narasingarao, I.R.Gangadhar, Advocates for Petitioner and petitioner called present filed memo not pressing the petition. Memo is recorded and this Court doth order and :
DECREE
1) that the Insolvent petition be and the same is hereby dismissed as not pressed;
2) that there be no order as to costs; ( copy of petition A and B schedule hereto enclosed)
Pronounced by me in open court, this the 22nd day of December,2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PETITIONER: FOR RESPONDENTS;
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Thursday, this the 22nd day of December,2017
I.P.No.04/2012 Between: 1.Vaddi Raju, S/o Appalaraju, age 35 years, residing at D.No.1-169, Ramakpuram colony, A.M.A.L.College road, Kothuru village andl panchayat, Anakapalle Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
Petitioner. And:
1. Afoz Bhanu,W/o Muzzafer Shariff, age 35 years, Muslim, residing at Flat No.F.2, K.C. Apartments, near Saibaba Temple, Sarada Nagar, Anakapalle,Visakhapatnam District. 2.Md.Fathilma, husband’s namek not known to the petitioner, C/o Afoz Bhanu, W/o Muzzafer Shariff, age 28 ayears, Hindu, residing at Flat No.F.2, K.C.Akpartments, near Saibaba Temple, Sarada Nagar, Anakapalle, Visakhapatnam District.
3. Md. Ahamad, S/o Md.Abdul Rawoof, age 30 years, Muslim, residing at D.No. 7-48/1, Muslims steet, Pedda Bazar, Kasimkota village and mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
4. M.Sameema, W/o Md.Abdul Rawoof, age 40 years, Muslim, residing at D.No.7-48/1, Muslims street, Pedda Bazar, Kasimkota village and mandal, Visakhapatnam District. 5.Zameela Begum, D/o Md.Abdul Rawoof, age 25 years, Muslim, resilding at D.No.7-48/1, Muslims street, Pedda Bazar,l Kasimkota village and mandal, Visakhapatnam District. 6.Shaik Halima, W/o Mohaddin,l age 30 years, Muslim care of M.Swarna Lakshmi, Teacher, opposite Ramalayam, D.No.12-4-105, Pudimadaka raod, Anakapalle, Visakhapatnam District. 7.Karim, father’s name not known to the petitioner,l age 28 years, Muslim, residing at care of M.Swarna Lakshmi, Teacher, opposite Ramalayam, D.No.12-4-105, pudimadaka road, Anakapalle, Vilsakhapatnam Dilstrict. 8.A.Arjunarao, father’s name not known to the petitioner, age 32 years, Teacher in A.M.A.A. High School, residing at D.No.2-139, near K.L.N.Parlour, A.M.A.L. college road, Kothuru village, Anakapalle mandal, Visakhapatnam District. 9.Bobbili Anatha Lakshmi W/o Bobbilil Appalaraju, age 25 years, Hindu, Teacher,l residing at Vijayaramarajupeta, Anakapalle, Visakhapatnam District.
Respondants.
This petiltion coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri S.Narasingarao, I.R.Gangadhar, Advocates for Petitioner and petitioner called present filed memo not pressing the petition. Memo is recorded and this Court delivered the following:
ORDER
Petitioner to declare the as insolvent person ( indigent person) and discharge him from all of theliabilities and debts due to the respondents; and or costs of the suit.
Petitioner called present filed memo not pressing the petition. Heard.
Memo is recorded. This petition dismissed as not pressed.
Pronounced by me in open court, this the 22nd day of December,2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
LIST OF DOCUMENTS
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentatioin:21-03-2012
Date of Filing:09-04-2012
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Wednesday, this thw 24th day of January, 2018.
I.P.No.01/2012 Between: 1.Doddi Naga Mophana Rao, S/o late Appa Rao, Hindu, age 32 years, cultivation, residing at Nagulapalli village, Munagapaka Mandal. 2.Polamarasetty Adi Murthy, S/o Apparao, Hindu, age 35 yealrs, cultivation, residing at Teacher’s colonyl, 3rd line, Nagulapalli village, Munagapaka Mandal.
3.Yellapu Sasi Bhushanam Rao, S/o late Kondala Rao, Hindu, age 47 years, residing at D.No.15-19-6, P.V.R.Naidu street, Opp. Women college, Gavarapalem, Anakapalli. Petitioners. And:
1.Yellapu Mangayyamma,W/o late Appa Rao, Hindu, age 48 years, business, residing at D.No.2-13-13,l Bo;ddeda vari veedhi,l Vijayaramarajupeta, Anakapalli. 2.Yellapu Venkata Nooka Apparao, S/o late Apparao, Hindu, age 30 years, business, rest-do-
3. Yellapu Vani, W/o Venkata Nooka Appa Rao, Hindu, age 23 years, business, C/o Pentakota Ramana, D.No.6-42-4, TVN colony,besides drivaer’s colony, Old Gajuwaka, Visakhapatnam District.
4. Adari Tilak, W/o Srinivasa Rao, Hindu, age 23 years, Business, residing at C/o Adari Rama Ra;o, Door No.14-13, Opp. Pada Gas Godown Court veedhi, Gandhinagaram, Anakapalli.
5. Yellapu Rama Krishna, S/o late Nooka Raju, Hindu, age 42 years, employee, residing at Door No.2-13-13 rest -do-.
Respondants.
This is a petition filed U/Sec.9 of provincial Insolvency Act praying to adjudge the respondent No.1 as insolvent ;(b) to appoint an interim receiver in respect of the estate of 1st respondent i.e. “B” schedule property; (c) to make an order directing the official receiver to take actual physical possession over the”B” schedule property.
A fixed court fee of Rs.10-00 is paid thereon under Sectilon 20 ScheduleI
Art.II(a) of APCF and S.V.Act. Administrative charges of Rs.2000/- is paid vide challan No.6604 dated 29.03.2012.
This petiltion coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri Budha Trinadha Rao, Advocate for Petiltioners and No evidence isfiled the petitioners called absent No representatilon and this Court doth order and :
DECREE
1) that the Insolvency petition be and the same is hereby dismissed for default;
2) that there be no order as to costs; ( Copy of petition A and B schedule hereto enclosed)
Given under my hand and the seal of this court this the 24th day of January, 2018.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PETITIONERS: FOR RESPONDENTS;
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Wednesday, this thw 24th day of January, 2018.
I.P.No.01/2012 Between: 1.Doddi Naga Mophana Rao, S/o late Appa Rao, Hindu, age 32 years, cultivation, residing at Nagulapalli village, Munagapaka Mandal. 2.Polamarasetty Adi Murthy, S/o Apparao, Hindu, age 35 yealrs, cultivation, residing at Teacher’s colonyl, 3rd line, Nagulapalli village, Munagapaka Mandal.
3.Yellapu Sasi Bhushanam Rao, S/o late Kondala Rao, Hindu, age 47 years, residing at D.No.15-19-6, P.V.R.Naidu street, Opp. Women college, Gavarapalem, Anakapalli. Petitioners. And:
1.Yellapu Mangayyamma,W/o late Appa Rao, Hindu, age 48 years, business, residing at D.No.2-13-13,l Bo;ddeda vari veedhi,l Vijayaramarajupeta, Anakapalli. 2.Yellapu Venkata Nooka Apparao, S/o late Apparao, Hindu, age 30 years, business, rest-do-
3. Yellapu Vani, W/o Venkata Nooka Appa Rao, Hindu, age 23 years, business, C/o Pentakota Ramana, D.No.6-42-4, TVN colony,besides drivaer’s colony, Old Gajuwaka, Visakhapatnam District.
4. Adari Tilak, W/o Srinivasa Rao, Hindu, age 23 years, Business, residing at C/o Adari Rama Ra;o, Door No.14-13, Opp. Pada Gas Godown Court veedhi, Gandhinagaram, Anakapalli.
5. Yellapu Rama Krishna, S/o late Nooka Raju, Hindu, age 42 years, employee, residing at Door No.2-13-13 rest -do-.
Respondants.
This petiltion coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri Budha Trinadha Rao, Advocate for Petiltioners and No evidence isfiled the petitioners called absent No representatilon and this Court delivered the following:
ORDER
This is a petition filed U/Sec.9 of provincial Insolvency Act praying to adjudge the respondent No.1 as insolvent ;(b) to appoint an interim receiver in respect of the estate of 1st respondent i.e. “B” schedule property; (c) to make an order directing the official receiver to take actual physical possession over the”B” schedule property.
No evidence is filed the petitioner called absent No representation. Hence petition is dismissed for default.
Pronounced by me in open court, this the 24th day of January, 2018.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
LIST OF DOCUMENTS
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation: 20-10-2014 Date of Filing:20-04-2014
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Thursday, this the 1st day of February, 2018.
O.S.No.263/2014
Between: Penmetsa Vishnukumar Raju S/o Satyanarayana Raju, age 53 years, residing at Plot No.A-19, D.No.50-104-1/9, Seeethammadhara N.E.Layout, Visakhapatnam-13. Plaintiff. And:
1.Karri Bangarunaidu S/o Ramunaidu, age 52 years, residing at Asakapalli village, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
2.Karri Ramprasad S/o Ramunaidu, age 44 years, residing at Asakapalli village, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
Defendants.
Suit filed by the plaintilff against the defendants(a) to pass a decree to directilng the defendants to execute the register a sale deed in favour of the plaintiff in respect of the plaintk kschedule property interms of the agreement of sale executed by the defendants in favour of the plaintiff within time fixed by the court (b) in case if the defendants fail to execute and register a sale deed, the court may itself execute and register a sale deed for aand on behalf of the defendants in respect of theplailant schedule at the expenses of the plaintiff
(c) to put the plaiantiff’s in possessilon of the plailnt schedule after evicting the defendants therefrom (d) alternatively, if the court feels that for any reason, the relief of specific performance could not be awarded, directing the defendants to refund the advance sale consideration of Rs.5,24,160/- paid by the plaintiff under the agreement of sale dtogether with interest at 24% p.a. from the date of the agreement of sale till date of full land final reliazation and for costs of the suilt.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and Jurisdiction is valued at
Rs.5,24,160-00 and a court fee of Rs.7726/- is being paid under Sec.39, r/w
Sch.I Art.I (b) & (c) of A.P.C.F. and S.V.Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Smt. A.Bhanumathi and Sri V.Viswanadham,Advocates for plaintiff and of Sri
M.Srinivasarao and M.V.R.Bhupathirao, Advocates for 1st defendant and of Sri
S.P.Naidu and R.Appalanaidu, Advocates for 2nd defendant . Plaintiff filed memo not press the suit claim. Memo is recorded and this Court doth order and:
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed as not pressed;
2) that there be no costs; ( Copy of plaint schedule hereto enclosed)
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 01st day of February, 2018.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PLAINTIFF; FOR DEFENDANTS;
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Thursday, this the 1st day of February, 2018.
O.S.No.263/2014
Between: Penmetsa Vishnukumar Raju S/o Satyanarayana Raju, age 53 years,residing at Plot No.A-19, D.No.50-104-1/9, Seeethammadhara N.E.Layout, Visakhapatnam-13. Plaintiff. And:
1.Karri Bangarunaidu S/o Ramunaidu, age 52 years, residing at Asakapalli village, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
2.Karri Ramprasad S/o Ramunaidu, age 44 years, residing at Asakapalli village, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
Defendants.
This suit coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Smt. A.Bhanumathi and Sri V.Viswanadham,Advocates for plaintiff and of Sri M.Srinivasarao and M.V.R.Bhupathirao, Advocates for 1st defendant and of Sri S.P.Naidu and R.Appalanaidu, Advocates for 2nd defendant . Plaintiff filed memo not press the suit claim. Memo is recorded and this Court delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
Suit filed by the plaintilff against the defendants(a) to pass a decree to directilng the defendants to execute the register a sale deed iln favour of the plailntiff in respect of the plaintk kschedule property ilnterms of the agreement of sale executed by the defendants in favour of the plaintiff withiln time fixed by the court (b) in case if the defendants fail to execute and register a sale deed, the court may itself execute and register a sale deed for aand on behalf of the defendants in respect of theplailant schedule at the expenses of the plaintiff (c) to put the plaiantiff’s in possessilon of the plailnt schedule after evicting the defendants therefrom (d) alternatively, if the court feels that for any reason, the relief of specific performance could not be awarded, directing the defendants to refund the advance sale consideration of Rs.5,24,160/- paid by the plaintiff under the agreement of sale dtogether with interest at 24% p.a. from the date of the agreement of sale till date of full land final reliazattion and for costs of the suilt.
Plaintiff filed a memo not press the suit claim as matter was settled out of court. Hence memo is recorded the suilt is dismissed without costs as not pressed.
Pronounced by me in open court, this lthe 1st day of February, 2018.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
LIST OF DOCUMENTS
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Wednesday, this the 31st day of January, 2018.
O.S.No.199/2012
Between: Vennela Pydamma,W/o Somulu, Hindu, age 65 years, household duties, resildilng at D.No.8-4, Mettapalem village, lH/o Vada Cheepurupalli, Paraawada Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
Plaintiff. And:
1.Eerla Sreeramulu,S/o Musalayya, Hindu, age 52 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.7-56,Sriram Nagar, T.Devada, Steet project Office, Visakhapatnam-31.
2.Eerla Suryanarayana, S/o Musalayya, Hindu, age 50 years, cultivation, residilng at D.No.7-55, Sriram Nagar, T.Devada, Steel project Office, Visakhapatnam-31.
3.Eerla Vonumulu, S/o Musalayya, Hindu, age 48 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.30-71-1, Appikonda RH colonyll, Vadlapudi, Gajuwakal Mandal, Visakhapatnam-46.
4. Kundrapu Somulamma, W/o Mutyalu, Hindu, age 62 years, housewife, residing at D.No.30-7-1, Appikonda RH colony, Vadlapudi, Gajuwaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam-46.
5.Kundrapu Simhachalam W/o Appalanaidu, Hindu, age 86 years, residing at Door No.7-5, Sriram Nagar, T.Devada, Steel project office, Visakhapatnam-31.
6. Geddam Kpentamma, W/o Simhachalam, age 58 years, Hindu, Housewife, D.No.5-4, Hastinapuram, H/o Vada Cheepurupalli, Parawada mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
7. Ramineni Venkateswararao, S/o Basavayya, Hindu, age 45 years, business, resilding at D.No.10-32-6, Visalakshmi Nagar, Visakhapatnam.
Defendants.
This suit coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri V.V.Jogayya and Sri M.Srinivasarao, Advocates for the plaintiff and of Sri A.V.S.Bhavani Prasad, Advocate for defendant No.7 and defendants 1,3,4,6 remind exparte and suit against defendant 2 and 5 dismissed for default and this Court delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
Suit for partition of the plaint schedule properties at metes and bounds into seven equal shares and allot one such share to the plaintiff and such equal shares dto thedefendants 1 to 6, and deliver separate possession ofk such share so allotted to the plaintiff and defendants 1 to 6 on converting the joint possession into separate possession; for profits that can be determined by way of separate application; and for costs of the suit.
PW.1 called absent No representation. Hence the matter is dismissed for default.
Pronounced by me in open court, this lthe 31st day of January, 2018.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
FOR PLAINTIFF:-
P.W.1/ dt.8.12.2017 - Vennela Pydamma W/o Somulu.(Chief examination only)
FOR DEFENDANT:- NIL
LIST OF DOCUMENTS
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation: 16-08-2012
Date of Filing:16-08-2012
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Wednesday, this the 31st day of January, 2018.
O.S.No.199/2012
Between: Vennela Pydamma,W/o Somulu, Hindu, age 65 years, household duties, resildilng at D.No.8-4, Mettapalem village, lH/o Vada Cheepurupalli, Paraawada Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
Plaintiff. And:
1.Eerla Sreeramulu,S/o Musalayya, Hindu, age 52 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.7-56, Sriram Nagar, T.Devada, Steet project Office, Visakhapatnam-31.
2.Eerla Suryanarayana, S/o Musalayya, Hindu, age 50 years, cultivation, residilng at D.No.7-55, Sriram Nagar, T.Devada, Steel project Office, Visakhapatnam-31.
3.Eerla Vonumulu, S/o Musalayya, Hindu, age 48 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.30-71-1, Appikonda RH colonyll, Vadlapudi, Gajuwakal Mandal, Visakhapatnam-46.
4. Kundrapu Somulamma, W/o Mutyalu, Hindu, age 62 years, housewife, residing at D.No.30-7-1, Appikonda RH colony, Vadlapudi, Gajuwaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam-46.
5.Kundrapu Simhachalam W/o Appalanaidu, Hindu, age 86 years, residing at Door No.7-5, Sriram Nagar, T.Devada, Steel project office, Visakhapatnam-31.
6. Geddam Kpentamma, W/o Simhachalam, age 58 years, Hindu, Housewife, D.No.5-4, Hastinapuram, H/o Vada Cheepurupalli, Parawada mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
7. Ramineni Venkateswararao, S/o Basavayya, Hindu, age 45 years, business, resilding at D.No.10-32-6, Visalakshmi Nagar, Visakhapatnam.
Defendants.
Suit for partition of the plaint schedule properties at metes and bounds into seven equal shares and allot one such share to the plaintiff and such equal shares dto thedefendants 1 to 6, and deliver separate possession ofk such share so allotted to the plaintiff and defendants 1 to 6 on converting the joint possession into separate possession; for profits that can be determined by way of separate application; and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and Jurisdiction of this court
Valuel of the plaint schedule property consisting of Ac.5.00 cents and @
Rs.15,00,000/- per acre as per basic value register Rs. 16,05,000-00
Plaintiff’s 1/7th share Rs. 10,71,428-00 3/4th value share Rs. 8,03,571-00
C.F. of Rs.10,826-00 is payable, but a fixed court fee of Rs.200/- is paid under
Sec.34(2) of A.P.C.F. Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri V.V.Jogayya and Sri M.Srinivasarao, Advocates for the plaintiff and of Sri
A.V.S.Bhavani Prasad, Advocate for defendant No.7 and defendants 1,3,4,6 remind exparte and suit against defendant 2 and 5 dismissed for default and this Court doth order and ;
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed for default;
2) that there be no order as to costs;
Given under my hand and theseal of this court, this the 31st day of January, 2018.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PLAINTIFF; FOR DEFENDANTS;
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Friday, this the 23rd day of February, 2018.
O.S.No.189/2017
Between: Chekuri Ramaraju S/o Venkata Raju @ Venkatarao, Hindu, age 38 years, cultivation, resident of D.No.1-38, Melupaka village and post, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Plaintiff. And:
Gogula Srinivas S/o Narayana Murthy, Hindu, age 49 years, resident of D.No.1- 113, Melupaka village and post, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
Defendant.
This suit coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri M.Jayaram & Sri BSVRajagopal,Advocates for plaintiff. Plaintiff filed memo not press the suit . Memo is recorded and this Court delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
Suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for recovery oif
Rs.6,84,333/- being the principal and interest due under a promissory note
dated 05.06.2016 for Rs.5,00,000/- executed by the defendant in favour of
plaintiff agreeing to repay the same with interest at 24% p.a., and for costs of the suit.
I.A59 /2018 is allowed. Accordingly the matter is advanced to today from 23.02.2018.
The plaintiff is present. Plaintiff filed memo not pressing the suit as matter was settled out of court. Heard. Memo is recorded. Accordingly suit is dismissed without costs as not pressed.
Pronounced by me in open court, this lthe 1st day of February, 2018.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
LIST OF DOCUMENTS
NIL PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:19-12-2017
Date of Filing:19-12-2017
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Friday, this the 23rd day of February, 2018.
O.S.No.189/2017
Between: Chekuri Ramaraju S/o Venkata Raju @ Venkatarao, Hindu, age 38 years, cultivation, resident of D.No.1-38, Melupaka village and post, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Plaintiff. And:
Gogula Srinivas S/o Narayana Murthy, Hindu, age 49 years, resident of D.No.1- 113, Melupaka village and post, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
Defendant.
Suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for recovery oif
Rs.6,84,333/- being the principal and interest due under a promissory note
dated 05.06.2016 for Rs.5,00,000/- executed by the defendant in favour of
plaintiff agreeing to repay the same with interest at 24% p.a., and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and Jurisdiction is
Rs.6,84,333/- and a court fee of Rs.9,326/- is paid under Section 20 r/w Art.I(a) of A.P.C.F. and S.V.Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri M.Jayaram & Sri B.S.V.Rajagopal, Advocates for plaintiff. Plaintiff filed memo not press the suit . Memo is recorded and this Court doth order and:
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed as not pressed;
2) that there be no costs;
Pronounced by me in open court, this the 1st day of February, 2018.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PLAINTIFF; FOR DEFENDANT;
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Thursday, this the 8th day of February, 2018.
O.S.No.255/2013
Between: Panduri Satyarao S/o Simhachalam, Hindu, age 69 years, retired MPDO, Sabbavaram, N/o Venkatapuram village Munagapaka Mandal, presently, residing at D.No.14-38-1/A, Plot No.303, Viswanadh Residency, Maharanipeta, Visakhapatnam-2. Plaintiff. And:
1. Panduri Kanaka Apparao,s/o Late Nookaiah, Hindu, age 45 years, Resident of Venkatapuram village, Via: Paravada, Thanam Post, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
2. Panduri Ramalakshmi W/o Kanaka Apparao, Hindu, age 40 years, resident of Venkatapuram village, Via: Paravada, Thanam Post, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
3. Chinni China Appalanaidu @ Innabbai,S/o Sanyasi, Hindu, age 69 yearls, resident of Venkatapuram village, via; Paravada, Thanam post, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
Defendants.
This suit coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri B.V.R.Joga rao and Mr.R.Atchutharamaiah, Advocates for plaintiff and of Sri K.P.Naidu, Advocate of defendants. Costs not paid. PW.1 called absent. No representation. Hence the suit is dismissed for default and this Court delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
This is a suit for declaration that the plaintiff is the absolute owner of item No.6 of plaint schedule property, and for recovery of possession of the item No.6 of plaint schedule property after evicting the defendants their men, agents servants there from; for future profits till the delivaery of the possession of item No.6 of schedule property as to be determined in a separate enquiry under order 20 R.12 of CPC; (b) for a permanent injunction restraining the defendants their men, agents, servants, and representatives from ever interfering with plaintiff’s peaceful possession and enjoyment of items 1 to 5 of plaint schedule property in any manner and for costs of the suit.
Costs not paid. PW1 called absent. No representation. Hence the suilt is dismissed for default.
Pronounced by me in open court, this the 8th day of February, 2018.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
FOR PLAINTIFF:-
PW1/ Dt.9-6-2017/Panduri Satya Rao, S/o Simhachalam (chief affidavit only)
FOR DEFENDANT: NIL
LIST OF DOCUMENTS
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation: 26-12-2013 Date of Filing: 26-12-2013
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Thursday, this the 8th day of February, 2018.
O.S.No.255/2013
Between: Panduri Satyarao S/o Simhachalam, Hindu, age 69 years, retired MPDO, Sabbavaram, N/o Venkatapuram village Munagapaka Mandal, presently, residing at D.No.14-38-1/A, Plot No.303, Viswanadh Residency, Maharanipeta, Visakhapatnam-2. Plaintiff. And:
1. Panduri Kanaka Apparao,s/o Late Nookaiah, Hindu, age 45 years, Resident of Venkatapuram village, Via: Paravada, Thanam Post, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
2. Panduri Ramalakshmi W/o Kanaka Apparao, Hindu, age 40 years, resident of Venkatapuram village, Via: Paravada, Thanam Post, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
3. Chinni China Appalanaidu @ Innabbai,S/o Sanyasi, Hindu, age 69 yearls, resident of Venkatapuram village, via; Paravada, Thanam post, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
Defendants.
This is a suit for declaration that the plaintiff is the absolute owner of item No.6 of plaint schedule property, and for recovery of possession of the item No.6 of plaint schedule property after evicting the defendants their men, agents servants there from; for future profits till the delivaery of the possession of item No.6 of schedule property as to be determined in a separate enquiry under order 20 R.12 of CPC; (b) for a permanent injunction restraining the defendants their men, agents, servants, and representatives from ever interfering with plaintiff’s peaceful possession and enjoyment of items 1 to 5 of plaint schedule property in any manner and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suilt for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction is
Rs.10,000/- for relief of permanent injunction and Rs.1,20,000/- being 3/4th market value for relief of declaration and possession and CF of Rs.4,412/- is paid under Sec.26 (c) & 24(a) of A.P.C.F. and S.V.Act.
Total value of item-6 property Rs. 1,60,000-00 3/4th of the Market value is Rs. 1,20,000-00
Notional value of items 1 to 5 Rs. 10,000-00
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri B.V.R.Joga rao and Mr.R.Atchutharamaiah, Advocates for plaintiff and of
Sri K.P.Naidu, Advocate of defendants. Costs not paid. PW.1 called absent. No representation. Hence the suit is dismissed for default and this Court doth order and :
DECREE
1) that the suilt be and the same is hereby dismissed for default;
2) that there be no order as to costs; ( Copy of plaint schedule and valuation slip hereto enclosed)
Pronounced by me in open court, this the 8th day of February, 2018.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PLAINTIFF; FOR DEFENDANTS;
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Tuesday, this the 23rd day of January, 2018.
O.S.No.221/2013
Between: Gulla Sreeram Murthy S/o Chellanna Dora, Hindu, age 33 years, cultivation, resident of Door No.3-16, Buddibanda village H/o Kovagunta village, Vommali Jagannadhapuram post, Ravikamatham Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
Plaintiff. And:
1.Konathala Radhabhai, W/o Seetharam, Hindu, age years, House wife, resident of Door No.2-95, Sampathipuram village, Anakapalle Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
2. Central Bank of India, Main branch, Visakhapatnam represented by its Chief Manager, Visakhapatnam.
Defendants.
This suit coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Venkateswara Rao, Advocate for plaintiff and of Sri
Ch.S.S.Ramachandrarao, Advocate for defendant No.2 and defendant No.1 remained exparte. Costs not paid. PW.1 called absent No representation on either side.Hence the suilt is dismissed for default and this Court delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
This is a suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant (a) for specific performance of the sale agreement dated 27.05.2005 by directing thedefendant to execute a regular sale deed on a proper stamp paper and register the samek in respect of the plaint schedule property in favoudr of the plaintiff and to do all the acts necaessary to put the plaintiff in possession with such time as the court fixes, ilf the 1st defendant, fails to execute the regular sale deed, the court may execute the same at the costs of the plaintiffl and recover the same from thedefendant (b) for an alternative relief foir refund of the advance amount of Rs.4,00,000/- with subsequent interest at the rate of 24% p.a. from the 1st defendant and for costs of the suilt.
Costs not paid. PW1 called absent. No representation on either side.
Hence the suit is dismissed for default.
Pronounced by me in open court, this the 23rd day of January, 2018.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIl
LIST OF DOCUMENTS
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
Date of presentation:22-11-2013 Date of Filing :22-11-2013
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Tuesday, this the 23rd day of January, 2018.
O.S.No.221/2013
Between: Gulla Sreeram Murthy S/o Chellanna Dora, Hindu, age 33 years, cultivation, resident of Door No.3-16, Buddibanda village H/o Kovagunta village, Vommali Jagannadhapuram post, Ravikamatham Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
Plaintiff. And:
1.Konathala Radhabhai, W/o Seetharam, Hindu, age years, House wife, resident of Door No.2-95, Sampathipuram village, Anakapalle Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
2. Central Bank of India, Main branch, Visakhapatnam represented by its Chief Manager, Visakhapatnam.
Defendants.
This is a suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant (a) for specific performance of the sale agreement dated 27.05.2005 by directing thedefendant to execute a regular sale deed on a proper stamp paper and register the samek in respect of the plaint schedule property in favoudr of the plaintiff and to do all the acts necaessary to put the plaintiff in possession with such time as the court fixes, ilf the 1st defendant, fails to execute the regular sale deed, the court may execute the same at the costs of the plaintiffl and recover the same from thedefendant (b) for an alternative relief foir refund of the advance amount of Rs.4,00,000/- with subsequent interest at the rate of 24% p.a. from the 1st defendant and for costs of the suilt.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and Jurisdiction is
Rs.4,00,000/- and a court fee of Rs.6,426/- is paid under Sec.39 of A.P.C.F. and
S.V.Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri G.Venkateswara Rao, Advocate for plaintiff and of Sri
Ch.S.S.Ramachandrarao, Advocate for defendant No.2 and defendant No.1 remained exparte. Costs not paid. PW.1 called absent No representation on either side. Hence the suilt is dismissed for default and this Court doth order and:
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed for default;
2) that there be no order as to costs; ( Copy of Plaint schedule hereto enclosed)
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 23rd day of January, 2018.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PLAINTIFF; FOR DEFENDANTS;
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation: 20-10-2014 Date of Filing:20-04-2014
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Thursday, this the 1st day of February, 2018.
O.S.No.263/2014
Between: Penmetsa Vishnukumar Raju S/o Satyanarayana Raju, age 53 years, residing at Plot No.A-19, D.No.50-104-1/9, Seeethammadhara N.E.Layout, Visakhapatnam-13. Plaintiff. And:
1.Karri Bangarunaidu S/o Ramunaidu, age 52 years, residing at Asakapalli village, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
2.Karri Ramprasad S/o Ramunaidu, age 44 years, residing at Asakapalli village, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
Defendants.
Suit filed by the plaintilff against the defendants(a) to pass a decree to directilng the defendants to execute the register a sale deed in favour of the plaintiff in respect of the plaintk kschedule property interms of the agreement of sale executed by the defendants in favour of the plaintiff within time fixed by the court (b) in case if the defendants fail to execute and register a sale deed, the court may itself execute and register a sale deed for aand on behalf of the defendants in respect of theplailant schedule at the expenses of the plaintiff
(c) to put the plaiantiff’s in possessilon of the plailnt schedule after evicting the defendants therefrom (d) alternatively, if the court feels that for any reason, the relief of specific performance could not be awarded, directing the defendants to refund the advance sale consideration of Rs.5,24,160/- paid by the plaintiff under the agreement of sale dtogether with interest at 24% p.a. from the date of the agreement of sale till date of full land final reliazation and for costs of the suilt.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and Jurisdiction is valued at
Rs.5,24,160-00 and a court fee of Rs.7726/- is being paid under Sec.39, r/w
Sch.I Art.I (b) & (c) of A.P.C.F. and S.V.Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Smt. A.Bhanumathi and Sri V.Viswanadham,Advocates for plaintiff and of Sri
M.Srinivasarao and M.V.R.Bhupathirao, Advocates for 1st defendant and of Sri
S.P.Naidu and R.Appalanaidu, Advocates for 2nd defendant . Plaintiff filed memo not press the suit claim. Memo is recorded and this Court doth order and:
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed as not pressed;
2) that there be no costs; ( Copy of plaint schedule hereto enclosed)
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 01st day of February, 2018.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PLAINTIFF; FOR DEFENDANTS;
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Thursday, this the 1st day of February, 2018.
O.S.No.263/2014
Between: Penmetsa Vishnukumar Raju S/o Satyanarayana Raju, age 53 years,residing at Plot No.A-19, D.No.50-104-1/9, Seeethammadhara N.E.Layout, Visakhapatnam-13. Plaintiff. And:
1.Karri Bangarunaidu S/o Ramunaidu, age 52 years, residing at Asakapalli village, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
2.Karri Ramprasad S/o Ramunaidu, age 44 years, residing at Asakapalli village, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
Defendants.
This suit coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Smt. A.Bhanumathi and Sri V.Viswanadham,Advocates for plaintiff and of Sri M.Srinivasarao and M.V.R.Bhupathirao, Advocates for 1st defendant and of Sri S.P.Naidu and R.Appalanaidu, Advocates for 2nd defendant . Plaintiff filed memo not press the suit claim. Memo is recorded and this Court delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
Suit filed by the plaintilff against the defendants(a) to pass a decree to directilng the defendants to execute the register a sale deed iln favour of the plailntiff in respect of the plaintk kschedule property ilnterms of the agreement of sale executed by the defendants in favour of the plaintiff withiln time fixed by the court (b) in case if the defendants fail to execute and register a sale deed, the court may itself execute and register a sale deed for aand on behalf of the defendants in respect of theplailant schedule at the expenses of the plaintiff (c) to put the plaiantiff’s in possessilon of the plailnt schedule after evicting the defendants therefrom (d) alternatively, if the court feels that for any reason, the relief of specific performance could not be awarded, directing the defendants to refund the advance sale consideration of Rs.5,24,160/- paid by the plaintiff under the agreement of sale dtogether with interest at 24% p.a. from the date of the agreement of sale till date of full land final reliazattion and for costs of the suilt.
Plaintiff filed a memo not press the suit claim as matter was settled out of court. Hence memo is recorded the suilt is dismissed without costs as not pressed.
Pronounced by me in open court, this lthe 1st day of February, 2018.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
LIST OF DOCUMENTS
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Wednesday, this the 31st day of January, 2018.
O.S.No.199/2012
Between: Vennela Pydamma,W/o Somulu, Hindu, age 65 years, household duties, resildilng at D.No.8-4, Mettapalem village, lH/o Vada Cheepurupalli, Paraawada Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
Plaintiff. And:
1.Eerla Sreeramulu,S/o Musalayya, Hindu, age 52 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.7-56,Sriram Nagar, T.Devada, Steet project Office, Visakhapatnam-31.
2.Eerla Suryanarayana, S/o Musalayya, Hindu, age 50 years, cultivation, residilng at D.No.7-55, Sriram Nagar, T.Devada, Steel project Office, Visakhapatnam-31.
3.Eerla Vonumulu, S/o Musalayya, Hindu, age 48 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.30-71-1, Appikonda RH colonyll, Vadlapudi, Gajuwakal Mandal, Visakhapatnam-46.
4. Kundrapu Somulamma, W/o Mutyalu, Hindu, age 62 years, housewife, residing at D.No.30-7-1, Appikonda RH colony, Vadlapudi, Gajuwaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam-46.
5.Kundrapu Simhachalam W/o Appalanaidu, Hindu, age 86 years, residing at Door No.7-5, Sriram Nagar, T.Devada, Steel project office, Visakhapatnam-31.
6. Geddam Kpentamma, W/o Simhachalam, age 58 years, Hindu, Housewife, D.No.5-4, Hastinapuram, H/o Vada Cheepurupalli, Parawada mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
7. Ramineni Venkateswararao, S/o Basavayya, Hindu, age 45 years, business, resilding at D.No.10-32-6, Visalakshmi Nagar, Visakhapatnam.
Defendants.
This suit coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri V.V.Jogayya and Sri M.Srinivasarao, Advocates for the plaintiff and of Sri A.V.S.Bhavani Prasad, Advocate for defendant No.7 and defendants 1,3,4,6 remind exparte and suit against defendant 2 and 5 dismissed for default and this Court delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
Suit for partition of the plaint schedule properties at metes and bounds into seven equal shares and allot one such share to the plaintiff and such equal shares dto thedefendants 1 to 6, and deliver separate possession ofk such share so allotted to the plaintiff and defendants 1 to 6 on converting the joint possession into separate possession; for profits that can be determined by way of separate application; and for costs of the suit.
PW.1 called absent No representation. Hence the matter is dismissed for default.
Pronounced by me in open court, this lthe 31st day of January, 2018.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
FOR PLAINTIFF:-
P.W.1/ dt.8.12.2017 - Vennela Pydamma W/o Somulu.(Chief examination only)
FOR DEFENDANT:- NIL
LIST OF DOCUMENTS
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation: 16-08-2012
Date of Filing:16-08-2012
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Wednesday, this the 31st day of January, 2018.
O.S.No.199/2012
Between: Vennela Pydamma,W/o Somulu, Hindu, age 65 years, household duties, resildilng at D.No.8-4, Mettapalem village, lH/o Vada Cheepurupalli, Paraawada Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
Plaintiff. And:
1.Eerla Sreeramulu,S/o Musalayya, Hindu, age 52 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.7-56, Sriram Nagar, T.Devada, Steet project Office, Visakhapatnam-31.
2.Eerla Suryanarayana, S/o Musalayya, Hindu, age 50 years, cultivation, residilng at D.No.7-55, Sriram Nagar, T.Devada, Steel project Office, Visakhapatnam-31.
3.Eerla Vonumulu, S/o Musalayya, Hindu, age 48 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.30-71-1, Appikonda RH colonyll, Vadlapudi, Gajuwakal Mandal, Visakhapatnam-46.
4. Kundrapu Somulamma, W/o Mutyalu, Hindu, age 62 years, housewife, residing at D.No.30-7-1, Appikonda RH colony, Vadlapudi, Gajuwaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam-46.
5.Kundrapu Simhachalam W/o Appalanaidu, Hindu, age 86 years, residing at Door No.7-5, Sriram Nagar, T.Devada, Steel project office, Visakhapatnam-31.
6. Geddam Kpentamma, W/o Simhachalam, age 58 years, Hindu, Housewife, D.No.5-4, Hastinapuram, H/o Vada Cheepurupalli, Parawada mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
7. Ramineni Venkateswararao, S/o Basavayya, Hindu, age 45 years, business, resilding at D.No.10-32-6, Visalakshmi Nagar, Visakhapatnam.
Defendants.
Suit for partition of the plaint schedule properties at metes and bounds into seven equal shares and allot one such share to the plaintiff and such equal shares dto thedefendants 1 to 6, and deliver separate possession ofk such share so allotted to the plaintiff and defendants 1 to 6 on converting the joint possession into separate possession; for profits that can be determined by way of separate application; and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and Jurisdiction of this court
Valuel of the plaint schedule property consisting of Ac.5.00 cents and @
Rs.15,00,000/- per acre as per basic value register Rs. 16,05,000-00
Plaintiff’s 1/7th share Rs. 10,71,428-00 3/4th value share Rs. 8,03,571-00
C.F. of Rs.10,826-00 is payable, but a fixed court fee of Rs.200/- is paid under
Sec.34(2) of A.P.C.F. Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri V.V.Jogayya and Sri M.Srinivasarao, Advocates for the plaintiff and of Sri
A.V.S.Bhavani Prasad, Advocate for defendant No.7 and defendants 1,3,4,6 remind exparte and suit against defendant 2 and 5 dismissed for default and this Court doth order and ;
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed for default;
2) that there be no order as to costs;
Given under my hand and theseal of this court, this the 31st day of January, 2018.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PLAINTIFF; FOR DEFENDANTS;
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Friday, this the 23rd day of February, 2018.
O.S.No.189/2017
Between: Chekuri Ramaraju S/o Venkata Raju @ Venkatarao, Hindu, age 38 years, cultivation, resident of D.No.1-38, Melupaka village and post, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Plaintiff. And:
Gogula Srinivas S/o Narayana Murthy, Hindu, age 49 years, resident of D.No.1- 113, Melupaka village and post, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
Defendant.
This suit coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri M.Jayaram & Sri BSVRajagopal,Advocates for plaintiff. Plaintiff filed memo not press the suit . Memo is recorded and this Court delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
Suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for recovery oif
Rs.6,84,333/- being the principal and interest due under a promissory note
dated 05.06.2016 for Rs.5,00,000/- executed by the defendant in favour of
plaintiff agreeing to repay the same with interest at 24% p.a., and for costs of the suit.
I.A59 /2018 is allowed. Accordingly the matter is advanced to today from 23.02.2018.
The plaintiff is present. Plaintiff filed memo not pressing the suit as matter was settled out of court. Heard. Memo is recorded. Accordingly suit is dismissed without costs as not pressed.
Pronounced by me in open court, this lthe 1st day of February, 2018.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
LIST OF DOCUMENTS
NIL PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:19-12-2017
Date of Filing:19-12-2017
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Friday, this the 23rd day of February, 2018.
O.S.No.189/2017
Between: Chekuri Ramaraju S/o Venkata Raju @ Venkatarao, Hindu, age 38 years, cultivation, resident of D.No.1-38, Melupaka village and post, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Plaintiff. And:
Gogula Srinivas S/o Narayana Murthy, Hindu, age 49 years, resident of D.No.1- 113, Melupaka village and post, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
Defendant.
Suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for recovery oif
Rs.6,84,333/- being the principal and interest due under a promissory note
dated 05.06.2016 for Rs.5,00,000/- executed by the defendant in favour of
plaintiff agreeing to repay the same with interest at 24% p.a., and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and Jurisdiction is
Rs.6,84,333/- and a court fee of Rs.9,326/- is paid under Section 20 r/w Art.I(a) of A.P.C.F. and S.V.Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri M.Jayaram & Sri B.S.V.Rajagopal, Advocates for plaintiff. Plaintiff filed memo not press the suit . Memo is recorded and this Court doth order and:
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed as not pressed;
2) that there be no costs;
Pronounced by me in open court, this the 1st day of February, 2018.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PLAINTIFF; FOR DEFENDANT;
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Thursday, this the 8th day of February, 2018.
O.S.No.255/2013
Between: Panduri Satyarao S/o Simhachalam, Hindu, age 69 years, retired MPDO, Sabbavaram, N/o Venkatapuram village Munagapaka Mandal, presently, residing at D.No.14-38-1/A, Plot No.303, Viswanadh Residency, Maharanipeta, Visakhapatnam-2. Plaintiff. And:
1. Panduri Kanaka Apparao,s/o Late Nookaiah, Hindu, age 45 years, Resident of Venkatapuram village, Via: Paravada, Thanam Post, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
2. Panduri Ramalakshmi W/o Kanaka Apparao, Hindu, age 40 years, resident of Venkatapuram village, Via: Paravada, Thanam Post, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
3. Chinni China Appalanaidu @ Innabbai,S/o Sanyasi, Hindu, age 69 yearls, resident of Venkatapuram village, via; Paravada, Thanam post, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
Defendants.
This suit coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri B.V.R.Joga rao and Mr.R.Atchutharamaiah, Advocates for plaintiff and of Sri K.P.Naidu, Advocate of defendants. Costs not paid. PW.1 called absent. No representation. Hence the suit is dismissed for default and this Court delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
This is a suit for declaration that the plaintiff is the absolute owner of item No.6 of plaint schedule property, and for recovery of possession of the item No.6 of plaint schedule property after evicting the defendants their men, agents servants there from; for future profits till the delivaery of the possession of item No.6 of schedule property as to be determined in a separate enquiry under order 20 R.12 of CPC; (b) for a permanent injunction restraining the defendants their men, agents, servants, and representatives from ever interfering with plaintiff’s peaceful possession and enjoyment of items 1 to 5 of plaint schedule property in any manner and for costs of the suit.
Costs not paid. PW1 called absent. No representation. Hence the suilt is dismissed for default.
Pronounced by me in open court, this the 8th day of February, 2018.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
FOR PLAINTIFF:-
PW1/ Dt.9-6-2017/Panduri Satya Rao, S/o Simhachalam (chief affidavit only)
FOR DEFENDANT: NIL
LIST OF DOCUMENTS
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation: 26-12-2013 Date of Filing: 26-12-2013
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Thursday, this the 8th day of February, 2018.
O.S.No.255/2013
Between: Panduri Satyarao S/o Simhachalam, Hindu, age 69 years, retired MPDO, Sabbavaram, N/o Venkatapuram village Munagapaka Mandal, presently, residing at D.No.14-38-1/A, Plot No.303, Viswanadh Residency, Maharanipeta, Visakhapatnam-2. Plaintiff. And:
1. Panduri Kanaka Apparao,s/o Late Nookaiah, Hindu, age 45 years, Resident of Venkatapuram village, Via: Paravada, Thanam Post, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
2. Panduri Ramalakshmi W/o Kanaka Apparao, Hindu, age 40 years, resident of Venkatapuram village, Via: Paravada, Thanam Post, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
3. Chinni China Appalanaidu @ Innabbai,S/o Sanyasi, Hindu, age 69 yearls, resident of Venkatapuram village, via; Paravada, Thanam post, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
Defendants.
This is a suit for declaration that the plaintiff is the absolute owner of item No.6 of plaint schedule property, and for recovery of possession of the item No.6 of plaint schedule property after evicting the defendants their men, agents servants there from; for future profits till the delivaery of the possession of item No.6 of schedule property as to be determined in a separate enquiry under order 20 R.12 of CPC; (b) for a permanent injunction restraining the defendants their men, agents, servants, and representatives from ever interfering with plaintiff’s peaceful possession and enjoyment of items 1 to 5 of plaint schedule property in any manner and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suilt for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction is
Rs.10,000/- for relief of permanent injunction and Rs.1,20,000/- being 3/4th market value for relief of declaration and possession and CF of Rs.4,412/- is paid under Sec.26 (c) & 24(a) of A.P.C.F. and S.V.Act.
Total value of item-6 property Rs. 1,60,000-00 3/4th of the Market value is Rs. 1,20,000-00
Notional value of items 1 to 5 Rs. 10,000-00
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri B.V.R.Joga rao and Mr.R.Atchutharamaiah, Advocates for plaintiff and of
Sri K.P.Naidu, Advocate of defendants. Costs not paid. PW.1 called absent. No representation. Hence the suit is dismissed for default and this Court doth order and :
DECREE
1) that the suilt be and the same is hereby dismissed for default;
2) that there be no order as to costs; ( Copy of plaint schedule and valuation slip hereto enclosed)
Pronounced by me in open court, this the 8th day of February, 2018.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PLAINTIFF; FOR DEFENDANTS;
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Tuesday, this the 23rd day of January, 2018.
O.S.No.221/2013
Between: Gulla Sreeram Murthy S/o Chellanna Dora, Hindu, age 33 years, cultivation, resident of Door No.3-16, Buddibanda village H/o Kovagunta village, Vommali Jagannadhapuram post, Ravikamatham Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
Plaintiff. And:
1.Konathala Radhabhai, W/o Seetharam, Hindu, age years, House wife, resident of Door No.2-95, Sampathipuram village, Anakapalle Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
2. Central Bank of India, Main branch, Visakhapatnam represented by its Chief Manager, Visakhapatnam.
Defendants.
This suit coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Venkateswara Rao, Advocate for plaintiff and of Sri Ch.S.S.Ramachandrarao, Advocate for defendant No.2 and defendant No.1 remained exparte. Costs not paid. PW.1 called absent No representation on either side.Hence the suilt is dismissed for default and this Court delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
This is a suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant (a) for specific performance of the sale agreement dated 27.05.2005 by directing thedefendant to execute a regular sale deed on a proper stamp paper and register the samek in respect of the plaint schedule property in favoudr of the plaintiff and to do all the acts necaessary to put the plaintiff in possession with such time as the court fixes, ilf the 1st defendant, fails to execute the regular sale deed, the court may execute the same at the costs of the plaintiffl and recover the same from thedefendant (b) for an alternative relief foir refund of the advance amount of Rs.4,00,000/- with subsequent interest at the rate of 24% p.a. from the 1st defendant and for costs of the suilt.
Costs not paid. PW1 called absent. No representation on either side.
Hence the suit is dismissed for default.
Pronounced by me in open court, this the 23rd day of January, 2018.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIl
LIST OF DOCUMENTS
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
Date of presentation:22-11-2013 Date of Filing :22-11-2013
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri S.Srinivasa Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalle Tuesday, this the 23rd day of January, 2018.
O.S.No.221/2013
Between: Gulla Sreeram Murthy S/o Chellanna Dora, Hindu, age 33 years, cultivation, resident of Door No.3-16, Buddibanda village H/o Kovagunta village, Vommali Jagannadhapuram post, Ravikamatham Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
Plaintiff. And:
1.Konathala Radhabhai, W/o Seetharam, Hindu, age years, House wife, resident of Door No.2-95, Sampathipuram village, Anakapalle Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
2. Central Bank of India, Main branch, Visakhapatnam represented by its Chief Manager, Visakhapatnam.
Defendants.
This is a suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant (a) for specific performance of the sale agreement dated 27.05.2005 by directing thedefendant to execute a regular sale deed on a proper stamp paper and register the samek in respect of the plaint schedule property in favoudr of the plaintiff and to do all the acts necaessary to put the plaintiff in possession with such time as the court fixes, ilf the 1st defendant, fails to execute the regular sale deed, the court may execute the same at the costs of the plaintiffl and recover the same from thedefendant (b) for an alternative relief foir refund of the advance amount of Rs.4,00,000/- with subsequent interest at the rate of 24% p.a. from the 1st defendant and for costs of the suilt.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and Jurisdiction is
Rs.4,00,000/- and a court fee of Rs.6,426/- is paid under Sec.39 of A.P.C.F. and
S.V.Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri G.Venkateswara Rao, Advocate for plaintiff and of Sri
Ch.S.S.Ramachandrarao, Advocate for defendant No.2 and defendant No.1 remained exparte. Costs not paid. PW.1 called absent No representation on either side. Hence the suilt is dismissed for default and this Court doth order and:
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed for default;
2) that there be no order as to costs; ( Copy of Plaint schedule hereto enclosed)
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 23rd day of January, 2018.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLE
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PLAINTIFF; FOR DEFENDANTS;
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT
ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
Friday, this the 2th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.1062016
Between:
Sri Bharnikana Ramana Babu.
Plaintiff.
And:
Sri Karanam Naidu and 8 others.
Defendants.
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me
in the presence of Sri V.Venkata Rao, Advocate for the Plaintiff and
of Sri M.Jayaram and B.S.V. Rajagopal, Advocates for the defendants
and having stood over till this day this court settle the following:
ISSUES
1) Whether the plaintiff is entitle for decree for specific
performance of contract or
for alternative relief?
2) Whether the defendants are trying to alienate the plaint schedule
properties to
3rd parties?
3) To what relief?
List of witnesses and documents within 15 days .
For trial 19-06-2017.
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 2nd day of
June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL
JUDGE
VISAKHAPATNAM
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
Thursday, this the 8th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.131/2016
Between: Sri Molleti Bhuvaneswara Ramana Murthy
Plaintiff. And: Smt Genji Mahalaxmi, W/o late Sanyasinaidu and another.
Defendants.
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri Lanka Jagannadham, Lanka Parvaateeswar and K.R.Ramaesh babu, Advocates for the Plaintiff and of SriP.Hara Srinivasa Rao,Advocate for the defendants and having stood over till this day this court settle the following: ISSUES
1) Whether the suit promissory note is a fabricated and created one and not supported by consideration?
2) Whether the plaintiff is entitle for decree for the suit amount?
3) To what relief?
List of witnesses and documents within 15 days .
For trial 23-06-2017.
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 8th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL
JUDGE
VISAKHAPATNAM
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT
ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
Thursday, this the 8th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.141/2016
Between:
Sri G.V.Nageswararao S/o Venkata Rao
Plaintiff.
And:
Sri Palaparthi Apparao S/o Kondayya.
Defendant.
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me
in the presence of Sri Ch.V.Krishna, Advocate for the Plaintiff and of
Sri C.Sivaiah,Advocate for the defendant and having stood over till
this day this court settle the following:
ISSUES
1) Whether the suit promissory note is a fabricated and rank forged
one and the
same is not supported by consideration as contended by
defendant?
2) Whether the plaintiff is entitle for decree for the suit amount?
3) To what relief?
List of witnesses and documents within 15 days .
For trial 23-06-2017.
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 8th day of
June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR
CIVIL JUDGE
VISAKHAPATNAM
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT
ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
Wednesday, this the 7th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.178/2016
Between:
Sri Katari Demudu S/o late Adeyya.
Plaintiff.
And:
Sri Chenna Parvathi @ Pujaramma W/o Appalakonda and 6 others.
Defendants.
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me
in the presence of Sri Lanka Jagannadham, Lanka Parvaateeswar
and K.R.Ramaesh babu, Advocates for the Plaintiff and of
SriP.V.Patnaik,Advocate for the defendants and having stood over till
this day this court settle the following:
ISSUES
1) Whether the suit promissory note is a rank forged one as
contended by the defendants?
2) Whether the plaintiff is entitle for decree for the suit amount?
3) To what relief?
List of witnesses and documents within 15 days .
For trial 23-06-2017.
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 7th day of
June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR
CIVIL JUDGE
VISAKHAPATNAM
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT
ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
Friday, this the 2nd day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.156/2016
Between:
Smt. Gunisetti Lakshmi W/o Srinivas.
Plaintiff.
And:
Smt.Senapathi Lakshmi W/o late Satyam and 3 others
Defendants.
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me
in the presence of Sri Vaddadi Venkata Rao, Advocate for the
Plaintiff and of Sri M.Jayaram,Advocate for the defendants 1 and 2 .
Defendants 3 remained exparte and having stood over till this day
this court settle the following:
ISSUES
1) Whether the interest claimed by the plaintiff is usurious as
contended
by the defendants?
2) Whether the plaintiff is entitle for preliminary decree for the suit
amount?
3) To what relief?
List of witnesses and documents within 15 days .
For trial 16-06-2017.
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 2nd day of
June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR
CIVIL JUDGE
VISAKHAPATNAM
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT
ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
Thursday, this the 8th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.104/2016
Between:
Smt. Uppada Uma Santhi Kumari W/o Ramachandrarao and another.
Plaintiffs.
And:
Sri Gundapu Ganapathirao S/o Jaggarao and another.
Defendants.
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me
in the presence of Sri Lanka Jagannadham, Lanka Parvaateeswar
and K.R.Ramaesh babu, Advocates for the Plaintiff and of SriS.Ram
Babu, Advocate for the defendants and having stood over till this
day this court settle the following:
ISSUES
1) Whether the suit promissory note is a fabricated and rank forged
one and the
same is not supported by consideration as contended by
defendant?
2) Whether the plaintiff is entitle for decree for the suit amount?
3) To what relief?
List of witnesses and documents within 15 days .
For trial 23-06-2017.
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 8th day of
June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR
CIVIL JUDGE
VISAKHAPATNAM
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT
ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
Wednesday, this the 7th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.113/2016
Between:
Sri Madem Venkata Ramana S/o late Bangarayya.
Plaintiff.
And:
Sri Singampali Rama Rao,S/o late Appanna.
Defendant.
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me
in the presence of Sri K.P.Naidu, Advocate for the Plaintiff and of Sri
S.P.Naidu,Advocate for the defendant and having stood over till this
day this court settle the following:
ISSUES
1) Whether the suit promissory note is a fabricated and created one
as contended
by defendants?
2) Whether the plaintiff is entitle for decree for the suit amount?
3) To what relief?
List of witnesses and documents within 15 days .
For trial 23-06-2017.
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 7th day of
June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL
JUDGE
VISAKHAPATNAM
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT
ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
Thursday, this the 8th day of June,
2017.
O.S.No.116/2016
Between:
State Bank of India, Munagapaka Branch, Munagapaka.
Plaintiff.
And:
M/s Laxmiprasanth Digital Studios and Vedeos, Munagapaaka and 2
others.
Defendants.
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me
in the presence of Smt. A.Bhanumathi, Sri V.Viswaanadham,
Advocates for the Plaintiff and of Sri Y.Jagaish, Advocate for the
defendants and having stood over till this day this court settle the
following:
ISSUES
1) Whether the defendants are small farmers and they are entitled
to get relief
under debt relief Acts?
2) Whether the interest claimed by the plaintiff is usurious?
3) Whether the plaintiff is entitle for preliminary decree for the suit
amount?
4) To what relief?
List of witnesses and documents within 15 days .
For trial 23-06-2017.
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 8th day of
June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR
CIVIL JUDGE
VISAKHAPATNAM
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT
ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
Monday, this the 8th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.229/2015
Between:
Sri Malla Madhavarao S/o Narasimhamurthy.
Plaintiff.
And:
Smt.Doppalapudi Manjula W/o Busayya and another.
Defendants.
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me
in the presence of Sri M.Jayaram, Advocate for the Plaintiff and of
Sri Y.Sairam, Advocate for the defendants and having stood over till
this day this court settle the following:
ISSUES
1) Whether the suit promissory note is true, supported by
consideration and the same is binding on the defendants or not?
2) Whether the plaintiff is entitle for decree for the suit amount?
3) To what relief?
List of witnesses and documents within 15 days .
For trial 21-06-2017.
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 5th day of
June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL
JUDGE
VISAKHAPATNAM
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT
ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
Monday, this the 5th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.117/2016
Between:
Smt. Tainana Parvathamma W/o Sannibabu.
Plaintiffs.
And:
Smt. Gorle Ramanamma W/o late Satyanarayana.
Defendant.
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me
in the presence of Sri Lanka Jagannadham, Lanka Parvaateeswar
and K.R.Ramaesh babu, Advocates for the Plaintiff and of
SriP.A.Narasimham, Advocate for the defendants and having stood
over till this day this court settle the following:
ISSUES
1) Whether the suit promissory note is true valid and the same is
binding
on the defendant or not?
2) Whether the interest claimed by the plaintiff is penal and
usurious?
2) Whether the plaintiff is entitle for decree for the suit amount?
3) To what relief?
List of witnesses and documents within 15 days .
For trial 21-06-2017.
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 5th day of
June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR
CIVIL JUDGE
VISAKHAPATNAM
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT
ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
Friday, this the 2th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.112/2016
Between:
State Bank of India, Sabbavaram, represented by its Branch
Manager, Sabbavaram.
Plaintiff.
And:
Sri Rama Poultry Feeds Thavvanipalem and 3 others.
Defendants.
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me
in the presence of Smt A.Bhanumathi and Sri V.Viswanadham,
Advocates for the Plaintiff and of Sri S.P.Naidu, Advocate for the
defendants and having stood over till this day this court settle the
following:
ISSUES
1) Whether the interest claimed by the plaintiff is penal and
excessive as contended
by the defendant?
2) Whether the plaintiff is entitle for decree for the suit amount?
3) To what relief?
List of witnesses and documents within 15 days .
For trial 16-06-2017.
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 2nd day of
June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR
CIVIL JUDGE
VISAKHAPATNAM
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT
ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
Thursday, this the 1st day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.249/2015
Between:
State Bank of India, Anakapalle Branch, represented by its Chief
Manager,Anakapalle.
Plaintiff.
And:
Kum.Vajragottu Lavanya and 3 others.
Defendants.
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me
in the presence of Smt. A.Bhanumathi, Sri V.Viswanadham,
Advocates for the plaintiff and of Sri K.P.V.Ramanaiah, Advocate for
defendants and having stood over till this day this court settle the
following:
ISSUES
1) Whether the Education loan is entitle to interest waiver, as such
the suit amount
is excessive and penal in nature?
2) Whether the defendants are trying to alienate the plaint schedule
properties to
III rd parties?
3) To what relief?
List of witnesses and documents within 15 days .
For trial 16-06-2017.
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 1st day of
June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR
CIVIL JUDGE
VISAKHAPATNAM
+ O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
Date of presentation:06-09-2007 Date of Filing:28-09-2007 06-09-2007IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Tuesday this the 20th of June, 2017.
CMA.No.01/2007
Between: Sri Villuri Ramu, son of late Mahalakshmi Naidu, Hindu, age 45 years, cultivation, residing at Dr.No.15-22-6/1, Anakapalle, Visakhapatnam District. Appellant. And:
1) The State of Andhra Pradesh represented by its District Collector, Visakhapatnam.
2) The Collector under Section-47-A of Indian stamp Act and District Registrar of Assurances, Registration and Stamps, Visakhapatnam.
3) The Sub Registrar, Sub-Registrar office, Anakapalle.
Respondents
Petition filed under section 47-A (4 & 5) of Indian Stamp Act read with Rule-9 of A.P.Stamp (Prevention of under valuation of instruments) Rules, 1975 by the Petitioner/Appellant against the respondent District Registrar of Assurance Registration and stamps Visakhapatnam to set aside the proceedings No.595/G2/07,dt.27-06-2007 by allowing this Appeal with costs.
A fixed Court fee of Rs.5/- is paid under Section47-A of Indian Stamp Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri V.V.Jogayya,
Sri M.Sreenivasa Rao, Advocates for Appellant and of Sri Assistant Government Pleader, Advocate for Defendants. Counsel for appellants filed memo stating that not pressing the Civil Miscellaneous petition and having stood over till this day this court doth order and:
DECREE
1) that the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal be and the same is hereby dismissed as not pressed;
2) that there be no costs;
Given under my hand and the seal of this court this the 20th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
For APPELLANT FOR RESPONDENTS
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Tuesday this the 20th of June, 2017.
CMA.No.01/2007
Between: Sri Villuri Ramu, son of late Mahalakshmi Naidu, Hindu, age 45 years, cultivation, residing at Dr.No.15-22-6/1, Anakapalle, Visakhapatnam District. Appellant. And:
1) The State of Andhra Pradesh represented by its District Collector, Visakhapatnam.
2) The Collector under Section-47-A of Indian stamp Act and District Registrar of Assurances, Registration and Stamps, Visakhapatnam.
3) The Sub Registrar, Sub-Registrar office, Anakapalle.
Respondents
This suit coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri V.V.Jogayya,
Sri M.Sreenivasa Rao, Advocates for Appellant and of Sri Assistant Government Pleader, Advocate for Defendants. Counsel for appellants filed memo stating that not pressing the Civil Miscellaneous petition and having stood over till this day this court delivered the following:
ORDER
Petition filed under section 47-A (4 & 5) of Indian Stamp Act read with Rule-9 of A.P.Stamp (Prevention of under valuation of instruments) Rules, 1975 by the Petitioner/Appellant against the respondent District Registrar of Assurance Registration and stamps Visakhapatnam to set aside the proceedings No.595/G2/07,dt.27-06-2007 by allowing this Appeal with costs.
Counsel for Appellants filed memo stating that not pressing the CMA. Memo is recorded.
Hence this CMA is dismissed without costs.
Pronounced by me in open court, this the 20th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:12-09-12012 Date of Filing:12-09-2012
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli,
Monday this the 19th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.223/2012
Between: Sri Pilli Manikumar,S/o late Somulu, Hindu, age 45 years, cultivation, residing at Door No.40-56- 16, Sanjeeviah colony, Near Logos Church, Tadichetlapalem, Visakhapatnam-4. Plaintiff. And:
1) Pilli Chellayyamma,W/o late Somulu, Hindu, age 67 years, house hold duties, residing at Pidiwada Agraharam Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
2) Ravada Saraswathi W/o late Appanna, Hindu, age 49 years, house hold duties, residing at Pydiwada Agraharam, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
3) Kannapalli Laxmi, W/o Ramulu, Hindu, age 46 years, household duties, residing at Ammulapalem villagae, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
4) andukuri Narasinga Rao, S/o late Apparao, Hindu, age 71 years, cultivation, D.No.8-7-10, Gajuwaka, Visakhapatnam Greater Municipal Corporation, Visakhapatnam District. Defendants
Suit for Preliminary decree for partition of the plaint schedule property into four equal shares with metes and bounds and allot one such equal separated share to the plaintiff after converting the joint possession into separate possession and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction is Rs.653063/- and a court fee of Rs.9026/- is payable but the schedule property is in joint possession and enjoyment of the plaintiff and the defendants a fixed court fee of Rs.200-00 is paid under Sec.34(2) of A.P.C.F. and
S.V.Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri
B.V.S.S.N.Murthy, Advocate for Plaintiff and of Sri A.V.S.Bhavani Prasad, Advocate for Defendant
No.4. Defendants 1 to 3 remained exparte. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court doth order and:
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed for default
2) that there be no costs:
( Copy of Plaint schedule and valuation slip hereto enclosed)
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Monday this the 19th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.223/2012
Between: Sri Pilli Manikumar,S/o late Somulu, Hindu, age 45 years, cultivation, residing at Door No.40-56- 16, Sanjeeviah colony, Near Logos Church, Tadichetlapalem, Visakhapatnam-4. Plaintiff. And:
1) Pilli Chellayyamma,W/o late Somulu, Hindu, age 67 years, house hold duties, residing at Pidiwada Agraharam Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
2) Ravada Saraswathi W/o late Appanna, Hindu, age 49 years, house hold duties, residing at Pydiwada Agraharam, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
3) Kannapalli Laxmi, W/o Ramulu, Hindu, age 46 years, household duties, residing at Ammulapalem villagae, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
4) Andukuri Narasinga Rao, S/o late Apparao, Hindu, age 71 years, cultivation, D.No.8-7-10, Gajuwaka, Visakhapatnam Greater Municipal Corporation, Visakhapatnam District. Defendants
This suit coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri
B.V.S.S.N.Murthy, Advocate for Plaintiff and of Sri A.V.S.Bhavani Prasad, Advocate for Defendant
No.4. Defendants 1 to 3 remained exparte. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
Suit for Preliminary decree for partition of the plaint schedule property into four equal shares with metes and bounds and allot one such equal separated share to the plaintiff after converting the joint possession into separate possession and for costs of the suit.
Costs not paid. Plaintiff called absent. No representation on behalf of plaintiff. Plaintiff failed to adduce evidence though granted several adjournments . Hence this suit is dismissed for default without costs.
Pronounced by me in open court, this the 19th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:12-09-12012 Date of Filing:12-09-2012
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Monday this the 19th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.223/2012
Between: Sri Pilli Manikumar,S/o late Somulu, Hindu, age 45 years, cultivation, residing at Door No.40-56- 16, Sanjeeviah colony, Near Logos Church, Tadichetlapalem, Visakhapatnam-4. Plaintiff. And:
1) Pilli Chellayyamma,W/o late Somulu, Hindu, age 67 years, house hold duties, residing at Pidiwada Agraharam Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
2) Ravada Saraswathi W/o late Appanna, Hindu, age 49 years, house hold duties, residing at Pydiwada Agraharam, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
3) Kannapalli Laxmi, W/o Ramulu, Hindu, age 46 years, household duties, residing at Ammulapalem villagae, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
4) andukuri Narasinga Rao, S/o late Apparao, Hindu, age 71 years, cultivation, D.No.8-7-10, Gajuwaka, Visakhapatnam Greater Municipal Corporation, Visakhapatnam District. Defendants
Suit for Preliminary decree for partition of the plaint schedule property into four equal shares with metes and bounds and allot one such equal separated share to the plaintiff after converting the joint possession into separate possession and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction is Rs.653063/- and a court fee of Rs.9026/- is payable but the schedule property is in joint possession and enjoyment of the plaintiff and the defendants a fixed court fee of Rs.200-00 is paid under Sec.34(2) of A.P.C.F. and
S.V.Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri
B.V.S.S.N.Murthy, Advocate for Plaintiff and of Sri A.V.S.Bhavani Prasad, Advocate for Defendant
No.4. Defendants 1 to 3 remained exparte. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court doth order and:
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed for default
2) that there be no costs:
( Copy of Plaint schedule and valuation slip hereto enclosed)
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:21-12-2015 Date of Filing:21-12-2015
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Wednesday this the 7th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.254/2015
Between: Sri Karri Bhasakara Rao, S/o Suryanarayana, Hindu, age 38 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.10- 63, Nagulapalli villagae, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Plaintiff. And: Sri Villuri Bhaskara Rao, S/o late Suribabu, Hindu, age 45 years, Business, residing at D.No.2-36 Ummalada village, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Defendant
Suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for specific performance of the plaint schedule property directing the defendant to execute the registered sale deed for the plaint schedule property in favour of the plaintiff and if the defendant do not do so, the court to register the sale deed; if for any reason the specific performance cannot be ordered, for the refund of the advance amount of Rs.5,00,000/- and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction is Rs.6,00,000/- and a court fee of Rs.8,426/- is paid under Sec.39 Sch.I ArtI(b) and (c) of A.P.C.F. and S.V.Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri Buddha
Thrinadha Rao Advocate for Plaintiff. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court doth order:
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed for default;
2) that there be no costs;
Give under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 7th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
For Plaintiff: For Defendant:
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And: 1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court delivered the following:
ORDER
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
Counter of R1 and R2 not filed. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court. Memo is recorded. Hence this petition is dismissed without costs as not pressed as settled out of court.
Pronounced by me in open court this the 8th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:31-08-2016 Date of Filing:15-09-2016
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And: 1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
A fixed Court fee of Re1/- is affixed on the petition.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court doth order and;
DECREETAL ORDER
1) that the petition be and the same is hereby dismissed as not pressed as settled out of Court.
2) that there be no costs; Given under my hand and the seal of this court this the 8th day of June,2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PETITIONER/PLAINTIFF FOR RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Wednesday this the 7th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.254/2015
Between: Sri Karri Bhasakara Rao, S/o Suryanarayana, Hindu, age 38 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.10- 63, Nagulapalli villagae, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Plaintiff. And: Sri Villuri Bhaskara Rao, S/o late Suribabu, Hindu, age 45 years, Business, residing at D.No.2-36 Ummalada village, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Defendant
This suit coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri Buddha
Thrinadha Rao Advocate for Plaintiff. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
Suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for specific performance of the plaint schedule property directing the defendant to execute the registered sale deed for the plaint schedule property in favour of the plaintiff and if the defendant do not do so, the court to register the sale deed; if for any reason the specific performance cannot be ordered, for the refund of the advance amount of Rs.5,00,000/- and for costs of the suit.
Publication not filed against defendant . Plaintiff called absent No representation on behalf of plaintiff. Hence this suit is dismissed for default without costs.
Pronounced by me in open court, this the 7th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:21-12-2015 Date of Filing:21-12-2015
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Wednesday this the 7th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.254/2015
Between: Sri Karri Bhasakara Rao, S/o Suryanarayana, Hindu, age 38 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.10- 63, Nagulapalli villagae, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Plaintiff. And: Sri Villuri Bhaskara Rao, S/o late Suribabu, Hindu, age 45 years, Business, residing at D.No.2-36 Ummalada village, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Defendant
Suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for specific performance of the plaint schedule property directing the defendant to execute the registered sale deed for the plaint schedule property in favour of the plaintiff and if the defendant do not do so, the court to register the sale deed; if for any reason the specific performance cannot be ordered, for the refund of the advance amount of Rs.5,00,000/- and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction is Rs.6,00,000/- and a court fee of Rs.8,426/- is paid under Sec.39 Sch.I ArtI(b) and (c) of A.P.C.F. and S.V.Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri Buddha
Thrinadha Rao Advocate for Plaintiff. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court doth order:
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed for default;
2) that there be no costs;
Give under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 7th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
For Plaintiff: For Defendant:
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And:
1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court delivered the following:
ORDER
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
Counter of R1 and R2 not filed. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court. Memo is recorded. Hence this petition is dismissed without costs as not pressed as settled out of court.
Pronounced by me in open court this the 8th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:31-08-2016
Date of Filing:15-09-2016
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And: 1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
A fixed Court fee of Re1/- is affixed on the petition.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court doth order and;
DECREETAL ORDER
1) that the petition be and the same is hereby dismissed as not pressed as settled out of Court.
2) that there be no costs; Given under my hand and the seal of this court this the 8th day of June,2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PETITIONER/PLAINTIFF FOR RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:21-12-2015 Date of Filing:21-12-2015
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Wednesday this the 7th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.254/2015
Between: Sri Karri Bhasakara Rao, S/o Suryanarayana, Hindu, age 38 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.10- 63, Nagulapalli villagae, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Plaintiff. And: Sri Villuri Bhaskara Rao, S/o late Suribabu, Hindu, age 45 years, Business, residing at D.No.2-36 Ummalada village, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Defendant
Suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for specific performance of the plaint schedule property directing the defendant to execute the registered sale deed for the plaint schedule property in favour of the plaintiff and if the defendant do not do so, the court to register the sale deed; if for any reason the specific performance cannot be ordered, for the refund of the advance amount of Rs.5,00,000/- and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction is Rs.6,00,000/- and a court fee of Rs.8,426/- is paid under Sec.39 Sch.I ArtI(b) and (c) of A.P.C.F. and S.V.Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri Buddha
Thrinadha Rao Advocate for Plaintiff. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court doth order:
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed for default;
2) that there be no costs;
Give under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 7th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
For Plaintiff: For Defendant:
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And: 1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court delivered the following:
ORDER
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
Counter of R1 and R2 not filed. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court. Memo is recorded. Hence this petition is dismissed without costs as not pressed as settled out of court.
Pronounced by me in open court this the 8th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:31-08-2016 Date of Filing:15-09-2016
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74,
Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And: 1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
A fixed Court fee of Re1/- is affixed on the petition.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court doth order and;
DECREETAL ORDER
1) that the petition be and the same is hereby dismissed as not pressed as settled out of Court.
2) that there be no costs; Given under my hand and the seal of this court this the 8th day of June,2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PETITIONER/PLAINTIFF FOR RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Wednesday this the 7th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.254/2015
Between:
Sri Karri Bhasakara Rao, S/o Suryanarayana, Hindu, age 38 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.10- 63, Nagulapalli villagae, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Plaintiff. And: Sri Villuri Bhaskara Rao, S/o late Suribabu, Hindu, age 45 years, Business, residing at D.No.2-36 Ummalada village, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Defendant
This suit coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri Buddha
Thrinadha Rao Advocate for Plaintiff. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
Suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for specific performance of the plaint schedule property directing the defendant to execute the registered sale deed for the plaint schedule property in favour of the plaintiff and if the defendant do not do so, the court to register the sale deed; if for any reason the specific performance cannot be ordered, for the refund of the advance amount of Rs.5,00,000/- and for costs of the suit.
Publication not filed against defendant . Plaintiff called absent No representation on behalf of plaintiff. Hence this suit is dismissed for default without costs.
Pronounced by me in open court, this the 7th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:21-12-2015 Date of Filing:21-12-2015
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Wednesday this the 7th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.254/2015
Between: Sri Karri Bhasakara Rao, S/o Suryanarayana, Hindu, age 38 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.10- 63, Nagulapalli villagae, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Plaintiff. And: Sri Villuri Bhaskara Rao, S/o late Suribabu, Hindu, age 45 years, Business, residing at D.No.2-36 Ummalada village, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Defendant
Suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for specific performance of the plaint schedule property directing the defendant to execute the registered sale deed for the plaint schedule property in favour of the plaintiff and if the defendant do not do so, the court to register the sale deed; if for any reason the specific performance cannot be ordered, for the refund of the advance amount of Rs.5,00,000/- and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction is Rs.6,00,000/- and a court fee of Rs.8,426/- is paid under Sec.39 Sch.I ArtI(b) and (c) of A.P.C.F. and S.V.Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri Buddha
Thrinadha Rao Advocate for Plaintiff. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court doth order:
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed for default;
2) that there be no costs;
Give under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 7th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
For Plaintiff: For Defendant:
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And: 1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court delivered the following:
ORDER
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
Counter of R1 and R2 not filed. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court. Memo is recorded. Hence this petition is dismissed without costs as not pressed as settled out of court.
Pronounced by me in open court this the 8th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:31-08-2016 Date of Filing:15-09-2016
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And: 1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
A fixed Court fee of Re1/- is affixed on the petition.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court doth order and;
DECREETAL ORDER
1) that the petition be and the same is hereby dismissed as not pressed as settled out of Court.
2) that there be no costs; Given under my hand and the seal of this court this the 8th day of June,2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PETITIONER/PLAINTIFF FOR RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:12-09-12012 Date of Filing:12-09-2012
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Monday this the 19th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.223/2012
Between: Sri Pilli Manikumar,S/o late Somulu, Hindu, age 45 years, cultivation, residing at Door No.40-56- 16, Sanjeeviah colony, Near Logos Church, Tadichetlapalem, Visakhapatnam-4. Plaintiff. And:
1) Pilli Chellayyamma,W/o late Somulu, Hindu, age 67 years, house hold duties, residing at Pidiwada Agraharam Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
2) Ravada Saraswathi W/o late Appanna, Hindu, age 49 years, house hold duties, residing at Pydiwada Agraharam, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
3) Kannapalli Laxmi, W/o Ramulu, Hindu, age 46 years, household duties, residing at Ammulapalem villagae, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
4) andukuri Narasinga Rao, S/o late Apparao, Hindu, age 71 years, cultivation, D.No.8-7-10, Gajuwaka, Visakhapatnam Greater Municipal Corporation, Visakhapatnam District. Defendants
Suit for Preliminary decree for partition of the plaint schedule property into four equal shares with metes and bounds and allot one such equal separated share to the plaintiff after converting the joint possession into separate possession and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction is Rs.653063/- and a court fee of Rs.9026/- is payable but the schedule property is in joint possession and enjoyment of the plaintiff and the defendants a fixed court fee of Rs.200-00 is paid under Sec.34(2) of A.P.C.F. and
S.V.Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri
B.V.S.S.N.Murthy, Advocate for Plaintiff and of Sri A.V.S.Bhavani Prasad, Advocate for Defendant
No.4. Defendants 1 to 3 remained exparte. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court doth order and:
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed for default
2) that there be no costs:
( Copy of Plaint schedule and valuation slip hereto enclosed)
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Monday this the 19th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.223/2012
Between: Sri Pilli Manikumar,S/o late Somulu, Hindu, age 45 years, cultivation, residing at Door No.40-56- 16, Sanjeeviah colony, Near Logos Church, Tadichetlapalem, Visakhapatnam-4. Plaintiff. And:
1) Pilli Chellayyamma,W/o late Somulu, Hindu, age 67 years, house hold duties, residing at Pidiwada Agraharam Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
2) Ravada Saraswathi W/o late Appanna, Hindu, age 49 years, house hold duties, residing at Pydiwada Agraharam, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
3) Kannapalli Laxmi, W/o Ramulu, Hindu, age 46 years, household duties, residing at Ammulapalem villagae, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
4) andukuri Narasinga Rao, S/o late Apparao, Hindu, age 71 years, cultivation, D.No.8-7-10, Gajuwaka, Visakhapatnam Greater Municipal Corporation, Visakhapatnam District. Defendants
This suit coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri
B.V.S.S.N.Murthy, Advocate for Plaintiff and of Sri A.V.S.Bhavani Prasad, Advocate for Defendant
No.4. Defendants 1 to 3 remained exparte. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
Suit for Preliminary decree for partition of the plaint schedule property into four equal shares with metes and bounds and allot one such equal separated share to the plaintiff after converting the joint possession into separate possession and for costs of the suit.
Costs not paid. Plaintiff called absent. No representation on behalf of plaintiff. Plaintiff failed to adduce evidence though granted several adjournments . Hence this suit is dismissed for default without costs.
Pronounced by me in open court, this the 19th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:12-09-12012 Date of Filing:12-09-2012
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Monday this the 19th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.223/2012
Between: Sri Pilli Manikumar,S/o late Somulu, Hindu, age 45 years, cultivation, residing at Door No.40-56- 16, Sanjeeviah colony, Near Logos Church, Tadichetlapalem, Visakhapatnam-4. Plaintiff. And:
1) Pilli Chellayyamma,W/o late Somulu, Hindu, age 67 years, house hold duties, residing at Pidiwada Agraharam Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
2) Ravada Saraswathi W/o late Appanna, Hindu, age 49 years, house hold duties, residing at Pydiwada Agraharam, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
3) Kannapalli Laxmi, W/o Ramulu, Hindu, age 46 years, household duties, residing at Ammulapalem villagae, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
4) andukuri Narasinga Rao, S/o late Apparao, Hindu, age 71 years, cultivation, D.No.8-7-10, Gajuwaka, Visakhapatnam Greater Municipal Corporation, Visakhapatnam District. Defendants
Suit for Preliminary decree for partition of the plaint schedule property into four equal shares with metes and bounds and allot one such equal separated share to the plaintiff after converting the joint possession into separate possession and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction is Rs.653063/- and a court fee of Rs.9026/- is payable but the schedule property is in joint possession and enjoyment of the plaintiff and the defendants a fixed court fee of Rs.200-00 is paid under Sec.34(2) of A.P.C.F. and
S.V.Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri
B.V.S.S.N.Murthy, Advocate for Plaintiff and of Sri A.V.S.Bhavani Prasad, Advocate for Defendant
No.4. Defendants 1 to 3 remained exparte. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court doth order and:
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed for default
2) that there be no costs:
( Copy of Plaint schedule and valuation slip hereto enclosed)
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:21-12-2015 Date of Filing:21-12-2015
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Wednesday this the 7th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.254/2015
Between: Sri Karri Bhasakara Rao, S/o Suryanarayana, Hindu, age 38 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.10- 63, Nagulapalli villagae, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Plaintiff. And: Sri Villuri Bhaskara Rao, S/o late Suribabu, Hindu, age 45 years, Business, residing at D.No.2-36 Ummalada village, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Defendant
Suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for specific performance of the plaint schedule property directing the defendant to execute the registered sale deed for the plaint schedule property in favour of the plaintiff and if the defendant do not do so, the court to register the sale deed; if for any reason the specific performance cannot be ordered, for the refund of the advance amount of Rs.5,00,000/- and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction is Rs.6,00,000/- and a court fee of Rs.8,426/- is paid under Sec.39 Sch.I ArtI(b) and (c) of A.P.C.F. and S.V.Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri Buddha
Thrinadha Rao Advocate for Plaintiff. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court doth order:
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed for default;
2) that there be no costs;
Give under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 7th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
For Plaintiff: For Defendant:
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And: 1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court delivered the following:
ORDER
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
Counter of R1 and R2 not filed. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court. Memo is recorded. Hence this petition is dismissed without costs as not pressed as settled out of court.
Pronounced by me in open court this the 8th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:31-08-2016 Date of Filing:15-09-2016
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And: 1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
A fixed Court fee of Re1/- is affixed on the petition.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court doth order and;
DECREETAL ORDER
1) that the petition be and the same is hereby dismissed as not pressed as settled out of Court.
2) that there be no costs; Given under my hand and the seal of this court this the 8th day of June,2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PETITIONER/PLAINTIFF FOR RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Wednesday this the 7th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.254/2015
Between: Sri Karri Bhasakara Rao, S/o Suryanarayana, Hindu, age 38 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.10- 63, Nagulapalli villagae, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Plaintiff. And: Sri Villuri Bhaskara Rao, S/o late Suribabu, Hindu, age 45 years, Business, residing at D.No.2-36 Ummalada village, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Defendant
This suit coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri Buddha
Thrinadha Rao Advocate for Plaintiff. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
Suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for specific performance of the plaint schedule property directing the defendant to execute the registered sale deed for the plaint schedule property in favour of the plaintiff and if the defendant do not do so, the court to register the sale deed; if for any reason the specific performance cannot be ordered, for the refund of the advance amount of Rs.5,00,000/- and for costs of the suit.
Publication not filed against defendant . Plaintiff called absent No representation on behalf of plaintiff. Hence this suit is dismissed for default without costs.
Pronounced by me in open court, this the 7th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:21-12-2015 Date of Filing:21-12-2015
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Wednesday this the 7th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.254/2015
Between: Sri Karri Bhasakara Rao, S/o Suryanarayana, Hindu, age 38 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.10- 63, Nagulapalli villagae, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Plaintiff. And: Sri Villuri Bhaskara Rao, S/o late Suribabu, Hindu, age 45 years, Business, residing at D.No.2-36 Ummalada village, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Defendant
Suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for specific performance of the plaint schedule property directing the defendant to execute the registered sale deed for the plaint schedule property in favour of the plaintiff and if the defendant do not do so, the court to register the sale deed; if for any reason the specific performance cannot be ordered, for the refund of the advance amount of Rs.5,00,000/- and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction is Rs.6,00,000/- and a court fee of Rs.8,426/- is paid under Sec.39 Sch.I ArtI(b) and (c) of A.P.C.F. and S.V.Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri Buddha
Thrinadha Rao Advocate for Plaintiff. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court doth order:
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed for default;
2) that there be no costs;
Give under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 7th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
For Plaintiff: For Defendant:
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And: 1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court delivered the following:
ORDER
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
Counter of R1 and R2 not filed. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court. Memo is recorded. Hence this petition is dismissed without costs as not pressed as settled out of court.
Pronounced by me in open court this the 8th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:31-08-2016 Date of Filing:15-09-2016
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And:
1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
A fixed Court fee of Re1/- is affixed on the petition.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court doth order and;
DECREETAL ORDER
1) that the petition be and the same is hereby dismissed as not pressed as settled out of Court.
2) that there be no costs; Given under my hand and the seal of this court this the 8th day of June,2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PETITIONER/PLAINTIFF FOR RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:21-12-2015 Date of Filing:21-12-2015
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Wednesday this the 7th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.254/2015
Between: Sri Karri Bhasakara Rao, S/o Suryanarayana, Hindu, age 38 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.10- 63, Nagulapalli villagae, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Plaintiff. And: Sri Villuri Bhaskara Rao, S/o late Suribabu, Hindu, age 45 years, Business, residing at D.No.2-36 Ummalada village, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Defendant
Suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for specific performance of the plaint schedule property directing the defendant to execute the registered sale deed for the plaint schedule property in favour of the plaintiff and if the defendant do not do so, the court to register the sale deed; if for any reason the specific performance cannot be ordered, for the refund of the advance amount of Rs.5,00,000/- and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction is Rs.6,00,000/- and a court fee of Rs.8,426/- is paid under Sec.39 Sch.I ArtI(b) and (c) of A.P.C.F. and S.V.Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri Buddha
Thrinadha Rao Advocate for Plaintiff. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court doth order:
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed for default;
2) that there be no costs;
Give under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 7th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
For Plaintiff: For Defendant:
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And: 1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court delivered the following:
ORDER
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
Counter of R1 and R2 not filed. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court. Memo is recorded. Hence this petition is dismissed without costs as not pressed as settled out of court.
Pronounced by me in open court this the 8th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:31-08-2016 Date of Filing:15-09-2016
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And: 1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
A fixed Court fee of Re1/- is affixed on the petition.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court doth order and;
DECREETAL ORDER
1) that the petition be and the same is hereby dismissed as not pressed as settled out of Court.
2) that there be no costs; Given under my hand and the seal of this court this the 8th day of June,2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PETITIONER/PLAINTIFF FOR RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Wednesday this the 7th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.254/2015
Between: Sri Karri Bhasakara Rao, S/o Suryanarayana, Hindu, age 38 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.10- 63, Nagulapalli villagae, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Plaintiff. And: Sri Villuri Bhaskara Rao, S/o late Suribabu, Hindu, age 45 years, Business, residing at D.No.2-36 Ummalada village, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Defendant
This suit coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri Buddha
Thrinadha Rao Advocate for Plaintiff. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
Suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for specific performance of the plaint schedule property directing the defendant to execute the registered sale deed for the plaint schedule property in favour of the plaintiff and if the defendant do not do so, the court to register the sale deed; if for any reason the specific performance cannot be ordered, for the refund of the advance amount of Rs.5,00,000/- and for costs of the suit.
Publication not filed against defendant . Plaintiff called absent No representation on behalf of plaintiff. Hence this suit is dismissed for default without costs.
Pronounced by me in open court, this the 7th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:21-12-2015 Date of Filing:21-12-2015
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Wednesday this the 7th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.254/2015
Between: Sri Karri Bhasakara Rao, S/o Suryanarayana, Hindu, age 38 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.10- 63, Nagulapalli villagae, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
Plaintiff. And: Sri Villuri Bhaskara Rao, S/o late Suribabu, Hindu, age 45 years, Business, residing at D.No.2-36 Ummalada village, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Defendant
Suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for specific performance of the plaint schedule property directing the defendant to execute the registered sale deed for the plaint schedule property in favour of the plaintiff and if the defendant do not do so, the court to register the sale deed; if for any reason the specific performance cannot be ordered, for the refund of the advance amount of Rs.5,00,000/- and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction is Rs.6,00,000/- and a court fee of Rs.8,426/- is paid under Sec.39 Sch.I ArtI(b) and (c) of A.P.C.F. and S.V.Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri Buddha
Thrinadha Rao Advocate for Plaintiff. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court doth order:
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed for default;
2) that there be no costs;
Give under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 7th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
For Plaintiff: For Defendant:
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And: 1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court delivered the following:
ORDER
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
Counter of R1 and R2 not filed. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court. Memo is recorded. Hence this petition is dismissed without costs as not pressed as settled out of court.
Pronounced by me in open court this the 8th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:31-08-2016 Date of Filing:15-09-2016
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And: 1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
A fixed Court fee of Re1/- is affixed on the petition.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court doth order and;
DECREETAL ORDER
1) that the petition be and the same is hereby dismissed as not pressed as settled out of Court.
2) that there be no costs; Given under my hand and the seal of this court this the 8th day of June,2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PETITIONER/PLAINTIFF FOR RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP + O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
Date of presentation:06-09-2007 Date of Filing:28-09-2007 06-09-2007IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Tuesday this the 20th of June, 2017.
CMA.No.01/2007
Between: Sri Villuri Ramu, son of late Mahalakshmi Naidu, Hindu, age 45 years, cultivation, residing at Dr.No.15-22-6/1, Anakapalle, Visakhapatnam District. Appellant. And:
1) The State of Andhra Pradesh represented by its District Collector, Visakhapatnam.
2) The Collector under Section-47-A of Indian stamp Act and District Registrar of Assurances, Registration and Stamps, Visakhapatnam.
3) The Sub Registrar, Sub-Registrar office, Anakapalle.
Respondents
Petition filed under section 47-A (4 & 5) of Indian Stamp Act read with Rule-9 of A.P.Stamp (Prevention of under valuation of instruments) Rules, 1975 by the Petitioner/Appellant against the respondent District Registrar of Assurance Registration and stamps Visakhapatnam to set aside the proceedings No.595/G2/07,dt.27-06-2007 by allowing this Appeal with costs.
A fixed Court fee of Rs.5/- is paid under Section47-A of Indian Stamp Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri V.V.Jogayya,
Sri M.Sreenivasa Rao, Advocates for Appellant and of Sri Assistant Government Pleader, Advocate for Defendants. Counsel for appellants filed memo stating that not pressing the Civil Miscellaneous petition and having stood over till this day this court doth order and:
DECREE
1) that the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal be and the same is hereby dismissed as not pressed;
2) that there be no costs;
Given under my hand and the seal of this court this the 20th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
For APPELLANT FOR RESPONDENTS
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Tuesday this the 20th of June, 2017.
CMA.No.01/2007
Between: Sri Villuri Ramu, son of late Mahalakshmi Naidu, Hindu, age 45 years, cultivation, residing at Dr.No.15-22-6/1, Anakapalle, Visakhapatnam District. Appellant. And:
1) The State of Andhra Pradesh represented by its District Collector, Visakhapatnam.
2) The Collector under Section-47-A of Indian stamp Act and District Registrar of Assurances, Registration and Stamps, Visakhapatnam.
3) The Sub Registrar, Sub-Registrar office, Anakapalle.
Respondents
This suit coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri V.V.Jogayya,
Sri M.Sreenivasa Rao, Advocates for Appellant and of Sri Assistant Government Pleader, Advocate for Defendants. Counsel for appellants filed memo stating that not pressing the Civil Miscellaneous petition and having stood over till this day this court delivered the following:
ORDER
Petition filed under section 47-A (4 & 5) of Indian Stamp Act read with Rule-9 of A.P.Stamp (Prevention of under valuation of instruments) Rules, 1975 by the Petitioner/Appellant against the respondent District Registrar of Assurance Registration and stamps Visakhapatnam to set aside the proceedings No.595/G2/07,dt.27-06-2007 by allowing this Appeal with costs.
Counsel for Appellants filed memo stating that not pressing the CMA. Memo is recorded.
Hence this CMA is dismissed without costs.
Pronounced by me in open court, this the 20th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:12-09-12012 Date of Filing:12-09-2012
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Monday this the 19th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.223/2012
Between: Sri Pilli Manikumar,S/o late Somulu, Hindu, age 45 years, cultivation, residing at Door No.40-56- 16, Sanjeeviah colony, Near Logos Church, Tadichetlapalem, Visakhapatnam-4. Plaintiff. And:
1) Pilli Chellayyamma,W/o late Somulu, Hindu, age 67 years, house hold duties, residing at Pidiwada Agraharam Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
2) Ravada Saraswathi W/o late Appanna, Hindu, age 49 years, house hold duties, residing at Pydiwada Agraharam, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
3) Kannapalli Laxmi, W/o Ramulu, Hindu, age 46 years, household duties, residing at Ammulapalem villagae, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
4) andukuri Narasinga Rao, S/o late Apparao, Hindu, age 71 years, cultivation, D.No.8-7-10, Gajuwaka, Visakhapatnam Greater Municipal Corporation, Visakhapatnam District. Defendants
Suit for Preliminary decree for partition of the plaint schedule property into four equal shares with metes and bounds and allot one such equal separated share to the plaintiff after converting the joint possession into separate possession and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction is Rs.653063/- and a court fee of Rs.9026/- is payable but the schedule property is in joint possession and enjoyment of the plaintiff and the defendants a fixed court fee of Rs.200-00 is paid under Sec.34(2) of A.P.C.F. and
S.V.Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri
B.V.S.S.N.Murthy, Advocate for Plaintiff and of Sri A.V.S.Bhavani Prasad, Advocate for Defendant
No.4. Defendants 1 to 3 remained exparte. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court doth order and:
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed for default
2) that there be no costs:
( Copy of Plaint schedule and valuation slip hereto enclosed)
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Monday this the 19th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.223/2012
Between: Sri Pilli Manikumar,S/o late Somulu, Hindu, age 45 years, cultivation, residing at Door No.40-56- 16, Sanjeeviah colony, Near Logos Church, Tadichetlapalem, Visakhapatnam-4. Plaintiff. And:
1) Pilli Chellayyamma,W/o late Somulu, Hindu, age 67 years, house hold duties, residing at Pidiwada Agraharam Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
2) Ravada Saraswathi W/o late Appanna, Hindu, age 49 years, house hold duties, residing at Pydiwada Agraharam, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
3) Kannapalli Laxmi, W/o Ramulu, Hindu, age 46 years, household duties, residing at Ammulapalem villagae, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
4) Andukuri Narasinga Rao, S/o late Apparao, Hindu, age 71 years, cultivation, D.No.8-7-10, Gajuwaka, Visakhapatnam Greater Municipal Corporation, Visakhapatnam District. Defendants
This suit coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri
B.V.S.S.N.Murthy, Advocate for Plaintiff and of Sri A.V.S.Bhavani Prasad, Advocate for Defendant
No.4. Defendants 1 to 3 remained exparte. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
Suit for Preliminary decree for partition of the plaint schedule property into four equal shares with metes and bounds and allot one such equal separated share to the plaintiff after converting the joint possession into separate possession and for costs of the suit.
Costs not paid. Plaintiff called absent. No representation on behalf of plaintiff. Plaintiff failed to adduce evidence though granted several adjournments . Hence this suit is dismissed for default without costs.
Pronounced by me in open court, this the 19th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:12-09-12012 Date of Filing:12-09-2012
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Monday this the 19th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.223/2012
Between: Sri Pilli Manikumar,S/o late Somulu, Hindu, age 45 years, cultivation, residing at Door No.40-56- 16, Sanjeeviah colony, Near Logos Church, Tadichetlapalem, Visakhapatnam-4. Plaintiff. And:
1) Pilli Chellayyamma,W/o late Somulu, Hindu, age 67 years, house hold duties, residing at Pidiwada Agraharam Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
2) Ravada Saraswathi W/o late Appanna, Hindu, age 49 years, house hold duties, residing at Pydiwada Agraharam, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
3) Kannapalli Laxmi, W/o Ramulu, Hindu, age 46 years, household duties, residing at Ammulapalem villagae, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
4) andukuri Narasinga Rao, S/o late Apparao, Hindu, age 71 years, cultivation, D.No.8-7-10, Gajuwaka, Visakhapatnam Greater Municipal Corporation, Visakhapatnam District. Defendants
Suit for Preliminary decree for partition of the plaint schedule property into four equal shares with metes and bounds and allot one such equal separated share to the plaintiff after converting the joint possession into separate possession and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction is Rs.653063/- and a court fee of Rs.9026/- is payable but the schedule property is in joint possession and enjoyment of the plaintiff and the defendants a fixed court fee of Rs.200-00 is paid under Sec.34(2) of A.P.C.F. and
S.V.Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri
B.V.S.S.N.Murthy, Advocate for Plaintiff and of Sri A.V.S.Bhavani Prasad, Advocate for Defendant
No.4. Defendants 1 to 3 remained exparte. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court doth order and:
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed for default
2) that there be no costs:
( Copy of Plaint schedule and valuation slip hereto enclosed)
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:21-12-2015 Date of Filing:21-12-2015
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Wednesday this the 7th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.254/2015
Between: Sri Karri Bhasakara Rao, S/o Suryanarayana, Hindu, age 38 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.10- 63, Nagulapalli villagae, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Plaintiff. And: Sri Villuri Bhaskara Rao, S/o late Suribabu, Hindu, age 45 years, Business, residing at D.No.2-36 Ummalada village, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Defendant
Suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for specific performance of the plaint schedule property directing the defendant to execute the registered sale deed for the plaint schedule property in favour of the plaintiff and if the defendant do not do so, the court to register the sale deed; if for any reason the specific performance cannot be ordered, for the refund of the advance amount of Rs.5,00,000/- and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction is Rs.6,00,000/- and a court fee of Rs.8,426/- is paid under Sec.39 Sch.I ArtI(b) and (c) of A.P.C.F. and S.V.Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri Buddha
Thrinadha Rao Advocate for Plaintiff. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court doth order:
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed for default;
2) that there be no costs;
Give under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 7th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
For Plaintiff: For Defendant:
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And: 1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court delivered the following:
ORDER
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
Counter of R1 and R2 not filed. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court. Memo is recorded. Hence this petition is dismissed without costs as not pressed as settled out of court.
Pronounced by me in open court this the 8th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:31-08-2016 Date of Filing:15-09-2016
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And: 1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
A fixed Court fee of Re1/- is affixed on the petition.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court doth order and;
DECREETAL ORDER
1) that the petition be and the same is hereby dismissed as not pressed as settled out of Court.
2) that there be no costs; Given under my hand and the seal of this court this the 8th day of June,2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PETITIONER/PLAINTIFF FOR RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Wednesday this the 7th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.254/2015
Between: Sri Karri Bhasakara Rao, S/o Suryanarayana, Hindu, age 38 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.10- 63, Nagulapalli villagae, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Plaintiff. And: Sri Villuri Bhaskara Rao, S/o late Suribabu, Hindu, age 45 years, Business, residing at D.No.2-36 Ummalada village, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Defendant
This suit coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri Buddha
Thrinadha Rao Advocate for Plaintiff. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
Suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for specific performance of the plaint schedule property directing the defendant to execute the registered sale deed for the plaint schedule property in favour of the plaintiff and if the defendant do not do so, the court to register the sale deed; if for any reason the specific performance cannot be ordered, for the refund of the advance amount of Rs.5,00,000/- and for costs of the suit.
Publication not filed against defendant . Plaintiff called absent No representation on behalf of plaintiff. Hence this suit is dismissed for default without costs.
Pronounced by me in open court, this the 7th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:21-12-2015 Date of Filing:21-12-2015
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Wednesday this the 7th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.254/2015
Between: Sri Karri Bhasakara Rao, S/o Suryanarayana, Hindu, age 38 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.10- 63, Nagulapalli villagae, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
Plaintiff. And: Sri Villuri Bhaskara Rao, S/o late Suribabu, Hindu, age 45 years, Business, residing at D.No.2-36 Ummalada village, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Defendant
Suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for specific performance of the plaint schedule property directing the defendant to execute the registered sale deed for the plaint schedule property in favour of the plaintiff and if the defendant do not do so, the court to register the sale deed; if for any reason the specific performance cannot be ordered, for the refund of the advance amount of Rs.5,00,000/- and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction is Rs.6,00,000/- and a court fee of Rs.8,426/- is paid under Sec.39 Sch.I ArtI(b) and (c) of A.P.C.F. and S.V.Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri Buddha
Thrinadha Rao Advocate for Plaintiff. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court doth order:
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed for default;
2) that there be no costs;
Give under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 7th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
For Plaintiff: For Defendant:
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And: 1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court delivered the following:
ORDER
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
Counter of R1 and R2 not filed. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court. Memo is recorded. Hence this petition is dismissed without costs as not pressed as settled out of court.
Pronounced by me in open court this the 8th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:31-08-2016 Date of Filing:15-09-2016
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And: 1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
A fixed Court fee of Re1/- is affixed on the petition.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court doth order and;
DECREETAL ORDER
1) that the petition be and the same is hereby dismissed as not pressed as settled out of Court.
2) that there be no costs; Given under my hand and the seal of this court this the 8th day of June,2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PETITIONER/PLAINTIFF FOR RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:21-12-2015 Date of Filing:21-12-2015
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Wednesday this the 7th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.254/2015
Between: Sri Karri Bhasakara Rao, S/o Suryanarayana, Hindu, age 38 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.10- 63, Nagulapalli villagae, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Plaintiff. And: Sri Villuri Bhaskara Rao, S/o late Suribabu, Hindu, age 45 years, Business, residing at D.No.2-36 Ummalada village, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Defendant
Suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for specific performance of the plaint schedule property directing the defendant to execute the registered sale deed for the plaint schedule property in favour of the plaintiff and if the defendant do not do so, the court to register the sale deed; if for any reason the specific performance cannot be ordered, for the refund of the advance amount of Rs.5,00,000/- and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction is Rs.6,00,000/- and a court fee of Rs.8,426/- is paid under Sec.39 Sch.I ArtI(b) and (c) of A.P.C.F. and S.V.Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri Buddha
Thrinadha Rao Advocate for Plaintiff. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court doth order:
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed for default;
2) that there be no costs;
Give under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 7th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
For Plaintiff: For Defendant:
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And: 1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court delivered the following:
ORDER
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
Counter of R1 and R2 not filed. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court. Memo is recorded. Hence this petition is dismissed without costs as not pressed as settled out of court.
Pronounced by me in open court this the 8th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:31-08-2016 Date of Filing:15-09-2016
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And: 1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
A fixed Court fee of Re1/- is affixed on the petition.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court doth order and;
DECREETAL ORDER
1) that the petition be and the same is hereby dismissed as not pressed as settled out of Court.
2) that there be no costs; Given under my hand and the seal of this court this the 8th day of June,2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PETITIONER/PLAINTIFF FOR RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Wednesday this the 7th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.254/2015
Between: Sri Karri Bhasakara Rao, S/o Suryanarayana, Hindu, age 38 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.10- 63, Nagulapalli villagae, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Plaintiff. And: Sri Villuri Bhaskara Rao, S/o late Suribabu, Hindu, age 45 years, Business, residing at D.No.2-36 Ummalada village, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Defendant
This suit coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri Buddha
Thrinadha Rao Advocate for Plaintiff. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
Suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for specific performance of the plaint schedule property directing the defendant to execute the registered sale deed for the plaint schedule property in favour of the plaintiff and if the defendant do not do so, the court to register the sale deed; if for any reason the specific performance cannot be ordered, for the refund of the advance amount of Rs.5,00,000/- and for costs of the suit.
Publication not filed against defendant . Plaintiff called absent No representation on behalf of plaintiff. Hence this suit is dismissed for default without costs.
Pronounced by me in open court, this the 7th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:21-12-2015 Date of Filing:21-12-2015
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Wednesday this the 7th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.254/2015
Between: Sri Karri Bhasakara Rao, S/o Suryanarayana, Hindu, age 38 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.10- 63, Nagulapalli villagae, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Plaintiff. And: Sri Villuri Bhaskara Rao, S/o late Suribabu, Hindu, age 45 years, Business, residing at D.No.2-36 Ummalada village, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Defendant
Suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for specific performance of the plaint schedule property directing the defendant to execute the registered sale deed for the plaint schedule property in favour of the plaintiff and if the defendant do not do so, the court to register the sale deed; if for any reason the specific performance cannot be ordered, for the refund of the advance amount of Rs.5,00,000/- and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction is Rs.6,00,000/- and a court fee of Rs.8,426/- is paid under Sec.39 Sch.I ArtI(b) and (c) of A.P.C.F. and S.V.Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri Buddha
Thrinadha Rao Advocate for Plaintiff. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court doth order:
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed for default;
2) that there be no costs;
Give under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 7th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
For Plaintiff: For Defendant:
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And: 1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court delivered the following:
ORDER
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
Counter of R1 and R2 not filed. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court. Memo is recorded. Hence this petition is dismissed without costs as not pressed as settled out of court.
Pronounced by me in open court this the 8th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:31-08-2016 Date of Filing:15-09-2016
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli
Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And: 1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
A fixed Court fee of Re1/- is affixed on the petition.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court doth order and;
DECREETAL ORDER
1) that the petition be and the same is hereby dismissed as not pressed as settled out of Court.
2) that there be no costs; Given under my hand and the seal of this court this the 8th day of June,2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PETITIONER/PLAINTIFF FOR RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:12-09-12012 Date of Filing:12-09-2012
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Monday this the 19th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.223/2012
Between: Sri Pilli Manikumar,S/o late Somulu, Hindu, age 45 years, cultivation, residing at Door No.40-56- 16, Sanjeeviah colony, Near Logos Church, Tadichetlapalem, Visakhapatnam-4. Plaintiff. And:
1) Pilli Chellayyamma,W/o late Somulu, Hindu, age 67 years, house hold duties, residing at Pidiwada Agraharam Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
2) Ravada Saraswathi W/o late Appanna, Hindu, age 49 years, house hold duties, residing at Pydiwada Agraharam, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
3) Kannapalli Laxmi, W/o Ramulu, Hindu, age 46 years, household duties, residing at Ammulapalem villagae, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
4) andukuri Narasinga Rao, S/o late Apparao, Hindu, age 71 years, cultivation, D.No.8-7-10, Gajuwaka, Visakhapatnam Greater Municipal Corporation, Visakhapatnam District. Defendants
Suit for Preliminary decree for partition of the plaint schedule property into four equal shares with metes and bounds and allot one such equal separated share to the plaintiff after converting the joint possession into separate possession and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction is Rs.653063/- and a court fee of Rs.9026/- is payable but the schedule property is in joint possession and enjoyment of the plaintiff and the defendants a fixed court fee of Rs.200-00 is paid under Sec.34(2) of A.P.C.F. and
S.V.Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri
B.V.S.S.N.Murthy, Advocate for Plaintiff and of Sri A.V.S.Bhavani Prasad, Advocate for Defendant
No.4. Defendants 1 to 3 remained exparte. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court doth order and:
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed for default
2) that there be no costs:
( Copy of Plaint schedule and valuation slip hereto enclosed)
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Monday this the 19th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.223/2012
Between: Sri Pilli Manikumar,S/o late Somulu, Hindu, age 45 years, cultivation, residing at Door No.40-56- 16, Sanjeeviah colony, Near Logos Church, Tadichetlapalem, Visakhapatnam-4. Plaintiff. And:
1) Pilli Chellayyamma,W/o late Somulu, Hindu, age 67 years, house hold duties, residing at Pidiwada Agraharam Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
2) Ravada Saraswathi W/o late Appanna, Hindu, age 49 years, house hold duties, residing at Pydiwada Agraharam, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
3) Kannapalli Laxmi, W/o Ramulu, Hindu, age 46 years, household duties, residing at Ammulapalem villagae, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
4) andukuri Narasinga Rao, S/o late Apparao, Hindu, age 71 years, cultivation, D.No.8-7-10, Gajuwaka, Visakhapatnam Greater Municipal Corporation, Visakhapatnam District. Defendants
This suit coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri
B.V.S.S.N.Murthy, Advocate for Plaintiff and of Sri A.V.S.Bhavani Prasad, Advocate for Defendant
No.4. Defendants 1 to 3 remained exparte. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
Suit for Preliminary decree for partition of the plaint schedule property into four equal shares with metes and bounds and allot one such equal separated share to the plaintiff after converting the joint possession into separate possession and for costs of the suit.
Costs not paid. Plaintiff called absent. No representation on behalf of plaintiff. Plaintiff failed to adduce evidence though granted several adjournments . Hence this suit is dismissed for default without costs.
Pronounced by me in open court, this the 19th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:12-09-12012 Date of Filing:12-09-2012
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Monday this the 19th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.223/2012
Between: Sri Pilli Manikumar,S/o late Somulu, Hindu, age 45 years, cultivation, residing at Door No.40-56- 16, Sanjeeviah colony, Near Logos Church, Tadichetlapalem, Visakhapatnam-4. Plaintiff. And:
1) Pilli Chellayyamma,W/o late Somulu, Hindu, age 67 years, house hold duties, residing at Pidiwada Agraharam Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
2) Ravada Saraswathi W/o late Appanna, Hindu, age 49 years, house hold duties, residing at Pydiwada Agraharam, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
3) Kannapalli Laxmi, W/o Ramulu, Hindu, age 46 years, household duties, residing at Ammulapalem villagae, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
4) andukuri Narasinga Rao, S/o late Apparao, Hindu, age 71 years, cultivation, D.No.8-7-10, Gajuwaka, Visakhapatnam Greater Municipal Corporation, Visakhapatnam District. Defendants
Suit for Preliminary decree for partition of the plaint schedule property into four equal shares with metes and bounds and allot one such equal separated share to the plaintiff after converting the joint possession into separate possession and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction is Rs.653063/- and a court fee of Rs.9026/- is payable but the schedule property is in joint possession and enjoyment of the plaintiff and the defendants a fixed court fee of Rs.200-00 is paid under Sec.34(2) of A.P.C.F. and
S.V.Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri
B.V.S.S.N.Murthy, Advocate for Plaintiff and of Sri A.V.S.Bhavani Prasad, Advocate for Defendant
No.4. Defendants 1 to 3 remained exparte. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court doth order and:
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed for default
2) that there be no costs:
( Copy of Plaint schedule and valuation slip hereto enclosed)
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:21-12-2015 Date of Filing:21-12-2015
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Wednesday this the 7th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.254/2015
Between: Sri Karri Bhasakara Rao, S/o Suryanarayana, Hindu, age 38 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.10- 63, Nagulapalli villagae, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Plaintiff. And: Sri Villuri Bhaskara Rao, S/o late Suribabu, Hindu, age 45 years, Business, residing at D.No.2-36 Ummalada village, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Defendant
Suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for specific performance of the plaint schedule property directing the defendant to execute the registered sale deed for the plaint schedule property in favour of the plaintiff and if the defendant do not do so, the court to register the sale deed; if for any reason the specific performance cannot be ordered, for the refund of the advance amount of Rs.5,00,000/- and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction is Rs.6,00,000/- and a court fee of Rs.8,426/- is paid under Sec.39 Sch.I ArtI(b) and (c) of A.P.C.F. and S.V.Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri Buddha
Thrinadha Rao Advocate for Plaintiff. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court doth order:
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed for default;
2) that there be no costs;
Give under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 7th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
For Plaintiff: For Defendant:
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And: 1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court delivered the following:
ORDER
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
Counter of R1 and R2 not filed. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court. Memo is recorded. Hence this petition is dismissed without costs as not pressed as settled out of court.
Pronounced by me in open court this the 8th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:31-08-2016 Date of Filing:15-09-2016
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And: 1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
A fixed Court fee of Re1/- is affixed on the petition.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court doth order and;
DECREETAL ORDER
1) that the petition be and the same is hereby dismissed as not pressed as settled out of Court.
2) that there be no costs; Given under my hand and the seal of this court this the 8th day of June,2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PETITIONER/PLAINTIFF FOR RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Wednesday this the 7th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.254/2015
Between: Sri Karri Bhasakara Rao, S/o Suryanarayana, Hindu, age 38 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.10- 63, Nagulapalli villagae, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Plaintiff. And: Sri Villuri Bhaskara Rao, S/o late Suribabu, Hindu, age 45 years, Business, residing at D.No.2-36 Ummalada village, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Defendant
This suit coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri Buddha
Thrinadha Rao Advocate for Plaintiff. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
Suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for specific performance of the plaint schedule property directing the defendant to execute the registered sale deed for the plaint schedule property in favour of the plaintiff and if the defendant do not do so, the court to register the sale deed; if for any reason the specific performance cannot be ordered, for the refund of the advance amount of Rs.5,00,000/- and for costs of the suit.
Publication not filed against defendant . Plaintiff called absent No representation on behalf of plaintiff. Hence this suit is dismissed for default without costs.
Pronounced by me in open court, this the 7th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:21-12-2015 Date of Filing:21-12-2015
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Wednesday this the 7th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.254/2015
Between: Sri Karri Bhasakara Rao, S/o Suryanarayana, Hindu, age 38 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.10- 63, Nagulapalli villagae, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Plaintiff. And: Sri Villuri Bhaskara Rao, S/o late Suribabu, Hindu, age 45 years, Business, residing at D.No.2-36 Ummalada village, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Defendant
Suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for specific performance of the plaint schedule property directing the defendant to execute the registered sale deed for the plaint schedule property in favour of the plaintiff and if the defendant do not do so, the court to register the sale deed; if for any reason the specific performance cannot be ordered, for the refund of the advance amount of Rs.5,00,000/- and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction is Rs.6,00,000/- and a court fee of Rs.8,426/- is paid under Sec.39 Sch.I ArtI(b) and (c) of A.P.C.F. and S.V.Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri Buddha
Thrinadha Rao Advocate for Plaintiff. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court doth order:
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed for default;
2) that there be no costs;
Give under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 7th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
For Plaintiff: For Defendant:
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And:
1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court delivered the following:
ORDER
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
Counter of R1 and R2 not filed. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court. Memo is recorded. Hence this petition is dismissed without costs as not pressed as settled out of court.
Pronounced by me in open court this the 8th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:31-08-2016
Date of Filing:15-09-2016
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And: 1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
A fixed Court fee of Re1/- is affixed on the petition.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court doth order and;
DECREETAL ORDER
1) that the petition be and the same is hereby dismissed as not pressed as settled out of Court.
2) that there be no costs; Given under my hand and the seal of this court this the 8th day of June,2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PETITIONER/PLAINTIFF FOR RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:21-12-2015 Date of Filing:21-12-2015
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Wednesday this the 7th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.254/2015
Between: Sri Karri Bhasakara Rao, S/o Suryanarayana, Hindu, age 38 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.10- 63, Nagulapalli villagae, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Plaintiff. And: Sri Villuri Bhaskara Rao, S/o late Suribabu, Hindu, age 45 years, Business, residing at D.No.2-36 Ummalada village, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Defendant
Suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for specific performance of the plaint schedule property directing the defendant to execute the registered sale deed for the plaint schedule property in favour of the plaintiff and if the defendant do not do so, the court to register the sale deed; if for any reason the specific performance cannot be ordered, for the refund of the advance amount of Rs.5,00,000/- and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction is Rs.6,00,000/- and a court fee of Rs.8,426/- is paid under Sec.39 Sch.I ArtI(b) and (c) of A.P.C.F. and S.V.Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri Buddha
Thrinadha Rao Advocate for Plaintiff. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court doth order:
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed for default;
2) that there be no costs;
Give under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 7th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
For Plaintiff: For Defendant:
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And: 1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court delivered the following:
ORDER
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
Counter of R1 and R2 not filed. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court. Memo is recorded. Hence this petition is dismissed without costs as not pressed as settled out of court.
Pronounced by me in open court this the 8th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:31-08-2016 Date of Filing:15-09-2016
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74,
Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And: 1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
A fixed Court fee of Re1/- is affixed on the petition.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court doth order and;
DECREETAL ORDER
1) that the petition be and the same is hereby dismissed as not pressed as settled out of Court.
2) that there be no costs; Given under my hand and the seal of this court this the 8th day of June,2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PETITIONER/PLAINTIFF FOR RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Wednesday this the 7th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.254/2015
Between:
Sri Karri Bhasakara Rao, S/o Suryanarayana, Hindu, age 38 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.10- 63, Nagulapalli villagae, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Plaintiff. And: Sri Villuri Bhaskara Rao, S/o late Suribabu, Hindu, age 45 years, Business, residing at D.No.2-36 Ummalada village, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Defendant
This suit coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri Buddha
Thrinadha Rao Advocate for Plaintiff. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
Suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for specific performance of the plaint schedule property directing the defendant to execute the registered sale deed for the plaint schedule property in favour of the plaintiff and if the defendant do not do so, the court to register the sale deed; if for any reason the specific performance cannot be ordered, for the refund of the advance amount of Rs.5,00,000/- and for costs of the suit.
Publication not filed against defendant . Plaintiff called absent No representation on behalf of plaintiff. Hence this suit is dismissed for default without costs.
Pronounced by me in open court, this the 7th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:21-12-2015 Date of Filing:21-12-2015
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Wednesday this the 7th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.254/2015
Between: Sri Karri Bhasakara Rao, S/o Suryanarayana, Hindu, age 38 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.10- 63, Nagulapalli villagae, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Plaintiff. And: Sri Villuri Bhaskara Rao, S/o late Suribabu, Hindu, age 45 years, Business, residing at D.No.2-36 Ummalada village, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Defendant
Suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for specific performance of the plaint schedule property directing the defendant to execute the registered sale deed for the plaint schedule property in favour of the plaintiff and if the defendant do not do so, the court to register the sale deed; if for any reason the specific performance cannot be ordered, for the refund of the advance amount of Rs.5,00,000/- and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction is Rs.6,00,000/- and a court fee of Rs.8,426/- is paid under Sec.39 Sch.I ArtI(b) and (c) of A.P.C.F. and S.V.Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri Buddha
Thrinadha Rao Advocate for Plaintiff. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court doth order:
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed for default;
2) that there be no costs;
Give under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 7th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
For Plaintiff: For Defendant:
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And: 1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court delivered the following:
ORDER
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
Counter of R1 and R2 not filed. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court. Memo is recorded. Hence this petition is dismissed without costs as not pressed as settled out of court.
Pronounced by me in open court this the 8th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:31-08-2016 Date of Filing:15-09-2016
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And: 1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
A fixed Court fee of Re1/- is affixed on the petition.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court doth order and;
DECREETAL ORDER
1) that the petition be and the same is hereby dismissed as not pressed as settled out of Court.
2) that there be no costs; Given under my hand and the seal of this court this the 8th day of June,2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PETITIONER/PLAINTIFF FOR RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.229/2015
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli.
O.S.No.
Between:
Plaintiff
And:
Defendant
This suit coming on this day for settlement of issues before me in the presence of Sri and of Sri and having stood over this day this court settled the following:
ISSUES
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
Date of presentation:06-09-2007 Date of Filing:28-09-2007 06-09-2007IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Tuesday this the 20th of June, 2017.
CMA.No.01/2007
Between: Sri Villuri Ramu, son of late Mahalakshmi Naidu, Hindu, age 45 years, cultivation, residing at Dr.No.15-22-6/1, Anakapalle, Visakhapatnam District. Appellant. And:
1) The State of Andhra Pradesh represented by its District Collector, Visakhapatnam.
2) The Collector under Section-47-A of Indian stamp Act and District Registrar of Assurances, Registration and Stamps, Visakhapatnam.
3) The Sub Registrar, Sub-Registrar office, Anakapalle.
Respondents
Petition filed under section 47-A (4 & 5) of Indian Stamp Act read with Rule-9 of A.P.Stamp (Prevention of under valuation of instruments) Rules, 1975 by the Petitioner/Appellant against the respondent District Registrar of Assurance Registration and stamps Visakhapatnam to set aside the proceedings No.595/G2/07,dt.27-06-2007 by allowing this Appeal with costs.
A fixed Court fee of Rs.5/- is paid under Section47-A of Indian Stamp Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri V.V.Jogayya,
Sri M.Sreenivasa Rao, Advocates for Appellant and of Sri Assistant Government Pleader, Advocate for Defendants. Counsel for appellants filed memo stating that not pressing the Civil Miscellaneous petition and having stood over till this day this court doth order and:
DECREE
1) that the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal be and the same is hereby dismissed as not pressed;
2) that there be no costs;
Given under my hand and the seal of this court this the 20th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
For APPELLANT FOR RESPONDENTS
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Tuesday this the 20th of June, 2017.
CMA.No.01/2007
Between: Sri Villuri Ramu, son of late Mahalakshmi Naidu, Hindu, age 45 years, cultivation, residing at Dr.No.15-22-6/1, Anakapalle, Visakhapatnam District. Appellant. And:
1) The State of Andhra Pradesh represented by its District Collector, Visakhapatnam.
2) The Collector under Section-47-A of Indian stamp Act and District Registrar of Assurances, Registration and Stamps, Visakhapatnam.
3) The Sub Registrar, Sub-Registrar office, Anakapalle.
Respondents
This suit coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri V.V.Jogayya,
Sri M.Sreenivasa Rao, Advocates for Appellant and of Sri Assistant Government Pleader, Advocate for Defendants. Counsel for appellants filed memo stating that not pressing the Civil Miscellaneous petition and having stood over till this day this court delivered the following:
ORDER
Petition filed under section 47-A (4 & 5) of Indian Stamp Act read with Rule-9 of A.P.Stamp (Prevention of under valuation of instruments) Rules, 1975 by the Petitioner/Appellant against the respondent District Registrar of Assurance Registration and stamps Visakhapatnam to set aside the proceedings No.595/G2/07,dt.27-06-2007 by allowing this Appeal with costs.
Counsel for Appellants filed memo stating that not pressing the CMA. Memo is recorded.
Hence this CMA is dismissed without costs.
Pronounced by me in open court, this the 20th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:12-09-12012 Date of Filing:12-09-2012
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Monday this the 19th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.223/2012
Between: Sri Pilli Manikumar,S/o late Somulu, Hindu, age 45 years, cultivation, residing at Door No.40-56- 16, Sanjeeviah colony, Near Logos Church, Tadichetlapalem, Visakhapatnam-4. Plaintiff. And:
1) Pilli Chellayyamma,W/o late Somulu, Hindu, age 67 years, house hold duties, residing at Pidiwada Agraharam Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
2) Ravada Saraswathi W/o late Appanna, Hindu, age 49 years, house hold duties, residing at Pydiwada Agraharam, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
3) Kannapalli Laxmi, W/o Ramulu, Hindu, age 46 years, household duties, residing at Ammulapalem villagae, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
4) andukuri Narasinga Rao, S/o late Apparao, Hindu, age 71 years, cultivation, D.No.8-7-10, Gajuwaka, Visakhapatnam Greater Municipal Corporation, Visakhapatnam District. Defendants
Suit for Preliminary decree for partition of the plaint schedule property into four equal shares with metes and bounds and allot one such equal separated share to the plaintiff after converting the joint possession into separate possession and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction is Rs.653063/- and a court fee of Rs.9026/- is payable but the schedule property is in joint possession and enjoyment of the plaintiff and the defendants a fixed court fee of Rs.200-00 is paid under Sec.34(2) of A.P.C.F. and
S.V.Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri
B.V.S.S.N.Murthy, Advocate for Plaintiff and of Sri A.V.S.Bhavani Prasad, Advocate for Defendant
No.4. Defendants 1 to 3 remained exparte. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court doth order and:
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed for default
2) that there be no costs:
( Copy of Plaint schedule and valuation slip hereto enclosed)
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Monday this the 19th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.223/2012
Between: Sri Pilli Manikumar,S/o late Somulu, Hindu, age 45 years, cultivation, residing at Door No.40-56- 16, Sanjeeviah colony, Near Logos Church, Tadichetlapalem, Visakhapatnam-4. Plaintiff. And:
1) Pilli Chellayyamma,W/o late Somulu, Hindu, age 67 years, house hold duties, residing at Pidiwada Agraharam Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
2) Ravada Saraswathi W/o late Appanna, Hindu, age 49 years, house hold duties, residing at Pydiwada Agraharam, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
3) Kannapalli Laxmi, W/o Ramulu, Hindu, age 46 years, household duties, residing at Ammulapalem villagae, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
4) Andukuri Narasinga Rao, S/o late Apparao, Hindu, age 71 years, cultivation, D.No.8-7-10, Gajuwaka, Visakhapatnam Greater Municipal Corporation, Visakhapatnam District. Defendants
This suit coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri
B.V.S.S.N.Murthy, Advocate for Plaintiff and of Sri A.V.S.Bhavani Prasad, Advocate for Defendant
No.4. Defendants 1 to 3 remained exparte. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
Suit for Preliminary decree for partition of the plaint schedule property into four equal shares with metes and bounds and allot one such equal separated share to the plaintiff after converting the joint possession into separate possession and for costs of the suit.
Costs not paid. Plaintiff called absent. No representation on behalf of plaintiff. Plaintiff failed to adduce evidence though granted several adjournments . Hence this suit is dismissed for default without costs.
Pronounced by me in open court, this the 19th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:12-09-12012 Date of Filing:12-09-2012
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Monday this the 19th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.223/2012
Between: Sri Pilli Manikumar,S/o late Somulu, Hindu, age 45 years, cultivation, residing at Door No.40-56- 16, Sanjeeviah colony, Near Logos Church, Tadichetlapalem, Visakhapatnam-4. Plaintiff. And:
1) Pilli Chellayyamma,W/o late Somulu, Hindu, age 67 years, house hold duties, residing at Pidiwada Agraharam Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
2) Ravada Saraswathi W/o late Appanna, Hindu, age 49 years, house hold duties, residing at Pydiwada Agraharam, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
3) Kannapalli Laxmi, W/o Ramulu, Hindu, age 46 years, household duties, residing at Ammulapalem villagae, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
4) andukuri Narasinga Rao, S/o late Apparao, Hindu, age 71 years, cultivation, D.No.8-7-10, Gajuwaka, Visakhapatnam Greater Municipal Corporation, Visakhapatnam District. Defendants
Suit for Preliminary decree for partition of the plaint schedule property into four equal shares with metes and bounds and allot one such equal separated share to the plaintiff after converting the joint possession into separate possession and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction is Rs.653063/- and a court fee of Rs.9026/- is payable but the schedule property is in joint possession and enjoyment of the plaintiff and the defendants a fixed court fee of Rs.200-00 is paid under Sec.34(2) of A.P.C.F. and
S.V.Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri
B.V.S.S.N.Murthy, Advocate for Plaintiff and of Sri A.V.S.Bhavani Prasad, Advocate for Defendant
No.4. Defendants 1 to 3 remained exparte. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court doth order and:
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed for default
2) that there be no costs:
( Copy of Plaint schedule and valuation slip hereto enclosed)
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:21-12-2015 Date of Filing:21-12-2015
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Wednesday this the 7th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.254/2015
Between: Sri Karri Bhasakara Rao, S/o Suryanarayana, Hindu, age 38 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.10- 63, Nagulapalli villagae, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Plaintiff. And: Sri Villuri Bhaskara Rao, S/o late Suribabu, Hindu, age 45 years, Business, residing at D.No.2-36 Ummalada village, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Defendant
Suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for specific performance of the plaint schedule property directing the defendant to execute the registered sale deed for the plaint schedule property in favour of the plaintiff and if the defendant do not do so, the court to register the sale deed; if for any reason the specific performance cannot be ordered, for the refund of the advance amount of Rs.5,00,000/- and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction is Rs.6,00,000/- and a court fee of Rs.8,426/- is paid under Sec.39 Sch.I ArtI(b) and (c) of A.P.C.F. and S.V.Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri Buddha
Thrinadha Rao Advocate for Plaintiff. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court doth order:
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed for default;
2) that there be no costs;
Give under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 7th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
For Plaintiff: For Defendant:
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And: 1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for
Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court delivered the following:
ORDER
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
Counter of R1 and R2 not filed. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court. Memo is recorded. Hence this petition is dismissed without costs as not pressed as settled out of court.
Pronounced by me in open court this the 8th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:31-08-2016 Date of Filing:15-09-2016
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And: 1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
A fixed Court fee of Re1/- is affixed on the petition.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court doth order and;
DECREETAL ORDER
1) that the petition be and the same is hereby dismissed as not pressed as settled out of Court.
2) that there be no costs; Given under my hand and the seal of this court this the 8th day of June,2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PETITIONER/PLAINTIFF FOR RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Wednesday this the 7th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.254/2015
Between: Sri Karri Bhasakara Rao, S/o Suryanarayana, Hindu, age 38 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.10- 63, Nagulapalli villagae, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Plaintiff. And: Sri Villuri Bhaskara Rao, S/o late Suribabu, Hindu, age 45 years, Business, residing at D.No.2-36 Ummalada village, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Defendant
This suit coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri Buddha
Thrinadha Rao Advocate for Plaintiff. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
Suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for specific performance of the plaint schedule property directing the defendant to execute the registered sale deed for the plaint schedule property in favour of the plaintiff and if the defendant do not do so, the court to register the sale deed; if for any reason the specific performance cannot be ordered, for the refund of the advance amount of Rs.5,00,000/- and for costs of the suit.
Publication not filed against defendant . Plaintiff called absent No representation on behalf of plaintiff. Hence this suit is dismissed for default without costs.
Pronounced by me in open court, this the 7th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:21-12-2015 Date of Filing:21-12-2015
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Wednesday this the 7th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.254/2015
Between: Sri Karri Bhasakara Rao, S/o Suryanarayana, Hindu, age 38 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.10- 63, Nagulapalli villagae, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Plaintiff. And: Sri Villuri Bhaskara Rao, S/o late Suribabu, Hindu, age 45 years, Business, residing at D.No.2-36 Ummalada village, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Defendant
Suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for specific performance of the plaint schedule property directing the defendant to execute the registered sale deed for the plaint schedule property in favour of the plaintiff and if the defendant do not do so, the court to register the sale deed; if for any reason the specific performance cannot be ordered, for the refund of the advance amount of Rs.5,00,000/- and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction is Rs.6,00,000/- and a court fee of Rs.8,426/- is paid under Sec.39 Sch.I ArtI(b) and (c) of A.P.C.F. and S.V.Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri Buddha
Thrinadha Rao Advocate for Plaintiff. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court doth order:
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed for default;
2) that there be no costs;
Give under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 7th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
For Plaintiff: For Defendant:
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And: 1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court delivered the following:
ORDER
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
Counter of R1 and R2 not filed. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court. Memo is recorded. Hence this petition is dismissed without costs as not pressed as settled out of court.
Pronounced by me in open court this the 8th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:31-08-2016 Date of Filing:15-09-2016
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And: 1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
A fixed Court fee of Re1/- is affixed on the petition.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court doth order and;
DECREETAL ORDER
1) that the petition be and the same is hereby dismissed as not pressed as settled out of Court.
2) that there be no costs; Given under my hand and the seal of this court this the 8th day of June,2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PETITIONER/PLAINTIFF FOR RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:21-12-2015 Date of Filing:21-12-2015
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli,
Wednesday this the 7th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.254/2015
Between: Sri Karri Bhasakara Rao, S/o Suryanarayana, Hindu, age 38 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.10- 63, Nagulapalli villagae, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Plaintiff. And: Sri Villuri Bhaskara Rao, S/o late Suribabu, Hindu, age 45 years, Business, residing at D.No.2-36 Ummalada village, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Defendant
Suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for specific performance of the plaint schedule property directing the defendant to execute the registered sale deed for the plaint schedule property in favour of the plaintiff and if the defendant do not do so, the court to register the sale deed; if for any reason the specific performance cannot be ordered, for the refund of the advance amount of Rs.5,00,000/- and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction is Rs.6,00,000/- and a court fee of Rs.8,426/- is paid under Sec.39 Sch.I ArtI(b) and (c) of A.P.C.F. and S.V.Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri Buddha
Thrinadha Rao Advocate for Plaintiff. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court doth order:
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed for default;
2) that there be no costs;
Give under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 7th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
For Plaintiff: For Defendant:
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And: 1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court delivered the following:
ORDER
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
Counter of R1 and R2 not filed. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court. Memo is recorded. Hence this petition is dismissed without costs as not pressed as settled out of court.
Pronounced by me in open court this the 8th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:31-08-2016 Date of Filing:15-09-2016
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And: 1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
A fixed Court fee of Re1/- is affixed on the petition.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court doth order and;
DECREETAL ORDER
1) that the petition be and the same is hereby dismissed as not pressed as settled out of Court.
2) that there be no costs; Given under my hand and the seal of this court this the 8th day of June,2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PETITIONER/PLAINTIFF FOR RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Wednesday this the 7th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.254/2015
Between: Sri Karri Bhasakara Rao, S/o Suryanarayana, Hindu, age 38 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.10- 63, Nagulapalli villagae, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Plaintiff. And: Sri Villuri Bhaskara Rao, S/o late Suribabu, Hindu, age 45 years, Business, residing at D.No.2-36 Ummalada village, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Defendant
This suit coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri Buddha
Thrinadha Rao Advocate for Plaintiff. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
Suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for specific performance of the plaint schedule property directing the defendant to execute the registered sale deed for the plaint schedule property in favour of the plaintiff and if the defendant do not do so, the court to register the sale deed; if for any reason the specific performance cannot be ordered, for the refund of the advance amount of Rs.5,00,000/- and for costs of the suit.
Publication not filed against defendant . Plaintiff called absent No representation on behalf of plaintiff. Hence this suit is dismissed for default without costs.
Pronounced by me in open court, this the 7th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:21-12-2015 Date of Filing:21-12-2015
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Wednesday this the 7th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.254/2015
Between: Sri Karri Bhasakara Rao, S/o Suryanarayana, Hindu, age 38 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.10- 63, Nagulapalli villagae, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Plaintiff. And: Sri Villuri Bhaskara Rao, S/o late Suribabu, Hindu, age 45 years, Business, residing at D.No.2-36 Ummalada village, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
Defendant
Suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for specific performance of the plaint schedule property directing the defendant to execute the registered sale deed for the plaint schedule property in favour of the plaintiff and if the defendant do not do so, the court to register the sale deed; if for any reason the specific performance cannot be ordered, for the refund of the advance amount of Rs.5,00,000/- and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction is Rs.6,00,000/- and a court fee of Rs.8,426/- is paid under Sec.39 Sch.I ArtI(b) and (c) of A.P.C.F. and S.V.Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri Buddha
Thrinadha Rao Advocate for Plaintiff. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court doth order:
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed for default;
2) that there be no costs;
Give under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 7th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
For Plaintiff: For Defendant:
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And: 1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court delivered the following:
ORDER
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
Counter of R1 and R2 not filed. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court. Memo is recorded. Hence this petition is dismissed without costs as not pressed as settled out of court.
Pronounced by me in open court this the 8th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:31-08-2016 Date of Filing:15-09-2016
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And: 1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
A fixed Court fee of Re1/- is affixed on the petition.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court doth order and;
DECREETAL ORDER
1) that the petition be and the same is hereby dismissed as not pressed as settled out of Court.
2) that there be no costs;
Given under my hand and the seal of this court this the 8th day of June,2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PETITIONER/PLAINTIFF FOR RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:12-09-12012 Date of Filing:12-09-2012
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Monday this the 19th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.223/2012
Between: Sri Pilli Manikumar,S/o late Somulu, Hindu, age 45 years, cultivation, residing at Door No.40-56- 16, Sanjeeviah colony, Near Logos Church, Tadichetlapalem, Visakhapatnam-4. Plaintiff. And:
1) Pilli Chellayyamma,W/o late Somulu, Hindu, age 67 years, house hold duties, residing at Pidiwada Agraharam Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
2) Ravada Saraswathi W/o late Appanna, Hindu, age 49 years, house hold duties, residing at Pydiwada Agraharam, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
3) Kannapalli Laxmi, W/o Ramulu, Hindu, age 46 years, household duties, residing at Ammulapalem villagae, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
4) andukuri Narasinga Rao, S/o late Apparao, Hindu, age 71 years, cultivation, D.No.8-7-10, Gajuwaka, Visakhapatnam Greater Municipal Corporation, Visakhapatnam District. Defendants
Suit for Preliminary decree for partition of the plaint schedule property into four equal shares with metes and bounds and allot one such equal separated share to the plaintiff after converting the joint possession into separate possession and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction is Rs.653063/- and a court fee of Rs.9026/- is payable but the schedule property is in joint possession and enjoyment of the plaintiff and the defendants a fixed court fee of Rs.200-00 is paid under Sec.34(2) of A.P.C.F. and
S.V.Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri
B.V.S.S.N.Murthy, Advocate for Plaintiff and of Sri A.V.S.Bhavani Prasad, Advocate for Defendant
No.4. Defendants 1 to 3 remained exparte. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court doth order and:
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed for default
2) that there be no costs:
( Copy of Plaint schedule and valuation slip hereto enclosed)
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Monday this the 19th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.223/2012
Between: Sri Pilli Manikumar,S/o late Somulu, Hindu, age 45 years, cultivation, residing at Door No.40-56- 16, Sanjeeviah colony, Near Logos Church, Tadichetlapalem, Visakhapatnam-4. Plaintiff. And:
1) Pilli Chellayyamma,W/o late Somulu, Hindu, age 67 years, house hold duties, residing at Pidiwada Agraharam Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
2) Ravada Saraswathi W/o late Appanna, Hindu, age 49 years, house hold duties, residing at Pydiwada Agraharam, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
3) Kannapalli Laxmi, W/o Ramulu, Hindu, age 46 years, household duties, residing at Ammulapalem villagae, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
4) andukuri Narasinga Rao, S/o late Apparao, Hindu, age 71 years, cultivation, D.No.8-7-10, Gajuwaka, Visakhapatnam Greater Municipal Corporation, Visakhapatnam District. Defendants
This suit coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri
B.V.S.S.N.Murthy, Advocate for Plaintiff and of Sri A.V.S.Bhavani Prasad, Advocate for Defendant
No.4. Defendants 1 to 3 remained exparte. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
Suit for Preliminary decree for partition of the plaint schedule property into four equal shares with metes and bounds and allot one such equal separated share to the plaintiff after converting the joint possession into separate possession and for costs of the suit.
Costs not paid. Plaintiff called absent. No representation on behalf of plaintiff. Plaintiff failed to adduce evidence though granted several adjournments . Hence this suit is dismissed for default without costs.
Pronounced by me in open court, this the 19th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:12-09-12012 Date of Filing:12-09-2012
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Monday this the 19th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.223/2012
Between: Sri Pilli Manikumar,S/o late Somulu, Hindu, age 45 years, cultivation, residing at Door No.40-56- 16, Sanjeeviah colony, Near Logos Church, Tadichetlapalem, Visakhapatnam-4. Plaintiff. And:
1) Pilli Chellayyamma,W/o late Somulu, Hindu, age 67 years, house hold duties, residing at Pidiwada Agraharam Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
2) Ravada Saraswathi W/o late Appanna, Hindu, age 49 years, house hold duties, residing at Pydiwada Agraharam, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
3) Kannapalli Laxmi, W/o Ramulu, Hindu, age 46 years, household duties, residing at Ammulapalem villagae, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
4) andukuri Narasinga Rao, S/o late Apparao, Hindu, age 71 years, cultivation, D.No.8-7-10, Gajuwaka, Visakhapatnam Greater Municipal Corporation, Visakhapatnam District. Defendants
Suit for Preliminary decree for partition of the plaint schedule property into four equal shares with metes and bounds and allot one such equal separated share to the plaintiff after converting the joint possession into separate possession and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction is Rs.653063/- and a court fee of Rs.9026/- is payable but the schedule property is in joint possession and enjoyment of the plaintiff and the defendants a fixed court fee of Rs.200-00 is paid under Sec.34(2) of A.P.C.F. and
S.V.Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri
B.V.S.S.N.Murthy, Advocate for Plaintiff and of Sri A.V.S.Bhavani Prasad, Advocate for Defendant
No.4. Defendants 1 to 3 remained exparte. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court doth order and:
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed for default
2) that there be no costs:
( Copy of Plaint schedule and valuation slip hereto enclosed)
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:21-12-2015
Date of Filing:21-12-2015
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Wednesday this the 7th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.254/2015
Between: Sri Karri Bhasakara Rao, S/o Suryanarayana, Hindu, age 38 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.10- 63, Nagulapalli villagae, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Plaintiff. And: Sri Villuri Bhaskara Rao, S/o late Suribabu, Hindu, age 45 years, Business, residing at D.No.2-36 Ummalada village, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Defendant
Suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for specific performance of the plaint schedule property directing the defendant to execute the registered sale deed for the plaint schedule property in favour of the plaintiff and if the defendant do not do so, the court to register the sale deed; if for any reason the specific performance cannot be ordered, for the refund of the advance amount of Rs.5,00,000/- and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction is Rs.6,00,000/- and a court fee of Rs.8,426/- is paid under Sec.39 Sch.I ArtI(b) and (c) of A.P.C.F. and S.V.Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri Buddha
Thrinadha Rao Advocate for Plaintiff. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court doth order:
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed for default;
2) that there be no costs;
Give under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 7th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
For Plaintiff: For Defendant:
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And: 1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court delivered the following:
ORDER
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
Counter of R1 and R2 not filed. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court. Memo is recorded. Hence this petition is dismissed without costs as not pressed as settled out of court.
Pronounced by me in open court this the 8th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:31-08-2016 Date of Filing:15-09-2016
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And: 1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
A fixed Court fee of Re1/- is affixed on the petition.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court doth order and;
DECREETAL ORDER
1) that the petition be and the same is hereby dismissed as not pressed as settled out of Court.
2) that there be no costs; Given under my hand and the seal of this court this the 8th day of June,2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PETITIONER/PLAINTIFF FOR RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Wednesday this the 7th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.254/2015
Between: Sri Karri Bhasakara Rao, S/o Suryanarayana, Hindu, age 38 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.10- 63, Nagulapalli villagae, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Plaintiff. And: Sri Villuri Bhaskara Rao, S/o late Suribabu, Hindu, age 45 years, Business, residing at D.No.2-36 Ummalada village, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Defendant
This suit coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri Buddha
Thrinadha Rao Advocate for Plaintiff. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
Suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for specific performance of the plaint schedule property directing the defendant to execute the registered sale deed for the plaint schedule property in favour of the plaintiff and if the defendant do not do so, the court to register the sale deed; if for any reason the specific performance cannot be ordered, for the refund of the advance amount of Rs.5,00,000/- and for costs of the suit.
Publication not filed against defendant . Plaintiff called absent No representation on behalf of plaintiff. Hence this suit is dismissed for default without costs.
Pronounced by me in open court, this the 7th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:21-12-2015 Date of Filing:21-12-2015
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Wednesday this the 7th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.254/2015
Between: Sri Karri Bhasakara Rao, S/o Suryanarayana, Hindu, age 38 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.10- 63, Nagulapalli villagae, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Plaintiff. And: Sri Villuri Bhaskara Rao, S/o late Suribabu, Hindu, age 45 years, Business, residing at D.No.2-36 Ummalada village, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Defendant
Suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for specific performance of the plaint schedule property directing the defendant to execute the registered sale deed for the plaint schedule property in favour of the plaintiff and if the defendant do not do so, the court to register the sale deed; if for any reason the specific performance cannot be ordered, for the refund of the advance amount of Rs.5,00,000/- and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction is Rs.6,00,000/- and a court fee of Rs.8,426/- is paid under Sec.39 Sch.I ArtI(b) and (c) of A.P.C.F. and S.V.Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri Buddha
Thrinadha Rao Advocate for Plaintiff. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court doth order:
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed for default;
2) that there be no costs;
Give under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 7th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
For Plaintiff: For Defendant:
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And: 1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court delivered the following:
ORDER
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
Counter of R1 and R2 not filed. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court. Memo is recorded. Hence this petition is dismissed without costs as not pressed as settled out of court.
Pronounced by me in open court this the 8th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:31-08-2016 Date of Filing:15-09-2016
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And: 1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
A fixed Court fee of Re1/- is affixed on the petition.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for
Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court doth order and;
DECREETAL ORDER
1) that the petition be and the same is hereby dismissed as not pressed as settled out of Court.
2) that there be no costs; Given under my hand and the seal of this court this the 8th day of June,2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PETITIONER/PLAINTIFF FOR RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:21-12-2015 Date of Filing:21-12-2015
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Wednesday this the 7th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.254/2015
Between: Sri Karri Bhasakara Rao, S/o Suryanarayana, Hindu, age 38 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.10- 63, Nagulapalli villagae, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Plaintiff. And: Sri Villuri Bhaskara Rao, S/o late Suribabu, Hindu, age 45 years, Business, residing at D.No.2-36 Ummalada village, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Defendant
Suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for specific performance of the plaint schedule property directing the defendant to execute the registered sale deed for the plaint schedule property in favour of the plaintiff and if the defendant do not do so, the court to register the sale deed; if for any reason the specific performance cannot be ordered, for the refund of the advance amount of Rs.5,00,000/- and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction is Rs.6,00,000/- and a court fee of Rs.8,426/- is paid under Sec.39 Sch.I ArtI(b) and (c) of A.P.C.F. and S.V.Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri Buddha
Thrinadha Rao Advocate for Plaintiff. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court doth order:
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed for default;
2) that there be no costs;
Give under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 7th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
For Plaintiff: For Defendant:
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli
Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And: 1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court delivered the following:
ORDER
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
Counter of R1 and R2 not filed. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court. Memo is recorded. Hence this petition is dismissed without costs as not pressed as settled out of court.
Pronounced by me in open court this the 8th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:31-08-2016 Date of Filing:15-09-2016
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And: 1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
A fixed Court fee of Re1/- is affixed on the petition.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court doth order and;
DECREETAL ORDER
1) that the petition be and the same is hereby dismissed as not pressed as settled out of Court.
2) that there be no costs; Given under my hand and the seal of this court this the 8th day of June,2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PETITIONER/PLAINTIFF FOR RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Wednesday this the 7th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.254/2015
Between: Sri Karri Bhasakara Rao, S/o Suryanarayana, Hindu, age 38 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.10- 63, Nagulapalli villagae, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Plaintiff. And: Sri Villuri Bhaskara Rao, S/o late Suribabu, Hindu, age 45 years, Business, residing at D.No.2-36 Ummalada village, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Defendant
This suit coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri Buddha
Thrinadha Rao Advocate for Plaintiff. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
Suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for specific performance of the plaint schedule property directing the defendant to execute the registered sale deed for the plaint schedule property in favour of the plaintiff and if the defendant do not do so, the court to register the sale deed; if for any reason the specific performance cannot be ordered, for the refund of the advance amount of Rs.5,00,000/- and for costs of the suit.
Publication not filed against defendant . Plaintiff called absent No representation on behalf of plaintiff. Hence this suit is dismissed for default without costs.
Pronounced by me in open court, this the 7th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:21-12-2015 Date of Filing:21-12-2015
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Wednesday this the 7th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.254/2015
Between: Sri Karri Bhasakara Rao, S/o Suryanarayana, Hindu, age 38 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.10- 63, Nagulapalli villagae, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Plaintiff. And: Sri Villuri Bhaskara Rao, S/o late Suribabu, Hindu, age 45 years, Business, residing at D.No.2-36 Ummalada village, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Defendant
Suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for specific performance of the plaint schedule property directing the defendant to execute the registered sale deed for the plaint schedule property in favour of the plaintiff and if the defendant do not do so, the court to register the sale deed; if for any reason the specific performance cannot be ordered, for the refund of the advance amount of Rs.5,00,000/- and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction is Rs.6,00,000/- and a court fee of Rs.8,426/- is paid under Sec.39 Sch.I ArtI(b) and (c) of A.P.C.F. and S.V.Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri Buddha
Thrinadha Rao Advocate for Plaintiff. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court doth order:
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed for default;
2) that there be no costs;
Give under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 7th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
For Plaintiff: For Defendant:
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And:
1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court delivered the following:
ORDER
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
Counter of R1 and R2 not filed. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court. Memo is recorded. Hence this petition is dismissed without costs as not pressed as settled out of court.
Pronounced by me in open court this the 8th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:31-08-2016
Date of Filing:15-09-2016
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And: 1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
A fixed Court fee of Re1/- is affixed on the petition.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court doth order and;
DECREETAL ORDER
1) that the petition be and the same is hereby dismissed as not pressed as settled out of Court.
2) that there be no costs; Given under my hand and the seal of this court this the 8th day of June,2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PETITIONER/PLAINTIFF FOR RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP Date of presentation:06-09-2007 Date of Filing:28-09-2007 06-09-2007IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Tuesday this the 20th of June, 2017.
CMA.No.01/2007
Between: Sri Villuri Ramu, son of late Mahalakshmi Naidu, Hindu, age 45 years, cultivation, residing at Dr.No.15-22-6/1, Anakapalle, Visakhapatnam District.
Appellant. And:
1) The State of Andhra Pradesh represented by its District Collector, Visakhapatnam.
2) The Collector under Section-47-A of Indian stamp Act and District Registrar ofAssurances, Registration and Stamps, Visakhapatnam.
3) The Sub Registrar, Sub-Registrar office, Anakapalle.
Respondents
Petition filed under section 47-A (4 & 5) of Indian Stamp Act read with Rule-9 of A.P.Stamp (Prevention of under valuation of instruments) Rules, 1975 by the Petitioner/Appellant against the respondent District Registrar of Assurance Registration and stamps Visakhapatnam to set aside the proceedings No.595/G2/07,dt.27-06-2007 by allowing this Appeal with costs.
A fixed Court fee of Rs.5/- is paid under Section47-A of Indian Stamp Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri V.V.Jogayya,
Sri M.Sreenivasa Rao, Advocates for Appellant and of Sri Assistant Government Pleader, Advocate for Defendants. Counsel for appellants filed memo stating that not pressing the Civil Miscellaneous petition and having stood over till this day this court doth order and:
DECREE
1) that the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal be and the same is hereby dismissed as not pressed;
2) that there be no costs;
Given under my hand and the seal of this court this the 20th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL
JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
For APPELLANT FOR RESPONDENTS
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Tuesday this the 20th of June, 2017.
CMA.No.01/2007
Between: Sri Villuri Ramu, son of late Mahalakshmi Naidu, Hindu, age 45 years, cultivation, residing at Dr.No.15-22-6/1, Anakapalle, Visakhapatnam District.
Appellant. And:
1) The State of Andhra Pradesh represented by its District Collector, Visakhapatnam.
2) The Collector under Section-47-A of Indian stamp Act and District Registrar ofAssurances, Registration and Stamps, Visakhapatnam.
3) The Sub Registrar, Sub-Registrar office, Anakapalle.
Respondents
This suit coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri V.V.Jogayya,
Sri M.Sreenivasa Rao, Advocates for Appellant and of Sri Assistant Government Pleader, Advocate for Defendants. Counsel for appellants filed memo stating that not pressing the Civil Miscellaneous petition and having stood over till this day this court delivered the following:
ORDER
Petition filed under section 47-A (4 & 5) of Indian Stamp Act read with Rule-9 of A.P.Stamp (Prevention of under valuation of instruments) Rules, 1975 by the Petitioner/Appellant against the respondent District Registrar of Assurance Registration and stamps Visakhapatnam to set aside the proceedings No.595/G2/07,dt.27-06-2007 by allowing this Appeal with costs.
Counsel for Appellants filed memo stating that not pressing the CMA. Memo is recorded.
Hence this CMA is dismissed without costs.
Pronounced by me in open court, this the 20th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR
CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:12-09-12012 Date of Filing:12-09-2012
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Monday this the 19th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.223/2012
Between: Sri Pilli Manikumar,S/o late Somulu, Hindu, age 45 years, cultivation, residing at Door No.40-56- 16, Sanjeeviah colony, Near Logos Church, Tadichetlapalem, Visakhapatnam-4.
Plaintiff. And:
1) Pilli Chellayyamma,W/o late Somulu, Hindu, age 67 years, house hold duties, residing at Pidiwada Agraharam Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
2) Ravada Saraswathi W/o late Appanna, Hindu, age 49 years, house hold duties, residing at Pydiwada Agraharam, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
3) Kannapalli Laxmi, W/o Ramulu, Hindu, age 46 years, household duties, residing at Ammulapalem villagae, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
4) andukuri Narasinga Rao, S/o late Apparao, Hindu, age 71 years, cultivation, D.No.8-7-10, Gajuwaka, Visakhapatnam Greater Municipal Corporation, Visakhapatnam District.
Defendants
Suit for Preliminary decree for partition of the plaint schedule property into four equal shares with metes and bounds and allot one such equal separated share to the plaintiff after converting the joint possession into separate possession and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction is Rs.653063/- and a court fee of Rs.9026/- is payable but the schedule property is in joint possession and enjoyment of the plaintiff and the defendants a fixed court fee of Rs.200-00 is paid under Sec.34(2) of A.P.C.F. and
S.V.Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri
B.V.S.S.N.Murthy, Advocate for Plaintiff and of Sri A.V.S.Bhavani Prasad, Advocate for Defendant
No.4. Defendants 1 to 3 remained exparte. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court doth order and:
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed for default
2) that there be no costs:
( Copy of Plaint schedule and valuation slip hereto enclosed)
Given under my hand and the seal of this Court, this the 19th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR
CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
For Plaintiff: FOR
Defendants
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Monday this the 19th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.223/2012
Between: Sri Pilli Manikumar,S/o late Somulu, Hindu, age 45 years, cultivation, residing at Door No.40-56- 16, Sanjeeviah colony, Near Logos Church, Tadichetlapalem, Visakhapatnam-4.
Plaintiff. And:
1) Pilli Chellayyamma,W/o late Somulu, Hindu, age 67 years, house hold duties, residing at Pidiwada Agraharam Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
2) Ravada Saraswathi W/o late Appanna, Hindu, age 49 years, house hold duties, residing at Pydiwada Agraharam, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
3) Kannapalli Laxmi, W/o Ramulu, Hindu, age 46 years, household duties, residing at Ammulapalem villagae, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
4) Andukuri Narasinga Rao, S/o late Apparao, Hindu, age 71 years, cultivation, D.No.8-7-10, Gajuwaka, Visakhapatnam Greater Municipal Corporation, Visakhapatnam District.
Defendants
This suit coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri
B.V.S.S.N.Murthy, Advocate for Plaintiff and of Sri A.V.S.Bhavani Prasad, Advocate for Defendant
No.4. Defendants 1 to 3 remained exparte. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
Suit for Preliminary decree for partition of the plaint schedule property into four equal shares with metes and bounds and allot one such equal separated share to the plaintiff after converting the joint possession into separate possession and for costs of the suit.
Costs not paid. Plaintiff called absent. No representation on behalf of plaintiff. Plaintiff failed to adduce evidence though granted several adjournments . Hence this suit is dismissed for default without costs.
Pronounced by me in open court, this the 19th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR
CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPAL
LI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:12-09-12012 Date of Filing:12-09-2012
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Monday this the 19th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.223/2012
Between: Sri Pilli Manikumar,S/o late Somulu, Hindu, age 45 years, cultivation, residing at Door No.40-56- 16, Sanjeeviah colony, Near Logos Church, Tadichetlapalem, Visakhapatnam-4. Plaintiff. And:
1) Pilli Chellayyamma,W/o late Somulu, Hindu, age 67 years, house hold duties, residing at Pidiwada Agraharam Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
2) Ravada Saraswathi W/o late Appanna, Hindu, age 49 years, house hold duties, residing at Pydiwada Agraharam, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
3) Kannapalli Laxmi, W/o Ramulu, Hindu, age 46 years, household duties, residing at Ammulapalem villagae, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
4) andukuri Narasinga Rao, S/o late Apparao, Hindu, age 71 years, cultivation, D.No.8-7-10, Gajuwaka, Visakhapatnam Greater Municipal Corporation, Visakhapatnam District. Defendants
Suit for Preliminary decree for partition of the plaint schedule property into four equal shares with metes and bounds and allot one such equal separated share to the plaintiff after converting the joint possession into separate possession and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction is Rs.653063/- and a court fee of Rs.9026/- is payable but the schedule property is in joint possession and enjoyment of the plaintiff and the defendants a fixed court fee of Rs.200-00 is paid under Sec.34(2) of A.P.C.F. and
S.V.Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri
B.V.S.S.N.Murthy, Advocate for Plaintiff and of Sri A.V.S.Bhavani Prasad, Advocate for Defendant
No.4. Defendants 1 to 3 remained exparte. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court doth order and:
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed for default
2) that there be no costs:
( Copy of Plaint schedule and valuation slip hereto enclosed)
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
Date of Presentation:21-12-2015 Date of Filing:21-12-2015
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Wednesday this the 7th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.254/2015
Between: Sri Karri Bhasakara Rao, S/o Suryanarayana, Hindu, age 38 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.10- 63, Nagulapalli villagae, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Plaintiff. And: Sri Villuri Bhaskara Rao, S/o late Suribabu, Hindu, age 45 years, Business, residing at D.No.2-36 Ummalada village, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Defendant
Suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for specific performance of the plaint schedule property directing the defendant to execute the registered sale deed for the plaint schedule property in favour of the plaintiff and if the defendant do not do so, the court to register the sale deed; if for any reason the specific performance cannot be ordered, for the refund of the advance amount of Rs.5,00,000/- and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction is Rs.6,00,000/- and a court fee of Rs.8,426/- is paid under Sec.39 Sch.I ArtI(b) and (c) of A.P.C.F. and S.V.Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri Buddha
Thrinadha Rao Advocate for Plaintiff. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court doth order:
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed for default;
2) that there be no costs;
Give under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 7th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
For Plaintiff: For Defendant:
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And: 1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court delivered the following:
ORDER
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
Counter of R1 and R2 not filed. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court. Memo is recorded. Hence this petition is dismissed without costs as not pressed as settled out of court.
Pronounced by me in open court this the 8th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:31-08-2016 Date of Filing:15-09-2016
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And: 1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
A fixed Court fee of Re1/- is affixed on the petition.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court doth order and;
DECREETAL ORDER
1) that the petition be and the same is hereby dismissed as not pressed as settled out of Court.
2) that there be no costs; Given under my hand and the seal of this court this the 8th day of June,2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PETITIONER/PLAINTIFF FOR RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Wednesday this the 7th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.254/2015
Between: Sri Karri Bhasakara Rao, S/o Suryanarayana, Hindu, age 38 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.10- 63, Nagulapalli villagae, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Plaintiff. And: Sri Villuri Bhaskara Rao, S/o late Suribabu, Hindu, age 45 years, Business, residing at D.No.2-36 Ummalada village, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Defendant
This suit coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri Buddha
Thrinadha Rao Advocate for Plaintiff. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
Suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for specific performance of the plaint schedule property directing the defendant to execute the registered sale deed for the plaint schedule property in favour of the plaintiff and if the defendant do not do so, the court to register the sale deed; if for any reason the specific performance cannot be ordered, for the refund of the advance amount of Rs.5,00,000/- and for costs of the suit.
Publication not filed against defendant . Plaintiff called absent No representation on behalf of plaintiff. Hence this suit is dismissed for default without costs.
Pronounced by me in open court, this the 7th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:21-12-2015 Date of Filing:21-12-2015
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Wednesday this the 7th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.254/2015
Between: Sri Karri Bhasakara Rao, S/o Suryanarayana, Hindu, age 38 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.10- 63, Nagulapalli villagae, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Plaintiff. And: Sri Villuri Bhaskara Rao, S/o late Suribabu, Hindu, age 45 years, Business, residing at D.No.2-36 Ummalada village, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Defendant
Suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for specific performance of the plaint schedule property directing the defendant to execute the registered sale deed for the plaint schedule property in favour of the plaintiff and if the defendant do not do so, the court to register the sale deed; if for any reason the specific performance cannot be ordered, for the refund of the advance amount of Rs.5,00,000/- and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction is Rs.6,00,000/- and a court fee of Rs.8,426/- is paid under Sec.39 Sch.I ArtI(b) and (c) of A.P.C.F. and S.V.Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri Buddha
Thrinadha Rao Advocate for Plaintiff. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court doth order:
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed for default;
2) that there be no costs;
Give under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 7th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
For Plaintiff: For Defendant:
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And: 1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court delivered the following:
ORDER
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
Counter of R1 and R2 not filed. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court. Memo is recorded. Hence this petition is dismissed without costs as not pressed as settled out of court.
Pronounced by me in open court this the 8th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:31-08-2016 Date of Filing:15-09-2016
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And: 1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
A fixed Court fee of Re1/- is affixed on the petition.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court doth order and;
DECREETAL ORDER
1) that the petition be and the same is hereby dismissed as not pressed as settled out of Court.
2) that there be no costs; Given under my hand and the seal of this court this the 8th day of June,2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PETITIONER/PLAINTIFF FOR RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:21-12-2015 Date of Filing:21-12-2015
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Wednesday this the 7th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.254/2015
Between: Sri Karri Bhasakara Rao, S/o Suryanarayana, Hindu, age 38 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.10- 63, Nagulapalli villagae, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Plaintiff. And: Sri Villuri Bhaskara Rao, S/o late Suribabu, Hindu, age 45 years, Business, residing at D.No.2-36 Ummalada village, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Defendant
Suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for specific performance of the plaint schedule property directing the defendant to execute the registered sale deed for the plaint schedule property in favour of the plaintiff and if the defendant do not do so, the court to register the sale deed; if for any reason the specific performance cannot be ordered, for the refund of the advance amount of Rs.5,00,000/- and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction is Rs.6,00,000/- and a court fee of Rs.8,426/- is paid under Sec.39 Sch.I ArtI(b) and (c) of A.P.C.F. and S.V.Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri Buddha
Thrinadha Rao Advocate for Plaintiff. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court doth order:
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed for default;
2) that there be no costs;
Give under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 7th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
For Plaintiff: For Defendant:
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And: 1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court delivered the following:
ORDER
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
Counter of R1 and R2 not filed. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court. Memo is recorded. Hence this petition is dismissed without costs as not pressed as settled out of court.
Pronounced by me in open court this the 8th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:31-08-2016 Date of Filing:15-09-2016
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And: 1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
A fixed Court fee of Re1/- is affixed on the petition.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court doth order and;
DECREETAL ORDER
1) that the petition be and the same is hereby dismissed as not pressed as settled out of Court.
2) that there be no costs; Given under my hand and the seal of this court this the 8th day of June,2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PETITIONER/PLAINTIFF FOR RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Wednesday this the 7th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.254/2015
Between: Sri Karri Bhasakara Rao, S/o Suryanarayana, Hindu, age 38 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.10- 63, Nagulapalli villagae, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Plaintiff. And: Sri Villuri Bhaskara Rao, S/o late Suribabu, Hindu, age 45 years, Business, residing at D.No.2-36 Ummalada village, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Defendant
This suit coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri Buddha
Thrinadha Rao Advocate for Plaintiff. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
Suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for specific performance of the plaint schedule property directing the defendant to execute the registered sale deed for the plaint schedule property in favour of the plaintiff and if the defendant do not do so, the court to register the sale deed; if for any reason the specific performance cannot be ordered, for the refund of the advance amount of Rs.5,00,000/- and for costs of the suit.
Publication not filed against defendant . Plaintiff called absent No representation on behalf of plaintiff. Hence this suit is dismissed for default without costs.
Pronounced by me in open court, this the 7th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:21-12-2015 Date of Filing:21-12-2015
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Wednesday this the 7th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.254/2015
Between: Sri Karri Bhasakara Rao, S/o Suryanarayana, Hindu, age 38 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.10- 63, Nagulapalli villagae, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Plaintiff. And: Sri Villuri Bhaskara Rao, S/o late Suribabu, Hindu, age 45 years, Business, residing at D.No.2-36 Ummalada village, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Defendant
Suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for specific performance of the plaint schedule property directing the defendant to execute the registered sale deed for the plaint schedule property in favour of the plaintiff and if the defendant do not do so, the court to register the sale deed; if for any reason the specific performance cannot be ordered, for the refund of the advance amount of Rs.5,00,000/- and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction is Rs.6,00,000/- and a court fee of Rs.8,426/- is paid under Sec.39 Sch.I ArtI(b) and (c) of A.P.C.F. and S.V.Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri Buddha
Thrinadha Rao Advocate for Plaintiff. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court doth order:
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed for default;
2) that there be no costs;
Give under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 7th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
For Plaintiff: For Defendant:
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And:
1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court delivered the following:
ORDER
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
Counter of R1 and R2 not filed. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court. Memo is recorded. Hence this petition is dismissed without costs as not pressed as settled out of court.
Pronounced by me in open court this the 8th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:31-08-2016
Date of Filing:15-09-2016
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And: 1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
A fixed Court fee of Re1/- is affixed on the petition.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court doth order and;
DECREETAL ORDER
1) that the petition be and the same is hereby dismissed as not pressed as settled out of Court.
2) that there be no costs; Given under my hand and the seal of this court this the 8th day of June,2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PETITIONER/PLAINTIFF FOR RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:12-09-12012 Date of Filing:12-09-2012
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Monday this the 19th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.223/2012
Between:
Sri Pilli Manikumar,S/o late Somulu, Hindu, age 45 years, cultivation, residing at Door No.40-56- 16, Sanjeeviah colony, Near Logos Church, Tadichetlapalem, Visakhapatnam-4. Plaintiff. And:
1) Pilli Chellayyamma,W/o late Somulu, Hindu, age 67 years, house hold duties, residing at Pidiwada Agraharam Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
2) Ravada Saraswathi W/o late Appanna, Hindu, age 49 years, house hold duties, residing at Pydiwada Agraharam, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
3) Kannapalli Laxmi, W/o Ramulu, Hindu, age 46 years, household duties, residing at Ammulapalem villagae, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
4) andukuri Narasinga Rao, S/o late Apparao, Hindu, age 71 years, cultivation, D.No.8-7-10, Gajuwaka, Visakhapatnam Greater Municipal Corporation, Visakhapatnam District. Defendants
Suit for Preliminary decree for partition of the plaint schedule property into four equal shares with metes and bounds and allot one such equal separated share to the plaintiff after converting the joint possession into separate possession and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction is Rs.653063/- and a court fee of Rs.9026/- is payable but the schedule property is in joint possession and enjoyment of the plaintiff and the defendants a fixed court fee of Rs.200-00 is paid under Sec.34(2) of A.P.C.F. and
S.V.Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri
B.V.S.S.N.Murthy, Advocate for Plaintiff and of Sri A.V.S.Bhavani Prasad, Advocate for Defendant
No.4. Defendants 1 to 3 remained exparte. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court doth order and:
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed for default
2) that there be no costs:
( Copy of Plaint schedule and valuation slip hereto enclosed)
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Monday this the 19th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.223/2012
Between: Sri Pilli Manikumar,S/o late Somulu, Hindu, age 45 years, cultivation, residing at Door No.40-56- 16, Sanjeeviah colony, Near Logos Church, Tadichetlapalem, Visakhapatnam-4. Plaintiff. And:
1) Pilli Chellayyamma,W/o late Somulu, Hindu, age 67 years, house hold duties, residing at Pidiwada Agraharam Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
2) Ravada Saraswathi W/o late Appanna, Hindu, age 49 years, house hold duties, residing at Pydiwada Agraharam, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
3) Kannapalli Laxmi, W/o Ramulu, Hindu, age 46 years, household duties, residing at Ammulapalem villagae, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
4) andukuri Narasinga Rao, S/o late Apparao, Hindu, age 71 years, cultivation, D.No.8-7-10, Gajuwaka, Visakhapatnam Greater Municipal Corporation, Visakhapatnam District. Defendants
This suit coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri
B.V.S.S.N.Murthy, Advocate for Plaintiff and of Sri A.V.S.Bhavani Prasad, Advocate for Defendant
No.4. Defendants 1 to 3 remained exparte. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
Suit for Preliminary decree for partition of the plaint schedule property into four equal shares with metes and bounds and allot one such equal separated share to the plaintiff after converting the joint possession into separate possession and for costs of the suit.
Costs not paid. Plaintiff called absent. No representation on behalf of plaintiff. Plaintiff failed to adduce evidence though granted several adjournments . Hence this suit is dismissed for default without costs.
Pronounced by me in open court, this the 19th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:12-09-12012 Date of Filing:12-09-2012
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Monday this the 19th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.223/2012
Between: Sri Pilli Manikumar,S/o late Somulu, Hindu, age 45 years, cultivation, residing at Door No.40-56- 16, Sanjeeviah colony, Near Logos Church, Tadichetlapalem, Visakhapatnam-4. Plaintiff. And:
1) Pilli Chellayyamma,W/o late Somulu, Hindu, age 67 years, house hold duties, residing at Pidiwada Agraharam Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
2) Ravada Saraswathi W/o late Appanna, Hindu, age 49 years, house hold duties, residing at Pydiwada Agraharam, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
3) Kannapalli Laxmi, W/o Ramulu, Hindu, age 46 years, household duties, residing at Ammulapalem villagae, Sabbavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
4) andukuri Narasinga Rao, S/o late Apparao, Hindu, age 71 years, cultivation, D.No.8-7-10, Gajuwaka, Visakhapatnam Greater Municipal Corporation, Visakhapatnam District. Defendants
Suit for Preliminary decree for partition of the plaint schedule property into four equal shares with metes and bounds and allot one such equal separated share to the plaintiff after converting the joint possession into separate possession and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction is Rs.653063/- and a court fee of Rs.9026/- is payable but the schedule property is in joint possession and enjoyment of the plaintiff and the defendants a fixed court fee of Rs.200-00 is paid under Sec.34(2) of A.P.C.F. and
S.V.Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri
B.V.S.S.N.Murthy, Advocate for Plaintiff and of Sri A.V.S.Bhavani Prasad, Advocate for Defendant
No.4. Defendants 1 to 3 remained exparte. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court doth order and:
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed for default
2) that there be no costs:
( Copy of Plaint schedule and valuation slip hereto enclosed)
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:21-12-2015 Date of Filing:21-12-2015
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Wednesday this the 7th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.254/2015
Between: Sri Karri Bhasakara Rao, S/o Suryanarayana, Hindu, age 38 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.10- 63, Nagulapalli villagae, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
Plaintiff. And: Sri Villuri Bhaskara Rao, S/o late Suribabu, Hindu, age 45 years, Business, residing at D.No.2-36 Ummalada village, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Defendant
Suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for specific performance of the plaint schedule property directing the defendant to execute the registered sale deed for the plaint schedule property in favour of the plaintiff and if the defendant do not do so, the court to register the sale deed; if for any reason the specific performance cannot be ordered, for the refund of the advance amount of Rs.5,00,000/- and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction is Rs.6,00,000/- and a court fee of Rs.8,426/- is paid under Sec.39 Sch.I ArtI(b) and (c) of A.P.C.F. and S.V.Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri Buddha
Thrinadha Rao Advocate for Plaintiff. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court doth order:
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed for default;
2) that there be no costs;
Give under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 7th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
For Plaintiff: For Defendant:
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And: 1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court delivered the following:
ORDER
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
Counter of R1 and R2 not filed. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court. Memo is recorded. Hence this petition is dismissed without costs as not pressed as settled out of court.
Pronounced by me in open court this the 8th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:31-08-2016 Date of Filing:15-09-2016
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And: 1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
A fixed Court fee of Re1/- is affixed on the petition.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court doth order and;
DECREETAL ORDER
1) that the petition be and the same is hereby dismissed as not pressed as settled out of Court.
2) that there be no costs; Given under my hand and the seal of this court this the 8th day of June,2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PETITIONER/PLAINTIFF FOR RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Wednesday this the 7th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.254/2015
Between: Sri Karri Bhasakara Rao, S/o Suryanarayana, Hindu, age 38 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.10- 63, Nagulapalli villagae, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Plaintiff. And: Sri Villuri Bhaskara Rao, S/o late Suribabu, Hindu, age 45 years, Business, residing at D.No.2-36 Ummalada village, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Defendant
This suit coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri Buddha
Thrinadha Rao Advocate for Plaintiff. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
Suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for specific performance of the plaint schedule property directing the defendant to execute the registered sale deed for the plaint schedule property in favour of the plaintiff and if the defendant do not do so, the court to register the sale deed; if for any reason the specific performance cannot be ordered, for the refund of the advance amount of Rs.5,00,000/- and for costs of the suit.
Publication not filed against defendant . Plaintiff called absent No representation on behalf of plaintiff. Hence this suit is dismissed for default without costs.
Pronounced by me in open court, this the 7th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:21-12-2015 Date of Filing:21-12-2015
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Wednesday this the 7th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.254/2015
Between: Sri Karri Bhasakara Rao, S/o Suryanarayana, Hindu, age 38 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.10- 63, Nagulapalli villagae, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Plaintiff. And: Sri Villuri Bhaskara Rao, S/o late Suribabu, Hindu, age 45 years, Business, residing at D.No.2-36 Ummalada village, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Defendant
Suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for specific performance of the plaint schedule property directing the defendant to execute the registered sale deed for the plaint schedule property in favour of the plaintiff and if the defendant do not do so, the court to register the sale deed; if for any reason the specific performance cannot be ordered, for the refund of the advance amount of Rs.5,00,000/- and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction is Rs.6,00,000/- and a court fee of Rs.8,426/- is paid under Sec.39 Sch.I ArtI(b) and (c) of A.P.C.F. and S.V.Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri Buddha
Thrinadha Rao Advocate for Plaintiff. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court doth order:
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed for default;
2) that there be no costs;
Give under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 7th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
For Plaintiff: For Defendant:
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And: 1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court delivered the following:
ORDER
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
Counter of R1 and R2 not filed. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court. Memo is recorded. Hence this petition is dismissed without costs as not pressed as settled out of court.
Pronounced by me in open court this the 8th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:31-08-2016 Date of Filing:15-09-2016
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And: 1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
A fixed Court fee of Re1/- is affixed on the petition.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court doth order and;
DECREETAL ORDER
1) that the petition be and the same is hereby dismissed as not pressed as settled out of Court.
2) that there be no costs; Given under my hand and the seal of this court this the 8th day of June,2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PETITIONER/PLAINTIFF FOR RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:21-12-2015 Date of Filing:21-12-2015
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Wednesday this the 7th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.254/2015
Between: Sri Karri Bhasakara Rao, S/o Suryanarayana, Hindu, age 38 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.10- 63, Nagulapalli villagae, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Plaintiff. And: Sri Villuri Bhaskara Rao, S/o late Suribabu, Hindu, age 45 years, Business, residing at D.No.2-36 Ummalada village, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Defendant
Suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for specific performance of the plaint schedule property directing the defendant to execute the registered sale deed for the plaint schedule property in favour of the plaintiff and if the defendant do not do so, the court to register the sale deed; if for any reason the specific performance cannot be ordered, for the refund of the advance amount of Rs.5,00,000/- and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction is Rs.6,00,000/- and a court fee of Rs.8,426/- is paid under Sec.39 Sch.I ArtI(b) and (c) of A.P.C.F. and S.V.Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri Buddha
Thrinadha Rao Advocate for Plaintiff. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court doth order:
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed for default;
2) that there be no costs;
Give under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 7th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
For Plaintiff: For Defendant:
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And:
1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court delivered the following:
ORDER
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
Counter of R1 and R2 not filed. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court. Memo is recorded. Hence this petition is dismissed without costs as not pressed as settled out of court.
Pronounced by me in open court this the 8th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:31-08-2016
Date of Filing:15-09-2016
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And: 1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
A fixed Court fee of Re1/- is affixed on the petition.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court doth order and;
DECREETAL ORDER
1) that the petition be and the same is hereby dismissed as not pressed as settled out of Court.
2) that there be no costs; Given under my hand and the seal of this court this the 8th day of June,2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PETITIONER/PLAINTIFF FOR RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Wednesday this the 7th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.254/2015
Between: Sri Karri Bhasakara Rao, S/o Suryanarayana, Hindu, age 38 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.10- 63, Nagulapalli villagae, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Plaintiff. And: Sri Villuri Bhaskara Rao, S/o late Suribabu, Hindu, age 45 years, Business, residing at D.No.2-36 Ummalada village, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Defendant
This suit coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri Buddha
Thrinadha Rao Advocate for Plaintiff. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
Suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for specific performance of the plaint schedule property directing the defendant to execute the registered sale deed for the plaint schedule property in favour of the plaintiff and if the defendant do not do so, the court to register the sale deed; if for any reason the specific performance cannot be ordered, for the refund of the advance amount of Rs.5,00,000/- and for costs of the suit.
Publication not filed against defendant . Plaintiff called absent No representation on behalf of plaintiff. Hence this suit is dismissed for default without costs.
Pronounced by me in open court, this the 7th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:21-12-2015 Date of Filing:21-12-2015
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli, Wednesday this the 7th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.254/2015
Between: Sri Karri Bhasakara Rao, S/o Suryanarayana, Hindu, age 38 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.10- 63, Nagulapalli villagae, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Plaintiff. And: Sri Villuri Bhaskara Rao, S/o late Suribabu, Hindu, age 45 years, Business, residing at D.No.2-36 Ummalada village, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Defendant
Suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for specific performance of the plaint schedule property directing the defendant to execute the registered sale deed for the plaint schedule property in favour of the plaintiff and if the defendant do not do so, the court to register the sale deed; if for any reason the specific performance cannot be ordered, for the refund of the advance amount of Rs.5,00,000/- and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction is Rs.6,00,000/- and a court fee of Rs.8,426/- is paid under Sec.39 Sch.I ArtI(b) and (c) of A.P.C.F. and S.V.Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri Buddha
Thrinadha Rao Advocate for Plaintiff. Plaintiff called absent No representation and this court doth order:
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed for default;
2) that there be no costs;
Give under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 7th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
For Plaintiff: For Defendant:
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And: 1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court delivered the following:
ORDER
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
Counter of R1 and R2 not filed. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court. Memo is recorded. Hence this petition is dismissed without costs as not pressed as settled out of court.
Pronounced by me in open court this the 8th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation:31-08-2016 Date of Filing:15-09-2016
IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between: Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petitioner/Plaintiff And: 1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendants.
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt.
11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
A fixed Court fee of Re1/- is affixed on the petition.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for
Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court doth order and;
DECREETAL ORDER
1) that the petition be and the same is hereby dismissed as not pressed as settled out of Court.
2) that there be no costs; Given under my hand and the seal of this court this the 8th day of June,2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PETITIONER/PLAINTIFF FOR RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Tuesday, this the 16th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No 165/2016
Between:
Sri Konatala Koteswara Rao, Late Ramu Naidu, Hindu, age 46 years, cultivation, resident at D.No.7-85, Munagapaka village, post and Mandal, near Sri Rama temple, Mandabayalu, Visakhapatnam . Plaintiff. And:
Sri Kandregula Nookaraju, S/o Sanyasi Naid, Hindu, age 47 years, cultivation resident at D.No.3-31, Vandrapalli village, post, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Defendant.
This suit coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri S.S.Chalam, Advocate for the Plaintiff and of Sri Lanka Jagannadham,Advocate for defendant and Counsel for plaintiff filed memo stating that the subject matter was settled out of court and having stood over till this day for consideration this court delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
Suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant (a) for a preliminary decree directing the defendant to pay the suit amount of Rs.10,03,333/- together with interest at the rate of Rs.24% per annum from the date of filing of the suit till the date of realization within the time stipulated by the court (b) if the defendant failed to pay the suit amount within the stipulated time, to pass a final decree ordering sale of the mortgaged property land for approaching such sale proceeds to the decretal amount (c) in the event, if the sale proceeds, are not balancing the decretal amount, permission may be granted to the plaintiff to sue the defendant personally and for costs of the suit.
Plaintiff and defendant present. Plaintiff filed memo stating that the subject matter of this suit was settled out of court and defendant paid entire mortgage debt and plaintiff prays the court may be pleased to dismiss the suit without costs. Memo is recorded. Hence this suit is dismissed without costs as settled out of court.
Pronounced by me in open court, this the 16th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation : 24-10-2016 Date of filing:24-10-2016
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Tuesday, this the 16th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No 165/2016
Between:
Sri Konatala Koteswara Rao, Late Ramu Naidu, Hindu, age 46 years, cultivation, resident at D.No.7-85, Munagapaka village, post and Mandal, near Sri Rama temple, Mandabayalu, Visakhapatnam . Plaintiff. And:
Sri Kandregula Nookaraju, S/o Sanyasi Naidul, Hindu, age 47 years, cultivation,resident at D.No.3-31, Vandrapalli village, post, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Defendant. Suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant (a) for a preliminary decree directing the defendant to pay the suit amount of Rs.10,03,333/- together with interest at the rate of Rs.24% per annum from the date of filing of the suit till the date of realization within the time stipulated by the court (b) if the defendant failed to pay the suit amount within the stipulated time, to pass a final decree ordering sale of the mortgaged property land for approaching such sale proceeds to the decretal amount (c) in the event, if the sale proceeds, are not balancing the decretal amount, permission may be granted to the plaintiff to sue the defendant personally and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction is
Rs.10,03,333-00 a court fee of Rs.12,626/- is paid under Sec.31(1) and Sec.20 of Sch.I Art.I (b) and(c) of A.P.C.F. and S.V.Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri S.S.Chalam, Advocate for the Plaintiff and of Sri Lanka Jagannadham, Advocate for defendant and Counsel for plaintiff filed memo stating that the subject matter was settled out of court and having stood over till this day for consideration this court doth order and:
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed as settled out of court;
2) that there be no costs; ( Copy of plaint schedule hereto enclosed)
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 16th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PLAINTIFF; FOR DEFENDANT;
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Tuesday, this the 16th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No 188/2014
Between:
State Bank of India,Anakapalli branch represented by its Chief Manager Sri A. Sai Prasad S/o Balaramaiah, age 50 years,Anakapalli, Visakhapatnam District. Plaintiff. And:
Sri Patoju Vseerabhadra Rao S/o late Vioshnu Murthy, age 56 years, residing at H.No.1-23, Tuypuram village Butchayyapeta Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Defendant.
This suit coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Smt.A.Bhanumathi, Sri V.Viswanadham, Advocates for the Plaintiff Bank and of Sri M.Jaya Ram,Advocate for defendant. Costs not paid. Steps against deceased defendant not taken No representation on behalf of plaintiff and having stood over till this day for consideration this court delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
Suit filed by the plaintiff bank (herein after to be referred as plaintiff) against the defendant for recover of an amount of Rs.3,26,147/- (Rupees three lakhs twenty six thousand one hundred and forty seven only) along with subsequent interest thereon at 13.40% p.a. with monthly rests from the date of the ksuiltk till date of realization and for costs of the suit.
Costs not paid. Steps against deceased defendant not taken. No representation on behalf of plaintiff. Hence this suit defendant ils dismissed without costs as abated.
Pronounced by me in open court, this the 16th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
For Plaintiff:
PW1:16-12-2015: Sri P.Satya SaiSubrahmanyaraju
List of documents marked for Plaintiff:-
Ex.A1 is the Bio-data form.
Ex.A2 is the letter of arrangement issued by the plaintiff and acknowledged the defendant.
Ex.A3 is the agreement of loan cum hypothecation executed by defendant.
Ex.A4 is the letter by the defendant addressed by the plaintiff.
Ex.A5 is the notice to the defendant by Lok Adalat, Anakapalli in
PLC.N;o.1171/13.
Ex.A6 is the certified extract of statement of loan.
For Defendant:- NIL
PSCJ/AKP Date of Presentation : 04-07-2014 Date of filing:30-07-2014
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Tuesday, this the 16th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No 188/2014
Between:
State Bank of India,Anakapalli branch represented by its Chief Manager Sri A. Sai Prasad S/o Balaramaiah, age 50 years,Anakapalli, Visakhapatnam District.
Plaintiff. And:
Sri Patoju Vseerabhadra Rao S/o late Vioshnu Murthy, age 56 years, residing at H.No.1-23, Tuypuram village Butchayyapeta Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
Defendant.
Suit filed by the plaintiff bank (herein after to be referred as plaintiff) against the defendant for recover of an amount of Rs.3,26,147/- (Rupees three lakhs twenty six thousand one hundred and forty seven only) along with subsequent interest thereon at 13.40% p.a. with monthly rests from the date of the suilt till date of realization and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and Jurisdiction is valued at
Rs.3,26,147/- and a court fee of Rs.5,726/- is paid thereon under Sec.20 read with Art.I(b) and (c) of schedule I of A.P.C.F. and S.V.Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Smt.A.Bhanumathi, Sri V.Viswanadham, Advocates for the Plaintiff Bank and of Sri M.Jaya Ram,Advocate for defendant. Costs not paid. Steps against deceased defendant not taken No representation on behalf of plaintiff and having stood over till this day for consideration this court doth order and:
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed as no representation on behalf of plaintiff;
2) that the suit against defendant is dismissed without costs as abated;
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 16th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PLAINTIFF; FOR DEFENDANT;
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Tuesday, this the 13th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.43/2016
Between:
Sri Kanchumarthy Ravi Kanth, son of Mohana Rao, Hindu, age 47 years, working as Deputy Manager, State Bank of India, Sonthyam, Visakhapatnam, residing at Flat S-1, Premier paradise No.3, Official colony, 3rd lane, Maharanipeta,Visakhapatnam . Plaintiff. And:
Smt.Kanchumarthy Bharathi Devi, daughter of Yarasani Suri Babu, Hindu, age 46 years, working as Teacher (In charge/Pre Premier), D.A.V Public School, Anakapalli, Visakhapatnam District, residing at Flat No.T-1, Sri Sai Ganesh Villa, Near Commercial Tax office, New colony, Anakapalle, Visakhapatnam District. Defendant.
This suit coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri I.M.Ahmed, Advocate for the Plaintiff and of Sri K.Sunil Reddy,Advocate for defendant and Counsel for plaintiff filed memo stating that the subject matter was settled out of court and having stood over till this day for consideration this court delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
Suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant (a) to direct the defendant to vacate the schedule premises and deliver vacant possession of the same to the plaintiff in good condition as is given to the defendant and direct the defendant to pay Rs.4,32,000/- towards arrears of rent from February,2013 to
February,2016 with subsequent interest at 24% p.a. from the date of suit till the date of realization and to direct the defendant to pay monthly rents at 12,000/- from March,2016 till delivery of the same to the plaintiff and for costs of the suit.
Counsel for plaintiff filed memo stating that the subject matter of this suit was settled out of court and hence the plaintiff not pressing the suit and prays the court may be pleased to dismiss the suit. Memo is recorded. Hence this suit dismissed without costs as settled out of court.
Pronounced by me in open court, this the 13th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation : 28-3-2016 Date of filing:29-03-2016
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge,
Anakapalli
Tuesday, this the 13th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.43/2016
Between:
Sri Kanchumarthy Ravi Kanth, son of Mohana Rao, Hindu, age 47 years, working as Deputy Manager, State Bank of India, Sonthyam, Visakhapatnam, residing at Flat S-1, Premier paradise No.3, Official colony, 3rd lane, Maharanipeta,Visakhapatnam . Plaintiff. And:
Smt.Kanchumarthy Bharathi Devi, daughter of Yarasani Suri Babu, Hindu, age 46 years, working as Teacher (In charge/Pre Premier), D.A.V Public School, Anakapalli, Visakhapatnam District, residing at Flat No.T-1, Sri Sai Ganesh Villa, Near Commercial Tax office, New colony, Anakapalle, Visakhapatnam District.
Defendant.
Suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant (a) to direct the defendant to vacate the schedule premises and deliver vacant possession of the same to the plaintiff in good condition as is given to the defendant and direct the defendant to pay Rs.4,32,000/- towards arrears of rent from February,2013 to February,2016 with subsequent interest at 24% p.a. from the date of suit till the date of realization and to direct the defendant to pay monthly rents at 12,000/- from March,2016 till delivery of the same to the plaintiff and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and Jurisdiction is as follows: For eviction the suit is valued on one year rent i.e. Rs.12,000/-x12= Rs.1,44,000/- and a court fee of Rs.3,926/- is paid .For recovery of arrears of rents the suit is valued at Rs.4,32,000/- (Rs.12,000/-X36) and a court fee of Rs.6,826/- is paid U/Sec.40 and 20 Art.I(b&c) of APCF and S.V.Act.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri I.M.Ahmed, Advocate for the Plaintiff and of Sri K.Sunil Reddy, Advocate for defendant and Counsel for plaintiff filed memo stating that the subject matter was settled out of court and having stood over till this day for consideration this court doth order and;
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed as settled out of court;
2) that there be no costs; ( Copy of plaint schedule hereto enclosed)
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 13th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PLAINTIFF; FOR DEFENDANT;
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli
Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between:
Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
Petitioner/Plaintiff And:
1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
Respondents/defendan ts.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri
M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court delivered the following:
ORDER
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt. 11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
Counter of R1 and R2 not filed. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court. Memo is recorded. Hence this petition is dismissed without costs as not pressed as settled out of court.
Pronounced by me in open court this the 8th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation : 31-08-2016 Date of Filing : 15-09-2016
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli Thursday, this the 8th day of June,2017.
I.A.343/2016 in O.S.225/2012
Between:
Mummina Sreenu S/o GangaRaju, Hindu 41 years, residing at D.No.2-74, Bavuluvada village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
……..Petitioner/Plaintiff
And:
1.Molli Apparao son of late Appalakonda, Hindu age 41 years, residing at House No.2, RV Palem Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal.
2. Molli Ramu S/o late Appalakonda, age 38 years, residing at D.No.1-43 Rongalivanipalem,Kunchangi, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakha Dist.
3. Molli Talupulu S/o late Appalakonda, Hindu age 36 years rest do.
…….Respondents/defendan ts
This petition filed under order 34 Rule 5 and Sec.151 of CPC.
The petitioner/plaintiff prays to order to pass a final decree in terms of the preliminary decree dt. 11-02-2016 for recovery of mortgage money for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit.
A fixed Court fee of Rs.1/- is affixed on the petition.
This petition coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri G.Nageswararao, Advocate for Petitioner/plaintiff and of Sri M.J.V.N.Kumar, Advocate for Respondents/defendants. Counsel for petitioner filed memo not pressing the petition as settled out of court and this court doth order and;
DECREETAL ORDER
1) that the petition be and the same is hereby dismissed as not pressed as settled out of Court.
2) that there be no costs;
Given under my hand and the seal of this court this the 8th day of June,2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PETITIONER/PLAINTIFF FOR RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS
No costs memo is filed on either side. PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge
Anakapalli
Wednesday, this the 7th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.254/2015
Between:
Sri Karri Bhaskara Rao,S/o Suryanarayana, Hindu, age 38 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.10-63, Nagulapalli village, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Plaintiff. And:
Sri Villuri Bhaskara Rao, S/o Late Suri babu, Hindu, age 45 years, Business, residing at D.No.2-36, Ummalada village, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Defendant.
This suit coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri B.Trinadha Rao, Advocate for the Plaintiff. Plaintiff called absent No representation and having stood over till this day for consideration this court delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
Suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for specific performance of the plaint schedule property directing the defendant to execute the registered sale deed for the plaint schedule property in favour of the plaintiff and if the defendant do not do so, the court to register the sale deed; if for any reason the specific performance cannot be ordered, for the refund of the advance amount of Rs.5,00,000/- and for costs of the suit.
Publication not filed against defendant. Plaintiff called absent No representation on behalf of plaintiff. Hence this suit is dismissed for default without costs.
Pronounced by me in open court, this the 7th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation : 21-12-2015 Date of filing:21-12-2015
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge,
Anakapalli
Wednesday, this the 7th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.254/2015
Between:
Sri Karri Bhaskara Rao,S/o Suryanarayana, Hindu, age 38 years, cultivation, residing at D.No.10-63, Nagulapalli village, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Plaintiff. And:
Sri Villuri Bhaskara Rao, S/o Late Suri babu, Hindu, age 45 years, Business, residing at D.No.2-36, Ummalada village, Munagapaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Defendant.
Suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for specific performance of the plaint schedule property directing the defendant to execute the registered sale deed for the plaint schedule property in favour of the plaintiff and if the defendant do not do so, the court to register the sale deed; if for any reason the specific paerformance cannot be ordered, for the refund of the advance amount of Rs.5,00,000/- and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction is
Rs.6,00,000/- and a court fee of Rs.8,426/- is paid under Sec.39 Sch.I Art.I(b) and (c) of A.P.C.F.& S.V.ACT.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri B.Trinadha Rao, Advocate for the Plaintiff. Plaintiff called absent No representation and having stood over till this day for consideration this court doth order and:
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed for default;
2) that there be no costs;
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 7th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PLAINTIFF; FOR DEFENDANT;
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge,
Anakapalli
Tuesday, this the 13th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.69/2013
Between:
Sri Chapala Gopi,S/o Bandiyya,Hindu, age 38 years, catering business, residing at D.No.20-3-10, Ambedkar Nagar, Gavarapalem, Anakapalli village and Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Plaintiff. And:
1) Mogalapalli Parvathi, D/o late Venkataramana, Hindu, age 56 years, household duties, residing at D.No.11-1-8, Opp.Kanyaka parameswari temple shopping complex, main road, Anakapalli village and Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
2) Mogalapalli Appalaraju Kumari, D/o late Venkataramana, Hindu, age 53 years, house hold duties-rest-do-
3) Mogalapalli Venkata Bhanu Murthy, S/o late Venkataramana, Hindu, age 50 Years, -rest-do-. Defendants
This suit coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence of
Sri B.Trinadha Rao, Advocate for the Plaintiff and of Sri A.V.S.Bhavani Prasad,
Advocate for defendants. Plaintiff called absent No representation and having stood over till this day for consideration this court delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
Suit filed for recover a sum of Rs.6,30,666/- being the principal of
Rs.5,00,000/- due on a promissory note dated 6-3-2012 executed by the defendants in favour of the plaintiff agreeing to repay the same with interest at 24% p.a. and with subsequent interest and for costs of the suit.
PW1 absent costs not paid. Plaintiff called absent. No representation on behalf of plaintiff. PW1 did not turn up to this court since long time though granted adjournments given on costs. Hence this suit is dismissed for default without costs.
Pronounced by me in open court, this the 13h day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
NIL
PSCJ/AKP
Date of Presentation : 08-04-2013 Date of Filing:08-04-2013
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLI
Present: Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao,
Principal Senior Civil Judge,
Anakapalli
Tuesday, this the 13th day of June, 2017.
O.S.No.69/2013
Between:
Sri Chapala Gopi,S/o Bandiyya,Hindu, age 38 years, catering business, residilng at D.No.20-3-10, Ambedkar Nagar, Gavarapalem, Anakapalli village and Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Plaintiff. And:
1) Mogalapalli Parvathi, D/o late Venkataramana, Hindu, age 56 years, household duties, residing at D.No.11-1-8, Opp.Kanyaka parameswari temple shopping complex, main road, Anakapalli village and Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
2) Mogalapalli Appalaraju Kumari, D/o late Venkataramana, Hindu, age 53 years, house hold duties-rest-do-
3) Mogalapalli Venkata Bhanu Murthy, S/o late Venkataramana, Hindu, Age 50 years, -rest-do-. Defendants
Suit filed for recover a sum of Rs.6,30,666/- being the principal of Rs.5,00,000/- due on a promissory note dated 6-3-2012 executed by the defendants in favour of the plaintiff agreeing to repay the same with interest at 24% p.a.and with subsequent interest and for costs of the suit.
Value of the suit for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction is Rs.6,30,666/- and a court fee of Rs.8,826/- is paid under Sec.20 Sch.I Art.I(b) and (c) of A.P.C.F.& S.V.ACT.
This suit coming on this day for final disposal before me in the presence of Sri B.Trinadha Rao, Advocate for the Plaintiff and of Sri A.V.S.Bhavani Prasad, Advocate for defendants. Plaintiff called absent No representation and having stood over till this day for consideration this court doth order
DECREE
1) that the suit be and the same is hereby dismissed for default;
2) that there be no costs;
Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 13th day of June, 2017.
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
ANAKAPALLI
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
FOR PLAINTIFF; FOR DEFENDANT;
No costs memo is filed on either side.
PSCJ/AKP
IN THE COURT OF THE ASSISTANT SESSIONS JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri M.P. SANNIDHI RAO Assistant Sessions Judge, Anakapalli.
Thursday this the 22nd day of June, 2017.
SESSIONS CASE NO. 100/2015
(P.R.C.17/2014 of Addl. Metropolitan Magistrate, Anakapalli) (Cr.No.103/2014 of Kasimkota Police Station)
Name of the complainant: State rep. by the Sub-Inspector of police, Kasimkota police station.
Name of the accused:Shaik Abdul Rajak, S/o. Mammoji, 29 Years, Dedukula by caste, Professional Driver, N/o. Patha kannurupalem Village, Kasimkota Mandal.
Plea of the accused:Not guilty
Prosecution conducted by:Sri M. Jayaram Addl. Public Prosecutor
Whether the accused :Sri Ch.I. Michael defended or notDefence counsel for accused.
This case has come up on 21-06-2017 for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri M.Jayaram, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State and of Sri Ch.I. Michael, Defence counsel for accused, having stood over to this day for consideration and this Court delivered the following:-
J U D G M E N T
The Sub- Inspector of Police, Kasimkota Police station laid charge sheet against the accused in Cr.No.103/2014 U/secs.448, 307, 509, 506 of IPC alleging that the accused trespassed into the house of LW-1, beat the LW-2 with a knife, abused the LW-1 in filthy language and threatened with dire consequences to kill LW-1.
2.The gist of the prosecution case is as follows :
LW-1/Lekkala Mutyalamma is a resident of Patha Kannurupalem Village,
Kasimkota Mandal. Her Marriage was performed about 4 years back prior to this case.
Before her marriage, the accused kept an eye on LW-1/Lekkala Mutyalamma and used to
tease her under the pretext of love. In this connection, she reported the matter in the police station, since then the accused left the village and went to some where for his livelihood. As the matter stood thus, on 16-05-2014 at about 11.00 hours while the LW-1 present in her house, the accused trespassed into the house, abused the LW-1 in filthy language and threatened with dire consequences to kill her. When she raised cries, the neighbour i.e. LW-3/Kannuri Bhavani came to her rescue. In the meanwhile, the LW-2/
Kundrapu Pentayya came there and asked the accused about his misbehaviour towards
LW-1, then the accused grew angry and picked up a knife which was concealed in his 2 back and threatened to kill the LW-2 and his daughter. When the accused attacked on LW- 2 with the knife, LW-2 obstructed him, then the accused hacked on his neck and caused bleeding injury with a view to murder him. In the mean while the Lws 4 and 5 namely
Kannuri Ramunaidu and Karri Kannayya respectively came there and rescued LW-2 from the hands of accused. They also pulled the knife from the hands of the accused. On the same day at 16.00 hours, LW-1 lodged a report and also handed over the knife which was used by the accused. Basing on the report of LW,1, LW-09/MV Ramana, Asst. Sub-
Inspector of Police registered the same as a case in Cr.No.103/2014, under secs.448, 307, 506, 509 of IPC and during the course of investigation, LW-9 seized one knife under the cover of FIR report, visited the scene of offence, inspected the same in the presence of mediators i.e. Lws 6 and 7 namely Kundrapu Narasimhamurthy, Kannuru Venkata
Ramana respectively, prepared rough sketch , examined the witnesses 1 to 5 and recorded their statements and he arrested the accused on 17-05-2014 and sent him for judicial custody and after receipt of wound certificate issued by LW-8/Dr.P.Ratna Kishore,
LW-10/T.V. Vijaya Kumar, SI of Police verified the investigation of LW-9 and filed charge sheet against the accused.
3.The learned Addl. Metropolitan Magistrate, Anakapalli took the cognizance of the offence under Sections 448, 307, 509 and 506 of IPC vide PRC 17/2014. He found the case is exclusively triable by the court of Sessions, committed the entire record to
Hon’ble the Principal District Court, Visakhapatnam, under Section 209 Cr.P.C., who in turn
assigned Sessions Case No.100/2015 and made over the same to this Court with a direction to dispose the same in accordance with law.
4.When accused appeared before the Court, after affording a reasonable opportunity, examined him under Section 228 Cr.P.C. in Telugu with reference to the allegations contained in the charge sheet for which he pleaded not guilty. Then charges
U/secs.448, 307, 509 and 506 of IPC were framed against him. When the said charges were explained and read over to the accused in Telugu for which the accused denied the charges and claimed to be tried. Hence evidence was let in.
5.At the trial, prosecution has examined as many as six witnesses out of ten list of witnesses and got marked Ex.P1 to P11 and M.O.1. PW-1/Lekkala Mutyalamma is a defacto complainant, PW-2/Kundrapu Pentayya is an injured person, PW-3/Kannuri
Bhavani is an independent witness and she is the relative of PWs 1 and 2, PWs 4 and 5 namely Kundrapu Narasimhamurthy and Kannuru Venkata Ramans are the mediators and 3
Pw-6/M.Venkata Ramana, Asst. Sub-Inspector of Police and also Investigation Officer in this case. The learned Addl. Public Prosecutor has given up the evidences of Lws 4, 5, 8 and 10 namely Kannuri Ramu Naidu, Karri Kannayya, Dr. P. Ratna Kishore and T.V. Vijaya
Kumar respectively. Thus prosecution evidence was closed.
6.Then, accused examined U/sec.313 Cr.P.C in Telugu with reference to the incriminating points available in the evidence of prosecution witnesses for which the accused have refused the entire prosecution case. Though he was called upon to enter upon his defence evidence for which reported no defence evidence. His plea is of total denial.
7.Heard the arguments from the learned A.P.P and the learned Defence counsel appearing for accused at length.
8)Now the points for consideration are:
1. “Whether the prosecution has proved its case against the accused for the offence U/secs.448, 307, 509 and 506 of IPC beyond all reasonable doubt?”
2. To what Result ?
9)Point No.1: PW-1/Lekkala Mutyalamma stated that she is resident of
Venkupalem Village and she is a house wife. PW-1 also stated that her parents village
Patha Kannuru Palem village of Kasimkota Mandal. PW-1 further stated that Kundrapu
Pentayya (LW-2) is her father, Kannuru Bhavani (LW-3) is sister by courtesy and her house is situated adjacent to her parents house. Kannuru Ramunaidu, Karri Kannayya, Kundrapu
Narasimha Murthy and Kannuri Venkataramana (LWs 4 to 7) are her relatives and she know the accused. PW-1 also further stated about 3 years back on one day she went to her parents house Patha Kannurupalem Village of Kasimkota from her in-laws house and while she was present in her parents house at about 11.00 AM she heard galata taken place near to her parents house and immediately she went to the scene of offence and she witnessed that her father (LW-2) sustained bleeding injuries and immediately she shifted her father to the police station of Kasimkota and she presented a report (Ex.P.7) to the police of Kasim Kota Police Station but she do not know the contents of the said report as the scribe of the said report did not read over and explained the contents of the said report to her. PW-1 identified her signature (Ex.P.1) on the report dt.16-05-2014. PW- 1 categorically stated that she was not examined by the police of Kasimkota Police
Station at any time in respect of this case. PW-1 stated in the cross examination that she did not state before the police as in Ex.P.2 [161(3) Cr.P.C. statement]. PW-1 also denied 4 the suggestion of Addl. Public Prosecutor in cross examination that the subject matter of this case was compromised before the elders and that she is speaking falsehood to save the accused from this case, though the accused hacked her father (LW-2) with a knife with an intention to kill him.
10)On a perusal of the evidence of PW-1, the PW-1 stated that while she was present in her parents house at about 11.00 AM on one day about three years back she heard galata taken place near to her parents house and immediately she went to the scene of offence, she witnessed that her father (LW-2) sustained bleeding injuries and that she took her (LW-2) to the Police Station, Kasimkota and she presented report (Ex.P.7) to the police of Kasimkota Police Station. But she do not know the contents of the report (Ex.P.7). PW-1 did not support the contents of her own report (Ex.P.7) and she also did not support the contents of her statement Ex.P.2 i.e. 161(3) Cr.P.C. statement. PW-1 no way stated in her evidence that how her father (LW-2) sustained injuries and who beat her father and caused injuries. Since the PW-1 did not support the contents of her own report (Ex.P.7) and her own statement (Ex.P.2), the evidence of PW-1 is no way helpful to the case of the prosecution.
11)PW-2/Kundrapu Pentayya who is injured person and father of PW-1 stated that he is the resident of Patha Kannuru Palem Village and he do live by cultivation. PW-2 also stated that PW-1 is his daughter, Kannuri Bhavani (LW-3) is daughter to him by courtesy, Kannuri Ramu Naidu, Karri Kannayya, Kundrapu Narasimhamurthy and Kannuri
Venkata Ramana (LWs 4 to 7) are his relatives and he knows the accused. PW-1 also further stated that about three years back on one day at about 11.00 AM galata taken place on the road near to his house and that he went to the said galata and by the time one unknown person of the said galata beat on the backside of his neck and that he sustained bleeding injury. But he do not identify the said person who beat on the backside of his neck, even if shown him. PW-2 further stated that accused accused did not beat him at any time. PW-2 also further stated his daughter took him to the Police Station,
Kasimkota and she (PW-1) presented a report to the Police of Kasimkota Police Station but he do not know the contents of the said report. PW-2 categorically stated that the police of Kasimkota sent him to the Government Hospital, Anakapalli for treatment but he was not examined by the police of Kasimkota Police Station at any time in respect of this case.
PW-2 denied the suggestion of Addl. Public Prosecutor in the cross examination that the
Asst. Sub Inspector of Police of Kasimkota Police Station examined him and recorded his statement u/sec.161 of Cr.P.C. and that he stated before the Asst. Sub-Inspector of Police, 5
Kasimkota Police Station as in Ex.P.3 i.e. 161(3) Cr.P.C. statement. PW-2 further denied the suggestion of Learned Addl. Public Prosecutor in the cross examination that the subject matter of this case was compromised before the elders and that he is speaking falsehood to save the accused from this case.
12)On a perusal of the evidence of PW-, the PW-2 stated that about three years back on one day at about 11.00 AM, galata was taken place on the road near to his house and that he went to the said galata and by the time one unknown person of the said galata beat on the back side of his neck and that he sustained bleeding injury on his neck, but he do not identify the said person who beat him even if shown to him. PW-2 also stated that he do not know the contents of the report (Ex.P.7) which submitted by his daughter (PW-1). PW-2 categorically stated that he was not examined by the police of
Kasimkota Police Station at any time in respect of this case and he did not state before
Asst. Sub-Inspector of Police as in Ex.P.3, since the PW-2 did not support the case of the prosecution, since PW-2 categorically stated that accused did not beat him at any time, the evidence of PW-2 is no way helpful to the case of prosecution.
13)PW-3/Kannuri Bhavani who is the relative of PWs 1 and 2 stated that she is the resident of Patha Kannurupalem Village and she is working in Bradix Company at
Atchutapuram. PW-3 also stated that she know the PWs 1 and 2 and LWs 4 to 7 as they are her relatives. PW-3 further stated that she know the accused. PW-3 also further stated that her house is situated near to the house of PW-2. But on the day of alleged incident she was not present at her house and she went to Brandix Company and attended the duty and that she do not know how PW-2 sustained injuries. PW-3 categorically stated that PW-2 did not state to her how he sustained injuries and who beat him. PW-3 also categorically stated that she was not examined by the police of
Kasimkota Police Station at any time in respect of this case. PW-3 denied the suggestion of Learned Addl. Public Prosecutor in the cross examination that Asst. Sub-inspector of
Police of Kasimkota Police Station examined her and recorded her statement u/sec.161(3)
Cr.P.C. statement and that she stated before the Asst. Sub-Inspector of Police, Kasimkota
Police Station as in Ex.P.4 i.e. 161(3) Cr.P.C. Statement. PW-3 also denied the suggestion of Addl. Public Prosecutor in the cross examination that she witnessed the incident relating to this case and also denied the suggestion that accused hacked with a knife on the backside of neck of PW-2 and that PW-2 sustained injuries. PW-3 also further denied the suggestion of Learned Addl. Public Prosecutor in the cross examination that the 6 subject matter of this case was compromised before the elders and that she is speaking falsehood to save the accused from this case.
14)On a perusal of the evidence of PW-3, the PW-3 categorically stated that she did not see the incident relating to this case and on the day of alleged incident she went to Brandix Company and attended the duty. PW-3 categorically stated that PW-2 did not state to her that how he sustained injuries. If really, the accused beat the PW-2 definitely the PW-2 would have stated before PW-3 that accused beat with a knife on the back of his neck and that he sustained injuries. Since the PW-3 did not support the case of the prosecution on any aspect and since PW-3 did not support the contents of her own statement i.e. 161(3) Cr.P.C. statement (Ex.P.4). The evidence of PW-3 is no way helpful to the case of prosecution.
15)PWs 4 and 5 who are said to have been mediators stated in one voice that they are the residence of Patha Kannurupalem village and they do live by coolie work.
PWs 4 and 5 also stated in one voice that they know PWs 1 to 3, but they do not know anything about this case. PWs 4 and 5 further stated in one voice that the Asst. Sub-
Inspector of Police of Kasimkota Police Station never visited the alleged scene of offence relating to this case and the Asst. Sub-Inspector of Police did not observe the alleged scene of offence in their presence at any time, but the Asst. Sub-Inspector of Police,
Kasimkota Police Station obtained their signature on one drafted paper at police station,
Kasimkota, but they do not know the contents of the said drafted paper. PWs 4 and 5 identified their signatures Exs.P.5 and 6 on the scene observation report dt.16-05-2014.
PWs 4 and 5 denied the suggestion of Learned Addl. Public Prosecutor in the cross examination that Asst. Sub Inspector of Police of Kasimkota Police Station visited the scene of offence relating to this case and observed the same in their presence and got drafted scene observation report on that they signed their respective signatures on the scene observation report at the scene of offence.
16)On a perusal, the PWs 4 and 5 categorically stated that the Asst. Sub-
Inspector of Police, Kasimkota Police Station never visited the alleged scene of offence and the Asst. Sub-Inspector of Police did not observe the alleged scene of offence in their presence at any time and also stated that the Asst. Sub-Inspector of Police, Kasimkota
Police Station obtained their signatures (Exs.P.5 and 6) on one drafted paper but they do not know the contents of said drafted paper. If really, the Asst. Sub-Inspector of Police,
Kasimkota Police Station visited the scene of offence and observed the same in the 7 presence of PWs 4 and 5 definitely, the PWs 4 and 5 would have stated in their evidence that the Asst. Sub-Inspector of Police, Kasimkota Police Station visited the scene of offence and observed the same and got drafted scene observation report and obtained their signatures on the scene observation report. Since PWs 4 and 5 did not support the contents of scene observation report dt.16-05-2014 and since PWs 4 and 5 categorically stated that they do not know the contents of scene observation report and they signed their respective signatures on one drafted paper at police station at the instance of Asst.
Sub-Inspector of Police, Kasimkota, the evidence of PWs 4 and 5 is no way helpful to the case of the prosecution.
17)PW-6 who is the Investigation officer in this case stated that on 16.05.2014 at about 4.00 PM while he was present in the charge of Kasimkota Police Station by the time PWs 1 and 2 came to the police station and PW-1 presented a report (Ex.P.7) along with one knife to him. Basing on the report (Ex.P.7) of PW-1 registered a case in
Cr.No.103/2014 u/secs.448, 307, 506, 509 of IPC and seized the knife (MO-1). PW-6 also stated that he got sent the original FIR (Ex.P.8) to Addl. Metropolitan Magistrate’s Court,
Anakapalli and he examined PWs 1 and 2 in the police station and he recorded their detailed statements. PW-6 also stated that on the same day i.e. 16-05-2014 at 7.00 PM he visited the scene of offence which taken place in front of the house of PW-1 and he observed the scene of offence in the presence of mediators (PWs 4 and 5) and he got drafted the scene observation report (Ex.P.9) at that place and obtained the signatures of
PWs 4 and 5 on the scene observation report.
18)PW-6 further stated that he secured the presence of PW-3, Kannuru Ramu
Naidu, Karri Kannayya (LWs 4 and 5) at the scene of offence and he examined them and recorded their detailed statements and he prepared rough sketch (Ex.P.10) of the scene of offence. PW-6 also further stated that on 17-05-2014, he arrested the accused at
Thallapalem Road Junction and he took the accused to the police station and on the same day he sent the accused to Addl. Metropolitan Magistrate’s Court, Anakapalli along with remand report for judicial custody of the accused. PW-6 also further stated that after receipt of wound certificate (Ex.P.11) relating to the injuries of PW-1 and after completion of investigation, the Sub-Inspector of Police, Kasimkota Police Station namely T.V. Vijay
Kumar (LW-10) filed charge sheet against the accused under sections 448, 30u7, 509 and 506 of IPC. PW-6 categorically stated that PWs1 to 3 stated before him as in Exs.P.2 to P.4 respectively. PW-6 denied the suggestion of defence counsel in the cross examination that PW-1 did not hand over knife (MO-1) to him at any time and he did not examine the 8
PWs 1 to 3 and other witnesses at any time and also denied the suggestion of defence counsel in the cross examination that he never visited the scene of offence. PW-6 also denied the suggestion of defence counsel in the cross examination that the scene observation report was prepared in the police station, Kasimkota and obtained the signatures of mediators (PWs 4 and 5) on the scene observation report in the police station and also denied the suggestion that PWs 1 to 3 did not state before him as Exs.P.2 to P.4 respectively and PW-6 further denied the suggestion of defence counsel in the cross examination that he is speaking falsehood against the accused.
19)On a perusal, the evidence of PWs 1 to 3 and the evidence of PW-6 is not corroborated with each other on the aspect that PW-6 examined the PWs 1 to 3 why because PWs 1 to 3 categorically stated that they were not examined by the PW-6 at any time relating to this case and they did not state before the PW-6 as in Exs.P.2 to P.6 respectively (161(3) Cr.P.C. Statements). The evidence of PW-1 is corroborated with the evidence of PW-6 on the aspect that PW-1 presented Ex.P.7 report to PW-6, but PW-1 categorically stated that she did not know the contents of the said report (Ex.P.7). PW-1 no way stated in her evidence that she (PW-1) handed over the knife to PW-6 at the time of presentation of report (Ex.P.7). But PW-6 stated that PW-1 handed over MO-1 knife to him and that he seized the same. If really PW-1 handed the knife (MO-1) along with
Ex.P.7 report definitely PW-1 would have stated before the court that she handed over the
MO-1 knife to PW-1 at the time of presentation of Ex.P.7 report. Hence, the evidence of
PW-1 is not corroborated with the evidence of PW-6 on the aspect that PW-1 handed over
MO-1 knife to PW-6 at the time of presentation of Ex.P.7 report. The evidence of PWs 4 and 5 is not corroborated with the evidence of PW-6 on the aspect that PW-6 visited and observed the scene of offence in their presence and drafted Ex.P.9 scene observation report at the scene of offence. PWs 4 and 5 categorically stated that PW-6 obtained their signature on one drafted paper at police station, Kasimkota but they do not know the contents of the said drafted paper. Since the Pws 1 to 5 did not support the evidence of the PW-6 on any aspect and since PW-2 categorically stated that accused did not beat him at any time with a knife, the prosecution miserably failed to establish the guilt of the accused for the offence punishable under section 448, 307, 509 and 506 of IPC beyond all reasonable doubt.
9
20)Point No.2: In the result, the accused is found not guilty for the offence punishable under sections 448, 307, 509 and 506 of IPC and the accused is acquitted
U/sec.235(1) Cr.P.C. for the said charges. Bail bonds of the accused shall stands cancelled. M.O.1/Knife shall be destroyed after expiry of appeal time.
Dictated to Grade-II Stenographer, transcribed by him, corrected and pronounced
by me in open Court, this the 22th day of June, 2017.
xx Sd/- Sri MP Sannidhi Rao Assistant Sessions Judge, Anakapalle. Appendix of evidence
No. of witnesses examined for
Prosecution:Defence:
PW1: Lekkala Mutyalamma None PW2: Kundrapu Pentayya PW3: Kannuri Bhavani PW4: Kundrapu Narasimha Murthy PW5: Kannuri Venkata Ramana PW6: M. Venkata Ramana No. of exhibits marked for Prosecution:Defence:
Ex.P1: Signature of PW-1 on report N I L Ex.P2: Sec.161 Cr.P.C. Statement of PW-1/LW-1 Ex.P3: Sec. 161 Cr.P.C. Statement of PW-2/LW2 Ex.P4: Sec. 161 Cr.P.C. Statement of PW-3/LW-3 Ex.P5: Signature of PW-4 on scene observation report dt.16.05.2014 Ex.P6: Signature of PW-5 on scene observation report dt.16.05.2014 Ex.P7: Report of PW-1 dt.16-05-2014 Ex.P8: Original FIR in Cr.No.103/2014 of Kasimkota PS Ex.P9: Scene observation report Ex.P10: Rough sketch Ex.P.11: Wound certificate of PW-2
No. of material objects marked M.O.1 : Knife xx Sd/- Sri MPSR ASJ/AKP.
1
C A L E N D A R
IN THE COURT OF THE ASSISTANT SESSIONS JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri M.P. SANNIDHI RAO Assistant Sessions Judge, Anakapalli.
Thursday this the 22nd day of June, 2017.
SESSIONS CASE NO. 100/2015
(P.R.C.17/2014 of Addl. Metropolitan Magistrate, Anakapalli) (Cr.No.103/2014 of Kasimkota Police Station)
Name of the complainant: State rep. by the Sub-Inspector of police,
Kasimkota police station.
Name of the accused:Shaik Abdul Rajak, S/o. Mammoji, 29 Years, Dedukula by caste, Professional Driver, N/o. Patha kannurupalem Village, Kasimkota Mandal.
Date of complaint: 16.05.2014
Date of apprehension: 17.05.2014
Date of commencement of trial : 12.06.2017
Date of closure of trial: 21.06.2017
Date of judgment: 22-06-2017
Whether the accused is in jail or on bail: Accused is on bail.
Explanation for the delay in Committal Court: Vide docket extract
Explanation for delay in the trial Court:
This case is filed by the Sub-Inspector of Police, Kasimkota Police Station against the accused for the offence punishable under Sections 448, 307, 509 and 506 IPC in Cr.No.103/2014 and the same was committed to the Hon’ble District Court, Visakhapatnam by the learned Addl. Metropolitan Magistrate, Anakapalli in P.R.C.17/2014 against accused as the case is triable by the Court of Sessions. On 21-09-2015 this case has been made over to this Court by the Hon’ble District Court, Visakhapatnam as per the Proceedings in Dis.No.8862 and the same was received by this Court on 29-09-2015. On 20-11-2015 the counsel for accused was filed memo of appearance on behalf of accused and on 05-02-2016 accused was examined under Section 228 Cr.P.C. and charges under sections 448, 307, 509 and 506 of IPC were framed, read over and explained to the accused in Telugu, for which he denied the charges and claimed to be tried. During course of trial the prosecution has examined Pws.1 to 6 on its behalf on different dates and got marked Exs.P1 to Ex.P11 and MO-1. Ultimately on 21-06-2017 the prosecution evidence closed. On closer of prosecution side evidence, the accused was examined u/sec.313 Cr.P.C. and he denied the incriminating evidence appearing against him and he reported no evidence. Hence, defence evidence is closed. Arguments were heard on both sides and the matter is posted for judgment on 22-06-2017. Judgment is
pronounced on 22-06-2017.
11
In the result, the accused is found not guilty for the offence punishable under sections 448, 307, 509 and 506 of IPC and the accused is acquitted U/sec.235(1) Cr.P.C.
for the said charges. Bail bonds of the accused shall stands cancelled. M.O.1/Knife shall be destroyed after expiry of appeal time.
xx Sd/- Sri MP Sannidhi Rao Assistant Sessions Judge, Anakapalle. Copy submitted to:
1. The Hon’ble Registrar (Judicial), High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad.
2. The Hon’ble District Judge, Visakhapatnam.
Copy to:
The Superintendent of Police (Rural), Visakhapatnam.
IN THE COURT OF THE ASSISTANT SESSIONS JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri M.P. SANNIDHI RAO Assistant Sessions Judge, Anakapalli.
Thursday this the 22nd day of June, 2017.
SESSIONS CASE NO. 111/2015
(P.R.C.12/2015 of V Metropolitan Magistrate, Anakapalli) (Cr.No.100/2015 of Anakapalli Town Police Station)
Name of the complainant: State rep. by the Sub-Inspector of police,
Anakapalli Town police station.
Name of the accused:Dowdupalli Chinna Rao, s/o. Ammoru, Age 38 Years, Vadabalija, Coolie work, R/o. Villuri Vai Veedhi, Gavarapalem, Anakapalli
Plea of the accused:Not guilty
Prosecution conducted by:Sri M. Jayaram Addl. Public Prosecutor
Whether the accused :Sri K.S. Achari defended or notDefence counsel for accused.
This case has come up on 21-06-2017 for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri M.Jayaram, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State and of Sri K.S. Achari, Defence counsel for accused, having stood over to this day for consideration and this Court delivered the following:-
J U D G M E N T
The Sub- Inspector of Police, Anakapalli Town Police station laid charge sheet against the accused in Cr.No.100/2015 U/secs.307 of IPC alleging that an intention to kill and stabbed LW-1 with a knife.
2.The gist of the prosecution case is as follows :
LW-1/Badampudi Santhosh Kumar @ Santhosh is residing at Tarakarama
Colony, Gavarapalem, Visakhapatnam and living by doing his caste profession (Dhobi) work. The LW-1 used to purchase the chicken from the accused who is hen’s cutter at
Nookalamma temple, as usually on 26.04.2015 at about 14.00 hours LW-1 went to
Nookalamma Temple, purchase the meat from the accused, when give the money, the accused was argued with LW-1 due to not give sufficient money and pushed each other and went away from there. Then at about 17.00 hours when LW-1 present at Nookalamma
Thalli “Gundam”, the accused bored grudge against the LW-1 went to LW-1 with a view to kill him and stabbed the LW-1 with a meat knife on the left side of ribs and caused bleeding injuries. Then the LW-1 was shifted to private hospital for treatment. Basing on the report of LW-1, LW-11/B. Srinivasa Rao, Sub-Inspector of Police registered the same as a case in Cr.No.100/2015, under secs.307 of IPC and during the course of investigation, 2
LW-11 visited the scene of offence, examined the witnesses 1 to 7 and recorded their statements and he arrested the accused on 27-04-2015 in the presence of mediators LWs 8 and 9 namely Balachakali Nageswara Rao, Badampudi Adhibabu respectively and produced the accused before court for judicial custody and after receipt of wound certificate issued by LW-10/Dr.K. Raja Sagar, he filed charge sheet against the accused.
3.The learned VMetropolitan Magistrate, Anakapalli took the cognizance of the offence under Sections 307 of IPC vide PRC 12/2015. He found the case is exclusively triable by the court of Sessions, committed the entire record to Hon’ble the Principal
District Court, Visakhapatnam, under Section 209 Cr.P.C., who in turn assigned Sessions
Case No.100/2015 and made over the same to this Court with a direction to dispose the same in accordance with law.
4.When accused appeared before the Court, after affording a reasonable opportunity, examined him under Section 228 Cr.P.C. in Telugu with reference to the allegations contained in the charge sheet for which he pleaded not guilty. Then charge
U/secs.307 of IPC was framed against him. When the said charge was explained and read over to the accused in Telugu for which the accused denied the charge and claimed to be tried. Hence evidence was let in.
5.At the trial, prosecution has examined as many as five witnesses out of eleven list of witnesses and got marked Ex.P1 to P13 and M.O.1. PW-1/Badampudi
Santhosh Kumar is a defacto complainant and also an injured person, PW-2/ Badampudi
Nagamani is the mother of PW-1, PWs 3 and 4 namely Balachakali Nageswara Rao and
Badampudi Adibabu respectively are the mediators and PW-5/ B.Srinivasa Rao, Sub- inspector of Police and also Investigation Officer of this case. The learned Addl. Public
Prosecutor has given up the evidences of LWs 3 to 7 and 10 namely Ganagalla
Dhaniyamma @ Dhana, Chevala Manga, Badampudi Suribabu, Siripurapu Ramakrishna @
Ramudu, Rajamandirapu Ramana and Sri B. Srinivasa Rao respectively. Thus prosecution evidence was closed.
6.Then, accused examined U/sec.313 Cr.P.C in Telugu with reference to the incriminating points available in the evidence of prosecution witnesses for which the accused have refused the entire prosecution case. Though he was called upon to enter upon his defence evidence for which reported no defence evidence. His plea is of total denial.
3
7.Heard the arguments from the learned Addl. Public Prosecutor and the learned Defence counsel appearing for accused at length.
8)Now the points for consideration are:
1. “Whether the prosecution has proved its case against the accused for the offence U/secs.307 of IPC beyond all reasonable doubt?”
2. To what Result ?
9) Point No.1:PW-1/Badampudi Santhosh Kumar stated that he is the resident of Anakapalli and he is a Dhobi by caste and he do live by his caste profession.
PW-1 also stated that Badampudi Nagamani (LW-2) is his mother, Ganagalla Dhaniyamma @ Dhana, Chevala Manga (LWs 3 and 4) are his neighbour hood, Badampudi Suribabu (LW-5) is his father and he know Siripurapu Ramakrishna @ Ramudu, Rajamandirapu
Ramana, Balachakali Nageswara Rao and Badampudi Adibabu (LWs 6 to 9) and he do not know the accused. PW-1 also stated that on 26-04-2015 at about 05.00 PM he was fallen at his house and that he sustained injuries on the left side of his rib. PW-1 further stated that he was not beaten by anybody and accused did not beat him at any time. PW-1 also further stated some body took him to the Government Hospital, Anakapalli and the police of Anakapalli Town Police Station recorded his statement (Ex.P.8) in the Government
Hospital, Anakapalli, but he do not know the contents of his statement as the constable who recorded his statement did not read over and explained the contents of his statement to him. But he can identify his signature if shown to him. Accordingly, PW-1 identified his signature i.e. B. Santhosh Kumar (Ex.P.1) on the statement dt.26-04-2015.
PW-1 categorically stated that he was not examined by the police of Anakapalli Town
Police Station at any time in respect of this case. PW-1 denied the suggestion of Learned
Addl. Public Prosecutor in the cross examination that the Sub-Inspector of Police of
Anakapalli Town Police Station examined him and recorded his statement u/sec.161(3) of
Cr.P.C. and that he stated before Sub-Inspector of Police at Anakapalli Town Police Station as in Ex.P.2 [161(3) of Cr.P.C. Statement]. PW-1 also denied the suggestion of Addl. Public
Prosecutor in the cross examination that accused stabbed with a knife on his left side rib and that he sustained bleeding injury. Pw-1 further denied the suggestion of learned
Addl. Public Prosecutor in the cross examination that the subject matter of this case was compromised before elders and that he is speaking falsehood to save the accused from this case. PW-1 categorically stated that he do not identify the alleged knife even if shown to him.
4
10)On a perusal of the evidence of PW-1, PW-1 categorically stated that on 26- 04-2015 at about 5.00 PM he was fallen at his house and that he sustained injury on the left side of his rib and also categorically stated that he was not beaten by any body and also categorically stated that accused did not beat him at any time. PW-1 further categorically stated that he do not know the contents of his statement recorded by the police constable as the police constable who recorded his statement in the hospital did not read over and explained the contents of statement to him and Pw-1 also further categorically stated that he was not examined by the Sub-Inspector of Police, Anakapalli
Town Police as in Ex.P.2, since PW-1 did not support the contents of his own statement recored by the Sub-Inspector of Police in the hospital and also did not support the contents of his Ex.P.2 statement and since PW-1 categorically stated that accused did not beat him at any time and further categorically stated that he sustained injury on his left side rib by fallen at his house,the evidence of PW-1 is no way helpful to the case of the prosecution.
11)PW-2/Badampudi Nagamani who is the mother of PW-1 stated that she is the resident of Anakapalli and she is Dhobi by caste and she do live by her caste profession.
PW-2 also stated that PW-1 is her son, Badampudi Suri Appa Rao (LW-5) is her husband,
LWs 3 and 4 are her neighbourhood and she know LWs 6 to 9 and she also know the accused. PW-2 also stated that about two years back on one day at about 05.00 PM while she was present at their Dhobi ghat by the time one un-known person came to her and stated to her that her son (PW-1) sustained bleeding injury and that she immediately went to her house and she shifted her son (PW-1) to the Government Hospital, Anakapalli.
PW-2 further stated that she was not examined by the police of Anakapalli Town Police at any time in respect of this case. PW-2 denied the suggestion of Learned Addl. Public
Prosecutor in the cross examination that the Sub-Inspector of Police, Anakapalli Town
Police Station examined her and recorded her statement u/sec. 161(3) Cr.P.C. statement and that she stated before Sub-Inspector of Police as in Ex.P.3. PW-2 also denied the suggestion of Learned Addl. Public Prosecutor in the cross examination that the subject matter of this case was compromised before the elders and that she is speaking falsehood to save the accused from this case, though the accused poked with a knife on the left side of rib of her son (PW-1).
12)On a perusal of the evidence of PW-2, the PW-2 categorically stated that about two years back on one day at about 5.00 PM while she was present at their Dhobi 5 ghat by the time one un-known person came to her and stated that her son (PW-1) sustained bleeding injury by fallen. If really, accused beat the PW-1 and PW-1 sustained bleeding injury in the hands of accused definitely the said person who stated to PW-2 certainly informed to PW-2 that the accused beat her son (PW-1) and that her son sustained bleeding injury. Since PW-2 categorically stated that she was not examined by the Sub-Inspector of Police of Anakapalli Town Police Station at any time she did not state as in Ex.P.2 before the Sub-Inspector of Police of Anakapalli Town Police Station and since the PW-2 did not support the contents of her Ex.P.2 statement, the evidence of PW-2 is no way helpful to the case of the prosecution.
13)PWs 3 and 4 who are said to have been the mediators stated in one voice that they are the residents of Anakapalli and PW-3 stated that he do live by wood business and PW-4 stated that he do live by his caste profession. PWs 3 and 4 also stated in one one voice that the Sub-Inspector of Police of Anakapalli Town Police Station never arrested the accused relating to this case in their presence and the accused never confessed before the Sub-Inspector of Police in their presence relating to this case. PWs 3 and 4 further stated that the Sub-Inspector of Police, Anakapalli Town Police never visited scene of offence relating to this case and the Sub-Inspector of Police never observed the scene of offence in their presence at any time and the Sub-inspector of
Police did not seize any knife from the possession of accused in their presence. PWs 3 and 4 further stated in one voice that the Sub-Inspector of Police, Anakapalli Town Police obtained their signatures on two drafted papers at police station, Anakapalli and they can identified their respective signatures if shown to them. Accordingly, PW-3 identified his signature (Ex.P.4) on the scene observation report and PW-3 also identified his signature (Ex.P.5) on the alleged confession statement of accused. PWs 3 and 4 denied the suggestion of Learned Addl. Public Prosecutior in the cross examination that the Sub- inspector of Police of Anakapalli Town Police observed the scene of offence in their presence and got drafted the scene observation report (Ex.P.10) in their presence at the scene of offence and obtained their signature on scene observation report at scene of offence. PWs 3 and 4 also denied the suggestion of Learned Addl. Public Prosecutor in the cross examination that accused confessed before the Sub-Inspector of Police of Anakapalli
Town Police Station in their presence that accused committed the offence relating to this case and that the Sub-inspector of Police got drafted confession statement of accused (Ex.P.12) and obtained their (PWs 3 and 4) signatures on the confession statement of accused. PWs 3 and 4 further denied the suggestion of Learned Addl. Public Prosecutor in 6 the cross examination that they are deposing falsehood at the instance of accused to save the accused from this case.
14)On a perusal of the evidence of PWs 3 and 4, the PWs 3 and 4 categorically stated that the Sub-Inspector of Police, Anakapalli Town Police Station never visited and observed the scene of offence relating to his case in their presence at any time and the
Sub-Inspector of Police never drafted scene observation report in their presence at the alleged scene of offence and PWs 3 and 4 also stated that the Sub-Inspector of Police,
Anakapalli Town Police Station never arrested the accused in their presence and never seized any knife from the possession of the accused and also stated that accused never confessed before Sub-Inspector of Police in their presence at any time that he (Accused) committed the offence relating to this case. Since the PWs 3 and 4 categorically stated that the Sub-Inspector of Police of Anakapalli Town Police Station never visited and observed the scene of offence in their presence and never drafted the scene observation report (Ex.P.10) in their presence and since PWs 3 and 4 categorically stated that the Sub-
Inspector of Police, Anakapalli Town Police Station never drafted the alleged confession statement of accused in their presence and since the PWs 3 and 4 categorically stated that the Sub-Inspector of Police, Anakapalli Town Police Station obtained their (PWs 3 and
4) signatures on two drafted papers, the evidence of PWs 3 and 4 is no way helpful to the case of prosecution.
15)PW-5 who is Investigation Officer in this case stated that on 26-04-2015 at 07.30 PM while he was present in the police station charge of Anakapalli Town Police
Station by the time he received medical intimation from Government Area Hospital,
Anakapalli stating that PW-1 admitted in the hospital with injuries and that immediately he visited the Government Area Hospital and recorded the statement of PW-1 and obtained the signature of PW-1 on the bottom of his statement (Ex.P.8). PW-5 also stated that basing on the Ex.P.8 statement of PW-1, he registered a case in Cr.No.100/2015 u/sec.307 of IPC and he got submitted the original FIR (Ex.P.9) to V Metropolitan
Magistrate’s Court, Anakapalli and he examined PW-1 and he recorded the detailed
statement of PW-1. PW-5 further stated that on the next day i.e. 27-04-2015, he visited the scene of offence by securing mediators namely PWs 3 and 4 and he observed the scene of offence which is situated near Nookalamma Temple, Anakapalli and he got drafted the scene observation report at that place and he obtained the signature of PWs 3 and 4 on the scene observation report (Ex.P.10). PW-5 also stated that he prepared rough sketch (Ex.P.11) of the scene of offence. PW-5 further stated that he secured the presence 7 of PW-2 and LWs 3 to 7 at the scene of offence and he examined them and recorded their detailed statement and on the same day i.e. on 27-04-2015 at 11.30 AM the accused came to police station and voluntarily surrendered before him and the accused confessed
before him in the presence of mediators (PWs 3 and 4) that he (Accused) committed the
offence relating to this case and that he recorded the confession statement of accused (Ex.P.12) in the presence of PWs 3 and 4 at police station and while the accused confessing the offence relating to this case, the accused handed over one knife (MO-1) to him in the presence of mediators (PWs 3 and 4) and he seized the same and he arrested the accused in the presence of PWs 3 and 4 and on the same day i.e. 27-04-2015, he got sent the accused to V Metropolitan Magistrate’s Court, Anakapalli along with remand report for judicial custody of accused. PW-5 also categorically stated that after receipt of wound certificate (Ex.P.13) relating to PW-1 and after completion of investigation he filed charge sheet against the accused under section 307 of IPC. PW-5 further categorically stated that PWs 1 and 2 stated before him as in Exs.P.2 and P.3 respectively. PW-3 denied the suggestion of defence counsel in the cross examination that he never examined PWs 1 and 2 at any time and PWs 1 and 2 did not state before him as in Exs. P. 2 and P.3 respectively. PW-5 also denied the suggestion of defence counsel in the cross examination that he never visited the scene of offence at any time and accused never confessed before him in the presence of mediators at any time and accused never handed over MO-1 to him at any time. PW-5 also further denied the suggestion of defence counsel in the cross examination that he obtained the signatures of PWs 3 and 4 on the scene observation report and on the alleged confession statement (Exs.P.10 and P.12) in the police station, Anakapalli.
16)On a perusal of the evidence of PW-5 and Pws 1 and 2, the PWs 1 and 2 did not support the evidence of Pw-5 on the aspect that PW-5 examined them and recorded their statements. PWs 1 and 2 categorically stated that they did not state before PW-5 as in Ex.P.2 and P.3 respectively. The evidence of PWs 3 and 4 is not corroborated with the evidence of PW-5 on the aspect that PW-5 observed the scene of offence and drafted the scene observation report at the alleged scene of offence and the evidence of PWs 3 and 4 did not corroborated with the evidence of PW-5 on the aspect that accused confessed
before Pw-5 in their presence and that PW-5 arrested the accused in their presence. The
evidence of PWs 3 and 4 further did not corroborate with the evidence of PW-5 on the aspect that accused handed over MO-1 knife to PW-5 in the presence of PWs 3 and 4.
PWs 3 and 4 categorically stated that the Sub-Inspector of Police, Anakapalli Town Police 8
Station obtained their signatures on two drafted papers at police station but they do not know the contents of said two drafted papers. Since the PWs 1 to 4 did not support the evidence of PW-5 and the case of prosecution on any aspect, the prosecution miserably failed to establish the guilt of the accused for offence punishable under section 307 of IPC beyond all reasonable doubt.
17)Point No.2: In the result, the accused is found not guilty for the offence punishable under section 307 of IPC and the accused is acquitted U/sec.235(1) Cr.P.C. for the said charge. Bail bonds of the accused shall stands cancelled. M.O.1/Knife shall be destroyed after expiry of appeal time.
Dictated to Grade-II Stenographer, transcribed by him, corrected and pronounced
by me in open Court, this the 22th day of June, 2017.
xx Sd/- Sri MP Sannidhi Rao Assistant Sessions Judge, Anakapalle. Appendix of evidence
No. of witnesses examined for
Prosecution:Defence:
PW1: Badampudi Santhnosh Kumar None PW2: Badampudi Nagamani PW3: Balachakali Nageswara Rao PW4: Badampudi Adibabu PW5: B. Srinivasa Rao No. of exhibits marked for Prosecution:Defence:
Ex.P1: Signature of PW-1 on the statement dt26.04.2015 N I L Ex.P2: Sec.161 Cr.P.C. Statement of PW-1/LW-1 Ex.P3: Sec.161 Cr.P.C. Statement of PW-2/LW2 Ex.P4: Signature of PW-3 on scene observation report Ex.P5: Signature of PW-3 on confession statement. Ex.P6: Signature of PW-4 on scene observation report. Ex.P7: Signature of PW-4 on confession statement Ex.P8: Statement of PW-1 given to police Ex.P9: Original FIR Ex.P10: Scene observation Report dt.27-04-2015 Ex.P.11: Rough sketch Ex.P.12: Confession statement Dt.27-04-2015 Ex.P.13: Wound certificate of Pw-1
No. of material objects marked M.O.1 : Knife xx Sd/- Sri MPSR ASJ/AKP.
9
C A L E N D A R
IN THE COURT OF THE ASSISTANT SESSIONS JUDGE AT ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri M.P. SANNIDHI RAO Assistant Sessions Judge, Anakapalli.
Thursday this the 22nd day of June, 2017.
SESSIONS CASE NO. 111/2015
(P.R.C.12/2015 of V Metropolitan Magistrate, Anakapalli) (Cr.No.100/2015 of Anakapalli Town Police Station)
Name of the complainant: State rep. by the Sub-Inspector of police,
Anakapalli Town police station. .
Name of the accused:Dowdupalli Chinna Rao, s/o. Ammoru, Age 38 Years, Vadabalija, Coolie work, R/o. Villuri Vai Veedhi, Gavarapalem, Anakapalli
Date of complaint: 26.04.2015
Date of apprehension: 27.04.2015
Date of commencement of trial : 12.06.2017
Date of closure of trial: 21.06.2017
Date of judgment: 22-06-2017
Whether the accused is in jail or on bail: Accused is on bail.
Explanation for the delay in Committal Court: Vide docket extract
Explanation for delay in the trial Court:
This case is filed by the Sub-Inspector of Police, Anakapalli Town Police Station against the accused for the offence punishable under Section 307 IPC in Cr.No.100/2015 and the same was committed to the Hon’ble District Court, Visakhapatnam by the learned V Metropolitan Magistrate, Anakapalli in P.R.C.12/2015 against accused as the case is triable by the Court of Sessions. On 08-10-2015 this case has been made over to this Court by the Hon’ble District Court, Visakhapatnam as per the Proceedings in Dis.No.9378 and the same was received by this Court on 12-10-2015. On 06-01-2016 the counsel for accused was filed memo of appearance on behalf of accused and on 08-02-2016 accused was examined under Section 228 Cr.P.C. and charge under section 307 of IPC was framed, read over and explained to the accused in Telugu, for which he denied the charge and claimed to be tried. During course of trial the prosecution has examined PWs.1 to 5 on its behalf on different dates and got marked Exs.P1 to Ex.P13 and MO-1. Ultimately on 21-06-2017 the prosecution evidence closed. On closer of prosecution side evidence, the accused was examined u/sec.313 Cr.P.C. and he denied the incriminating evidence appearing against him and he reported no evidence. Hence, defence evidence is closed. Arguments were heard on both sides and the matter is posted for judgment on 22-06- 2017. Judgment is pronounced on 22-06-2017.
1
In the result, the accused is found not guilty for the offence punishable under section 307 of IPC and the accused is acquitted U/sec.235(1) Cr.P.C. for the said charge.
Bail bonds of the accused shall stands cancelled. M.O.1/Knife shall be destroyed after expiry of appeal time.
xx Sd/- Sri MP Sannidhi Rao Assistant Sessions Judge, Anakapalle. Copy submitted to:
1. The Hon’ble Registrar (Judicial), High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad.
2. The Hon’ble District Judge, Visakhapatnam.
Copy to:
The Superintendent of Police (Rural), Visakhapatnam.
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri M.P. SANNIDHI RAO,
Principal Senior Civil Judge,
Anakapalli
Thursday, this the 22nd day of June, 2017.
H.M.O.P.No.70/2016
Between:
Indala Appalakonda @ Raju, s/o. Kannamnaidu, Hindu, Aged about 31 Years, working in Army – Appalakonda.I, 15155394L, Rank Naik/Gunner, Unit-1391/139, Medium Regiment, c/o. 99APO, native Swambhuvaram Village, Kalapaka Panchayat, Parawada mandal in Visakhapatnam District. … Petitioner And:
Bonda (Indala) Bharathi, w/o. Appalakonda, Hindu, Aged about 23 Years, Houysewife, Residing at D.No.31-36-177, MIG-242, Rajiv Nagar, Kurmannapalem, Gajuwaka mandal, Visakhapatnam District. …Respondent
This petition is coming on 15-06-2017 for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri s. Srinivas Advocate for the petitioner and of the respondent remained exparte, having stood over till this day, this court delivered the following:
O R D E R
Petitioner Indala Appalakonda @ Raju being the husband filed petition
U/sec.13(1)(ia)(ib) of Hindu Marriage Act against his wife namely Bonda (Indala)
Bharathi who none other than the respondent praying the court to dissolve their marriage held on 12/13-02-2011 with the following grounds.
Petitioner Indala Appalakonda @ Raju being the husband filed petition
U/sec.13(1)(ia)(ib) Hindu Marriage Act against his wife namely Bonda (Indala)
Bharathi who none other than the respondent praying the court to dissolve their marriage held on 12/13-02-2011
2.Case of petitioner may be briefed in nut shell as below:
The marriage between the petitioner and respondent was held on 12/13.02.2011at Swayambhuvaram Village as per Hindu rites and caste custom.
Subsequently, the marriage between the petitioner and respondent was consummated and led their conjugal life as wife and husband. There are no issues out of their wedlock. The respondent is none other than the daughter of the sister of the petitioner and at the time of the marriage, the parents of the 2 respondent agreed to gift Rs.2,00,000/- as lanchanams to the petitioner, but they could not fulfill the same due to domestic problems. The respondent did not bother about the above said lanchanams. The petitioner and respondent are known to each other since long time, but differences arose on several occasions on several aspects mainly the respondent who was studying Engineering at the time of marriage gradually developed superior complexion and did not show interest towards the petitioner in conjugal life. The petitioner was disappointed every time with the adamant behaviour of the respondent. The petitioner discussed about future settlement, respondent’s education, but she did not accept the intentions of the petitioner. The petitioner tried his level best to move close with the respondent but she used to avoid him on some pretext or the other and neglected him. The petitioner raised the dispute before elders about the non co- operation of the respondent, but she bluntly refused to change her attitude and further expressed her intention to live separate with the petitioner. In those circumstances, the parents of the respondent also tried their level best but their negotiations had no impact on the respondent and finally, they have taken back the respondent to their house in the month of January 2013. The petitioner further submits that after waiting for more than three years and after trying his level best, now he could realize that the respondent is not interested in leading conjugal life with him and also there is no future hope to live together and in these circumstances, the petitioner is decided to seek divorce from the respondent. Hence the petitioner prays the court to grant decree of divorce by dissolving the marriage between the petitioner and respondent held on 12/13-02- 2011.
3.Notice ordered to respondent through court and registered post were returned with an endorsement ‘House Vacant’ on that the petitioner has filed a petition under order 5, rule 20 of CPC for substitute service to issue notice against the respondent for publication. This court allowed the said petition in I.A.10/2017 on 20-04-2017 and ordered to issue paper publication in Leader Daily News Paper.
3
On 07-06-2017, the petitioner filed publication. Respondent called absent. No representation on behalf of respondent. Hence, respondent is set exparte.
4.Then petitioner was allowed to lead his evidence to substantiate his petition averments. In that process, petitioner got examined himself as PW1, no exhibits are marked. Respondent remained exparte. Heard the learned counsel for PW1.
5. Basing on the pleadings and evidence, the point that arise for determination is:
Whether PW1 Sri Indala Appalakonda @ Raju has proved the
petition contents on the part of his wife Bonda (Indala) Bharathi
beyond all probabilities and if so, whether he deserve for decree of
divorce as prayed?
6.I have heard arguments from learned counsel appearing for PW1. I have already said that no resistance whatsoever has been registered by respondent inspite of publication.
7.Point:The evidence on record clinchingly discloses the fact that respondent lived with PW1 for a short period that too with differences. It has come on record that even though the respondent was studying Engineering while their marriage was took place gradually developed superior complexion and did not show any interest in the conjugal life with the PW-1. The evidence of PW1 is an indication of negligent attitude of respondent towards marital life and therefore this court find legal significance in the testimony of PW1 whose testimony clinchingly disclose the fact of desertion on the part of respondent. It is very clear that PW1 was dis-allowed to lead marital life with the respondent without any justifiable cause and therefore there are no remote possibilities for the re-union since long term was already rolled on account of serious differences. The evidence of PW1 is sufficient enough to conclude that the arrogance of respondent was only the cause for differences and therefore this court find that PW1 has made out the grounds of desertion beyond all probabilities. Thus I find this point in PW1’s favour in affirmative.
4
8.In result, the petition is allowed without costs. The marriage held on 12/13- 2-2011 between PW1 Indala Appalakonda @ Raju and respondent Bonda (Indala)
Bharathi shall be dissolved on the ground of desertion from the date of this order.
Accordingly decree shall follow.
Typed to my dictation, corrected and pronounced by me in open Court, this the 22nd day of June, 2017.
xx Sd/- Sri MP Sannidhi Rao
Principal Senior Civil Judge,
Anakapalle. Appendix of evidence
Witnesses examined for: Petitioner: Respondent:
PW1: Indala Appalakonda @ Raju None
Documents marked for
No documents were marked on either side xx Sd/- Sri MPSR PSCJ/AKP.
5
Date of Presentation: 07-11-2016 Date of filing: 19-11-2016
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, ANAKAPALLE
Present: Sri M.P. SANNIDHI RAO,
Principal Senior Civil Judge,
Anakapalli
Thursday, this the 22nd day of June, 2017.
H.M.O.P.No.70/2016
Between:
Indala Appalakonda @ Raju, s/o. Kannamnaidu, Hindu, Aged about 31 Years, working in Army – Appalakonda.I, 15155394L, Rank Naik/Gunner, Unit-1391/139, Medium Regiment, c/o. 99APO, native Swambhuvaram Village, Kalapaka Panchayat, Parawada mandal in Visakhapatnam District. … Petitioner And:
Bonda (Indala) Bharathi, w/o. Appalakonda, Hindu, Aged about 23 Years, Houysewife, Residing at D.No.31-36-177, MIG-242, Rajiv Nagar, Kurmannapalem, Gajuwaka mandal, Visakhapatnam District. …Respondent
Petitioner Indala Appalakonda @ Raju being the husband filed petition
U/sec.13(1)(ia)(ib) of Hindu Marriage Act against his wife namely Bonda (Indala)
Bharathi who none other than the respondent praying the court to dissolve their marriage held on 12/13-02-2011on the ground of desertion
A fixed court fee of Rs.10-00 is paid under Art.I (vii) Sch.II of A.P.C.F. and S.V.Act. This petition is coming on 15-06-2017 for final hearing before me in the presence of Sri s. Srinivas Advocate for the petitioner and of the respondent remained exparte, having stood over till this day, this court doth order and;
D E C R E E
1)that the petition be and the same is hereby allowed without costs;
2) that the marriage held on 12/13-02-2011 between PW1 Indala Appalakonda @ Raju and respondent Bonda (Indala) Bharathi shall be dissolved on the ground of desertion from the date of this order;
Given under my hand and the seal of the court, this the 22nd day of June, 2017.
xx Sd/- Sri MP Sannidhi Rao Prl. Senior Civil Judge, Anakapalle
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
No costs memo is filed by either side. xx Sd/- Sri MPSR PSCJ/AKP
Order Record 26 total
| Case No. | Parties | Date | Type | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SC/100/2015 | Sub-Inspector ofPolice,Kasimkota vs Shaik Abdul Rajak | 22 Jun 2017 | JUDGEMENT | Acquitted |
| SC/111/2015 | The Sub-Inspector of Police, Anakapalli Town PS vs Dowdupalli Chinna Rao | 22 Jun 2017 | JUDGEMENT | Acquitted |
| H.M.O.P/70/2016 | Indala Appala Konda alias Raju vs Smt. Bonda Bharathi | 22 Jun 2017 | ORDER | — |
| EP/128/2014 | Padathala Suri Babu vs Lalam Kondamma | 21 Jun 2017 | ORDER | Dismissed Disposal Date: 21-06-2017 Prl Senior Civil Judge |
| EP/6/2016 | Alla Nooka Appa Rao vs I.Raju | 20 Jun 2017 | ORDER | Suit Dismissed |
| OS/52/2014 | Viijapu srinivasu vs Ch.Damodaram | 20 Jun 2017 | JUDGEMENT | — |
| OS/55/2017 | Sri Saragadam Hari vs Sri Koribilli Appalaraju and another | 20 Jun 2017 | JUDGEMENT | — |
| OS/68/2015 | konathala Ganesh vs Neelapu mani | 20 Jun 2017 | JUDGEMENT | — |
| OS/69/2016 | Gangupam Suresh vs Smt. Katakamsetty Krishna Veni | 20 Jun 2017 | JUDGEMENT | — |
| OS/223/2012 | Pilli Mani Kumar vs Pilli Chellayyamma | 19 Jun 2017 | JUDGEMENT | — |
| SC/34/2016 | The Inspector of Police, Anandapuram PS vs Thatipudi Shankar | 19 Jun 2017 | JUDGEMENT | — |
| OS/1/2017 | Gantakuru Murali Krishna vs Marpu Dhanunjaya Rao | 16 Jun 2017 | JUDGEMENT | — |
| OS/165/2016 | Konatala Koteswara Rao vs Kandregula Nooka Raju | 16 Jun 2017 | JUDGEMENT | — |
| OS/188/2014 | State Bank of India, Anakapalli vs Patoju Veerabhadra Rao | 16 Jun 2017 | JUDGEMENT | — |
| SC/85/2015 | State rep. by S.I. of Police, Anakapalli Town PS vs Korubilli Gangadhar | 15 Jun 2017 | JUDGEMENT | — |
| EP/11/2007 | State Bank of India, Kasimkota vs Dibbidi Ramadevi | 14 Jun 2017 | ORDER | — |
| OS/74/2015 | Pentakota Swamy Satyanarayana vs Boddeda Adi Bhavani Sankar Rao @ Sankar | 14 Jun 2017 | JUDGEMENT | — |
| OS/25/2017 | Adari Rama Koteswararao vs Kndregula Srinivas Kumr | 13 Jun 2017 | JUDGEMENT | — |
| OS/43/2016 | Kanchumarthy Ravi Kanth vs Kanchumarthy Bharathi Devi | 13 Jun 2017 | JUDGEMENT | — |
| OS/46/2017 | Adari Rama Koteswara Rao vs Kandregula Srinivas Kumar | 13 Jun 2017 | JUDGEMENT | — |
| OS/69/2013 | Chapala Gopi vs Mogalapalli parvathi | 13 Jun 2017 | JUDGEMENT | — |
| OS/123/2016 | Pedapudi Sattavathi vs Sirimalla Suryanarayana | 09 Jun 2017 | JUDGEMENT | — |
| OS/171/2014 | Konathala Divakar vs Yallapu Srinivasa Rao | 09 Jun 2017 | JUDGEMENT | — |
| EP/111/2014 | Kanchinadham Lakshminarayana vs Kadimisetty Kameswara Rao | 07 Jun 2017 | ORDER | — |
| OS/254/2015 | Karri Bhaskara Rao vs Villuri Bhaskara Rao | 07 Jun 2017 | JUDGEMENT | — |
| EP/18/2012 | Bheeswtti Tarakeswara Rao, vs Polamarasetti Nagaraju | 06 Jun 2017 | ORDER | — |
Frequently Asked Questions
How many cases has Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao handled?
Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao has handled 32 court orders since 2017 at X Addl District Court Anakapalle. The average disposal rate is 22 orders per month.
What types of cases does Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao hear?
Based on available records, Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao primarily handles Civil matters (Original Suits, Execution Petitions) and Criminal matters (Sessions Cases) at X Addl District Court Anakapalle.
Where is Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao currently posted?
Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao is posted as PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE (SENIOR DIVISION) at X Addl District Court Anakapalle, Visakapatnam, Andhra Pradesh.
Are judgments by Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao available online?
Yes. 5 judgments by Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao are available on Legistro with full text, outcome, and sections cited.
How fast does Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao dispose cases?
Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao disposes approximately 22 cases per month, based on 32 orders handled over their tenure at X Addl District Court Anakapalle.
Since when is Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao serving?
Sri M.P.Sannidhi Rao has been serving at X Addl District Court Anakapalle since 2017.
Case Types
Posting History
-
May 2017 — Jun 2017PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE (SENIOR DIVISION) · 32 orders
-
May 2017 — Jun 2017ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE (SENIOR DIVISION) FTC
Outcomes on Record
Other Judges at this Court