Sri M.Pavan Kumar

junior civil judge

Senior Civil Judge`s Court, Atmakur (Taluka) · Kurnool · Andhra Pradesh

Sri M.Pavan Kumar, junior civil judge, is posted at Senior Civil Judge`s Court, Atmakur (Taluka), Kurnool, Andhra Pradesh, India. 562 court orders on record since 2023. 7 judgments with full text available. Primarily handles CC, OS, EP cases.

562

Total Orders

Judgments

169

Orders/Month

Postings

Featured Judgments

EP/20/2022 Acquitted

XXXXX vs XXXXX

21 Nov 2023

IN THE COURT OF THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS ::

NANDIKOTKUR:

PRESENT: Sri M.PAVAN KUMAR,

Judicial Magistrate of First Class,Nandikotkur.

Wednesday, this the 15 th Day of November, 2023.

C.C.No.322 of 2022

Between: The State represented by Special Enforcement Bureau SubInspector,

Nandikotkur... Complainant.

AND

Neelishikari Avar Singh, aged 28 years, S/o.N.S.Than Singh, R/o.Neelishikari Colony, Nandikotkur Town. … Accused

This case is presented before me on this day for final hearing in the presence of Assistant Public Prosecutor for the Complainant and

Legal Aid Counsel for accused upon hearing arguments, upon perusing the material available on record and having stood over for consideration, this Court delivered the following :

J U D G M E N T

1. The Special Enforcement Bureau SubInspector, Nandikotkur has filed Charge Sheet against the accused in Cr.No.161/2018 for the offence punishable U/Sec.7(a) r/w 8(e) of A.P. Prohibition (Amendment) Act 2019 against the accused.

2. The brief averments of the prosecution case are as follows:

On 28062018 at Afternoon B.SreelakshmiProh. & Excise Sub

Inspector, Nandikotkur along with her staff LW.2/K.Ramanjaneyulu (P&E Head Constable, Nandikotkur), LW.3/P.Sarath Kumar Reddy 2 (P&E Constable, Nandikotkur), during raids for excise offences reached

Lakshmapuram road, situated at a distance of 4 KM on the way towards Pagidyala road at 05.00 p.m. and found one male person driving an Auto with two plastic bags inside the auto in suspicious circumstances and on seeing them the said person tried to escape from there but she along with her staff surrounded the said person and on enquiry, the accused revealed his name as Neelishikari Avar Singh. On examining the Two plastic bag which was in the possession of the accused, she found 10 Liters of ID Arrack in each plastic bagin total20

Liters of ID Arrack in the plastic bags. The contraband was seized and the accused was arrested under the cover of Special Report drafted on the spot. Later she drawn sample from the contraband for chemical analysis purpose. Basing on the strength of special report, she registered a case in Cr.No.161/2018 u/Sec.7(a) r/w 8(e) of APP Act and submitted the FIR to all the concerned. The accused was arrested and later released after obtaining two sureties. She also forwarded the lifted sample to the Chemical Examiner under the letter of advice and she received the Analysis Report. Later she handed over the case file to

LW4/K.Giri (Enforcement SubInspector, Nandikotkur) and on that

LW4K.Giri, after verifying the investigation haslaid the Charge sheet against the accused.

3. The case was taken on file for the offence U/Sec.7 (a) r/w 8 (e) of A.P. Prohibition Act against the accused.

4. On appearance of the accused, the copies of the case documents furnished to him in compliance of Section 207 Cr.P.C.

5. Accused is examined U/Sec.239 Cr.P.C. Charge U/Sec.7 (a) r/w 8(e) of A.P. Prohibition Act framed against the accused read over and explained to him in Telugu U/Sec.240 (2) Cr.P.C. After having understood the same, he pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried.

6. In order to establish the guilt of the accused, the prosecution examined P.W.1 and marked Ex.P1 to Ex.P3, so also M.O.1 and M.O.2.

7. On completion of prosecution side evidence, the accused is examined U/Sec.313 Cr.P.C. by explaining the incriminating material appearing in the evidence of prosecution witness, for which he denied.

On behalf of accused no oral evidence is adduced and no documents marked.

8.Heard both the sides.

9.Now, the point for determination is :

Whether the prosecution has succeeded in

establishing the guilt of the accused for the

offence U/Sec.7 (a) r/w 8(e) of A.P.

Prohibition Act beyond reasonable doubt or

otherwise ...

POINT:

10. In this case, the prosecution examined the Proh. And Excise Sub

Inspector, Nandikotkur as P.W.1. Her evidence in chief is in tune with the records of the prosecution. Through her the Ex.P1 to Ex.P3, M.O.1 and M.O.2 received into evidence.

11. On perusal of the evidence available on record, what emerges clear is that the scene of offence is a busy locality as it is situated at a distance of 4 KM on the way towards Pagidyala road. The evidence of

Investigating officer is that she deputed her constable

L.W.2/K.Ramanjaneyulu for securing the mediators in and around the scene of offence but in vain.

12. After analysis of the above evidence what emerges clear is that the alleged scene is situated is a busy locality. Despite this topography of the scene, the prosecution failed to secure the support of independent witnesses for the search of the accused and seizure of contraband. The attempt of the Police Party in deputing the constable to secure mediators and he return in vain, has become futile when the deputed constable failed to file the report of nonavailability of mediators. If at all the Police party tried best to secure mediators and failed, they ought to have filed report of the deputed constable as to whom he contacted 5 and where and that he failed to secure the mediators. In the absence of such report, the alleged attempt of the Police party to secure mediators and special report against the accused basing on the special report appears to be doubtful virtually. Thus there is a doubt in the case of the prosecution.

13. With this what emerges clear is that, by the time the search was conducted and seizure was made, there were people all along in the nearby vicinity and locality including village VRO and other official witnesses and that, despite their presence the investigating officer could not take their assistance to act as mahazardars. In other words, the local inhabitants were not pressed into service to act as mahazardars. Thus, the entire search is against the spirit of law of search, thereby the alleged seizure and arrest thereon is in contravention of the above law. In this way, the evidence adduced by the prosecution is not sufficient to prove the special report on which the case of the prosecution is edificed, thereby the special report doubted, consequently, the entire case of the prosecution.

14. So, in the light of the above discussion, the Court is of the view that the case of the prosecution filled with doubts, and that, the evidence of Police party alone is not inspiring confidence of this Court to proceed against the accused. Hence, the POINT is answered holding that the prosecution failed to establish the guilt of the accused beyond 6 reasonable doubt.

15. In the result, this Court found the accused not guilty for the offence U/Sec.7 (a) r/w 8(e) of A.P. Prohibition Act, thereby he is acquitted U/Sec.248 (1) Cr.P.C. The bail bonds of the accused shall remain in force for a period of six months from the date of Judgment.

The case property i.e., M.O.1 – 180ml sample bottle of I.D. Arrack and

M.O.2another 180ml sample bottle of ID Arrack received in

CPR.No.178/2023 shall be destroyed after expiry of the appeal time.

Typed to my dictation by the Stenographer Grade III, corrected, signed and pronounced by me in the open court, on this the 15 th day of November, 2023.

Sd/M.Pavan Kumar Judl. Magistrate of First Class, Nandikotkur.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSESS EXAMINED ON BEHALF OF :

PROSECUTION : DEFENCE:

P.W.1: B.Sreelakshmi – None –

EXHIBITS MARKED ON BEHALF OF:

PROSECUTION :

Ex.P1:Special report dt.28062018.

Ex.P2:Original First Information Report in Cr.No.161/2018 of 7A r/w 8(e) of A.P. Prohibition (Amendment) Act, 2019 of SEB, Nandikotkur dt: 28062018. Ex.P3:Analysis report.

DEFENCE : Nil.

MATERIAL OBJECTS MARKED

M.O.1 – 180ml sample bottle of I.D Arrack.

M.O.2 – another 180ml sample bottle of I.D.Arrack.

Sd/M.Pavan Kumar Judl. Magistrate of First Class, Nandikotkur.

//True Copy//

Judl. Magistrate of First Class, Nandikotkur.

CALENDAR AND JUDGMENT

Calendar of cases tried by Sri M.Pavan Kumar, Judl. First Class

Magistrate,Nandikotkur.

Date of Offence: 28062018

Date of Report or Complaint: 28062018

Date of Apprehension of accused: 30012020

Date of Commencement of trial : 07112023

Date of Close of trial: 07112023

Date of sentence of Order: 15112023

Explanation of delay and remarks : Due to nonproduction of

Prosecution witnesses in time.

Judgment in Calendar Case No.322 of 2022 on the file of the Judl.

First Class Magistrate Court,Nandikotkur.

Neelishikari Avar Singh, aged 28 years, S/o.N.S.Than Singh, R/o.Neelishikari Colony, Nandikotkur Town. … Accused

Offence: U/Sec.7(A) r/w 8(e) of APP Act

Plea of accused : Not guilty

Finding: Not guilty

Sentence : In the result, this Court found the accused not guilty for the offence U/Sec.7 (a) r/w 8(e) of A.P. Prohibition Act, thereby he is acquitted U/Sec.248 (1) Cr.P.C. The bail bonds of the 9 accused shall remain in force for a period of six months from the date of Judgment. The case property i.e., M.O.1 – 180ml sample bottle of

I.D. Arrack and M.O.2another 180ml sample bottle of ID Arrack received in CPR.No.178/2023 shall be destroyed after expiry of the appeal time.

Sd/M.Pavan Kumar Judl. First Class Magistrate, Nandikotkur. To The Hon’ble Chief Judl.Magistrate of I Classcum Prl.Asst. Sessions Judge,Kurnool. Dis No. Dated:

/True Copy//

Judl. Magistrate of First Class, Nandikotkur.

CC/322/2022 Acquitted

State rep. by SHO of Nandikotkur SEB Station vs Neelishikari Avar Singh

15 Nov 2023

IN THE COURT OF THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS ::

NANDIKOTKUR:

PRESENT: Sri M.PAVAN KUMAR,

Judicial Magistrate of First Class,Nandikotkur.

Wednesday, this the 15 th Day of November, 2023.

C.C.No.322 of 2022

Between: The State represented by Special Enforcement Bureau SubInspector,

Nandikotkur... Complainant.

AND

Neelishikari Avar Singh, aged 28 years, S/o.N.S.Than Singh, R/o.Neelishikari Colony, Nandikotkur Town. … Accused

This case is presented before me on this day for final hearing in the presence of Assistant Public Prosecutor for the Complainant and

Legal Aid Counsel for accused upon hearing arguments, upon perusing the material available on record and having stood over for consideration, this Court delivered the following :

J U D G M E N T

2. The brief averments of the prosecution case are as follows:

On 28062018 at Afternoon B.SreelakshmiProh. & Excise Sub

Inspector, Nandikotkur along with her staff LW.2/K.Ramanjaneyulu (P&E Head Constable, Nandikotkur), LW.3/P.Sarath Kumar Reddy 2 (P&E Constable, Nandikotkur), during raids for excise offences reached

LW4/K.Giri (Enforcement SubInspector, Nandikotkur) and on that

LW4K.Giri, after verifying the investigation haslaid the Charge sheet against the accused.

3. The case was taken on file for the offence U/Sec.7 (a) r/w 8 (e) of A.P. Prohibition Act against the accused.

4. On appearance of the accused, the copies of the case documents furnished to him in compliance of Section 207 Cr.P.C.

6. In order to establish the guilt of the accused, the prosecution examined P.W.1 and marked Ex.P1 to Ex.P3, so also M.O.1 and M.O.2.

On behalf of accused no oral evidence is adduced and no documents marked.

8.Heard both the sides.

9.Now, the point for determination is :

Whether the prosecution has succeeded in

establishing the guilt of the accused for the

offence U/Sec.7 (a) r/w 8(e) of A.P.

Prohibition Act beyond reasonable doubt or

otherwise ...

POINT:

10. In this case, the prosecution examined the Proh. And Excise Sub

Inspector, Nandikotkur as P.W.1. Her evidence in chief is in tune with the records of the prosecution. Through her the Ex.P1 to Ex.P3, M.O.1 and M.O.2 received into evidence.

Investigating officer is that she deputed her constable

L.W.2/K.Ramanjaneyulu for securing the mediators in and around the scene of offence but in vain.

The case property i.e., M.O.1 – 180ml sample bottle of I.D. Arrack and

M.O.2another 180ml sample bottle of ID Arrack received in

CPR.No.178/2023 shall be destroyed after expiry of the appeal time.

Typed to my dictation by the Stenographer Grade III, corrected, signed and pronounced by me in the open court, on this the 15 th day of November, 2023.

Sd/M.Pavan Kumar Judl. Magistrate of First Class, Nandikotkur.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSESS EXAMINED ON BEHALF OF :

PROSECUTION : DEFENCE:

P.W.1: B.Sreelakshmi – None –

EXHIBITS MARKED ON BEHALF OF:

PROSECUTION :

Ex.P1:Special report dt.28062018.

Ex.P2:Original First Information Report in Cr.No.161/2018 of 7A r/w 8(e) of A.P. Prohibition (Amendment) Act, 2019 of SEB, Nandikotkur dt: 28062018. Ex.P3:Analysis report.

DEFENCE : Nil.

MATERIAL OBJECTS MARKED

M.O.1 – 180ml sample bottle of I.D Arrack.

M.O.2 – another 180ml sample bottle of I.D.Arrack.

Sd/M.Pavan Kumar Judl. Magistrate of First Class, Nandikotkur.

//True Copy//

Judl. Magistrate of First Class, Nandikotkur.

CALENDAR AND JUDGMENT

Calendar of cases tried by Sri M.Pavan Kumar, Judl. First Class

Magistrate,Nandikotkur.

Date of Offence: 28062018

Date of Report or Complaint: 28062018

Date of Apprehension of accused: 30012020

Date of Commencement of trial : 07112023

Date of Close of trial: 07112023

Date of sentence of Order: 15112023

Explanation of delay and remarks : Due to nonproduction of

Prosecution witnesses in time.

Judgment in Calendar Case No.322 of 2022 on the file of the Judl.

First Class Magistrate Court,Nandikotkur.

Neelishikari Avar Singh, aged 28 years, S/o.N.S.Than Singh, R/o.Neelishikari Colony, Nandikotkur Town. … Accused

Offence: U/Sec.7(A) r/w 8(e) of APP Act

Plea of accused : Not guilty

Finding: Not guilty

I.D. Arrack and M.O.2another 180ml sample bottle of ID Arrack received in CPR.No.178/2023 shall be destroyed after expiry of the appeal time.

Sd/M.Pavan Kumar Judl. First Class Magistrate, Nandikotkur. To The Hon’ble Chief Judl.Magistrate of I Classcum Prl.Asst. Sessions Judge,Kurnool. Dis No. Dated:

/True Copy//

Judl. Magistrate of First Class, Nandikotkur.

CC/967/2022 Acquitted

State rep. by SI of Police, SEB Nandikotkur vs Samudrala Sudhakar

15 Nov 2023

IN THE COURT OF THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS ::

NANDIKOTKUR:

PRESENT: Sri M.PAVAN KUMAR,

Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Nandikotkur.

Wednesday, this the 15 th Day of November, 2023

C.C.No.967 of 2022

Between: The State represented by Special Enforcement Bureau SubInspector,

Nandikotkur. ... Complainant.

AND

Samudrala Sudhakar, aged 35 years, S/o.S.Ankanna, R/o.Bhojanam Village, Bandi Atmakur Mandal. … Accused

*******

This case is presented before me on this day for final hearing in the presence of Assistant Public Prosecutor for the Complainant and of Sri V.Arun Kumar, Advocate for accused, upon hearing arguments, upon perusing the material available on record and having stood over for consideration, this Court delivered the following :

J U D G M E N T

1. The Enforcement SubInspector, SEB Station, Nandikotkur has filed Charge sheet in Cr.No.222/2020 for the offence punishable

U/Sec.34(a) of A.P. Excise Act, 1968 against the accused.

2. The brief averments of the prosecution case are as follows:

On 30062020 at afternoon B.SreelakshmiSEB SubInspector,

SEB Station, Nandikotkur along with her staff LW.2/Naga Sunitha 2

Rani (SEB Inspector, SEB Station, Nandikotkur), LW.3/K.Nagaraju (Constable, SEB, Nandikotkur), LW4/K.Bharath (Constable, SEB,

Nandikotkur) during raids for excise offences reached near K.C.Canal

Bridge located furlong away from Allur village of Nandikotkur Manal at 01.30 p.m. and found one male person coming in an auto with a plastic bag in suspicious circumstances and on seeing them the said person tried to escape from there but she along with her staff surrounded the said person and on enquiry, the accused revealed his name as Samudrala Sudhakar. On examining the plastic bag which was in the possession of the accused, she found 10 pints(375 ml) of

Imperial Blue Classic Grain Whisky bottles and 32 nips(180 ml) of Old

Admiral VSOP Brandy Bottles in the plastic bag. The contraband was seized and the accused was arrested under the cover of Special Report drafted on the spot. Later she drawn sample from the contraband for chemical analysis purpose. Basing on the strength of special report, she registered a case in Cr.No.222/2020 U/Sec.34(a) of A.P.Excise

Act and submitted the FIR to all the concerned. The accused was served 41(a) Cr.P.C., notice. She also forwarded the lifted sample to the Chemical Examiner under the letter of advice and she received the

Analysis Report. Later she handed over the case file to LW5/K.Giri (Enforcement SubInspector, Nandikotkur) and on that he, after 3 verifying the investigation has laid the Charge sheet against the accused.

3. The case was taken on file for the offence U/Sec.34(a) of A.P.

Excise Act against the accused.

4. On appearance of the accused, the copies of the case documents furnished to him in compliance of Section 207 Cr.P.C.

5. Accused was examined U/Sec.239 Cr.P.C. Charge U/Sec.34(a) of A.P. Excise Act framed against the accused read over and explained to him in Telugu U/Sec.240(2) Cr.P.C. After having understood the same, he pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried.

6. In order to establish the guilt of the accused, the prosecution examined P.W.1 and marked Exs.P1 to Ex.P3, so also M.O.1 and

M.O.2.

7. On completion of prosecution side evidence, the accused was examined U/Sec.313 Cr.P.C. by explaining the incriminating material appearing in the evidence of prosecution witness, for which he denied.

On behalf of accused no oral evidence is adduced and no documents marked.

8.Heard both the sides.

9.Now, the point for determination is :

Whether the prosecution has succeeded in

establishing the guilt of the accused for the

offence U/Sec.34(a) of A.P. Excise Act

beyond reasonable doubt or otherwise ...

POINT:

10. In this case, the prosecution examined the SEB SubInspector, SEB

Station, Nandikotkur as P.W.1. The evidence in chief of P.W.1 is in tune with the records of the prosecution. Through P.W.1 Ex.P1 to

Ex.P3 so also M.O.1 and M.O.2 received into evidence.

11. On perusal of the evidence available on record, what emerges clear is that the scene of offence is a busy locality, which is situated near K.C.Canal Bridge located furlong away from Allur Village of

Nandikotkur Mandal. The evidence of Investigating officer is that she deputed her Constable L.W.2/K.Nagaraju for securing the mediators in and around the scene of offence but in vain.

12. With this what emerges clear is that, by the time the search was conducted and seizure was made, there were people all along in the nearby vicinity and locality including village V.R.O and other official 5 witnesses and that, despite their presence the investigating officer could not take their assistance to act as mahazardars. In other words, the local inhabitants were not pressed into service to act as mahazardars. Thus, the entire search is against the spirit of law of search, thereby the alleged seizure and arrest thereon is in contravention of the above law. In this way, the evidence adduced by the prosecution is not sufficient to prove the special report on which the case of the prosecution is edificed, thereby the special report doubted, consequently, the entire case of the prosecution.

13. So, in the light of the above discussion, the Court is of the view that the case of the prosecution filled with doubts, and that, the evidence of Police party alone is not inspiring confidence of this Court to proceed against the accused. Hence, the POINT is answered holding that the prosecution failed to establish the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt.

14. In the result, this Court found the accused not guilty for the offence U/Sec.34(a) of A.P. Excise Act, thereby he is acquitted

U/Sec.248(1) Cr.P.C. The bail bonds of the accused shall remain in force for a period of six months from the date of Judgment. The case 6 property i.e., M.O.1 375ml sample bottle of Imperial Blue Classic

Grain Whisky bottle and M.O.2180ml sample bottle of Old Admiral

VSOP Brandy bottle received in CPR.No. 179/2023 shall be destroyed after expiry of the appeal time.

Typed to my dictation by the Stenographer Grade III, corrected, signed and pronounced by me in the open court on this the 15 th day of November, 2023

Sd/M.Pavan Kumar Judl. Magistrate of First Class, Nandikotkur.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSESS EXAMINED ON BEHALF OF :

PROSECUTION : DEFENCE:

P.W.1 : B.Sreelakshmi – None –

EXHIBITS MARKED ON BEHALF OF:

PROSECUTION :

Ex.P1:Special Report dt.30062020.

Ex.P2:Original First Information Report in Cr.No.222/2020 of 34(a) of A.P. Excise (Amendment) Act, 2020, Enforcement SubInspector, SEB, Nandikotkur dt: 30 062020.

Ex.P3:Analysis report.

DEFENCE : Nil.

MATERIAL OBJECTS MARKED

M.O.1 : 375ml sample bottle of Imperial Blue Classic Grain Whisky bottle.

M.O.2: 180ml sample bottle of Old Admiral VSOP Brandy bottle.

Sd/M.Pavan Kumar Judl. Magistrate of First Class, Nandikotkur.

//True Copy//

Judl. Magistrate of First Class, Nandikotkur.

CALENDAR AND JUDGMENT

Calendar of cases tried by Sri M.Pavan Kumar, Judl. First Class

Magistrate,Nandikotkur.

Date of Offence: 30062020

Date of Report or Complaint: 30062020

Date of Apprehension of accused: 30062020

Date of Commencement of trial : 07112023

Date of Close of trial: 07112023

Date of sentence of Order: 15112023

Explanation of delay and remarks : Due to nonproduction of Prosecution witnesses in time.

Judgment in Calendar Case No.967 of 2022 on the file of the Judl.

First Class Magistrate Court,Nandikotkur.

Samudrala Sudhakar, aged 35 years, S/o.S.Ankanna, R/o.Bhojanam Village, Bandi Atmakur Mandal. … Accused

Offence: U/Sec.34(a) of A.P. Excise Act

Plea of accused : Not guilty

Finding: Not guilty

Sentence : In the result, this Court found the accused not guilty for the offence U/Sec.34(a) of A.P. Excise Act, thereby he is 9 acquitted U/Sec.248(1) Cr.P.C. The bail bonds of the accused shall remain in force for a period of six months from the date of Judgment.

The case property i.e., M.O.1 375ml sample bottle of Imperial Blue

Classic Grain Whisky bottle and M.O.2180ml sample bottle of Old

Admiral VSOP Brandy bottle received in CPR.No. 179/2023 shall be destroyed after expiry of the appeal time.

Sd/M.Pavan Kumar Judl. First Class Magistrate, Nandikotkur. To The Hon’ble Chief Judl.Magistrate of I Classcum Prl.Asst. Sessions Judge,Kurnool. Dis No. Dated:

//True Copy//

Judl. Magistrate of First Class, Nandikotkur.

CC/958/2022 Acquitted

State rep. by SI of of police, SEB Nandikotkur vs Dudekula Rahim Basha

15 Nov 2023

IN THE COURT OF THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS ::

NANDIKOTKUR:

PRESENT: Sri M.PAVAN KUMAR,

Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Nandikotkur.

Wednesday, this the 15 th Day of November, 2023

C.C.No.958 of 2022

Between: The State represented by Special Enforcement Bureau Inspector,

Nandikotkur. ... Complainant.

AND

Dudekula Rahim Basha, aged 32 years, S/o.Dudekula Hussain Saheb, R/o.Muchumarri Village, Pagidyala Mandal. … Accused

*******

This case is presented before me on this day for final hearing in the presence of Assistant Public Prosecutor for the Complainant and of Sri M.V. Balanagaiah Guptha, Advocate for accused, upon hearing arguments, upon perusing the material available on record and having stood over for consideration, this Court delivered the following :

J U D G M E N T

1. The Enforcement Inspector, SEB Station, Nandikotkur has filed

Charge sheet in Cr.No.210/2021 for the offence punishable

U/Sec.34(a) of A.P. Excise (Amendment) Act, 2020 against the accused.

2. The brief averments of the prosecution case are as follows:

On 21062021 at about 03.15 p.m., K.GiriSEB SubInspector,

SEB Station, Nandikotkur along with his staff LW.2/S.Manohar (SEB

Head Constable, Nandikotkur), LW.3/ Ch.Eranna (SEB Constable,

Nandikotkur), LW4/S.Chandranna (SEB Constable, SEB, Nandikotkur) and LW5/P.Chenna Krishna(SEB Constable, Nandikotkur) during raids for excise offences reached near K.C.Canal, Muchumarri village and found one person carrying a white plastic bag coming suspicious circumstances and on seeing them the said person tried to escape from there but he along with his staff surrounded the said person and on enquiry, the accused revealed his name as Dudekula Rahim

Basha/Accused. On examining the plastic bag which was in the possession of the accused, he found 48 nips (180 ml) of Old Admiral

VSOP Brandy bottles in the possession of the accused. The Contraband was seized and the accused was arrested under the cover of Special

Report drafted on the spot. Later he drawn sample from the contraband for chemical analysis purpose. Basing on the strength of

Special Report, he registered a case in Cr.No.210/2021 U/Sec.34(a) of A.P.Excise Act and submitted the FIR to all the concerned. The accused was served 41(a)Cr.P.C., notice. He also forwarded the lifted sample to the Chemical Examiner under the letter of advice and He 3 received the Analysis Report. Later,hehanded over the entire case file to LW6/A.Ramesh Reddy(SEB Inspector, Nandikotkur), after verifying the investigation LW6/A.Ramesh Reddy(SEB Inspector,

Nandikotkur)laid the Charge sheet against the accused.

the accused.

3. The case was taken on file for the offence U/Sec.34(a) of A.P.

Excise Act against the accused.

4. On appearance of the accused, the copies of the case documents furnished to him in compliance of Section 207 Cr.P.C.

6. In order to establish the guilt of the accused, the prosecution examined P.W.1 and marked Exs.P1 to Ex.P3, so also M.O.1.

On behalf of accused no oral evidence is adduced and no documents marked.

8.Heard both the sides.

9.Now, the point for determination is :

Whether the prosecution has succeeded in

establishing the guilt of the accused for the

offence U/Sec.34(a) of A.P. Excise Act

beyond reasonable doubt or otherwise ...

POINT:

10. In this case, the prosecution examined the SEB SubInspector,

Nandikotkur as P.W.1. The evidence in chief of P.W.1 is in tune with the records of the prosecution. Through P.W.1 Ex.P1 to Ex.P3 so also

M.O.1 received into evidence.

11. On perusal of the evidence available on record, what emerges clear is that the scene of offence is a busy locality, which is situated near K.C.Canal, Muchumarri Village. The evidence of Investigating officer is that he deputed his Head Constable L.W.2/S.Manohar for securing the mediators in and around the scene of offence but in vain.

12. With this what emerges clear is that, by the time the search was conducted and seizure was made, there were people all along in the nearby vicinity and locality including village V.R.O and other official witnesses and that, despite their presence the investigating officer could not take their assistance to act as mahazardars. In other words, the local inhabitants were not pressed into service to act as mahazardars. Thus, the entire search is against the spirit of law of search, thereby the alleged seizure and arrest thereon is in contravention of the above law. In this way, the evidence adduced by the prosecution is not sufficient to prove the special report on which the case of the prosecution is edificed, thereby the special report doubted, consequently, the entire case of the prosecution.

14. In the result, this Court found the accused not guilty for the offence U/Sec.34(a) of A.P. Excise Act, thereby he is acquitted

U/Sec.248(1) Cr.P.C. The bail bonds of the accused shall remain in force for a period of six months from the date of Judgment. The case property i.e., M.O.1 180 ml sample bottle of Old Admiral VSOP

Brandy bottle received in CPR.No. 177/2023 shall be destroyed after expiry of the appeal time.

Typed to my dictation by the Stenographer Grade III, corrected, signed and pronounced by me in the open court on this the 15 th day of November, 2023

Sd/M.Pavan Kumar Judl. Magistrate of First Class, Nandikotkur.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSESS EXAMINED ON BEHALF OF :

PROSECUTION : DEFENCE:

P.W.1 : K.Giri – None –

EXHIBITS MARKED ON BEHALF OF:

PROSECUTION :

Ex.P1:Special Report dt.21062021.

Ex.P2:Original First Information Report in Cr.No.210/2021 of 34(a) of A.P. Excise (Amendment) Act, 2020, Enforcement SubInspector, SEB, Nandikotkur dt: 21 062021.

Ex.P3:Analysis report.

DEFENCE : Nil.

MATERIAL OBJECTS MARKED

M.O.1: 180ml sample bottle of Old Admiral VSOP Brandy bottle.

Sd/M.Pavan Kumar Judl. Magistrate of First Class, Nandikotkur.

//True Copy//

Judl. Magistrate of First Class, Nandikotkur.

CALENDAR AND JUDGMENT

Calendar of cases tried by Sri M.Pavan Kumar, Judl. First Class

Magistrate,Nandikotkur.

Date of Offence: 21062021

Date of Report or Complaint: 21062021

Date of Apprehension of accused: 21062021

Date of Commencement of trial : 07112023

Date of Close of trial: 07112023

Date of sentence of Order: 14112023

Explanation of delay and remarks : Due to nonproduction of Prosecution witnesses in time.

Judgment in Calendar Case No.958 of 2022 on the file of the Judl.

First Class Magistrate Court,Nandikotkur.

Dudekula Rahim Basha, aged 32 years, S/o.Dudekula Hussain Saheb, R/o.Muchumarri Village, Pagidyala Mandal. … Accused

Offence: U/Sec.34(a) of A.P. Excise Act

Plea of accused : Not guilty

Finding: Not guilty

Sentence : In the result, this Court found the accused not guilty for the offence U/Sec.34(a) of A.P. Excise Act, thereby he is acquitted U/Sec.248(1) Cr.P.C. The bail bonds of the accused shall 9 remain in force for a period of six months from the date of Judgment.

The case property i.e., M.O.1 180 ml sample bottle of Old Admiral

VSOP Brandy bottle received in CPR.No. 177/2023 shall be destroyed after expiry of the appeal time.

Sd/M.Pavan Kumar Judl. First Class Magistrate, Nandikotkur. To The Hon’ble Chief Judl.Magistrate of I Classcum Prl.Asst. Sessions Judge,Kurnool. Dis No. Dated:

//True Copy//

Judl. Magistrate of First Class, Nandikotkur.

CC/13/2022 Convicted

The Sub-Inspector of Police, Atmakur PS vs Dudekula Ali Akbar

13 May 2023

IN THE COURT OF THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF I CLASS AT ATMAKUR

Present: Sri M. Pavan Kumar,

Judl. Magistrate of I Class, Nandikotkur.

F.A.C/Judl. Magistrate of I Class, Atmakur

Saturday, the 13th day of May, 2023.

C.C.No.13/2022

Between The State represented by Sub Inspector of Police, Kothapalli Police Station. ……Complainant .

-and-

Dudekula Ali Akbar, S/o D. Pedda Swamy, aged 34 Years, R/o. Kurukunda village, Atmakur Mandal Kurnool District. ……Accused

This case is coming on 13.05.2023 before me for final hearing in the presence of Assistant Public Prosecutor for the Prosecution and the accused appeared in person, upon perusing the material papers on record, this Court delivered the following:

JUDGMENT

The Sub Inspector of Police, Kothapallil P.S filed charge sheet against the accused in Crime No.115/2021 for the offence punishable under Section 420 of

Indian Penal Code (herein after referred as IPC).

2. The brief allegations in the Police Report are as follows :

On 03-04-2021 at about 16:30 hours on information LW6/G. Nagendra

Prasad, Sub Inspector of Police along with his staff HG-69, PCs-2914, 3492 left police station and reached near abandoned house, Kurukunda village, Atmakur mandal, they noticed the accused and found PDS rice. He enquired about the PDS rice in surroundings in the presence of panchayatdars and the villagers stated that the above PDS rice bags belongs to accused and he used to purchased the same from surrounding villages and dumped in the said house and export to other villagers. On suspicious they chased and caught hold the accused and arrested him. On his examination the accused revealed his identity particulars and confessed that he purchased the said PDS rice from the persons of neighbouring 2 villages as well as from unknown persons for lower price to sell the same for higher price with a view to get wrongful gain and to cheat the public as well as the

Government. LW6/G. Nagendra Prasad, Sub Inspector of Police apprehended the accused and seized 205 bags of PDS rice total 9225 Kgs of PDS rice under cover of panchanama in the presence of panchayatdars.

b. Basing on the report of LW6/G. Nagendra Prasad, Sub Inspector of Police, registered a case in Cr.No.115/2021 and investigated into. LW7/K. Hari Prasad, Sub

Inspector of Police, Atmakur P.S served notice u/Sec.41-A of Cr.PC on the accused and obtained reply. He handed over the 205 PDS rice bags. After completion of investigation, he filed charge sheet. Thus Accused is liable for the offence punishable under section 420 of IPC. Hence, the charge.

3. Cognizance was taken for the offence punishable under Section 420 of IPC against Accused.

4. On appearance of Accused, copies of documents were furnished to him as required u/Sec. 207 of Cr.P.C.

5. On 13-05-2023 Accused is examined under Section 239 of Cr.P.C. A charge under section 420 of IPC was framed against the accused, read over and explained to him in Telugu. The accused pleaded guilty. Having understood the same, the Accused voluntarily admitted the commission of offence. This court is satisfied that the accused admitted the offence voluntarily.

6.Heard the Accused with regard to quantum of sentence. He submitted that the prosecution was launched against him alleging that he has collected PDS rice from the villagers for lower price in order to sell the same to others for higher price. He further submitted that as collection of PDS rice from the ration card holders is not an offence, the offence under Essential Commodities Act is not taken cognizance by the Hon’ble Court. He also submitted that since there is no complaint/report from the end of any person that they cheated the said person by selling the low quality rice as if good quality rice, lenient view may be taken and he 3 prays to impose fine only. Considering the facts and circumstances, this court is inclined to take lenient view against the accused in imposing sentence.

7.As per the charge sheet, no person is cited as witness in this case that he was cheated by the accused by selling PDS rice stating that the rice is of good quality. Moreover, though the charge sheet is filed for the offence under section 7(1) of Essential Commodities Act, the same is not taken cognizance as securing

PDS rice from the Ration Card Holders is not an offence since the Act operates till the time of reaching the essential commodity to the Ration Card Holder only.

Hence this court is inclined to take lenient view against the accused and imposing of fine besides invoking the provision under section 354 (4) of Cr.PC.

8. IN THE RESULT, Accused is found guilty for the offence punishable u/Sec. 420 of I.P.C and he is convicted u/Sec.252 of Cr.P.C. Accused is sentenced to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/- for the offence punishable u/Sec. 420 of IPC, and in default of payment of fine amount, the accused shall undergo SI for a period of one month and also sentenced to suffer imprisonment for one day i.e., till rising of the Court.

The bail bonds of the accused, if any, shall stand cancelled after expiry of appeal time.

Directly typed to my dictation, corrected and pronounced by me on this the 13 th day of May, 2023.

JUDL. MAGISTRATE OF I CLASS,

NANDIKOTKUR.

FAC/JUDL. MAGISTRATE OF I CLASS,

ATMAKUR

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

-NIL-

JMFC, NDK.

FAC/JMFC,ATK

Order Record 557 total

Case No.	Parties	Date	Type	Outcome
EP/3/2021	P.Radhamma vs Golla Bala Swamy	23 Nov 2023	Copy of Order	—
EP/20/2022	XXXXX vs XXXXX	21 Nov 2023	Copy of Order	Acquitted
CC/322/2022	State rep. by SHO of Nandikotkur SEB Station vs Neelishikari Avar Singh	15 Nov 2023	Copy of Judgement	Acquitted
CC/958/2022	State rep. by SI of of police, SEB Nandikotkur vs Dudekula Rahim Basha	15 Nov 2023	Copy of Judgement	Acquitted
CC/967/2022	State rep. by SI of Police, SEB Nandikotkur vs Samudrala Sudhakar	15 Nov 2023	Copy of Judgement	Acquitted
CC/586/2023	State represented by SI of Police, Nandikotkur PS vs Shaik Vali	14 Nov 2023	Copy of Judgement	—
CC/450/2023	State rep. by SI of Police, SEB, Nandikotkur vs Dasari Sanjeevarayudu	26 Oct 2023	Copy of Judgement	—
CC/247/2022	State rep. by SHO of Brahmanakotkur PS vs Baddeti Sunkanna	17 Oct 2023	Copy of Judgement	—
CC/4/2020	S.Abdulla vs B.Venkateswarlu	16 Oct 2023	Copy of Order	—
CC/141/2019	P.Sudhakar Reddy vs K.V.Ramanaiah	16 Oct 2023	Copy of Order	—
CC/246/2022	State rep. by SHO of Brahmanakotkur PS vs Kaveti Srinivasulu	16 Oct 2023	Copy of Judgement	—
CC/1046/2021	Sub Inspector of Police,Brahmanakotkur PS vs Kaveti Rameswari	16 Oct 2023	Copy of Judgement	—
CC/1049/2021	Sub Inspector of Police, Brahmanakotkur PS vs Bestha Ramudu	16 Oct 2023	Copy of Judgement	—
PRC/16/2023	State represented by SI of Police, Midthur PS vs Bhushapogu Kalpalatha Devi @ Kalpalatha	16 Oct 2023	Copy of Order	—
CC/137/2019	J.Lakshmi Narayana vs V.Vijaya Kumar	13 Oct 2023	Copy of Order	—
CC/831/2021	Sub Inspector of Police, Brahmanakotkur PS vs Mallepogu Yohan	13 Oct 2023	Copy of Judgement	—
CC/926/2021	Sub Inspector of Police, Brahmanakotkur PS vs Shaik Murthuja	13 Oct 2023	Copy of Judgement	—
CC/990/2021	Sub Inspector of Police, Brahmanakotkur PS vs Manjula Subba Rayudu	13 Oct 2023	Copy of Judgement	—
CC/715/2021	Sub Inspector of Police, Brahmanakotkur PS vs Bandi Venkata Lakshmamma	12 Oct 2023	Copy of Judgement	—
CC/724/2021	Sub Inspector of Police, Brahmanakotkur PS vs Peddamaddi Bhaskar	12 Oct 2023	Copy of Judgement	—
CC/753/2022	S.I. of police, Brahmanakotkur PS vs Kummari Yelleswaraiah	12 Oct 2023	Copy of Judgement	—
CC/159/2023	State rep.by S.I. of police, Muchumarri PS vs P. Shaikshavali	11 Oct 2023	Copy of Judgement	—
CC/390/2023	State rep. by SI of Police, Brahmanakotkur PS vs E. Govindu Naik	11 Oct 2023	Copy of Judgement	—
CC/1255/2021	State rep.by SHO of Brahmanakotkur PS vs Boya Madhusudhan	11 Oct 2023	Copy of Judgement	—
CC/755/2022	S.I. of police, Brahmanakotkur PS vs Boya Chinna Thikka Swamy	10 Oct 2023	Copy of Judgement	—
CC/768/2022	S.I. of police, Brahmanakotkur PS vs Vadde Rajendra Babu	10 Oct 2023	Copy of Judgement	—
CC/702/2022	SEB Sub-Inspector, Nandikotkur vs K. Karnamma	06 Oct 2023	Copy of Judgement	—
CC/474/2023	State rep. by SI of Police, SEB, Nandikotkur vs N.S. Venkamma	05 Oct 2023	Copy of Judgement	—
CC/475/2023	State rep. by SI of Police, SEB, Nandikotkur vs Yerukali Sivamma	05 Oct 2023	Copy of Judgement	—
OS/40/2021	O.Madhu vs G.Prasad Rao	04 Oct 2023	Copy of Order	—
OS/166/2019	Arveti Janardhan vs M.Bala Krishna Murthy	04 Oct 2023	Copy of Order	—
CC/141/2018	Vemula Purushotham vs Guntamitnala Chakrapani	04 Oct 2023	Copy of Order	—
CC/471/2023	State rep. by S.I. of Police, SEB, Nandikotkur vs Harijana Dasari Yesuratnam	04 Oct 2023	Copy of Judgement	—
CC/472/2023	State rep by S.I of Police, SEB, Nandikotkur vs Boya Nagendramma	04 Oct 2023	Copy of Judgement	—
OS/101/2023	Mandlem Krishna Reddy vs SA Hameed	03 Oct 2023	Copy of Judgement	—
OS/179/2017	S.Doulath Basha vs Ramulamma @ Lalithamba	03 Oct 2023	Copy of Order	—
CC/468/2023	State rep by S.I of Police, SEB, Nandikotkur vs Kattela Bhaskar	03 Oct 2023	Copy of Judgement	—
CC/470/2023	State rep by S.I of Police, SEB, Nandikotkur vs Madireddy Naga Seshamma	03 Oct 2023	Copy of Judgement	—
OS/173/2015	Shaik Mahaboob Basha vs Shaik Hameed Basha	29 Sep 2023	Copy of Order	—
OS/50/2018	Jaanapati Narayana vs Golla Venkateswarlu	26 Sep 2023	Copy of Order	—
CC/14/2022	Katam Venkateswarlu vs Jagatap Jashuva	26 Sep 2023	Copy of Order	—
PRC/15/2023	State represented by Inspector of Police, Nandikotkur UPS vs Golla Rangaswamy	26 Sep 2023	Copy of Order	—
CC/146/2023	State rep. by S.I. of Police, Brahmanakotkur PS vs Katepogu Arun Kumar	25 Sep 2023	Copy of Judgement	—
CC/467/2023	State rep by S.I of Police, SEB, Nandikotkur vs Pinjari Hussain Saheb	23 Sep 2023	Copy of Order	—
OS/176/2018	N.Padmanabha Reddy vs Dudekula Madar Saheb	22 Sep 2023	Copy of Order	—
OS/219/2018	Pinjari Fathima Bee vs B.Raghunath	22 Sep 2023	Copy of Order	—
CC/147/2017	Sub Inspector of Police, Muchumarri PS vs Panduga Jayarami Reddy	21 Sep 2023	Copy of Judgement	—
CC/454/2023	State rep. by SI of Police, SEB, Nandikotkur vs Boya Thirupalamma	21 Sep 2023	Copy of Judgement	—
CC/455/2023	State rep. by SI of Police, SEB, Nandikotkur vs Katepogu Yellaiah	21 Sep 2023	Copy of Judgement	—
CC/449/2023	State rep. by SI of Police, SEB, Nandikotkur vs Y. Samba Sivudu	20 Sep 2023	Copy of Judgement	—
CC/453/2023	State rep. by SI of Police, SEB, Nandikotkur vs Shikari Gola	20 Sep 2023	Copy of Judgement	—
OS/26/2023	K. Kumara Goud vs Boya Madhu	15 Sep 2023	Copy of Judgement	—
OS/72/2023	andhra Pragathi Grameena Bank vs Budagajangam Mothi Sekhar	15 Sep 2023	Copy of Order	—
EP/24/2018	Sapuru Ravi Kumar vs T.Thirupathaiah	14 Sep 2023	Copy of Order	—
OS/310/2022	P. Siva Prasad vs D. Chennaiah	13 Sep 2023	Copy of Judgement	—
PRC/11/2023	State rep. by S.I. of Police, Nandikotkur PS vs Patan Khaja	13 Sep 2023	Copy of Order	—
EP/11/2021	P.Heeroji Rao vs M.D.Shabbir	12 Sep 2023	Copy of Order	—
CC/223/2017	Sub Inspector of Police, Midthur PS vs Bonasi Suresh	12 Sep 2023	Copy of Judgement	—
CC/5/2018	Sub Inspector of Police, Brahmanakotkur vs Are Balaswamy	11 Sep 2023	Copy of Judgement	—
CC/636/2023	State represented by SI of Police Muchumarri PS vs Srigiri Mangamma	11 Sep 2023	Copy of Other	—
CC/637/2023	State represented by Si of Police Jupadubunglow PS vs Nathi Imamgaari Subhan basha	11 Sep 2023	Copy of Other	—
EP/5/2021	M.Vijaya Bhaskar vs Sangem Satya Narayana	09 Sep 2023	Copy of Other	—
EP/42/2017	S.Madhusudhan Reddy vs Mooravakonda Telugu Bitchanna	09 Sep 2023	Copy of Other	—
EP/50/2023	D Veerabhadraiah vs Reddypogu Raji Lilli Florence	09 Sep 2023	Copy of Other	—
OS/7/2022	Kodi Venkata Sivaiah vs Kodi Chinna Ramachandrudu	09 Sep 2023	Copy of Order	—
OS/47/2021	Golla Roshanna vs Palle Satyanarayana Reddy	09 Sep 2023	Copy of Order	—
OS/188/2023	Chakali Nagabhushanam vs Chakali Venkateswarlu	09 Sep 2023	Copy of Order	—
CC/1/2022	State rep.by SHO of Midthur PS vs Addakula Sunkanna	09 Sep 2023	Copy of Judgement	—
CC/3/2023	State rep. by SI of Police, Nandikotkur vs G.M. Mujibur Rahiman	09 Sep 2023	Copy of Judgement	—
CC/39/2023	State rep. by SHO of Midthur PS vs Manukindi Anil Naidu @ Anand	09 Sep 2023	Copy of Other	—
CC/43/2023	State rep. by SHO of Nandikotkur PS vs Alvakonda Chinna Subbarayudu	09 Sep 2023	Copy of Other	—
CC/51/2023	Reddigari Mahalakshmi vs P. Madhusudana Chakravarthy	09 Sep 2023	Copy of Other	—
CC/81/2022	State rep. by SHO of Nandikotkur PS vs Vadla Nagaraja achari	09 Sep 2023	Copy of Other	—
CC/89/2022	State rep.by SHO of Nandikotkur PS vs Gandikota venkateswarlu alias Venkatesh	09 Sep 2023	Copy of Other	—
CC/96/2020	Sub Inspector of Police, Midthur PS vs Jummplagari Mahesh	09 Sep 2023	Copy of Judgement	—
CC/132/2023	State rep. by S.I. of Police, Muchumarri PS vs Mandla Chandra Mohan Naidu	09 Sep 2023	Copy of Judgement	—
CC/150/2023	State rep. by S.I. of Police, Midthur PS vs Shaik Althaf	09 Sep 2023	Copy of Other	—
CC/186/2021	Sub Inspector of Police, Brahmanakotkur PS vs Kedam Ayyaswamy	09 Sep 2023	Copy of Judgement	—
CC/187/2023	State rep. by S.I. of Police, Nandikotkur PS vs Shikari Ravi	09 Sep 2023	Copy of Judgement	—
CC/190/2023	State rep. by S.I. of Police, Brahmanakotkur PS vs Valluru Madan @ Madhu	09 Sep 2023	Copy of Other	—
CC/241/2023	State rep. by S.I. of Police, Jupadubungalow PS vs Rathnavath Vali Naik @ Vali	09 Sep 2023	Copy of Other	—
CC/245/2021	Sub Inspector of Police, Jupadubunglow PS vs Syed Sulthan	09 Sep 2023	Copy of Other	—
CC/257/2023	State rep. by S.I. of Police, Nandikotkur P.S. vs Shaik Althaf	09 Sep 2023	Copy of Other	—
CC/281/2022	State rep. by SHO of Jupadubungalow PS vs Vsavula Hari Prasad alias Golla Hari Prasad	09 Sep 2023	Copy of Other	—
CC/306/2023	State rep. by S.I. of Police, Midthur PS vs Dandagala Maddilety	09 Sep 2023	Copy of Other	—
CC/334/2023	Sub Inspector of Police, Nandikotkur UPS vs Mandla Bala Krishna	09 Sep 2023	Copy of Judgement	—
CC/361/2016	M.M.K.V. Chalapathi Rao vs Katepogu Chinna Sunkanna	09 Sep 2023	Copy of Other	—
CC/376/2023	State rep. by SI of Police, Nandikotkur PS vs Shaik Vazeer	09 Sep 2023	Copy of Other	—
CC/379/2023	State rep. by SI of police, Nandikotkur PS vs Patan Salam Khan	09 Sep 2023	Copy of Judgement	—
CC/380/2023	State rep. by SI of Police, Nandikotkur PS vs Vadde Anjaneyulu	09 Sep 2023	Copy of Other	—
CC/395/2023	State rep. by SI of Police, Muchumarri PS vs Oggu Parusharamudu	09 Sep 2023	Copy of Other	—
CC/396/2023	State rep. by SI of Police, Muchumarri PS vs Oggu Mallaiah	09 Sep 2023	Copy of Other	—
CC/401/2022	S.I. of Police, Jupadubungalow PS vs Kadivinchi Siva alias Kadamanchi Venkata Sivudu	09 Sep 2023	Copy of Other	—
CC/402/2023	State rep. by S.I. of Police, Nandikotkur PS vs Shaik Kaleem Basha	09 Sep 2023	Copy of Judgement	—
CC/403/2023	State rep. by SI of Police, Nandikotkur PS vs Shaik Kaleem Basha	09 Sep 2023	Copy of Judgement	—
CC/405/2023	State rep.by SI of Police, Jupadubunglow PS vs Gundepogu Rajesh @ Raju	09 Sep 2023	Copy of Other	—
CC/407/2023	State rep.by SI of Police, Midthur PS vs Kuruva Venkata Ramudu	09 Sep 2023	Copy of Other	—
CC/427/2019	Sub Inspector of Police, Muchumarri PS vs Yerram Aravinda Reddy	09 Sep 2023	Copy of Other	—
CC/463/2021	Sub Inspector of Police, Midthur PS vs C.Bala Krishna	09 Sep 2023	Copy of Other	—
CC/483/2023	State represented by SI of Police, Nandikotkur PS vs Cheruku Krishna	09 Sep 2023	Copy of Other	—

Showing 100 of 557 orders — Log in to browse all pages.

Monthly Orders (Last 12 Months)

Nov 2023		6
Oct 2023		32
Sep 2023		144
Aug 2023		90
Jul 2023		81
Jun 2023		31
May 2023		178

Frequently Asked Questions

How many cases has Sri M.Pavan Kumar handled?

Sri M.Pavan Kumar has handled 562 court orders since 2023 at Senior Civil Judge`s Court, Atmakur (Taluka). The average disposal rate is 169 orders per month.

What types of cases does Sri M.Pavan Kumar hear?

Based on available records, Sri M.Pavan Kumar primarily handles Criminal matters (Criminal Cases, Summary Trial Cases) and Civil matters (Original Suits, Execution Petitions) at Senior Civil Judge`s Court, Atmakur (Taluka).

Where is Sri M.Pavan Kumar currently posted?

Sri M.Pavan Kumar is posted as junior civil judge at Senior Civil Judge`s Court, Atmakur (Taluka), Kurnool, Andhra Pradesh.

Are judgments by Sri M.Pavan Kumar available online?

Yes. 7 judgments by Sri M.Pavan Kumar are available on Legistro with full text, outcome, and sections cited.

How fast does Sri M.Pavan Kumar dispose cases?

Sri M.Pavan Kumar disposes approximately 169 cases per month, based on 562 orders handled over their tenure at Senior Civil Judge`s Court, Atmakur (Taluka).

Since when is Sri M.Pavan Kumar serving?

Sri M.Pavan Kumar has been serving at Senior Civil Judge`s Court, Atmakur (Taluka) since 2023.

Case Types

CC 72%

OS 16%

EP 5%

STC 4%

PRC 2%

MC 1%

ELECOP 0%

DVC 0%

Posting History

Jul 2023 — Aug 2023

junior civil judge · 1 orders
May 2023 — May 2023

junior civil judge · 69 orders
May 2023 — Nov 2023

Junior Civil Judge · 492 orders

Outcomes on Record

Acquitted 4

Convicted 1

Other Judges at this Court

Smt A.Sobha Rani

Senior Civil Judge

0 orders

P Rahul Ambedkar

junior civil judge

139 orders

← View all judges at Senior Civil Judge`s Court, Atmakur (Taluka)

Sri M.Pavan Kumar

PRESENT:­ Sri M.PAVAN KUMAR,

Wednesday, this the 15 th Day of November, 2023.

C.C.No.322 of 2022

AND

J U D G M E N T

Whether the prosecution has succeeded in

establishing the guilt of the accused for the

offence U/Sec.7 (a) r/w 8(e) of A.P.

Prohibition Act beyond reasonable doubt or

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSESS EXAMINED ON BEHALF OF :

PROSECUTION : DEFENCE:

EXHIBITS MARKED ON BEHALF OF:

MATERIAL OBJECTS MARKED

CALENDAR AND JUDGMENT

PRESENT:­ Sri M.PAVAN KUMAR,

Wednesday, this the 15 th Day of November, 2023.

C.C.No.322 of 2022

AND

J U D G M E N T

Whether the prosecution has succeeded in

establishing the guilt of the accused for the

offence U/Sec.7 (a) r/w 8(e) of A.P.

Prohibition Act beyond reasonable doubt or

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSESS EXAMINED ON BEHALF OF :

PROSECUTION : DEFENCE:

EXHIBITS MARKED ON BEHALF OF:

MATERIAL OBJECTS MARKED

CALENDAR AND JUDGMENT

PRESENT:­ Sri M.PAVAN KUMAR,

Wednesday, this the 15 th Day of November, 2023

C.C.No.967 of 2022

AND

***

J U D G M E N T

Whether the prosecution has succeeded in

establishing the guilt of the accused for the

offence U/Sec.34(a) of A.P. Excise Act

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSESS EXAMINED ON BEHALF OF :

PROSECUTION : DEFENCE:

EXHIBITS MARKED ON BEHALF OF:

MATERIAL OBJECTS MARKED

CALENDAR AND JUDGMENT

PRESENT:­ Sri M.PAVAN KUMAR,

Wednesday, this the 15 th Day of November, 2023

C.C.No.958 of 2022

AND

***

J U D G M E N T

Whether the prosecution has succeeded in

establishing the guilt of the accused for the

offence U/Sec.34(a) of A.P. Excise Act

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSESS EXAMINED ON BEHALF OF :

PROSECUTION : DEFENCE:

EXHIBITS MARKED ON BEHALF OF:

MATERIAL OBJECTS MARKED

CALENDAR AND JUDGMENT

Present: Sri M. Pavan Kumar,

C.C.No.13/2022

JUDGMENT

JUDL. MAGISTRATE OF I CLASS,

NANDIKOTKUR.

ATMAKUR

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

JMFC, NDK.

PRESENT: Sri M.PAVAN KUMAR,

PRESENT: Sri M.PAVAN KUMAR,

PRESENT: Sri M.PAVAN KUMAR,

*******

PRESENT: Sri M.PAVAN KUMAR,

*******