M.S.Karimulla,B.Sc.,LL.M

Principal Junior Civil Judge

Prl JCJ Court Dhone · Kurnool · Andhra Pradesh

M.S.Karimulla,B.Sc.,LL.M, Principal Junior Civil Judge, is posted at Prl JCJ Court Dhone, Kurnool, Andhra Pradesh, India. 2,541 court orders on record since 2014. 4 judgments with full text available. Primarily handles CC, PRC, MC cases.

2,541

Total Orders

Judgments

Orders/Month

Postings

Featured Judgments

CC/151/2015 Acquitted

Sub Inspector of Police vs S.Noor Ahmed

26 Apr 2017

JMFC, DHONE. C.C.No.151 of 2015.

In the Court of the Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Dhone.

Present: Sri M.S.Karimulla,

Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Dhone.

Wednesday, the 26th day of April, 2017.

C.C.No.151 of 2015

State: Represented by SubInspector of Police, Dhone Town P.S.… Complainant.

Versus

S.Noor Ahammad, age 34 years, S/o Mahammad, Rider of Motor Cycle Bearing No.AP 21 BC 0473, Kothapeta, Dhone Town. … Accused.

This case coming on 25042017 before me for hearing in the presence of Assistant Public Prosecutor for the Complainant/State and of Sri M.Nagabhushana Reddy and Sri A.Sreedhar, Advocates

for the accused, and having stood over for consideration till this

day, this court delivered the following:

JUDGMENT

1. The SubInspector of Police, Dhone Town Police Station filed charge sheet against the accused in Cr.No.53 of 2015 for the offences punishable under Sections 337, 304A IPC.

2.The brief facts of the case are as follows:

The accused is resident of Dhone Town. The offence took place at the outskirts of Dhone Town which is within the jurisdiction of this court.

3.The defacto complainant/PW.1B.Naidu is eye witness in this case.

PW.2B.Keshanna who is father of the deceased, PW.4

B.Ranganna and PW.5B.Diwakar Naidu are hearsay witnesses.

JMFC, DHONE. C.C.No.151 of 2015.

PW.6B.Sunkanna is injured person in this case and also eye witness.

PW.3T.Ramachandrudu, LW.7B.Rangadu and LW.8

G.Pedda Raju are inquest panchayathdars.

LW.9Dr.M.Bala Chandra Reddy is Medical Officer.

LW.10C.V.Ramana is Motor Vehicle Inspector.

LW.11S.Ghousul Vara, Assistant SubInspector of Police and

LW.12V.Subramanyam Reddy, SubInspector of Police are

Investigation Officers.

4. On 1622015 at about 9.30 p.m., while the defacto complainant/PW.1B.NaiduwascomingfromBugga

Ramalingeswara Swamy Temple at Dhone to his house and when he reached Chakirevumetta situated at the outskirts of Dhone

Town and he noticed the deceased Lakshmi Naidu and the injured

PW.6B.Sunkanna were proceeding ahead of him on a motor bike.

At that time the accused came in a rash and negligent manner on his motor bike bearing No.AP 21 BC 0473 and dashed the motor bike of the deceased. As a result, the deceased and PW.6 were hit a cement road divider. The PW.1 noticed that the deceased and PW.6 were sustained severe bleeding injuries on their respective heads.

Immediately, the PW.1 shifted the deceased and PW.6 to

Government Hospital, Dhone wherein doctors declared the deceased as died and the PW.6 was shifted to Government General

Hospital, Kurnool for better treatment. On the next day the PW.1 came to police station and gave a report.

5.Basing on the report of PW.1, LW.11S.Ghousul Vara,

Assistant SubInspector of Police registered a case in

Cr.No.533/2015 under Secs.337, 304A IPC and he got conducted inquest panchanama over the dead body of the deceased Lakshmi

Naidu in the presence of PW.3T.Ramachandrudu, LW.7 3

JMFC, DHONE. C.C.No.151 of 2015.

B.Rangadu and LW.8G.Pedda Raju, he also examined and recorded the statements of PW.1, PW.2, PW.4 to PW.6 and he also visited scene of offence and prepared rough sketch.

LW.9Dr.M.Bala Chandra Reddy, Medical Officer who conducted autopsy over the dead body of deceased, issued post mortem examination certificate stating the deceased died due to

Hemorrhage shock and polytrauma.

LW.9Dr.M.Bala Chandra Reddy, Medical Officer also treated the PW.6 issued wound certificate stating the injuries sustained by the PW.6 are simple in nature.

LW.10C.V.Ramana, Assistant Motor Vehicle Inspector who inspected the crime vehicle issued report stating the accident was not occurred due to any mechanical defects of the crime vehicle.

LW.12V.Subramanyam Reddy, SubInspector of Police verified the investigation of LW.11S.Ghousul Vara, Assistant Sub

Inspector of Police and arrested the accused on 2722015 and released him on bail as the offences are bailable in nature and after completion of investigation he laid charge sheet. Thus, the accused committed offences punishable under Secs.337, 304A IPC. Hence the charge.

6. This court took the cognizance of the offences committed under

Secs.337, 304A IPC.

7.On appearance of the accused copies of documents were furnished to him as required under section 207 Cr.P.C.

8.When the accused was asked about the means, he stated that he had means to engage his defence counsel. Later the accused was examined under section 251 of Criminal Procedure Code and the 4

JMFC, DHONE. C.C.No.151 of 2015.

substance of accusation under Secs.337, 304A IPC were read over to him for which he pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried.

9.To prove its case, the prosecution examined P.W.1 to P.W.6 and got marked Ex.P1 to Ex.P7.

10.Heard both sides.

11.Now the point for determination is:

Whether the prosecution has proved the guilt of the

accused for the offences punishable under Secs.337,

304A IPC beyond all reasonable doubt?

12. During the course of trial, the defacto complainant/PW.1

B.Naidu who is eye witness in this case, PW.2B.Keshanna who is father of the deceased, PW.4B.Ranganna and PW.5B.Diwakar

Naidu who are hearsay witnesses and PW.6B.Sunkanna who is injured person and also eye witness did not depose anything against the accused except the accident and the PW.1 and PW.6 deposed that they cannot identify the driver of the crime vehicle as he fled away immediately after the accident and the PW.2, PW.4 and PW.5 deposed that they did not know who is the driver of the crime vehicle. The PW.1 even denied giving report to the police except admitting his signature on the report which is marked as

Ex.P1. The PW.1, PW.2, PW.4 to PW.6 also denied their under

Sec.161 Cr.P.C. Statements which are marked as Ex.P.2, Ex.P.3,

Ex.P5, Ex.P6 and Ex.P7 respectively.

13.PW.3T.Ramachandrudu who is one of the inquest panchayathdars over the dead body of the deceased Lakshmi Naidu deposed conducting inquest panchanama on 1722015 and Ex.P.4 inquest panchanama of deceased is marked.

14.The learned APP cross examined PW.1, PW.2, PW.4 to PW.6 with the permission of Court as they did not identify the accused and did not depose anything against the accused, but nothing 5

JMFC, DHONE. C.C.No.151 of 2015.

suitable to the case of prosecution is elicited. The learned APP has given up the evidence of LW.7 to LW.12 opining that no purpose would be served even by examining them in this case as the all material witnesses did not support the case of the prosecution.

15.The scope of evidence of punch witnesses on inquest panchanamas is very limited as to only cause of death. It does not concern with regard to who committed the offence and also in what manner. Hence, the evidence of punch witness in inquest panchanamas is not useful to the case of prosecution to connect the accused in this case.

16.As there is no incriminating evidence against the accused the examination under Sec.313 Cr.P.C is dispensed with.

17.Absolutely there is nothing on record to connect the accused with the offence in this case. The prosecution miserably failed to prove its case against the accused. Hence, the accused is entitled for acquittal.

18.In the result, the accused is found not guilty for the offences under Secs.337, 304A IPC and he is acquitted under section 255(1) Cr.P.C.

The bail bonds of the accused and his sureties shall be in force for six months under section 437A Cr.P.C.

As there is no property, no property order is passed.

Typed directly to my dictation by the Personal Assistant, corrected and pronounced by me in open court, this the 26th day of

April, 2017.

Judicial Magistrate of First Class,

Dhone.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

JMFC, DHONE. C.C.No.151 of 2015.

WITNESSES EXAMINED

FOR PROSECUTION FOR DEFENCE

P.W.1: B.Naidu.None

P.W.2: B.Keshanna.

P.W.3: T.Ramachandrudu.

P.W.4: B.Ranganna.

P.W.5: B.Diwakar Naidu.

P.W.6: B.Sunkanna.

EXHIBITS MARKED

FOR PROSECUTION FOR DEFENCE

Ex.P.1: Signature of PW.1 on the Report.NIL

Ex.P.2: 161 Cr.P.C. Statement of P.W.1.

Ex.P.3: 161 Cr.P.C. Statement of P.W.2.

Ex.P.4: Inquest Panchanama of the deceased Lakshmi Naidu.

Ex.P.5: 161 Cr.P.C. Statement of P.W.4.

Ex.P.6: 161 Cr.P.C. Statement of P.W.5.

Ex.P.7: 161 Cr.P.C. Statement of P.W.6.

MATERIAL OBJECTS MARKED

NIL

J.M.F.C., Dhone.

JMFC, DHONE. C.C.No.151 of 2015.

CALENDAR AND JUDGMENT

In the Court of the Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Dhone.

C.C.No.151 of 2015

Date of Offence16022015 Date of Complaint17022015 Date of 27022015 apprehension of accused Date of release on 27022015 bail of accused Date of 18042017 commencement of trial Date of close of trial26042017 Date of Judgment26042017 ComplainantSubInspector of Police, Dhone Town P.S. Name of the S.Noor Ahammad, age 34 years, S/o AccusedMahammad, Rider of Motor Cycle Bearing No.AP 21 BC 0473, Kothapeta, Dhone Town. OffenceUnder Sections 337, 304A IPC. FindingsFound not guilty. SentenceThe accused is found not guilty for the offences under Secs.337, 304A IPC and he is acquitted under section 255(1) Cr.P.C.

The bail bonds of the accused and his sureties shall be in force for six months under section 437A Cr.P.C.

As there is no property, no property order is passed.

Judl.Magistrate of First Class, Dhone.

Copy submitted to: The Hon’ble Chief Judl.Magistrate–cum Prl.Asst.Sessions Judge, Kurnool. Dis.No.

CC/151/2015 Acquitted

Sub Inspector of Police vs S.Noor Ahmed

26 Apr 2017

JMFC, DHONE. C.C.No.151 of 2015.

In the Court of the Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Dhone.

Present: Sri M.S.Karimulla,

Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Dhone.

Wednesday, the 26th day of April, 2017.

C.C.No.151 of 2015

State: Represented by SubInspector of Police, Dhone Town P.S.… Complainant.

Versus

S.Noor Ahammad, age 34 years, S/o Mahammad, Rider of Motor Cycle Bearing No.AP 21 BC 0473, Kothapeta, Dhone Town. … Accused.

This case coming on 25042017 before me for hearing in the presence of Assistant Public Prosecutor for the Complainant/State and of Sri M.Nagabhushana Reddy and Sri A.Sreedhar, Advocates

for the accused, and having stood over for consideration till this

day, this court delivered the following:

JUDGMENT

1. The SubInspector of Police, Dhone Town Police Station filed charge sheet against the accused in Cr.No.53 of 2015 for the offences punishable under Sections 337, 304A IPC.

2.The brief facts of the case are as follows:

The accused is resident of Dhone Town. The offence took place at the outskirts of Dhone Town which is within the jurisdiction of this court.

3.The defacto complainant/PW.1B.Naidu is eye witness in this case.

PW.2B.Keshanna who is father of the deceased, PW.4

B.Ranganna and PW.5B.Diwakar Naidu are hearsay witnesses.

JMFC, DHONE. C.C.No.151 of 2015.

PW.6B.Sunkanna is injured person in this case and also eye witness.

PW.3T.Ramachandrudu, LW.7B.Rangadu and LW.8

G.Pedda Raju are inquest panchayathdars.

LW.9Dr.M.Bala Chandra Reddy is Medical Officer.

LW.10C.V.Ramana is Motor Vehicle Inspector.

LW.11S.Ghousul Vara, Assistant SubInspector of Police and

LW.12V.Subramanyam Reddy, SubInspector of Police are

Investigation Officers.

4. On 1622015 at about 9.30 p.m., while the defacto complainant/PW.1B.NaiduwascomingfromBugga

Ramalingeswara Swamy Temple at Dhone to his house and when he reached Chakirevumetta situated at the outskirts of Dhone

Town and he noticed the deceased Lakshmi Naidu and the injured

PW.6B.Sunkanna were proceeding ahead of him on a motor bike.

Immediately, the PW.1 shifted the deceased and PW.6 to

Government Hospital, Dhone wherein doctors declared the deceased as died and the PW.6 was shifted to Government General

Hospital, Kurnool for better treatment. On the next day the PW.1 came to police station and gave a report.

5.Basing on the report of PW.1, LW.11S.Ghousul Vara,

Assistant SubInspector of Police registered a case in

Cr.No.533/2015 under Secs.337, 304A IPC and he got conducted inquest panchanama over the dead body of the deceased Lakshmi

Naidu in the presence of PW.3T.Ramachandrudu, LW.7 3

JMFC, DHONE. C.C.No.151 of 2015.

B.Rangadu and LW.8G.Pedda Raju, he also examined and recorded the statements of PW.1, PW.2, PW.4 to PW.6 and he also visited scene of offence and prepared rough sketch.

LW.9Dr.M.Bala Chandra Reddy, Medical Officer who conducted autopsy over the dead body of deceased, issued post mortem examination certificate stating the deceased died due to

Hemorrhage shock and polytrauma.

LW.9Dr.M.Bala Chandra Reddy, Medical Officer also treated the PW.6 issued wound certificate stating the injuries sustained by the PW.6 are simple in nature.

LW.10C.V.Ramana, Assistant Motor Vehicle Inspector who inspected the crime vehicle issued report stating the accident was not occurred due to any mechanical defects of the crime vehicle.

LW.12V.Subramanyam Reddy, SubInspector of Police verified the investigation of LW.11S.Ghousul Vara, Assistant Sub

6. This court took the cognizance of the offences committed under

Secs.337, 304A IPC.

7.On appearance of the accused copies of documents were furnished to him as required under section 207 Cr.P.C.

8.When the accused was asked about the means, he stated that he had means to engage his defence counsel. Later the accused was examined under section 251 of Criminal Procedure Code and the 4

JMFC, DHONE. C.C.No.151 of 2015.

substance of accusation under Secs.337, 304A IPC were read over to him for which he pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried.

9.To prove its case, the prosecution examined P.W.1 to P.W.6 and got marked Ex.P1 to Ex.P7.

10.Heard both sides.

11.Now the point for determination is:

Whether the prosecution has proved the guilt of the

accused for the offences punishable under Secs.337,

304A IPC beyond all reasonable doubt?

12. During the course of trial, the defacto complainant/PW.1

B.Naidu who is eye witness in this case, PW.2B.Keshanna who is father of the deceased, PW.4B.Ranganna and PW.5B.Diwakar

Ex.P1. The PW.1, PW.2, PW.4 to PW.6 also denied their under

Sec.161 Cr.P.C. Statements which are marked as Ex.P.2, Ex.P.3,

Ex.P5, Ex.P6 and Ex.P7 respectively.

14.The learned APP cross examined PW.1, PW.2, PW.4 to PW.6 with the permission of Court as they did not identify the accused and did not depose anything against the accused, but nothing 5

JMFC, DHONE. C.C.No.151 of 2015.

16.As there is no incriminating evidence against the accused the examination under Sec.313 Cr.P.C is dispensed with.

18.In the result, the accused is found not guilty for the offences under Secs.337, 304A IPC and he is acquitted under section 255(1) Cr.P.C.

The bail bonds of the accused and his sureties shall be in force for six months under section 437A Cr.P.C.

As there is no property, no property order is passed.

Typed directly to my dictation by the Personal Assistant, corrected and pronounced by me in open court, this the 26th day of

April, 2017.

Judicial Magistrate of First Class,

Dhone.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

JMFC, DHONE. C.C.No.151 of 2015.

WITNESSES EXAMINED

FOR PROSECUTION FOR DEFENCE

P.W.1: B.Naidu.None

P.W.2: B.Keshanna.

P.W.3: T.Ramachandrudu.

P.W.4: B.Ranganna.

P.W.5: B.Diwakar Naidu.

P.W.6: B.Sunkanna.

EXHIBITS MARKED

FOR PROSECUTION FOR DEFENCE

Ex.P.1: Signature of PW.1 on the Report.NIL

Ex.P.2: 161 Cr.P.C. Statement of P.W.1.

Ex.P.3: 161 Cr.P.C. Statement of P.W.2.

Ex.P.4: Inquest Panchanama of the deceased Lakshmi Naidu.

Ex.P.5: 161 Cr.P.C. Statement of P.W.4.

Ex.P.6: 161 Cr.P.C. Statement of P.W.5.

Ex.P.7: 161 Cr.P.C. Statement of P.W.6.

MATERIAL OBJECTS MARKED

NIL

J.M.F.C., Dhone.

JMFC, DHONE. C.C.No.151 of 2015.

CALENDAR AND JUDGMENT

In the Court of the Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Dhone.

C.C.No.151 of 2015

The bail bonds of the accused and his sureties shall be in force for six months under section 437A Cr.P.C.

As there is no property, no property order is passed.

Judl.Magistrate of First Class, Dhone.

Copy submitted to: The Hon’ble Chief Judl.Magistrate–cum Prl.Asst.Sessions Judge, Kurnool. Dis.No.

CC/549/2016 Acquitted

Shaik Nabi Saheb vs K.Ramudu

28 Apr 2017

JMFC, DHONE. C.C.No.549 of 2016.

In the Court of the Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Dhone.

Present: Sri M.S.Karimulla,

Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Dhone.

Friday, the 28th day of April, 2017.

C.C.No.549 of 2016.

State: Represented by SubInspector of Police, Dhone Rural P.S. … Complainant.

Versus

K.Ramudu, S/o Nagaraju, age 30 years, Sanjeev Nagar, Nandyal, now at Kocheruvu Village, Dhone Mandal, Driver of Tractor bearing No.AP 21 TY 0827 (Engine), Trolley bearing No.AP 21 TY 0828. … Accused.

This case coming on 2642017 before me for hearing in the presence of Assistant Public Prosecutor for the Complainant/State and of Sri M.Nagabhushana Reddy and Sri A.Sreedhar, Advocates

for the accused, and having stood over for consideration till this

day, this court delivered the following:

JUDGMENT

1. The SubInspector of Police, Dhone Rural Police Station filed charge sheet against the accused in Cr.No.92 of 2016 for the offence punishable under Section 304A IPC.

2.The brief facts of the case are as follows:

The accused is resident of Kocheruvu Village, Dhone Mandal.

The offence took place at tank bund in Kocheruvu Village, Dhone

Mandal which is within the jurisdiction of this court.

3.The defacto complainant/PW.1Shaik Nabi Saheb is father of the deceased person in this case namely Vannur Vali. PW.2Shaik

Mahaboob Bee is wife of PW.1, LW.3Shaik Moulali is another son of PW.1, LW.4Shaik Abdul Rahiman is brother of PW.1 who are 2

JMFC, DHONE. C.C.No.549 of 2016.

hearsay witnesses.

PW.3K.T.Raju is eye witness.

PW.4V.Sudhakar, LW.7P.Kullai and LW.8B.Venkatesh are inquest panchayathdars.

LW.9Dr.T.Chandrakala is Medical Officer.

LW.10B.Subbarayudu is Assistant Motor Vehicle Inspector.

LW.11M.Md.Ismail, Assistant SubInspector of Police and

LW.12K.Ramasubbaiah, SubInspector of Police are Investigation

Officers.

4.On 652016 at about 7.00 a.m., the deceased person namely

Vannur Vali went to their fields. After some time i.e., at 7.30 a.m., the crime vehicle i.e., tractor and trolley bearing No.AP 21 TY 0827 and AP 21 TY 0828 being driven by the accused with rash and negligent manner and hit the deceased, as a result the deceased fell on the ground by sustaining severe bleeding injuries. The PW.3

K.T.Raju witnessed the incident and informed the same to the defacto complainant/PW.1Shaik Nabi Saheb, PW.2Shaik

Mahaboob Bee who are parents of the deceased. Immediately, the

PW.1, PW.2, LW.3Shaik Moulali and LW.4Shaik Abdul Rahiman rushed to the scene of offence and found the deceased with injuries and blood was oozing from his nose. Immediately, the PW.1 and others shifted the deceased to Government Hospital, Dhone wherein the doctors declared the deceased as died. On the same day the PW.1 gave a report to the police.

5.Basing on the report of PW.1, LW.11M.Md.Ismail, Assistant

SubInspector of Police registered a case in Cr.No.92/2016 under

Sec.304A IPC, he also examined and recorded the statements of

PW.1 to PW.3, LW.3Shaik Moulali and LW.4Shaik Abdul

Rahiman, he also visited the scene of offence and prepared rough sketch and he got conducted inquest panchanama over the dead body of the deceased Vannur Vali in the presence of PW.4

V.Sudhakar, LW.7P.Kullai and LW.8B.Venkatesh.

JMFC, DHONE. C.C.No.549 of 2016.

LW.9Dr.T.Chandrakala, Medical Officer who conducted autopsy over the dead body of deceased, issued Post Mortem certificate stating the deceased Vannur Vali died due to Cardio

Respiratory Arrest due to Head Injury.

LW.10B.Subbarayudu, Assistant Motor Vehicle Inspector who inspected the crime vehicle issued report stating the accident was not occurred due to any mechanical defect of crime vehicle.

LW.12K.Ramasubbaiah, SubInspector of Police verifying the investigation of LW.11M.Md.Ismail, Assistant SubInspector of

Police and arrested the accused on 752016 and released him on bail as the offence is bailable in nature and after completion of investigation he laid charge sheet. Thus, the accused committed offence punishable under Sec.304A IPC. Hence the charge.

6. This court took the cognizance of the offence committed under

Sec.304A IPC.

7.On appearance of the accused copies of documents were furnished to him as required under section 207 Cr.P.C.

8.When the accused was asked about the means, he stated that he had means to engage his defence counsel. Later the accused was examined under section 251 of Criminal Procedure Code and the substance of accusation under Sec.304A IPC were read over to him for which he pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried.

9.To prove its case, the prosecution examined P.W.1 to P.W.4 and got marked Ex.P1 to Ex.P5.

10.Heard both sides.

11.Now the point for determination is:

Whether the prosecution has proved the guilt of the

accused for the offence punishable under Sec.304A IPC beyond

all reasonable doubt?

JMFC, DHONE. C.C.No.549 of 2016.

12. During the course of trial, the defacto complainant/ PW.1

Shaik Nabi Saheb who is father of the deceased Vannur Vali, PW.2

Shaik Mahaboob Bee who is wife of PW.1 and PW.3K.T.Raju who is eye witness to the incident did not depose anything against the accused except the accident and did not identify the accused in open Court. The PW.1 denied giving report to the Police except admitting his signature on the report which is marked as Ex.P1.

The PW.1 to PW.3 even denied their U/Sec.161 Cr.P.C. statements which are marked as Ex.P.2, Ex.P3 and Ex.P4 respectively.

13.PW.4V.Sudhakar who is one of the inquest panchayathdars deposed that he knew the deceased Vannur Vali and also LW.7

P.Kullai and LW.8B.Venkatesh in this case, on 652016 himself and LW.7 and LW.8 acted as panchayathdars on the inquest held over the dead body of deceased Vannur Vali at Government

Hospital, Dhone and inquest panchanama was also drafted in their presence under Ex.P5, they attested on the same, they came to a conclusion that the deceased died due to road accident.

14.The learned APP cross examined PW.1 to PW.3 with the permission of Court as they did not identify the accused and did not depose anything against the accused, but nothing suitable to the case of prosecution is elicited. The learned APP has given up the evidence of LW.3, LW.4, LW.7 to LW.12 opining that no purpose would be served even by examining them in this case as the all material witnesses did not support the case of the prosecution.

15.The scope of evidence of punch witnesses on inquest panchanama is very limited as to only cause of death. It does not concern with regard to who committed the offence and also in what manner. Hence, the evidence of punch witnesses in inquest panchanama is not useful to the case of prosecution to connect the accused in this case.

JMFC, DHONE. C.C.No.549 of 2016.

16.As there is no incriminating evidence against the accused the examination under Sec.313 Cr.P.C is dispensed with.

18.In the result, the accused is found not guilty for the offence under Sec.304A IPC and he is acquitted under section 255(1)

Cr.P.C.

The bail bonds of the accused and his sureties shall be in force for six months under section 437A Cr.P.C.

As there is no property, no property order is passed.

Typed directly to my dictation by the Personal Assistant, corrected and pronounced by me in open court, this the 28th day of

April, 2017.

Judicial Magistrate of First Class,

Dhone.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

FOR PROSECUTION FOR DEFENCE

P.W.1: Shaik Nabi Saheb.None

P.W.2: Shaik Mahaboob Bee.

P.W.3: K.T.Raju.

P.W.4: V.Sudhakar.

JMFC, DHONE. C.C.No.549 of 2016.

EXHIBITS MARKED

FOR PROSECUTION FOR DEFENCE

Ex.P.1: Signature of PW.1 on the Report.NIL

Ex.P.2: 161 Cr.P.C. Statement of P.W.1.

Ex.P.3: 161 Cr.P.C. Statement of P.W.2.

Ex.P.4: 161 Cr.P.C. Statement of P.W.3.

Ex.P.5: Inquest Panchanama of the deceased Vannur Vali.

MATERIAL OBJECTS MARKED

NIL

J.M.F.C., Dhone.

JMFC, DHONE. C.C.No.549 of 2016.

CALENDAR AND JUDGMENT

In the Court of the Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Dhone.

C.C.No.549 of 2016

Date of Offence06052016 Date of 06052016 Complaint Date of 07052016 apprehension of accused Date of release on07052016 bail of accused Date of 26042017 commencement of trial Date of close of 26042017 trial Date of Judgment28042017 ComplainantSubInspector of Police, Dhone Rural P.S. Name of the K.Ramudu, S/o Nagaraju, age 30 years, Sanjeev AccusedNagar, Nandyal, now at Kocheruvu Village, Dhone Mandal, Driver of Tractor bearing No.AP 21 TY 0827 (Engine), Trolley bearing No.AP 21 TY 0828. OffenceUnder Section 304A IPC. FindingsFound not guilty. SentenceThe accused is found not guilty for the offence under Sec.304A IPC and he is acquitted under section 255(1) Cr.P.C.

The bail bonds of the accused and his sureties shall be in force for six months under section 437A Cr.P.C.

As there is no property, no property order is passed.

Judl.Magistrate of First Class, Dhone.

Copy submitted to: The Hon’ble Chief Judl.Magistrate–cum Prl.Asst.Sessions Judge, Kurnool. Dis.No.

JMFC, DHONE. C.C.No.549 of 2016.

CC/549/2016 Acquitted

Shaik Nabi Saheb vs K.Ramudu

28 Apr 2017

JMFC, DHONE. C.C.No.549 of 2016.

In the Court of the Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Dhone.

Present: Sri M.S.Karimulla,

Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Dhone.

Friday, the 28th day of April, 2017.

C.C.No.549 of 2016.

State: Represented by SubInspector of Police, Dhone Rural P.S. … Complainant.

Versus

This case coming on 2642017 before me for hearing in the presence of Assistant Public Prosecutor for the Complainant/State and of Sri M.Nagabhushana Reddy and Sri A.Sreedhar, Advocates

for the accused, and having stood over for consideration till this

day, this court delivered the following:

JUDGMENT

1. The SubInspector of Police, Dhone Rural Police Station filed charge sheet against the accused in Cr.No.92 of 2016 for the offence punishable under Section 304A IPC.

2.The brief facts of the case are as follows:

The accused is resident of Kocheruvu Village, Dhone Mandal.

The offence took place at tank bund in Kocheruvu Village, Dhone

Mandal which is within the jurisdiction of this court.

3.The defacto complainant/PW.1Shaik Nabi Saheb is father of the deceased person in this case namely Vannur Vali. PW.2Shaik

Mahaboob Bee is wife of PW.1, LW.3Shaik Moulali is another son of PW.1, LW.4Shaik Abdul Rahiman is brother of PW.1 who are 2

JMFC, DHONE. C.C.No.549 of 2016.

hearsay witnesses.

PW.3K.T.Raju is eye witness.

PW.4V.Sudhakar, LW.7P.Kullai and LW.8B.Venkatesh are inquest panchayathdars.

LW.9Dr.T.Chandrakala is Medical Officer.

LW.10B.Subbarayudu is Assistant Motor Vehicle Inspector.

LW.11M.Md.Ismail, Assistant SubInspector of Police and

LW.12K.Ramasubbaiah, SubInspector of Police are Investigation

Officers.

4.On 652016 at about 7.00 a.m., the deceased person namely

K.T.Raju witnessed the incident and informed the same to the defacto complainant/PW.1Shaik Nabi Saheb, PW.2Shaik

Mahaboob Bee who are parents of the deceased. Immediately, the

5.Basing on the report of PW.1, LW.11M.Md.Ismail, Assistant

SubInspector of Police registered a case in Cr.No.92/2016 under

Sec.304A IPC, he also examined and recorded the statements of

PW.1 to PW.3, LW.3Shaik Moulali and LW.4Shaik Abdul

Rahiman, he also visited the scene of offence and prepared rough sketch and he got conducted inquest panchanama over the dead body of the deceased Vannur Vali in the presence of PW.4

V.Sudhakar, LW.7P.Kullai and LW.8B.Venkatesh.

JMFC, DHONE. C.C.No.549 of 2016.

LW.9Dr.T.Chandrakala, Medical Officer who conducted autopsy over the dead body of deceased, issued Post Mortem certificate stating the deceased Vannur Vali died due to Cardio

Respiratory Arrest due to Head Injury.

LW.10B.Subbarayudu, Assistant Motor Vehicle Inspector who inspected the crime vehicle issued report stating the accident was not occurred due to any mechanical defect of crime vehicle.

LW.12K.Ramasubbaiah, SubInspector of Police verifying the investigation of LW.11M.Md.Ismail, Assistant SubInspector of

6. This court took the cognizance of the offence committed under

Sec.304A IPC.

7.On appearance of the accused copies of documents were furnished to him as required under section 207 Cr.P.C.

9.To prove its case, the prosecution examined P.W.1 to P.W.4 and got marked Ex.P1 to Ex.P5.

10.Heard both sides.

11.Now the point for determination is:

Whether the prosecution has proved the guilt of the

accused for the offence punishable under Sec.304A IPC beyond

all reasonable doubt?

JMFC, DHONE. C.C.No.549 of 2016.

12. During the course of trial, the defacto complainant/ PW.1

Shaik Nabi Saheb who is father of the deceased Vannur Vali, PW.2

The PW.1 to PW.3 even denied their U/Sec.161 Cr.P.C. statements which are marked as Ex.P.2, Ex.P3 and Ex.P4 respectively.

13.PW.4V.Sudhakar who is one of the inquest panchayathdars deposed that he knew the deceased Vannur Vali and also LW.7

P.Kullai and LW.8B.Venkatesh in this case, on 652016 himself and LW.7 and LW.8 acted as panchayathdars on the inquest held over the dead body of deceased Vannur Vali at Government

Hospital, Dhone and inquest panchanama was also drafted in their presence under Ex.P5, they attested on the same, they came to a conclusion that the deceased died due to road accident.

JMFC, DHONE. C.C.No.549 of 2016.

16.As there is no incriminating evidence against the accused the examination under Sec.313 Cr.P.C is dispensed with.

18.In the result, the accused is found not guilty for the offence under Sec.304A IPC and he is acquitted under section 255(1)

Cr.P.C.

The bail bonds of the accused and his sureties shall be in force for six months under section 437A Cr.P.C.

As there is no property, no property order is passed.

Typed directly to my dictation by the Personal Assistant, corrected and pronounced by me in open court, this the 28th day of

April, 2017.

Judicial Magistrate of First Class,

Dhone.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

FOR PROSECUTION FOR DEFENCE

P.W.1: Shaik Nabi Saheb.None

P.W.2: Shaik Mahaboob Bee.

P.W.3: K.T.Raju.

P.W.4: V.Sudhakar.

JMFC, DHONE. C.C.No.549 of 2016.

EXHIBITS MARKED

FOR PROSECUTION FOR DEFENCE

Ex.P.1: Signature of PW.1 on the Report.NIL

Ex.P.2: 161 Cr.P.C. Statement of P.W.1.

Ex.P.3: 161 Cr.P.C. Statement of P.W.2.

Ex.P.4: 161 Cr.P.C. Statement of P.W.3.

Ex.P.5: Inquest Panchanama of the deceased Vannur Vali.

MATERIAL OBJECTS MARKED

NIL

J.M.F.C., Dhone.

JMFC, DHONE. C.C.No.549 of 2016.

CALENDAR AND JUDGMENT

In the Court of the Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Dhone.

C.C.No.549 of 2016

The bail bonds of the accused and his sureties shall be in force for six months under section 437A Cr.P.C.

As there is no property, no property order is passed.

Judl.Magistrate of First Class, Dhone.

Copy submitted to: The Hon’ble Chief Judl.Magistrate–cum Prl.Asst.Sessions Judge, Kurnool. Dis.No.

JMFC, DHONE. C.C.No.549 of 2016.

Order Record 1,265 total

Case No.	Parties	Date	Type	Outcome
CC/382/2017	Sub Inspector of Police vs Kummari Venkateshwarlu	29 Apr 2017	copy of others	—
CC/383/2017	SI of Police vs Shaik Vali Basha	29 Apr 2017	copy of others	—
CC/549/2016	Shaik Nabi Saheb vs K.Ramudu	28 Apr 2017	copy of judgement	Acquitted
CC/366/2017	Inspector of Police vs Nadimindal Chiranjeevi	27 Apr 2017	copy of others	—
CC/151/2015	Sub Inspector of Police vs S.Noor Ahmed	26 Apr 2017	copy of judgement	Acquitted
CC/347/2017	Sub Inspector of Police vs RM.Philip Kumar@ Philipsi	25 Apr 2017	copy of judgement	—
CC/569/2015	Ala Rajasekhar reddy vs Kovela Sreenivasulu	25 Apr 2017	copy of judgement	—
CC/1016/2016	Sub Inspector of Police vs T. Venkata Ramaiah	25 Apr 2017	copy of judgement	—
CC/1183/2016	Sub Inspector of Police vs R.Siluvaiah @ Siva	25 Apr 2017	copy of judgement	—
CC/1004/2016	Sub Inspector of Police vs Yendapalli Narasinga Rao	24 Apr 2017	copy of others	—
CC/1095/2016	Sub Inspector of Police vs S.Shehansha	24 Apr 2017	copy of judgement	—
CC/241/2016	m.kommu Lakshmi devi vs D.Hussaini,	21 Apr 2017	copy of judgement	—
CC/879/2016	N.Siva Ramudu vs M.Krishnareddy and 2 others	21 Apr 2017	copy of judgement	—
CC/73/2016	Rangapuram Maheswari vs Vs1. Madiga Rachapogula Madanna and another	20 Apr 2017	copy of judgement	—
CC/343/2017	SHO, Bethamcherla PS vs K.Mahesh	20 Apr 2017	copy of judgement	—
CC/801/2016	R.Sunkamma vs Vs1. R.Meheswari and Sunkanna	20 Apr 2017	copy of judgement	—
CC/245/2013	MALAGANDHAM OBAIAH vs L.MEENAKSHI	18 Apr 2017	copy of judgement	—
CC/123/2016	P.Ramesh Reddy vs P.Paravathi	17 Apr 2017	copy of others	—
CC/363/2016	K.Ram Mohan vs Gajula Ganesh Vishnu Kumar	15 Apr 2017	copy of others	—
CC/377/2016	K.Gurumurthy vs Gaqjula Ganesh Vishnu Kumar	15 Apr 2017	copy of others	—
CC/33/2017	Sub Inspector of Police vs Vadde Dhanunjanaiah	13 Apr 2017	copy of others	—
MC/28/2016	L.Sai Sirisha @ V.Sireesha vs L.Ranga Rao	12 Apr 2017	copy of others	—
PRC/8/2015	k.madiga raju vs T.E.DINESH GOUD	12 Apr 2017	copy of order	—
CC/500/2014	BOYA VALLE GOPAL vs Vs1. BOYA VALLE NAIDU AND 4 OTHERS	11 Apr 2017	copy of judgement	—
CC/501/2014	BOYA VALLE NAIDU vs BOYA VALLE GOPAL AND 4 OTHERS	11 Apr 2017	copy of judgement	—
CC/2/2017	Sub Inspector of Police vs Chakali Govindu	08 Apr 2017	copy of others	—
CC/4/2016	Boya Koulutlaiah vs Vs1.Boya Chandra and 2 others	08 Apr 2017	copy of others	—
CC/62/2016	Balija Neeraja vs Vs1. Shaik Mahaboob Basha and 4 others	08 Apr 2017	copy of others	—
CC/151/2017	Sub Inspector of Police vs Vykuntam Siva Sankar	08 Apr 2017	copy of others	—
CC/177/2016	SHO, Jaladurgam PS vs Boya Pododdi Chandra Babu	08 Apr 2017	copy of others	—
CC/188/2017	Sub Inspector of Police vs Shaik Abdul Rasool	08 Apr 2017	copy of others	—
CC/189/2016	E.Ramanjaneyulu vs Vallagi Ramudu	08 Apr 2017	copy of others	—
CC/223/2017	Sub Inspector of Police vs Boya Peddapay Ramanjaneyulu	08 Apr 2017	copy of others	—
CC/224/2017	Sub Inspector of Police vs Talari Chinna Yamanna	08 Apr 2017	copy of others	—
CC/252/2017	Sub Inspector of police vs K.Sanjeeva Rayudu	08 Apr 2017	copy of others	—
CC/261/2016	Boya Jayalakshmi vs Boya Koulutlaiah	08 Apr 2017	copy of others	—
CC/275/2017	SHO, N.Racharla PX vs N.Saraswathi	08 Apr 2017	copy of others	—
CC/279/2017	S.H.O.Dhon e Rural P.S. vs P.Venkateswarlu	08 Apr 2017	copy of others	—
CC/287/2017	Sub Inspector vs Boya Nallabothula Krishnam Raju	08 Apr 2017	copy of others	—
CC/288/2017	SI of police vs Boya Srinivasulu @ Thoppela Seenu	08 Apr 2017	copy of others	—
CC/289/2017	SI of police vs K.Thimmappa	08 Apr 2017	copy of others	—
CC/290/2017	SI of Police vs Mudavath Laxma Naik	08 Apr 2017	copy of others	—
CC/291/2017	Sub Inspector of police vs C.Ramesh	08 Apr 2017	copy of others	—
CC/292/2017	SI of Police vs Ediga Chandranna	08 Apr 2017	copy of others	—
CC/293/2017	Sub Inspector of police vs Bestha Murali Krishna	08 Apr 2017	copy of others	—
CC/294/2017	Sub Inspector of police vs Yerukali Guru Swamy	08 Apr 2017	copy of others	—
CC/295/2017	Sub Inspector of police vs Boya Sunkanna	08 Apr 2017	copy of others	—
CC/296/2017	Sub - Inspector vs Vadde Naga Ramanjaneyulu	08 Apr 2017	copy of others	—
CC/298/2014	U.PULLANNA vs Vs1. BOYA VEERABHADRUDU AND TWO OTHERS	08 Apr 2017	copy of others	—
CC/298/2017	Sub Inspector of Police vs Sugali Rangamma	08 Apr 2017	copy of others	—
CC/299/2017	Sub Inspector of Police vs Boya Yellaiah	08 Apr 2017	copy of others	—
CC/300/2017	Sub Inspector of Police vs Sapparla Naidu	08 Apr 2017	copy of others	—
CC/301/2017	Sub Inspector of Police vs Harijana parla Maddilety	08 Apr 2017	copy of others	—
CC/302/2017	Sub Inspector of police vs Boya Pendekanti Maddaiah	08 Apr 2017	copy of others	—
CC/303/2017	Sub Inspector of police vs M.Chandu Naik	08 Apr 2017	copy of others	—
CC/304/2017	SI of Police vs M.Govinda Naik	08 Apr 2017	copy of others	—
CC/305/2017	SI of Police vs Chandra Sekhar	08 Apr 2017	copy of others	—
CC/306/2017	SI of police vs B.Bala Rangadu	08 Apr 2017	copy of others	—
CC/307/2017	SI of Police vs G.Krupanandam	08 Apr 2017	copy of others	—
CC/308/2017	SI of Police vs V.Linganna	08 Apr 2017	copy of others	—
CC/309/2017	SI of Police vs Ediga Krishna Goud	08 Apr 2017	copy of others	—
CC/310/2017	SI of Police vs V.Venkatamma Bai	08 Apr 2017	copy of others	—
CC/311/2017	SI of Police vs B.Sugali Sreenivasulu	08 Apr 2017	copy of others	—
CC/313/2017	Sub Inspector vs Madiga Cheruvsali Maddaiah	08 Apr 2017	copy of others	—
CC/314/2017	SI of Police vs G.Jayaram Naik	08 Apr 2017	copy of others	—
CC/315/2017	SI of Police vs Y.Lakshmi Devi @Rama Laxmi	08 Apr 2017	copy of others	—
CC/316/2017	SI of Police vs Harijana Dasu	08 Apr 2017	copy of others	—
CC/317/2017	SI of Police vs N.Krishna Naik	08 Apr 2017	copy of others	—
CC/318/2017	SI of Police vs R.Jethe Naik	08 Apr 2017	copy of others	—
CC/320/2017	SHO, Peapully PS vs Govindu	08 Apr 2017	copy of others	—
CC/321/2017	SHO, Jaladurgam Police Station vs Gundala Devadasu	08 Apr 2017	copy of others	—
CC/322/2017	SHO, Dhone Town PS vs S.Edur Basha	08 Apr 2017	copy of others	—
CC/323/2017	SHO, Dhone Rural PS vs Boya Hari Krishna	08 Apr 2017	copy of others	—
CC/367/2016	1.Boya Mallikarjuna vs Vs1. Sanjapaagari Sanjeevudu and another	08 Apr 2017	copy of others	—
CC/375/2016	P.Kambagiri reddy vs Vs1. P.Krishna reddy and 2 others	08 Apr 2017	copy of others	—
CC/387/2016	Y.Rama Swamy vs G.Sreeram Prasad	08 Apr 2017	copy of others	—
CC/424/2014	TELUGU NAGARAJU vs Vs1. TELUGU BANGI RANGA RAO	08 Apr 2017	copy of others	—
CC/425/2014	TELUGU BANGI SRINIVASULU vs Vs1. TELUGU NAGARAJU AND TWO OTHERS	08 Apr 2017	copy of others	—
CC/492/2015	Boya Maliki Laxmidevi vs Vs1. Boya Narayanamma and 2 others	08 Apr 2017	copy of others	—
CC/586/2016	E.Chinna Yella goud vs Vs1. Bethapalli Pedda Soimappa and another	08 Apr 2017	copy of others	—
CC/607/2016	K.S.Manmadha KUmar vs S.K.Sudhakar Reddy	08 Apr 2017	copy of others	—
CC/621/2016	Kuruva Padmavathi vs Kotha Kuruva Ramudu	08 Apr 2017	copy of others	—
CC/674/2016	Harijana Lakshmi devi vs Vs1. Harijana Nadipi Thimmaiah and 3 others	08 Apr 2017	copy of others	—
CC/675/2016	Harijana Haritha vs Vs1. Harijana Thimma raju and 4 others	08 Apr 2017	copy of others	—
CC/679/2016	Sirivella Muralidhar reddy vs S.Venkata Subba Reddy	08 Apr 2017	copy of others	—
CC/749/2016	Boya Doddi Lakshmidevi vs Boya Pikkili Maddaiah	08 Apr 2017	copy of others	—
CC/750/2014	TELUGU LAXMI DEVI vs Vs1. TELUGU JAYA RAMUDU AND TELUGU RAMA DEVI	08 Apr 2017	copy of others	—
CC/847/2016	Boya Chinna Giddaiah vs Yerukali Venkataiah	08 Apr 2017	copy of others	—
CC/930/2015	E.L.Srinivasa Goud vs Vs1. Sai Vijayakumar and another	08 Apr 2017	copy of others	—
CC/982/2015	K.Eswaramma vs Vs1.Shaik Bindela Basha and another	08 Apr 2017	copy of others	—
CC/993/2016	Sub Inspector of Police vs Boya Sambasivudu @ Siva	08 Apr 2017	copy of others	—
CC/1090/2016	SHO, Jaladurgam PS vs Boya Kondaiah	08 Apr 2017	copy of others	—
DVC/1/2017	Arunamma vs P.Chandra Sekhar Reddy	08 Apr 2017	copy of others	—
CC/9/2017	Sub Inspector of Police vs Shaik Mehboob Basha	07 Apr 2017	copy of judgement	—
CC/403/2016	P.Yuvaraj vs Afzal Musthaque Pawaskar	07 Apr 2017	copy of judgement	—
CC/559/2016	B,K,Ramanjaneyulu vs G.H.Pavan Kumar	07 Apr 2017	copy of judgement	—
CC/845/2016	Boya Maddilety vs Vs1.Telugu Bhaskar and another	07 Apr 2017	copy of others	—
CC/477/2015	M.Siva Reddy vs Vs1. R.Ramanareddy and 5 others	03 Apr 2017	copy of judgement	—
MC/22/2015	D.Nagamani vs D.SURESH KUMAR	31 Mar 2017	copy of order	—
CC/922/2016	Shaik Chand Basha vs Vs1. B.Ravikumar and another	30 Mar 2017	copy of others	—

Showing 100 of 1,265 orders — Log in to browse all pages.

Monthly Orders (Last 12 Months)

Apr 2017		198
Mar 2017		82
Feb 2017		268
Jan 2017		38
Dec 2016		58
Nov 2016		92
Oct 2016		82
Sep 2016		78
Aug 2016		84
Jul 2016		46
Jun 2016		79
May 2016		58

Frequently Asked Questions

How many cases has M.S.Karimulla,B.Sc.,LL.M handled?

M.S.Karimulla,B.Sc.,LL.M has handled 2541 court orders since 2014 at Prl JCJ Court Dhone. The average disposal rate is 95 orders per month.

What types of cases does M.S.Karimulla,B.Sc.,LL.M hear?

Based on available records, M.S.Karimulla,B.Sc.,LL.M primarily handles Criminal matters (Criminal Cases) and Civil matters (Execution Petitions) at Prl JCJ Court Dhone.

Where is M.S.Karimulla,B.Sc.,LL.M currently posted?

M.S.Karimulla,B.Sc.,LL.M is posted as Principal Junior Civil Judge at Prl JCJ Court Dhone, Kurnool, Andhra Pradesh.

Are judgments by M.S.Karimulla,B.Sc.,LL.M available online?

Yes. 4 judgments by M.S.Karimulla,B.Sc.,LL.M are available on Legistro with full text, outcome, and sections cited.

How fast does M.S.Karimulla,B.Sc.,LL.M dispose cases?

M.S.Karimulla,B.Sc.,LL.M disposes approximately 95 cases per month, based on 2541 orders handled over their tenure at Prl JCJ Court Dhone.

Since when is M.S.Karimulla,B.Sc.,LL.M serving?

M.S.Karimulla,B.Sc.,LL.M has been serving at Prl JCJ Court Dhone since 2014.

Case Types

CC 94%

PRC 3%

MC 3%

DVC 0%

EP 0%

Posting History

Jun 2016 — Jul 2016

Principal Junior Civil Judge · 1 orders
May 2014 — May 2017

Addl.Junior Civil Judge, Dhone · 1,268 orders
Apr 2014 — May 2017

Addl.Junior Civil Judge cum JMFC · 1,272 orders

Outcomes on Record

Acquitted 4

Other Judges at this Court

Palamanglam Vinodh

Principal Junior Civil Judge

477 orders

Sake Jyothi

Addl.Junior Civil Judge cum JMFC

46 orders

← View all judges at Prl JCJ Court Dhone

M.S.Karimulla,B.Sc.,LL.M

C.C.No.151 of 2015

JUDGMENT

accused for the offences punishable under Secs.337,

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

FOR PROSECUTION FOR DEFENCE

EXHIBITS MARKED

FOR PROSECUTION FOR DEFENCE

MATERIAL OBJECTS MARKED

­NIL­

CALENDAR AND JUDGMENT

C.C.No.151 of 2015

C.C.No.151 of 2015

JUDGMENT

accused for the offences punishable under Secs.337,

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

FOR PROSECUTION FOR DEFENCE

EXHIBITS MARKED

FOR PROSECUTION FOR DEFENCE

MATERIAL OBJECTS MARKED

­NIL­

CALENDAR AND JUDGMENT

C.C.No.151 of 2015

C.C.No.549 of 2016.

JUDGMENT

accused for the offence punishable under Sec.304­A IPC beyond

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

FOR PROSECUTION FOR DEFENCE

EXHIBITS MARKED

FOR PROSECUTION FOR DEFENCE

MATERIAL OBJECTS MARKED

­NIL­

CALENDAR AND JUDGMENT

C.C.No.549 of 2016

C.C.No.549 of 2016.

JUDGMENT

accused for the offence punishable under Sec.304­A IPC beyond

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

FOR PROSECUTION FOR DEFENCE

EXHIBITS MARKED

FOR PROSECUTION FOR DEFENCE

MATERIAL OBJECTS MARKED

­NIL­

CALENDAR AND JUDGMENT

C.C.No.549 of 2016

NIL

NIL

accused for the offence punishable under Sec.304A IPC beyond

NIL

accused for the offence punishable under Sec.304A IPC beyond

NIL