M.sridhar

Senior Civil Judge

Senior Civil Court, Palamaner · Chittoor · Andhra Pradesh

M.SRIDHAR, Senior Civil Judge, is posted at Senior Civil Court, Palamaner, Chittoor, Andhra Pradesh, India. 359 court orders on record since 2019. 4 judgments with full text available. Primarily handles H, OS, AS cases.

359

Total Orders

Judgments

Orders/Month

Posting

Featured Judgments

H.M.O.P/92/2021

B.A.Siva Kumar vs NIL

07 Apr 2022

1 HMOP. 92 of 2021

IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE PALAMANER.

Present: - Sri M. Sridhar

Senior Civil Judge.

Thursday, the 7th (seventh) day of April, 2022

H.M.O.P.No. 92 of 2021

Between:-

1.B.A.Siva Kumar,

2.Smt V. Rekha @ Poojitha.

... Petitioners.

And:- -Nil-

... Respondent

This petition coming on before me for final hearing on 01.4.2022 upon perused the petition and other material papers on record, upon hearing the arguments of Sri P.Paramasivappa, learned counsel for petitioners and being a mutual consent petition and having stood over for consideration till this day, this court made the following:-

O R D E R

This petition is filed by the petitioners under Section 13-B of Hindu

Marriage Act, 1955 with a prayer to dissolve the marriage dated 26.11.2020 of petitioners by means of a decree of divorce by mutual consent.

2. The brief averments in the petition are that the petitioners are husband and wife. Their marriage was performed on 26.11.2020 at Kalabaireswaraswamy temple Theertham village, Baireddipalle as per Hindu rites and customs. Both of them lived together only for 3 days and their marriage was consummated.

Thereafter there were misunderstandings in between them, 2nd petitioner left the matrimonial home on 29.11.2020 and since then they are living separately. Later at the instance of elders, both the petitioners decided to live separately as there is no possibility of reunion. Hence, the petition.

2 HMOP. 92 of 2021

3. From the Petitioner side, the 1st petitioner is examined as PW1 on his behalf and the 2nd petitioner as PW2. Ex.P1 and Ex.P2 are marked.

4. Heard the arguments of petitioners’ side.

5. Now, the point for determination is:

1) Whether the petitioners are entitled for the relief of decree of divorce by dissolving the marriage between petitioners by way of mutual consent?

2) To what relief?

6. POINT: The 1st Petitioner himself is examined as PW1 and he reiterated the petition averments in his chief examination affidavit which goes to show that some misunderstandings arose in between them and they could adjust with each other. Pw1 further deposed that himself and Pw2 are residing separately from 29.11.2020, and subsequently, a mediation was held but failed as they could not reconcile and could not live together and they decided to get their marriage dissolved with mutual consent, and thus, both Pw1 and Pw2 have agreed to take divorce through court and they decided to get their marriage dissolved by mutual consent, Pw1 and Pw2 agreed to exchange the jewels and belongings to each other .

7. Further the evidence of PW1 was corroborated with the evidence of

PW2 in all aspects and she deposed that herself and Pw1 have voluntarily filed the present petition without any force by anybody to get their marriage dissolved as there are no chances for reunion,.

8. In view of the irrebuttable evidence of PW1 and PW2 the petitioners convincingly proved their contentions. As per the evidence of PWs 1 and 2, it reveals that there are no chances for their reunion. Therefore the petitioners are entitled for decree of divorce. Accordingly this point is answered.

3 HMOP. 92 of 2021

9. POINT NO: 2:- In view of the findings in point No: 1 the petition is liable to be allowed by granting decree of divorce by mutual consent dissolving the marriage between the parties.

10. In the result, the petition is allowed by granting decree of divorce by dissolving the marriage performed in between the petitioners 1 and 2 on 26.11.2020 by way of mutual consent. In the circumstances of the case both petitioners shall bear their own costs.

Typed to my dictation by the Personal Assistant, corrected by me and

pronounced in open court this the 7th day of April, 2022.

Sd/- M. Sridhar

Senior Civil Judge

Palamaner

Appendix of Evidence Witnesses examined

For Petitioners: For respondent:-

PW1 : B.A.Shiva Kumar, -None- PW2 : Smt V.Rekha @ Poojitha.

Exhibits marked

For petitioners:-

Ex.P.1 : Wedding card of petitioners. Ex.P.2 : Marriage photograph of petitioners.

For respondent: -Nil-

Sd/- M. Sridhar

S C J. Palamaner

// True copy//

4 HMOP. 92 of 2021

Draft / Fair Order In HMOP.No. 92 of 2021 Dt.7.4.2022 5 HMOP. 92 of 2021

H.M.O.P/50/2019

A.Rajababu vs S.Manjula

08 Apr 2022

1 HMOP. 50 of 2019

IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE PALAMANER.

Present: - M. Sridhar

Senior Civil Judge.

Friday, the 8th (Eigth) day of April, 2022

H.M.O.P.No. 50 of 2019

Between:-

1. D. Raja Babu,

2. Smt Manjula.

... Petitioners.

And:- -Nil-

... Respondent

This petition coming on before me for final hearing on 01.4.2022 upon perused the petition and other material papers on record, upon hearing the arguments of Sri S.Lakshman Reddy, learned counsel for petitioners and being a mutual consent petition and having stood over for consideration till this day, this court made the following:-

O R D E R

This petition is filed by the petitioners under Section 13-B of Hindu

Marriage Act, 1955 with a prayer to dissolve the marriage dated 11.12.2009 of petitioners by means of a decree of divorce by mutual consent.

2. The brief averments in the petition are that the petitioners are husband and wife. Their marriage was performed on 11.12.2009 at TTD

Kalyanamandapam, V.Kota as per Hindu rites and customs. Both of them lived together for 2 years at the house of 1st petitioner at Kudavagadda. Thereafter there were misunderstandings in between them, and they are living separately from the month of August, 2017 as 2nd petitioner left the company of 1st petitioner. Later at the instance of elders several mediation were held but failed both the petitioners decided to live separately. There is no possibility of reunion.

2 HMOP. 50 of 2019

Hence, the petition.

3. From the Petitioner side, the 1st petitioner is examined as PW1 on his behalf and the 2nd petitioner as PW2. Ex.P1 and Ex.P2 are marked.

4. Heard the arguments of petitioners’ side.

5. Now, the point for determination is:

1) Whether the petitioners are entitled for the relief of decree of divorce by dissolving the marriage between petitioners by way of mutual consent?

2) To what relief?

6. POINT: The 1st Petitioner himself is examined as PW1 and he reiterated the petition averments in his chief examination affidavit which goes to show that some misunderstandings arose in between them and they could adjust with each other. Pw1 further deposed that himself and Pw2 are residing separately from the month of August, 2017, and subsequently, several mediation were held but failed as they could not reconcile and could not live together and they decided to get their marriage dissolved with mutual consent.

7. Further the evidence of PW1 was corroborated with the evidence of

PW2 in all aspects and she deposed that herself and Pw1 have voluntarily filed the present petition without any force by anybody to get their marriage dissolved as there are no chances for reunion,.

9. POINT NO: 2:- In view of the findings in point No: 1 the petition is liable to be allowed by granting decree of divorce by mutual consent dissolving the marriage between the parties dated 11.2.2009.

3 HMOP. 50 of 2019

10. In the result, the petition is allowed by granting decree of divorce by dissolving the marriage performed in between the petitioners 1 and 2 on 11.12.2009 by way of mutual consent. In the circumstances of the case both petitioners shall bear their own costs.

Typed to my dictation by the Personal Assistant, corrected by me and

pronounced in open court this the 8th day of April, 2022.

Sd/- M.Sridhar

Senior Civil Judge

Palamaner

Appendix of Evidence Witnesses examined

For Petitioners: For respondent:-

PW1 : D.Raja Babu,-None- PW2 : Smt Manjula.

Exhibits marked

For petitioners:-

Ex.P.1 : Wedding card of petitioners. Ex.P.2 : Marriage photograph of petitioners.

For respondent: -Nil-

Sd/- Sri M. Sridhar

S C J. Palamaner

// True copy//

4 HMOP. 50 of 2019

Draft / Fair Order In HMOP.No. 50 of 2019 Dt.8.4.2022

H.M.O.P/50/2019

A.Rajababu vs S.Manjula

08 Apr 2022

1 HMOP. 50 of 2019

IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE PALAMANER.

Present: - M. Sridhar

Senior Civil Judge.

Friday, the 8th (Eigth) day of April, 2022

H.M.O.P.No. 50 of 2019

Between:-

1. D. Raja Babu,

2. Smt Manjula.

... Petitioners.

And:- -Nil-

... Respondent

O R D E R

This petition is filed by the petitioners under Section 13-B of Hindu

Marriage Act, 1955 with a prayer to dissolve the marriage dated 11.12.2009 of petitioners by means of a decree of divorce by mutual consent.

2. The brief averments in the petition are that the petitioners are husband and wife. Their marriage was performed on 11.12.2009 at TTD

2 HMOP. 50 of 2019

Hence, the petition.

3. From the Petitioner side, the 1st petitioner is examined as PW1 on his behalf and the 2nd petitioner as PW2. Ex.P1 and Ex.P2 are marked.

4. Heard the arguments of petitioners’ side.

5. Now, the point for determination is:

1) Whether the petitioners are entitled for the relief of decree of divorce by dissolving the marriage between petitioners by way of mutual consent?

2) To what relief?

6. POINT: The 1st Petitioner himself is examined as PW1 and he reiterated the petition averments in his chief examination affidavit which goes to show that some misunderstandings arose in between them and they could adjust with each other. Pw1 further deposed that himself and Pw2 are residing separately from the month of August, 2017, and subsequently, several mediation were held but failed as they could not reconcile and could not live together and they decided to get their marriage dissolved with mutual consent.

7. Further the evidence of PW1 was corroborated with the evidence of

PW2 in all aspects and she deposed that herself and Pw1 have voluntarily filed the present petition without any force by anybody to get their marriage dissolved as there are no chances for reunion,.

3 HMOP. 50 of 2019

Typed to my dictation by the Personal Assistant, corrected by me and

pronounced in open court this the 8th day of April, 2022.

Sd/- M.Sridhar

Senior Civil Judge

Palamaner

Appendix of Evidence Witnesses examined

For Petitioners: For respondent:-

PW1 : D.Raja Babu,-None- PW2 : Smt Manjula.

Exhibits marked

For petitioners:-

Ex.P.1 : Wedding card of petitioners. Ex.P.2 : Marriage photograph of petitioners.

For respondent: -Nil-

Sd/- Sri M. Sridhar

S C J. Palamaner

// True copy//

4 HMOP. 50 of 2019

Draft / Fair Order In HMOP.No. 50 of 2019 Dt.8.4.2022

AS/3/2021

M.Jayaraman vs K.Sekhar

11 Apr 2022

Order Record 355 total

Case No.	Parties	Date	Type	Outcome
OS/9/2019	Canara Bank, Kuppam Branch, rep by it branchmaneger Pavan Kumar vs D.Vijayalakshmi	12 Apr 2022	Other	—
AS/3/2021	M.Jayaraman vs K.Sekhar	11 Apr 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/50/2019	A.Rajababu vs S.Manjula	08 Apr 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/92/2021	B.A.Siva Kumar vs NIL	07 Apr 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/50/2021	R.Chaitanya vs Nil	06 Apr 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/65/2021	B.Roja vs Nil	06 Apr 2022	Judgement	—
H.M.O.P/13/2018	G. Hemagiri vs M. Bharathi @ Baby Sakunthala	01 Apr 2022	Order	—
OS/310/2014	Gantlappa vs Lakshmidevamma	31 Mar 2022	Judgement	—
H.M.O.P/89/2021	R Hari Prasad vs P.Kranthi Kiran Mai	31 Mar 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/17/2022	N.S.Pravallika vs NIl	30 Mar 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/43/2021	K.Harish vs NIL	30 Mar 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/70/2021	L.Geethanjali vs G.Suresh Reddy	30 Mar 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/83/2021	V.Vignesh vs V.Sindhu	30 Mar 2022	Order	—
OS/268/2014	M.R. Prathima mentally challenged rep by her next friend and mother M.R.Saraswathi vs Abdul Rahim - died	29 Mar 2022	Judgement	—
AS/84/2014	Gowramma vs Nadipivadu alias Chennappa Naidu	25 Mar 2022	Judgement	—
OS/56/2015	Smt Kanthamma vs Rathnamma	24 Mar 2022	Judgement	—
H.M.O.P/39/2019	N.Chandra Sekhar vs Smt.Aruna Kumari	24 Mar 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/53/2019	P.Devika vs Vs	24 Mar 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/66/2021	K.Suresh vs Nil	24 Mar 2022	Order	—
AS/48/2014	Devanamma vs Abdul Zaleel	23 Mar 2022	Judgement	—
H.M.O.P/24/2020	S.Lakshmi Pathi vs S.Ramya	22 Mar 2022	Order	—
OS/11/2022	S.K.Azeemunisa Begum (deid and 14 others vs M.Paras Mull (died) and M5 others	21 Mar 2022	Order	—
AS/99/2014	N. Hanumantha Reddy vs G. Venkatramana Reddy	19 Mar 2022	Judgement	—
H.M.O.P/6/2022	P.Ashok Kumar @ P.Ashok Kumar Reddy vs Smt. P.S. Swathi	16 Mar 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/15/2022	S.Roshan vs NIL	16 Mar 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/62/2021	C.Lokesh vs P.Chandrakala	16 Mar 2022	Order	—
OS/23/2016	R. Srinivasulu vs Kuchi Papamma	14 Mar 2022	Judgement	—
EP/4/2022	A.Lakshmi narayana vs K.Jayapal	12 Mar 2022	Order	—
EP/10/2018	D. Chakrapani vs C. Sambaiah	12 Mar 2022	Order	—
OS/44/2017	Santhammal vs P. Prabhakar Reddy	12 Mar 2022	Order	—
OS/567/2014	Sapthgiri Grameena Bank vs Ganesh (JLG) Kotabanda	12 Mar 2022	Order	—
OS/1/2019	G. A. Nazeem vs G. A. Azam	11 Mar 2022	Judgement	—
H.M.O.P/58/2017	M. Dinakar vs Gayathri	11 Mar 2022	Order	—
SC/93/2017	SI of police, Gudupalli PS vs G.Prabhu	10 Mar 2022	Judgement	—
H.M.O.P/60/2021	C.Kanchana Bhargavi @ C.Bhargavi vs A.Manjunath	10 Mar 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/18/2019	B.M.Punith Kumar vs Gayathri	09 Mar 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/22/2018	G. Dhanalakshmi vs B. Ramesh	05 Mar 2022	Order	—
EP/6/2017	P. Venkata Reddy vs N. Venkatesu Reddy	04 Mar 2022	Order	—
OS/80/2015	C Venkatesu vs D Anjineyulu	03 Mar 2022	Judgement	—
OS/162/2014	D Anjaneyulu vs C Venkatesu	03 Mar 2022	Judgement	—
AS/36/2014	B.G.Chengalrayappa vs B.G.Subbah	25 Feb 2022	Judgement	—
H.M.O.P/44/2019	D.Lokeshh @ Lokanadhan vs Smt.Lakshmi Devi	25 Feb 2022	Order	—
AS/6/2015	K. Venkatramappa @ Venkatramana vs Kondaiah Chetty	24 Feb 2022	Judgement	—
H.M.O.P/26/2018	V. Ramesh vs Savithramma @ Savithri	24 Feb 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/52/2018	Talari Rathnamma vs Neerugatti Hari Prasad	24 Feb 2022	Order	—
AS/100/2014	G. Narayanappa vs J. Ramakrishna Reddy	23 Feb 2022	Judgement	—
AS/5/2015	Savithramma vs Aynam Raghuram Reddy	19 Feb 2022	Judgement	—
AS/3/2016	M.R. Anjaneyulu vs R. Subramanya	17 Feb 2022	Judgement	—
H.M.O.P/30/2014	Cleverdass vs S Preethi	11 Feb 2022	Order	—
OS/32/2016	J. Bhagyaraj Prabhanjan vs Smt V.S. Maheswari Devi	02 Feb 2022	Judgement	—
H.M.O.P/14/2020	M.Balakrishna vs Rajeswari NArayanappa	28 Jan 2022	Order	—
OS/1/2021	T.G.Indrasekhar vs N.Bhavani	27 Jan 2022	Order	—
OS/348/2014	Kuppamma - died vs A Nagamma	27 Jan 2022	Judgement	—
H.M.O.P/56/2019	R.Ganesh vs G.Nithya	25 Jan 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/10/2018	H. Dhanalakshmi vs Vs	22 Jan 2022	Order	—
S.O.P/8/2019	K. Ananda vs Vs	22 Jan 2022	Order	—
OS/72/2015	V. Ramachandra vs V.Venkatesu	21 Jan 2022	Judgement	—
H.M.O.P/39/2020	N.Ashlesha vs K.Naveen Kumar	18 Jan 2022	Order	—
AS/116/2014	Rukkamma vs Chinnakka	17 Jan 2022	Order	—
H.M.O.P/29/2019	V.Somasekhar vs K.Bhargavi	17 Jan 2022	Order	—
OS/291/2014	N. Prabhakar vs T. Venkatesh Gowdu	07 Jan 2022	Judgement	—
OS/13/2020	P.Harshavardhan (Minor) vs M.Rajesh	06 Jan 2022	Judgement	—
SC/58/2017	Sub-Inspector Of Police, Palamaner P.S. vs J. Ravindra Reddy @ Thadimarri Ravindra Reddy	05 Jan 2022	Judgement	—
AS/101/2014	V. Jayaram vs M. Saroja	04 Jan 2022	Judgement	—
H.M.O.P/4/2018	R. Mahalakshmi vs K. Rajendra Prasad	31 Dec 2021	Order	—
H.M.O.P/62/2018	G. R. Manjunath vs Vs	31 Dec 2021	Order	—
OS/41/2018	D. Purushotham Naidu vs B. Narmada	30 Dec 2021	Judgement	—
H.M.O.P/66/2017	B. Sreelatha vs M. Venkatramana Naik	30 Dec 2021	Order	—
OS/14/2018	A. Narendra Babu vs A. Rajendra Naidu	29 Dec 2021	Judgement	—
AS/4/2017	B. Lakshmi Prasanna Kumari vs Ramalakshmamma	20 Dec 2021	Judgement	—
OS/22/2017	K Dharmachari vs V Nagamma	20 Dec 2021	Judgement	—
OS/29/2017	D. Mohanraj vs B. Yerrappa	20 Dec 2021	Judgement	—
H.M.O.P/42/2016	Pandaiah Pushpalatha vs Kollu Subramanyam	20 Dec 2021	Order	—
H.M.O.P/42/2020	M.Varalakshmi vs R.Sreeramulu	20 Dec 2021	Order	—
H.M.O.P/67/2018	P. M. Sri Githa vs D. G. Venkatachalam	20 Dec 2021	Order	—
SC/146/2015	The Inspector of police, Kuppam circle vs Vellayan Manikanta @ Vellayan @ Sampath	18 Dec 2021	Judgement	—
SC/435/2011	Inspector of Police, Palamaner vs Pillappagari Nethappa alias Gopi alisas Puchinoda	18 Dec 2021	Judgement	—
AS/47/2014	T. Allabakshu vs Sharifunabee	17 Dec 2021	Judgement	—
EP/12/2016	Uday Kumar vs The Land Acquisition Officer cum Revenue Divisional Officer, Madanapalle	17 Dec 2021	Order	—
EP/13/2016	P. Susil Kumar vs The LandAcquisition Officer cum Revenue Divisional Officer, Madanapalle	17 Dec 2021	Order	—
EP/14/2016	N. Rajappa vs The land acquisitiion officer cum RDO Madanapalle	17 Dec 2021	Order	—
EP/15/2016	V.S. Ramachandra Chetty vs The Land Acquuisition Officer-CUM-RDO, Madanapalle	17 Dec 2021	Order	—
EP/16/2016	V. Subbarajulu vs The Land Acquisition Officer-Cum-RDO, Madanapalle	17 Dec 2021	Order	—
EP/17/2016	K. Harinath vs The Land Acquistion Officer-Cum- RDO, Madanapalle	17 Dec 2021	Order	—
EP/18/2016	D. Nagaraja vs The Land Acquisition Officer-cum-RDO, Madanapalle	17 Dec 2021	Order	—
EP/19/2016	N. Balasundaram vs The Land Acquisition Officer-cum-RDO, Madanapalle	17 Dec 2021	Order	—
EP/20/2016	K. K. Venkatesu vs The Land Acquisition Officer-cum-RDO, Madanapalle	17 Dec 2021	Order	—
EP/22/2016	P. Sundaramma vs The LandAcquisition Officer cum Revenue Divisional Officer, Madanapalle	17 Dec 2021	Order	—
EP/23/2016	K. Salamma vs The Land Acquisition Officer cum Revenue Divisional Officer, Madanapalle	17 Dec 2021	Order	—
OS/45/2016	M. B. Roupaleka vs Syed Goush	17 Dec 2021	Judgement	—
OS/52/2017	S. Lakshmi Devi vs Shaik Nowshad Begum	17 Dec 2021	Judgement	—
SC/109/2017	SI of Police, Palamaner P.S. vs D.Anand	17 Dec 2021	Judgement	—
H.M.O.P/14/2018	V. Ramakrishna vs V. R. Ananthalakshmi	16 Dec 2021	Order	—
H.M.O.P/20/2020	P.Rajasekhar vs Vs	16 Dec 2021	Order	—
H.M.O.P/48/2021	K.Soujanya vs K.Nagaraju	15 Dec 2021	Order	—
H.M.O.P/4/2021	N.Manjunath vs Nil	14 Dec 2021	Order	—
H.M.O.P/22/2017	Venkatesh Murali vs Venkatesh Bharathi	14 Dec 2021	Order	—
H.M.O.P/51/2020	B.Balasubramanyam vs Nil	14 Dec 2021	Order	—
AS/14/2017	P. Krishna Reddy vs L. Rama Subba Reddy	11 Dec 2021	Order	—
AS/45/2014	P.G.Ramappa vs Diety Sri Veeranjaneyaswamy, V.Kota rep. by its Managing trustee K.Rajagopal Naidu died	11 Dec 2021	Order	—

Showing 100 of 355 orders — Log in to browse all pages.

Monthly Orders (Last 12 Months)

Apr 2022		8
Mar 2022		34
Feb 2022		11
Jan 2022		14
Dec 2021		60
Nov 2021		9
Oct 2021		9
Sep 2021		4
Aug 2021		3
Jul 2021		11
Apr 2021		4
Mar 2021		7

Frequently Asked Questions

How many cases has M.SRIDHAR handled?

M.SRIDHAR has handled 359 court orders since 2019 at Senior Civil Court, Palamaner. The average disposal rate is 11 orders per month.

What types of cases does M.SRIDHAR hear?

Based on available records, M.SRIDHAR primarily handles Civil matters (Original Suits, Appeal Suits) and Criminal matters (Sessions Cases) at Senior Civil Court, Palamaner.

Where is M.SRIDHAR currently posted?

M.SRIDHAR is posted as Senior Civil Judge at Senior Civil Court, Palamaner, Chittoor, Andhra Pradesh.

Are judgments by M.SRIDHAR available online?

Yes. 4 judgments by M.SRIDHAR are available on Legistro with full text, outcome, and sections cited.

How fast does M.SRIDHAR dispose cases?

M.SRIDHAR disposes approximately 11 cases per month, based on 359 orders handled over their tenure at Senior Civil Court, Palamaner.

Since when is M.SRIDHAR serving?

M.SRIDHAR has been serving at Senior Civil Court, Palamaner since 2019.

Case Types

H 41%

OS 36%

AS 10%

EP 6%

SC 5%

IP 1%

S 1%

CMA 0%

Posting History

Aug 2019 — Apr 2022

Senior Civil Judge · 359 orders

Other Judges at this Court

V.audhinarayana

Senior Civil Judge

403 orders

← View all judges at Senior Civil Court, Palamaner

M.sridhar

IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE PALAMANER.

O R D E R

// True copy//

IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE PALAMANER.

O R D E R

// True copy//

IN THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE PALAMANER.

O R D E R

// True copy//

IN THE C CÔURT OF

THE

CAMP COUNT SENMOT

AT KUPPAM

Presentt Si M.Sridhar,

Senior

Monday the i% Cvi Judge.

day of Apri, 2022.

AS. No

03 of 2021

MJayaraman

The appellants above

MJayaraman

IUDGMENT

sC),PIMR