Sri. Mohd. Abdul Jaleel

JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE

Junior Civil Judge`s Court, Pattikonda (Taluka) · Kurnool · Andhra Pradesh

SRI. MOHD. ABDUL JALEEL, JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE, is posted at Junior Civil Judge`s Court, Pattikonda (Taluka), Kurnool, Andhra Pradesh, India. 651 court orders on record since 2017. 4 judgments with full text available. Primarily handles CC, OS, EP cases.

651

Total Orders

Judgments

Orders/Month

Posting

Featured Judgments

OS/20/2017

C.Sreenivasa Reddy. vs A.P.Hanumantha Reddy.

20 Jun 2018

1 O.S. NO. 20/2017

IN THE COURT OF THE JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE, PATTIKONDA.

PRESENT : SRI MOHD. ABDUL JALEEL,

JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE

WEDNESDAY, THIS THE 20 th DAY OF JUNE, 2018.

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 20/2017

Between:

C. Sreenivasa Reddy S/o C.Narsi Reddy, aged about 60 years,Hindu, Agriculturist, r/o D.No.17/179/131, Yashoda Garden, Pattikonda village and Mandal, Kurnool District. … Plaintiff

and

A.P Hanumantha Reddy S/o A.Ranga Reddy, aged about 50 years, Hindu, Business and Agriculturist, r/o H.No.17/19553, Pattikonda village and Mandal, Kurnool District, now residing at C/o A.Parvathamma, Retired Health Supervisor, Near Government Hospital Quarters, Kadiri Road, Gorantla village and Mandal, Anantapur District. … Defendant.

This suit is filed by the plaintiff against defendant praying to pass decree for Rs.1,71,500/ (Rupees One Lakh Seventy One Thousand and Five Hundred only) with costs basing on suit promissory note, with the following averments that on 25012014, defendant borrowed an amount of Rs.1,00,000/ (Rupees One Lakh only) in cash agreeing to repay the same with interest at 24% p.a., and executed suit promissory note in favour of the plaintiff on the same day i.e., 25012014. Inspite of oral demands made by plaintiff, defendant failed to repay the debt amount under suit promissory note. Hence, the suit.

Plaint presented on 2012017 and filed on 222017. J.V. of Rs.1,71,500/ and Court Fee of Rs.4,226/ is paid under Section 20 of APCF and SV Act.

Cause of action for the suit arose on 2512014 at Pattikonda village, when the defendant executed pronote in favour of plaintiff and on dates of oral demands and on several dates when plaintiff demanded defendant to repay the promissory note debt, within the territorial jurisdiction of this Court.

This suit is coming before me on 13062018 for final hearing in the presence of Sri V. Eranna, Advocate for the plaintiff and defendant called absent and set exparte and having stood over for consideration till this day, this Court doth order and decree as follows :

i)that the defendant do pay to the plaintiff a sum of Rs.Rs.1,71,500/ (Rupees One Lakh Seventy One Thousand and Five Hundred only), with subsequent interest at the rate of 12% per annum from the date of the filing the suit i.e., 2012017 till the date of decree and at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of the decree till realization on principal amount of Rs.1,00,000/; and

Page 1 2 O.S. NO. 20/2017 ii) that the defendant do also pay a sum of Rs.12,585/ to the plaintiff being the costs of the suit.

Given under my hand and seal of the Court, this the 20th day of June, 2018.

JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

PATTIKONDA.

MEMO OF COSTS

Particulars For Plaintiff For defendant

Vakalath 2-00-Exparte - Stamp on plaint4,226-00 - Stamp on process 885-00- Advocate Fee3,422-00- Publication charges 4,000-00 Typing charges 50-00- Total 12,585-00

JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

PATTIKONDA.

Page 2 3 O.S. NO. 20/2017

IN THE COURT OF THE JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE, PATTIKONDA.

PRESENT : SRI MOHD. ABDUL JALEEL,

JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE

WEDNESDAY, THIS THE 20 th DAY OF JUNE, 2018.

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 20/2017

Between:

C. Sreenivasa Reddy … Plaintiff

and

A.P Hanumantha Reddy … Defendant.

:: JUDGMENT ::

1.This suit is filed by the plaintiff against defendant praying to pass decree for Rs.1,71,500/ (Rupees One Lakh Seventy One Thousand and Five

Hundred only) with costs basing on suit promissory note.

2.The brief averments of the plaint are as follows :

On 25012014, defendant borrowed an amount of Rs.1,00,000/ (Rupees One Lakh only) in cash agreeing to repay the same with interest at 24% p.a., and executed suit promissory note in favour of the plaintiff on the same day i.e., 25012014. Inspite of oral demands made by plaintiff, defendant failed to repay the debt amount under suit promissory note. Hence, the suit.

3.Written statement not filed after lapse of 90 days, even on specific conditional order. Hence, the defendant was set exparte.

4.During trial, plaintiff examined himself as PW.1 and got exhibited document A.1 on his behalf.

5.Heard the counsel for the plaintiff. Perused record.

Page 3 4 O.S. NO. 20/2017

6.Now, the point for determination is :

“Whether the plaintiff is entitled to recover the suit amount as prayed for ?

ANSWER TO POINT:

7.The plaintiff examined himself as PW.1 and reiterated contents of plaint in his chiefexamination affidavit and further got exhibited document A.1 on his behalf. The evidence of PW.1 is found to be consistent, cogent and trustworthy. The suit promissory note is exhibited as A.1. The unchallenged testimony of PW.1, coupled with Ex. A.1 to prove suit claim. Hence, the suit of plaintiff is liable to be decreed with costs. The point is answered accordingly.

8.IN THE RESULT, the suit of the plaintiff is decreed with costs against the defendant for a sum of Rs.1,71,500/ (Rupees One Lakh Seventy One

Thousand and Five Hundred only) and with subsequent interest at the rate of 12% per annum from the date of the filing the suit till date of decree and thenceforth at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of the decree till realization on principal amount i.e. Rs.1,00,000/

Typed to dictation, corrected and pronounced by me in the Open Court, this the 20 th day of June, 2018.

JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

PATTIKONDA.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

FOR PLAINTIFF : FOR DEFENDANT: PW.1 : C. Sreenivasa Reddy NONE

EXHIBITS MARKED

FOR PLAINTIFF : FOR DEFENDANT: NIL

Ex.A.1: Original Promissory note dated 25012014.

JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

Page 4 5 O.S. NO. 20/2017

PATTIKONDA.

Page 5

OS/21/2017

C.Sreenivasa Reddy. vs A.P.Hanumantha Reddy.

20 Jun 2018

1 O.S. NO. 21/2017

IN THE COURT OF THE JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE, PATTIKONDA.

PRESENT : SRI MOHD. ABDUL JALEEL,

JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE

WEDNESDAY, THIS THE 20 th DAY OF JUNE, 2018.

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 21/2017

Between:

C. Sreenivasa Reddy S/o C.Narsi Reddy, aged about 60 years,Hindu, Agriculturist, r/o D.No.17/179/131, Yashoda Garden, Pattikonda village and Mandal, Kurnool District. … Plaintiff

and

Plaint presented on 2012017 and filed on 222017. J.V. of Rs.1,71,500/ and Court Fee of Rs.4,226/ is paid under Section 20 of APCF and SV Act.

Page 1 2 O.S. NO. 21/2017 ii) that the defendant do also pay a sum of Rs.12,585/ to the plaintiff being the costs of the suit.

Given under my hand and seal of the Court, this the 20th day of June, 2018.

JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

PATTIKONDA.

MEMO OF COSTS

Particulars For Plaintiff For defendant

Vakalath 2-00-Exparte - Stamp on plaint4,226-00 - Stamp on process 885-00- Advocate Fee3,422-00- Publication charges 4,000-00 Typing charges 50-00- Total 12,585-00

JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

PATTIKONDA.

Page 2 3 O.S. NO. 21/2017

IN THE COURT OF THE JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE, PATTIKONDA.

PRESENT : SRI MOHD. ABDUL JALEEL,

JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE

WEDNESDAY, THIS THE 20 th DAY OF JUNE, 2018.

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 21/2017

Between:

C. Sreenivasa Reddy … Plaintiff

and

A.P Hanumantha Reddy … Defendant.

:: JUDGMENT ::

1.This suit is filed by the plaintiff against defendant praying to pass decree for Rs.1,71,500/ (Rupees One Lakh Seventy One Thousand and Five

Hundred only) with costs basing on suit promissory note.

2.The brief averments of the plaint are as follows :

3.Written statement not filed after lapse of 90 days, even on specific conditional order. Hence, the defendant was set exparte.

4.During trial, plaintiff examined himself as PW.1 and got exhibited document A.1 on his behalf.

5.Heard the counsel for the plaintiff. Perused record.

Page 3 4 O.S. NO. 21/2017

6.Now, the point for determination is :

“Whether the plaintiff is entitled to recover the suit amount as prayed for ?

ANSWER TO POINT:

8.IN THE RESULT, the suit of the plaintiff is decreed with costs against the defendant for a sum of Rs.1,71,500/ (Rupees One Lakh Seventy One

Typed to dictation, corrected and pronounced by me in the Open Court, this the 20 th day of June, 2018.

JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

PATTIKONDA.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

FOR PLAINTIFF : FOR DEFENDANT: PW.1 : C. Sreenivasa Reddy NONE

EXHIBITS MARKED

FOR PLAINTIFF : FOR DEFENDANT: NIL

Ex.A.1: Original Promissory note dated 25012014.

Page 4 5 O.S. NO. 21/2017

JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

PATTIKONDA.

Page 5

OS/14/2017

C.Srinivasa Reddy. vs A.P.Hanumantha Reddy.

20 Jun 2018

1 O.S. NO. 14/2017

IN THE COURT OF THE JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE, PATTIKONDA.

PRESENT : SRI MOHD. ABDUL JALEEL,

JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE

WEDNESDAY, THIS THE 20 th DAY OF JUNE, 2018.

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 14/2017

Between:

C. Sreenivasa Reddy S/o C.Narsi Reddy, aged about 60 years,Hindu, Agriculturist, r/o D.No.17/179/131, Yashoda Garden, Pattikonda village and Mandal, Kurnool District. … Plaintiff

and

This suit is filed by the plaintiff against defendant praying to pass decree for Rs.1,67,000/ (Rupees One Lakh Sixty Seven Thousand only) with costs basing on suit promissory note, with the following averments that on 27032014, defendant borrowed an amount of Rs.1,00,000/ (Rupees One Lakh only) in cash agreeing to repay the same with interest at 24% p.a., and executed suit promissory note in favour of the plaintiff on the same day i.e., 27032014. Inspite of oral demands made by plaintiff, defendant failed to repay the debt amount under suit promissory note. Hence, the suit.

Plaint presented on 122017 and filed on 122017. J.V. of Rs.1,67,000/ and Court Fee of Rs.4,126/ is paid under Section 20 of APCF and SV Act.

Cause of action for the suit arose on 2732014 at Pulikonda village, when the defendant executed pronote in favour of plaintiff and on dates of oral demands and on several dates when plaintiff demanded defendant to repay the promissory note debt, within the territorial jurisdiction of this Court.

i)that the defendant do pay to the plaintiff a sum of Rs.1,67,000/ (Rupees One Lakh Sixty Seven Thousand only), with subsequent interest at the rate of 12% per annum from the date of the filing the suit i.e., 122017 till the date of decree and at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of the decree till realization on principal amount of Rs.1,00,000/; and

Page 1 2 O.S. NO. 14/2017 ii) that the defendant do also pay a sum of Rs.12,718/ to the plaintiff being the costs of the suit.

Given under my hand and seal of the Court, this the 20th day of June, 2018.

JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

PATTIKONDA.

MEMO OF COSTS

Particulars For Plaintiff For defendant

Vakalath 2-00-Exparte - Stamp on plaint4,126-00 - Stamp on process 1,185-00- Advocate Fee3,355-00- Publication charges 4,000-00 Typing charges 50-00- Total 12,718-00

JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

PATTIKONDA.

Page 2 3 O.S. NO. 14/2017

IN THE COURT OF THE JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE, PATTIKONDA.

PRESENT : SRI MOHD. ABDUL JALEEL,

JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE

WEDNESDAY, THIS THE 20 th DAY OF JUNE, 2018.

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 14/2017

Between:

C. Sreenivasa Reddy … Plaintiff

and

A.P Hanumantha Reddy … Defendant.

:: JUDGMENT ::

1.This suit is filed by the plaintiff against defendant praying to pass decree for Rs.1,67,000/ (Rupees One Lakh Sixty Seven Thousand only) with costs basing on suit promissory note.

2.The brief averments of the plaint are as follows :

On 27032014, defendant borrowed an amount of Rs.1,00,000/ (Rupees One Lakh only) in cash agreeing to repay the same with interest at 24% p.a., and executed suit promissory note in favour of the plaintiff on the same day i.e., 27032014. Inspite of oral demands made by plaintiff, defendant failed to repay the debt amount under suit promissory note. Hence, the suit.

3.Written statement not filed after lapse of 90 days, even on specific conditional order. Hence, the defendant was set exparte.

4.During trial, plaintiff examined himself as PW.1 and got exhibited document A.1 on his behalf.

5.Heard the counsel for the plaintiff. Perused record.

Page 3 4 O.S. NO. 14/2017

6.Now, the point for determination is :

“Whether the plaintiff is entitled to recover the suit amount as prayed for ?

ANSWER TO POINT:

8.IN THE RESULT, the suit of the plaintiff is decreed with costs against the defendant for a sum of Rs.1,67,000/(Rupees One Lakh Sixty Seven Thousand only) and with subsequent interest at the rate of 12% per annum from the date of the filing the suit till date of decree and thenceforth at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of the decree till realization on principal amount i.e. Rs.1,00,000/

Typed to dictation, corrected and pronounced by me in the Open Court, this the 20 th day of June, 2018.

JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

PATTIKONDA.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

FOR PLAINTIFF : FOR DEFENDANT: PW.1 : C. Sreenivasa Reddy NONE

EXHIBITS MARKED

FOR PLAINTIFF : FOR DEFENDANT: NIL

Ex.A.1: Original Promissory note dated 27032014.

Page 4 5 O.S. NO. 14/2017

JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

PATTIKONDA.

Page 5

OS/15/2017

C.Srinivasa Reddy. vs A.P.Hanumantha Reddy.

20 Jun 2018

1 O.S. NO. 15/2017

IN THE COURT OF THE JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE, PATTIKONDA.

PRESENT : SRI MOHD. ABDUL JALEEL,

JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE

WEDNESDAY, THIS THE 20 th DAY OF JUNE, 2018.

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 15/2017

Between:

C. Sreenivasa Reddy S/o C.Narsi Reddy, aged about 60 years,Hindu, Agriculturist, r/o D.No.17/179/131, Yashoda Garden, Pattikonda village and Mandal, Kurnool District. … Plaintiff

and

Plaint presented on 122017 and filed on 122017. J.V. of Rs.1,67,000/ and Court Fee of Rs.4,126/ is paid under Section 20 of APCF and SV Act.

Cause of action for the suit arose on 2732014 at Pattikonda village, when the defendant executed pronote in favour of plaintiff and on dates of oral demands and on several dates when plaintiff demanded defendant to repay the promissory note debt, within the territorial jurisdiction of this Court.

Page 1 2 O.S. NO. 15/2017 ii) that the defendant do also pay a sum of Rs.12,718/ to the plaintiff being the costs of the suit.

Given under my hand and seal of the Court, this the 20th day of June, 2018.

JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

PATTIKONDA.

MEMO OF COSTS

Particulars For Plaintiff For defendant

Vakalath 2-00-Exparte - Stamp on plaint4,126-00 - Stamp on process 1,185-00- Advocate Fee3,355-00- Publication charges 4,000-00 Typing charges 50-00- Total 12,718-00

JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

PATTIKONDA.

Page 2 3 O.S. NO. 15/2017

IN THE COURT OF THE JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE, PATTIKONDA.

PRESENT : SRI MOHD. ABDUL JALEEL,

JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE

WEDNESDAY, THIS THE 20 th DAY OF JUNE, 2018.

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 15/2017

Between:

C. Sreenivasa Reddy … Plaintiff

and

A.P Hanumantha Reddy … Defendant.

:: JUDGMENT ::

1.This suit is filed by the plaintiff against defendant praying to pass decree for Rs.1,67,000/ (Rupees One Lakh Sixty Seven Thousand only) with costs basing on suit promissory note.

2.The brief averments of the plaint are as follows :

3.Written statement not filed after lapse of 90 days, even on specific conditional order. Hence, the defendant was set exparte.

4.During trial, plaintiff examined himself as PW.1 and got exhibited document A.1 on his behalf.

5.Heard the counsel for the plaintiff. Perused record.

Page 3 4 O.S. NO. 15/2017

6.Now, the point for determination is :

“Whether the plaintiff is entitled to recover the suit amount as prayed for ?

ANSWER TO POINT:

Typed to dictation, corrected and pronounced by me in the Open Court, this the 20 th day of June, 2018.

JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

PATTIKONDA.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

FOR PLAINTIFF : FOR DEFENDANT: PW.1 : C. Sreenivasa Reddy NONE

EXHIBITS MARKED

FOR PLAINTIFF : FOR DEFENDANT: NIL

Ex.A.1: Original Promissory note dated 27032014.

Page 4 5 O.S. NO. 15/2017

JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE,

PATTIKONDA.

Page 5

Order Record 650 total

Case No.	Parties	Date	Type	Outcome
EP/75/2017	U/o.21.Rule.48-Puna Mallikarjuna vs B.Nataraja Naik.	20 Jun 2018	Others	—
OS/14/2017	C.Srinivasa Reddy. vs A.P.Hanumantha Reddy.	20 Jun 2018	Judgement	—
OS/15/2017	C.Srinivasa Reddy. vs A.P.Hanumantha Reddy.	20 Jun 2018	Judgement	—
OS/20/2017	C.Sreenivasa Reddy. vs A.P.Hanumantha Reddy.	20 Jun 2018	Judgement	—
OS/21/2017	C.Sreenivasa Reddy. vs A.P.Hanumantha Reddy.	20 Jun 2018	Judgement	—
OS/22/2017	C.Sreenivasa Reddy. vs A.P.Hanumantha Reddy.	20 Jun 2018	Judgement	—
OS/107/2009	Gullamorusu Narsamma vs Harijana lakshmi alias Pagidala Nagalakshmi	20 Jun 2018	Judgement	—
OS/146/2012	Smt Mahadevamma vs Chintamanu Palli Adivappa	20 Jun 2018	Others	—
OS/46/2017	Juturu Balaramudu. vs A.P.Hanumantha Reddy.	19 Jun 2018	Judgement	—
MC/8/2015	Mutiki Hemalatha vs B.Sreedhar	14 Jun 2018	Order	—
EP/10/2017	Nemakal Shaik Masthan Bee. vs Pinjari Khasim.	13 Jun 2018	Others	—
OS/42/2017	Kuruva Govindappa. vs Kuruva Prabhakar. D.1	11 Jun 2018	Judgement	—
OS/69/2010	Pudicherla Lalappa vs K.Sreenivasa Achari	11 Jun 2018	Others	—
OS/217/2016	K.Bhaskar. vs N. Krishna Chaithanya.	11 Jun 2018	Others	—
OS/219/2016	K.Bhaskar. vs N. Krishna Chaithanya.	11 Jun 2018	Others	—
MC/1/2017	Mala Dasari Swarna. vs Mala Dasari Surendra Babu @ Surendra	11 Jun 2018	Order	—
CC/339/2017	SHO-GONEGANDLA P.S. - M.Gayathri-D/Complainant vs Mala Kalvagadda Hari-Accused	07 Jun 2018	Judgement	—
CC/27/2017	Telugu Venkataramudu. vs Moola Manjunath.	06 Jun 2018	Judgement	—
CC/198/2013	Motu Sunkamma vs Motu Ramaiah	06 Jun 2018	Judgement	—
CC/199/2013	Mota Maddilety vs Mota Kesanna	06 Jun 2018	Judgement	—
CC/274/2015	Rathana Jayalakshmi vs Aligeri Krishna Murthy	06 Jun 2018	Judgement	—
PRC/14/2018	Dy.Supdt. of Police. vs Madiga Kistanna and others	06 Jun 2018	Order	—
CC/97/2016	T. Parvathamma. vs Pandikona Mahadevudu. A-1	05 Jun 2018	Judgement	—
CC/163/2016	R.Narasamma. vs Thuruppu Chandra Mouli. A-1	05 Jun 2018	Judgement	—
MC/13/2016	Munnangi Rangamma @ Rani @ Harijana Rangamma vs Munnangi Suresh Kumar.	05 Jun 2018	Judgement	—
OS/175/2017	SUIT ON PRONOTE -M.Suresh vs B.Rangaswamy	04 Jun 2018	Judgement	—
OS/178/2017	K. Lakshmi Devi vs Katari Nagaraju	04 Jun 2018	Judgement	—
OS/179/2017	SUIT ON PRONOTE - G.Masthan Vali vs N.Ramudu	04 Jun 2018	Judgement	—
OS/194/2015	Kasapuram Lakshmanna vs Ponuganti Chandra	04 Jun 2018	Judgement	—
OS/270/2017	PRONOTE - Chinna Obulesh. vs Chityala Ram Murthy	04 Jun 2018	Judgement	—
CC/37/2015	Uppari Sumangalamma. vs Sareddy Shiva Reddy. A-1	04 Jun 2018	Judgement	—
CC/217/2014	Sareddy Shiva Reddy vs Uppri Chinna Sanjappa	04 Jun 2018	Judgement	—
CC/194/2012	P.Lakshmidevamma vs Maddilety Naidu and 7 others	30 May 2018	Judgement	—
CC/448/2017	EXCISE STATION, PATTIKONDA, PROHIBITION AND EXCISE SUB- INSPECTOR, PATTIKONDA. vs Boya Chandra - A1	30 May 2018	Judgement	—
CC/75/2015	Kuruva Venkatalakshmi vs Yerukala Maddilety	29 May 2018	Judgement	—
CC/5/2018	SHO-DEVANAKONDA P.S - S.I of Police, Devanakonda-D/C vs Boya Ramudu.	28 May 2018	Judgement	—
CC/6/2018	SHO-DEVANAKONDA - S.Gangaiah Yadav-S.I of police vs Ediga Chenna Kesavulu Goud -A1	28 May 2018	Judgement	—
CC/179/2018	SHO-PATTIKONDA P.S- K.Brahmaiah Achari-D/Complainant vs E.Govinda Goud	26 May 2018	Others	—
MC/6/2015	Yalamarthi Lakshmi vs Eepthi Sunkanna	25 May 2018	Others	—
CC/92/2015	B. Harikrishna Achary vs S. Padmavathamma	24 May 2018	Judgement	—
CC/80/2018	SHO-DEVANAKONDA P.S - S.Gangaiah Yadav-SI of Police-D/Complainant vs Golla Vijay-A1	23 May 2018	Judgement	—
CC/176/2015	Boya Ramudu vs Vadde Veeresh	22 May 2018	Judgement	—
CC/333/2017	SHO-GONEGANDLA P.S. - Soganuru Nagendra - D/Complainant vs Golla Ravi	21 May 2018	Judgement	—
OS/97/2010	D.Rahamatulla vs D.Mudava Sakrappa alias Roganna and others	09 May 2018	Judgement	—
OS/193/2016	Medam Anjineyulu. vs Chakali Ranganna.	09 May 2018	Judgement	—
OS/218/2017	INJUNCTION - Kuruva Sekhar vs Kuruva Avula Suri-D1	09 May 2018	Judgement	—
CC/55/2015	Golla Ramanjaneyulu vs Marella golla Kishtanna	09 May 2018	Judgement	—
CC/128/2018	SHO-MADDIKERA P.S- Kolli Sujatha-D/Complainant. vs Koli Ramanjineyulu-A1 and three others.	09 May 2018	Judgement	—
CC/258/2015	Golla Gokari vs Golla Gopal. A-1	09 May 2018	Judgement	—
CC/331/2015	Madiga Danamaiah vs Madiga Thirupathaiah. A-1	09 May 2018	Judgement	—
MC/9/2017	Boya Rameswaramma vs BoyaTalari Narendra Naidu.	09 May 2018	Order	—
OS/24/2018	PRONOTE- Yerravali Rangaiah vs Bestha Mareppa @ Earla Mareppa	08 May 2018	Judgement	—
OS/174/2017	SUIT ON PRONOTE - Kummari Lakshmi vs Bestha Chinna Ramudu.	08 May 2018	Judgement	—
OS/207/2017	PRONOTE - M.Chandrasekhar Naidu. vs Pinjari Siddaiah.	08 May 2018	Judgement	—
CC/20/2015	Subhan H vs Madapuram Purushotam Naidu	08 May 2018	Judgement	—
CC/63/2017	Ediga Narendra Goud vs Dudekula Masthan Vali	08 May 2018	Judgement	—
CC/205/2012	Vadde Veeresh vs Boya Madhu	08 May 2018	Judgement	—
CC/212/2015	Boya Rajendra Prasad vs Boya Ramesh	08 May 2018	Judgement	—
EP/108/2014	Madiga Ranganna vs Harijana Anjanaiah alias Nattenna	07 May 2018	Order	—
OS/141/2011	Gampala Eramma vs G.Krishna Murthy	07 May 2018	Judgement	—
OS/182/2017	PERMANENT INJUNCTION - Gujarathi Govindarajulu- Plaintiff vs Golaka Chandranna- Defendant	07 May 2018	Judgement	—
CC/20/2017	Banavath Govindhu Naik vs P.Surendra.	07 May 2018	Judgement	—
CC/139/2015	N. Chandrababu vs Boya Tuggali Nagesh	07 May 2018	Judgement	—
EP/39/2016	Yerramala Anjinamma vs T.Hanumanthu.	05 May 2018	Others	—
OS/15/2015	Kampati Shanthamma vs Nagappa and 6 others	05 May 2018	Others	—
OS/16/2015	K. Nagappa vs G.Nagabhusanam	05 May 2018	Others	—
OS/17/2015	A. Veerabhadrappa vs G. Nagabhusanam	05 May 2018	Others	—
CC/227/2015	Telugu Annaiah. vs Telugu Sreeramulu.	04 May 2018	Judgement	—
CC/244/2015	Telugu Sunitha vs Telugu Annaiah	04 May 2018	Judgement	—
CC/317/2015	A.Thirumala Vani vs Pinjari Rahamathulla. A-1.	04 May 2018	Judgement	—
CC/319/2015	Madiga Jevaiah vs Pinjari Rahamathulla. A-1.	04 May 2018	Judgement	—
CC/381/2017	Sub-Inspector of police,MADDIKERA PS vs Besta Venkatesh	04 May 2018	Judgement	—
PRC/13/2018	SHO- DEVANAKONDA PS- Golla Takkuk Venkatesh-D/Complainant vs Golla Takku Rangaswamy-A1	04 May 2018	Order	—
CC/138/2017	SHO of Jonnagiri P.S-- Boya Yelagani Raju-Complainant vs Chinthakayala Ramesh.	03 May 2018	Judgement	—
CC/175/2017	SHO JONNAGIRI PS vs Naya Kanti Yallaiah	03 May 2018	Judgement	—
EP/11/2017	Nemakal Hasen. vs Pinjari Khasim.	02 May 2018	Others	—
EP/47/2016	Kunka Hmpaiah. vs Kunka Rangaswamy.	02 May 2018	Others	—
OS/8/2018	PRONOTE - Vadla Veerappachari ( Died). Rep.by his legal heirs vs V.Venkataramanachari	02 May 2018	Judgement	—
OS/160/2017	PRONOTE - Nayak Ahammad vs Hotel Aalam Basha	02 May 2018	Judgement	—
CC/262/2016	Challa Sunkanna. vs Manikindi Mallikarjuna @ Arjunappa.A-1	02 May 2018	Judgement	—
OS/117/2015	Pujari Sunkanna vs Hotel Aalam Basha	01 May 2018	Judgement	—
CC/47/2015	Giripogula Kalyani vs Erasani David	01 May 2018	Judgement	—
CC/382/2017	Sub-Inspector of police,MADDIKERA PS vs Ediga Ramachandra Goud	01 May 2018	Judgement	—
EP/40/2015	Vadlamudu Ramappa vs Yenugula Venkata Ramappa	30 Apr 2018	Others	—
OS/120/2008	Boya Anjinamma and others vs Boya Ramudu and another	30 Apr 2018	Judgement	—
PRC/12/2018	SHO-DEVANAKONDA P.S- Golla Anjineyulu-D/Com vs Golla Sunkanna-A1	30 Apr 2018	Order	—
OS/49/2016	M.Rangaswamy. vs Ediga Venkateswarlu.	27 Apr 2018	Others	—
OS/121/2010	Harijana Moddu Shantamma vs District collecotr Kurnool	27 Apr 2018	Judgement	—
OS/162/2015	Hari Kiran vs K. Mruthunjaya	27 Apr 2018	Others	—
CC/172/2016	Ediga Chandrakala. vs Golla Bhalla Yaganti. A-1	26 Apr 2018	Judgement	—
CC/185/2016	B.Sreeramulu. vs Varikuppala Vaddera Venkatesh. A-1	26 Apr 2018	Judgement	—
OS/16/2016	B.Siddanna vs Bodibanda Yagantaiah	25 Apr 2018	Judgement	—
OS/233/2017	PERMANENT INJUNCTION - Vadde Ranganna vs Driver VAdda Nagesh-D1	25 Apr 2018	Judgement	—
OS/245/2017	PRONOTE - V. Raja Sekhar vs B.Kowlutla	25 Apr 2018	Judgement	—
CC/135/2018	SHO-PATTIKONDA P.S- Nanavath Raju Naik-D/Complainant vs N. Chandra Naik.	25 Apr 2018	Judgement	—
EP/32/2016	Uppara Sreenivasulu. vs Kuruvaladoddi Ranganna.	24 Apr 2018	Others	—
OS/41/2011	Uppara Chinna Sanjappa vs Sareddi Jayarami Reddy and another	24 Apr 2018	Others	—
CC/47/2017	K.Laksshmi Devi vs Y.Ramanjaneyulu	24 Apr 2018	Judgement	—
CC/380/2017	Sub-Inspector of police,MADDIKERA PS vs Katika Ilaya Raju	24 Apr 2018	Judgement	—
CC/82/2018	SHO- JONNAGIRI P.S- S.Nazeer Ahammad-D/Comlainant vs Yerukala Nagaraju.	23 Apr 2018	Judgement	—

Showing 100 of 650 orders — Log in to browse all pages.

Monthly Orders (Last 12 Months)

Jun 2018		32
May 2018		51
Apr 2018		112
Mar 2018		50
Feb 2018		50
Jan 2018		45
Dec 2017		26
Nov 2017		45
Oct 2017		47
Sep 2017		28
Aug 2017		43
Jul 2017		101

Frequently Asked Questions

How many cases has SRI. MOHD. ABDUL JALEEL handled?

SRI. MOHD. ABDUL JALEEL has handled 651 court orders since 2017 at Junior Civil Judge`s Court, Pattikonda (Taluka). The average disposal rate is 50 orders per month.

What types of cases does SRI. MOHD. ABDUL JALEEL hear?

Based on available records, SRI. MOHD. ABDUL JALEEL primarily handles Criminal matters (Criminal Cases) and Civil matters (Original Suits, Execution Petitions) at Junior Civil Judge`s Court, Pattikonda (Taluka).

Where is SRI. MOHD. ABDUL JALEEL currently posted?

SRI. MOHD. ABDUL JALEEL is posted as JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE at Junior Civil Judge`s Court, Pattikonda (Taluka), Kurnool, Andhra Pradesh.

Are judgments by SRI. MOHD. ABDUL JALEEL available online?

Yes. 4 judgments by SRI. MOHD. ABDUL JALEEL are available on Legistro with full text, outcome, and sections cited.

How fast does SRI. MOHD. ABDUL JALEEL dispose cases?

SRI. MOHD. ABDUL JALEEL disposes approximately 50 cases per month, based on 651 orders handled over their tenure at Junior Civil Judge`s Court, Pattikonda (Taluka).

Since when is SRI. MOHD. ABDUL JALEEL serving?

SRI. MOHD. ABDUL JALEEL has been serving at Junior Civil Judge`s Court, Pattikonda (Taluka) since 2017.

Case Types

CC 61%

OS 27%

EP 8%

PRC 2%

MC 2%

A 0%

DVC 0%

RCC 0%

Posting History

May 2017 — Jun 2018

JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE · 651 orders

Other Judges at this Court

T Jyothsna Devi

JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE

423 orders

← View all judges at Junior Civil Judge`s Court, Pattikonda (Taluka)