Sri Mohd. Abdul Javeed Pasha(FAC)

IN THE COURT OF THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS

AT :: BHAINSA::

Between SHO PS Bhainsa Town 01-02-2025

...Complainant

and

A1 Irfan Kahan and another

...Accused

::ORDER ::

A1 called present. A2 called absent. The defacto complainant i.e., LW1 called present. The defacto complainant and injured intend to settle this case before the National Lok Adalath. As per the judgment of Hon''ble High Court of Kerala in Y.P Baiju vs State of Kerala of others reported in 2008 Crl.L.J. 928 even the absence of the accused compromise can be recorded when the defacto complainant and victim comes forward and reports compromise. The APPO filed the memo to alter the section of law from Sec.324 IPC to sec.323 IPC, the said memo is considered and altered the section of law from sec.324 IPC to Sec.323 IPC, in the interest of justice and in view of the compromise reported by both parties. The learned APP filed the petition for withdrawal of sec.294(b) IPC. In view of the compromise reported byboth parties permission is accorded for withdrawal of sec.294b IPC. Accused is acquitted u.sec.320(8) Cr.P.C for the offences punishable u.sec.323 r/w 34 IPC. The bail bonds and surety bonds of the accused shall stand cancelled.

JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS,

BHAINSA.

Dt: 31-01-2019

OS/30/20131 / 1

TSNR030001832013

IN THE COURT OF THE Junior Civil Judge: Bhainsa

Present: Junior Civil Judge, Bhainsa

OS/30/2013

Between:

Rathod Jayshree Address: Occ agriculture … Plaintiff/Petitioner AND

Jadhav Nagesh Address: Occ Agriculture … Defendent/Respondent

Counsel for Petitioner : Sri. BRK Adv.,Advocate

Counsel for Respondent : Sri. Dileep Kulakarni Adv.,Advocate

This (case type) having come before me for hearing today, having heard and considered the record, this court delivered the following :

ORDER

Plaintiff called absent. No representation. On perusal of the docket orders, this case is coming for trial since long time and inspite of ample opportunity and condition orders of this court, neither the plaintiff present nor adduced his side evidence. It seems that plaintiff is not interested to proceed with this case. Hence, this suit is dismissed for default.

Dt: 31-01-2019

OS/30/20131 / 1

This Order Generated in Case Information System (CIS) on 31-01-2019 {JUDGE_DESIGNATION_NAM} Bhainsa (Visit ecourts.gov.in for updates or download mobile app “eCourts Services” from Android or iOS)

IN THE COURT OF THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS

AT :: BHAINSA::

Between SHO P.S Lokeshwaram 01-02-2025

...Complainant

and

A1 Srirampuram Lalu and another

...Accused

::ORDER ::

A1 and A2 called present. The defacto complainant and injured i.e., LWs 1 and 2 called present. Both parties intend to settle this case before the national lok Adalath. The learned APP filed the petition u/sec.321 Cr.P.c for withdrawal of sec.181 and 196 of MV Act on A1 and Sec.180 and 196 of MV Act on A2. In view of the compromise reported by both parties, permission is accorded for withdrawal of sec.181 and 196 of MV act on A1 and Sec.180 and 196 MV Act on A2. A1 is called present. The defacto complainant and injured persons i.e. LWs 1 and 2 called present. Compromise recorded Accused is acquitted u/sec.320(8) Cr.P.C. for the offence punishable u/sec.337 IPC. The bail bonds and surety bonds of the Accused shall stand cancelled.

JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS,

BHAINSA.

IN THE COURT OF THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS

AT :: BHAINSA::

Between SHO PS Lokeshwaram 01-02-2025

...Complainant

and

A1 Kuthari laxmi

...Accused

::ORDER ::

A1 to A7 called present. The defacto complainant and injured i.e., LW1 called present. Both parties intend to settle this case before the national lok Adalath. The learned APP filed the petition for withdrawal of sec.294(b) IPC. In view of the compromise reported by both parties. permission is accorded for withdrawal of sec.294(b) IPC. Accused is acquitted u.sec.320(8) of Cr.P.C for the offence punishable u.sec.448, 323 and 506 r/w 34 IPC. The bail bonds and surety bonds of the A1 to A7 shall stand cancelled.

JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS,

BHAINSA.

IN THE COURT OF THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS

AT :: BHAINSA::

Between Deepika 01-02-2025

...Complainant

and

Naremdhra patel and another

...Accused

::ORDER ::

Petitioner is called. Absent. No represented for her. since long time also absent. As the petitioner failed to commence her evidence, in spite of granting served adjournments, it appears that petitioner post interest in prosecuting the case. Considering the case docket, thus petition is dismissed for default.

JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS,

BHAINSA.