Sri N.ramesh Babu

1C.C.09/2011/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SPECIAL JUDGE FOR C.B.I. CASES,

VISAKHAPATNAM.

Present:Sri N.RAMESH BABU

Principal Spl. Judge for C.B.I. Cases,

Visakhapatnam.

Friday, this the 28 th day of June, 2019

C.C.No.09/2011

Between:

State represented by CBI, Visakhapatnam.

…Complainant And:

1.Mr.M.Anil Kumar, S/o late Singaiah, Branch Manager (dismissed), Union Bank of India, Pasumarru branch, Chilakaluripet, Guntur District, R/o D.No.4-15-117/8B1, Bharatpet, Guntur. (Accused No.1)

2. Mr.Eluri Prasada Rao, S/o late Govindaiah, President, The Martur Sericulture Intergrated RuralDevelopmentSociety(MSIRDS), Pathepuram, Santha Mauguluru Mandal, Prakasam District, R/o D.No.8-84. Balaramnagar, Martur, Prakasam District (Accused No.2).

3.Mr.Budati Lakshminarayana, S/o Anjaneyulu, Proprietor, M/s Alankar Silk Palace, Main Road, Chilakaluripet, Guntur District. R/o Opp. Pavuluri Sivaramaiah Hospital main road, Chilakaluripet, Guntur District. (Accused No.3)

4. Mr.Boyapati Veeranjaneyulu, S/o Chandraiah, Member, the Martur Sericulture Integrated Rural Development Society (MSIRDS), Pathepuram, Santha Mauguluru Mandal, Prakasam District. R/o Ponugotivaripalem, Arepalli Muppala, Ipur Mandal, Guntur District.(Accused No.4)

5. Mr.S.Sivaram Prasad, S/o Hanumantha Rao, LIC Agent, LIC of India, Chilakaluripet, Guntur District, R/o D.No.2-30/A, Ramulavariveedhi, Vinjanampadu post, Via Martur, Yaddanapudi Mandal, Prakasam District.(Accused No.5)

6. Mr.M.Siva Prasad, S/o Lakshmi Narasaiah, LIC Agent, LIC of India, Chilakaluripet, Guntur District, R/o D.No.37-81, Purushothampatnam 2C.C.09/2011/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Post,Chilakaluripet,GunturDistrict. (Accused No.6)

7. Mr.Dachepalle Narayana Murthy, S/o late Jagannadham, Clerk, Shop & Residence, M/s Vijaya Lakshmi Kirana Centre, Nh-5 road, Nagarajupalli Centre, Martur, Guntur District. (Accused No.7)

….. Accused No.1 to A7

This case came on14.06.2019 for final hearing before me in the presence of Mr.Ch.Chennakesavulu, Ld. Sr.Public Prosecutor for the

Complainant and of Mr.G.V.A.Sai Baba, Advocate for A1, Mr.N.V.V.Prasad,

Advocate for A2, Mr.M.V.Sudhakar, Advocate for A3, Mr.Y.V.Prasad, Advocate for A4, A6 and A7 and of Mr.M.Ravee Raju, Advocate for A5 and the matter having stood over for consideration till this day, this Court doth the following:

J U D G M E N T

1.The Inspector of Police, SPE, CBI, Visakhapatnam has filed a charge sheet in RC No.06(A)/2007-CBI/VSP for the offence under Sections 120-B, 419, 420, 468, 470 and 471 IPC and under Section 13(2) r/w 13(1)

(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act 1988 with the following allegations:

2.Mr.M.Anil Kumar(A1) who worked as Branch Manager, Pasumarru

Branch, Union Bank of India during the period from 11th July, 2001 to 22nd

December, 2003 submitted a proposal recommending sanction of loan to the tune of Rs.1.10crores to the Martur Sericulture integrated Rural

Development Society (MSIRDS), Pathepuram. The Field General Manager,

Chennai sanctioned Agricultural Term Loan of Rs.107.25lakhs as per the recommendations of Branch and Regional Office, Vijayawada. As per sanction terms, the “ Disbursement of loan should be made directly to the suppliers/dealers along with the margin money and state and central government portion. The relevant bills/stamped receipts should be certified by the Inspector and Asst. Director of Sericulture, Ongole and should be held on record. The end use will be supervised by the Inspector and Asst. Director 3C.C.09/2011/Prl. CBI Court/VSP of Sericulture, Ongole, BM/RDO and Society President/ Secretary. BM/RDO should visit the unit along with the Govt. Officials on monthly intervals and branch should ensure submission of progress report of the project certified by the Asst. Director Sericulture during the project implementation”.

3.The Assistant Director, Agriculture vide his letter No.362/PP/ 2003-04/B dt.20.09.2003 informed Pasumarru branch that the loan should be released after Joint Inspection and satisfaction of both the parties and after taking permission from the Commissioner of Sericulture. But, Sh.Anil Kumar without following the above instructions disbursed loan of Rs.39lakhs by issuing 3 pay orders in favour of M/s Sudha Enterprises . The pay orders were en-cashed through Vijaya Bank by opening the account in the name of

M/s Sudha enterprises on the date of issuing 1st Pay Order and after encashment of the same and the account was closed on 12.02.2004. There is nothing in the name of Sudha Enterprises at the given address and bill produced appeared to be bogus/fabricated.

4.Mr.Eluri Prasad Rao(A2) who is the President of Martur Sericulture

Integrated Rural Development Society (MSIRDS), Pathepuram Prakasam

District opened a current account bearing No.30017 on 16.07.2003 and he was introduced to the bank by Mr.B.L.Narayana(A3) who is proprietor of

Alankar Silk Palace, Main Road, Chilkaluripet, partner of M/s Alankar Silk

Palace who is holding CD A/c No.23024. As per the sanctioned terms the following lands are to be given as Collateral security.

i) Ac 68.73cents valued at Rs.96.22lakhs(at Arepalli village, Rompicherla Madnal). ii)Ac 17.89cents valued at Rs.23.25lakhs (at Arepalli village, Rompicherla Mandal) iii) Ac 42.15cents valued at Rs.56.90lakhs (At Koppam village, Santhamaguluru Mandal) iv)Ac 0.25cents valued t Rs.16.47 lakhs(at Ganapavaram village) 4C.C.09/2011/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

5.The MSRIDS submitted the unregistered lease agreement dated 08.09.2003 for a period of 5 years from 08.07.2003 to 07.07.2008 entered with the following parties for cultivation of mulberry in the lands.

SName ofPeriodLeaseLocationD.No.Extent NExecutantsper o.Acre/ year FromTo

1.Eluri Govindaiah8.07.037.07.083000/-Elchuru 5032.00

2.Eluri Prasada Rao8.07.037.07.083000/-Elchuru 50321.00 S/o Govindaiah

3.Eluri Prasada Rao8.07.037.07.083000/-Kopparam887/A23.00 S/o Govindaiah

4.EluriSrinivasa8.09.037.07.083000/-Kopparam1012/011.00 Rao

5.SurePeda8.09.037.07.083000/-Arepalli91/168.73 Narasaiah, Sure China NArasaiah, Sure Anjaneyulu, S/oAppaiah Pathepuram

6.Boyapati8.09.037.07.083000/-ARepalli 14-2/417.89 Veeranjaneyulu S/o Chandraiah Pathepuram

6.The Regional Office, Union Bank of India, Vijayawada received a letter bearing No.RC.362/2003-B, dt.15.07.2003 from Mr.I.P.Sukumar Sen,

Asst.Director, Sericulture, Ongole, Prakasam District, informing that an

Sericulture, Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad, by Central Silk Board, Bangalore. He further informed that the Commissioner of Sericulture, Hyderabad , A.P.

released an amount of Rs.35.4975lakh as 1st installment to start the programme and the amount was deposited in the Union Bank of India,

Pasamarru Branch, On 12.06.2003. As per the records an amount of Rs.35lakh was released as Central Government Subsidy(CSB) and the same was deposited in Union Bank of India, Pasumarru Branch, Chilakaluripet. No other subsidy from State or Central Government was received by the Branch. Even the borrowers margin money was also not routed through the account.

Mr.M.Anil Kumar without following the instructions, which were sent along 5C.C.09/2011/Prl. CBI Court/VSP with sanction advice to Union Bank of India, Pasamarru Branch, Chilakaluripet without receiving the corresponding/matching subsidy and Members Margin

Money released the following amounts on the dates mentioned against each.

10.10.2003Rs.30,02,200 17.10.2003Rs.20,00,000 27.10.2003Rs. 1,00,000 31.10.2003Rs. 70,000 18.11.2003Rs.39,50,000 20.12.2003Rs. 1,32,075 26.03.2004Rs. 19,000 ---------------- TOTALRs.92,73,275 ----------------

Out of the total outstanding amount of Rs.92,73,275/- an amount of Rs.39.50lakhs was released on 18.11.2003 by totally ignoring the sanction stipulations and telegram dt.14.10.2003. Out of this, an amount of

Rs.23lakh was drawn by way of Self cheque bearing No.25771 dt.18.11.2003.

This amount was drawn by third party namely one Mr.Siva Rama Prasad(A5) who is working as LIG agents, LIC of India, Chilakaluripeta, Guntur District.

On 11.10.2003 Mr.Anil Kumar(A1) had drawn one Memorandum for creation of Equitable Mortgage of land Ac.68.73cents. The declaration for creation of

E.M of ac.68.73cents is impersonated. The owners i.e., Mr.Sure Anjaneyulu,

Mr.Sure Venkata Narasaiah of the land have given in writing that they had not executed any mortgage to the Bank. Mr.M.Anil Kumar (A1), the then

Branch Manager, vide letter No.03, dt.31.10.2003 confirmed to Regional

Office, Vijayawada that the E.M was created on 11.10.2003 (though the Gift

Deed was registered on 14.11.2003). He also informed in the limit proposal dt.26.8.2003, that the MSIRDS had already purchased Ac.5.00cents of land in R.S.No.945/C2, at Pathepuram to construct the sheds. However the said land was purchased on 17.11.2003, E.M. was created on 18.11.2003 and legal opinion was also obtained on the same day.

6C.C.09/2011/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

7. The branch had drawn a memorandum of deposition of title deeds for the properties offered as both primary/Collateral securities for the loan Rs.1,07,25,000/- sanctioned to the MSIRDS as under.

Sl.No.Date ofParticulars of Property Name of the Properties E.MOwners

1.18.11.03Ac,5.15Cents–The MSIRDS Kopparum

2.11.10.03Ac 42.15cents ElchuruEluri Govindaiah & KopparumEluri Srinivasa Rao Eluri Prasada Rao

3.11.10.0325.35centsPavuluri Siva Ramaiah Ganapavaram

4.11.10.03Ac 68.73cents ArepalliSure Peda Narasaiah Sure Narasaiah Sure Anjaneyulu

5.15.11.03Ac 17.89 Arepalli Boyapati Veeranjaneyulu

The MSIRDS submitted a sale Agreement dated 15.06.03 for purchase of 5.15Acres of land from Jammula Bhaskar, S/o Bala Kotaiah

Pathepuram. However the signatures of Mr.Jammula Bhaskar on sale agreement and the sale deed bearing No.6153/03 dated 17.11.03 are not matching with each other. A Gift Deed was registered as No.6124/03, dt.14.11.2003 for an extent of Ac.17.89cents in favour of Mr.Boyapati

Veeranjaneyulu (done). The gift was purportedly given by Mr.Sure Peda

Narasayya, Narasayya and Anjaneyulu (Donors). It is also stated that the done is nephew of the donors. Since, Sure Anjaneyulu and his brother Sure

Venkata Narasayya stated that they had never executed such a gift deed in favour of Mr.Boyapati Veeranjaneyulu and Mr.Boyapati Veeranjaneyulu is not their nephew. In fact Mr.Boyapati Veeranjaneyulu is not at all related to them and they do not have a sister by name Smt.Chenchamma, W/o Mr.Boyapati

Chandraiah. They did not go to Sub- Registrar’s Office, Narasaropet on 12.11.2003 for execution of such any registered deed.

7C.C.09/2011/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

8.A document bearing No.6420/1966 was registered at Sub

Registrar Office, Narasaropet, Pertaining to 13 acres of land under Survey (demarcation) No.887/A of Kopparam Village, Santhamagaluru Mandalam,

Prakasam District. The same was executed among Mr.Kanumuri Govinda

Reddy who purchased the above said 13 acres of land from Sri Kanumuri

Bala Kotaiah, S/o Peraiah and 21 others of Pathepuram village,

Santhamagaluru Mandalam, Prakasam District for a sale consideration of

Rs.7800/- on 2.10.1966 and the same was registered at Sub- Registrar Office,

Narasaraopet. Mr.K.Bapi Reddy, S/o Mr.Govinda Reddy stated that he went to Mandal Revenue Office, Santhamagaluru and met Dy.Tahsildar and requested him for issuance of Pattadar Pass Books for the above said land.

The Dy.Tahsildar verified records like 10-1 Adangal and fount that Pattadar

Pass Books were not issued to them. He asked Mr.K.Bapi Reddy to meet the

MandalRevnueOfficer,Santhamagaluru.Accordingly

Mr.Bapipreddy met the MRO. The MRO advised him to get a no dues certificate from Union Bank of India, Pasumarru Branch, Chilakaluripet as it was learnt that there was a loan obtained by pledging the above said lands.

On 26.6.08, he went to Union Bank of India and requested the Branch

Manager to issue no dues certificate for the above said land of 13 acres in

S.No.887/A of Kopparam Village. He was instructed to furnish an

Encumbrance Certificate for the above said lands. He obtained E.C from the

SRO, Narasaraopet wherein it was mentioned that the said property was leased to 150 farmers by one Mr.Eluri Prasad Rao. It was further mentioned in the E.C that vide document No.9988 of 2001 of SRO, Narasaraopet, the said property belonged to Mr.Eluri Prasada Rao and others. He stated that neither his father nor he had ever sold that property to anybody and to

Mr.Eluri Prasada Rao, particularly.

8C.C.09/2011/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

9. The original letter No.CSB/37/(296)/AP/2002-07-TS dt.28.3.2003 from

Mr. B.Prakash, Deputy Secretary (Tech), CSB, Bangalore addressed to the

COS, A.P.Hyderabad, copy marked to (1) Assistant Secretary (Tech), RDO,

CSB, Hyderabad for information and (2) Martur Sericulture Society, Martur, was not received in the office of Commissioner of Sericulture, Hyderabad and

Mr.R.Chandra Sekhar, Joint Director, Sericulture, Hyderabad confirmed that the signature of Mr.B.Prakash, Dy.Secretary (Tech), CSB, BLR does not belong to Mr.B.Prakash. Vide memo No.1650/TMI/2001, dt.04.06.2003, COS,

Hyderabad released an amount of Rs.35,49,750/- to Asst. Director,

Sericulture, Ongole. On 14.10.2003, the Director of Sericulture had given a

Telegram to the Branch stating that the branch should inform him before release of any amount and to release the amount only after joint inspection by the Department and the Branch. Inspsite of the instructions, Mr.Anil

Kumar continued to release the amounts to the party. On 3.1.2004, the COS,

A.P., Hyderabad had requested the Dist Collectors of Guntur & Prakasham to depute the Asst. Director (Survey and Land Records), M.R.O concerned, AD

Sericulture concerned to demarcate the land on ground to know whether the planted area matches with the Survey Nos. On 24.1.2004, the COS, A.P.

Hyderabad had requested the Dist Collectors of Guntur & Prakasham to complete survey of land. On 31.1.2004 a joint inspection report was submitted after conducting the land survey and approval by district

Collector. Further on 3.2.2004 a Joint Inspection was conducted with MRO,

Surveyor, Revenue Inspector of Rompicharla Mandal and observed that no mulberry plantation was taken up in Arepalli village of Rompicherla Mandal.

On 4.3.2004, the Dist Collector Guntur had furnished the joint inspection report on survey of land.

10.A1 had released the following amounts on 18.11.03.

9C.C.09/2011/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Sl.No.Date ofAmountinPurpose Infavour of ReleaseRs.

1.18.11.038,00,000/-PurchaseofM/sSudha Cement & Ironenterprises

2.18.11.0317,50,000ForRearing1. M/sSudha (8,50,000+equipments & ColliEnterprises 9,00,000)Charges2. Credited to Cd A/c No.30017

3.18.11.035,00,000/-ForRearingCredited to CD (A/cequipments A/c No.30017 No.12821)

11. M/s Sudha Enterprises is a fictitious firm and one Mr.M.Siva

Prasad(A6) who is working as LIC agent in Chilakaluripeta, Guntur District and he opened an account in the said firm’s name at Vijaya Bank on 10.10.2003. It is also found that there is no firm/office in the name of Sudha

Enterprises at the given address and the bills produced are found to be bogus/fabricated. Three Pay Orders were issued in favour of the said firm by Mr.Anil Kumar (A1) as under:

Sl.No.Pay Order number and Date Amount

1.P.O.No.9292623, dt.10.10.03Rs.15,99,595(Rs.16,02,200- Comm.2605) 2PO No.9292626, dt.20.10.03Rs.14,97,750(Rs.15,00,000-Com, 2250/-)

3.PO No.9292633, dt.18.11.03Rs.7,98,800(Rs.8,00,000- com.1200/-)

Further, it is revealed that the amounts so credited through the above three Pay Orders were disbursed to the following persons as under.

S.ChequeAmount inInfavour of Remarks No.No.&Dt.Rs.

1.582807,525/-M.Siva PrasadFilled in the 3.1.04chequeand signed

2.0582801,7,98,000/-S.Siva Rama Prasad-do- 21.10.03

3.0582810,2,00,000/-P.siva Rama Prasad-do- 11.2.04 40582811,1,000/-Self-do- 12.2.04

5.026966,10,00,000/-Self-do- 11.10.03

6.026968,5,99,000/-Self-do- 10C.C.09/2011/Prl. CBI Court/VSP 13.10.03

7.0582694.7,00,000/-Self-do- 20.10.03

8.0582804,4,32,000/-Sree Lakshmi VenkateswaraSignedthe 17.12.03CottonTradersS.Sivacheque Ramaprasad

9.0582802,2,98,000/-S.Siva Ramaprasad-do- 21.11.03

10.0582809,4,62,000/-Sree Lakshmi Venkateswara-do- 9.01.04Cotton Traders

11.0582803,5,00,000/-B.L.Narayana-do- 19.11.03

It is further alleged that Mr.S.Siva Ram Prasad (A5) with drew an amount of Rs.7,98,000/- vide Ch.No.0582801, 21.10.03 from the account of

M/s Sudha enterprises. He had also withdrawn an amount of Rs.2,98,000/- vide Ch.No.0582802, dated 21.11.03, Mr.B.L.Narayana (A3) withdrew an amount of Rs.5,00,000/- vide Ch.o.0582803, dated 19.11.03 from the said account. An amount of Rs.4,32,000/- vide cheque No.582804, dt.17.12.2003 and an amount of Rs.4,62,000/- vide cheque No.582809, dt.09.01.2004 were issued by Sri M.Siva Prasad(A6) in favour of Sri Lakshmivenkateswara Cotton

Traders for which Mr.Budati Laxminarayana (A3) is the proprietor. These cheques were presented by UCO Bank, Guntur for collection at Vijaya Bank,

Chilakaluripet and the same were honoured. The signatures behind he cheques were of Mr.Budati Lakshminarayana (A3).

12.Subsequently the Inspector of Police of CBI, Visakhapatnam has filed an additional charge sheet against Mr.Dachepalle Narayana Murthy showing him as A7 alleging that he conspiracy with A1 to A3 had opened an account bearing No.385 with Syndicate Bank, Brundavangardens Branch,

Guntur in the name of M/s Vignesh Enterprises a non-existing firm on the basis of false and fictitious documents and obtained pecuniary advantage to a tune of Rs.8,46,600/- out of the sanctioned loan amount of 11C.C.09/2011/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Rs.92.73lakhs. in favour of MSIRDS on the basis of false and fictitious quotations submitted in the name of a non-existing firm namely M/s Siri

Enterprises, Guntur. Mr.Anil Kumar (A1), the Bank Manager issued a DD bearing No.760/18315 on 19.11.2003 for Rs.8,46,600/- favouring Siri

Enterprises to be drawn at Union Bank of India, Guntur Main Branch, Guntur.

The same DD was sent to Union Bank of India, Main Branch, Guntur for collection by Syndicate Bank, Guntur. There was an endorsement on the back of the DD favouring M/s Vignesh Enterprises. Sri Dachepalli Narayana

Murthy is the Proprietor of M/s Vignesh Enterprises. An amount of

Rs,.8,46,600/- was credited to the account No.385 through DD No.18315 dt.20.11.2003 drawn on Union Bank of India, Guntur. The account was closed on 21.06.2004 and the balance at the time of closure of the account was Rs.6/-. M/s Siri Enterprises does not have any Bank account in

Syndicate Bank, Brundavangardens Branch, Guntur.

13. Considering the contents of the charge sheet and additional charge sheet, the case was taken on file for the offences under Sections 120-B, 420

IPC and u/Sec.13(2) r/w 13(1) (d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 against A1 and u/Sec. 120-B and 420 IPC against A2 and U/sec.120-B, 420, 468 and 471 IPC against A3 and u/Sec.120-B, 419, 420, 468 and 471 IPC against A4 and u/Sec.120-B, 419 and 420 IPC against A5 and A6 and u/Sec.120-B, 420, 468 and 471 IPC against A7. After the accused made their appearance, the copies of documents were furnished to them as required under Section 207 Cr.P.C. and they acknowledged the same.

14. Upon hearing both sides, the charges under secs.120-B, 420 IPC against A1 to A7 and u/Sec.419 IPC against A4 and u/Sec.468 r/w 471 IPC against A4, A6 and A7 and u/Sec.13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of 12C.C.09/2011/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Corruption Act, 1988 against A.1 were framed, read over and explained to them for which they pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried.

15. In order to prove the case of prosecution, the prosecution side had got examined as many as 44 witnesses as PWs.1 to PW.44 and got marked Exs.P1 to Ex.P322 documents on its behalf.

16. After closure of the prosecution side evidence, the accused were examined U/Sec.313 Cr.P.C. informing to them the incriminating evidence available on record against them, for which they have stated the same is false and that they did not commit any offence.

17.The 2nd accused has got examined one witness as DW.1. The 1st accused got examined one witness as DW.2. No oral evidence is adduced on behalf of the other accused. Ex.D1 to Ex.D5 documents were marked on behalf of the defence side.

18. I have heard the learned Public Prosecutor for the prosecution and the learned counsel for the accused. The learned public prosecutor has submitted written arguments also. The learned counsel for A1 to A3 have submitted their respective written arguments. I have perused the case record and the evidence on record both oral and documentary and also the written arguments submitted by the learned public prosecutor for the prosecution and the learned counsel for A1 to A3.

19. The evidence adduced by the prosecution side, both oral and documentary is as follows:

13C.C.09/2011/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

P.W.1 namely Mr.D. Rama Rao, the then Branch Manager, Union

Bank of India, Pasumarru branch, Guntur has deposed that A1 recommended

Medium Term loan to MSIRDS (Martur Sericulture integrated Rural

Development Society)and that Ex.P.1 is photo copy of Certificate of

Registration of Society MSIRDS under Society Registration Act dated 12.3.2001. Ex.P.2 is original current account opening form of MSIRDS dated 16.7.2003 bearing account no 30017 and the account holder was introduced by Mr.B.Laxminarayana (A3) who is having current account with their branch bearing no. 23024. A3 is one of the partners of Alankar Silk Palace. Ex.P.3 is specimen signatures card which contains the signatures of society president

Eluri Prasad Rao (A2) and Treasurer Mr.K.Rama Rao. Ex.P.4 is photo copy of

Memorandum of Association of MSIRDS along with plan (Photocopy) showing the proposed construction of RCC sheds of MSIRDS, Pathepuram village,

Santamagulru Mandal, Prakasam District. Ex.P.5 is original application for medium term loan of Rs. 1,10,00,000/- of MSIRDS. Ex.P.6 is original sale agreement dated 15.6.2003 executed by Jammula Bhaskar infavour of

MSIRDS for a consideration of 8 lakhs in respect of the Ac.5.15 cents at

Pathepuram village, in D No. 945/C2. Ex.P.7 is original sale deed bearing Doc no. 6154/2003 dated 17.11.2003 executed by Mr.Jammula Bhaskar infavour of MSIRDS for the same extent in Ex.P.6 for consideration of Rs. 1,13,500/-.

P.W.1 has further deposed that Ex.P.8 is original letter addressed by Mr.I.P.Sukumar Singh, Assistant Director of Sericulture, Ongole, Prakasam district bearing letter no. RC NO. 362/2003-B, dt. 15.7.2003 to the Regional

Manager, Union Bank of India, Vijayawada, informing that the MSIRDS initially proposed to develop Ac 500.00 under mulberry cultivation under the

Catalytic development program with the assistance of both State and Central

Governments. Initially sanctioned Ac 150.00 in the first spell to implement 14C.C.09/2011/Prl. CBI Court/VSP the program with a total outlay of Rs 304.19 lakhs. Rs 83.07 lakhs, Rs.67.05 lakhs are the subsidy of Central silk board and State Government respectively and Rs. 110.25 lakhs are the loan portion and the balance is beneficiary contribution. In this an amount of Rs.35,49,750/- is the first installment. Ex.P.9 is statement of account of SB account No.9180 of

Assistant Director, Sericulture, Ongole and on 27.6.2003 an amount of

Rs.35,49,750/- was credited to this account. Ex.P.10 is original letter addressed by S.K.Sinha, IAS, Commissioner of Sericulture, AP, Hyderabad to the Assistant General Manger, Union Bank of India, Regional Office,

Vijayawada dated 17.11.2003 informing release of Rs. 8,16,750/- to the

Branch Manager, Union Bank of India Pasumarr requesting to credit

Rs.5,445/- to each of the 150 beneficiaries accounts but the branch manager has credited the entire amount to the account of President of the MSIRDS society.

P.W.1 has further deposed that Ex.P.11 is statement of account of MSIRDS current account bearing no. 30017 showing the credit of Rs 8,16,750/- on 16.7.2003. Ex.P.12 is original Pre sanction inspection report

dated 26.8.2003 signed by Mr.K.Gopinadh, Assistant Manager and Mr.M.Anil

Kumar Branch Manager, informing the brief history of the society and inspection of the firms and plantations and support from the Sericulture department and the total value of securities mentioned in the pre sanction inspection report which is Ex.P12 is Rs.192.84 lakhs, which signing authority recommended for sanction of Rs.1.10 crores to 150 farmers of

MSIRDS society. He identified signature of A1 as Branch Manager in Ex.P.12.

Ex.P.13 is original lease agreement executed by Mr.Elure Govindiah in favour of MSIRDS dated 8.9.2003 for a period of 5 years from 8.7.2003 to 7.7.2008.

Schedule property in lease agreement is Ac 2.00 cents of land in Elurchuru 15C.C.09/2011/Prl. CBI Court/VSP village in D.No. 503 and Lease amount is Rs.3000/- per year per acre.

Ex.P.14 is another lease agreement dated 8.9.2003 executed by Mr.Elure

Papa Rao in favour of MSIRDS for a period of 5 years from 8.7.2003 to 7.7.2008. Schedule property in that lease agreement is Ac 21.00 cents of land in Elurchuru village in D.No.503 and Lease amount is Rs.3000/- per acre per year. Ex.P.15 is another lease agreement dated 8.9.2003 executed by

Mr.Elure Prasad Rao( A2) in favour of MSIRDS for a period of 5 years from 8.7.2003 to 7.7.2008 and schedule property in that lease agreement contains 2 items, first item is Ac 23.00 cents of land in Kopparam village in

D.No. 887/A and second item is Ac12.00 cents of land in Kopparam village in

D.No. 886/B1,886/B2 and 886/C and lease amount for both items is Rs.3000/- per acre per year.

P.W.1 has further deposed that Ex.P.16 is another lease agreement

dated 8.9.2003 executed by Mr.Elure Srinivasa Rao in favour of MSIRDS for a

period of 5 years from 8.7.2003 to 7.7.2008 and Schedule property in that lease agreement contains 2 items. First item is Ac 4.15 cents of land in

Elchure village in D.No. 503. Second item is Ac. 1.00 cents of land in

Kopparam Village in D.NO. 1012/C1 and lease amount for both items is

Rs.3000/- per acre per year. Ex.P.17 is another lease agreement dated 8.9.2003 executed by Mr.Sure Pedanarasayya, Mr.Sure Chinnanarasayya and

Sure Anjaneyulu of Patthepuram village, Santhamaluru mandal, Prakasam district in favour of MSIRDS for a period of 5 years from 8.7.2003 to 7.7.2008 and the schedule property in that lease agreement is Ac 68.73 cents of land in Arepalle village, Guntur District in D.No. 91-1. Ex.P.18 is another lease agreement dated 8.9.2003 executed by Mr.Boyapati Veeranjaneyulu (A4) in favour of MSIRDS for a period of 5 years from 8.7.2003 to 7.7.2008 and the schedule property in that lease agreement is Ac 17.89 cents of land in 16C.C.09/2011/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Arepalle village , Guntur District in D.No. 14-2/4. Ex.P.19 is original letter addressed by Pasumarr branch, signed by Mr.M.Anil Kumar (A1) Branch

Manager to the Assistant General Manager, Regional office, Vijaywada informing the total number of accounts proposed to be opened in the term loan for 150 beneficiaries @Rs 73,500/- for each beneficiary involving a total amount of Rs. 1,10,25,000/- with the subsidy of Rs 1.42 crores and requesting the Regional Manager to go out of service area and disburse loan in this scheme. He identified signature of A1 in Ex.P.19. Ex.P.20 is the photo copy of office note dated 9.9.2003 by Union Bank of India, Regional Office,

Vijayawada, addressed to Field General Manager, FGM Office, Chennai, recommending sanction of Rs 107.25 lakhs to 150 member farmers of

MSIRDS.

P.W.1 has further deposed that Ex.P.21 is the photocopy of office note dated 3.10.2003 of General Managers office, Chennai informing sanction of Rs 107.25 lakhs stipulating certain terms and conditions. Ex.P.22 is the original sanction advice No.275/03 dated 8.10.2003 communicated by

Regional Office, Union Bank of India, Vijayawada to Union Bank of India,

Pasumarr branch informing the sanction of Rs 107.25 lakhs to MSIRDS with special instructions as per office note No.ROPST 336/03 dated 9.9.2003 and

FGM Chennai office note no.GMOCR10856, dt.3.10.2003 with terms from

S.No. 1 to 17 mentioned in that letter dated 8.10.2003. Ex.P.23 is original demand promissory note for Rs. 1,07,25,000/-dated 10.10.2003 executed by the President MSIRDS, Mr.Elure Prasada Rao and Treasurer Mr.K.Rama Rao.

Ex.P.24 is original memorandum of deposit of title deeds dated 18.11.2003 where in it is mentioned that MSIRDS deposited property covered under sale deed no. 6154/2003 (Ex.P.7) dated 17.11.2003 in respect of an extent of Ac 5.15 cents in D.No.945/C2 in Kopparam Village infavour of Union bank of 17C.C.09/2011/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

India, Posumarr branch. Ex.P.25 is original memorandum of deposit of title deeds of Mr.Elure Prasad Rao(A2) , Mr.Elure Srinivasa Rao of Pathepuram village on 10.10.2003. They deposited the following documents. 1) Title deed bearing Patta no. 1189 issued by MRO, Santhamaguluru mandal 2)

Registered partition deed No.9888/01 dated 30.10.01. 3) EC 2375/03 dated 27.8.03 4) Possession certificate issued by Panchayat Secretary 5) EC No.

2333/03 dated 26.8.03 6) EC no. 2334/03 dated 26.8.2003.

P.W.1 has further deposed that Ex.P.26 is memorandum of deposit of title deeds by Dr. Pavuluru Sivaramayya on 10.10.2003 and he deposited registered sale deed bearing doc. No.578/82 dated 16.3.82 and EC No.

910/03 dated 16.4.2003. Ex.P.27 is original Registered sale deed bearing doc.

No. 578/82 dated 16.3.82. Ex.P.28 is memorandum of deposit of title deeds on 10.10.2003 by Mr.Sri Sure Peddanarasayya, Mr.Sure Chinnanaryasayya,

Sure Anjaneyulu of Arepalle village. The title deeds deposited are registered sale deed No.279/24 dated 6.12.1923, Certificate by Village Secretary, True copy of No. 3 account issued by MRO, Rompicherla dated 28.11.03, EC 1359/03 dated 24/5/03 and certified copy of registered sale deed bearing no.

279/24 dated 6.12.1923. Ex.P.29 is certified copy of registered sale deed bearing No.279/24 dated 6.12.1923. Ex.P.30 is photocopy of legal opinion given by Mr.Panduranga Rao, Advocate, Chilakalurepet to the branch manager, Union Bank of India, Pasurmurr branch dated 20.5.2003 for an extent of Ac 68.73 cents of land situated at Arepalle village, Narasaraopet

Sub Registration district giving clear title for Ac 68.73 cents for equitable mortgage of the said property in favour of the bank.

P.W.1 has further deposed that Ex.P.31 is original memorandum of deposit of title deeds by Mr.Boyapati Veeranjaneyulu on 14.11.2003 18C.C.09/2011/Prl. CBI Court/VSP pertaining to Ac 17.89 cents of land in Survey.No.14/2/4 in Arepalli

Agraharam village. The following documents are deposited 1. Certified copy of registered sale deed bearing doc. No. 279/24 2) registered gift deed bearing doc. No. 6124/03 dated 14.11.03 3) true copy of 3 account issued by

MRO 4) certificate issued by village secretary Arepalli 5) another certificate issued by village secretary Arepalli 6) Ec no. 3746/2003 dated 15.11.2003 7)

Original registered sale deed bearing doc no. 2739/1924 dated 6.12.1923.

Ex.P.32 is original legal opinion given by Mr.T. Rajendra Prasad , advocate ,

Chilkalurepet, to the branch manager, Union Bank of India, Pasumarr in respect of an extent of Ac 5.15 cents in D.No.945/C2 , Kopparam village ,

Santhamaguluru Mandal, Prakasam District informing that the owners have absolute title for equitable mortgage of property in favour of the bank.

Ex.P.33 is original Encumbrance certificate bearing No.6463 dated 18.11.2003. Ex.P.34 is photo copy of title deed book in the name of

Mr.Jammula Bhaskar S/o Balakotayya for an extent of Ac 5.15 cents in D.No.

945/C2 , Pathepuram village.

P.W.1 has further deposed that Ex.P.35 is original declaration

dated 18.11.2003 given by Mr.Elure Prasada Rao (A2) declaring that he is the

owner of the property submitted to Union Bank of India. Ex.P.36 is the photocopy of legal opinion given by Mr.A.Pratap Kumar, Advocate,

Chilakalurupet to Union Bank of India, Pasamarr branch stating that there is clean marketable title in respect of properties in D.No.887/A of Kopparam village for Ac 23.00, D.No. 886/D1 for Ac 3.33 cents in Kopparam village and

D.No. 886/B2 for Ac 2.75 cents in Kopparam village and D.No. 886/C for Ac 6.64 cents in Kopparam village . Ex.P.37 is the photocopy of valuation report

dated 18.8.2003 given by Mr.B.Srinivasa Rao to Union Bank of India,

19C.C.09/2011/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Pasumarr branch pertaining to the properties of Mr.E.Govindayya, Mr.E.

Srinivasa Rao, Mr.E.Prasad Rao of Pathepuram village in D.No.503 of Alchuru,

D.No.1012/C1, D.NO.887/A, D.No.886/B1, 886/B-2, 886/C of Kopparam village for an extent of Ac 42.15 cents, for Rs. 56,90,000/- . Ex.P.38 is the original

Pattadhar pass book given to E.Prasada Rao by MRO, Santhamaguluru in respect of an extent of three properties in Survey nos 887/A, 886/B, 886/B2, 886/C, 945/C, for a total extent of Ac 37.00 cents. Ex.P.39 is original partition deed between Mr.E.Govindayya , Mr.E.Srinivasa Rao, Mr.E.Prasada Rao dated 30.10.2001. Mr.E.Prasad Rao got C schedule share which is shown as two items 1) Ac.23.00 cents and 2) Ac.12.00 cents. A schedule fell to the share of

Mr.E.Govindayya, extent is Ac. 2.00 cents. B Schedule fell to the share of

Mr.E.Srinivasa rao extent is Ac.5.15 cents. Total extent of A to C schedules is

Ac 42.15 cents. Ex.P.40 contains 3 Original ECs and they are EC no. 2375 of 2003, 2333/2003, 2334/2003.

P.W.1 has further deposed that Ex.P.41 is declaration given by

Mr.E.Govindayya, Mr.E.Srinivasa Rao Mr.E.Prasada Rao (A2) in respect of properties in D.No. 887/A for an extent of Ac. 23.00 cents, D.NO. 886/B1 for an extent of Ac 3.33 cents, D.NO.886/B2 for Ac 2.75 cents , D.NO. 886/C for

Ac 6.64 cents of Kopparam village and D.NO.503 for an extent of Ac 2.00 cents and D.No.503 for Ac 4.15 cents of Elchuru village and D.No. 1012/C1 for Ac1.00 of Elchuru village. Ex.P.42 is original legal opinion dated 29.5.2003 given by Mr.P.Panduranga Rao, Advocate , Chilkalurupet to the branch manager, Union Bank of India, Pasumarr in respect of extent of Ac 0.25 cents in Ganapavaram village of Chilkalurupet Sub registration district, giving a clear title for creating equitable mortgage in favour of the bank. Ex.P.43 is original Encumbrance certificate No.910 /2003 dated 16.4.2003. Ex.P.44 is 20C.C.09/2011/Prl. CBI Court/VSP original valuation report dated 23.5.2003 given by Mr.B.Srinivasa Rao to the property held in the name of Mr.P.Sivaramayya in respect of an extent of Ac 0.25 cents, for Rs. 16,47,000/-. Ex.P.45 is original declaration dated 11.10.2003 given by Mr.P.Sivaramayya in respect of an extent of

Ac 0.25 cents declaring that he is the absolute owner of the property.

P.W.1 has further deposed that Ex.P.46 is photo copy of valuation report dated 23.5.2003 given by Mr.P.Srinivasa Rao in respect of an extent of

Ac. 68.73 cents in Arepalli village of Rompicharla mandal, for an amount of

Rs 96,22,000/-. Ex.P.47 is original EC dated 24.5.2003. Ex.P.48 is original certificate issued by village secretary, Arepalli on 29.4.2003 , certifying that an extent of Ac 68.72 cents in Survey No.91/1 is in the possession of

Mr.Suryanarasayya and Mr.Suryanjaneyulu. Ex.P.49 is photo copy of Adangal

Pahani for the FASLI 1407 which corresponds to the year 1997-98. It is in respect of cultivation details in the lands mentioned therein. Ex.P.50 is declarationgivenbyMr.S.Pedanarasayya,Mr.S.Chinanarasayya,

Mr.S.Anjaneyulu of Arepalli village declaring that they are the owners of Ac 68.73 acres of land. Ex.P.51 is original legal opinion dated 15.11.2003 given by P.Panduranga Rao, Advocate, Chilakaluripet to Branch Manager, Union

Bank of India, Pasumarru stating that there is clear title to B.Veeranjaneyulu in respect of extent of Ac 17.89 cents in Arepalli agraharam for creation of

Equitable mortgage in favour of the bank. Ex.P.52 is the valuation report

dated 18.8.2003 given by B.Srinivasa Rao to Union Bank of India, Pasumarr

in respect of Ac 17.89 cents in Survey No. 14/2-4 of Arepalle village,

Rompicherla mandal as Rs. 23,25,000/-. Ex.P.53 is original Encumbrance certificate bearing No. 6418 dated 15.11.2003 in respect of an extent of Ac.

17.89 cents. Ex.P.54 is the original gift deed dated 12.11.2002 bearing

Doc.No. 6124/2003 executed by Mr.Sure Pedanarasayya, Mr.Sure 21C.C.09/2011/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Chinanarasayya, Mr.Sure Anjaneyulu, sons of Mr.Sure Appayya in respect of an extent of Ac 17.89 cents in Arepalli agraharam in Survey No.14/2-4.

Ex.P.55 is original certificate issued by Village Secretary, Arepalle dated 9.10.2003, certifying that Mr.B.Veeranjaneyulu( A4) is having absolute right over Ac 17.89 cents in D.No. 14/2-4 of Arepalli village.

P.W.1 has further deposed that Ex.P.56 is the photo copy of No.3

Adangal extract for FASLI 1407, corresponding year 1997-98, in respect of cultivation details in the lands mentioned therein. Ex.P.57 is the declaration given by Mr.B.veeranjaneyulu (A4) dated 14.11.2003 declaring that he is the absolute owner for an extent of Ac.17.89 cents in survey No.14/2-4. Ex.P.58 is original plan of TMSIRDS showing the location of extents of land of the persons mentioned there in Pathepuram, drawn by Panel valuer Union Bank,

Pasumurr branch and total extent mentioned in Ex.P.58 is Ac 137.25 cents confirmed by Branch Manager (A1). Ex.P.59 is certified copy of document no.

6420 of 1966 dated 2.10.1966. Ex.P.60 is certified copy of document No.

6421 of 1966 dated 2.10.1966. Ex.P.61 is EC bearing No.9971/2008. Ex.P.62 is EC bearing no. 9972/2008. Ex.P.63 is photocopy of letter addressed by

Mr.S.K.Sinha IAS, Commissioner of Sericulture dated 3.1.2004 to Mr.Krishna

Babu furnishing the lease land particulars of Ac 152.47 cents submitted by

Mr.E.Prasada Rao President of MSIRDS for a period of 10 years and he also requested Mr.Krishna Babu to depute Assistant Director, Survey and Land records, MRO concerned, Assistant Director of Sericulture concern to demarcate the land mentioned therein after physically measuring the same.

Ex.P.64 is carbon copy of letter dated 20.9.2003 addressed by Assistant

Director of Sericulture to the Branch Manager, Union Bank of India,

Pasumarru branch requesting to release fund installments after joint inspection and satisfaction. Ex.P.65 is carbon copy of letter dated 12.6.2003 22C.C.09/2011/Prl. CBI Court/VSP addressed by Assistant Director, Sericulture to the branch manager, Union

Bank of India, Pasumarr branch informing the release of Rs 35, 49,750 /- to 150 farmers and asking the bank to deposit the said amount in the SB account of Assistant Director of Sericulture.

PW.1 has further deposed that Ex.P.66 is copy of telegram issued by Assistant Director, Sericulture to Pasumarr branch requesting to inform

before release of loan portion to the Martur Society. Ex.P.67 is letter

addressed by Branch Manager, Pasumarru branch to Assistant Director,

Sericulture informing the sanction of Rs.107.25 lakhs to MSIRDS by FGM office Chennai enclosing the sanction advice along with terms and conditions enlisted as 1 to 17 for compliance to disburse the loan. Ex.P.68 is the confirmation of sanction stipulations in AGM Sericulture account of MSIRDS by the branch manager Mr.M.Anil Kumar (A1) to the Manager (PSD) RO,

Vijayawada dated 10.10.2003. He identified signature of A1 in Ex.P.68.

Ex.P.69 is letter dated 1.11.2003 addressed by Pasumarru branch to AGM,

RO, Vijayawada enclosing inspection report along with confirmation of compliance of the sanctioned terms and conditions and status of the account as on 1.11.2003 and appraising the Regional office and in the said letter the branch manager mentioned that condition of crops are very good , progress of work regarding the rearing sheds and Chaki rearing sheds are satisfactory.

The letter bears the signature of A1 and he identified the signature of A1.

P.W.1 has further deposed that Ex.P.70 is original letter addressed by MSIRDS president requesting the bank for release of amount of Rs.36 lakhs for purchase of cement, Iron and other material and to ensure to produce the bills and in the same letter it is requested to credit

Rs.6,45,000/-, Rs, 6,14,250/-, Rs 4,76,000/-, Rs. 2,62,550/- to the Society’s 23C.C.09/2011/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Current account for this work as he cannot produce the bills. Ex.P.71 is original letter addressed by President MSIRDS to Branch Manager, Union

Bank, Pasumurri branch assuring the utilization of the funds of Rs.36 lakhs and Rs 12 lakhs pertaining to borrowers margin money for the purposes to which it was mentioned. Ex.P.72 is verification certificate given by

Mr.D.S.R.Krishna Murthy, Advocate to the branch Manager, Pasumuri branch

dated 11.10.2003 saying the documents executed are part of equitable

Mortgage created as per norms but EM created by B.Veeranjaneyulu (A4) was on 15.11.2003.Ex.P.73 is letter dated 15.10.2003 addressed by President

MSIRDS to the Branch Manager, requesting to release bank loan component without linking to the release of subsidy from State and Central

Governments. Ex.P.74 is original letter addressed by President MSIRDS to the

Branch manager informing the amount released so far of Rs. 50,72,000/- for construction of 80 rearing sheds and Chake rearing sheds and he requested for release of amount of Rs. 39,50,000/- for construction of balance 70 rearing sheds and Chake rearing sheds out of that amount he requested to release an amount of Rs.8 lakhs for purchase of iron and cement to M/s

Sudha enterprises, Chilakaluripet and Rs 8,50,000/- to Siri enterprises,

Guntur and request to release an amount of Rs 23 lakhs to their current account for payment to the plot maintenance. Ex.P.75 is original letter dated 8.12.2003 addressed by President, MSRIDS to the Branch Manager, Union bank of India, Pasumurre branch informing the release of Rs. 91,22,200/- confirming that amount raised was properly utilized.

P.W.1 has further deposed that Ex.P.76 is original demand draft voucher dated 18.11.2003 issued infavour of Sudha enterprises for Rs.8lakhs which includes the commission of Rs. 1200/- . Ex.P.77 is original debit cum advice dated 18.11.2003 to the AGMTL account of MSIRDS for 24C.C.09/2011/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Rs.17,50,000/-. Ex.P.78 is original debit cum advice dated 18.11.2003 of

AGMTL Account of MSIRDS for Rs. 14 lakhs. Ex.P.79 is original demand draft voucher dated 18.11.2003 infavour of SIRI enterprises for Rs. 8,50,000/- which includes bank commission of Rs1700/-. Ex.P.80 is original self cheque bearing No.0025771 dated 18.11.2003 drawn by MSIRDS for Rs.23 lakhs.

Ex.P.81 is credit cum advise voucher dated 18.11.2003 for Rs.23 lakhs to the current account of MSIRDS bearing no. 30017. Ex.P.82 is photostat copy of letter addressed by Mr.S.K.Sinha, Commissioner of Sericulture dated 20.12.2003 to Mr.Krishna Babu saying the Village Secretary of Pathepuram village gave a certificate certifying the Ac 150.00 on which the mulberry cultivation was taken is the own lands of the farmers but later on the

President of MSIRDS says that these lands are leased lands and hence he requested to take action against the Village Secretary for giving false certificate stating that Seri culture department have already taken action against Inspector Sericulture and Assistant Director of Sericulture by suspending their services.

P.W.1 has further deposed that Ex.P.83 is original of Ex.P.82 which was sent to President MSIRDS. Ex.P.84 is copy of letter dated 2.1.2004 addressed by Commissioner, Sericulture to President, MSIRDS to confirm that in which survey numbers mulberry is cultivated in Ac152.47 cents as he observed some variations in the names of the beneficiaries since he had given some other names in the proposals to the department. Ex.P.85 is letter dated 3.1.2004 addressed by Mr.S.K.Sinha, Commissioner, Sericulture, requesting the Collector, Prakasam District, to depute Assistant Director (Survey and

Land records) MRO concerned and Assistant Director of Sericulture to find out the lands physically on the ground whether the survey numbers submitted by the President, MSIRDS matches with the Mulberry plantations 25C.C.09/2011/Prl. CBI Court/VSP on the ground. Ex.P.86 is letter dated NIL addressed by Mr. Eluru Prasadarao,

President, MSIRDS, to the Manager, Union Bank of India that Ac.5.15 of land which they have purchased from Mr.Jammala Bhaskara Rao is not having any title deed book and he assured to submit the same as and when MRO concerned issues. Ex.P.87 is letter dated 20.5.2006 addressed by Mr. Suri

Anjaneyulu, one of the guarantors and alleged mortgagor of the property, wherein he said that they never visited the Bank and executed any documents relating to the guarantee and mortgage of properties to the

Bank.

P.W.1 has further deposed that Mr.Suri Venkata Narasaiah, one of the guarantors and alleged mortgagor of the property, vide his letter dated 20.05.2006 said that they never visited the Bank and executed any documents relating to the guarantee and mortgage of properties to the Bank and it is marked as Ex.P.88.

The following documents are the debit and credit vouchers pertaining to the accounts of MSIRDS:

Ex.P.89 is the debit-cum-advice dated 10.10.2003 showing the payment of Rs.16,02,200/- from the agriculture Medium Term loan account of MSIRDS and it contains signatures of Gopinath and another officer. Ex.P.90 is Pay order application dated 10.10.2003 for Rs.15,99,525/- in favour of

Sudha Enterprises payable at Pasumarru branch. Ex.P.91 is debit-cum-advice

dated 10.10.2003 showing the payment of Rs.14,00,000/- from the

agriculture Medium Term loan account of MSIRDS. It contains signature of

Gopinath and signature of another officer. Ex.P.92 is credit-cum-advice dated 10.10.2003 for Rs.14,00,000/- showing the credit to the CD A/c.No.30017 of 26C.C.09/2011/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

MSIRDS signed by M. Anil Kumar (A.1) and Mr.K. Gopinath. Ex.P.93 is the debit-cum-advice dated 31.10.2003 for Rs.70,000/- in the AGMTL Account

No.12820 of MSIRDS. Ex.P.94 is the credit-cum-advice dated 31.10.2003 for

Rs.70,000/- showing credit in the CD A/c.No.30017 of MSIRDS. Ex.P.95 is the debit-cum-advice dated 18.11.2003 for Rs.8,00,000/- showing debit in the

AGMTL Account of MSIRDS.

P.W.1 has further deposed that Ex.P.96 is the plain debit voucher

dated 20.12.2003 showing the debit of Rs.20,20,000/- to the AGMTL

A/c.No.12820 of MSIRDS. Ex.P.97 is the credit voucher dated 20.12.2003 showing the credit of Rs.20,20,000/- to the AGMTL loan A/c.No.12821 of

MSIRDS. Ex.P.98 is the debit-cum-advice dated 20.12.2003 for Rs.1,32,075/- showing the debit to the AGMTL loan A/c.No.12820 of MSIRDS. Ex.P.99 is plain credit voucher dated 20.12.2003 for Rs.1,33,675/- showing the credit to the Income A/c., of the branch. Ex.P.100 is the debit voucher dated 30.01.2004 for Rs.19,000/- to the term loan of A/c.No.12820 of the MSIRDS and crediting the SB A/c.No.8689 of Mr.Eluru Prasada Rao (A.2), the

President of MSIRDS. Ex.P.101 is credit voucher dated 30.01.2004 for

Rs.19,000/- showing the credit in the SB A/c.No.8689 of A.2. Ex.P.102 is cheque bearing No.0162751 dated 5.2.2004 for Rs.3,93,174/- issued by

MSIRDS from the CD A/c.No.30017 of MSIRDS in favour of Reliance General

Insurance Company Limited. Ex.P.103 is demand draft application dated 20.12.2004 for Rs.3,92,459/- in favour of ICICI Bank Limited, Mumbai.

Ex.P.104 is debit voucher dated 26.3.2004 for Rs.19,000/- debiting AGMTL

No.12820 of MSIRDS and crediting to the CD A/c.No.30017 of MSIRDS.

Ex.P.105 is credit voucher dated 26.3.2004 for Rs.19,000/- showing the credit in the CD A/c.No.30017 of MSIRDS.

27C.C.09/2011/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

P.W.1 has further deposed that Ex.P.106 is the debit voucher dated 30.7.2004 for Rs.48,127/- to the account No.12820 of MSIRDS to credit

AGMTL A/c.No.12821 of MSIRDS. Ex.P.107 is credit voucher dated 30.7.2004 for Rs.48,127/- showing the credit in AGMTL A/c.No.12821 of MSIRDS.

Ex.P.108 is debit voucher dated 11.2.2005 for Rs.67,112/- showing the debit of AGMTL A/c.No.12820 of MSIRDS. Ex.P.109 is the pay order application

dated 11.2.2005 for Rs.69,911/- in favour of New India Assurance Company

Limited. Ex.P.110 is debit voucher dated 23.2.2006 for Rs.23,032/- showing the debit in the AGMTL A/c.No.12820 of MSIRDS along with calculation sheet.

Ex.P.111 is the pay order application dated 23.2.2006 for Rs.23,032/- in favour of New India Assurance Company Limited. Ex.P.112 is self cheque bearing No.0025766 dated 10.10.2003 for Rs.14,00,000/- issued by MSIRDS in CD A/c.No.30017 sent by A.2 and Mr.K.Rama Rao, Treasurer. Ex.P.113 is debit-cum-advice dated 17.10.2003 for Rs.15,00,000/- showing the debit in the AGMTL A/c.No.12821 of MSIRDS. Ex.P.114 is pay order application dated 17.10.2003 for Rs.14,97,750/- in favour of Sudha Enterprises.Ex.P.115 is debit-cum-advice dated 17.10.2003 for Rs.5,00,000/- showing the debit in the AGMTL A/c.No.12821 of MSIRDS.

P.W.1 has further deposed that Ex.P.116 is credit-cum-advice

dated 17.10.2003 for Rs.5,00,000/- showing the credit in the CD

A/c.No.30017 of MSIRDS. Ex.P.117 is pay in slip for Rs.2,500/- dated 16.7.2003 showing the credit in CD A/c.No.30017 of MSIRDS. Ex.P.118 is credit-cum-advice dated 16.07.2003 for Rs.8,16,750/- showing the credit in the CD A/c.No.30017 of MSIRDS. Ex.P.119 is self cheque bearing No.0025751

dated 16.7.2003 for Rs.8,00,000/- drawn by the President, MSIRDS (Mr.Eluru

Prasada Rao/ A.2) and the Treasurer, MSIRDS. Ex.P.120 is self cheque bearing

No.0025753 dated 13.7.2003 for Rs.15,000/- drawn by the President, MSIRDS 28C.C.09/2011/Prl. CBI Court/VSP (Mr.Eluru Prasada Rao/A.2) and the Treasurer, MSIRDS. Ex.P.121 is a pay in slip dated 6.8.2003 for Rs.12,00,000/- being the proceeds of cheque

No.559702. Ex.P.122 is self cheque bearing No.0025756 dated 06.8.2003 for

Rs.12,00,000/- drawn by the President, MSIRDS (Mr.Eluru Prasada Rao/ A.2) and the Treasurer, MSIRDS in CD A/c.No.30017. Ex.P.123 is a pay in slip dated 12.8.2003 for Rs.9,00,000/- in CD A/c.No.30017 of MSIRDS being the proceeds of 55973. Ex.P.124 is self cheque bearing No.0025757 dated 12.8.2003 for Rs.2,50,000/- drawn by the President, MSIRDS (Mr.Eluru

Prasada Rao/ A.2) and the Treasurer, MSIRDS in CD A/c.No.30017. Ex.P.125 is self cheque bearing No.0025758 dated 12.8.2003 for Rs.2,00,000/- drawn by the President, MSIRDS (Mr.Eluru Prasada Rao/A.2) and the Treasurer, MSIRDS in CD A/c.No.30017.

P.W.1 has further deposed that Ex.P.126 is a self cheque bearing

No.0025759 dated 12.8.2003 for Rs.3,00,000/- drawn by the President,

MSIRDS (Mr.Eluru Prasada Rao/A.2) and the Treasurer, MSIRDS in CD

A/c.No.30017. Ex.P.127 is self cheque bearing No.0025761 dated 13.8.2003 for Rs.1,00,000/- drawn by the President, MSIRDS (Mr.Eluru Prasada Rao/A.2) and the Treasurer, MSIRDS in CD A/c.No.30017. Ex.P.128 is self cheque bearing No.0025760 dated 13.8.2003 for Rs.50,000/- drawn by the President,

MSIRDS (Mr.Eluru Prasada Rao/ A.2) and the Treasurer, MSIRDS in CD

A/c.No.30017. Ex.P.129 is self cheque bearing No.0025767 dated 17.10.2003 for Rs.4,00,000/- drawn by the President, MSIRDS (Mr.Eluru Prasada Rao/ A.2) and the Treasurer, MSIRDS in CD A/c.No.30017. Ex.P.130 is self cheque bearing No.0025768 dated 27.10.2003 for Rs.75,000/- drawn by the

President, MSIRDS (Mr.Eluru Prasada Rao/A.2) and the Treasurer, MSIRDS in

CD A/c.No.30017. Ex.P.131 is self cheque bearing No.0025769 dated 31.10.2003 for Rs.70,000/- drawn by the President, MSIRDS (Mr.Eluru 29C.C.09/2011/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Prasada Rao/A.2) and the Treasurer, MSIRDS in CD A/c.No.30017. Ex.P.132 is self cheque bearing No.0025770 dated 3.11.2003 for Rs.25,000/- drawn by the President, MSIRDS (Mr.Eluru Prasada Rao/A.2) and the Treasurer, MSIRDS in CD A/c.No.30017. Ex.P.133 is pay in slip dated 20.2.2004 for Rs.3,93,174/- showing the credit in the CD A/c.No.30017 of MSIRDS.Ex.P.134 is self cheque bearing No.0162758 dated 1.3.2004 for Rs.20,000/- drawn by the President,

MSIRDS (Mr.Eluru Prasada Rao/ A.2) and the Treasurer, MSIRDS in CD

A/c.No.30017. Ex.P.135 is pay in slip dated 09.9.2003 for Rs.4,10,000/- showing the credit in the CD A/c.No.30017 of MSIRDS.

P.W.1 has further deposed that Ex.P.136 is self cheque bearing

No.0025765 dated 15.9.2003 for Rs.10,000/- drawn by the President, MSIRDS (Mr.Eluru Prasada Rao/ A.2) and the Treasurer, MSIRDS in CD A/c.No.30017.

Ex.P.137 is self cheque bearing No.0025763 dated 9.9.2003 for Rs.4,00,000/- drawn by the President, MSIRDS (Mr.Eluru Prasada Rao/ A.2) and the

Treasurer, MSIRDS in CD A/c.No.30017. Ex.P.138 is self cheque bearing

No.559915 dated 13.11.2003 for Rs.19,000/- drawn by the Mr.Eluru Prasada

Rao/A.2 in S.B.A/c.No.8689. Ex.P.139 is pay in slip dated 27.6.2003 for

Rs.35,49,750/- in the SB A/c.No.9180 of Assistant Director, Sericulture,

Ongole, along with the cheque collection schedule bearing OBC No.212 dated 13.6.2003. Ex.P.140 is self cheque bearing No.559701 dated 30.06.2003 for

Rs.8,16,750/- drawn by Assistant Director, Sericulture, Ongole in

S.B.A/c.No.9180. Ex.P.141 is self cheque bearing No.559702 dated 05.08.2003 for Rs.12,00,000/- drawn by Assistant Director, Sericulture,

Ongole in S.B.A/c.No.9180. Ex.P.142 is a cheque bearing No.559703 dated 11.08.2003 issued in favour of President, MSIRDS, for Rs.9,00,000/-drawn by

Assistant Director, Sericulture, Ongole in S.B.A/c.No.9180. Ex.P.143 is a cheque bearing No.559704 dated 08.09.2003 for Rs.4,10,000/- drawn by 30C.C.09/2011/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Assistant Director, Sericulture, Ongole issued in faour of President, MSIRDS, in S.B.A/c.No.9180. Ex.P.144 is a debit voucher dated 18.10.2003 for

Rs.2,41,734/- in the SB A/c.No.9180. Ex.P.145 is a pay order bearing

No.9292623 dated 10.10.2003 for Rs.15,99,595/- issued in favour of Sudha

Enterprises signed by Mr.M. Anil Kumar and Mr.K. Gopinath. Ex.P.146 is a pay order bearing No.9292626 dated 17.10.2003 for Rs.14,97,750/- issued in favour of Sudha Enterprises signed by Mr.M. Anil Kumar and Mr.K. Gopinath.

Ex.P.147 is a pay order bearing No.9292633 dated 18.11.2003 for

Rs.7,98,800/- issued in favour of Sudha Enterprises signed by M. Anil Kumar and another officer.

P.W.1 has further deposed that the purpose of sanction of loan in this case is development of Sericulture in Ac.150.0 situated in various villages and in March 2006 loan account became NPA and during recovery process we issued a demand notice on 28.3.2006 to the borrowers and guarantors for repayment of the dues and the notices issued to guarantors namely Mr.Sure Peddanarasiah, Mr.Sure Chinnanarasiah, Mr.Sure Anjaneyulu and Mr.Boipati Veeranjaneyulu were returned unserved and then they went to the village Pathepuram in Prakasam District to enquire about the guarantors whose notices are returned unserved and they came to know that those guarantors do not belong to that village but they hail from Guntur

District and they came back to the branch and on next day i.e. on 3.5.2006 and they went to Arepalli Agraharam and Ponugotivaripalem villages, met

Mr.Sure Anjaneyulu and Mr.Sure Chinnanarasiah in Arepalli Agraharam village and informed about their guarantees given to the MSIRDS loan. Mr.Sure

Anjaneyulu and Mr.Chinnanarasiah informed that they never came to the branch for execution of any guarantee documents and creation of mortgage on their properties in favour of the bank and later they went to 31C.C.09/2011/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Ponugotivaripalem village to meet Mr.Boyapati Veeranjaneyulu (A4) another guarantor and as guarantor is not available his father and mother told that their son is not there at home.

P.W.1 has further deposed that total subsidy from both Central Silk board and AP State Sericulture department is Rs. 150.00 crores and out of that the branch received Rs 35,49,750/- only and remaining amounts were not released as fraud involved in the implementation of the scheme and as per the scheme the loan amount along with subsidy from Central Silk board and AP State Sericulture department and the margin money from the borrower is to be disbursed simultaneously, but the Branch Manager/

Mr.M.Anil Kumar (A1) released the loan amount without matching receipt of subsidy from Central Silk braard and AP State Sericulture department.

P.W.1 has further deposed that Ex.P.148 is the Specimen signatures of A5/S.Siva Rrama Prasad, collected by CBI in his presence in 5 sheets and he identified his signature as attestor therein. Ex.P.149 contains hand writings of different words of A.5 collected by CBI in his presence in 20 sheets and he identified his signature as attestor therein. Ex.P.150 is the hand writings of A.5 in Telugu, written as Sure Anjaneyulu in 5 sheets and he identified his signature as attestor therein. Ex.P.151 is the hand writings of

A.5 in Telugu, written as Sure Chinnanarasiah in 5 sheets and he identified his signature as attestor therein. Ex.P.152 is the hand writings of A.5 in

Telugu, written as B.Veeranjaneyulu in 5 sheets and he identified his signature as attestor therein. Ex.P.153 is the hand writings of A.5 in Telugu, written as Eluri Srinivasa Rao in 5 sheets. Ex.P.154 is the hand writings of

A.5 in Telugu, written as S.Peddanarasiah in 5 sheets and he identified his signature as attestor therein.

32C.C.09/2011/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

P.W.2 namely Mr.P.Devakinandan Sharma, the then Senior Manager,

Vigilance, Central Office, Union Bank of India, Mumbai, deposed that he investigated into fraud loan account of Martur Sericulture Integrated development Society (MSIRDS) in Pasumuru branch of Union bank of India under the instructions of Chief Vigilance officer, Union bank of India, Central

Office, Mumbai. Chief Vigilance officer received a letter from General

Manager, Chennai requesting him to investigate the irregularities in the

MSIRDS and hence he was instructed by him to visit the branch and to inform the factual position. He found the following irregularities in the said loan account. Ex.P.2 is the account opening form of MSIRDS. This account was opened by Mr.Anil Kumar, the then Branch Manager, Pasumur branch.

MSIRDS account was introduced by Mr.B.Laxmi Narayana. Ex.P.159 is letter

dated 15.7.2003, addressed by Sri I.P.Sukumar Sen, Assistant Director of

Sericulture, Ongole to Regional Manager, Union Bank of India, Vijayawada. In this letter the Assistant Director informed that an amount of Rs.35.49 lakhs was released on 12.6.2003. But in the loan proposal recommended by Sri

Anil Kumar subsidy amount is mentioned as around Rs. 75 lakhs.

P.W.2 has further deposed that Ex.P.160 is an anonymous complaint addressed to Mr.Sudhakar, the then Assistant General Manager,

Regional Office, Vijayawada.Modus operandi of releasing of funds by Sri Anil

Kumar is as follows :

1. The loan was released without receiving the matching grant by the

Central Silk board and AP state Government.

2. The loan has to be released to the suppliers only, but it was observed that an amount of about Rs 20 lakhs was released by cash , which is against the sanction stipulations.

3. The amount of about Rs. 39 lakhs was released by way of pay orders infavour of one Sudha Enterprises. The Sudha Enterprises opened an 33C.C.09/2011/Prl. CBI Court/VSP account in Vijaya bank , Pasumuru to encash the above payment or- ders only. There were no other transactions in the said account and the same was closed after withdrawing the amount of Rs. 39 lakhs. It was also informed that there was no shop in the name of Sudha Enter- prises.

4. There was one Telegram received by the branch from the Assistant Di- rector of Sericulture requesting the Branch Manager not to release any funds to the society without their confirmation. But the amount was released by the Branch Manager to the society without taking into cognizance of the telegram.

5. It was observed that the amounts were released by the Branch Man- ager without receiving any matching subsidy amount by the Central and State Governments.

6. The gift deed (Ex.P.54) for Ac.17.89 cents was created by imperson- ation. Infact the executants Mr.Sure Pedanarasiah, S/o Mr.Ayyappa,

Mr.Sure Narasaiah S/o Ayyappa, Mr.Sure Anjaneyulu S/o Ayyappa cre- ated infavour of Mr.Boyapati Veeranjaneyulu ( A4). As per the bank records it was found that the Sure Pedanarasiah and Sure Narasaiah and Sure Anjaneyulu denied the execution of Ex.P.54. Hence it is im- personation.

7. As per Ex.P.21 the contributions of amounts are as follows: Contribution by borrowers Rs. 46.78 lakhs Central Silk board subsidy Rs. 83.07 lakhs AP State Government SubsidyRs. 67.05 lakhs Bank loanRs. 107.25 lakhs TotalRs. 304.15 lakhs

But the loan amount of about Rs.92 lakhs was released without receiving the matching subsidy.

P.W.2 has further deposed that it was observed by the Seri

Culture department that amount was falsely claimed by the President of the

Society Mr.E.Prasad Rao (A2) by submitting false health certificates. Ex.P.1 is the Certificate of Registration of Societies dated 12.3.2001 in the name of the Martur Sericulture Integrated Rural Development society, Pathepuram, 34C.C.09/2011/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Prakasam District. Subsequently another Mutual Aided society for claiming of subsidy amount of around Rs. 4 crores was created by Mr. Prasad Rao ( A2). Exs.P.145, 146 and 147 are the payment orders infavour of Sudha

Enterprises for an amount of around Rs.39 lakhs which were encashed by opening account on 10.10.2003 (i.e. the day of the first pay order issued of

Rs. 15.99 lakhs) with Vijaya Bank and subsequently the account was closed after withdrawing the entire amount and there were no other transactions in the account. It was also found that the said Sudha Enterprises was not in existence. Ex.P.161 is the statement of Sudha Enterprises, Proprietor

Mr.M.Prasad Rao with Vijaya Bank for the period from 10.10.2003 to 12.2.2004. Ex.P.69 is the Inspection report submitted by Sri Anil Kumar , the then Bank Manager to Assistant General manager, Regional Office,

Vijayawada, informing that the EM was created on 11.10.2003 but infact it was created subsequently and informed about the satisfaction of the Seri culture which was not correct. Ex.P.162 is the letter addressed by Assistant

Director of Sericulture, Ongole to Assistant General Manager, Regional Office, informing that the plantation in entire Ac 150.00 was not taken up and it is also informed that the coordination between the bank and the department in grounding the scheme was totally over looked. Ex.P.163 is statement of

MSIRDS from 1.7.2002 to 31.5.2007 bearing No.12820 indicating that the amounts were released without receiving matching subsidy. Ex.P.164 is statement of A2 for the period from 1.1.2003 to 31.12.2003, it is observed that the minimum balance was not even maintained.

P.W.2 has further deposed that Ex.P.12 is the Pre inspection report submitted by Assistant Manager and Branch Manager (Mr.Anil Kumar). It was informed that the total acerage planted was Ac.150.00, which was not true. It was also informed that the society has purchased Ac 5.00 land in Sr.No.

945/2 in Pathepuram. Infact the said Ac. 5.00 was purchased after the loan 35C.C.09/2011/Prl. CBI Court/VSP was disbursed. Hence Mr.Anil Kumar misinformed the Regional Office about the facts of the society. It is also informed that an amount of Rs. 73 lakhs subsidy was released but the same is not correct.

P.W.2 has further deposed that Exs.P.165 and P.166 are the

Quotations issued by Siri Enterprises for Rs.4,87,359/- and Rs. 7,19,500/-.

These quotations are submitted as bills and it is also found that there is no shop in the name of Siri Enterprises. Ex.P.22 is the sanction order issued by

Union Bank of India, Regional Office, Vijayawada, sanctioning an amount of

Rs. 107.25 lakhs (subsidy amount of Rs. 196.90 lakhs to be released). As per

Ex.P.22 disbursement should be made directly to the suppliers/dealers along with the margin money and State and Central Government portion. But the amounts are released without adhering to the sanction stipulations. Ex.P.11 is the statement of account of MSIRDS from 16.7.2003 to 31.3.2004. It is observed that heavy amounts were withdrawn by cash. Ex.P.167 is the statement of account bearing No. 12821 in the name of MSIRDS for the period from 1.7.2002 to 31.5.2007. The purpose of opening different accounts in the same name is not known. As per the records the Manager

Law and Field Officer Mr.Yogeswara Rao submitted their reports. The

Manager Law informed that the Ems were created properly, but the fact is otherwise. Similarly The Filed Officer Mr.Yogeswara Rao has given a satisfactory report about the plantation, but the fact is otherwise. Mulberry plantation was supposed to be cultivated for the purpose of Sericulture in

Ac.150.00. But the cultivation was not done in Ac.150.00. Ex.P.168 is the report submitted by him to Chief Vigilance Officer on 9.9.2006 about the fraud in the account of MSIRDS.

P.W.3 namely Mr.A. Shukuarsha, the then Branch Manager, Union

Bank of India, Pasumuru branch, deposed that he visited three villages i.e., 36C.C.09/2011/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Phatepuram, Kopparam and Yelchuru for the purpose of seeing the condition of mulberry crop and developments in the construction of rearing sheds etc.

A team of officers from Regional Office, Vijayawada visited Phatepuram,

Kopparam, Yelchuru and Arepalli Mupalla. By the time he reported at

Pasumuru branch, the mulberry crop was growing in the fields, rearing sheds were also in different stages of construction but the insurance cover was not taken for any of these things so the assets i.e. Mulberry crop, sheds and other Seri culture equipments were hypothecated to the bank.

P.W.3 has further deposed that to protect the interest of the bank, he tried to take insurance policy from M/s. New India Assurance

Company with whom their bank was having tie up. But they did not come forward or did not agree to underwrite the policy, with a reason that they do not have specific guidelines regarding the tariff and the risks to be covered.

So he enquired with other insurance companies also but he was not successful in getting the insurance then. At that stage he received a cheque for collection drawn on MSIRDS account in favour of Reliance General

Insurance Company for Rs.3,93,174/- dated 5.2.2004. Till receiving the date, he was not aware of anything about the issuance of the cheque. So he contacted the MSIRDS people and enquired about this cheque. Then they came to the branch and explained him of having issued this cheque and also shown the insurance policy. As he was not in a position to get insurance cover, even though the cheque was for higher amount, he has accepted it and debited it at the end of February. Ex.P.102 is the said cheque issued by

MSIRDS in favour of Reliance General Insurance Company Ltd.

P.W.3 has further deposed that the total project cost was around

Rs.3crores and odd and the insurance policy was covered for Rs.4.95 crores.

37C.C.09/2011/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

After seeing Ex.P.102 and before debiting it into account, he also contacted the development officer of Reliance General Insurance company over phone and enquired about the premium amount and also requested him to reduce the premium amount and also the insurance coverage amount. But he informed him that the policy was taken as a comprehensive policy and hence it cannot be changed and the premium cannot be reduced, even though coverage amount is reduced. After expiry of Reliance General Insurance policy, he got the insurance cover from New India Assurance Company covering the sheds and other equipments for about one crore and odd and paid a premium of Rs. 69,000/- towards fire.

P.W.4 namely Mr.A. Sudhakar, the then Regional Manager, Union

Bank of India, Vijayawada, deposed that Regional Office, Vijayawada has jurisdiction over 8 districts in Andhra Pradesh including Guntur District. As

Regional manager his duties were deposit mobilization, deployment of credit, follow and recovery of advances, Human Resource management and General administration.

P.W.4 has further deposed that MSIRDS loan proposal was recommended by their Branch Manager, Pasumuru considering a term loan of Rs. 107.25 lakhs. During July 2003, their office received a communication (Ex.P.8) from Assistant Director Sericulture, Ongole requesting them to consider finance for Sericulture and they have also informed that they have released an amount of Rs. 39.49 lakhs as subsidy for the project being taken up by MSIRDS. The society intended to take up Sericulture activity in

Ac.150.00 with a total outlay of 304.14 lakhs. Loan component is

Rs.107.25 lakhs. Ex.19 is loan proposal sent by Branch Manager, Pasumuru giving details of loan recommended in favour of society. Ex.P.19 was signed 38C.C.09/2011/Prl. CBI Court/VSP by the then Branch Manager ( A1), Pasumuru. Ex.P.20 is an internal note of

RO, Vijayawada prepared recommending proposal to their General Manager,

Chennai under whose jurisdiction the quantum of loan sought falls. Ex.P.21 is sanction advice issued by RO, Vijayawada infavour of MSIRDS, sanctioning

Rs.107.25 lakhs based on the approval given by General Manager, Chennai.

Ex.P.12 is the Inspection report sent by Branch Manager( A1) regarding the project taken up by MSIRDS to Regional Office, Vijayawada. General

Manager , Chennai while conveying sanction of the above loan has stipulated certain terms and conditions on which loan has to be disbursed. The main condition is disbursement of loan should be made directly to suppliers or the dealers along with margin money and State and Central government portion.

The relevant bills and stamped receipts should be held on record. These bills certified by Assistant Director, Seri Culture should be held on record. As stated above since the payments have to be made directly to the suppliers, any cash payments made in the account are in violation of sanction stipulations.

P.W.4 has further deposed that as per Ex.P.21 the total component is Rs 304.15 lakhs, borrowers contribution should be Rs 46.78 lakhs, Central

State Board subsidy is Rs. 83.07 lakhs, AP state Government subsidy is

Rs.67.05 lakhs and the balance of Rs.107.25 lakhs is by way of term loan from the bank. Ex.P.69 is a letter from Branch Manager, Pasumuru, giving status of the account after disbursement of Rs.50.72lakhs in the account.

Ex.P.69 was signed by A.1. As per the loan stipulations the payment have to be made directly to the suppliers as such any cash withdrawals are not in line with the sanction terms. Ex.P.80 is cheque dated 18.11.2003, issued by

Society drawn favouring self for Rs. 23 lakhs. Ex.P.80, Ex.P.112, Ex.P.119, 39C.C.09/2011/Prl. CBI Court/VSP 120, 121, Exs.P.124 to 132 are cheques issued by Society drawn favouring self and cash was withdrawn.

P.W.4 has further deposed that the sanction advice was received from General manager, Chennai was communicated to Pasumuru Branch on 8.10.2003 vide Ex.P.22. Ex.P.119, 120 and P.121 are the cheques issued by

Society on 16.7.2003 and 18.7.2003 favouring self and cash was drawn.

Ex.P.119 is dated 16.7.2003, Ex.P.120 is dated 18.7.2003, Ex.P.121 is dated 6.8.2003. Amount covered under Ex.P.121 was credited to the society. While their office communicated GM office sanction on 8.10.2003, the society has issued cheques favouring self on 16.7.2003, 18.7.2003, 6.8.2003 much

before the sanction was given by the General Manager. Exs.P.124, 125, 126,

127 and Ex.P.128 are the cheques issued by the society favouring self where cash has been drawn with approval of A.1.The withdrawal of cash by way of self cheque is in violation of the condition no.16 in Ex.P.22. Ex.P.169 is a report dated 25.11.2003 submitted by Mr. Bhagavan, Manager, RO,

Vijayawada wherein he has brought out certain sanction stipulations that have not been followed by the branch. He also point out that schedule of disbursement not followed and contribution of society is not ensured. From the report it is observed that branch has not taken insurance. It is also reported that disbursement and end use of funds not overseen/ensured by

Sericulture department. On receipt of this report their office was directed to call for the comments of the branch manager.

P.W.5 namely Mr.Matta Babu, the then Senior Manager, HR, Union Bank of India, Regional office, Vijayawada, deposed that Ex.P.19 is a letter addressed to Assistant General Manger, RO, Vijayawada dated 5.7.2003 written by A.1 ,the then Branch Manager of Pasumuru branch. In his letter 40C.C.09/2011/Prl. CBI Court/VSP he narrated about the intention to sanction for 150 members of farmers as a loan for Sericulture activity. The total loan amount is Rs. 1,10,000,25 /-. Out of this each beneficiary will be sanctioned Rs.73, 500/-. He sought permission for going finance out of the service area. After receiving the said letter the Assistant General manager made some remarks on the face of the letter , which states that inform to BM regarding submission of other details as discussed. This letter was marked to one Mr.Yogeswara Rao.

P.W.5 has further deposed that Ex.P.8 is a letter from Government of AP, Sericulture department, addressed to Regional Manager, Union Bank of

India, Vijayawada. It states that they have already sanctioned subsidy amount of State Government Rs 110.25 lakhs to implement the program of

Sericulture for entire proposed Ac.500.00, initially sanctioned for Ac 150.00 as a first spell. The Branch Manager agreed to cooperate in the matter to do the needful in sanction of the loans. Further he stated that Rs 141.99 lakhs has already been released to the Commissioner of Sericulture, AP, by Central

Silk board. These funds will be released when the activity shall come into progress continuously. In this letter he further recommended that the government officials should visit the fields and satisfy with all the norms for cultivation of the Sericulture. As per Ex.P.9, the Sericulture department released the amount of Rs.35,49,750/- and kept it in the Pasumuru branch account as a deposit.

P.W.5 has further deposed that as per Ex.P.12 letter, as discussed in Ex.P.19, the Branch Manager, Pasumuru branch resubmitted after inspection of the fields on 11.8.2003, the detailed information regarding the farmers , plantation area, mentioning the total aggregate plant area is Ac 150.00, the total value of sericulture unit, support from the Government side 41C.C.09/2011/Prl. CBI Court/VSP i.e. from Sericulture department, if sanctioned as per his recommendations the benefits of the branch. He sought permission in this letter to go for out of service area and recommended accordingly for sanction of loan. After receiving Ex.P.12, the Regional office satisfied with the information received from the branch and also from the visit of fields by the Regional Office officials, the Assistant General Manager recommended sanction of the loan as it is feasible unit.

P.W.5 has further deposed that Ex.P.21 is process note cum sanction advice by the General Manager, Chennai, sanctioning Rs. 107.25 lakhs and specified certain terms and conditions to observe before release of the funds, since he is sanctioning authority. Ex.P.22 is additional terms and conditions given by Manager (PSD), Senior Manager (RAD) from Regional office, Vijayawada, while conveying the sanction of loan from the competent authority. In Ex.P.22 one of the conditions is disbursement of loan should be made directly to the suppliers /dealers along with the margin money and

State and Central government Portion. The relevant bills/ stamped receipts should be certified by the Inspector and Assistant Director of Sericulture,

Ongole should be held on record. The end use will be supervised by the

Inspector and Assistant Director of Sericulture Ongole. Ex.P.160 is a letter having nature of complaint addressed to MR. Sudhakar without any signature stating the violations of rules and regulations while sanction of loans and also giving the information about the land which was considered for cultivation of mulberry plants, infact is a dry land and there are no bore wells and water facilities in the fields.

P.W.5 has further deposed that Ex.P.170 is inspection report addressed to the Assistant General Manager, Union Bank of India, Regional

Office, Vijayawada dated 14.11.2003. Yogeswara rao has given Ex.P.170 42C.C.09/2011/Prl. CBI Court/VSP inspection report. Ex.P.171 is report given by Bhaskar Raju, Manager Law to

AGM, RO, confirming that documents taken as security are correct.

Subsequently he came to know that one of the document i.e. gift deed which was taken as security was impersonated.

P.W.6 namely Mr.K.Ramesh Reddy, the then Branch Manager,

Central Bank of India, Benz Circle branch, Vijayawada, deposed that he handed over Specimen signature card, account opening forms of

Mr.S.Shivarama Prasad ( A5) for A/c No.8849 and Mr.M.Shiva Prasad and

Vani(Joint account) for A/c 10480,Form no. 60, one certificate issued by LIC of

India, letter dated 23.9.2002, statements of account to CBI on 20.7.2007.Ex.P.177 is specimen signature card of Mr.M.Sivaprasad(A6) and

Mrs.M.Vani. Ex.P.178 is application for opening SB account of

Mr.M.Sivaprasad and he identified signature of Mr.M.Sivaprasad on Ex.P.178.

This account was introduced by Mr.E.V.Ramana Babu having A/c No. 8051.

Ex.P.179 is form 60 of A6. Ex.P.180 is certificate issued by LIC Of India,

Chilakaluripet. Ex.P.181 is letter dated 23.9.2002given by Mr.M.Siva Prasad requesting to add his wife’s name Mrs.M.Vani in the account with mandate to operate the account either of them or survivor.

P.W.6 has further deposed that Ex.P.182 is certified copy of statement of account of Mr.M.Siva Prasad(A6) for A/c No. 10480 for the period from 8.11.2001 to 18.7.2007. Ex.P.183 is specimen signature card of

Mr.S.Sivarama Prasad(A5) bearing A/c No.8849. He identified the signature of Mr.S.Sivarama Prasad (A5) on Ex.P.183. Ex.P.184 is application for opening

SB account of Mr.S.Siva Rama Prasad dated 29.7.1999 and he identified the signature of Mr.S.Sivarama Prasad (A5) on Ex.P.184. This account was introduced by Mr.Ch.Srinivasa Rao with A/C.No. 6138. Ex.P.185 is certified 43C.C.09/2011/Prl. CBI Court/VSP copy of statement of account of Mr.S.Sivarama Prasad (A5) for A/c No. 8849 for the period from 21.7.2001 to 18.7.2007.

P.W.7 namely Mr.K. Bhaskar Raju, Chief Manager, Union Bank of

India, has deposed that his duties during that time were guiding the branches and other departments over the legal matters and any other duties assigned by higher authorities. Sri A.Sudhakar (PW.4), Assistant General

Manager, Regional Office, Vijaywada advised him to visit the Pasumuru branch and inspect the documents obtained in the account of MSIRDS. On 11.11.2003, he visited for the first time and verified the documents obtained by the branch in that account and briefed his Regional Manager (PW4) on the next day. Thereafter he asked him to obtain search report on the mortgaged properties in this loan account. Again he visited on 13.11.2003 with the help of their panel advocate Mr.Panduranga Rao, visited the SRO of Chilakaluripet and Narasaraopet to verify the title deeds deposited in the branch in respect of 3 properties already mortgaged to the bank. His verification report is

Ex.P.171 and he identified his signature on Ex.P.171.

P.W.7 has further deposed that Ex.P.39 is registered partition deed executed between Mr.E.Govindiah, Mr.E.Srinivasa Rao and Mr.E.Prasad Rao ( A2). Total extent covered under the schedule under this document is Ac 42.15 cents, situated in D.No.503, Elchuru village, 1012/C1, 887/A, 886/B1, 886/B2, 886/C, Kopparam village. On the date of his visit only one Pattadhar passbook held in the name of Mr. E.Prasad Rao( A2) bearing no. G318743 obtained by the branch (Ex.P.38). Ex.P.38 was issued by MRO,

Santhamaguluru. Hence he advised Branch Manager to obtain the Pattadhar pass books held in the names of other mortgagers i.e. Mr.E.Govindiah and

Mr.E.Srinivasa Rao. In Ex.P.38 extent is Ac 37.00 cents.

44C.C.09/2011/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

P.W.7 has further deposed that Ex.P.27 is sale deed executed infavour of Mr.P.Sivaramiah, dated 16.3.1982. The extent under this document is Ac 0.25 cents and 420 Sq.yards in D.No. 454 of Ganapavaram village. Ex.P.29 is Doc No.279/1924 dated 6.12.1923 executed by

Mr.D.Venkata Krishniah and others in favour of Mr.Sure Appaiah. Schedule of property mentions the extent as Ac 166.00, out of this Ac 68.73 cents covered in D.No.91/1 of Arepalli village was mortgaged by legal heirs of

Mr.Sure Appaiah namely Mr.Sure PEdanarasiah, Mr.Sure Narasiah and Mr.Sure

Anjaneyulu to Union Bank of India.

P.W.7 has further deposed that Mortgage declarations were not obtained by the Branch Manager, hence he advised to obtain mortgage declarations from all the 3 legal heirs. Subsequently branch filed their letter

dated 15.11.2003, confirmed the same. By the date of his visit another

property was not mortgaged covered under Ex.P.54 gift deed which was executed by Mr.Sure Pedanarasiah, Mr.Sure Narasiah, Mr.Sure Anjaneyulu infavour of Mr.B.Veeranjaneyulu (A4). On the date of his visit, he has not verified this document since it was not available. Ex.P.54 was registered on 14.11.2003 and Branch Manager ( A1) brought this document to Regional office on 15.11.2003. Since Ex.P.54 was not in existence on the date of his visit, he could not verify the genuineness of this document with the concerned SRO.

P.W.7 has further deposed that on the date of his visit he has verified

Ex.P.23, Ex.P.175, Ex.P.176, Ex.P.174, Exs.P.13 to 18. Subsequently he came to know that Ex.P.175, Ex.P.176, Exs.P.13 to 18 were impersonated. On the date of his visit Ex.P.55 was not produced before him for verification. But on 45C.C.09/2011/Prl. CBI Court/VSP 15.11.2003, A.1 Branch Manager brought Ex.P.55 to Regional office along with gift deed Ex.P.54. Subsequently he came to know Ex.P55 is not issued by Village Secretary, Arepalli. By the date of his visit another property covered under Ex.P.7 was not mortgaged to the bank. Hence he could not verify any papers pertaining to the said property. Subsequently he came to know the said property was also mortgaged.

P.W.7 has further deposed that Ex.P.186 is legal opinion obtained from their panel advocate Mr.P.Panduranga Rao in respect of the property covered under Ex.P.29. Ex.P.187 is legal opinion obtained from their panel advocate Mr. A.Pratap kumar in respect of the property covered under

Ex.P.27. Ex.P.188 is 9 credit reports compiled by Branch Manager in respect ofMr.E.PapaRao,Mr.SureAnjaneyulu,Mr.B.Veeranjaneyulu,

Mr.P.Sivaramaiah,Mr.SurePedanarasaiah,Mr.SureNarasaiah,

Mr.E.Govindaiah, Mr.E.Srinivasa Rao and Mr.E.Prasad Rao (9 sheets).

P.W.8 namely Mr.B.Chandra Sekhar, the then Joint Director of

Sericulture, Hyderabad has deposed that in February, 2001, a proposal came from Joint Director, Chittoor about taking Ac 500.00 cents in Prakasam

District by MSIRDS for cultivation of Mulberry and Silk Cocoon production.

Then they recommended the said proposal to Central Silk Board,

Government of India in March 2001. In May 2001 a meeting took place in

Central Silk Board with regard to this proposal. They took a decision to constitute a small committee making Joint Director of Sericulture as the leader of the project and three officers from Central Silk board were the members of committee. The said three members were asked to inspect the field and submit the feasibility report. After receiving feasibility report they submitted the proposal to Central Silk Board. Central Silk board requested 46C.C.09/2011/Prl. CBI Court/VSP them to reduce the area of cultivation to Ac.150.00 cents and send fresh proposal. Then they directed Assistant Director of Ongole to send proposal accordingly. That proposal was received by them in the month of September 2002. Thereafter Village Secretary of Fathepuram village sent the names of farmers in 150 acres of land to their office. After receiving the said list we forwarded that proposal to Central Silk Board.

P.W.8 has further deposed that in June 2003, Central Silk Board approved the project and released the first installment of funds i.e. Rs. 35 lakhs to the Department of Sericulture, AP. After receiving that funds they have given detailed guidelines to Assistant Director of Sericulture, Ongole and to implement the scheme according to the guidelines. In the month of

September 2003, he visited the fields in Fathepuram village where Mulberry cultivation was taken up. In that visit, he observed that survival percent of

Mulberry plants was less than 40% and Mulberry plantation was made in 30 acres instead of 150 acres and out of the plantation made in 30 acres survival percent was less than 40%. He submitted field report to the

Commissioner of Sericulture with all the details. His report is available in office records. After submission of his report Commissioner of Seri culture,

AP, Hyderabad had given instructions to Assistant Director of Sericulture,

Ongole not to make further release of funds to MSIRDS without the knowledge of Commissioner. By the date of his visit of the fields the then

Assistant Director , Sericulture , Ongole had released around Rs 8 lakhs to

MSIRDS. Even that fact was mentioned in his report.

P.W.8 has further deposed that in October 2003, Commissioner of

Sericulture also visited the fields and he also observed the irregularities as reported by him and by the date of visit of Commissioner, Union bank of 47C.C.09/2011/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

India, Pasumuru branch, released around 90 lakhs without the knowledge of

Sericulture department. As per records A.1 was the branch manager at that time.

P.W.8 has further deposed that Ex.P.189 is original letter dated 28.3.2003, addressed by Deputy Secretary (Technical) namely Mr.B.Prakash to the Commissioner of Sericulture with regard to release of funds. Ex.P.190 is letter dated 28.3.2003, addressed by Deputy Secretary (Technical) namely

Mr.B.Prakash to the Commissioner of Sericulture with regard to release of funds. But signature in this letter is not that of Mr.B.Prakash. Ex.P.190 letter is not available in their office and this is a forged letter. Ex.P.191 is memorandum dated 21.5.2001 issued by Assistant Director, Sericulture,

Ongole, giving instructions to the Inspector of Sericulture, Talluru to obtain the data mentioned therein from MRO, MDO and Chief Planning officer.

P.W.8 has further deposed that Ex.P.192 is memo dated 23.8.2002, given by Commissioner to Assistant Director, Sericulture, Ongole requesting to identify the farmers together with the financing bank in consultation with the society and submit the proposal through Joint Director, Sericulture,

Ananthapur who was the then controlling officer along with photo copy of profile of Catalytic Development Program. witness adds original of the said profile will be in Commissioner’s office. Ex.P.193 is memo dated 10.5.2003 issued by Commissioner of Sericulture, Hyderabad to Assistant Director of

Sericulture, Ongole for implementation of scheme to the individual farmers but not to the society. Ex.P.194 is Component wise requirement of funds for implementation of the scheme including subsidy and bank loan.

48C.C.09/2011/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

P.W.8 has further deposed that Ex.P.195 is memo dated 4.6.2003 issued by Commissioner of Sericulture to Assistant Director of Sericulture for releasing the amount of Rs 35,49,750/-, which was received from the Central

Silk board. He was requested to implement the scheme as per the guidelines of the Catalytic Development Program. Ex.P.196 is telegram dated 22.9.2003 issued by Commissioner of Sericulture to Assistant Director of Sericulture not to release any further amounts to MSIRDS until further orders from

Commissioner. Ex.P.197 is telegram dated 24.9.2003 issued by Deputy

Director of Ongole to the Assistant Director of Ongole to stop payments to

MSIRDS.

P.W.8 has further deposed that Ex.P.198 is Telegram through mail

dated 22.9.2003, addressed to AD, Sericulture , Ongole and Inspector

Sericulture, Martur not to release any amounts to the Society until further orders from Commissioner of Sericulture to ensure that physical work is available on the ground for the money paid. Ex.P.199 is photocopy of mail

dated 28.7.2003 given by Commissioner of Sericulture to Assistant Director,

Sericulture, Ongole giving instructions that further amounts should be given only to the society but not directly to the beneficiaries. Ex.P.200 is photocopy list of beneficiaries of Fathepuram village prepared by Inspector of

Sericulture, Assistant Director of Sericulture and Village Secretary of

Fathepuram village.

P.W.8 has further deposed that Ex.P.201 is photocopy of request letter addressed by President and other members of MSIRDS to

Commissioner to release the funds to the society. Ex.P.202 is photocopy (OC) of mail dated 28.7.2003, given by Commissioner of Sericulture to

Assistant Director of Sericulture, Ongole. Ex.P.203 is photocopy of mail dated 49C.C.09/2011/Prl. CBI Court/VSP 21.92003 attested by witness, given by Commissioner of Sericulture to

Assistant Director of Sericulture, Ongole not to make any payment until further orders to MSIRDS. Ex.P.204 is photo copy of tour notes dated 22.9.2003 of Deputy Director of Sericulture attested by witness. Ex.P.205 is photo copy of letter dated 3.2.2004 attested by witness addressed by AD

Sericulture, Guntur to the Commissioner of Sericulture submitting the joint inspection report conducted by MRO, Rompacherla, Mandal Surveyor

Rompacherla for identification of Mulberry plantation in S.No.91/1 and 14/2-4 of Arepalli Village of Rompacherla village on 31.1.2004 along with joint inspection report. According to join inspection report no mulberry plantation was raised in Arepalli village in the said survey numbers.

P.W.8 has further deposed that Ex.P.206 is photocopy of list of beneficiaries attested by witness, identified to take up sericulture in MSIRDS.

The said List was submitted by Village Secretary to Commissioner,

Sericulture, Hyderabad. Ex.P.207 list photocopy of list of beneficiaries attested by witness, identified to take up sericulture in leased lands. The said

List was submitted by Village Secretary to Commissioner , Sericulture,

Hyderabad. Ex.P.208 is photocopy of list of beneficiaries attested by witness, identified to take up sericulture in MSIRDS. The said List was submitted by

Village Secretary to Commissioner, Sericulture, Hyderabad. Ex.P.209 is photocopy of list of beneficiaries attested by witness, submitted by Union

Bank to Central Silk board by marking copy to Commissioner, Sericulture,

Hyderabad. Ex.P.210 is original letter dated 31.1.2004 along with orders of

District Collector, Ongole, enclosing combined sketch showing the Sericulture lands in Elchuru and Kopparam villages. Ex.P.211 is DO letter from Collector,

Guntur to Commissioner of Sericulture, AP, Hyderabad stating that there was no Mulberry plantation in S.NO. 91/1 and 14/2-4 of Arepalli village of 50C.C.09/2011/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Rompacherla mandal. He was examined by inspector CBI and recorded his statement.

P.W.9 Mr.V.Kullaya Reddy, the then Sericulturue Officer in

Sericulture Department, Ongole, deposed that his duties as Sericulture officer at that time were extending technical guidance to the farmers in mulberry cultivation and silk worm rearing and extend financial assistance to farmers for preparation of assets required to take up sericulture and main object of Sericulture department is to develop the farmers in Mulberry cultivation and Silk worm culture to produce Cocoons which is raw material for rearing sector in production of silk bye products. Farmer requires minimum of 1 acre with assured water sources and construction of shed for silk worm rearing. For getting mulberry leaf till silk worm culture the first crop will be ready in 3 months. In subsequent crops, 45 days for garden growing and 25 days for silk worm culture is required. Likewise 5 crops will come in one year. In each village we will select 5 to 10 members in a group to promote collective development in marketing and sale of the cocoons. To extend mulberry cultivation in villages, they use to establish technical service center headed by Sericulture officer or Assistant Sericulture officer with supporting sub staff to give the technical guidance to the group of farmers and extend all requirements to the farmers in mulberry garden and silk warm culture for production of cocoons.

P.W.9 has further deposed that DFLS means(Disease Free Layings)

Silk worm eggs. The silk worm layings will be supplied to the farmers on assessing the leaf quantity and capacity of the garden for silk worm culture on payments. Farmers themselves have to develop the sheds. Depends on extent of plantation, plinth area of shed should be 40x20x12x15 per one 51C.C.09/2011/Prl. CBI Court/VSP acre. Catalytic development program is Central Government Sponsored scheme which have intension to intensify the Mulberry Sericulture in quality and quantitative terms with advanced technology in mulberry cultivation and silk worm culture. Farmers investment in this is 50% beyond subsidy. In the remaining 50% subsidy, 25% contribution is from the State (Sericulture department) and 25% from Central Government (CSB). The approximate unit cost per acre at that time was Rs.1,62,250/- which consists of mulberry cultivation, construction of silk worm rearing shed and erection of rearing appliances in silk worm rearing sheds.

P.W.9 has further deposed that MSIRDS project was initially promoted by Mr.Eluru Prasada Rao (A2) as a President of the society, registered society under Society Act 21 of 1860. Ex.P.1 is the society registration certificate. Under guidelines of Catalytic development program implementation the individual beneficiaries assets developed through society and subsidies were given to the assets being developed by individual beneficiaries only and not to any society. President of MSIRDS requested

Commissioner of Sericulture for making payment of subsidy to the society instead of individual farmers, stating the difficulty to bring the farmers every time to the bank and to the office of ADS, Ongole.

P.W.9 has further deposed that in his inspection of site and fields, he observed that Mulberry cultivation was not found done in the leased lands. Similarly sheds were constructed in the site outside the project area which do not belong to the beneficiaries. He reported the said facts to the

ADS, Ongole. By the time the said deviations occurred, Commissioner

Sericulture gave directions not to release any funds on the ground that it was difficult to continue the project. He visited the bank for entries in pass book 52C.C.09/2011/Prl. CBI Court/VSP regarding the subsidies released to this project. Branch Manager has not revealed the loan given to the society in connection with this project.

P.W.10 namely Mr.K.M. Prabhudas, the then Branch Manager,

Vijaya Bank, Chilakuluripet Branch, deposed that he handed over Specimen

Signature card of Sudha Enterprises, Statement of account, Credit Voucher and cheques in respect of that account to Inspector CBI. Ex.P.212 is

Specimen Signature card of M/s Sudha Enterprises, signed by its proprietor

Mr.M.Prasad Rao. Ex.P.213 is Cash Credit voucher dated 10.10.2003 of M/s

Sudha Enterprises. Ex.P.161 is Statement of Account of M/s Sudha

Enterprises. He could not hand over account opening form of Sudha

Enterprises because it was misplaced due to shifting of branch at that point of time.

P.W.10 has further deposed that Ex.P.214 is original Credit slip submitted by M/s Sudha Enterprises for collection of pay order in the name of

Sudha Enterprises for Rs. 15,99,595/-. The said pay order was issued by

Union Bank of India, Pasumuru Branch. Clearing house for said pay order is

SBI, Chilakaluripet Branch. Ex.P.215 is Cheque dated 11.10.2003, favouring self issued for Rs.10 lakhs, issued by M/s Sudha Enterprises. The Cheque was encashed on the same date. Amount under the cheque was paid to

Mr.M.Prasad Rao. Ex.P.216 is cheque dated 13.10.2003 favouring self issued for Rs. 5,99,000/- issued by M/s Sudha Enterprises. The Cheque was encashed on the same date. Amount under the cheque was paid to M.Prasad

Rao.Ex.P.217 is Credit slip dated 17.10.2003 for Rs. 14,97,750/- in favour of

M/s sudha Enterprises, issued by Union Bank of India, Pasumuru Branch. The amount was credited on 20.10.2003 as per Ex.P.161 statement of account.

Ex.P.218 is cheque dated 20.10.2003, for Rs.7,00000/- issued by Sudha 53C.C.09/2011/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Enterprises, favouring self and cash was paid on the same date to the

Proprietor Sri M.Prasad Rao. Amount covered under the cheque was withdrawn as per Ex.p.161 statement of account. Ex.P.219 is cheque dated 21.10.2003 for Rs. 7,98,000/- issued by Sudha Enterprises, favouring S.Siva

Rama Prasad and cash was paid to Mr.S.Siva Rama Prasad ( A5) on the same date. Ex.P.220 is credit slip dated 18.11.2003 for Rs. 7,98,800/- issued by

Union Bank of India, Pasumuru branch. Ex.P.221 is is cheque dated 19.11.2003 for Rs.5 lakhs favouring Mr.B.L.Narayana ( A3) issued by M/s

Sudha Enterprises and cash was paid on the same date. Ex.P.222 is cheque

dated 21.11.2003, for Rs. 2,98,000/- issued by M/s Sudha Enterprises and

cheque was encashed on the same date. As per ExP161 statement, the said account was closed on 12.2.2004.

P.W.11 namely Mr.K.Chandra Sekhar Rao, the then Assistant

Manager in Syndicate Bank, Brudavan Garden branch has deposed that worked as Assistant Manager in Syndicate Bank, Brundavan Garden branch.

Vignesh Enterprises represented by Mr.Pachepalli Narayana Murthy got current A/.c NO. 385 in that branch. On 9.5.2002, the said account was opened. Mr.G.Sambasiva Rao of GSR Residential College, introduced this account holder to the bank.

P.W.11 has further deposed that Ld.No.303 shown to him is account opening form of Vignesh Enterprises. Ex.P.224 is confirmation of introduction of the account holder. Ex.P.225 is Form 60 in respect of that account. Ex.P.226 is copy of certification of registration of Vignesh

Enterprises. Ex.P.227 is account opening print out. Ex.P.228 is statement of account. Ex.P.229 is pay in slip for an amount of Rs. 8,46,600/- dated 20.11.2003. Ex.P.230 is letter dated 12.7.2007 through which he handed 54C.C.09/2011/Prl. CBI Court/VSP over all these documents. Through DD of Union Bank of India, Pasumuru

Branch for Rs. 8,46,600/- was credited to the account of Vignesh Enterprises on 20.11.2003. On 21.6.2004, the account of Vignesh Enterprises was closed in that branch. By the date of closing the account there was an amount of Rs. 6/- in that account. Ex.P.231 is letter dated 27.3.2013 along with two cheques addressed by Branch Manager of Syndicate Bank,

Brundavan garden branch, Guntur to Mr.S.V.S.Naidu, Inspector of Police, CBI.

Through this letter branch manager forwarded two self cheques dated 21.11.2003 and 20.11.2003 issued by Vignesh Enterprises for an amount of

Rs. 3,44,600/- and Rs 8,46,000/- respectively.

P.W.12 namely Mr.Ch.V. Madhusudhana Rao, the then Typist, o/o

A.D. Sericulture, Ongole has deposed that in 2003, one Mr.Sukumar Sein was

A.D of Sericulture in that office. One Mr.Y.Ramesh was inspector, Sericulture during that time. The duty of Sri Y.Ramesh was to give assistance to the farmers of Sericulture on fields and to recommend for subsidies to them. In 2003, the said Mr.Ramesh proposed to A.D. Sericulture for land preparation charges, cost of saplings to MSIRDS. On 4.9.2003, as per the instructions of

Mr.AD.Sukumar Sein, 8 notings were typed by him on the same date with regard to the said proposal. After typing the notings, he was asked to put his initial by A.D and he refused the said request to put the initials on the same day on 8 notings on the ground that concerned files were not with him. Then

A.D. compelled him to put initials and threatened that he would suspend him if he refused to do so. Under the said threat, he put his initials in 8 notings.

Witness identified his initials in Ld.No.98 and it is marked as Ex.P.228. Nearly

Rs 30 lakhs of grant was sanctioned by AD under the said notings. He prepared two cheques in his own handwriting in that connection. He did not inform the threats extended by AD to Superior officers.

55C.C.09/2011/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

P.W.13 namely Mr.K.Raghupati Rao, the then Technical Officer in the office of Assistant Director, Sericulture, Ongole, has deposed that during that time one I.P.Sukumar Sein worked as A.D in that office. Ex.P.155 contains his initials. Under the directions of the then AD, Ex.P.155 letter was prepared. A.D himself got prepared even project report enclosed to Ex.P.155 letter. The project report in fact has to be prepared by society who claims subsidies. He has no personal knowledge about the project report or

Ex.P.155 letter, only on the directions of Mr.I.P.Sukumar Sein, he prepared them.

P.W.14 Mr.Achibigali Sk. Mohammed Kasi, the then Technical

Officer, Sericulture in the office of A.D., Ongole, has deposed that his duties as Technical officer were going to the fields and providing technical assistance to the farmers in rearing silk worms. Once he went to MSIRDS as a part of his duties. He observed silk worm crop at that time. He gave technical guidance to the farmers at that time. He went to MSIRDS at later stage of silk worm crop. During his tenure in that office, I.P.Sukumar Sein was A.D., and he identified his initials in Ex.P.159. Ex.P.159 was addressed by AD to Regional Manager, Union Bank of India, Vijayawada, informing sanction of Rs. 1,41,99,000/- for sericulture development. Upon the instructions of AD, he put his initials in that letter. A.D.Sukumar Sein himself used to maintain Sericulture files. He used to preserve those files in his cupboard under his lock and key.

P.W.15 namely Mrs.Poosapati Rajyalakshmi, the then Technical

Officer in office of A.D. Sericulture, Ongole, Prakasam District, deposed that as Technical officer, he used to prepare progress reports and attended other 56C.C.09/2011/Prl. CBI Court/VSP technical works. He knows know MSIRDS. President of the said society is

Mr.Eluru Prasad Rao ( A2). In 2001, the said President requested him to prepare progress report for the society. He replied that he has no right to prepare the same because he did not deal with the said file. Then he reprimanded him with harsh words. Immediately, he reported the same to the then A.D. Mr. Gopalakrishnan. A.D. called for the said President and reprimanded him. Then President of MSIRDS tendered apology. The said

President asked him to prepare Progress report for an amount of Rs.35 lakhs and odd.

P.W.16 namely Mr.Konala Bapireddy deposed that his father used to have agricultural land of Ac.13.00 in Sr.No.887/A, in Kopparam,

Santhamaguluru Mandal, Prakasam district. In 1966 his father purchased the said land from Balakotayya and others. Ex.P.59 is certified copy of the said sale deed. In 2008, when he went to MRO, Santhamaguluru for obtaining

Pattadhar Pass book for the said land, he directed him to obtain no due certificate from Union Bank of India, Pasumuru branch. Accordingly he went to the said branch and made application in writing. Manager of the said branch stated that Mr.Eluru Prasad Rao (A2) obtained loan in respect of the lands in Sr.No.887/A and as such no due certificate will not be given. He also stated that there is CBI enquiry in respect of these lands and directed him to go to CBI office. When he obtained EC on their land of Ac 13.00, it shows that A2 has leased out these lands to 150 persons. The said EC is Ex.P.62.

Either himself or his father did not execute any agreement of sale in respect of their land of Ac 13.00 in favour of others. He did not obtain loan by mortgaging the said land of Ac 13.00 at any time from any bank including

Union Bank of India, Pasumuru branch.

57C.C.09/2011/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

P.W.17 namely Mr.Binakanahalli Prakash, Deputy Secretary (Technical), Central Silk Board, Bangalore, deposed that the nature of his duties were to implement one major program or project called Catalytic

Development program (CDP) in addition to whatever duties assigned by the

Member Secretary, Central Silk Board. Main functions of Central Silk Board are to develop Sericulture and Silk industry in the country by supplementing the efforts of the State Governments. Besides the Central Silk board is basically R&D organization having a network of Research Extension Centers spread over the different parts of the Country. Besides Central Silk Board also undertakes production and supply of quality silk worm seed to the farmers in the country, apart from governing imports and exports of silk.

P.W.17 has further deposed that Catalytic Development program is a flagship program of the Central Silk board which was approved by

Government of India mainly to increase the income of farmers at grass root level by providing supply chain in the silk industry. Their office has dealt with the file of MSIRDS. To his remembrance Sri E.Prasad Rao was the president of MSIRDS. MSIRDS submitted application for grant of subsidy to their project worth Rs 9.73 crores, which involves State Share, Central Silk

Board share, Bank finance and also MSIRDS share. The proposal of MSIRDS was forwarded to Member Secretary, Central Silk board through Director of

Sericulture , Government of AP, Hyderabad on 15.3.2001.

P.W.17 has further deposed that Ex.P.233 is project report along with covering letter of Director Sericulture, Hyderabad and it is attested by him and he identified his signature in Ex.P.233. Member Secretary Central

Silk board convened a meeting after receiving this proposal. In that meeting it was decided that a four member committee comprising Sri R.Prabhakar, 58C.C.09/2011/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Joint Director Sericulture, Government of AP, Chitoor, Sri Dwarakanath,

Deputy Director, National Silkworkm Seed project, Bangalore, Sri K.Raghu

Assistant Director, Demonstration Cum Training Center (DCTC), Hindupur and

Dr. D.Subba Rao, Assistant Director, Grainage Extension Center, National

Silkworm Seed project, Central Silk board, Vijayawada. Ex.P.234 is Attested copy of memorandum of Central Silk board.

P.W.17 has further deposed that these members have visited the project site and submitted report to Central Silk board. Ex.P.235 is the attested copy of report submitted to Central Silk board. The main recommendations of the committee were to implement Sericulture programs to benefit the farmers in the area in a limited way and later on after seeing the success of the program it could be further expanded. Besides the committee also observed and suggested that in and around the project area there was lot of tobacco growing and spraying of pesticides should be avoided when Sericulture programs like Mulberry plantation, Silkworm rearing, etc are taken up.

P.W.17 has further deposed that the recommendations of above Four member committee were forwarded to the Director Sericulture, Government of AP on 24.8.2001, informing that the Sericulture activities could be taken up in a limited way comprising in the beginning providing of drip irrigation, construction of rearing houses, supply of multi end reeling machines and supply of rearing equipments. Besides it was mentioned that the subsidy will be provided only to the individual farmers and there is no provision to provide any subsidy directly to the society or route it through the society.

59C.C.09/2011/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

P.W.17 has further deposed that Ex.P.236 is the letter dated 24.8.2001, addressed by Member Secretary to Director of Sericulture,

Government of AP. Based upon Ex.P.236, Commissioner of Sericulture has requested for sanction of Central Share to cover the above beneficiaries of the society on 25.6.2002. Ex.P.237 is attested copy of letter addressed by

Commissioner Sericulture to Member secretary. They addressed a letter based on the request from the Commissioner of Sericulture, Government of

AP vide Central Silk board letter dated 6.8.2002 that the department of

Sericulture may cover the farmers of the above society as identified by the

Director Sericulture and extend the benefits of Catalytic development programs. Ex.P.238 is attested copy of the said letter dated 6.8.2002.

P.W.17 has further deposed that in response, the Commissioner of

Sericulture, Government of AP sent a request to the Member secretary vide their letter dated 24.2.2003 to release the additional funds , to cover 150 acres and 150 farmers under the MSIRDS.Ex.P.239 is attested letter

dated 24.2.2003. After receiving Ex.P.239 letter Central Silk Board released a

sum of Rs. 35,49,750/-, being 50% CSB share, covering 7 components under

CDP under Ex.P.189 and he identified his signature in Ex.P.189. For having released the subsidy to the Society through Department of Sericulture,

Government of AP, the Central Silk board deputed a two member team consisting of Sri N.Sri Prakash (LW25), Assistant Secretary (Technical),

Central Silk board and DR.D.Subba Rao to visit the project area and to submit a report about the progress made. Ex.P.240 is attested copy of notice dated 12.12.2003.

P.W.17 has further deposed that they visited the project area on 18.12.2003 and submitted a report to Central Silk board. The team in its 60C.C.09/2011/Prl. CBI Court/VSP report mentioned that instead of implementing 7 components under CDP for which the subsidy was released, only two components namely Raising of

Mulberry Saplings and construction of Rearing houses have been implemented. Ex.P.241 is attested copy of report dated 18.12.2003. After receiving the report, Central Silk board addressed a letter to Commissioner of

Sericulture , Government of AP on 30.12.2003 informing the details of the report with a request to implement the components as approved by the

Central Silk board otherwise the Mulberry plantation raised by the farmers may wither and farmers may lose interest in Sericulture. In reply to their above letter, the Commissioner of Sericulture, Government of AP informed vide his letter dated 31.12.2003, that MSIRDS is not having sufficient transparency in their dealings and the land covered by the society are on lease basis and the farmers of the society do not have their own land.

Further the farmers involved in raising mulberry plantation were hired coolies and not the real farmers. This has lead to a difficulty in working in the project area by the State Departmental staff.

P.W.17 has further deposed that in response to the above

Commissioners letter, Member Secretary Central Silk board addressed a letter to Commissioner Seri culture , Government of AP to verify the land records of the above society through the District Collector of Prakasam and

Guntur Districts. Ex.P.190 was not issued from our office and the signature in that letter is not that of mine. The amount mentioned in Ex.P.190 i.e.

Rs.1,41,99,000/- is wrong. Ex.P.242 are leave letters containing his signatures. CBI people collected his specimen signatures. Ex.P.243 contains his specimen signatures obtained by CBI.

61C.C.09/2011/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

P.W.18 namely Mr.N.Sriprakash, the then Assistant Secretary (Technical) in Central Silk Board, Bangalore, deposed that he visited MSIRDS plantation site on 18.12.2003. Target given was 150 acres but Mulberry plantation was raised only in 125 acres. About 1500 disease free silk worm eggs were used for rearing by the date of his visit. From 10 acres mulberry leaves were collected for rearing 1500 disease free silk worm eggs. Only two components were implemented by the date of his visit. One component is reimbursement of cost of saplings, other component is construction of rearing house. 150 rearing houses must be constructed as per the target.

During his visit, he found only 42 rearing houses were constructed and for 8 rearing house foundation was being laid. Ex.P.241 is the report submitted by him after his visit. One Dr. B.Subba Rao also visited the said site along with him besides State Government officials of AP. Witness identified signatures of himself and Mr.B.Subba Rao in the report. In his presence specimen signatures of PW.17 were collected by CBI under Ex.P.243.

P.W.19 namely Mr.Jammula Veera Bhaskara Rao, Agriculturist,

Pathepuram village, deposed that he knows Mr.Eluru Prasada Rao (A2) who belongs to Pathepuram i.e., his village. He do not know that he formed a

Sericulture Society. He never joined as member in that society. He got 7 acres of land in Pathepuram village. The said 7 acres of land is in four survey numbers. He got 1 acre in Sr.No. 945/C2 of Pathepuram village. Mortha

Gangamma, Jammula Prasananjaneyulu and some others also got land in the same survey number. Mr.Eluru Prasada Rao is not having any land in that survey number. He never sold any land Mr.Eluru PRasada Rao or to the society. He never entered into any agreements with them with regard to sale of lands. Signature shown to him on Ex.P.6 is not that of mine. The signatures and photograph shown to him on Ex.P.7 are not that of him.

62C.C.09/2011/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

During his examination, he handed over Xerox copy of his pass book to CBI.

Ex.P.244 is the photocopy of said pass book. His specimen signatures are obtained by Inspector CBI. Ex.P.245 contains his specimen signatures. He never obtained loans from Union Bank of India, Pasumuru. He has no relationship with Mr.Eluru Prasad Rao.

P.W.20 namely Mr.Jammula Parameswara Rao, Agriculturist,

Chithipothulavaripalem village has deposed that he got 1 ½ acres of land in

Chitipothulavaripalem and they raise paddy if there is source of water , if there is no such source of water they raise pulses. He knows Mr.Eluru

Prasada Rao( A2). He belongs to Pathepuram village. Earlier, he was resident of Pathepuram village. He knows that he formed a Sericulture society. He is also a member in that society. He did not receive any loan amounts or subsidies through that society. He do not have any land in Survey no. 887A of Pathepuram village. He did not raise mulberry plantation on his own in

Pathepuram. He worked as coolie in Sericulture sheds constructed by the said society of A.2. He never went to Union Bank of India Pasumuru for payment of the amounts.

P.W.21 namely Mr.Venkata Ramanadham Garre, the then AGM in

UCO Bank, Guntur, deposed that he handed over the following documents relating to this case to CBI on 13.2.2009. Ex.P.246 is Original account opening form of Sri Laxmi Venkateswara Cotton Traders. Ex.P.247 is specimen signature card of the proprietor of the said firm. Ex.P.248 is statement of account of the said proprietary concern from 17.10.2003 to 31.1.12004. Through Ex.P.249 letter dated 13.2.2009, he handed over

Exs.P.246 to 248. As per Ex.P.248, on 17.12.2003, Rs. 4,32,000/- was credited 63C.C.09/2011/Prl. CBI Court/VSP into the current account of Laxmi Venkateswara Cotton traders and on 9.1.2004, Rs.4,61,480/- was credited and withdrawn on the same day.

P.W.22 namely Mr.U.Muneswara Rao, the then LIC, Chilakaluripet,

Guntur, deposed that the nature of his duties were recommending the agents, giving training to agents, service to policy holders and procuring business. He knows Mr.M.Siva Prasad (A6) and Mr.Sivarama Prasad ( A5).

They are agents recommended by him and he can identify their handwritings and signatures. The photo and writing in signature in Ex.P.212 are that of

Mr.M.Siva Prasad (A6) and he signed as Mr.M.Prasada Rao in Ex.P.212.

Handwriting in Ex.P.218, Ex.P.216, Ex.P.215 belongs to Mr.M.Siva Prasad (A6).

Handwriting in body of Ex.P.219 cheque is not that of Mr.M.Siva Prasad (A6).

Again he deposed that the writing in rupees column of Ex.P.219 cheque appears to be that of M.Siva Prasad ( A6). The writing in Signature in

Ex.P.219 cheque appears to be that of M.Siva Prasad (A6).

P.W.22 has further deposed that Ex.P.250 is cheque dated 3.1.2004. The writing in name and signature part of Ex.P.250, appears to be that of M.Siva Prasad (A6). Ex.P.251 is application for License to act as an insurance agent. Writing and signatures in Ex.P.251 are that of Mr.M.Siva

Prasad ( A6). Ex.P.252 (4 sheets) is correspondence made by Mr.M.Siva

Prasad with Branch Manager, LIC Chilakaluripet. The writing and signatures in Ex.P.252 are that of Mr.M.Siva Prasad (A6). Ex.P.253 is the cheque dated 11.2.2004. The writing and signature in Ex.P.253 are that of Mr.M.Siva

Prasad (A6). Ex.P.254 is the cheque dated 12.2.2004. The writing and signature in Ex.P.254 are that of Mr.M.Siva Prasad ( A6). Ex.P.255 is application made by Mr.S.Sivarama Prasad (A5) for license to act as insurance agent. Signature in Ex.P.255 is that of Mr.S.Sivarama Prasad 64C.C.09/2011/Prl. CBI Court/VSP ( A5). Ex.P.256 is correspondence made by Mr.S.Sivarama Prasad with

Branch Manager, LIC Chilakaluripet.. Signatures on 4 sheets of Ex.P.256 are that of S.Sivarama Prasad ( A5). The writing in Telugu in 3rd and 4th sheets of

Ex.P.256 is that of Mr.S.Sivarama Prasad.

P.W.23 Mr.S.V.S.Naidu, the then Inspector of Police, CBI,

Visakhapatnam, deposed that on 30.4.2007, as per orders of his SP, CBI,

Visakhapatnam, he has registered a case against A.1 and A.2 U/sec. 120-B, 420 IPC and Sec. 13(2) r/w 13(1)(d) of PC Act, 1988 on a fax complaint received from Chief Vigilance officer, Union Bank of India, Mumbai. Ex.P.257 is FIR. On 7.6.2007, he has conducted search at the residence of A.1 on the strength of search warrant and also caused search U/sec. 165 Cr.P.C at the residence of A.2 with the assistance of Mr.D.Mishra , Inspector of Police. On the same day, he has seized 5 documents and Mr.D.Mishra Seized 16 number of documents and A.2 was arrested. On 8.6.2007, A.2 was produced

before the Hon’ble court and he was sent to Judicial custody. On 11.6.2007,

he produced the documents before the Hon’ble court and taken police custody of A.2 on the orders of Hon’ble court for 3 days from 11.6.2007 to 14.6.2007. On 12.6.2007, he obtained specimen signatures of A.2 and interrogated A.1 and arrested him following all legal formalities. On 13.6.2007, he produced A.1 before the Hon’ble court . On 23.6.2007, he received 11 number of documents from DGM, Union Bank of India, Regional office. On 27.6.2007, he received 3 documents from Branch Manager, Vijaya

Bank, Chilakaluripet, examined and recorded the statement of

Mr.K.M.Prabhu, Branch Manager, Vijaya Bank.

P.W.23 has further deposed that On 2.7.2007, he received 2 certified copies of documents from Manager, LIC of India , Chilakaluripet. On 65C.C.09/2011/Prl. CBI Court/VSP 3.7.2007, he received 3 documents from Branch Manager, Union Bank of

India, Chilakaluripet. On 5.7.2007, he obtained specimen signatures of

Mr.S.Sivarama Prasad (A5), examined and recorded the statement of Sri

D.Rama Rao, Branch Manager, Union Bank of India, Chilakaluripet. On 9.7.2007, he obtained specimen signatures of Mr.M.Siva Prasad (A6). On 10.7.2007, he obtained specimen signatures of Mr.S.Sivarama Prasad ( A5).

On 12.7.2007, he received 7 documents from Assistant Manager, Syndicate

Bank, Guntur and examined Sri Mr.K.Chandrasekhar Rao. On 20.7.2007, he received 9 documents from Sri K.Ramesh Reddy, Branch Manager, Central

Bank of India, Chilakaluripet, examined and recorded his statement. On 26.7.2007, he received 2 original documents from Branch Manager, LIC of

India, Chilakaluripet. On 16.8.2007, he examined and recorded the statement of Dr.P.Sivaramaiah. On 21.8.2007, he examined Sri U.Munieswara

Rao, Development officer LIC of India, Chilakaluripet. On 23.8.2007, he examined and recorded the statement of Sri Sure Anjaneyulu and Mr.Sure

Venkata Narasaiah and obtained their specimen signatures. On 27.8.2007, he examined Mr.Jammula Veera Bhaskara Rao and obtained his specimen signatures. On 23.10.2007, he examined and recorded the statement of

Mr.M.Yogeswara Rao.

P.W.23 has further deposed that on 22.2.2008, he examined

Mr.V.Kullaya Reddy, Sericulture officer and received documents from Sri V.Ch.

Sharma, Sericulture officer, Ongole. On 24.4.2008, he examined Sri

Y.Ramesh, sericulture officer, Giddaluru. On 29.4.2008, he examined

Mr.B.Prakash and Mr.N. Sriprakash , he also obtained specimen signatures of

Mr.B.Prakash and received certified copies of documents. On 8.5.2008, he examined Sri A.Sudhakar, DGM, Union Bank of India, Bubaneswar. On 6.6.2008, he received 6 documents from Sri Matta Babu, Senior Manager, 66C.C.09/2011/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Union Bank of India. On 13.6.2008, he received 2 documents from Sri Matta

Babu, Senior Manager, Union Bank of India. On 17.6.2008, he examined and recorded the statement of Mr.K.Rama Rao and obtained his specimen signatures. On 18.6.2008, he examined and recorded the statement of Sri

A.Sukarsha, branch Manager, Union Bank of India. On 20.6.2008, he examined and recorded the statement of Sri K.Baskhar Raju, Senior Manager (LAW), Regional office south, Unon Bank of India. On 21.6.2008, he examined Sri P.D.N.Sharma, Senior Manager, Union Bank of India,

Karithabad, Hyderabad. On 2.7.2008, he examined Sri K.Bapireddy , Civil

Contractor, Tanuku. On 27.8.2008, he examined Sri I.P.Sukumar Sen and obtained his specimen signatures. On 9.9.2008, he examined and recorded the statement of Sri M.babu, Senior Manager, HR , Union bank of India. On 8.10.2008, he examined and recorded the statement of Sri B.Chandrasekhar,

Joint Director, Sericulture and received 42 documents from Commissioner of

Sericulture, Hyderabad. On 22.10.2008, he examined and recorded the statements of Sri Ch.Venkata Madhusudhana Rao, Mr.K.Raghupati Rao,

Mr.A.Sk.Mohammad Kasim, Smt. K.Rajyalakshmi. On 31.10.2008, he received 8 certified copies of documents from Sri V.V.Nagaraju Kumar , Joint Sub

Registrar (1), Narasaraopet and recorded his statement. On 28.11.2008, he examined and recorded the statement of Sri T.Rajendra Prasad , Advocate,

Chilakaluripet.

P.W.23 has further deposed that on 3.1.2009, he examined and recorded the statement of Sri P.Panduranga Rao, Advocate . On 14.2.2009, he received 3 documents from Sri G.V.Ramanadham, AGM, UCO bank, Guntur and recorded his statement. On 15.2.2009, he received 1 document from

Branch Manager , Union Bank of India , Patnam Bazar, Guntur. On 26.2.2009, he received 10 documents from Branch Manager, Union Bank of India, 67C.C.09/2011/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Chilakaluripet. On 3.3.2009, he sent documents to GEQD , Hyderabad for opinion through his SP, CBI, Visakhapatnam. On 30.3.2009, he received dismissal order dated 25.2.2008 of A.1. On 31.3.2009, he filed charge sheet against Mr.M.Anil Kumar A.1, Sri E.Prasad Rao (A2), Sri D.laxminarayana ( A3), Sri B.Veeranjaneyulu ( A4), Sri S.Sivarama Prasad ( A5) and Sri M.Siva

Prasad ( A6) U/secs. 120-B, 419, 420, 463, 468, 470, 471 IPC and Sec. 13(2) r/w 13(1)(d) of PC Act, 1988.

P.W.23 has further deposed that on 8.4.2009, he filed petition before the Hon’ble Court for further investigation U/sec. 178 Cr.P.C. On 22.4.2009, he received 2 copies of documents from Sri N.Seetaramaiah and recorded his statement. On 24.4.2009, he examined and recorded the statement of Sri

Jammula Parameswara Rao. On 2.6.2009, he received GEQD opinion No. CH- 42/2009, vide Letter no. 1645, dt.22.5.2009. On 21.7.2009, he received documents from Tahasildhar, Santamaguluru,Prakasam District vide Letter

No.RB 134/08, dt. 10.7.2009. On 1.4.2011, he submitted original documents received from GEQD before the Hon’ble Court. On 25.11.2011, he filed petition for further investigation. On 25.3.2013, he examined and recorded the statement of Sri G.Sambasiva Rao, Proprietor, GSR Residential college.

On 27.3.2013, he examined and recorded the statement of Kalahasti Laxmi

Sowbhagya, Assistant Manager , Syndicate bank and Sri Padesetti srinivasulu , Branch Manager and Sri Mallisetti Shiva Shankar Rao. He also received two documents from Manager, Syndicate Bank, Brundawan Gardens, Guntur.

P.W.23 has further deposed that on 28.3.2013, he examined and recorded the statement of Sri P.Satyanarayana Murthy, Manager, Retail

Banking, Regional office, Syndicate Bank , Vijayawada, recorded the statement of Dr. P.Satyan Kumar, CTO, Patnam Bazar and received one 68C.C.09/2011/Prl. CBI Court/VSP document. He also received one document from CTO, Chilakaluripet and examined and recorded the statement of Mr.P.Sai babu, ACTO-IV . On 8.4.2013, he examined and recorded the statement of Sri R.Balayogi,

Manager, Syndicate Bank, Inispet Rajahmundry. On 16.4.2013, he examined and recorded the statement of Sri Manukonda John Babu, Revenue Inspector, ward 34, Guntur and received a letter from him. On 1.5.2013, he handed over the case file to Sri P.V.S.N.Raju, Inspector of Police for further investigation.

P.W.23 has further deposed that Ex.P.293 is letter addressed by

Inspector Sericulture to Assistant Director of Sericulture dated 24.10.2003.

Ex.P.294 is letter addressed by Commissioner of Sericulture to AGM, Union

Bank of India, Vijayawada dated 17.11.2003. Ex.P.295 is Photo copy of letter addressed by Branch Manager, Andhra Bank, Patnam Bazar, Guntur addressed to the President MSIRDS. Ex.P.296 is photo copy of letter of

Deputy Secretary Central Silk Board, Bangalore to Commissioner of

Sericulture, Hyderabad dated 28.3.2003. Ex.P.297 is letter addressed to

Commissioner of Sericulture by farmers association, Phathepuram, dated 4.6.2003. Ex.P.298 is letter of Assistant Director, Sericulture , Guntur addressed to Commissioner of Sericulture, Hyderabad dated 3.2.2004.

Ex.P.299 is photocopy of letter of Deputy Secretary Technical, Central Silk

Board, Bangalore addressed to Commissioner of Sericulture, Hyderabad

dated 28.3.2003.Ex.P.300 is letter of President MSIRDS, addressed to

manager, Union Bank, Pasumarru dated NIL. Ex.P.301 is photocopy of balance sheet of MSIRDS as on 31.3.2002. Ex.P.302 is photocopy of balance sheet of MSIRDS as on 31.3.2003.

69C.C.09/2011/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

P.W.23 has further deposed that Ex.P.303 is the credit information of Mr.Eluru Paparao and others. Ex.P.304 is quotation from Sudha Enterprises for Rs. 16,02,200/- dated 6.10.2003. Ex.P.305 is voucher dated 10.10.2003 for Rs. 20,000/ issued by Mr.A.Venkateswara Reddy. Ex.P.306 is voucher for

Rs. 6,25,000/- issued by Mr.Sk.Abdulla dated 10.10.2003. Ex.P.307 is voucher for Rs. 6, 14,215/- issued by Mr.Gandham Janakiramaiah dated 10.10.2003.

Ex.P.308 is voucher issued by Mr.Sk.Basha for Rs. 1,38,550/- dated 10.10.2003. Ex.P.309 is cash bill issued by Sudha Enterprises for Rs.

16,02,200/- dated 10.10.2003. Ex.P.310 is cash bill issued by Sudha

Enterprises for Rs. 22,49,000 dated 31.10.2003.

P.W.23 has further deposed that Ex.P.311 is cash receipt from

Mr.SK.Johnybasha for Rs. 2,02,000- dated 17.10.2003. Ex.P.312 is cash receipt from Mr.Saiad Ibrahim for Rs. 3,54,250/- dated 16.10.2003. Ex.P.313 is cash receipt from Mr.Kacherla Srinivasa Rao for Rs. 1,75,000/- dated nil.

Ex.P.314 is cash receipt for Rs. 1,87,750/- dated NIL. Ex.P.315 is the quotation from Sudha Enterprises for Rs. 12,11,600/- dated 17.11.2003.

Ex.P.316 is SB account opening form of A2 in Union Bank of India, Pasumarru branch. Ex.P.317 is cheque bearing no.0582809 for Rs. 4,62,000 dated 9.1.2004. Ex.P.318 is cheque bearing no. 0582804 for Rs. 4,32,000/- dated 17.12.2003. Ex.P.319 is cash credit slip for Rs. 4,62,000/- dated 5.2.2004.

Ex.P.320 is cash credit slip for Rs. 4,32,000 dated 31.12.2003. Ex.P.321 is cash credit slip for Rs. 2,00,000/- dated 11.2.2004. Ex.P.322 is photocopy of memorandum issued to A.1 dated 25.1.2008.

P.W.24 namely Mr.N.Sitaramaiah, Agriculturist, Pathepuram village deposed that he got 4 ½ acres of land in Pathepuram village. He has no land 70C.C.09/2011/Prl. CBI Court/VSP in Survey No. 887/A. He brought his Pattadar Pass book. He knows Mr.Eluru

Prasada Rao (A2) who belongs to his village.

P.W.25 Mr.G.Sambasiva Rao, Director of G.S.R.Residential College,

Guntur, deposed that he is running G.S.R.Residential College, 4th line,

Brundavan Gardens, Guntur which is near Syndicate Bank, Brundavan

Gardens branch. He do not Mr.B.Laxminarayana (A3). He also do not know

Mr.Dachepalli Narayana Murthy ( A7). Ex.P.223 contains his signature as introducer of the proposed account holder. He cannot identify the photo affixed in Ex.P.223 or signature of account holder therein. Usually he introduced the account holders in nearby Syndicate Bank to facilitate the parents of the students in his college to open the accounts or if Branch

Manager requests, he signed as introducer. In the same manner he signed in

Ex.P.223.

P.W.26 namely Mr.P.Srinivasulu, the then Senior Branch Manager,

Syndicate Bank, Brudavan Gardens Brach, Guntur, deposed that he handed over Two Self cheques issued by Vignesh Enterprises under Ex.P.231 to CBI.

Proprietor of Vignesh Enterprises is Mr.B.N.Murthy ( A7). He was examined by Inspector CBI and recorded his statement.

P.W.27 Mrs.K.Laxmi Sowbhagyavalli, the then Assistant Manager,

Syndicate Bank, Brudavan Gardens Brach, Guntur, deposed that One Vignesh

Enterprises got account in that branch. One Mr.B.N.Murthy ( A7) is Proprietor of the said Vignesh Enterprises. Ex.P.223 is the account opening form of

Vignesh Enterprises. Ex.P.229 contains his Signature. Ex.P.229 is credit challan for an amount of Rs. 8,46,600/-, dt. 20.11.2003. Ex.P.229 credit 71C.C.09/2011/Prl. CBI Court/VSP challan is in respect of a DD. Ex.P.266 contains DD for Rs. 8,46,600/- which relates to Ex.P.229. Ex.P.266 DD is in favour of Siri Enterprises. Siri

Enterprises have endorsed the said DD in favour of Vignesh Enterprises.

Accordingly the amount was credited into the account of Vignesh

Enterprises. Ex.P.266 is not a crossed DD.

P.W.28 namely Mr.P.Sai Babu, the then Assistant Commercial Tax

Officer in Chilakaluripeta, deposed that if any business is to be carried on in the circle of his office, one has to register their business concern. In ‘A’

Register the Registered names of business concerns will be mentioned. The registered numbers of business concerns will be in continuation and they do not commence afresh with the change of years. At the time of registration, if dealer has to do interstate business, he has to furnish Security bond in the form of submitting National Saving Certificates. At the time of closing business, they return the NSCs. He was examined by Inspector CBI in respect of registration No. NRP/05/2/2609.

P.W.28 has further deposed that CBI enquired his CTO about this registration number and in turn his CTO asked him to go through the details and furnish the information. Accordingly he verified A register and found that the said registration number belongs to Hemasai Cotton Traders, Proprietor

Potireddy Nagamani. He handed over certified copy of A register in respect of the said concern. Hemasai Cotton traders also gave Rs.6000 worth NSCs as security. It is entered in security register, he handed over Certified copy of security register in respect of the said security to his CTO and his CTO in turn handed over the certified copies given by him under a covering letter (LD.298) shown to him to CBI. It is Ex.P.267. Ex.P.226 bears the registration number of 2609 in the name of Vignesh Enterprises, Proprietor D.Narayana 72C.C.09/2011/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Murthy (A7). Ex.P.226 is not a genuine document. Same registration number will not be given to two business concerns by their department.

P.W.29 namely Mr.P.Satya Kumar, the then Commercial Tax Officer in Patnam Bazar Circle, Guntur, deposed that during that period , he gave information to CBI relating to the registration details of Siri Enterprises,

Proprietor Mr.P.Shankar. He got the details verified through ACTO, Bhaskar and furnished the details. On verification they noticed that there was no registration number with the name of Siri Enterprises, Proprietor

Mr.P.Shankar. After enquiry ACTO Bhaskar Gave report to him in this connection and he forwarded the same to CBI under a covering letter dated 28.3.2013. LD.NO. 268 shown to him is the said letter with three enclosures.

It is Ex.P.268. The Door number given for verification is 2-12-31/2, shop no.

4, Brundavan complex, Patnam Bazar, Guntur. On verification they found that there is no such door number in Brundavan Complex , Patnam Bazar.

P.W.30 Mr.P.Satyanarayana Murthy, the then Branch Manager,

Syndicate Bank, Brundavan Gardens Branch, Guntur, deposed that during his tenure in that branch Vignesh Enterprises, proprietor Mr.Dachepalli Narayana

Murthy opened Current account on 9.5.2002 and he identified his signature in Ex.P.223 account opening form. Ex.P.266 DD was issued in favour of SIRI

Enterprises and it was drawn on Union Bank of India. The DD amount was credited to the account of Vigenesh Enterprises on endorsement made by

Siri Enterprises. On the same day the said amount was withdrawn by

Proprietor of Vignesh Enterprises (A7).

73C.C.09/2011/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

P.W.31 namely Mr.R.Balayogi, the then Assistant Manager,

Syndicate Bank, Brundavan Garden Branch, Guntur, deposed that during his tenure in that branch Vignesh Enterprises opened a current account. Pw.25 introduced the proposed account holder. Because A.7 do not know how to fill the form in English, he himself filled Ex.P.223 account opening form and he identified his handwriting in Ex.P.223. At the time of filling up the said application by him, A.7 was personally present. Ex.P.231 cheques were passed by him and they contain his signatures. One of the cheques for an amount of Rs. 8,46,000/- under Ex.P.231 contains the endorsement “ of late cash”, initialed by the then Branch Manager Mr.P.Satyanarayana Murthy (PW.13). Late cash means the amount paid after business hours.

P.W.32 namely Mr.M.John Babu, the then Superintendent incharge in Revenue section in Guntur Municipal Corporation, deposed that he worked as Revenue Inspector 7 in Guntur Municipal Corporation in the year 2013.

Ward No.34 comes under the jurisdiction of Revenue Inspector 7. CBI enquired their office about D.NO. 2-12-31/2, Shop No.4, Brundavan Complex,

Patnam Bazar, Guntur. On enquiry he came to know that the said door number is not existing in that address. In Stambalagaruvu area of Guntur

D.no. 2-12-31 is existing. The then Municipal Commissioner was

Mr.P.Srinivasulu and he can identify his signature. On furnishing information to the commissioner, he addressed letter to CBI. Letter dated 6.4.2013 shown to him is the said letter. It is Ex.P.269.

P.W.33 namely Mr.B.Venkata Nagar Raja Kumar, the then Joint Sub

Registrar, Narasaropet, deposed that during that time, he furnished certified copies of documents to CBI relating to this case. Ex.P.7 is the registered sale deed bearing Doc.No. 6154/2003, registered on 17.11.2003 on the file of 74C.C.09/2011/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

SRO, Narasaraopet. It was executed by Jammula Bhaskar. Ex.P.39 is the registered partition deed bearing Doc.no.9988/2001, dt. 30.10.2001 between

Mr.Eluru Govindaiah and his sons. Ex.P.54 is registered gift deed bearing doc. No. 5124/2003, executed by Mr.Pedanarasaiah and others on the file of

SRO, Narasaraopet. Ex.P.59 is certified copy of sale deed bearing doc.No.

6420/1966, on the file of SRO, Narasaraopet, executed by Mr.Kanumuru

Balakotaiah and others. He issued Ex.P.59 certified copy. Ex.P.60 is certified copy of sale deed bearing doc. No.6421/1966, on the file of SRO,

Narasaraopet, executed by Mr.Kanumuru Balakotaiah and others. His colleague i.e. joint Sub Registrar II by name Mr.P.V.Reddy issued Ex.P.60 certified copy. Ex.P.61 is EC bearing no. 9971 of 2008. This contains manual and computerized entries. Ex.P.61 was issued by joint Sub Registrar II by name Mr.P.V.Reddy. Ex.P.62 is EC bearing no. 9972 of 2008, which contains manual and computerized entries, issued by joint Sub Registrar II by name

Mr.P.V.Reddy.

P.W.33 has further deposed that Ex.P.40 is the EC bearing no. 2375 of 2003, which contains manual and computerized entries, issued by joint Sub

Registrar II by name Mr.M.Nageswara Rao, for the period from 1.1.1970 to 26.8.2003. Out of them from 1.1.1970 to 31.12.1982 there were manual entries and thereafter till 26.8.2003 there are computer entries. Application name in Ex.P.40 is Mr.Elure Prasad Rao ( A2). He made application only for the period from 1.1.1970 to 26.8.2003. Hence there are no entries in this EC prior to 1.1.1970. In Ex.P.59 the schedule of property contains survey no.

887/A. The total extent in that Survey no. is mentioned as 23 acres. The extent sold out of that survey number is 13 acres. In Ex.P.60 also same survey number is mentioned. Total extent in the survey number is mentioned

as 23 acres. The extent sold out of that survey number is 10 acres.

75C.C.09/2011/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

P.W.34 namely Mr.K.Rama Rao, Agriculturist, Lingayapalem, Guntur

District, deposed that he knows Mr.Eluri Prasad Rao ( A2) and he is his relative. He got 4 brothers. His eldest brothers name is Yogeswara Rao. He is no more. Name of his second brother is Paparao. He is residing in

Pathepuram. Name of his third brother is Hari babu, he is working in a college at Vijayawada. His last brother name is Mr.Srinivas Rao, he is an agriculturist. Eluru Prasad Rao is Elected President of MSIRDS. Vice

President of the said society is Mr.Pavuluri Siva Ramayya. He is Treasurer of the said society. As a Treasurer, he used to sign in necessary papers. The said society opened account in Union Bank of India, Pasumuru. Vice

President of the society Pavuluri Siva Ramayya introduced the Branch

Manager and he identified his signature in Ex.P.2 account opening form of

MSIRDS. Signature shown to him on Ex.P.3 specimen signature card is not that of him.

P.W.34 has further deposed that Signatures on Ex.P.115, Ex.P.116,

Ex.P.23, Ex.P.81, Exs.P.76 to 79, Ex.P.129, Ex.P.134, Ex.P.113, Ex.P.114 and

Ex.P.174 are that of mine. Three or four times, he went to Union Bank of

India, Pasumuru Branch. One Siva Ram Prasad (A5) brought this document to him and obtained his signature. Ex.P.270 is Quotation of Sudha

Enterprises. By the time of visit of Sericulture officers, 21 sheds were completed and 21 sheds were under construction in Pathepuram village.

Ex.P.264 contains his specimen signatures obtained by CBI.

P.W.35 namely Mr.P.Panduranga Rao, Advocate, Chilakaluripet, deposed that he is panel advocate for Union Bank of India since 1980. He has given legal opinion in respect of some documents in this case. Ex.P.186 which consists of two opinions and Ex.P.51 opinion were given by him.

76C.C.09/2011/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Witness identified his signatures in Exs.P.186 and Ex.P.51 opinions. The first opinion in Ex.P.186 relates to AC.68.73 cents. The second opinion under

Ex.P.186 relates to 0.25 cents and 429 Sq.Links. The documents referred by him in arriving at opinion are clearly mentioned in opinions themselves.

Ex.P.51 opinion is in respect of Ac.17.89 cents of land. He referred Ex.P.29 and Ex.P.54 in the opinion under Ex.P.51. He referred original as well as certified copy of Ex.P.29 and Ex.P.54 and other documents in Ex.P.51 opinion.

The Branch Manager Anil Kumar brought the required documents for giving

Ex.P.51 and Ex.P.186 opinions.

P.W.36 namely Mr.Sure Venkata Narasiah, Agriculturist, Muppala, deposed that he has no idea about the property of their fore fathers. His paternal grandfather got 4 brothers. They got property from their fore fathers. His paternal grandfather got 4 sons including his father. His father and his brothers also inherited property from his paternal grandfather.

Including him, his father had five sons. He got 1 ½ acres from his father.

They have no sister by name Chenchamma. Even his father brothers do not have any such daughter by name Chenchamma. In Ex.P.54 there are no photographs of himself and his cousin brothers and sisters. It also did not contain his signature. Ex.P.50 and Ex.P.17 also do not contain my signatures.

Mr.Sure Pedanarasaiah is no more, who is son of his senior paternal uncle is no more. Mr.Sure Pedanarasaiah inherited 2 ½ acres of ancestral land. He was examined by officials of Union bank of India, Pasumuru. He told them clearly that he did not mortgage his land to that bank. He has affixed his photograph and signed in Ex.P.88 statement. Photograph shown to him on

Ex.P.88 is that of mine. Ex.P.259 contains my specimen signatures, they were collected by Inspector CBI.

77C.C.09/2011/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

P.W.37 namely Mr.Sure Anjaneyulu, Agriculturist, Muppala, deposed that his paternal grandfather’s name is Mr.Sure Subbaiah and his father got one brother. His grandfather and grandfather of PW.36 are brothers. His father inherited 9 acres of land from his grandfather. There is no sister by name Chenchamma to them in their families. He got 3 acres of land from his grandfather and he can sign his name. Ex.P.54 shown to him did not contain his signature, so also did not contain the photographs of his cousins. Ex.P.50 did not contain his signature and he never mortgaged his property to Union Bank of India, Pasumuru and never leased out his lands to the said society. Ex.P.17 did not contain his signatures. Sure Pedanarasaiah is his cousin. He is no more. Mr.Sure Pedanarasaiah inherited 4 or 5 acres from his father. Union Bank Officers, Pasumuru branch came and enquired him whether he mortgaged his land to that bank. He told them that he did not mortgage his land and they obtained Ex.P.87 statement from him.

Signature and photograph in Ex.P.87 are that of him. Inspector CBI collected

Specimen signatures from him. Ex.P.258 contains his specimen signatures.

P.W.38 namely Mr.T. Rajendra Prasad, Panel Advocate deposed that since 24 years, he is panel advocate for Union Bank of India. He gave legal opinion under Ex.P.32 in respect of this case and he identified his signature in Ex.P.32. The documents referred to by him for giving legal opinion are clearly mentioned in Ex.P.32. The clerk of MSIRDS brought the documents to him for giving the said legal opinion. Ex.P.33 is the EC pertaining to the property covered under the legal opinion. MSIRDS itself obtained the said EC in his name and handed over the same to him on 18.11.2003. On the same day evening, he gave Ex.P.32 opinion. Ex.P.34 and Ex.P.7 were referred to in his legal opinion.

78C.C.09/2011/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

P.W.39 namely Mr.P.Srinivasa Murthy, the then Tahsildar in

Santhamaguluru, deposed that during that time, he was enquired by CBI

Officials pertaining to Khata No. 1189 of Kopparam Village. When he verified the records, he found that Ex.P.38 Pattadar Pass book was not issued by their office. The details regarding the Khata Number mentioned in Ex.P.38 pass book was not found in revenue records with regard to properties of Mr.Eluri

Prasad Rao (A2). On verification of records, they found that land in Survey

No. 887/A did not stand in the name of Mr.Eluri Prasad Rao. He got land in an extent of Ac.2.00 is in Survey No.945/C. He furnished the said information to CBI. Ex.P.274 contains the said information along with Ex.P.274 information, he gave certified copies of 1B Adangal and Re-

Settlement Register pertaining to Kopparam Village. In S.No. 887/A according to their records, Mr.Pavuri Srinivasa Reddy and others got land. There is no

Khata No. 1189 of Kopparam Village allotted by Survey authorities. Hence it is not correct.

P.W.40 namely Mr.Y.Ramesh, the then Sericulture Officer in the office of Assistant Director of Sericulture, Ongole, deposed that his duties during that time was providing technical assistance to farmers. He knows

Mr.Eluri Prasad Rao (A2). A.2 came to their office along with other farmers to meet him and his director to establish sericulture project at Pathepuram,

Santhamaguluru Mandal. Himself along with field assistants inspected the lands in Pathepuram in that connection. They have submitted a list of farmers who were interested in and intended to do sericulture to their AD.

They have inspected nearly 150 acres of land in Pathepuram. They identified 150 farmers out of 500 during the said inspection. They did not verify title deeds of 150 farmers during that inspection. Ex.P.157 shown to him is the list submitted by him to the AD. In the said Ex.P.157 list, he mentioned the 79C.C.09/2011/Prl. CBI Court/VSP survey number and extent of land of each farmer in that list. Ex.P.158 letter was addressed by him to AD, Sericulture, Ongole and he identified his writing and signature in Ex.P.158 and its enclosures. Ex.P.191 is the letter addressed by their AD to him, directing him to furnish information with regard to available agricultural land, irrigation facility available, average rain fall per annum, average temperature and humidity and nature of soil with soil testing report recently conducted by agricultural department by obtaining the same from the concerned departments. He furnished the said information accordingly. Ex.P.159 shown to him is the letter addressed by their AD to Regional Manager, Union Bank of India, Vijayawada and identified the signature of AD in that letter. Ex.P.159 also contains his initial in token of receiving copy of the said letter.

P.W.40 has further deposed that Ex.P.275 shown to him is the letter addressed by him to their AD, recommending the issue of subsidy for plantation and he identified his handwriting and signature in Ex.P.275.

Ex.P.276 is the letter addressed by him to their AD, enclosing the list issued by Panchayat Secretary, Marturu and his hand writing and signature in

Ex.P.276.

P.W.41 Mr.P.V.S.N. Raju, the then Inspector of Police, CBI,

Visakhapatnam, deposed that on 1.5.2013, this case in RC 6(A)/2007 was transferred to him from Sri S.V.S.Naidu, the then Inspector of police. On 6.6.2013, a letter addressed to CFSL, Hyderabad forwarding Specimen signatures of Sri D.Narayana Murthy A7), marked as S.126 to S.130, documents containing questioned signatures/ writings marked as Q.204 to 208 and documents containing admitted signatures marked as A.61 and 62 were sent to CFSL, Hyderabad for comparison and opinion. This letter was 80C.C.09/2011/Prl. CBI Court/VSP forwarded by DIG, CBI, Visakhapatnam. The said letter was prepared by him.

Ex.P.279 contains specimen signatures of A.7 D.Narayana Murthy marked as

S126 to S130. On 20.8.2013, the case was transferred from him to Sri

Ch.V.Narendra Dev.

P.W.42 namely Mr.Ch.V.Narendra Dev, Deputy Superintendent of

Police, CBI, Visakhapatnam, deposed that the case in RC.6(A)/2007, CBI,

Visakhapatnam was transferred to him for further investigation on 20.8.2013.

He took over the CD file from Sri P.V.S.N.Raju, the then Inspector of Police on the same day. He received the report of CFSL, Hyderabad dated 22.7.2013 on 21.8.2013 . It is Ex.P.280. Subsequently on 3.10.2013, he filed supplementary final report (Chargesheet) before this court arraying Sri

Dachepalli Narayana Murthy as A.7. Along with this report, he also filed

additional documents which are numbered as Ld.295 to Ld.311 and

additional witnesses were numbered as LWs 34 to 48. He has gone through

the earlier documents collected by his predecessor.

P.W.42 has further deposed that Ex.P.281 is opinion of GEQD

dated 21.5.2009. Ex.P.282 is specimen signature card of Alankar Silk Palace,

represented by Gudeti Laxminarayana (A3). Ex.P.283 is the cheque issued by A3 dated 1.7.2004 for a sum of Rs.29,700/-. Ex.P.284 is cheque issued by

A3 dated 10.8.2004 for Rs. 40,000/-. Ex.P.285 is cheque issued by A3 dated 10.8.2004 for a sum of Rs. 40,000/-. Ex.P.286 is a cheque issued by A3 dated 14.8.2004 for a sum of Rs. 30,000/-. Ex.P.287 is the letter addressed by the

President MSIRDS ( A2) dated 15.10.2003. Ex.P.288 is letter dated 12.2.2004 of Sudha Enterprises, addressed to the Manger, Vijaya Bank, Chilakaluripet.

Ex.P.289 is letter dated 4.6.2005 of District Collector, Prakasam District, addressed to District Panchayat officer, Ongole. Ex.P.290 is letter dated 81C.C.09/2011/Prl. CBI Court/VSP 16.7.2003, addressed to Branch Manager, Union Bank of India, Pasumuru branch by Inspector of Sericulture, Talluru. Ex.P.291 is Debit balance confirmation dated 1.10.2004 addressed to Union Bank of India, Pasumuru.

P.W.43 namely Mr.Naresh Kumr Agarwal, the then Chief Vigilance

Officer, Union Bank of India, deposed that he has given complaint in this case to CBI. Fax copy of the complaint dated 25.4.2007 is the complaint given by him to CBI pertaining to MSIRDS in Pasumuru Branch of Union Bank of India.

It is Ex.P.292. A.1 was the Branch Manager during the relevant period in

Pasumuru branch. Based on the complaint received from Field General

Manager office, Vigilance department conducted internal investigation.

Based upon the report of internal investigation, he has given complaint.

P.W.44 namely Mr.P.Venugopala Rao, Assistant Director and Scientist C,

Hyderabad, deposed that the documents in this case were forwarded with two forwarding letters on different dates. In the first instance, the documents were forwarded by the SP CBI, Visakhapatnam vide letter dated 3.3.2009. The documents were received by him in the office on 5.3.2009, for his examination and opinion. The documents which were forwarded for examination were the questioned writings marked Q1 to Q203, Q63/1, Q67/1,

Q117A, Q145A, Q148A, Q152A, Q156A, Q160A, Q164A, Q198A, Q200A and

Q202A; the specimen writings of various persons marked S1 to S124; the admitted writings of various persons marked A1 to A60. As per the query in the forwarding letter, he has examined the documents and arrived at the opinion which bears the number CH-42/2009, dt. 21.05.2009 which is in two pages and his detailed reasons which are in 8 pages are also enclosed along with the opinion. The opinion, reasons and one page of case abstract were returned to the SP, CBI, Visakhapatnam vide laboratory letter dated 22.5.2009. The Opinion and reasons is Ex.P.281.

82C.C.09/2011/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

P.W.44 further deposed that all the documents were separately dispatched through special messenger vide office letter dated 5.6.2009. In each of the pages of the opinion as well as the reasons, his signature appears. Sri C.Rajesh, A.G.E.Q.D of the laboratory also independently examined the documents and arrived at the same opinion. His signatures are also present along with his signatures in the opinion. He can identify the signature of Sri C.Rajesh as he has a long association with him. Further documents were sent by the SP, CBI in the same case vide a letter dated 06.06.2013. The documents were received by him in the office on 28.06.2013. The documents which were received as further documents were the disputed writings marked Q204 to Q208; the specimen writings marked

S126 to S130; and the admitted writings A61 and A62. On his examination of the further documents, he has arrived at the supplementary opinion dated 22.7.2013 which is in 3 pages. It is Ex.P.280. Reasons are part of the opinion. In each of the pages of the opinion , his signature is present. He has examined the documents independently utilizing lenses of various magnifications. He applied the basic principle which is like with like comparison.

20. Now the Point for determination is :

Whether the prosecution side is able to establish the guilt of the accused for the charges framed against them beyond all reasonable doubt?.

POINT:

21.CHARGE NO.1 under Section 120-B r/w 420 IPC The evidence on record both oral and documentary very clearly shows that MSIRDS had availed a loan of Rs.92,00,000/- and odd from the

Union Bank of India Pasumarru branch for which A1 was the Branch

Manager at the time of sanctioning the loan and that the loan was 83C.C.09/2011/Prl. CBI Court/VSP sanctioned by the General Manager at Chennai as per the recommendation made by A1 and that it was sanctioned as per the document under Ex.P21 with the terms and conditions as mentioned in document under Ex.P22. A2 was the President of MSIRDS at the time of obtaining the loan. Since I have discussed the evidence both oral and documentary in detail as above, now it is not necessary to repeat the same. The evidence on record very clearly shows that A1 had released the loan amount of Rs.92,58,275/- between 10.10.2003 and 20.12.2003 which is within a span of 70days, even though there was no matching grant and release of amount by either Silk Board or the A.P. State Government. Undisputedly it was agreed that the borrowers contribution was Rs.46.78lakhs and the subsidy by the Central Silk Board was Rs.83.07lakhs and the subsidy by the A.P. State Government was

Rs.67.05lakhs and the bank loan was Rs.107.25lakhs and the total cost of the project was 305.15lakhs. Admittedly except an amount of Rs.35,49,750/- released by the COS, Hyderabad as per the Memo No.1650 /TMI/2001 dated 04.06.2003 to the Assistant Director, Sericulture, Ongole which was deposited in the Union Bank of India, Pasumarru Branch as per Ex.P9 statement, no other amount was released either by the Central Silk Board or by the A.P. State Government. The borrowers contribution of an amount of

Rs.46.78lakhs was not deposited by MSIRDS in the bank. The release of entire loan amount of Rs.92,58,275/- by A1 without there being release of matching grant by other departments is nothing but violation of instruction

No.16 of Ex.P22 document. As per the instruction No.16 of Ex.P22 the disbursement of loan should be made directly to the suppliers/dealers along with the margin money of State and Central Government portion. The same instruction No.16 shows that the disbursement of loan should be made directly to the suppliers/dealers which means that it should not be made directly to the borrowers. But the evidence on record shows that A1 84C.C.09/2011/Prl. CBI Court/VSP had allowed A2 in the capacity of the President of the society to draw several amounts out of the loan amount by issuing self cheques. So it is very clear that A1 had acted against instruction No.16 of Annexure-I of

Ex.P22 document. The explanation offered by A1 in this regard is that he did the same as per the oral direction of his superior authorities. A suggestion was given to the relevant witnesses in this regard but it was denied by them. There is no positive evidence to show that the superior officers of A1 had given oral instructions to A1 to release the funds either directly to the borrower or without there being release of matching grants from other departments. So the contention of A1 in this regard cannot be accepted.

22. The other explanation offered by A1 for releasing the entire loan amount without there being releasing of matching grant by other departments is that he did the same in order to save the crop from being damaged because it is a time bound programme. But this contention of A1 also cannot be accepted because he cannot act independently against the instructions given under Ex.P22. It is not his personal activity to do as he liked. Once the loan was sanctioned under Ex.P21 with instructions under

Ex.P22 which are inwriting A1 is bound to follow the same and he cannot take decisions independently on his own. The act of A1 releasing the total loan amount hurriedly within 50days without there being release of matching grants by the other departments is nothing but violation of the terms and conditions of loan. The act of A1 in this regard clearly appears that he did some favour in favour of A2 who was the President of MSIRDS.

23. Coming to the role of A2, the clear allegation of the prosecution is that under the guise of MSIRDS A2 has done everything in the loan transaction. The evidence on record very clearly shows that A2 being the 85C.C.09/2011/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

President of MSIRDS had personally dealt with all the transactions relating to the loan. It is not the case of the prosecution that MSIRDS is the culprit.

The clear case of the prosecution is that A2 was the culprit in the alleged commission of offence. So the society is not the accused here and A2 is the accused even though he was the President of the society and the loan was sanctioned in the name of MSIRDS. But all the transactions relating to the loan were attended by A2 personally taking help from Mr.K.Rama

Rao(PW.34) who was the Treasurer of the society. Admittedly PW.34 is the close relative of A2. According to PW.34, sister of his wife is wife of A2.

So they are closely related to each other as co-brothers. Even Pw.34 has admitted that A2 is his friend. So PW.34 might have helped A2 in the commission of alleged offence. Simply because Pw.34 is not prosecuted as an accused A2 is not entitled for any benefit out of the same. Even the evidence of PW.34 appears that he was trying to save A2 because they were friends and co-brothers.

24. Coming to the role of A3 in the alleged commission of offence as per the evidence on record, A3 shared some amounts out of the loan amounts. Even though he introduced A2 for opening the account in the name of MSIRDS but basing on his introduction of opening the account in the name of society, A2 cannot be found guilty for the alleged offences. But because A3 shared the loan amounts along with other accused it must be understood that there was conspiracy for him with other accused in the commission of alleged offence. There is a very clear evidence which is evident from Ex.P161 the statement of account of Sudha Enterprises that A3 had withdrawn an amount of Rs.5,00,000/- out of the loan amount. The documents under Ex.P246 to 249 show that A3 being the owner of

Srilakhsmi Venkateswara cotton Traders had also taken some portion of the 86C.C.09/2011/Prl. CBI Court/VSP loan amount through Sudha Enterprises for which A6 was the Proprietor.

The contention of A3 in this regard is that the amounts withdrawn by him as per the evidence were taken by him for different purposes and not relate to this loan account. But he did not adduce any evidence in support of his contention in this regard. The evidence on record clearly shows that the amounts taken by A3 were only out of the loan amount.

25. So far as A4 is concerned according to the document under

Ex.P21 he was one of the executive members of the society. He is also one of the guarantors for the loan amount. The evidence on record shows that he offered his property covered by the gift deed under Ex.P54 as collateral security for the loan amount. Ex.P54 is Original Registered Gift Deed said to have been executed by Mr.Sure Peda Narasayya , Mr.Sure Narasayya (PW.36) and Mr.Sure Anjaneyulu(PW.37). The evidence of PW.36 and PW.37 is that Mr.Sure Peda Narasayya died and no more. It is not the case of A4 that Mr.Sure Peda Narasayya is alive. So it must be believed that Mr.Sure

Peda Narasayya who is the one of the executants of Ex.P54 Gift Deed died and no more. PW.36 and PW.37 who are the alleged other executants of

Ex.P54 Gift Deed have clearly denied execution of the said document.

According to them, they do not know even A4 but in Ex.P54 it has been recited that A4 is the nephew of PW.36, PW.7 and the deceased Mr.Sure Peda

Narasayya, as being the son of their sister namely Mrs. Boyapati

Chenchamma W/o Mr.Chandraiah. They have clearly denied this relation with A4. Even they have denied the photos affixed to this document as belonging to them. It is very clear that Ex.P54 was not executed by PW.36 and PW.37 and Mr.Sure Peda Narasayya. So Ex.P54 is a fictitious and fabricated document. Because this document is a gift deed in favour of A4 it must be understood that he fabricated this document. The evidence on 87C.C.09/2011/Prl. CBI Court/VSP record very clearly shows that the property covered under Ex.P54 was mortgaged to the Union Bank of India, Pasumarru Branch for the said loan as collateral security by A4. When Ex.P54 is a forged and fabricated document, the alleged mortgage becomes invalid. It cannot be considered that A2 does not know about the document under Ex.P54. The evidence of PW.44 who is an expert also supports the case of prosecution that Ex.P54 is a forged and fabricated document. Even before execution of Ex.P54 on 12.11.2003, A4 had executed a lease document under Ex.P18 on 08.09.2003 for the same property covered by Ex.P54.

26.The gift deed under Ex.P54 is dated 14.11.2003 and as per the

Memorandum under Ex.P31 the said gift deed under Ex.P54 was deposited by A4 in the bank on 14.11.2003 itself. Ex.P7 dated 17.11.2003 shows that

A2 had purchased the property covered by that document under that document. Even this property has been shown as collateral security for the loan as the property belonging to A2 but before the date of this sale deed itself major portion of the loan amount was already disbursed.

27.The evidence of PW.22 who worked as a development officer in

LIC is that A5 and A6 were LIC agents recommended by him. His evidence is that he can identify the signatures and handwriting of A6 and that in

Ex.P212 which is the specimen signature card, A6 had signed as M.Prasada

Rao as the proprietor of M/s Sudha Enterprises. Ex.P212 contains the photo of A6. PW.10 who worked as the Senior Manager of Vijaya Bank,

Narasaraopet had produced the original statement of account of M/s Sudha

Enterprises which is marked Ex.P161. Ex.P161 statement shows that the account in the name of M/s Sudha Enterprises was opened by

Mr.M.Prasada Rao who is no other than A6 on 10.10.2003. This account 88C.C.09/2011/Prl. CBI Court/VSP was closed on 12.02.2004. The evidence on record very clearly shows the loan amount was transferred to the account of Sudha Enterprises and that

A3, A5 and A6 have drawn amounts from this account. The evidence on record clearly shows that A6 even though his name is Mr.M.Siva Prasada Rao but he maintained an account in Vijaya Bank of Chilakaluripet in the name of

Sudha Enterprises as its proprietor by changing his name as M.Prasada Rao and that the said account was opened only for the sake of withdrawing the amounts by transferring to the account of the M/s Sudha Enterprises from the loan account by the use of pay orders and cheques. As per the evidence of PW.22, A5 and A6 were colleagues being LIC agents. So the evidence clearly shows that A6 had utilized the service of his colleague A5 for withdrawing the amounts through the account of M/s sudha Enterprises maintained in Vijaya Bank. So it is very clear that A5 and A6 had also shared the loan amount.

28. The evidence of PW.11 who worked as the Assistant Manager in

Syndicate Bank of Brundavangardens Branch, Guntur shows that A7 had opened an account in the name of M/s Vignesh Enterprises as its proprietor on 09.05.2002. Ex.P223 to Ex.P231 are the documents relating to the said opening of account in the name of M/s Vignesh Enterprises. As per the pay in slip under Ex.P229 an amount of rs.8,46,600/- was withdrawn through the said account out of the loan amount. The said amount was withdrawn through a D.D. issued by A1 in favour of M/s Siri Enterprises which was marked as Ex.P266 and it was transferred to M/s Vignesh Enterprises for which A7 is the proprietor through the credit challan under Ex.P229. The said amount was credited to the account of M/s Vignesh Enterprises. So A7 also had shared some portion of the loan amount.

89C.C.09/2011/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

29.Considering M/s Sudha Enterprises, M/s Siri Enterprises and M/s

Vignesh Enterprises the evidence on record very clearly shows that they are non-existing firms, even though accounts were opened in different banks in those names for withdrawing the loan amounts released by A1. The evidence of PW.28 namely Mr.P.Sai Babu who worked as the Assistant

Commercial Tax Officer in Chilakaluripet and the evidence of PW.29 namely

Mr.P.Satya Kumar who worked as the Commercial Tax Officer in Guntur and

PW.32 namely Mr.M.John Babu who worked as the Revenue Inspector in Guntur

Municipal Corporation show the same.

30.The oral and documentary evidence which I have discussed in detail as above, very clearly shows that A2 to A7 had shared the loan amount released by A1 which was sanctioned as a loan to MSIRDS. It is very clear that for withdrawing the amounts from the loan account fictitious and non-existing firms namely M/s Sudha Enterprises, M/s Siri Enterprises and M/s Vignesh Enterprises were created and accounts were opened in those names and the amounts were withdrawn. It is also very clear from the above evidence that the documents including Ex.P54 were fabricated by forgery and also impersonation for this loan purpose. All the acts of the accused which I have discussed earlier appeared to be the products of conspiracy among them. The conspiracy was to cheat the Union Bank of

India for getting amounts under the guise of loan in the name of MSIRDS.

31. The learned public prosecutor has contended that the intention of conspiracy would be locked in the minds of the accused and the acts of conspiracy would be done in secrecy and so it is difficult to secure direct evidence to prove the same and in this regard the acts of the accused and their participation in the commission of alleged offences are important to 90C.C.09/2011/Prl. CBI Court/VSP prove the offence of conspiracy. In support of his contention in this regard the learned public prosecutor has relied upon a decision in Mir Nagvi

Askari Vs. CBI in Criminal Appeal No.1477/2004 dated 07.08.2009 of

the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India. In this decision it has been observed that the Courts, however, while drawing an inference from the material brought on record to arrive at a finding as to whether the charges of the criminal conspiracy have been proved or not, must always bear in mind that a conspiracy is hatched in secrecy and it is difficult, if not impossible, to obtain direct evidence to establish the same and that the manner and circumstances in which the offence have been committed and the accused persons took part are relevant. There is no dispute with regard to the preposition laid down in the cited decision.

32.Admittedly the Union Bank of India has initiated civil proceedings for recovery of the amount. Ex.D4 is the copy of OA 88/2007 filed by the bank against the society and others. Admittedly the loan was settled under one time settlement. Ex.D5 is the certificate issued by the branch manager of that bank stating that the borrower paid the loan amount under compromise as per the settlement sanctioned by the Central

Office, Mumbai and the that account was closed on 21.11.2015. Regarding the same the contention of the learned counsel for the accused is that because the loan was discharged under one time settlement, the accused cannot be convicted in this case.

33. The counsel for A2 has relied upon decision in T.B.Shankar Rao and others Vs. C.B.I reported in 2015(2) ALT (Crl.) 47 (A.P). In this case the offences under Sections 120-B, 420, 468 and 471 IPC against private persons and the IPC offences and the offence under the Prevention of Corruption Act against bank officials were alleged. But in pursuance of a 91C.C.09/2011/Prl. CBI Court/VSP statement and compromise between the bank and the borrowers the entire loan was settled and so by following the Judgments of Hon’ble Supreme

Court in Para-42 it was observed as follows :

Para-42 “Considering the judgments of the Honourable

Supreme Court referred above, and applying the principles and observations made in the above referred decisions, I am of the view that continuation of the proceedings against the petitioners would be futile exercise, therefore, to secure ends of justice, powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. have to be exercised”.

34. The learned public prosecutor has contended that the offence under provisions of special Acts like the Prevention of Corruption Act 1988 stand on different footing and so the inherent power under Section 482 of the Act of Criminal Procedure cannot be exercised regarding such offences and because the offences provided under the Prevention of Corruption Act are non-compoundable, they cannot be compounded under Section 320 of the Act of Criminal Procedure. In support of this contention the learned public prosecutor has relied upon a decision in the State of Madhya

Pradesh Vs. Laxmi Narayana and Ors. In Criminal Appeal Nos.349

and 350 of 2019 dated 05.03.2019. In this decision in Para-13(iii) it has been observed and held that the power conferred under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to quash the criminal proceedings for the non-compoundable offence under Section 320 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is not to be exercised for the offences under the special statues like Prevention of Corruption Act or the offences committed by public servants while working in that capacity are not to be quashed merely on the basis of compromise between the victim and the offender.

92C.C.09/2011/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

In reference to this decision the further contention of the learned public prosecutor is that inspite of the loan connected to this case was discharged by one time settlement between the bank and the borrower, the criminal liability of the accused would not be absolved even though civil liability gets absolved.

35.I see some force in this contention of the learned public prosecutor. The inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C exercised by the

Hon’ble Supreme Court of India and the Hon’ble High Courts cannot be

exercised by this Court in dealing with a criminal. Because the loan was settled under one time settlement, it absolves only the civil liability of the borrower but not the criminal liability of the accused in this case. So I respectfully follow the decision cited supra relied upon by the learned public prosecutor and hold that the decision relied by the learned counsel for

A2 is not applicable to this case.

36. The learned counsel for A2 has contended that the borrower in this case is the Martur Sericulture Integrated Rural Development Society (MSIRDS) and not A2 personally but the prosecution side has not impleaded the said society as an accused and has prosecuted A2 personally because he is the President of that society and so the prosecution is not sustainable against A2 personally. In support of his contention in this regard, the learned counsel for A2 has relied upon a decision in Sharad

Kumar Sanghi Vs. Sangita Rane reported in (2016) Supreme Court

Cases (Cri) Page 159. In this decision in Para-11 it has been observed as follows:

93C.C.09/2011/Prl. CBI Court/VSP “In the case at hand as the complainant’s initial statement would reflect, the allegations are against the company, the company has not been made a party and , therefore, the allegations are restricted to the Managing

Director. As we have noted earlier, allegations are vague and in fact, principally the allegations are against the company. There is no specific allegations against the

Managing Director. When a company has not been arrayed as a party, no proceeding can be initiated against it even where vicarious liability is fastened under certain statues.”

It is very clear from the facts of the referred case that there was clear allegations of the alleged offence against the company but not personally against its Managing Director. Even the allegations made against the

Managing Director in that case were vague and no clear allegations were made against the Managing Director regarding the alleged commission of offence by him personally. So taking into consideration the facts of that case the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India had observed as extracted above.

37. The learned counsel for A2 has relied upon another decision in

Sunil Bharti Mittal Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation reported in

(2015) Supreme Court Cases (Crl) page 687. In this decision in Paras 40 and 41 it has been observed as follows:

Para-40 “ It is abundantly clear from the above that the principle which is laid down to the effect that the criminal intent of the “alter ego” of the company, that is the personal group of persons that guide the business of the company, would be imputed to the company/corporation.

94C.C.09/2011/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

The legal proposition that is laid down in the aforesaid judgment in Iridium India case 6is that if the person or group of persons who control the affairs of the company commit an offence with a criminal intent, their criminality can be imputed to the company as well as they are “alter ego” of the company”.

Para-41 “In the present case, however, this principle is applied in an exactly reverse scenario. Here, company is the accused person and the learned Special Magistrate has observed in the impugned order that since the appellants represent the directing mind and will of each company, their state of mind is the state of mind of the company and, therefore, on this premise, acts of the company are attributed and imputed to the appellants. It is difficult to accept it as the correct principle of law. As demonstrated hereinafter, this proposition would run contrary to the principle of vicarious liability detailing the circumstances under which a Director of a company can be held liable”.

38.As I have already stated, it is not the case of the prosecution that the society has committed the alleged offence. The clear allegation in this case is that A2 as the President of the society in conspiracy with the other accused had cheated the bank by taking amount from the bank under the guise of said loan in the name of the society. So the facts of the case cited supra relied upon by the learned counsel for A2 are different from the facts of this case and so those decisions cannot be applied to this case.

95C.C.09/2011/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

39.The learned counsel for A1 has contended that there is no evidence in this case to show that A1 had obtained any valuable thing or pecuniary advantage by corrupt or illegal means and so the offence under

Section 13(1) (d) for which the charge was framed against him is not proved and that he is entitled for acquittal. In support of his contention in this regard, the learned counsel for A1 has relied upon a decision in

K.R.Purushothamman Vs. State of Kerala dated 25.10.2005. In this

decision the Hon’ble Supreme Court has observed that to attract the provisions of Section 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, public servant should obtain for himself or for any other person any valuable thing or pecuniary advantage by corrupt or illegal means of by abusing his position as a public servant and that therefore , for convicting the person and that provision there must be evidence on record that the accused has obtained for himself or for any other person any valuable thing or pecuniary advantage by corrupt or illegal means or by abusing his position as a public servant”.

40. The learned counsel for A1 has relied upon another decision in

C.K.Jaffer Sharief Vs. State in criminal Appeal No.1804/2012 dated

09.11.2012. In this case Mr.C.K.Jaffer Sharief was working as a Minister of

Railways at the relevant time and also the Head of the two Public Sector undertakings which were in question at the relevant time. The allegation against him was that he had dishonestly made the Managing Directors of

RITES and IRCON which are the said two Public undertakings to approve the journeys of Mr.B.N.Nagesh, the then Additional PS to Railway Minister,

Mr.S.M.Mastan and Mr.Murlidharan who are stenographers in the Railway cell and one Mr.Samaullah the domestic help assistant of Mr.C.K.Jaffer Sharief to

London in connection with the medical treatment of Mr.C.K.Jaffer Sharief 96C.C.09/2011/Prl. CBI Court/VSP and that the journeys undertaken by those four persons were solely at the behest of Mr.C.K.Jaffer Sharief and thereby he caused loss to the Public

Sector undertakings and obtained benefit for himself which is punishable under Section 13(1) (d) read with 13(2) of the Prevention of corruption Act 1988. But considering those facts in Para-17 of the decision it was observed that the material on record shows that the said four persons while in

London had assisted the Mr.C.K.Jaffer Sharief in performing certain tasks connected with the discharge of duties as a Minister. So it does not amounts to obtaining any valuable thing or pecuniary advantage either for himself or for those four persons and so contention of his prosecution for the said offence is abuse of process of Court.

41. The learned counsel for A1 has contended that A1 in this case had acted according to the oral instructions given by his higher authorities in releasing the funds and so the offence under Section 13 of the Prevention of

Corruption Act does not attract. In support of his contention the learned counsel for A1 has relied upon a decision in S.V.L.Murthy Vs. State in

Criminal Appeal No.942/2009 dated 06.05.2009. In this case it was observed that the appellants therein acted on instructions by the higher authority and so their conviction was set aside.

42. Coming to offence under Section 13 of the Prevention of

Corruption Act 1988, the learned public prosecutor has contended that even though there was no pecuniary benefit or obtaining valuable thing by the public servant for himself and in case if obtaining any valuable thing or pecuniary advantage is in favour of some other also the offence under this provision gets attracted. In support of his contention in this regard, the learned public prosecutor has relied upon a decision in Runu Ghosh Vs.

C.B.I. in Criminal Appeal No.482/2002 dated 21.12.2011 of the

97C.C.09/2011/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Hon’ble High Court of Delhi. In this case Mr.Sukh Ram was the then

Union Minister of State for Communication and the appellant Ms.Runu

Ghosh was the Director (FA-V) in the Department of Telecommunications and

Mr.P.Rama Rao was the Managing director of Advanced Radio Masts Pvt.,

Ltd.( ARM). Considering the facts of that case in Para-147 of the Judgment it was observed that Ms.Runu ghosh acted as the mouthpiece of ARM, which in turn acted through Mr.Rma Rao and that she clearly abused her office as a public servant to obtain pecuniary advantage to ARM. But for her acts, and her proximity with ARM’s

Mr.Rama Rao, it would not have been possible for the latter to sell the crystal version of the product at the same price as the synthesized version and that her action resulted in ARM obtaining pecuniary advantage without public interest and so there was no infirmity in conviction of Ms.Runu Ghosh for the offence under Section 13 of the

Prevention of Corruption Act.

43.No doubt there is no evidence in this case that A1 had directly obtained any valuable thing or pecuniary advantage out of the loan transaction but regarding the offence under Section 13(1) (d) r/w 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act 1988 it is not necessary that the Public

Officer should get benefit or valuable thing or personal advantage to himself. It can be even in favour of others. The provision under Section 13 itself clarifies the same. Even the decision relied upon by the learned public prosecutor is also to the same effect. So I respectfully follow the same.

The decisions relied upon by the learned counsel for A1 in this regard are upon different set of facts which are not similar to the present case. So they cannot be applied to this case.

44.Coming to the defence side evidence DW.1 is the scribe of

Ex.P7 but because I have not given any finding regarding the document 98C.C.09/2011/Prl. CBI Court/VSP under Ex.P7 it is not necessary to discuss about the evidence of DW.1.

Dw.2 namely Mr.G.Masthanaiah is a retired employee of the Union Bank of

India. His evidence is in support of the case of A1. But in view of the documentary evidence available on record and from my above discussion it is not necessary to give any importance to the oral evidence of Dw.2 when there are clear instructions under Ex.P22 the oral evidence of Dw.2 is not relevant regarding the disbursement of loan amount.

45.The learned counsel for A1 has contended that A1 was awarded as a best manger in his service for several times and he has got very good record in the banking service. The positive photo under Ex.D1 shows that he was given an award. Some of the bank officials who were examined as witnesses also deposed that A1 was given some awards for his service. No doubt the character and good behaviour of an accused is relevant in a criminal case but in view of my above discussion and specific evidence against A1 by taking into consideration his good character and awards, he cannot be acquitted from this case.

46.PW.7 namely Mr.K.Bharaskara Raju who worked as a Manager (Law) in the Regional Office Vijaywada and who dealt with this loan transaction has admitted in his cross examination that he faced a departmental enquiry with regard to this loan and that he was awarded punishment in that enquiry. Ex.D2 is the copy of a notice given to him in that regard. PW.7 is not prosecuted in this case. No other bank officer is prosecuted in this case. It is not the case of the prosecution that there was fraud in sanctioning the loan. The allegation against A1 is that he released the loan amount against the terms and conditions of the loan as mentioned in Ex.P22. Simply because no prosecution was launched against other bank 99C.C.09/2011/Prl. CBI Court/VSP officers irrespective of whether their involvement was there in the fraud, A1 cannot take advantage of the same. A1 is liable for punishment for his deeds. He cannot take advantage of the deeds committed by others. Ex.D3 is the copy of a registered sale deed said to have been executed by PW.36 and others. In his cross examination PW.36 has admitted his execution of the original of Ex.D3 sale deed. The sale deed under Ex.D3 is not relevant to this case except that it was executed by PW.36 along with some others. So it is not necessary to discuss much about Ex.D3 document in this case.

47.The prosecution side has got marked some copies of the documents and electronic records. The learned counsel for the accused have raised objection of marking those documents on the ground that the electronic record is not supported by any certificate as required under

Section 65(B) of the Evidence Act.

48. For the contentions raised by the learned counsel for the accused regarding the use of electronic record as evidence without any certificate under Sections 65(B)(4) of the Evidence Act, the learned public prosecutor has contended that it is not necessary to produce a certificate under Section 65(B)(h) of the Evidence Act in all cases and that in the particular case even though no such certificate is produced the evidence adduced in the form of electronic record can be relied upon in the interest of justice and particularly in the special facts and circumstances of this case. In support of his contention, in this regard the learned public prosecutor has relied upon a decision in Shafhi Mohammad Vs. The State of Himachal Pradesh in a

Special Leave Petition (CRL.) No.2302 of 2017 dated 30.01.2018. In this decision the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India has observed that requirement of certificate under Section 65(B)(h) is not always mandatory.

100C.C.09/2011/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

In para-12 of this Order the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India has observed as follows:

“ Para-12, Accordingly , we clarify the legal position on the subject on the admissibility of the electronic evidence, especially by a party who is not in possession of device from which the document is produced. Such party cannot be required to produce certificate under Section 65(B)(4) of the

Evidence Act. The applicability of requirement of certificate being procedural can be relaxed by Court wherever interest of justice so justifies”.

49.This decision squarely applies to this case. The copies of the documents and the electronic record got marked by the prosecution side were obtained from proper custody and they were exhibited by the official witnesses. No contra evidence is adduced by the accused regarding those documents. So I do not accept the contention of the learned counsel for the accused in this regard and hold that all those documents are admissible in evidence and can be relied upon.

50.The learned counsel for A1 has contended that A1 has not committed any fraud, even though there were procedural irregularities committed by him in this case. But I do not accept the contention of the learned counsel for A1 in this regard because of the clear evidence both oral and documentary available on record and from my above discussion.

51.The learned counsel for the accused have raised some other contentions but in view of my above discussion and specific evidence available on record which I have mentioned above in detail, I hold that it is 101C.C.09/2011/Prl. CBI Court/VSP not necessary to discuss all those contentions for deciding this case because those contentions do not go to the root of the case of the prosecution.

52.The learned counsel for the accused have contended that the sheds were constructed and the activity of the Sericulture was taken in the lands with money advanced by the bank and so there was no fraud committed by the accused as alleged by the prosecution. No doubt the evidence on record shows that about 50 sheds constructed completely and some other sheds were constructed upto the roof level and that Sericulture activity was commenced in some portion of the lands. But mere construction of some sheds and commencing the Sericulture activity in some portion of the lands are not sufficient to consider that there was no fraud committed in this case as contended by the learned counsel for the accused.

Considering the totality of the facts and circumstances of this case and the evidence on record both oral and documentary, it clearly appears that A2 having secured some names and obtained signatures of some persons had made the bank to believe that a society was a formed and in the name of the society he obtained loan in collusion with A1 and other accused by creating false and fictitious documents. For that reason only neither the

Central Silk Board nor A.P State Government had released any subsidy except the amount of Rs.36,00,000/- and odd which was released prior to sanction of the loan.

53.Except the Investigation Officers all other witnesses examined by the prosecution side are independent witnesses and majority of them are official witnesses. There was no motive for them to speak falsely either in favour of the prosecution or against the accused. There are neither material omissions nor contradictions nor discrepancies nor any variances 102C.C.09/2011/Prl. CBI Court/VSP in their evidence. So I find no reason to disbelieve their evidence. So the prosecution side is able to establish that there was criminal conspiracy among all the accused for cheating the Union Bank of India which is punishable under Section 120-B r/w 420 IPC. From the above discussion, I hold that the prosecution side is able to establish the guilt of A1 to A7 for the offence under Section 120-B r/w 420 IPC beyond all reasonable doubt and the accused are liable for punishment for the said offence.

54.CHARGE NO.2 under Section 420 IPC:

The evidence which I have discussed above, very clearly proves that the accused A1 to A7 have committed the offence of cheating by cheating the Union Bank of India by sharing the loan amount released by A1 from the bank in the name of MSIRDS. So in view of my above discussion, I hold that the prosecution side has established the guilt of A1 to A7 for the offence under Section 420 IPC beyond all reasonable doubt and that A1 to

A7 are liable for punishment for the said offence .

55.CHARGE NO.3 under Section 419 IPC:

This charge is only against A4. A4 even though not the nephew of late Mr.Sure Peda Narasayya, Mr.Sure Venkata Narasaiah(PW.36) and

Mr.Sure Anjaneyulu(PW.37) but he has fabricated a registered gift deed which is under Ex.P54 as their nephew and thereby impersonated as their nephew which is punishable under Section 419 IPC. So from the above discussion, I hold that the prosecution side is able to establish the guilt of

A4 for the offence under Section 419 IPC beyond reasonable doubt and that he is liable for punishment for the said offence.

56.CHARGE NO.4 under Section 468 r/w 471 IPC:

103C.C.09/2011/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

The evidence on record very clearly shows that A4 has fabricated

Ex.P54 document by forgery and also impersonation and used the same as genuine document which is punishable under Section 468 r/w 471 IPC. The evidence on record very clearly shows that A6 has fabricated documents in the name of M/s Sudha Enterprises as its proprietor only for the sake of this loan and used those documents as genuine documents which is punishable under Section 468 and r/w 471 IPC. The evidence on record very clearly shows that A7 has fabricated documents by creating fictitious company namely M/s Vignesh Enterprises only for the purpose of this loan and used those documents as genuine documents which is punishable under Section 468 r/w 471 IPC.

57.From the above discussion, I hold that the prosecution side is able to establish the guilt of the accused No.4, 6 and 7 for the offence under

Section 468 r/w 471 IPC beyond reasonable doubt and that they are liable for punishment for the said offence.

58.LAST CAHRGE under Section 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of the

Prevention of Corruption Act 1988:

The evidence on record very clearly shows that A1 being a public servant while working as the Manager of Union Bank of India,

Pasumarru Branch had released the loan amount in violation of the terms and conditions of the loan and helped the other accused to gain pecuniary advantage which is punishable under Section 13(1) (d) r/w 13(2) of the

Prevention of Corruption Act , 1988.

104C.C.09/2011/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

59. From the above discussion, I hold that the prosecution side is able to establish the guilt of the accused No.1 for the offence under Section 13(1)

(d) r/w 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act , 1988 beyond reasonable doubt and the accused No.1 is liable for punishment for the said offence.

60. Accordingly, I answer the Point in favour of the prosecution and against the accused as stated above.

S/d N.Ramesh Babu

PRINCIPAL SPL. JUDGE FOR

CBI CASES

VISAKHAPATNAM

At this stage the accused are questioned about the quantum of sentence that is going to be imposed against them, for which they have stated as follows:

Mr M.Anil Kumar (A1) has stated that he hails from a poor family and weaker section community and that he has a wife, mother and two daughters who are depending upon him and that he is only earning member of the family to maintain them and that he has suffered a lot for about 10 to 12 years till now because of this case. He pleaded for the mercy of the

Court.

Mr.Eluri Prasada Rao (A2) has stated that he belongs to a poor family and he got minor childrens and that they and his wife are all depending upon him and he pleaded for mercy of the Court.

Mr.Budati Lakshminarayana(A3) has stated that his wife, minor children and his old aged mother who is suffering from arthritis are all depending upon him and he is also suffering from paralysis with which he was attacked recently. He also pleaded for mercy of the Court.

105C.C.09/2011/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Mr.Boyapati Veeranjaneyulu (A4) has stated that he suffered from heart stroke and his wife also suffering from illness. He also pleaded for mercy of the Court.

Mr.S.Sivaram Prasad (A5) has stated that his father suffers from Heart disease and that his wife is suffering diabetes and that he also suffers from diabetes and gastric problem and that his wife and minor son are all depending upon him and that he belongs to a poor family and he also pleaded for mercy of the Court.

Mr.M.Siva Prasad (A6) has stated that his wife, three children and his old aged mother who is suffering from illness are all depending upon him and that he is the sole bred winner of the family and that he is suffering from blood pressure and he also pleaded for mercy of the Court.

Mr.Dachepalle NArayana Murthy(A7) has stated that he is suffering from blood pressure and diabetes and that his wife and children are all depending upon him and that he is the sole bred winner of his family and he has to maintain all of them and he also pleaded for mercy of the Court.

But taking into consideration the nature of the offences proved against them and the manner in which they were committed and taking into consideration the special facts and circumstances of the case, I feel that it is not expedient to extend the benefits of the provisions of the probation of the offenders Act in favour of the accsued. But taking into consideration their statements and since the accused have been attending the Court for about more than eight years all the way from their respective places to

Visakhapatnam which is the place of this Court, I feel that it is necessary to take a lenient view in imposing punishment against them.

106C.C.09/2011/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

In the result, A1 to A7 are found guilty of the offence under Section 120-B r/w 420 IPC and 420 IPC and they are convicted under Section 248(2)

Cr.P.C. A4 is also found guilty of the offence under Section 419 IPC and he is convicted under Section 248(2) Cr.P.C for the said offence. A4, A6 and A7 are also found guilty of the offence under Section 468 r/w 471 IPC and accordingly they are convicted under Section 248(2) Cr.P.C for the said offence. A1 is also found guilty of the offence under Section 13(1) (d) r/w 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and he is convicted under

Section 248(2) Cr.P.C for the said offence. They are imposed punishments as stated below:

A1 is sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of TWO YEARS and to pay fine of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five thousand only) in default simple imprisonment for a period of One month for the offences under Section 120-B r/w 420 IPC. He is also sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of Two YEARS and to pay fine of

Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five thousand only), in default simple imprisonment for a period of One month for the offence under Section 420 IPC. He is further sentenced to under go rigorous imprisonment for a period of

TWO YEARS and to pay fine of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five thousand

only), in default simple imprisonment for a period of One month for the offence under Section 13(1) (d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

A2 is sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of TWO YEARS and to pay fine of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five thousand only) in default simple imprisonment for a period of One month for the offence under Section 120-B r/w 420 IPC. He is further sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of TWO YEARS and to 107C.C.09/2011/Prl. CBI Court/VSP pay fine of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five thousand only), in default simple imprisonment for a period of One month for the offence under Section 420

IPC.

A3 is sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of TWO YEARS and to pay fine of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five thousand only), in default simple imprisonment for a period of One month for the offence under Section 120-B r/w 420 IPC. Further he is sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of TWO YEARS and to pay fine of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five thousand only), in default simple imprisonment for a period of One month for the offence under Section 420

IPC.

A4 is sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of TWO YEARS and to pay fine of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five thousand only), in default simple imprisonment for a period of One month for the offences under Section 120-B r/w 420 IPC. He is also sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of Two YEARS and to pay fine of

Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five thousand only), in default simple imprisonment for a period of One month for the offence under Section 420 IPC. He is also sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of

TWO YEARS and to pay fine of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five thousand

only), in default simple imprisonment for a period of One month for the offence under Section 419 IPC . He is further sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of TWO YEARS and to pay fine of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five thousand only), in default simple imprisonment for a period of One month for the offence under Section 468 r/w 471 IPC.

108C.C.09/2011/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

A5 is sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of TWO YEARS and to pay fine of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five thousand only), in default simple imprisonment for a period of One month for the offence under Section 120-B r/w 420 IPC. He is also sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of TWO YEARS and to pay fine of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five thousand only), in default simple imprisonment for a period of One month for the offence under Section 420

IPC.

A6 is sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of TWO YEARS and to pay fine of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five thousand only), in default simple imprisonment for a period of One month for the offences under Section 120-B r/w 420 IPC. He is also sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of TWO YEARS and to pay fine of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five thousand only), in default simple imprisonment for a period of One month for the offence under Section 420

IPC. Further he is sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of TWO YEARS and to pay fine of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five thousand only), in default simple imprisonment for a period of One month for the offence under Section 468 r/w 471 IPC.

A7 is sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of TWO YEARS and to pay fine of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five thousand only), in default simple imprisonment for a period of One month for the offences under Section 120-B r/w 420 IPC. He is also sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of TWO YEARS and to pay fine of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five thousand only), in default simple imprisonment for a period of One month for the offence under Section 420

IPC. Further he is also sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 109C.C.09/2011/Prl. CBI Court/VSP a period of TWO YEARS and to pay fine of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five thousand only), in default simple imprisonment for a period of One month for the offence under Section 468 r/w 471 IPC.

All the above stated sentences of imprisonments should run concurrently for all the accused. They are entitled for set off under Section 428 Cr.P.C, the period of remand undergone by them, if any.

All the accused are informed that they are entitled to prefer appeal against this Judgment and they are also entitled for free legal aid. It is ordered to supply a copy of this Judgment to each of the accused on free of cost.

Typed to my dictation, corrected and pronounced by me in open Court on this the day 28th day of June, 2019.

S/d N.Ramesh Babu

PRINCIPAL SPL. JUDGE FOR CBI CASES

VISAKHAPATNAM

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

LIST OF WITNESSES EXAMINED ON BEHALF OF PROSECUTION.

P.W.1/06.09.2017: D.Rama Rao P.W.2/27.11.2017: P.Devakinandan Sharma P.W.3/28.11.2017: A.Shukuarsha P.W.4/29.11.2017: A.Sudhakar P.W.5/29.11.2017: Matta Babu P.W.6/12.12.2017: K.Ramesh Reddy P.W.7/13.12.2017 : K.Bhaskar Raju P.W.8/15.12.2017: B.Chandra Sekhar P.W.9/ 15.12.2017:V.Kullaya Reddy P.W.10/02.01.2018: K.M.Prabhudas P.W.11/03.01.2018: K.Chandra Sekhar Rao P.W.12/03.01.2018: Ch.V.Madhusudhana Rao P.W.13/18.01.2018: K.Raghupati Rao P.W.14/18.01.2018 : Achibigali Sk. Mohammed Kasi P.W.15/18.01.2018: Poosapati Rajyalakshmi P.W.16/19.01.2018: Konala Bapireddy P.W.17/22.01.2018: Binakanahalli Prakash P.W.18/22.01.2018: N.Sriprakash 110C.C.09/2011/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

P.W.19/22.01.2018: Jammula Veera Bhaskara Rao P.W.20/22.01.2018: Jammula Parameswara Rao P.W.21/25.01.2018:Venkata Ramanadham Garre P.W.22/25.01.2018: U.Muneswara Rao P.W.23/29.01.2018: S.V.S.Naidu P.W.24/ 30.01.2018:N.Sitaramaiah P.W.25/31.01.2018: G.Sambasiva Rao P.W.26/05.02.2018: P.Srinivasulu P.W.27/05.02.2018: K.Laxmi Sowbhagyavalli P.W.28/06.02.2018: P.Sai Babu P.W.29/06.02.2018: P.Satya Kumar P.W.30/07.02.2018: P.Satyanarayana Murthy P.W.31/07.2.2018 : R.Balayogi P.W.32/08.2.2018 : M.John Babu P.W.33/09.2.2018 : V.Venkata Nagar Raja Kumar P.W.34/12.2.2018 : K.Rama Rao P.W.35/14.2.2018 : P.Panduranga Rao P.W.36/15.2.2018 : Sure Venkata Narasaiah P.W.37/15.2.2018 : Sure Anjaneyulu P.W.38/16.2.2018 : T.Rajendra Prasad P.W.39/19.2.2018 : P.Srinivasa Murthy P.W.40/26.2.2018 : Y.Ramesh P.W.41/27.2.2018 : P.V.S.N.Raju P.W.42/06.2.2018 : Ch.V.Narendra Dev P.W.43/19.3.2018 : Naresh Kumar Agarwal P.W.44/06.04.2018:P.Venugopala Rao

LIST OF DOCUMENTS MARKED ON BEHALF OF PROSECUTION.

Ex.P.1 :Certificate of Registration of Society MSIRDS under Society Registration Act

dated 12.3.2001(photocopy)

Ex.P.2:Original current account opening form of MSIRDS dated 16.7.2003 bearing account no 30017 ( 2 sheets) Ex.P.3:Specimen signatures card of A2 (1 sheet) Ex.P.4:Photocopy of Memorandum of Association of MSIRDS along with plan Ex.P.5:Original application for medium term loan of Rs. 1,10,00,000/- of MSIRDS Ex.P.6:Original sale agreement dated 15.6.2003 executed by Jammula Bhaskar infavour of MSIRDS Ex.P.7:Original sale deed bearing Doc no. 6154/2003 dated 17.11.2003 executed by Jammula Bhaskar infavour of MSIRDS Ex.P.8:Letter dt.15.07.2003 in RC NO. 362/2003-B ( 5 sheets) Ex.P.9:Statement of account of SB account No.9180 of Assistant Director, Sericulture, Ongole along with 65-B Certificate. Ex.P.10:Original letter addressed by S.K.Sinha, IAS, Commissioner of Sericulture, AP, Hyderabad to the Assistant General Manger, Union Bank of India, Regional Office, Vijayawada dated 17.11.2003 Ex.P.11:Statement of account of MSIRDS current account bearing no. 30017 along with 65-B certificate. Ex.P.12:Original Pre sanction inspection report dated 26.8.2003(5 sheets). Ex.P.13:Original lease agreement executed by Elure Govindiah in favour of MSIRDS dated 8.9.2003 ( 2 sheets) Ex.P.14:Lease agreement dated 8.9.2003 executed by Elure Papa Rao in favour of MSIRDS 111C.C.09/2011/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.15:Lease agreement dated 8.9.2003 executed by Elure Prasad Rao(A2) in favour of MSIRDS Ex.P.16:Lease agreement dated 8.9.2003 executed by Elure Srinivasa Rao in favour of MSIRDS Ex.P.17:Lease agreement dated 8.9.2003 executed by Sure Pedanarasayya, Sure Chinnanarasayya and Sure ANjaneyulu of Patthepuram village, Santhamaluru mandal, Prakasam district in favour of MSIRDS. Ex.P.18:Lease agreement dated 8.9.2003 executed by Boyapati Veeranjaneyulu (A4) in favour of MSIRDS Ex.P.19:Original letter addressed by Pasumarru branch, signed by M.Anil Kumar (A1) Branch Manager to the Assistant General Manager, Regional office, Vijayawada( 3 sheets) Ex.P.20:Photocopy of office note dated 9.9.2003 by Union Bank of India, Regional Office, Vijayawada, addressed to Field General Manager, FGM Office, Chennai, recommending sanction of Rs 107.25 lakhs to 150 member farmers of MSIRDS ( 9 sheets). Ex.P.21:Photocopy of office note dated 3.10.2003 of General Managers office, Chennai. Ex.P.22:Original sanction advice no. 275/03 dated 8.10.2003. Ex.P.23:Original demand promissory note for Rs. 1,07,25,000/-dated 10.10.2003 executed by the President MSIRDS, Elure Prasada Rao and Treasurer K.Rama Rao ( 1 sheet). Ex.P.24:Original memorandum of deposit of title deeds dated 18.11.2003( 1 sheet). Ex.P.25 :Original memorandum of deposit of title deeds of Elure Prasad Rao(A2) , Elure Srinivasa Rao of Pathepuram village on 10.10.2003. (2 sheets). Ex.P.26 :Memorandum of deposit of title deeds by Dr. Pavuluru Sivaramayya on 10.10.2003(2 sheets). Ex.P.27:Original Registered sale deed bearing doc. No. 578/82 dated 16.3.82( 9 sheets). Ex.P.28:Memorandum of deposit of title deeds on 10.10.2003. Ex.P.29:Certified copy of registered sale deed bearing no. 279/24

dated 6.12.1923( 7 sheets).

Ex.P.30:Photocopy of legal opinion dated 20.5.2003. Ex.P.31:Original memorandum of deposit of title deeds by A4. Ex.P.32:Original legal opinion given by T. Rajendra Prasad (2 sheets) Ex.P.33: Original Encumbrance certificate bearing no. 6463 dated 18.11.2003 ( 1 sheet) Ex.P.34:Photocopy of title deed book ( 2 sheets) Ex.P.35:Original declaration dated 18.11.2003 given by Elure Prasada Rao (A2) Ex.P.36:Photocopy of legal opinion given by A.Pratap Kumar , Advocate, Chilakalurupet to Union Bank of India, Pasamarr branch Ex.P.37:Photocopy of valuation report dated 18.8.2003 given by B.Srinivasa Rao to Union Bank of India, Pasumarr branch Ex.P.38: Original Pattadhar pass book given to E.Prasada Rao by MRO, Santhamaguluru Ex.P.39: Original partition deed between E.Govindayya , E.Srinivasa Rao, E.Prasada Rao dated 30.10.2001 Ex.P.40:Three Original ECs. i.e., EC no. 2375 of 2003, 2333/2003, 2334/2003. Ex.P.41:Declaration given by E.Govindayya, E.Srinivasa Rao E.Prasada Rao (A2) Ex.P.42:Original legal opinion dated 29.5.2003 given by P.Panduranga Rao, Advocate , Chilkalurupet to the branch manager, Union Bank of India, Pasumar Ex.P.43:original Encumbrance certificate No.910 /2003 dated 16.4.2003. Ex.P.44: Original valuation report dated 23.5.2003 given by B.Srinivasa Rao. Ex.P.45:Original declaration dated 11.10.2003 give by P.Sivaramayya 112C.C.09/2011/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.46:Photocopy of valuation report dated 23.5.2003 given by P.Srinivasa Rao. Ex.P.47:Original EC dated 24.5.2003. Ex.P.48:Original certificate issued by village secretary, Arepalli on 29.4.2003. Ex.P.49:Photocopy of Adangal Pahani for the FASLI 1407 which corresponds to the year 1997-98. Ex.P.50:Declaration given by S.Pedanarasayya, S.Chinanarasayya, S.Anjaneyulu of Arepalli village. Ex.P.51:Original legal opinion dated 15.11.2003 given by P.Panduranga Rao, Advocate, Chilakaluripet to Branch Manager, Union Bank of India, Pasumarru. Ex.P.52:Photocopy of Valuation report dated 18.8.2003 given by B.Srinivasa Rao to Union Bank of India, Pasumarru Ex.P.53:Original Encumbrance certificate bearing No. 6418 dated 15.11.2003 Ex.P.54:Original gift deed dated 12.11.2002 bearing Doc.No. 6124/2003 executed by Sure Pedanarasayya, Sure Chinanarasayya, Sure Anjaneyulu, sons of Sure Appayya. Ex.P.55:Original certificate issued by Village Secretary, Arepalle dated 9.10.2003. Ex.P.56:Photocopy of No.3 Adangal extract for FASLI 1407, corresponding year 1997-98. Ex.P.57: Declaration given by B.veeranjaneyulu (A4) dated 14.11.2003 Ex.P.58:Original plan of TMSIRDS. Ex.P.59: Certified copy of document no. 6420 of 1966 dated 2.10.1966. Ex.P.60: Certified copy of document no. 6421 of 1966 dated 2.10.1966. Ex.P.61: EC bearing no. 9971/2008( 12 sheets). Ex.P.62: EC bearing no. 9972/2008 (12 sheets). Ex.P.63:Photocopy of letter addressed by S.K.Sinha IAS, Commissioner of Sericulture dated 3.1.2004. Ex.P.64: Carbon copy of letter dated 20.9.2003. Ex.P.65: Carbon copy of letter dated 12.6.2003. Ex.P.66: Copy of telegram issued by Assistant Director, Sericulture to Pasumarru. Ex.P.67: Letter addressed by Branch Manage r, Pasumarru branch to Assistant Director, Sericulture. Ex.P.68: Confirmation of sanction stipulations in AGM Sericulture account of MSIRDS by the branch manager M.Anil Kumar (A1) dt.10.10.2003. Ex.P.69:Letter dated 1.11.2003 addressed by B.M.Pasumarru branch to AGM, RO , Vijayawada dt.1.11.2003. Ex.P.70:Original letter addressed by MSIRDS president to Branch Manager, Union Bank, Pasumurri Branch. Ex.P.71: Original letter addressed by President MSIRDS to Branch Manager, Union Bank, Pasumurri branch Ex.P.72: Verification certificate given by D.S.R.Krishna Murthy, Advocate to the branch Manager, Pasumuri branch dated 11.10.2003. Ex.P.73: Letter dated 15.10.2003 addressed by President MSIRDS to the Branch Manager. Ex.P.74:Original letter addressed by President MSIRDS to the Branch manager, Union Bank. Ex.P.75: Original letter dated 8.12.2003 addressed by President, MSRIDS to the Branch Manager, Union bank of India, Pasumurre branch. Ex.P.76:Original demand draft voucher dated 18.11.2003 issued infavour of Sudha enterprises for Rs. 8 lakhs. Ex.P.77:Original debit cum advice dated 18.11.2003 to the AGMTL account of MSIRDS for Rs. 17,50,000/-. Ex.P.78:Original debit cum advice dated 18.11.2003 of AGMTL Account of MSIRDS for Rs.14,00,000/-.

113C.C.09/2011/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.79:Original demand draft voucher dated 18.11.2003 infavour of SIRI enterprises for Rs. 8,50,000/-. Ex.P.80:Original self cheque bearing no. 0025771 dated 18.11.2003 drawn by MSIRDS for Rs.23,00,000/-/ Ex.P.81:Credit cum advise voucher dated 18.11.2003 for Rs.23,00,000/- to the current account of MSIRDS bearing no. 30017. Ex.P.82:Photocopy of letter addressed by S.K.Sinha, Commissioner of Sericulture dated 20.12.2003 to Krishna Babu. Ex.P.83: Original of Ex.P.82 sent to President MSIRDS. Ex.P.84: Copy of letter dated 2.1.2004 addressed by Commissioner , Sericulture to President, MSIRDS. Ex.P.85: Letter dated 3.1.2004 addressed to Collector, Prakasam District by Commissioner, Sericulture. Ex.P.86: Letter addressed to the Manager, UBI by President, MSIRDS. Ex.P.87: Letter dated 20.05.2006 of S.Anjaneyulu. Ex.P.88: letter dated 20.05.2006 of S.V.Narasaiah. Ex.P.89: Debit-cum-advice dated 10.10.2003. Ex.P.90 : Pay order application dated 10.10.2003 for Rs.15,99,525/- in favour of Sudha Enterprises payable at Pasumarru branch Ex.P.91 : Debit-cum-advice dated 10.10.2003 for Rs.14,00,000/ Ex.P.92 : Credit-cum-advice dated 10.10.2003 for Rs.14,00,000/- Ex.P.93 : Debit-cum-advice dated 31.10.2003 for Rs.70,000/- Ex.P.94 : Credit-cum-advice dated 31.10.2003 for Rs.70,000/- Ex.P.95 : Debit-cum-advice dated 18.11.2003 for Rs.8,00,000/- Ex.P.96 : Plain debit voucher dated 20.12.2003 Ex.P.97 : Credit voucher dated 20.12.2003 Ex.P.98 : Debit-cum-advice dated 20.12.2003 for Rs.1,32,075/- Ex.P.99 : Credit voucher dated 20.12.2003 for Rs.1,33,675/- Ex.P.100 : Debit voucher dated 30.01.2004 for Rs.19,000/- Ex.P.101 : Credit voucher dated 30.01.2004 for Rs.19,000/- Ex.P.102 : Cheque bearing No.0162751 dated 5.2.2004 for Rs.3,93,174/. Ex.P.103 : Demand draft application dated 20.12.2004 for Rs.3,92,459/- in favour of ICICI Bank Limited, Mumbai. Ex.P.104 : Debit voucher dated 26.3.2004 for Rs.19,000/- Ex.P.105 : Credit voucher dated 26.3.2004 for Rs.19,000/- Ex.P.106 : Debit voucher dated 30.7.2004 for Rs.48,127/- Ex.P.107 : Credit voucher dated 30.7.2004 for Rs.48,127/- Ex.P.108: Debit voucher dated 11.2.2005 for Rs.67,112/- Ex.P.109 : Pay order application dated 11.2.2005 for Rs.69,911/- Ex.P.110 : Debit voucher dated 23.2.2006 for Rs.23,032/- Ex.P.111 : Pay order application dated 23.2.2006 for Rs.23,032/- Ex.P.112 : Self cheque dated 10.10.2003 for Rs,14,00,000/-. Ex.P.113 : Debit-cum-advice dated 17.10.2003 for Rs. 15,00,000/- Ex.P.114 : Pay order application dated 17.10.2003 for Rs.14,97,750/- Ex.P.115 : Debit-cum-advice dated 17.10.2003 for Rs.5,00,000/- Ex.P.116 : Credit-cum-advice dated 17.10.2003 for Rs.5,00,000/- Ex.P.117 : Pay in slip for Rs.2,500/- dated 16.7.2003 Ex.P.118 : Credit-cum-advice dated 16.07.2003 for Rs.8,16,750/- Ex.P.119 : Cheque bearing No.0025751 dated 16.7.2003 for Rs.8,00,000/- Ex.P.120 : Self cheque bearing No.0025753 dated 13.7.2003 Ex.P.121 : Pay in slip dated 6.8.2003 for Rs.12,00,000/- Ex.P.122 : Self cheque bearing No.0025756 dated 06.8.2003 for Rs.12,00,000/- Ex.P.123 : Pay in slip dated 12.8.2003 for Rs.9,00,000/-. Ex.P.124 : Self cheque bearing No.0025757 dated 12.8.2003 for Rs.2,50,000/-. Ex.P.125 : Self cheque bearing No.0025758 dated 12.8.2003 for Rs.2,00,000/-.

114C.C.09/2011/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.126 : Self cheque bearing No.0025759 dated 12.8.2003 for Rs.3,00,000/- Ex.P.127 : Self cheque bearing No.0025761 dated 13.8.2003 for Rs.1,00,000/- Ex.P.128: Self cheque bearing No.0025760 dated 13.8.2003 for Rs.50,000/- Ex.P.129 : Self cheque bearing No.0025767 dated 17.10.2003 for Rs.4,00,000/- Ex.P.130 : self cheque bearing No.0025768 dated 27.10.2003 for Rs.75,000/- Ex.P.131 : Self cheque bearing No.0025769 dated 31.10.2003 for Rs.70,000/- Ex.P.132 : Self cheque bearing No.0025770 dated 3.11.2003 for Rs.25,000/- Ex.P.133 : Pay in slip dated 20.2.2004 for Rs.3,93,174/- Ex.P.134 : Self cheque bearing No.0162758 dated 1.3.2004 for Rs.20,000/- Ex.P.135 : Pay in slip dated 09.9.2003 for Rs.4,10,000/- Ex.P.136 : Self cheque bearing No.0025765 dated 15.9.2003 for Rs.10,000/- Ex.P.137 : Self cheque bearing No.0025763 dated 9.9.2003 for Rs.4,00,000/- Ex.P.138 : Self cheque bearing No.559915 dated 13.11.2003 for Rs.19,000/- Ex.P.139 :Pay in slip dated 27.6.2003 for Rs.35,49,750/- Ex.P.140 : self cheque bearing No.559701 dated 30.06.2003 for Rs.8,16,750/- Ex.P.141 : Self cheque bearing No.559702 dated 05.08.2003 for Rs.12,00,000/- Ex.P.142 : Cheque bearing No.559703 dated 11.08.2003 issued in favour of President, MSIRDS, for Rs.9,00,000/- Ex.P.143 : Cheque bearing No.559704 dated 08.09.2003 for Rs.4,10,000/- Ex.P.144 : Debit voucher dated 18.10.2003 for Rs.2,41,734/- Ex.P.145 : Pay order bearing No.9292623 dated 10.10.2003 for Rs.15,99,595/-. Ex.P.146 :Pay order bearing No.9292626 dated 17.10.2003 for Rs.14,97,750/-. Ex.P.147: Pay order bearing No.9292633 dated 18.11.2003 for Rs.7,98,800/-. Ex.P.148 : Specimen signatures of A5/S.Siva Rrama Prasad. Ex.P.149: Hand writings of different words of A.5 (20 sheets). Ex.P.150 : Hand writings of A.5 in Telugu, written as Sure Anjaneyulu (5 sheets). Ex.P.151 : Hand writings of A.5 in Telugu, written as Sure Chinnanarasiah (5 sheets) Ex.P.152 : Hand writings of A.5 in Telugu, written as B.Veeranjaneyulu (5 sheets) Ex.P.153 : Hand writings of A.5 in Telugu, written as Eluri Srinivasa Rao (5 sheets) Ex.P.154 : Hand writings of A.5 in Telugu, written as S.Peddanarasiah ( 5 sheets) Ex.P.155 : Letter dated 13.3.2001 addressed by Assistant Director of Sericulture, Ongole to President MIRDS, Fathepuram Ex.P.156 : Letter dated 28.2.2001 addressed by Regional Director, Sericulture Department, Chittoor to Director of Sericulture, Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad Ex.P.157 : Letter dated nil addressed by Y.Ramesh, Inspector , Sericulture to the Assistant Director, Sericulture, Ongole Ex.P.158 : Letter dated 3.10.2001, addressed by Y.Ramesh, Inspector, Sericulture, Talur to Assistant Director of Sericulture, Ongole Ex.P.159 : Letter dated 15.7.2003, addressed by Sri I.P.Sukumar Sen, Assistant Director of Sericulture, Ongole to Regional Manager, Union Bank of India, Vijayawada. Ex.P.160 : Anonymous complaint addressed to Mr.Sudhakar, the then Assistant General Manager, Regional Office, Vijayawada Ex.P.161 : Statement of Sudha Enterprises, Proprietor M.Prasad Rao with Vijaya Bank for the period from 10.10.2003 to 12.2.2004 Ex.P.162 : Letter addressed by Assistant Director of Sericulture, Ongole to Assistant General Manager, Regional Office dt.4.12.2003. Ex.P.163 : Statement of MSIRDS from 1.7.2002 to 31.5.2007 A/c No.12820. Ex.P.164 : Statement of A2 for the period from 1.1.2003 to 31.12.2003 Ex.P.165 : Quotations issued by Siri Enterprises for Rs.4,87,359/-. Ex.P.166 : Quotations issued by Siri Enterprises for Rs.7,19,500/ 115C.C.09/2011/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.167 : Statement of account bearing No. 12821 in the name of MSIRDS for the period from 1.7.2002 to 31.5.2007 Ex.P.168: Report submitted by PW.2 to Chief Vigilance Officer on 9.9.2006. Ex.P.169 : Report dated 25.11.2003 submitted by Mr. Bhagavan, Manager, RO, Vijayawada. Ex.P.170 : Inspection report addressed to the Assistant General Manager, Union Bank of India, Regional Office, Vijayawada dated 14.11.2003. Ex.P.171 : Report given by Bhaskar Raju, Manager Law to AGM, RO. Ex.P.172 : Letter dt.1.11.2003 sent by A.1 from Pasumurru Branch, addressed to RO, Vijayawada. Ex.P.173: Letter dated 1.11.2003. Ex.P.174: Hypothecation agreement executed by MSIRDS for Rs.107.25 lakhs. Ex.P.175: Letter of guarantee signed by various guarantors of MSIRDS Ex.P.176: Deed of guarantee signed by various guarantors of MSIRDS Ex.P.177: Specimen signature card of M.Sivaprasad(A6) and M.Vani. Ex.P.178: Application for opening SB account of M.Sivaprasad. Ex.P.179: Form 60 of A6. Ex.P.180: Certificate issued by LIC Of India, Chilakaluripet. Ex.P.181: Letter dated 23.9.2002given by A6. Ex.P.182: Certified copy of statement of account of M.Siva Prasad(A6) for A/c No. 10480 for the period from 8.11.2001 to 18.7.2007. Ex.P.183: Specimen signature card of S.Sivarama Prasad(A5) bearing A/c No.8849. Ex.P.184: Application for opening SB account of S.Siva Rama Prasad dated 29.7.1999 Ex.P.185: Certified copy of statement of account of A5 by A/c No.8849 for the period from 21.7.2001 to 18.7.2007 Ex.P.186: Legal opinion obtained from panel advocate. Ex.P.187: Legal opinion. Ex.P.188: 9 credit reports compiled by Branch Manager. Ex.P.189 : Original letter dated 28.3.2003, addressed by Deputy Secretary (Technical) namely B.Prakash to the Commissioner of Sericulture Ex.P.190 : Letter dated 28.3.2003, addressed by Deputy Secretary (Technical) namely B.Prakash to the Commissioner of Sericulture Ex.P.191 : Memorandum dated 21.5.2001 issued by Assistant Director, Sericulture, Ongole. Ex.P.192 : Memo dated 23.8.2002, given by Commissioner to Assistant Director, Sericulture, Ongole. Ex.P.193 : Memo dated 10.5.2003 issued by Commissioner of Sericulture, Hyderabad to Assistant Director of Sericulture, Ongole. Ex.P.194 : Component wise requirement of funds. Ex.P.195 : Memo dated 4.6.2003 issued by Commissioner of Sericulture to Assistant Director of Sericulture Ex.P.196 : Telegram dated 22.9.2003 issued by Commissioner of Sericulture to Assistant Director of Sericulture Ex.P.197 : Telegram dated 24.9.2003 issued by Deputy Director of Ongole to the Assistant Director of Ongole Ex.P.198 : Telegram through mail dated 22.9.2003 Ex.P.199 : Photocopy of mail dated 28.7.2003 given by Commissioner of Sericulture to Assistant Director, Sericulture, Ongole Ex.P.200 : Photocopy list of beneficiaries of Fathepuram village Ex.P.201 : Photocopy of request letter addressed by President and other members of MSIRDS to Commissioner Ex.P.202 : Photocopy (OC) of mail dated 28.7.2003, given by Commissioner of Sericulture to Assistant Director of Sericulture, Ongole 116C.C.09/2011/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.203 : Photocopy of mail dated 21.92003 attested by witness, given by Commissioner of Sericulture to Assistant Director of Sericulture, Ongole Ex.P.204 : Photo copy of tour notes dated 22.9.2003 of Deputy Director of Sericulture Ex.P.205 : Photocopy of letter dated 3.2.2004. Ex.P.206 : Photocopy of list of beneficiaries. Ex.P.207 : Photocopy of list of beneficiaries. Ex.P.208 : Photocopy of list of beneficiaries. Ex.P.209 : Photocopy of list of beneficiaries. Ex.P.210 : Original letter dated 31.1.2004 along with orders of District Collector, Ongole. Ex.P.211 : DO letter from Collector , Guntur to Commissioner of Sericulture, AP , Hyderabad. Ex.P.212 : Specimen Signature card of M/s Sudha Enterprises, signed by its proprietor M.Prasad Rao. Ex.P.213 : Cash Credit voucher dated 10.10.2003 of M/s Sudha Enterprises. Ex.P.214 : Original Credit slip. Ex.P.215: Cheque dated 11.10.2003 for Rs. 10 lakhs. Ex.P.216 : Cheque dated 13.10.2003 for Rs. 5,99,000/-. Ex.P.217: Credit slip dated 17.10.2003 for Rs. 14,97,750/- Ex.P.218 : Cheque dated 20.10.2003, for Rs. 7,00000/- Ex.P.219 : Cheque dated 21.10.2003 for Rs. 7,98,000/- Ex.P.220 : Credit slip dated 18.11.2003 for Rs. 7,98,800/- Ex.P.221 : Cheque dated 19.11.2003 for Rs.5 lakhs. Ex.P.222 : Cheque dated 21.11.2003, for Rs. 2,98,000/- Ex.P.223 : Account opening form of Vignesh Enterprises Ex.P.224 :Confirmation of introduction of the account holder Ex.P.225 : Form 60 in respect of account. Ex.P.226 : Copy of certification of registration of Vignesh Enterprises Ex.P.227 : Account opening print out. Ex.P.228 : Statement of account. Ex.P.229 : Pay in slip for an amount of Rs. 8,46,600/- dated 20.11.2003 Ex.P.230: Letter dated 12.7.2007 Ex.P.231 : Letter dt.27.3.2003 and two self cheques dt.21.11.2003 and 20.11.2003 for Rs.3,44,600/- and Rs.8,46,000/- respectively. Ex.P.232 : Typed notings prepared by PW.12 dt.4.9.2003. Ex.P.233 : Project report along with covering letter of Director Sericulture, Hyderabad Ex.P.234 : Attested copy of memorandum of Central Silk board. Ex.P.235 : Attested copy of report submitted to Central Silk board. Ex.P.236 : Letter dated 24.8.2001, addressed by Member Secretary to Director of Sericulture, Government of AP. Ex.P.237 : Attested copy of letter addressed by Commissioner Sericulture to Member secretary. Ex.P.238 : Attested copy of the said letter dated 6.8.2002. Ex.P.239 : Attested letter dated 24.2.2003. Ex.P.240 : Attested copy of notice dated 12.12.2003. Ex.P.241 : Attested copy of report dated 18.12.2003. Ex.P.242 : Leave letters of PW.17 B.Prakash. Ex.P.243 : Specimen signatures of PW.17 B.Prakash. Ex.P.244 : Photocopy of passbook of PW.18 J.V.Bhaskara Rao. Ex.P.245 : Specimen signatures of PW.18 J.V.Bhaskara Rao. Ex.P.246: Original account opening form of Sri Laxmi Venkateswara Cotton Traders. Ex.P.247 : Specimen signature card of the firm Sri Venkateswara Cotton Traders.

117C.C.09/2011/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.248 : Statement of account of the said proprietary concern from 17.10.2003 to 31.1.12004. Ex.P.249 : Letter dt.13.02.2009. Ex.P.250 : Cheque dt.03.01.2004. Ex.P.251 : Application for License to act as an insurance agent. Ex.P.252 : Correspondence made by M.Siva Prasad with Branch Manager, LIC Chilakaluripet. Ex.P.253 : Cheque dated 11.2.2004. Ex.P.254 : Cheque dated 12.2.2004. Ex.P.255 : Application made by S.Sivarama Prasad (A5) for license to act as insurance agent. Ex.P.256 : Correspondence made by S.Sivarama Prasad with Branch Manager, LIC Chilakaluripet. Ex.P.257 : Original FIR in RC 6(A)/07. Ex.P.258 : Specimen signatures of S.Anjaneyulu. Ex.P.259 : Specimen signatures of Sure Venkata Narasaiah. Ex.P.260 : Signatures of M.Siva Prasad (A6). Ex.P.261 : Specimen signatures of M.Siva Prasad (A6). Ex.P.262 : Specimen signatures of S.Siva Rama Prasad (A5). Ex.P.263 : Specimen signatures of E.Prasada Rao (A2). Ex.P.264 : Specimen signature of K.Rama Rao. Ex.P.265 : Specimen signatures of I.P.Sukumar Sen Ex.P.266 : DD for Rs. 8,46,600/- dt.19.11.2003. Ex.P.267 : Letter ROC No.Nil/2013, JA-3, dt.28.03.2013 of CTO, Chilakaluripeta ( 4 sheets) Ex.P.268 : Letter RC No.58/2013 dt.28.03.2013. Ex.P.269: Letter dated 6.4.2013. Ex.P.270 : Quotation of Sudha Enterprises. Ex.P.271: Relevant portion in 161 Cr.P.C statement of PW.34.(2 lines) Ex.P.272 : Relevant portion in 161 Cr.P.C statement of PW.38. Ex.P.273: Relevant portion in 161 Cr.P.C. statement fo PW.38. Ex.P.274 : Information furnished to CBI by PW.39 along with letter dt.10.07.2009 Ex.P.275 : Letter addressed by PW.40 to AD, Sericulture Ongole. Ex.P.276 : Letter addressed by PW.40 to AD, Sericulture Ongole along with beneficiary landholding details of formers by panchayat Secretary, Marturu. Ex.P.277 : Photo copy of certificate issued by Village Secretary, pathepuram. Ex.P.278 : Photocopy of certificate issued by Village Secretary, pathepuram. Ex.P.279 : Specimen signatures of A.7 D.Narayana Murthy. Ex.P.280 : Report of CFSL, Hyderabad dated 22.7.2013 Ex.P.281 : Opinion of GEQD dated 21.5.2009 Ex.P.282 : Specimen signature card of Alankar Silk Palace, represented by Gudeti Laxminarayana (A3). Ex.P.283 : Cheque issued by A3 dated 1.7.2004 for a sum of Rs.29,700/. Ex.P.284 : Cheque issued by A3 dated 10.8.2004 for Rs. 40,000/-. Ex.P.285 :Cheque issued by A3 dated 10.8.2004 for a sum of Rs.40,000/- Ex.P.286 :Cheque issued by A3 dated 14.8.2004 for a sum of Rs.30,000/- Ex.P.287 :Letter addressed by the President MSIRDS (A2) dated 15.10.2003. Ex.P.288 : Letter dated 12.2.2004 of Sudha Enterprises, addressed to the Manger, Vijaya Bank, Chilakaluripet. Ex.P.289 :Letter dated 4.6.2005 of District Collector, Prakasam District, addressed to District Panchayat officer, Ongole Ex.P.290 :Letter dated 16.7.2003, addressed to Branch Manager, Union Bank of India, Pasumurru branch by Inspector of Sericulture, Talluru.

118C.C.09/2011/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.291 :Debit balance confirmation dated 1.10.2004 addressed to Union Bank of India, Pasumurru. Ex.P.292 : Fax copy of the Complaint dated 25.4.2007 Ex.P.293 : Letter addressed by Inspector sericulture to Asst. Director of Sericulture dt.24.10.2003. Ex.P.294: Letter addressed by commissioner of Sericulture to AGM, UBI, VJW dt.17.11.2003. Ex.P.295 : Photocopy of letter addressed by Branch Manager, Andhra Bank, Patnam Bazar, Guntur addressed to the President MSIRDS. Ex.P.296 : Photocopy of letter of Deputy Secretary Central Silk Board, Bangalore to Commissioner of Sericulture, Hyderabad dated 28.3.2003 Ex.P.297 : Letter addressed to Commissioner of Sericulture by farmers association , Phathepuram, dated 4.6.2003. Ex.P.298 : Letter of Assistant Director, Sericulture , Guntur addressed to Commissioner of Sericulture, Hyderabad dated 3.2.2004. Ex.P.299 : Photocopy of letter of Deputy Secretary Technical, Central Silk Board, Bangalore addressed to Commissioner of Sericulture, Hyderabad dated 28.3.2003. Ex.P.300 : Letter of President MSIRDS, addressed to manager, Union Bank, Pasumarru Ex.P.301 : Photocopy of balance sheet of MSIRDS as on 31.3.2002. Ex.P.302 : Photocopy of balance sheet of MSIRDS as on 31.3.2003. Ex.P.303 : Credit information of Eluru Paparao and others. (10 sheets) Ex.P.304 : Quotation from Sudha Enterprises for Rs. 16,02,200/- dated 6.10.2003. Ex.P.305 : Voucher dated 10.10.2003 for Rs. 20,000/ issued by A.Venkateswara Reddy. Ex.P.306 : Voucher for Rs. 6,25,000/- issued by Sk . Abdulla dated 10.10.2003. Ex.P.307 : Voucher for Rs. 6, 14,215/- issued by Gandham Janakiramaiah dated 10.10.2003. Ex.P.308: Voucher issued by Sk.Basha for Rs. 1,38,550/- dated 10.10.2003. Ex.P.309 : Cash bill issued by Sudha Enterprises for Rs. 16,02,200/- dated 10.10.2003 Ex.P.310 : Cash bill issued by Sudha Enterprises for Rs. 22,49,000 dated 31.10.2003. Ex.P.311 : Cash receipt from SK.Johnybasha for Rs. 2,02,000- dated 17.10.2003. Ex.P.312 : Cash receipt from Saiad Ibrahim for Rs. 3,54,250/- dated 16.10.2003. Ex.P.313 : Cash receipt from Kacherla Srinivasa Rao for Rs. 1,75,000/-. Ex.P.314 : Cash receipt for Rs. 1,87,750/-. Ex.P.315 : quotation from Sudha Enterprises for Rs. 12,11,600/- dated 17.11.2003 Ex.P.316 : SB account opening form of A2 in Union Bank of India, Pasumarru branch Ex.P.317 : Cheque bearing no.0582809 for Rs. 4,62,000 dated 9.1.2004. Ex.P.318 : Cheque bearing no. 0582804 for Rs. 4,32,000/- dated 17.12.2003 ExP.319 : Cash credit slip for Rs. 4,62,000/- dated 5.2.2004. Ex.P.320 : Cash credit slip for Rs. 4,32,000 dated 31.12.2003. Ex.P.321 : Cash credit slip for Rs. 2,00,000/- dated 11.2.2004 Ex.P.322 : Photocopy of memorandum issued to A.1 dated 25.1.2008

LIST OF WITNESSES EXAMINED ON BEHALF OF DEFENCE.

DW.1/08.03.2019: J.V.L.Janaki Rama Rao

DW.2 /23.04.2019: G.Masthanaiah 119C.C.09/2011/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

LIST OF DOCUMENTS MARKED ON BEHALF OF DEFENCE.

Ex.D.1 : Photo of Award giving to A1. Ex.D.2 : Memorandum dt.13.6.2008 issued by HRM Department FMG, Office, Bangalore. Ex.D.3: Photocopy of sale deed dt.26.9.2005. Ex.D.4: Certified copy of application filed by bank. Ex.D.5: Certificate issued by B.M.

S/d N.Ramesh Babu

PRINCIPAL SPL. JUDGE FOR C.B.I. CASES,

VISAKHAPATNAM.

Copy submitted to

The Hon’ble Registrar (Judicial), High Court of Andhra Pradesh.

Copies to:

1. The A.1 to A7.

2. The Superintendent of Police, C.B.I., Visakhapatnam.

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SPECIAL JUDGE FOR C.B.I.

CASES, VISAKHAPATNAM.

Present: N.RAMESH BABU,

Principal Special Judge for C.B.I. Cases,

Visakhapatnam.

Tuesday this the 16th day of April, 2019

C.C.No.7/2007

Between:

State represented by Addl. Superintendent of Police, CBI, SPE, Visakhapatnam. …Complainant

And:

1. Mr.Pandurangan Sambandan (Died)** Late Kuppuswamy Pandurangan, Aged 58 years, Hindu, Occupation :Formerly Director, NSDRC, Visakhapatnam. R/o No.1, 1st Main Road, Avenue, Dhandeswaram, Velachery, Chennai.

2. Mr.Saga Jagapathi, S/o Saga Venkata Ratnam, aged 46 years, Male, Hindu, R/o 25, SBI Colony, Pedawaltair, Visakhapatnam.

**(A1 died and case against him abated on 25.04.2011)

….. Accused Nos.1 and 2

This case came on 08.04.2019 for final hearing before me in the presence of Mr.K.Suryanarayana, Ld. Sr.Public Prosecutor for the

Complainant and of Mr.M.Rave Raaj, Advocate for A2 and the case against A1 stood abated since he died and the matter having stood over for consideration till this day, this Court doth the following:

J U D G M E N T

1. The Additional Superintendent of Police of CBI (SPE),

Visakhapatnam has filed a charge sheet against the accused for the offences under Sections 120-B r/w 420, 468 and 471 IPC and Section 2C.C.7/2007/Prl. CBI Court/VSP 13(2) read with 13(1) (d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 against

A1 and for the offences under Sections 120-B read with 420, 468 and 471 IPC against A2.

2. Several allegations were made in the charge sheet against A1 namely Mr.Pandurangan Sambandan who worked as the Director

National Ship Design and Research Centre, Visakhapatnam (NSDRC) regarding irregular recruitments of several employees and regularization of several employees without following the rules of recruitment of NSDRC and etc., But subsequently when the matter was coming up for trial since A1 died, on the death certificate filed by the prosecution side, the case against A1 was abated on 25.4.2011. So now the case stands against A2 only.

3. Coming to the allegations against A2, it is the case of the prosecution that there was conspiracy between A1 and A2 and that 20 temporary employees were recruited through M/s.Kranti

Contractors & Service, Visakhapatnam which belongs to A2 in NSDRC out of whom seven persons were already working in NSDRC and were terminated just one day prior to their recruitment to A2 and so they were not actually supplied by A2 and that in that connection NSDRC had incurred an additional expenditure of Rs.52,218/- which was paid to A2 towards administrative charges.

4. It is further alleged that A2 had forged the signatures of Mr.

Papa Rao Mahanthi(PW.2) and Mr.Bakshi on the quotations which were fabricated in the names of M/s Megacity Man Power Supply and Star

Contractors & Service respectively and those quotations were submitted to NSDRC with a dishonest and fraudulent intention to 3C.C.7/2007/Prl. CBI Court/VSP obtain manpower supply contract for Rs.3,14,275/-. The Government

Examiner of Questioned document had given opinion that A2 had forged the signatures of Mr.Papa Rao Mahanti and Mr.Bakshi.

5. Considering the contents of the charge sheet, the case was taken on file for the offences under Sections 120-B, 420, 468 and 471 r/w 465 IPC and under Section 13(2) r/w 13(1) (d) of Prevention of

Corruption Act, 1988 against A1 and for the offences under Section 120-B, 420, 468 and 471 r/w 465 IPC against A2. After A2 made his appearance before the Court, the copies of documents were furnished to him as required under Section 207 Cr.P.C. and he acknowledged the same. He was examined under Section 239 Cr.P.C.

but he denied the case of the prosecution denying the allegations of forgery of the signatures but admitting that the contract was given to him. The charges for the offences under Section 120-B, 420, 468 and 465 r/w 471 IPC were framed read over and explained to A2 in telugu, for which he pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried.

6. The prosecution side has got examined 12 witnesses as

PWs.1 to PW.12 and got marked Exs.P1 to Ex.P1777, 1763-A and 1767-

A documents on its behalf. A2 was examined under Sections 313

Cr.P.C. informing him the incriminating evidence available on record against him, for which he stated that he submitted a quotation and that the other evidence of the prosecution side against him regarding the offences, for which the charges were framed is false and that he has been falsely implicated in this case. He filed a written statement stating that his firm M/s.Kranti Contractors & Service had sent a quotation to NSDRC for supply of employees as many other agencies 4C.C.7/2007/Prl. CBI Court/VSP sent quotations and that the quotation sent by their firm was accepted and that he only represented on behalf of the said firm and that he has nothing to do with NSDRC or its officials and he did not get any benefit either from his firm or from NSDRC and that his signatures on several papers were obtained by use of warning and threat and he was forced to sign and write on several papers like the signatures and writings which were shown to him and that he never put his specimen writings and signatures in front of any witnesses. No oral or documentary evidence was adduced on behalf of A2 but he got marked Ex.D1 which is a portion in the Section 161 Cr.P.C statement of

PW.5.

7. I have heard the learned Public Prosecutor for the prosecution and the learned counsel for the accused. I have perused the case record and the evidence on record both oral and documentary.

8. Since A1 died and the case against him was abated on 25.4.2011, I feel that it is not necessary to discuss about the evidence regarding him unless it is connected to A2. So the evidence relating to A2 only and the charges against him are discussed hereunder.

9.The evidence of PW.1 namely Mr.Iragavarapu Venkata

Lakshmi Prasad who is the then Office Superintendent of Maritime

University which is known as NSDRC is that he worked under one

Mr.P.Rama Rao and that on the dictation of Mr.Rama Rao, advisor, he (PW.1) typed a document which was marked as Ex.P.1709 which discloses that quotations were obtained locally from intending contractors to supply the services as per the requirement of NSDRC 5C.C.7/2007/Prl. CBI Court/VSP and that he prepared the comparative statement for man power supply basing on the quotations received by the office of NSDRC, as per the instructions of Mr.P.Rama Rao , which is marked as Ex.P.1761 which he handed over to Mr.P.Rama Rao. His further evidence is that one Mr.V.V.Shiv Kumar the then purchase officer had put up a note

dated 5.4.1999 which is Ex.P.1762 in connection with the award of

work to M/s Kranthi Contractors & Service and that the note under

Ex.P.1762 was dictated by Mr.P.Rama Rao and approved by A1.

10.The evidence of PW.2 namely Mr.Mahanty Paparao is that when he was examined by the officials of CBI, he stated that he does not know any one in NSDRC and that he has no business with the same and that the CBI officials had shown to him a document and asked him whether he signed on that document and that after perusal of the same he stated that he did not sign on the said document, which is a letter addressed to the Director, NSDRC, Visakhapatnam by

Mega City Man Power Supply, Visakhapatnam which is marked as

Ex.P.1763. According to him he did not sign on Ex.P.1763 on the name of Mr.Paparao which signature is marked as Ex.P.1763-A on

Ex.P.1763. He further deposed that the CBI officials had obtained his specimen signatures on two occasions in the presence of mediators on the sheets which are marked as Ex.P.1764 and Ex.P.1765. He has categorically deposed that he knows one Mr.S.M.Bakshi who is no more.

11. The evidence of PW.3 namely Mr.P.V.S.yerraji Rao who worked as a Draftsman in NSDL is that one Mr.V.K.C.Reddy obtained the specimen handwritings and signatures of one Mr.S.C.Misra who 6C.C.7/2007/Prl. CBI Court/VSP was one of the Governing body members of NSDRC and

Mr.A.Ramprasad who was the Deputy General Manager of NSDRC and

Mr.S.Jagapathi (A2) who is a contractor of NSDRC. He further deposed that Ex.P.1766 are the signatures which are the specimen signatures of A2 which were obtained in his presence by the CBI officials. He identified A2 before the Court but when a question was put to him by the learned Public Prosecutor showing the signatures and handwritings encircled in blue colour pencil markings in sheet Nos.1 to 12 of Ex.P.1766 and questioned as to who signed before him and to whom those signatures and handwritings belong, PW.3 has deposed that he cannot identify those signatures and handwritings and that he does not know who signed before him. The learned Senior Public

Prosecutor took permission of this Court and cross examined PW.3 in which, when a suggestion was put to PW.3 that A2 wrote and signed on pages 1 to 12 of Ex.P.1766 and that he(PW.3) made endorsement on all those pages to the effect that they were written and signed

before him, Pw.3 has denied the said suggestion. In his cross

examination by the learned counsel for the defence side, PW.3 has deposed that he saw A2 in their office in the year 2000 as A2 used to do contract works with his office.

12.PW.4 namely Mr.Akella Venkata Rama Murthy who is the then Head Finance & Accounts of Indian Maritme University,

Visakhapatnam has deposed that M/s Kranthi Contractors and Service used to supply man power to NSDRC and A2 used to represent the said firm and that A2 used to submit bills for the service rendered to

NSDRC and accordingly payments were made for those bills. Two files which contain renewal letters issued to Kranthi Contractors and 7C.C.7/2007/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Service, Pedawaltair, Visakhapatnam by competent authority of

NSDRC and also bio datas of various personnel engaged on contract basis through Kranthi Contractors were marked as Ex.P.1767 through

PW.4. He further deposed that the Volume No.II of Ex.P.1767 contains the original bills raised by M/s Kranthi Contractors and Service from time to time on monthly basis for the man power service rendered and a covering letter dated 6.9.2005 under which Ex.P.1767 was furnished to the Additional Superintendent of Police, CBI, Visakhapatnam by him was marked through PW.4 as Ex.P.1767-A.

13. The further evidence of PW.4 is that Volume No.II of

Ex.P.1767 contains 13 bills raised by M/s Kranthi Contractors and

Service which were submitted by A2 and that the same were enrooted through the personnel department with their recommendations and were processed by Mr.J.R.C.Murthy, the then Junior Accounts Officer and also by him (PW.4) and that the same were recommended to

Mr.P.Rama Rao who is the then advisor who in turn recommended for payments against those bills and they were duly approved by A1 and subsequently the payments were made by cheques on different dates and that A2 made endorsement on all the bills in token of having received the cheques and also issued stamped receipts for the cheques received by him and that a total amount of Rs.2,55,034/- was paid after making all standard deductions and administrative charges to an extent of Rs.52,218/-. He has further deposed that had the personnel been directly hired by NSDRC from the open market, the organization would have saved Rs.52,218/- and that the said amount was paid as administrative charges to A2.

8C.C.7/2007/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

14.The evidence of Pw.5 namely Mr.A.Ramesh Kumar who is the then Secretary/PAO of NSDRC is mostly related to A1. His evidence regarding A2 is that one Mr.B.Satyanarayana (PW.6) addressed a letter which is Ex.P.41 to M/s Kranthi Contractors and Service represented by

A2 and that Ex.P.1768 is another letter dated 8.9.1999 addressed by

B.Satyanarayana (PW.6) to Kranthi Contractors and Service represented by A2 to provide a driver and that Ex.P..1767-A is the file relating to Ms/ Kranthi Contractors and Service represented by A2 and that A2 had received payment for the bills .

15.During the course of cross examination of PW.5 he admitted that he did not state before police as in Ex.D1 which is a portion in his (PW.5) Section 161Cr.P.C. statement which reads that A.2 is a private person and is the managing partner of Kranthi Contractors and Service, Visakhapatnam and that A2 forged the signatures of

Mr.Paparao(P.W.2) and Mr.Bakshi on the quotations of Mega City Man

Power Supply and Star Contracts and Services respectively and obtained a contract to supply man power to NSDRC, Visakhapatnam and that he does not have any personal knowledge about this case and that his evidence is based on the record and that he only handedover the files to CBI.

16.The evidence of PW.6 namely Mr.B.Satyanarayana who is the then Personal Officer of NSDRC is that A2 was doing small contract works and that he (PW.6) addressed the letters under Ex.P.41 and Ex.P.1768 to Kranthi Contractors and Services i.e., A2 for supply of man power. According to him the quotations from Mega City Man

Power Supply in the name of PW.2 which is Ex.P.1763-A and the 9C.C.7/2007/Prl. CBI Court/VSP quotation from M/s Kranthi Contractors and another quotation which is

Ex.P.1761 from Star Contracts were received. He further deposed that a note under Ex.P.1709 dated 31.3.1999 was approved and that he addressed the letter under Ex.P.1769 to A2 for supply of man power and that an agreement with A2 on 15.4.1999 was entered under

Ex.P.1770 and he was the signatory for NSDRC and that A2 signed on the agreement on behalf of M/s Kranthi Contractors and Services.

17.The evidence of PW.10 namely Mr.M.Krishna who was the

Assistant Director in Central Forensic Science Laboratory at Hyderabad is that one CPU, 27 floppies, 1 CD and the documents marked as Q.1 to

Q.24 were received in their laboratory on 14.11.2005 which were forensically imaged and analyzed and that he gave a report dated 7.2.2006 which is Ex.P.1760.

18. The evidence of Pw.11 namely Mr.Y.Surya Prasad who is the Government Examiner of Questioned Documents in the Central

Forensic Science Laboratory, Hyderabad is that the Superintendent of

Police of CBI, Visakhapatnam had referred certain documents through a letter dated 3.1.2006 relating to this case and further referred some material vide letter dated 18.8.2006 in which specimen writings marked as S.57 to S.65 of two persons along with admitted markings

A1 to A3 of a person and that the questioned documents were marked as Q.1 to Q.146 and Q.144/1 by their agency and that the specimen writings of 9 persons were marked as S.1 to S.56 and that he examined all those documents along with Mr.B.Venu gopala Rao who is the Assistant Government Examiner in Questioned Documents and that they gave a combined opinion dated 29.5.2006 which is Ex.P.1772 10C.C.7/2007/Prl. CBI Court/VSP along with the supplementary opinion dated 31.8.2006 which is

Ex.P.1773 opining that the person who wrote the specimen writings marked as S.57 to S.60 also wrote questioned writings marked as Q.1 to Q.2 vide Ex.P.1763-A. The copy of reasons given by them for their opinion under Ex.P.1773 is marked as Ex.P.1776 and that the copy of the letter addressed by the Superintendent of Police, CBI,

Visakhapatnam dated 18.8.2006 was marked as Ex.P.1775 through

PW.11.

19. In this case the Investigation Officer namely Mr.

V.K.C.Reddy is not examined by the prosecution side. In his place

Mr.L.Narayana Murthy who is a retired Sub Inspector of Police, CBI,

Visakhapatnam was examined as an additional witness as PW.12.

According to him Mr.V.K.C.Reddy died in the year 2007 and that

Mr.V.K.C.Reddy had registered a case in R.C.No.10(A)/2005 on 31.3.2005 and examined the witnesses and recorded their statements and collected the relevant documents and laid charge sheet against the accused. PW.12 has deposed that he knows

Mr.V.K.C.Reddy and can identify the writings and signatures of

Mr.V.K.C.Redy. The FIR in R.C.No. 10(A)/2005 has been marked as

Ex.P.1777 through PW.12.

20.Basing on the evidence referred above, now the Point for determination are as follows:

1. Whether the prosecution side is able to prove that A2 had forged or fabricated any documents as alleged by the prosecution?

11C.C.7/2007/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

2. Whether the prosecution side is able to establish that there was criminal conspiracy between A1 and A2 for committing any offence?

3. Whether the prosecution side is able to prove that A2 had fraudulently and dishonestly used any forged documents as genuine knowing that they are

forged documents at the time of using the same?

4. Whether the prosecution side is able to establish that A2 had cheated NSDRC as alleged by the prosecution?

21. POINT No 1:

1. Whether the prosecution side is able to prove that A2 had forged or fabricated any documents as alleged by the prosecution?

Even though the prosecution side has referred several documents as forged and fabricated documents but they are connected to A1 and not against A2, except the quotations marked as

Ex.P.1763 alleged to have been submitted by PW.2 and another quotation under Ex.P.1761 alleged to have been submitted by Star

Contracts. Regarding the quotation under Ex.P.1761 said to have been submitted by Star Contracts, there is no direct evidence to show that it is a forged document. Only the evidence of PW.11 who is an expert is there regarding the same. Coming to quotation under

Ex.P.1763 the direct evidence of PW.3 is available which is very clear that he neither submitted the quotation under Ex.P.1763 nor it contains his signature which is marked under Ex.P.1763-A. So apart from the evidence of the expert who is PW.11, the other evidence to 12C.C.7/2007/Prl. CBI Court/VSP show that the quotation under Ex.P.1763 is a forged document is from

PW.2. If the quotation under Ex.P.1763 was submitted by PW.2 it should contain his signature. As I have already stated PW.2 has clearly deposed that he neither submitted the quotation under

Ex.P.1763 nor it contains his signature. So it is very clear that the quotation under Ex.P.1763 is a forged document. There is no cross examination to the evidence of PW.2 from the side of A2 that

Ex.P.1763 quotation was submitted by PW.2 or that it contains his signature. So the evidence of PW.2 remained unchallenged by the defence side. Having submitted the quotation under Ex.P.1763 by putting his signature thereon which is under Ex.P.1763-A, there was no reason for PW.2 to deny the same and depose otherwise. It is not the case of A2 that there was enmity between him and PW.2. There is nothing on record to discredit the evidence of PW.2 in this regard.

The evidence of PW.2 appears to be true and trustworthy. If his evidence is believed it must be necessarily concluded that Ex.P.1763 was not submitted by him and that he did not sign on the same. So

Ex.P.1763 is a forged and fabricated document.

22.The evidence of PW.11 shows that his opinion under

Ex.P.1773 is that the signatures and the handwritings of the disputed documents and the specimen signatures and specimen handwritings belong to one and the same person. The evidence of PW.3 shows that the specimen signatures and writings were obtained from A2 in his presence by the CBI officials. So if the evidence of PW.3 and the evidence of PW.11 and his opinion are read together the necessary conclusion that can be drawn is that those writings and signatures belong to A2 which means that A2 forged the disputed documents.

13C.C.7/2007/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

But there is no direct evidence to show that A2 forged the disputed documents. The evidence of PW.11 an expert is only an opinion evidence and neither conclusive proof nor substantial evidence.

Without there being any direct evidence to show that A2 had forged the disputed documents, merely basing on the evidence of PW.3 and

PW.11 it cannot be concluded A2 had forged and fabricated the disputed documents. The evidence of an expert being only a opinion evidence can be taken only as a corroborative evidence but not substantial evidence. Regarding the document under Ex.P.1763 even though through the evidence of PW.2 it is proved that it is a forged and fabricated document but there is no direct evidence to show that it was forged and fabricated by A2.

23.Coming to the evidence of the expert i.e., PW.11 the objection raised by the learned counsel for the accused is that the specimen writings and signatures of A2 were neither taken by the

Court nor taken with the direction of the Court and so they are not admissible and the evidence of PW.11 cannot be relied upon.

24.In this regard, the learned counsel for the accused has relied upon a decision in Deputy Chief Controller of Imports and

Exports, Hyderabad Vs. Boddula Malleshara reported in 1997 1

ALT (Crl) Page 719. In this decision at the end of Para -7 it has been observed that from the law declared by the Supreme Court (Sukhvinder Singh V. State of Punjab reported in 1994 (0) SCC (crl.)

Page 1376), it is clear that whether accused objected to or not, if the specimen signature was not taken either in the presence of the Court or by the Court itself, the same would not be admissible.

14C.C.7/2007/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

25.The cited decision squarely applies to the present case because the specimen writings and signatures of A2 were neither taken before this Court nor taken with the direction of this Court.

Moreover, as I have already stated that because the expert’s evidence is only an opinion evidence merely basing on the opinion of an expert it is unsafe and undesirable to conclude that A2 had forged the disputed documents. From the above discussion, I hold on the

Point that the prosecution side has failed to establish that A2 had forged and fabricated the disputed documents.

26.POINT Nos. 2 to 4 :

2. Whether the prosecution side is able to establish that there was criminal conspiracy between A1 and A2 for committing any offence?

3. Whether the prosecution side is able to prove that A2 had fraudulently and dishonestly used any forged documents as genuine knowing that they are forged documents at the time of using the same?

4. Whether the prosecution side is able to establish that A2 had cheated NSDRC as alleged by the prosecution?

These three Points require common discussion to avoid repeatance of the facts and circumstances of the case and the evidence in the discussion. So they are taken together for discussion.

The evidence of PW.1 and PW.4 to PW.6 shows that quotations were obtained from the contractors to supply the services of man power as per the requirement of NSDRC and that out of the three quotations received, the quotation submitted by M/s Kranthi

Contractors and Service represented by A2 was accepted. Even though it is alleged by the prosecution that there was no necessity for

NSDRC to obtain man power from private agencies by calling for 15C.C.7/2007/Prl. CBI Court/VSP quotations but A2 has nothing to do with the same. A2 is not attributable for calling the quotations by A1 regarding man power supply for the sake of NSDRC. The evidence on record clearly shows that a quotation as under Ex.P.1763 is alleged to have been submitted by PW.2 which I have decided in the earlier point as a forged and fabricated document and another quotation from Star Contracts which is Ex.P.1761 and another quotation from M/s Kranthi Contractors and

Service represented by A2 were received by A1 and that as per the note dated 5.4.1999 under Ex.P.1762 the quotation submitted by M/s

Kranthi Contractors and Service was accepted by A1 and the work was awarded to M/s Kranthi Contractors and Service.

27.The evidence of PW.4 clearly shows that a total amount of

Rs.2,55,034/- was paid for the men supplied by the M/s Kranthi

Contractors and Service and that an amount of Rs.52,218/- was paid to

A2 as administrative charges. A2 has not denied about the allotment of work by NSDRC to M/s Kranthi Contractors and Service by accepting its quotation out of the three quotations, the other two quotations being Ex.P.1763 submitted by Mega City Man Power Supply,

Visakhapatnam and the other quotation under Ex.P.1761 submitted by

Star Contracts. A2 has not denied receiving an amount of

Rs.52,218/- towards administrative charges. The prosecution side has alleged that out of the personnel shown to have been supplied by M/s

Kranthi Contractors and Service some of them were removed from services by NSDRC on the previous day of their supply. So according to the prosecution side the personnel who were under employment in

NSDRC and who were removed were shown to have been supplied by

A2 in collusion between A1 and A2. Even if it is true nothing is 16C.C.7/2007/Prl. CBI Court/VSP attributable to A2 because there is no harsh rule that A2 should not supply the personnel who were removed by NSDRC, previously. When there was a contract for A2 to supply personnel, A2 would have supplied new personnel who were never employed in NSDRC or even the personnel who were removed by NSDRC. If there was any fraudulent and dishonest intention in this regard it must have been in the mind of A1 but A2 is not connected with the same.

28.The evidence on record which I have referred above clearly shows that there was prior understanding between A1 and A2 in awarding contract in favour of M/s Kranthi Contractors and Service represented by A2.

29.When the quotation under Ex.P.1763 is a forged document, certainly A1 and A2 might have known that it was a forged document when it was used for awarding the contract in favour of M/s Kranthi

Contractors and Service. In the facts and circumstances of this case it appears that the quotation under Ex.P.1763 was used by A1 and A2 for awarding contract in favour of M/s Kranthi Contractors and Service as a genuine document knowingfully well that it was a forged document when it was used. So taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of this case and the evidence on record both oral and documentary it can be concluded that A1 and A2 had fraudulently or dishonestly used as geuine Ex.P.1763 knowingfully well that it is a forged document which is punishable under Section 471 IPC. So certainly there was a criminal conspiracy between A1 and A2 for using Ex.P.1763 which is a forged document as a genuine document knowingfully well that it was a forged document by the time of using 17C.C.7/2007/Prl. CBI Court/VSP the document. This act of A1 and A2 is punishable under Section 120-B IPC. Even this act of A1 and A2 using the forged document under Ex.P.1763 as a genuine document knowingfully well that it was a forged document when it was used for the benefit of A2 amounts to the offence of cheating punishable under Section 420 IPC because by that act A2 received money from NSDRC towards administrative charges .

30.The learned counsel for A2 has contended that A2 is only an employee in M/s Kranthi Contractors and Service but he is neither a partner in it nor the contractor and so he is not connected with the alleged offences. But the oral evidence of PW.1 and PWs.4 to 6 and the agreement entered between NSDRC and A2 under Ex.P.1770 clearly shows that A2 himself is the contractor. Ex.P.1770 contains the signature of A2 as the contractor. So the contention of the learned counsel for A2 in this regard cannot be accepted.

31.The learned counsel for A2 referring the evidence of PW.4 wherein in his cross examination he admitted that one Mr.P.Rama Rao and Mr.J.R.C.Murthy are the best persons to speak about the contractor has contended that non examination of Mr.P.Rama Rao and

Mr.J.R.C.Murthy is fatal to the case of the prosecution.

32.The learned counsel for the accused has relied upon a decision in Govindaraju @ Govinda Vs. State by Srirampuram

P.S. and another reported in 2012(2) ALD (Crl.) 580 (SC). In this case it has been observed that the Court can draw inference against the prosecution case, if a material witness is not examined. But when there is documentary evidence as under Ex.P.1770 and clear oral 18C.C.7/2007/Prl. CBI Court/VSP evidence that A2 has represented M/s Kranthi Contractors and

Service and entered into the agreement under Ex.P.1770 in the capacity of a contractor on behalf of M/s Kranthi Contractors and

Service, I do not accept the contention of learned counsel for A2 in this regard. So under these circumstances non examination of

Mr.P.Rama Rao and Mr.J.R.C.Murthy is not at all fatal to this case and they are not material witnesses to this case.

33. The learned counsel for A2 has contended that the explanation offered by A2 in his statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C.

can be taken into consideration. In support of his contention in this regard, the learned counsel for the accused has relied upon a decision

in Punjabrao Vs. State of Maharashtra reported in(2002) 10

Supreme Court Cases 371. In this decision in the middle of para-3 it has been observed as follows :

“ It is further clear that the accused is not required to establish his defence by proving beyond reasonable doubt as the prosecution but can establish the same by preponderance of probability. It is undisputed that from 24th to 26th the Patwari was collecting loans in a collection compaign. It is, of course, true as observed by the High

Court that when the investigating officer seized the amount from the accused Patwari, he did not offer the explanation that it was in relation to a collection of loan, but that by itself would not be sufficient to throw away the explanation offered by the accused in his statement under

Section 313 when such explanation could be held to be reasonable under the facts and circumstances of the case, 19C.C.7/2007/Prl. CBI Court/VSP as indicated by the learned Special Judge while acquitting the accused”.

34.There is no dispute with regard to the observation made in the cited decision but in view of above discussion and clear finding that Ex.P.1763 is a forged document and that A1 and A2 used the same as a genuine document by knowingfully well at the time of using the same that it is a forged document, the explanation offered by A2 in his written statement does not merit any consideration in this case.

35.In the cross examination of PW.5 when a suggestion was put to him that he did not state before police as in Ex.D1 he admitted the said suggestion. A portion in the 161 Cr.P.c. statement of PW.5 was marked as Ex.D1, according to which Pw.5 has stated to police that S.Jagapathi (A2) is a private person and is the Managing partner of Kranthi Contractors and Service, Visakhapatnam and he forged the signatures of Mr.Paparao (PW.2) and Mr.Bakshi on the quotations of

Mega City Man Power Supply and Star Contracts and Services respectively and obtained a contract to supply man power to NSDRC,

Visakhapatnam. But my finding in Point No.1 is that the prosecution side has failed to prove that A2 had forged any documents in this case including the signatures of PW.2 and Mr.Bakshi. So it is not necessary to discuss much about Ex.D1.

36.From the above discussion, I hold on these three Points that the prosuection side is able to establish that there was a criminal conspiracy between A1 and A2 for committing an offence of cheating by using a forged document which is Ex.P.1763, the quotation alleged 20C.C.7/2007/Prl. CBI Court/VSP to have been given by PW.2 as a genuine document knowingfully well that it is a forged document when it used as a genuine document and that the act of A2 in this regard amounts to cheating NSDRC to have wrongful gain and so I hold that the prosecution side is able to establish that A2 had cheated NSDRC as alleged by it. Accordingly, I decide these three Points in favour of prosecution and against A2.

37.In the light of my findings on the earlier discussed and decided Points Nos.1 to 4, I hold that the prosecution side is able to establish that there was a criminal conspiracy between A1 and A2 for committing an offence which is punishable under Section 120-B of the

Indian Penal Code and also able to establish that A2 had fraudulently and dishonestly used Ex.P.1763 quotation which is a forged document as a genuine document knowingfully well that it is a forged document, when it was used, punishable under Section 471 IPC and further I hold that the prosecution side is able to establish that A2 had cheated

NSDRC punishable under Section 420 IPC beyond reasonable doubt and that A2 is liable for punishment for the offences under Section 120-B, 471 IPC and 420 IPC.

38.I further hold that the prosecution side has failed to establish that A2 has forged any documents and so he is not liable for punishment for the offence under Section 468 of Indian Penal Code.

In the result, the Accused No.2 is found guilty of the offence under Section 468 r/w 471 IPC and further he is also found guilty of the offence under Section 120-B r/w 420 IPC and he is liable for conviction for the said two offences. But he is entitled for acquittal for the offence under Section 468 IPC.

21C.C.7/2007/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

S/d N.Ramesh Babu

PRINCIPAL SPL. JUDGE FOR CBI CASES

VISAKHAPATNAM

At this stage the accused No.2 is questioned about the quantum of sentence that is going to be imposed against him for the offence under Section 468 r/w 471 IPC and for the offence under

Section 120-B r/w 420 IPC, for which he stated that he has an old aged father who is also suffering from heart ailment, blood pleasure and diabetes and that his mother expired and there is nobody to look after his father except the accused No.2 himself . But taking into consideration the nature of the offences proved against him and the manner in which they were committed and the facts and circumstances of this case, I do not want to extend the benefits of the provisions of the probation of offenders Act in favour of the accused

No.2. But considering his statement and the facts and circumstances of the case and the nature of the offences, I feel that imposition of

Rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year and to pay fine of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only), in default simple imprisonment for a period of two months for the offence under section 468 r/w 471 IPC and imposition of Rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year and to pay fine of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only), in default simple imprisonment for a period of two months for the offences under section 120-B r/w 420 IPC are just and proper in this case.

In the result, the accused No.2 is found guilty of the offence under Section 468 r/w 471 IPC and on conviction under Section 248(2)

Cr.P.C he is sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of One year and to pay fine of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten 22C.C.7/2007/Prl. CBI Court/VSP thousand only) for the said offence. Further he is sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of One year and to pay fine of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only), in default simple imprisonment for a period of two months for the offences under Section 120-B r/w 420 IPC.

Both sentences of imprisonments imposed against him for the said offences shall run concurrently.

The accused No.2 is entitled for set off under Section 428

Cr.P.C, the period of remand if any undergone by him.

The accused No.2 is acquitted under Section 248(1) Cr.P.C. for the offence under Section 468 IPC.

The accused No.2 is informed that he is entitled to prefer appeal against this Judgment according to law. He is also informed that he is entitled for legal aid according to law. It is ordered to supply a copy of this Judgment to the Accused No.2 on free of cost.

Dictated to the stenographer Grade-I, transcribed by

her, corrected and pronounced by me in the Open court on this the 16th day of April, 2019

S/d N.Ramesh Babu

PRINCIPAL SPL. JUDGE FOR CBI CASES

VISAKHAPATNAM

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

LIST OF WITNESSES EXAMINED ON BEHALF OF PROSECUTION.

P.W.1: Iragavarapu Venkata Lakshmi Prasad

P.W.2: Paparao Mahanthy

P.W.3: P.V.S. Yerraji Rao

P.W.4: Akella Venkata Ramana Murthy 23C.C.7/2007/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

P.W.5: A. Ramesh Kumar

P.W.6: B.Satyanarayana

P.W.7: B. Srinias

P.W.8: V.V. Shiva Kumar

P.W.9: Dr. Guna Sekhar

P.W.10: M. Krishna

P.W.11: Y. Surya Prasad,

P.W.12: L. Narayana Murthy.

Defence : None.

No. of documents marked for

Prosecution:

Ex.P.1 : Certified copy of FIR dated 31.03.2005 (8 Sheets)

Ex.P.2: Certified copy of Certificate of Registration of Societies along with memorandum and articles of association of NSDRC along with Service Rules for employees. (relevant pages 1 to 5 and 14 to 16) along with the the letter dt. 20.04.2005 and 17.11.2006 of the Secretary, NSDRC Visakhapatnam and copy of letter dt. 21.01.89 of the Govt. of India.

Ex.P.3: Certified copy of extracts of Item No.3 of Minutes of the4th Governing Body meeting dated 22.08.89 (4 Sheets).

Ex.P.4 : Certified copy of Recruitment Rule of NSDRC (38 Sheets).

Ex.P.5: Certified copy of Minutes of the 6th Governing Body meeting

dated 15.12.1989 (3 Sheets)

Ex.P.6: Certified copy of extracts of Item No.8 of Minutes of the 8th Governing Body meeting dated 26.09.90 (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.7: Certified copy of Minutes of the 30th Governing Body meeting

dated 30.05.1997 (6 Sheets)

Ex.P.8: Certified copy of Minutes of the 32nd Governing Body meeting

dated 09.01.1998 (5 Sheets)

Ex.P.9: Certified copy of extracts of Item No.5.0 of Minutes of the 33rd Governing Body meeting dated 02.09.1998 (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.10: Certified copy of Minutes of the 38th Governing Body meeting

dated 31.03.2000 (5 Sheets)

24C.C.7/2007/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.11: Certified copy Minutes of the 39th Governing Body meeting

dated 30.09.2000 (6 Sheets)

Ex.P.12: Certified copy of Minutes of the 40th Governing Body meeting

dated 12.01.2001 (7 Sheets)

Ex.P.13: Certified copy of Minutes of the 41st Governing Body meeting

dated 01.06.2001 (7 sheets)

Ex.P.14: Certified copy of Minutes of the 42nd Governing Body meeting

dated 25.09.2001 (9 Sheets)

Ex.P.15: Certified copy of Minutes of the 52nd Governing Body meeting

dated 02.08.2004 (8 Sheets)

Ex.P.16: Certified copy of Minutes of the 53rd Governing Body meeting Body meeting dated 27.09.2004 (9 Sheets)

Ex.P.17: Certified copy of Minutes of the 54th Governing Body meeting Body meeting dated 27.10.2004 (14 Sheets)

Ex.P.18: Letters dt 22.08.2006 and 20.11.2006 of Shri A. Ramesh Kumar, Secretary, NSDRC addressed to Shri VKC Reddy, Addl.SP, CBI, along with the enclosures (11 Sheets)

Ex.P.19: Certified copy of joining reported dated 25.03.1996 of Shri P. Sambandan (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.20: Certified copy of IIT, Madras Office Order dt 01.04.1996 to Shri P. Sambandan (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.21:Certified copy of letter dt 25.03.1998 of Registrar, IIT, Madras to Shri P. Sambandan (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.22: Certified copy of letter dt 19.03.2001 of Shri P. Sambandan to the Director, IIT, Madras (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.23: Original letter no.SY-11011/1/2004-SBR dt.3.11.2004 of Shri D.T. Joseph, Secretary (Shipping), Ministry of Shipping, New Delhi to Shri P. Sambandan, (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.24: Letter dt.14.08.2006 and 26.10.2006 of Shri A.Ramesh Kumar, Secretary, NSRC addressed to Addl. S.P., CBI along with enclosures (19 Sheets)

Ex.P.25: Application dt.09.07.1999 of Shri N.V.S. Sesha Sai along with enclosures (12 Sheets)

Ex.P.26:Certified copy of letter dt. 15.10.1999 of Shri B. Satyyanarayana, Head Personnel & Administration to Shri N.V.S. Sesha Sai (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.27: Joining report dated 20.10.99 of Shri N.V.S. Sesha Sai (1 Sheet) 25C.C.7/2007/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.28: Note dt. 18.04.2000 of Shri B. Satyanarayana for extension of his services for another six months (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.29: Certified copy of letter dated 20.04.2000 of Shri. B. Satyanarayana, HPA to Shri N.V.S. Sesha Sai (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.30: Joining report dt. 20.04.2000 of Shri N.V.S. Sesha Sai (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.31:Letter dt. 13.04.2000 of Shri N.V.S. Sesha Sai to Shri P. Sambandan informing About the details of dependents residing with him in the NSDRC residential quarters (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.32:Certified copy of letter dt. 07.09.2000 of Shri B. Satyanarayana, HPA to Shri N.V.S. Sesha sai (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.33: Joining report dt. 07.09.2000 of Shri N.V.S. Sesha Sai (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.34: Certified copy of letter dated 29.12.2000 of Sri V.V. Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri N.V.S. Sesha Sai (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.35: Joining report dt. 1.1.2001 of Shri N.V.S. Sesha Sai, (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.36: Certified copy of Office order NSDRC/007/29 dt.19.10.2001 Shri P. Sambandan (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.37: Letter dt.01.07.2004 of Shri Sesha Sai(1 Sheet)

Ex.P.38: Certified copy of letter dt. 30.09.2004 of Shri V.V. Shiv Kumar, HPT to Shri N.V. Sesha Sai (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.39: Joining report dt. 01.10.2004 of Shri N.V.S. Sesha Sai (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.40: Certified copy of application dt. Nil of Shri P.B. Srinivas along with encousers (21 Sheets)

Ex.P.41: Certified copy of letter dt. 05.11.1999 of Shri B.Satyanarayana, HPA to M/s. Kranti Contracts & Services, Visakhapatnam (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.42: Note dated 2.05.2000 of Shri A.V. Ramana Murthy Head Finance and Account to Shri P. Sambandan requesting for extension of services of Sri P.B. Srinivas (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.43: Note dated 19.07.2000 of Sri A.V. Ramana Murthy, Head Finance and Accounts to Shri P. Sambandan requesting for extension of service of Sri P.B. Srinivas for six months (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.44:Certified copy of letter dt. 27.7.2000 of Shri B. Satyanarayana, HPA to Shri P. B. Srinivas (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.45 : Joining reportdt. 01.08.2000 of Shri P.B. Srinivas (1 Sheet) 26C.C.7/2007/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.46: Certified copy of letter dated 29.12.2000 of V.V. Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri P. B. Srinivas (2 Sheet)

Ex.P.47: Joining report dt. 01.01.2001 of Shri P.B. Srinivas (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.48: Letter dated 17.09.2003 of Shri P.B. Srinivas (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.49: Letter dt. 17.09.2003 of Shri P.B. Srinivas (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.50: Certified copy of letter dt. 17.09.2003 of Shri V.V. Shiv Kumar, Head Personnel & Training to Shri P.B. Srinivas (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.51: Certified copy of letter dt. 06.10.2003 of Shri P.B. Srinivas to Shri Y.R. Rao, Advisor, NSDRC, Hyderabad (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.52: Application dt. 24.08.2000 of Shri S. Raju requesting for employment along with encousers (13 Sheets)

Ex.P.53: Certified copy of letter dt. 25.08.2000 of Shri B. Satyanarayana, HPA to Shri S. Raju (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.54: Joining report dt. 25.08.2000 of Shri S. Raju (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.55: Certified copy of letter dated 29.12.2000 of Shri V.V. Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri S. Raju (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.56: Joining report dt. 01.01.2001 of Shri S. Raju (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.57: Certified copy of letter dt. 01.07.2004 of Shri S. Raju to Shri P. Sambandan (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.58: Certified copy of letter dt. 30.09.2004 of Shri V.V. Shiv Kumar, HPT to Shri S. Raju (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.59: Joining report dt. 01.10.2004 of Shri S. Raju (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.60:Note dt.12.05.2000 of Shri B. Satyanarayana, Head personnel & Administration to Shri P. Rama Rao, Advisor (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.61: Certified copy of letter dt. 15.05.2000 of Shri B. Satyanarayana, HPA to Shri Ch. Satyanarayana (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.62: Joining report dt. 15.05.2000 of Shri Ch. Satyanarayana (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.63: Note dt. 18.10.2000 of Shri. V. Krishna Mohan, Sr. Assistant to Shri V.V. Shiv Kumar, HPT (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.64: Certified copy of letter dt. 15.11.2000 of Shri V.V. Shiv Kumar, HPT to Shri Ch. Satyanarayana (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.65: Joining report dt. 15.11.2000 of Shri Ch. Satyanarayana(1 Sheet) 27C.C.7/2007/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.66: Certified copy of letter dated 29.12.2000 of Sri V.V. Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri Ch. Satyanarayana (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.67: Joining report dt. 01.01.2001 of Shri Ch. Satyanarayana (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.68: Letter dt. 05.09.2002 of Shri Ch. Satyanarayana (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.69: Application dt. 27.11.1998 of Shri A. Narasimha Murthy requesting for employment along with enclousers (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.70: Certified copy of letter dt. 27.11.1998 of Shri A. Ramesh Kumar, Head Personnel & Administration to Shri A. Narasimha Murthy (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.71: Joining report dt. 27.11.1998 of Shri A. Narashima Murthy (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.72: Certified copy of letter dt. 05.04.1999 of Shri B. Satyanarayana, HPA to Shri A. Narasimha Murthy (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.73: Certified copy of note dt. 25.9.2000 Shri V. Krishna Mohan, Sr.Assistant to Shri V.V. Shiv Kumar, HPT (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.74: Certified copy of letter dt. 16.10.2000 of Shri. V.V. Shiv Kumar to Shri A. Narashimha Murhty (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.75: Joining report dt. 18.10.2000 of Shri A. N. Murthy (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.76: Certified copy of letter dated 29.12.2000 of Sri V.V. Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri A. Narasimha Murthy (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.77: Joining report dt. 01.01.2001 of shri A. Narasimha Murthy (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.78: Letter dt. 01.07.2004 of Shri A. Narasimha Murthy to Shri P. Sambandan (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.79: Certified copy of letter dt. 30.09.2004 of Shri V.V. Shiv Kumar, HPT, to Shri A. Narasimha Murthy (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.80: Joining report dt. 01.10.2004 of Shri A. Narasimha Murthy (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.81: Certified copy of note dt. 14.02.2002 of Shri V.V. Shiv Kumar, HPT for filling up the vancy of Senior Librarian on deputation basis in the pay scale of Rs.8000-275-13500 for a period of twenty months as the present Sr. Librarian proceeded on study leave for a period of two ears from 1.1.2002 to31.12.2003 (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.82: Certified copy of letter dt. 18.02.2002 of shri V.V. Shiv Kumar, HPT to ISRO Bangalore and CSIR Chennai (1 Sheet) 28C.C.7/2007/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.83: Certified copy of letter no.HQ.ADMN.4.9 (3) dt. 08.03.2002 from ISRO, Bangalore (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.84: Certified copy of note dt. 11.03.2002 of Shri V.V. Shiv Kumar, HPT to Shri P. Sambandan (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.85: Certified copy of letter dt. 13.03.2002 of Shri V.V. Shiv Kumar, HPT to ISRO (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.86: Certified copy of note dt. 15.04.2002 of Shri V.V. Shiv Kumar, HPT to Shri P. Sambandan in which it was intimated that since the library essentially requires the services of Senior Librarian with experience, it was desirable to obtain the services of a Senior Librarian to carry out the functions even in the higher scale of Rs.10000-325-15200 as Manager (Library) (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.87: Certified copy of letter dt. 15.04.2002 of Shri V.V. Shiv Kumar, HPT to CSIR and ISRO (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.88:Certified copy of fax message HQ.ADMN.4.9(3) dt. 23.04.2002 from ISRO Bangalore (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.89: Certified copy of note dt.30.04.2002 of Shri V.V. Shiv Kumar, HPT to Shri P. Sambandan (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.90: Certificate copy of the letter dt. 30.04.2002 of Shri V.V. Shiv Kumar, HPT to ISRO, Bangalore (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.91: Certified copy of letter no.HQ.ADMN.4.9(3) dt. 13.05.2002 of ISRO (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.92: Certified copy of note dt.14.05.2002 of Shri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Shri P. Sambandan regarding deputation of Smt. S. Padmashree as Manager (Library) on a starting salary of Rs.10,000/- in the pay scale of Rs.10000-325-15200 and to inform to ISRO of the same (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.93: Certified copy of letter dt. 17.05.2002 of Shri V.V. Shiv Kumar, HPT to ISRO, Bangalore (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.94: Certified copy of letter no.HQ.ADMN.4.9(3) dt. 06.06.2002 of ISRO, Bangalore (4 Sheets)

Ex.P.95: Certified copy of note dt. 07.06.2002 of Shri V.V. Shiv Kumar, HPT to Shri P. Sambandan regarding the terms and conditions of Smt. S. Padmashree (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.96: Certified copy of letter dt. 10.06.2002 of Shri V.V. Shiv Kumar, HPT to ISRO, Bangalore (1 Sheet) 29C.C.7/2007/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.97: Certified copy of Office order HQ.ADMN.12.1 dt. 10.06.2002 of ISRO (4 Sheets)

Ex.P.98: Joining report dt. 13.06.2002 of Smt.S.Padmashree (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.99: letter dt. 13.10.2003 of Smt. S. Padmashree to Shri P. Sambandan (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.100: Letter dt. 22.10.2003 of Shri V.V. Shiv Kumar, HPT to ISRO, Bangalore (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.101:Certified copy of fax letter no.HQ.ADMN.4.9(3) dt.14.11.2003 of ISRO (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.102: Certified copy of letter dt.19.11.2003 of Mrs. S. Padmashree to ISRO, Bangalore (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.103: Certified copy of letter dt.19.11.2003 of Mrs. S. Padmashree to ISRO, Bangalore (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.104: Note dt. 19.11.2003 of Shri V.V. Shiv Kumar to Shri P. Sambandan (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.105: Certified copy of letter dt. 20.11.2003 of Shri V.V. Shiv Kumar, HPT to ISRO, Bangalore (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.106: Letter HQ.ADMN.4.9(3) dt.09.12.2003 from ISRO (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.107: Note dt.10.12.2003 of Shri V.V. Shiv Kumar, HPT to Shri P. Sambandan (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.108: Certified copy of Order dt.10.12.2003 of Shri V.V. Shiv Kumar, HPT to Smt. S. Padmashree with a copy marked to ISRO, Bangalore (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.109: Joining report dt.10.12.2003 of Smt.S.Padmashree (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.110: Certified copy of letter dt.11.07.1996 of Shri G.P. Raju, Secretary-cum-Administrative Officer (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.111: Certified copy of the letter dt.19.08.1998 of Shri. A. Ramesh Kumar, Secretary-cum-Head Pers. & Admin (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.112:Certified copy of the letter dt.21.02.2000 of Shri B. Satyanarayana, Head Pers. & Admin. (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.113:Application dt. nil Of Shri S. Shanmuga Sundaram (4 Sheets)

Ex.P.114:Certified copy of letter dt.09.07.1999 of Shri B. Satyanarayana, HPA to Shri S. Shanmuga Sundaram (2 Sheets) 30C.C.7/2007/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.115:Joining report dt. 28.07.1999 of Shri. S. Shanmuga Sundaram (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.116: Note dt.21.07.2000 of Shri B. Satyanarayana, HPA for extension of services of Shri S. Shanmuga Sundaram and to issue a fresh appointment letter (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.117: Letter dt. 25.07.2000 of Shri B. Satyanarayana, HPA to Shri S.Shanmuga Sundaram (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.118: Joining report dt. 28.07.2000 of Shri S.S. Sundaram (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.119: Certified copy of letter dated 29.12.2000 of Sri V.V. Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri S. Shanmuga Sundaram (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.120: Joining report dt.01.1.2001 of Shri S.S. Sundaram (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.121: Letter dated 01.10.2001 of Shri V.V. Shiv Kumar, HPT to Shri S. Shanmuga Sundaram (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.122:Joining report dt. 01.10.2001 of Shri S. Shanmuga Sundaram (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.123: Note dt.27.11.1998 of Shri A. Ramesh Kumar, HPA seeking approval for fixing in the pay scale of Rs.5000-150-8000 for Shri V. Sanyasi Naidu as he as working as casual employee since 16.08.1996 (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.124: Certified copy of letter dt. 01.12.1998 of Shri A. Ramesh Kumar, HPA to Shri V. Sanyasi Naidu (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.125: Joining report dt. 01.12.1998 of Shri V. Sanyasi Naidu (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.126: Letter dt. 29.12.2000 of Shri V.V. Shiv Kumar, HPT to Shri V. Sanyasi Naidu (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.127: Joining report dt. 01.01.2001 of Shri V. Sanyasi Naidu (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.128: Letter dt. 01.10.2001 of Shri V.V. Shiv Kumar, HPT to Shri V. Sanyasi Naidu (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.129: Joining report dt.01.10.2001 of Shri V. Sanyasi Naidu (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.130: Letter dt. 23.09.2002 of Shri V. Sanyasi Naidu (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.131: Note dt. 11.11.1998 of Shri A. Ramesh Kumar, HPA regarding regularisation of services of Shri P. Ramnajaneya Reddy in the pay scale of Rs. 5000-15-8000 and also request for constitution of a Committee (1 Sheet) 31C.C.7/2007/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.132: Note dt. 16.11.1998 of Shri A. Ramesh Kumar, enclosing the recommendations of the Committee that Shri P. Ramanjaneya Reddy be appointed on contract basis for a period of five years in the pay scale of Rs.5000-150-8000 w.e.f. 1.2.1998 (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.133: Certified copy of letter dt.01.12.1998 of Shri A. Ramesh Kumar, Secretary-cum-Head Pers. & Admin. To Shri P. Ramanjaneya Reddy on contract basis (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.134: Joining report dt. 01.12.1998 of Shri P.Ramanjaneya Reddy, (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.135: Certified copy of letter dt. 01.10.2001 of Shri V.V. Shiv Kumar, HPT to Shri P.Ramanjaneya Reddy (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.136: Joining report dt. 01.10.2001 of Shri P.Ramanjaneya Reddy, (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.137: Letter dt. Nil of Shri P. Ramanjaneya Reddy (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.138: Note dt. 05.11.1996 of Cdr. K.K. Varma, Head Personnel & Administration to Shri S.E. sridharan, Head Computer Services (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.139: Certified copy of Office Order dt. 22.11.1996 of Cdr. K.K. Varma to Shri M. Dhanunjaya Naidu (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.140: Certified copy of letter dt. 26.11.1996 of Cdr. K.K. Varmo to shri M. Dhanunjaya Naidu (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.141: Joining report dt.26.11.1996 of Shri M. Dhanunjaya Naidu (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.142: Note dt. 06.02.1997 of Mrs. K. Pushpa, Senior Librarian to Shri S.E. Sridharan recommending to extend the services of Sri Ramanjaneya Reddy, V. Sanyasi Naidu and M. Dhanunjaya Naidu for a period of three months (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.143: Note dt. 07.02.1997 of Shri I.V. Lakshmi Prasad, Steno/Asstt to shri V.V. Shiv Kumar, Jr. Personnel Officer wherein he mentioned about the recommendations of Mrs. K. Pushpa about extending the services of three temporary library assistants (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.144: Certified copy of Office order dt. 20.02.1997 of Cdr. K.K. Varma to shri M. Dhanunjaya Naidu (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.145: Certified copy of letter dt 24.02.1997 of Cdr. K.K. Varma to Shri M. Dhanunjaya Naidu (1 Sheet) 32C.C.7/2007/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.146: Joining report dt. 24.02.1997 of Shri M. Dhanunjaya Naidu (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.147: Note dt. 09.05.1997 of Mrs. K. Pushpa, Senior Librarian to Shri S.E. Sridharan recommending to extend the services of Shri Ramanjaneya Reddy, V. Sanyasi Naidu and M. Dhanunjaya Naidu for a period of three months (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.148: Note dt. 12.05.1997 of Shri I.V.Lakshmi Prasad, Steno/Asstt to Cdr. K.K. Varma where in he mentioned about the recommendations of Mrs. K. Pushpa about extending the services of three temporary library assistants (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.149: Certified copy of Office Order dt. 23.05.1997 of Cdr. K.K. Varma to Shri. M. Dhanunjaya Naidu (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.150: Certified copy of letter dt. 26.05.1997 of Cdr. K.K. Varma to Shri M. Dhanunjaya Naidu (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.151: Joining report dt. 26.05.1997 of Shri. M. Dhanunjaya Naidu(1 Sheet)

Ex.P.152: Note dt. 07.08.1997 of Mrs. K. Pushpa, Senior Librarian to Shri S.E. Sridharan recommending to extend the services of S/Shri Ramanjaneya Reddy, V. Sanyasi Naidu and M. Dhanunjaya Naidu for a period of three months (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.153: Note dt. 8.8.1997 of Shri A. Ramesh Kumar to Shri P. Sambandan (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.154: Certified copy of letter dt.22.08.1997 of Shri A. Ramesh Kumar to Shri M. Dhanunjaya Naidu (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.155: Application dated.21.10.97 of Shri P.S.N.Murthy along with enclousers (8 Sheets)

Ex.P.156: Letter dt.27.10.97 of Shri A. Ramesh Kumar, PAO cum Secretary to Shri PSN Murhty (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.157: Joining Report dt.5.11.1997 of Shri PSN Murthy (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.158: Note Dt. 1.5.1998 of Shri A. Ramesh Kumar, Head Personnel and Administration to Shri P. Sambandan (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.159: Certified copy of letter dt. 5.5.98 of Shri A. Ramesh Kumar, PAO cum Secretary to Shri PSN Murhty (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.160: Joining Report dt. 5.5.1998 of Shri PSN Murthy (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.161: Certified copy of call-letter dt.11.08.1998 of Shri A. Ramesh Kumar, PAO to Shri PSN Murthy (1 Sheet) 33C.C.7/2007/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.162: Certified copy of letter dt.1.9.1998 of Shri A.Ramesh Kumar to Shri PSN Murthy (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.163: Joining Report dt.01.9.1998 of Shri PSN Murthy (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.164: Letter dt.4.9.2003 of Shri PSN Murthy ( 1 Sheet)

Ex.P.165: Fax application dt.23.10.97 of Shri Ajit Nair (3 Sheets)

Ex.P.166: Letter dt.27.10.97 of Shri A. Ramesh Kumar, Head Personnel & Administration to Shri Aji Nair (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.167: Joining report dt.10.11.1997 of Shri Ajit Nair (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.168: Letter dt. 12.5.1998 of Shri A. Ramesh Kumar, PAO cum Secretary to Sri Ajit Nair (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.169: Joining Report dt.12.5.1998 of Shri Ajit Nair (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.170: Certified copy of call-letter dt.11.8.1998 of Shri A Ramesh

Kumar, PAO to Shri Ajit Nair (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.171: Certified copy of letter dt.1.9.1998 of Shri A. Ramesh Kumar to Shri Aji Nair (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.172: Joining Report dt.1.9.1998 of Shri Ajit Nair (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.173: Certified copy of letter dt.1.11.2001 of Shri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Shri Ajit Nair (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.174: Joining Report dt.1.1.2001 of S hri Ajit Nair (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.175: Letter dt.7.3.2002 of Shri Ajit Nair (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.176: Application dt.13.11.97 of Shri Litty Dani Cherian along with enclousers (8 Sheets)

Ex.P.177: Certified copy of letter dt.19.11.1997 of Shri A.Ramesh Kumar, HPA to Shri Litty Dani Cherian (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.178: Joining Report dt.1.12.1997 of Shri Litty Dani Cherian (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.179: Letter dt.1.6.1998 of Shri A.Ramesh Kumar to Shri Litty Dani Cherian (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.180: Joining Report dt.1.6.1998 of Shri Litty Dani Cherian (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.181: Certified copy of call-letter dt.11.8.1998 of Shri A Ramesh Kumar, Secretary & HPA to Shri Litty Dani Cherian (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.182: Certified copy of letter dt.1.9.1998 of Shri A. Ramesh Kumar, PAO cum cum Secretary to Shri Litty Dani Cherian (2 Sheet) 34C.C.7/2007/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.183: Joining Report dt.1.9.1998 of Shri Litty Dani Cherian (1 Sheet) ( Page 21)

Ex.P.184: Letter dt.23.5.1999 of Shri Litty Dani Cherian (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.185: Application dt.15.11.1997 of Shri G.Vijay Anand along with enclousers (20 Sheets)

Ex.P.186: Letter dt.24.11.1997 of Shri A. Ramesh Kumar, HPA to Shri G.Vijay Anand (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.187: Joining report dt.1.12.1997 of Shri G. Vijay Anand (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.188: Letter dt.20.02.1998 of Shri G. Vijay Anand to Shri P. Sambandan requesting to relieve him (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.189: Letter dt.23.10.1999 of Shri G. Vijay Anand to Shri P. Sambandan intimating his availability for joining in NSDRC w.e.f. 1.11.1999 and requested for re-instatement as Chief Manager (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.190:Certified copy of letter dt.1.11.1999 of Shri B. Satyanarayana, Head Personnel & Administration to Sri. G. Vijay Anand (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.191: Joining Report dt.1.11.1999 of Shri G. Vijay Anand (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.192: Certified copy of letter dt.1.10.2001 of Shri V.V. Shiv Kumar,HPT to Shri G. Vijay Anand (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.194: Letter dt.12.6.2003 of Shri G. Vijay Anand (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.195: Application dt.7.11.97 of Shri Sanal B Nair along with enclousers (11 Sheets)

Ex.P.196: Certified copy of letter dt.19.11.97 of Shri A. Ramesh Kumar, HPA to Shri Sanal B. Nair (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.197: Joining report dt.1.12.1997 of Shri Sanal B. Nair (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.198: Letter dt.1.6.1998 of Shri A. Ramesh Kumar, HPA to Shri Sanal B Nair (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.199: Joining report dt. 1.6.1998 of Shri Sanal B. Nair (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.200: Certified copy of letter call-letter dt.11.8.1998 of Shri A Ramesh Kumar, Secretary & HPA to Shri Sanal B. Nair (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.201: Certified copy of letter dt.1.9.1998 of Shri A. Ramesh Kumar to Shri Sanal B. Nair (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.202: Joining Report dt. 1.9.1998 of Shri Sanal B. Nair (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.203:Certified copy of letter dt.18.3.2002 of Shri V.V. Shiv Kumar, HPT to Shri Sanal B. Nair (2 Sheets) 35C.C.7/2007/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.204: Joining Report dt. 18.3.2002 of Shri Sanal B. Nair (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.205: Certified copy of letter dt.27.6.2002 of Shri Sanal B. Nair (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.206: Application dt.5.11.1997 of Ms. Prabha V. Dilok along with enclousers (3 Sheets)

Ex.P.207: Certified copy of letter dt. 20.11.1997 of Shri A. Ramesh Kumar, Head pers. & Admin. To Ms. Prabha V. Dilok (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.208: Joining report dt. 15.12.1997 of Ms. Prabha V Dilok. (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.209: Note dt. 9.6.1998 of Shri. A. Ramesh Kumar, HPA to Shri P. Sambandan (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.210:Letter dt. 15.06.1998 of Shri A. Ramesh Kumar to Ms. Prabha V Dilok (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.211: Joining Report dt. 15.06.1998 of Ms. Prabha V. Dilok (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.212: Certified copy of call-letter dt. 11.08.1998 of Shri A Ramesh Kumar, PAO to Ms. Prabha V Dilok (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.213: Letter dt. 01.9.1998 of Shri A. Ramesh Kumar, Secretary-cum Head Pers. & Admin to Ms. Prabha V Dilok (2 sheets)

Ex.P.214: Joining Report dt. 1.9.1998 of Ms. Prabha V Dilok (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.215: Letter dt. 1.10.2001 of Shri V.V. Shiv Kumar, HPT to Ms. Prabha V. Dilok (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.216: Joining Report of dt. 01.10.2001 of Ms. Prabha V. Dilok (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.217: Certified copy of application dt. 16.12.1997 of Mrs. T.S. Renjana along with enclousers ( 6 Sheets)

Ex.P.218: Certified copy of letter dt. 19.12.1997 issued by shri V.V. Shiv Kumar, Jr. Personnel Officer on behalf of Shri A. Ramesh Kumar, Head Personnel & Administration to Mrs. T.S. Renjana (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.219: Certified copy of joining report dt. 1.1.1998 of Ms. T.S. Renjana (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.220: Certified copy of letter dt. 1.7.1998 of Shri. A. Ramesh Kumar to Ms. T.S. Renjana (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.221: Certified copy of joining report dt. 01.7.1998 of Ms. T.S. Renjana (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.222: Certified copy of call-letter dt. 11.8.1998 of Shri A. Ramesh Kumar, PAO to Ms. T.S. Renjana (1 Sheet) 36C.C.7/2007/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.223: Certified copy of letter dt. 1.9.1998 of Shri A.Ramesh Kumar, Secretary-cum Head Pers. & Admin to Ms. T.S. Renjana (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.224: Certified copy of joining report dt. 1.9.1998 of Ms. T.S. Renjana (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.225: Certified copy of NSDRC advertisement in The Hindu dt. 21.2.2001 (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.226: Application dt. 23.02.2001 of Ms. T.S. Renjana (6 Sheets)

Ex.P.227: Certified copy of call-letter dt. 9.7.2001 of Shri V.V. Shiv Kumar, HPT to Ms. T.S. Renjana (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.228: Certified copy of call-letter dt 23.7.2001 of Shri V.V. Shiv Kumar, HPT to Ms. T.S. Renjana (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.229: Certified copy of letter dt. 27.8.2001 of Shri V.V. Shiv Kumar, HPT to Ms. T.S. Renjana ( 2 Sheets)

Ex.P.230: Certified copy of joining report dt. 29.8.2001 of Ms. T.S. Renjana (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.231: Certified copy of letter dt. 1.10.2001 of Shri V.V. Shiv Kumar, HPT to Ms. T.S. Renjana (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.232: Certified copy of joining report of Ms. T.S. Renjana (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.233: Certified copy of letter dt. 20.1.2004 of Ms. T.S. Renjana (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.234: Application dt. Nil of Shri Syed Anwar (4 Sheet)

Ex.P.235: Letter dt. 13.2.1998 of Shri A. Ramesh Kumar, Head Personnel & Administration to Shri Syed Anwar (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.236: Joining Report dt. 16.2.1998 of Shri Syed Anwar (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.237: Note dt. 13.5.1998 of Shri A. Ramesh Kumar to Shri P. Sambandan (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.238: Letter dt. 19.5.1998 of Shri A. Ramesh Kumar to Shri Syed Anwar (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.239: Joining Report dt. 19.5.1998 of Shri Syed anwar (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.240: Note dt. 17.8.1998 of Shri A. Ramesh Kumar to Shri P. Sambandan (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.241: Certified copy of letter dated 24.8.1998 of Shri A. Ramesh Kumar to Shri Syed Anwar (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.242: Joining report dt. 24.8.1998 of Shri Syed Anwar (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.243: Certified note dt. 5.11.1998 of Shri A. Ramesh Kumar to Shri P.Sambandan (1 Sheet) 37C.C.7/2007/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.244: Letter dt/ 27.11.1998 of Shri A. Ramesh Kumar to Shri Syed Anwar (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.245: Joining report dt. 27.11.1998 of Shri Syed Anwar (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.246: Note dt. 2.2.1999 of Shri A. Ramesh Kumar to Shri P. Sambandan (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.247: Certified cpy of letter dt. 2.3.1999 of Shri B. Satyanarayana, Head Personnel & Administration to Shri Syed Anwar (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.248: Joining report dt. 2.3.1999 of Shri B. Satyanarayana to Shri Syed Anwar (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.249: Letter dt. 5.4.1999 of Shri B. Satyanarayana to Shri Syed Anwar (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.250: Application dt. Nil of Shri T.D. Jones along with enclousers (9 Sheets)

Ex.P.251: Letter dt. 19.2.1998 of Shri A. Ramesh Kumar, HPA to Shri T.D. Jones (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.252: Joining report dt. 23.2.1998 of Shri T.D. Jones (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.253: Note dt. 13.5.1998 of Shri S.E. Sridharan, Head, Computer Services to Shri A. Ramesh Kumar requesting for Shri T.D. Jones extension of service for a period of three months. Shri A. Ramesh Kumar recommended (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.254: Letter dt. 26.5.1998 of Shri A. Ramesh Kumar to Shri T.D. Jones (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.255: Joining Report dt. 26.5.1998 of Shri TD Jones (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.256: Copy of note dt. 13.8.1998 of Shri S.E. Sridharan, Head Computer Services requested Shri P. Sambandan through Shri A. Ramesh Kumar, for extension of services of Shri T.D.Jones. Shri A. Ramesh Kumar recommeded for three months extension. (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.257: Letter dt. 31.8.1998 of Shri A. Ramesh Kumar, Secretary-cum-Head Personnel & Administration to Shri T.D. Jones (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.258: Joining report dt. 31.8.1998 of Shri T.D. Jones (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.259: Certified copy of letter dt. 4.12.1998 of Shri A. Ramesh Kumar,Secretary-cum-HeadPersonnel& Administration to Shri T.D. Jones (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.260: Joining report dt. 4.12.1998 of Shri T.D. Jones (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.261: Note dt. 25.2.1999 of Shri S.E. Sridharan, Head Computer Services to Shri P. Sambandan requesting for extension of services of Shri T.D. Jones for a longer period (1 Sheet) 38C.C.7/2007/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.262:Certified copy of letter dt. 8.3.1999 of Shri B. Satyanarayana, Head Personnel & Administration to Shri T.D. Jones (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.263: Joining report dt. 8.3.1999 of Shri T.D. Jones (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.264: Note dt. 12.5.1999 of Shri S.E. Sridharan, Head Computer Services to Shri P. Sambandan requesting for extension of services of Shri T.D. Jones for a further period (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.265: Certified copy of letter dt. 11.6.1999 of Shri B. Satyanarayana, Head Personnel & Administration to Shri T.D. Jones (2 Sheet)

Ex.P.266: Joining report dt. 11.6.1999 of Shri T.D. Jones (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.267: Order dt. 4/11 of Shri P. Sambandan (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.268: Letter dt. 11.11.1999 of Shri B. Satyanarayana, Head Personnel & Administration to Shri T.D. Jones (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.269: Joining report dt. 11.11.1999 of Shri T.D. Jones (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.270: Note dt. 8.5.2000 of Shri B. Satyanarayana, Head Personnel & Administration to Shri S.E. Sridharan, Head Computer Services requesting for recommendations for extension of Shri T.D. Jones services (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.271: Certified copy of letter dt. 10.5.2000 of Shri B. Satyanarayana, Head Personnel & Administration to Shri T.D. Jones (1 folio)

Ex.P.272: Joining report dt. 11.5.2000 of Shri T.D. Jones (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.273: Note dt. 18.10.2000 of Shri V. Krishna Mohan, Senior Assistant to Shri V.V. Shiv Kumar, HPT (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.274: Certified copy of letter dt. 13.11.2000 of Shri V.V. Shiv Kumar, HPT Shri T.D. Jones services (2 Sheet)

Ex.P.275: Joining report dt. 13.11.2000 of Shri T.D. Jones (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.276: Certified copy of letter dt. 29.12.2000 of Shri V.V. Shiv Kumar, HPT Shri T.D. Jones services (2 Sheet)

Ex.P.277: Joining report dt. 1.1.2001 of Shri T.D. Jones (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.278: Certified copy of letter dt. 1.10.2001 of Shri V.V. Shiv Kumar, HPT Shri T.D. Jones services (2 Sheet)

Ex.P.279: Joining report dt. 1.1.2001 of Shri T.D. Jones (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.280: Letter dt. 16.3.2004 of Shri T.D. Jones (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.281: Application dt. 1.4.1998 of Shri K.V. Rama Rao along with enclosures (7 Sheet) 39C.C.7/2007/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.282: Letter dt. 3.4.1998 of Shri A. Ramesh Kumar, Head Pers. & Admin. To shri K.V. Rama Rao (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.283: Joining report dt. 6.4.1998 of Shri K.V. Rama Rao, (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.284: Note dt. 24.9.1998 of Shri A. Ramesh Kumar, HPA to Shri P. Sambandan (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.285: Letter dt. 9.10.1998 of Shri A. Ramesh Kumar, HPA to Shri K.V. Rama Rao, (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.286: Certified copy of joining report dt. 9.10.1998 of Shri K.V. Rama Rao (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.287: Order dt. 26/3 of Shri. P. Sambandan (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.288: Certified copy of letter dt. 30.3.1999 of Shri B. Satyanarayana, HPA to Shri KV Rama Rao (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.289: Joining report dt. 1.4.1998 of Shri K.V. Rama Rao, (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.290: Certified copy of letter dt. 1.10.1999 of Shri B. Satyanarayana, HPA to Shri KV Rama Rao (2 Sheet)

Ex.P.291: Certified copy of letter dt. 1.10.1999 of Shri K.V. Rama Rao, (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.292: Order dt.26/11 of Shri. P. Sambandan (1 Sheet) (back page of D-291)

Ex.P.293: Letter dt. 1.12.1999 of Shri B. Satyanarayana, HPA to K.V. Rama Rao (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.294: Joining report dt.1.12.1999 of Shri K.V.Rama Rao, (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.295: Letter dt. 24.5.2000 of Shri K.V. Rama Rao to Shri P. Sambanadan (1 Sheets)

Ex.P.296: Letter dt. 1.6.2000 of Shri B. Satyanarayana, HPA to K.V. Rama Rao (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.297: Joining report dt. 1.6.2000 of Shri K.V. Rama Rao, (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.298: Letter dt. 11.7.2000 of Shri B. Satyanarayana, HPA to K.V. Rama Rao (1 Sheets)

Ex.P.299: Letter dt. 10.8.2000 of Shri K.V. Rama Rao to Shri P. Sambanadan (1 Sheets)

Ex.P.300: Certified copy of letter dt. 29.12.2000 of Shri V.V. Shiv Kumar, HPT to Shri K.V. Rama Rao (2 Sheet)

Ex.P.301: Joining report dt. 1.1.2001 of Shri K.V. Rama Rao, (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.302: Certified copy of letter dt. 1.10.2001 of Shri V.V. Shiv Kumar, HPT to Shri K.V. Rama Rao (2 Sheet)

Ex.P.303: Joining report dt. 1.10.2001 of Shri K.V. Rama Rao, (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.304L Application dt. 11.2.1998 addressed to no one (3 Sheets) 40C.C.7/2007/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.305: Letter dt. 1.4.1998 of Shri A. Ramesh Kumar to Shri M. Surya Prakasa Raju (1 Sheets)

Ex.P.306: Order dt. 6/4 of Shri P. Sambandan (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.307: Letter dt. 7.4.1998 of Shri A. Ramesh Kumar to Shri M. Surya Prakasa Raju (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.308: Joining report dt. 7.4.1998 of Shri M. Surya Prakasa Raju (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.309: Letter dt. 6.6.1998 of Shri M. Surya Prakasa Raju (1 Sheets)

Ex.P.310: Application dt. 13.12.1997 of Miss Khadarunnisa (4 Sheets)

Ex.P.311: Letter dt. 1.4.1998 of Shri A. Ramesh Kumar, HPA to Miss Khadarunnisa (1 Sheets)

Ex.P.312: Order dt. 6/4 of Shri P. Sambandan (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.313: Letter dt.7.4.1998 of Shri A. Ramesh Kumar, Head Personnel & Administration to Miss Khadarunnisa (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.314: Joining report dt. 7.4.1998 of Miss Khadarunnisa (1 Sheets)

Ex.P.315: Certified copy of call-letter dt. 11.8.1998 of Shri A. Ramesh Kumar, PAO to Miss Khadarunnisa (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.316: Certified copy of letter dt. 1.9.1998 of Shri A. Ramesh Kumar, PAO to Miss Khadarunnisa (2 Sheet)

Ex.P.317: Joining report dt. 1.9.1998 of Miss Khadarunnisa (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.318: Certified copy of letter dt. 18.9.2003 of Miss Khadarunnisa (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.319: Application dt. 13.4.1998 of Mr. J. Suneela (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.320: Certified copy of letter dt. 13.4.1998 of Shri V.V.Shiv Kumar, Junior Personnel Officer, on behalf of Shri A. Ramesh Kumar, HPA to Ms. J. Suneel (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.321: Joining report dt. 22.4.1998 of Ms. J. Suneela (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.322: Certified copy of note dt. 24.9.1998 of Shri A. Ramesh Kumar, to Shri P. Sambandan (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.323: Certified copy of letter dt. 26.10.1998 of Shri A. Ramesh Kumar, to Ms. J. Suneela (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.324: Certified copy of joining report dt. 26.10.1998 of Ms. J. Suneela (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.325: Order dt. 26/3 of Shri P.Sambandan (1 Sheet) (back page of D-324)

Ex.P.326:Certified copy of letter dt. 26.3.1999 of Shri B. Satyanarayana, Head Personnel & Administration (1 Sheet) 41C.C.7/2007/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.327: Application dt. 24.3.1998 of Shri Avinash L. Chary. Cdr. K.K. Varma recommended for Shri Avinash L Chary’s appointment (6 Sheets)

Ex.P.328: Letter dt. 2.4.1998 of Shri A. Ramesh Kumar to Shri Avinash L.Chary (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.329: Joining report dt. 27.4.1998 of Shri Avinash L. Chary (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.330: Certified copy of call-letter dt. 11.8.1999 of Shri A. Ramesh Kumar, PAO to Avinash L Chary (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.331: Certified copy of letter dt. 1.9.1998 of Shri A. Ramesh Kumar, Secretary-cum Head Pers. & Admin. To Shri Avinash L Chary (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.332: Joining report dt. 7.9.1998 of Shri Avinash L. Chary (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.333: Certified copy of letter dt. 1.10.2001 of Shri V.V. Shiv Kumar, HPT to Shri Avinash L Chary (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.334: Joining report dt. 1.10.2001 of Shri Avinash L. Chary (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.335: Application dt. 25.4.1998 of Shri B.S. Jagadamba (5 Sheets)

Ex.P.336: Letter dt. 27.4.1998 of Shri A. Ramesh Kumar, HPA to Mrs. B.S. Jagadamba (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.337: Joining report dt. 28.4.1998 of Mrs. B.S. Jagadamba (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.338: Certified copy of letter dt. 2.11.1998 of Shri A. Ramesh Kumar, HPA to Mrs. B.S. Jagadamba (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.339: Joining report dt. 2.11.1998 of Mrs. B.S. Jagadamba (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.340: Letter dt. 5.4.1999 of Shri B. Satyanarayana, HPA to Mrs. B.S. Jagadamba (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.341: Certified copy of note dt. 25.9.2000 of Shri V.Krishna Mohan, Senior Assistant to Shri V..V. Shiv Kumar, HPT (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.342: Letter dt. 16.10.2000 of Shri V.V. Shiv Kumar, HPT to Mr. B.S. Jagadamba (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.343: Joining report dt. 16.10.2000 of Mr. B.S. Jagadamba (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.344: Certified copy of letter dt. 29.12.2000 of Shri V.V. Shiv Kumar, HPT to Mr. B.S. Jagadamba (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.345: Joining report dt. 1.1.2001 of Mr. B.S. Jagadamba (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.346: Letter dt. 1.7.2004 of Mrs.B.S.Jagadamba to Shri P. Sambandan (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.347: Certified copy of letter dt. 30.9.2004 of Shri V.V. Shiv Kumar, HPT to Mrs. B.S. Jagadamba (2 Sheets) 42C.C.7/2007/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.348: Joining report dt.1.10.2004 of Mrs.B.S.Jagadamba (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.349: Application dt. 29.4.1998 of Shri Cdr. V.V. Rao in response to the advertisement in The Hindu dt. 15.4.1998 for the post of Officer-Naval Architect. Cdr. K.K. Varma recommended for Cdr V.V. Rao’s appointment (14 Sheets)

Ex.P.350: Letter dt. 30.4.1998 issued by Shri a. Ramesh Kumar, HPA to Cdr. V.V. Rao (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.351: Joining report dt. 1.5.1998 of Cdr. V.V. Rao (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.352: Certified copy of call-letter dt. 11.8.1998 of Shri A. Ramesh Kumar, Secretary & HPA to Cdr. V.V. Rao (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.353: Letter dt. 1.9.1998 of Shri A. Ramesh Kumar, Secretary & HPA to Cdr. V.V. Rao (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.354: Joining Report dt. 1.9.1998 of Cdr. V.V. Rao (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.355: Letter dt. 7.6.2000 of Cdr. V.V. Rao (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.356: Application dt. Nil of Shri Mohammed Abbas K.M. along with enclousers (4 Sheets)

Ex.P.357: Letter dt. 5.8.1998 of Shri A. Ramesh Kumar, Secretary & Head Personnel & Administration to Shri Mohammed Abbas KM (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.358: Joining Report dt. 5.8.1998 of Shri Mohammad Abbas KM (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.359: Note dt. 2.2.1999 of Shri A. Ramesh Kumar, HPA to Shri P. Sambandan seeking advice as Shri Mohammed Abbas tenure expires on 4.2.1999 and sought advise (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.360: Certified copy of letter dt. 5.2.1999 of Shri A. Ramesh Kumar to Shri Mohammed Abbas (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.361: Joining report dt. 5.2.1999 of Shri KMM Abbas (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.362: Note dt. 3.8.1999 of Shri B. Satyanaraya, HPA to Shri P. Sambandan that Shri Mohammed Abbas tenure will be expiring on 4.8.1999 and requested for approval to extend the period of appointment for another six months w.e.f. 5.8.1999 (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.363:Certified copy of letter dt. 5.8.1999 of Shri B. Satyanarayana, HPA to Shri Mohammed Abbas (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.364: Joining report dt. 5.8.1999 of Shri Mohammed Abbas KM(1 Sheet)

Ex.P.365: Letter dt. 31.1.2000 of Shri Mohammed Abbas requesting for extension of his services (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.366:Certified copy of letter dt. 4.2.2000 of Shri B. Satyanarayana, HPA to Shri Mohammed Abbas (2 Sheets) 43C.C.7/2007/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.367: Joining report dt. 7.2.2000 of Shri Mohammed Abbas KM (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.368: Note dt. 26.7.2000 of Shri B. Satyanaraya, HPA requested for approval for extending the period of appointment of Shri Abbas for another six months w.e.f. 7.8.2000 (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.369: Letter dt. 31.7.2000 of Shri V. Krishna Mohan, Senior Assistant to Shri Mohammed Abbas on behalf of Shri B. Satyanarayana, HPA (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.370: Joining report dt. 7.8.2000 of Shri Mohammed Abbas KM (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.371: Certified copy of letter dt. 29.12.2000 of Shri V.V. Shiv Kumar, HPT to Shri Mohammed Abbas KM (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.372: Joining report dt. 1.1.2001 of Shri Mohammed Abbas KM (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.373: Letter dt. 11.10.2002 of Shri Mohammed Abbas KM (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.374:Application dt. 21.8.1998 of Shri S.Venkanna Babu addressed to no one (4 Sheets)

Ex.P.375: Certified copy of letter dt. 21.9.1998 of Shri A.Ramesh Kumar, Secretary-cum-Head Personnel & Administration to Shri S. Venkanna Babu (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.376: Letter dt. 24.9.1998 of Shri Venkanna Babu to Shri A. Ramesh Kumar (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.377: Certified copy of letter dt. 28.9.1998 of Shri A. Ramesh Kumar, to Shri S. Venkanna Babu (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.378 : Certified copy of joining report dt. 7.10.1998 of Shri S. Venkanna Babu (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.379: Order dt. 26/3 of Shri P. Sambandan (1 Sheet) (back side of D-378)

Ex.P.380: Certified copy of letter dt. 30.03.1999 of Shri B. Satyanarayana, Head Personnel & Administration to Shri Venkanna Babu (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.381: Joining report dt. 1.4.1999 of Shri S. Venkanna Babu (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.382: Certified copy of letter dt. 1.10.1999 of Shri B. Satyanarayana to Shri Venkanna Babu (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.383: Certified copy of joining report dt. 1.10.1999 of Shri S. Venkanna Babu (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.384: Order dt. 26/11 of Shri P. Sambandan (1 Sheet) (back page of D-383) 44C.C.7/2007/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.385: Letter dt. 1.12.1999 of Shri B. Satyanarayana, Head Personnel & Administration to Shri Venkanna Babu (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.386: Joining report dt. 1.12.1999 of Shri S. Venkanna Babu (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.387: Note dt. 27.12.1999 of Shri B. Satyanaraya, to Cdr. K.K. Varma, General Manager (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.388:Certified copy of letter dt.28.12.1999 of Sri B.Satyanarayana to Sri Venkanna Babu (1 sheet)

Ex.P.389:Letter dt.4.1.2000 of Sri Venkanna Babu to Sri P.Sambandan (1 sheet).

Ex.P.390:Note dt.5.1.2000 o f Sri B.Satyanarayana to Cdr.Varma (1 sheet)

Ex.P.391:Letter dt.18.1.2000 Sri Venkanna Babu to Sri P.Sambandan (2 sheets)

Ex.P.392: Note dt.24.1.2000 of Sri B.Satyanarayana to Cdr.Varma General Manager (1 sheet)

Ex.P.393: Certified copy of letter dt.27.1.2000 of Sri B.Satyanarayana to Sri S.Venkanna Babu (2 sheets)

Ex.P.394: Joining report dt.27.1.2000 of Sri Venkanna Babu (1 sheet)

Ex.P.395:Letterdt.21.3.2000ofSriB.Satyanarayanato Sri S.Venkanna Babu (1 sheet)

Ex.P.396: Application dt.23.10.1998 of Sri JBPP Prasad (7 sheets)

Ex.P.397: Certified copy of letter dt.27.10.1998 of Sri A.Ramesh Kumar to Sri JBPP Prasad (1 sheet).

Ex.P.398: Joining report dt.2.11.1998 of Sri JBPP Prasad.

Ex.P.399: Order dt.3/5 of Shri P.Sambandan (1 sheet)

Ex.P.400: Certified copy of letter dt.3.5.1999 of Sri B.Satyanarayana to Sri JBPP Prasad (1 sheet)

Ex.P.401: Application dt.9.11.1998 of Shri D.Apparao (7 sheets)

Ex.P.402:Order dt.9/1 of Sri P.Sambandan.(1 sheet)

Ex.P.403:Certified copy of letter dt.9.11.19998 of Sri A.Ramesh Kumar, Secretary-cum- Head Personnel & Administration to Sri D.Apparao (1 sheet).

Ex.P.404: Joining report dt.9.11.1998 of Sri D.Apparao.(1 sheet)

Ex.P.405: Letter dt.5.4.1999 of Sri B.Satyanarayana, Head Personnel & Administration to Sri D.Apparao. (1 sheet)

Ex.P.406: Application dt.5.11.1998 of Sri K.Srinivas. (4 sheets) 45C.C.7/2007/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.407: Certified copy of letter dt.6.11.1998 of Sri A.Ramesh Kumar, Secretary-cum-Head Personnel & Administration to Sri K.Srinivas. (1 sheet)

Ex.P.408: Joining report dt.23.11.1998 of Sri K.Srinivas. (1 sheet)

Ex.P.409: Order dt.31/3 of Shri P.Sambandan. (1 sheet)

Ex.P.410:Letter dt.26.5.1999 of Sri B.Satyanarrayana, Head Personnel & Administration to Sri K.Srinivas. (1 sheet)

Ex.P.411: Joining report dt.26.5.1999 of Sri K.Srinivas. (1 sheet)

Ex.P.412: Letter dt.25.8.1999 to Sri K.Srinivas. (1 sheet)

Ex.P.413: Application dt.15.12.1998 of Sri N.S.Venkateswara Rao along with enclosures. (6 sheets)

Ex.P.414: Certified copy of letter dt.17.12.1998 of Sri A.Ramesh Kumar, Secretary cum Head Personnel & Administration to Sri NS Venkateswara Rao (1 sheet)

Ex.P.415: Joining report dt.17.12.1998 of Sri NS Venkateswara Rao. (1 sheet)

Ex.P.416: Certified copy of letter dt.5.4.1999 of Sri B.Satyanarayana, Head Personnel & Administration to Sri N.S.Venkateswara Rao (1 sheet)

Ex.P.417: Letter dt.16.10.2000 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri NS Venkatekswara Rao, (2 sheets)

Ex.P.418: Joining report dt. 16.10.2000 of Shri N.S. Venkateswara Rao (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.419: Certified copy of letter dt. 29.12.2000 of Shri V.V. Shiv Kumar, HPT to Shri NS Venkateswara Rao (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.420: Joining report dt. 1.1.2001 of Shri N.S. Venkateswara Rao (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.421: Letter dt. 1.7.2004 of Shri N.S. Venkateswara Rao to Shri P. sambandan (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.422: Certified copy of letter dt. 30.09.2004 of Shri V.V. Shiv Kumar,HPT to Shri NS Venkateswara Rao (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.423: Joining report dt. 1.10.2004 of Shri N.S. Venkateswara Rao (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.424: Application dt. 15.12.1998 of Sri K.Srinivas Reddy along with enclousers (13 sheets)

Ex.P.425: Certified copy of letter dt. 17.12.1998 of Shri A. Ramesh Kumar, Secretary cum head Personnell & Administration to Shri K. Srinivasa Reddy (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.426: Joining report dt. 21.12.1998 of Shri K. Srinivasa Reddy (1 Sheet) 46C.C.7/2007/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.427: Note dt. 18.6.1999 of Shri B. Satyanaraya, HPA to Cdr. K.K. Varma, General Manger for extension of services of Shri K. Srinivasa Reddy (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.428: Letter dt. 24.6.1999 of Shri B. Satyanarayana to Shri K. Srinivasa Reddy (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.429: Joining report dt. 24.06.1999 of Shri K. Srinivasa Reddy (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.430: Letter dt. 15.12.1999 of Shri K. Srinivasa Reddy to Shri P. Sambandan (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.431: Certified copy of letter dt. 24.12.1999 of Shri B. Satyanarayana to Shri K. Srinivasa Reddy (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.432: Joining report dt. 17.1.2000 of Shri K. Srinivasa Reddy (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.433: Letter dt. 15.12.1999 of Shri K. Srinivasa Reddy to Shri P. Sambandan (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.434: Application dt. 29.5.2001 of Shri K. Srinivasa Reddy (4 Sheets)

Ex.P.435: Certified copy of letter dt. 29.5.2001 of Shri V.V. Shiv Kumar, HPT to Shri K. Srinivasa Reddy (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.436: Joining report of Shri K. Srinivasa Reddy (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.437: Certified copy of letter dt.1.10.2001 of Shri V.V. Shiv Kumar, HPT to Shri K. Srinivasa Reddy (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.438: Joining report dt. 1.10.2001 of Shri K. Srinivasa Reddy (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.439: Application dt. 27.11.1998 of Shri CS. Prasanna Kumar addressed to no one (3 Sheets)

Ex.P.440: Certified copy of letter dt. 5.1.1999 of Shri A. Ramesh Kumar,Secretary-cum-Headpersonnel& Administration to Shri CS. Prasanna Kumar (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.441: Joining report dt. 5.1.1999 of Shri C.S. Prasanna Kumar (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.442: Note dt. 29.6.1999 of Shri B. Satyanaraya, Head Personnel Administration to Cdr. K.K. Varma, General Manger (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.443: Certified copy of letter dt. 7.7.1999 of Shri B. Satyanarayana, to Shri CS. Prasanna Kumar (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.444: Joining report dt. 8.7.1999 of Shri C.S. Prasanna Kumar (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.445: Letter dt. 3.1.2000 of Shri C.S. Prasanna Kumar to Shri P. Sambandan (1 Sheet) 47C.C.7/2007/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.446: Note dt. 3.1.2000 of Shri B. Satyanaraya, to Shri. P. Rama Rao, Advisor (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.447: Certified copy of letter dt. 10.1.2000 of Shri B. Satyanarayana, to Shri CS. Prasanna Kumar (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.448: Joining report dt. 10.1.2000 of Shri C.S. Prasanna Kumar (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.449: Letter dt. 29.6.2000 of Shri C.S. Prasanna Kumar (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.450: Application dt. 09.1.1998 of Shri S. Lakshmana Rao (3 Sheets)

Ex.P.451: Certified copy of letter dt. 12.1.1999 of Shri A. Ramesh Kumar, Secretary-cum Head Personnel & Administration to Shri S. Lakshmana Rao (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.452: Joining report dt. 12.1.1999 of Shri S. Lakshmana Rao (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.453: Certified copy of letter dt.5.4.1999 of Sri B.Satyanarrayana, Head Personnel & Administration to Sri S.Lakshmana Rao.(1 Sheet)

Ex.P.454:Application dt.nil of Sri K.V.S.Rama Raju along with enclosures (14 Sheets)

Ex.P.455:Certified copy of letter dt.12.1.1999 of Sri A.Ramesh Kumar to Sri K.V.S.Rama Raju(1 Sheet).

Ex.P.456:Joining report dt.27.1.1999 of Sri KVS Rama Raju.(1 Sheet)

Ex.P.457:Certified copy of letter dt.5.4.1999 of Sri B.Satyanarayana to Sri KVS Rama Raju (1 Sheet).

Ex.P.458:Application dt.12.1.1999 of Sri D.Kamalasekaram (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.459: Certified copy of letter dt.28.1.1999 of Sri A.Ramesh Kumar, Secretary cum Head Personnel &Administration to SriD.Kamalasekaram (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.460:Joining report dt.28.1.1999 of Sri D.Kamalasekaram.(1 Sheet)

Ex.P.461: Letter dt.22.4.1999 of Sri D.Kamalasekaram(1 Sheet)

Ex.P.462:Certified copy of application dt.29.1.199 of Sri P.Raja Sekhar. (3 Sheet)

Ex.P.463:Certified copy of letter dt.16.2.1999 of Sri B.Satyanaryana, HPA to Sri P.Rajasekhar.(1 Sheet)

Ex.P.464:Certified copy of joining report dt.18.2.1999 of Sri P.Raja Sekhar (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.465:Certified copy of letter dt.11.6.1999 of Sri B.Satyanarayana, HPA to Sri P.Raja Sekhar informing that his temporary appointment expires on 17.8.1999.(1 Sheet) 48C.C.7/2007/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.466:Certified copy of letter dt.18.8.1999 of Sri B.Satyanarayana HPA to Sri P.Raja Sekhar (2 Sheet)

Ex.P.467:Certified copy of joining report dt.18.8.1999 of Sri P.Raja Sekhar(1 Sheet)

Ex.P.468:Certified note dt.4.2.2000 of Sri B.Satyanarayana, HPA to Sri S.E.Sridharan, Head computer service. (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.469:Certified copy of letter dt.18.2.2000 of Sri B.Satyanarayana, HPA to Sri P.Raja Sekhar (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.470:Certified copy of joining report dt.18.2.2000 of Sri P.Raja Sekhar (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.471:Certified copy of note dt.17.8.2000 of Sri V.Krishna Mohan, Senior Assistant on behalf of Sri B.Satyanarayana, HPA to Sri S.E.Sridharan, Head Computer Services (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.472:Certified copy of letter dt.18.8.2000 of Sri B.Satyanarayana, HPA to Sri P.Raja Sekhar.(2 Sheets)

Ex.P.473:Certified copy of joining report dt.18.8.2000 of Sri P.Raja Sekhar (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.474:Certified copy of letter dt.29.12.2000 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri P.Rajasekhar.(2 Sheets)

Ex.P.475:Certified copy of joining report dt.1.1.2001 of Sri P.Rajasekhar (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.476:Certified copy of letter dt.1.10.2001 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri P.Rajasekhar(2 Sheets)

Ex.P.477:Certified copy of joining report dt.1.10.2001 of Sri P.Rajasekhar (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.478:Letter dt.5.1.2005 of Sri P.RajasekharCertified copy of (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.479:Application dt.9.11.1998 of Sri P.Siya Kumar (7 Sheets)

Ex.P.480:Certified copy of letter dt.18.2.1999 of Sri B.Satyanarayana to Sri P.Siva Kumar (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.481: Joining report dt.19.2.1999 of Sri P.Siva Kumar (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.482:Letter dt.21.6.2000 of Sri B.Satyanarayana to Sri P.Siva Kumar (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.483: Application dt.Nil of Mrs. L.Padma(5 sheets)

Ex.P.484:Certified copy of letter dt.18.2.1999 of Sri B.Satyanarayana, HPA to Mrs.L.Padma(1 Sheet)

Ex.P.485:Joining report dt.24.2.1999 of Mrs.L.Padma.(1 sheet) 49C.C.7/2007/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.486:Certified copy of letter dt.11.6.1999 of Sri B.Satyanarayana, HPA to Mrs. L.Padma stating that her temporary appointment expires on 23.8.1999 (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.487:Certified copy of letter dt.24.8.1999 of Sri B.Satyanarayana, HPA to Mrs.L.Padma.(2 sheets)

Ex.P.488:Joining report dt.24.8.1999 of Mrs.L.Padma (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.489:Certified copy of letter dt.24.2.2000 of Sri B.Satyanarayana, HPA to Mrs.L.Padma. (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.490:Joining report dt.24.2.2000 of Mrs.L.Padma. (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.491:Certified copy of letter dt.24.8.2000 of Sri B.Satyanarayana HPA to Mrs.L.Padma(2 Sheets)

Ex.P.492: Joining report dt.24.8.2000 of Mrs.L.Padma.(1 Sheet)

Ex.P.493:Certified copy of letter dt.29.12.2000 of Sri VV Shiv Kumar, HPT to Mrs.L.Padma. (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.494:Joining report dt.1.1.2001 of Mrs.L.Padma. (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.495:Letter dt.1.10.2001 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Mrs.L.Padma(2 sheets)

Ex.P.496:Joining report dt.1.10.2001 of Mrs.L.Padma (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.497:Certified copy of letter dt.5.11.2003 of Sri P.Sambandan to Mrs.L.Padma(1 Sheet)

Ex.P.498:Certified copy of letter dt.5.11.2003 of Sri VV Shiv Kumar, HPT to Mrs.L.Padma(1 Sheet)

Ex.P.499: Application dt.Nil of Sri D.Kondaiah.(1 Sheet)

Ex.P.500:Certified copy of letter dt.18.2.1999 of Sri B.Satyanarayana, Head Personnel & Administration to Sri D.Kondaiah(1 Sheet)

Ex.P.501: Joining report dt.24.2.1999 of Sri D.Kondaiah.(1 Sheet)

Ex.P.502:Certified copy of letter dt.5.4.1999 of Sri D.Kondaiah. (1 Sheet) Ex.P.503:Application dt.25.2.1999 of Sri P.Lakshmipathi Raju (5 Sheets)

Ex.P.504:Certified copy of letter dt.25.2.1999 of Sri B.Satyanarayana, Head Personnel & Administration to Sri P.Lakshmipathi Raju (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.505:Joining report dt.1.3.1999 of Sri P.Lakshmipathi Raju (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.506:Letter dt.21.6.2000 of Sri B.Satyanarayana to Sri P.Lakshmipathi Raju (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.507:Bio-data dt.Nil of Sri CSR Bhargava (11 Sheets) 50C.C.7/2007/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.508:Certified copy of letter dt.9.3.1999 of Sri A.V.Ramana Murthy, on behalf of Sri B.Satyanarayana, Head Personnel & Adminisration to Sri CSR Bhargava(1 Sheet)

Ex.P.509:Joining report dt.15.3.1999 of Sri CSR Bhargava (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.510: Letter dt.21.6.2000 of Sri B.Satyanarayana to Sri CSR Bhargava (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.511: Application dt.Nil of Sri I Srinivasu Rao along with enclosures (11 Sheets)

Ex.P.512:Certified copy of letter dt.17.3.1999 of Sri B.Satyanarayana, Head Personnel & Administration to Sri I.Srinivasu Rao (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.513: Joining report dt.19.3.1999 of Sri I.Srinivasu Rao(1 Sheet) Ex.P.514: Letter dt.21.6.2000 of B.Satyanarayana to Sri I.Srinivasu Rao (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.515:Application dt.Nil of Sri I.Srinivasu Rao along with enclosures (15 Sheets)

Ex.P.516:Certified copy of letter dt.4.7.2002 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to sri I.Srinivasu Rao. (2 sheets) (Page 16 & 17)

Ex.P.517:Joining letter dt.5.7.2002 of Sri I.Srinivasu Rao ( 1 Sheet)

Ex.P.518:Application dt.29.3.1999 of Sri M.A.R.Gopalakrishna submitted by his father Sri M.C.Kesava Rao (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.519:Certified copy of letter dt.31.3.1999 of Sri B.Satyanarayana, Head Personnel & Administrartion to Sri M.A.R.Gopalakrishna ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.520:Joining report dt.5.4.1999 of Sri MAR Gopalakrishna (1 sheet)

Ex.P.521: Letter dt.21.6.2000 of Sri B.Satyanarayana to Sri M.A.R.Gopalakrishna (1 sheet)

Ex.P.522:Application dt.24.3.1999 of Sri Biswajit Kolay (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.523:Certified copy of letter dt.5.4.1999 of Sri B.Satyanarayana, Head Personnel & Administration to Sri Biswajit Kolay(1 Sheet)

Ex.P.524:Joining report dt.13.4.1999 of Sri Biswajir Kolay (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.525: Letter dt.21.6.2000 of Sri B.Satyanarayana to Sri Biswajit Kolay (1 sheet) 51C.C.7/2007/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.526: Application dt. Nil of Shri A. Vamsi Krishna along with enclousers (5 Sheets)

Ex.P.527: Certified copy of letter dt.23.4.1999 of Shri B. Satyanarayana, HPA to Shri A. Vamsi Krishna (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.528:Joining report dt. 26.4.1999 of Shri A. Vamsi Krishna (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.529:Certified copy of letter dt.23.4.1999 of Shri B. Satyanarayana, HPA to Shri A. Vamsi Krishna issuing appointment letter (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.530: Letter dt. 26.10.1999 of Sri B.Satyanarayana, HPA to Shri A. Vamsi Krishna (2 Sheets) Ex.P.531:Joining report dt. 26.10.1999 of Shri A. Vamsi Krishna (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.532: Letter dt. Nil of Shri A. Vamsi Krishna to Shri P. Sambandan (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.533: Note dt. 24.4.2000 of Shri V. Krishna Mohan, Senior Assistant on behalf of Shri B. Satyanarayana, HPA to Project Manager that Sri Vamsi Krishna’s services exp[ires on 25.4.2000 and requested to put up his recommendations to Sri P.Sambandan for extention ( 1 sheet).

Ex.P.534: Letter dt. 26.4.2000 of Shri B. Satyanarayana, HPA to Shri A. Vamsi Krishna (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.535:Joining report dt. 26.4.2000 of Shri A. Vamsi Krishna (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.536: Note dt.6.10.2000 of Shri V. Krishna Mohan, Senior Assistant to Shri V.V. Shiv Kumar, Head Personnel & Tranining (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.537: Letter dt. 27.10.2000 of Shri V.V. Shiv Kumar, HPT to Shri A. Vamsi Krishna (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.538: Joining report dt. 27.10.2000 of Shri A. Vamsi Krishna (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.539: Certified copy of letter dt.29.12.2000 of Shri V.V. Shiv Kumar, HPT to Shri A. Vamsi Krishna (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.540: Joining report dt. 1.1.2001 of Shri A. Vamsi Krishna (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.541: Certified copy of letter dt.01.10.2001 of Shri V.V. Shiv Kumar, HPT to Shri A. Vamsi Krishna (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.542: Joining report dt.1.10.2001 of Shri A. Vamsi Krishna (1 Sheet) 52C.C.7/2007/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.543: Application dt. 04.05.1999 of Ms. G.V. Ramani (3 Sheets)

Ex.P.544: Certified copy of letter dt. 15.5.1999 of Shri B. Satyanarayana, Head Personnel & Administration to Ms.G.V. Ramani (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.545: Joining report dt.10.05.1999 of Shri Ms. G.V. Ramani (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.546: Letter dt. 31.05.1999 of Ms. G.V. Ramani (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.547: Application dt. 09.06.1999 of Shri K. Vishnu Kiran Reddy (9 Sheets)

Ex.P.548:Certified copy of letter dt. 10.6.1999 of Shri B. Satyanarayana, Head Personnel & Administration to Shri K. Vishnu Kiran Reddy (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.549: Certified copy of joining report dt. 10.6.1999 of Shri K. Vishnu Kiran Reddy (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.550: Order dt. 26/11 of Shri P. Sambandan (1 Sheet) (back-side of D-549)

Ex.P.551: Certified copy of letter dt. 10.12.1999 of Shri B. Satyanarayana to K. Vishnu Kiran Reddy (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.552: Joining report dt.10.12.1999 of Shri K. Vishnu Kiran Reddy (1 Sheet) Ex.P.553: Letter dt. 26.07.2000 of Shri K. Vishnu Kiran Reddy to Shri P. Sambandan (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.554: Application dt. 25.06.1999 of Shri G.V. Sriram (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.555: Certified copy of letter dt. 28.06.1999 of Shri B. Satyanarayana Head Personnel & Administration to Shri G.V. Sriram (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.556: Joining report dt.28.06.1999 of Shri G.V. Sriram (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.557: Letter dt. 21.06.2000 of Shri B. Satyanarayana to Shri G.V. Sriram (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.558: Application dt. 21.01.2004 of Shri G.V. Sriram Shri A. Rama Prasad, DGM recommended for his appointment (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.559: Letter dt. 21.01.2004 of Shri V.V. Shiv Kumar to Shri G.V. Sriram (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.560: Joining report dt.23.01.2004 of Shri G.V. Sriram (1 Sheet) 53C.C.7/2007/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.561: Note dt.15.4.2004 of Shri V. Krishna Mohan, Senior Assistant to Shri V.V. Shiv Kumar, HPT (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.562: Certified copy of letter dt. 23.04.2004 of Shri V.V Shiv Kumar, HPT to Shri G.V. Sriram (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.563: Joining report dt.23.04.2004 of Shri G.V. Sriram (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.564:Certified copy of letter dt. 30.09.2004 of Shri P. Sambandan to Shri G.V. Sriram (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.565: Certified copy of letter dt. 30.09.2004 of Shri V.V. Shiv Kumar, HPT to Shri G.V. Sriram (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.566: Certified copy of application dt.Nil of Shri P.Gobinath along with enclousers (5 Sheets)

Ex.P.567:Certified copy of letter dt.2.8.1999 of Shri B. Satyanarayana, HPA to Shri P. Gobinath (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.568:Certified copy of joining report dt.2.8.1999(1 Sheet)

Ex.P.569:Certified copy of note dt.31.1.2000 of Shri B. Satyanarayana, HPA to Cdr.K.K.VArma, General Manager submitted that Sri P.Gobinath’s tenure expires 1.2.2000 and recommended to extent for another six months Cdr.K.K.Varma recommended (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.570:Certified copy of letter dt. 1.2.2000 of Shri B. Satyanarayana, HPA to Shri P. Gobinath (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.571: Certified copy of joining report dt. 2.2.2000 of Shri P. Gopinath (1 Sheets)

Ex.P.572: Certified copy of note dt. 26.7.2000 of Shri B. Satyanarayana, HPA to Shri P. Sambandan to approve to extend the period of appointment of Shri P.Gopinath by another six months (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.573: Certified copy of leter dt.31.7.2000 of Shri V. Krishna Mohan, Senior Assistant on behalf of Shri B. Satyanarayana, HPA to Shri P. Gopinath (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.574: Certified copy of joining report dt. 2.8.2000 of Shri P. Gopinath (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.575: Certified copy of letter dt. 29.12.2000 of Shri V.V. Shiv Kumar, HPT to Shri P. Gobinath (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.576: Certified copy of joining report dt. 1.1.2001 of Shri P. Gopinath (1 Sheet) 54C.C.7/2007/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.577: Certified copy of letter dt. 01.10.2001 of Shri V.V. Shiv Kumar, HPT to Shri P. Gopinath (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.578: Certified copy of joining report dt. 1.10.2001 of Shri P. Gopinath (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.579: Application dt. nil of Shri S.V.S.Nagesh along wih enclousers (9 Sheets)

Ex.P.580:Certified copy of letter dt. 17.08.1999 of Shri B. Satyanarayana, HPA to Shri S.V.S. Nagesh (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.581: Joining report dt. 18.8.1999 of Shri S.V.S. Nagesh (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.582: Certified copy of letter dt. 18.2.2000 of Shri B. Satyanarayana to Shri S.V.S. Nagesh (2 Sheets).

Ex.P.583: Joining report dt. 18.2.2000 of Shri S.V.S. Nagesh (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.584: Letter dt. 18.8.2000 of Shri B. Satyanarayana to Shri S.V.S. Nagesh (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.585: Joining report dt. 18.8.2000 of Shri S.V.S. Nagesh (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.586: Certified copy of letter dt. 29.12.2000 of Shri V.V. Shiv Kumar, HPT to Shri S.V.S. Nagesh (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.587: Joining report dt. 1.1.2001 of Shri S.V.S. Nagesh (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.588: Certified copy of letter dt. 1.10.2001 of Shri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Shri S.V.S. Nagesh (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.589: Joining report dt. 1.10.2001 of Shri S.V.S. Nagesh (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.590: Letter dt. 30.08.2004 of Shri S.V.S. Nagesh (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.591: Application dt.2.8.1999 of Shri B.S.S.V.L. Narayana (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.592: Certified copy of letter dt. 6.8.1999 of Shri B. Satyanarayana, HPA to Shri B.S.S.V.L. Narayana (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.593: Joining report dt. 6.9.1999 of Shri B.S.S.V. Laxmi Naryana (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.594: Note dt.1.3.2000 of Shri B. Satyanarayana, HPA to Cdr. K.K. Varma, Senior General Manager for extension of service of Shri B.S.S.V. Laxmi Narayana (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.595: Certified copy of letter dt. 3.3.2000 of Shri B. Satyanarayana, HPA to Shri B.S.S.V. Laxmi Narayana (2 Sheets) Ex.P.596: Joining report dt. 3.3.2000 of Shri B.S.S.V. Laxmi Naryana (1 Sheet) 55C.C.7/2007/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.597: Certified copy of letter dt. 1.10.2001 of Shri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Shri B.S.S.V.L Narayana (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.598: Joining report dt. 1.10.2001 of Shri B.S.S.V.L.Naryana (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.599: Letter dt. 8.12.2003 of Shri B.S.S.V. Laxmi Naryana (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.600 : Application dt. 16.9.1999 of Ms. M.A. Aruna (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.601: Certified copy of letter dt. 16.09.1999 of Shri B. Satyanarayana, HPA to Mrs. M.A. Aruna (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.602 : Joining report dt. 16.09.1999 of Mrs. M.A. Aruna (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.603: Note dt.2.3.2000 of Shri B. Satyanarayana, HPA for extension of Mrs. M.A. Aruna’s services (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.604 :Certified copy of letter dt. 16.03.2000 of Shri B. Satyanarayana, HPA to Mrs. M.A. Aruna (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.605 : Joining report dt. 16.03.2000 of Mrs. M.A. Aruna (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.606 : Note dt.5.9.2000 of Shri B.Satyanarayana, HPA for extension of Mr.M.A. Aruna’s services (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.607 : Certified copy of letter dt. 15.09.2000 of Shri B. Satyanarayana, HPA to Ms.M.A. Aruna (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.608 : Joining report dt. 15.09.2000 of Mrs. M.A. Aruna (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.609 : Certified copy of letter dt. 29.12.2000 of Shri V .V. Shiv Kumar, HPT to Mrs. M.A. Aruna (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.610 : Joining report dt. 1.01.2001 of Mrs. M.A. Aruna (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.611 : Letter dt. 25.7.2001 of Ms. M.A. Aruna (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.612 : Application dt. 27.9.2002 of Mrs. M.A. Aruna (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.613 : Certified copy of letter dt.30.12.2002 of Shri V.V. Shiv Kumar, HPT to Mrs. M.A. Aruna (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.614 : Joining report of Ms.M.A.Aruna(1 sheet)

Ex.P.615 : Application dt.10.1.2000 of Sri Ranjeet Kumar Jha. (2 sheets)

Ex.P.616 :Certified copy of letter dt.17.1.2000 of Sri B.Satyanarayana, HPA to Sri Ranjeet Kumar Jha (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.617 : Joining report dt.20.1.2000 of Sri Ranjeet Kumar Jha (1 sheet) 56C.C.7/2007/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.618 :Certified copy of letter dt.20.7.2000 of sri B.Satyanarayana, HPA to Sri Ranjeet Kumar Jha. (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.619 : Joining report dt.20.7.2000 of Sri Ranjeet Kumar Jah ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.620 : Certified copy of letter dt.29.12.2000 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri Ranjeet Kumar Jha.(2 Sheets)

Ex.P.621: Joining report dt.1.1.2001 of Sri Ranjeet Kumar Jha (1 sheet)

Ex.P.622 : Letter dt.1.10.2001 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri Ranjeet Kumar Jha.(2 sheets)

Ex.P.623 : Joining report dt.1.10.2001 of Sri Ranjeete Kumar Jha.( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.624 : Letter dt.23.8.2004 of Sri Ranjeet Kumar Jha.(1 sheet)

Ex.P.625 : Certified copy of application dt.9.1.2000 of Sri K.Sridhar (3 sheets)

Ex.P.626 :Certified copy of letter dt.17.1.2000 of Sri B.Satyanarayana, HPA to Sri K.Sridhar (2 sheets)

Ex.P.627 : Certified copy of joining report dt.20.1.2000 of Sri K.Sridhar (1 sheet)

Ex.P.628 : Certified copy of letter dt.20.7.2000 of Sri B.Satyanarayana, HPA to Sri K.Sridhar (2 sheets)

Ex.P.629 : Joining report dt.20.7.2000 of Sri K.Sridhar (1 sheet)

Ex.P.630 : Certified copy of letter dt.29.12.2000 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri K.Sridhar(2 sheets)

Ex.P.631: Certified copy of joining report dt.1.1.2001 of Sri K.Sridhar (1 sheet)

Ex.P.632: Certified copy of letter dt.1.10.2001 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri K.Sridhar( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.633: Certified copy of joining report dt.1.10.2001 of Sri K.Sridhar (1 sheet)

Ex.P.634: Letter dt.30.9.2004 of Sri P.Sambandan to Sri K.Sridhar( 1 sheet) Ex.P.635: Letter dt.30.9.2004 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar to Sri K.Sridhar (1 sheet) Ex.P.636: Certified copy of application dt.Nil of Ms.B.Adi Lakshmi addressed to no one Sri Y.R.Rao, Advisor recommended for her appointment (6 Sheets) 57C.C.7/2007/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.637: Certified copy of letter dt.28.1.2000 of Sri B.Satyanarayana, Head Personnel & Administration to Ms.B.Adi Lakshmi (2 sheets)

Ex.P.638: Joining report dt.1.2.2000 of Ms.B.Adi Lakshmi (1 sheet).

Ex.P.639: Application dt.23.1.2000 of Sri A.Raghunadha Rao.(4 sheets (page 4).

Ex.P.640:Certified copy of letter dt.28.1.2000 of Sri B.Satyanarayana, HPA to Sri A.Raghunadha Rao (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.641: Joining report dt.1.2.2000 of Sri A.Raghunadha Rao (1 sheet)

Ex.P.642: Letter dt.25.7.2000 of Sri B.Satyanarayana, HPA to Sri A.Raghunadha Rao ( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.643: Joining report dt.1.8.2000 of Sri A.Raghunadha Rao (1 sheet)

Ex.P.644: Certified copy of letter dt.29.12.2000 ofSri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri A.Raghunadha Rao ( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.645: Joining report dt.1.1.2001 of Sri A.Raghunadha Rao (1 sheet)

Ex.P.646: Certified copy of letter dt.1.10.2001 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri A.Raghunadha Rao (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.647: Joining report dt.1.10.2001 of Sri A.Raghunadha Rao (1 sheet)

Ex.P.648: Certified copy of note dt.18.12.2004 of Sri A.V.Ramana Murthy, Head Finance & Accounts to Sri K.R.Kishore, Director I/c about projects of Electronics & Teleom Division (2 sheets)

Ex.P.649: Certified copy of letter dt.27.12.2004 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, Head Personnel & Training to Sri A.Raghunadha Rao.(1 sheet)

Ex.P.650: Application dt.Nil of Sri K.Praveen addressed to no one.( 3 sheets)

Ex.P.651: Letter dt.28.1.2000 of Sri B.Satyanarayana, Head Personnel & Administration to Ms.B.Adilakshmi.(2 sheets)

Ex.P.652: Joining report dt.8.2.2000 of Sri K.Praveen (1 sheet)

Ex.P.653:Note dt.7.8.2000 of Sri B.Satyanarayana to Sri S.E.Sridharan, Head Computer Services.(1 sheet)

Ex.P.654: Letter dt.8.8.2000 of Sri B.Satyanarayana to Sri K.Praveen (2 sheets) 58C.C.7/2007/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.655: Joining report dt.8.8.2000 of Sri K.Praveen(1 sheet)

Ex.P.656: Letter dt.31.8.2000 of Sri K.Praveen (1 sheet)

Ex.P.657: Certified copy of application dt.30.1.2000 of Mrs.Y.Hema Syamala(3 sheets)

Ex.P.658: Certified copy of letter dt.3.2.2000 of Sri B.Satyanarayana, HPA to Mrs. Y.Hema Syamala (2 sheets)

Ex.P.659: Certified copy of joining report dt.14.2.2000 of Mrs.Y.Hema Syamala (1 sheet)

Ex.P.660: Certified copy of note dt.8.8.2000 of Sri B.Satyanarayana for extension of her services (1 sheet)

Ex.P.661: Certified copy of letter dt.9.8.2000 of Sri B.Satyanarayana to Mrs.Y.Hema Syamala( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.662:Joining report dt.16.8.2000 of Mrs.Y.Hema Syamala(1 sheet)

Ex.P.663: Certified copy of letter dt.29.12.2000 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Mrs.Y.Hema Syamala ( 2 sheets).

Ex.P.664: Certified copy of joining report dt.1.1.2001 of Ms.Y.Hema Syamala (1 sheet)

Ex.P.665: Certified copy of letter dt.1.10.2001 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Mrs.Y.Hema Syamala (2 sheets)

Ex.P.666:Joining report dt.1.10.2001 of Ms.Y.Hema Syamala (1 sheet)

Ex.P.667:Certified copy of letter dt.27.12.2004 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, Head Personnel & Training to Mrs.Y.Hema Syamala.(1 sheet)

Ex.P.668: Application dt.Nil of Ms.D.Malathi along with enclosures (6 sheets).

Ex.P.669: Certified copy of letter dt.8.5.2000 of Sri B.Satyanarayana, HPA to Ms.D.Malathi.(2 sheets)

Ex.P.670:Joining report dt.8.5.2000 of Ms.D.Malathi ( 1sheet) (page 9)

Ex.P.671: Note dt.18.10.2000 of Sri V.Krishna Mohan, Sr.Assistant to Shri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT, (2 sheets)

Ex.P.672: Certified copy of letter dt.8.11.2000 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Ms.D.Malathi (2 sheets)

Ex.P.673: Joining report dt.8.11.2000 of Ms.D.Malathi.(1 sheet) 59C.C.7/2007/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.674: Certified copy of letter dt.29.12.2000 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Ms.D.Malathi.(2 sheets)

Ex.P.675: Joining report dt.1.1.2001 of Ms.D.Malathi (1 sheet)

Ex.P.676: Certified copy of letter dt.1.10.2001 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Ms.D.Malathi.(2 sheets)

Ex.P.677: Joining report dt.1.10.2001 of Ms.D.Malathi (1 sheet)

Ex.P.678: Certified copy of letter dt.5.11.2003 of Sri P.Sambandan to Ms.D.Malathi (1 sheet)

Ex.P.679: Certified copy of letter dt.5.11.2003 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Ms.D.Malathi (1 sheet)

Ex.P.680: Application dt.11.5.2000 of Sri V.Srinivasa Rao( 3 sheets)

Ex.P.681: Certified copy of letter dt.7.8.2000 of Sri B.Satynarayana, HPA to Sri V.Srinivasa Rao (2 sheets )

Ex.P.682: Joining report dt.7.8.2000 of Sri V.Srinivasa Rao

Ex.P.683: Certified copy of letter dt.29.12.2000 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri V.Srinivasa Rao ( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.684: Joining report dt.1.1.2001 of Sri V.Srinivasa Rao (1 sheet)

Ex.P.685: Certified copy of letter dt.1.10.2001 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri V.Srinivasa Rao (2 sheets)

Ex.P.686: Joining report dt.1.10.2001 of Sri V.Srinivasa Rao (1 sheet)

Ex.P.687: Application dt.Nil of Sri S.S.Reddy along with enclosures (13 sheets) (pages 75 to 79)

Ex.P.688: Certified copy of letter dt.7.8.2000 of Sri B.Satyanarayana, HPA to Sri S.S.Reddy(2 sheets)

Ex.P.689: Joining report dt.8.8.2000 of Sri S.S.Reddy (1 sheet)

Ex.P.690: Certified copy of letter dt.29.12.2000 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri S.S.Reddy (2 sheets)

Ex.P.691: Joining report dt.1.1.2001 of Sri S.S.Reddy (1 sheet)

Ex.P.692: Certified copy of letter dt.1.10.2001 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri S.S.Redd y.(2 sheets)

Ex.P.693: Joining report dt.1.10.2001 of Sri S.S.Reddy (1 sheet)

Ex.P.694: Letter dt.24.4.2003 of Sri S.S.Reddy (1 sheet) 60C.C.7/2007/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.695: Note dt.5.9.2000 of Sri B.Satyanarayana, HPA to Sri URP Sudhakar, Transport -in-charge for extension of Sri K.Sanni Babu’s services (1 sheet)

Ex.P.696: Letter dt.8.9.2000 of Sri B.Satyanarayana, HPA to Sri K.Sanni Babu(2 sheets)

Ex.P.697:Joining report dt.8.9.2000 of Sri K.Sanni Babu(1 sheet)

Ex.P.698: Certified copy of letter dt.29.12.2000 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri K.Sanni Babu (2 sheets)

Ex.P.699: Joining report dt.1.1.2001 of Sri K.Sanni Babu (1 sheet)

Ex.P.700: Letter dt.1.7.2004 of Sri K.Sanni Babu to Sri P.Sambandan (1 sheet)

Ex.P.701 : Certified copy of letter dt.30.9.2004 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri K.Sanni Babu (2 sheets)

Ex.P.702: Joining report dt.1.10.2004 f Sri K.Sanni Babu (1 sheet)

Ex.P.703 : Application dt.nil of Sri Sundeep Laxman along with enclosures addressed to no one.(4 sheets)

Ex.P.704 : Letter dt.18.10.2000 of Sri S.S.Reddy, General Manager to Sri P.Sambandan(1 sheet)

Ex.P.705 : Certified copy of letter dt.24.10.2000 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, Head Personnel & Training to Sri Sundeep Laxman (2 sheets)

Ex.P.706 : Joining report dt.6.11.2000 of Sri Sundeep Laxman(1 sheet)

Ex.P.707 : Certified copy of letter dt.29.12.2000 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar to Sri Sundeep Laxman (2 sheets)

Ex.P.708 : Letter dt.19.3.2001 of Sri Sundeep Laxman(1 sheet)

Ex.P.709 : Application dt.21.11.2000 of Sri KV Srikanth Patnaik (12 sheets)

Ex.P.710 : Certified copy of letter dt.27.11.2000 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Shri K.V.Srikanth Patnaik (2 sheets)

Ex.P.711 : Certified copy of joining report dt.27.11.2000 of Sri K.V.Srikanth Patnaik(1 sheet)

Ex.P.712 :Certified copy of letter dt.29.12.2000 of Sri V.V.Shi Kumar, HPT to Sri K.v.Srikanth Patnaik (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.713 : Joining report dt.1.1.2001 of Sri K.V.Srikanth Patnaik (1 sheet) 61C.C.7/2007/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.714 : Certified copy of letter dt.1.10.2001 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri K.V.Srikanth Patnaik (2 sheets)

Ex.P.715 : Joining report dt.1.10.2001 of Sri K.V.Srikanth Patnaik.(1 sheet)

Ex.P.716: Letter dt.28.10.2002 of sri K.V.Srikanth Patnaik (1 sheet)

Ex.P.717 : Application dt.7.2.2001 of Sri A.Atchaiah along ith enclosures (6 sheets)

Ex.P.718 : Certified copy of letter dt.8.2.2001 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri A. Atchaiah.( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.719 : Joining report dt.8.2.2001 of Sri A.Atchaiah(1 sheet)

Ex.P.720 : Note dt.27.7.2001, Sri S.S.Reddy, General Manager and Sri Y.R.Rao, Advisor recommended for placing the services of Sri A.Atchaiah on contract basis for 5 years, (1 sheet)

Ex.P.721 : Certified copy of letter dt.13.8.2001 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri A.Atchaiah( 2sheets)

Ex.P.722 :Joining report dt.17.8.2001 of Sri A.Atchaiah (1 sheet)

Ex.P.723: Certified copy of letter dt.1.10.2001 of Shri. V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Shri A. Atchaiah (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.724: Joining report dt.1.10.2001 of Sri A.Atchaiah (1 sheet)

Ex.P.725 : Certified copy of letter dt.27.12.2004 of Shri. V.V. Shiv Kumar, Head Personnel & Training to Shri A. Atchaiah (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.726 : Application dt.nil of Shri D.S. Nagi Reddy (3 sheets)

Ex.P.727 : Certified copy of letter dt.19.02.2001 of Shri. V.V. Shiv Kumar, HPT to Shri D.S. Nagi Reddy (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.728 : Joining report dt.1.02.2001 of Shri D.S. Nagi Reddy (1 sheet)

Ex.P.729 : Note dt.27.7.2001 of Shri Y.R. Rao, Advisor to Shri P. Sambandan recommending for extension of services fo Shri D.S.Nagi Reddy (1 sheet)

Ex.P.730 : Certified copy of letter dt.13.8.2001 of Shri. V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Shri D.S. Nagi Reddy (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.731 : Joining report dt.18.08.2001 of Shri D.S.Nagi Reddy (1 sheet) 62C.C.7/2007/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.732 : Certified copy of letter dt.1.10.2001 of Shri. V.V. Shiv Kumar, HPT to Shri D.S. Nagi Reddy (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.733 : Joining report dt.1.10.2001 of Shri D.S. Nagi Reddy (1 sheet)

Ex.P.734 : Letter dt.1.8.2003 of Shri. D.S. Nagi Reddy (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.735 : Application dt. 10.03.2001 of Shri P.Venkata Rao along with enclousers (14 sheets)

Ex.P.736 : Certified copy of letter dt.12.3.2001 of Shri. V.V. Shiv Kumar, HPT to Shri P. Venkata Rao (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.737 : Joining report dt.12.3.2001 of Shri P. Venkata Rao (1 sheet)

Ex.P.738 :Note dt.20.8.2001 of Shri N.R.K. Rao, Advisor for extension of P.Venkata Rao’s services (1 sheet)

Ex.P.739 : Certified copy of letter dt.12.9.2001 of Shri. V.V. Shiv Kumar, HPT to Shri P. Venkata Rao (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.740 : Joining report dt.12.9.2001 of Shri P. Venkata Rao (1 sheet)

Ex.P.741 : Letter dt.19.12.2001 of Shri. V.V. Shiv Kumar, HPT to Shri P. Venkata Rao (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.742 : Joining report dt.1.1.2002 of Shri P. Venkata Rao (1 sheet)

Ex.P.743 : Letter dt.3.12.2003 of Shri. P. Venkata Rao (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.744 : Application dt. Nil of Mrs. D. Jyothi along with enclousers (17 sheets)

Ex.P.745 : Certified copy of letter dt.9.3.2001 of Shri. V.V. Shiv Kumar, HPT to Mrs. D. Jyothi (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.746 : Joining report dt.3.4.2001 of Ms. D. Jyothi (2 sheets)

Ex.P.747 : Certified copy of letter dt.1.10.2001 of Shri.V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Mrs. D. Jyothi (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.748 : Joining report dt.1.10.2001 of Ms. D. Jyothi (1 sheet)

Ex.P.749: Resume dt. Nil of Shri. R.P. Vikas Babu (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.750 : Note dt.9.4.2001 of Shri S.S. Reddy, General Manager to Shri Y.R. Rao, Advisor recommending for the appointment of Shri R.P. Vikas babu Shri Y.R. Rao also recommended for his appointment (1 sheet)

Ex.P.751 : Letter dt.16.4.2001 of Shri. S.S. Reddy, General Manager to Shri V.V. Shiv Kumar, HPT (1 Sheet) 63C.C.7/2007/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.752 : Certified copy of letter dt.9.4.2001 of Shri. V.V. Shiv Kumar, HPT to Shri R.P. Vikas Babu (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.753 : Joining report dt.9.4.2001 of Shri R.P. Vikas Babu (1 sheet)

Ex.P.754 : Note dt.7.9.2001 of Shri A.V. Ramana Murthy, Head Finance & Accounts on behalf of Shri V.V. Shiv Kumar, HPT to Shri Y.R. Rao, Advisor (1 sheet)

Ex.P.755 : Certified copy of letter dt.1.10.2001 of Shri. V.V. Shiv Kumar, HPT to Shri R.P. Vikas Babu (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.756 : Joining report dt.1.10.2001 of Shri R.P. Vikas Babu (1 sheet)

Ex.P.757 : Letter dt.27.12.2004 of Shri. V.V.Shiv Kumar, Head Personnel & Training to Shri R.P. Vikas Babu (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.758 : Application dt. Nil of Shri G.Satyanarayana along with enclosures .(6 sheets)

Ex.P.759 : Certified copy of letter dt.28.3.2001 of Shri. V.V.Shiv Kumar, Head Personnel Training to Shri G. Satyanarayana (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.760 : Joining report dt.3.4.2001 of Shri G. Satyanarayana (1 sheet)

Ex.P.761 : Certified copy of letter dt.10.10.2001 of Shri. V.V.Shiv Kumar to Shri G. Satyanarayana (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.762 : Application dt. 2.12.2002 of Shri G. Satyanarayana (4 sheets)

Ex.P.763 : Certified copy of letter dt.4.12.2002 of Shri.V.V.Shiv Kumar to HPT to Shri G. Satyanarayana (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.764 : Joining report of Shri G. Satyanarayana (1 sheet)

Ex.P.765 : Certified copy of note dt.15.2.2005 of Shri. NRK Rao, Head (Construction Supervision) to Shri A. Rama Prasad, DGM (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.766 : Note dt.21.2.2005 of Mrs. J. Syamala, Sr. Assistant to Shri V.V. Shiv Kumar, HPT regarding termination of Shri G. Satyanarayana’s services (1 sheet)

Ex.P.767 : Certified copy of letter dt.23.2.2005 of Shri. A. Ramesh Kumar, PAO to Shri G. Satyanarayana (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.768 : Application dt. 16.3.2001 of Shri K. Mohammed Safiullah along with enclousers (9 sheets) 64C.C.7/2007/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.769 : Certified copy of letter dt.23.4.2001 of Shri. A.V.Ramana Murthy, Head Finance & Accounts on behalf of Shri V.V. Shiv Kumar, Head Personnel & Training to Shri K. Mohammed Safiullah (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.770 : Joining report dt. 23.4.2001 of Shri K.Mohammed Safiullah (1 sheet)

Ex.P.771 : Note dt.12.9.2001 of Mrs. B.S. Jagadamba, Office Assistant to Shri V.V. Shiv Kumar, HPT (1 sheet)

Ex.P.772 : Certified copy of letter dt.23.10.2001 of Shri V.V. Shiv Kumar, HPT to Shri K. Mohammed Safiullah (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.773 : Joining report dt. 23.10.2001 of Shri K.Mohammed Safiullah (1 sheet)

Ex.P.774 : Certified copy of letter dt.19.12.2001 of Shri V.V. Shiv Kumar, HPT to Shri K. Mohammed Safiullah (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.775 : Joining report dt. 1.1.2002 of Shri K.Mohammed Safiullah (1 sheet)

Ex.P.776 : Resume dt.Nil of Sri S.Surendra Babu(3 sheets)

Ex.P.777:Certified copy of note dt.9.4.2001 of Sri S.S.Reddy, General Manager to Sri Y.R.Rao, Advisor recommending for the appointment of Sri S.Surendra Babu.(1 sheet)

Ex.P.778: Certified copy of letter dt.16.4.2001 of Sri V.V.Shivkumar, HPT to Sri Surendra Babu (2 sheets)

Ex.P.779:Certified copy of joining report dt.25.4.2001 of Sri Surendra Babu (1 sheet)

Ex.P.780: Certified copy of note dt.7.9.2001 of Shri A.V.Ramana Murthy, Head Finance & Accounts on behalf of Shri V.V. Shiv Kumar, HPT to Shri Y.R. Rao, Advisor (1 sheet)

Ex.P.781 : Certified copy of letter dt.1.10.2001 of Sri V.V.Shivkumar, HPT to Sri Surendra Babu (2 sheets)

Ex.P.782 :Certified copy of joining report dt.1.10.2001 of Sri Surendra Babu (1 sheet)

Ex.P.783 :Letter dt.16.9.2004 of Shri. S. Surendra Babu (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.784 :Certified copy of application dt.11.05.2001 of Mrs. A. Sofia along with enclousers (10 sheets)

Ex.P.785 :Certified copy of letter dt.16.5.2001 of Shri V.V.Shivkumar, HPT to Mrs. A. Sofia (2 sheets) 65C.C.7/2007/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.786 :Certified copy of joining report dt.17.5.2001 of Mrs.A. Sofia (1 sheet)

Ex.P.787 :Certified copy of letter dt.13.12.2001 of Shri V.V.Shivkumar, HPT to Mrs. A. Sofia (2 sheets)

Ex.P.788 :Certified copy of joining report dt.14.12.2001 of Mrs. A. Sofia (1 sheet)

Ex.P.789:Certified copy of letter dt.5.11.2003 of Shri P. Sambandan to Mrs. A. Sofia (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.790:Certified copy of letter dt.5.11.2003 of Shri V.V. Shiv Kumar, HPT to Mrs. A. Sofia (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.791 :Certified copy of application dt. Nil of Mrs. Bh. Kameswari Devi (11 Sheets)

Ex.P.792 :Certified copy of letter dt.10.05.2001 of Shri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Mrs. Bh.Kameswari Devi (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.793 :Certified copy of joining report dt.17.5.2001 of Mrs. Bh. Kameswari Devi (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.794 :Certified copy of note dt.7.11.2001 of Shri V.V. Shiv Kumar, HPT to Shri A. Rama Prasad for extension of services of Ms. Bh. Kameswari Devi, if required (1 sheet)

Ex.P.795 :Certified copy of letter dt.16.11.2001 of Shri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Mrs.Bh.Kameswari Devi (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.796 :Certified copy of joining report dt.16.11.2001 of Ms.Bh. Kameswari Devi (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.797 :Certified copy of letter dt.19.12.2001 of Shri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Mrs. Bh. Kameswari Devi (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.798 :Certified copy of letter dt.30.09.2004 of Shri P. Sambandan to Ms. Bh. Kameswari Devi (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.799 :Letter dt.30.09.2004 of Shri V.V. Shiv Kumar, HPT to Ms. Bh. Kameswari Devi (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.800 :Certified copy of application dt. Nil of Shri K. Chandra Mouli along with enclousers (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.801 :Certified copy of letter dt.6.6.2001 of Shri V.V. Shiv Kumar, HPT to Shri K. Chandra Mouli (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.802 :Certified copy of joining report dt.6.6.2001 of Shri K. Chandra Mouli (1 Sheet) 66C.C.7/2007/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.803 :Certified copy of note dt.21.11.2001 of Mrs.B.S. Jagadamba, Office Assistant to Shri V.V. Shiv Kumar, HPT (1 sheet)

Ex.P.804 :Certified copy of letter dt.6.12.2001 of Shri V.V. Shiv Kumar, HPT to Shri K. Chandra Mouli (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.805 :Certified copy of joining report dt.6.12.2001 of Shri K.Chandra Mouli (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.806 :Certified copy of letter dt.19.12.2001 of Shri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Shri K. Chandra Mouli (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.807 :Joining report dt.1.1.2002 of Shri K. Chandra Mouli (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.808 :Certified copy of letter dt.30.9.2004 of Shri P. Sambandan to Shri K. Chandra Mouli (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.809: Certified copy of letter dt.30.9.2004 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri K.Chandra Mouli. (1 sheet)

Ex.P.810: Application dt.Nil of Sri K.Shankar Narayana addressed to no one.(39 sheets)

Ex.P.811 : Certified copy of letter dt.6.6.2001 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, Head Personnel & Training to Sri K.Shankar Narayana.( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.812 :Joining report dt.8.6.2001 of Sri K.Shankar Narayana (1 sheet)

Ex.P.813 : Letter dt.27.8.2001 of Sri K.Shankar Narayana(1 sheet)

Ex.P.814 : Application dt.25.4.2001 of Sri V.Sriharsha (4 sheets)

Ex.P.815 : Certified copy of letter dt.30.5.2001 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri V.Sriharsha.(2 sheets)

Ex.P.816 : Certified copy of joining report dt.11.6.2001 of Sri V.Sriharsha(1 sheet)

Ex.P.817 : Certified copy of note dt.21.11.201 of Mrs.B.S. Jagadamba, Office Assistant to Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT (1 sheet)

Ex.P.818 :Certified copy of letter dt.11.12.2001 of Sri V.V.Shiv(1 Sheet)

Ex.P.819 :Certified copy of joining report dt.11.12.2001 of Sri V.Sriharsha (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.820 :Certified copy of dt.19.12.2001 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri V.Srisharsha (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.821 : Joining report dt.1.1.2002 of Sri V.Sriharsha.

67C.C.7/2007/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.822 : Letter dt.11.8.2004 of Sri V.Sriharsha(1 sheet)

Ex.P.823 :Application dt.26.5.2001 of Sri V.V.Narasimha Rao along with enclosures to the Manager, NSDRC, Hyderabad. (9 sheets)

Ex.P.824 : Note dt.25.5.2001 of Sri S.S.Reddy, General Manager to Sri Y.R.Rao, Advisor recommending for the appointment of Sri V.V.Narasimha Rao (1 sheet)

Ex.P.825 :Certified copy of letter dt.20.6.2001 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri V.V.Narasimha Rao (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.826 : Joining report dt.20.6.2001 of Sri V.V.Narasimha Rao (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.827 : Note dt.26.11.2001 of Sri S.S.Reddy, General Manager to Sri Y.R.Rao, Advisor recommending for the extension of Sri VV Narasimha Rao’s services (1 sheet)

Ex.P.828 : Certified copy of letter dt.13.12.2001 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri V.V. Narasimha Rao (2 sheets)

Ex.P.829 : Joining report dt.nil of Sri V.V.Narasimha Rao (1 sheet)

Ex.P.830 : Certified copy of letter dt.19.12.2001 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri V.V.Narasimha Rao.(2 sheets)

Ex.P.831 : Joining report dt.1.1.2002 of Sri V.V.Narasimha Rao (1 sheet)

Ex.P.832 : Certified copy of letter dt.27.12.2004 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, Head Personnel & Training to Sri V.V.Narasimha Rao.(1 sheet)

Ex.P.833 : Resume dt.Nil of Sri C.Sharan Kumar along with enclosures(6 sheets)

Ex.P.834 : Note dt.21.6.2001 of S.S.Reddy, General Manager to Sri Y.R.Rao, Advisor recommending for the appointment of Sri C.Sharan Kumar (1 sheet)

Ex.P.835 :Certified copy of letter dt.25.6.2001 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri C.Sharan Kumar (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.836 : Joining report dt.2.7.2001 of Sri C.Sharan Kumar.(1 sheet)

Ex.P.837 :Certified copy of letter dt.19.12.2001 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri C.Sharan Kumar (2 sheets)

Ex.P.838 : Joining report dt.Nil of Sri C.Sharan Kumar (1 sheet)

Ex.P.839 :Certified copy of letter dt.27.12.2004 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, Head Personnel & Training to Sri C.Sharan Kumar (1 sheet) 68C.C.7/2007/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.840 : Resume dt.Nil of Sri Y.Srinivasa Rao.(3 sheets)

Ex.P.841 : Note dt.15.6.2001 of Sri S.S.Reddy, General Manager to Sri Y.R.Rao, Advisor recommending for the appointment of Sri Y.Srinivasa Rao.(1 sheet).

Ex.P.842 :Certified copy of letter dt.25.6.2001 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri Y.Srinivasa Rao. (2 sheets)

Ex.P.843: Joining report dt.2.7.2001 of Sri Y.Srinivasa Rao (1 sheet)

Ex.P.844 : Certified copy of leter dt.19.12.2001 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri Y.Srinivasa Rao (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.845 : Joining report dt. Nil of Sri Y.Srinivasa Rao (1 sheet)

Ex.P.846 : Certified copy of letter dt.27.12.2004 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, Head Personnel & Training to Sri Y.Srinivasa Rao (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.847 : Application dt.27.12.1999 of Sri S.V.D.Praad (2 sheets)

Ex.P.848 : Letter dt.4.2.2000 of Sri B.Satyanarayana, HPA to Sri S.V.D.Prasad(1 sheet)

Ex.P.849 :Letter dt.16.4.2001 from Sri S.V.D.Prasad & Smt.S.Padmashree intimating that they did not hear anything after their meeting with Sri P.Sambandan. They also enclosed their resumes (5 sheets)

Ex.P.850 :Certified copy of letter dt.30.5.2001 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri S.V.D. Prasad (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.851 : Joining report dt.30.7.2001 of Sri S.V.D.Prasad (1 sheet)

Ex.P.852 :Certified copy of letter dt.19.12.2001 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri S.V.D.Prasad (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.853 : Joining report dt.1.1.2002 of Sri S.V.D.Prasad (1 sheet)

Ex.P.854 :Certified copy of application dt.nil of Ms.A.Kiranmai (11 sheets)

Ex.P.855: Certified copy of letter dt.23.8.2001 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar HPT to Ms.A.Kiranmai.(2 Sheet)

Ex.P.856:Certified copy of joining report dt.31.8.2001 of Ms.A.Kiranmai(1 Sheet)

Ex.P.857 : Certified copy of letter d.19.12.2001 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Ms.Akiranmai.(2 sheets) 69C.C.7/2007/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.858: Certified copy of joining report dt.2.1.2002 of Ms.A.Kiranmai. (1 sheet)

Ex.P.859 : Certified copy of letter dt.1.3.2002 of Ms. A.Kiranmai.( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.860 : Certified copy of application dt.nil of Mrs.R.Deva Devi ( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.861 : Certified copy of letter dt.14.8.2001 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Ms.R.Deva Devi.( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.862 : Certified copy of joining report dt.3.9.2001 of Ms.R.Deva Devi. (1 sheet)

Ex.P.863 :Certified copy of letter dt.19.12.2001 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Ms.R.Deva Devi. (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.864 :Certified copy of joining report dt.1.1.2002 of Ms.R.Deva Devi.(1 Sheet)

Ex.P.865 : Certified copy of letter dt.16.6.2003 of Mrs.R.Deva Devi.(1 Sheet)

Ex.P.866 : Resume dt. Nil of Sri U.Ramakrishna along with enclosures. (10 sheets)

Ex.P.867 : Note dt.27.8.2001 of Sri S.S.Reddy GM to Sri Y.R.Rao, Advisor recommending for the appointment of Sri U.Ramakrishna (1 sheet)

Ex.P.868 : Certified copy of letter dt.3.9.2001 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri U.Ramakrishna.(2 Sheets)

Ex.P.869 : Joining report dt.3.9.2001 of Sri U.Ramakrishna (1 sheet)

Ex.P.870 : Certified copy of fax note dt.20/26 Feb, 2002 of Sri S.S.Reedy to Sri Y.R.Rao recommending for extension of services of Sri U.Ramakrishna, Sri Y.R.Rao recommended for extension(1 Sheet)

Ex.P.871: Certified copy of letter dt.1.4.2002 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri U.Ramakrishna.(2 sheets)

Ex.P.872: Joining report dt.5.4.2002 of Sri U.Ramakrishna (1 sheet)

Ex.P.873 : Letter dt.Nil of Sri U.Ramakrishna.(1 sheet)

Ex.P.874 : Certified copy of note dt.4.12.2001 of Prof.R.V.Rama Rao, Advisor to Sri P.Sambandan.(1 sheet)

Ex.P.875: Certified copy of letter dt.7.12.2001 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, Head Personnel & Training to Sri Y.Sandeep. (2 sheets) 70C.C.7/2007/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.876: Joining report dt.12.12.2001 of Sri Y.Sandeep.(1 sheet)

Ex.P.877 : Certified copy of note dt.28.1.2002 of Prof. R.V.Rama Rao to Sri P.Sambandan.(1 sheet)

Ex.P.878 : Certified copy of letter dt.7.12.2001 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri TVR Dinesh Kumar (2 sheets)

Ex.P.879 : Joining report dt.12.12.2001 of Sri TVR Dinesh Kumar(1 sheet)

Ex.P.880 : Note dt.12.3.2002 of Prof. R.V.Rama Rao requesting for extension of Sri TVR Dinesh Kumar’s services for three months(1 sheet)

Ex.P.881 :Certified copy of letter dt.12.3.2002 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri TVR Dinesh Kumar. (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.882 : Joining report dt.12.3.2002 of Sri TVR Dinesh Kumar (1 sheet)

Ex.P.883 : Note dt.5.6.2002 of Prof.R.V.rama Rao, requesting for extension of Sri TVR Dinesh Kumarr’s services for a further period of 6 months .(1 sheet)

Ex.P.884 :Certified copy of letter dt.12.6.2002 of sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri TVR Dinesh Kumar (2 sheets)

Ex.P.885 : Joining report dt.nil of Sri TVR Dinesh Kumar (1 sheet)

Ex.P.886: Note dt.2.12.2002 of Prof.R.V.Rama Rao to Sri P.Sambandan. (1 sheet)

Ex.P.887 : Certified copy of letter dt.9.12.2002 of Sri V.V.shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri TVR Dinesh Kumar.(2 sheets)

Ex.P.888 : Joining report dt.12.12.2002 of Sri TVR Dinesh Kumar (1 sheet)

Ex.P.889 : Certified copy of note dt.31.3.2003 of Prof. R.V.Rama Rao requesting for lumpsum payment to be given to Sri TVR Dinesh Kumar, (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.890: Certified copy of letter dt.8.4.2003 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri TVR Dinesh Kumar (2 sheets )

Ex.P.891: Joining report dt.8.4.2003 of Sri TVR Dinesh Kumar (1 sheet)

Ex.P.892 : Letter dt.30.8.2003 of Sri A.V.Ramana Murthy, Head Finance and Accounts on behalf of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, Head Personnel & Training (1 sheet) 71C.C.7/2007/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.893 : Application dt.nil of Ms.V.Arunakanthi. ( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.894 : Certified copy of letter dt.24.1.2002 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Mrs.V.Arunakanthi.( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.895 :Joining report dt.30.1.2002 of Ms.V.Arunakanthi. (1 sheet) Ex.P.896 : Note dt.22.7.2002 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri A.Rama Prasad for extension of services of Ms.V.Arunakanthi. (1 sheet)

Ex.P.897 : Certified copy of dt.31.7.2002 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar to Ms.V.Arunakanthi. (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.898: Joining report dt.Nil of Ms.V.Arunakanthi.(1 sheet)

Ex.P.899 : Noe dt.6.1.2003 of Mrs.B.S.Jagadamba, Office Assistnat to Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar HPT, (1 sheet)

Ex.P.900 : Certified copy of letter dt.3.2.2003 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Ms.V.Arunkanthi.( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.901 : Joining report dt.1.2.2003 of Ms.V.Arunakanthi.(1 sheet)

Ex.P.902:Certified copy of Order dt.21.2.2003 of Sri P.Sambandan.(1 Sheet)

Ex.P.903: Certified copy of letter dt.24.2.2003 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Ms.V.Arunakanthi.(2 Sheets)

Ex.P.904: Joining report dt.1.3.2003 of Ms.V.Arunakanthi.(1 sheet)

Ex.P.905 : Letter dt.5.8.2004 of V.Arunakanthi(1 sheet)

Ex.P.906 :Application dt.23.1.2002 of Sri MV Raja Sekhar ( 8 sheets)

Ex.P.907 : Certified copy of letter dt.24.1.2002 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri M.V.Raja Sekhar.(2 sheets)

Ex.P.908 : Joining report dt.30.1.2002 of Sri M.V.Raja Sekhar (1 sheet)

Ex.P.909 : Note dt.22.7.2002 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri A.Rama Prasad, DGM for extension of services of Sri M.V.Raja Sekhar, if required.(1 sheet)

Ex.P.910 : Certified copy of letter dt.31.7.2002 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri M.V.Raja Sekhar(2 sheets)

Ex.P.911 : Joining report dt.19.8.2002 of Sri M.V.Raja Sekhar (1 sheet)

Ex.P.912 :Note dt.6.1.2003 of Mrs.B.S.Jagadamba, Office Assistant to Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT. (1 sheet) 72C.C.7/2007/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.913 : Letter dt.3.2.2003 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri M.V.Raja Sekhar (2 sheets)

Ex.P.914 : Joining report dt.1.2.2003 of Sri M.V.Raja Sekhar (1 sheet)

Ex.P.915 :Certified copy of letter dt.24.2.2003 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri M.V.Raja Sekhar ( 2sheets)

Ex.P.916 :Joining report dt.1.3.2003 of Sri M.V.Raja Sekhar (1 sheet)

Ex.P.917 : Certified copy of letter dt.30.9.2004 of Sri P.Sambandan to Sri M.V.Raja Sekhar (1 sheet)

Ex.P.918 : Certified copy of letter dt.30.9.2004 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar to Sri M.V.Raja Sekhar (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.919 :Certified copy of fax letter dt.4.10.2004 of Sri M.V.Raja Sekhar (1 sheet)

Ex.P.920: Note dt.28.1.2002 of Prfo R.V.Rama Rao to Sri N.V.Rao, DGM recommending for a temporary appointment for Sri P.Srikanth for a period of three months and enclosed the resume of Sri P.Srikanth (9 sheets)

Ex.P.921 : Certified copy of letter dt.31.1.2002 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri P.Srikanth (2 sheets)

Ex.P.922 : Joining report dt.1.2.2002 of Sri P.Srikanth(1 sheet)

Ex.P.923 :Certified copy of note dt.1.5.2002 of Prof.R.V.Ramana Rao, Advisor to Sri P.Sambandan requesting to appoint Mr.Srikanth and Mr.Chandrasekhar for a tenure of 4 months w.e.f.1.5.2002 (2 Sheet)

Ex.P.924 : Certified copy of letter dt.1.5.2002 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri P.Srikanth. (2 sheets)

Ex.P.925 : Joining report dt.nil of Sri P.Srikanth (1 sheet)

Ex.P.926 : Certified copy of note dt.22.8.2002 fo Prof R.V.Rama Rao, Advisor, recommending for the extension of services of Sri P.Srikanth and Sri M.Chandrasekhar till 31.3.2003. ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.927: Certified copy of letter dt.30.8.2002 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri P.Srikanth.(1 sheet)

Ex.P.928: Certified copy of note dt.20.3.2003 of Prof. R.V.Rama Rao, advisor to Sri P.Sambandan recommending for extension of services of Sri P.Srikanth and Sri M.Chandradeskhar for a period of one year ( 1 sheet) 73C.C.7/2007/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.929: Certified copy of letter dt.27.3.2003 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri P.Srikanth.(1 sheet)

Ex.P.930: Note dt 1.3.2004 of Mrs.P.Nagamani, Assistant to Shri V.V. Shiv Kumar, HPT ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.931 : Certified copy of letter dt.8.3.2004 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri P.Srikanth.(1 sheet)

Ex.P.932 : Certified copy of note dt.4.8.2002 of Prof. R.V.Rama Rao, advisor requesting for a temporary appointment to be given to Shri D.Yogendar, S. Ram Prasad Babu, V. Govidu and P. Sriramamurthy ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.933 : Certified copy of letter dt.1.8.2002 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Shri D. Yogendar (2 sheets)

Ex.P.934 : Joining report dt. 1.8.2002 of Shri D.Yogendar (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.935: Certified copy of note dt.31.3.2003 of Prof. R.V.Rama Rao, requesting for lumpsum payment to be given to Shri D. Yogendar (1 sheet)

Ex.P.936: Certified copy of letter dt.8.4.2003 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Shri D. Yogendar (2 sheets)

Ex.P.937 : Joining report dt. 10.4.2002 of Shri D. Yogendar.

Ex.P.938 : Certified copy of letter dt.30.8.2003 of Shri A.V. Ramana Murthy, Head Finance & Accounts to Shri D.Yogendar (1 sheet)

Ex.P.939: Note dt.8.9.2003 of Shri. N.V. Rao, Deputy General Manager requesting for the sercices of Shri D.Yogendar for a period of six months (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.940: Certified copy of letter dt.9.9.2003 of Shri V.V. Shiv Kumar, HPT to Shri D. Yogendar (2 sheets)

Ex.P.941: Joining report dt. 9.9.2003 of Shri D. Yogendar (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.942 : Note dt.1.3.2004 of Shri. S.V.D. Prasad recommending for extension of services of Shri D. Yogendar for another six months (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.943 : Certified copy of letter dt.5.3.2004 of Shri V.V. Shiv Kumar, HPT to Shri D. Yogendar (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.944: Note dt.16.8.2004 of Shri. S.V.D. Prasad recommending for extension of services of Shri D. Yogendar for another one month (1 Sheet) 74C.C.7/2007/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.945 : Certified copy of letter dt.2.9.2004 of Shri V.V. Shiv Kumar, HPT to Shri D. Yogendar (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.946 : Certified copy of letter dt.1.8.2002 of Shri V.V. Shiv Kumar, HPT to Shri V. Govindu (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.947 : Joining report dt. 16.8.2002 of Shri V. Govindu (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.948: Certified copy of note dt.14.10.2003 of Mrs. D.Jyothi, Project Coordinator to Shri S.V.D. Prasad requesting to regularize the services of Shri S.Ram Prasad Babu and Shri V. Govindu from temporary to contract (1 sheet)

Ex.P.949: Certified copy of letter dt.14.10.2003 of Shri V.V. Shiv Kumar, HPT to Shri V. Govindu (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.950 : Joining report dt. Nil of Shri V. Govindu (1 sheet)

Ex.P.951 : Note dt.9.6.2004 of Sri S.V. Durga Prasad, Chief Manager to Shri P. Sambandan recommending for extension of Shri V. Govindu’s services for six months (1 sheet)

Ex.P.952: Certified copy of letter dt.10.6.2004 of Shri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Shri V. Govindu (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.953 : Note dt.13.12.2004 of S.V.D. Prasad, Chief Manager to Shri K.R. Kishore, Director I/c for extension of services of Shri V. Govindu upto 31st December 2005 (1 sheet)

Ex.P.954 : Certified copy of letter dt.27.12.2004 of Shri V.V. Shiv Kumar, HPT to Shri V. Govindu (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.955 : Certified copy of letter dt.1.8.2002 of Shri V.V. Shiv Kumar, HPT to Shri S. Ram Prasad Babu (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.956 : Joining report dt. 16.8.2002 of Shri S. Ram Prasad Babu (1 sheet)

Ex.P.957 : Certified copy of letter dt.14.10.2003 of Shri V.V. Shiv Kumar, HPT to Shri S. Ram Prasad Babu (2 Sheets)

Ex.P.958 : Joining report dt. Nil of Shri S. Ram Prasad Babu(1 sheet)

Ex.P.959 : Note dt.27.5.2004 of S.V.D. Prasad and Shri U.S.Ramesh to Shri P. Sambandan for extension of services of Shri S. Ram Prasad Babu (1 sheet)

Ex.P.960 : Certified copy of letter dt.10.06.2004 of Shri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Shri S. Ram Prasad Babu (1 Sheet)

Ex.P.961: Note dt.7.12.2004 of Sri U.S.Ramesh, Head of the Divisions (SW & IT) to Sri K.R.Kishore, director i/c for extension of 75C.C.7/2007/Prl. CBI Court/VSP services of Sri S.Ram Prasad Babu upto 31.12.2005 ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.962 : Certified copy of letter dt.29.12.2004 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri S.Ram Prasad Babu ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.963:Application dt.26.7.2002 of Ms.I.Ramadevi along with enclosures ( 6 sheets)

Ex.P.964 : Certified copy of leter dt.16.8.2002 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Ms.I.Rama Devi ( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.965 : Joining report dt.19.8.2002 of Ms.I.Ramadevi ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.966 : Note dt.5.2.2003 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri A.Rama Prasad, DGM for extension of Ms.I Ramadevi’s services, if required ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.967 : Certified copy of letter dt.17.2.2003 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Ms.I Rama devi( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.968 :Joining report dt.17.2.2003 of Ms.I.Rama Devi ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.969 : Certified copy of note dt.4.8.2003 of Sri A.Rama Prasad, DGM to Sri P.Sambandan ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.970 : Certified copy of letter dt.5.8.2003 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Ms.I.Ramadevi ( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.971: Joining report dt.1.10.2003 of Ms.I.Rama Devi ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.972 : Letter dt.3.3.2005 of Ms.I Ramadevi ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.973 : Certified copy of note dt.5.8.2002 of Prof.R.V.Rama Rao, Advisor( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.974 : Letter dt.1.8.2002 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri P.Srirama Murthy ( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.975 : Joinijng report dt.21.8.2002 of Sri P.Srirama Murthy ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.976 : Certified copy note dt.22.3.2003 of Sri NRK Rao, DGM to Sri P.Sambandan ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.977: Certified copy of letter dt.26.3.2003 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri P.Srrirama Murthy ( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.978 : Joining report dt.Nil of Sri P.Srirama Murthy ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.979 : Certified copy of leter dt.30.9.2004 of Sri P.Sambandan to Sri P.Srirama Murthy ( 1 sheet) 76C.C.7/2007/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.980 : Certified copy of letter dt.30.9.2004 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri P.Srirama Murthy ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.981 :Certified copy of fax dt.13.10.2004 of Sri P.Srirama Murthy ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.982 :Application dt.11.9.2002 of Sri Uday Juvvala along with enclosures ( 7 sheets)

Ex.P.983 : Certified copy of letter dt.18.9.2002 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri Uday Juvvala ( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.984 : Joining report dt.30.9.2002 of Sri Uday Juvvala ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.985 : Certified copy of letter dt.26.3.2003 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPt to Sri Uday Juvvala ( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.986 : Joining report dt.Nil of Sri Uday Juvvala ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.987 : Letter dt.20.8.2003 of Sri Uday Juvvala ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.988 : Application dt.Nil of Sri A.Rama Prasad along with enclosures ( 8 sheets)

Ex.P.989 : Letter dt.29.7.1998 of Sri A.Ramesh Kumar, Head Personnel & Administration to Sri A.Rama Prasad ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.990 : Joining report dt.3.8.1998 of Sri A.Rama Prasad ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.991 : Certified copy of call letter dt.11.8.1998 of Sri A.Ramesh Kumar, Secretary & HPA to Sri A.Rama Prasad ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.992 : Letter dt.1.9.1998 of Sri A.Ramesh Kumar, Secreatry-cum Head Pers. & Admin to Sri A.Rama Prasad ( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.993 : Joining report dt.1.9.1998 of Sri A.Rama Prasad( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.994 : Certified copy of letter dt.1.10.2001 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri A.Ramaprasad( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.995 : Application dt.Nil of Sri P.V.V.Prasad ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.996 : Certified copy of letter dt.2.12.1996 of Cdr.K.K.Varma, Head Personnel & Administration to Sri PVV Prasad.

Ex.P.997 : Certified copy of letter dt.5.3.1997 of Sri P.V.V Prasd to Sri P.Sambandan ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.998 : Certified copy of letter dt.14.3.1997 of Cdr.K.K.Varma, Head Personnel & Administration to Sri P.v.V.Prasad ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.999 : Certified copy of call letter dt.2.5.1997 of Cdr.KK.Varma, HPT to Sri PVV Prasad . ( 1 sheet) 77C.C.7/2007/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.1000: Letter dt.2.6.1997 of Cdr.K.K.Varma, HPA to Sri PVV Prasad( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1001 : Joining report dt.3.6.1997 of Sri PVV Prasad (1 sheet)

Ex.P.1002 : Memorandum dt.6.1.1998 of Cdr.K.K.Varma, General Manager to PVV Prasad as his service are far from satisfactory (1 sheet)

Ex.P.1003 :Memorandum dt.17.2.1998 of Sri A.Ramesh Kumar, HPA to Sri PVV Prasad (1 sheet)

Ex.P.1004 : Note dt.18.5.1998 of Sri A.Ramesh Kumar, HPA to Cdr. K.K.Varma, GM sought advice as the probation of Sri PVV Prasad is due on 2.6.1998 (1 sheet)

Ex.P.1005 : Note dt.18.5.1998 of Sri A.Ramesh Kumar, HPA to Cdr.K.K.Varma, GM (1 sheet)

Ex.P.1006 : Letter dt.18.5.1998 of Sri A.Ramesh Kumar, HPA to Sri PVV Prasad(1 sheet)

Ex.P.1007 : Certified copy of letter dt.16.6.1998 of Sri A.Ramesh Kumar, HPA to Sri PVV Prasad ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1008 : Note dt.16.6.1998 of Sri A.Ramesh Kumar, HPA to Cdr.KK Varma, GM for relieving Sri PVV Prasad(1 sheet)

Ex.P.1009 : Note dt.14.9.1998 of Sri A.Ramesh Kumar, HPA to Sri P.Sambandan informing that the extended period of Sri PVV Prasad is completing on 17.9.1998 and sought the advice of the Director (1 sheet)

Ex.P.1010 : Letter dt.18.9.1998 of Sri A.Ramesh Kumar, Secretary-cum- Head Personnel & Administration to Sri PVV Prasad (2 sheets)

Ex.P.1011 : Joining report dt.18/9/1998 of Sri PVV Prasad (1sheet)

Ex.P.1012 : Note dt.8/8/2001 of Shri A.Rama Prasad, Dy.General manager to Shri P.Sambandan for extension of contract of Shri PVV prasad for five years (1 sheet)

Ex.P.1013 : Certified copy of leter dt.12/9/2001 of Shri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Shri PVV Prasad (1 sheet)

Ex.P.1014: Joining report dt.18/9/2001 of Shri PVV Prasad (1 sheet)

Ex.P.1015 : Certified copy of letter dt.1/10/2001 of Shri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Shri P.V.V.Prasad (2 sheets)

Ex.P.1016 : Joining report dt.1/10/2001 of Shri PVV Prasad (1 sheet) 78C.C.7/2007/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.1017 : Application dt.18/9/1998 of Shri K.Sridhar along with enclosures (27 sheets)

Ex.P.1018 : Letter dt.29/9/1998 of Shri A.Ramesh Kumar, HPA to Shri K.Sridhar (2 sheets)

Ex.P.1019: Joining report dt.14/12/1998 of Shri K.Sridhar (1 sheet)

Ex.P.1020: Letter dt.7/8/2001 of Shri K.Sridhar (1 sheet)

Ex.P.1021:Application dt.4/3/1999 of Shri N.Bhaskar along with enclosures. Shri N.V.Rao, recommended to take Shri Bhaskar, Cdr.K.K.Varma also recommended to offer Shri Bhaskar a contract appointment similar to Mr.Sridhar, who is Bhaskar’s class-mate (4 sheets)

Ex.P.1022:Certified copy of letter dt.24/5/1999 of Shri B.Satyanarayana, HPA to Shri N.Bhaskar (2 sheets)

Ex.P.1023: Joining report dt.5/7/1999 of Shri N.Bhaskar (1 sheet)

Ex.P.1024: Letter dt.28/8/2001 of Shri N.Bhaskar (1 sheet)

Ex.P.1025: Application dt.17/6/1999 of Shri Anil M.N.along with enclosures (12 sheets)

Ex.P.1026:Certified copy of letter dt.8/7/1999 of Shri B.Satyanarayana, Head Personnel & Administration to Shri Anil MN (2 sheets)

Ex.P.1027: Joining report dt.18/10/1999 of Shri Anil MN ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1028:Letter dt.3/4/2000 of Shri Anil MN ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1029: Application dt.14/8/1997 of Shri G.V.Sudarshana Rao along with enclosures ( 4 sheets)

Ex.P.1030: Letter dt.3/10/1997 of Shri A.Ramesh kumar, Officer, Pers. & Admin. To Shri G.V.Sudarshan Rao ( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1031: Joining report dt.3/11/1997 of Shri G.V.Sudarshan Rao ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1032: Certified copy of letter dt.3/11/1998 of Shri A.Ramesh Kumar, Secretary cum Head Personnel & Administration to Shri G.V.Sudarshana Rao ( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1033: Joining report dt.3/11/1998 of Shri G.V.Sudarshana Rao ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1034 : Letter dt.29/8/2001 of Shri G.V.Sudarshana Rao to Sri P.Sambandan. ( 1 sheet) 79C.C.7/2007/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.1035 : Application dt.14/8/1997 of Shri S.R.Mohammad ( 6 sheets)

Ex.P.1036 : Letter dt.3/10/1997 of Shri A.Ramesh Kumar, Officer, Pers.& Admin.to Shri S.R.Mohammad ( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1037 : Joining report dt.3/11/1997 of Shri S.R.Mohammad ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1038: Certified copy of letter dt.3/11/1998 of Shri A.Ramesh Kumar, Secretary cum Head Personnel & Administration to Shri S.R.Mohammad ( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1039 : Joining report dt.3/11/1998 of Shri S.R.Mohammad ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1040 : Certified copy of letter dt.1/10/2001 of Shri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Shri S.R.Mohammad ( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1041 : Joining report dt.1/10/2001 of Shri S.R.Mohammad ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1042 : Letter dt.23/1/2003 of Shri S.R.Mohammad ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1043 : Application dt.17/8/1997 of Shri MVSS Prakash ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1044 : Letter dt.3/10/1997 of Shri A.Ramesh Kumar, Officer, Pers. & Admin. To Shri MVSS Prakash ( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1045 : Joining report dt.3/11/1997 of Shri MVSS Prakash ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1046 : Certified copy of letter dt.3/11/1998 of Shri A.Ramesh Kumar, Secretary cum Head Personnel & Administration to Shri MVSS Prakash ( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1047 : Joining report dt.3/11/1998 of Shri MVSS Prakash (1 sheet)

Ex.P.1048 : Certified copy of letter dt.1/10/2001 of Shri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Shri MVSS Prakash ( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1049 : Joining report dt.1/10/2001 of Shri MVSS Prakash ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1050 : Application dt.nil of Shri VL Rama Kishore along with enclosures ( 5 sheets)

Ex.P.1051 : Letter dt.3/10/1997 of Shri A.Ramesh kumar, Officer, Pers. & Admin. To Shri VL Rama Kishore ( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1052 : Joining report dt.3/11/1997 of Shri VL Rama Kishore ( 1 sheet) 80C.C.7/2007/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.1053 : Certified copy of letter dt.3/11/1998 of Shri A.Ramesh Kumar, Secretary cum Head Personnel & Administration of Shri VL Rama Kishore ( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1054 : Joining report dt.3/11/1998 of Shri V.L.Rama Kishore ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1055 : Certified copy of letter dt.1/10/2001 of Shri V.V.Shiv Kumar,HPT to Shri VL Rama Kishore ( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1056 : Joining report dt.1/10/2001 of Shri VL Rama Kishore ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1057 : Application dt.18/8/1997 of Shri P.Suresh ( 5 sheets)

Ex.P.1058 : Letter dt.3/10/1997 of Shri A.Ramesh Kumar, Officer, Pers. & Admin. to Shri P.Suresh ( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1059 : Joining report dt.3/11/1997 of Shri P.Suresh ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1060 : Certified copy of letter dt.3/11/1998 of Shri A.Ramesh kumar, secretary cum Head Personnel & Administration to Shri P.Suresh ( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1061 : Joining report dt.3/11/1998 of Shri P.Suresh ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1062 : Certified copy of letter dt.1/10/2001 of Shri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Shri P.Suresh (2 sheets)

Ex.P.1063 : Joining report dt.1/10/2001 of Shri P.Suresh ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1064 : Application dt.nil of Shri K.S.V.P.Venu Madhav( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1065 : Letter dt.3/10/1997 of Shri A.Ramesh Kumar, Officer, Pers & Admin to Srhi KSVP Venu Madhav ( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1066 : Joining report dt.3/11/1997 of Shri KSVP Venu Madhav ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1067 : Certified copy of letter dt.3/11/1998 of Shri A.Ramesh Kumar, Secretary cum Head Personnel & Administrationto Shri KSVP Venu Madhav ( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1068 : Joining report dt.3/11/1998 of Shri KSVP Venu Madhav ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1069: Certified copy of letter dt.23/10/2001 of Shri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Shri KSVP Venu Madhav ( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1070 : Joining report dt.23/10/2001 of Shri KSVP Venu Madhav ( 1 sheet) 81C.C.7/2007/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.1071 : Application dt.21/8/1997 of Shri M.Jagannadha Raju ( 5 sheets)

Ex.P.1072 : Letter dt.3/10/1997 of Shri A.Ramesh Kumar, officer, Pers.& Admin. to Shri M.Jagannadha Raju ( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1073: Joining report dt.3/11/1997 of Shri M.Jagannadha Raju ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1074 : Certified copy of letter dt.3/11/1998 of Shri A.Ramesh Kumar, Secretary cum Head Personnel & Administration to Shri M.Jagannadha Raju ( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1075 : Joining report dt.3/11/1998 of Shri M.Jagannadha Raju ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1076 : Certified copy of letter dt.1/10/2001 of Shri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Shri M.Jagannadha Raju ( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1077 : Joining report dt.1/10/2001 of Shri M.Jagannadha Raju (1 sheet)

Ex.P.1078 : Application dt.nil of Shri K.Ganesh naidu along with enclosures ( 3 sheets)

Ex.P.1079 : letter dt.3/10/1997 of Shri A.Ramesh Kumar, Officer, Pers. & Admin.to Shri K.Ganesh Naidu ( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1080 : Joining report dt.3/11/1997 of Shri K.Ganesh Naidu ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1081 : Certified copy of letter dt.3/11/1998 of Shri A.Ramesh Kumar, Secretary cum Head Personnel & Administration to Shri K.Ganesh naidu ( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1082 : Joining report dt.3/11/1998 of Shri K.Ganesh Naidu ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1083 : Certified copy of letter dt.1/10/2001 of Shri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Shri K.Ganesh Naidu (2 sheets)

Ex.P.1084 : Joining report dt.1/10/2001 of Shri K.Ganesh Naidu ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1085 : Application dt.nil of Shri N.Madhu Kumar along with enclosures (2 sheets)

Ex.P.1086 : Letter dt.3/10/1997 of Shri A.Ramesh Kumar, Officer, Pers. & Admin. to Shri N.Madhu Kumar ( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1087 : Joining report dt.3/11/1997 of Shri N.Madhu Kumar ( 1 sheet) 82C.C.7/2007/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.1088 : Certified copy of letter dt.3/11/1998 of Shri A.Ramesh Kumar, Secretary cum Head Personnel & Administration to Shri N.Madhu Kumar, ( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1089 :Joining report dt.3/11/1998 of Shri N.Madhu Kumar ( 1 sheet) Ex.P.1090 :Certified copy of letter dt.1/10/2001 of Shri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Shri N.Madhu Kumar ( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1091 :Joining report dt.1/10/2001 of Shri N.Madhu Kumar ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1092 :Application dt.19/8/1997 of Shri H.Vijaya Krishna along with enclosures ( 3 sheets)

Ex.P.1093 :Letter dt.3/10/1997 of Shri A.Ramesh Kumar, Officer, Pers. & Admin. to Shri H.Vijaya Krishna ( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1094 :Joining report dt.3/11/1997 of Shri H.Vijaya Krishna ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1095 :Certified copy of letter dt.3/11/1998 of Shri A.Ramesh Kumar, Secretary cum Head Personnel & Administration to Shri H.Vijaya Krishna ( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1096 :Joining report dt.3/11/1998 of Shri H.Vijaya Krishna ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1097 : Certified copy of letter dt.1/10/2001 of Shri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Shri H.Vijaya Krishna ( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1098 : Joining report dt.1/10/2001 of Shri H.Vijaya Krishna ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1099 : Application dt.18/8/1997 of Shri I.Srinivasa Rao along with enclosures ( 6 sheets)

Ex.P.1100 : Letter dt.27/10/1997 of Shri A.Ramesh, Officer, Pers. & Admin. to Shri I.Srinivasa Rao ( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1101 : Joining report dt.3/11/1997 of Shri I.Srinivasa Rao ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1102 : Certified copy of letter dt.3/11/1998 of Shri A.Ramesh Kumar, Secretary cum Head Pers. & Admin. to Shri I.Srinivasa Rao ( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1103 : Joining report dt.3/11/1998 of Shri I.Srinivasa Rao ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1104 : Certified copy of letter dt.1/10/2001 of Shri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Shri I.Srinivasa Rao ( 2 sheets) 83C.C.7/2007/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.1105 : Joining report dt.1/10/2001 of Shri I.Srinivasa Rao ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1106 : Application dt.3/5/1999 of Shri N.Suresh ( 6 sheets)

Ex.P.1107 : Letter dt.17/5/1999 of Shri B.Satyanarayana, HPA to Shri N.Suresh ( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1108 : Joining report dt.16/7/1999 of Shri N.Suresh ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1109 : Note dt.11/7/2000 of Shri B.Satyanarayana, HPA to Shri N.V.Rao, Dy.General Manager for extension of services of Shri N.Suresh ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1110 : Letter dt.14/7/2000 of Sri B.Satyanarayana, HPA to Sri N.Suresh ( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1111 : Certified copy of letter dt.29/12/2000 of Shri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to shri N.Suresh ( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1112: Joining report dt.1/1/2001 of Shri N.Suresh ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1113 : Letter dt.1/10/2001 of Shri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Shri N.Suresh (2 sheets)

Ex.P.1114 : Joining report dt.1/10/2001 of Shri N.Suresh ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1115 : Certified copy of letter dt.8/7/2002 of Shri N.Suresh ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1116: Application dt.15/11/1997 of Shri Niladri pal ( 3 sheets)

Ex.P.1117: Letter dt.4/12/1997 of Shri A.Ramesh Kumar, HPA to Shri Niladri Pal (1 sheet)

Ex.P.1118 : Letter dt.12/7/1999 of Shri B.Satyanarayana, HPA to Shri Niladri pal (2 sheets)

Ex.P.1119 : Joining report dt.17/8/1999 ( 1 sheet) ( page 12)

Ex.P.1120 : Certified copy of letter dt.10/7/2000 of Shri Niladri Pal to Sri P.Sambandan ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1121 :Letter dt.12/8/2000 of Shri Niladri Pal to Shri B.Satyanarayana, HPA (1 sheet)

Ex.P.1122 : Note dt.8/8/2000 of Shri B.Satyanarayana, HPA to Shri P.Sambandan regarding extension of Shri Niladri Pal’s services for a period of one year (1 sheet)

Ex.P.1123: Letter dt.13/8/2000 of Shri B.Satyanarayana HPA to Shri Niladri pal (2 sheets) 84C.C.7/2007/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.1124 : Certified copy of letter dt.29/12/2000 of Shri V.V.shiv Kumar, HPT to Shri Niladri pal ( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1125: Joining report dt.1/1/2001 of Shri Niladri Pal (1 sheet)

Ex.P.1126 : Certified copy of letter dt.1/10/2001 of Shri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Shri Niladri Pal (2 sheets)

Ex.P.1127 : Joining report dt.1/10/2001 of Shri Niladri Pal ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1128 : Letter dt.14/11/2001 of Shri Niladri Pal (1 sheet)

Ex.P.1129 : Certified copy of NSDRC advertisement in The Hindu ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1130 : Certified copy of call letter dt.9/7/2001 of Shri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Shri VVSG Sankar Rao ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1131 : Call letter dt.23/7/2001 of Shri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Shri VVSG Sankar Rao ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1132 : Certified copy of letter dt.27.8.2001 of Shri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Shri VVSG Sankar Rao (2 sheets)

Ex.P.1133 : Joining report dt.10/9/2001 of Shri VVSG Sankar Rao ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1134: Certified copy of letter dt.1/10/2001 of Shri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Shri VVSG Sankar Rao ( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1135: Joining report dt.1/10/2001 of Shri VVSG Sankar Rao ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1136: Letter dt.31/12/2004 of Shri VVSG Sankar Rao ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1137 : Certified copy of call letter dt.9.7.2001 of Shri V.V.Shi v Kumar, HPT to Shri K.Rajendra (1 sheet)

Ex.P.1138 : Call letter dt.23/7/2001 of Shri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Shri K.Rajendra ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1139: Certified copy of letter dt.27/8/2001 of Shri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Shri K.Rajendra (2 sheets)

Ex.P.1140: Joining report dt.10/9/2001 of Shri K.Rajendra (1 sheet)

Ex.P.1141 : Certified copy of letter dt.1/10/2001 of Shri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Shri K.Rajednra (2 sheets)

Ex.P.1142 : Joining report dt.1/10/2001 of Shri K.Rajendra (1 sheet)

Ex.P.1143 : Letter dt.18/9/2003 of Shri K.Rajendra (1 sheet) 85C.C.7/2007/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.1144: Certified copy of call letter dt.9/7/2001 of Shri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Shri Syed Maqsood Ahmed (1 sheet)

Ex.P.1145: Call letter dt.23/7/2001 of Shri V.v.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Shri Syed Maqsood Ahmed (1 sheet)

Ex.P.1146: Certified copy of letter dt.27/8/2001 of Shri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Shri Syed Maqsood Ahmed (2sheets)

Ex.P.1147: Joining report dt.1/10/2001 of Shri Syed Maqsood Ahmed (1 sheet)

Ex.P.1148 : Certified copy of letter dt.1/10/2001 of Shri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Shri Syed Maqsood Ahmed (2 sheets)

Ex.P.1149 : Joining report dt.1/10/2001 of Shri Syed Maqsood Ahmed (1 sheet)

Ex.P.1150 : Letter dt.31/12/2001 of Shri Syed Maqsood Ahmed (1 sheet)

Ex.P.1151: Application dt.11/4/1999 of Shri NRK Rao along with enclosures (4 sheets)

Ex.P.1152: Letter dt.28/4/1999 of Shri P.Sambandan to Shri NRK Rao (1 sheet)

Ex.P.1153: Joining report dt.10/5/1999 of Shri NRK Rao (1 sheet)

Ex.P.1154 : Certified copy of letter dt.1/10/2001 of Shri V.v.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Shri NRO Rao (2 sheets)

Ex.P.1155: Joining report dt.1/10/2001 of Shri NRK Rao (1 sheet)

Ex.P.1156: Application dt.nil of Shri A.Suresh Kumar along with enclosures (32 sheets)

Ex.P.1157 : Certified copy of letter dt.1/10/2001 of Shri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Shri A.Suresh Kumar (2 sheets)

Ex.P.1158: Joining report dt.3/10/2001 of Shri A.Suresh Kumar (1 sheet)

Ex.P.1159 : Application dt.nil of Shri V.Bangarayya along with enclosures (5 sheets)

Ex.P.1160 : Certified copy of letter dt.1/10/2001 of Shri V.v.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Shri V.Bangarayya (2 sheets)

Ex.P.1161: Joining report dt.1/10/2001 of Shri V.Bangarayya (1 sheet) 86C.C.7/2007/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.1162: Certified copy of letter dt.30/9/2004 of Shri P.Sambandan to Shri V.Bangarayya (1 sheet)

Ex.P.1163 : Certified copy of letter dt.30/9/2004 of Shri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Shri V.Bangarayya (1 sheet)

Ex.P.1164: Application dt.nil of Shri K.Venkata jagadeesh along with enclosures (8 sheets)

Ex.P.1165: Note dt.20/9/2001 of Shri S.S.Reddy, General Manager to Shri Y.R.Rao, Advisor recommending for the appointment of Shri Venkata Jagadeesh (1 sheet)

Ex.P.1166 : Letter dt.22/9/2001 of Shri S.S.Reddy, General Manager to Shri v.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT (1 sheet)

Ex.P.1167: Letter dt.1/10/2001 of Shri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Shri K.Venkata Jagadeesh (2 sheets)

Ex.P.1168: Joining report dt.1/10/2001 of Shri K.Venkata Jagadeesh (1 sheet)

Ex.P.1169: Letter dt.30/9/2004 of Shri K.Venkata Jagadeesh (1 sheet)

Ex.P.1170:Application dt.nil of Shri C.Srinivas along with enclosure(18 sheets)

Ex.P.1171: Certified copy of letter dt.9/10/2001 of Shri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Shri C.Srinivas (2 sheets)

Ex.P.1172: Joining report dt.15/10/2001 of Shri C.Srinivas (1 sheet)

Ex.P.1173 : Letter dt.5/2/2003 of Shri C.Srinivas (1 sheet)

Ex.P.1174: Application dt.1/10/2001 of Shri MSN Krishna Prasad along with enclosures (8 sheets)

Ex.P.1175 : Certified copy of letter dt.3/10/2001 of Shri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Shri MSN Krishna Prasad (2 sheets)

Ex.P.1176 : Joining report dt.18/10/2001 of Shri MSN Krishna Prasad (1 sheet)

Ex.P.1177: Certified copy of letter dt.5/11/2003 of Shri P.Sambandan to Shri MSN Krishna Prasad (1 sheet)

Ex.P.1178: Certified copy of letter dt.5/11/2003 of Shri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Shri MSN Krishna Prasad (1 sheet)

Ex.P.1179: Note dt.14/1/2004 of Shri S.E.Sridharan for extension of services of Shri MSN Krishna Prasad ( 1 sheet) 87C.C.7/2007/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.1180: Certified copy of letter dt.20/1/2004 of Shri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Shri MSN Krishna Prasad (1 sheet)

Ex.P.1181: Resume dt.nil of Ms.D.Anuradha (6 sheets)

Ex.P.1182 : Note dt.10/11/2001 of Shri S.S.Reddy, General Manager to Shri Y.R.Rao, Advisor recommending for the appointment of Mrs.D.Anuradha (1 sheet)

Ex.P.1183: Certified copy of letter dt.16/11/2001 of Shri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Ms.D.Anuradha (2 sheets)

Ex.P.1184 : Joining report dt.16/11/2001 of Ms.D.Anuradha (1 sheets)

Ex.P.1185 : Letter dt.21/4/2001 of Ms.D.Anuradha (1 sheet)

Ex.P.1186 : Application dt.7/11/2001 of Shri Gautam Chakraborty along with enclosure (11 sheets)

Ex.P.1187: Certified copy of letter dt.7/12/2001 of Shri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Shri Gautam Chakraborty (2 sheets)

Ex.P.1188: Joining report dt.13/12/2001 of Shri Gautam Chakraborty ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1189: Certified copy of letter dt.30/9/2004 of Shri P.Sambandan to Shri Gautam Chakraborty (1 sheet)

Ex.P.1190: Certified copy of letter dt.30/9/2004 of Shri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Shri Gautam Chakraborty (1 sheet)

Ex.P.1191: Note dt.8/12/2004 of Shri U.R.P.Sudhakar, Head METS division to Shri K.R.Kishore, Director I/c for extension of services of Shri Gautam Chakraborty (1 sheet)

Ex.P.1192: Certified copy of letter dt.23/12/2004 of Shri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Shri Gautam Chakraborthy ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1193: Resume dt.nil of Shri PUBV Rama Sastry along with enclosures (9 sheets)

Ex.P.1194: Noate dt.26/11/2001 of Shri S.S.Reddy, General Manager to Shri Y.R.Rao, Advisor recommending for the appointment of Shri P.U.B.V.Rama Sastry (1 sheet)

Ex.P.1195: Certified copy of letter dt.19/12/2001 of Shri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Shri P.U.B.V.Rama Sastry (2 sheets)

Ex.P.1196: Joining report dt.28/12/2001 of Shri PUBV Rama Sastry ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1197: Application dt.8/12/2001 of Shri S.Chowdhury (1 sheet) 88C.C.7/2007/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.1198: Certified copy of letter dt.14/12/2001 of Shri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Shri S.Chowdhury (2 sheets)

Ex.P.1199: Joining report dt.nil of Shri S.Chowdhury ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1200: Letter dt.22/5/2003 of Shri S.Chowdhury ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1201: Resume dt.nil of Ms.N.Asha Kranthi (5 sheets)

Ex.P.1202 : Note dt.23/11/2001 of Shri S.S.Reddy, General Manager to Shri Y.R.Rao, Advisor recommending for the appointment of Ms.N.Asha Kranthi (1 sheet)

Ex.P.1203: Certified copy of letter dt.1/12/2001 of Shri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Ms.N.Asha Kranthi (2 sheets)

Ex.P.1204: Joining report dt.1/1/2002 of Ms.N.Asha Kranthi ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1205: Letter dt.14/3/2002 of Shri B.Satyanarayana to Ms.N.Asha Kranthi (1 sheet)

Ex.P.1206: Application dt.13/11/2001 of Mrs.Anitha Thomas (3 sheets)

Ex.P.1207: Certified copy of letter dt.19/11/2001 of Shri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Mrs.Anitha Thomas (1 sheet)

Ex.P.1208: Letter dt.26/11/2001 of Mrs.Anitha Thomas to Shri P.Sambandan (1 sheet)

Ex.P.1209: Note dt.14/12/2001 of Shri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Shri A.Rama Prasad, DGM (1 sheet)

Ex.P.1210: Certified copy of letter dt.7/1/2002 of Shri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Mrs. Anitha Thomas ( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1211: Joining report dt.7/1/2002 of Mrs.Anitha Thomas ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1212: Copy of application dt. Nil of Shri D.Raja Ajay along with enclosures (12 sheets)

Ex.P.1213: Certified copy of letter dt.7/1/2002 of Shri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Shri D.Raja Ajay ( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1214: Certified copy of joining report dt.7/1/2002 of Shri D.Raja Ajay (1 sheet)

Ex.P.1215: Application dt.10/10/2001 of Shri N.Jeya Kumar (2 sheets)

Ex.P.1216 : Certified copy of letter dt.7/1/2002 of Shri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Shri N.Jeya Kumar (2 sheets) 89C.C.7/2007/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.1217 : Joining report of Shri N.Jeya Kumar (1 sheet)

Ex.P.1218 : Certified copy of letter dt.30/9/2004 of Shri P.Sambandan to Shri N.Jeya Kumar (1 sheet)

Ex.P.1219 : Certified copy of letter dt.30/9/2004 of Shri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Shri N.Jeya Kumar (1 sheet)

Ex.P.1220 : Certified copy of application dt.7/11/2001 of Shri G.Govind Kumar along with enclosures ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1221 : Certified copy of letter dt.25/2/2002 of Shri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Shri G.Govind Kumar (2 sheets)

Ex.P.1222 : Certified copy of joining report dt.25/2/2002 of Shri G.Govind Kumar (1 sheet)

Ex.P.1223: Letter dt.9/8/2004 of Shri G.Govind Kumar (1 sheet)

Ex.P.1224: Application dt.nil of Shri GVVS Gopi Chand along with enclosures (7 sheets) Ex.P.1225: Letter dt.7/3/2002 of Shri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Shri GVVS Gopi Chand (2 sheets)

Ex.P.1226: Joining report dt.7/3/2002 of Shri Gopi Chand (1 sheet)

Ex.P.1227: Resume dt.nil of Shri V.Lakshmi kanth Reddy (2 sheets)

Ex.P.1228 : Note dt.14/2/2002 of Shri S.S.Reddy, General Manager to Shri Y.R.Rao, Advisor recommending for appointing Shri V.Lakshmikanth Reddy (1 sheet)

Ex.P.1229 : Certified copy of letter dt.11/3/2002 of Shri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Shri V.Lakshmikanth Reddy (2 sheets)

Ex.P.1230 : Joining report dt.nil of Shri V.Lakshmikanth Reddy (1 sheet)

Ex.P.1231 : Note dt.29/8/2002 of Shri S.S.Reddy to Shri Y.R.Rao recommending for termination of Shri V.Lakshmikanth Reddy’s services ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1232 : Certified copy of letter of Shri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Shri V.Lakshmikath Reddy ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1233: Application dt.nil of Mrs.Seema Verma (2 sheets)

Ex.P.1234 : Certified copy of letter dt.4/4/2002 of Shri V.v.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Mrs.Seema Verma (2 sheets)

Ex.P.1235: Joining letter dt.5/4/2002 of Mrs.Seema Verma (1 sheet)

Ex.P.1236 : Certified copy of letter dt.5/11/2003 of Shri P.Sambandan to Mrs.Seema Verma (1 sheet) 90C.C.7/2007/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.1237: Certified copy of letter dt.5/11/2003 of Shri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Mrs.Seema Verma (1 sheet)

Ex.P.1238: Certified copy of application dt.nil of Mrs.K.Kusuma (15 sheets)

Ex.P.1239 : Certified copy of letter dt.4/4/2002 of Shri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Ms.K.Kusuma (2 sheets)

Ex.P.1240 : Certified copy of joining report dt.8/4/2002 of Ms.K.Kusuma (1 sheet)

Ex.P.1241: Certified copy of application dt.nil of Shri VSR Kamalakkanan (2 sheets) Ex.P.1242: Certified copy of note dt.3/3/2002 of Shri S.S.Reddy, General manager to Shri Y.R.Rao recommending for the appointment of Shri V.S.R. Kamalakkanan ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1243: Certified copy of letter dt.1.4.2002 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar to Sri VSR Kamalakanna ( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1244:Joining letter dt .15.4.2002 of Sri VSR Kamalakkanan ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1245: Note dt. 21.9.2002 of Sri S.S.Reddy, General Manager to Sri YR Rao for extension of services of Sri VSR Kamalakkanan( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1246:Certified copy of letter dt.4.10.2002 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPt to Sri VSR Kamalakkanan ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1247: Letter dt.30.6.2004 of Sri VSR Kamalakkanan ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1248: Certified copy of application dt.Nil of Sri MS Ravindran ( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1249: Certified copy of note dt.9.3.2002 of Sri S.S.Reddy, General Manager to Sri Y.R.Rao, Advisor recommending for the appointment of Sri M.s.Ravindran ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1250: Certified copy of letter dt.1.4.2002 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri M.S.Ravindran ( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1251: Joining report dt.15.4.2002 of Sri MS RAvindran ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1252: Note dt.21.9.2002 of Sri S.S.Reddy, General Manager to Sri Y.R.Rao, Advisor, recommending for extension of services of Sri M.S. Ravindran( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1253: Certified copy of letter dt.4.10.2002 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri MS Ravindran ( 1 sheet) 91C.C.7/2007/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.1254: Letter dt.4.10.2003 of Sri M.S.Ravindran ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1255: Application dt.19.4.2002 of Sri N.Chandrasekhar ( 3 sheets)

Ex.P.1256: Letter dt.19.4.2002 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri N.Chandrasekhar ( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1257: Joining report dt.26.4.2002 of Sri N.Chandra Sekhar ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1258: Certified copy of letter dt.21.5.2002 of Sri N.Chandrasekhar ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1259: Certified copy of fax application dt.8.4.2002 of Sri K.V.Sanjoy Kumar ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1260: Certified copy of letter dt.15.4.2002 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri K.V.Sanjoy Kumar ( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1261: Joining report dt.29.4.2002 of Sri K.V.Sanjoy Kumar ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1262: Letter dt.31.12.2004 of Sri K.V.Sanjoy Kumar ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1263: Application dt.Nil of Sri R.Amit Varma ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1264: Note dt.17.4.2002 of Sri S.S.Reddy, General Manager to Sri Y.R.Rao, Advisor recommending for the appointment of Sri R.Amit Varma ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1265: Certified copy of letter dt.22.4.2002 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri R.Amit Varma ( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1266: Joining report dt.1.5.2002 of Sri R.Amit Varma( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1267: Letter dt.25.1.2003 of Sri R.Amit Varma ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1268: Letter dt.1.5.2002 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri M.Chandra Sekhar ( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1269: Joining report dt.1.5.2002 of Sri M.Chandra SEkhar ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1270: Certified copy of letter dt.30.8.2002 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri M.Chandra Sekhar ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1271: Certified copy of letter dt.27.3.2003 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri M.Chandra Sekhar ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1272: Lettter dt.12.1.2004 of Sri M.Chandra Sekhar ( 1 sheet) 92C.C.7/2007/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.1273: Applciation dt.24.4.2002 of Mrs.M.Bhanu Priya along with enclosures ( 12 sheets)

Ex.P.1274: Certified copy of letter dt.1.5.2002 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Mrs.M.Bhanu Priya ( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1275:Joining report dt.7.5.2002 of Ms M.Bhanu Priya ( 1 sheet) Ex.P.1276: Applciation dt.Nil of Miss K.Santhi Sree along with enclosures ( 6 sheets)

Ex.P.1277: Certified copy of letter dt.8.5.2002 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPt to Ms.K.SAnthi Sree ( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1278: Joinign report dt.8.5.2002 of Ms.K.SAnthi Sree ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1279: Letter dt.24.11.2003 of Miss K.Santhi Sree ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1280: Application dt.22.2.2002 of Miss N.Sri Neelima ( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1281: Certified copy of letter dt.3.5.2002 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Miss N.Sri Neelima ( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1282: Certified copy of joining report dt.15.5.2002 of Ms.N.Sri Neelima ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1283: Certified copyof letter dt.30.9.2004 of Sri P.Sambandan to Ms.N.Sri Neelima ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1284: Certified copy of letter dt.30.9.2004 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Ms.N.Sri Neelima ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1285: Certified copy of letter dt.29.10.2004 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Ms.N.Sri Neelima ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1286: Application dt.22.2.2002 of Sri P.Ravi Kumar ( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1287: Certified copy of letter dt.3.5.2002 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPt to Sri P.Ravi Kumar ( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1288: Joining report dt.15.5.202 of Sri P.Ravi Kumar ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1289: Certified copy of letter dt.30.9.2004 of Sri P.Sambandan to Sri P.Ravi Kumar ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1290: Certified copy of letter dt.30.9.2004 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPt to Sri P.Ravi Kumar ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1291: Certified copy of letter dt.29.10.2004 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri P.Ravi Kumar ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1292: Application dt.30.4.2002 of Ms.K.Sujatha( 2 sheets) 93C.C.7/2007/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.1293: Certified copy of letter dt.3.5.2002 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPt to Ms.K. Sujatha ( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1294: Joining letter dt.15.5.2002 of Mrs.K.Sujatha ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1295: Letter dt.31.12.2004 of Mrs.K.Sujatha ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1296: Application dt.30.4.2002 of Sri M.Suresh Kumar ( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1297: Certified copy of letter of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar , HPT to Sri M.Suresh Kumar ( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1298: Joining report dt.15.5.2002 of Sri M.Suresh Kumar ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1299: Certified copy of letter dt.30.9.2004 of Sri P.Sambandan to Sri M.Suresh Kumar ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1300: Certified copy of letter dt.30.9.2004 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri M.Suresh Kumar( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1301 : Certified copy of letter dt.29.10.2004 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri M.Suresh Kumar( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1302 : Application dt.14.5.2002 of Sri D.SAi Prasanth along with enclosures ( 14 sheets)

Ex.P.1303 : Certified copy of letter dt.16.5.2002 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri D.Sai Prasanth ( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1304: Joining report dt.17.5.2002 of Sri D.Sai Prasanth( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1305 : Application dt.Nil of Sri V.Anil ( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1306 : Certified copy of letter dt.29.5.2002 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri V.Anil ( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1307: Joining report dt.6.6.2002 of Sri V.Anil

Ex.P.1308 : Application dt.16.2.2002 of Sri S.Ramesh ( 13 sheets)

Ex.P.1309 : Certified copy of letter dt.17.6.2002 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri S.Ramesh ( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1310 : Joining report dt.17.6.2002 of Sri S.Ramesh ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1311: Certified copy of fax application dt.Nil of Sri P.Naresh Kumar ( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1312 : Note dt.28.5.2002 of Sri S.S.Reddy, General Manager to Sri P.Sambandan recommending for the appointment of Sri P.Naresh Kumar ( 1 sheet) 94C.C.7/2007/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.1313 : Certified copy of letter dt.3.6.2002 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri P.Naresh Kumar ( 2 sheets) Ex.P.1314 : Joining report dt.21.6.2002 of Sri P.Naresh Kumar ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1315 : Letter dt.11.8.2004 of Sri P.Naresh Kumar ( 1 shet)

Ex.P.1316 : Application dt.Nil of Miss K.Hema Vijaya along with enclosures.(13 sheets)

Ex.P.1317 : Certified copy of letter dt.11.6.2002 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Ms.K.Hema Vijaya ( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1318 : Joining report dt.24.6.2002 of Ms.K.Hema Vijaya ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1319 : Note dt.14.2.2003 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT regarding non-attendance of Ms.K.Hema Vijaya and as such recommending for termination of her services ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1320 : Certified copy of letter dt.14.2.2003 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Ms.K.Hema Vijaya( 1sheet)

Ex.P.1321 : Application dt.24.6.2002 of Sri B.N.V.V.Chandu along with enclosures ( 7 sheets)

Ex.P.1322 : Certified copy of letter dt.27.6.2002 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri BNVV Chandu ( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1323 : Joining report dt.27.6.2002 of Sri BNVV Chandu( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1324 : Certified copy of letter dt.5.11.2003 of Sri P.Sambandan to Sri BNVV Chandu ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1325: Certified copy of letter dt.5.11.2003 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri BNVV Chandu ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1326 : Application dt.17.6.2002 of Sri U.Pavan Kumar ( 19 sheets)

Ex.P.1327 : Certified copy of letter dt.20.6.2002 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri U.Pavan Kumar ( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1328 : Joining report dt.1.7.2002 of Sri U.Pavan Kumar ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1329 : Certified copy of letter dt.5.11.2003 of Sri P.Sambandan to Sri U.Pavan Kumar ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1330 : Certified copy of letter dt.5.11.2003 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri U.Pavan Kumar ( 1 sheet) Ex.P.1331 : Application dt.27.6.202 of Sri P.Sunil Kumar ( 9 sheets)

Ex.P.1332 : Certified copy of letter dt.28.6.2002 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri P.Sunil Kumar ( 2 sheets) 95C.C.7/2007/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.1333 : Joining report dt.1.7.2002 of Sri P.Sunil Kumar ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1334 : Letter dt.27.1.2003 of Sri P.Sunil Kumar ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1335 : Application dt.7.1.2002 of Mrs K.Rama Devi along with enclosures ( 7 sheets)

Ex.P.1336 : Certified copy of letter dt.4.7.2002 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Ms.K.Rama Devi. (2 sheets)

Ex.P.1337 : Joining report dt.5.7.2002 of Ms.K.Rama Devi.( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1338 : Application dt.Nil of Sri Jeevan Ram S. ( 3 sheets)

Ex.P.1339 : Certified copy of letter dt.23.7.2002 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri Jeevan Ram S.( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1340 : Certified copy of joining report dt.5.8.2002 of Sri Jeevan Ram S.( sheet)

Ex.P.1341 : Letter dt.13.12.2002 of Sri Jeevan Ram S.( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1342 : Note dt.14.8.2002 of Sri U.R.P.Sudhakar, DGM to Sri P.Sambandan recommending for the appointment of Sri DSP Vidyasagar( 17 sheets)

Ex.P.1343 : Certified copy of leter dt.19.8.2002 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri D.S.P.Vidyasagar( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1344 : Joining report dt.19.8.2002 of Sri DSP Vidyasagar ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1345 : Application dt.nil of Miss Vinita Sarabhai ( 3 sheets)

Ex.P.1346 : Certified copy of letter dt.5.9.2002 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar (2 sheets)

Ex.P.1347 : Joining report dt.5.9.2002 of Ms.Vinita Sarabhai( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1348 : Note dt.18.8.2003 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri P.Sambandan ( 1sheet)

Ex.P.1349 : Certified copy of letter dt.6.11.2003 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPt to Ms.Vinita Sarabhai ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1350 : Application dt.Nil of Ms.Ch.Srilakshmi ( 3 sheets)

Ex.P.1351 : Note dt.6.9.2002 of Sri S.S.Reddy, General Manager to Sri Y.R.Rao, Advisor recommending for Ms.Ch.Srilakshmi’s appointment ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1352 : Certified copy of letter dt.11.9.2002 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar to Ms.Ch.Srilakshmi ( 2 sheets) 96C.C.7/2007/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.1353 : Joining report of Ms.Ch.Srilakshmi ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1354 : Letter dt.Nil of Ms.Ch.Srilakshmi ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1355 : Applciation dt.Nil of Sri K.Eswar Rao along with enclosures ( 7 sheets)

Ex.P.1356: Certified copy of letter dt.17.9.2002 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri K.Eswar Rao.( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1357 : Joining report dt.19.9.2002 of Sri K.Eswar Rao ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1358 : Note dt.1.3.2004 of Sri SV Durga Prasad, Chief Manager to Sri P.Sambandan forwarded through Sri A.Rama Prasad, DGM ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1359 : Certified copy of letter dt.5.3.2004 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri K.Eswar Rao ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1360: Certified copy of letter dt.30.9.2004 of Sri P.Sambandan to Sri K. Eswara Rao ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1361: Certified copy of letter dt.30.9.2004 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri K.Eswar Rao ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1362 : Application dt.9.8.2002 of Sri M.Satyanarayana along with enclosures ( 4 sheets)

Ex.P.1363 : Certified copy of letter dft.17.9.2002 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri M.Satyanarayana ( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1364 : Joining report dt.20.9.2002 of Sri M.Satyanarayana ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1365 : Certified copy of letter dt.5.3.2004 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPt to Sri M.Satyanarayana ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1366 : Certified copy of letter dt.30.9.2004 of Sri P.Sambandan to Sri M.Satyanarayana ( 1 sheet) Ex.P.1367 : Certified copy of letter dt.30.9.2004 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri M.Satyanarayana ( 1 sheet).

Ex.P.1368 : Note dt.20.10.2004 of Sri K.Rajendra Prasad, Advisor to Sri A.Rama Prasad, Advisor to Sri A.Rama Prasad, DGM for extension of services of Sri M.Satyanarayana ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1369 : Certified copy of letter dt.25.10.2004 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri M.Satyanarayana ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1370 : Note dt.21.2.2005 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPt to Sri A.Ramesh Kumar, Personnel & Administrative Officer cum Secretary ( 1 sheet) 97C.C.7/2007/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.1371 : Certified copy of letter of Sri A.Ramesh Kumar, PAO to Sri M.Satyanarayana ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1372: Application dt.Nil of Sri Kishore Maharan ( 16 sheets)

Ex.P.1373 : Certified copy of letter dt.17.9.2002 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri Kishore Maharana ( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1374 : Joining report of Sri M.Kishore Maharana ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1375 : Certified copy of letter dt.5.3.2004 of Sri V.v.Shiv Kumar, HPt to Sri Kishore Maharana ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1376 : Certified copy of letter dt.30.9.2004 of Sri P.Sambandan to Sri Kishore Maharana ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1377 : Certified copy of letter dt.30.9.2004 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri Kishore Maharana ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1378 : Application dt.26.8.2002 of Sri V.V.Subba Rao along with enclosures ( 24 sheets)

Ex.P.1379 : Certified copy of letter dt.5.9.2002 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPt to Sri V.v.Subba Rao ( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1380 : Joining report dt.2.12.2002 of Sri V.V.Subba Rao ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1381 : Application dt.Nil of Sri D.Saravanane( 7 sheets)

Ex.P.1382 : Note dt.12.11.2002 of Sri S.S.Reddy, General Manager to Sri Y.R.Rao, Advisor recommending Sri D.Saravanane’s appointment ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1383 : Certified copy of letter dt.20.11.2002 of Srui V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri D.Saravanane( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1384 : Joining letter dt.5.12.2002 of Sri D.Saravanane( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1385 : Letter dt.12.9.2003 of Sri D.Saravanane( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1386 : Fax application dt.26.12.2002 of Cdr.Manoj Kumar received through fax ( 3 sheets)

Ex.P.1387 : Certified copy of letter dt.27.12.2002 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPt to Cdr Manoj Kumar ( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1388 : Certified copy of joining report dt.30.12.2002 of Cdr.Manoj Kumar ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1389 : Certified copy of letter dt.5.11.2003 of Sri P.Sambandan to Cdr.Manoj Kumar ( 1 sheet) 98C.C.7/2007/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.1390 : Certified copy of letter dt.5.11.2003 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPt to Cdr.Manoj Kumar ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1391 : Certified copy of letter dt.6.1.2004 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar to Cdr.Manoj Kumar ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1392 :Letter dt.27.1.2004 of Cdr.Manoj Kumar to Sri.P.Sambandan ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1393 : Letter dt.28.4.2004 of Cdr.Manjo Kumar ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1394 : Application dt.30.12.2002 of Sri R.Datta ( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1395 : Certified copy of letter dt.1.1.2003 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri R.Datta ( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1396 : Joining report dt.Nil of Sri R.Datta ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1397 : Certified copy of letter dt.30.9.2004 of Sri P.Sambandan to Sri R.Datta ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1398 : Certified copy of letter dt.30.9.2004 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri R.Datta ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1399 : Application dt.6.5.2002 of Miss M.Hari Priya ( 3 sheets)

Ex.P.1400 : Certified copy of letter dt.24.12.2002 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Miss M.Hari Priya ( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1401 :Joining report dt.16.1.2003 of Miss M.Hari Priya ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1402 : Application dt.23.1.2003 of Sri Ch.Satyanand( 23 sheets)

Ex.P.1403 : Certified copy of letter dt.24.1.2003 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri Ch.Satyanand ( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1404 : Joining report dt.27.1.2003 of Sri Ch.Satyanand ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1405 : Application dt.Nil of Sri G.N.Murali Krishna ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1406 : Note dt.24.12.2002 of Sri S.S.Reddy, General Manager to Sri Y.R.Rao, Advisor recommending for Sri G.N.Murali Krishna’s appointment ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1407 : Certified copy of letter dt.28.1.2003 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri G.N.Murali Krishna ( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1408 : Joining report dt.1.2.2003 of Sri G.N.Murali Krishna ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1409 : Letter dt.5.8.2004 of Sri G.N.Muralikrishna ( 1 sheet) 99C.C.7/2007/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.1410 : Application dt.Nil of Sri Sukhpreet Singh( 8 sheets)

Ex.P.1411 : Certified copy of letter dt.21.1.2003 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri Sukhpreet Singh ( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1412: Joining report dt.3.2.2003 of Sri Sukhpreet Singh ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1413: Certified copy of letter dt.30.9.2004 of Sri P.Sambandan to Sri Sukhpreet Singh ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1414 : Certified copy of letter dt.30.9.2004 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri Sukhpreet Singh ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1415 : Application dt.20.1.2003 of Sri P.V.R.B Acharyulu ( 9 sheets)

Ex.P.1416 : Certified copy of letter dt.19.2.2003 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri PVRB Acharyulu ( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1417 :Joining report dt.4.3.2003 of Sri PVRB Acharyulu, ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1418 : Certified copy of letter dt.13.9.2003 of Sri N.R.K.Rao, Project Manager to Sri P.Sambandan regarding non- attendance of Sri PVRB Acharyulu and Sri M.Sabarinathan ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1419 : Certified copy of letter dt.17.9.2003 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri PVRB Acharyulu ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1420: Application dt.nil of Miss P.Sundari ( 1 sheet) Ex.P.1421 : Certified copy of letter dt.5.3.2003 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Miss P.Sundari ( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1422: Joining report dt.7.3.2003 of Miss P.Sundari ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1423 : Note dt.5.8.2003 of Mrs.B.S.Jagadamba, Office Assistant to Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1424 : Certified copy of letter dt.3.9.2003 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar. HPT to Miss P.Sundari( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1425 :Joining report dt.nil of MS.P.Sundari ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1426 : Note dt.16.2.2004 of Sri V.Krishna Mohan, Senior Assistant to Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1427 : Certified copy of letter dt.4.4.2004 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Miss P.Sundari ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1428 : Joining report dt.5.3.2004 of Ms.P.Sundari ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1429 : Application dt.Nil of Ms.V.V.Lakshmi ( 1 sheet) 100C.C.7/2007/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.1430 : Note dt.7.3.2003 of Sri S.S.Reddy, General Manager to Sri YR Rao, Advisor, recommending for appointment of Mrs.V.V.Lakshmi ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1431 : Certified copy of letter dt.13.3.2003 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Mrs. V.V.Lakshmi ( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1432 : Joining report dt.13.3.2003 of Mrs.V.V.Lakshmi ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1433 : Certified copy of note dt.8.7.2004 of Sri Y.R.Rao to Sri P.Sambandan recommending termination of services of Ms.V.V.Lakshmi along with Sri GSSA Rama Rao, D.Somasekhar, Sanjeev Kumar and A.S.Srinivasu ( 1 sheet).

Ex.P.1434 : Certified copy of letter dt.13.7.2004 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Mrs.V.V.Lakshmi ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1435 : Application dt.Nil of Sri R.R.Bajee Ramesh ( 3 sheets)

Ex.P.1436 : Certified copy of letter dt.11.3.2003 of Sri Y.R.Rao, Advisor to Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1437 : Letter dt.13.3.2003 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri R.R.Bajee Ramesh ( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1438 :Joining report dt.18.3.2003 of Sri R.R.Bajee Ramesh ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1439 : Letter dt.30.9.2004 of Sri R.R.Bajee Ramesh ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1440 : Application dt.nil of Sri L.Srinivas along with enclosures( 5 sheets)

Ex.P.1441 :Certified copy of letter dt.13.3.2003 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri L.Srinivas ( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1442 : Joining report dt.7.4.2003 of Sri L.Srinivas ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1443 : Certified copy of leter dt.27.12.2004 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri L.Srinivas ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1444 : Note dt.4.4.2003 of Prfo R.V.Rama Rao, Advisor and Head of Division (P&I/EN) recommending for the appointment of Sri K.N.Murthy for a period of six months ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1445 : Certified copy of letter dt.8.4.2003 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri K.N.Murthy ( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1446 : Joining report dt.10.4.2003 of Sri K.N.Murthy ( 1 sheet) 101C.C.7/2007/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.1447 : Certified copy of letter dt.30.8.2003 of Sri A.V.Ramana Murthy, Head Finance & Accounts on behalf of Sri V.V. Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri K.N.Murthy( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1448 :Application dt.6.1.2003 of Sri Vinod Kumari Rewani ( 3 sheets)

Ex.P.1449 : Certified copy of letter dt.18.2.2003 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri Vinod Kumar Rewani ( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1450 : Joining report dt.22.4.2003 of Sri Vinod Kumar Rewani ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1451 : Application dt.29.11.2002 of Miss Ch.Padmavathi along with enclosures ( 6 sheets)

Ex.P.1452 : Certified copy of letter dt.21.4.2003 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Miss Ch.Padmavathi ( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1453 : Joining report dt.1.5.2003 of Ms. Ch.Padmavathi ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1454 :Note dt.16.10.2003 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri A.Rama Prasad, DGM for extension of Miss Padmavathi’s services ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1455 : Certified copy of letter dt.22.10.2003 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar to Miss Padmavathi ( 1 sheet) Ex.P.1456 : Joining report dt.1.11.2003 of Ms.Ch.Padmavathi ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1457 :Note dt.15.4.2004 of Sri V.Krishna Mohan, Senior Assistant to Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1458 : Certified copy of letter dt.29.4.2004 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Miss Padmavathi ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1459 : Joining report dt.1.5.2004 of Ms.Padmavathi.

Ex.P.1460 : Certified copy of letter dt.30.9.2004 of Sri P.Sambandan to Miss Ch.Padamavthi ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1461:Certified copy of leter dt.30.9.2004 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Miss Ch.Padmavathi ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1462 : Certified copy of letter dt.8.5.2003 of Sri Y.R.Rao, Advisor to Sri P.Sambandan recommending to issue appointment order to Sri Sudhansu Mahapatro, Ms.Sridevi and J.V.K.Lakshmi ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1463 : Certified copy of letter dt.14.5.2003 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri Sudhansu Mahapatro ( 2 sheets) 102C.C.7/2007/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.1464 : Joining report dt.31.5.2003 of Sri Sudhansu Mahapatro. ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1465 : Application dt.Nil of Sri B.Narasimha Rao ( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1466 :Certified copy of letter dt.16.4.2003 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri B.Narasimha Rao ( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1467: Joining report dt.19.5.2003 of Sri B.Narasimha Rao ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1468 : Order dt.16.9.2003 of Sri P.Sambandan to to Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1469:Certified copy of letter dt.17.9.2003 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri B.Narasimha Rao ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1470 : Letter dt.14.5.2003 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Miss K.Sridevi ( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1471 : Joining report dt.Nil of Miss K.Sridevi ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1472 :Note dt.24.12.2003 of Sri V.Krishna Mohan, Senior Assistant to Sri VV Shiv Kumar, HPT ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1473 : Certified copy of letter dt,.29.12.2003 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar to Miss Sridevi ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1474 :Note dt.18.5.2004 of Sri S.E.Sreedharan, DGM to Sri P.Sambandan recommending for extension of Miss Sreedvi’s services till 31.8.2004 ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1475 : Certified copy of letter dt.24.5.2004 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar to Miss Sri Devi ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1476 :Note dt.20.8.2004, Sri S.E.Sridharan, DGM recommending for Mis Sridevi’s extension for a period of six months ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1477 : Certified copy of letter dt.3.9.2004 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Miss Sridevi ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1478:Note dt.19.1.2005 of Sri S.E.Sridharan, DGM to Sri K.R.Kishore, Director i/c for extension of Miss Sridevi’s services till 30th April, 2005. ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1479: Certified copy of letter dt.16.2.2005 of Sri A.Ramesh Kumar, PAO to Miss K.Sridevi ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1480 :Application dt.12.3.2003 of Sri P.Sreekanth Reddy ( 3 sheets) 103C.C.7/2007/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.1481 : Certified copy of letter dt.22.5.2003 of Sri Y.R.Rao to Shri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1482 : Certified copy of letter dt.27.5.2003 of Sri v.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri P.Sreekanth Reddy ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1483 : Joining report dt.2.6.2003 of Sri P.Sreekanth Reddy ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1484 : Letter dt.18.9.2003 of Sri P.Sreekanth Reddy ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1485 : Application dt.Nil of Ms.V.Sri Mahitha ( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1486: Certified copy of letter dt.27.5.2003 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Ms.V.Sri Mahitha( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1487:Joining report dt.2.6.2003 of Ms.V.Sri Mahitha ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1488 : Certified copy of letter dt.27.12.2004 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Ms.V.Sri Mahitha ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1489 :Applciation dt.26.5.2003 of Sri M.Sabrinathan ( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1490 :Certified copy of letter dt.28.5.2003 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri M.Sabarinathan ( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1491 : Joining report dt.2.6.2003 of Sri M.Sabarinathan( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1492: Certified copy of leter dt.17.9.2003 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri M.Sabarinathan ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1493 :Application dt.Nil of Sri A.V.Krishna Rao ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1494: Certified copy of letter dt.27.5.2003 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri A.V.Krishna Rao ( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1495: Joining report dt.5.6.2003 of Sri A.V.Krishna Rao ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1496: Certified copy of letter dt.27.12.2004 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri A.V. Krishna rao ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1497 : Application dt.Nil of Sri G.Ravi Kumar( 4 sheets)

Ex.P.1498 : Note dt.17.3.2003 of Sri S.S.Reddy General Manager to Sri Y.R.Rao, Advisor recommending for the appointment of Sri G.Ravi Kumar ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1499 : Certified copy of letter dt.27.5.2003 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri G.Ravi Kumar ( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1500 : Joining report dt.19.6.2003 of Sri G.Ravi Kumar ( 1 sheet) 104C.C.7/2007/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.1501 : Certified copy of letter dt.30.9.2004 of Sri P.Sambandan to Sri G.Ravi Kumar ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1502 : Certified copy of letter dt.30.9.2004 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri G.Ravi Kumar ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1503 : Certified copy of application dt.nil of Mrs.P.Nagamani along with enclosures.( 4 sheets)

Ex.P.1504: Certified copy of letter dt.26.6.2003 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Mrs. P.Nagamani ( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1505 : Certified copy of joining report dt.1.7.2003 of Mrs.P.Nagamani ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1506 : Certified copy of letter dt.30.9.2004 of Sri P.Sambandan to Mrs.P.Nagamani ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1507 : Certified copy of letter dt.30.9.2004 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Ms.P.Nagamani ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1508 : Certified copy of letter dt.25.6.2003 of Sri P.Sambandan to Sri C.V.Gopala Rao, visiting Professor, Naval Architecture, Andhra University, Visakhapatnam (1 sheet)

Ex.P.1509: Letter dt.1.7.2003 of Ms.S.V.Kalyani to Sri P.Sambandan wherein she referred to the letter addressed to Sri Gopala Rao and conveyed her acceptance of appointment ( 1 sheet).

Ex.P.1510: Certified copy of letter dt.1.7.2003 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Miss S.V. Kalyani ( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1511: Joining report dt.1.7.2003 of Ms.S.V.Kalyani ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1512:Certified copy of the letter dt.25.6.2003 of Sri P.Sambandan to Prof C.V.Gopala Rao (1 sheet)

Ex.P.1513 : Certified copy of letter dt.2.7.2003 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri D.Rajesh Kumar ( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1514 : Joining report dt.2.7.2003 of Sri D.Rajesh Kumar ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1515 : Certified copy of letter dt.2.7.2003 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Miss P.Lavanya ( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1516 : Joining report dt.2.7.2003 of Miss P.Lavanya ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1517 : Certified copy of letter dt.2.7.2003 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Miss B.S.U.Harini ( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1518 : Joining report dt.2.7.2003 of Miss B.S.U.Harini. ( 1 sheet) 105C.C.7/2007/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.1519 : Letter dt.17.3.2004 of Miss B.S.U.Harini( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1520 : Certified copy of letter dt.14.5.2003 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Mrs.J.V.K.Lakshmi ( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1521 : Joining report dt.16.7.2003 of Mrs.J.V.K.Lakshmi ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1522 : Certified copy of application dt.9.7.2003 of Mrs.P.Sujatha along with enclosure ( 13 sheets)

Ex.P.1523 : Certified copy of letter dt.11.7.2003 of Sri v.v.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Mrs.P.Sujatha( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1524 : Certified copy joining report dt.16.7.2003 of Mrs.P.Sujatha ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1525 : Certified copy of letter dt.30.9.2004 of Sri P.Sambandan to Mrs. P.Sujatha ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1526 : Certified copy of letter dt.30.9.2004 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Mrs.P.Sujatha ( 1 sheet) Ex.P.1527 : Note dt.14.12.2004 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri K.R.Kishore recommending for extension of her services ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1528 : Certified copy of letter dt.29.12.2004 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Mrs.P.Sujatha( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1529 : Note dt.10.3.2005 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri A.Ramesh Kumar, PAO regarding extention of services of Ms.P.Sujatha( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1530 : Application dt.Nil of Sri M.N.Murthy along with enclosure ( 3 sheets)

Ex.P.1531 : Certified copy of letter dt.7.8.2003 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT ( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1532 : Joining report dt.Nil of Sri M.N.Murthy ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1533 : Certified copy of letter dt.30.9.2004 of Sri P.Sambandan to Sri M.N.Murthy ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1534 : Certified copy of letter dt.30.9.2004 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri M.N.Murthy ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1535 : Recommendations dt.31.7.2003 of Sri R.Srinivas, DGM and Sri PUBV Rama Sastry, Manager to Sri Y.R. Rao, Advisor for appointment of Sri M.Srinivas Goud.( 3 sheets)

Ex.P.1536 : Certified copy of note dt.4.8.2003 of Sri Y.R.Rao, Advisor to Sri Shiv Kumar, HPT.( 1 sheet) 106C.C.7/2007/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.1537 : Certified copy of letter dt.7.8.2003 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri M.Srinivas Goud( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1538 : Joining report dt.16.8.2003 of Sri M.Srinivas Goud. ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1539 : Certified copy of letter dt.27.12.2004 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri M.Srinivas Goud ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1540 : Resume dt.Nil of Sri B.Ramesh Kumar ( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1541 : Certified copy of letter dt.21.8.2003 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri B.Ramesh Kumar ( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1542 : Joining report dt.4.9.2003 of Sri B.Ramesh Kumar ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1543 : Letter dt.11.3.2005 of Sri B.Ramesh Kumar ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1544 : Application dt.Nil of Sri E.Vijay Kumar ( 20 sheets)

Ex.P.1545 : Certified copy of letter dt.12.8.2003 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri E.Vijay Kumar ( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1546 : Joining report dt.1.10.2003 of Sri E.Vijay Kumar ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1547 : Note dt.14.10.2003 of Sri S.V.D .Prasad, Chief Manager recommending for the appointment of Sri S.Harikrishna ( 12 sheets)

Ex.P.1548 : Certified copy of letter dt.14.10.2003 of Sri VV Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri S.Harikrishna ( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1549 : Joining report dt.14.10.2003 of Sri S.Harikrishna ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1550 : Note dt.1.6.2004 of Sri SVD Prasad to Sri P.Sambandan recommending for extension of services of Sri S.Harikrishna ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1551 : Certified copy of letter dt.2.6.2004 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri S.Harikrishna ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1552 : Application dt.30.9.2003 of Sri M.Srinivas to DGM ( 7 sheets)

Ex.P.1553 : Certified copy of letter dt.1.10.2003 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri M.Srinivas ( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1554 : Joining report dt.15.10.2003 of Sri M.Srinivas ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1555 : Letter dt.2.2.2005 of Sri M.Srinivas ( 1 sheet) 107C.C.7/2007/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.1556 : Note dt.20.9.2003 of Sri S.E.Sridharan, DGM to Sri P.Sambandan, recommending for the appointment of Sri GVS Trinadh along with Committee recommendations (16 sheets)

Ex.P.1557 : Certified copy of letter dt.9.10.2003 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri GVS Trinadh ( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1558 : Joining report dt.20.10.2003 of Sri GVS Trinadh ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1559 : Note dt.29.3.2004 of Sri V.Krishna Mohan , Senior Assistant to Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1560 : Note dt.12.4.2004 of Sri S.E.Sridharan, DGM(IT & SW) to Sri P.Sambandan ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1561 : Certified copy of letter dt.16.4.2004 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri GVS Trinadh ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1562 : Letter dt.12.8.2004 of Sri GVS Trinadh ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1563 : Application dt.Nil of Miss K.Suneetha along with enclosures ( 6 sheets)

Ex.P.1564 : Certified copy of letter dt.11.11.2003 of Sri V.S.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Miss Suneetha ( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1565 : Joining report dt.19.11.2003 of Miss K.Suneetha (1 sheet)

Ex.P.1566 : Letter dt.Nil of Miss K.Suneetha ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1567 : Certified copy of note dt.24.10.2003 of Sri A.Raghunadha Rao, Chief Manager to Sri Y.R.Rao, Advisor ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1568 : Recommendations dt.Nil of the committee to Sri Y.R.Rao, Advisor, stating that except Sri Sahu, others were suitable ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1569:Certified copy of note dt.31.10.2003 of Sri B.Satyanarayana, Personnel Officer to Sri VV Shiv Kumar to issue appointment orders to Sri AA Srinivasu, Sri D.Pradeep, Sri Sanjeev Kumar and Sri Somasekhar w.e.f 1.11.2003 for a period of six months after approval from Sri P.Sambandan ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1570 : Letter dt.4.11.2003 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri A.A.Srinivasu( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1571 : Joining report dt.Nil of Sri A.A.Srinivasu ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1572 : Certified copy of note dt.19.4.2004 of Sri P.U.B.V.Rama Sastry to Sri Y.R.Rao, Advisor( 1 sheet) 108C.C.7/2007/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.1573 : Certified copy of letter dt.2.6.2004 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri A.A. Srinivasu ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1574 : Certified copy of letter dt.13.7.2004 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri A.A.Srinivasu ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1575 : Certified copy of letter dt.4.11.2003 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri D.Pradeep ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1576 : Joining report dt.Nil of Sri D.Pradeep ( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1577 :Certified copy of letter dt.21.4.2004 of Sri D.Pradeep received through fax ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1578 :Certified copy of letter dt.4.11.2003 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri Sanjeev Kumar ( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1579 : Joining report dt.Nil of Sri Sanjeev Kumar ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1580 : Certified copy of letter dt.2.6.2004 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri Sanjeev Kumar (1 sheet)

Ex.P.1581 : Certified copy of letter dt.13.7.2004 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri Sanjeev Kumar (1 sheet)

Ex.P.1582 : Letter dt.4.11.2003 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri Somshekhar( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1583 : Joining report dt.Nil of Sri Somshekhar ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1584 : Certified copy of letter dt.2.6.2004 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri Somshekar (1 sheet)

Ex.P.1585 : Certified copy of letter dt.13.7.2004 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri Someshekar (1 sheet)

Ex.P.1586 : Note dt.Nil of Sri PUBV Ramasastry, Manager (QA) to Sri Y.R.Rao, Advisor recommending the appointment of Sri Sasanka Baruah ( 3 sheets)

Ex.P.1587: Letter dt.8.12.2003 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri Sasanka Baruah ( 2 sheet)

Ex.P.1588 : Joining report dt.1.12.2003 of Sri Sasanka Baruah ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1589 : Letter dt.8.3.2004 of Sri Sasanka Baruah ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1590 : Application dt.Nil of Sri G.S.S.A Rama Rao ( 5 sheets)

Ex.P.1591 : Recommendations dt.2.12.2003 of Sri R.Srinivas, DGM and Sri PUBV Rama Sastry, Manager to Sri Y.R.Rao, Advisor for the appointment of Sri G.S.S.A. Rama Rao( 1 sheet) 109C.C.7/2007/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.1592: Certified copy of letter dt.8.12.2003 of Sri VV Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri GSSA Rama Rao ( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1593 : Joining report dt.16.12.2003 of Sri GSSA Rama Rao ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1594 : Note dt.5.6.2004 of Sri Y.R.Rao, Advisor to Sri P.Sambandan recommending for extension of Sri GSSA Rama Rao’s services upto 15.12.2004 ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1595 : Certified copy of letter dt.10.6.2004 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri GSSA Rama Rao (1 sheet)

Ex.P.1596 : Note dt.2.7.2004 of Sri B.Satynarayana, Personnel Officer to Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1597 : Note dt.6.7.2004 of Sri v.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri P.Sambandan regarding relief of Sri VSR Kamalakannan and Sri GSSA Rama Rao ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1598 : Certified copy of letter dt.9.7.2004 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri Y.R.Rao Advisor ( sheets)

Ex.P.1599 : Applciation dt.Nil of Sri KSK Mangapathi Raju along with enclosures.( 4 sheets)

Ex.P.1600 :Certified copy of letter dt.6.1.2004 of Sri B.Satyanarayana, Personnel Officer to Sri KSK Mangapathi Raju (1 sheet)

Ex.P.1601: Committee recommendations dt.13.1.2004 of Sri R.Srinivas, Sri A.Raghunadha Rao and Sri PUBV Rama Sastry to Sri YR Rao, Advisor, recommending for appointment of Sri KSK Mangapathi Raju (1 sheet)

Ex.P.1602 :Certified copy of letter dt.16.1.2004 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri KSK Mangapathi Raju ( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1603 : Joining report dt.6.2.2004 of Sri KSK Mangapathi Raju (1 sheet)

Ex.P.1604 : Certified copy of letter dt.27.12.2004 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar HPT to Sri KSK Mangapathi Raju (1 sheet)

Ex.P.1605 : Application dt.30.12.2003 of Sri S.R.Mohammad (6 sheets)

Ex.P.1606 : Certified copy of letter dt.4.2.2004 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri SR Mohammad (2 sheets)

Ex.P.1607 : Joining report dt.10.2.2004 of Sri SR Mohammand (1 sheet) 110C.C.7/2007/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.1608 : Note dt.4.3.2004 of Sri URP Sudhakar, Business Associate recommending for the appointment of Sri BP Patnaik for a period of one year alogn with enclosure (2 sheets)

Ex.P.1609 : Certified copy of letter dt.5.3.2004 of Sri VV Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri BP Patnaik ( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1610 : Joining report dt.8.3.2004 of Sri BP Patnaik (1 sheet)

Ex.P.1611:Note dt.24.3.2004 of Sri S.E.Sridharan, DGM, recommending for the appointment of Sri S.Sarvottam along with his application ( 8 sheets)

Ex.P.1612 : Certified copy of letter dt.29.3.2004 of Sri VV Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri S.Sarvottam( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1613 : Joining report dt.23.3.2004 of Sri S.Sarvottam( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1614 : Letter dt.25.6.2004 of Sri S.Sarvottam ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1615 : Resume dt.Nil of Sri V.Kiran Kumar ( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1616 : Letter dt.28.1.2004 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri V.Kiran Kumar ( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1617 : Joining report dt.3.2.2004 of Sri V.Kiran Kumar ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1618 : Letter dt.2.6.2004 of Sri V.Kiran Kumar to Sri P.Sambandan( 8 sheets)

Ex.P.1619 : Note dt.1.6.2004 of Sri U.S.Ramesh, Chief Manager recommending for the appointment of Sri V.Kiran Kumar for a period of one year ( 1 sheet).

Ex.P.1620 : Certified copy of lettet dt.2.6.2004 of Sri VV Siv Kumar, HPT to Sri V.Kiran Kumar ( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1621 : Joining report dt.3.6.2004 of Sri V.Kiran Kumar (1 sheet)

Ex.P.1622 :Committee recommendations dt.26.4.2004 of Sri A.Raghunadha Rao, Chief Manager and Sri PUBV Rama Sastry, Manager to Sri Y.R.Rao, Advisor recommending for Sri A.Manikandan’s appointment (8 sheets)

Ex.P.1623: Certified copy of letter dt.9.6.2004 of Sri VV Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri A.Manikandan ( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1624 : Joining report dt.12.6.2004 of Sri A.Manikandan( 1hsset)

Ex.P.1625 : Note dt.13.12.2004 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri K.R.Kishore, Director i.e., regarding termination of services of Sri A.Manikandan (1 sheet) 111C.C.7/2007/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.1626 : Certified copy of letter dt.29.12.2004 of Sri VV Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri A.Manikandan(1 sheet)

Ex.P.1627 : Certified copy of note dt.22.6.2004 of Sri S.E.Sridharan, DGM (IT) to Sri P.Sambandan( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1628 :Certified copy of letters dt.23.6.2004 of Sri S.E.Sridharan, DGM to Andhra University, GITAM college of Engineering and Gayathri Vidya Parishad college of Engineering ( 3 sheets)

Ex.P.1629 : Certified copy of note dt.2.8.2004 of Sri U.S.Ramesh, Chief Manager to Sri P.Sambandan for nomination of a Comiitee to conduct interviews ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1630 : Certified copy of letter dt.3.8.2004 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Ms.P.Aruna Kumari( 1 sheet).

Ex.P.1631 : Certified copy of note dt.12.8.2004 of Sri VV Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri P.Sambandan enclosing the Selection Committee recommendations (2 sheets)

Ex.P.1632 : Certified copy of letter dt.12.8.2004 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Miss P.Aruna Kumari(2 sheets)

Ex.P.1633 : Joining report dt.18.8.2004 of Miss P.Aruna Kumari ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1634 : Certified copy of letter dt.3.8.2004 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Ms.M.Madhuri Latha ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1635 : Certified copy of letter dt.12.8.2004 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Miss M.Madhuri Latha, (2 sheets)

Ex.P.1636 : Joining report dt.18.8.2004 of Miss M.Madhuri Latha ( 1 sheet).

Ex.P.1637 : Certified copy of letter dt.3.8.2004 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri P.Madu( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1638 : Certified copy of letter dt.12.8.2004 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri P.Madhu. (2 sheets)

Ex.P.1639 : Joining report dt.18.8.2004 of Sri P.Madhu(1 sheet)

Ex.P.1640 : Certified copy of letter dt.3.8.2004 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Ms.B.Ashalatha (1 sheet)

Ex.P.1641 : Certified copy of letter dt.12.8.2004 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Ms.B.Ashalatha.( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1642 : Joining report dt.18.8.2004 of Ms.B.Ashalatha (1 sheet)

Ex.P.1643 : Letter dt.11.11.2004 of Miss B.Ashalatha.( 1 sheet) 112C.C.7/2007/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.1644 : Certified copy of letter dt.3.8.2004 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Ms.A.Ramya Bala (1 sheet)

Ex.P.1645 : Certified copy of letter dt.12.8.2004 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Miss A.Ramyabala ( 2 pages)

Ex.P.1646 : Joining report dt.23.8.2004 of Miss A.Ramyabala ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1647 : Letter dt.8.9.2004 of Miss A.Ramyabala ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1648 : Certified copy of letter dt.3.8.2004 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri N.Datta Suresh( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1649 : Certified copy of letter dt.12.8.2004 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri N.Datta Suresh ( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1650 : Joining report dt.26.8.2004 of Sri N.Datta Suresh ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1651 : Letter dt.27.10.2004 of Sri N.Datta Suresh (1 sheet)

Ex.P.1652 : Application dt.Nil of Sri S.Srinivasan ( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1653 :Letter dt.9.9.2004 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar to Sri S.Srinivasan ( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1654 : Joining report dt.24.9.2004 of Sri S.Srinvasan( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1655 : Note dt.6.1.2005 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri K.R.Kishore, Director i.e., recommending for termination of the services of Sri S.Srinivasn ( 1sheet)

Ex.P.1656 : Certified copy of letter dt.10.1.2005 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri S.Srinivasan (1 sheet)

Ex.P.1657 : Note dt.20.9.2004 of Sri U.S.Ramesh, Chief Manager to Sri P.Sambandan enclosing the resume of Sri K.Ramakrishna ( 7 sheets)

Ex.P.1658 : E-Mail dt.23.9.2004 of Sri U.S.Ramesh, Chief Manager to Sri K.Ramakrishna (1 sheet)

Ex.P.1659 : Committee’s recommendations dt.27.9.2004 submitted to Sri P.Sambandan(2 sheets)

Ex.P.1660 : Certified copy of letter dt.4.10.2004 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar to Sri K.Ramakrisna ( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1661 : Joining report dt.15.10.2004 of Sri K.Ramakrishna ( 1 sheet) 113C.C.7/2007/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.1662 : Selection committee recommendations dt.27.12.2000 of Dr.R.L.Roy Choudhury, Sri S.Paramanandahan and Sri P.Sambandan.

Ex.P.1663 : Proceedings dt.28.9.2001 ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1664 : Proceedings dt.30.9.2001 (2 sheets)

Ex.P.1665 : Proceedings dt.1.10.2001 (1 sheet)

Ex.P.1666 : Proceedings dt.12.11.2001 (1 sheet)

Ex.P.1667 : Proceedings dt.15.12.2001 (1 sheet)

Ex.P.1668 : Proceedings dt.5.1.2002 (1 sheet)

Ex.P.1669 : Proceedings dt.4.3.2002 (1 sheet)

Ex.P.1670 : Proceedings dt.3.4.2002 (1 sheet)

Ex.P.1671 : Proceedings dt.19.4.2002 (1 sheet)

Ex.P.1672 : Proceedings dt.1.5.2002 (1 sheet)

Ex.P.1673: Proceedings dt.30.5.2002 (1 sheet)

Ex.P.1674 : Proceedings dt.28.6.2002 (1 sheet)

Ex.P.1675 : Proceedings dt.10.9.2002 (1 sheet)

Ex.P.1676 : Proceedings dt.15.11.2002 (1 sheet)

Ex.P.1677 : Proceedings dt.24.12.2002 (1 sheet)

Ex.P.1678: Proceedings dt.23.1.2003 (1 sheet)

Ex.P.1679 : Proceedings dt.12.3.2003 (1 sheet)

Ex.P.1680 : Proceedings dt.7.4.2003 (1 sheet)

Ex.P.1681: Proceedings dt.26.5.2003 (1 sheet)

Ex.P.1682 : Proceedings dt.30.6.2003 (1 sheet)

Ex.P.1683 : Proceedings dt.4.8.2003 (1 sheet)

Ex.P.1684 : Proceedings dt.14.10.2003 ( sheet)

Ex.P.1685 : Proceedings dt.6.11.2003 (1 sheet)

Ex.P.1686 : Proceedings dt.5.12.2003 (1 sheet) 114C.C.7/2007/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.1687 :Seizure Memo dt.6.4.2005 of Sri N.Raja Rao, Inspector of Police, CBI, Visakhapatnam.

Ex.P.1688 : Letter dt.27.4.2005 of Sri A.Ramesh Kumar, Secretary, NSDRC, Visakhapatnam to Addl. Suptd. Of Police, CBI, Visakhapatnam ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1689 : Letter dt.22.7.2005 of Sri A.Ramesh Kumar, Secretary, NSDRC, Visakhapatnam to Addl. Suptd., of police CBI, Visakhapatnam ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1690 : Letter dt.22.7.2005 of Sri A.Ramesh Kumar, Secreatry, NSDRC, Visakhapatnam to Addl. Suptd., of police, CBI, Visakhapatnam ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1691 :Certified copy of office Order No.NSDRC/27/98 dt.6.4.1998 ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1692 : Certified copy of Office Order No.NSDRC/33/98 dt.29.6.19998 (1 sheet)

Ex.P.1693: Original letter No.SY16012/2/2003-SBR/Vig. Dt.26.5.2004 of sri Susheel Kumar, Joint Secretary (Shipping) & CVO, Ministry of Shipping New Delhi addressed to Sri P.Sambandan ( 3 sheets)

Ex.P.1694 : Certified copy of letter dt.13.6.2004 of Sri P.Sambandan to Sri Susheel Kumar, JS (Shipping) & CVO, Ministry of Shipping, New Delhi (13 sheets)

Ex.P.1695: Original note of Sri P.Sambandan (2 sheets)

Ex.P.1696 : Original approval note NSDRC/1406 dt.30.4.2002 of Sri P.Sambandan ( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1697 : Letter dt.22.7.2005 of Sri A.Ramesh Kumar, Secretary, NSDRC, Visakhapatnam to Addl. Suptd., of Police, CBI, Visakhapatnam ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1698 : Letter dt.19.8.2005 received from Sri A.Ramesh Kumar, Secretary, NSDRC, Visakhapatnam to Addl. Suptd., of Police, CBI, Visakhapatnam (1 sheet)

Ex.P.1699 : Original attendance register of NSDRC pertaining to Sri A. Rama Prasad

Ex.P.1700 : Letter dt.22.7.2005 of Sri A.Ramesh Kumar, Secretary , NSDRC, Visakhapantam to Addl. Suptd., of Police, CBI, Visakhapatnam. (1 sheet)

Ex.P.1701 :Letter dt.4.8.2005 of Sri A.Ramesh Kumar, Secretary, NSDRC, Visakhapatnam to Addl. Suptd., of Police, CBI, Visakhapatnam(1 sheet) 115C.C.7/2007/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.1702 : Fax letter dt.6.8.2005 of DR.K.Satynarayana, Director, NSTL, Visakhapantam to SP, CBI, Visakhapatnam (2 sheets)

Ex.P.1703 : Fax letter dt.8.8.2005 of Dr. K.Satyanarayana, Director, NSTL, Visakhapantam to SP, CBI, Visakhapatnam (2 sheets)

Ex.P.1704 :Letter dt.19.8.2005 received from Sri A.Ramesh Kumar, Secretary, NSDRC, Visakhapantam to Addl. Suptd. Of Police, CBI, Visakhapantam (1 sheet)

Ex.P.1705 : Certified copy of office order NSDRC/0007/0002 dt.5.2.1999 of Sri P.Sambandan.(1 sheet)

Ex.P.1706 : Certified copy of Departmental Promotion Committee (DPC) Metting held on 12.4.2002 ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1707 : Original recommendations of Committee dt.27.12.2000 consisting of Sri P.Sambandan, Cdr.K.K.Varma, Sr.General Manager and Sri CSR Anjaneyulu, Advisor (1 sheet).

Ex.P.1708 : Original note NSDRC/1329 dt.30.3.1999 approved by Sri P.Sambandan( 2 sheets)

Ex.P.1709:Original note dt.31.3.1999 approved by Sri P.Sambandan(1 sheet)

Ex.P.1710 : Letter dt.25.8.2005 received from Sri A.Ramesh Kumar, Secreatry, NSDRC, Visakhapatnam to Addl. Supdt., of Police, CBI, Visakhapatnam(1 sheet)

Ex.P.1711 : Original note NSDRC/1329 dt.15.10.1999 of Sri B.Satyanarayana, HPA i/c.(1 sheet)

Ex.P.1712 : Letter dt.25.8.2005 of Sri D.Gunasekarn, Registrar, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur to Superintendent of Police, CBI, Visakhapatnam. (10 sheets)

Ex.P.1713 : Letter dt.16.9.2005 of Sri D.Gunasekaran, Registrar, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur to Addl. Superintendent of Police, CBI, Visakhapatnam. (1 sheet & 2 books)

Ex.P.1714 : Letter dt.1.11.2005 received from Sri A.Ramesh Kumar, Secretary, NSDRC, Visakhapantam to Addl.Suptd., of Police, CBI, Visakhapatnam (2 sheets)

Ex.P.1715: Certified copy of Ministry of Home Affairs O.M.27/4/67(II)- Estt.(SCT) dt.24.9.1968 (1 sheet)

Ex.P.1716: Certified copy of G.I Dept., of Per.& Trg.O.M. no.36012/22/93-Estt.(SCT) dt.3.2.1994 relating to reservation for OBC for 27% posts.( 2 sheets) 116C.C.7/2007/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.1717 : Certified copy of Ministry of Home Affairs Resolution No.27/25/68-Estt.(SCT)dt.25.3.1970 regarding reservation of posts at 15% & 7.5% respectively to SC & ST were given (1 sheet)

Ex.P.1718: Certified copy of Ministry of Home Affairs O.M. No.16/17/67 Est (c )dt.10.4.68. (4 sheets)

Ex.P.1719 : Certified copy of Department of Personeel and A.R.O.M. No.36022/2/84-Estt. (SCT) dt.18.1.1985 . (2 sheets)

Ex.P.1720 : Certified copy of Dept., of Per. & Trg.O.M. No.36012/2/96- Estt. (Res) dt.2.7.1997.(3 sheets)

Ex.P.1721 : Certified copy of letter dt.1.7.2002 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri P.Rama Rao (1 sheet)

Ex.P.1722 : Certified copy of letter dt.1.10.1996 of Sri P.Sambandan to Prof.R.L.Roy Choudhury (1 sheet)

Ex.P.1723 : Certified copy of Office Memorandum dt.4.12.2001 of Ministry of shopping, New Delhi. (2 sheets)

Ex.P.1724 : Certified copy of Office Memorandum dt.1.2.1989 of Ministry of Shipping, New Delhi. (3 sheets)

Ex.P.1725 : Certified copy of letter no.Y-13013/3/1988-SBR(Vol,III) dt.22.7.2004 of Ministry of Shipping , New Delhi (1 sheet)

Ex.P.1726 : Original letter dt.9.2.2004 of Sri B.Srinivas, former Chief VigilanceOfficer,HindustanShipyardLimited, Visakhapatnam to Sri P.Sambandan (3 sheets)

Ex.P.1727 : Letter dt.7.11.2005 of Sri A.Ramesh Kumar, Secretary , NSDRC, Visakhapatnam to Addl. Suptd., of Police, CBI, Visakhapatnam.

Ex.P.1728 : Letter dt.27.12.2005 of Sri A.Ramesh Kumar, Secretary, NSDRC, Visakhapatnam to Addl. Suptd,. of Police, CBI, Visakhapatnam.(1 sheet)

Ex.P.1729:Original Departmental Promotion Committee (DPC) recommendations held on 14.2.2000. (3 sheet)

Ex.P.1730 : Letter dt.2.1.2006 of Sri A.Ramesh Kumar, Secretary, NSDRC, Visakhapatnam to Addl. Suptd., of Police, CBI, Visakhapatnam.(1 sheet)

Ex.P.1731 : Original Departmental Promotion Committee (DPC) recommendations held on 12.8.1988.( 2 sheets) 117C.C.7/2007/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.1732 : Letter dt.3.1.2006 of Sri A.Ramesh Kumar, Secretary NSDRC, Visakhapatnam to Addl. Suptd., of Police, CBI, Visakhapatnam (1 sheet)

Ex.P.1733 : Letter dt.4.1.2006 of Sri A.Ramesh Kumar, Secretary, NSDRC, Visakhapantam to Addl. Suptd., of Police, CBI, Visakhapatnam.

Ex.P.1734 : Certified copy of agenda item 55/2 & 55/6.

Ex.P.1735 : Certified copy of minutes of the 55th Governing Body Meeting.

Ex.P.1736 : Certified copy of Ministry of Surface Transport Office Memorandum No.Sy-13013/3/88-SBR dt.6.3.1997( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1737 : Letter dt.9.1.2006 of Sri A.Ramesh Kumar, Secretary, NSDRC, Visakhapatnam to Addl. Suptd., of Police, CBI, Visakhapatnam (1 sheet)

Ex.P.1738 : Letter No.NSDRC/0042 dt.27.3.2004 of Sri V.V.Shiv Kumar, HPT to Sri B.Srinivas, former CVO, HSL., (18 sheets)

Ex.P.1739 : Letter dt.14.8.2006 of Sri A.Ramesh Kumar, Secretary, NSDRC, Visakhapatnam to Addl. Suptd., of Police, CBI, Visakhapatnam(1 sheet)

Ex.P.1740 : Letter dt.24.8.2006 of Sri A.Ramesh Kumar, Secretary, NSDRC, Visakhapatnam to Addl. Suptd., of Police, CBI, Visakhapatnam(1 sheet)

Ex.P.1741 : Certified copy of Circular No.NSDRC/0003 dt.7.9.2001 of Sri P.Sambandan(2 sheets)

Ex.P.1742 : Approved original list of 61 employees on contract for lumpsum payment (2 sheets)

Ex.P.1743 : Letter dt.25.9.2006 of Sri A.Ramesh Kumar, Secretary, NSDRC, Visakhapatnam to Addl. Suptd. Of police, CBI, Visakhapatnam (1 sheet)

Ex.P.1744 : Report dt.1.4.2004 of Sri B.Srinivas, IAS, former CVO, Hindustan Shipyard Limited.

Ex.P.1745 : Material objects computer, Hard Disc.

Ex.P.1746 : Hard Disc bearing model No.ST 320 410A. (the same is in item No.2)

Ex.P.1747: CPU bearing No.7022DW450107

Ex.P.1748 : 27 numbers of Floppies 118C.C.7/2007/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.1749 : One CDROM containing the yearly back-up of 2004 of Smt.N.V.Sita Kumari from Sri P.S.P.Chakravarthy.

Ex.P.1750 : New hard disk of Seagate make.

Ex.P.1751 :Copies of 23 Selection Committee Proceedings dt.28.9.2001, 30.9.2001,1.10.2001,12.11.2001,15.12.2001, 5.1.2002,4.3.2002, 3.4.2002, 19.4.2002, 1.5.2002, 30.5.2002, 28.6.2002, 10.9.2002, 15.11.2002, 24.12.2002, 12.3.2003, 7.4.2003, 30.6.2003,4.8.2003, 14.10.2003, 6.11.2003, 5.12.2003 and 26.5.2003 (1 sheet)

Ex.P.1752 : Fax dated 4.10.2006 of BRAHMOS sent to Addl. Suptd., of police, CBI, Visakhapatnam (1 sheet)

Ex.P.1753 : Specimen signatures of S.Paramanandan, S/o Sri Subramanyam (2 sheets) S-16 & S-17,.

Ex.P.1754: Specimen Siganture of Prof P.Sambandan, S/o Sri K.Pandurangan (2 sheets) S-18, S-19.

Ex.P.1755 : Specimen Signature of Sri K.Satyanarayana, S/o K.Vudaya Chalam ( 2 sheets) S-20, S-21.

Ex.P.1756 : Specimen Signature of Dr.suresh Chandra Mishra, S/o late Sadasiva Mishra (s sheets) S-22, S-23.

Ex.P.1757 : Specimen signature of Sri S.Mahopatro, S/o late Ajayananda Mahopatro (2 sheets) S-24, S-25.

Ex.P.1758 : Specimen Siganture of Sri VV Shiv Kumar S/o V.Vasudeva Rao (2 sheets) S-26, S-27

Ex.P.1759 : Specimen Signature of Sri A.Rama Prasad, S/o A.Venkateswara Rao ( 3 sheets) S-28 to S-30.

Ex.P.1760 : Opinion dt.7.2.2006 of Sri Pendyala Krishna Sastry, EQD, Assistant Government Examiner, Computer Forensic Division, Hyderabad.(121 sheets)

Ex.P.1761 : Comparative Statement for manpower supply ( 1 sheet)

Ex.P.1762: Original approval note dt.5.4.1999.

Ex.P.1763: Letter addressed by M/s Mega city manpower supply addressed to NSDRC.

Ex.P.1763-A : Signature of PW.2 (Q1) on Ex.P.1763

Ex.P.1764 : Specimen signatures of PW.2

Ex.P.1765 : Addl. Specimen signatures of PW.2 119C.C.7/2007/Prl. CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.1766 : Specimen signatures of A2 Saga Jagapathi (3 sheets)

Ex.P.1767: Two files containing renewal letters. In Vol.I & II.

Ex.P.1767-A : Covering letter dt.6.9.2005

Ex.P.1768: Letter dt.8.9.1999 addressed to Kranthi Contracts & Services

Ex.P.1769 : Letter addressed by A2 to supply man power

Ex.P.1770 : Agreement dt.15.4.1999

Ex.P.1771 : Termination letter dt.20.4.2000

Ex.P.1772 : Opinion GEQD

Ex.P.1773 : Supplementary opinion

Ex.P.1774 : Specimen Handwriting

Ex.P.1775 : Copy of letter addressed to SP, CBI dt.18.8.2006.

Ex.P.1776 : Copy of Reason given by GEQD.

Ex.P.1777 : Original FIR RC 10(A)/20045

LIST OF DOCUMENTS MARKED ON BEHALF OF DEFENCE.

Ex.D1 : 161Cr.P.C. statement of PW.1 Page No.9 Para 9

MATERIAL OBJECTS MARKED ON BEHALF OF PROSECUTION

NIL

S/d N.Ramesh Babu

PRL. SPL. JUDGE FOR C.B.I. CASES,

VISAKHAPATNAM

Copy submitted to The Hon’ble Registrar (Judicial), High Court of Andhra Pradesh

Copies to: The Superintendent of Police, C.B.I., Visakhapatnam.

IN THE COURT OF THE I ADDL. SPECIAL JUDGE FOR C.B.I.

CASES, VISAKHAPATNAM.

Present:Sri N.RAMESH BABU Prl. Spl. Judge for C.B.I. Cases, FAC I Addl. Spl. Judge for C.B.I Cases, Visakhapatnam.

Friday , this the 27 th day of December, 2019

C.C.No.05/2015

Between:

State represented by CBI, Visakhapatnam.

…Complainant And:

1. Mr.Kasukurthi Jalaramaiah, S/o Peda Kotaiah, Aged 51 years, Door No.6-117, J.Sri Nagar 1st Lane, 3rd Cross Road, Behind St.Xaviers Girls- High School-cum-Girls Junior College, Kurnool Road, Ongole, Prakasam District.

2. Mr.Linga Ammaiah, S/o late Basavayya, Door No.5-45, Deivalaravuru Village, Korisapadu Mandal, Prakasam District.

….. Accused Nos.1 and 2

This case came on 19.12.2019 for final hearing before me in the presence of Mrs.K.Srilatha, Ld.Public Prosecutor for the Complainant and of Mr.N.V.V.Prasad, Advocate for A1 and Mr.P.Satya Srinivas,

Advocate for A2 and the matter having stood over for consideration till this day, this Court doth the following:

J U D G M E N T

1. The Inspector of Police, CBI, ACB, Visakhapatnam has filed a charge sheet in RC.No.13(A)/2009 against the accused for the offences under Sections 120-B, 420, 468 and 471 IPC and under

Sec.13(2) r/w 13(1) (d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

2C.C.05/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

2.The case of prosecution as per the charge sheet is that while A1 was working as the Branch Manager of Andhra Bank, Rvinuthala

Branch, he inconnivance with one Mr.Ch.Venkateswara Rao who was working as an Officer in the same bank had opened savings bank accounts in the names of non-existing persons and sanctioned crop loans in the names of those non existing persons basing on fake and forged documents like No Dues Certificates, Revenue Passbooks and

Residence proof certificates. On the report given by Mr.D.V.Narasimha

Rao, the then Dy.General Manager of Andhra Bank, Ongole, the above stated case was registered and during the course of investigation it was revealed that A1 having conspired with A2 and others had sanctioned and disbursed 153 loans amounting to Rs.110.64lakhs under Pattabhi Agri Credit Card Scheme and converted Crop Loans in fraudulent manner basing on fake documents and that in this case 54 crop loans were sanctioned in the names of non-existing persons and having credited the loan amounts to the fictitious savings bank accounts had misappropriated the loan proceeds and thereby caused a loss of Rs.51,20,000/- to the bank and gained wrongfully.

Said Mr.Ch.Venkateswara Rao died on 6.12.2010 and so he is not prosecuted in this case. During the course of investigation of this case it was revealed that the title deed passbook enclosed to the loan documents was got prepared by A1 through A2 and the Government

Examiner of Questioned Documents had given positive opinion that the writings in those passbook belong to A2.

3.Considering the contents of the charge sheet, the case was taken on file for the offences under Sections 120-B, 420, 468 and 471 3C.C.05/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

IPC and under Sections 13(2) r/w 13(1) (d) of the Prevention of

Corruption Act, 1988 against A1 and for the offences under Sections 120-B, 420, 468 and 471 IPC against A2.

4. After the accused made their appearance before the Court and on hearing both sides, this Court has framed charges for the offences under Sections 120-B, 420, 468 and 471 IPC against A1 and A2 and under Section 13(1) (d) r/w 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 against A1, read over and explained to them, in Telugu for which they pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried.

5. At the trial the prosecution side has got examined 56 witnesses as PW.1 to PW.56 and got marked Exs.P1 to Ex.P403 documents on its behalf to prove its case.

6.No oral evidence is adduced on behalf of the accused but Ex.D1 to D3 documents were marked on behalf of the accused. After closure of recording the prosecution side evidence, the accused were examined under Section Sec.313 Cr.P.C informing to them the incriminating circumstances available in the evidence against them, for which they have stated that the same is false and that they have not committed any offence.

7.I have heard the learned Public Prosecutor for prosecution and the learned counsel for the accused. The learned Public Prosecutor and the learned counsel for A1 have submitted written arguments and

I have perused the same.

4C.C.05/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

8.The gist of prosecution side evidence both oral and documentary is as follows:

The evidence of PW.1 namely Mr.Davuluri Venkata Narasimha

Rao who is the defacto complainant and worked as the Zonal Manager in Andhra Bank, Zonal Office Ongole is that A1 had committed fraud and sanctioned Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loans and converted Crop Agricultural Term Loans numbering into 153, violating the bank norms and disbursed an amount of Rs.110.64lakhs, which are still outstanding and that the bank has sustained a loss of

Rs.124.22lakhs and that one Mr.K.Gopala Krishna Murthy, Dy.Manager of Inspection and Audits, Hyderabad had inspected the Ravinuthala branch of Andhra Bank in December, 2008 and noticed some fake

Pattadhar passbooks and identity and residential proofs and some other documents relating to the loans sanctioned by A1 and submitted a report basing on which the Vigilance Department was directed to investigate the matter thoroughly and so the authorities of Vigilance

Department came to the said Ravinuthala Branch and verified all the documents pertaining to the loans sanctioned by A1 and referred the documents to the concerned issuing authorities for information about the genuineness of those documents, for which the information was given in writing that those documents are fake and so the Vigilance authorities had submitted a report to the Head Office, Andhra Bank,

Hyderabad and then the Vigilance Department has directed him(PW.1) to give a report to CBI Department against A1 and so he gave a report on 9.6.2009 which is Ex.P1 which contains his signature.

5C.C.05/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

9.The further evidence of PW.1 is that A1 had opened savings bank accounts in the names of fictitious persons on the basis of false identity and residential proofs and sanctioned loans in the names of those fictitious persons basing on false and fabricated pattadhar passbooks, adangals, 10(1) accounts and bogus no dues certificates and disbursed the loan with conspiracy and plan with unknown persons without proper appraisal and even by altering the appraiser reports of the Rural Development Officer. He has exhibited a list of 153 accounts relating to the alleged fraudulent transactions which has been marked as Ex.P2.

10.The evidence of PW.2 namely Mr.Hejeebu Seshagiri Rao who worked as the Assistant General Manager in Andhra Bank, Zonal

Office, Guntur is that the Branch Manager has to inform sanction of loans exceeding Rs.50,000/- to the Zonal Office in the form of ADA-1 and ADA-5 and that reports in ADA-1 are submitted for each group of loans and that the reports in ADA-5 are submitted for the entire loans, consolidated, and that the Credit Monitoring Review Department in

Zonal Office monitor all the reports of ADA-1 and ADA-5 submitted by the Branch Managers and that the Ravinuthala branch of Andhra Bank was not sending monthly reports relating to sanction of loans exceeding Rs.50,000/- to Zonal Office, promptly and so reminders were issued. A copy of a letter dated 17.11.2007 has been marked as

Ex.P3. Through PW.2 the letters of sanction of different loans have been marked as Ex.P4 to Ex.P31 and the corresponding assessment forms are marked as Ex.P4-A to Ex.P31-A which relate to Pattabhi

Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loans. Those documents relate to the 6C.C.05/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP month of October, 2007. Through him ADA-1 report dated 14.12.2007 is marked as Ex.P33 and ADA-5 report dated 14.12.2007 is marked as

Ex.P34 and a copy of covering letter dated 14.12.2007 is marked as

Ex.P32. Likewise, some letters of sanction of different loans relating to

Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loans were marked as Ex.P35 to Ex.P44 and the corresponding assessment forms were marked as

Ex.P35-A to Ex.P44-A. Those documents relate to the month of

November, 2007.

11.According to PW.2 the ADA-1 report dated 12.2.2008 and ADA-5 report dated 19.2.2008 which are marked as Ex.P45 and Ex.P46 respectively were received by the Chief Manager, Zonal Office, Andhra

Bank for the month of December,2007 with a covering letter. The letters of sanction of that month for different loans were marked as

Ex.P47 to Ex.P66 and the corresponding assessment forms were marked as Ex.P47-A to Ex.P66-A. The ADA-1 report dated 13.2.2008 and the ADA-5 report dated 15.3.2008 were marked as Ex.P67 and

Ex.P68 respectively for the month of January, 2008 and the letters of sanction relating to different loans of that month were marked as

Ex.P69 to Ex.P81 and the relevant assessment forms were marked as

Ex.P69-A to Ex.P81-A. The ADA-1 report dated 11.4.2008 and the ADA- 5 report dated 30.4.2008 which relate to the month of February, 2008 were marked as Ex.P83 and Ex.P84 respectively and the copy of covering letter through which they were sent was marked as Ex.P82.

The letters of sanction of different loans were marked as Ex.P85 to

Ex.P98 and the relevant assessment forms were marked as Ex.P85-A to

Ex.P98-A which relate to the month of February, 2008. The 7C.C.05/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP observations which are sent to the Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala Branch by the Chief Manager, Andhra Bank Zonal Office pertaining to the remarks in sanctioning the loans, appraisal notes, compliance report, process notes etc., for each month i.e., November, 2007, December, 2007, January, 2008 and February, 2008 were marked as Ex.P99 to

Ex.P102 respectively.

12.According to PW.2 he compared the original process notes and sanction letters with the copies of process notes and sanction letters which are sent to the Zonal Office and noticed that the appraising officers who signed in the original process notes and the appraising officers who signed on the process notes sent to the Zonal Office are not one and the same and that the correction fluid was used in the original process notes at the column of ‘recommendations and signature of the appraising officer’ by mentioning on the top of the correction fluid that ‘recommended for sanction’. According to PW.2 all those assessment forms contain the signatures of 1st accused and that A1 had signed as sanctioning authority on those forms in the capacity of branch manager.

13.Likewise, Ex.P103 to Ex.P128 and Ex.P103-A to Ex.P128-A documents were marked through PW.2. According to him correction fluid was used in the original process notes of those documents at the column of recommendations and signature of the appraising officer and it was mentioned on the top of the correction fluid that ‘recommended for sanction’. He has further deposed that the appraising officer who signed on the original process notes and the 8C.C.05/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP appraising officer who signed on the process notes sent to the Zonal

Office are not one and the same.

14.PW.3 namely Tatineni Hanumantha Rao who worked as the

Senior Manager in Andhra Bank, Zonal Office, Guntur has deposed that the Zonal Manager as per a letter dated 17.1.2009 instructed him to work in Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch to assist the branch manger for recovery of 153 irregular crop loans and so from 19.1.2009 till 3.2.2009 he worked in that branch and visited different villages on different dates and met the borrowers who were available and the guarantors of the borrowers and that some of the borrowers have made part payments and that others had promised to discharge the loans. According to him some borrowers were not available at the addresses given in the loan applications and on enquiry he was informed that no such persons were residing in the respective villages.

According to him, he gave reports about his visits and enquires. The copies of those reports were marked as Ex.P129 to Ex.P137. He has further deposed that A1 who accompanied him could not even locate some of the borrowers to whom the crop loans were granted.

15.PW.4 namely Mr.Harinath who worked as a Senior Manager in

Credit Monitoring Review Department of Andhra Bank, Zonal Office,

Guntur has deposed that the Andhra Bank Head Office, Hyderabad had released a master circular for specifying the rules and norms to sanction crop loans by the branch managers and that Ex.P139 is the copy of the same and that Ex.P138 is the covering letter dated 23.4.2010. According to him as per the circular under Ex.P139 the branch manager has to submit reports in ADA-1 and ADA-5 forms every 9C.C.05/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP month for the loans sanctioned in their respective branches. He has further deposed that a circular No.344 dated 29.1.2010 the copy of which is marked as Ex.P140 was issued prescribing a procedure to prepare a note if any deviations were found in sanctioning the loans.

16.PW.5 namely Mr.Kuntamukkala Suryanarayana Murthy who worked as the Chief Manager in Andhra Bank, Zonal Office, Guntur has deposed about the procedure to be followed in sanctioning crop loans and about the enquiry conducted by him regarding irregularities found connected to the crop loans sanctioned in Ravinuthala branch. He also deposed about the defects that were found in sanction of the crop loans in that branch and also the defects in the documents required for sanction of crop loans. He also deposed about the role of branch managers and precautions to be taken in sanctioning the crop loans.

17.PW.6 namely Mr.Padmanabhuni Padma Naga Vara Prasad who worked as a Senior Manager in Zonal Office of Andhra Bank, Guntur has also deposed about the irregularities noticed by him in sanctioning the crop loans by Ravinuthala branch of Andhra Bank and through him the loan files were marked as Ex.P141 to Ex.P248. According to him, he handed over all the relevant documents relating to the loan accounts to the Inspector of Police, CBI, Visakhapatnam under a receipt dated 31.3.2011 which is marked as Ex.P.249. He also deposed about the defects he found in the loan documents.

10C.C.05/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

18.Mrs.Kidambi Mydhili who was examined as PW.7 has deposed that she worked as an Officer in Zonal Office, Andhra Bank, Guntur in the Credit Monitoring and Review Department. She spoke about her assistance to the Senior Manager in reviewing the ADA reports which were received from the branches including the Ravinuthala branch of

Andhra Bank. She also spoke about the lapses which were found in sanctioning the crop loans by Ravinuthala branch of Andhra Bank.

According to her she prepared the observations under Ex.P99 to

Ex.P102 pertaining to the remarks in sanctioning the loans, appraisal notes, compliance reports, process note etc., relating to some months and that they contain her initials. According to her on comparison she came to know that there are differences between the copies of the process notes and sanction orders sent to the Zonal Office with the original process notes and sanction orders.

19.PW.8 namely Mr.Makkena Venkateswarlu who is the successor in office of A1 as the Branch Manager of Ravinuthala branch, Andhra

Bank has deposed that A1 had handed over the documents pertaining to 1100 crop loans stating that he(A1) sanctioned those crop loans as per the bank norms and that there were no irregularities in sanction of those crop loans, except in one or two loans.

20.PW.8 has further deposed that A1 had informed to him that A1 had referred the pattadhar passbooks to MRO, Korisapadu for verification and that the MRO had verified those pattadhar passbooks and issued certificates stating that some are genuine and that the said certificates were kept in the concerned loan files. Further PW.8 11C.C.05/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP has deposed that A1 informed that A1 verified the loans of the borrowers in the said crop loans and that the borrowers were in possession of the lands mentioned in their pattadhar passbooks and that the extents mentioned in the pattadhar passbooks were correct and further that the Chief Manager, Mr.K.S.Murthy, Rural Development

Officer, Mr.M.Anand and Mr.N.S.Sharma belonging to the Inspection

Department, Zonal Office, Guntur had visited Ravinuthala branch and verified the loan documents and found that the pattadhar pass books in two or three crop loans were fake. According to PW.8 one

Mr.Suresh Kumar, the Rural Development Officer, Zonal Office, Andhra

Bank of Guntur had visited Ravinuthala branch on 22.11.2008 and 23.11.2008 and verified the documents pertaining to the crop loans sanctioned by A1 and even thereafter also Mr.Suresh Kumar visited that branch and again verified the documents for a period of three more days and informed to PW.8 that the pattadhar passbooks in the crop loans sanctioned to Abhaya Savings Bank account holders were fake.

21.PW.8 has further deposed Mr.Suresh Kumar took him and also 16 to 18 pattadhar pass books pertaining to those crop loans to the office of MRO, Koresipadu and verified them with the revenue records through MRO and came to know that except one pattadhar passbook all the remaining pattadhar pass books were not genuine and that a report was prepared to that effect and was submitted to the Zonal

Office.

22.The further evidence of PW.8 is that one Mr.K.G.K.Murthy and

Mr.Murali Krishna of Inspection department, Head Office, Andhra Bank, 12C.C.05/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

Hyderabad had visited the Ravinuthala branch for annual inspection and referred 400 pattadhar pass books pertaining to the crop loans sanctioned by A1 to the MRO, Koresipadu and on verification they came to know that pattadhar pass books relating to 153 crop loans were fake. According to PW.8 the Zonal office, Andhra Bank, Guntur gave directions to A1 to recover overdue crop loans sanctioned by A1 and so A1 had recovered pay payments in around 40 crop loans in which pattadhar pass books were noticed as fake and handed over those part payments to PW.8 for adjustment in the respective crop loans

23.The further evidence of PW.8 is that he took 800 pattadhar passbooks pertaining to the crop loans sanctioned by A1 to the office of MRO, Koresipadu and on verification it was noticed that some of them were fake and so he obtained a certificate about the same and submitted to the Zonal Office. PW.8 spoke about enquiry conducted by

Mr.T.Hanumantha Rao.

24.The further evidence of PW.8 is that he, A1 and

Mr.T.Hanumantha Rao have visited some villages for borrowers and came to know that some of those borrowers were not residing in the villages and regarding some borrowers the villagers had informed to them that no such persons were residing in the villages.

25.PW.9 namely Mr.Pulicherla Paul Caesar who worked as the Senior

Manager in Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch from 20.05.2009 to 25.06.2012 has deposed that he handed over some loan files relating 13C.C.05/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP to the crop loans connected to this case through a covering letter

dated 15.6.2009 which was marked as Ex.P250.

26.PW.10 namely Mr.Adavani Sravan Kumar who worked as Rural

Development Officer of Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala Branch from 13.8.2007 to 15.11.2008 has deposed that while A1 was working as the branch manager in Ravinuthala Branch of Andhra Bank,

Mr.Y.Ravindranath worked as a bank officer and one

Mr.Ch.Venkateswara Rao worked as a Clerk/ Cashier and that A1 had personally attended for sanction of the crop loans pertaining to this case and that A1 himself contracted the borrowers and received applications from the borrowers and collected the documents such as pattadhar passbook, title deed, 10(1) adangal, small farmer certificate, no due certificates issued by other banks and abstract forms issued by the Mandal Revenue Officers and sanctioned crop loans and that subsequently A1 after disbursing the crop loans to the borrowers asked him(PW.10) to fill up the applications of the borrowers and the necessary documents and so he filled up the loan applications and other documents in the crop loans pertaining to this case and that as per the instructions of A1 they were kept in strong room and the keys were in the custody of A1. According to him he prepared appraisal and process notes as per the instructions of A1 and he filled up transfer forms for adjustment of the crop loan amounts in the SB accounts of the borrowers and also entered the same in the system as directed by

A1. The further evidence of PW.10 is that the Rural Development

Officer namely Siva Kumar visited that branch once in a week on every

Thursday and that without appraising and preparing sanction notes 14C.C.05/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP had simply signed on them and since already crop loans were sanctioned and the amounts were disbursed by A1.

27.The further evidence of PW.10 is that A1 himself rub out the remarks made by the Rural Development Officer Mr.Siva Kumar in appraisal forms by using correction fluid and directed him(PW.10) to write as ‘recommended for sanction’ and accordingly he wrote the same and when he questioned A1 about the same, A1 scolded him and directed him to work as instructed by A1 stating that A1 was the head of the branch and sanctioning authority and responsible for the entire transaction in the branch and that A1 got filled up the applications of SB accounts of the borrowers in the crop loans, through him(PW.10). According to PW.10 he was terminated from the service on the allegations that he acted in accordance with the illegal directions of A1 and as he signed in the appraisal forms and process notes without inspecting the fields. Inspite of Mr.Siva Kumar did not sign on them and that he was responsible for tampering of the records and because he wrote in the appraisal form and process notes as recommended for sanction at the place of rubout of remarks with correction fluid. The further evidence of PW.10 is that A1 handed over loan application, letter of sanction, appraisal forms and memorandum for sanction, Form of Andhra Bank for issue Pattabhi Agri Card, Demand

Promissory note, composite agreement for agriculture, covenants of the co-obligant forms, Bank’s right to cancel limits and property statements to him along with property valuation certificate, adangal and title deed in all the crop loans pertaining to these cases for filling up the same as per the particulars mentioned in property valuation 15C.C.05/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP certificate, adangal and title deed. According to PW.10

Mr.Ch.Venkateswara Rao and one Mr.S.A.Pyaru who worked as a

Cashier also filled up some columns in those documents relating to crop loans and that Mr.K.C.Siva Kumar the Rural Development Officer filled up some columns in the appraisal forms and letter of sanction of the crop loans and that A1 sent ADA-1 reports pertaining to the crop loans to the Zonal Office along with copies of sanction letter, application form and appraisal form and sanction of short term loans.

According to him the copies of appraisal form and sanction of short term loans in some of the crop loans which are submitted to the Zonal

Office were not the copies of the originals and A1 took his signatures in the said copies and he signed on them as per the directions given by A1 and that A1 had obtained the signatures of Mr.Siva Kumar in the original of appraisals and short term loans after submitting the deception copies of appraisals and short term loans to the Zonal office.

According to PW.10 even though Mr.Siva Kumar, the Rural

Development Officer had endorsed on some of the original appraisals and short terms loans as not recommended but A1 having rubbed out the same with correction fluid had got written through him(PW.10) as recommended and he wrote the same as per the instructions of A1.

28.PW.11 namely Mr.K.C.Siva Kumar who worked as the Rural

Development Officer in Chimakurthi branch May, 2005 to May, 2009 has deposed that the Zonal Office, Andhra Bank, Guntur has directed him to attend Ravinuthala branch of Andhra Bank to monitor the agricultural loans and so he attended that branch once in 15 days, for a total of 14 days and monitored the agricultural loans from July, 2007 16C.C.05/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP to September, 2007 and even thereafter he attended the monitoring of agricultural loans in that branch as per the direction of the zonal office. According to him he came to know that A1 being the branch manager of that branch had sanctioned crop loans and disbursed the amounts to the borrowers and entered the same in the system and also attended for a documentation and that A1 placed of those loan files before him(PW.11) for signing and he questioned A1 for asking him to sign on the loan files which loans were already sanctioned and disbursed to the borrowers and then A1 had informed that A1 had received loan applications and attended for documentation and sanctioned and disbursed the crop loan amounts to the borrowers because PW.11 used to come to the branch once in 15 days or once in a month and that there was immediate necessity to sanction crop loans due to crop season and A1 had informed that A1 had sanctioned crop loans to the borrowers as there was immediate need and that A1 verified all the loan applications and documents submitted by the borrowers which are proper and A1 himself personally attended the documentation and that there were latches in sanction the crop loans and requested to sign on the documents for sending the same to the Zonal Office in the manner of ADA Report and so he(PW.11) obliged A1 and signed on the loan documents relating to the crop loans subsequent to the sanction and disbursement of the loan amount by A1. According to PW.11 he filled only some columns in the sanction letters and process notes in 4 or 5 loan accounts which were kept blank as per the instructions of A1 and that Mr.Sravan Kumar the

Probationary Rural Development Officer had filled up the loan applications and documents pertaining to those crop loans and that 17C.C.05/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

PW.11 has not seen even one of the persons to whom those crop loans were sanctioned because A1 had sanctioned them in the absence of PW.11 and that neither the borrowers nor the Co-obligants nor A1 signed on the applications or documents in the presence of

PW.11. The further evidence of PW.11 is that in the month of June, 2008 when A1 asked him to sign on the loan files which loans were already sanctioned and the amounts were disbursed, he signed in the annexures/process notes relating to the loan accounts by mentioning as ‘verified only documents’. The enquiry officer of the Vigilance

Department, Head Office, Andhra Bank, Hyderabad had informed to him by phone that in some of the crop loan files there was rub out with correction fluid.

29.PW.12 Mr.Yerragudi Ravindranath who worked as Assistant

Manager in Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala Branch from 18.06.2007 to 12.02.2008 has deposed that A1 worked as branch manager during that time and sanctioned some crop loans and he (PW.12) had opened only three SB accounts relating to those loans on the basis of ration card and voter card but he does not know who opened the SB accounts relating to other crop loans and A1 had assigned the work of opening SB accounts relating to those crop loans to Mr.Sravan Kumar the Probationary Rural Development Officer and Mr.Ch.Venkateswara

Rao a sub manager also attended for that work and that A1 entrusted the work of filling up the crop loan applications and documents, preparation of vouchers and other works to Mr.Sravan Kumar and that

A1 had insisted Mr.Sravan Kumar to rub out the remarks made by

Mr.K.C.Siva Kumar in appraisal of crop loans by using correction fluid 18C.C.05/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP and to write as ‘recommended’ at the rub out column and Mr.Sravan

Kumar did the same which was informed to PW.12 when the CBI caused enquiry relating to those crop loans. According to PW.12 even though Mr.K.C.Siva Kumar a Rural Development Officer was deputed to work in that branch for appraisal of the crop loans but A1 appraised, sanctioned and disbursed the crop loans and also entered in the computer system in the absence of Mr.K.C.Siva Kumar and that

Mr.K.C.Siva Kumar had questioned A1 about the same and argued with him in the bank in their presence. PW.12 has deposed about the irregularities and defects found in those crop loans and the documents of the loans. According to him the S.B account opening forms do not contain the signatures of the introducers.

30.The further evidence of PW.12 is that the borrowers relating to those crop loans were visiting the bank in the evening hours and that

A1 and the Sub Manager namely Mr.Ch.Venkateswara Rao were working in the bank beyond banking hours and they have detained the Probationary Rural Development Officer who is Mr.Sravan Kumar to work along with them in the branch beyond bank hours.

31.PW.13 namely Mr.Shaik Abdul Pyaru who worked as cashier in

Ravinuthala branch of Andhra Bank from February, 2008 to October, 2009 has deposed that he being cashier in that branch had attended to pay cash to the parties on passed withdrawals by collecting tokens and also attended the work entrusted to him by A1 who worked as the branch manager. According to him he paid cash to the parties by receivingtokensbecausetheSubManagernamely 19C.C.05/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

Mr.Venkateswararao had identified the parties and verified the passbooks. He admitted his signatures on the loan files marked as

Ex.P225, Ex.P227, Ex.P229, Ex.P233, Ex.P235 and that he filled up the sanction letters in the loan files marked as Ex.P237, Ex.P233, Ex.P235, as per the instructions of A1. He has categorically deposed that on two occasions when parties were not available he handed over the cash on passed withdrawals numbering 8 or 9 to A1 after banking hours on the instructions of the sub manager Mr.Venkateswara Rao but he does not know whether A1 handed over the said amount to the parties or not. He further deposed that on one occasion when a party asked him to pay cash regarding five tokens which were given to the party in the counter, he (PW.13) has refused to give cash regarding five tokens but as per the instructions by A1 he paid cash to A1 regarding those five tokens.

32.The evidence of PW.14 namely Mr.Palakaveety Krishna Murthy who worked as a Tashildar in Santanutalapadu Mandal is that he verified and compared the relevant entries of the copies of the pattadhar pass books relating to 92 crop loans which were sent to him by the MRO, Koresapadu with the relevant entries in the Record of

Rights i.e., 1(A), 1 (B), Fair Land Register and 10 (1) account copy, as per the proceedings of the District Collector of Prakasam District

dated 7.7.2010 and came to conclusion that 91 pattadhar passbooks

were fake and bogus and they are not pertaining to the persons whose names were mentioned in those books and so he gave a report to the District Collector, the copy of which is marked as Ex.P251.

According to him he narrated in Ex.P251 about the particulars of the 20C.C.05/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP original land owners for the survey numbers mentioned in the copies of the pattadhar passbooks and also explained as to how the entries are fabricated in those passbooks and the alternations were made in the revenue records.

33.PW.15 namely Mr.K.Srinivasa Rao who worked as the Tashildar of

Parchuru Mandal, Prakasam District has deposed that the District

Collector of Prakasam District has instructed him as per the proceedings dated 7.7.2010 to verify pattadhar passbooks and title deeds pertaining to 61 crop loans sanctioned by Ravinuthala branch of Andhra Bank and to give a report about their genuineness and so he received the copies of the pattadhar passbooks from ‘D’ Section of

District Collector’s Office, Ongole and collected Re-survey and settlement record, adangal, draft Record of Rights register, 1-B

Register, 10 (1) account and Field Measurement Book pertaining to the lands mentioned in those pattadhar passbooks from the office of

Tashildar, Koresapadu and verified the relevant entries and came to a conclusion that the said 61 pattadhar passbooks are not genuine and he has submitted a report to the District Collector, the copy of which is marked as Ex.P.252, because according to him the relevant entries of those books are not tallied with the entries in the pattadhar passbooks.

34.Mr.Chillara Ramesh who is PW.16 who worked as Senior Assistant in Mandal Office, Koresapadu has deposed about the procedure for issuing pattadhar and title deed passbooks relating to the landed property. PW.17 namely Mr. Kosanam Ravi Kumar who worked as

Mandal Revenue Inspector of Korisapadu has also deposed about the 21C.C.05/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP procedure for issuing the pattadhar and title deed passbooks.

According to him the private persons will not be authorized to note the entries in the pattadhar passbooks or title deed passbooks and that if the entries written in the passbooks are not tallied with the entries noted in the revenue records, it can be said that those passbooks are not genuine. According to him the Mandal Revenue Officer/Tahsildar is the competent authority to issue nativity certificate. His further evidence is that the loan file under Ex.P239 contains a letter addressed by the branch manager dated 20.4.2007 but it does not contain the signature of one Mrs.Y.Subbalakshmi who worked as

Tahsildar of Koresapadu Mandal on 4.10.2007. According to him the signature on the property certificate is not of the Panchayat Secretary and the signature on 10(1) account is not the signature of the concerned village revenue officer and that the signatures appearing on the title deed does not belong to MRO, RDO and Sub Registrar of

Amanabrolu and that the signature on the nativity certificate which is marked as Ex.P240 does not belong to the village revenue officer of

Ravinuthala.

35.PW.18 namely Mr.Bhuvanam Ramalinga Vara Prasad worked as

Additional Revenue Inspector in Korisapadu Mandal, PW.19namely

Mr.Ramachandruni Vasudevarao who worked as the Manadal Revenue

Inspector in Korisapadu Mandal, PW.20namelyMr.Rachavalla

Venkata Sesaiah who worked as Mandal Revenue Inspector in

Korisapadu Mandal, PW.21 namely Mrs.Gunturu Sujatha who worked as

Junior Assistant in the office of RDO, Ongole from 2001 to 2006,

PW.22 namely Mr.P.Venugopala Rao who worked as the branch 22C.C.05/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP manager in Union Bank of India, Ravinuthala branch from 28.8.2007 to 26.7.2011, PW.24 namely Mr. A.Raghava Reddy who worked as the

Assistant Branch Manager in Indian Bank, Medarametla branch, PW.25 namely Mr.Busurapalli Anjaiah who worked as the branch manager in

Prakasam District Co-operative Central Bank Limited, Ravinuthala branch from September, 2005 to October, 2007, PW.26 namely

Mr.Cherukuri Venkateswarlu who worked as the branch manager in the same bank, PW.27 namely Mr. Karicheti Narayana who worked as a staff assistant in the same bank, PW.28 namely Mr.K.Sanjeeva Rao who worked as the Staff Assistant in the same bank and PW.29 namely

Mr. Giddi Ravindra Babu who worked as the branch manager in Andhra

Pragathi Grameena Bank of Medarametla branch from June, 2005 to

June, 2008 have deposed that the signatures available on the letters, property certificates, No.3 account copies, adangals and the title deeds and nativity certificates and no dues certificates available in the loan files do not belong to the respective officials who worked at the relevant times and that even the seals affixed at those signatures also do not belong to the respective offices.

36.PW.23 namely Mr.Sareddu Sambasiva Rao who worked as the

Sub Registrar in the office of Sub Registrar, Addanki from April, 2010 to 30.6.2012 has deposed that the Village Administrative Officers used to produce the title deeds and obtain the signatures of the Sub

Registrars who after verifying the survey numbers would sign on the title deeds if those survey numbers are not in the prohibited list.

23C.C.05/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

37.PW.30 namely Mr. Marriboyina Anjaneyulu who worked as Extra

Department Delivery Agent in Pamidipadu Post Office, since 1983 is that if the addressees are not available in the given address and the registered posts by causing enquiry about them for six days, they would return the covers to this senders. Through him Ex.P253 to

Ex.276 returned unserved registered postal covers were marked which are addressed to different persons and according to PW.30 having caused enquiries about the persons to whom the covers were addressed, as they were not available, he returned those covers by making an endorsement stating that the addressees were not residing in Pamidipadu village, to the CBI which is the sender of those covers.

38.PW.31 namely Mr.Tammuluri Subbarao who worked as Extra

Department Mail Carrier, Ravinuthala Sub Post Office, since 10.12.1986 has deposed that Mr.Kondru Kanakaiah who expired on 22.1.2011 worked as Postman/Extra Department Delivery Agent in the sub post office, Ravinuthala and that he has got acquaintance with the signatures of late Mr.Kondru Kanakaiah and that Ex.P277 to Ex.304 postal covers contain the endorsements made by Mr.Kondru

Kanakaiah which were returned unserved to the sender CBI,

Visakhapatnam with an endorsement as the addressees were not residing in the given addresses and those endorsements contain the signatures of Mr.Konduru Kanakaiah.

39.PW.32 namely Maddineni Anjaneyulu who worked as the Village

Revenue Officer of Ravinuthala village has deposed that the Village

Revenue Officers are not competent to issue nativity certificates since 24C.C.05/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP 2008 and that the Gram Panchayat Secretaries are only competent to issue nativity certificates. According to him the signatures available on the property certificates, No.3 adangals and pattadar pass books and the nativity certificates, available in the loan files of this case are not his signatures and that he did not issue those nativity certificates.

Even he denied the seals as belonging to him and to his office which are available in the loan files.

40.PW.33 namely Mr.Medikonda Venkata Narayana who worked as

Village Revenue Officer-II of Pamidipadu village from December, 2008 to May, 2013 has deposed that by the time he assumed charge as

Village Revenue Officer of Pamidipadu village, one Mr.Hari Prabhakar was working as the Village Revenue Officer of Pamidipadu village but he died in February, 2009 and that they both worked together for about two months and that he has acquaintance with the signatures and handwritings of Mr.Hari Prabahkar. He also deposed that since 2008 the Village Revenue Officers are not competent to issue nativity certificates and that Gram Panchayat Secretaries are only competent to issue nativity certificates. According to him the signatures and seals available on the property certificates, 10(1) account copies, No.3 adangals and pattadhar passbooks and the nativity certificates available in the loan files connected to this case are not his signatures and also not the signatures of MrHari Prabhakar and those seals also do not belong to them.

41.PW.34 namely Mr.Yedavalli Venkata Subbarao who worked as panchayat secretary of Pamidipadu Grampanchayat, Korisapadu 25C.C.05/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

Mandal from June, 2007 to 2011 has deposed that it is the duty of

Grampanchayat Secretaries to issue nativity certificates and the power to issue copies of adangals was given to the Grampanchayat

Secretary in the year 2007. According to him the signatures appearing on the nativity certificates, property certificates, No.3 adangals which are available in the loan files connected to this case are not his signatures and even the seals appearing on those documents do not belong to him.

42.PW.35 namely Mr.Yalakapati Bhaskara Rao who worked as the

Village Revenue Officer of Pichukalagudipadu village from 24.5.2008 15.5.2013 has deposed about the duties of village revenue officers.

PW.36 namely Mr.Yenumula Venkata Chennaiah who worked as Village

Revenue Officer of Timmalapalem and Yerapalem villages from May, 2008 to May, 2013 has also deposed about the duties of village revenue officers. According to PW.35 and PW.36 the persons who are shown as the borrowers in the loan applications connected to this case do not belong to their respective villages as mentioned in the loan files.

43.PW.37 namely Mr. Molaka Srinivasulu who worked as the Village

Revenue Officer of Bodduvanipalem village from May, 2008 to May, 2013 has deposed that he worked as incharge village revenue officer of Rachapudi and Ravinuthala villages also for two months in

September and October, 2008. According to him when he was asked to identify the borrowers of Bodduvanipalem, Rachapudi and

Ravinuthala villages as per the loan files, he identified only two photos 26C.C.05/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP out of them who belong to Rachapudi village and the loan file which was marked as Ex.P207 the name of pattadhar in the pattadhar passbook was mentioned as Mr.Tirumalasetty Eswaramma but the photo of Mrs.Usurumati Seshamma was affixed on the pattadar passbook and that in the loan file which was marked as Ex.P.225, the photo of Mrs.Chatla Venkayamma, resident of Rachapudi village was affixed on the pattadhar passbook but the name of Mrs.Arla

Subbayamma was mentioned in that passbook.

44.PW.38 namely Mr.Pulipati Lazar who worked as the Village

Revenue Assistant in Kurravanipalem village of Koresapadu Mandal has deposed that in the loan file under Ex.P187 the photo of

Mrs.Chopparapu Seethamma was affixed on the pattadhar passbook but the name of Mrs.Arla Kotamma was mentioned in that pattadhar passbook and that in the loan file under Ex.P191 the photo of

Mrs.Pyrada Sumathi was affixed but the name of Mrs.Mandalapu

Anjuamma was mentioned in that pattadhar passbook. He further deposed that in the loan file under Ex.P195 the photo of

Mrs.Medikonda Indira was affixed on the pattadhar passbook whereas the name of Mrs.Palaparthi Prameela was mentioned on that pattadhar passbook. According to him in the loan file under Ex.P181 the photo of native of Koresapadu village was affixed in the pattadhar passbook but the name of the pattadhar was mentioned as Mr.Pydi

Punnarao but the photo does not belong to him. Likewise, in the loan file under Ex.P219 the photo of a person relating to Koresapadu village was affixed mentioning the name of pattadhar as Mr.Mandapati

Srinivasarao but the said photo does not belong to him.

27C.C.05/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

45.He has further deposed that in the loan file under Ex.P221 the photo of Mrs.Kale Devi was affixed but her name on the pattadhar passbook was mentioned as Mrs.Payanam Ademma and that in the loan file under Ex.P.229 the photo of Mrs.Katta Ramana, W/o.Jaipaul was affixed mentioning the name of the pattadhar as Mrs.Lalam

Seethamma

46.PW.39 namely Mr. Palaparthi Ruben who worked as the Village

Revenue Assistant of Pamidipadu village for about 25 years has deposed that the photos of the persons affixed on the pattadhar passbooks in the loan files marked as Exs.P143, 177, 181, 183, 185, 187, 189, 191, 193, 195, 197, 199, 201, 203, 205, 207, 211, 213, 215, 217, 219, 223, 225 and 245 are not residents of Pamidipadu village and that the person whose photo was affixed on the pattadhar passbook in the loan file under Ex.P237 is not resident of

Krishnamrajuvanipalem village. PW.40 namely Mr.Palaparthi Solomon who worked as the Village Revenue Assistant of Pamidipadu village for about 10 years has deposed as deposed by PW.39. PW.41 namely

Mr.Palaparthi Yesu who worked as the Village Revenue Assistant of

Pamidipadu village for about 10 years also deposed as deposed by

PW.39 and PW.40.

47.PW.42 namely Mr. Kommareddy Ravindra Reddy who is a resident of Koresapadu village has deposed that the photo affixed on the title deed which is available in the loan file marked as Ex.P181 is his photo but the name of Mr.Pydi Punnarao is noted on that title deed which is 28C.C.05/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP not his name and that he is not resident of Pamidipadu village and his father’s name is Mr.Ramireddy but not Mr.Subbaiah and that he has no lands in survey numbers 321/6 and 362/3 of Pamidipadu village and that the said title deed is not related to him. He further deposed that the photo affixed to the nativity certificate which is available in the SB account loan file under Ex.P182 is his photo but the name mentioned in that certificate is not his name and that the signatures and thumb impression available in the loan application and in the SB Account file do not belong to him. According to him he never obtained any nativity certificate in the year 2007 but he obtained house loan from Andhra

Pragathi Grameena Bank, Medarametla branch under Indiramma scheme. The photocopy of his household card was marked as Ex.P305.

48.PW.43 namely Mr.Kommareddy Subbareddy who is a resident of

Koresapadu Mandal has deposed that the photo in the loan application and in the title deed available in the loan file marked as Ex.P219 belong to him but the name mentioned on them as Mr.Mandapati

Srinivasarao does not belong to him and that he never resided in

Pamidipadu village and his father’s name is Mr.Ramireddy but not

Mr.Ramarao and he has no lands in survey numbers 301/2 and 411/6 of Pamidipadu village. According to him the said title deed does not belong to him and that he did not take any crop loan from Andhra

Bank, Ravinuthala branch but he took house loan from Pinakini

Grameena Bank, Medarametla branch under Indiramma scheme and at that time he gave his photos which are similar to the photos that are affixed in the said loan application and title deed. He has further deposed that he never obtained any nativity certificate which is 29C.C.05/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP marked as Ex.P220 and even the name mentioned in that certificate does not belong to him and even the signatures available on the loan application and SB account file marked as Ex.P220 are not his signatures. He does not know Mrs.Arla Punnamma who is shown as the guarantor of that land. The Photostat copy of his household card was marked as Ex.P306.

49.PW.44 namely Mr.Choppavarapu Seethamma who is a resident of

Kurravanipalem village has deposed as deposed by PW.42 and PW.43 but the difference is only regarding the loan file and the SB account file marked as Ex.P187 and Ex.P188 respectively. The Photostat copy of the household card of PW.44 was marked as Ex.P307 and the Photostat copy of the first page of the bank passbook of PW.44 maintained in

Union Bank of India, Ravinuthala Branch was marked as Ex.P308.

50.PW.45 namely Mrs.Kale Devi who is resident of Kurravanipalem village also deposed as deposed by PW.42 to PW.44 but the difference is regarding to the loan file and S.B account file marked as Ex.P221 and Ex.P222 respectively. After verifying with the original and on comparison of the same, the photo copy of the household card of

PW.45 was marked as Ex.P309. Likewise the photocopy of the first page of bank passbook and the photocopy of the voters identity card of

PW.45 were marked as Ex.P310 and Ex.P311 respectively after comparison with the original documents.

51.The evidence of PW.46 namely Mr.Katta Ravana is in respect of the loan file and S.B account file which are marked as Ex.P229 and 30C.C.05/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P230 respectively but he also deposed as deposed by PW.42 to

PW.45. The photocopies of Rajeev Arogyasri Health Card, first page of bank passbook maintained in Union Bank of India, Ravinuthala branch of PW.46 were marked as Ex.P312 and Ex.P313 respectively after comparison of the same with the original documents. The Photocopy of post office savings bank account passbook of PW.46 was marked as

Ex.P314. PW.47 namely Mr. Medikonda Indira spoke about the loan file and SB account file which were marked as Ex.P195 and Ex.P196 respectively through whom Ex.P315 to Ex.P318 documents were marked. PW.48 namely Mrs.Pyeaddu Sumathi has deposed about the loan file and S.B account file which were marked as Ex.P191 and

Ex.P192 respectively through whom Ex.P319 and Ex.P320 documents were marked. PW.47 and PW.48 also deposed as deposed by PW.42 to

PW.46.

52.PW.52 namely Mrs.Chetla Venkayamma through whom Ex.P.324 and Ex.P.325 documents were marked has deposed regarding the loan file and SB account file which were marked as Ex.225 and

Ex.P2226 respectively. PW.53 namely Mrs.Ittadi Raghava Rani through whom Ex.P.326 and Ex.P.327 documents were marked has deposed about the loan file and SB account file which were marked as Ex.P.227 and Ex.P.228 respectively. PW.54 namely Mrs.Usurumati Seshamma through whom Ex.P.328 and Ex.P.329 documents were marked has deposed regarding the loan file and SB account file which were marked as Ex.207 and Ex.P208 respectively. PW.52 to PW.54 have deposed as deposed by PW.42 to PW.48 31C.C.05/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

53.PW.49 namely Mr.Kavuri Gopala Krishna Murthy who worked as the Inspector of branches in Inspection and Audit Department, Head

Office, Andhra Bank, Hyderabad has deposed that as per the instructions of General Manager, Head Office, Andhra Bank,

Hyderabad, he inspected Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch in

December, 2008 accompanied by one Mr.K.Murali Krishna a Senior

Inspector for a period of two weeks from 01.12.2008 and verified all the files of the crop loans including the documents therein and also the SB accounts including the account opening forms and found that 13 to 16 crop loans were sanctioned on fake pattadhar passbooks and submitted his report to the Zonal office. According to him at his request one Mr.Hari Narayana Seeth of Andhra Bank was directed to assist him on verification of the Pattadhar passbooks through the

Mandal Revenue Officer and it was found that 153 out of 400 Pattadhar passbooks were not tallying with the Revenue records and that a certificate was given by the MRO to that effect which he sent to the

Head Office. He further noticed that the SB accounts relating to 153 crop loans were not opened in accordance with KYC norms and so he prepared a report and submitted the same to the Head Office, the attested copy of which is marked as Ex.P321. According to him, he observed that in the loan account bearing No.2007/585 the name of the borrower was shown as Mr.Marriboina Venkata Rao, S/o

Venkateswarulu of Meedarametla as per the sanction order but in the pattadhar passbook the name was mentioned as Mr.Marriboina

Venkata Rao, S/o Peddabbai of Pamidipadu village but the loan amount was credited to the account bearing No.ASB 1452 relating to

Mr.Marriboina Venkata Rao, S/o. Srinivasa Rao of Anamanamuru.

32C.C.05/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

54.The Evidence of PW.50 namely Mrs.Yerramothu Subba Lakshmi who worked as the MRO of Korisipadu Mandal from 2005 to 2009, is that A1 who was the Branch Manager of Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch did not send any letter to her to register lien/charge pertaining to the crop loans in the revenue records when she worked as the

Mandal Revenue Officer of Korisipadu. According to her the signatures available on the title deed and a letter marked as Ex.P141-A which are available in the loan file marked as Ex.P141 are not her signatures and that even the stamp under those signatures does not relate to the office of MRO, Korisipadu and that she did not issue that title deed.

According to her the signatures available in the passbooks available in the loan files marked as Exs.P.143, 145, 147,149,151,153,155,157, 159,161,163,165,167,169,171,173,175,177,179, 181,183,185, 187,189,191,193,195,197,199,201,203,205,207,209,211, 213, 215,217,219,221,223,225,227,229,231, 233, 235, 237, 239,241, 243, 245 and 247 and the signatures on the letters available in those files which are marked as Exs.P.143-A, 145-A, 147-A,149-A,151-A, 153-A,155-A,157-A,159-A,161-A,163-A,165-A,167-A,169-A,171-A, 173-A,175-A,177-A,179-A, 181-A183-A,185-A, 187-A,189-A,191-A, 193-A,195-A,197-A,199-A,201-A,203-A,205-A,207-A,209-A,211-A, 213-A215-A,217-A,219-A,221-A,223-A,225-A,227-A,229-A, 231-A, 233-A, 235-A, 237-A, 239-A,241-A, 243-A, 245-A and 247-A are not her signatures and that she did not issue those passbooks and that she did not make any endorsement on those letters and that even the stamps available on those documents do not belong to the office of

MRO of Korisipadu.

33C.C.05/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

55.PW.51 namely Mr.Bhaskaruni Satyanarayana who worked as the cashier in Union Bank of India, Ravinuthala branch from May, 2002 to

January, 2012 has deposed that when he was shown the pattadhar passbooks pertaining to the crop loan files of Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch and asked about the persons whose photos affixed in those pattadar pass books, on perusal of the same, he had informed that he does not know about those persons and that when he was shown some passbooks and savings bank accounts pertaining to Union Bank of India of Ravinuthala branch. He had informed that those passbooks relate to their bank. The photocopy of passbook relating to the savings bank account No. 7159 and the photocopy of the passbook relating to savings bank account bearing No.371902010007161 were marked as

Ex.P322 and Ex.P323 respectively through him and according to him the passbook under Ex.P.323 belongs to Mrs.Chetla Venkayamma.

56.PW.55 namely Mr.Vijaya Shankar Pasumarthi is a Handwriting

Expert who worked in the Government Examiner of Questioned

Documents Laboratory, Hyderabad. According to him this case was allotted to him by the Director, CFSL, Hyderabad in which the documents like title deed pass books, loan applications and specimen signatures of some persons were received and he has carefully and scientifically compared the general writing habits and individual writing characteristics between the supplied standard signatures/writings with the disputed signatures/writings as per the questionnaire and gave his opinion which is marked as Ex.P.330. Through him the specimen writings of Mr.Linga Ammaiah(A2) were marked as Ex.P331 and that 34C.C.05/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP his clear opinion is that the specimen signatures of PW.50 were not tallied with her questioned signatures and so the questioned signatures were not signed by her. His further clear opinion is that A2 had written the questioned handwritings.

57.PW.56 namely Mr.S.P.Rama Rao is the investigation officer of this case. He has deposed about registration of this case and issuing the

FIR which was marked as Ex.P.332. He also deposed about his examination of the witnesses and recording their statements and also collection of the relevant documents and about his filing the charge sheet. Through him Ex.P334 to Ex.P399 documents were marked.

58.The learned public prosecutor has submitted mainly that A1 being the Manager was duty bound to verify the S.B accounts opened properly and scrutinize the loan applications properly before sanctioning and disbursing the loans. But in this case A1 in collusion with others had opened the accounts without introducers and proper identification of the borrowers and knowing fully well had sanctioned the loans basing on forged and fabricated documents by entering into the criminal conspiracy with others and he gained pecuniary advantage not only to himself but also extended the same to others by cheating the bank by fabricating false documents and using the forged and fabricated documents as genuine documents and that by adducing oral and documentary evidence which are believable the prosecution side could prove the guilt of A1 for all the offences, for which charges were framed against him beyond reasonable doubt and that he is liable for punishment of all those offences.

35C.C.05/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

59.Regarding the objection raised by the accused for admitting some electronic documents into evidence without the certificate under

Section 65-B(4) of the Indian Evidence Act, the learned public prosecutor has contended that the electronic documents which were adduced into evidence were secured by the bank officers who handed over the same to the investigation officer of this case and they were not secured from any person who was in possession of the device and the certificate under Section 65-B(4) of the Indian Evidence Act is not necessary in this case and even in the interest of justice, this Court has got power to relax the requirement of that certificate in this particular case. In support of her contention in this regard the learned public prosecutor has relied upon a decision in SHAFHI

MOHAMMAD Vs. THE STATE OF HIMACHALRADESH in Special

Leave Petition (CRL.).No.2302 of 2017 of the Hon’ble SUPREME

COURT OF INDIA. In this decision it has been observed as follows:

“Thus, requirement of certificate under Section 65B(h) is not always mandatory. Accordingly, we clarify the legal position on the subject on the admissibility of the electronic evidence, especially by a party who is not in possession of device from which the document is produced. Such party cannot be required to produce certificate under Section 65B(4) of the Evidence Act. The applicability of requirement of certificate being procedural can be relaxed by Court wherever interest of justice so justifies”.

There is no dispute with regard to the preposition laid down in the cited decision.

36C.C.05/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

60.On the other hand, the learned counsel for A1 has submitted mainly that A1 had no knowledge that the passbooks and the certificates produced by the borrowers were fake or not genuine and that by believing that those documents are genuine and as per the recommendations made by the staff working in the bank he had sanctioned and disbursed the loans and disbursed the proceeds to the respective savings bank accounts of the borrowers who had withdrawn the amounts from their respective accounts and he did not get any pecuniary advantage in those loan transactions and that there was neither conspiracy nor collusion on his part with anybody and that the evidence adduced by the prosecution side against him is neither believable nor sufficient to prove the allegations made and charges framed against him and the prosecution side has failed to prove the guilt of A1 for any of the charges that were framed against him beyond reasonable doubt and that he is entitled for acquittal.

61.His further contention is that according to Section 6 of A.P. Right in Land and Pattadhar Passbooks Act, 1971 the entries in the passbooks shall be presumed to be true and so nothing can be attributed against A1 in his believing those documents. According to him the prosecution side has not specifically stated which is the clause i.e., applicable against A1 out of the three clauses mentioned under

Section 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. He further contends that for prosecuting A1 because he was a public servant during the time of alleged offences, sanction under Section 197 of the

Code of Criminal Procedure is required but the prosecution side has not obtained any sanction for prosecuting him under that provision.

37C.C.05/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

He submitted that A1 is entitled for acquittal for all the offences since the prosecution side has failed to prove those charges beyond reasonable doubt.

62.In support of his contention in this regard, the learned counsel for A1 has relied upon a decision in P.Nagendra Kumar and Others

v. State, Central Bureau of Investigation, rep. by its Public

Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad reported in 2011(2)

ALT (Crl.)113(A.P). In this decision in Para-6 it has been observed that when once the proceeds are credited to the account of the customer, then the amount ceased to have identify of the proceeds of the discounted cheque and the amount becomes property of the said customer in whose account the amount was credited.

63.Regarding the protection under Section 197 of the Code of

Criminal Procedure, the learned counsel for A1 has relied upon a decision in State of Punjab Vs. Labh Singh reported in (2015) 3

Supreme Court Cases (Cri) 601. In this decision in Para-10 it has been observed that unlike Section 19 of the Prevention of Corruption

Act, protection under Section 197 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is available to the public servant concerned even after retirement. So the submission of learned counsel for A1 is that in this regard is that inspite of A1 was not in service by the time of taking cognizance of the alleged offences in this case the sanction under Section 19 of the

Code of Criminal Procedure is necessary.

38C.C.05/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

64.In reply to the said contentions of the learned counsel A1 regarding the sanction under Section 197 Cr.P.C., the learned Public

Prosecutor has referred a decision in Punjab State Warehousing

Corporation vs. Bhushan Chander and Another of the Hon’ble

Supreme Court of India dated 29.06.2016 in Criminal Appeal

No.159/2016 in which at Para-22 it has been observed by referring several decisions of the Hon’ble Apex Court on the subject that a survey of the precedents makes it absolutely clear that there has to be reasonable connection between the omission or commission and the discharge of official duty or the act committed was under the colour of the office held by the official and that if the acts omission or commission is totally alien to the discharge of the official duty, question of invoking Section 197 Cr.P.C does not arise.

65.In N.K.Ganuguly Vs. CBI New Delhi the Hon’ble Supreme

Court of Indian in its Judgment dated 19.11.2015 in Criminal

Appeal No.798/2015 at Page 50 it has been observed that the offence of cheating under Section 420 or for that matter the offences relatable to Sections 467, 468, 471 and 120-B can by no stretch of imagination by their very nature be regarded as having been committed by any public servant while acting or purporting to act in discharge of official duty and that in such cases, the official status only provides an opportunity for commission of the offence.

66.The learned counsel for A1 has relied upon a decision in

A.Sivaprakash v. State of Kerala in 2016(2) ALT (Crl.) 341 of

the Hon’ble Supreme Court, regarding the burden of the 39C.C.05/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP prosecution to prove the mandatory ingredients of the alleged offences under Section 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act. In this regard in Para-18 it has been observed that it was the obligation of the prosecution to satisfy the mandatory ingredients which could implicate the accused under the provisions of Section 13(1)(d) of the

Prevention of Corruption Act.

67.The learned counsel for A2 has contended that except the evidence of handwriting expert which is a very weak piece of evidence and not substantial evidence, there is no evidence against A2 in this case and that the prosecution side has not examined the mediator in whose presence the specimen handwriting of A2 was obtained and that the evidence of investigation officer alone is not sufficient to prove that the specimen writing compared by the expert with the disputed writings were obtained from A2 and that the evidence of handwriting expert is neither believable nor sufficient to prove the charges that were framed against A2 and that the prosecution has failed to prove the same beyond reasonable doubt.

68.The learned counsel for A2 has relied upon a decision in

Sukhvinder Singh & Ors. Vs. State of Punjab reported in 1994

(2) Crimes(SC) 904. In this decision in Paras-18 and 19 it has been observed as follows :

“Para-18 : The second paragraph of Section 73 enables the court to direct any person present before it to give his specimen writing "for the purpose of enabling the court to compare" such writings with writings alleged to have been written by such person. The obvious implication of the words "for the purpose of enabling the court to compare" is that there is some proceeding 40C.C.05/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP pending before the court in which or as a consequence of which it is necessary for the court to compare such writings. The direction is therefore required to be given for the purpose of "enabling the court to compare" and not for the purpose of enabling an investigating or a prosecuting agency to obtain and produce as evidence in the case the specimen writings for their ultimate comparison with the disputed writings. Where the case is still under investigation and no proceeding are pending in any court in which it might be necessary to compare the two writings, the person (accused) cannot be compelled to give his specimen writings, The language of Section 73 does not permit any court to give a direction to an accused to give his specimen writing for comparison in a proceeding which may subsequently be instituted in some other competent court. Section 73 of the Evidence Act in our opinion cannot be made use of for collecting specimen writings during the investigation and recourse to it can be had only when the enquiry or the trial court before which proceedings are pending requires the writing for the purpose of enabling it to compare the same. A court holding an enquiry under the code of Criminal Procedure is indeed entitled under Section 73 of the Evidence Act to direct an accused person appearing before it to give his specimen handwriting to enable the court by which he may be subsequently tried to compare it with the disputed writings. Therefore, in our opinion the court which can issue a direction to the person to give his specimen writing can either by the court holding the enquiry under the Code of Criminal Procedure or the court trying the accused person with a view to enable it to compare the specimen writings with the writings alleged to have been written by such a person, A court which is not holding an enquiry under the Code of Criminal Procedure or conducting the trial is not permitted, on the plain language of Section 73 of the Evidence Act, to issue any direction of the nature contained in the second paragraph of Section 73 of the Evidence Act. The words "any person present in the court" in Section 73 has a reference only to such person who are parties to a cause pending before the court and in a given case may even include the witnesses in the said cause but where there is no cause pending before the court for its determination, the question of obtaining for the purposes of comparison of the handwriting of a person may not arise at all 41C.C.05/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP and therefore, the provisions of Section 73 of the Evidence Act would have no application”.

“Para-19: The specimen writings in the instant case of appellant Sukhdev Paul were taken under the directions of Sh. S.P. Garg, Tehsildar executive Magistrate, PW 13. No enquiry or trial was admittedly pending in the court of the Tehsildar Executive

Magistrate. The enquiry and trial in this case were pending

under TADA before the Designated Court only. The direction given by the Tehsildar Executive Magistrate Sh. S.P. Garg to the appellant Sukhdev Paul to give his specimen writing was clearly unwarranted and not contemplated or envisaged by Section 73 of the Evidence Act. The prosecution has not disclosed as to at what stage of investigation or enquiry or trial was Sukhdev Paul appellant produced before the Executive Magistrate PW13 to take the specimen writing of the appellant and why the specimen writings were obtained under directions of PW13 and not of the Designated Court. It is a mystry as to how the specimen writings required to be used at the trial against the appellant were directed to be taken by PW13, who was to enquiring or trying the case. To a specific question during his cross examination, PW13 admitted at the trial, that when he had issued the direction to the appellant there was no document on his file, which could go to show as to under whose orders the appellant had been sent to him for taking his specimen handwriting. The manner in which the specimen writing of Sukhdev Paul was taken is totally objectionable and against the provisions of Section 73 of the Evidence Act. The Executive

Magistrate PW13 appears to have been too obliging and did not

even care to examine the provisions of law before issuing the direction to the appellant. The argument of the learned counsel for the State that since no objection was raised by the appellant when he was called upon to give his specimen handwriting by PW13 therefore he cannot be permitted to make a grievance now is only an argument of despair and the silence of the appellant, who admittedly on that day, was not even represented by an advocate, cannot certainly clothe PW13 with any jurisdiction to issue the directions as envisaged by Section 73 of the Evidence Act. The specimen writing of Sukhdev Paul could not, therefore, be made use of during the Trial and the 42C.C.05/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP report of the handwriting expert, when considered in the light of the foregoing discussion, is rendered of no consequence at all and cannot be used against Sukhdev Paul appellant to connect him with the crime”.

69.The learned counsel for A2 has submitted to acquit A2 of all the charges. In support of his contentions the learned counsel for A2 has relied upon a decision in Deputy Chief Controller of Imports

and Exports, Hyderabad Vs. Boddula Malleshara reported in

1997 (1) ALD (Cri) 752. In this decision the observations of the

Hon’ble Supreme Court in the above referred Sukhvinder Singh’s

case were followed, according to which whether the accused objected to or not, if the specimen signature was not taken either in the presence of the Court or by the Court itself, the same would not be admissible.

70.Regarding the evidentiary value of the expert opinion the learned counsel for A2 has relied upon a decision in Shashi Kumar

Banerjee and others reported in AIR 1964 Supreme Court 529.

In this decision it has been observed that the expert’s evidence as to handwriting is opinion evidence and it can rarely, if ever, take the place of substantive evidence and that before acting on such evidence it is usual to see if it is corroborative either by clear direct evidence or by circumstantial evidence.

71.In this regard the learned public prosecutor has relied upon a decision in State through SPE & CBI, AP Vs. M.Krishna Mohan

and another of the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India dated

43C.C.05/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP 12.10.2007 in Appeal (crl.) No.1934-1395 of 2004. In this decision in para-11 it has observed as follows:

“ Para-11: When an accused person is called upon by the court or any other authority holding an investigation to give his finger impression or signature or a specimen of his handwriting, he is not giving any testimony of the nature of a "personal testimony". The giving of a "personal testimony" must depend upon his volition. He can make any kind of statement or may refuse to make any statement. But his finger impressions or his handwriting, in spite of efforts at concealing the true nature of it by dissimulation cannot change their intrinsic character. Thus, the giving of finger impressions or of specimen writing or of signatures by an accused person, though it may amount to furnishing evidence in the larger sense, is not included within the expression "to be a witness".

72.In view of the above stated evidence and the contentions of the learned public prosecutor and the learned counsel for the accused and decisions cited supra, now the Point that arises for determination is :

1. Whether the prosecution side is able to establish the guilt of the accused for the charges that were framed against them beyond reasonable doubt?

POINT: The evidence of PW.1(Mr.D.Venkata Narasimha Rao) is only useful to the case of prosecution regarding the documents marked as

Exs.P1 and Ex.P2. He is the defacto complainant and he gave the report under Ex.P1 to the CBI Department for conducting investigation of this case. Along with Ex.P1, he gave the list of alleged fake loans which is marked under Ex.P2. His other evidence is only his opinion and because he is not an expert his opinion evidence is not relevant to 44C.C.05/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP this case. Basing on his oral evidence it cannot be considered that the loan accounts which he listed under Ex.P2 are fraudulent transaction.

The documents under Ex.P1 and Ex.P2 only enabled the complainant department to investigate the case.

73.Coming to the evidence of PW.2 his evidence that the appraising officers who signed in the original process notes and the appraising officers who signed on the process notes sent to the Zonal office are not one and the same is duly corroborated by the documents which were exhibited by him. His further evidence that the correction fluid was used in the original process notes at the column of ‘recommendations and signature’ of the appraising officer by mentioning on the top of the correction fluid recommended for sanction is also corroborated by the original process notes which were exhibited by him. His further evidence that the assessment forms contain the signature of A1 and A1 had signed on those forms as sanctioning authority in the capacity of branch manager is also corroborated by all the assessment forms which were exhibited by him.

74.The evidence of PW.3 to PW.7 and PW.13 who are all bank officials also duly corroborated by the documents they have exhibited and which were referred in their evidence .

75.The evidence of PW.9(Mr.P.Paul Ceasar) is only handing over of the loan files to the CBI Department. There is no dispute with regard to the fact that A1 worked as the branch manager of Andhra Bank,

Ravinuthala branch at the relevant time of sanctioning the crop loans 45C.C.05/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP which are disputed in this case. A perusal of the loan files connected to this case clearly show the signatures of A1 put therein as the authorized officer. It is not the case of A1 that he neither worked as branch manager in Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch at the relevant time nor sanctioned the crop loans which are disputed in this case.

76.(PW.8) Mr.M.Venkateswaruluis the successor of A1 in office as the branch manager of Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala Branch. Mr.Sravan

Kumar(PW.10) is the probationer Rural Development Officer in the said bank when A1 worked as the branch manager in that bank.

Mr.K.C.Shiva Kumar(PW.11) was deputed to work in Andhra Bank,

Ravinuthala branch to monitor the agricultural lands. The clear evidence of Mr.Sravan Kumar and Mr.K.C.Shiva Kumar is that A1 having already sanctioned the loans and disbursed the amounts had asked them to attend the documentation of the loan files and they have dealt with those documents as per the instructions of A1. Being the Rural Development Officer on probation working under A1,

Mr.A.Sravan Kumar might have followed the instructions of A1 without raising any objection. According to him even though he sought for clarification A1 shouted against him, asking him to act according to the instructions of A1 who was responsible for the loan transaction. Even though Mr.K.C.Shiva Kumar was not under obligation to work according to the instructions of A1 but according to him as the loans were already sanctioned and the amount was also disbursed, he could not do anything except to contribute his signatures on the documents as per the instructions of A1. Even though there was opportunity for

Mr.Shiva Kumar and Mr.Sravan Kumar to report against A1 for asking 46C.C.05/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP them to deal with the documents after sanctioning the loans they might have not exhibited courage against A1 to report to the superior officer. Simply because they did not report anything against A1 it does not mean that what they have deposed in the evidence is false.

The clear evidence of Mr.Sravan Kumar is that A1 rubbed out the writing of Mr.K.C.Shiva Kumar in the appraisal form and process notes with correction fluid and that he wrote on the place where correction fluid was used, as ‘recommended for sanction’ at the instructions of

A1. The evidence of Mr.Sravan Kumar shows that he was removed from service, after conducting a departmental enquiry for the acts he committed regarding the loan files, even though according to him his act in this regard was according to the instructions given by A1. The evidence of Mr.Sravan Kumar duly corroborated the evidence of PW.2 regarding the difference of the officers who signed on the original process notes and sanctioned letter and the copies of process notes and the sanctioned letters.

77.Coming to the evidence of Mr.Y.Ravendranath(PW.12), it is not in dispute that he worked as the Assistant Manager in Andhra Bank,

Ravinuthala branch when A1 worked as the branch manager of that bank during the time of sanctioning the crop loans connected to this case. His evidence duly corroborates the evidence of Mr.Sravan Kumar and Mr.Shiva Kumar regarding their attending to the documentation of the crop loans as per the instructions of A1. His evidence further shows that A1 and the sub manager of that bank namely

Mr.Ch.Venkateswara Rao who died and no more even worked in the bank beyond banking hours and that even Mr.Sravan Kumar was 47C.C.05/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP forced to work in the bank beyond bank hours at their instance and that the borrowers of the crop loans were visiting the bank during evening hours beyond the bank hours.

78.The evidence of Mr.Sk.Abdul Pyaru(PW.13) also corroborates the evidence of Mr.Ravindranth to the effect that A1 worked in the bank even in the evening. His further evidence shows that he gave the cash which is the loan proceeds of some loans to A1 at the instructions of the sub manager namely Mr.Venkteswara Rao. His further evidence shows that a borrower asked him to pay cash regarding five tokens connected to the loans but he refused to pay the amount and then A1 took the amount regarding those five tokens.

79.The main contention of the prosecution side is that the passbooks, nativity certificates and the letters addressed by bank manager to the MRO and the endorsements of the MRO on that letters and the other revenue records and also the no objection certificate issued by different banks have been fabricated in this case.

The evidence of Mrs.Y.Subba lakshmi(PW.50) who worked as MRO of

Korisapadu is very clear that she neither issued the passbooks nor gave endorsements on the letters said to have been addressed by the bank manager which are available in the loans files.

80.The evidence of Mr.P.Krishna Murthy(PW.14) who conducted enquiry about the entries in the relevant passbooks and compared them with the relevant entries available in the official revenue records, the copies of which were supplied to him is very clear that the entries 48C.C.05/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP in the passbooks available in the loan files are not correct and that those passbooks are fake documents. The report he prepared duly corroborates his evidence in this regard. The original revenue records which are (1A) and (1B) Registers which are exhibited in this case also duly corroborate his evidence.

81.Mr.K.Srinivasa Rao(PW.15) a revenue officer who conducted enquiry comparing the entries in the relevant passbooks which are available in the loan files with the entries mentioned in the official revenue records, the copies of which were supplied to him has given his opinion that the entries in those passbooks are not correct and that those passbooks are fake documents. The report he prepared duly corroborates his evidence in this regard. The original revenue records which are (1A) and (1B) Registers which are exhibited in this case also duly corroborate his evidence.

82.Mr.Ch.Ramesh(PW.16) had explained the procedure of issuing pattadhar and title deed passbooks.

83.Mr.K.RaviKumar(PW.17),Mr.B.R.VaraPrasad(PW.18),

Mr.R.VasudevaRao(Pw.19),Mr.R.V.Seshayya(PW.20)and

Mrs.G.Sujatha(PW.21) have categorically deposed that the documents which were alleged to have been issued by the revenue authorities available in the loan files are not containing the signatures of the revenue officers who worked at the relevant times and that the signatures available on those documents said to have been belonging 49C.C.05/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP to the revenue officials do not belong to those revenue officials who worked at the relevant times.

84.The evidence of Mr.M.Anjaneulu(PW.32), Mr.M.V.Narayana (PW.33), Mr.Y.V.Subba Rao(PW.34), Mr.Y.Bhaskara Rao(PW.35),

Mr.Y.V.Chennaiah(PW.36), Mr.M.Srinivasulu(PW.37), Mr.P.Lazer (PW.38)

Mr.Ruber(Pw.39), Mr.P.Solmon(PW.40) and P.Yesu (PW.41)also shows that the passbooks and other revenue documents including nativity certificates available in the loan files do not contain the signatures of the respective officials who worked at the relevant times and that the signatures available on those documents are not the signatures of those officials who worked at the relevant times.

85.Concerning the no dues certificates available in the loan files

Mr.P.Venu Gopala Rao(PW.22), Mr.A.Raghava Reddy(PW.24),

Mr.B.Anjaiah(PW.25), Mr.Ch.Venkateswarulu,(PW.26) Mr.K.Narayana (PW.27) , Mr.K.Sanjeeva Rao(PW.28), Mr.G.Ravindra Babu(PW.29) have categorically denied their signatures said to have been available on the no dues certificates available in the loan files. According to them they did not issue such no dues certificates. Even they have denied the seals as belonging to their respective banks which are available on the said no dues certificates. All these witnesses are bank employees and they have no motive to speak falsely either in favour of prosecution case or against the accused after taking oath before this

Court. If really they made endorsements on those no dues certificates and put their signatures and seals on those certificates, there was no necessity for them to deny those signatures which are available on the 50C.C.05/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP certificates as belonging to them. Taking into consideration their evidence it can be safely concluded that the no dues certificates available in the loan files were not issued by them and that they are fake documents.

86.The evidence of K.Gopalakrishna Murthy shows that he conducted an enquiry regarding the crop loans connected to this case and found that some crop loans were sanctioned on fake documents and he gave report accordingly. His report duly corroborates his evidence in this regard. His clear evidence is that the savings bank accounts relating to the crop loans of this case were not opened in accordance with KYC norms . The same is evident from his report.

87. The oral evidence of Mr.K.Ravendra Reddy(PW.42), Mr.K.Subba

Reddy(PW.43), Mrs.Ch.Seethamma(PW.44), MRs.Kale Devi(PW.45),

Mr.Katta RAmana(PW.46), Mrs.M.Indira(PW.47), Mrs.P.Sumathi (PW.48),

Mr.B.Satyanarayana(PW.51),Mrs.Ch.Venkayamma(PW.52),

Mrs.I.Raghava Rani and Mrs.U.Seshamma shows that in the title deeds and passbooks which are available in the loan files as against the names of the borrowers, the photos of some other persons were affixed and that the name of person mentioned in the passbook or title deed is not tallying with the photos of the person affixed in that book.

Some of those witnesses shows that even the photos of the dead persons were affixed in those passbooks. Their evidence is supported by the documents, they have exhibited. Even though some copies of documents were marked as exhibits through some of them but according to them those documents are Photostat copies of their 51C.C.05/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP original documents. Some of them brought their original documents for comparison with the copies of the documents but some of them have not brought the original documents. They are independent witnesses and they have no motive to speak falsely either in favour of the prosecution or against the accused after taking oath before the

Court. It is not necessary for them to fabricate documents and obtain their copies for giving false evidence before this Court. Even if the documents which were marked which are only copies are excluded but the other documents even though they are copies because they were verified with the originals, they can be taken into consideration. Their oral evidence supported by the documents exhibited by them clearly proves that the passbooks which they have referred in their evidence which are available in the loan files are fabricated documents. Some of them have deposed that even the persons whose photos were affixed in the passbooks and whose names are mentioned therein do not possess the lands which are mentioned in those documents particularly in their respective villages. Some of them have clearly deposed that those persons do not belong to the villages, the names of which were mentioned in the passbooks. So it is very clear from their evidence that all those documents referred by them are fake documents and fabricated documents.

88.The learned counsel for the accused have contended that the prosecution side has not exhibited either the voters list or the ration cards to show that the borrowers are not relating to the villages which were mentioned in their respective loan files. But this contention cannot be accepted because if a person belongs to a particular village 52C.C.05/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP for proving that the said person belongs to that village his voters identity card or ration card can be exhibited positively. But for producing negative evidence it is difficult to produce documentary evidence. When there is direct evidence from the villagers and revenue officials who are examined as witnesses that the alleged borrowers are not residents of the villages which are mentioned in their respective loan files, their evidence can be taken into consideration for proving that those borrowers do not relate to the villages, the names of which were mentioned in the respective loan files.

89. The allegation in this case is that A1 without following the KYC norms had opened the SB accounts of the borrowers. As could be seen from the loan files exhibited in this case except a nativity certificate which is alleged to have been a fabricated document, there is no other document to prove that the borrower is a resident of the relevant village. Neither the voters identity card nor the ration card nor any other document to show that the borrower belongs to a particular village was taken for opening the savings bank account.

Concerning the nativity certificate available in the file, the evidence of revenue officials and panchayat secretaries is available to show that they are not genuine documents. The evidence on record is very clear that those nativity certificates have been fabricated only for the sake of opening SB accounts in the names of the borrowers.

90. The other contention of the learned counsel for A1 is that it is not the duty of A1 to open the SB accounts and other staff working in 53C.C.05/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP the bank have to attend that work. Even though the other staff working in the bank were entrusted with attending the opening of savings bank account but being the Manager of Andhra Bank,

Ravinuthala Branch, A1 was the authorized officer to open the accounts. The duty of the other staff was only to scrutinize the documentation regarding the same. In this case the allegation is that

Mr.Ch.Venkateswra Rao who worked in that branch also colluded with

A1 in the alleged loan transactions. Because he died, he has not been prosecuted in this case. So irrespective of whether there was any role played by the other staff members in opening the SB account without following the KYC norms but A1 cannot avoid his liability of opening those accounts without following the KYC norms, because ultimately after his scrutiny only, the SB accounts would be opened.

So certainly there was role played by A1 in opening the SB accounts without following the KYC norms in the names of borrowers. If A1 was diligent and had no criminal intention, certainly he would have insisted for production of any document regarding identity proof of borrowers without merely depending upon the nativity certificates which are fabricated documents.

91. The learned counsel for A1 has contended referring the evidence recorded in the cross examination of Mr.A.Sravan

Kumar(PW.10), Mr.K.C.Shiva Kumar(PW.11), Y.Ravendranath(PW.12) and

Mr.Sk.Abdul Pyaru(PW.13) wherein they have stated that the loan proceeds were disbursed to the borrowers on proper identification and presentation of the respective tokens has contended that A1 had not taken any amount and so he did not gain any pecuniary advantage in 54C.C.05/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP this case. But those witnesses have deposed the manner in which the loan proceeds need to be disbursed. But in this case there is no specific evidence to show that all the borrowers had personally took the loan amounts by attending the bank. The evidence also shows that in respect of some loan transactions the amount was paid to A1.

Taking into consideration the evidence on record it appears that even though the documents were prepared properly as if the loan proceeds were paid to the respective borrowers but in fact it was not done properly. Whether there was collusion for A1 with other staff members including Mr.A.Sravan Kumar(PW.10), Mr.K.C.Shiva Kumar(PW.11),

Y.Ravendranath(PW.12) and late Mr.Ch.Venkatesawrulu or not, but certainly A1 had played major role in the alleged loan transactions. It appears that fortunately because nobody stated anything against other staff members except A1 and Mr.Ch.Venkateswarulu, those other staff members have not been prosecuted in this case. The evidence on record is very clear that A1 had played major role in fabrication of documentation in the alleged loan transactions.

92. There is evidence of even postal officials to show that the postal covers which were addressed to the borrowers were returned unserved as they were not residing in the respective villages. Even the postal officials are independent witnesses and they have no motive to speak falsely either in favour of prosecution side or against the accused.

Their evidence is corroborated duly by the relevant documentary evidence.

55C.C.05/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

93. The evidence of Mr.M.Venkateswarulu(PW.8) who is the successor of A1 clearly shows that A1 had handed over the loan files to him stating that all the loan transactions and the documents available in the loan files are genuine transactions and documents and that A1 got verified the passbooks through the revenue officials and got confirmed that they are genuine documents

94. The evidence of Mrs.Y.Subbalakshmi(PW.50) the then MRO of

Korisapadu and other revenue officials clearly shows that the title deeds and passbooks available in the loan files are fake documents.

The letter addressed by A1 to the MRO of Korisapadu which is available in the loan file contains an endorsement of the MRO which is alleged to be containing the signature and seal of Mrs.Y.Subbalakshmi but she denied the same. The opinion of the expert also is available to the effect that the signature appearing on this letter does not belong to Mrs.Y.Subbalakshmi. The expert also gave evidence to that effect. In the cross examination when a suggestion was put to her that the signatures available on those letters belong to her, she has denied the same. It is a letter exclusively addressed by A1 to the MRO of

Korisapadu and so A1 cannot plead ignorance on that letter.

Mrs.Y.Subbalakshmi is a Government servant and an independent witness. She has no motive to speak falsely either in favour of the case of prosecution or against the accused. If really she gave that endorsement by signing and affixing her seal, there was no necessity for her to deny the same. I find no reason to disbelieve her evidence in this regard. Her evidence clearly proves that the endorsement in the form of acknowledgment available on that letter 56C.C.05/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP does not belong to her. So with her evidence which appears to me as believable, it is proved that the said letter is a fabricated document. Except for A1 there was no necessity for any other person to fabricate that letter. A perusal of that letter shows that it was exclusively dealt by A1. So the criminal intention on the part of A1 not only in fabricating the loan documents but also in the loan transactions can be easily understood.

95. Irrespective of whether the alleged borrowers were fictitious persons or not, but certainly there was fabrication of documents in the loan transactions connected to this case. Particularly the title deed passbook or pattadhar passbook whichever is available in the loan file and the nativity certificate and the no dues certificates the said letter addressed by A1 to Mrs.Y.Subbalakshmi and other revenue records available in the loan file were fabricated for the purpose of alleged loan transactions. Because Mr.Ch.Venkateswarulu who worked in that bank died and no more and other staff members of that bank have not been prosecuted in this case, A1 is not entitled to be let of from this case.

He is liable for fabrication of documents and using the fabricated and forged documents as genuine documents and also cheating the bank in collusion with other persons, for the best reasons known to him.

There is ample evidence of the bank officials, revenue officials, postal authorities and also the villagers which is duly corroborated by ample documentary evidence to prove the involvement of A1 in the alleged loan transactions.

57C.C.05/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

96.The other contention of the learned counsel for A1 is that it is not necessary for A1 to cross verify the documents produced by the borrowers to know whether they are genuine documents or not. So far as the title deed passbook or pattadhar passbook is concerned, the learned counsel for A1 relies Section 6 of A.P Right in Land and

Pattadhar Passbooks Act, 1971. There is no dispute regarding the fact that A1 does not need to cross verify the documents produced by the borrowers unless he personally entertains any doubt. Even if the title deed passbook or pattadhar passbook is not genuine because there is no direct evidence to show that A1 has fabricated the same nothing can be attributed against him in this regard. But regarding the letters addressed by him to the MRO Korisapadu, as I have already stated the endorsement obtained on that letter has been fabricated which is within the exclusive knowledge of A1. The SB accounts were opened clearly without following the KYC norms at least insisting for any introducer. So even though A1 was under no obligation to cross verify the documents produced by the borrower and can rely upon the presumption under Section 6 of the said Act but he cannot avoid his liability in the loan transactions for not following the KYC norms in opening the SB accounts and for fabrication of the said letter and the acknowledgment thereon alleged to have been given by

Mrs.Y.Subbalakshmi. Even basing on the evidence of other bank employees regarding ‘no dues certificates’ it can be considered in this case that even the ‘no dues certificates’ have been fabricated by forgery which must be to the knowledge of A1. So irrespective of whether A1 knows about the fabrication of title deed passbook/pattadhar passbook and other revenue records including the 58C.C.05/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP nativity certificates, as already stated he must be held responsible for fabrication of the said letter and not following the KYC norms in opening the SB accounts. So far as the statement of accounts which are computer generated sheets relying upon the observations in

Shafhi Mohammad case cited supra, those documents can be taken into consideration as admissible in evidence not only because they were secured from a person who is not in possession of the device or the person who was dealing with the system but also by dispensing with the certificate required under Section 65(B) of the Indian

Evidence Act.

97.There is no dispute with regard to the observations made in the decisions cited supra, so far as the sanction under Section 197 Cr.P.C is concerned. It is required only if the act alleged against the public servant is a part of the discharge of his official duty. In the present case charges framed against A1 are under Section 120-B, 420, 468 and 471 IPC. Even though sanctioning loan and disbursement of the loan amount to the borrower is a part of discharge of the official duty of A1, but the allegations made in this case against him are that A1 in conspiracy with others had fabricated documents by forgery and in criminal conspiracy with others had committed the offence of cheating by using those documents as genuine documents. So fabrication of documents by forgery and entering into the criminal conspiracy with others and cheating the bank do not form part of discharge of official duties of A1. So the protection under Section 197 of the Code of

Criminal Procedure which is meant to safe guard or protect the public servant from vexatious prosecution, in the facts and circumstances of 59C.C.05/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP this case is not available to A1 and so the sanction required under that provision is not necessary for prosecution of A1 in this case for the alleged offences. So far as the offence under Section 13(2) r/w 13(1)

(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, the sanction as required under Section 19 of that Act is not necessary in this case because by the date of taking cognizance of the alleged offences A1 was not in service.

98.Coming to framing of charges under Section 13(2) r/w 13(1)(d) of the said Act it was clearly alleged in the charge sheet that A1 had committed gross criminal misconduct in sanctioning the loans connected to this case by abusing his possession as a public servant holding the office as the Manager of Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch by cheating and adopting illegal means and the offence under Section 13 of the said Act is nothing but criminal misconduct by a public servant. So the allegations leveled against A1 covered all the three clauses of Section 13(1)(d) of that provision. The charge framed against A1 under that provision includes all the three clauses. So even if it is not specifically mentioned in the charge under which clause out of the three clauses of that provision, the act alleged against A1 falls under, it cannot said that the charge is defective. So far as the burden of proving the charge is concerned certainly it entirely lies on the prosecution side as contended by the learned counsel for A1.

99.There are neither contradictions nor major omissions amounting to contradictions proved in this case. Ex.D1 to D3 are relating to the residence of six persons namely Mrs.A.Sumithra, Mr.T.Venkateswarlu, 60C.C.05/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

Mr.Ravi Samrajyam, Mrs.P.Amareswari, Mrs.P.Sujatha and Mr.Oruganti

Basavaiah. According to Mr.P.Ruben(PW.39), Mr.P.Solmon (PW.40) and

Mr.P.Yesu(PW.41) they have not stated that those six persons are residents of Pamidipadu village but in the 161 Cr.P.C of those witnesses it is there that they have stated that those six persons are residents of Pamidipadu village. Ex.D1 was marked in the evidence fo

Mr.P.Ruben, Ex.D2 was marked in the evidence of Mr.P.Solman and

Ex.D3 was marked in the evidence of Mr.P.Yesu regarding the said fact. But these contradictions marked as Ex.D1 to Ex.D3 are not material to this case because those six persons are not parties to this case and even their loan files are not exhibited in this case. So, for this reason it is not necessity to take into consideration the contradictions marked as Ex.D1 to Ex.D3 in this case.

100. Even Though it is contended by the prosecution side that the borrowers in this case are non-existing persons but in order to prove the charges that are framed against the accused. It is not necessary to prove in this case that the borrowers are non-existing persons.

Even if the borrowers were existing and took the loan proceeds still

A1 is liable for the alleged offences because there was fabrication of documents by forgery and using them as genuine documents and thereby cheating the bank either to get benefit for himself or to extend the benefits to the borrowers or others by A1.

101. Concerning A2 the only evidence available on record is of the hand writing expert apart from the investigation Officer. The prosecution side has not obtained the admitted hand writings of A2.

61C.C.05/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

The prosecution side has not exhibited any document containing the admitted hand writing of A2. The hand writing expert had admittedly given his opinion by comparing the alleged disputed hand writing of A2 with the alleged specimen hand writing of A2. A2 had denied in the cross examination of the investigation officer about obtaining the alleged specimen hand writing from A2. So now even the alleged specimen hand writing of A2 became disputed hand writing. The prosecution side has to prove that even the alleged specimen hand writing of A2 is in fact the hand writing of A2 because disputed hand writing cannot be compared with other disputed writing. Even if any opinion is given by any expert by comparison of disputed hand writing with other disputed hand writing, it cannot be considered. In order to prove that the alleged specimen hand writing was obtained from A2, there is no evidence at all on record. The Investigation officer has clearly stated that she did not obtain the specimen writings of A2.

Even the mediator in whose presence the alleged specimen hand writing of A2 was obtained is not examined in this case. The prosecution side has not explained as to why the said mediator was not examined. Even if the alleged specimen hand writing of A2 was obtained by the Investigation Officer in view of the decision cited supra in Deputy Chief Controller of Import and Exports which has been relied up on by the learned counsel for A2, the same is not admissible and the opinion given by the expert basing on the same cannot be accepted.

102. Even otherwise unlike examination of thumb impressions, examination of hand writing is not exact science. The evidence of 62C.C.05/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP expert as to hand writing is only opinion evidence and it is not substantive evidence as laid down in Shashikumar Banerjee and

Others case which is cited supra relied upon by the learned counsel for A2. So it is not safe and desirable to solely rely upon the evidence of hand writing expert for any finding. Moreover since in this case the opinion of the hand writing expert was not given basing on admitted writing and even the alleged specimen writing basing on which the expert gave opinion, is not proved as has been obtained from A2 no reliance can be placed on the opinion of the hand writing expert given in this case. For the same reason even this court cannot invoke the provision under sec.73 of the Indian Evidence Act of taking the burden of comparison of the disputed writings with the alleged specimen hand writings of A2 available on record. So if the opinion of the Handwriting expert is removed from consideration A2 cannot be found guilty of any of the offences alleged against him.

103. Majority of the witnesses are official witnesses of different banks,

Revenue Department and Postal Department and those witnesses and the private witnesses who have been examined in this case, as I have already stated, are independent witnesses and they have no motive at all to give false evidence either in favour of prosecution or against the accused and even the documents relied upon by the prosecution side are public documents maintained in day to day official transactions.

The documentary evidence adduced by the prosecution side duly corroborates the oral evidence which is available on record. I find no reason to disbelieve or discredit such evidence and the same is believable, trustworthy, cogent and clinching. So I believe the same.

63C.C.05/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

104. The learned counsel for A1 has raised some other contentions regarding appreciation of evidence which have been mentioned in his written arguments which became part of the record but in view of my above discussion I hold that they are neither material to this case nor do they go to the root of the case of prosecution. They do not in any way influence the result of the case. So this court opines that it is not necessary to discuss about them.

105. Considering the charge under sec.13 (1) (d) r/w sec.13 (2) of the

Prevention of Corruption Act 1988 it is not necessary that A1 should get any pecuniary advantage for himself out of the alleged fraud transaction in this case. Even if the pecuniary advantage was extended to any other person including the borrowers by his official discharge of duties while holding the public office in the capacity of Branch Manager of Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala Branch by corrupt or illegal means by abusing his position as such public servant A1 is liable for punishment for the said charge under that provision of law. So by sanctioning the loan and disbursing the loan amount to the borrowers in this case based on forged and fabricated documents and using them as genuine documents in criminal conspiracy with the borrowers and thereby cheating the said Bank to part with the loan amount A1 had obtained pecuniary advantage as such public servant while holding the office of branch manager of that Bank by abusing his position as such public servant by corrupt or illegal means and thereby A1 is liable for punishment of the offence under sec.13 (1) (d) r/w sec.13(2) of the said Act.

64C.C.05/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

106. There are neither contradictions nor major omissions proved in this case. Even though there are some discrepancies and variations and inconsistencies in the evidence, they are minor in nature and not material and they do not go to the root of case of prosecution, making the same as not believable. Considering the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and the evidence on record both oral and documentary I have no hesitation to believe the evidence adduced by the prosecution side and to consider the case of prosecution positively to hold that the prosecution side is able to establish the guilt of the accused for all the offenses for which charges were framed against them beyond reasonable doubt.

107. From the above discussion I hold on the point that the prosecution side is able to establish the guilt of the accused No.1 for all the charges that were framed against them beyond reasonable doubt and that the accused No.1 is liable for punishment according to law for all those offences. A2 is found not guilty of any of the offences and so he is entitled for acquittal of all the offences for which charges were framed against him.

In the result, the Accused No.1 is found guilty of the offences under Sections 120-B IPC, 420 IPC, 471 r/w 468 IPC and under Section 13(1) (d) r/w 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and he is convicted under Section 428 (2) Cr.P.C. for the said four offences.

Accused No.2 is found not guilty of the offences under Sections 120-B IPC, 420 IPC, 471 r/w 468 IPC and he is acquitted under Section 248(1) Cr.P.C. for the said offences. His bail bonds shall stands cancelled after expiry of appeal time. Accused No.2 is directed to execute bail bonds as required u/Sec.437 A Cr.P.C.

65C.C.05/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

PRINCIPAL SPL. JUDGE FOR C.B.I. CASES,

FAC I Addl. SPL.JUDGE FOR C.B.I CASES,

VISAKHAPATNAM.

At this stage the accused No.1 is questioned about the quantum of sentence that is going to be imposed against him for the offences under Sections 120-B, 420, 471 r/w 468 IPC and under Section 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 which are proved against him for which he stated that he suffers from diabetes, blood pleasure and nervous weakness and heart ailment and that he lost his wife in the year 2007 and that he has got three daughters out of whom two were married and that his youngest daughter is yet to be married and that he incurred heavy debts for maintenance of his family and that he was dismissed from service in the year 2008 and has been struggling for survival and he pleaded mercy of the Court.

But taking into consideration the nature of offences and the manner in which they were committed in this case, this Court does not incline to extend the benefit of the provisions of the Probation of Offenders Act in his favour. But taking into consideration his statement and the over all facts and circumstances of the case, this Court opines that imposition of Rigorous imprisonment for a period of TWO

YAERS and to pay fine of Rs.2,000/- (Rupees Two thousand

only), in default simple imprisonment for a period of ONE

month for the offence under section 120-B IPC and Rigorous

imprisonment for a period of TWO YEARS and to pay fine of

Rs.2,000/- (Rupees Two thousand only), in default simple

imprisonment for a period of ONE MONTH for the offence

under section 420 IPC and Rigorous imprisonment for a period

66C.C.05/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

of TWO YEARS and to pay fine of Rs.2,000/- (Rupees Two

thousand only), in default simple imprisonment for a period of

ONE month for the offence under section 471 r/w 468 IPC

and Rigorous imprisonment for a period of TWO YEARS and to

pay fine of Rs.2,000/- (Rupees Two thousand only), in default

simple imprisonment for a period of ONE month for the

offence under section 13 (1)(d) r/w 13(2) of the Prevention of

Corruption Act, 1988 is just and proper in this case. Accordingly A1 is convicted and the sentences are imposed against him as stated above.

All the sentences of imprisonments imposed against him shall run concurrently. He is entitled for set off the period of remand undergone by him under Section 428 Cr.P.C. It is informed to him that he is entitled to challenge this Judgment in the Appellate Court and also entitled to legal aid according to law. It is ordered to supply a copy of this Judgment to him on free of cost.

Dictated to the stenographer Grade-I, transcribed by her,

corrected and pronounced by me in the Open court on this the 27th day of December, 2019.

PRINCIPAL SPL. JUDGE FOR C.B.I. CASES,

FAC I Addl. SPL.JUDGE FOR C.B.I CASES,

VISAKHAPATNAM.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

LIST OF WITNESSES EXAMINED ON BEHALF OF PROSECUTION.

For Prosecution:

P.W.1 (L.W.1) :D.Venkata Narasimha Rao P.W.2 (L.W.2) :Hejeebu Seshagiri Rao P.W.3 (L.W.3) :Tatineni Hanumantha Rao P.W.4 (L.W.4) :Nalam Harinath 67C.C.05/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

P.W.5 (L.W.5) :Kuntamukkala Suryanarayana Murthy P.W.6 (L.W.7) :Padmanabhuni Padma Naga Vara Prasad P.W.7 (L.W.8) :Kidambi Mydhili P.W.8 (L.W.9) :Makkena Venkateswarlu P.W.9 (L.W.10) :Pulicherla Paul Caesar P.W.10 (L.W.11) :Adavani Sravan Kumar P.W.11 (L.W.12 ):K.C.Siva Kumar P.W.12 (L.W.13) :Yerragudi Ravindranath P.W.13 (L.W.14) :Shaik Abdul Pyaru P.W.14 (L.W.15): Palakaveety Krishna Murthy

P.W.15 (L.W.16) :K.Srinivasa Rao

P.W.16 (L.W.17) : Chillara Ramesh

P.W.17 (L.W.18) : Kosanam Ravi Kumar

P.W.18 (L.W.19) : Bhuvanam Ramalinga Vara Prasad

P.W.19 (L.W.20) : Ramachandruni Vasudevarao

P.W.20 (L.W.21) : Rachavalla Venkata Sesaiah

P.W.21 (L.W.22) : Gunturu Sujatha

P.W.22 (L.W.27) : P.Venugopala Rao

P.W.23 (L.W.26) : Sareddu Sambasiva Rao

P.W.24 (L.W.29): A.Raghava Reddy

P.W.25 (L.W.30) : Busurapalli Anjaiah

P.W.26 (L.W.31) : Cherukuri Venkateswarlu

P.W.27 (L.W.32) : Karicheti Narayana

P.W.28 (L.W.33) : K.Sanjeeva Rao

P.W.29 (L.W.34) : Giddi Ravindra Babu

P.W.30 (L.W.35) : Marriboyina Anjaneyulu

P.W.31 (L.W.36) : Tammuluri Subbarao

P.W.32 (L.W.37) : Maddineni Anjaneyulu

P.W.33 (L.W.39) : Medikonda Venkata Narayana

P.W.34 (L.W.40) : Yedavalli Venkata Subbarao

P.W.35 (L.W.41) : Yalakapati Bhaskara Rao

P.W.36 (L.W.42) : Yenumula Venkata Chennaiah

P.W.37 (L.W.43) : Molaka Srinivasulu

P.W.38 (L.W.44) : Pulipati Lazar

P.W.39 (L.W.45) : Palaparthi Ruben 68C.C.05/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

P.W.40 (L.W.46) : Palaparthi Solomon

P.W.41 (L.W.47) : Palaparthi Yesu

P.W.42 (L.W.51) : Kommareddy Ravindra Reddy

P.W.43 (L.W.52) : Kommareddy Subbareddy

P.W.44 (L.W.48) : Choppavarapu Seethamma

P.W.45 (L.W.53) : Kale Devi

P.W.46 (L.W.54) : Katta Ravana

P.W.47 (L.W.55) : Medikonda Indira

P.W.48 (L.W.56) : Pyeaddu Sumathi

P.W.49 (L.W.6) : Kavuri Gopala Krishna Murthy

P.W.50 (L.W.24) : Yerramothu Subba Lakshmi

P.W.51 (L.W.28) : Bhaskaruni Satyanarayana

P.W.52 (L.W.49) : Chetla Venkayamma

P.W.53 (L.W.50) : Ittadi Raghava Rani

P.W.54 (L.W.57) : Usurumati Seshamma

P.W.55 (L.W.58) : Vijaya Shankar Pasumarthi P.W.56 (L.W.59) : S.P.Rama Rao

LIST OF DOCUMENTS MARKED ON BEHALF OF PROSECUTION.

Ex.P.1:Complaint/report Dt.9.6.2009.

Ex.P.2:List of 153 accounts relating to the fraudulent transactions enclosed to the complaint Ex.P.1.

Ex.P.3:Copy of Letter Dt. 17.11.2007 issued by the Zonal Office to the Chief Manager/Manager, Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch.

Ex.P.4:Letter of sanction Dt.4.10.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/172.

Ex.P.4-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/172.

Ex.P.5:Letter of sanction Dt.4.10.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No. 2007/173.

Ex.P.5-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No. 2007/173.

69C.C.05/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.6:Letter of sanction Dt.4.10.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No. 2007/174.

Ex.P.6-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No. 2007/174.

Ex.P.7:Letter of sanction Dt.4.10.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No. 2007/175.

Ex.P.7-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No. 2007/175.

Ex.P.8:Letter of sanction Dt.4.10.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No. 2007/176.

Ex.P.8-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No. 2007/176.

Ex.P.9:Letter of sanction Dt.4.10.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No. 2007/178.

Ex.P.9-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No. 2007/178.

Ex.P.10:Letter of sanction Dt.4.10.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No. 2007/180.

Ex.P.10-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No. 2007/180.

Ex.P.11:Letter of sanction Dt.4.10.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No. 2007/201.

Ex.P.11-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No. 2007/201.

Ex.P.12:Letter of sanction Dt.4.10.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No. 2007/222.

Ex.P.12-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No. 2007/222.

Ex.P.13:Letter of sanction Dt.4.10.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No. 2007/240.

Ex.P.13-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No. 2007/240.

Ex.P.14:Letter of sanction Dt.4.10.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No. 2007/260.

Ex.P.14-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No. 2007/260.

70C.C.05/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.15:Letter of sanction Dt.4.10.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No. 2007/282.

Ex.P.15-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No. 2007/282.

Ex.P.16:Letter of sanction Dt.4.10.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No. 2007/283.

Ex.P.16-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No. 2007/283.

Ex.P.17:Letter of sanction Dt.4.10.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No. 2007/285.

Ex.P.17-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No. 2007/285.

Ex.P.18:Letter of sanction Dt.4.10.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No. 2007/295.

Ex.P.18-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No. 2007/295.

Ex.P.19: Letter of sanction Dt.4.10.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No. 2007/300.

Ex.P.19-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No. 2007/300.

Ex.P.20:Letter of sanction Dt.4.10.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No. 2007/304.

ExP.20-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No. 2007/304.

Ex.P.21: Letter of sanction Dt.4.10.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No. 2007/306.

Ex.P.21-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No. 2007/306.

Ex.P.22:Letter of sanction Dt.20.10.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No. 2007/314.

Ex.P.22-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No. 2007/314.

Ex.P.23:Letter of sanction Dt.12.10.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No. 2007/316.

Ex.P.23-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No. 2007/316.

71C.C.05/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.24:Letter of sanction Dt.20.10.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No. 2007/321.

Ex.P.24-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No. 2007/321.

Ex.P.25:Letter of sanction Dt.22.10.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No. 2007/323.

Ex.P.25-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No. 2007/323.

Ex.P.26:Letter of sanction Dt.22.10.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No. 2007/324.

Ex.P.26-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No. 2007/324.

Ex.P.27:Letter of sanction Dt.22.10.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No. 2007/325.

Ex.P.27-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No. 2007/325.

Ex.P.28: Letter of sanction Dt.22.10.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No. 2007/326.

Ex.P.28-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No. 2007/326.

Ex.P.29:Letter of sanction Dt.22.10.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No. 2007/330.

Ex.P.29-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No. 2007/330.

Ex.P.30:Letter of sanction Dt.22.10.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No. 2007/340.

Ex.P.30-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No. 2007/340.

Ex.P.31:Letter of sanction Dt.22.10.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No. 2007/366.

Ex.P.31-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No. 2007/366.

Ex.P.32:Covering letter Dt.14.12.2007.

Ex.P.33:ADA-1 Report dt.14.12.2007.

Ex.P.34:ADA-5 report Dt.14.12.2007.

72C.C.05/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.35:Letter of sanction Dt.1.11.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/391.

Ex.P.35-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/391.

Ex.P.36:Letter of sanction Dt.2.11.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/394.

Ex.P.36-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/394.

Ex.P.37:Letter of sanction Dt.7.11.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/449.

Ex.P.37-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/449.

Ex.P.38:Letter of sanction Dt.7.11.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/451.

Ex.P.38-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/451.

Ex.P.39:Letter of sanction Dt.15.11.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/484.

Ex.P.39-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/484.

Ex.P.40: Letter of sanction Dt.15.11.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/487.

Ex.P.40-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/487.

Ex.P.41:Letter of sanction Dt.26.11.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/527.

Ex.P.41-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/527.

Ex.P.42:Letter of sanction Dt.26.11.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/530.

Ex.P.42-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/530.

Ex.P.43:Letter of sanction Dt.26.11.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/531.

Ex.P.43-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/531.

73C.C.05/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.44:Letter of sanction Dt.26.11.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/532.

Ex.P.44-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/532.

Ex.P.45:ADA-1 Report dt.12.2.2008.

Ex.P.46:ADA-5 report Dt.19.2.2008.

Ex.P.47:Letter of sanction Dt.6.12.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/576.

Ex.P.47-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/576.

Ex.P.48:Letter of sanction Dt.6.12.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/577.

Ex.P.48-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/577.

Ex.P.49:Letter of sanction Dt.6.12.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/578.

Ex.P.49-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/578.

Ex.P.50:Letter of sanction Dt.6.12.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/579.

Ex.P.50-AAssessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/579.

Ex.P.51:Letter of sanction Dt.6.12.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/580.

Ex.P.51-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/580.

Ex.P.52:Letter of sanction Dt.10.12.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/588.

Ex.P.52-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/588.

Ex.P.53:Letter of sanction Dt.10.12.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/590.

Ex.P.53-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/590.

Ex.P.54:Letter of sanction Dt.10.12.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/591.

74C.C.05/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.54-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/591.

Ex.P.55:Letter of sanction Dt.10.12.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/592.

Ex.P.55-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/592.

Ex.P.56:Letter of sanction Dt.10.12.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/595.

Ex.P.56-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/595.

Ex.P.57:Letter of sanction Dt.10.12.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/597.

Ex.P.57-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/597.

Ex.P.58:Letter of sanction Dt.10.12.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/598.

Ex.P.58-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/598.

Ex.P.59:Letter of sanction Dt.10.12.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/599.

Ex.P.59-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/599.

Ex.P.60:Letter of sanction Dt.10.12.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/600.

Ex.P.60-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/600.

Ex.P.61:Letter of sanction Dt.10.12.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/603.

Ex.P.61-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/603.

Ex.P.62:Letter of sanction Dt.10.12.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/613.

Ex.P.62-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/613.

Ex.P.63:Letter of sanction Dt.18.12.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/617.

75C.C.05/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.63-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/617.

Ex.P.64:Letter of sanction Dt.20.12.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/638.

Ex.P.64-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/638.

Ex.P.65:Letter of sanction Dt.28.12.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/650.

Ex.P.65-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/650.

Ex.P.66:Letter of sanction Dt.28.12.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/652.

Ex.P.66-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/652.

Ex.P.67:ADA-1 Report dt.13.2.2008.

Ex.P.68:ADA-5 report Dt.15.3.2008.

Ex.P.69:Letter of sanction Dt.5.1.2008 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/669.

Ex.P.69-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/669.

Ex.P.70:Letter of sanction Dt.5.1.2008 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/670.

Ex.P.70-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/670.

Ex.P.71:Letter of sanction Dt.18.1.2008 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/678.

Ex.P.71-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/678.

Ex.P.72:Letter of sanction Dt.18.1.2008 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/679.

Ex.P.72-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/679.

Ex.P.73:Letter of sanction Dt.18.1.2008 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/680.

Ex.P.73-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/680.

76C.C.05/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.74:Letter of sanction Dt.24.1.2008 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/685.

Ex.P.74-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/685.

Ex.P.75:Letter of sanction Dt.24.1.2008 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/686.

Ex.P.75-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/686.

Ex.P.76:Letter of sanction Dt.24.1.2008 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/687.

Ex.P.76-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/687.

Ex.P.77:Letter of sanction Dt.24.1.2008 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/689.

Ex.P.77-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/689.

Ex.P.78:Letter of sanction Dt.24.1.2008 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/690.

Ex.P.78-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/690.

Ex.P.79:Letter of sanction Dt.30.1.2008 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/696.

Ex.P.79-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/696.

Ex.P.80:Letter of sanction Dt.30.1.2008 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/698.

Ex.P.80-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/698.

Ex.P.81:Letter of sanction Dt.30.1.2008 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/699.

Ex.P.81-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/699.

Ex.P.82:Copy of covering letter under which the Chief Manager, Zonal Office, Andhra Bank received reports of ADA-1 and ADA-5, sanction letters and assessment forms for the month of February, 2008.

77C.C.05/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.83:ADA-1 Report dt.11.4.2008.

Ex.P.84:ADA-5 report Dt.30.4.2008.

Ex.P.85:Letter of sanction Dt.1.2.2008 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/701.

Ex.P.85-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/701.

Ex.P.86:Letter of sanction Dt.1.2.2008 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/707.

Ex.P.86-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/707.

Ex.P.87:Application form Dt.7.2.2008 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/714.

Ex.P.87-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/714.

Ex.P.88:Letter of sanction Dt.9.2.2008 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/719.

Ex.P.88-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/719.

Ex.P.89:Letter of sanction Dt.9.2.2008 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/721.

Ex.P.89-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/721.

Ex.P.90:Letter of sanction Dt.9.2.2008 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/727.

Ex.P.90-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/727.

Ex.P.91:Letter of sanction Dt.13.2.2008 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/730.

Ex.P.91-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/730.

Ex.P.92:Letter of sanction Dt.13.2.2008 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/738.

Ex.P.92-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/738.

Ex.P.93:Letter of sanction Dt.13.2.2008 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/739.

78C.C.05/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.93–A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/739.

Ex.P.94:Letter of sanction Dt.13.2.2008 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/740.

Ex.P.94-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/740.

Ex.P.95:Letter of sanction Dt.13.2.2008 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/742.

Ex.P.95-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/742.

Ex.P.96:Letter of sanction Dt.13.2.2008 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/744.

Ex.P.96-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/744.

Ex.P.97:Letter of sanction Dt.13.2.2008 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/745.

Ex.P.97-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/745.

Ex.P.98:Letter of sanction Dt.15.2.2008 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/755.

Ex.P.98-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/755.

Ex.P.99:Observations sent to the Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch by the Chief Manager, Andhra Bank, Zonal Office pertaining to remarks in sanctioning the loans, appraisal notes, compliance reports, process notes etc., for the month of November, 2007.

Ex.P.100:Observations sent to the Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch by the Chief Manager, Andhra Bank, Zonal Office pertaining to remarks in sanctioning the loans, appraisal notes, compliance reports, process notes etc., for the month of December, 2007.

Ex.P.101:Observations sent to the Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch by the Chief Manager, Andhra Bank, Zonal Office pertaining to remarks in sanctioning the loans, appraisal notes, compliance reports, process notes etc., for the month of January, 2008.

79C.C.05/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.102:Observations sent to the Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch by the Chief Manager, Andhra Bank, Zonal Office pertaining to remarks in sanctioning the loans, appraisal notes, compliance reports, process notes etc., for the month of February, 2008.

Ex.P.103:Copy of the assessment form in the loan file relating to the loan account of 2007/701.

Ex.P.103-A: Copy of process note in Ex.P.103.

Ex.P.104:Copy of assessment form in the loan file relating to the loan account of 2007/719.

Ex.P.104-A:Copy of original process note in Ex.P.104.

Ex.P.105:Copy of assessment form in the loan file relating to the loan account of 2007/727.

Ex.P.105-A: Copy of process note in Ex.P.105.

Ex.P.106:Copy of assessment form in the loan file relating to the loan account of 2007/738.

Ex.P.106-A: Copy of process note in Ex.P.106.

Ex.P.107:Copy of assessment form in the loan file relating to the loan account of 2007/739.

Ex.P.107-A: Copy of process note in Ex.P.107.

Ex.P.108:Copy of assessment form in the loan file relating to the loan account of 2007/740.

Ex.P.108-A: Copy of process note in Ex.P.108.

Ex.P.109:Copy of assessment form in the loan file relating to the loan account of 2007/742.

Ex.P.109-A: Copy of process note in Ex.P.109.

Ex.P.110:Copy of assessment form in the loan file relating to the loan account of 2007/744.

Ex.P.110-A: Copy of process note in Ex.P.110.

Ex.P.111:Copy of assessment form in the loan file relating to the loan account of 2007/745.

Ex.P.111-A: Copy of process note in Ex.P.111.

Ex.P.112:Copy of assessment form in the loan file relating to the loan account of 2007/755.

Ex.P.112-A: Copy of process note in Ex.P.112.

80C.C.05/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.113:Assessment form in the loan file relating to the loan account of 2007/707.

Ex.P.113-A: Original process note in Ex.P.113.

Ex.P.114:Original assessment form in the loan file relating to the loan account of 2007/730.

Ex.P.114-A: Original process note in Ex.P.114.

Ex.P.115: Copy of assessment form in the loan file relating to the loan account of 2007/638.

Ex.P.115-A: Copy of the original process note in Ex.P.115.

Ex.P.116:Copy of the assessment form in the loan file relating to the loan account of 2007/669.

Ex.P.116-A:Copy of the original process note in Ex.P.116.

Ex.P.117:Copy of the assessment form in the loan file relating to the loan account of 2007/670.

Ex.P.117-A: Copy of the original process note in Ex.P.117.

Ex.P.118: Copy of the assessment form in the loan file relating to the loan account of 2007/678.

Ex.P.118-A: Copy of the original process note in Ex.P.118.

Ex.P.119: Copy of the assessment form in the loan file relating to the loan account of 2007/679.

Ex.P.119-A: Copy of the original process note in Ex.P.119.

Ex.P.120:Copy of the assessment form in the loan file relating to the loan account of 2007/680.

Ex.P.120-A: Copy of the original process note in Ex.P.120.

Ex.P.121:Copy of the assessment form in the loan file relating to the loan account of 2007/686.

Ex.P.121-A: Copy of the original process note in Ex.P.121.

Ex.P.122:Copy of the assessment form in the loan file relating to the loan account of 2007/687.

Ex.P.122-A: Copy of the original process note in Ex.P.122.

Ex.P.123:Copy of the assessment form in the loan file relating to the loan account of 2007/689.

Ex.P.123-A: Copy of the original process note in Ex.P.123.

81C.C.05/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.124:Copy of the assessment form in the loan file relating to the loan account of 2007/690.

Ex.P.124-A:Copy of the original process note in Ex.P.124.

Ex.P.125:Copy of the assessment form in the loan file relating to the loan account of 2007/696.

Ex.P.125-A: Copy of the original process note in Ex.P.125.

Ex.P.126: Copy of the assessment form in the loan file relating to the loan account of 2007/698.

Ex.P.126-A: Copy of the original process note in Ex.P.126.

Ex.P.127:Copy of the assessment form in the loan file relating to the loan account of 2007/699.

Ex.P.127-A: Copy of the original process note in Ex.P.127.

Ex.P.128:Copy of assessment form in the loan file relating to the loan account of 2007/721.

Ex.P.128-A: Copy of process note in Ex.P.128.

Ex.P.129:Copy of report submitted to Andhra Bank, Zonal office, Guntur.

Ex.P.130:Copy of report submitted to Andhra Bank, Zonal office, Guntur.

Ex.P.131: Copy of report submitted to Andhra Bank, Zonal office, Guntur.

Ex.P.132: Copy of report submitted to Andhra Bank, Zonal office, Guntur.

Ex.P.133: Copy of report submitted to Andhra Bank, Zonal office, Guntur.

Ex.P.134:Copy of report submitted to Andhra bank, Zonal Office, Guntur.

Ex.P.135: Copy of report submitted to Andhra Bank, Zonal office, Guntur.

Ex.P.136: Copy of report submitted to Andhra Bank, Zonal office, Guntur.

Ex.P.137:Copy of report submitted to Andhra Bank, Zonal office, Guntur.

82C.C.05/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.138:Copy of the covering letter Dt.23.4.2010 under which the Dy. General Manager furnished copy of master circular to the Inspector of Police, CBI, Visakhapatnam.

Ex.P.139:Copy of the master circular.

Ex.P.140:Copy of the internal Circular No.334 Dt.29.01.2010.

Ex.P.141:Loan file relating to the loan account No.PAGCC 2007/113.

Ex.P.141-A:Letter dated ‘NIL’ addressed by the Branch Manager, Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch in the loan file Ex.P.141.

Ex.P.142:Loan file relating to the S.B. Account No.ABJ 431.

Ex.P.143:Loan file relating to the loan account No. PAGCC 2007/145.

Ex.P.143-A:Letter dated 15.09.2007 addressed by the Branch Manager, Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch in the loan file Ex.P.143.

Ex.P.144:Loan file relating to the S.B. Account No.ABJ 435.

Ex.P.145:Loan file relating to the loan account No. PAGCC 2007/150.

Ex.P.145-A:Letter dated 10.09.2007 addressed by the Branch Manager, Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch in the loan file Ex.P.145.

Ex.P.146:Loan file relating to the S.B. Account No.ASB 7917.

Ex.P.147:Loan file relating to the loan account No. PAGCC 2007/240.

Ex.P.147:Letter dated 01.10.2007 addressed by the Branch Manager, Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch in the loan file Ex.P.147.

Ex.P.148:Loan file relating to the S.B. Account No.ASBP 173.

Ex.P.149:Loan file relating to the loan account No. PAGCC 2007/175.

Ex.P.149-A:Letter dated 20.09.2007 addressed by the Branch Manager, Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch in the loan file Ex.P.149.

Ex.P.150:Loan file relating to the S.B. Account No.SB 7929.

Ex.P.151:Loan file relating to the loan account No. PAGCC 2007/176.

Ex.P.151-A:Letter dated 01.10.2007 addressed by the Branch Manager, Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch in the loan file Ex.P.151.

Ex.P.152:Loan file relating to the S.B. Account No.SB 7930.

Ex.P.153: Loan file relating to the loan account No. PAGCC 2007/178.

Ex.P.153-A:Letter dated 25.09.2007 addressed by the Branch Manager, Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch in the loan file Ex.P.153

Ex.P.154:Loan file relating to the S.B. Account No.ASBP 161.

Ex.P.155:Loan file relating to the loan account No. PAGCC 2007/323.

83C.C.05/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.155-A:Letter dated 01.10.2007 addressed by the Branch Manager, Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch in the loan file Ex.P.155.

Ex.P.156: Loan file relating to the S.B. Account No.ASBP 232.

Ex.P.157:Loan file relating to the loan account No. PAGCC 2007/282.

Ex.P.157-A:Letter dated 5.10.2007 addressed by the Branch Manager, Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch in the loan file Ex.P.157.

Ex.P.158:Loan file relating to the S.B. Account No.ASBP 195.

Ex.P.159:Loan file relating to the loan account No. PAGCC 2007/283.

Ex.P.159-A:Letter dated 4.10.2007 addressed by the Branch Manager, Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch in the loan file Ex.P.159.

Ex.P.160:Loan file relating to the S.B. Account No.ASBP 198.

Ex.P.161:Loan file relating to the loan account No. PAGCC 2007/285.

Ex.P.161-A:Letter dated 5.10.2007 addressed by the Branch Manager, Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch in the loan file Ex.P.161.

Ex.P.162:Loan file relating to the S.B. Account No.ASBP 174.

Ex.P.163:Loan file relating to the loan account No. PAGCC 2007/300.

Ex.P.163-A:Letter dated 5.10.2007 addressed by the Branch Manager, Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch in the loan file Ex.P.163.

Ex.P.164:Loan file relating to the S.B. Account No.SB 7934.

Ex.P.165:Loan file relating to the loan account No. PAGCC 2007/304.

Ex.P.165-A:Letter dated 5.10.2007 addressed by the Branch Manager, Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch in the loan file Ex.P.165.

Ex.P.166:Loan file relating to the S.B. Account No.ASBP 207.

Ex.P.167:Loan file relating to the loan account No. PAGCC 2007/314.

Ex.P.167-A: Letter dated 18.10.2007 addressed by the Branch Manager, Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch in the loan file Ex.P.167.

Ex.P.168:Loan file relating to the S.B. Account No.ASBP 216 .

Ex.P.169:Loan file relating to the loan account No. PAGCC 2007/316.

Ex.P.169-A:Letter dated 8.10.2007 addressed by the Branch Manager, Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch in the loan file Ex.P.169.

Ex.P.170:Loan file relating to the S.B. Account No.SB 7946.

Ex.P.171:Loan file relating to the loan account No. PAGCC 2007/321.

Ex.P.171-A:Letter dated 1.10.2007 addressed by the Branch Manager, Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch in the loan file Ex.P.171.

Ex.P.172:Loan file relating to the S.B. Account No.ASBP 231.

84C.C.05/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.173:Loan file relating to the loan account No. PAGCC 2007/324.

Ex.P.173-A:Letter dated 01.10.2007 addressed by the Branch Manager, Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch in the loan file Ex.P.173.

Ex.P.174:Loan file relating to the S.B. Account No.Sb 7948.

Ex.P.175:Loan file relating to the loan account No. PAGCC 2007/340.

Ex.P.175-A:Letter dated 5.10.2007 addressed by the Branch Manager, Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch in the loan file Ex.P.175.

Ex.P.176:Loan file relating to the S.B. Account No.ASBP 217.

Ex.P.177:Loan file relating to the loan account No. PAGCC 2007/398.

Ex.P.177-A:Letter dated 20.10.2007 addressed by the Branch Manager, Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch in the loan file Ex.P.177.

Ex.P.178:Loan file relating to the S.B. Account No.ASBP 247.

Ex.P.179:Loan file relating to the loan account No. PAGCC 2007/401.

Ex.P.179-A:Letter dated 20.10.2007 addressed by the Branch Manager, Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch in the loan file Ex.P.179.

Ex.P.180:Loan file relating to the S.B. Account No.ASBP 248.

Ex.P.181:Loan file relating to the loan account No. PAGCC 2007/562.

Ex.P.181-A:Letter dated 2.12.2007 addressed by the Branch Manager, Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch in the loan file Ex.P.181.

Ex.P.182:Loan file relating to the S.B. Account No.ASBP 347.

Ex.P.183:Loan file relating to the loan account No. PAGCC 2007/404.

Ex.P.183-A:Letter dated 20.10.2007 addressed by the Branch Manager, Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch in the loan file Ex.P.183.

Ex.P.184:Loan file relating to the S.B. Account No.ASBP 249.

Ex.P.185:Loan file relating to the loan account No. PAGCC 2007/419.

Ex.P.185-A:Letter dated 15.10.2007 addressed by the Branch Manager, Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch in the loan file Ex.P.185.

Ex.P.186:Loan file relating to the S.B. Account No.ASBP 269.

Ex.P.187:Loan file relating to the loan account No. PAGCC 2007/427.

Ex.P.187-A:Letter dated 25.10.2007 addressed by the Branch Manager, Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch in the loan file Ex.P.187.

Ex.P.188:Loan file relating to the S.B. Account No.ASBP 279.

Ex.P.189:Loan file relating to the loan account No. PAGCC 2007/462.

Ex.P.189-A:Letter dated 25.10.2007 addressed by the Branch Manager, Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch in the loan file Ex.P.189.

85C.C.05/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.190:Loan file relating to the S.B. Account No.ASBP 290.

Ex.p.191:Loan file relating to the loan account No. PAGCC 2007/464.

Ex.P.191:Letter dated 25.10.2007 addressed by the Branch Manager, Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch in the loan file Ex.P.191.

Ex.P.192:Loan file relating to the S.B. Account No.ASBP 265.

Ex.P.193:Loan file relating to the loan account No. PAGCC 2007/466.

Ex.P.193-A:Letter dated 24.10.2007 addressed by the Branch Manager, Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch in the loan file Ex.P.193.

Ex.P.194:Loan file relating to the S.B. Account No.ASBP 267.

Ex.P.195:Loan file relating to the loan account No. PAGCC 2007/467.

Ex.P.195-A: Letter dated 25.10.2007 addressed by the Branch Manager, Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch in the loan file Ex.P.195.

Ex.P.196:Loan file relating to the S.B. Account No.ASBP 264.

Ex.P.197:Loan file relating to the loan account No. PAGCC 2007/507.

Ex.P.197-A:Letter dated 12.11.2007 addressed by the Branch Manager, Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch in the loan file Ex.P.197

Ex.P.198:Loan file relating to the S.B. Account No.ASBP 309.

Ex.P.199:Loan file relating to the loan account No. PAGCC 2007/512.

Ex.P.199-A:Letter dated 12.11.2007 addressed by the Branch Manager, Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch in the loan file Ex.P.199.

Ex.P.200:Loan file relating to the S.B. Account No.ASBP 315.

Ex.P.201:Loan file relating to the loan account No. PAGCC 2007/513.

Ex.P.201:Letter dated 12.11.2007 addressed by the Branch Manager, Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch in the loan file Ex.P.201.

Ex.P.202:Loan file relating to the S.B. Account No.ASBP 316.

Ex.P.203:Loan file relating to the loan account No. PAGCC 2007/515.

Ex.P.203-A:Letter dated 10.11.2007 addressed by the Branch Manager, Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch in the loan file Ex.P.203.

Ex.P.204:Loan file relating to the S.B. Account No.ASBP 318.

Ex.P.205:Loan file relating to the loan account No. PAGCC 2007/516.

Ex.P.205-A:Letter dated 10.11.2007 addressed by the Branch Manager, Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch in the loan file Ex.P.205.

Ex.P.206:Loan file relating to the S.B. Account No.ASBP 308.

Ex.P.207:Loan file relating to the loan account No. PAGCC 2007/520.

86C.C.05/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.207-A:Letter dated 18.11.2007 addressed by the Branch Manager, Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch in the loan file Ex.P.207.

Ex.P.208:Loan file relating to the S.B. Account No.ASBP 322.

Ex.P.209:Loan file relating to the loan account No. PAGCC 2007/403.

Ex.P.209-A:Letter dated 20.10.2007 addressed by the Branch Manager, Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch in the loan file Ex.P.209.

Ex.P.210:Loan file relating to the S.B. Account No.ASBP 236.

Ex.P.211:Loan file relating to the loan account No. PAGCC 2007/550.

Ex.P.211-A:Letter dated 10.11.2007 addressed by the Branch Manager, Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch in the loan file Ex.P.211.

Ex.P.212:Loan file relating to the S.B. Account No.ASBP 346.

Ex.P.213:Loan file relating to the loan account No. PAGCC 2007/561.

Ex.P.213-A:Letter dated 2.12.2007 addressed by the Branch Manager, Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch in the loan file Ex.P.213.

Ex.P.214:Loan file relating to the S.B. Account No.ASBP 327.

Ex.P.215:Loan file relating to the loan account No. PAGCC 2007/566.

Ex.P.215-A:Letter dated 12.11.2007 addressed by the Branch Manager, Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch in the loan file Ex.P.215.

Ex.P.216:Loan file relating to the S.B. Account No.ASBP 343.

Ex.P.217:Loan file relating to the loan account No. PAGCC 2007/567.

Ex.P.217-A:Letter dated 2.12.2007 addressed by the Branch Manager, Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch in the loan file Ex.P.217.

Ex.P.218:Loan file relating to the S.B. Account No.ASBP 349.

Ex.P.219:Loan file relating to the loan account No. PAGCC 2007/568.

Ex.P.219-A:Letter dated 2.12.2007 addressed by the Branch Manager, Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch in the loan file Ex.P.219.

Ex.P.220:Loan file relating to the S.B. Account No.ASBP 348.

Ex.P.221:Loan file relating to the loan account No. PAGCC 2007/588.

Ex.P.221-A:Letter dated 02.12.2007 addressed by the Branch Manager, Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch in the loan file Ex.P.221.

Ex.P.222:Loan file relating to the S.B. Account No.ASBP 364.

Ex.P.223:Loan file relating to the loan account No. PAGCC 2007/590.

EX.P.223-A:Letter dated 02.12.2007 addressed by the Branch Manager, Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch in the loan file Ex.P.223

Ex.P.224:Loan file relating to the S.B. Account No.ASBP 365.

87C.C.05/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.225:Loan file relating to the loan account No. PAGCC 2007/592.

Ex.P.225-A:Letter dated 2.12.2007 addressed by the Branch Manager, Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch in the loan file Ex.P.225

Ex.P.226:Loan file relating to the S.B. Account No.ASBP 366.

Ex.P.227:Loan file relating to the loan account No. PAGCC 2007/650.

Ex.P.227-A:Letter dated 1.11.2007 addressed by the Branch Manager, Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch in the loan file Ex.P.227.

Ex.P.228:Loan file relating to the S.B. Account No.ASBP 379.

Ex.P.229:Loan file relating to the loan account No. PAGCC 2007/652.

Ex.P.229-A:Letter dated 1.11.2007 addressed by the Branch Manager, Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch in the loan file Ex.P.229.

Ex.P.230:Loan file relating to the S.B. Account No.ASBP 388.

Ex.P.231:Loan file relating to the loan account No. PAGCC 2007/774.

Ex.P.231-A:Letter dated 11.02.2008 addressed by the Branch Manager, Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch in the loan file Ex.P.231.

Ex.P.232:Loan file relating to the S.B. Account No.ASBP 515.

Ex.P.233:Loan file relating to the loan account No. PAGCC 2007/776.

Ex.P.223-A:Letter dated 11.02.2008 addressed by the Branch Manager, Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch in the loan file Ex.P.233.

Ex.P.234:Loan file relating to the S.B. Account No.ASBP 514.

Ex.P.235:Loan file relating to the loan account No. PAGCC 2007/778.

Ex.P.235-A:Letter dated ‘NIL’ addressed by the Branch Manager, Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch in the loan file Ex.P.235.

Ex.P.236:Loan file relating to the S.B. Account No.ASBP 513.

Ex.P.237:Loan file relating to the loan account No. PAGCC 2007/779.

Ex.P.237-A:Letter dated 10.02.2008 addressed by the Branch Manager, Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch in the loan file Ex.P.237.

Ex.P.238:Loan file relating to the S.B. Account No.ASBP 516.

Ex.P.239:Loan file relating to the loan account No. PAGCC 2007/172.

Ex.P.239-A:Letter dated 20.04.2007 addressed by the Branch Manager, Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch in the loan file Ex.P.239.

Ex.P.240:Loan file relating to the S.B. Account No.SB 7931.

Ex.P.241:Loan file relating to the loan account No. PAGCC 2007/173.

Ex.P.241-A:Letter dated 01.10.2007 addressed by the Branch Manager, Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch in the loan file Ex.P.241.

88C.C.05/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.242:Loan file relating to the S.B. Account No.ASBP 176.

Ex.P.243:Loan file relating to the loan account No. PAGCC 2007/174.

Ex.P.243-A:Letter dated 20.09.2007 addressed by the Branch Manager, Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch in the loan file Ex.P.243.

Ex.P.244:Loan file relating to the S.B. Account No.ASBP 175.

Ex.P.245:Loan file relating to the loan account No. PAGCC 2007/730.

Ex.P.245-A:Letter dated 09.12.2007 addressed by the Branch Manager, Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch in the loan file Ex.P.245.

Ex.P.246:Loan file relating to the S.B. Account No.ASBP 239.

Ex.P.247:Loan file relating to the loan account No. PAGCC 2007/707.

Ex.P.247-A:Letter dated 15.12.2007 addressed by the Branch Manager, Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch in the loan file Ex.P.247.

Ex.P.248:Loan file relating to the S.B. Account No.ASBP 442.

Ex.P.249:Receipt memo under which P.W.6 handed over relevant documents relating to the loan accounts to the Inspector of Police, CBI, Visakhapatnam under acknowledgment.

Ex.P.250:Covering letter dt.15.6.2009 under which loan files relating to the crop loans and bank circular No.488 were handed over to the CBI.

Ex.P.251:Copy of the report submitted to the District Collector, Prakasam District.

Ex.P.252:Copy of the report submitted to the District Collector, Prakasam District.

Ex.P.253:Returned/unserved registered cover with acknowledgement addressed to Ravi Shanta Kumari, R/o Pamidipadu village.

Ex.P.254:Returned/unserved registered cover with acknowledgement addressed to Ramachandraiah, R/o Pamidipadu village.

Ex.P.255:Returned/unserved registered cover with acknowledgement addressed to Pydi Punna Rao, R/o Pamidipadu village.

Ex.P.256:Returned/unserved registered cover with acknowledgement addressed to Mandapati Suseela, R/o Pamidipadu village.

Ex.P.257:Returned/unserved registered cover with acknowledgement addressed to Mandapati Srinivasa Rao, R/o Pamidipadu village.

Ex.P.258:Returned/unserved registered cover with acknowledgement addressed to Pydi Drawpadi, R/o Pamidipadu village.

Ex.P.259:Returned/unserved registered cover with acknowledgement addressed to Arla Subbayamma, R/o Pamidipadu village.

89C.C.05/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.260:Returned/unserved registered cover with acknowledgement addressed to Koduri Samamma, R/o Pamidipadu village.

Ex.P.261:Returned/unserved registered cover with acknowledgement addressed to Polavarapu Anjaiah, R/o Pamidipadu village.

Ex.P.262:Returned/unserved registered cover with acknowledgement addressed to Muvva Syamala, R/o Pamidipadu village.

Ex.P.263:Returned/unserved registered cover with acknowledgement addressed to Kema Ravi Kumari, R/o Pamidipadu village.

Ex.P.264:Returned/unserved registered cover with acknowledgement addressed to Arla Kotamma, R/o Pamidipadu village.

Ex.P.265:Returned/unserved registered cover with acknowledgement addressed to Maruboina Ayyamma, R/o Pamidipadu village.

Ex.P.266:Returned/unserved registered cover with acknowledgement addressed to Mandalapu Anjamma, R/o Pamidipadu village.

Ex.P.267:Returned/unserved registered cover with acknowledgement addressed to Bandi Koteswara Rao, R/o Pamidipadu village.

Ex.P.268:Returned/unserved registered cover with acknowledgement addressed to Palaparthi Prameela, R/o Pamidipadu village.

Ex.P.269:Returned/unserved registered cover with acknowledgement addressed to Kukkala Narayana, R/o Pamidipadu village.

Ex.P.270:Returned/unserved registered cover with acknowledgement addressed to Kavuri Nageswara Rao, R/o Pamidipadu village.

Ex.P.271:Returned/unserved registered cover with acknowledgement addressed to Ravi Bharatamma, R/o Pamidipadu village.

Ex.P.272:Returned/unserved registered cover with acknowledgement addressed to Arla Basavayya, R/o Pamidipadu village.

Ex.P.273:Returned/unserved registered cover with acknowledgement addressed to Perumalla Nagendrayya, R/o Pamidipadu village.

Ex.P.274:Returned/unserved registered cover with acknowledgement addressed to Tirumalasetti Eswaramma, R/o Pamidipadu village.

Ex.P.275:Returned/unserved registered cover with acknowledgement addressed to Degala Nagendrayya, R/o Pamidipadu village.

Ex.P.276:Returned/unserved registered cover with acknowledgement addressed to Chennam Anna Rao, R/o Kanagalavari palem.

Ex.P.277:Returned/unserved registered cover with acknowledgement addressed to Raavi Babi, R/o Ravinuthala village.

Ex.P.278:Returned/unserved registered cover with acknowledgement addressed to Muvva Nageswara rao, R/o Ravinuthala village.

90C.C.05/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.279:Returned/unserved registered cover with acknowledgement addressed to Nagaboina Hanumayamma, R/o Ravinuthala village.

Ex.P.280:Returned/unserved registered cover with acknowledgement addressed to Naguboina Ankamarao, R/o Ravinuthala village. Ex.P.281:Returned/unserved registered cover with acknowledgement addressed to Muvva Ramanamma, R/o Ravinuthala village.

Ex.P.282:Returned/unserved registered cover with acknowledgement addressed to Raavi Ramadevi, R/o Ravinuthala village.

Ex.P.283:Returned/unserved registered cover with acknowledgement addressed to Muvva Anjamma, R/o Ravinuthala village.

Ex.P.284:Returned/unserved registered cover with acknowledgement addressed to Jagarlamudi Aruna, R/o Ravinuthala village.

Ex.P.285:Returned/unserved registered cover with acknowledgement addressed to Polavarapu Shyambabu, R/o Ravinuthala village.

Ex.P.286:Returned/unserved registered cover with acknowledgement addressed to Kema Somaiah, R/o.Ravinuthala Village.

Ex.P.287:Returned/unserved registered cover with acknowledgement addressed to Muvva Kondalarao, R/o Ravinuthala village.

Ex.P.288:Returned/unserved registered cover with acknowledgement addressed to Polavarapu Arundathi, R/o. Ravinuthala village.

Ex.P.289:Returned/unserved registered cover with acknowledgement addressed to Polavarapu Punnamma, R/o.Ravinuthala Village.

Ex.P.290:Returned/unserved registered cover with acknowledgement addressed to Naguboina Suribabu, R/o.Ravinuthala Village.

Ex.P.291:Returned/unserved registered cover with acknowledgement addressed to Polavarapu Sambaiah, R/o.Ravinuthala Village.

Ex.P.292:Returned/unserved registered cover with acknowledgement addressed to Polavarapu Anuradha, R/o.Ravinuthala Village.

Ex.P.293:Returned/unserved registered cover with acknowledgement addressed to Muvva Polayya, R/o.Ravinuthala Village.

Ex.P.294:Returned/unserved registered cover with acknowledgement addressed to Raavi Brahmaiah, R/o.Ravinuthala Village.

Ex.P.295:Returned/unserved registered cover with acknowledgement addressed to Muvva Chenchuramaiah, R/o.Ravinuthala Village.

Ex.P.296:Returned/unserved registered cover with acknowledgement addressed to Soparla Molakamma, R/o.Ravinuthala Village.

Ex.P.297:Returned/unserved registered cover with acknowledgement addressed to Kema Manikyamma, R/o.Ravinuthala Village.

Ex.P.298:Returned/unserved registered cover with acknowledgement addressed to Lallam Aruna, R/o.Ravinuthala Village.

91C.C.05/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.299:Returned/unservedregisteredcoverwith acknowledgement addressed to Painam Adimma, R/o.Ravinuthala Village. Ex.P.300:Returned/unserved registered cover with acknowledgement addressed to Gonigunta Rani, R/o.Ravinuthala Village.

Ex.P.301:Returned/unserved registered cover with acknowledgement addressed to Lalam Seethamma, R/o.Ravinuthala Village.

Ex.P.302:Returned/unserved registered cover with acknowledgement addressed to Arla Ramakotaiah, R/o.Ravinuthala Village.

Ex.P.303:Returned/unserved registered cover with acknowledgement addressed to Arudra Punnarao, R/o.Ravinuthala Village.

Ex.P.304:Returned/unserved registered cover with acknowledgement addressed to Paruchuri Hanumantharao, R/o.Ravinuthala Village.

Ex.P.305:Photocopy of the household card relating to P.W.42.

Ex.P.306:Photocopy of the household card relating to P.W.43.

Ex.P.307:Photocopy of the household card relating to P.W.44.

Ex.P.308:Photocopy of the first page of bank pass book maintained in Union Bank of India, Ravinuthala branch relating to P.W.44.

Ex.P.309:Photocopy of the household card of P.W.45.

Ex.P.310:Photocopy of the first page of bank pass book maintained in Union Bank of India, Ravinuthala branch relating to P.W.45.

Ex.P.311:Photocopy of the voter identity card relating to P.W.45.

Ex.P.312:Photocopy of the Rajeev Arogyasri Health Card of P.W.46.

Ex.P.313:Photocopy of the first page of bank pass book maintained in Union Bank of India, Ravinuthala branch relating to P.W.46.

Ex.P.314:Photocopy of post office S.B. Account pass book relating to P.W.46.

Ex.P.315:Photocopy of the first page of pass book of the post office saving account relating to P.W.47/

Ex.P.316:Photocopy of the household cardrelating to P.W.47.

Ex.P.317:Photocopy of the first page of bank pass book maintained in Union Bank of India, Ravinuthala branch relating to P.W.47.

Ex.P.318:Photocopy of the voter identity card relating to P.W.47.

Ex.P.319:Photocopy of the household card relating to P.W.48.

Ex.P.320:Photocopy of the first page of bank pass book maintained in Union Bank of India, Ravinuthala branch relating to P.W.48.

92C.C.05/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.321:Attested copy of report Dt. 15.12.2008 submitted by P.W.49 to the Head Office, Andhra Bank, Hyderabad.

Ex.P.322:Photocopy of the pass book relating to the savings bank account No. 7159 of Union Bank of India, Ravinuthala branch consisting the thumb impressions of P.W.51.

Ex.P.323:Photocopy of the pass book relating to the savings bank account No. 371902010007161 of Union Bank of India, Ravinuthala branch consisting the thumb impressions of P.W.51.

Ex.P.324:Photocopy of the voter identity card of P.W.52.

Ex.P.325:Photocopy of household cardof P.W.52.

Ex.P.326:Photocopy of the voter identity card of P.W.53.

Ex.P.327:Photocopy of the house hold card of P.W.53.

Ex.P.328:Photocopy of the voter identity card of P.W.54.

Ex.P.329:Photocopy of household card of P.W.54.

Ex.P.330:Copy of the C.F.S.L. opinion No.CH71/2011 Dt. 19.03.2012 alongwith the reasons.

Ex.P.331:Specimen writings of the person namely Linga Ammaiah (2nd accused in this case).

Ex.P.332:FIR in R.C.No. 13 (A)/2009 of CBI, Visakhapatnam U/Sec. 120-B, 420, 468 and 471 IPC and U/Sec. 13 (2) r/w. 13 (1) (d) of P.C.Act, 1988.

Ex.P.333:Covering letter Dt.15.6.2009 under which P.W.9 handed over the statement of accounts pertaining to the crop loans of this case alongwith certificates U/Sec. 2 of Banker’s Books of Evidence Act.

Ex.P.334:Statement of account pertaining to the crop loan relating to this case alongwith certificate U/Sec. 2 of Banker’s Books of Evidence Act.

Ex.P.335:Statement of account pertaining to the crop loan relating to this case alongwith certificate U/Sec. 2 of Banker’s Books of Evidence Act.

Ex.P.336:Statement of account pertaining to the crop loan relating to this case alongwith certificate U/Sec. 2 of Banker’s Books of Evidence Act.

Ex.P.337:Statement of account pertaining to the crop loan relating to this case alongwith certificate U/Sec. 2 of Banker’s Books of Evidence Act.

Ex.P.338:Statement of account pertaining to the crop loan relating to this case alongwith certificate U/Sec. 2 of Banker’s Books of Evidence Act.

Ex.P.339:Statement of account pertaining to the crop loan relating to this case alongwith certificate U/Sec. 2 of Banker’s Books of Evidence Act.

93C.C.05/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.340:Statement of account pertaining to the crop loan relating to this case alongwith certificate U/Sec. 2 of Banker’s Books of Evidence Act.

Ex.P.341:Statement of account pertaining to the crop loan relating to this case alongwith certificate U/Sec. 2 of Banker’s Books of Evidence Act.

Ex.P.342:Statement of account pertaining to the crop loan relating to this case alongwith certificate U/Sec. 2 of Banker’s Books of Evidence Act.

Ex.P.343:Statement of account pertaining to the crop loan relating to this case alongwith certificate U/Sec. 2 of Banker’s Books of Evidence Act.

Ex.P.344:Statement of account pertaining to the crop loan relating to this case alongwith certificate U/Sec. 2 of Banker’s Books of Evidence Act.

Ex.P.345:Statement of account pertaining to the crop loan relating to this case alongwith certificate U/Sec. 2 of Banker’s Books of Evidence Act.

Ex.P.346:Statement of account pertaining to the crop loan relating to this case alongwith certificate U/Sec. 2 of Banker’s Books of Evidence Act.

Ex.P.347:Statement of account pertaining to the crop loan relating to this case alongwith certificate U/Sec. 2 of Banker’s Books of Evidence Act.

Ex.P.348:Statement of account pertaining to the crop loan relating to this case alongwith certificate U/Sec. 2 of Banker’s Books of Evidence Act.

Ex.P.349:Statement of account pertaining to the crop loan relating to this case alongwith certificate U/Sec. 2 of Banker’s Books of Evidence Act.

Ex.P.350:Statement of account pertaining to the crop loan relating to this case alongwith certificate U/Sec. 2 of Banker’s Books of Evidence Act.

Ex.P.351:Statement of account pertaining to the crop loan relating to this case alongwith certificate U/Sec. 2 of Banker’s Books of Evidence Act.

Ex.P.352:Statement of account pertaining to the crop loan relating to this case alongwith certificate U/Sec. 2 of Banker’s Books of Evidence Act.

Ex.P.353:Statement of account pertaining to the crop loan relating to this case alongwith certificate U/Sec. 2 of Banker’s Books of Evidence Act.

Ex.P.354:Statement of account pertaining to the crop loan relating to this case alongwith certificate U/Sec. 2 of Banker’s Books of Evidence Act.

94C.C.05/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.355:Statement of account pertaining to the crop loan relating to this case alongwith certificate U/Sec. 2 of Banker’s Books of Evidence Act.

Ex.P.356:Statement of account pertaining to the crop loan relating to this case alongwith certificate U/Sec. 2 of Banker’s Books of Evidence Act.

Ex.P.357:Statement of account pertaining to the crop loan relating to this case alongwith certificate U/Sec. 2 of Banker’s Books of Evidence Act.

Ex.P.358:Statement of account pertaining to the crop loan relating to this case alongwith certificate U/Sec. 2 of Banker’s Books of Evidence Act.

Ex.P.359:Statement of account pertaining to the crop loan relating to this case alongwith certificate U/Sec. 2 of Banker’s Books of Evidence Act.

Ex.P.360:Statement of account pertaining to the crop loan relating to this case alongwith certificate U/Sec. 2 of Banker’s Books of Evidence Act.

Ex.P.361:Statement of account pertaining to the crop loan relating to this case alongwith certificate U/Sec. 2 of Banker’s Books of Evidence Act.

Ex.P.362:Statement of account pertaining to the crop loan relating to this case alongwith certificate U/Sec. 2 of Banker’s Books of Evidence Act.

Ex.P.363:Statement of account pertaining to the crop loan relating to this case alongwith certificate U/Sec. 2 of Banker’s Books of Evidence Act.

Ex.P.364:Statement of account pertaining to the crop loan relating to this case alongwith certificate U/Sec. 2 of Banker’s Books of Evidence Act.

Ex.P.365:Statement of account pertaining to the crop loan relating to this case alongwith certificate U/Sec. 2 of Banker’s Books of Evidence Act.

Ex.P.366:Statement of account pertaining to the crop loan relating to this case alongwith certificate U/Sec. 2 of Banker’s Books of Evidence Act.

Ex.P.367:Statement of account pertaining to the crop loan relating to this case alongwith certificate U/Sec. 2 of Banker’s Books of Evidence Act.

Ex.P.368:Statement of account pertaining to the crop loan relating to this case alongwith certificate U/Sec. 2 of Banker’s Books of Evidence Act.

Ex.P.369:Statement of account pertaining to the crop loan relating to this case alongwith certificate U/Sec. 2 of Banker’s Books of Evidence Act.

95C.C.05/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.370:Statement of account pertaining to the crop loan relating to this case alongwith certificate U/Sec. 2 of Banker’s Books of Evidence Act.

Ex.P.371:Statement of account pertaining to the crop loan relating to this case alongwith certificate U/Sec. 2 of Banker’s Books of Evidence Act.

Ex.P.372:Statement of account pertaining to the crop loan relating to this case alongwith certificate U/Sec. 2 of Banker’s Books of Evidence Act.

Ex.P.373:Statement of account pertaining to the crop loan relating to this case alongwith certificate U/Sec. 2 of Banker’s Books of Evidence Act.

Ex.P.374:Statement of account pertaining to the crop loan relating to this case alongwith certificate U/Sec. 2 of Banker’s Books of Evidence Act.

Ex.P.375:Statement of account pertaining to the crop loan relating to this case alongwith certificate U/Sec. 2 of Banker’s Books of Evidence Act.

Ex.P.376:Statement of account pertaining to the crop loan relating to this case alongwith certificate U/Sec. 2 of Banker’s Books of Evidence Act.

Ex.P.377:Statement of account pertaining to the crop loan relating to this case alongwith certificate U/Sec. 2 of Banker’s Books of Evidence Act.

Ex.P.378:Statement of account pertaining to the crop loan relating to this case alongwith certificate U/Sec. 2 of Banker’s Books of Evidence Act.

Ex.P.379:Statement of account pertaining to the crop loan relating to this case alongwith certificate U/Sec. 2 of Banker’s Books of Evidence Act.

Ex.P.380:Statement of account pertaining to the crop loan relating to this case alongwith certificate U/Sec. 2 of Banker’s Books of Evidence Act.

Ex.P.381:Statement of account pertaining to the crop loan relating to this case alongwith certificate U/Sec. 2 of Banker’s Books of Evidence Act.

Ex.P.382:Statement of account pertaining to the crop loan relating to this case alongwith certificate U/Sec. 2 of Banker’s Books of Evidence Act.

Ex.P.383:Statement of account pertaining to the crop loan relating to this case alongwith certificate U/Sec. 2 of Banker’s Books of Evidence Act.

Ex.P.384:Statement of account pertaining to the crop loan relating to this case alongwith certificate U/Sec. 2 of Banker’s Books of Evidence Act.

96C.C.05/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.385:Statement of account pertaining to the crop loan relating to this case alongwith certificate U/Sec. 2 of Banker’s Books of Evidence Act.

Ex.P.386:Statement of account pertaining to the crop loan relating to this case alongwith certificate U/Sec. 2 of Banker’s Books of Evidence Act.

Ex.P.387:Statement of account pertaining to the crop loan relating to this case alongwith certificate U/Sec. 2 of Banker’s Books of Evidence Act.

Ex.P.388:Receipt memo under which Ex.P.307 and Ex.P.308 were collected.

Ex.P.389:Receipt memo under which Ex.P.310, Ex.P.309 and Ex.P.311 were collected.

Ex.P.390:Receipt memo under which Ex.P.315, Ex.P.317, Ex.P.316 and Ex.P.318 were collected.

Ex.P.391:Receipt memo under which Ex.P.327 and Ex.P.326 were collected.

Ex.P.392:Receipt memo under which Ex.P.205 was collected.

Ex.P.393:Receipt memo under which Ex.P.306 and copy of first page of bank pass book bearing A/c.No.3951 were collected.

Ex.P.394:Receipt memo under which Ex.P.319 and Ex.P.320 were collected.

Ex.P.395:Receipt memo under which Ex.P.312, Ex.P.313 and Ex.P.314 were collected.

Ex.P.396:Receipt memo under which Ex.P.324, Ex.P.325 and Ex.P.323 were collected.

Ex.P.397:Copy of covering letter Dt.11.4.2011 under which the Chief Manager, Andhra bank, Zonal Office, Ongole submitted the documents.

Ex.P.398:Copy of letter dt.19.1.2009 addressed by the Dy. General Manager to the General Manager, Andhra Bank, Inspection and Audit Department, Head Office, Koti, Hyderabad.

Ex.P.399:Copy of letter Dt.29.1.2009 addressed by the Dy. General Manager to the General Manager, Andhra Bank, Inspection and Audit Department, Head Office, Koti, Hyderabad.

Ex.P.400:Draft ROR 1(A) registers in 3 volumes relating to Ravinuthala village.

Ex.P.401:Draft ROR 1 (B) register in 3 volumes relating to Ravinuthala village.

Ex.P.402:1 (A) Register in three volumes relating to Pamidipadu village.

Ex.P.403:I (B) Register in three volumes relating to Pamidipadu village.

LIST OF WITNESSES EXAMINED ON BEHALF OF DEFENCE.

97C.C.05/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

NIL

LIST OF DOCUMENTS MARKED ON BEHALF OF DEFENCE.

Ex.D.1:Relevant portions in the statements of witnesses i) Anubrolu Sumithra, W/o.Tatarao; ii) Tulluri Venkateswarlu, S/o.Laksmaiah; iii) Ravi Samrajyam, w/o.Janaikiramaiah; iv) Polavarapu Amareswari, W/o.srinivasarao; v) Paleru Sujatha, w/o.Ramanjaneyulu and; vi) ‘Oruganti Basavaiah, S/o.Adayya are the residents of Pamidipadu village. It is not true to suggest that I have stated before the CBI that i) Anubrolu Sumithra, W/o.Tatarao; ii) Tulluri Venkateswarlu, S/o.Laksmaiah; iii) Ravi Samrajyam, w/o.Janaikiramaiah; iv) Polavarapu Amareswari, W/o.srinivasarao; v) Paleru Sujatha, w/o.Ramanjaneyulu and vi) ‘Oruganti Basavaiah, S/o.Adayya recorded under 161 Cr.P.C.

Ex.D.2:Relevant portions in the statements of witnesses recorded under 161 Cr.P.C is marked as Ex.D2 in PW40 evidence.

Ex.D.3:Relevant portions in the statements of witnesses recorded under 161 Cr.P.C is marked as Ex.D2 in PW41 evidence.

PRINCIPAL SPL. JUDGE FOR C.B.I. CASES,

FAC I Addl. SPL.JUDGE FOR C.B.I CASES,

VISAKHAPATNAM.

Copy submitted to

The Hon’ble Registrar (Judicial), High Court of Andhra Pradesh.

Copies to:

1. The Accused No.1

2. The Superintendent of Police, C.B.I., Visakhapatnam.

IN THE COURT OF THE I ADDL. SPECIAL JUDGE FOR C.B.I.

CASES, VISAKHAPATNAM.

Present:Sri N.RAMESH BABU Prl. Spl. Judge for C.B.I. Cases, FAC I Adll. Spl. Judge for C.B.I Cases, Visakhapatnam.

Friday , this the 27 th day of December, 2019

C.C.No.06/2015

Between:

State represented by CBI, Visakhapatnam.

…Complainant And:

1. Mr.Kasukurthi Jalaramaiah, S/o Peda Kotaiah, Aged 51 years, Door No.6-117, J.Sri Nagar 1st Lane, 3rd Cross Road, Behind St.Xaviers Girls- High School-cum-Girls Junior College, Kurnool Road, Ongole, Prakasam District.

2. Mr.Balineni Anjaneyulu, S/o late Venkateswarulu, Near Panchayat Board, Gollavarapadu Village, Korasapadu Mandal, Prakasam District.

….. Accused Nos.1 and 2

This case came on 19.12.2019 for final hearing before me in the presence of Mrs.K.Srilatha, Ld.Public Prosecutor for the Complainant and of Mr.N.V.V.Prasad, Advocate for A1 and Mr.P.Satya Srinivas,

Advocate for A2 and the matter having stood over for consideration till this day, this Court doth the following:

J U D G M E N T

1. The Inspector of Police, CBI, ACB, Visakhapatnam has filed a charge sheet in RC.No.13(A)/2009 against the accused for the offences under Sections 120-B, 420, 468 and 471 IPC and under

Sec.13(2) r/w 13(1) (d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

2C.C.06/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

2.The case of prosecution as per the charge sheet is that while A1 was working as the Branch Manager of Andhra Bank, Rvinuthala

Branch, he inconnivance with one Mr.Ch.Venkateswara Rao who was working as an Officer in the same bank had opened savings bank accounts in the names of non-existing persons and sanctioned crop loans in the names of those non existing persons basing on fake and forged documents like No Dues Certificates, Revenue Passbooks and

Residence proof certificates. On the report given by Mr.D.V.Narasimha

Rao, the then Dy.General Manager of Andhra Bank, Ongole, the above stated case was registered and during the course of investigation it was revealed that A1 having conspired with A2 and others had sanctioned and disbursed 153 loans amounting to Rs.110.64lakhs under Pattabhi Agri Credit Card Scheme and converted Crop Loans in fraudulent manner basing on fake documents and that in this case 32 crop loans were sanctioned in the names of non-existing persons and having credited the loan amounts to the fictitious savings bank accounts had misappropriated the loan proceeds and thereby caused a loss of Rs.23,65,000/- to the bank and gained wrongfully.

Said Mr.Ch.Venkateswara Rao died on 6.12.2010 and so he is not prosecuted in this case. During the course of investigation of this case it was revealed that the title deed passbook enclosed to the loan documents was got prepared by A1 through A2 and the Government

Examiner of Questioned Documents had given positive opinion that the writings in those passbook belong to A2.

3.Considering the contents of the charge sheet, the case was taken on file for the offences under Sections 120-B, 420, 468 and 471 3C.C.06/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

IPC and under Sections 13(2) r/w 13(1) (d) of the Prevention of

Corruption Act, 1988 against A1 and for the offences under Sections 120-B, 420, 468 and 471 IPC against A2.

4. After the accused made their appearance before the Court and on hearing both sides, this Court has framed charges for the offences under Sections 120-B, 420, 468 and 471 IPC against A1 and A2 and under Section 13(1) (d) r/w 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 against A1, read over and explained to them, in Telugu for which they pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried.

5. At the trial the prosecution side has got examined 62 witnesses as PW.1 to PW.62 and got marked Exs.P1 to Ex.P283 documents on its behalf to prove its case.

6.No oral evidence is adduced on behalf of the accused but Ex.D1 to D3 documents were marked on behalf of the accused. After closure of recording the prosecution side evidence, the accused were examined under Section Sec.313 Cr.P.C informing to them the incriminating circumstances available in the evidence against them, for which they have stated that the same is false and that they have not committed any offence.

7.I have heard the learned Public Prosecutor for prosecution and the learned counsel for the accused. The learned Public Prosecutor and the learned counsel for A1 have submitted written arguments and

I have perused the same.

4C.C.06/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

8.The gist of prosecution side evidence both oral and documentary is as follows:

The evidence of PW.1 namely Mr.Davuluri Venkata Narasimha

Rao who is the defacto complainant and worked as the Zonal Manager in Andhra Bank, Zonal Office Ongole is that A1 had committed fraud and sanctioned Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loans and converted Crop Agricultural Term Loans numbering into 153, violating the bank norms and disbursed an amount of Rs.110.64lakhs, which are still outstanding and that the bank has sustained a loss of

Rs.124.22lakhs and that one Mr.K.Gopala Krishna Murthy, Dy.Manager of Inspection and Audits, Hyderabad had inspected the Ravinuthala branch of Andhra Bank in December, 2008 and noticed some fake

Pattadhar passbooks and identity and residential proofs and some other documents relating to the loans sanctioned by A1 and submitted a report basing on which the Vigilance Department was directed to investigate the matter thoroughly and so the authorities of Vigilance

Department came to the said Ravinuthala Branch and verified all the documents pertaining to the loans sanctioned by A1 and referred the documents to the concerned issuing authorities for information about the genuineness of those documents, for which the information was given in writing that those documents are fake and so the Vigilance authorities had submitted a report to the Head Office, Andhra Bank,

Hyderabad and then the Vigilance Department has directed him(PW.1) to give a report to CBI Department against A1 and so he gave a report on 9.6.2009 the copy of which is Ex.P1 and that the original is filed in

CC 5/2015 which contains his signature.

5C.C.06/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

9.The further evidence of PW.1 is that A1 had opened savings bank accounts in the names of fictitious persons on the basis of false identity and residential proofs and sanctioned loans in the names of those fictitious persons basing on false and fabricated pattadhar passbooks, adangals, 10(1) accounts and bogus no dues certificates and disbursed the loan with conspiracy and plan with unknown persons without proper appraisal and even by altering the appraiser reports of the Rural Development Officer. He has exhibited a list of 153 accounts relating to the alleged fraudulent transactions, the copy of which has been marked as Ex.P2 since the original list was marked in C.C.5/2015.

10.The evidence of PW.2 namely Mr.Hejeebu Seshagiri Rao who worked as the Assistant General Manager in Andhra Bank, Zonal

Office, Guntur is that the Branch Manager has to inform sanction of loans exceeding Rs.50,000/- to the Zonal Office in the form of ADA-1 and ADA-5 and that reports in ADA-1 are submitted for each group of loans and that the reports in ADA-5 are submitted for the entire loans, consolidated, and that the Credit Monitoring Review Department in

Zonal Office monitor all the reports of ADA-1 and ADA-5 submitted by the Branch Managers and that the Ravinuthala branch of Andhra Bank was not sending monthly reports relating to sanction of loans exceeding Rs.50,000/- to Zonal Office, promptly and so reminders were issued. A copy of a letter dated 17.11.2007 has been marked as

Ex.P3. Through PW.2 the letters of sanction of different loans have been marked as Ex.P4 to Ex.P31 and the corresponding assessment forms are marked as Ex.P4-A to Ex.P31-A which relate to Pattabhi 6C.C.06/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loans. Those documents relate to the month of October, 2007. Through him ADA-1 report dated 14.12.2007 is marked as Ex.P33 and ADA-5 report dated 14.12.2007 is marked as

Ex.P34 and a copy of covering letter dated 14.12.2007 is marked as

Ex.P32. Likewise, some letters of sanction of different loans relating to

Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loans were marked as Ex.P35 to Ex.P44 and the corresponding assessment forms were marked as

Ex.P35-A to Ex.P44-A. Those documents relate to the month of

November, 2007.

11.According to PW.2 the ADA-1 report dated 12.2.2008 and ADA-5 report dated 19.2.2008 which are marked as Ex.P45 and Ex.P46 respectively were received by the Chief Manager, Zonal Office, Andhra

Bank for the month of December,2007 with a covering letter. The letters of sanction of that month for different loans were marked as

Ex.P47 to Ex.P66 and the corresponding assessment forms were marked as Ex.P47-A to Ex.P66-A. The ADA-1 report dated 13.2.2008 and the ADA-5 report dated 15.3.2008 were marked as Ex.P67 and

Ex.P68 respectively for the month of January, 2008 and the letters of sanction relating to different loans of that month were marked as

Ex.P69 to Ex.P81 and the relevant assessment forms were marked as

Ex.P69-A to Ex.P81-A. The ADA-1 report dated 11.4.2008 and the ADA- 5 report dated 30.4.2008 which relate to the month of February, 2008 were marked as Ex.P83 and Ex.P84 respectively and the copy of covering letter through which they were sent was marked as Ex.P82.

The letters of sanction of different loans were marked as Ex.P85 to

Ex.P98 and the relevant assessment forms were marked as Ex.P85-A to 7C.C.06/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P98-A which relate to the month of February, 2008. The observations which are sent to the Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala Branch by the Chief Manager, Andhra Bank Zonal Office pertaining to the remarks in sanctioning the loans, appraisal notes, compliance report, process notes etc., for each month i.e., November, 2007, December, 2007, January, 2008 and February, 2008 were marked as Ex.P99 to

Ex.P102 respectively.

12.According to PW.2 he compared the original process notes and sanction letters with the copies of process notes and sanction letters which are sent to the Zonal Office and noticed that the appraising officers who signed in the original process notes and the appraising officers who signed on the process notes sent to the Zonal Office are not one and the same and that the correction fluid was used in the original process notes at the column of ‘recommendations and signature of the appraising officer’ by mentioning on the top of the correction fluid that ‘recommended for sanction’. According to PW.2 all those assessment forms contain the signatures of 1st accused and that A1 had signed as sanctioning authority on those forms in the capacity of branch manager.

13.Likewise, Ex.P103 to Ex.P128 and Ex.P103-A to Ex.P128-A documents were marked through PW.2. According to him correction fluid was used in the original process notes of those documents at the column of recommendations and signature of the appraising officer and it was mentioned on the top of the correction fluid that ‘recommended for sanction’. He has further deposed that the 8C.C.06/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP appraising officer who signed on the original process notes and the appraising officer who signed on the process notes sent to the Zonal

Office are not one and the same.

14.PW.3 namely Tatineni Hanumantha Rao who worked as the

Senior Manager in Andhra Bank, Zonal Office, Guntur has deposed that the Zonal Manager as per a letter dated 17.1.2009 instructed him to work in Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch to assist the branch manger for recovery of 153 irregular crop loans and so from 19.1.2009 till 3.2.2009 he worked in that branch and visited different villages on different dates and met the borrowers who were available and the guarantors of the borrowers and that some of the borrowers have made part payments and that others had promised to discharge the loans. According to him some borrowers were not available at the addresses given in the loan applications and on enquiry he was informed that no such persons were residing in the respective villages.

According to him, he gave reports about his visits and enquires. The copies of those reports were marked as Ex.P129 to Ex.P137. He has further deposed that A1 who accompanied him could not even locate some of the borrowers to whom the crop loans were granted.

15.PW.4 namely Mr.Harinath who worked as a Senior Manager in

Credit Monitoring Review Department of Andhra Bank, Zonal Office,

Guntur has deposed that the Andhra Bank Head Office, Hyderabad had released a master circular for specifying the rules and norms to sanction crop loans by the branch managers and that Ex.P139 is the copy of the same and that Ex.P138 is the covering letter dated 9C.C.06/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP 23.4.2010. According to him as per the circular under Ex.P139 the branch manager has to submit reports in ADA-1 and ADA-5 forms every month for the loans sanctioned in their respective branches. He has further deposed that a circular No.344 dated 29.1.2010 the copy of which is marked as Ex.P140 was issued prescribing a procedure to prepare a note if any deviations were found in sanctioning the loans.

16.PW.5 namely Mr.Kuntamukkala Suryanarayana Murthy who worked as the Chief Manager in Andhra Bank, Zonal Office, Guntur has deposed about the procedure to be followed in sanctioning crop loans and about the enquiry conducted by him regarding irregularities found connected to the crop loans sanctioned in Ravinuthala branch. He also deposed about the defects that were found in sanction of the crop loans in that branch and also the defects in the documents required for sanction of crop loans. He also deposed about the role of branch managers and precautions to be taken in sanctioning the crop loans.

17.PW.6 namely Mr.Padmanabhuni Padma Naga Vara Prasad who worked as a Senior Manager in Zonal Office of Andhra Bank, Guntur has also deposed about the irregularities noticed by him in sanctioning the crop loans by Ravinuthala branch of Andhra Bank and through him the loan files were marked as Ex.P141 to Ex.P204. According to him, he handed over all the relevant documents relating to the loan accounts to the Inspector of Police, CBI, Visakhapatnam under a receipt dated 31.3.2011 which is marked as Ex.P.205. He also deposed about the defects he found in the loan documents.

10C.C.06/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

18.Mrs.Kidambi Mydhili who was examined as PW.7 has deposed that she worked as an Officer in Zonal Office, Andhra Bank, Guntur in the Credit Monitoring and Review Department. She spoke about her assistance to the Senior Manager in reviewing the ADA reports which were received from the branches including the Ravinuthala branch of

Andhra Bank. She also spoke about the lapses which were found in sanctioning the crop loans by Ravinuthala branch of Andhra Bank.

According to her she prepared the observations under Ex.P99 to

Ex.P102 pertaining to the remarks in sanctioning the loans, appraisal notes, compliance reports, process note etc., relating to some months and that they contain her initials. According to her on comparison she came to know that there are differences between the copies of the process notes and sanction orders sent to the Zonal Office with the original process notes and sanction orders.

19.PW.8 namely Mr.Makkena Venkateswarlu who is the successor in office of A1 as the Branch Manager of Ravinuthala branch, Andhra

Bank has deposed that A1 had handed over the documents pertaining to 1100 crop loans stating that he(A1) sanctioned those crop loans as per the bank norms and that there were no irregularities in sanction of those crop loans, except in one or two loans.

20.PW.8 has further deposed that A1 had informed to him that A1 had referred the pattadhar passbooks to MRO, Korisapadu for verification and that the MRO had verified those pattadhar passbooks and issued certificates stating that some are genuine and that the 11C.C.06/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP said certificates were kept in the concerned loan files. Further PW.8 has deposed that A1 informed that A1 verified the loans of the borrowers in the said crop loans and that the borrowers were in possession of the lands mentioned in their pattadhar passbooks and that the extents mentioned in the pattadhar passbooks were correct and further that the Chief Manager, Mr.K.S.Murthy, Rural Development

Officer, Mr.M.Anand and Mr.N.S.Sharma belonging to the Inspection

Department, Zonal Office, Guntur had visited Ravinuthala branch and verified the loan documents and found that the pattadhar pass books in two or three crop loans were fake. According to PW.8 one

Mr.Suresh Kumar, the Rural Development Officer, Zonal Office, Andhra

Bank of Guntur had visited Ravinuthala branch on 22.11.2008 and 23.11.2008 and verified the documents pertaining to the crop loans sanctioned by A1 and even thereafter also Mr.Suresh Kumar visited that branch and again verified the documents for a period of three more days and informed to PW.8 that the pattadhar passbooks in the crop loans sanctioned to Abhaya Savings Bank account holders were fake.

21.PW.8 has further deposed Mr.Suresh Kumar took him and also 16 to 18 pattadhar pass books pertaining to those crop loans to the office of MRO, Koresipadu and verified them with the revenue records through MRO and came to know that except one pattadhar passbook all the remaining pattadhar pass books were not genuine and that a report was prepared to that effect and was submitted to the Zonal

Office.

12C.C.06/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

22.The further evidence of PW.8 is that one Mr.K.G.K.Murthy and

Mr.Murali Krishna of Inspection department, Head Office, Andhra Bank,

Hyderabad had visited the Ravinuthala branch for annual inspection and referred 400 pattadhar pass books pertaining to the crop loans sanctioned by A1 to the MRO, Koresipadu and on verification they came to know that pattadhar pass books relating to 153 crop loans were fake. According to PW.8 the Zonal office, Andhra Bank, Guntur gave directions to A1 to recover overdue crop loans sanctioned by A1 and so A1 had recovered pay payments in around 40 crop loans in which pattadhar pass books were noticed as fake and handed over those part payments to PW.8 for adjustment in the respective crop loans

23.The further evidence of PW.8 is that he took 800 pattadhar passbooks pertaining to the crop loans sanctioned by A1 to the office of MRO, Koresipadu and on verification it was noticed that some of them were fake and so he obtained a certificate about the same and submitted to the Zonal Office. PW.8 spoke about enquiry conducted by

Mr.T.Hanumantha Rao.

24.The further evidence of PW.8 is that he, A1 and

Mr.T.Hanumantha Rao have visited some villages for borrowers and came to know that some of those borrowers were not residing in the villages and regarding some borrowers the villagers had informed to them that no such persons were residing in the villages.

13C.C.06/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

25.PW.9 namely Mr.Pulicherla Paul Caesar who worked as the Senior

Manager in Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch from 20.05.2009 to 25.06.2012 has deposed that he handed over some loan files relating to the crop loans connected to this case through a covering letter

dated 15.6.2009, the copy of which was marked as Ex.P206. The copy

of Circular No.488 is marked as Ex.P207.

26.PW.10 namely Mr.Adavani Sravan Kumar who worked as Rural

Development Officer of Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala Branch from 13.8.2007 to 15.11.2008 has deposed that while A1 was working as the branch manager in Ravinuthala Branch of Andhra Bank,

Mr.Y.Ravindranath worked as a bank officer and one

Mr.Ch.Venkateswara Rao worked as a Clerk/ Cashier and that A1 had personally attended for sanction of the crop loans pertaining to this case and that A1 himself contracted the borrowers and received applications from the borrowers and collected the documents such as pattadhar passbook, title deed, 10(1) adangal, small farmer certificate, no due certificates issued by other banks and abstract forms issued by the Mandal Revenue Officers and sanctioned crop loans and that subsequently A1 after disbursing the crop loans to the borrowers asked him(PW.10) to fill up the applications of the borrowers and the necessary documents and so he filled up the loan applications and other documents in the crop loans pertaining to this case and that as per the instructions of A1 they were kept in strong room and the keys were in the custody of A1. According to him he prepared appraisal and process notes as per the instructions of A1 and he filled up transfer forms for adjustment of the crop loan amounts in the SB accounts of 14C.C.06/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP the borrowers and also entered the same in the system as directed by

A1. The further evidence of PW.10 is that the Rural Development

Officer namely Siva Kumar visited that branch once in a week on every

Thursday and that without appraising and preparing sanction notes had simply signed on them and since already crop loans were sanctioned and the amounts were disbursed by A1.

27.The further evidence of PW.10 is that A1 himself rub out the remarks made by the Rural Development Officer Mr.Siva Kumar in appraisal forms by using correction fluid and directed him(PW.10) to write as ‘recommended for sanction’ and accordingly he wrote the same and when he questioned A1 about the same, A1 scolded him and directed him to work as instructed by A1 stating that A1 was the head of the branch and sanctioning authority and responsible for the entire transaction in the branch and that A1 got filled up the applications of SB accounts of the borrowers in the crop loans, through him(PW.10). According to PW.10 he was terminated from the service on the allegations that he acted in accordance with the illegal directions of A1 and as he signed in the appraisal forms and process notes without inspecting the fields. Inspite of Mr.Siva Kumar did not sign on them and that he was responsible for tampering of the records and because he wrote in the appraisal form and process notes as recommended for sanction at the place of rubout of remarks with correction fluid. The further evidence of PW.10 is that A1 handed over loan application, letter of sanction, appraisal forms and memorandum for sanction, Form of Andhra Bank for issue Pattabhi Agri Card, Demand

Promissory note, composite agreement for agriculture, covenants of 15C.C.06/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP the co-obligant forms, Bank’s right to cancel limits and property statements to him along with property valuation certificate, adangal and title deed in all the crop loans pertaining to these cases for filling up the same as per the particulars mentioned in property valuation certificate, adangal and title deed. According to PW.10

Mr.Ch.Venkateswara Rao and one Mr.S.A.Pyaru who worked as a

Cashier also filled up some columns in those documents relating to crop loans and that Mr.K.C.Siva Kumar the Rural Development Officer filled up some columns in the appraisal forms and letter of sanction of the crop loans and that A1 sent ADA-1 reports pertaining to the crop loans to the Zonal Office along with copies of sanction letter, application form and appraisal form and sanction of short term loans.

According to him the copies of appraisal form and sanction of short term loans in some of the crop loans which are submitted to the Zonal

Office were not the copies of the originals and A1 took his signatures in the said copies and he signed on them as per the directions given by A1 and that A1 had obtained the signatures of Mr.Siva Kumar in the original of appraisals and short term loans after submitting the deception copies of appraisals and short term loans to the Zonal office.

According to PW.10 even though Mr.Siva Kumar, the Rural

Development Officer had endorsed on some of the original appraisals and short terms loans as not recommended but A1 having rubbed out the same with correction fluid had got written through him(PW.10) as recommended and he wrote the same as per the instructions of A1.

28.PW.11 namely Mr.K.C.Siva Kumar who worked as the Rural

Development Officer in Chimakurthi branch May, 2005 to May, 2009 16C.C.06/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP has deposed that the Zonal Office, Andhra Bank, Guntur has directed him to attend Ravinuthala branch of Andhra Bank to monitor the agricultural loans and so he attended that branch once in 15 days, for a total of 14 days and monitored the agricultural loans from July, 2007 to September, 2007 and even thereafter he attended the monitoring of agricultural loans in that branch as per the direction of the zonal office. According to him he came to know that A1 being the branch manager of that branch had sanctioned crop loans and disbursed the amounts to the borrowers and entered the same in the system and also attended for a documentation and that A1 placed of those loan files before him(PW.11) for signing and he questioned A1 for asking him to sign on the loan files which loans were already sanctioned and disbursed to the borrowers and then A1 had informed that A1 had received loan applications and attended for documentation and sanctioned and disbursed the crop loan amounts to the borrowers because PW.11 used to come to the branch once in 15 days or once in a month and that there was immediate necessity to sanction crop loans due to crop season and A1 had informed that A1 had sanctioned crop loans to the borrowers as there was immediate need and that A1 verified all the loan applications and documents submitted by the borrowers which are proper and A1 himself personally attended the documentation and that there were latches in sanction the crop loans and requested to sign on the documents for sending the same to the Zonal Office in the manner of ADA Report and so he(PW.11) obliged A1 and signed on the loan documents relating to the crop loans subsequent to the sanction and disbursement of the loan amount by A1. According to PW.11 he filled only some columns in the 17C.C.06/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP sanction letters and process notes in 4 or 5 loan accounts which were kept blank as per the instructions of A1 and that Mr.Sravan Kumar the

Probationary Rural Development Officer had filled up the loan applications and documents pertaining to those crop loans and that

PW.11 has not seen even one of the persons to whom those crop loans were sanctioned because A1 had sanctioned them in the absence of PW.11 and that neither the borrowers nor the Co-obligants nor A1 signed on the applications or documents in the presence of

PW.11. The further evidence of PW.11 is that in the month of June, 2008 when A1 asked him to sign on the loan files which loans were already sanctioned and the amounts were disbursed, he signed in the annexures/process notes relating to the loan accounts by mentioning as ‘verified only documents’. The enquiry officer of the Vigilance

Department, Head Office, Andhra Bank, Hyderabad had informed to him by phone that in some of the crop loan files there was rub out with correction fluid.

29.PW.12 Mr.Yerragudi Ravindranath who worked as Assistant

Manager in Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala Branch from 18.06.2007 to 12.02.2008 has deposed that A1 worked as branch manager during that time and sanctioned some crop loans and he (PW.12) had opened only three SB accounts relating to those loans on the basis of ration card and voter card but he does not know who opened the SB accounts relating to other crop loans and A1 had assigned the work of opening SB accounts relating to those crop loans to Mr.Sravan Kumar the Probationary Rural Development Officer and Mr.Ch.Venkateswara

Rao a sub manager also attended for that work and that A1 entrusted 18C.C.06/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP the work of filling up the crop loan applications and documents, preparation of vouchers and other works to Mr.Sravan Kumar and that

A1 had insisted Mr.Sravan Kumar to rub out the remarks made by

Mr.K.C.Siva Kumar in appraisal of crop loans by using correction fluid and to write as ‘recommended’ at the rub out column and Mr.Sravan

Kumar did the same which was informed to PW.12 when the CBI caused enquiry relating to those crop loans. According to PW.12 even though Mr.K.C.Siva Kumar a Rural Development Officer was deputed to work in that branch for appraisal of the crop loans but A1 appraised, sanctioned and disbursed the crop loans and also entered in the computer system in the absence of Mr.K.C.Siva Kumar and that

Mr.K.C.Siva Kumar had questioned A1 about the same and argued with him in the bank in their presence. PW.12 has deposed about the irregularities and defects found in those crop loans and the documents of the loans. According to him the S.B account opening forms do not contain the signatures of the introducers.

30.The further evidence of PW.12 is that the borrowers relating to those crop loans were visiting the bank in the evening hours and that

A1 and the Sub Manager namely Mr.Ch.Venkateswara Rao were working in the bank beyond banking hours and they have detained the Probationary Rural Development Officer who is Mr.Sravan Kumar to work along with them in the branch beyond bank hours.

31.PW.13 namely Mr.Shaik Abdul Pyaru who worked as cashier in

Ravinuthala branch of Andhra Bank from February, 2008 to October, 2009 has deposed that he being cashier in that branch had attended 19C.C.06/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP to pay cash to the parties on passed withdrawals by collecting tokens and also attended the work entrusted to him by A1 who worked as the branch manager. According to him he paid cash to the parties by receivingtokensbecausetheSubManagernamely

Mr.Venkateswararao had identified the parties and verified the passbooks. According to him he filled up the address in the sanction letter available in the loan file under Ex.P199 as per the instructions of

A1 and that he has got acquaintance with the signatures and handwritings of A1 and Mr.Sravan Kumar(PW.10) and Mr.Ravindranath (PW.12) and Mr.Venkteswara Rao who worked as the Sub Manager and that the sanction letter contain the signatures of A1 and that the withdrawal form contain the signature of Mr.Sravan Kumar and

Mr.Venkateswara Rao and that Mr.Sravan Kumar had written the amount in the form of appraisal and that the letter addressed to the

MRO, Korisepadu available in that file was addressed by A1. He has categorically deposed that on two occasions when parties were not available he handed over the cash on passed withdrawals numbering 8 or 9 to A1 after banking hours on the instructions of the sub manager Mr.Venkateswara Rao but he does not know whether A1 handed over the said amount to the parties or not. He further deposed that on one occasion when a party asked him to pay cash regarding five tokens which were given to the party in the counter, he (PW.13) has refused to give cash regarding five tokens but as per the instructions by A1 he paid cash to A1 regarding those five tokens.

32.The evidence of PW.14 namely Mr.Palakaveety Krishna Murthy who worked as a Tashildar in Santanutalapadu Mandal is that he 20C.C.06/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP verified and compared the relevant entries of the copies of the pattadhar pass books relating to 92 crop loans which were sent to him by the MRO, Koresapadu with the relevant entries in the Record of

Rights i.e., 1(A), 1 (B), Fair Land Register and 10 (1) account copy, as per the proceedings of the District Collector of Prakasam District

dated 7.7.2010 and came to conclusion that 91 pattadhar passbooks

were fake and bogus and they are not pertaining to the persons whose names were mentioned in those books and so he gave a report to the District Collector, the copy of which is marked as Ex.P208.

According to him he narrated in Ex.P208 about the particulars of the original land owners for the survey numbers mentioned in the copies of the pattadhar passbooks and also explained as to how the entries are fabricated in those passbooks and the alternations were made in the revenue records.

33.PW.15 namely Mr.K.Srinivasa Rao who worked as the Tashildar of

Parchuru Mandal, Prakasam District has deposed that the District

Collector of Prakasam District has instructed him as per the proceedings dated 7.7.2010 to verify pattadhar passbooks and title deeds pertaining to 61 crop loans sanctioned by Ravinuthala branch of Andhra Bank and to give a report about their genuineness and so he received the copies of the pattadhar passbooks from ‘D’ Section of

District Collector’s Office, Ongole and collected Re-survey and settlement record, adangal, draft Record of Rights register, 1-B

Register, 10 (1) account and Field Measurement Book pertaining to the lands mentioned in those pattadhar passbooks from the office of

Tashildar, Koresapadu and verified the relevant entries and came to a 21C.C.06/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP conclusion that the said 61 pattadhar passbooks are not genuine and he has submitted a report to the District Collector, the copy of which is marked as Ex.P.209, because according to him the relevant entries of those books are not tallied with the entries in the pattadhar passbooks.

34.Mr.Chillara Ramesh who is PW.16 who worked as Senior Assistant in Mandal Office, Koresapadu has deposed about the procedure for issuing pattadhar and title deed passbooks relating to the landed property. PW.17 namely Mr. Kosanam Ravi Kumar who worked as

Mandal Revenue Inspector of Korisapadu has also deposed about the procedure for issuing the pattadhar and title deed passbooks.

According to him the private persons will not be authorized to note the entries in the pattadhar passbooks or title deed passbooks and that if the entries written in the passbooks are not tallied with the entries noted in the revenue records, it can be said that those passbooks are not genuine. According to him the Mandal Revenue Officer/Tahsildar is the competent authority to issue nativity certificate. His further evidence is that the loan file under Ex.P199 contains a letter addressed by the branch manager dated 1.2.2008 but it does not contain the signature of one Mrs.Y.Subbalakshmi who worked as

Tahsildar of Koresapadu Mandal on 4.10.2007. According to him the signature on the property certificate is not of the Panchayat Secretary and the signature on 10(1) account is not the signature of the concerned village revenue officer and that the signatures appearing on the title deed does not belong to MRO, RDO and Sub Registrar of

Amanabrolu and that the signature on the nativity certificate which is 22C.C.06/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP marked as Ex.P200 does not belong to the village revenue officer of

Ravinuthala.

35.PW.18 namely Mr.Bhuvanam Ramalinga Vara Prasad who worked as Additional Revenue Inspector in Korisapadu Mandal, PW.19 namely

Mr.Ramachandruni Vasudevarao who worked as the Manadal Revenue

Inspector in Korisapadu Mandal, PW.20namelyMr.Rachavalla

Venkata Sesaiah who worked as Mandal Revenue Inspector in

Korisapadu Mandal, PW.21 namely Mrs.Gunturu Sujatha who worked as

Junior Assistant in the office of RDO, Ongole from 2001 to 2006,

PW.22 namely Mr.P.Venugopala Rao who worked as the branch manager in Union Bank of India, Ravinuthala branch from 28.8.2007 to 26.7.2011, PW.24 namely Mr. A.Raghava Reddy who worked as the

Assistant Branch Manager in Indian Bank, Medarametla branch, PW.25 namely Mr.Busurapalli Anjaiah who worked as the branch manager in

Prakasam District Co-operative Central Bank Limited, Ravinuthala branch from September, 2005 to October, 2007, PW.26 namely

Mr.Cherukuri Venkateswarlu who worked as the branch manager in the same bank, PW.27 namely Mr. Karicheti Narayana who worked as a staff assistant in the same bank, PW.28 namely Mr.K.Sanjeeva Rao who worked as the Staff Assistant in the same bank and PW.29 namely

Mr. Giddi Ravindra Babu who worked as the branch manager in Andhra

Pragathi Grameena Bank of Medarametla branch from June, 2005 to

June, 2008 have deposed that the signatures available on the letters, property certificates, No.3 account copies, adangals and the title deeds and nativity certificates and no dues certificates available in the loan files do not belong to the respective officials who worked at the 23C.C.06/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP relevant times and that even the seals affixed at those signatures also do not belong to the respective offices.

36.PW.23 namely Mr.Sareddu Sambasiva Rao who worked as the

Sub Registrar in the office of Sub Registrar, Addanki from April, 2010 to 30.6.2012 has deposed that the Village Administrative Officers used to produce the title deeds and obtain the signatures of the Sub

Registrars who after verifying the survey numbers would sign on the title deeds if those survey numbers are not in the prohibited list.

37.PW.30 namely Mr. Marriboyina Anjaneyulu who worked as Extra

Department Delivery Agent in Pamidipadu Post Office, since 1983 is that if the addressees are not available in the given address and the registered posts by causing enquiry about them for six days, they would return the covers to this senders. Through him Ex.P210 to

Ex.222 returned unserved registered postal covers were marked which are addressed to different persons and according to PW.30 having caused enquiries about the persons to whom the covers were addressed, as they were not available, he returned those covers by making an endorsement stating that the addressees were not residing in Pamidipadu village, to the CBI which is the sender of those covers.

38.PW.31 namely Mr.Tammuluri Subbarao who worked as Extra

Department Mail Carrier, Ravinuthala Sub Post Office, since 10.12.1986 has deposed that Mr.Kondru Kanakaiah who expired on 22.1.2011 worked as Postman/Extra Department Delivery Agent in the sub post office, Ravinuthala and that he has got acquaintance with the 24C.C.06/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP signature of late Mr.Kondru Kanakaiah and that Ex.P223 postal cover contain the endorsement made by Mr.Kondru Kanakaiah which was returned unserved to the sender CBI, Visakhapatnam with an endorsement as the addressee are not residing in the given address and the endorsement contain the signature of Mr.Konduru Kanakaiah.

39.PW.32 namely Maddineni Anjaneyulu who worked as the Village

Revenue Officer of Ravinuthala village has deposed that the Village

Revenue Officers are not competent to issue nativity certificates since 2008 and that the Gram Panchayat Secretaries are only competent to issue nativity certificates. According to him the signatures available on the property certificates, No.3 adangals and pattadar pass books and the nativity certificates, available in the loan files of this case are not his signatures and that he did not issue those nativity certificates.

Even he denied the seals as belonging to him and to his office which are available in the loan files.

40.PW.33 namely Mr.Medikonda Venkata Narayana who worked as

Village Revenue Officer-II of Pamidipadu village from December, 2008 to May, 2013 has deposed that by the time he assumed charge as

Village Revenue Officer of Pamidipadu village, one Mr.Hari Prabhakar was working as the Village Revenue Officer of Pamidipadu village but he died in February, 2009 and that they both worked together for about two months and that he has acquaintance with the signatures and handwritings of Mr.Hari Prabahkar. He also deposed that since 2008 the Village Revenue Officers are not competent to issue nativity certificates and that Gram Panchayat Secretaries are only competent 25C.C.06/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP to issue nativity certificates. According to him the signatures and seals available on the property certificates, 10(1) account copies, No.3 adangals and pattadhar passbooks and the nativity certificates available in the loan files connected to this case are not his signatures and also not the signatures of MrHari Prabhakar and those seals also do not belong to them.

41.PW.34 namely Mr.Yedavalli Venkata Subbarao who worked as panchayat secretary of Pamidipadu Grampanchayat, Korisapadu

Mandal from June, 2007 to 2011 has deposed that it is the duty of

Grampanchayat Secretaries to issue nativity certificates and the power to issue copies of adangals was given to the Grampanchayat

Secretary in the year 2007. According to him the signatures appearing on the nativity certificates, property certificates, No.3 adangals which are available in the loan files connected to this case are not his signatures and even the seals appearing on those documents do not belong to him.

42.PW.35 namely Mr.Yalakapati Bhaskara Rao who worked as the

Village Revenue Officer of Pichukalagudipadu village from 24.5.2008 15.5.2013 has deposed about the duties of village revenue officers.

PW.36 namely Mr.Yenumula Venkata Chennaiah who worked as Village

Revenue Officer of Timmalapalem and Yerapalem villages from May, 2008 to May, 2013 has also deposed about the duties of village revenue officers. According to PW.35 and PW.36 the persons who are shown as the borrowers in the loan applications connected to this 26C.C.06/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP case do not belong to their respective villages as mentioned in the loan files.

43.PW.37 namely Mr. Pulipati Lazar who worked as the Village

Revenue Assistant in Kurravanipalem village of Koresapadu Mandal has deposed that the photo affixed to the pattadhar passbook available in the loan file marked as Ex.P193 relates to Mr.Kancharla John Babu, S/o

Anjaiah a resident of Koresapadu village but the name mentioned on the pattadhar passbook is Mr.Pinnaka Baburao and that the persons whose photos were affixed on the pattadhar passbooks available in the loan files marked as Exs.P169, P179, P181, Ex.189 and P191 are neither the residents of Kurravanipalem village nor the residents of

Koresapadu village and that those photos do not belong to the persons whose names were mentioned in those respective pattadhar passbooks and that the person whose photo was affixed in the loan file under Ex.P201 is a resident of Kurravanipalem village but it does not relate to the person whose name was mentioned in the pattadhar passbook.

44.PW.38 namely Mr. Palaparthi Ruben who worked as the Village

Revenue Assistant of Pamidipadu village for about 25 years has deposed that the photos of the persons affixed on the pattadhar passbooks in the loan files marked as Exs.P141, 143, 149, 155, 159, 161, 163, 165, 167, 173, 175, 177, 183, 187, 193, 195 and 203 are not residents of Pamidipadu, Kanaganivanipalem, Anubroluvaniapelm,

Mallempativanipalem and Krishnarajuvaniapelm villages and. PW.39 namely Mr.Palaparthi Solomon who worked as the Village Revenue

Assistant of Pamidipadu village for about 10 years has deposed as 27C.C.06/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP deposed by PW.38. PW.40 namely Mr.Palaparthi Yesu who worked as the Village Revenue Assistant of Pamidipadu village for about 10 years also deposed as deposed by PW.38 and PW.39.

45.PW.41 namely Mr.Kavuri Gopala Krishna Murthy who worked as the Inspector of branches in Inspection and Audit Department, Head

Office, Andhra Bank, Hyderabad has deposed that as per the instructions of General Manager, Head Office, Andhra Bank,

Hyderabad, he inspected Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch in

December, 2008 accompanied by one Mr.K.Murali Krishna a Senior

Inspector for a period of two weeks from 01.12.2008 and verified all the files of the crop loans including the documents therein and also the SB accounts including the account opening forms and found that 13 to 16 crop loans were sanctioned on fake pattadhar passbooks and submitted his report to the Zonal office. According to him at his request one Mr.Hari Narayana Seeth of Andhra Bank was directed to assist him on verification of the Pattadhar passbooks through the

Mandal Revenue Officer and it was found that 153 out of 400 Pattadhar passbooks were not tallying with the Revenue records and that a certificate was given by the MRO to that effect which he sent to the

Head Office. He further noticed that the SB accounts relating to 153 crop loans were not opened in accordance with KYC norms and so he prepared a report and submitted the same to the Head Office, the attested copy of which is marked as Ex.P224. According to him, he observed that in the loan account bearing No.2007/585 the name of the borrower was shown as Mr.Marriboina Venkata Rao, S/o

Venkateswarulu of Meedarametla as per the sanction order but in the 28C.C.06/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP pattadhar passbook the name was mentioned as Mr.Marriboina

Venkata Rao, S/o Peddabbai of Pamidipadu village but the loan amount was credited to the account bearing No.ASB 1452 relating to

Mr.Marriboina Venkata Rao, S/o. Srinivasa Rao of Anamanamuru.

46.The Evidence of PW.42 namely Mrs.Yerramothu Subba Lakshmi who worked as the MRO of Korisipadu Mandal from 2005 to 2009, is that A1 who was the Branch Manager of Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch did not send any letter to her to register lien/charge pertaining to the crop loans in the revenue records when she worked as the

Mandal Revenue Officer of Korisipadu. According to her the signatures available on the title deed and a letter marked as Ex.P141-A which are available in the loan filed marked as Ex.P141 are not her signatures and that even the stamp under those signatures does not relate to the office of MRO, Korisipadu and that she did not issue that title deed.

According to her the signatures available in the passbooks available in the loan files marked as Exs.P.143, 145, 147,149,151,153,155,157, 159,161,163,165,167,169,171,173,175,177,179, 181, 183,185, 187,189,191,193,195,197,199,201 and 203 and the signatures on the letters available in those files which are marked as Exs.P.143-

A, 145-A, 147-A,149-A,151-A,153-A,155-A,157-A,159-A,161-A,163-

A,165-A,167-A,169-A,171-A,173-A,175-A,177-A,179-A, 181-A, 183-

A,185-A, 187-A,189-A,191-A,193-A,195-A,197-A,199-A,201-A and 203-A,are not her signatures and that she did not issue those passbooks and that she did not make any endorsement on those letters and that even the stamps available on those documents do not belong to the office of MRO of Korisipadu.

29C.C.06/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

47.PW.43 namely Mr.Chandrapati Radhakrishna Murthy who worked as Manager (In-charge) of Prakasam District Co-Operative Central

Bank Limited of B.Nidamanuru branch from 3.9.2010 to 30.1.2012 has deposed that he furnished the attested extract of the Savings Bank

Account of Mr.Kamepalli Kotaiah, S/o.Ramaswamy of Hanumapuram village, Naguluppalapadu Mandal which is Ex.P226 under a covering letter dt.4.5.2011 which is Ex.P225 and that the said account No.3570 was opened in September, 1998 and was operated till 6.10.1998 and later it was closed.

48.The evidence of PW.44 namely Mr.Telaghathoti Ananda Rao the

Extra Department Delivery Agent in Rachapudi Branch Post Office from

October, 2010 to November, 2011 is that he has returned two unserved registered covers which were addressed to Mr.Kanagala

Ramakrishna, son of Bhadraiah, resident of Malampativaripalem village and Mr.Eda Hanuma reddy, son of Chenchu Reddy, resident of

Krishnamrajuvaripalem village which were marked as Exs.P.227 and

P.228 respectively with an endorsement that the addressees were not residing in the given addresses and that those endorsements contain his signatures.

49.PW.45 namely Mrs. Animalla Muthyalamma who worked as a

Village Revenue Officer in Prasangalapadu village from February, 1995 to February, 2012 has deposed that the photo affixed to the title deed in the loan file under Ex.P.199 does not relate to a resident of

Prasangalapadu village and that no person in the name of Mrs.Bonthu 30C.C.06/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

Rajamma, W/o.Veeraiah was residing in that village and that the signature on that title deed said to be the signature of village revenue officer does not relate to her and she did not sign on that title deed.

50.PW.46 namely Mrs.Nakka Ganga Bhavani Devi who worked as the Panchayat secretary of Kurravanipalem from March, 2002 to

August, 2015 has deposed that the signatures available on the nativity certificates in the files of SB accounts marked as Exs.P.180, P.182,

P.190, P.192 and P.202 are not her signatures and even the seals on those certificates are not her seals and that she never worked as

Grampanchayat secretary of Koresapadu Panchayat Office and that the power of Grampanchayat Secretaries to issue nativity certificates were discontinued from February, 2007.

51.PW.47 namely Mr.Bijja Srinivasulu who worked as the Village

Revenue Officer of Hanumapuram, Kavuruvanipalem and H-Nidamanur of Naguluppalapadu Mandal from 2008 to 2013 is that the photo affixed in the title deed available in the loan file under Ex.P.161 relates to Mr.Kamepalli Kotaiah, S/o Ramaswamy a resident of Hanumapuram but the name mentioned on the title deed is Mr.Devabaktuni

Ramanadham, S/o.Krishnaiah and that Mr.Kamepalli Kotaiah died in the year 2002.

52.PW.48 namely Mr.Naraparaju Venkata Suryanarayana who worked as the Village Revenue Officer of Naguluppalapadu is that the photo affixed in the title deed which is available in the loan file under

Ex.P163 relates to Mr.Narasimha Rao, S/o.Subbaraidu a resident of 31C.C.06/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

Ommevaram village but not relate to Kunda Mohan Rao, S/o.Rama

Krishnaiah whose name was mentioned therein.

53.He has further deposed that the photo affixed in the title deed which is available in the loan file under Ex.P.189 relates to Mr.Marella

Srinivasa Rao, S/o.Subbaiah who is a resident of Naguluppalapadu village but not to Mr.Mallela Srinivasarao, S/o.Subbaiah a resident of

Koresapadu village whose name was mentioned on the title deed.

54.PW.49 namely Mrs.Banala Srilakshmi who worked as the Village

Revenue Officer of Maddiralapadu village of Naguluppalapadu Mandal from February, 2010 to June, 2012 has deposed that out of 150 title deeds available in the crop loan files that were shown to her, she could identify only one photo which was affixed in the title deed which is available in the loan file marked as Ex.P167 whose name is

Mr.Neppala Venkaiah but the name of Mr.Taluri Viswanadham,

S/o.Veeraiah was mentioned as title holder on that title deed and that

Mr.Neppala Venkaiah died long back.

55.PW.50 namely Mr.Garnepudi Kodandaram who worked as the

Revenue Inspector of Uppugunduru village of Naguluppalapadu

Mandal has deposed that out of 150 title deeds relating to the crop loan files, he could identify only one photo which was affixed to the title deed available in the loan file marked as Ex.P163 and his name is

Mr.Veeragandham Narasimha Rao, S/o Subbaramaiah a resident of

Ommevaram village but the name of Kunda Mohan Rao,

S/o Ramakrishnaiah was mentioned on the title deed.

32C.C.06/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

56.PW.51 Mr.Chevula Rajachandra Sekhar who worked as the Junior

Assistant of H.Nidamanuru village of Naguluppalapadu Mandal from 28.4.2007 to 31.12.2013 and worked as In-charge Panchayat

Secretary of that village between 1.2.2009 to 30.11.2012 and who has been working as the Panchayat Secretary to Ulavapadu village since 21.1.2015 has deposed that he issued the death certificate of

Mr.Kamepalli Kotaiah which is Ex.P229, according to which

Mr.Kamepalli Kotaiah died on 14.2.2002 and that the death intimation, the copy of which was marked as Ex.P230 was received on 15.2.2002 and the covering letter was marked as Ex.P231.

57.PW.52 namely Mr. Nandigama Koteswara Rao a native of

Hanumapuram village has deposed that the photo of Mr.Kamepalli

Kotaiah who is related as grandfather to him is available in the loan file under Ex.P161 but the name on the title deed was mentioned as

Mr.Devabhaktuni Ramanadham, S/o Krishnaiah and that his grandfather died in the year 2000 and that the title deed in Ex.P161 loan file does not belong to Mr.Kamepalli Kotaiah. His further evidence is that he also identified the photo of Mr.Kovi Raghavaiah of

Hanumapuram but Mr.Kovi Raghavaiah died prior to his examination by the CBI in the year 2011.

58.PW.53 namely Mr. Veeragandham Narasimha Rao who is a resident of Ommevaram village of Naguluppalapadu Mandal has deposed that the photo affixed to the title deed which was available in the loan file marked as Ex.P163 relates to him but his name is not

Mr.Kunda Mohan Rao as mentioned in the title deed and his father’s 33C.C.06/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP name is Mr.Veeragandham Subba Ramaiah but not Mr.Ramakrishnaiah and that the said title deed does not belong to him and that he has no lands in Pamidipadu village and he never took any crop loan from

Andhra Bank of Ravinuthala branch and he does not know Mr.Kunda

Anantharamaiah who stood as guarantor for that loan and that the loan file under Ex.P163 and the SB account file under Ex.P.164 do not contain his signatures. Through him the copies of the savings bank passbook of Union Bank and savings bank passbook of SBI

Uppugunduru branch, pattadhar passbook, title deed and pattadhar passbooks in patta No.1460 and patta No.1177 were marked as

Ex.P.232 after comparing with the originals.

59.PW.54 namely Mr.Aluri Veerabrahmachari who worked as a postman in Rachapudi Branch Post Office from February, 1998 to

September, 2009 has deposed that if the addressees are not available in the village in the given addresses after causing enquiries about them for 7 days, they would return the registered covers to the senders and that he knows PW.44 who had returned the registered covers marked as Ex.P227 and Ex.P228 by making necessary endorsements.

60.PW.55 namely Mr.Pidugu Venkataramaiah who worked as the

Village Revenue Officer in Mandal Revenue Office, Koresapadu village from 9.2.2007 to 14.5.2013 has deposed that he verified the pattadhar passbooks and crop loan files and according to him he does not know the persons whose photos were affixed in the title deeds available in the loan files marked as Exs.P169, P179, P181, P189,

P191 and P201 and whether those persons are residents of 34C.C.06/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

Koresapadu village or not. and that there are no persons residing in

Koresapadu village to his knowledge namely Mr.Ravuri

Lakshminarayana, Mrs.Ravuri Ademma, Mr. Jarugula Ramatirdham,

Mr.Mallela Srinivasarao, Mrs.Mallela Padmavathi and Mr.Keerthi Hari

Babu. According to him the signatures available at the seal of Village

Administrative Officer on the title deeds available in the said loan files are not his signatures and that he did not affix those signatures.

61.PW.56 namely Mr.Rayapati Babu Rao who worked as the Village

Revenue Officer of Anamanamuru and Thammavaram villages,

Koresapadu Mandal from 2.6.2008 to 23.5.2013 also deposed as deposed by PW.55 but relating to the photos and the persons whose names are mentioned in the title deeds available in the loan files marked as Exs.P147, P151, P153, P171, P185 and P197 and according to him no persons whose names are mentioned in those title deeds were residing in the respective villages and that the signatures available on those title deeds at the seal of Village Revenue Officer are not his signatures and he did not affix those signatures.

62.PW.57 namely Mr.Nune Ujwala Prasanna Kumar who worked as

Panchayat Secretary of Anamanamuru Grampanchayat of Koresapadu

Mandal has deposed that the signatures available on the nativity certificates which are available in the files of SB accounts marked as

Exs.P148, P154, P172, P186 and P198 are not his signatures and he did not put those signatures and he did not affix the seals available in those documents. According to him the Government by issuing a

G.O.Ms.No.199 Dt.18.5.2007 has discontinued the powers of

Grampanchayat Secretaries to issue nativity certificates.

35C.C.06/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

63.PW.58 namely Mr.Neppala Subbarayudu a resident of

Maddiralapadu village has deposed that his father namely Mr.Neppala

Venkaiah died on 27.5.2003 owning lands an extent of 8.00Acrs in that village and after his death PW.58 and his brother Mr.Neppala Hari babu have been possessing and enjoying those lands and that they had no other lands. According to him the photos available in the documents marked as Exs.P167 and P168 belong to his father but the name and address mentioned in those documents are not relating to his father and that the title deed available in the loan file does not belong to their father and the lands mentioned in that title deed are not related to his father and that his father never obtained any crop loan from Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala Branch.

64.PW.59 namely Mr.Kancharla John Babu a native of Koresapadu village has deposed that his father is Mr.Anjaiah and not

Mr.Chenchayya and that he(PW.59) was never called as Mr.Pinnaka

Babu Rao. According to him the photo available in the documents marked as Ex.P193 and Ex.P194 belong to him but the name and address mentioned therein do not belong to him and the title deed available in the loan file under Ex.P.193 does not belong to him and that he never availed any crop loan in Andhra Bank of Ravinuthala branch and that he does not know Mr.Pinnaka Ramaiah.

65.PW.60 namely Mr.Kondru Dharma Rao who worked as Village

Revenue Assistant in Ravinuthala village of Koresapadu Mandal for about 9 years prior to his examination on 20.10.2017 has deposed that the person whose photos are available in the documents marked as 36C.C.06/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P145 and Ex.P146 is not related to Ravinuthala Village and that no person with the name of Mrs.Muvva Ratna Kumar is residing in

Ravinuthala village.

66. PW.61 namely Mr.Vijaya Shankar Pasumarthi is a Handwriting

Expert who worked in the Government Examiner of Questioned

Documents Laboratory, Hyderabad. According to him this case was allotted to him by the Director, CFSL, Hyderabad in which the documents like title deed pass books, loan applications and specimen signatures of some persons were received and he has carefully and scientifically compared the general writing habits and individual writing characteristics between the supplied standard signatures/writings with the disputed signatures/writings as per the questionnaire and gave his opinion which is marked as Ex.P.233. Through him the specimen writings of Mr.Linga Ammaiah(A2) were marked as Ex.P234 and that his clear opinion is that the specimen signatures of PW.42 were not tallied with her questioned signatures and so the questioned signatures were not signed by her. His further clear opinion is that A2 had written the questioned handwritings.

67.PW.62 namely Mr.S.P.Rama Rao is the investigation officer of this case. He has deposed about registration of this case and issuing the

FIR copy of which was marked as Ex.P.235. He also deposed about his examination of the witnesses and recording their statements and also collection of the relevant documents and about his filing the charge sheet. Through him Exs.P236 to Ex.P276 documents were marked.

68.The learned public prosecutor has submitted mainly that A1 being the Manager was duty bound to verify the S.B accounts opened 37C.C.06/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP properly and scrutinize the loan applications properly before sanctioning and disbursing the loans. But in this case A1 in collusion with others had opened the accounts without introducers and proper identification of the borrowers and knowing fully well had sanctioned the loans basing on forged and fabricated documents by entering into the criminal conspiracy with others and he gained pecuniary advantage not only to himself but also extended the same to others by cheating the bank by fabricating false documents and using the forged and fabricated documents as genuine documents and that by adducing oral and documentary evidence which are believable the prosecution side could prove the guilt of A1 for all the offences, for which charges were framed against him beyond reasonable doubt and that he is liable for punishment of all those offences.

69.Regarding the objection raised by the accused for admitting some electronic documents into evidence without the certificate under

Section 65-B(4) of the Indian Evidence Act, the learned public prosecutor has contended that the electronic documents which were adduced into evidence were secured by the bank officers who handed over the same to the investigation officer of this case and they were not secured from any person who was in possession of the device and the certificate under Section 65-B(4) of the Indian Evidence Act is not necessary in this case and even in the interest of justice, this Court has got power to relax the requirement of that certificate in this particular case. In support of her contention in this regard the learned public prosecutor has relied upon a decision in SHAFHI

MOHAMMAD Vs. THE STATE OF HIMACHALRADESH in Special

38C.C.06/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

Leave Petition (CRL.).No.2302 of 2017 of the Hon’ble SUPREME

COURT OF INDIA. In this decision it has been observed as follows:

“Thus, requirement of certificate under Section 65B(h) is not always mandatory. Accordingly, we clarify the legal position on the subject on the admissibility of the electronic evidence, especially by a party who is not in possession of device from which the document is produced. Such party cannot be required to produce certificate under Section 65B(4) of the Evidence Act. The applicability of requirement of certificate being procedural can be relaxed by Court wherever interest of justice so justifies”.

There is no dispute with regard to the preposition laid down in the cited decision.

70.On the other hand, the learned counsel for A1 has submitted mainly that A1 had no knowledge that the passbooks and the certificates produced by the borrowers were fake or not genuine and that by believing that those documents are genuine and as per the recommendations made by the staff working in the bank he had sanctioned and disbursed the loans and disbursed the proceeds to the respective savings bank accounts of the borrowers who had withdrawn the amounts from their respective accounts and he did not get any pecuniary advantage in those loan transactions and that there was neither conspiracy nor collusion on his part with anybody and that the evidence adduced by the prosecution side against him is neither believable nor sufficient to prove the allegations made and charges framed against him and the prosecution side has failed to prove the 39C.C.06/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP guilt of A1 for any of the charges that were framed against him beyond reasonable doubt and that he is entitled for acquittal.

71.His further contention is that according to Section 6 of A.P. Right in Land and Pattadhar Passbooks Act, 1971 the entries in the passbooks shall be presumed to be true and so nothing can be attributed against A1 in his believing those documents. According to him the prosecution side has not specifically stated which is the clause i.e., applicable against A1 out of the three clauses mentioned under

Section 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. He further contends that for prosecuting A1 because he was a public servant during the time of alleged offences, sanction under Section 197 of the

Code of Criminal Procedure is required but the prosecution side has not obtained any sanction for prosecuting him under that provision.

He submitted that A1 is entitled for acquittal for all the offences since the prosecution side has failed to prove those charges beyond reasonable doubt.

72.In support of his contention in this regard, the learned counsel for A1 has relied upon a decision in P.Nagendra Kumar and Others

v. State, Central Bureau of Investigation, rep. by its Public

Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad reported in 2011(2)

ALT (Crl.)113(A.P). In this decision in Para-6 it has been observed that when once the proceeds are credited to the account of the customer, then the amount ceased to have identify of the proceeds of the discounted cheque and the amount becomes property of the said customer in whose account the amount was credited.

40C.C.06/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

73.Regarding the protection under Section 197 of the Code of

Criminal Procedure, the learned counsel for A1 has relied upon a decision in State of Punjab Vs. Labh Singh reported in (2015) 3

Supreme Court Cases (Cri) 601. In this decision in Para-10 it has been observed that unlike Section 19 of the Prevention of Corruption

Act, protection under Section 197 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is available to the public servant concerned even after retirement. So the submission of learned counsel for A1 is that in this regard is that inspite of A1 was not in service by the time of taking cognizance of the alleged offences in this case the sanction under Section 19 of the

Code of Criminal Procedure is necessary.

74.In reply to the said contentions of the learned counsel A1 regarding the sanction under Section 197 Cr.P.C., the learned Public

Prosecutor has referred a decision in Punjab State Warehousing

Corporation vs. Bhushan Chander and Another of the Hon’ble

Supreme Court of India dated 29.06.2016 in Criminal Appeal

No.159/2016 in which at Para-22 it has been observed by referring several decisions of the Hon’ble Apex Court on the subject that a survey of the precedents makes it absolutely clear that there has to be reasonable connection between the omission or commission and the discharge of official duty or the act committed was under the colour of the office held by the official and that if the acts omission or commission is totally alien to the discharge of the official duty, question of invoking Section 197 Cr.P.C does not arise.

41C.C.06/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

75.In N.K.Ganuguly Vs. CBI New Delhi the Hon’ble Supreme

Court of Indian in its Judgment dated 19.11.2015 in Criminal

Appeal No.798/2015 at Page 50 it has been observed that the offence of cheating under Section 420 or for that matter the offences relatable to Sections 467, 468, 471 and 120-B can by no stretch of imagination by their very nature be regarded as having been committed by any public servant while acting or purporting to act in discharge of official duty and that in such cases, the official status only provides an opportunity for commission of the offence.

76.The learned counsel for A1 has relied upon a decision in

A.Sivaprakash v. State of Kerala in 2016(2) ALT (Crl.) 341 of

the Hon’ble Supreme Court, regarding the burden of the prosecution to prove the mandatory ingredients of the alleged offences under Section 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act. In this regard in Para-18 it has been observed that it was the obligation of the prosecution to satisfy the mandatory ingredients which could implicate the accused under the provisions of Section 13(1)(d) of the

Prevention of Corruption Act.

77.The learned counsel for A2 has contended that except the evidence of handwriting expert which is a very weak piece of evidence and not substantial evidence, there is no evidence against A2 in this case and that the prosecution side has not examined the mediator in whose presence the specimen handwriting of A2 was obtained and that the evidence of investigation officer alone is not sufficient to prove that the specimen writing compared by the expert with the disputed 42C.C.06/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP writings were obtained from A2 and that the evidence of handwriting expert is neither believable nor sufficient to prove the charges that were framed against A2 and that the prosecution has failed to prove the same beyond reasonable doubt.

78.The learned counsel for A2 has relied upon a decision in

Sukhvinder Singh & Ors. Vs. State of Punjab reported in 1994

(2) Crimes(SC) 904. In this decision in Paras-18 and 19 it has been observed as follows :

“Para-18 : The second paragraph of Section 73 enables the court to direct any person present before it to give his specimen writing "for the purpose of enabling the court to compare" such writings with writings alleged to have been written by such person. The obvious implication of the words "for the purpose of enabling the court to compare" is that there is some proceeding pending before the court in which or as a consequence of which it is necessary for the court to compare such writings. The direction is therefore required to be given for the purpose of "enabling the court to compare" and not for the purpose of enabling an investigating or a prosecuting agency to obtain and produce as evidence in the case the specimen writings for their ultimate comparison with the disputed writings. Where the case is still under investigation and no proceeding are pending in any court in which it might be necessary to compare the two writings, the person (accused) cannot be compelled to give his specimen writings, The language of Section 73 does not permit any court to give a direction to an accused to give his specimen writing for comparison in a proceeding which may subsequently be instituted in some other competent court. Section 73 of the Evidence Act in our opinion cannot be made use of for collecting specimen writings during the investigation and recourse to it can be had only when the enquiry or the trial court before which proceedings are pending requires the writing for the purpose of enabling it to compare the same. A court holding an enquiry under the code of Criminal Procedure is indeed entitled under 43C.C.06/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

Section 73 of the Evidence Act to direct an accused person appearing before it to give his specimen handwriting to enable the court by which he may be subsequently tried to compare it with the disputed writings. Therefore, in our opinion the court which can issue a direction to the person to give his specimen writing can either by the court holding the enquiry under the Code of Criminal Procedure or the court trying the accused person with a view to enable it to compare the specimen writings with the writings alleged to have been written by such a person, A court which is not holding an enquiry under the Code of Criminal Procedure or conducting the trial is not permitted, on the plain language of Section 73 of the Evidence Act, to issue any direction of the nature contained in the second paragraph of Section 73 of the Evidence Act. The words "any person present in the court" in Section 73 has a reference only to such person who are parties to a cause pending before the court and in a given case may even include the witnesses in the said cause but where there is no cause pending before the court for its determination, the question of obtaining for the purposes of comparison of the handwriting of a person may not arise at all and therefore, the provisions of Section 73 of the Evidence Act would have no application”.

“Para-19: The specimen writings in the instant case of appellant Sukhdev Paul were taken under the directions of Sh. S.P. Garg, Tehsildar executive Magistrate, PW 13. No enquiry or trial was admittedly pending in the court of the Tehsildar Executive

Magistrate. The enquiry and trial in this case were pending

under TADA before the Designated Court only. The direction given by the Tehsildar Executive Magistrate Sh. S.P. Garg to the appellant Sukhdev Paul to give his specimen writing was clearly unwarranted and not contemplated or envisaged by Section 73 of the Evidence Act. The prosecution has not disclosed as to at what stage of investigation or enquiry or trial was Sukhdev Paul appellant produced before the Executive Magistrate PW13 to take the specimen writing of the appellant and why the specimen writings were obtained under directions of PW13 and not of the Designated Court. It is a mystry as to how the specimen writings required to be used at the trial against the appellant were directed to be taken by PW13, who was to 44C.C.06/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP enquiring or trying the case. To a specific question during his cross examination, PW13 admitted at the trial, that when he had issued the direction to the appellant there was no document on his file, which could go to show as to under whose orders the appellant had been sent to him for taking his specimen handwriting. The manner in which the specimen writing of Sukhdev Paul was taken is totally objectionable and against the provisions of Section 73 of the Evidence Act. The Executive

Magistrate PW13 appears to have been too obliging and did not

even care to examine the provisions of law before issuing the direction to the appellant. The argument of the learned counsel for the State that since no objection was raised by the appellant when he was called upon to give his specimen handwriting by PW13 therefore he cannot be permitted to make a grievance now is only an argument of despair and the silence of the appellant, who admittedly on that day, was not even represented by an advocate, cannot certainly clothe PW13 with any jurisdiction to issue the directions as envisaged by Section 73 of the Evidence Act. The specimen writing of Sukhdev Paul could not, therefore, be made use of during the Trial and the report of the handwriting expert, when considered in the light of the foregoing discussion, is rendered of no consequence at all and cannot be used against Sukhdev Paul appellant to connect him with the crime”.

79.The learned counsel for A2 has submitted to acquit A2 of all the charges. In support of his contentions the learned counsel for A2 has relied upon a decision in Deputy Chief Controller of Imports

and Exports, Hyderabad Vs. Boddula Malleshara reported in

1997 (1) ALD (Cri) 752. In this decision the observations of the

Hon’ble Supreme Court in the above referred Sukhvinder Singh’s

case were followed, according to which whether the accused objected to or not, if the specimen signature was not taken either in the presence of the Court or by the Court itself, the same would not be admissible.

45C.C.06/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

80.Regarding the evidentiary value of the expert opinion the learned counsel for A2 has relied upon a decision in Shashi Kumar

Banerjee and others reported in AIR 1964 Supreme Court 529.

In this decision it has been observed that the expert’s evidence as to handwriting is opinion evidence and it can rarely, if ever, take the place of substantive evidence and that before acting on such evidence it is usual to see if it is corroborative either by clear direct evidence or by circumstantial evidence.

81.In this regard the learned public prosecutor has relied upon a decision in State through SPE & CBI, AP Vs. M.Krishna Mohan

and another of the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India dated

12.10.2007 in Appeal (crl.) No.1934-1395 of 2004. In this decision in para-11 it has observed as follows:

“ Para-11: When an accused person is called upon by the court or any other authority holding an investigation to give his finger impression or signature or a specimen of his handwriting, he is not giving any testimony of the nature of a "personal testimony". The giving of a "personal testimony" must depend upon his volition. He can make any kind of statement or may refuse to make any statement. But his finger impressions or his handwriting, in spite of efforts at concealing the true nature of it by dissimulation cannot change their intrinsic character. Thus, the giving of finger impressions or of specimen writing or of signatures by an accused person, though it may amount to furnishing evidence in the larger sense, is not included within the expression "to be a witness".

46C.C.06/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

82.In view of the above stated evidence and the contentions of the learned public prosecutor and the learned counsel for the accused and decisions cited supra, now the Point that arises for determination is :

1. Whether the prosecution side is able to establish the guilt of the accused for the charges that were framed against them beyond reasonable doubt?

POINT: The evidence of PW.1 is only useful to the case of prosecution regarding the documents marked as Exs.P1 and Ex.P2. He is the defacto complainant and he gave the report under Ex.P1 to the CBI

Department for conducting investigation of this case. Along with

Ex.P1, he gave the list of alleged fake loans which is marked under

Ex.P2. His other evidence is only his opinion and because he is not an expert his opinion evidence is not relevant to this case. Basing on his oral evidence it cannot be considered that the loan accounts which he listed under Ex.P2 are fraudulent transaction. The documents under

Ex.P1 and Ex.P2 only enabled the complainant department to investigate the case.

83.Coming to the evidence of PW.2 his evidence that the appraising officers who signed in the original process notes and the appraising officers who signed on the process notes sent to the Zonal office are not one and the same is duly corroborated by the documents which were exhibited by him. His further evidence that the correction fluid was used in the original process notes at the column of ‘recommendations and signature’ of the appraising officer by mentioning on the top of the correction fluid recommended for sanction is also corroborated by the original process notes which were 47C.C.06/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP exhibited by him. His further evidence that the assessment forms contain the signature of A1 and A1 had signed on those forms as sanctioning authority in the capacity of branch manager is also corroborated by all the assessment forms which were exhibited by him.

84.The evidence of PW.3 to PW.7 and PW.13 who are all bank officials also duly corroborated by the documents they have exhibited and which were referred in their evidence .

85. The evidence of Pw.9 is only handing over of the loan files to the CBI Department. There is no dispute with regard to the fact that A1 worked as the branch manager of Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch at the relevant time of sanctioning the crop loans which are disputed in this case. A perusal of the loan files connected to this case clearly show the signatures of A1 put therein as the authorized officer. It is not the case of A1 that he neither worked as branch manager in

Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch at the relevant time nor sanctioned the crop loans which are disputed in this case.

86.(PW.8) Mr.M.Venkateswaruluis the successor of A1 in office as the branch manager of Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala Branch. Mr.Sravan

Kumar(PW.10) is the probationer Rural Development Officer in the said bank when A1 worked as the branch manager in that bank.

Mr.K.C.Shiva Kumar(PW.11) was deputed to work in Andhra Bank,

Ravinuthala branch to monitor the agricultural lands. The clear evidence of Mr.Sravan Kumar and Mr.K.C.Shiva Kumar is that A1 having already sanctioned the loans and disbursed the amounts had 48C.C.06/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP asked them to attend the documentation of the loan files and they have dealt with those documents as per the instructions of A1. Being the Rural Development Officer on probation working under A1,

Mr.A.Sravan Kumar might have followed the instructions of A1 without raising any objection. According to him even though he sought for clarification A1 shouted against him, asking him to act according to the instructions of A1 who was responsible for the loan transaction. Even though Mr.K.C.Shiva Kumar was not under obligation to work according to the instructions of A1 but according to him as the loans were already sanctioned and the amount was also disbursed, he could not do anything except to contribute his signatures on the documents as per the instructions of A1. Even though there was opportunity for

Mr.Shiva Kumar and Mr.Sravan Kumar to report against A1 for asking them to deal with the documents after sanctioning the loans they might have not exhibited courage against A1 to report to the superior officer. Simply because they did not report anything against A1 it does not mean that what they have deposed in the evidence is false.

The clear evidence of Mr.Sravan Kumar is that A1 rubbed out the writing of Mr.K.C.Shiva Kumar in the appraisal form and process notes with correction fluid and that he wrote on the place where correction fluid was used, as ‘recommended for sanction’ at the instructions of

A1. The evidence of Mr.Sravan Kumar(PW.10) shows that he was removed from service, after conducting a departmental enquiry for the acts he committed regarding the loan files, even though according to him his act in this regard was according to the instructions given by A1.

The evidence of Mr.Sravan Kumar duly corroborated the evidence of

PW.2 regarding the difference of the officers who signed on the original 49C.C.06/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP process notes and sanctioned letter and the copies of process notes and the sanctioned letters.

87.Coming to the evidence of Mr.Y.Ravendranath(PW.12), it is not in dispute that he worked as the Assistant Manager in Andhra Bank,

Ravinuthala branch when A1 worked as the branch manager of that bank during the time of sanctioning the crop loans connected to this case. His evidence duly corroborates the evidence of Mr.Sravan Kumar and Mr.Shiva Kumar regarding their attending to the documentation of the crop loans as per the instructions of A1. His evidence further shows that A1 and the sub manager of that bank namely

Mr.Ch.Venkateswara Rao who died and no more even worked in the bank beyond banking hours and that even Mr.Sravan Kumar was forced to work in the bank beyond bank hours at their instance and that the borrowers of the crop loans were visiting the bank during evening hours beyond the bank hours.

88.The evidence of Mr.Sk.Abdul Pyaru(PW.13) also corroborates the evidence of Mr.Ravindranath to the effect that A1 worked in the bank even in the evening. His further evidence shows that he gave the cash which is the loan proceeds of some loans to A1 at the instructions of the sub manager namely Mr.Venkteswara Rao. His further evidence shows that a borrower asked him to pay cash regarding five tokens connected to the loans but he refused to pay the amount and then A1 took the amount regarding those five tokens.

50C.C.06/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

89.The main contention of the prosecution side is that the passbooks, nativity certificates and the letters addressed by bank manager to the MRO and the endorsements of the MRO on that letters and the other revenue records and also the no objection certificate issued by different banks have been fabricated in this case.

The evidence of Mrs.Y.Subba lakshmi(PW.42) who worked as MRO of

Korisapadu is very clear that she neither issued the passbooks nor gave endorsements on the letters said to have been addressed by the bank manager which are available in the loans files.

90.The evidence of Mr.P.Krishna Murthy(PW.14) who conducted enquiry about the entries in the relevant passbooks and compared them with the relevant entries available in the official revenue records, the copies of which were supplied to him is very clear that the entries in the passbooks available in the loan files are not correct and that those passbooks are fake documents. The report he prepared duly corroborates his evidence in this regard. The original revenue records which are (1A) and (1B) Registers which are exhibited in this case also duly corroborate his evidence.

91.Mr.K.Srinivasa Rao(PW.15) a revenue officer who conducted enquiry comparing the entries in the relevant passbooks which are available in the loan files with the entries mentioned in the official revenue records, the copies of which were supplied to him has given his opinion that the entries in those passbooks are not correct and that those passbooks are fake documents. The report he prepared duly corroborates his evidence in this regard. The original revenue records 51C.C.06/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP which are (1A) and (1B) Registers which are exhibited in this case also duly corroborate his evidence.

92.Mr.Ch.Ramesh(PW.16) had explained the procedure of issuing pattadhar and title deed passbooks. The report he prepared duly corroborates his evidence in this regard. The original revenue records which are (1A) and (1B) Registers which are exhibited in this case also duly corroborate his evidence.

93.Mr.K.RaviKumar(PW.17),Mr.B.R.VaraPrasad(PW.18),

Mr.R.VasudevaRao(Pw.19),Mr.R.V.Seshayya(PW.20)and

Mrs.G.Sujatha(PW.21),Mrs.A.Muthyalamma(PW.45),Mrs.N.GAnga

BhavaniDevi(PW.46),Mr.B.Srinivasulu(PW.47),Mr.N.Venkata

Suryanarayana(PW.48), Mrs.B.Srilakshmi(PW.49), Mr.G.Kodandaram (PW.50), Mr.Ch.Rajachandra Sekhar(PW.51), Mr.P.Venkataramaiah (PW.55), Mr.R.Babu Rao(PW.56), Mr.N.Ujwala Prasanna Kumar (PW.57) and Mr.K.Dharma Rao have categorically deposed that the documents which were alleged to have been issued by the revenue authorities available in the loan files are not containing the signatures of the revenue officers who worked at the relevant times and that the signatures available on those documents said to have been belonging to the revenue officials do not belong to those revenue officials who worked at the relevant times.

94.The evidence of Mr.M.Anjaneulu(PW.32), Mr.M.V.Narayana (PW.33), Mr.Y.V.Subba Rao(PW.34), Mr.Y.Bhaskara Rao(PW.35), 52C.C.06/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

Mr.Y.V.Chennaiah(PW.36),Mr.P.Lazer(PW.38)Mr.Ruber(Pw.39),

Mr.P.Solmon (PW.40) and P.Yesu (PW.41)also shows that the passbooks and other revenue documents including nativity certificates available in the loan files do not contain the signatures of the respective officials who worked at the relevant times and that the signatures available on those documents are not the signatures of those officials who worked at the relevant times.

95.Concerning the no dues certificates available in the loan files

Mr.P.Venu Gopala Rao(PW.22), Mr.A.Raghava Reddy(PW.24),

Mr.B.Anjaiah(PW.25), Mr.Ch.Venkateswarulu,(PW.26) Mr.K.Narayana (PW.27) , Mr.K.Sanjeeva Rao(PW.28), Mr.G.Ravindra Babu(PW.29) have categorically denied their signatures said to have been available on the no dues certificates available in the loan files. According to them they did not issue such no dues certificates. Even they have denied the seals as belonging to their respective banks which are available on the said no dues certificates. All these witnesses are bank employees and they have no motive to speak falsely either in favour of prosecution case or against the accused after taking oath before this

Court. If really they made endorsements on those no dues certificates and put their signatures and seals on those certificates, there was no necessity for them to deny those signatures which are available on the certificates as belonging to them. Taking into consideration their evidence it can be safely concluded that the no dues certificates available in the loan files were not issued by them and that they are fake documents.

53C.C.06/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

96.The evidence of K.Gopalakrishna Murthy(PW.41) shows that he conducted an enquiry regarding the crop loans connected to this case and found that some crop loans were sanctioned on fake documents and he gave report accordingly. His report duly corroborates his evidence in this regard. His clear evidence is that the savings bank accounts relating to the crop loans of this case were not opened in accordance with KYC norms . The same is evident from his report.

97.The learned counsel for the accused have contended that the prosecution side has not exhibited either the voters list or the ration cards to show that the borrowers are not relating to the villages which were mentioned in their respective loan files. But this contention cannot be accepted because if a person belongs to a particular village for proving that the said person belongs to that village his voters identity card or ration card can be exhibited positively. But for producing negative evidence it is difficult to produce documentary evidence. When there is direct evidence from the villagers and revenue officials who are examined as witnesses that the alleged borrowers are not residents of the villages which are mentioned in their respective loan files, their evidence can be taken into consideration for proving that those borrowers do not relate to the villages, the names of which were mentioned in the respective loan files.

98. The allegation in this case is that A1 without following the KYC norms had opened the SB accounts of the borrowers. As could be seen from the loan files exhibited in this case except a nativity 54C.C.06/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP certificate which is alleged to have been a fabricated document, there is no other document to prove that the borrower is a resident of the relevant village. Neither the voters identity card nor the ration card nor any other document to show that the borrower belongs to a particular village was taken for opening the savings bank account.

Concerning the nativity certificate available in the file, the evidence of revenue officials and panchayat secretaries is available to show that they are not genuine documents. The evidence on record is very clear that those nativity certificates have been fabricated only for the sake of opening SB accounts in the names of the borrowers.

99. The other contention of the learned counsel for A1 is that it is not the duty of A1 to open the SB accounts and other staff working in the bank have to attend that work. Even though the other staff working in the bank were entrusted with attending the opening of savings bank account but being the Manager of Andhra Bank,

Ravinuthala Branch, A1 was the authorized officer to open the accounts. The duty of the other staff was only to scrutinize the documentation regarding the same. In this case the allegation is that

Mr.Ch.Venkateswra Rao who worked in that branch also colluded with

A1 in the alleged loan transactions. Because he died, he has not been prosecuted in this case. So irrespective of whether there was any role played by the other staff members in opening the SB account without following the KYC norms but A1 cannot avoid his liability of opening those accounts without following the KYC norms, because ultimately after his scrutiny only, the SB accounts would be opened.

So certainly there was role played by A1 in opening the SB accounts 55C.C.06/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP without following the KYC norms in the names of borrowers. If A1 was diligent and had no criminal intention, certainly he would have insisted for production of any document regarding identity proof of borrowers without merely depending upon the nativity certificates which are fabricated documents.

100. The learned counsel for A1 has contended referring the evidence recorded in the cross examination of Mr.A.Sravan

Kumar(PW.10), Mr.K.C.Shiva Kumar(PW.11), Y.Ravendranath(PW.12) and

Mr.Sk.Abdul Pyaru(PW.13) wherein they have stated that the loan proceeds were disbursed to the borrowers on proper identification and presentation of the respective tokens has contended that A1 had not taken any amount and so he did not gain any pecuniary advantage in this case. But those witnesses have deposed the manner in which the loan proceeds need to be disbursed. But in this case there is no specific evidence to show that all the borrowers had personally took the loan amounts by attending the bank. The evidence also shows that in respect of some loan transactions the amount was paid to A1. Taking into consideration the evidence on record it appears that even though the documents were prepared properly as if the loan proceeds were paid to the respective borrowers but in fact it was not done properly. Whether there was collusion for A1 with other staff members including Mr.A.Sravan Kumar(PW.10), Mr.K.C.Shiva

Kumar(PW.11), Y.Ravendranath(PW.12) and late Mr.Ch.Venkatesawrulu or not, but certainly A1 had played major role in the alleged loan transactions. It appears that fortunately because nobody stated anything against other staff members except A1 and 56C.C.06/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

Mr.Ch.Venkateswarulu, those other staff members have not been prosecuted in this case. The evidence on record is very clear that A1 had played major role in fabrication of documentation in the alleged loan transactions.

101. There is evidence of even postal officials to show that the postal covers which were addressed to the borrowers were returned unserved as they were not residing in the respective villages. Even the postal officials are independent witnesses and they have no motive to speak falsely either in favour of prosecution side or against the accused. Their evidence is corroborated duly by the relevant documentary evidence.

102. The evidence of Mr.M.Venkateswarulu(PW.8) who is the successor of A1 clearly shows that A1 had handed over the loan files to him stating that all the loan transactions and the documents available in the loan files are genuine transactions and documents and that A1 got verified the passbooks through the revenue officials and got confirmed that they are genuine documents

103. The evidence of Mrs.Y.Subbalakshmi(PW.42) the then MRO of

Korisapadu and other revenue officials clearly shows that the title deeds and passbooks available in the loan files are fake documents.

The letter addressed by A1 to the MRO of Korisapadu which is available in the loan file contains an endorsement of the MRO which is alleged to be containing the signature and seal of

Mrs.Y.Subbalakshmi but she denied the same. The opinion of the 57C.C.06/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP expert also is available to the effect that the signature appearing on this letter does not belong to Mrs.Y.Subbalakshmi. The expert also gave evidence to that effect. In the cross examination when a suggestion was put to her that the signatures available on those letters belong to her, she has denied the same. It is a letter exclusively addressed by A1 to the MRO of Korisapadu and so A1 cannot plead ignorance on that letter. Mrs.Y.Subbalakshmi is a Government servant and an independent witness. She has no motive to speak falsely either in favour of the case of prosecution or against the accused. If really she gave that endorsement by signing and affixing her seal, there was no necessity for her to deny the same. I find no reason to disbelieve her evidence in this regard. Her evidence clearly proves that the endorsement in the form of acknowledgment available on that letter does not belong to her. So with her evidence which appears to me as believable, it is proved that the said letter is a fabricated document. Except for A1 there was no necessity for any other person to fabricate that letter. A perusal of that letter shows that it was exclusively dealt by A1. So the criminal intention on the part of A1 not only in fabricating the loan documents but also in the loan transactions can be easily understood.

104. Irrespective of whether the alleged borrowers were fictitious persons or not, but certainly there was fabrication of documents in the loan transactions connected to this case. Particularly the title deed passbook or pattadhar passbook whichever is available in the loan file and the nativity certificate and the no dues certificates the said letter addressed by A1 to Mrs.Y.Subbalakshmi(PW.42) and other revenue 58C.C.06/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP records available in the loan file were fabricated for the purpose of alleged loan transactions. Because Mr.Ch.Venkateswarulu who worked in that bank died and no more and other staff members of that bank have not been prosecuted in this case, A1 is not entitled to be let of from this case. He is liable for fabrication of documents and using the fabricated and forged documents as genuine documents and also cheating the bank in collusion with other persons, for the best reasons known to him. There is ample evidence of the bank officials, revenue officials, postal authorities and also the villagers which is duly corroborated by ample documentary evidence to prove the involvement of A1 in the alleged loan transactions.

105. The other contention of the learned counsel for A1 is that it is not necessary for A1 to cross verify the documents produced by the borrowers to know whether they are genuine documents or not. So far as the title deed passbook or pattadhar passbook is concerned, the learned counsel for A1 relies on Section 6 of A.P Right in Land and

Pattadhar Passbooks Act, 1971. There is no dispute regarding the fact that A1 does not need to cross verify the documents produced by the borrowers unless he personally entertains any doubt. Even if the title deed passbook or pattadhar passbook is not genuine because there is no direct evidence to show that A1 has fabricated the same nothing can be attributed against him in this regard. But regarding the letters addressed by him to the MRO Korisapadu, as I have already stated the endorsement obtained on that letter has been fabricated which is within the exclusive knowledge of A1. The SB accounts were opened clearly without following the KYC norms at least insisting for any 59C.C.06/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP introducer. So even though A1 was under no obligation to cross verify the documents produced by the borrower and can rely upon the presumption under Section 6 of the said Act but he cannot avoid his liability in the loan transactions for not following the KYC norms in opening the SB accounts and for fabrication of the said letter and the acknowledgment thereon alleged to have been given by

Mrs.Y.Subbalakshmi. Even basing on the evidence of other bank employees regarding ‘no dues certificates’ it can be considered in this case that even the ‘no dues certificates’ have been fabricated by forgery which must be to the knowledge of A1. So irrespective of whether A1 knows about the fabrication of title deed passbook/pattadhar passbook and other revenue records including the nativity certificates, as already stated he must be held responsible for fabrication of the said letter and not following the KYC norms in opening the SB accounts. So far as the statement of accounts which are computer generated sheets relying upon the observations in

Shafhi Mohammad case cited supra, those documents can be taken into consideration as admissible in evidence not only because they were secured from a person who is not in possession of the device or the person who was dealing with the system but also by dispensing with the certificate required under Section 65(B) of the Indian

Evidence Act.

106. There is no dispute with regard to the observations made in the decisions cited supra, so far as the sanction under Section 197 Cr.P.C is concerned. It is required only if the act alleged against the public servant is a part of the discharge of his official duty. In the present 60C.C.06/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP case charges framed against A1 are under Section 120-B, 420, 468 and 471 IPC. Even though sanctioning loan and disbursement of the loan amount to the borrower is a part of discharge of the official duty of A1, but the allegations made in this case against him are that A1 in conspiracy with others had fabricated documents by forgery and in criminal conspiracy with others had committed the offence of cheating by using those documents as genuine documents. So fabrication of documents by forgery and entering into the criminal conspiracy with others and cheating the bank do not form part of discharge of official duties of A1. So the protection under Section 197 of the Code of

Criminal Procedure which is meant to safe guard or protect the public servant from vexatious prosecution, in the facts and circumstances of this case is not available to A1 and so the sanction required under that provision is not necessary for prosecution of A1 in this case for the alleged offences. So far as the offence under Section 13(2) r/w 13(1)

(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, the sanction as required under Section 19 of that Act is not necessary in this case because by the date of taking cognizance of the alleged offences A1 was not in service.

107. Coming to framing of charges under Section 13(2) r/w 13(1)(d) of the said Act it was clearly alleged in the charge sheet that A1 had committed gross criminal misconduct in sanctioning the loans connected to this case by abusing his possession as a public servant holding the office as the Manager of Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch by cheating and adopting illegal means and the offence under Section 13 of the said Act is nothing but criminal misconduct by a public 61C.C.06/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP servant. So the allegations leveled against A1 covered all the three clauses of Section 13(1)(d) of that provision. The charge framed against A1 under that provision includes all the three clauses. So even if it is not specifically mentioned in the charge under which clause out of the three clauses of that provision, the act alleged against A1 falls under, it cannot said that the charge is defective. So far as the burden of proving the charge is concerned certainly it entirely lies on the prosecution side as contended by the learned counsel for A1.

108. There are neither contradictions nor major omissions amounting to contradictions proved in this case. Ex.D1 to D3 are relating to the residence of six persons namely Mrs.A.Sumithra, Mr.T.Venkateswarlu,

Mr.Ravi Samrajyam, Mrs.P.Amareswari, Mrs.P.Sujatha and Mr.Oruganti

Basavaiah. According to Mr.P.Ruben(PW.38), Mr.P.Solmon (PW.39) and

Mr.P.Yesu(PW.40) they have not stated that those six persons are residents of Pamidipadu village but in the 161 Cr.P.C of those witnesses it is there that they have stated that those six persons are residents of Pamidipadu village. Ex.D1 was marked in the evidence of

Mr.P.Ruben, Ex.D2 was marked in the evidence of Mr.P.Solman and

Ex.D3 was marked in the evidence of Mr.P.Yesu regarding the said fact. But these contradictions marked as Ex.D1 to Ex.D3 are not material to this case because those six persons are not parties to this case and even their loan files are not exhibited in this case. So, for this reason it is not necessity to take into consideration the contradictions marked as Ex.D1 to Ex.D3 in this case.

62C.C.06/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

109. Even Though it is contended by the prosecution side that the borrowers in this case are non-existing persons but in order to prove the charges that are framed against the accused. It is not necessary to prove in this case that the borrowers are non-existing persons.

Even if the borrowers were existing and took the loan proceeds still

A1 is liable for the alleged offences because there was fabrication of documents by forgery and using them as genuine documents and thereby cheating the bank either to get benefit for himself or to extend the benefits to the borrowers or others by A1.

110. Concerning A2 the only evidence available on record is of the hand writing expert apart from the investigation Officer. The prosecution side has not obtained the admitted hand writings of A2.

The prosecution side has not exhibited any document containing the admitted hand writing of A2. The hand writing expert had admittedly given his opinion by comparing the alleged disputed hand writing of A2 with the alleged specimen hand writing of A2. A2 had denied in the cross examination of the investigation officer about obtaining the alleged specimen hand writing from A2. So now even the alleged specimen hand writing of A2 became disputed hand writing. The prosecution side has to prove that even the alleged specimen hand writing of A2 is in fact the hand writing of A2 because disputed hand writing cannot be compared with other disputed writing. Even if any opinion is given by any expert by comparison of disputed hand writing with other disputed hand writing, it cannot be considered. In order to prove that the alleged specimen hand writing was obtained from A2, there is no evidence at all on record. The Investigation officer has 63C.C.06/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP clearly stated that she did not obtain the specimen writings of A2.

Even the mediator in whose presence the alleged specimen hand writing of A2 was obtained is not examined in this case. The prosecution side has not explained as to why the said mediator was not examined. Even if the alleged specimen hand writing of A2 was obtained by the Investigation Officer in view of the decision cited supra in Deputy Chief Controller of Import and Exports which has been relied up on by the learned counsel for A2, the same is not admissible and the opinion given by the expert basing on the same cannot be accepted.

111. Even otherwise unlike examination of thumb impressions, examination of hand writing is not exact science. The evidence of expert as to hand writing is only opinion evidence and it is not substantive evidence as laid down in Shashikumar Banerjee and

Others case which is cited supra relied upon by the learned counsel for A2. So it is not safe and desirable to solely rely upon the evidence of hand writing expert for any finding. Moreover since in this case the opinion of the hand writing expert was not given basing on admitted writing and even the alleged specimen writing basing on which the expert gave opinion, is not proved as has been obtained from A2 no reliance can be placed on the opinion of the hand writing expert given in this case. For the same reason even this court cannot invoke the provision under sec.73 of the Indian Evidence Act of taking the burden of comparison of the disputed writings with the alleged specimen hand writings of A2 available on record. So if the opinion of the Handwriting 64C.C.06/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP expert is removed from consideration A2 cannot be found guilty of any of the offences alleged against him.

112. Majority of the witnesses are official witnesses of different banks,

Revenue Department and Postal Department and those witnesses and the private witnesses who have been examined in this case, as I have already stated, are independent witnesses and they have no motive at all to give false evidence either in favour of prosecution or against the accused and even the documents relied upon by the prosecution side are public documents maintained in day to day official transactions.

The documentary evidence adduced by the prosecution side duly corroborates the oral evidence which is available on record. I find no reason to disbelieve or discredit such evidence and the same is believable, trustworthy, cogent and clinching. So I believe the same.

113. The learned counsel for A1 has raised some other contentions regarding appreciation of evidence which have been mentioned in his written arguments which became part of the record but in view of my above discussion I hold that they are neither material to this case nor do they go to the root of the case of prosecution. They do not in any way influence the result of the case. So this court opines that it is not necessary to discuss about them.

114. Considering the charge under sec.13 (1) (d) r/w sec.13 (2) of the

Prevention of Corruption Act 1988 it is not necessary that A1 should get any pecuniary advantage for himself out of the alleged fraud transaction in this case. Even if the pecuniary advantage was extended 65C.C.06/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP to any other person including the borrowers by his official discharge of duties while holding the public office in the capacity of Branch Manager of Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala Branch by corrupt or illegal means by abusing his position as such public servant A1 is liable for punishment for the said charge under that provision of law. So by sanctioning the loan and disbursing the loan amount to the borrowers in this case based on forged and fabricated documents and using them as genuine documents in criminal conspiracy with the borrowers and thereby cheating the said Bank to part with the loan amount A1 had obtained pecuniary advantage as such public servant while holding the office of branch manager of that Bank by abusing his position as such public servant by corrupt or illegal means and thereby A1 is liable for punishment of the offence under sec.13 (1) (d) r/w sec.13(2) of the said Act.

115. There are neither contradictions nor major omissions proved in this case. Even though there are some discrepancies and variations and inconsistencies in the evidence, they are minor in nature and not material and they do not go to the root of case of prosecution, making the same as not believable. Considering the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and the evidence on record both oral and documentary I have no hesitation to believe the evidence adduced by the prosecution side and to consider the case of prosecution positively to hold that the prosecution side is able to establish the guilt of the accused for all the offenses for which charges were framed against them beyond reasonable doubt.

66C.C.06/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

116. From the above discussion, I hold on the point that the prosecution side is able to establish the guilt of the accused No.1 for all the charges that were framed against them beyond reasonable doubt and that the accused No.1 is liable for punishment according to law for all those offences. A2 is found not guilty of any of the offences and so he is entitled for acquittal of all the offences for which charges were framed against him.

In the result, the Accused No.1 is found guilty of the offences under Sections 120-B IPC, 420 IPC, 471 r/w 468 IPC and under Section 13(1) (d) r/w 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and he is convicted under Section 428 (2) Cr.P.C. for the said four offences.

Accused No.2 is found not guilty of the offences under Sections 120-B IPC, 420 IPC, 471 r/w 468 IPC and he is acquitted under Section 248(1) Cr.P.C. for the said offences. His bail bonds shall stands cancelled after expiry of appeal time. Accused No.2 is directed to execute bail bonds as required u/Sec.437 A Cr.P.C.

PRINCIPAL SPL. JUDGE FOR C.B.I. CASES,

FAC I Addl. SPL.JUDGE FOR C.B.I CASES,

VISAKHAPATNAM.

At this stage the accused No.1 is questioned about the quantum of sentence that is going to be imposed against him for the offences under Sections 120-B, 420, 471 r/w 468 IPC and under Section 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 which are proved against him for which he stated that he suffers from diabetes, blood 67C.C.06/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP pleasure and nervous weakness and heart ailment and that he lost his wife in the year 2007 and that he has got three daughters out of whom two were married and that his youngest daughter is yet to be married and that he incurred heavy debts for maintenance of his family and that he was dismissed from service in the year 2008 and has been struggling for survival and he pleaded mercy of the Court.

But taking into consideration the nature of offences and the manner in which they were committed in this case, this Court does not incline to extend the benefit of the provisions of the Probation of Offenders Act in his favour. But taking into consideration his statement and the over all facts and circumstances of the case, this Court opines that imposition of Rigorous imprisonment for a period of TWO

YAERS and to pay fine of Rs.2,000/- (Rupees Two thousand

only), in default simple imprisonment for a period of ONE

month for the offence under section 120-B IPC and Rigorous

imprisonment for a period of TWO YEARS and to pay fine of

Rs.2,000/- (Rupees Two thousand only), in default simple

imprisonment for a period of ONE MONTH for the offence

under section 420 IPC and Rigorous imprisonment for a period

of TWO YEARS and to pay fine of Rs.2,000/- (Rupees Two

thousand only), in default simple imprisonment for a period of

ONE month for the offence under section 471 r/w 468 IPC

and Rigorous imprisonment for a period of TWO YEARS and to

pay fine of Rs.2,000/- (Rupees Two thousand only), in default

simple imprisonment for a period of ONE month for the

offence under section 13 (1)(d) r/w 13(2) of the Prevention of

Corruption Act, 1988 is just and proper in this case. Accordingly A1 68C.C.06/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP is convicted and the sentences are imposed against him as stated above.

All the sentences of imprisonments imposed against him shall run concurrently. He is entitled for set off the period of remand undergone by him under Section 428 Cr.P.C. It is informed to him that he is entitled to challenge this Judgment in the Appellate Court and also entitled to legal aid according to law. It is ordered to supply a copy of this Judgment to him on free of cost.

Typed to my dictation, corrected and pronounced by me in open Court on this the day 27th day of December, 2019.

PRINCIPAL SPL. JUDGE FOR C.B.I. CASES,

FAC I Addl. SPL.JUDGE FOR C.B.I CASES,

VISAKHAPATNAM.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

LIST OF WITNESSES EXAMINED ON BEHALF OF PROSECUTION.

For Prosecution:

P.W.1 (L.W.1) :Davuluri Venkata Narasimha Rao

P.W.2 (L.W.11):Hejeebu Seshagiri Rao

P.W.3 (L.W.3):Tatineni Hanumantha Rao

P.W.4 (L.W.12):Nalam Harinath

P.W.5 (L.W.13):Kuntamukkala Suryanarayana Murthy

P.W.6 (L.W.10):Padmanabhuni Padma Naga Vara Prasad

P.W.7 (L.W.14):Kidambi Mydhili

P.W.8 (L.W.4):Makkena Venkateswarlu

P.W.9 (L.W.5):Pulicherla Paul Caesar

P.W.10 (L.W.6):Adavani Sravan Kumar

P.W.11 (L.W.7):K.C.Siva Kumar

P.W.12 (L.W.8):Yerragudi Ravindranath

P.W.13 (L.W.9) : Shaik Abdul Pyaru P.W.14 (L.W.16) : Palakaveety Krishna Murthy

P.W.15 (L.W.15): K.Srinivasa Rao 69C.C.06/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

P.W.16 (L.W.17) : Chillara Ramesh

P.W.17 (L.W.18) : Kosanam Ravi Kumar

P.W.18 (L.W.19) : Bhuvanam Ramalinga Vara Prasad

P.W.19 (L.W.20): Ramachandruni Vasudevarao

P.W.20 (L.W.21) : Rachavalla Venkata Sesaiah

P.W.21 (L.W.22) : Gunturu Sujatha

P.W.22 (L.W.27) : P.Venugopala Rao

P.W.23 (L.W.26) : Sareddu Sambasiva Rao

P.W.24 (L.W.28) : A.Raghava Reddy

P.W.25 (L.W.29) : Busurapalli Anjaiah

P.W.26 (L.W.30) : Cherukuri Venkateswarlu

P.W.27 (L.W.31) : Karicheti Narayana

P.W.28 (L.W.32): K.Sanjeeva Rao

P.W.29 (L.W.34) : Giddi Ravindra Babu

P.W.30 (L.W.35) : Marriboyina Anjaneyulu

P.W.31 (L.W.36) : Tammuluri Subbarao

P.W.32 (L.W.41) : Maddineni Anjaneyulu

P.W.33 (L.W.43) : Medikonda Venkata Narayana

P.W.34 (L.W.49) : Yedavalli Venkata Subbarao

P.W.35 (L.W.50) : Yalakapati Bhaskara Rao

P.W.36 (L.W.51) : Yenumula Venkata Chennaiah

P.W.37 (L.W.66) : Pulipati Lazar

P.W.38 (L.W.57) : Palaparthi Ruben

P.W.39 (L.W.67) : Palaparthi Solomon

P.W.40 (L.W.68) : Palaparthi Yesu

P.W.41 (L.W.2) : Kavuri Gopala Krishna Murthy

P.W.42 (L.W.24): Yerramothu Subba Lakshmi

P.W.43 (L.W.33): Chandrapati Radhakrishna murthy

P.W.44 (L.W.38): Telaghathoti Ananda Rao

P.W.45 (L.W.44): Animalla Muthyalamma

P.W.46 (L.W.48): Nakka Ganga Bhavani Devi

P.W.47 (L.W.53): Bijja Srinivasulu

P.W.48 (L.W.54): Naraparaju Venkata Suryanarayana

P.W.49 (L.W.58) : Banala Srilakshmi

P.W.50 (L.W.59) : Garnepudi Kodandaram

P.W.51 (L.W.60) : Chevula Rajachandra Sekhar 70C.C.06/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

P.W.52 (L.W.61) : Nandigama Koteswara Rao

P.W.53 (L.W.64) : Veeragandham Narasimha Rao

P.W.54 (L.W.40) : Aluri Veerabrahmachari

P.W.55 (L.W.45) : Pidugu Venkataramaiah

P.W.56 (L.W.46) : Rayapati Babu Rao

P.W.57 (L.W.47) : Nune Ujwala Prasanna Kumar

P.W.58 (L.W.62) : Neppala Subbarayudu

P.W.59 (L.W.63) : Kancharla John Babu

P.W.60 (L.W.71) : Kondru Dharmarao

P.W.61 (L.W.72) : Vijaya Shankar Pasumarthi

P.W.62 (L.W.73) : S.P.Rama Rao.

LIST OF DOCUMENTS MARKED ON BEHALF OF PROSECUTION.

Ex.P.1:Copy of complaint/report Dt.9.6.2009

Ex.P.2:Copy of List of 153 accounts relating to the fraudulent transactions enclosed to the complaint Ex.P.1

Ex.P.3:Copy of Letter Dt. 17.11.2007 issued by the Zonal Office to the Chief Manager/Manager, Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch.

Ex.P.4:Letter of sanction Dt.4.10.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/172

Ex.P.4-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/172

Ex.P.5:Letter of sanction Dt.4.10.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No. 2007/173

Ex.P.5-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No. 2007/173

Ex.P.6:Letter of sanction Dt.4.10.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No. 2007/174

Ex.P.6-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No. 2007/174

Ex.P.7:Letter of sanction Dt.4.10.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No. 2007/175

Ex.P.7-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No. 2007/175 71C.C.06/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.8:Letter of sanction Dt.4.10.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No. 2007/176

Ex.P.8-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No. 2007/176

Ex.P.9:Letter of sanction Dt.4.10.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No. 2007/178

Ex.P.9-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No. 2007/178

Ex.P.10:Letter of sanction Dt.4.10.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No. 2007/180

Ex.P.10-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No. 2007/180

Ex.P.11:Letter of sanction Dt.4.10.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No. 2007/201

Ex.P.11-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No. 2007/201

Ex.P.12:Letter of sanction Dt.4.10.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No. 2007/222

Ex.P.12-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No. 2007/222

Ex.P.13:Letter of sanction Dt.4.10.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No. 2007/240

Ex.P.13-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No. 2007/240

Ex.P.14:Letter of sanction Dt.4.10.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No. 2007/260

Ex.P.14-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No. 2007/260

Ex.P.15:Letter of sanction Dt.4.10.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No. 2007/282

Ex.P.15-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No. 2007/282

Ex.P.16:Letter of sanction Dt.4.10.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No. 2007/283

Ex.P.16-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No. 2007/283 72C.C.06/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.17:Letter of sanction Dt.4.10.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No. 2007/285

Ex.P.17-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No. 2007/285

Ex.P.18:Letter of sanction Dt.4.10.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No. 2007/295

Ex.P.18-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No. 2007/295

Ex.P.19: Letter of sanction Dt.4.10.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No. 2007/300

Ex.P.19-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No. 2007/300

Ex.P.20:Letter of sanction Dt.4.10.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No. 2007/304

ExP.20-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No. 2007/304

Ex.P.21: Letter of sanction Dt.4.10.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No. 2007/306

Ex.P.21-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No. 2007/306

Ex.P.22:Letter of sanction Dt.20.10.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No. 2007/314

Ex.P.22-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No. 2007/314

Ex.P.23:Letter of sanction Dt.12.10.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No. 2007/316

Ex.P.23-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No. 2007/316

Ex.P.24:Letter of sanction Dt.20.10.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No. 2007/321

Ex.P.24-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No. 2007/321

Ex.P.25:Letter of sanction Dt.22.10.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No. 2007/323

Ex.P.25-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No. 2007/323 73C.C.06/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.26:Letter of sanction Dt.22.10.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No. 2007/324

Ex.P.26-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No. 2007/324

Ex.P.27:Letter of sanction Dt.22.10.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No. 2007/325

Ex.P.27-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No. 2007/325

Ex.P.28: Letter of sanction Dt.22.10.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No. 2007/326

Ex.P.28-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No. 2007/326

Ex.P.29:Letter of sanction Dt.22.10.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No. 2007/330

Ex.P.29-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No. 2007/330

Ex.P.30:Letter of sanction Dt.22.10.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No. 2007/340

Ex.P.30-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No. 2007/340

Ex.P.31:Letter of sanction Dt.22.10.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No. 2007/366

Ex.P.31-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No. 2007/366

Ex.P.32:Covering letter Dt.14.12.2007.

Ex.P.33:ADA-1 Report dt.14.12.2007.

Ex.P.34:ADA-5 report Dt.14.12.2007

Ex.P.35:Letter of sanction Dt.1.11.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/391

Ex.P.35-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/391

Ex.P.36:Letter of sanction Dt.2.11.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/394

Ex.P.36-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/394 74C.C.06/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.37:Letter of sanction Dt.7.11.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/449

Ex.P.37-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/449

Ex.P.38:Letter of sanction Dt.7.11.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/451

Ex.P.38-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/451

Ex.P.39:Letter of sanction Dt.15.11.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/484

Ex.P.39-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/484

Ex.P.40: Letter of sanction Dt.15.11.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/487

Ex.P.40-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/487

Ex.P.41:Letter of sanction Dt.26.11.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/527

Ex.P.41-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/527

Ex.P.42:Letter of sanction Dt.26.11.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/530

Ex.P.42-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/530

Ex.P.43:Letter of sanction Dt.26.11.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/531

Ex.P.43-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/531

Ex.P.44:Letter of sanction Dt.26.11.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/532

Ex.P.44-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/532

Ex.P.45:ADA-1 Report dt.12.2.2008

Ex.P.46:ADA-5 report Dt.19.2.2008

Ex.P.47:Letter of sanction Dt.6.12.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/576 75C.C.06/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.47-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/576

Ex.P.48:Letter of sanction Dt.6.12.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/577

Ex.P.48-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/577

Ex.P.49:Letter of sanction Dt.6.12.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/578

Ex.P.49-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/578

Ex.P.50:Letter of sanction Dt.6.12.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/579

Ex.P.50-AAssessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/579

Ex.P.51:Letter of sanction Dt.6.12.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/580

Ex.P.51-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/580

Ex.P.52:Letter of sanction Dt.10.12.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/588

Ex.P.52-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/588

Ex.P.53:Letter of sanction Dt.10.12.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/590

Ex.P.53-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/590

Ex.P.54:Letter of sanction Dt.10.12.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/591

Ex.P.54-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/591

Ex.P.55:Letter of sanction Dt.10.12.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/592

Ex.P.55-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/592

Ex.P.56:Letter of sanction Dt.10.12.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/595 76C.C.06/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.56-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/595

Ex.P.57:Letter of sanction Dt.10.12.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/597

Ex.P.57-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/597

Ex.P.58:Letter of sanction Dt.10.12.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/598

Ex.P.58-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/598

Ex.P.59:Letter of sanction Dt.10.12.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/599

Ex.P.59-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/599

Ex.P.60:Letter of sanction Dt.10.12.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/600

Ex.P.60-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/600

Ex.P.61:Letter of sanction Dt.10.12.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/603

Ex.P.61-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/603

Ex.P.62:Letter of sanction Dt.10.12.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/613

Ex.P.62-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/613

Ex.P.63:Letter of sanction Dt.18.12.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/617

Ex.P.63-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/617

Ex.P.64:Letter of sanction Dt.20.12.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/638

Ex.P.64-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/638

Ex.P.65:Letter of sanction Dt.28.12.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/650 77C.C.06/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.65-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/650

Ex.P.66:Letter of sanction Dt.28.12.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/652

Ex.P.66-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/652

Ex.P.67:ADA-1 Report dt.13.2.2008

Ex.P.68:ADA-5 report Dt.15.3.2008

Ex.P.69:Letter of sanction Dt.5.1.2008 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/669

Ex.P.69-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/669

Ex.P.70:Letter of sanction Dt.5.1.2008 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/670

Ex.P.70-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/670

Ex.P.71:Letter of sanction Dt.18.1.2008 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/678

Ex.P.71-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/678

Ex.P.72:Letter of sanction Dt.18.1.2008 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/679

Ex.P.72-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/679

Ex.P.73:Letter of sanction Dt.18.1.2008 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/680

Ex.P.73-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/680

Ex.P.74:Letter of sanction Dt.24.1.2008 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/685

Ex.P.74-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/685

Ex.P.75:Letter of sanction Dt.24.1.2008 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/686

Ex.P.75-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/686 78C.C.06/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.76:Letter of sanction Dt.24.1.2008 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/687

Ex.P.76-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/687

Ex.P.77:Letter of sanction Dt.24.1.2008 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/689

Ex.P.77-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/689

Ex.P.78:Letter of sanction Dt.24.1.2008 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/690

Ex.P.78-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/690

Ex.P.79:Letter of sanction Dt.30.1.2008 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/696

Ex.P.79-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/696

Ex.P.80:Letter of sanction Dt.30.1.2008 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/698

Ex.P.80-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/698

Ex.P.81:Letter of sanction Dt.30.1.2008 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/699

Ex.P.81-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/699

Ex.P.82:Copy of covering letter under which the Chief Manager, Zonal Office, Andhra Bank received reports of ADA-1 and ADA-5, sanction letters and assessment forms for the month of February, 2008.

Ex.P.83:ADA-1 Report dt.11.4.2008.

Ex.P.84:ADA-5 report Dt.30.4.2008

Ex.P.85:Letter of sanction Dt.1.2.2008 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/701

Ex.P.85-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/701.

Ex.P.86:Letter of sanction Dt.1.2.2008 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/707 79C.C.06/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.86-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/707

Ex.P.87:Application form Dt.7.2.2008 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/714.

Ex.P.87-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/714.

Ex.P.88:Letter of sanction Dt.9.2.2008 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/719

Ex.P.88-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/719.

Ex.P.89:Letter of sanction Dt.9.2.2008 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/721

Ex.P.89-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/721

Ex.P.90:Letter of sanction Dt.9.2.2008 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/727

Ex.P.90-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/727

Ex.P.91:Letter of sanction Dt.13.2.2008 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/730

Ex.P.91-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/730

Ex.P.92:Letter of sanction Dt.13.2.2008 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/738

Ex.P.92-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/738

Ex.P.93:Letter of sanction Dt.13.2.2008 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/739

Ex.P.93–A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/739

Ex.P.94:Letter of sanction Dt.13.2.2008 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/740

Ex.P.94-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/740

Ex.P.95:Letter of sanction Dt.13.2.2008 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/742 80C.C.06/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.95-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/742

Ex.P.96:Letter of sanction Dt.13.2.2008 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/744

Ex.P.96-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/744

Ex.P.97:Letter of sanction Dt.13.2.2008 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/745

Ex.P.97-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/745

Ex.P.98:Letter of sanction Dt.15.2.2008 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/755

Ex.P.98-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/755

Ex.P.99:Observations sent to the Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch by the Chief Manager, Andhra Bank, Zonal Office pertaining to remarks in sanctioning the loans, appraisal notes, compliance reports, process notes etc., for the month of November, 2007.

Ex.P.100:Observations sent to the Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch by the Chief Manager, Andhra Bank, Zonal Office pertaining to remarks in sanctioning the loans, appraisal notes, compliance reports, process notes etc., for the month of December, 2007.

Ex.P.101:Observations sent to the Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch by the Chief Manager, Andhra Bank, Zonal Office pertaining to remarks in sanctioning the loans, appraisal notes, compliance reports, process notes etc., for the month of January, 2008.

Ex.P.102:Observations sent to the Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch by the Chief Manager, Andhra Bank, Zonal Office pertaining to remarks in sanctioning the loans, appraisal notes, compliance reports, process notes etc., for the month of February, 2008.

Ex.P.103:Copy of the assessment form in the loan file relating to the loan account of 2007/701

Ex.P.103-A: Copy of process note in Ex.P.103

Ex.P.104:Copy of assessment form in the loan file relating to the loan account of 2007/719 81C.C.06/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.104-A:Copy of original process note in Ex.P.104

Ex.P.105:Copy of assessment form in the loan file relating to the loan account of 2007/727

Ex.P.105-A: Copy of process note in Ex.P.105

Ex.P.106:Copy of assessment form in the loan file relating to the loan account of 2007/738

Ex.P.106-A: Copy of process note in Ex.P.106

Ex.P.107:Copy of assessment form in the loan file relating to the loan account of 2007/739

Ex.P.107-A: Copy of process note in Ex.P.107

Ex.P.108:Copy of assessment form in the loan file relating to the loan account of 2007/740

Ex.P.108-A: Copy of process note in Ex.P.108

Ex.P.109:Copy of assessment form in the loan file relating to the loan account of 2007/742

Ex.P.109-A: Copy of process note in Ex.P.109

Ex.P.110:Copy of assessment form in the loan file relating to the loan account of 2007/744

Ex.P.110-A: Copy of process note in Ex.P.110

Ex.P.111:Copy of assessment form in the loan file relating to the loan account of 2007/745

Ex.P.111-A: Copy of process note in Ex.P.111

Ex.P.112:Copy of assessment form in the loan file relating to the loan account of 2007/755

Ex.P.112-A: Copy of process note in Ex.P.112

Ex.P.113:Assessment form in the loan file relating to the loan account of 2007/707

Ex.P.113-A: Original process note in Ex.P.113

Ex.P.114:Original assessment form in the loan file relating to the loan account of 2007/730

Ex.P.114-A: Original process note in Ex.P.114

Ex.P.115: Copy of assessment form in the loan file relating to the loan account of 2007/638 82C.C.06/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.115-A: Copy of the original process note in Ex.P.115

Ex.P.116:Copy of the assessment form in the loan file relating to the loan account of 2007/669

Ex.P.116-A:Copy of the original process note in Ex.P.116

Ex.P.117:Copy of the assessment form in the loan file relating to the loan account of 2007/670

Ex.P.117-A: Copy of the original process note in Ex.P.117

Ex.P.118: Copy of the assessment form in the loan file relating to the loan account of 2007/678

Ex.P.118-A: Copy of the original process note in Ex.P.118

Ex.P.119: Copy of the assessment form in the loan file relating to the loan account of 2007/679

Ex.P.119-A: Copy of the original process note in Ex.P.119

Ex.P.120:Copy of the assessment form in the loan file relating to the loan account of 2007/680

Ex.P.120-A: Copy of the original process note in Ex.P.120

Ex.P.121:Copy of the assessment form in the loan file relating to the loan account of 2007/686

Ex.P.121-A: Copy of the original process note in Ex.P.121

Ex.P.122:Copy of the assessment form in the loan file relating to the loan account of 2007/687 is marked as

Ex.P.122-A: Copy of the original process note in Ex.P.122

Ex.P.123:Copy of the assessment form in the loan file relating to the loan account of 2007/689

Ex.P.123-A: Copy of the original process note in Ex.P.123

Ex.P.124:Copy of the assessment form in the loan file relating to the loan account of 2007/690

Ex.P.124-A:Copy of the original process note in Ex.P.124

Ex.P.125:Copy of the assessment form in the loan file relating to the loan account of 2007/696

Ex.P.125-A: Copy of the original process note in Ex.P.125

Ex.P.126: Copy of the assessment form in the loan file relating to the loan account of 2007/698 83C.C.06/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.126-A: Copy of the original process note in Ex.P.126

Ex.P.127:Copy of the assessment form in the loan file relating to the loan account of 2007/699

Ex.P.127-A: Copy of the original process note in Ex.P.127

Ex.P.128:Copy of assessment form in the loan file relating to the loan account of 2007/721

Ex.P.128-A: Copy of process note in Ex.P.128

Ex.P.129:Copy of report submitted to Andhra Bank, Zonal office, Guntur.

Ex.P.130:Copy of report submitted to Andhra Bank, Zonal office, Guntur.

Ex.P.131:Copy of report submitted to Andhra Bank, Zonal office, Guntur.

Ex.P.132: Copy of report submitted to Andhra Bank, Zonal office, Guntur.

Ex.P.133: Copy of report submitted to Andhra Bank, Zonal office, Guntur.

Ex.P.134:Copy of report submitted to Andhra bank, Zonal Office, Guntur.

Ex.P.135:Copy of report submitted to Andhra Bank, Zonal office, Guntur.

Ex.P.136:Copy of report submitted to Andhra Bank, Zonal office, Guntur.

Ex.P.137:Copy of report submitted to Andhra Bank, Zonal office, Guntur.

Ex.P.138:Copy of the covering letter Dt.23.4.2010 under which the Dy. General Manager furnished copy of master circular to the Inspector of Police, CBI, Visakhapatnam

Ex.P.139:Copy of the master circular

Ex.P.140:Copy of the internal circular No.334 Dt.29.1.2010

Ex.P.141:Loan file relating to the loan account No. PAGCC 2007/449.

Ex.P.141-A:Letter dated ‘NIL’ addressed by the Branch Manager, Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch in the loan file Ex.P.141.

Ex.P.142:Loan file relating to the S.B. Account No.ASBP 255.

Ex.P.143:Loan file relating to the loan account No. PAGCC 2007/451.

84C.C.06/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.143-A:Letter dated ‘NIL’ addressed by the Branch Manager, Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch in the loan file Ex.P.143.

Ex.P.144:Loan file relating to the S.B. Account No.ASBP 257.

Ex.P.141:Loan file relating to the loan account No. PAGCC 2007/113

Ex.P.142:Loan file relating to the S.B. Account No.ABJ 431

Ex.P.143:Loan file relating to the loan account No. PAGCC 2007/145

Ex.P.144:Loan file relating to the S.B. Account No.ABJ 435.

Ex.P.145:Loan file relating to the loan account No. PAGCC 2007/484.

Ex.p.145-A:Letter dated 04.11.2007 addressed by the Branch Manager, Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch in the loan file Ex.P.145

Ex.P.146:Loan file relating to the S.B. Account No.ASB 304.

Ex.P.147:Loan file relating to the loan account No. PAGCC 2007/487.

Ex.P.147-A:Letter dated 10.11.2007 addressed by the Branch Manager, Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch in the loan file Ex.P.147

Ex.P.148:Loan file relating to the S.B. Account No.ASBP 294.

Ex.P.149:Loan file relating to the loan account No. PAGCC 2007/527.

Ex.P.149-A:Letter dated 26.11.2007 addressed by the Branch Manager, Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch in the loan file Ex.P.149.

Ex.P.150:Loan file relating to the S.B. Account No.ASBP 337.

Ex.P.151:Loan file relating to the loan account No. PAGCC 2007/531.

Ex.P.151-A:Letter dated 26.11.2007 addressed by the Branch Manager, Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch in the loan file Ex.P.151

Ex.P.152:Loan file relating to the S.B. Account No.AASBP 333.

Ex.P.153:Loan file relating to the loan account No. PAGCC 2007/532.

Ex.P.153-A:Letter dated 26.11.2007 addressed by the Branch Manager, Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch in the loan file Ex.P.153

Ex.P.154:Loan file relating to the S.B. Account No.ASBP 331.

Ex.P.155:Loan file relating to the loan account No. PAGCC 2007/574.

Ex.P.155-A:Letter dated 02.12.2007 addressed by the Branch Manager, Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch in the loan file Ex.P.155

Ex.P.156:Loan file relating to the S.B. Account No.ASBP 356.

Ex.P.157:Loan file relating to the loan account No. PAGCC 2007/575.

85C.C.06/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.157-A:Letter dated 02.12.2007 addressed by the Branch Manager, Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch in the loan file Ex.P.157.

Ex.P.158:Loan file relating to the S.B. Account No.ASBP 352.

Ex.P.159:Loan file relating to the loan account No. PAGCC 2007/576.

Ex.p.159-A:Letter dated 02.12.2007 addressed by the Branch Manager, Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch in the loan file Ex.P.159

Ex.P.160:Loan file relating to the S.B. Account No.ASBP 353.

Ex.P.161:Loan file relating to the loan account No. PAGCC 2007/577.

Ex.P.161-A:Letter dated 02.12.2007 addressed by the Branch Manager, Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch in the loan file Ex.P.161.

Ex.P.162:Loan file relating to the S.B. Account No.ASBP 354.

Ex.P.163:Loan file relating to the loan account No. PAGCC 2007/578.

Ex.P.163-A:Letter dated 02.12.2007 addressed by the Branch Manager, Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch in the loan file Ex.P.163.

Ex.P.164:Loan file relating to the S.B. Account No.ASBP 355.

Ex.P.165:Loan file relating to the loan account No. PAGCC 2007/579.

Ex.P.165-A:Letter dated 02.12.2007 addressed by the Branch Manager, Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch in the loan file Ex.P.165.

Ex.P.166:Loan file relating to the S.B. Account No.ASBP 350.

Ex.P.167:Loan file relating to the loan account No. PAGCC 2007/580.

Ex.P.167-A:Letter dated 02.12.2007 addressed by the Branch Manager, Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch in the loan file Ex.P.167.

Ex.P.168:Loan file relating to the S.B. Account No.ASBP 351.

Ex.P.169:Loan file relating to the loan account No. PAGCC 2007/617.

Ex.P.169-A:Letter dated 10.12.2007 addressed by the Branch Manager, Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch in the loan file Ex.P.169.

Ex.P.170:Loan file relating to the S.B. Account No.ASBP 395.

Ex.P.171:Loan file relating to the loan account No. PAGCC 2007/638.

Ex.P.171-A:Letter dated 01.12.2007 addressed by the Branch Manager, Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch in the loan file Ex.P.171.

Ex.P.172:Loan file relating to the S.B. Account No.ASBP 397.

Ex.P.173:Loan file relating to the loan account No. PAGCC 2007/613.

Ex.P.173-A:Letter dated 10.12.2007 addressed by the Branch Manager, Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch in the loan file Ex.P.173 86C.C.06/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.174:Loan file relating to the S.B. Account No.ASBP 391.

Ex.P.175:Loan file relating to the loan account No. PAGCC 2007/669.

Ex.P.175-A:Letter dated 20.12.2007 addressed by the Branch Manager, Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch in the loan file Ex.P.175.

Ex.P.176:Loan file relating to the S.B. Account No.ASBP 412.

Ex.P.177:Loan file relating to the loan account No. PAGCC 2007/670.

Ex.P.177-A:Letter dated 01.12.2007 addressed by the Branch Manager, Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch in the loan file Ex.P.177

Ex.P.178:Loan file relating to the S.B. Account No.ASBP 413.

Ex.P.179:Loan file relating to the loan account No. PAGCC 2007/678.

Ex.P.179-A:Letter dated 01.01.2008 addressed by the Branch Manager, Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch in the loan file Ex.P.179

Ex.P.180:Loan file relating to the S.B. Account No.SB 8016.

Ex.P.181:Loan file relating to the loan account No. PAGCC 2007/679.

Ex.P.181-A:Letter dated 1.1.2008 addressed by the Branch Manager, Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch in the loan file Ex.P.181

Ex.P.182:Loan file relating to the S.B. Account No.SB 8017.

Ex.P.183:Loan file relating to the loan account No. PAGCC 2007/680.

Ex.P.183-A:Letter dated 1.1.2008 addressed by the Branch Manager, Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch in the loan file Ex.P.183

Ex.P.184:Loan file relating to the S.B. Account No.SB 8018.

Ex.P.185:Loan file relating to the loan account No. PAGCC 2007/686.

Ex.P.185-A:Letter dated 1.1.2008 addressed by the Branch Manager, Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch in the loan file Ex.P.185

Ex.P.186:Loan file relating to the S.B. Account No.ASBP 424.

Ex.P.187:Loan file relating to the loan account No. PAGCC 2007/687.

Ex.P.187-A:Letter dated 1.11.2007 addressed by the Branch Manager, Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch in the loan file Ex.P.187

Ex.P.188:Loan file relating to the S.B. Account No.ASBP 425.

Ex.P.189:Loan file relating to the loan account No. PAGCC 2007/689.

Ex.P.189-A:Letter dated 1.11.2007 addressed by the Branch Manager, Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch in the loan file Ex.P.189

Ex.P.190:Loan file relating to the S.B. Account No.ASBP 427.

Ex.P.191:Loan file relating to the loan account No. PAGCC 2007/690.

87C.C.06/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.191-A:Letter dated 1.11.2007 addressed by the Branch Manager, Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch in the loan file Ex.P.191

Ex.P.192:Loan file relating to the S.B. Account No.ASBP 428.

Ex.P.193: Loan file relating to the loan account No. PAGCC 2007/696.

Ex.P.193-A:Letter dated 01.01.2008 addressed by the Branch Manager, Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch in the loan file Ex.P.193

Ex.P.194:Loan file relating to the S.B. Account No.ASBP 430.

Ex.P.195:Loan file relating to the loan account No. PAGCC 2007/698.

Ex.P.195-A:Letter dated 01.01.2008 addressed by the Branch Manager, Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch in the loan file Ex.P.195

Ex.P.196:Loan file relating to the S.B. Account No.ASBP 432.

Ex.P.197:Loan file relating to the loan account No. PAGCC 2007/699.

Ex.P.197-A:Letter dated 01.01.2008 addressed by the Branch Manager, Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch in the loan file Ex.P.197

Ex.P.198:Loan file relating to the S.B. Account No.ASBP 433.

Ex.P.199:Loan file relating to the loan account No. PAGCC 2007/768.

Ex.P.199-A:Letter dated 1.2.2008 addressed by the Branch Manager, Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch in the loan file Ex.P.199

Ex.P.200:Loan file relating to the S.B. Account No.ASBP 500.

Ex.P.201:Loan file relating to the loan account No. PAGCC 2007/780.

Ex.P.201-A:Letter dated 25.1.2008 addressed by the Branch Manager, Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch in the loan file Ex.P.201

Ex.P.202:Loan file relating to the S.B. Account No.ASBP 504.

Ex.P.203:Loan file relating to the loan account No. PAGCC 2007/782.

Ex.P.203-A:Letter dated 27.1.2008 addressed by the Branch Manager, Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch in the loan file Ex.P.203

Ex.P.204:Loan file relating to the S.B. Account No.ASBP 503.

Ex.P.205:Copy of the receipt memo Dt.31.3.2011 under which documents relating to the loan accounts are handed over to the Inspector of Police, CBI, Visakhapatnam under acknowledgment.

Ex.P.206:Copy of the covering letter dated 15.06.2009 under which loan files relating to the crop loans and bank circular No.488 are handed over to the CBI.

88C.C.06/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.207:Copy of the bank circular no.488 regarding sanction of crop loans under the scheme of Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card.

Ex.P.208:Copy of report submitted the report to the District Collector, Prakasam District.

Ex.P.209:Copy of report submitted to the District Collector, Prakasam District.

Ex.P.210:Returned/unservedregisteredcoverwith acknowledgement addressed to Boyapati Syamala Devi, R/o Pamidipadu village.

Ex.P.211:Returned/unservedregisteredcoverwith acknowledgement addressed to Vikram Rajeswari, R/o Pamidipadu village.

Ex.P.212:Returned/unservedregisteredcoverwith acknowledgement addressed to Vikram Rajasekhar, R/o Pamidipadu village.

Ex.P.213:Returned/unservedregisteredcoverwith acknowledgement addressed to Kunda Mohan Rao, R/o Pamidipadu village.

Ex.P.214:Returned/unservedregisteredcoverwith acknowledgement addressed to Kondugunda Prameela, R/o Pamidipadu village.

Ex.P.215:Returned/unservedregisteredcoverwith acknowledgement addressed toVinjam Krishna Mohan, R/o Pamidipadu village.

Ex.P.216:Returned/unservedregisteredcoverwith acknowledgement addressed to Pinnaka Babu Rao, R/o Pamidipadu village.

Ex.P.217:Returned/unservedregisteredcoverwith acknowledgement addressed to Kunda Rama Lakshmi, R/o Pamidipadu village.

Ex.P.218:Returned/unservedregisteredcoverwith acknowledgement addressed to Pinnaka Rama Devi, R/o Pamidipadu village.

Ex.P.219:Returned/unservedregisteredcoverwith acknowledgement addressed to Kota Tirumalamma, R/o Kanagalavaripalem.

Ex.P.220:Returned/unservedregisteredcoverwith acknowledgement addressed to Anavalla Rama Tirdham, R/o Kanagalavaripalem 89C.C.06/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.221:Returned/unservedregisteredcoverwith acknowledgement addressed to Pochampalli Rama Kotaiah, R/o Anubroluvaripalem.

Ex.P.222:Returned/unservedregisteredcoverwith acknowledgement addressed to Talluri Viswanadham, R/o Anubroluvaripalem

Ex.P.223:Returned/unservedregisteredcoverwith acknowledgement addressed to Muvva Ratnakumari, R/o Ravinuthala village.

Ex.P.224:Attested copy of report Dt.12.12.2008 submitted by P.W.41 to the Head Office, Andhra Bank, Hyderabad.

Ex.P.225:Covering letter Dt.4.5.2011 under which attested extract of the Savings Bank Account (manual) of Kamepalli Kotaiah, S/o.Ramaswamy, Hanumapuram village, Naguluppalapadu Mandal was furnished.

Ex.P.226:Attested extract of the savings bank account of Kamepalli Kotaiah, S/o.Ramaswamy, Hanumapuram

Ex.P.227:Returned/unservedregisteredcoverwith acknowledgement addressed to Kanagala Ramakrishna, S/o.Bhadraiah, R/o. Malampativaripalem village.

Ex.P.228:Returned/unservedregisteredcoverwith acknowledgement addressed to Eda Hanuma reddy, S/o.Chenchu Reddy, R/o. Krishnamrajuvaripalem village.

Ex.P.229:Death certificate of Kamepalli Kotaiah, S/o.Ramaswamy

Ex.P.230:Attested copy of death intimation.

Ex.P.231:Covering letter.

Ex.P.232:Copies of Savings Bank pass book of Union Bank; savings bank pass book of State Bank of India, Uppugunduru branch; pattadar pass book; title deed; pattadar pass book in patta No.1460; pattadar pass book in patta No.1177.

Ex.P.233:Copy of C.F.S.L. opinion No.CH71/2011 Dt. 19.03.2012 alongwith the reasons.

Ex.P.234:Specimen writings of the person namely B.Anjaneyulu (2nd accused)

Ex.P.235:FIR in R.C.13 (A)/2009 of CBI, Visakhapatnam U/Sec. 120-B, 420, 468 and 471 IPC and U/Sec. 13 (2) r/w. 13 (1) (d) of P.C.Act, 1988

Ex.P.236:Copy of the covering letter under which P.W.9 handed over statement of accounts pertaining to the crop loans relating 90C.C.06/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP to this case alongwith certificates U/Sec. 2 of Banker’s Books of Evidence Act.

Ex.P.237:Statement of account pertaining to the crop loan relating to this case alongwith certificate U/Sec. 2 of Banker’s Books of Evidence Act handed over by P.W.9

Ex.P.238:Statement of account pertaining to the crop loan relating to this case alongwith certificate U/Sec. 2 of Banker’s Books of Evidence Act handed over by P.W.9

Ex.P.239:Statement of account pertaining to the crop loan relating to this case alongwith certificate U/Sec. 2 of Banker’s Books of Evidence Act handed over by P.W.9

Ex.P.240:Statement of account pertaining to the crop loan relating to this case alongwith certificate U/Sec. 2 of Banker’s Books of Evidence Act handed over by P.W.9

Ex.P.241:Statement of account pertaining to the crop loan relating to this case alongwith certificate U/Sec. 2 of Banker’s Books of Evidence Act handed over by P.W.9

Ex.P.242:Statement of account pertaining to the crop loan relating to this case alongwith certificate U/Sec. 2 of Banker’s Books of Evidence Act handed over by P.W.9

Ex.P.243:Statement of account pertaining to the crop loan relating to this case alongwith certificate U/Sec. 2 of Banker’s Books of Evidence Act handed over by P.W.9

Ex.P.244:Statement of account pertaining to the crop loan relating to this case alongwith certificate U/Sec. 2 of Banker’s Books of Evidence Act handed over by P.W.9

Ex.P.245:Statement of account pertaining to the crop loan relating to this case alongwith certificate U/Sec. 2 of Banker’s Books of Evidence Act handed over by P.W.9

Ex.P.246:Statement of account pertaining to the crop loan relating to this case alongwith certificate U/Sec. 2 of Banker’s Books of Evidence Act handed over by P.W.9

Ex.P.247:Statement of account pertaining to the crop loan relating to this case alongwith certificate U/Sec. 2 of Banker’s Books of Evidence Act handed over by P.W.9

Ex.P.248:Statement of account pertaining to the crop loan relating to this case alongwith certificate U/Sec. 2 of Banker’s Books of Evidence Act handed over by P.W.9 91C.C.06/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.249:Statement of account pertaining to the crop loan relating to this case alongwith certificate U/Sec. 2 of Banker’s Books of Evidence Act handed over by P.W.9

Ex.P.250:Statement of account pertaining to the crop loan relating to this case alongwith certificate U/Sec. 2 of Banker’s Books of Evidence Act handed over by P.W.9

Ex.P.251:Statement of account pertaining to the crop loan relating to this case alongwith certificate U/Sec. 2 of Banker’s Books of Evidence Act handed over by P.W.9

Ex.P.252:Statement of account pertaining to the crop loan relating to this case alongwith certificate U/Sec. 2 of Banker’s Books of Evidence Act handed over by P.W.9

Ex.P.253:Statement of account pertaining to the crop loan relating to this case alongwith certificate U/Sec. 2 of Banker’s Books of Evidence Act handed over by P.W.9

Ex.P.254:Statement of account pertaining to the crop loan relating to this case alongwith certificate U/Sec. 2 of Banker’s Books of Evidence Act handed over by P.W.9

Ex.P.255:Statement of account pertaining to the crop loan relating to this case alongwith certificate U/Sec. 2 of Banker’s Books of Evidence Act handed over by P.W.9

Ex.P.256:Statement of account pertaining to the crop loan relating to this case alongwith certificate U/Sec. 2 of Banker’s Books of Evidence Act handed over by P.W.9

Ex.P.257:Statement of account pertaining to the crop loan relating to this case alongwith certificate U/Sec. 2 of Banker’s Books of Evidence Act handed over by P.W.9

Ex.P.258:Statement of account pertaining to the crop loan relating to this case alongwith certificate U/Sec. 2 of Banker’s Books of Evidence Act handed over by P.W.9

Ex.P.259:Statement of account pertaining to the crop loan relating to this case alongwith certificate U/Sec. 2 of Banker’s Books of Evidence Act handed over by P.W.9

Ex.P.260:Statement of account pertaining to the crop loan relating to this case alongwith certificate U/Sec. 2 of Banker’s Books of Evidence Act handed over by P.W.9

Ex.P.261:Statement of account pertaining to the crop loan relating to this case alongwith certificate U/Sec. 2 of Banker’s Books of Evidence Act handed over by P.W.9 92C.C.06/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.262:Statement of account pertaining to the crop loan relating to this case alongwith certificate U/Sec. 2 of Banker’s Books of Evidence Act handed over by P.W.9

Ex.P.263:Statement of account pertaining to the crop loan relating to this case alongwith certificate U/Sec. 2 of Banker’s Books of Evidence Act handed over by P.W.9

Ex.P.264:Statement of account pertaining to the crop loan relating to this case alongwith certificate U/Sec. 2 of Banker’s Books of Evidence Act handed over by P.W.9

Ex.P.265:Statement of account pertaining to the crop loan relating to this case alongwith certificate U/Sec. 2 of Banker’s Books of Evidence Act handed over by P.W.9

Ex.P.266:Statement of account pertaining to the crop loan relating to this case alongwith certificate U/Sec. 2 of Banker’s Books of Evidence Act handed over by P.W.9

Ex.P.267:Statement of account pertaining to the crop loan relating to this case alongwith certificate U/Sec. 2 of Banker’s Books of Evidence Act handed over by P.W.9

Ex.P.268:Statement of account pertaining to the crop loan relating to this case alongwith certificate U/Sec. 2 of Banker’s Books of Evidence Act handed over by P.W.9.

Ex.P.269:Copy of covering letter Dt. 11.4.2011 under which the Chief Manager, Andhra bank, Zonal Office, Ongole submitted the documents

Ex.P.270:Copy of letter dt.19.1.2009 addressed by the Dy.General Manager to the General Manager, Andhra Bank, Inspection and Audit Department, Head Office, Koti, Hyderabad

Ex.P.271:Copy of letter Dt.29.1.2009 addressed by the Dy.General Manager to the General Manager, Andhra Bank, Inspection and Audit Department, Head Office, Koti, Hyderabad

Ex.P.272:Receipt memo Dt.6.5.2011 under which copy of election identity card of P.W.59 was collected

Ex.P.273:Attested photocopy of election identity card of P.W.59

Ex.P.274:Receipt memo Dt.5.5.2011 under which photocopy of bank pass book relating to the S.B. Account of P.W.58 was collected

Ex.P.275Attested photocopy of bank pass book of P.W.58.

Ex.P.276:Returned unserved postal cover relating to the borrower Bonthu Rajamma, W/o.Veeraiah, Prasangalapadu, Ongole District.

Ex.P.277:Draft ROR (1A) Register relating to Korisapadu village 93C.C.06/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.278: Draft ROR (1B) Register relating to Korisapadu village (Two volumes)

Ex.P.279:Draft ROR (1A) register of Prasangalapadu village

Ex.P.280:Draft ROR (1B) register relating to Prasangalapadu village

Ex.P.281:Draft ROR (1A) register relating to Anamanuru village

Ex.P.282:Draft ROR (1B) register pertaining to Anamanuru village

Ex.P.283:Bunch of certified copies of 1A register of Pamidipadu village relevant extract from volumes 1,2 and 3.

LIST OF WITNESSES EXAMINED ON BEHALF OF DEFENCE.

NIL

LIST OF DOCUMENTS MARKED ON BEHALF OF DEFENCE.

Ex.D.1:Relevant portions in the statements of the witnesses i) Anubrolu Sumithra, W/o.Tatarao; ii) Tulluri Venkateswarlu, S/o.Laksmaiah; iii) Ravi Samrajyam, w/o.Janaikiramaiah; iv) Polavarapu Amareswari, W/o.srinivasarao; v) Paleru Sujatha, w/o.Ramanjaneyulu and; vi) ‘Oruganti Basavaiah, S/o.Adayya are the residents of Pamidipadu village. It is not true to suggest that I have stated before the CBI that i) Anubrolu Sumithra, W/o.Tatarao; ii) Tulluri Venkateswarlu, S/o.Laksmaiah; iii) Ravi Samrajyam, w/o.Janaikiramaiah; iv) Polavarapu Amareswari, W/o.srinivasarao; v) Paleru Sujatha, w/o.Ramanjaneyulu and vi) ‘Oruganti Basavaiah, S/o.Adayya of Pamidipadu village, recorded under 161 Cr.P.C.

Ex.D.2:Residents of pamidipadu village and relevant portions in the statement of the witness recorded under 161 Cr.P.C.

Ex.D.3:Residents of Pamidipadu village and the relevant portions in the statement of the witness recorded under sec.161 Cr.P.C.

PRINCIPAL SPL. JUDGE FOR C.B.I. CASES,

FAC I Addl. SPL.JUDGE FOR C.B.I CASES,

VISAKHAPATNAM.

Copy submitted to The Hon’ble Registrar (Judicial), High Court of Andhra Pradesh. Copies to:

1. The Accused No.1

2. The Superintendent of Police, C.B.I., Visakhapatnam.

94C.C.06/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

IN THE COURT OF THE I ADDL. SPECIAL JUDGE FOR C.B.I.

CASES, VISAKHAPATNAM.

Present:Sri N.RAMESH BABU Prl. Spl. Judge for C.B.I. Cases, FAC I Adll. Spl. Judge for C.B.I Cases, Visakhapatnam.

Friday , this the 27 th day of December, 2019

C.C.No.07/2015

Between:

State represented by CBI, Visakhapatnam.

…Complainant And:

Mr.Kasukurthi Jalaramaiah, S/o Peda Kotaiah, Aged 51 years, Door No.6-117, J.Sri Nagar 1st Lane, 3rd Cross Road, Behind St.Xaviers Girls- High School-cum-Girls Junior College, Kurnool Road, Ongole, Prakasam District.

….. Accused

This case came on 19.12.2019 for final hearing before me in the presence of Mrs.K.Srilatha, Ld.Public Prosecutor for the Complainant and of Mr.N.V.V.Prasad, Advocate for Accused and the matter having stood over for consideration till this day, this Court doth the following:

J U D G M E N T

1. The Inspector of Police, CBI, ACB, Visakhapatnam has filed a charge sheet in RC.No.13(A)/2009 against the accused for the offences under Sections 120-B, 420, 468 and 471 IPC and under

Sec.13(2) r/w 13(1) (d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

2.The case of prosecution as per the charge sheet is that while the accused was working as the Branch Manager of Andhra Bank,

Rvinuthala Branch, he inconnivance with one Mr.Ch.Venkateswara 2C.C.07/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

Rao who was working as an Officer in the same bank had opened savings bank accounts in the names of non-existing persons and sanctioned crop loans in the names of those non existing persons basing on fake and forged documents like No Dues Certificates,

Revenue Passbooks and Residence proof certificates. On the report given by Mr.D.V.Narasimha Rao, the then Dy.General Manager of

Andhra Bank, Ongole, the above stated case was registered and during the course of investigation it was revealed that the accused having conspired with Mr.Ch.Venkateswarulu and others had sanctioned and disbursed 153 loans amounting to Rs.110.64lakhs under Pattabhi Agri Credit Card Scheme and converted Crop Loans in fraudulent manner basing on fake documents and that in this case 28 crop loans were sanctioned in the names of non-existing persons and having credited the loan amounts to the fictitious savings bank accounts had misappropriated the loan proceeds and thereby caused a loss of Rs.20,90,659/- to the bank and gained wrongfully. Said

Mr.Ch.Venkateswara Rao died on 6.12.2010 and so he is not prosecuted in this case.

3.Considering the contents of the charge sheet, the case was taken on file for the offences under Sections 120-B, 420 and 471 IPC and under Section 13(2) r/w 13(1) (d) of the Prevention of Corruption

Act, 1988 against the accused.

4. After the accused made his appearance before the Court and on hearing both sides, this Court has framed charges for the offences under Sections 120-B, 420 and 471 IPC and under Section 13(1) (d) 3C.C.07/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP r/w 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 against the accused, read over and explained to him, in Telugu for which he pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried.

5. At the trial the prosecution side has got examined 45 witnesses as PW.1 to PW.45 and got marked Exs.P1 to Ex.P273 documents on its behalf to prove its case.

6.No oral or documentary evidence is adduced on behalf of the accused. After closure of recording the prosecution side evidence, the accused was examined under Section Sec.313 Cr.P.C informing to him the incriminating circumstances available in the evidence against him, for which he has stated that the same is false and that he has not committed any offence.

7.I have heard the learned Public Prosecutor for prosecution and the learned counsel for the accused. The learned Public Prosecutor and the learned counsel for the accused have submitted written arguments and I have perused the same.

8.The gist of prosecution side evidence both oral and documentary is as follows:

The evidence of PW.1 namely Mr.Davuluri Venkata Narasimha

Rao who is the defacto complainant and worked as the Zonal Manager in Andhra Bank, Zonal Office Ongole is that the accused had committed fraud and sanctioned Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card

Loans and converted Crop Agricultural Term Loans numbering into 153, violating the bank norms and disbursed an amount of 4C.C.07/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

Rs.110.64lakhs, which are still outstanding and that the bank has sustained a loss of Rs.124.22lakhs and that one Mr.K.Gopala Krishna

Murthy, Dy.Manager of Inspection and Audits, Hyderabad had inspected the Ravinuthala branch of Andhra Bank in December, 2008 and noticed some fake Pattadhar passbooks and identity and residential proofs and some other documents relating to the loans sanctioned by the accused and submitted a report basing on which the Vigilance Department was directed to investigate the matter thoroughly and so the authorities of Vigilance Department came to the said Ravinuthala Branch and verified all the documents pertaining to the loans sanctioned by the accused and referred the documents to the concerned issuing authorities for information about the genuineness of those documents, for which the information was given in writing that those documents are fake and so the Vigilance authorities had submitted a report to the Head Office, Andhra Bank,

Hyderabad and then the Vigilance Department has directed him(PW.1) to give a report to CBI Department against the accused and so he gave a report on 9.6.2009 the copy of which is Ex.P1 and that the original is filed in CC 5/2015 which contains his signature.

9.The further evidence of PW.1 is that the accused had opened savings bank accounts in the names of fictitious persons on the basis of false identity and residential proofs and sanctioned loans in the names of those fictitious persons basing on false and fabricated pattadhar passbooks, adangals, 10(1) accounts and bogus no dues certificates and disbursed the loan with conspiracy and plan with unknown persons without proper appraisal and even by altering the 5C.C.07/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP appraiser reports of the Rural Development Officer. He has exhibited a list of 153 accounts relating to the alleged fraudulent transactions, the copy of which has been marked as Ex.P2 since the original list was marked in C.C.5/2015.

10.The evidence of PW.2 namely Mr.Hejeebu Seshagiri Rao who worked as the Assistant General Manager in Andhra Bank, Zonal

Office, Guntur is that the Branch Manager has to inform sanction of loans exceeding Rs.50,000/- to the Zonal Office in the form of ADA-1 and ADA-5 and that reports in ADA-1 are submitted for each group of loans and that the reports in ADA-5 are submitted for the entire loans, consolidated, and that the Credit Monitoring Review Department in

Zonal Office monitor all the reports of ADA-1 and ADA-5 submitted by the Branch Managers and that the Ravinuthala branch of Andhra Bank was not sending monthly reports relating to sanction of loans exceeding Rs.50,000/- to Zonal Office, promptly and so reminders were issued. A copy of a letter dated 17.11.2007 has been marked as

Ex.P3. Through PW.2 the letters of sanction of different loans have been marked as Ex.P4 to Ex.P31 and the corresponding assessment forms are marked as Ex.P4-A to Ex.P31-A which relate to Pattabhi

Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loans. Those documents relate to the month of October, 2007. Through him ADA-1 report dated 14.12.2007 is marked as Ex.P33 and ADA-5 report dated 14.12.2007 is marked as

Ex.P34 and a copy of covering letter dated 14.12.2007 is marked as

Ex.P32. Likewise, some letters of sanction of different loans relating to

Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loans were marked as Ex.P35 to Ex.P44 and the corresponding assessment forms were marked as 6C.C.07/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P35-A to Ex.P44-A. Those documents relate to the month of

November, 2007.

11.According to PW.2 the ADA-1 report dated 12.2.2008 and ADA-5 report dated 19.2.2008 which are marked as Ex.P45 and Ex.P46 respectively were received by the Chief Manager, Zonal Office, Andhra

Bank for the month of December,2007 with a covering letter. The letters of sanction of that month for different loans were marked as

Ex.P47 to Ex.P66 and the corresponding assessment forms were marked as Ex.P47-A to Ex.P66-A. The ADA-1 report dated 13.2.2008 and the ADA-5 report dated 15.3.2008 were marked as Ex.P67 and

Ex.P68 respectively for the month of January, 2008 and the letters of sanction relating to different loans of that month were marked as

Ex.P69 to Ex.P81 and the relevant assessment forms were marked as

Ex.P69-A to Ex.P81-A. The ADA-1 report dated 11.4.2008 and the ADA- 5 report dated 30.4.2008 which relate to the month of February, 2008 were marked as Ex.P83 and Ex.P84 respectively and the copy of covering letter through which they were sent was marked as Ex.P82.

The letters of sanction of different loans were marked as Ex.P85 to

Ex.P98 and the relevant assessment forms were marked as Ex.P85-A to

Ex.P98-A which relate to the month of February, 2008. The observations which are sent to the Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala Branch by the Chief Manager, Andhra Bank Zonal Office pertaining to the remarks in sanctioning the loans, appraisal notes, compliance report, process notes etc., for each month i.e., November, 2007, December, 2007, January, 2008 and February, 2008 were marked as Ex.P99 to

Ex.P102 respectively.

7C.C.07/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

12.According to PW.2 he compared the original process notes and sanction letters with the copies of process notes and sanction letters which are sent to the Zonal Office and noticed that the appraising officers who signed in the original process notes and the appraising officers who signed on the process notes sent to the Zonal Office are not one and the same and that the correction fluid was used in the original process notes at the column of ‘recommendations and signature of the appraising officer’ by mentioning on the top of the correction fluid that ‘recommended for sanction’. According to PW.2 all those assessment forms contain the signatures of 1st accused and that the accused had signed as sanctioning authority on those forms in the capacity of branch manager.

13.Likewise, Ex.P103 to Ex.P128 and Ex.P103-A to Ex.P128-A documents were marked through PW.2. According to him correction fluid was used in the original process notes of those documents at the column of recommendations and signature of the appraising officer and it was mentioned on the top of the correction fluid that ‘recommended for sanction’. He has further deposed that the appraising officer who signed on the original process notes and the appraising officer who signed on the process notes sent to the Zonal

Office are not one and the same.

14.PW.3 namely Tatineni Hanumantha Rao who worked as the

Senior Manager in Andhra Bank, Zonal Office, Guntur has deposed that the Zonal Manager as per a letter dated 17.1.2009 instructed 8C.C.07/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP him to work in Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch to assist the branch manger for recovery of 153 irregular crop loans and so from 19.1.2009 till 3.2.2009 he worked in that branch and visited different villages on different dates and met the borrowers who were available and the guarantors of the borrowers and that some of the borrowers have made part payments and that others had promised to discharge the loans. According to him some borrowers were not available at the addresses given in the loan applications and on enquiry he was informed that no such persons were residing in the respective villages.

According to him, he gave reports about his visits and enquires. The copies of those reports were marked as Ex.P129 to Ex.P137. He has further deposed that the accused who accompanied him could not even locate some of the borrowers to whom the crop loans were granted.

15.PW.4 namely Mr.Harinath who worked as a Senior Manager in

Credit Monitoring Review Department of Andhra Bank, Zonal Office,

Guntur has deposed that the Andhra Bank Head Office, Hyderabad had released a master circular for specifying the rules and norms to sanction crop loans by the branch managers and that Ex.P139 is the copy of the same and that Ex.P138 is the covering letter dated 23.4.2010. According to him as per the circular under Ex.P139 the branch manager has to submit reports in ADA-1 and ADA-5 forms every month for the loans sanctioned in their respective branches. He has further deposed that a circular No.344 dated 29.1.2010 the copy of which is marked as Ex.P140 was issued prescribing a procedure to prepare a note if any deviations were found in sanctioning the loans.

9C.C.07/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

16.PW.5 namely Mr.Kuntamukkala Suryanarayana Murthy who worked as the Chief Manager in Andhra Bank, Zonal Office, Guntur has deposed about the procedure to be followed in sanctioning crop loans and about the enquiry conducted by him regarding irregularities found connected to the crop loans sanctioned in Ravinuthala branch. He also deposed about the defects that were found in sanction of the crop loans in that branch and also the defects in the documents required for sanction of crop loans. He also deposed about the role of branch managers and precautions to be taken in sanctioning the crop loans.

17.PW.6 namely Mr.Padmanabhuni Padma Naga Vara Prasad who worked as a Senior Manager in Zonal Office of Andhra Bank, Guntur has also deposed about the irregularities noticed by him in sanctioning the crop loans by Ravinuthala branch of Andhra Bank and through him the loan files were marked as Ex.P141 to Ex.P194. According to him, he handed over all the relevant documents relating to the loan accounts to the Inspector of Police, CBI, Visakhapatnam under a receipt dated 31.3.2011 which is marked as Ex.P.195. He also deposed about the defects he found in the loan documents.

18.Mrs.Kidambi Mydhili who was examined as PW.7 has deposed that she worked as an Officer in Zonal Office, Andhra Bank, Guntur in the Credit Monitoring and Review Department. She spoke about her assistance to the Senior Manager in reviewing the ADA reports which were received from the branches including the Ravinuthala branch of 10C.C.07/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

Andhra Bank. She also spoke about the lapses which were found in sanctioning the crop loans by Ravinuthala branch of Andhra Bank.

According to her she prepared the observations under Ex.P99 to

Ex.P102 pertaining to the remarks in sanctioning the loans, appraisal notes, compliance reports, process note etc., relating to some months and that they contain her initials. According to her on comparison she came to know that there are differences between the copies of the process notes and sanction orders sent to the Zonal Office with the original process notes and sanction orders.

19.PW.8 namely Mr.Makkena Venkateswarlu who is the successor in office of the accused as the Branch Manager of Ravinuthala branch,

Andhra Bank has deposed that the accused had handed over the documents pertaining to 1100 crop loans stating that he (the accused) sanctioned those crop loans as per the bank norms and that there were no irregularities in sanction of those crop loans, except in one or two loans.

20.PW.8 has further deposed that the accused had informed to him that the accused had referred the pattadhar passbooks to MRO,

Korisapadu for verification and that the MRO had verified those pattadhar passbooks and issued certificates stating that some are genuine and that the said certificates were kept in the concerned loan files. Further PW.8 has deposed that the accused informed that the accused verified the loans of the borrowers in the said crop loans and that the borrowers were in possession of the lands mentioned in their pattadhar passbooks and that the extents mentioned in the pattadhar 11C.C.07/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP passbooks were correct and further that the Chief Manager,

Mr.K.S.Murthy, Rural Development Officer, Mr.M.Anand and

Mr.N.S.Sharma belonging to the Inspection Department, Zonal Office,

Guntur had visited Ravinuthala branch and verified the loan documents and found that the pattadhar pass books in two or three crop loans were fake. According to PW.8 one Mr.Suresh Kumar, the

Rural Development Officer, Zonal Office, Andhra Bank of Guntur had visited Ravinuthala branch on 22.11.2008 and 23.11.2008 and verified the documents pertaining to the crop loans sanctioned by the accused and even thereafter also Mr.Suresh Kumar visited that branch and again verified the documents for a period of three more days and informed to PW.8 that the pattadhar passbooks in the crop loans sanctioned to Abhaya Savings Bank account holders were fake.

21.PW.8 has further deposed Mr.Suresh Kumar took him and also 16 to 18 pattadhar pass books pertaining to those crop loans to the office of MRO, Koresipadu and verified them with the revenue records through MRO and came to know that except one pattadhar passbook all the remaining pattadhar pass books were not genuine and that a report was prepared to that effect and was submitted to the Zonal

Office.

22.The further evidence of PW.8 is that one Mr.K.G.K.Murthy and

Mr.Murali Krishna of Inspection department, Head Office, Andhra Bank,

Hyderabad had visited the Ravinuthala branch for annual inspection and referred 400 pattadhar pass books pertaining to the crop loans sanctioned by the accused to the MRO, Koresipadu and on 12C.C.07/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP verification they came to know that pattadhar pass books relating to 153 crop loans were fake. According to PW.8 the Zonal office, Andhra

Bank, Guntur gave directions to the accused to recover overdue crop loans sanctioned by the accused and so the accused had recovered pay payments in around 40 crop loans in which pattadhar pass books were noticed as fake and handed over those part payments to PW.8 for adjustment in the respective crop loans

23.The further evidence of PW.8 is that he took 800 pattadhar passbooks pertaining to the crop loans sanctioned by the accused to the office of MRO, Koresipadu and on verification it was noticed that some of them were fake and so he obtained a certificate about the same and submitted to the Zonal Office. PW.8 spoke about enquiry conducted by Mr.T.Hanumantha Rao.

24. The further evidence of PW.8 is that he, the accused and

Mr.T.Hanumantha Rao have visited some villages for borrowers and came to know that some of those borrowers were not residing in the villages and regarding some borrowers the villagers had informed to them that no such persons were residing in the villages.

25.PW.9 namely Mr.Pulicherla Paul Caesar who worked as the Senior

Manager in Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch from 20.05.2009 to 25.06.2012 has deposed that he handed over some loan files relating to the crop loans connected to this case through a covering letter

dated 15.6.2009, the copy of which was marked as Ex.P196. The copy

of Circular No.488 is marked as Ex.P197.

13C.C.07/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

26.PW.10 namely Mr.Adavani Sravan Kumar who worked as Rural

Development Officer of Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala Branch from 13.8.2007 to 15.11.2008 has deposed that while the accused was working as the branch manager in Ravinuthala Branch of Andhra Bank,

Mr.Y.Ravindranath worked as a bank officer and one

Mr.Ch.Venkateswara Rao worked as a Clerk/ Cashier and that the accused had personally attended for sanction of the crop loans pertaining to this case and that the accused himself contracted the borrowers and received applications from the borrowers and collected the documents such as pattadhar passbook, title deed, 10(1) adangal, small farmer certificate, no due certificates issued by other banks and abstract forms issued by the Mandal Revenue Officers and sanctioned crop loans and that subsequently the accused after disbursing the crop loans to the borrowers asked him(PW.10) to fill up the applications of the borrowers and the necessary documents and so he filled up the loan applications and other documents in the crop loans pertaining to this case and that as per the instructions of the accused they were kept in strong room and the keys were in the custody of the accused. According to him he prepared appraisal and process notes as per the instructions of the accused and he filled up transfer forms for adjustment of the crop loan amounts in the SB accounts of the borrowers and also entered the same in the system as directed by the accused. The further evidence of PW.10 is that the Rural Development

Officer namely Siva Kumar visited that branch once in a week on every

Thursday and that without appraising and preparing sanction notes 14C.C.07/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP had simply signed on them and since already crop loans were sanctioned and the amounts were disbursed by the accused .

27.The further evidence of PW.10 is that the accused himself rub out the remarks made by the Rural Development Officer Mr.Siva Kumar in appraisal forms by using correction fluid and directed him(PW.10) to write as ‘recommended for sanction’ and accordingly he wrote the same and when he questioned the accused about the same, the accused scolded him and directed him to work as instructed by the accused stating that the accused was the head of the branch and sanctioning authority and responsible for the entire transaction in the branch and that the accused got filled up the applications of SB accounts of the borrowers in the crop loans, through him(PW.10).

According to PW.10 he was terminated from the service on the allegations that he acted in accordance with the illegal directions of the accused and as he signed in the appraisal forms and process notes without inspecting the fields. Inspite of Mr.Siva Kumar did not sign on them and that he was responsible for tampering of the records and because he wrote in the appraisal form and process notes as recommended for sanction at the place of rubout of remarks with correction fluid. The further evidence of PW.10 is that the accused handed over loan application, letter of sanction, appraisal forms and memorandum for sanction, Form of Andhra Bank for issue Pattabhi Agri

Card, Demand Promissory note, composite agreement for agriculture, covenants of the co-obligant forms, Bank’s right to cancel limits and property statements to him along with property valuation certificate, adangal and title deed in all the crop loans pertaining to these cases 15C.C.07/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP for filling up the same as per the particulars mentioned in property valuation certificate, adangal and title deed. According to PW.10

Mr.Ch.Venkateswara Rao and one Mr.S.A.Pyaru who worked as a

Cashier also filled up some columns in those documents relating to crop loans and that Mr.K.C.Siva Kumar the Rural Development Officer filled up some columns in the appraisal forms and letter of sanction of the crop loans and that the accused sent ADA-1 reports pertaining to the crop loans to the Zonal Office along with copies of sanction letter, application form and appraisal form and sanction of short term loans.

According to him the copies of appraisal form and sanction of short term loans in some of the crop loans which are submitted to the Zonal

Office were not the copies of the originals and the accused took his signatures in the said copies and he signed on them as per the directions given by the accused and that the accused had obtained the signatures of Mr.Siva Kumar in the original of appraisals and short term loans after submitting the deception copies of appraisals and short term loans to the Zonal office. According to PW.10 even though

Mr.Siva Kumar, the Rural Development Officer had endorsed on some of the original appraisals and short terms loans as not recommended but the accused having rubbed out the same with correction fluid had got written through him(PW.10) as recommended and he wrote the same as per the instructions of the accused .

28.PW.11 namely Mr.K.C.Siva Kumar who worked as the Rural

Development Officer in Chimakurthi branch May, 2005 to May, 2009 has deposed that the Zonal Office, Andhra Bank, Guntur has directed him to attend Ravinuthala branch of Andhra Bank to monitor the 16C.C.07/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP agricultural loans and so he attended that branch once in 15 days, for a total of 14 days and monitored the agricultural loans from July, 2007 to September, 2007 and even thereafter he attended the monitoring of agricultural loans in that branch as per the direction of the zonal office. According to him he came to know that the accused being the branch manager of that branch had sanctioned crop loans and disbursed the amounts to the borrowers and entered the same in the system and also attended for a documentation and that the accused placed of those loan files before him(PW.11) for signing and he questioned the accused for asking him to sign on the loan files which loans were already sanctioned and disbursed to the borrowers and then the accused had informed that the accused had received loan applications and attended for documentation and sanctioned and disbursed the crop loan amounts to the borrowers because PW.11 used to come to the branch once in 15 days or once in a month and that there was immediate necessity to sanction crop loans due to crop season and the accused had informed that the accused had sanctioned crop loans to the borrowers as there was immediate need and that the accused verified all the loan applications and documents submitted by the borrowers which are proper and the accused himself personally attended the documentation and that there were latches in sanction the crop loans and requested to sign on the documents for sending the same to the Zonal Office in the manner of ADA Report and so he(PW.11) obliged the accused and signed on the loan documents relating to the crop loans subsequent to the sanction and disbursement of the loan amount by the accused. According to PW.11 he filled only some columns in the sanction letters and process notes in 4 or 5 loan 17C.C.07/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP accounts which were kept blank as per the instructions of the accused and that Mr.Sravan Kumar the Probationary Rural Development Officer had filled up the loan applications and documents pertaining to those crop loans and that PW.11 has not seen even one of the persons to whom those crop loans were sanctioned because the accused had sanctioned them in the absence of PW.11 and that neither the borrowers nor the Co-obligants nor the accused signed on the applications or documents in the presence of PW.11. The further evidence of PW.11 is that in the month of June, 2008 when the accused asked him to sign on the loan files which loans were already sanctioned and the amounts were disbursed, he signed in the annexures/process notes relating to the loan accounts by mentioning as ‘verified only documents’. The enquiry officer of the Vigilance Department, Head

Office, Andhra Bank, Hyderabad had informed to him by phone that in some of the crop loan files there was rub out with correction fluid.

29.PW.12 Mr.Yerragudi Ravindranath who worked as Assistant

Manager in Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala Branch from 18.06.2007 to 12.02.2008 has deposed that the accused worked as branch manager during that time and sanctioned some crop loans and he (PW.12) had opened only three SB accounts relating to those loans on the basis of ration card and voter card but he does not know who opened the SB accounts relating to other crop loans and the accused had assigned the work of opening SB accounts relating to those crop loans to

Mr.Sravan Kumar the Probationary Rural Development Officer and

Mr.Ch.Venkateswara Rao a sub manager also attended for that work and that the accused entrusted the work of filling up the crop loan 18C.C.07/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP applications and documents, preparation of vouchers and other works to Mr.Sravan Kumar and that the accused had insisted Mr.Sravan

Kumar to rub out the remarks made by Mr.K.C.Siva Kumar in appraisal of crop loans by using correction fluid and to write as ‘recommended’ at the rub out column and Mr.Sravan Kumar did the same which was informed to PW.12 when the CBI caused enquiry relating to those crop loans. According to PW.12 even though Mr.K.C.Siva Kumar a Rural

Development Officer was deputed to work in that branch for appraisal of the crop loans but the accused appraised, sanctioned and disbursed the crop loans and also entered in the computer system in the absence of Mr.K.C.Siva Kumar and that Mr.K.C.Siva Kumar had questioned the accused about the same and argued with him in the bank in their presence. PW.12 has deposed about the irregularities and defects found in those crop loans and the documents of the loans.

According to him the S.B account opening forms do not contain the signatures of the introducers.

30.The further evidence of PW.12 is that the borrowers relating to those crop loans were visiting the bank in the evening hours and that the accused and the Sub Manager namely Mr.Ch.Venkateswara Rao were working in the bank beyond banking hours and they have detained the Probationary Rural Development Officer who is Mr.Sravan

Kumar to work along with them in the branch beyond bank hours.

31.PW.13 namely Mr.Shaik Abdul Pyaru who worked as cashier in

Ravinuthala branch of Andhra Bank from February, 2008 to October, 2009 has deposed that he being cashier in that branch had attended 19C.C.07/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP to pay cash to the parties on passed withdrawals by collecting tokens and also attended the work entrusted to him by the accused who worked as the branch manager. According to him he paid cash to the parties by receiving tokens because the Sub Manager namely

Mr.Venkateswararao had identified the parties and verified the passbooks. According to him he filled up the address in the sanction letters available in the loan files under Exs.P171, P173, P175, P177 and

P189 as per the instructions of the accused and that he has got acquaintance with the signatures and handwritings of the accused and

Mr.SravanKumar(PW.10)andMr.Ravindranath(PW.12)and

Mr.Venkteswara Rao who worked as the Sub Manager and that the sanction letters contain the signatures of the accused and that the withdrawal forms contain the signatures of Mr.Sravan Kumar and

Mr.Venkateswara Rao and that Mr.Sravan Kumar had written the amount in the forms of appraisal and that the letters addressed to

MRO, Korisepadu available in those files were addressed by the accused. He has categorically deposed that on two occasions when parties were not available he handed over the cash on passed withdrawals numbering 8 or 9 to the accused after banking hours on the instructions of the sub manager Mr.Venkateswara Rao but he does not know whether the accused handed over the said amount to the parties or not. He further deposed that on one occasion when a party asked him to pay cash regarding five tokens which were given to the party in the counter, he (PW.13) has refused to give cash regarding five tokens but as per the instructions by the accused he paid cash to the accused regarding those five tokens.

20C.C.07/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

32.The evidence of PW.14 namely Mr.Palakaveety Krishna Murthy who worked as a Tashildar in Santanutalapadu Mandal is that he verified and compared the relevant entries of the copies of the pattadhar pass books relating to 92 crop loans which were sent to him by the MRO, Koresapadu with the relevant entries in the Record of

Rights i.e., 1(A), 1 (B), Fair Land Register and 10 (1) account copy, as per the proceedings of the District Collector of Prakasam District

dated 7.7.2010 and came to conclusion that 91 pattadhar passbooks

were fake and bogus and they are not pertaining to the persons whose names were mentioned in those books and so he gave a report to the District Collector, the copy of which is marked as Ex.P198.

According to him he narrated in Ex.P198 about the particulars of the original land owners for the survey numbers mentioned in the copies of the pattadhar passbooks and also explained as to how the entries are fabricated in those passbooks and the alternations were made in the revenue records.

33.PW.15 namely Mr.K.Srinivasa Rao who worked as the Tashildar of

Parchuru Mandal, Prakasam District has deposed that the District

Collector of Prakasam District has instructed him as per the proceedings dated 7.7.2010 to verify pattadhar passbooks and title deeds pertaining to 61 crop loans sanctioned by Ravinuthala branch of Andhra Bank and to give a report about their genuineness and so he received the copies of the pattadhar passbooks from ‘D’ Section of

District Collector’s Office, Ongole and collected Re-survey and settlement record, adangal, draft Record of Rights register, 1-B 21C.C.07/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

Register, 10 (1) account and Field Measurement Book pertaining to the lands mentioned in those pattadhar passbooks from the office of

Tashildar, Koresapadu and verified the relevant entries and came to a conclusion that the said 61 pattadhar passbooks are not genuine and he has submitted a report to the District Collector, the copy of which is marked as Ex.P.199, because according to him the relevant entries of those books are not tallied with the entries in the pattadhar passbooks.

34.Mr.Chillara Ramesh who is PW.16 who worked as Senior Assistant in Mandal Office, Koresapadu has deposed about the procedure for issuing pattadhar and title deed passbooks relating to the landed property. PW.17 namely Mr. Kosanam Ravi Kumar who worked as

Mandal Revenue Inspector of Korisapadu has also deposed about the procedure for issuing the pattadhar and title deed passbooks.

According to him the private persons will not be authorized to note the entries in the pattadhar passbooks or title deed passbooks and that if the entries written in the passbooks are not tallied with the entries noted in the revenue records, it can be said that those passbooks are not genuine. According to him the Mandal Revenue Officer/Tahsildar is the competent authority to issue nativity certificate. His further evidence is that the loan file under Ex.P189 contains a letter addressed by the branch manager dated 15.12.2007 but it does not contain the signature of one Mrs.Y.Subbalakshmi who worked as

Tahsildar of Koresapadu Mandal on 4.10.2007. According to him the signature on the property certificate is not of the Panchayat Secretary and the signature on 10(1) account is not the signature of the concerned village revenue officer and that the signatures appearing on 22C.C.07/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP the title deed does not belong to MRO, RDO and Sub Registrar of

Amanabrolu and that the signature on the nativity certificate which is marked as Ex.P190 does not belong to the village revenue officer of

Ravinuthala.

35.PW.18 namely Mr.Bhuvanam Ramalinga Vara Prasad who worked as Additional Revenue Inspector in Korisapadu Mandal, PW.19 namely

Mr.Ramachandruni Vasudevarao who worked as the Manadal Revenue

Inspector in Korisapadu Mandal, PW.20namelyMr.Rachavalla

Venkata Sesaiah who worked as Mandal Revenue Inspector in

Korisapadu Mandal, PW.21 namely Mrs.Gunturu Sujatha who worked as

Junior Assistant in the office of RDO, Ongole from 2001 to 2006,

PW.22 namely Mr.P.Venugopala Rao who worked as the branch manager in Union Bank of India, Ravinuthala branch from 28.8.2007 to 26.7.2011, PW.24 namely Mr. A.Raghava Reddy who worked as the

Assistant Branch Manager in Indian Bank, Medarametla branch, PW.25 namely Mr.Busurapalli Anjaiah who worked as the branch manager in

Prakasam District Co-operative Central Bank Limited, Ravinuthala branch from September, 2005 to October, 2007, PW.26 namely

Mr.Cherukuri Venkateswarlu who worked as the branch manager in the same bank, PW.27 namely Mr. Karicheti Narayana who worked as a staff assistant in the same bank, PW.28 namely Mr.K.Sanjeeva Rao who worked as the Staff Assistant in the same bank and PW.29 namely

Mr. Giddi Ravindra Babu who worked as the branch manager in Andhra

Pragathi Grameena Bank of Medarametla branch from June, 2005 to

June, 2008 have deposed that the signatures available on the letters, property certificates, No.3 account copies, adangals and the title deeds 23C.C.07/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP and nativity certificates and no dues certificates available in the loan files do not belong to the respective officials who worked at the relevant times and that even the seals affixed at those signatures also do not belong to the respective offices.

36.PW.23 namely Mr.Sareddu Sambasiva Rao who worked as the

Sub Registrar in the office of Sub Registrar, Addanki from April, 2010 to 30.6.2012 has deposed that the Village Administrative Officers used to produce the title deeds and obtain the signatures of the Sub

Registrars who after verifying the survey numbers would sign on the title deeds if those survey numbers are not in the prohibited list.

37.PW.30 namely Mr. Marriboyina Anjaneyulu who worked as Extra

Department Delivery Agent in Pamidipadu Post Office, since 1983 is that if the addressees are not available in the given address and the registered posts by causing enquiry about them for six days, they would return the covers to this senders. Through him Ex.P200 to

Ex.202 returned unserved registered postal covers were marked which are addressed to different persons and according to PW.30 having caused enquiries about the persons to whom the covers were addressed, as they were not available, he returned those covers by making an endorsement stating that the addressees were not residing in Pamidipadu village, to the CBI which is the sender of those covers.

38.PW.31 namely Mr.Tammuluri Subbarao who worked as Extra

Department Mail Carrier, Ravinuthala Sub Post Office, since 10.12.1986 has deposed that Mr.Kondru Kanakaiah who expired on 22.1.2011 24C.C.07/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP worked as Postman/Extra Department Delivery Agent in the sub post office, Ravinuthala and that he has got acquaintance with the signatures of late Mr.Kondru Kanakaiah and that Ex.P203 to Ex.225 postal covers contain the endorsements made by Mr.Kondru

Kanakaiah which were returned unserved to the sender CBI,

Visakhapatnam with an endorsement as the addressees were not residing in the given addresses and those endorsements contain the signatures of Mr.Konduru Kanakaiah.

39.PW.32 namely Maddineni Anjaneyulu who worked as the Village

Revenue Officer of Ravinuthala village has deposed that the Village

Revenue Officers are not competent to issue nativity certificates since 2008 and that the Gram Panchayat Secretaries are only competent to issue nativity certificates. According to him the signatures available on the property certificates, No.3 adangals and pattadar pass books and the nativity certificates, available in the loan files of this case are not his signatures and that he did not issue those nativity certificates.

Even he denied the seals as belonging to him and to his office which are available in the loan files.

40.PW.33 namely Mr.Medikonda Venkata Narayana who worked as

Village Revenue Officer-II of Pamidipadu village from December, 2008 to May, 2013 has deposed that by the time he assumed charge as

Village Revenue Officer of Pamidipadu village, one Mr.Hari Prabhakar was working as the Village Revenue Officer of Pamidipadu village but he died in February, 2009 and that they both worked together for 25C.C.07/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP about two months and that he has acquaintance with the signatures and handwritings of Mr.Hari Prabahkar. He also deposed that since 2008 the Village Revenue Officers are not competent to issue nativity certificates and that Gram Panchayat Secretaries are only competent to issue nativity certificates. According to him the signatures and seals available on the property certificates, 10(1) account copies, No.3 adangals and pattadhar passbooks and the nativity certificates available in the loan files connected to this case are not his signatures and also not the signatures of MrHari Prabhakar and those seals also do not belong to them.

41.PW.34 namely Mr.Yedavalli Venkata Subbarao who worked as panchayat secretary of Pamidipadu Grampanchayat, Korisapadu

Mandal from June, 2007 to 2011 has deposed that it is the duty of

Grampanchayat Secretaries to issue nativity certificates and the power to issue copies of adangals was given to the Grampanchayat Secretary in the year 2007. According to him the signatures appearing on the nativity certificates, property certificates, No.3 adangals which are available in the loan files connected to this case are not his signatures and even the seals appearing on those documents do not belong to him.

42.PW.35 namely Mr.Yalakapati Bhaskara Rao who worked as the

Village Revenue Officer of Pichukalagudipadu village from 24.5.2008 15.5.2013 has deposed about the duties of village revenue officers.

PW.36 namely Mr.Yenumula Venkata Chennaiah who worked as Village

Revenue Officer of Timmalapalem and Yerapalem villages from May, 26C.C.07/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP 2008 to May, 2013 has also deposed about the duties of village revenue officers. According to PW.35 and PW.36 the persons who are shown as the borrowers in the loan applications connected to this case do not belong to their respective villages as mentioned in the loan files.

43.PW.37 namely Mr.Kavuri Gopala Krishna Murthy who worked as the Inspector of branches in Inspection and Audit Department, Head

Office, Andhra Bank, Hyderabad has deposed that as per the instructions of General Manager, Head Office, Andhra Bank,

Hyderabad, he inspected Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch in

December, 2008 accompanied by one Mr.K.Murali Krishna a Senior

Inspector for a period of two weeks from 01.12.2008 and verified all the files of the crop loans including the documents therein and also the SB accounts including the account opening forms and found that 13 to 16 crop loans were sanctioned on fake pattadhar passbooks and submitted his report to the Zonal office. According to him at his request one Mr.Hari Narayana Seeth of Andhra Bank was directed to assist him on verification of the Pattadhar passbooks through the

Mandal Revenue Officer and it was found that 153 out of 400 Pattadhar passbooks were not tallying with the Revenue records and that a certificate was given by the MRO to that effect which he sent to the

Head Office. He further noticed that the SB accounts relating to 153 crop loans were not opened in accordance with KYC norms and so he prepared a report and submitted the same to the Head Office, the attested copy of which is marked as Ex.P226. According to him, he observed that in the loan account bearing No.2007/585 the name of 27C.C.07/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP the borrower was shown as Mr.Marriboina Venkata Rao, S/o

Venkateswarulu of Meedarametla as per the sanction order but in the pattadhar passbook the name was mentioned as Mr.Marriboina

Venkata Rao, S/o Peddabbai of Pamidipadu village but the loan amount was credited to the account bearing No.ASB 1452 relating to

Mr.Marriboina Venkata Rao, S/o. Srinivasa Rao of Anamanamuru.

44.The Evidence of PW.38 namely Mrs.Yerramothu Subba Lakshmi who worked as the MRO of Korisipadu Mandal from 2005 to 2009, is that the accused who was the Branch Manager of Andhra Bank,

Ravinuthala branch did not send any letter to her to register lien/charge pertaining to the crop loans in the revenue records when she worked as the Mandal Revenue Officer of Korisipadu. According to her the signatures available on the title deed and a letter marked as

Ex.P141-A which are available in the loan filed marked as Ex.P141 are not her signatures and that even the stamp under those signatures does not relate to the office of MRO, Korisipadu and that she did not issue that title deed. According to her the signatures available in the passbooks available in the loan files marked as Exs.P.143, 145, 147, 149,151,153,155,157,159,161,163,165,167,169,171,173,175, 177,179, 181,183,185, 187 and 189 and the signatures on the letters available in those files which are marked as Exs.P.143-A, 145-

A, 147-A,149-A,151-A,153-A,155-A,157-A,159-A,161-A,163-A,165-

A,167-A,169-A,171-A,173-A,175-A,177-A,179-A, 181-A, 183-A,185-

A, 187-A and 189-Aare not her signatures and that she did not issue those passbooks and that she did not make any endorsement on those 28C.C.07/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP letters and that even the stamps available on those documents do not belong to the office of MRO of Korisipadu.

45.PW.39 Mr.Bijja Srinivasulu who worked as the Village Revenue

Officer to the villages of Hanumapuram, H-Nidamanur and

Kavuruvanipalem of Naguluppalapadu Mandal from 2008 to 2013 has deposed that the photo affixed in the title deed available in the loan file marked as Ex.P149 relates to Mr.Kovi Raghavaiah who is a resident of Hanumapuram village but the name mentioned in that title deed is Mr.Ravi Ramanujam and that Mr.Kovi Raghavaiah died in the year 2000.

46.PW.40 namely Mr. Chevula Rajachandra Sekhar who worked as the Junior Assistant of H.Nidamanuru village of Naguluppalapadu

Mandal from 28.4.2007 to 31.12.2013 and also worked as In-charge

Panchayat Secretary of that village between 1.2.2009 to 30.11.2012 and who has been working as the Panchayat Secretary of Ulavapadu village since 21.1.2015 has deposed that he issued a death certificate of Mr.Kovi Raghavaiah, S/o Subbaiah of Hanumapuram village with a covering letter, the copy of which is marked as Ex.P227.

47.PW.41 namely Mr.Rayapati Babu Rao who worked as the Village

Revenue Officer of Anamanamuru and Thammavaram villages of

Koresapadu Mandal from 2.6.2008 to 23.5.2013 has deposed that he does not know the person whose photograph was affixed in the title deed which is available in Ex.P147 file and that there is no person namelyPamidighantaAnnapurnaiah,S/oVenkateswarluin 29C.C.07/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

Anamanamuru village and that the signature available at the seal of

Village Administrative Officer in the said title deed does not relate to him and that he did not affix that signature.

48.PW.42 namely Mr.Kovi Anjaiah a resident of Hanumapuram village has deposed that the photo affixed in the pattadhar pass book which is available in the crop loan file marked as Ex.P147 belongs to his father by name Mr.Raghavaiah but he is a native of Hanumapuram village but he never resided in Anamanamuru village and he has no lands in that village. Through PW.42 the photocopy of the death certificate of Mr.Kovi Raghavaiah was marked as Ex.P228 and the photo consisting of Mr.Kovi Raghavaiah and his grand daughter was marked as Ex.P229 and the photocopy of the pattadhar passbook relating to Mr.Kovi Raghavaiah was marked as Ex.P230.

49.PW.43 namely Mr.Chennaboina Ramamurthy a resident of

Koresapadu village has deposed that he is native of Koresapadu village and having lands in that village and neither he nor his father

Mr.Venkatappaiah has no lands anywhere and they never resided in

Ravinuthala village and did not avail any loan in Andhra Bank,

Ravinuthala Branch. According to him, even though the photo available in SB Account file marked as Ex.P178 and the loan file marked as Ex.P.177 belong to him but the name and address mentioned in those files do not belong to him and that the title deed available in that file does not belong to him and that the lands mentioned therein do not belong to him and that he was never called as Mr.Putta Balaiah and that his father’s name is not Mr.Veeragandham 30C.C.07/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP and that the signatures appearing in those documents are not relating to him and that he does not know about Mr.Muvva Rangayya.

50.PW.44 namely Mr.Vijaya Shankar Pasumarthi is a Handwriting

Expert who worked in the Government Examiner of Questioned

Documents Laboratory, Hyderabad. According to him this case was allotted to him by the Director, CFSL, Hyderabad in which the documents like title deed pass books, loan applications and specimen signatures of some persons were received and he has carefully and scientifically compared the general writing habits and individual writing characteristics between the supplied standard signatures/writings with the disputed signatures/writings as per the questionnaire and gave his opinion which is marked as Ex.P.231. Through him the specimen writings of Mr.Linga Ammaiah were marked as Ex.P232 and that his clear opinion is that the specimen signatures of PW.38 were not tallied with her questioned signatures and so the questioned signatures were not signed by her.

51.PW.45 namely Mr.S.P.Rama Rao is the investigation officer of this case. He has deposed about registration of this case and issuing the

FIR copy of which was marked as Ex.P.233. He also deposed about his examination of the witnesses and recording their statements and also collection of the relevant documents and about his filing the charge sheet. Through him Exs.P234 to Ex.P269 documents were marked.

52.The learned public prosecutor has submitted mainly that the accused being the Manager was duty bound to verify the S.B accounts 31C.C.07/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP opened properly and scrutinize the loan applications properly before sanctioning and disbursing the loans. But in this case the accused in collusion with others had opened the accounts without introducers and proper identification of the borrowers and knowing fully well had sanctioned the loans basing on forged and fabricated documents by entering into the criminal conspiracy with others and he gained pecuniary advantage not only to himself but also extended the same to others by cheating the bank by fabricating false documents and using the forged and fabricated documents as genuine documents and that by adducing oral and documentary evidence which are believable the prosecution side could prove the guilt of the accused for all the offences, for which charges were framed against him beyond reasonable doubt and that he is liable for punishment of all those offences.

53.Regarding the objection raised by the accused for admitting some electronic documents into evidence without the certificate under

Section 65-B(4) of the Indian Evidence Act, the learned public prosecutor has contended that the electronic documents which were adduced into evidence were secured by the bank officers who handed over the same to the investigation officer of this case and they were not secured from any person who was in possession of the device and the certificate under Section 65-B(4) of the Indian Evidence Act is not necessary in this case and even in the interest of justice, this Court has got power to relax the requirement of that certificate in this particular case. In support of her contention in this regard the learned public prosecutor has relied upon a decision in SHAFHI 32C.C.07/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

MOHAMMAD Vs. THE STATE OF HIMACHALRADESH in Special

Leave Petition (CRL.).No.2302 of 2017 of the Hon’ble SUPREME

COURT OF INDIA. In this decision it has been observed as follows:

“Thus, requirement of certificate under Section 65B(h) is not always mandatory. Accordingly, we clarify the legal position on the subject on the admissibility of the electronic evidence, especially by a party who is not in possession of device from which the document is produced. Such party cannot be required to produce certificate under Section 65B(4) of the Evidence Act. The applicability of requirement of certificate being procedural can be relaxed by Court wherever interest of justice so justifies”.

There is no dispute with regard to the preposition laid down in the cited decision.

54.On the other hand, the learned counsel for the accused has submitted mainly that the accused had no knowledge that the passbooks and the certificates produced by the borrowers were fake or not genuine and that by believing that those documents are genuine and as per the recommendations made by the staff working in the bank he had sanctioned and disbursed the loans and disbursed the proceeds to the respective savings bank accounts of the borrowers who had withdrawn the amounts from their respective accounts and he did not get any pecuniary advantage in those loan transactions and that there was neither conspiracy nor collusion on his part with anybody and that the evidence adduced by the prosecution side against him is neither believable nor sufficient to prove the allegations made and charges framed against him and the prosecution side has 33C.C.07/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP failed to prove the guilt of the accused for any of the charges that were framed against him beyond reasonable doubt and that he is entitled for acquittal.

55.His further contention is that according to Section 6 of A.P. Right in Land and Pattadhar Passbooks Act, 1971 the entries in the passbooks shall be presumed to be true and so nothing can be attributed against the accused in his believing those documents.

According to him the prosecution side has not specifically stated which is the clause i.e., applicable against the accused out of the three clauses mentioned under Section 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of

Corruption Act, 1988. He further contends that for prosecuting the accused because he was a public servant during the time of alleged offences, sanction under Section 197 of the Code of Criminal

Procedure is required but the prosecution side has not obtained any sanction for prosecuting him under that provision. He submitted that the accused is entitled for acquittal for all the offences since the prosecution side has failed to prove those charges beyond reasonable doubt.

56.In support of his contention in this regard, the learned counsel

for the accused has relied upon a decision in P.Nagendra Kumar and

Others v. State, Central Bureau of Investigation, rep. by its

Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad reported in

2011(2) ALT (Crl.)113(A.P). In this decision in Para-6 it has been observed that when once the proceeds are credited to the account of the customer, then the amount ceased to have identify of the 34C.C.07/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP proceeds of the discounted cheque and the amount becomes property of the said customer in whose account the amount was credited.

57.Regarding the protection under Section 197 of the Code of

Criminal Procedure, the learned counsel for the accused has relied upon a decision in State of Punjab Vs. Labh Singh reported in (2015) 3 Supreme Court Cases (Cri) 601. In this decision in Para- 10 it has been observed that unlike Section 19 of the Prevention of

Corruption Act, protection under Section 197 of the Code of Criminal

Procedure is available to the public servant concerned even after retirement. So the submission of learned counsel for the accused is that in this regard is that inspite of the accused was not in service by the time of taking cognizance of the alleged offences in this case the sanction under Section 19 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is necessary.

58.In reply to the said contentions of the learned counsel the accused regarding the sanction under Section 197 Cr.P.C., the learned

Public Prosecutor has referred a decision in Punjab State

Warehousing Corporation vs. Bhushan Chander and Another

of the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India dated 29.06.2016 in

Criminal Appeal No.159/2016 in which at Para-22 it has been observed by referring several decisions of the Hon’ble Apex Court on the subject that a survey of the precedents makes it absolutely clear that there has to be reasonable connection between the omission or commission and the discharge of official duty or the act committed was under the colour of the office held by the official and that if the acts 35C.C.07/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP omission or commission is totally alien to the discharge of the official duty, question of invoking Section 197 Cr.P.C does not arise.

59.In N.K.Ganuguly Vs. CBI New Delhi the Hon’ble Supreme

Court of Indian in its Judgment dated 19.11.2015 in Criminal

Appeal No.798/2015 at Page 50 it has been observed that the offence of cheating under Section 420 or for that matter the offences relatable to Sections 467, 468, 471 and 120-B can by no stretch of imagination by their very nature be regarded as having been committed by any public servant while acting or purporting to act in discharge of official duty and that in such cases, the official status only provides an opportunity for commission of the offence.

60.The learned counsel for the accused has relied upon a decision in A.Sivaprakash v. State of Kerala in 2016(2) ALT (Crl.) 341 of the Hon’ble Supreme Court, regarding the burden of the prosecution to prove the mandatory ingredients of the alleged offences under Section 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act. In this regard in Para-18 it has been observed that it was the obligation of the prosecution to satisfy the mandatory ingredients which could implicate the accused under the provisions of Section 13(1)(d) of the

Prevention of Corruption Act.

61.In view of the above stated evidence and the contentions of the learned public prosecutor and the learned counsel for the accused and decisions cited supra, now the Point that arises for determination is :

36C.C.07/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

1. Whether the prosecution side is able to establish the guilt of the accused for the charges that were

framed against him beyond reasonable doubt?

POINT:

The evidence of PW.1(D.Venkata Narasimha Rao) is only useful to the case of prosecution regarding the documents marked as

Exs.P1 and Ex.P2. He is the defacto complainant and he gave the report under Ex.P1 to the CBI Department for conducting investigation of this case. Along with Ex.P1, he gave the list of alleged fake loans which is marked under Ex.P2. His other evidence is only his opinion and because he is not an expert his opinion evidence is not relevant to this case. Basing on his oral evidence it cannot be considered that the loan accounts which he listed under Ex.P2 are fraudulent transaction.

The documents under Ex.P1 and Ex.P2 only enabled the complainant department to investigate the case.

62.Coming to the evidence of PW.2(H.Seshagiri Rao) his evidence that the appraising officers who signed in the original process notes and the appraising officers who signed on the process notes sent to the Zonal office are not one and the same is duly corroborated by the documents which were exhibited by him. His further evidence that the correction fluid was used in the original process notes at the column of ‘recommendations and signature’ of the appraising officer by mentioning on the top of the correction fluid recommended for sanction is also corroborated by the original process notes which were exhibited by him. His further evidence that the assessment forms contain the signature of the accused and the accused had signed on 37C.C.07/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP those forms as sanctioning authority in the capacity of branch manager is also corroborated by all the assessment forms which were exhibited by him.

63.The evidence of PW.3 to PW.7 and PW.13 who are all bank officials also duly corroborated by the documents they have exhibited and which were referred in their evidence .

64.The evidence of PW.9(P.Paul Ceasar) is only handing over of the loan files to the CBI Department. There is no dispute with regard to the fact that the accused worked as the branch manager of Andhra Bank,

Ravinuthala branch at the relevant time of sanctioning the crop loans which are disputed in this case. A perusal of the loan files connected to this case clearly show the signatures of the accused put therein as the authorized officer. It is not the case of the accused that he neither worked as branch manager in Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch at the relevant time nor sanctioned the crop loans which are disputed in this case.

65.(PW.8) Mr.M.Venkateswaruluis the successor of the accused in office as the branch manager of Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala Branch.

Mr.Sravan Kumar (PW.10) is the probationer Rural Development Officer in the said bank when the accused worked as the branch manager in that bank. Mr.K.C.Shiva Kumar(PW.11) was deputed to work in

Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch to monitor the agricultural lands.

The clear evidence of Mr.Sravan Kumar and Mr.K.C.Shiva Kumar is that the accused having already sanctioned the loans and disbursed 38C.C.07/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP the amounts had asked them to attend the documentation of the loan files and they have dealt with those documents as per the instructions of the accused. Being the Rural Development Officer on probation working under the accused, Mr.A.Sravan Kumar might have followed the instructions of the accused without raising any objection. According to him even though he sought for clarification the accused shouted against him, asking him to act according to the instructions of the accused who was responsible for the loan transaction. Even though

Mr.K.C.Shiva Kumar was not under obligation to work according to the instructions of the accused but according to him as the loans were already sanctioned and the amount was also disbursed, he could not do anything except to contribute his signatures on the documents as per the instructions of the accused. Even though there was opportunity for Mr.Shiva Kumar and Mr.Sravan Kumar to report against the accused for asking them to deal with the documents after sanctioning the loans they might have not exhibited courage against the accused to report to the superior officer. Simply because they did not report anything against the accused it does not mean that what they have deposed in the evidence is false. The clear evidence of

Mr.Sravan Kumar is that the accused rubbed out the writing of

Mr.K.C.Shiva Kumar in the appraisal form and process notes with correction fluid and that he wrote on the place where correction fluid was used, as ‘recommended for sanction’ at the instructions of the accused. The evidence of Mr.Sravan Kumar(PW.10) shows that he was removed from service, after conducting a departmental enquiry for the acts he committed regarding the loan files, even though according to him his act in this regard was according to the instructions given by the 39C.C.07/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP accused. The evidence of Mr.Sravan Kumar duly corroborated the evidence of PW.2 regarding the difference of the officers who signed on the original process notes and sanctioned letter and the copies of process notes and the sanctioned letters.

66.Coming to the evidence of Mr.Y.Ravendranath(PW.12), it is not in dispute that he worked as the Assistant Manager in Andhra Bank,

Ravinuthala branch when the accused worked as the branch manager of that bank during the time of sanctioning the crop loans connected to this case. His evidence duly corroborates the evidence of Mr.Sravan

Kumar and Mr.Shiva Kumar regarding their attending to the documentation of the crop loans as per the instructions of the accused.

His evidence further shows that the accused and the sub manager of that bank namely Mr.Ch.Venkateswara Rao who died and no more even worked in the bank beyond banking hours and that even

Mr.Sravan Kumar was forced to work in the bank beyond bank hours at their instance and that the borrowers of the crop loans were visiting the bank during evening hours beyond the bank hours.

67.The evidence of Mr.Sk.Abdul Pyaru(PW.13) also corroborates the evidence of Mr.Ravindranath to the effect that the accused worked in the bank even in the evening. His further evidence shows that he gave the cash which is the loan proceeds of some loans to the accused at the instructions of the sub manager namely Mr.Venkteswara Rao.

His further evidence shows that a borrower asked him to pay cash regarding five tokens connected to the loans but he refused to pay 40C.C.07/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP the amount and then the accused took the amount regarding those five tokens.

68.The main contention of the prosecution side is that the passbooks, nativity certificates and the letters addressed by bank manager to the MRO and the endorsements of the MRO on that letters and the other revenue records and also the no objection certificate issued by different banks have been fabricated in this case.

The evidence of Mrs.Y.Subba lakshmi(PW.38) who worked as MRO of

Korisapadu is very clear that she neither issued the passbooks nor gave endorsements on the letters said to have been addressed by the bank manager which are available in the loans files.

69.The evidence of Mr.P.Krishna Murthy(PW.14) who conducted enquiry about the entries in the relevant passbooks and compared them with the relevant entries available in the official revenue records, the copies of which were supplied to him is very clear that the entries in the passbooks available in the loan files are not correct and that those passbooks are fake documents. The report he prepared duly corroborates his evidence in this regard. The original revenue records which are (1A) and (1B) Registers which are exhibited in this case also duly corroborate his evidence.

70.Mr.K.Srinivasa Rao(PW.15) a revenue officer who conducted enquiry comparing the entries in the relevant passbooks which are available in the loan files with the entries mentioned in the official revenue records, the copies of which were supplied to him has given 41C.C.07/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP his opinion that the entries in those passbooks are not correct and that those passbooks are fake documents. The report he prepared duly corroborates his evidence in this regard. The original revenue records which are (1A) and (1B) Registers which are exhibited in this case also duly corroborate his evidence.

71.Mr.Ch.Ramesh(PW.16) had explained the procedure of issuing pattadhar and title deed passbooks.

72.Mr.K.RaviKumar(PW.17),Mr.B.R.VaraPrasad(PW.18),

Mr.R.Vasudeva Rao(PW.19), Mr.R.V.Seshayya(PW.20), Mrs.G.Sujatha (PW.21), Mr.B.Srinivasulu(PW.39), Mr.Ch.Rajachandra Sekhar(PW.40), and Mr.R.Babu Rao(PW.40) have categorically deposed that the documents which were alleged to have been issued by the revenue authorities available in the loan files are not containing the signatures of the revenue officers who worked at the relevant times and that the signatures available on those documents said to have been belonging to the revenue officials do not belong to those revenue officials who worked at the relevant times.

73.The evidence of Mr.M.Anjaneulu(PW.32), Mr.M.V.Narayana (PW.33), Mr.Y.V.Subba Rao(PW.34), Mr.Y.Bhaskara Rao(PW.35), and

Mr.Y.V.Chennaiah(PW.36) also shows that the passbooks and other revenue documents including nativity certificates available in the loan files do not contain the signatures of the respective officials who worked at the relevant times and that the signatures available on 42C.C.07/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP those documents are not the signatures of those officials who worked at the relevant times.

74.Concerning the no dues certificates available in the loan files

Mr.P.Venu Gopala Rao(PW.22), Mr.A.Raghava Reddy(PW.24),

Mr.B.Anjaiah(PW.25), Mr.Ch.Venkateswarulu,(PW.26) Mr.K.Narayana (PW.27), Mr.K.Sanjeeva Rao(PW.28), Mr.G.Ravindra Babu(PW.29) have categorically denied their signatures said to have been available on the no dues certificates available in the loan files. According to them they did not issue such no dues certificates. Even they have denied the seals as belonging to their respective banks which are available on the said no dues certificates. All these witnesses are bank employees and they have no motive to speak falsely either in favour of prosecution case or against the accused after taking oath before this

Court. If really they made endorsements on those no dues certificates and put their signatures and seals on those certificates, there was no necessity for them to deny those signatures which are available on the certificates as belonging to them. Taking into consideration their evidence it can be safely concluded that the no dues certificates available in the loan files were not issued by them and that they are fake documents.

75. The evidence of K.Gopalakrishna Murthy(PW.37) shows that he conducted an enquiry regarding the crop loans connected to this case and found that some crop loans were sanctioned on fake documents and he gave report accordingly. His report duly corroborates his evidence in this regard. His clear evidence is that the savings bank 43C.C.07/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP accounts relating to the crop loans of this case were not opened in accordance with KYC norms . The same is evident from his report.

76.The learned counsel for the accused have contended that the prosecution side has not exhibited either the voters list or the ration cards to show that the borrowers are not relating to the villages which were mentioned in their respective loan files. But this contention cannot be accepted because if a person belongs to a particular village for proving that the said person belongs to that village his voters identity card or ration card can be exhibited positively. But for producing negative evidence it is difficult to produce documentary evidence. When there is direct evidence from the villagers and revenue officials who are examined as witnesses that the alleged borrowers are not residents of the villages which are mentioned in their respective loan files, their evidence can be taken into consideration for proving that those borrowers do not relate to the villages, the names of which were mentioned in the respective loan files.

77. The allegation in this case is that the accused without following the KYC norms had opened the SB accounts of the borrowers. As could be seen from the loan files exhibited in this case except a nativity certificate which is alleged to have been a fabricated document, there is no other document to prove that the borrower is a resident of the relevant village. Neither the voters identity card nor the ration card nor any other document to show that the borrower belongs to a particular village was taken for opening the savings bank 44C.C.07/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP account. Concerning the nativity certificate available in the file, the evidence of revenue officials and panchayat secretaries is available to show that they are not genuine documents. The evidence on record is very clear that those nativity certificates have been fabricated only for the sake of opening SB accounts in the names of the borrowers.

78. The other contention of the learned counsel for the accused is that it is not the duty of the accused to open the SB accounts and other staff working in the bank have to attend that work. Even though the other staff working in the bank were entrusted with attending the opening of savings bank account but being the Manager of Andhra

Bank, Ravinuthala Branch, the accused was the authorized officer to open the accounts. The duty of the other staff was only to scrutinize the documentation regarding the same. In this case the allegation is that Mr.Ch.Venkateswra Rao who worked in that branch also colluded with the accused in the alleged loan transactions. Because he died, he has not been prosecuted in this case. So irrespective of whether there was any role played by the other staff members in opening the

SB account without following the KYC norms but the accused cannot avoid his liability of opening those accounts without following the KYC norms, because ultimately after his scrutiny only, the SB accounts would be opened. So certainly there was role played by the accused in opening the SB accounts without following the KYC norms in the names of borrowers. If the accused was diligent and had no criminal intention, certainly he would have insisted for production of any document regarding identity proof of borrowers without merely 45C.C.07/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP depending upon the nativity certificates which are fabricated documents.

79. The learned counsel for the accused has contended referring the evidence recorded in the cross examination of Mr.A.Sravan

Kumar(PW.10), Mr.K.C.Shiva Kumar(PW.11), Y.Ravendranath(PW.12) and

Mr.Sk.Abdul Pyaru(PW.13) wherein they have stated that the loan proceeds were disbursed to the borrowers on proper identification and presentation of the respective tokens has contended that the accused had not taken any amount and so he did not gain any pecuniary advantage in this case. But those witnesses have deposed the manner in which the loan proceeds need to be disbursed. But in this case there is no specific evidence to show that all the borrowers had personally took the loan amounts by attending the bank. The evidence also shows that in respect of some loan transactions the amount was paid to the accused. Taking into consideration the evidence on record it appears that even though the documents were prepared properly as if the loan proceeds were paid to the respective borrowers but in fact it was not done properly. Whether there was collusion for the accused with other staff members including

Mr.A.SravanKumar(PW.10),Mr.K.C.ShivaKumar(PW.11),

Y.Ravendranath(PW.12) and late Mr.Ch.Venkatesawrulu or not, but certainly the accused had played major role in the alleged loan transactions. It appears that fortunately because nobody stated anything against other staff members except the accused and

Mr.Ch.Venkateswarulu, those other staff members have not been prosecuted in this case. The evidence on record is very clear that the 46C.C.07/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP accused had played major role in fabrication of documentation in the alleged loan transactions.

80. There is evidence of even postal officials to show that the postal covers which were addressed to the borrowers were returned unserved as they were not residing in the respective villages. Even the postal officials are independent witnesses and they have no motive to speak falsely either in favour of prosecution side or against the accused.

Their evidence is corroborated duly by the relevant documentary evidence.

81. The evidence of Mr.M.Venkateswarulu(PW.8) who is the successor of the accused clearly shows that the accused had handed over the loan files to him stating that all the loan transactions and the documents available in the loan files are genuine transactions and documents and that the accused got verified the passbooks through the revenue officials and got confirmed that they are genuine documents

82. The evidence of Mrs.Y.Subbalakshmi(PW.38) the then MRO of

Korisapadu and other revenue officials clearly shows that the title deeds and passbooks available in the loan files are fake documents.

The letter addressed by the accused to the MRO of Korisapadu which is available in the loan file contains an endorsement of the MRO which is alleged to be containing the signature and seal of

Mrs.Y.Subbalakshmi but she denied the same. The opinion of the expert also is available to the effect that the signature appearing on 47C.C.07/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP this letter does not belong to Mrs.Y.Subbalakshmi. The expert also gave evidence to that effect. In the cross examination when a suggestion was put to her that the signatures available on those letters belong to her, she has denied the same. It is a letter exclusively addressed by the accused to the MRO of Korisapadu and so the accused cannot plead ignorance on that letter. Mrs.Y.Subbalakshmi is a Government servant and an independent witness. She has no motive to speak falsely either in favour of the case of prosecution or against the accused. If really she gave that endorsement by signing and affixing her seal, there was no necessity for her to deny the same. I find no reason to disbelieve her evidence in this regard. Her evidence clearly proves that the endorsement in the form of acknowledgment available on that letter does not belong to her. So with her evidence which appears to me as believable, it is proved that the said letter is a fabricated document. Except for the accused there was no necessity for any other person to fabricate that letter.

A perusal of that letter shows that it was exclusively dealt by the accused. So the criminal intention on the part of the accused not only in fabricating the loan documents but also in the loan transactions can be easily understood.

83. Irrespective of whether the alleged borrowers were fictitious persons or not, but certainly there was fabrication of documents in the loan transactions connected to this case. Particularly the title deed passbook or pattadhar passbook whichever is available in the loan file and the nativity certificate and the no dues certificates the said letter addressed by the accused to Mrs.Y.Subbalakshmi(PW.38) and other 48C.C.07/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP revenue records available in the loan file were fabricated for the purpose of alleged loan transactions. Because Mr.Ch.Venkateswarulu who worked in that bank died and no more and other staff members of that bank have not been prosecuted in this case, the accused is not entitled to be let of from this case. He is liable for fabrication of documents and using the fabricated and forged documents as genuine documents and also cheating the bank in collusion with other persons, for the best reasons known to him. There is ample evidence of the bank officials, revenue officials, postal authorities and also the villagers which is duly corroborated by ample documentary evidence to prove the involvement of the accused in the alleged loan transactions.

84.The other contention of the learned counsel for the accused is that it is not necessary for the accused to cross verify the documents produced by the borrowers to know whether they are genuine documents or not. So far as the title deed passbook or pattadhar passbook is concerned, the learned counsel for the accused relies on

Section 6 of A.P Right in Land and Pattadhar Passbooks Act, 1971.

There is no dispute regarding the fact that the accused does not need to cross verify the documents produced by the borrowers unless he personally entertains any doubt. Even if the title deed passbook or pattadhar passbook is not genuine because there is no direct evidence to show that the accused has fabricated the same nothing can be attributed against him in this regard. But regarding the letters addressed by him to the MRO Korisapadu, as I have already stated the endorsement obtained on that letter has been fabricated which is within the exclusive knowledge of the accused. The SB accounts 49C.C.07/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP were opened clearly without following the KYC norms at least insisting for any introducer. So even though the accused was under no obligation to cross verify the documents produced by the borrower and can rely upon the presumption under Section 6 of the said Act but he cannot avoid his liability in the loan transactions for not following the KYC norms in opening the SB accounts and for fabrication of the said letter and the acknowledgment thereon alleged to have been given by Mrs.Y.Subbalakshmi. Even basing on the evidence of other bank employees regarding ‘no dues certificates’ it can be considered in this case that even the ‘no dues certificates’ have been fabricated by forgery which must be to the knowledge of the accused. So irrespective of whether the accused knows about the fabrication of title deed passbook/pattadhar passbook and other revenue records including the nativity certificates, as already stated he must be held responsible for fabrication of the said letter and not following the KYC norms in opening the SB accounts. So far as the statement of accounts which are computer generated sheets relying upon the observations in Shafhi Mohammad case cited supra, those documents can be taken into consideration as admissible in evidence not only because they were secured from a person who is not in possession of the device or the person who was dealing with the system but also by dispensing with the certificate required under Section 65(B) of the

Indian Evidence Act.

85.There is no dispute with regard to the observations made in the decisions cited supra, so far as the sanction under Section 197 Cr.P.C is concerned. It is required only if the act alleged against the public 50C.C.07/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP servant is a part of the discharge of his official duty. In the present case charges framed against the accused are under Section 120-B, 420, 468 and 471 IPC. Even though sanctioning loan and disbursement of the loan amount to the borrower is a part of discharge of the official duty of the accused, but the allegations made in this case against him are that the accused in conspiracy with others had fabricated documents by forgery and in criminal conspiracy with others had committed the offence of cheating by using those documents as genuine documents. So fabrication of documents by forgery and entering into the criminal conspiracy with others and cheating the bank do not form part of discharge of official duties of the accused. So the protection under Section 197 of the Code of Criminal

Procedure which is meant to safe guard or protect the public servant from vexatious prosecution, in the facts and circumstances of this case is not available to the accused and so the sanction required under that provision is not necessary for prosecution of the accused in this case for the alleged offences. So far as the offence under Section 13(2) r/w 13(1) (d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, the sanction as required under Section 19 of that Act is not necessary in this case because by the date of taking cognizance of the alleged offences the accused was not in service.

86.Coming to framing of charges under Section 13(2) r/w 13(1)(d) of the said Act it was clearly alleged in the charge sheet that the accused had committed gross criminal misconduct in sanctioning the loans connected to this case by abusing his possession as a public servant holding the office as the Manager of Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch 51C.C.07/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP by cheating and adopting illegal means and the offence under Section 13 of the said Act is nothing but criminal misconduct by a public servant. So the allegations leveled against the accused covered all the three clauses of Section 13(1)(d) of that provision. The charge framed against the accused under that provision includes all the three clauses. So even if it is not specifically mentioned in the charge under which clause out of the three clauses of that provision, the act alleged against the accused falls under, it cannot said that the charge is defective. So far as the burden of proving the charge is concerned certainly it entirely lies on the prosecution side as contended by the learned counsel for the accused.

87.Even Though it is contended by the prosecution side that the borrowers in this case are non-existing persons but in order to prove the charges that are framed against the accused. It is not necessary to prove in this case that the borrowers are non-existing persons.

Even if the borrowers were existing and took the loan proceeds still the accused is liable for the alleged offences because there was fabrication of documents by forgery and using them as genuine documents and thereby cheating the bank either to get benefit for himself or to extend the benefits to the borrowers or others by the accused.

88.Majority of the witnesses are official witnesses of different banks,

Revenue Department and Postal Department and those witnesses and the private witnesses who have been examined in this case, as I have already stated, are independent witnesses and they have no motive at 52C.C.07/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP all to give false evidence either in favour of prosecution or against the accused and even the documents relied upon by the prosecution side are public documents maintained in day to day official transactions.

The documentary evidence adduced by the prosecution side duly corroborates the oral evidence which is available on record. I find no reason to disbelieve or discredit such evidence and the same is believable, trustworthy, cogent and clinching. So I believe the same.

89.The learned counsel for the accused has raised some other contentions regarding appreciation of evidence which have been mentioned in his written arguments which became part of the record but in view of my above discussion I hold that they are neither material to this case nor do they go to the root of the case of prosecution. They do not in any way influence the result of the case. So this court opines that it is not necessary to discuss about them.

90.Considering the charge under sec.13 (1) (d) r/w sec.13 (2) of the

Prevention of Corruption Act 1988 it is not necessary that the accused should get any pecuniary advantage for himself out of the alleged fraud transaction in this case. Even if the pecuniary advantage was extended to any other person including the borrowers by his official discharge of duties while holding the public office in the capacity of

Branch Manager of Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala Branch by corrupt or illegal means by abusing his position as such public servant the accused is liable for punishment for the said charge under that provision of law. So by sanctioning the loan and disbursing the loan amount to the borrowers in this case based on forged and fabricated 53C.C.07/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP documents and using them as genuine documents in criminal conspiracy with the borrowers and thereby cheating the said Bank to part with the loan amount the accused had obtained pecuniary advantage as such public servant while holding the office of branch manager of that Bank by abusing his position as such public servant by corrupt or illegal means and thereby the accused is liable for punishment of the offence under sec.13 (1) (d) r/w sec.13(2) of the said Act.

91.There are neither contradictions nor major omissions proved in this case. Even though there are some discrepancies and variations and inconsistencies in the evidence, they are minor in nature and not material and they do not go to the root of case of prosecution, making the same as not believable. Considering the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and the evidence on record both oral and documentary I have no hesitation to believe the evidence adduced by the prosecution side and to consider the case of prosecution positively to hold that the prosecution side is able to establish the guilt of the accused for all the offenses for which charges were framed against them beyond reasonable doubt.

92.From the above discussion, I hold on the point that the prosecution side is able to establish the guilt of the accused for all the charges that were framed against them beyond reasonable doubt and that the accused are liable for punishment according to law for all those offences.

54C.C.07/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

In the result, the accused is found guilty of the offences under

Sections 120-B IPC, 420 IPC, 471 r/w 468 IPC and under Section 13(1)

(d) r/w 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and he is convicted under Section 428 (2) Cr.P.C. for the said four offences.

PRINCIPAL SPL. JUDGE FOR C.B.I. CASES,

FAC I Addl. SPL.JUDGE FOR C.B.I CASES,

VISAKHAPATNAM.

At this stage the accused is questioned about the quantum of sentence that is going to be imposed against him for the offences under Sections 120-B, 420, 471 r/w 468 IPC and under Section 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 which are proved against him for which he stated that he suffers from diabetes, blood pleasure and nervous weakness and heart ailment and that he lost his wife in the year 2007 and that he has got three daughters out of whom two were married and that his youngest daughter is yet to be married and that he incurred heavy debts for maintenance of his family and that he was dismissed from service in the year 2008 and has been struggling for survival and he pleaded mercy of the Court.

But taking into consideration the nature of offences and the manner in which they were committed in this case, this Court does not incline to extend the benefit of the provisions of the Probation of Offenders Act in his favour. But taking into consideration his statement and the over all facts and circumstances of the case, this Court opines that imposition of Rigorous imprisonment for a period of TWO YAERS

and to pay fine of Rs.2,000/- (Rupees Two thousand only), in

default simple imprisonment for a period of ONE month for

the offence under section 120-B IPC and Rigorous

55C.C.07/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

imprisonment for a period of TWO YEARS and to pay fine of

Rs.2,000/- (Rupees Two thousand only), in default simple

imprisonment for a period of ONE MONTH for the offence

under section 420 IPC and Rigorous imprisonment for a period

of TWO YEARS and to pay fine of Rs.2,000/- (Rupees Two

thousand only), in default simple imprisonment for a period of

ONE month for the offence under section 471 r/w 468 IPC

and Rigorous imprisonment for a period of TWO YEARS and to

pay fine of Rs.2,000/- (Rupees Two thousand only), in default

simple imprisonment for a period of ONE month for the

offence under section 13 (1)(d) r/w 13(2) of the Prevention of

Corruption Act, 1988 is just and proper in this case. Accordingly the accused is convicted and the sentences are imposed against him as stated above.

All the sentences of imprisonments imposed against him shall run concurrently. He is entitled for set off the period of remand undergone by him under Section 428 Cr.P.C. It is informed to him that he is entitled to challenge this Judgment in the Appellate Court and also entitled to legal aid according to law. It is ordered to supply a copy of this Judgment to him on free of cost.

Typed to my dictation, corrected and pronounced by me in open Court on this the day 27th day of December, 2019.

PRINCIPAL SPL. JUDGE FOR C.B.I. CASES,

FAC I Addl. SPL.JUDGE FOR C.B.I CASES,

VISAKHAPATNAM.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

LIST OF WITNESSES EXAMINED ON BEHALF OF PROSECUTION.

56C.C.07/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

P.W.1: Davuluri Venkata Narasimha Rao P.W.2: Hejeebu Seshagiri Rao P.W.3: Tatineni Hanumantha Rao P.W.4: Nalam Harinath P.W.5: Kuntamukkala Suryanarayana Murthy P.W.6 : Padmanabhuni Padma Naga Vara Prasad P.W.7: Kidambi Mydhili P.W.8: Makkena Venkateswarlu P.W.9: Pulicherla Paul Caesar P.W.10: Adavani Sravan Kumar P.W.11: K.C.Siva Kumar P.W.12: Yerragudi Ravindranath P.W.13: Shaik Abdul Pyaru P.W.14: Palakaveety Krishna Murthy P.W.15: K.Srinivasa Rao P.W.16: Chillara Ramesh P.W.17: Kosanam Ravi Kumar P.W.18: Bhuvanam Ramalinga Vara Prasad P.W.19: Ramachandruni Vasudevarao P.W.20: Rachavalla Venkata Sesaiah P.W.21: Gunturu Sujatha P.W.22: P.Venugopala Rao P.W.23: Sareddu Sambasiva Rao P.W.24: A.Raghava Reddy P.W.25: Busurapalli Anjaiah P.W.26: Cherukuri Venkateswarlu P.W.27: Karicheti Narayana P.W.28: K.Sanjeeva Rao P.W.29: Giddi Ravindra Babu P.W.30: Marriboyina Anjaneyulu P.W.31: Tammuluri Subbarao P.W.32: Maddineni Anjaneyulu P.W.33: Medikonda Venkata Narayana P.W.34: Yedavalli Venkata Subbarao P.W.35: Yalakapati Bhaskara Rao P.W.36: Yenumula Venkata Chennaiah P.W.37: Kavuri Gopala Krishna Murthy P.W.38: Yerramothu Subba Lakshmi P.W.39: Bijja Srinivasulu P.W.40: Chevula Rajachandra Sekhar P.W.41: Rayapati Babu Rao P.W.42: Kovi Anjaiah P.W.43: Chennaboina Ramamurthy P.W.44: Vijaya Shankar Pasumarthi P.W.45: S.P.Rama Rao

LIST OF DOCUMENTS MARKED ON BEHALF OF PROSECUTION.

Ex.P.1: Copy of complaint/report dt.9.6.2009. Ex.P.2: Copy of the list of 153 accounts relating to the fraudulent transactions enclosed to the complaint Ex.P1.

57C.C.07/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.3:Copy of letter dt.17.11.2007 issued by the Zonal Office to the Chief Manager/Manager, Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch. Ex.P.4:Letter of sanction dt.4.10.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/172. Ex.P.4-A :Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/172. Ex.P.5:Letter of sanction dt.4.10.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/173. Ex.P.5-A:Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/173. Ex.P.6:Letter of sanction dt.4.10.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/174. Ex.P.6-A : Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/174. Ex.P.7:Letter of sanction dt.4.10.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/175. Ex.P.7-A : Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/175. Ex.P.8:Letter of sanction dt.4.10.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/176. Ex.P.8-A : Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/176. Ex.P.9:Letter of sanction dt.4.10.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/178. Ex.P.9-A : Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/178. Ex.P.10:Letter of sanction dt.4.10.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/180. Ex.P.10-A : Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/180. Ex.P.11:Letter of sanction dt.4.10.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/201. Ex.P.11-A : Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/201. Ex.P.12: Letter of sanction dt.4.10.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/222. Ex.P.12-A : Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/222. Ex.P.13: Letter of sanction dt.4.10.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/240. Ex.P.13-A : Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/240. Ex.P.14:Letter of sanction dt.4.10.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/260. Ex.P.14-A : Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/260. Ex.P.15:Letter of sanction dt.4.10.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/282. Ex.P.15-A : Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/282. Ex.P.16: Letter of sanction dt.4.10.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/283.

58C.C.07/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.16-A : Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/283. Ex.P.17: Letter of sanction dt.4.10.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/285. Ex.P.17-A : Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/285. Ex.P.18: Letter of sanction dt.4.10.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/295. Ex.P.18-A : Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/295. Ex.P.19: Letter of sanction dt.4.10.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/300. Ex.P.19-A : Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/300. Ex.P.20: Letter of sanction dt.4.10.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/304. Ex.P.20-A : Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/304. Ex.P.21: Letter of sanction dt.4.10.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/306. Ex.P.21-A : Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/306. Ex.P.22:Letter of sanction dt.20.10.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/314. Ex.P.22-A : Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/314. Ex.P.23:Letter of sanction dt.12.10.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/316. Ex.P.23-A :Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/316. Ex.P.24:Letter of sanction dt.20.10.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/321. Ex.P.24-A : Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/321. Ex.P.25 :Letter of sanction dt.22.10.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/323. Ex.P.25-A : Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/323. Ex.P.26 :Letter of sanction dt.22.10.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/324. Ex.P.26-A : Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/324. Ex.P.27: Letter of sanction dt.22.10.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/325. Ex.P.27-A : Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/325. Ex.P.28: Letter of sanction dt.22.10.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/326. Ex.P.28-A : Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/326. Ex.P.29: Letter of sanction dt.22.10.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/330. Ex.P.29-A : Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold 59C.C.07/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

Credit Card Loan No.2007/330. Ex.P.30: Letter of sanction dt.22.10.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/340. Ex.P.30-A : Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/340. Ex.P.31: Letter of sanction dt.22.10.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/366. Ex.P.31-A : Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/366. Ex.P.32: Covering letter dt.14.12.2007. Ex.P.33: ADA-1 Report dt.14.12.2007. Ex.P.34: ADA-5 report dt.14.12.2007. Ex.P.35: Letter of sanction dt.1.11.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/391. Ex.P.35-A : Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/391. Ex.P.36: Letter of sanction dt.2.11.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/394. Ex.P.36-A : Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/394. Ex.P.37: Letter of sanction dt.7.11.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/449. Ex.P.37-A : Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/449. Ex.P.38:Letter of sanction dt.7.11.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/451. Ex.P.38-A :Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/451. Ex.P.39:Letter of sanction dt.15.11.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/484. Ex.P.39-A :Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/484. Ex.P.40:Letter of sanction dt.15.11.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/487. Ex.P.40-A : Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/487. Ex.P.41: Letter of sanction dt.26.11.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/527. Ex.P.41-A :Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/527. Ex.P.42:Letter of sanction dt.26.11.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/530. Ex.P.42-A : Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/530. Ex.P.43:Letter of sanction dt.26.11.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/531. Ex.P.43-A : Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/531. Ex.P.44:Letter of sanction dt.26.11.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/532. Ex.P.4-A : Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/532. Ex.P.45: ADA-1 Report dt.12.2.2008.

60C.C.07/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.46:ADA-5 report dt.19.2.2008. Ex.P.47:Letter of sanction dt.6.12.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/576. Ex.P.47-A :Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/576. Ex.P.48:Letter of sanction dt.6.12.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/577. Ex.P.48-A :Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/577. Ex.P.49:Letter of sanction dt.6.12.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/578. Ex.P.49-A :Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/578. Ex.P.50: Letter of sanction dt.6.12.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/579. Ex.P.50-A :Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/579. Ex.P.51:Letter of sanction dt.6.12.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/580. Ex.P.51-A :Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/580. Ex.P.52:Letter of sanction dt.10.12.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/588. Ex.P.52-A :Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/588. Ex.P.53:Letter of sanction dt.10.12.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/590. Ex.P.53-A :Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/590. Ex.P.54:Letter of sanction dt.10.12.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/591. Ex.P.54-A :Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/591. Ex.P.55:Letter of sanction dt.10.12.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/592. Ex.P.55-A :Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/592. Ex.P.56:Letter of sanction dt.10.12.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/595. Ex.P.56-A :Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/595. Ex.P.57:Letter of sanction dt.10.12.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/597. Ex.P.57-A :Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/597. Ex.P.58:Letter of sanction dt.10.12.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/598. Ex.P.58-A :Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/598. Ex.P.59:Letter of sanction dt.10.12.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/599. Ex.P.59-A :Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/599.

61C.C.07/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.60:Letter of sanction dt.10.12.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/600. Ex.P.60 -A :Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/600. Ex.P.61:Letter of sanction dt.10.12.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/603. Ex.P.61-A :Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/603. Ex.P.62:Letter of sanction dt.10.12.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/613. Ex.P.62-A :Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/613. Ex.P.63:Letter of sanction dt.18.12.2007relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/617. Ex.P.63-A :Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/617. Ex.P.64:Letter of sanction dt.20.12.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/638. Ex.P.64-A :Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/638. Ex.P.65:Letter of sanction dt.28.12.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/650. Ex.P.65-A :Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/650. Ex.P.66:Letter of sanction dt.28.12.2007 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/652. Ex.P.66-A :Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/652. Ex.P.67:ADA-1 Report dt.13.2.2008. Ex.P.68:ADA-5 report dt.15.3.2008. Ex.P.69:Letter of sanction dt.5.1.2008 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/669. Ex.P.69-A :Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/669. Ex.P.70:Letter of sanction dt.5.1.2008 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/670. Ex.P.70-A :Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/670. Ex.P.71:Letter of sanction dt.18.1.2008 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/678. Ex.P.71-A :Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/678. Ex.P.72:Letter of sanction dt.18.1.2008 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/679. Ex.P.72-A :Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/679. Ex.P.73:Letter of sanction dt.18.1.2008 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/680. Ex.P.73-A :Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/680. Ex.P.74:Letter of sanction dt.24.1.2008 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/685. Ex.P.74-A :Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold 62C.C.07/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

Credit Card Loan No.2007/685. Ex.P.75:Letter of sanction dt.24.1.2008 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/686. Ex.P.75-A :Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/686. Ex.P.76:Letter of sanction dt.24.1.2008 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/687. Ex.P.76-A :Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/687.

Ex.P.77:Letter of sanction dt.24.1.2008 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/689. Ex.P.77-A :Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/689. Ex.P.78:Letter of sanction dt.24.1.2008 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/690. Ex.P.78-A :Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/690. Ex.P.79:Letter of sanction dt.30.1.2008 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/696. Ex.P.79-A :Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/696. Ex.P.80:Letter of sanction dt.30.1.2008 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/698. Ex.P.80-A :Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/698. Ex.P.81:Letter of sanction dt.30.1.2008 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/699. Ex.P.81-A :Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/699. Ex.P.82:Copy of covering letter under which the Chief Manager, Zonal Office, Andhra Bank received reports of ADA-1 and ADA-5, sanction letters and assessment forms for the month of February, 2008. Ex.P.83:ADA-1 Report dt.11.4.2008. Ex.P.84:ADA-5 report dt.30.4.2008. Ex.P.85:Letter of sanction dt.1.2.2008 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/701. Ex.P.85-A :Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/701. Ex.P.86:Letter of sanction dt.1.2.2008 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/707. Ex.P.86 -A :Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/707. Ex.P.87:Application form dt.7.2.2008 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/714. Ex.P.87-A :Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/714. Ex.P.88:Letter of sanction dt.9.2.2008 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/719. Ex.P.88-A :Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/719.

63C.C.07/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.89:Letter of sanction dt.9.2.2008 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/721. Ex.P.89-A :Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/721. Ex.P.90 :Letter of sanction dt.9.2.2008 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/727. Ex.P.90-A :Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/727. Ex.P.91 :Letter of sanction dt.13.2.2008 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/730. Ex.P.91-A :Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/730. Ex.P.92 :Letter of sanction dt.13.2.2008 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/738. Ex.P.92-A :Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/738. Ex.P.93 :Letter of sanction dt.13.2.2008 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/739. Ex.P.93-A :Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/739. Ex.P.94 :Letter of sanction dt.13.2.2008 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/740. Ex.P.94-A :Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/740. Ex.P.95 :Letter of sanction dt.13.2.2008 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/742. Ex.P.95-A :Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/742. Ex.P.96 :Letter of sanction dt.13.2.2008 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/744. Ex.P.96-A :Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/744. Ex.P.97 :Letter of sanction dt.13.2.2008 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/745. Ex.P.97-A :Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/745. Ex.P.98 :Letter of sanction dt.15.2.2008 relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/755. Ex.P.98-A :Assessment form relating to Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card Loan No.2007/755. Ex.P.99 :Observations sent to the Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch by the Chief Manager, Andhra Bank, Zonal Office pertaining to remarks in sanctioning the loans, appraisal notes, compliance reports, process notes etc., for the month of November, 2007. Ex.P.100 :Observations sent to the Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch by the Chief Manager, Andhra Bank, Zonal Office pertaining to remarks in sanctioning the loans, appraisal notes, compliance reports, process notes etc., for the month of December,2007. Ex.P.101 :Observations sent to the Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch by the Chief Manager, Andhra Bank, Zonal Office pertaining to remarks in sanctioning the loans, appraisal notes, 64C.C.07/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP compliance reports, process notes etc., for the month of January, 2008.

Ex.P.102 :Observations sent to the Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch by the Chief Manager, Andhra Bank, Zonal Office pertaining to remarks in sanctioning the loans, appraisal notes, compliance reports, process notes etc., for the month of February, 2008. Ex.P.103 :Copy of the assessment form in the loan file relating to the loan account of 2007/701. Ex.P.103-A :Copy of process note in Ex.P.103. Ex.P.104 :Copy of the assessment form in the loan file relating to the loan account of 2007/719. Ex.P.104-A :Copy of original process note in Ex.P.104. Ex.P.105 :Copy of the assessment form in the loan file relating to the loan account of 2007/727. Ex.P.105-A :Copy of process note in Ex.P.105. Ex.P.106 :Copy of the assessment form in the loan file relating to the loan account of 2007/738. Ex.P.106-A :Copy of process note in Ex.P.106. Ex.P.107 :Copy of the assessment form in the loan file relating to the loan account of 2007/739. Ex.P.107-A :Copy of process note in Ex.P.107. Ex.P.108:Copy of the assessment form in the loan file relating to the loan account of 2007/740. Ex.P.108-A :Copy of process note in Ex.P.108. Ex.P.109 :Copy of the assessment form in the loan file relating to the loan account of 2007/742. Ex.P.109-A :Copy of process note in Ex.P.109. Ex.P.110 :Copy of the assessment form in the loan file relating to the loan account of 2007/744. Ex.P.110-A :Copy of process note in Ex.P.110. Ex.P.111 :Copy of the assessment form in the loan file relating to the loan account of 2007/745. Ex.P.111-A :Copy of process note in Ex.P.111. Ex.P.112 :Copy of the assessment form in the loan file relating to the loan account of 2007/755. Ex.P.112-A :Copy of process note in Ex.P.112. Ex.P.113 :Copy of the assessment form in the loan file relating to the loan account of 2007/707. Ex.P.113-A :Original process note in Ex.P.113. Ex.P.114 :Original assessment form in the loan file relating to the loan account of 2007/730. Ex.P.114-A :Original process note in Ex.P.114. Ex.P.115 :Copy of the assessment form in the loan file relating to the loan account of 2007/638. Ex.P.115-A :Copy of process note in Ex.P.115. Ex.P.116 :Copy of the assessment form in the loan file relating to the loan account of 2007/669. Ex.P.116-A :Copy of original process note in Ex.P.116. Ex.P.117 :Copy of the assessment form in the loan file relating to the loan account of 2007/670. Ex.P.117-A :Copy of original process note in Ex.P.117.

65C.C.07/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.118 :Copy of the assessment form in the loan file relating to the loan account of 2007/678. Ex.P.118-A :Copy of original process note in Ex.P.118. Ex.P.119 :Copy of the assessment form in the loan file relating to the loan account of 2007/679. Ex.P.119-A :Copy of original process note in Ex.P.119. Ex.P.120 :Copy of the assessment form in the loan file relating to the loan account of 2007/680. Ex.P.120-A :Copy of original process note in Ex.P.120. Ex.P.121 :Copy of the assessment form in the loan file relating to the loan account of 2007/686. Ex.P.121-A :Copy of original process note in Ex.P.121. Ex.P.122 :Copy of the assessment form in the loan file relating to the loan account of 2007/687. Ex.P.122-A :Copy of original process note in Ex.P.112. Ex.P.123 :Copy of the assessment form in the loan file relating to the loan account of 2007/689. Ex.P.123-A :Copy of original process note in Ex.P.123. Ex.P.124 :Copy of the assessment form in the loan file relating to the loan account of 2007/690. Ex.P.124-A :Copy of original process note in Ex.P.124. Ex.P.125 :Copy of the assessment form in the loan file relating to the loan account of 2007/696. Ex.P.125-A :Copy of original process note in Ex.P.125. Ex.P.126 :Copy of the assessment form in the loan file relating to the loan account of 2007/698. Ex.P.126-A :Copy of original process note in Ex.P.126. Ex.P.127 :Copy of the assessment form in the loan file relating to the loan account of 2007/699. Ex.P.127-A :Copy of original process note in Ex.P.127. Ex.P.128:Copy of the assessment form in the loan file relating to the loan account of 2007/721. Ex.P.128-A :Copy of process note in Ex.P.128. Ex.P.129 :Copy of report submitted to Andhra Bank, Zonal office, Guntur. Ex.P.130 :Copy of report submitted to Andhra Bank, Zonal office, Guntur. Ex.P.131 :Copy of report submitted to Andhra Bank, Zonal office, Guntur. Ex.P.132 :Copy of report submitted to Andhra Bank, Zonal office, Guntur. Ex.P.133 :Copy of report submitted to Andhra Bank, Zonal office, Guntur. Ex.P.134 :Copy of report submitted to Andhra Bank, Zonal office, Guntur. Ex.P.135 :Copy of report submitted to Andhra Bank, Zonal office, Guntur. Ex.P.136 :Copy of report submitted to Andhra Bank, Zonal office, Guntur. Ex.P.137 :Copy of report submitted to Andhra Bank, Zonal office, Guntur.

66C.C.07/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.138 :Copy of covering letter dt.23.4.2010 under which the Dy.General Manager furnished copy of master circular to the Inspector of Police, CBI, Visakhapatnam. Ex.P.139 : Copy of master circular. Ex.P.140 : Copy of internal circular No.334 dt.29.1.2010. Ex.P.141 :Loan file relating to the loan account No.PAGCC 2007/306. Ex.P.142 :Loan file relating to the S.B.Account No.ASBP 180. Ex.P.143 :Loan file relating to the loan account No.PAGCC 2007/503. Ex.P.144 :Loan file relating to the S.B.Account No.ASBP 243. Ex.P.145 :Loan file relating to the loan account No.PAGCC 2007/504. Ex.P.146 :Loan file relating to the S.B.Account No.ASBP 245. Ex.P.147 :Loan file relating to the loan account No.PAGCC 2007/530. Ex.P.148 :Loan file relating to the S.B.Account No.ASBP 332. Ex.P.149:Loan file relating to the loan account No.PAGCC 2007/591. Ex.P.150 :Loan file relating to the S.B.Account No.ASBP 371. Ex.P.151 :Loan file relating to the loan account No.PAGCC 2007/600. Ex.P.152 :Loan file relating to the S.B.Account No.ASBP 377. Ex.P.153 :Loan file relating to the loan account No.PAGCC 2007/595. Ex.P.154 :Loan file relating to the S.B.Account No.ASBP 376. Ex.P.155 :Loan file relating to the loan account No.PAGCC 2007/597. Ex.P.156 :Loan file relating to the S.B.Account No.ASBP 358. Ex.P.157 :Loan file relating to the loan account No.PAGCC 2007/598. Ex.P.158 :Loan file relating to the S.B.Account No.ASBP 369. Ex.P.159 :Loan file relating to the loan account No.PAGCC 2007/599. Ex.P.160 :Loan file relating to the S.B.Account No.ASBP 367. Ex.P.161 :Loan file relating to the loan account No.PAGCC 2007/603. Ex.P.162 :Loan file relating to the S.B.Account No.ASBP 368. Ex.P.163 :Loan file relating to the loan account No.PAGCC 2007/701. Ex.P.164 :Loan file relating to the S.B.Account No.ASBP 436. Ex.P.165 :Loan file relating to the loan account No.PAGCC 2007/719. Ex.P.166 :Loan file relating to the S.B.Account No.ASBP 459. Ex.P.167 :Loan file relating to the loan account No.PAGCC 2007/721. Ex.P.168:Loan file relating to the S.B.Account No.ASBP 461. Ex.P.169 :Loan file relating to the loan account No.PAGCC 2007/727. Ex.169-A:Letter dated 1.2.2008 addressed by the Branch Manager, Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch in the loan file Ex.P.169. Ex.P.170 :Loan file relating to the S.B.Account No.ASBP 467. Ex.P.171 :Loan file relating to the loan account No.PAGCC 2007/738. Ex.171-A:Letter dated 11.12.2007 addressed by the Branch Manager, Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch in the loan file Ex.P.171. Ex.P.172 :Loan file relating to the S.B.Account No.ASBP 473. Ex.P.173:Loan file relating to the loan account No.PAGCC 2007/739. Ex.173-A:Letter dated 15.12.2007 addressed by the Branch Manager, Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch in the loan file Ex.P.173. Ex.P.174:Loan file relating to the S.B.Account No.ASBP 474. Ex.P.175:Loan file relating to the loan account No.PAGCC 2007/740. Ex.175-A:Letter dated 6.12.2007 addressed by the Branch Manager, Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch in the loan file Ex.P.175. Ex.P.176:Loan file relating to the S.B.Account No.ASBP 475. Ex.P.177:Loan file relating to the loan account No.PAGCC 2007/742.

67C.C.07/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

Ex.177-A:Letter dated 1.2.2008 addressed by the Branch Manager, Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch in the loan file Ex.P.177. Ex.P.178:Loan file relating to the S.B.Account No.ASBP 477. Ex.P.179:Loan file relating to the loan account No.PAGCC 2007/744. Ex.179-A:Letter dated 4.1.2008 addressed by the Branch Manager, Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch in the loan file Ex.P.179. Ex.P.180:Loan file relating to the S.B.Account No.ASBP 479. Ex.P.181:Loan file relating to the loan account No.PAGCC 2007/745. Ex.181-A:Letter dated 4.1.2008 addressed by the Branch Manager, Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch in the loan file Ex.P.181. Ex.P.182:Loan file relating to the S.B.Account No.ASBP 480. Ex.P.183:Loan file relating to the loan account No.PAGCC 2007/750. Ex.183-A:Letter dated 10.12.2007 addressed by the Branch Manager, Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch in the loan file Ex.P.183. Ex.P.184:Loan file relating to the S.B.Account No.ASBP 484. Ex.P.185:Loan file relating to the loan account No.PAGCC 2007/751. Ex.185-A:Letter dated 15.12.2007 addressed by the Branch Manager, Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch in the loan file Ex.P.185. Ex.P.186:Loan file relating to the S.B.Account No.ASBP 485. Ex.P.187:Loan file relating to the loan account No.PAGCC 2007/753. Ex.187-A:Letter dated 15.12.2007 addressed by the Branch Manager, Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch in the loan file Ex.P.187. Ex.P.188: Loan file relating to the S.B.Account No.ASBP 487. Ex.P.189 :Loan file relating to the loan account No.PAGCC 2007/754. Ex.189-A:Letter dated 15.12.2007 addressed by the Branch Manager, Andhra Bank, Ravinuthala branch in the loan file Ex.P.189. Ex.P.190 :Loan file relating to the S.B.Account No.ASBP 488. Ex.P.191 :Loan file relating to the loan account No.PAGCC 2007/755. Ex.P.192 :Loan file relating to the S.B.Account No.ASBP 454. Ex.P.193 :Loan file relating to the loan account No.PAGCC 2007/762. Ex.P.194 :Loan file relating to the S.B.Account No.ASBP 494. Ex.P.195 :Receipt memo dt.31.3.2011 under which relevant documents relating to loan accounts are handed over to the Inspector of Police, CBI, Visakhapatnam under acknowledgment. Ex.P.196 :Copy of covering letter under which loan files relating to the crop loans and bank circular No.488 are handed over to the CBI. Ex.P.197 :Copy of the bank circular No.488 with regard to sanction crop loans under the scheme of Pattabhi Agricultural Gold Credit Card. Ex.P.198 :Report submitted to the District Collector, Prakasam District. Ex.P.199 :Copy of report submitted to the District Collector, Prakasam District. Ex.P.200 :Returned/unserved registered cover with acknowledgment addressed to Maruboina Rama Devi, R/o Pamidipadu village.

68C.C.07/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.201 :Returned/unserved registered cover with acknowledgment addressed to Maleru Chenchamma, R/o Pamidipadu village. Ex.P.202 :Returned/unserved registered cover with acknowledgment addressed to Yelaparthi Nagendramma, R/o Pamidipadu village. Ex.P.203 :Returned/unserved registered cover with acknowledgment addressed to Raavi Ramanujam, R/o Kurravanipalem village. Ex.P.204 :Returned/unserved registered cover with acknowledgment addressed to Raavi Govardhana Rao, R/o Kurravanipalem village. Ex.P.205 :Returned/unserved registered cover with acknowledgment addressed to Ravipudi Naresh, R/o Ravinuthala village. Ex.P.206 :Returned/unserved registered cover with acknowledgment addressed to Bodapati Ramaiah, R/o Ravinuthala village. Ex.P.207 :Returned/unserved registered cover with acknowledgment addressed to Raavi Balaiah, R/o Ravinuthala village. Ex.P.208 :Returned/unserved registered cover with acknowledgment addressed to Raavi Sureshbabu, R/o Ravinuthala village. Ex.P.209 : Returned/unserved registered cover with acknowledgment addressed to Koli Ramesh, R/o Ravinuthala village. Ex.P.210 : Returned/unserved registered cover with acknowledgment addressed to Alla Sundarababu, R/o Ravinuthala village. Ex.P.211: Returned/unserved registered cover with acknowledgment addressed to Paruchuri Ramasubbaiah, R/o Ravinuthala village. Ex.P.212 : Returned/unserved registered cover with acknowledgment addressed to Kuraku Padmavathi, R/o Ravinuthala village. Ex.P.213 : Returned/unserved registered cover with acknowledgment addressed to Kuraku Ramanjaneyulu, R/o Ravinuthala village. Ex.P.214 : Returned/unserved registered cover with acknowledgment addressed to Narra Buliramaiah, R/o Ravinuthala village. Ex.P.215: Returned/unserved registered cover with acknowledgment addressed to Kema Kantharao, R/o Ravinuthala village. Ex.P.216 : Returned/unserved registered cover with acknowledgment addressed to Bandaru Haribabu, R/o Ravinuthala village. Ex.P.217: Returned/unserved registered cover with acknowledgment addressed to Putta Balaiah, R/o Ravinuthala village. Ex.P.218: Returned/unserved registered cover with acknowledgment addressed to Muvva RAngaiah, R/o Ravinuthala village. Ex.P.219: Returned/unserved registered cover with acknowledgment addressed to Kema RAngaiah, R/o Ravinuthala village. Ex.P.220: Returned/unserved registered cover with acknowledgment addressed to Thota Bullibabu, R/o Ravinuthala village. Ex.P.221: Returned/unserved registered cover with acknowledgment addressed to Thota Purnamma, R/o Ravinuthala village. Ex.P.222: Returned/unserved registered cover with acknowledgment addressed to Thota Bhaskara Rao, R/o Ravinuthala village. Ex.P.223: Returned/unserved registered cover with acknowledgment addressed to Kancharala Chenchu Lakshmi, R/o Ravinuthala village.

69C.C.07/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.224: Returned/unserved registered cover with acknowledgment addressed to Ravinuthala Rajyalakshmi, R/o Ravinuthala village. Ex.P.225: Returned/unserved registered cover with acknowledgment addressed to Arla Sravani, R/o Ravinuthala village. Ex.P.226: Attested copy of report dt.12.12.2008 submitted by PW.37 to the Head Office, Andhra Bank, Hyderabad. Ex.P.227: Copy of the covering letter under which death certificate of Kovi Raghavaiah, S/o Subbaiah of Hanumapuram village was issued by PW.40. Ex.P.228: Photocopy of death certificate of father of PW.42. Ex.P.229: Copy of photograph of father of PW.42. Ex.P.230: Photocpy of the pattadar passbook . Ex.P.231: Copy of C.F.S.L. opinion No.CH71/2011 dt.19.3.2012 along with the reasons. Ex.P.232: Copy of specimen signatures of the person namely Y.Subbalakshmi(PW.38). Ex.P.233: Copy of Fir in R.C.13(A)/2009 of CBI, Visakhapatnam u/Sec.120-B, 420, 468 and 471 IPC and u/Sec.13(2) r/w 13(1) (d) of P.C. Act, 1988. Ex.P.234: Copy of covering letter under which PW.9 handed over the statement of accounts pertaining to the crop loans separately alongwith certificates u/sec.2 of Banker’s Books of Evidence Act. Ex.P.235: Statement of account pertaining to the crop loan relating to this case along with certificate u/Sec.2 of Banker’s Books of Evidence Act. Ex.P.236 : Statement of account pertaining to the crop loan relating to this case along with certificate u/Sec.2 of Banker’s Books of Evidence Act. Ex.P.237 : Statement of account pertaining to the crop loan relating to this case along with certificate u/Sec.2 of Banker’s Books of Evidence Act. Ex.P.238 : Statement of account pertaining to the crop loan relating to this case along with certificate u/Sec.2 of Banker’s Books of Evidence Act. Ex.P.239 : Statement of account pertaining to the crop loan relating to this case along with certificate u/Sec.2 of Banker’s Books of Evidence Act. Ex.P.240 : Statement of account pertaining to the crop loan relating to this case along with certificate u/Sec.2 of Banker’s Books of Evidence Act. Ex.P.241 : Statement of account pertaining to the crop loan relating to this case along with certificate u/Sec.2 of Banker’s Books of Evidence Act. Ex.P.242 : Statement of account pertaining to the crop loan relating to this case along with certificate u/Sec.2 of Banker’s Books of Evidence Act. Ex.P.243 : Statement of account pertaining to the crop loan relating to this case along with certificate u/Sec.2 of Banker’s Books of Evidence Act.

70C.C.07/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.244 : Statement of account pertaining to the crop loan relating to this case along with certificate u/Sec.2 of Banker’s Books of Evidence Act. Ex.P.245 : Statement of account pertaining to the crop loan relating to this case along with certificate u/Sec.2 of Banker’s Books of Evidence Act. Ex.P.246 : Statement of account pertaining to the crop loan relating to this case along with certificate u/Sec.2 of Banker’s Books of Evidence Act. Ex.P.247 : Statement of account pertaining to the crop loan relating to this case along with certificate u/Sec.2 of Banker’s Books of Evidence Act. Ex.P.248 : Statement of account pertaining to the crop loan relating to this case along with certificate u/Sec.2 of Banker’s Books of Evidence Act. Ex.P.249 : Statement of account pertaining to the crop loan relating to this case along with certificate u/Sec.2 of Banker’s Books of Evidence Act. Ex.P.250 : Statement of account pertaining to the crop loan relating to this case along with certificate u/Sec.2 of Banker’s Books of Evidence Act. Ex.P.251 : Statement of account pertaining to the crop loan relating to this case along with certificate u/Sec.2 of Banker’s Books of Evidence Act. Ex.P.252 : Statement of account pertaining to the crop loan relating to this case along with certificate u/Sec.2 of Banker’s Books of Evidence Act. Ex.P.253 : Statement of account pertaining to the crop loan relating to this case along with certificate u/Sec.2 of Banker’s Books of Evidence Act. Ex.P.254 : Statement of account pertaining to the crop loan relating to this case along with certificate u/Sec.2 of Banker’s Books of Evidence Act. Ex.P.255 : Statement of account pertaining to the crop loan relating to this case along with certificate u/Sec.2 of Banker’s Books of Evidence Act. Ex.P.256: Statement of account pertaining to the crop loan relating to this case along with certificate u/Sec.2 of Banker’s Books of Evidence Act. Ex.P.257 : Statement of account pertaining to the crop loan relating to this case along with certificate u/Sec.2 of Banker’s Books of Evidence Act. Ex.P.258 : Statement of account pertaining to the crop loan relating to this case along with certificate u/Sec.2 of Banker’s Books of Evidence Act. Ex.P.259 : Statement of account pertaining to the crop loan relating to this case along with certificate u/Sec.2 of Banker’s Books of Evidence Act. Ex.P.260 : Statement of account pertaining to the crop loan relating to this case along with certificate u/Sec.2 of Banker’s Books of Evidence Act.

71C.C.07/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP

Ex.P.261 : Statement of account pertaining to the crop loan relating to this case along with certificate u/Sec.2 of Banker’s Books of Evidence Act. Ex.P.262 : Covering letter dt.11.4.2011 under which the Chief Manager, Andhra Bank, Zonal office, Ongole submitted the documents. Ex.P.263 : Letter dt.19.1.2009 addressed by the Dy. General Manager to the General Manager, Andhra Bank, Inspection and Audit Department, Head Office, Koti, Hyderabad. Ex.P.264 : Letter dt.29.1.2009 addressed by the Dy.General Manager to the General Manager, Andhra Bank, Inspection and Audit Department, Head Office, Koti, Hyderabad. Ex.P.265 : Receipt memo under which photocopy of ration card of PW.43 and photocopy of pattadar passbook and title deed in the name of PW.43 were collected. Ex.P.266 : Photocopy of the ration card relating to PW.43. Ex.P.267 : Photocopy of title deed relating to PW.43. Ex.P.268 : Photocopy of the pattadar passbook relating to PW.43. Ex.P.269 : Death certificate of the 2nd accused Chandolu Venkateswara Rao. Ex.P.270 : Draft ROR (IA Register) of Anamanuru village. Ex.P.271 : Draft ROR (IA Register) pertaining to Anamanamuru Ex.P.272 : Draft ROR (IA Register) pertaining to Ravinuthala village (3 volumes) Ex.P.273 : Draft ROR (I.A. Register) pertaining to Ravinuthala village (3 volumes)

LIST OF WITNESSES EXAMINED ON BEHALF OF DEFENCE.

NIL

LIST OF DOCUMENTS MARKED ON BEHALF OF DEFENCE.

NIL

PRINCIPAL SPL. JUDGE FOR C.B.I. CASES,

FAC I Addl. SPL.JUDGE FOR C.B.I CASES,

VISAKHAPATNAM.

Copy submitted to The Hon’ble Registrar (Judicial), High Court of Andhra Pradesh. Copies to:

1. The Accused

2. The Superintendent of Police, C.B.I., Visakhapatnam.

72C.C.07/2015/ I CBI Court/VSP