Nallala Venkat Sachin Reddy

1 of 7 Prl.JCJ-cum-JMFC,Godavarikhani

OS. No. 205 of 2024 (F)

IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE CUM JUDICIAL

MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS AT GODAVARIKHANI

Present: Sri.N.Venkat Sachin Reddy, Prl.Junior Civil Judge-cum-

Judicial Magistrate of First Class,

Godavarikhani.

Friday, on this the 27 th day of June, 2025

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 205 of 2024

Between: Rayadandi Srinivas, S/o. Venkati, Age: 34 years, Occ: Teacher, R/o.H.No.15-3-452 L.B Nagar, Godavarikhani, Ramagundam Mandal, District Peddapalli. …Plaintiff

A N D

1. Kondamena Ravi Kumar, S/o. Late Rayamallu, Age: 45 years,

2. Kondamena Ashok Kumar, S/o. Late Rayamallu, Age: 42 years,

3. Kondamena Vijay Kumar, S/o. Late Rayamallu, Age: 38 years,

All are R/o.H.No.21-6-55/2 Gowthami Nagar, Hanuman Temple Ramagundam Mandal, District Peddapalli.

...Defendants

This suit is coming on 23.06.2025 for final hearing in the presence of Sri.G. Sravan Kumar and K.Chandra Shekar, Advocates for the plaintiff and the Defendants remained exparte, upon perusal of the material papers on record and the case having been heard and stood over for consideration till this day, this court delivered the following:

:: J U D G M E N T ::

1.This suit is filed by the Plaintiff for granting perpetual injunction against the Defendant, restraining them, their agents, servants, 2 of 7 Prl.JCJ-cum-JMFC,Godavarikhani

OS. No. 205 of 2024 (F)

henchmen from interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the plaintiff over the land in Sy.No.303, Admeasuring 242 Sq.Yds, situated at Mathangi Colony Medipalli Shivar of

Ramagundam Mandal, District Peddapalli (herein after referred as suit schedule property for brevity).

2. The brief averments of the plaint are as follows:

2(a). That the plaintiff is the absolute owner and possessor of the suit schedule property which is his self acquired property vide sale deed

No.3377/2018, dt.09.05.2018 through GPA rectification deed vide

Doc.No.3279/2018, dt.04.05.2018 and Doc No.894/2017 dt.20.02.2017.

The plaintiff submits that he is in the absolute possession and enjoyment of the suit schedule property and that the Defendants are noway concerned with suit schedule property, creating disputes with false documents and trying to interfere with the suit schedule property along with unsocial elements to dispossess the plaintiff from suit land.

2(b). The plaintiff submits that on 13.11.2024 at about 11.00 PM the defendants along with unsocial elements went with JCB to dismantle the compound walls of the suit schedule property, and that the plaintiff received the information of the same through one Balasani Swami Goud, later the plaintiff lodged a complaint at PS, NTPC about which an FIR is 3 of 7 Prl.JCJ-cum-JMFC,Godavarikhani

OS. No. 205 of 2024 (F)

issued under Cr.No.213/2024 for offence U/Sec. 229(3), 224(4) r/w 3(5) of

BNS.

2(c). The plaintiff further submits that on 20.11.2024 the defendants along with some unsocial elements have again tried to interfere with the suit schedule property to dispossess the plaintiff with an intention to grab the same, but the plaintiff submits that with great difficulty he could resist the acts of the defendants with the help of neighbours, apprehension of dispossession the present suit is filed.

3.Upon duly serving of summons on the defendants, they appeared and engaged a counsel, however the defendants have failed to file their written statement within the statutory period and despite of condition of passing adverse orders they did not choose to contest the matter, as such the matter is proceeded exparte.

4.In order to prove his claim, the Plaintiff himself got examined as

PW1, Ex.A1 to A3 were marked through him. As the defendants remained exparte, no evidence on their behalf.

5. Heard the Counsel for Plaintiff. Perused the material available on record.

4 of 7 Prl.JCJ-cum-JMFC,Godavarikhani

OS. No. 205 of 2024 (F)

6.Now the point for determination is:

1) Whether the plaintiff is in lawful possession over the suit schedule property as on the date of filing of the suit?

2) Whether the plaintiff entitled for perpetual injunction?

3) If so, as to what Relief?

7. Point No. 1 & 2:

As both the points are inter connected with each other this court is of the opinion to answer both the points together:

Before answering the point it is pertinent to note that the plaintiff is

claiming the equitable relief of injunction, for which the initial burden is on the plaintiff to prove that, he is in lawful possession of the Suit

Schedule Property as on the date of filing of the suit and that there is a breach of obligation or infringement of his legal right.

8.In order to prove his claim, the plaintiff himself got examined as

PW1 and filed chief affidavit in lieu of his chief examination, reiterating the material contents of his plaint by affirming that he is the absolute owner and possessor of suit schedule land which he purchased through sale deed No.3377/2018, dt.09.05.2018. To substantiate the same he relied upon the registered sale deed vide sale deed No.3377/2018, dt.09.05.2018 under Ex.A1. Further Ex.A2 i.e., Rectification deed 5 of 7 Prl.JCJ-cum-JMFC,Godavarikhani

OS. No. 205 of 2024 (F)

No.3279/2018, dt.04.05.2018 and Ex.A3 i.e., deed of GPA vide

Doc.No.894/2017 dt.21.02.2017 establishes the right of the vendors under Ex.A1 to execute the sale deed over the suit schedule property in favour of the plaintiff.

9.From the above discussion the deposition of PW1, coupled with documentary evidence of Ex.A1 to Ex.A3 proves the possession of the plaintiff over the suit schedule property and the same remained undisputed as the defendants did not contest the subject matter. PW1 through his affidavit, deposed about the interference of the defendants with his peaceful possession over the suit schedule property and the same remained undisputed. Accordingly, the evidence of plaintiff was undisputed, un-rebutted, unchallenged by the defendants. Considering the material available on record, this court is of the opinion that the plaintiff is in the lawful possession of the suit schedule property as on the date of filing of the suit and further due to the interference by the defendant, plaintiff is entitled for Injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with the possession and enjoyment of the plaintiff over the suit schedule property.

Accordingly the point No.1 & 2 are answered in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendants.

6 of 7 Prl.JCJ-cum-JMFC,Godavarikhani

OS. No. 205 of 2024 (F)

10. Point No.3:

In view of the findings in the Point No.1 & 2, which are answered in favour of the plaintiff, this court believes the version of the plaintiff and the defendants did not choose to challenge the same. Therefore, by the strength of the unchallenged evidence of PW.1, coupled with Ex.A1 to

Ex.A3, this court holds that plaintiff established his case.

11. IN THE RESULT, the suit is decreed, in the circumstances of the case without costs, by granting perpetual injunction in favour of the plaintiff restraining the defendant No.1 to 3 and persons claiming through them, from interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the plaintiff over the suit schedule property.

Computerized to my dictation by Steno, corrected and

pronounced by me in the open Court on this the 27 th day of June, 2025.

Sd/-

PRL., JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE-CUM-JUDL.

MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS,

GODAVARIKHANI.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

FOR PLAINTIFF:-

PW1: Rayadandi Srinivas 7 of 7 Prl.JCJ-cum-JMFC,Godavarikhani

OS. No. 205 of 2024 (F)

FOR DEFENDANTS:

- Exparte -

EXHIBITS MARKED

FOR PLAINTIFF:-

Ex.A1: Is the Sale Deed vide registered No.3377/2018, dt.09.05.2018 Ex.A2Is the Rectification Deed No.3279/2018, dt.04.05.2018 Ex.A3Is the GPA vide document No.894/2017, dt.21.02.2017

FOR DEFENDANTS:

- Nil -

Sd/-

PRL., JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE-CUM-JUDL.

MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS,

GODAVARIKHANI.

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE-CUM-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF F.C. :

GODAVARIKHANI

Present:Sri N.Venkat Sachin Reddy, Prl.Junior Civil Judge-cum-

Judicial Magistrate of First Class,

Godavarikhani.

TUESDAY, ON THIS THE 5 th DAY OF MAY, 2026.

EP.No.16 of 2025

IN

A.R.B.No.890 of 2014

Between: M/s. Shriram Chits Pvt. Ltd., R/by its Authorized Person Mr. K. Srinivas, S/o. Chandraiah, Aged: 32 years, Oce: Sr. Office Assistant, R/o. Godavarikhani. Peddapalli Dist. ...Award Holder. AND

1. Pamukuntla Pradeep Kumar S/o. Saraiah Age. 31 vears, Occ: Business. R/o. H.No.9-1-150/A, Vittal Nagar, Godavarikhani. Dist. Peddapalli.

2.K Venkata Swamy S/o. Venkati. Age. 35 years, Occ: Over Man. Employee No. 00123638, O/o. The Singereni Collieries Company Limited. GDK 10 Incline, Ramagundam-3Area, R/o. Q.No. T2-1473 8 Incline colony, Dist. Peddapalli.

3. Reddy Mallesh, S/o. Ellajah, Age. 45 years, Occ; General Mazdoor. Employee No. 00911918, 0/0. The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, GDK 10Inc line mine, Ramagundam-3 Area, R/o. H.No. 9-1-156, Vittal Nagar, Godavarikhani, Dist. Peddapalli,

4. Potharaju Raju S/o Ilaiah Age. 30 years, Occ; OM/MS/SF, Employee No. 00125347, O/o. The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Adriyala LWP, Ramagundam-3 Area, R/o. Q.No. C2-98, Centinary Colony, Godavarikhani, Dist. Peddapalli.

... Jdrs/ Opponents.

:: ORDER ::

Dhr present. Counsel for Dhr present. Jdr absent. Counsel for Jdr.No.2 present. Dhr filed in writing that they are intending not to proceed with this EP and not pressing accordingly. Recorded the same. Hence EP is dismissed as not pressed salary attachment warrant against JDr.No.2 is hereby raised. Pending EAs if any shall stand dismissed. Coming to the request of Dhr to permit fresh EP, they are at liberty to file EP in accordance with law and on amount at which the Jdrs are due if any. 

Sd/-

Prl.Junior Civil Judge-cum

Judicial Magistrate of First Class

Godavarikhani.

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE-CUM-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF F.C. :

GODAVARIKHANI

Present:Sri N.Venkat Sachin Reddy, Prl.Junior Civil Judge-cum-

Judicial Magistrate of First Class,

Godavarikhani.

FRIDAY, ON THIS THE 8 th DAY OF MAY, 2026.

EP.No.43 of 2024

IN

ARB.No.843 of 2021

Between: M/s. MANAHITHA CHIT FUND (P) LIMITED, Branch Godavarikhani, H. No. 21-2-158/3, 1st Floor, Opposite Siddhartha High School, Markandeya its Branch Foreman, Colony, Godavarikhani, Represented by S. SOMESHWAR RAO, S/o. Malla Reddy, Aged about 53 Years, Occupation: Foreman of M/s. Manahitha Chit Fund (P) Limited, Godavarikhani, R/o. Godavarikhani. ...Decree Holder. AND

01. KATAM VEERESH, S/o. Keshavulu, Aged about 28 Years, R/o. H. No. 3-4-199, Indira Nagar, Godavarikhani of Ramagundam Mandal of Peddapalli District,

02. NEELAM SHANKAR, S/o. Hanmanthu, Aged about 50 Years, Occupation: Plant Attendant, Civil SD- 1, Telangana Thermal Station, Ramagundam, R/o. Qr. No. D-36, "A" Colony, Near Masjid, Ramagundam Town & Mandal of Peddapalli District,

03. NUNE RAJENDER, S/o. Veeraiah, Aged about 46 Years, Occupation: EM-Civil, SD-1, Telangana Power Generation Corporation Ltd., Ramagundam Area, R/o. H. No. 1-6-250, Qr. No. E-16, "A" Colony, Near Masjid, Ramagundam Town & Mandal of Peddapalli District ... Jdrs.

:: ORDER ::

Dhr absent. Counsel for Dhr present. Salary attachment warrant against Jdr.No.3 executed and salary attachment warrant on Jdr.No.2 returned as unexecuted as Jdr.No.2 is not appearing for his duties and that salary not paid to Jdr.No.2. Accordingly this EP cannot be executed against Jdr.No.2. Accordingly this EP cannot be executed against Jdr.No.2. As salary attachment warrant against JDr.No.3 is executed, EP is closed with liberty to Dhr to approach this court, if not receiving the attached amount.

Sd/-

Prl.Junior Civil Judge-cum

Judicial Magistrate of First Class

Godavarikhani.

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE­CUM­JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE

OF F.C. : GODAVARIKHANI

Present:Sri N.Venkat Sachin Reddy, Prl.Junior Civil Judge­cum­

Judicial Magistrate of First Class,

Godavarikhani.

FRIDAY, ON THIS THE 27 th DAY OF JUNE, 2025.

EP.No.91 of 2025

IN

A.R.B.No.124 of 2022

Between Vishvodaya Chit Fund Private Limited., NTPC, Jyothi Nagar Represented by its Legal Manager, Alapati Boju Kumar, S/o. Kanakaiah, Aged about: 49 years, Occupation: Legal Manager of Vishvodaya Chit Fund Private Limited., R/o. NTPC, Jyothi Nagar, Ramagundam Mandal, Peddapalli District. ...Decree Holder

A N D

1. Muddam Vijay, S/o. Mallaiah, Aged about: 30 years, R/o.H.No.21­1­130/1, Housing Board Colony, Ramagundam Post and Mandal of Peddapalli District.

2. Bathula Devender, S/o. Shanker, Aged about: 41 years, Occupation: Security Guard, S&PC, SCCL, Ramagundam Area­3, Employee Code No. 01003394, R/o.Qr.No.ST2­2649, 8 Incline Colony, Via: Godavarikhani Ramagundam Mandal, Peddapalli District.

3. Pilli Perumallu, S/o. Sanjeeva Rao, Aged about: 56 years, Occupation: General Mazdoor, GDK­OC­3, SCCL Ramagundam Area­3, Employee Codoe No. 00289793, R/o.Qr.No.ST2­ 1999, 8 Incline Colony, Via: Godavarikhani, Ramagundam Mandal, Peddapalli District.

4. Badikala Iyalaiah, S/o. Yellaiah, Aged about: 36 years, Occupation: Fitter, IK1A Incline SCCL, RPA­SRP, Employee Code No. 02922096, R/o.H.No. 13­1­192, Near Qr.No. D­2419, Thilak Nagar, Godavarikhani Post, Ramagundam Mandal of Peddapalli District.

5. Samala Bharath, S/o. Satyanarayana, Aged about: 33 years, Occupation: General Mazdoor, Adriyala Long wall project, SCCL Ramagundam Area­III, Employee Code No. 02385016, R/o.Qr.No. MD­603, Block No. 44, Pothana Colony, Via: Godavarikhani, Ramagundam Mandal, Peddapalli District. ...Jdrs/Opponents

:: ORDER ::

D.Hr called present. Counsel for D.Hr called present. Salary attachment warrant served on J.Dr.No.2. Hence, EP is closed. D.Hr is at liberty to approach this court in case of non receiving of attached amount.

Sd/­ Prl.Junior Civil Judge­cum

Judicial Magistrate of First Class

Godavarikhani.

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE-CUM-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF F.C. :

GODAVARIKHANI

Present:Sri N.Venkat Sachin Reddy, Prl.Junior Civil Judge-cum-

Judicial Magistrate of First Class,

Godavarikhani.

WEDNESDAY, ON THIS THE 6 th DAY OF MAY, 2026.

EP.No.32 of 2026

IN

A.R.B.No.222 of 2023

Between: M/s saradhiChit Funds Pvt. Ltd., R/by its Authrized Person Mr. Mothe Devender Reddy, S/o. Raji Reddy, Aged: 46 years, Occ: Chairman, R/o. Godavarikhani, Peddapalli Dist. ...Award Holder. AND

1. Peddala Thirupathi S/o Lasmaiah Age: (32) yrs, Occ: Artisan, Gr-II, O/o TSNPDCL, EC NO, 24020070 R/o.H.No.4-93, Shetpally, Jaipur, Mancherial.

2. Rodda Latha D/o Gopal Age: (35) yrs, Occ: School Asistant, EC NO, 1350544, O/o TS Education-1, Backside, Vanitha Kangan Hall, Maderam, Bellampally, Dist. Mancherial.

3. Manthri Raju S/o Yadagiri Age: (43) yrs, Occ: School Assistant, EC NO 1315048, O/o TS Education-1, Savithrinagar, R/o.H.No.4-419,Jafar nagar, Mancherial, Dist. Mancherial.

4. Sajjarapu Sheshagiri S/o Chandraiah Age: (45) yrs, Occ: Artisan, EC NO;24020094, Gr-II, O/o TSNPDCL, Near Prathati Stadium Board, Opp: Pragathi Ground, Srirampur, Dist: Mancherial.

5. Venaladevi Thirupathi S/o Rajaiah Age: (33) yrs, Occ: Badili Worker, EC NO 2943246, O/o The SCCL, R/o. H.No.1-110, Shetpally, Jaipur, Mancherial, ... Jdrs/Opponents.

:: ORDER ::

Dhr present. Counsel for Dhr present. Salary attachment warrant on Jdr.No.5 executed in office. Upon perusal of record, salary attachment warrant are executed against all the Jdrs against whom the EP is filed. Hence EP is closed with liberty to dhr to approach this court in case of non receiving of attached amount.

Sd/-

Prl.Junior Civil Judge-cum

Judicial Magistrate of First Class

Godavarikhani.