Sri.P.Govardhan

1

MVOP. No.83/2023 II Additional District Court, Amalapuram

BEFORE THE MOTOR ACCIDENTS CLAIMS TRIBUNAL-CUM-II

ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE : AMALAPURAM.

Present:- Sri P.Govardhan, VI Additional District Judge, Kakinada, (FAC) II Additional District Judge, Amalapuram.

Friday, the 24th day of April, 2026

M.V.O.P. No.83 of 2023

Between:- Mallipudi Bhaskararao, S/o.Suryanarayana, age 51 years, Hindu, R/o.Edarapalli, Amalapuram Mandal, Dr. …Petitioner B.R. Ambedkar Konaseema District

AND 1.Kesanakurthi Palleswararao, S/o.Veerabadrudu, age 43 years, R/o.Near ZPH School, Kandikuppa, Kandreg- ula Mandal, Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Konaseema District. (Driver of Ambulance bearing Regd.No.AP39-TP-1917) 2.Palepu Venkateswararao, S/o.China Veerraju, age not known, R/o.Door No.19-3-14/4C, Ramachan- draraopeta, Rajamahendravaram Urban (Owner of Am- bulance bearing Regd.No.AP39-TP-1917) 3.Shriram General Insurance Company Limited, repre- sented by Claims Manager, E8, APIP, RIICO, Industrial area, Sitapura, Rajasthan-302022

...Respondents

This petition has come on 17.04.2026 before me for hearing in the presence of Sri D.Erakayya, Advocate forpetitioner, Sri Ch.Pattabhi

Rama Rao, Advocate for respondents 1 and 2 and Sri D.S.R.K.V.V.S.

Srinivasa Rao, Advocate for respondent No.3, and upon perusing the ma- terial on record and the matter having stood over for consideration, till this day, this Tribunal delivered the following:- 2

O R D E R

This petition is filed by the petitioner, under Section 166 of Motor Ve- hicles Act and Rule 455 of Motor Vehicles Rules, claiming compensation of Rs.6,00,000/- for the injuries sustained in the road accident, due to the rash and negligent driving of Ambulance bearing Regd.No.AP39-TP-1917 i.e., respondent No.1.

2.The case of the petitioner, in brief, as follows;

i)On 05.02.2023, while the petitioner proceeding on his TVS Jupiter motorcycle and at about 09.15 P.M., when he reached near Anathavaram

Sachivalayam, Mummidivaram Mandal in a cautious manner, by that time one Ambulance bearing No.AP39-TP-1917 which was driven by the 1st respondent in a rash and negligent manner, at a high speed from Amala- puram towards Mummidivaram side and without observing the road sense, dashed the petitioner’s motorcycle in opposite direction. As a re- sult, the petitioner fell on the road and received severe injuries on his per- son i.e., (i)Fracture of right patella, (ii)Head injury, (iii)injury over upper lip and other multiple injuries all over the body. Immediately, he was shifted to KIMS Hospital, Amalapuram, where he taken treatment as inpatient for a period of 15 days and undergone major operations in that period and thereafter he is taking treatment as an outpatient continuously. The acci- dent solely occurred due to rash or negligent driving of respondent No.1.

A case in Crime No.28 of 2023 was registered against respondent No.1 for the offences punishable under Secs.337 and 338 of I.P.C.

(ii)Petitioner is hale and healthy, eking out his livelihood on his driv- ing, as he is a professional driver and was earning Rs.20,000/- per month as on the date of accident and he lost all his earnings due to the accident.

The petitioner spent more than Rs.1,50,000/- towards medical expenses and as he could not regain normalcy and bedridden, he is spending more than Rs.10,000/- towards attendant charges.

3

(iii)Respondent No.1 is driver, respondent No.2 is owner and respon- dent No.3 is insurer of the crime vehicle and they are jointly and severally liable to pay compensation. Hence, the petition.

3.When the matter is about to post for hearing on issues, after filing of written statements by all the respondents, at the request of both parties by filing a joint memo, the matter is referred to the Mediation Center on 10.04.2026 and thereafter the matter was dealt with by the mediator and during mediation, on 17.04.2026, both parties settled their dispute as per the terms and conditions mentioned in the memorandum of settlement

dated 17.04.2026 and the terms and conditions are as follows:

i) The respondent No.3 agreed to pay an amount of Rs.4,60,000/- towards full and final settlement of the MVOP.83/2023 and the peti- tioner agreed for the same.

4.In the present case, the mediator succeeded in his efforts and as seen from the memorandum of settlement, both parties have settled their dispute amicably and agreed to put an end to the litigation and it is signed by both parties and their counsels. After receiving the report of the Medi- ator dated 17.04.2026, both parties appeared before this court and con- sented for passing orders as per memorandum of settlement dated 17.04.2026. Terms and conditions are not against the public policy and they are in accordance with law and as such this court inclined to record the said terms.

5.In the result, this petition is disposed of in terms of memorandum of settlement before the Mediator dated 17.04.2026. Accordingly, the re- spondent No.3 is directed to inform the deposit of agreed compensation amount of Rs.4,60,000/- (Rupees four lakhs sixty thousand only) within 30 days from the date of decree, in the petitioner’s bank account i.e.,ac- 4

count bearing No.11101619016, IFSC Code:SBIN0000803, State Bank of

India, Amalapuram,and send the copy of the same to the beneficiary and original receipt to this Tribunal, as per the directions of Hon'ble Supreme

Court issued in Suo-motu W.P.C.No.7 of 2024 titled “In Re: Compen-

sation Amounts Deposited with Motor Accident Tribunals and

Labour Courts” and the Circular of the Hon’ble High Court of Andhra

Pradesh, dated 14.07.2025.

(c) On such deposit, the petitioner is permitted to withdraw entire compensation amount,

(d)If the respondent No.3 fails to deposit the said compensation amount as agreed,the petitioner is entitled to claim interest @ 9% per annum from the date of decree till realization, on the decretal award amount.

(e)There shall be no order as to costs.

Typed to my dictation by the Stenographer, corrected and pronounced by me in open court on this 24 th day of April, 2026.

Sd/- Sri P.Govardhan

VI Additional District Judge, Kakinada (FAC) II Additional District Judge, Amalapuram.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

NIL.

Sd/- Sri P.Govardhan

VI Additional District Judge, Kakinada (FAC) II Additional District Judge, Amalapuram.

1

D.O.P. No.251 of 2025 II Additional District Court, Amalapuram

IN THE COURT OF THE II ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE :

AMALAPURAM.

Present: Sri P.Govardhan,

VI Additional District Judge, Kakinada

FAC II Additional District Judge, Amalapuram.

Friday, the 24th day of April, 2026.

D.O.P. No.251 of 2025

Between:

1.Kodamanchili Ajay, S/o.Ramakrishna, age 25 years, R/o.Door No.6-69/1 No.1 road, Magam village, Ainavilli Mandal, Amalapuram DMC, Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Konaseema District.

2.Kodamanchili Mani @ Bommu Mani, W/o.Ajay, D/o.Bommu Pallayya (late), age 29 years, Housewife, R/o.Door No.2-23 of Pasupalli village, Ambajipeta Mandal, Amalapuram DMC, Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Konaseema District …PETITIONERS AND

Nil…RESPONDENT

This petition is coming before me, on 17.04.2026, for final hearing in the presence of Sri A.Valiyababa, Advocate for petitioners and the matter having stood over for consideration till this day, this Court made the following:

O R D E R

Petitioners filed this petition, under Section 10(A) of Divorce Act, 1869, seeking decree of divorce, by dissolving their marriage, which took place on 22.10.2022.

2.The contentions of petitioners, as seen from the petition, are as follows:

(i)The marriage between the petitioners 1 and 2 was performed on 22.10.2022 at the house of 1st petitioner’s parents at Magam village, Ainavilli

Mandal, according to Christian rites and caste customs and immediately the marriage was consummated. Thereafter, 2nd petitioner joined the 1st petitioner 2

D.O.P. No.251 of 2025 II Additional District Court, Amalapuram

at his house at Magam village and led marital life upto January, 2023 with a great difficulty, as the nature of 1st petitioner was not accepted by the 2nd petitioner. As the petitioners were distinctly grown up, their feelings never coincide and thereby they were unable to live under one roof. As a result, in the month of January, 2023, the 2nd petitioner discarded the society of 1st petitioner and since then she is residing at her parents’ house at Pasupalli village. During wedlock, no children are born to them. The efforts made by the elders for the reunion of petitioners, turned futile. As there is no chance for their reunion, they have decided to dissolve their marriage by mutual consent. The 1st petitioner agreed to pay Rs.1,00,000/- to the 2nd petitioner towards permanent alimony, 1st petitioner paid Rs.50,000/- to the 2nd petitioner on the date of filing the suit and he agreed to pay the remaining amount of Rs.50,000/- at the time of orders of this court. Hence the petition.

3.Petitioners filed evidence after the attempts for reconciliation failed.

The 1st petitioner was examined as PW1 and through P.W.1, Exs.A1 to A4 were marked. The 2nd petitioner was examined as PW2 and no documents were marked through PW2.

4.Heard counsel for the petitioners.

5.Now the point which arises:

Whether petitioners are entitled to decree of divorce by mutual consent under section 10 (A) of Divorce Act, 1869?

POINT:

6.PW1/ 1st petitioner-husband deposed that his marriage with the 2nd petitioner was performed on 22.10.2022 at the house of 1st petitioner’s parents at Magam village, Ainavilli Mandal, as per Christian Religious Rites and customs. Ex.A1 wedding card of petitioners showing the date of marriage as 22.10.2022, Ex.A2 marriage certificate dated 22.10.2022 and

Ex.A3 wedding photograph of petitioners clearly show that the marriage of 3

D.O.P. No.251 of 2025 II Additional District Court, Amalapuram

petitioners had taken place on 22.10.2022 as per Christian Religious Rites and Customs. Both petitioners 1 and 2 deposed in the same lines and PW2/ 2nd petitioner-wife stated that they have decided to dissolve their marriage by mutual consent, as there is no chance for reunion due to disputes and difference of opinion between them since the inception of their marriage.

PW2 further deposed that, as agreed the 1st petitioner paid Rs.1,00,000/- to her towards permanent alimony.

7.As seen from the evidence of P.Ws.1 and 2, they have deposed in one voice that they mutually agreed to dissolve their marriage and they have been living separately for a minimum period of two years prior to filing of this petition.

8.Both petitioners have jointly presented the present petition after considerable time for mutual consent, and evidence is taken after efforts for reconciliation failed. Therefore, the marriage of petitioners is irretrievably broken. By relying upon the evidence of P.Ws.1 and 2, this Court comes to a conclusion that the marriage of petitioners can be dissolved by mutual consent as there is no scope for their reunion as seen from the evidence of

P.Ws.1 and 2. Accordingly, the point is answered.

9.In the result, the petition is allowed granting a decree of divorce by mutual consent to petitioners 1 and 2 as per the provisions under Section 10(A) of Divorce Act, 1869, dissolving their marriage which was solemnized on 22.10.2022 as per the Christian Rites and caste customs at Magam village of Ainavilli Mandal. There shall be no order as to costs.

Typed to my dictation to the Stenographer, corrected and pronounced by me in the open Court, on this the 24 th day of April, 2026.

Sd/- Sri P.Govardhan

VI Additional District Judge, Kakinada (FAC) II Additional District Judge, Amalapuram.

4

D.O.P. No.251 of 2025 II Additional District Court, Amalapuram

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

For Petitioners:

PW1 : Kodamanchili Ajay– 17.04.2026 – 1st petitioner PW2 : Kodamanchili Mani - 17.04.2026 – 2nd petitioner

For Respondent: None

EXHIBITS MARKED

For Petitioners:

Ex.A1 : Wedding card of the petitioners dated 22.10.2022 Ex.A2 : Marriage Certificate of the petitioners dated 22.10.2022 Ex.A3 : Wedding photograph of petitioners Ex.A4 : C.D. of Ex.A3

For Respondent: Nil.

Sd/- Sri P.Govardhan

VI Additional District Judge, Kakinada (FAC) II Additional District Judge, Amalapuram.

IN THE COURT OF THE II ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE :

AMALAPURAM

Present: Sri P.Govardhan

VI Additional District Judge, Kakinada

(FAC) II Additional District Judge, Amalapuram.

Friday, the 24th day of April, 2026

E.P. No.178/2018 in A.C. No.434/2017

Between: M/s. Shriram Transport Finance Company Limited, Rajamahendravaram Branch, represented by its Senior Credit Executive cum G.P.A. Holder I.Sai

Subrahmanyam...Petitioner/DHR

AND 1.Geddadi Srinivasa Rao, S/o.Nadavapalli, Hindu, age 37 years, D.No.16- 102, Kesanakurru Palem Village, I.Polavaram Mandal, E.G. District.

2.Patchimala Durga Prasad, S/o.Nageswara Rao, Hindu, age 29 years, D.No.16-102, Kesanakurru Palem village, I.Polavaram Mandal, E.G. District.

3.M/s.Naga Venkata Sai Auto Finance, represented by its Manager, D.No.70-2-146/E, Ashram Public School Gate, near H.P. Gas Company, Ramanayyapeta, Kakinada, E.G. District

....Respondents/JDRs

This petition is coming before me on 24.04.2026 for final hearing in the presence of Sri D.V.V.S.Murthy, Advocates for the petitioner/DHR and Sri G.Eswara Rao, Advocate for the respondents/JDR Nos.1 and 2 and this day, this Court made the following:

O R D E R

F.S. memo is filed. F.S is recorded. E.P. is terminated. Rule 37(2) warrant on the 2nd JDR is cancelled.

Pronounced in the open court, this the 24 th day of April, 2026.

VI Additional District Judge, Kakinada

(FAC) II Additional District Judge,

Amalapuram.

3

DOP.203 of 2025 II Addl. District Court,

Amalapuram.

IN THE COURT OF THE II ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE :

AMALAPURAM

Present: Sri P.Govardhan

VI Additional District Judge, Kakinada

(FAC) II Additional District Judge, Amalapuram.

Friday, the 27th day of February, 2026

D.O.P.No.203 of 2024

Between: Mandapati Srinivasa Rao @ Srinu @ Nehemiya, S/o.Mandapati Yesuratnam, age 37 years, Occ: private employee, presently residing at H.No.2-00, Gamallapalem, Kadali, Razole Mandal. …PETITIONER AND

Mandapati Durga @ Navya @ Vaddi Durga, W/o.Mandapati Srinivasa Rao @ Srinu @ Nehemiya, Christian, age 35 years, housewife, D/o.Vaddi Satyanarayana, Chintalapalli, Razole Mandal. Presently residing at C/o. Saleh Khudabakhsh Hasim Albulushi, Alkhoud 295. Alkhoudh-OMAN. …RESPONDENT

The Petitioner filed this petition under Sec.10(1)(ix) of the Divorce Act, 1869, praying this court to pass a decree of divorce thereby dissolving the marriage that was solemnized in between the petitioner and the respondent on 29.06.2012 at the house of petitioner at Gamallapalem H/o.Kadali of

Razole Mandal, as per Christian rites and caste customs, on the ground of desertion.

As this petition is filed under Sec.10(1)(ix) of the Divorce Act, a court fee of Rs.30/- is paid, as per Sch.II Art.1(vii) of APCF & SV Act.

Cause of action for the petition arose on 29.06.2012 when the marriage between the petitioner and respondent was performed and during the course of marital life when the respondent left the company of petitioner in the month of May, 2022 and at at Gamallapalem H/o.Kadali of Razole 4

DOP.203 of 2025 II Addl. District Court,

Amalapuram.

Mandal where the marriage was performed and where the petitioner is residing, all are within the jurisdiction of this Hon'ble Court.

This petition is coming before me on 20.02.2026 for final hearing in the presence of Sri P.E. Michael, Advocate for petitioner and the respondent remained exparte and the matter having stood over for consideration till this day, this Court doth order and decree:

(1)That the marriage between the petitioner and respondent, performed on 29.06.2012, be and the same is hereby dissolved by granting divorce, (2)That there be no order as to costs.

Given under my hand and the seal of this court, this the 27 th day of February,

2026.

Sd/- Sri P.Govardhan

VI Additional District Judge, Kakinada (FAC) II Additional District Judge, Amalapuram.

IN THE COURT OF THE II ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE :

AMALAPURAM

Present: Sri P.Govardhan

VI Additional District Judge, Kakinada

(FAC) II Additional District Judge, Amalapuram.

Friday, the 24th day of April, 2026

D.O.P. No.76 of 2024

Between:

Jalli Anil Kumar, S/o.Hanumantha Rao, Christian, Coolie, age 40 years, D.No.7-12, Indira Nagar, Devaguptam, Allavaram Mandal, Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Konaseema District …PETITIONER AND 1.Jalli Lakshmi Durga, W/o.Anil Kumar, Christian, Housewife, age 33 years, C/o.Katikadala Gangadhar, D.No.8-2-47/14, Sundarayya Nagar, Manuguru, Bhadradri Kothagudem District, State of Telangana.

2.Boda Pavan Kumar, S/o.Venkataratnam, Christian, Inam, age 27 years, D.No.12-21, CSI Church Road, Gundugolanu, Bhimadolu Mandal, Eluru District …RESPONDENTS

This petition is filed by the petitioner under Sec.10(1)(ix) and Sec.11 of Divorce Act, 1869, to dissolve the marriage of the petitioner with the respondent, which was performed on 24.05.2014, by granting divorce and for costs of the lis.

This petition is coming before me on 24.04.2026 for final hearing in the presence of Sri JDML, Advocate for the petitioner, Sri K.Satyanaryana, Advocate for the respondent No.1, and the 2nd respondent remained set exparte and this day, this Court made the following:

O R D E R

1st respondent called present. Petition filed by the petitioner seeking permission to withdraw the petition. No objection reported by R1. The petition is allowed and accordingly the petitioner is permitted to withdraw this DOP and to file fresh OP with correct facts before the Family Court,

Eluru. Accordingly, this proceedings is closed.

Pronounced in the open court, this the 24 th day of April, 2026.

Sd/- Sri P.Govardhan

VI Additional District Judge, Kakinada

(FAC) II Additional District Judge,

Amalapuram.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

Nil

Sd/- Sri P.Govardhan

VI Additional District Judge, Kakinada

(FAC) II Additional District Judge,

Amalapuram.

IN THE COURT OF THE II ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE :

AMALAPURAM

Present: Sri P.Govardhan

VI Additional District Judge, Kakinada

(FAC) II Additional District Judge, Amalapuram.

Friday, the 24th day of April, 2026

E.P. No.121/2019 in A.C. No.52/2018

Between: M/s. Shriram Transport Finance Co. Limited, Amalapuram, represented by its GPA Holder, Ivaturi Sai Subrahmanyam, S/o.Ramakrishna Rao, Hindu, age 39 years, resident of Rajamahendravarm

....Petitioner/DHR

AND 1.Gundumogula Srinivasa Rao, age 45 years, D.No.2-6, Gundubogula Vari street, Nallacheruvu, H/o.Nedunuru, Ainavilli Mandal, J.C.J. Amalapuram 2.Sampathi Veeranjineya Swamy, S/o.China Venkanna, Indian, age 43 years, Business, D.No.2-23, Kapula Veedhi, Nedunuru, Ainavilli Mandal, JCJ Amalapuram.

3.Gundumogula Ramakrishna, Indian, aged 41 years, business, D.No.2-6, Gundubogula Vari street, Nallacheruvu, H/o.Nedunuru, Ainavilli Mandal, J.C.J. Amalapuram

....Respondents/JDRs

This petition is coming before me on 24.04.2026 for final hearing in the presence of Sri V.R. Vidyasankaram, and Sri D.V.V.S.Murthy, Advocates

for the petitioner/DHR and Sri K.Satyanarayana, Advocate for the 1st

respondent/JDR No.1 and the matter having stood over for consideration till this day, this Court made the following:

O R D E R

F.S. memo is filed. F.S is recorded. E.P. is terminated. Attachment is raised. Communicate the same to S.R.O., Amalapuram, on payment of process by the date.

Pronounced in the open court, this the 24 th day of April, 2026.

Sd/- Sri P.Govardhan

VI Additional District Judge, Kakinada

(FAC) II Additional District Judge,

Amalapuram.