P. Lokanadham

Additional Junior Civil Judge

Addl Dist Court Complex Gudur · Nellore · Andhra Pradesh

P. Lokanadham, Additional Junior Civil Judge, is posted at Addl Dist Court Complex Gudur, Nellore, Andhra Pradesh, India. 311 court orders on record since 2022. 14 judgments with full text available. Primarily handles CC, PRC, MC cases.

311

Total Orders

Judgments

Orders/Month

Posting

Featured Judgments

CC/914/2022 Acquitted

Inspector, Spl. Enforcement Bureau Station, Gudur vs Paricherla Kasthuraiah

24 Apr 2025

APNE0B0001512022

Presented on : 03-01-2022 Registered on : 03-02-2022 Decided on : 24-04-2025 Duration : 3 years, 3 months, 21 days

THE COURT OF ADDITIONAL JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF I CLASS::

GUDUR, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT

Present: - Sri. P.LOKANADHAM,

Additional Judicial Magistrate of I Class, Gudur.

Dated, this the 24th day of April, 2025

Calendar Case No: 142 of 2022

State : Enforcement Inspector, Special Enforcement Bureau Station, Gudur.… Complainant

Versus

Kethu Raja Rami Reddy, S/o Yanadhi Reddy, Aged about 45 Years, R/o Thiruvengalayapalli Village, Gudur Rural Mandal, SPSR Nellore District.… Accused

This case coming before me on 22-04-2025 for final hearing and disposal in the presence of Learned Sr. Assistant Public Prosecutor for the State and of Sri P. Venkata Subbaiah, Advocate for the accused, upon hearing on both sides and having stood over for consideration till this day, this court delivered the following:

J U D G M E N T

The Enforcement Inspector, Special Enforcement Bureau Station, Gudur has filed the charge sheet against the accused for the offence punishable Under

Section.34 (a) 1 (i) of A.P. Excise Act in Crime No.151/2021 of Special Enforcement

Bureau Station, Gudur.

2. The prosecution case in nutshell is as follows:

On 22-10-2021 at 4.30 PM, PW2 / Enforcement Inspector, Special Enforcement

Bureau Station, Gudur accompanied by his staff LW1 SK Gouse Basha, Constable, and PW1 proceeded in Govt. hired vehicle to conduct raids and when reached Water

Page 2 of 6 CC NO.142 of 2022, Dt.24-04-2025

Tank of Thiruvengalayapalli Village of Gudur Rural Mandal, PW2 found the accused standing with one white plastic gunny bag and on seeing the SEB officials, the accused tried to ran away but PW2 caught hold the accused with the help of his staff, then PW2 verified the bag in the presence of Lw.1 and PW1 and found that the bag contains 10 bottles of Kingswell Select brandy 750 ml, 02 bottles of Royal Palace

VSOP Brandy 750 ml, 02 bottles of Malabar House VSOP Brandy 750 ml and the labels were torn away which were printed as “For sale in Andhra Pradesh only” and treated as duty paid liquor bottles. On further questioning by Pw2, the accused revealed his identity particulars and he purchased the liquor bottles from Govt. Outlets to sell them at higher prices. PW2 drawn one bottle of Kingswell Select brandy 750 ml, one bottle of Royal Palace VSOP Brandy 750 ml and one bottle of Malabar House

VSOP Brandy 750 ml for chemical analysis and the remaining bottles were seized and the two wheeler bike which is black colour Pasion Pro Two Wheeler vehicle bearing

No. AP 26 AZ 7802. PW2 registered Ex.P1 Special report in crime no.151/2021 under section 34 (a) (1) (i) of AP Excise Amendment Act and issued ExP-2 FIR and sent the accused to judicial custody and later LW4 Inspector, SEB produced the samples for

Chemical Analysis and opined that the sample is “Indian Liquor”. Hence, the charge sheet.

3.Cognizance was taken for the offence under Section 34(a)1(i) of A.P.

Excise Act, and summons were issued to the accused.

4.After appearance of accused before the Court, copies of all documents were furnished to him as contemplated under Section 207 Criminal procedure Code.

5. On consideration of entire material on record, accused is examined under section 239 of Criminal Procedure Code, a charge under section 34(a)1(i) of A.P.

Excise Act is framed against him, explained the substance of accusation to the accused in Telugu, for which, he pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried.

Page 3 of 6 CC NO.142 of 2022, Dt.24-04-2025 6. The prosecution, in order to prove its case, cited Four witnesses, among them examined Two witnesses i.e., P.W.1 and PW.2 and Exs.P.1 to P5 marked. This court has closed the evidences of Lw.1 / SK Gouse Basha, in view of Pw.1 and Pw.2.

Hence, evidence on prosecution side is closed.

7.On closure of prosecution evidence, accused is examined Under section 313 of Criminal Procedure Code, explaining the available incriminating material on record, he denied the same and reported no defence evidence on his behalf.

8. Heard both sides.

9. The learned Assistant Public Prosecutor argued that with the evidence adduced, the prosecution succeeded in proving its case against the accused.

10. Per contra, the learned defence counsel argued that the evidence available on record is not sufficient to prove the case against accused that accused is entitled for acquittal.

11 . Now the Point of determination is :

“Whether the prosecution is able to prove the guilt of accused for the offence under Section 34 (a)1(i) of A.P. Excise Act beyond all reasonable doubt?” POINT:

12.To prove the offence under Section 34 (a) 1 (i) of A.P. Excise Act, the prosecution has to establish that the accused herein was transporting, exporting, importing, manufacturing, collecting or possessing any intoxicants in contravention of

A.P. Excise Act,1968 or any license or permit granted or issued under this Act.

13.According to the evidences of P.W.1 and Pw.2, on 22-10-2021, at 4.30

PM, PW1, PW2 and Lw.1 / SK Gouse Basha, Constable, proceeded to Water Tank of

Tiruvengalayapalli Village, Gudur Rural Mandal to conduct raids and found the accused with white plastic gunny bag containing 10 bottles of Kingswell Select brandy 750 ml, 02 bottles of Royal Palace VSOP Brandy 750 ml, 02 bottles of Malabar House

VSOP Brandy 750 ml and on seeing them, the accused tried to skulk away, but apprehended him and later Pw.2 instructed LW.1 / constable to secure mediators,

Page 4 of 6 CC NO.142 of 2022, Dt.24-04-2025

Lw.1 returned with but in vain, and then PW.1 on questioning the accused person, he revealed his identity particulars, and also revealed that he purchased the same in various shops at Gudur 3 in each shop and thereupon Pw.1 drew one bottle as sample, sealed and labeled it, seized the remaining contraband and arrested the accused under cover of ExP-1 special report scribed by Pw.1 on the dictation of PW2 and later Pw.1 registered ExP-2 FIR and sent the accused to judicial remand and sent

MO1 to MO3 samples to the Chemical analysis and received ExP-3 analysis report which contains that it is an Indian Liquor and basing on ExP-4 Destruction proceedings, destroyed ExP-5 Destruction Panchanaama. During the course of cross examination, the seized motor cycle bearing No. AP 26 AZ 7802 was also confiscated by the proceedings of the Deputy Commissioner of SEB, Ananthapur and that Ex.P6 is the confiscation proceedings in RCA No.538/2022/C2, dated 02-07-2022 of the seized motor cycle.

14.During the course of cross examination, PW1 and PW2 admitted that they have no idea whether Tiruvengalayapalli Village, Gudur Rural Mandal is a major Panchayat or not and that they do not know whether there are two VRO’s and many other village officials working in the Tiruvengalayapalli Village and that Tiruvengalayapalli Village is a busy locality and that they have no idea as to how many village officials are working in that unit. No doubt, when the search and seizure is in open place, there is no mandatory requirement to secure the independent mediators of the locality but to prove their case beyond any iota of doubt, it is expected that the police officials should have seriously and sincerely tried for independent mediators to show their impartial investigation. No doubt, the acts of police officials in discharge of their official duties are presumed to be correct unless contrary is proved. But, when there was opportunity to secure the mediators in Village inhabitants, no convincing attempts being made by

PW2. At this juncture, it is relevant to note a decision made in:

Page 5 of 6 CC NO.142 of 2022, Dt.24-04-2025

S.Babu Saheb @ Babu v. State of A.P., 2010 (1) A.L.T. (Crl.) 32 A.P. wherein it was held ‘no efforts being made to secure the mediators is doubtful. The necessity was emphasized by the Hon’ble High Court when there is seizure of contraband’.

Also in, Gajamker Narayana v. State of A.P., 2005 (3) A.L.T. (Crl.) 1, it was held “.... Section 100(4) Cr.P.C. lays down that before making a search, the officer of other person about to make it shall call upon two or more independent and respectable inhabitants of the locality in which the place to be searched is situated or of any other locality...”, the seizure of contraband was held to be illegal when the provision of Section 100 (4) Code of Criminal Procedure are not complied. Also, it was held that the evidence of Excise officials is interested, artificial and routine. In this case, on hand also, PW2 did not depose the convincing reasons for non-securing of the independent mediators from the locality.

In Botcha Raju v. State Rep. by the Inspector of Police, Vizianagaram Rural

Circle, 1994 (2) A.L.T. (Crl.) 69 (A.P.), it was held “...the Courts below fell in error by accepting the version of the Police Officers without the corroboration of the disinterested witnesses...”.

15.There is no sufficient material placed by the prosecution to establish that the accused possessed contraband. Therefore, the prosecution miserably failed to establish the guilt against the accused for the offence under Section 34(a)1(i) of A.P.

Excise Act. In the light of above discussion, and the evidence of P.W.1 being the police official and his evidence pertaining to Ex.P.1 above referred citations, accused is entitled for benefit of doubt.

16.With regard to the alleged confessional statement of the accused before

P.W.1, the same is hit by Sec.25 of Indian Evidence Act and is inadmissible in evidence.

17.For the above discussion, this Court feels that prosecution utterly failed to prove the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt for the offence alleged against him.

Page 6 of 6 CC NO.142 of 2022, Dt.24-04-2025

IN THE RESULT, the Accused is found not guilty for the offence punishable

Under Sec.34 (a) 1 (i) of A.P. Excise Act and accordingly, he is acquitted Under

Sec.248(1) Criminal Procedure Code. The Accused shall execute a personal bond for

Rs.10,000/- and it shall remain in force for a period of six months as required Under

Section 437-A of Criminal Procedure Code.

M.O.1 to M.O.3 shall be destroyed after lapse of appeal time.

Typed to my dictation by the Personal Assistant, corrected and pronounced by me in the open court, this the 24th day of April, 2025.

Sd/- P.LOKANADHAM,

Additional Judicial Magistrate of I Class,

Gudur.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

Witnesses Examined on behalf of Prosecution

Pw1 : M. Kiran Singh, Head Constable

Pw2 : A. Seshamma, Sub-Inspector, SEB

Witnesses Examined on behalf of Defence

- NONE -

Exhibits marked on behalf of Prosecution

Ex.P1: Special Report, dated 22.10.2021

Ex.P2: FIR

Ex.P3: Chemical Analysis Report

Ex.P4: Proceedings dated 05-08-2022

Ex.P5: Destruction Panchanama, dated 10-07-2022

Ex.P6: Confiscation proceedings in RCA.No.538/2022/C2, dated 02.07.2022 of the seized motor cycle

Exhibits marked on behalf of Defence - NIL -

Material Objects

M.O.1 : Sample Bottle of Kingswell Select Brandy with 750 Ml capacity

M.O.2 : Sample Bottle of Royal Palace VSOP Brandy with 750 Ml capacity

M.O.3 : Sample Bottle of Malabar House VSOP Brandy with 750 Ml capacity

Sd/- P.LOKANADHAM,

Additional Judicial Magistrate of I Class,

Gudur

CC/914/2022 Acquitted

Inspector, Spl. Enforcement Bureau Station, Gudur vs Paricherla Kasthuraiah

24 Apr 2025

APNE0B0001512022

Presented on : 03-01-2022 Registered on : 03-02-2022 Decided on : 24-04-2025 Duration : 3 years, 3 months, 21 days

THE COURT OF ADDITIONAL JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF I CLASS::

GUDUR, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT

Present: - Sri. P.LOKANADHAM,

Additional Judicial Magistrate of I Class, Gudur.

Dated, this the 24th day of April, 2025

Calendar Case No: 142 of 2022

State : Enforcement Inspector, Special Enforcement Bureau Station, Gudur.… Complainant

Versus

Kethu Raja Rami Reddy, S/o Yanadhi Reddy, Aged about 45 Years, R/o Thiruvengalayapalli Village, Gudur Rural Mandal, SPSR Nellore District.… Accused

J U D G M E N T

The Enforcement Inspector, Special Enforcement Bureau Station, Gudur has filed the charge sheet against the accused for the offence punishable Under

Section.34 (a) 1 (i) of A.P. Excise Act in Crime No.151/2021 of Special Enforcement

Bureau Station, Gudur.

2. The prosecution case in nutshell is as follows:

On 22-10-2021 at 4.30 PM, PW2 / Enforcement Inspector, Special Enforcement

Bureau Station, Gudur accompanied by his staff LW1 SK Gouse Basha, Constable, and PW1 proceeded in Govt. hired vehicle to conduct raids and when reached Water

Page 2 of 6 CC NO.142 of 2022, Dt.24-04-2025

VSOP Brandy 750 ml for chemical analysis and the remaining bottles were seized and the two wheeler bike which is black colour Pasion Pro Two Wheeler vehicle bearing

Chemical Analysis and opined that the sample is “Indian Liquor”. Hence, the charge sheet.

3.Cognizance was taken for the offence under Section 34(a)1(i) of A.P.

Excise Act, and summons were issued to the accused.

4.After appearance of accused before the Court, copies of all documents were furnished to him as contemplated under Section 207 Criminal procedure Code.

5. On consideration of entire material on record, accused is examined under section 239 of Criminal Procedure Code, a charge under section 34(a)1(i) of A.P.

Excise Act is framed against him, explained the substance of accusation to the accused in Telugu, for which, he pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried.

Hence, evidence on prosecution side is closed.

8. Heard both sides.

9. The learned Assistant Public Prosecutor argued that with the evidence adduced, the prosecution succeeded in proving its case against the accused.

10. Per contra, the learned defence counsel argued that the evidence available on record is not sufficient to prove the case against accused that accused is entitled for acquittal.

11 . Now the Point of determination is :

“Whether the prosecution is able to prove the guilt of accused for the offence under Section 34 (a)1(i) of A.P. Excise Act beyond all reasonable doubt?” POINT:

A.P. Excise Act,1968 or any license or permit granted or issued under this Act.

13.According to the evidences of P.W.1 and Pw.2, on 22-10-2021, at 4.30

PM, PW1, PW2 and Lw.1 / SK Gouse Basha, Constable, proceeded to Water Tank of

VSOP Brandy 750 ml and on seeing them, the accused tried to skulk away, but apprehended him and later Pw.2 instructed LW.1 / constable to secure mediators,

Page 4 of 6 CC NO.142 of 2022, Dt.24-04-2025

PW2. At this juncture, it is relevant to note a decision made in:

Page 5 of 6 CC NO.142 of 2022, Dt.24-04-2025

In Botcha Raju v. State Rep. by the Inspector of Police, Vizianagaram Rural

16.With regard to the alleged confessional statement of the accused before

P.W.1, the same is hit by Sec.25 of Indian Evidence Act and is inadmissible in evidence.

17.For the above discussion, this Court feels that prosecution utterly failed to prove the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt for the offence alleged against him.

Page 6 of 6 CC NO.142 of 2022, Dt.24-04-2025

IN THE RESULT, the Accused is found not guilty for the offence punishable

Under Sec.34 (a) 1 (i) of A.P. Excise Act and accordingly, he is acquitted Under

Sec.248(1) Criminal Procedure Code. The Accused shall execute a personal bond for

Rs.10,000/- and it shall remain in force for a period of six months as required Under

Section 437-A of Criminal Procedure Code.

M.O.1 to M.O.3 shall be destroyed after lapse of appeal time.

Typed to my dictation by the Personal Assistant, corrected and pronounced by me in the open court, this the 24th day of April, 2025.

Sd/- P.LOKANADHAM,

Additional Judicial Magistrate of I Class,

Gudur.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

Witnesses Examined on behalf of Prosecution

Pw1 : M. Kiran Singh, Head Constable

Pw2 : A. Seshamma, Sub-Inspector, SEB

Witnesses Examined on behalf of Defence

- NONE -

Exhibits marked on behalf of Prosecution

Ex.P1: Special Report, dated 22.10.2021

Ex.P2: FIR

Ex.P3: Chemical Analysis Report

Ex.P4: Proceedings dated 05-08-2022

Ex.P5: Destruction Panchanama, dated 10-07-2022

Ex.P6: Confiscation proceedings in RCA.No.538/2022/C2, dated 02.07.2022 of the seized motor cycle

Exhibits marked on behalf of Defence - NIL -

Material Objects

M.O.1 : Sample Bottle of Kingswell Select Brandy with 750 Ml capacity

M.O.2 : Sample Bottle of Royal Palace VSOP Brandy with 750 Ml capacity

M.O.3 : Sample Bottle of Malabar House VSOP Brandy with 750 Ml capacity

Sd/- P.LOKANADHAM,

Additional Judicial Magistrate of I Class,

Gudur

CC/914/2022 Acquitted

Inspector, Spl. Enforcement Bureau Station, Gudur vs Paricherla Kasthuraiah

24 Apr 2025

APNE0B0001512022

Presented on : 03-01-2022 Registered on : 03-02-2022 Decided on : 24-04-2025 Duration : 3 years, 3 months, 21 days

THE COURT OF ADDITIONAL JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF I CLASS::

GUDUR, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT

Present: - Sri. P.LOKANADHAM,

Additional Judicial Magistrate of I Class, Gudur.

Dated, this the 24th day of April, 2025

Calendar Case No: 142 of 2022

State : Enforcement Inspector, Special Enforcement Bureau Station, Gudur.… Complainant

Versus

Kethu Raja Rami Reddy, S/o Yanadhi Reddy, Aged about 45 Years, R/o Thiruvengalayapalli Village, Gudur Rural Mandal, SPSR Nellore District.… Accused

J U D G M E N T

The Enforcement Inspector, Special Enforcement Bureau Station, Gudur has filed the charge sheet against the accused for the offence punishable Under

Section.34 (a) 1 (i) of A.P. Excise Act in Crime No.151/2021 of Special Enforcement

Bureau Station, Gudur.

2. The prosecution case in nutshell is as follows:

On 22-10-2021 at 4.30 PM, PW2 / Enforcement Inspector, Special Enforcement

Bureau Station, Gudur accompanied by his staff LW1 SK Gouse Basha, Constable, and PW1 proceeded in Govt. hired vehicle to conduct raids and when reached Water

Page 2 of 6 CC NO.142 of 2022, Dt.24-04-2025

VSOP Brandy 750 ml for chemical analysis and the remaining bottles were seized and the two wheeler bike which is black colour Pasion Pro Two Wheeler vehicle bearing

Chemical Analysis and opined that the sample is “Indian Liquor”. Hence, the charge sheet.

3.Cognizance was taken for the offence under Section 34(a)1(i) of A.P.

Excise Act, and summons were issued to the accused.

4.After appearance of accused before the Court, copies of all documents were furnished to him as contemplated under Section 207 Criminal procedure Code.

5. On consideration of entire material on record, accused is examined under section 239 of Criminal Procedure Code, a charge under section 34(a)1(i) of A.P.

Excise Act is framed against him, explained the substance of accusation to the accused in Telugu, for which, he pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried.

Hence, evidence on prosecution side is closed.

8. Heard both sides.

9. The learned Assistant Public Prosecutor argued that with the evidence adduced, the prosecution succeeded in proving its case against the accused.

10. Per contra, the learned defence counsel argued that the evidence available on record is not sufficient to prove the case against accused that accused is entitled for acquittal.

11 . Now the Point of determination is :

“Whether the prosecution is able to prove the guilt of accused for the offence under Section 34 (a)1(i) of A.P. Excise Act beyond all reasonable doubt?” POINT:

A.P. Excise Act,1968 or any license or permit granted or issued under this Act.

13.According to the evidences of P.W.1 and Pw.2, on 22-10-2021, at 4.30

PM, PW1, PW2 and Lw.1 / SK Gouse Basha, Constable, proceeded to Water Tank of

VSOP Brandy 750 ml and on seeing them, the accused tried to skulk away, but apprehended him and later Pw.2 instructed LW.1 / constable to secure mediators,

Page 4 of 6 CC NO.142 of 2022, Dt.24-04-2025

PW2. At this juncture, it is relevant to note a decision made in:

Page 5 of 6 CC NO.142 of 2022, Dt.24-04-2025

In Botcha Raju v. State Rep. by the Inspector of Police, Vizianagaram Rural

16.With regard to the alleged confessional statement of the accused before

P.W.1, the same is hit by Sec.25 of Indian Evidence Act and is inadmissible in evidence.

17.For the above discussion, this Court feels that prosecution utterly failed to prove the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt for the offence alleged against him.

Page 6 of 6 CC NO.142 of 2022, Dt.24-04-2025

IN THE RESULT, the Accused is found not guilty for the offence punishable

Under Sec.34 (a) 1 (i) of A.P. Excise Act and accordingly, he is acquitted Under

Sec.248(1) Criminal Procedure Code. The Accused shall execute a personal bond for

Rs.10,000/- and it shall remain in force for a period of six months as required Under

Section 437-A of Criminal Procedure Code.

M.O.1 to M.O.3 shall be destroyed after lapse of appeal time.

Typed to my dictation by the Personal Assistant, corrected and pronounced by me in the open court, this the 24th day of April, 2025.

Sd/- P.LOKANADHAM,

Additional Judicial Magistrate of I Class,

Gudur.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

Witnesses Examined on behalf of Prosecution

Pw1 : M. Kiran Singh, Head Constable

Pw2 : A. Seshamma, Sub-Inspector, SEB

Witnesses Examined on behalf of Defence

- NONE -

Exhibits marked on behalf of Prosecution

Ex.P1: Special Report, dated 22.10.2021

Ex.P2: FIR

Ex.P3: Chemical Analysis Report

Ex.P4: Proceedings dated 05-08-2022

Ex.P5: Destruction Panchanama, dated 10-07-2022

Ex.P6: Confiscation proceedings in RCA.No.538/2022/C2, dated 02.07.2022 of the seized motor cycle

Exhibits marked on behalf of Defence - NIL -

Material Objects

M.O.1 : Sample Bottle of Kingswell Select Brandy with 750 Ml capacity

M.O.2 : Sample Bottle of Royal Palace VSOP Brandy with 750 Ml capacity

M.O.3 : Sample Bottle of Malabar House VSOP Brandy with 750 Ml capacity

Sd/- P.LOKANADHAM,

Additional Judicial Magistrate of I Class,

Gudur

CC/914/2022 Acquitted

Inspector, Spl. Enforcement Bureau Station, Gudur vs Paricherla Kasthuraiah

24 Apr 2025

APNE0B0001512022

Presented on : 03-01-2022 Registered on : 03-02-2022 Decided on : 24-04-2025 Duration : 3 years, 3 months, 21 days

THE COURT OF ADDITIONAL JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF I CLASS::

GUDUR, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT

Present: - Sri. P.LOKANADHAM,

Additional Judicial Magistrate of I Class, Gudur.

Dated, this the 24th day of April, 2025

Calendar Case No: 142 of 2022

State : Enforcement Inspector, Special Enforcement Bureau Station, Gudur.… Complainant

Versus

Kethu Raja Rami Reddy, S/o Yanadhi Reddy, Aged about 45 Years, R/o Thiruvengalayapalli Village, Gudur Rural Mandal, SPSR Nellore District.… Accused

J U D G M E N T

The Enforcement Inspector, Special Enforcement Bureau Station, Gudur has filed the charge sheet against the accused for the offence punishable Under

Section.34 (a) 1 (i) of A.P. Excise Act in Crime No.151/2021 of Special Enforcement

Bureau Station, Gudur.

2. The prosecution case in nutshell is as follows:

On 22-10-2021 at 4.30 PM, PW2 / Enforcement Inspector, Special Enforcement

Bureau Station, Gudur accompanied by his staff LW1 SK Gouse Basha, Constable, and PW1 proceeded in Govt. hired vehicle to conduct raids and when reached Water

Page 2 of 6 CC NO.142 of 2022, Dt.24-04-2025

VSOP Brandy 750 ml for chemical analysis and the remaining bottles were seized and the two wheeler bike which is black colour Pasion Pro Two Wheeler vehicle bearing

Chemical Analysis and opined that the sample is “Indian Liquor”. Hence, the charge sheet.

3.Cognizance was taken for the offence under Section 34(a)1(i) of A.P.

Excise Act, and summons were issued to the accused.

4.After appearance of accused before the Court, copies of all documents were furnished to him as contemplated under Section 207 Criminal procedure Code.

5. On consideration of entire material on record, accused is examined under section 239 of Criminal Procedure Code, a charge under section 34(a)1(i) of A.P.

Excise Act is framed against him, explained the substance of accusation to the accused in Telugu, for which, he pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried.

Hence, evidence on prosecution side is closed.

8. Heard both sides.

9. The learned Assistant Public Prosecutor argued that with the evidence adduced, the prosecution succeeded in proving its case against the accused.

10. Per contra, the learned defence counsel argued that the evidence available on record is not sufficient to prove the case against accused that accused is entitled for acquittal.

11 . Now the Point of determination is :

“Whether the prosecution is able to prove the guilt of accused for the offence under Section 34 (a)1(i) of A.P. Excise Act beyond all reasonable doubt?” POINT:

A.P. Excise Act,1968 or any license or permit granted or issued under this Act.

13.According to the evidences of P.W.1 and Pw.2, on 22-10-2021, at 4.30

PM, PW1, PW2 and Lw.1 / SK Gouse Basha, Constable, proceeded to Water Tank of

VSOP Brandy 750 ml and on seeing them, the accused tried to skulk away, but apprehended him and later Pw.2 instructed LW.1 / constable to secure mediators,

Page 4 of 6 CC NO.142 of 2022, Dt.24-04-2025

PW2. At this juncture, it is relevant to note a decision made in:

Page 5 of 6 CC NO.142 of 2022, Dt.24-04-2025

In Botcha Raju v. State Rep. by the Inspector of Police, Vizianagaram Rural

16.With regard to the alleged confessional statement of the accused before

P.W.1, the same is hit by Sec.25 of Indian Evidence Act and is inadmissible in evidence.

17.For the above discussion, this Court feels that prosecution utterly failed to prove the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt for the offence alleged against him.

Page 6 of 6 CC NO.142 of 2022, Dt.24-04-2025

IN THE RESULT, the Accused is found not guilty for the offence punishable

Under Sec.34 (a) 1 (i) of A.P. Excise Act and accordingly, he is acquitted Under

Sec.248(1) Criminal Procedure Code. The Accused shall execute a personal bond for

Rs.10,000/- and it shall remain in force for a period of six months as required Under

Section 437-A of Criminal Procedure Code.

M.O.1 to M.O.3 shall be destroyed after lapse of appeal time.

Typed to my dictation by the Personal Assistant, corrected and pronounced by me in the open court, this the 24th day of April, 2025.

Sd/- P.LOKANADHAM,

Additional Judicial Magistrate of I Class,

Gudur.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

Witnesses Examined on behalf of Prosecution

Pw1 : M. Kiran Singh, Head Constable

Pw2 : A. Seshamma, Sub-Inspector, SEB

Witnesses Examined on behalf of Defence

- NONE -

Exhibits marked on behalf of Prosecution

Ex.P1: Special Report, dated 22.10.2021

Ex.P2: FIR

Ex.P3: Chemical Analysis Report

Ex.P4: Proceedings dated 05-08-2022

Ex.P5: Destruction Panchanama, dated 10-07-2022

Ex.P6: Confiscation proceedings in RCA.No.538/2022/C2, dated 02.07.2022 of the seized motor cycle

Exhibits marked on behalf of Defence - NIL -

Material Objects

M.O.1 : Sample Bottle of Kingswell Select Brandy with 750 Ml capacity

M.O.2 : Sample Bottle of Royal Palace VSOP Brandy with 750 Ml capacity

M.O.3 : Sample Bottle of Malabar House VSOP Brandy with 750 Ml capacity

Sd/- P.LOKANADHAM,

Additional Judicial Magistrate of I Class,

Gudur

CC/914/2022 Acquitted

Inspector, Spl. Enforcement Bureau Station, Gudur vs Paricherla Kasthuraiah

24 Apr 2025

APNE0B0001512022

Presented on : 03-01-2022 Registered on : 03-02-2022 Decided on : 24-04-2025 Duration : 3 years, 3 months, 21 days

THE COURT OF ADDITIONAL JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF I CLASS::

GUDUR, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT

Present: - Sri. P.LOKANADHAM,

Additional Judicial Magistrate of I Class, Gudur.

Dated, this the 24th day of April, 2025

Calendar Case No: 142 of 2022

State : Enforcement Inspector, Special Enforcement Bureau Station, Gudur.… Complainant

Versus

Kethu Raja Rami Reddy, S/o Yanadhi Reddy, Aged about 45 Years, R/o Thiruvengalayapalli Village, Gudur Rural Mandal, SPSR Nellore District.… Accused

J U D G M E N T

The Enforcement Inspector, Special Enforcement Bureau Station, Gudur has filed the charge sheet against the accused for the offence punishable Under

Section.34 (a) 1 (i) of A.P. Excise Act in Crime No.151/2021 of Special Enforcement

Bureau Station, Gudur.

2. The prosecution case in nutshell is as follows:

On 22-10-2021 at 4.30 PM, PW2 / Enforcement Inspector, Special Enforcement

Bureau Station, Gudur accompanied by his staff LW1 SK Gouse Basha, Constable, and PW1 proceeded in Govt. hired vehicle to conduct raids and when reached Water

Page 2 of 6 CC NO.142 of 2022, Dt.24-04-2025

VSOP Brandy 750 ml for chemical analysis and the remaining bottles were seized and the two wheeler bike which is black colour Pasion Pro Two Wheeler vehicle bearing

Chemical Analysis and opined that the sample is “Indian Liquor”. Hence, the charge sheet.

3.Cognizance was taken for the offence under Section 34(a)1(i) of A.P.

Excise Act, and summons were issued to the accused.

4.After appearance of accused before the Court, copies of all documents were furnished to him as contemplated under Section 207 Criminal procedure Code.

5. On consideration of entire material on record, accused is examined under section 239 of Criminal Procedure Code, a charge under section 34(a)1(i) of A.P.

Excise Act is framed against him, explained the substance of accusation to the accused in Telugu, for which, he pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried.

Hence, evidence on prosecution side is closed.

8. Heard both sides.

9. The learned Assistant Public Prosecutor argued that with the evidence adduced, the prosecution succeeded in proving its case against the accused.

10. Per contra, the learned defence counsel argued that the evidence available on record is not sufficient to prove the case against accused that accused is entitled for acquittal.

11 . Now the Point of determination is :

“Whether the prosecution is able to prove the guilt of accused for the offence under Section 34 (a)1(i) of A.P. Excise Act beyond all reasonable doubt?” POINT:

A.P. Excise Act,1968 or any license or permit granted or issued under this Act.

13.According to the evidences of P.W.1 and Pw.2, on 22-10-2021, at 4.30

PM, PW1, PW2 and Lw.1 / SK Gouse Basha, Constable, proceeded to Water Tank of

VSOP Brandy 750 ml and on seeing them, the accused tried to skulk away, but apprehended him and later Pw.2 instructed LW.1 / constable to secure mediators,

Page 4 of 6 CC NO.142 of 2022, Dt.24-04-2025

PW2. At this juncture, it is relevant to note a decision made in:

Page 5 of 6 CC NO.142 of 2022, Dt.24-04-2025

In Botcha Raju v. State Rep. by the Inspector of Police, Vizianagaram Rural

16.With regard to the alleged confessional statement of the accused before

P.W.1, the same is hit by Sec.25 of Indian Evidence Act and is inadmissible in evidence.

17.For the above discussion, this Court feels that prosecution utterly failed to prove the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt for the offence alleged against him.

Page 6 of 6 CC NO.142 of 2022, Dt.24-04-2025

IN THE RESULT, the Accused is found not guilty for the offence punishable

Under Sec.34 (a) 1 (i) of A.P. Excise Act and accordingly, he is acquitted Under

Sec.248(1) Criminal Procedure Code. The Accused shall execute a personal bond for

Rs.10,000/- and it shall remain in force for a period of six months as required Under

Section 437-A of Criminal Procedure Code.

M.O.1 to M.O.3 shall be destroyed after lapse of appeal time.

Typed to my dictation by the Personal Assistant, corrected and pronounced by me in the open court, this the 24th day of April, 2025.

Sd/- P.LOKANADHAM,

Additional Judicial Magistrate of I Class,

Gudur.

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

Witnesses Examined on behalf of Prosecution

Pw1 : M. Kiran Singh, Head Constable

Pw2 : A. Seshamma, Sub-Inspector, SEB

Witnesses Examined on behalf of Defence

- NONE -

Exhibits marked on behalf of Prosecution

Ex.P1: Special Report, dated 22.10.2021

Ex.P2: FIR

Ex.P3: Chemical Analysis Report

Ex.P4: Proceedings dated 05-08-2022

Ex.P5: Destruction Panchanama, dated 10-07-2022

Ex.P6: Confiscation proceedings in RCA.No.538/2022/C2, dated 02.07.2022 of the seized motor cycle

Exhibits marked on behalf of Defence - NIL -

Material Objects

M.O.1 : Sample Bottle of Kingswell Select Brandy with 750 Ml capacity

M.O.2 : Sample Bottle of Royal Palace VSOP Brandy with 750 Ml capacity

M.O.3 : Sample Bottle of Malabar House VSOP Brandy with 750 Ml capacity

Sd/- P.LOKANADHAM,

Additional Judicial Magistrate of I Class,

Gudur

Order Record 295 total

Case No.	Parties	Date	Type	Outcome
CC/914/2022	Inspector, Spl. Enforcement Bureau Station, Gudur vs Paricherla Kasthuraiah	24 Apr 2025	judgement	Acquitted
CC/412/2022	Inspector, Special Enforcement Bureau Station, Gudur. vs Yaraballi Penchalaiah	23 Apr 2025	judgement	—
CC/551/2022	Inspector, Special Enforcement Bureau Station, Gudur vs Mangalapuri Srihari	23 Apr 2025	judgement	—
CC/1195/2022	Inspector, Spl. Enforcement Bureau Station, Gudur vs Gunji Krishnamma	23 Apr 2025	judgement	—
CC/82/2018	SHO, Gudur I Town P.S vs Bykani Jangaiah	22 Apr 2025	judgement	—
CC/350/2022	Inspector, Spl. Enforcement Bureau Station, Gudur vs Pasupuleti Chenchuramaiah	22 Apr 2025	judgement	—
CC/27/2025	SHO Gudur Rural P.S vs Vschalam seenaiah	07 Apr 2025	judgement	—
CC/472/2024	Sub-Inspector of Police, Manubolu P.S. vs Sura Ankaiah	17 Feb 2025	judgement	—
CC/274/2017	SHO, Gudur Rural P.S vs Bochu Surendra	17 Jan 2025	judgement	—
CC/564/2018	SHO, Chillakur P.S vs Cherukuru Venkata Krishnaiah	16 Jan 2025	judgement	—
CC/379/2019	SHO, Sydapuram P.S vs Lakku Masthan Reddy @ Babul Reddy	10 Jan 2025	judgement	—
CC/400/2022	Inspector, Spl. Enforcement Bureau Station, Gudur vs Thirakala Narayana	09 Jan 2025	judgement	—
CC/459/2017	Inspector of Police, Gudur Rural Circle vs Sanniboyina Haranadh - A2	09 Jan 2025	judgement	—
CC/743/2019	SHO, Gudur Rural P.S vs Bandi Sekhar @ Chandra Sekhar	09 Jan 2025	judgement	—
CC/997/2020	SHO, Sydapuram P.S vs Atchi Penchalaiah	08 Jan 2025	judgement	—
CC/700/2020	SHO, Chillakur P.S vs Golagamudi Venkata Ramanaiah	02 Jan 2025	judgement	—
CC/559/2024	Sub-Inspector of Police, Gudur I Town PS vs Chimalamarri Devaraj	27 Dec 2024	judgement	—
CC/344/2019	SHO, Manubolu P.S vs Kudumula Rajasekhar	26 Dec 2024	judgement	—
CC/418/2019	SHO, Gudur Rural P.S vs Thammi Penchalaiah	26 Dec 2024	judgement	—
CC/421/2019	SHO, Gudur Rural P.S vs Kurugonda Sivaiah	26 Dec 2024	judgement	—
CC/422/2019	SHO, Gudur Rural P.S vs Kantlam Hari	26 Dec 2024	judgement	—
CC/75/2018	SHO, Chillakur P.S vs Gendi Kasthuraiah	23 Dec 2024	judgement	—
CC/421/2019	SHO, Gudur Rural P.S vs Kurugonda Sivaiah	23 Dec 2024	judgement	—
CC/929/2020	SHO, Gudur I Town P.S vs Sunkara Audi Narayana @ Audi	23 Dec 2024	judgement	—
CC/113/2018	SHO, Manubolu P.S vs Dama Venkata Subba Rao	21 Dec 2024	judgement	—
CC/7/2020	SHO, Gudur I Town P.S vs Nimmakayala Prudvi Teja	20 Dec 2024	judgement	—
CC/717/2019	SHO, Sydapuram P.S vs Kona Ramesh Reddy	20 Dec 2024	judgement	—
CC/7/2020	SHO, Gudur I Town P.S vs Nimmakayala Prudvi Teja	19 Dec 2024	judgement	—
CC/534/2021	SHO, Gudur I Town P.S vs Shaik Firoz	19 Dec 2024	judgement	—
CC/775/2021	SHO, Manubolu Police Station vs Anjuru Vinod Kumar	19 Dec 2024	judgement	—
CC/1169/2022	Sub-Inspector of Police, Gudur Rural P.S. vs Noor Siraj	18 Dec 2024	judgement	—
CC/58/2022	Sub-Inpsector of Police, Gudur II Town P.S. vs Jakkala Venkateswarlu	16 Dec 2024	judgement	—
CC/519/2021	SHO, Sydapuram P.S vs Vallepu Muni Babu	13 Dec 2024	judgement	—
CC/774/2019	SI of Police, Chillakur PS vs Sk.Lalu	13 Dec 2024	judgement	—
CC/155/2024	Sub-Inspector of police, Gudur I Town PS vs Dodla Niranjan Reddy	29 Nov 2024	judgement	—
CC/776/2019	SI of Police, Chillakur PS vs Perubatla Narahari	29 Nov 2024	judgement	—
CC/679/2019	SHO, Gudur II Town P.S vs Chelikam Siva Sekhar Reddy	28 Nov 2024	judgement	—
CC/8/2018	Inspector of Police, Gudur Urban Circle. vs Sannareddy Srinivasulu Reddy	27 Nov 2024	judgement	—
CC/590/2018	SHO, Manubolu P.S vs Chennuru Chandra Sekhar Reddy	27 Nov 2024	judgement	—
CC/618/2023	Sub-Inspector of Police, Gudur Rural PS vs Singanapalli Sasidhar	27 Nov 2024	judgement	—
CC/823/2022	Sub-Inspector of Police, Chillakur P.S. vs Pitti Sudhakar	27 Nov 2024	judgement	—
CC/595/2022	Sub-Inspector of Police, Kandaleru P.S. vs Jilakara Kalyan Teja @ Teja	25 Nov 2024	judgement	—
CC/37/2019	SHO, Manubolu P.S vs Avula Koteswara Rao	05 Aug 2024	judgement	—
CC/80/2021	SHO, Gudur I Town P.S vs Gunnamreddy Rajasekhar Reddy	05 Aug 2024	judgement	—
CC/167/2022	Inspector, Special Enforcement Bureau Station, Rapur vs Badugu Srinivasulu	02 Aug 2024	judgement	—
CC/996/2020	SHO, Gudur I Town P.S vs Gurrala Venkata Ramana	02 Aug 2024	judgement	—
CC/931/2020	SHO, Gudur I Town P.S vs Oduru Srinivasulu	01 Aug 2024	judgement	—
CC/554/2022	Inspector, Special Enforcement Bureau Station, Gudur vs Budida Balaiah	23 Jul 2024	judgement	—
CC/292/2023	Sub-Inspector of Police, Chillakur PS vs Kathi Siva	22 Jul 2024	judgement	—
CC/136/2022	Enforcement Inspector, Special Enforcement Bureau Station, Gudur vs Kokku Chenchaiah	19 Jul 2024	judgement	—
CC/231/2017	AP State SHO. Chillakur P.S vs Bona Srinivasulu	19 Jul 2024	judgement	—
CC/727/2022	Inspector, Spl. Enforcement Bureau Station, Gudur vs Nimmala Sivaram	19 Jul 2024	judgement	—
CC/321/2023	Inspector, Spl. Enforcement Bureau, Gudur vs Eluru Venkataiah	11 Jul 2024	judgement	—
CC/733/2022	Inspector, Spl. Enforcement Bureau Station, Gudur vs Mangalapuri Seenaiah	11 Jul 2024	judgement	—
CC/973/2021	Inspector, Spl. Enforcement Bureau Station, Gudur vs Eragaraju Seshaiah	11 Jul 2024	judgement	—
CC/553/2022	Inspector, Special Enforcement Bureau Station, Gudur vs Chittamuru Venkateswarlu	10 Jul 2024	judgement	—
CC/868/2021	Special Enforcement Bureau Station, Gudur vs Kumba Subbamma	10 Jul 2024	judgement	—
CC/897/2022	Inspector, Spl. Enforcement Bureau Station, Rapur vs Gunji Venkateswarlu	04 Jul 2024	judgement	—
CC/898/2022	Inspector, Spl. Enforcement Bureau Station, Rapur vs Pillipaka Narasaiah	04 Jul 2024	judgement	—
CC/352/2022	Inspector, Spl. Enforcement Bureau Station, Gudur vs Eeduru Venkata Krishnaiah	03 Jul 2024	judgement	—
CC/565/2022	Inspector, Spl. Enforcement Bureau Station, Gudur vs Achhi Guravaiah	03 Jul 2024	judgement	—
CC/168/2023	Inspector, Spl. Enforcement Bureau Station, Gudur vs Gnana Manikanta	02 Jul 2024	judgement	—
CC/285/2022	Inspector, Special Enforcement Bureau Station, Gudur vs Karipem Venkateswarlu	02 Jul 2024	judgement	—
CC/933/2021	Inspector, Spl.Enforcement Bureau Station, Gudur vs Thirakala Narayana	02 Jul 2024	judgement	—
CC/1183/2022	Inspector, Spl. Enforcement Bureau Station, Gudur vs Chenji Subramanyam	02 Jul 2024	judgement	—
CC/296/2020	SHO, Manubolu P.S vs Yelimeti Sreekanth	28 Jun 2024	judgement	—
CC/1194/2022	Inspector, Spl. Enforcement Bureau Station, Gudur vs Turaka Lakshamma	28 Jun 2024	judgement	—
CC/327/2022	Sub-Inspector of Police,Chillakur P.S. vs Ingilala Pavan Kalyan	27 Jun 2024	judgement	—
CC/638/2021	AP State Enforcement Inspector, SEB Station, Gudur vs Kosuru Krishnaiah	27 Jun 2024	judgement	—
CC/869/2021	Special Enforcement Bureau Station, Gudur vs Kaitepalli Masthan	27 Jun 2024	judgement	—
CC/870/2022	Inspector, Spl.Enforcement Bureau, Venkatagiri vs Uranduru Penchalaiah	27 Jun 2024	judgement	—
CC/883/2021	Inspector, Special Enforcement Bureau Station, Gudur vs Ravula Ankaiah	27 Jun 2024	judgement	—
CC/573/2022	Inspector, Spl.Enforcement Bureau Station, Rapur vs Badugu Sudhakar	26 Jun 2024	judgement	—
CC/576/2022	Inspector, Spl.Enforcement Bureau Station, Rapur vs Badugu Balakrishna @ Balakrishnaiah	26 Jun 2024	judgement	—
CC/588/2022	Inspector, Spl. Enforcement Bureau Station, Rapur vs Panem Prudhviraj	26 Jun 2024	judgement	—
CC/590/2022	Inspector, Spl. Enforcement Bureau Station, Rapur vs Savuturu Harinath	26 Jun 2024	judgement	—
CC/509/2019	SHO, Gudur I Town P.S vs Vakati Ravi	21 Jun 2024	judgement	—
CC/44/2018	SHO, Gudur I Town P.S vs Giddaluru Venkata Ramanaiah	19 Jun 2024	judgement	—
CC/712/2023	Sub-Inspector of Police, Sydapuram PS vs Karreddula Padmamma	15 May 2024	judgement	—
CC/610/2021	AP State Sub-Inspector Police, Gudur Rural P.S. vs Bondala Murali	03 May 2024	judgement	—
MC/36/2019	Miriyala @ Visarapu Dharanija vs Visarapu Krishna Satya Bhaskar Phanidhar	29 Apr 2024	judgement	—
MC/12/2018	Chillakuru Santhi alias Gonu Santhi vs Chillakuru Subrahmanyam	22 Apr 2024	judgement	—
MC/20/2019	Badveli Vani vs Badveli Yugandhar	22 Apr 2024	judgement	—
CC/269/2019	SHO, Gudur II Town P.S vs Sarvepalli Masthanaiah	15 Apr 2024	judgement	—
CC/280/2021	State Inspector, Special Enforcement Bureau Station, Gudur. vs Jadapalli Surendra	15 Apr 2024	judgement	—
CC/236/2019	Gudur II Town P.S vs Kandhala Gopi	08 Apr 2024	judgement	—
CC/729/2023	Sub-Inspector of Police, Sydapuram PS vs Cheerla Arun Kumar	08 Apr 2024	judgement	—
CC/55/2021	State Inspector, Special Enforcement Bureau Station, Gudur. vs Entrapati Chakrapani	04 Apr 2024	judgement	—
CC/118/2021	State Inspector, Special Enforcement Bureau Station, Gudur vs Eragaraju Subrahmanyam	04 Apr 2024	judgement	—
CC/238/2019	SHO, Gudur II Town P.S vs Thinnaloori Kiran Kumar @ Kiran	04 Apr 2024	judgement	—
CC/501/2019	SHO, Gudur II Town P.S vs Avileli Munikrishna @ Krishna	03 Apr 2024	judgement	—
CC/75/2021	State Inspector, Special Enforcement Bureau Station, Gudur. vs Chenji Subramanyam	02 Apr 2024	judgement	—
CC/298/2023	Sub-Inspector of Police, Chillakur PS vs Peruboyina Sahi Bhargav	02 Apr 2024	judgement	—
CC/282/2021	State Inspector, Special Enforcement Bureau Station, Gudur. vs Gundala Polaiah	01 Apr 2024	judgement	—
CC/500/2019	SHO, Gudur I Town P.S vs Rudraraju Sudhakara Raju	01 Apr 2024	judgement	—
CC/158/2022	Enforcement Inspector, Special Enforcement Bureau Station, Rapur vs Badugu Veerendra	20 Mar 2024	judgement	—
CC/166/2022	Inspector, Special Enforcement Bureau Station, Rapur vs Badugu Ramesh	19 Mar 2024	judgement	—
CC/893/2017	SHO, Manubolu P.S vs Gadimeni Sulamayya	18 Mar 2024	judgement	—
CC/164/2022	Inspector, Special Enforcement Bureau Station, Rapur vs Kosuru Bhaskar	15 Mar 2024	judgement	—
CC/1210/2022	Inspector, Spl. Enforcement Bureau Station, Rapur vs Thalla Chinna Penchalaiah	14 Mar 2024	judgement	—

Showing 100 of 295 orders — Log in to browse all pages.

Monthly Orders (Last 12 Months)

Apr 2025		20
Feb 2025		1
Jan 2025		8
Dec 2024		19
Nov 2024		8
Aug 2024		5
Jul 2024		18
Jun 2024		13
May 2024		2
Apr 2024		15
Mar 2024		18
Feb 2024		19

Frequently Asked Questions

How many cases has P. Lokanadham handled?

P. Lokanadham has handled 311 court orders since 2022 at Addl Dist Court Complex Gudur. The average disposal rate is 10 orders per month.

What types of cases does P. Lokanadham hear?

Based on available records, P. Lokanadham primarily handles Criminal matters (Criminal Cases) at Addl Dist Court Complex Gudur.

Where is P. Lokanadham currently posted?

P. Lokanadham is posted as Additional Junior Civil Judge at Addl Dist Court Complex Gudur, Nellore, Andhra Pradesh.

Are judgments by P. Lokanadham available online?

Yes. 14 judgments by P. Lokanadham are available on Legistro with full text, outcome, and sections cited.

How fast does P. Lokanadham dispose cases?

P. Lokanadham disposes approximately 10 cases per month, based on 311 orders handled over their tenure at Addl Dist Court Complex Gudur.

Since when is P. Lokanadham serving?

P. Lokanadham has been serving at Addl Dist Court Complex Gudur since 2022.

Case Types

CC 94%

PRC 4%

MC 2%

Posting History

Aug 2022 — Apr 2025

Additional Junior Civil Judge · 311 orders

Outcomes on Record

Acquitted 14

Other Judges at this Court

Sri B. Rajesh

Senior Civil Judge

143 orders

Sri K.Venkata Naga Pavan

VII Addl. District Judge

268 orders

Sri Ch. Madhubabu

Prl.Junior Civil Judge

0 orders

← View all judges at Addl Dist Court Complex Gudur