P.Rahul Amedkar

Crl.M.P.No. 995 /2020execution of personal bond for

Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand Cr.No.103 /2020 of Thamballapalle P.S. only) each with two sureties for like sum each. 27.08.2020:

This is a petition filed

JMFC, PLMNR,

U/Sec.437 Cr.P.C. praying the

FAC JMFC, TMBPL.

Court to enlarge petitioners/A1 to

A3 on bail for the offence U/Sec.7

(a) r/w 8 (e) of A.P. Prohibition

Act.

The learned counsel for petitioners/A1 to A3 submitted that petitioners/A1 to A3 have not committed the offence as alleged against them and they have been falsely implicated in this case.

Therefore, he prays the Court to enlarge petitioners/ A1 to A3.

Notice given to learned A.P.P.

for State. The learned A.P.P. for

State submitted that await chemical analysis report and opposed the petition.

Perused the remand report,

CD file and other relevant record.

Perusal of the same shows that the investigation in this case is completed and even the case property is recovered. Therefore, there is no chance for tampering with prosecution witnesses. In view of the above, this Court is of the considered view that there is no need for further detention of petitioners/ A1 to A3.

In the result, the petition is allowed and petitioners/ A1 to A3 shall be enlarged on bail on their

Crl.M.P.No. 994 /2020execution of personal bond for

Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand Cr.No.60 /2020 of SEB P.S. of Molakalacheruvu only) with two sureties for like sum each. 27.08.2020:

JMFC, PLMNR,

This is a petition filed

FAC JMFC, TMBPL.

U/Sec.437 Cr.P.C. praying the

Court to enlarge petitioner/accused on bail for the offences U/Sec.34 (1) r/w Sec.34 (a), 11 (2), 42 of

A.P. Excise Amendment Act, 2020.

The learned counsel for petitioner/accused submitted that petitioner/accused has not committed the offences as alleged against him and he has been falsely implicated in this case.

Therefore, he prays the Court to enlarge petitioner/ accused.

Notice given to the learned

A.P.P. for State. The learned

A.P.P. for State submitted that await chemical analysis report and opposed the petition.

Perused the remand report,

CD file and other relevant record.

Perusal of the same shows that the investigation in this case is completed and even the case property is recovered. Therefore, there is no chance for tampering with prosecution witnesses. In view of the above, this Court is of the considered view that there is no need for further detention of petitioner/accused.

In the result, the petition is allowed and petitioner/accused shall be enlarged on bail on his

Crl.M.P.No. 991 /2020execution of personal bond for

Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand Cr.No.61 /2020 of SEB P.S. of Molakalacheruvu only) with two sureties for like sum each. 26.08.2020:

JMFC, PLMNR,

This is a petition filed

FAC JMFC, TMBPL.

U/Sec.437 Cr.P.C. praying the

Court to enlarge petitioner/accused on bail for the offences U/Sec.34

(a) r/w Sec.34 (1), 11 (2), 42 of

A.P. Excise Amendment Act, 2020.

The learned counsel for petitioner/accused submitted that petitioner/accused has not committed the offences as alleged against him and he has been falsely implicated in this case.

Therefore, he prays the Court to enlarge petitioner/ accused.

Notice given to the learned

A.P.P. for State. The learned

A.P.P. for State submitted that await chemical analysis report and opposed the bail.

Perused the remand report,

CD file and other relevant record.

Perusal of the same shows that the investigation in this case is completed and even the case property is recovered. Therefore, there is no chance for tampering with prosecution witnesses. In view of the above, this Court is of the considered view that there is no need for further detention of petitioner/accused.

In the result, the petition is allowed and petitioner/accused shall be enlarged on bail on his

Crl.M.P.No. 992 /2020execution of personal bond for

Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand Cr.No.62 /2020 of SEB P.S. of Molakalacheruvu only) with two sureties for like sum each. 26.08.2020:

JMFC, PLMNR,

This is a petition filed

FAC JMFC, TMBPL.

U/Sec.437 Cr.P.C. praying the

Court to enlarge petitioner/accused on bail for the offences U/Sec.34

(a) r/w Sec.34 (1), 11 (2), 42 of

A.P. Excise Amendment Act, 2020.

The learned counsel for petitioner/accused submitted that petitioner/accused has not committed the offences as alleged against him and he has been falsely implicated in this case.

Therefore, he prays the Court to enlarge petitioner/ accused.

Notice given to the learned

A.P.P. for State. The learned

A.P.P. for State submitted that await chemical analysis report and opposed the bail.

Perused the remand report,

CD file and other relevant record.

Perusal of the same shows that the investigation in this case is completed and even the case property is recovered. Therefore, there is no chance for tampering with prosecution witnesses. In view of the above, this Court is of the considered view that there is no need for further detention of petitioner/accused.

In the result, the petition is allowed and petitioner/accused shall be enlarged on bail on his

Crl.M.P.No. 996 /2020Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand

only) with two sureties for like sum Cr.No.109 /2020 of Peddamandyam P.S. each.

JMFC, PLMNR,

27.08.2020:

FAC JMFC, TMBPL.

This is a petition filed

U/Sec.437 Cr.P.C. praying the

Court to enlarge petitioner/accused on bail for the offence U/Sec.7 (a) r/w 8 (e) of A.P. Prohibition Act.

The learned counsel for petitioner/accused submitted that petitioner/accused has not committed the offences as alleged against him and he has been falsely implicated in this case.

Therefore, he prays the Court to enlarge petitioner/ accused.

Notice given to the learned

A.P.P. for State. The learned

A.P.P. for State submitted that await chemical analysis report and opposed the petition.

Perused the remand report,

CD file and other relevant record.

Perusal of the same shows that the investigation in this case is completed and even the case property is recovered. Therefore, there is no chance for tampering with prosecution witnesses. In view of the above, this Court is of the considered view that there is no need for further detention of petitioner/accused.

In the result, the petition is allowed and petitioner/accused shall be enlarged on bail on his execution of personal bond for