Sri P.Srinivasa Rao

Junior Civil Judge, Darsi

Senior Civil Judge, Darsi (Taluka) · Prakasham · Andhra Pradesh

Sri P.Srinivasa Rao, Junior Civil Judge, Darsi, is posted at Senior Civil Judge, Darsi (Taluka), Prakasham, Andhra Pradesh, India. 1,862 court orders on record since 2017. 5 judgments with full text available. Primarily handles CC, OS, EP cases.

1,862

Total Orders

Judgments

121

Orders/Month

Posting

Featured Judgments

CC/340/2017 Convicted

Sub Inspector of Police vs Palle Devaiah

23 Aug 2018

IN THE COURT OF THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS :: DARSI

Present: Sri P. Srinivasa Rao, Judl. Magistrate of First Class, Darsi

Dated this the 23rd day of August, 2018

C.C. No. 340 of 2017

Between:

State – Sub Inspector of Police, Kurichedu Police Station… Complainant

AND

Palle Devaiah and others ... Accused

The Sub-Inspector of Police, Kurichedu Police Station fled charge sheet against the accused 1 to 3 in Cr. No. 78/2017 for the ofences punishable U/Sec.323 and 509 r/w 34 of IPC.

// J U D G M E N T //

A1 to A3 are present. The case is coming for trial. At this stage, the learned counsel for the accused fled a memo stating that A1 to A3 are ready to plead guilty and also prayed the court to accept the guilt of A1 to A3. The learned counsel for A1 to A3 also urged the Court that the admission of A1 to A3 is voluntary and request the Court to accept the same. The prosecution also submitted that A1 to A3 have right to admit the ofence at any stage of the proceedings and they also request the Court to accept the admission of the accused. The prosecution also submitted that the court has wide powers to accept the guilt of accused at any stage of proceedings and they also requested the court to accept the admission of guilt of accused. I am satisfed that the admission of the accused, at this stage, is voluntarily and free from any coercion. 2.In a decision reported in State of Maharashtra Vs. Sukhdev Singh and another (1992 (3) ALT, NRC 33), it was held as follows Court may also act on admission made on the course of trial. There is no reason why the court could not act on the admission or confession made by the accused in the course of the trial or in his statement recorded U/s 313 Cr.P.C. 3.In another decision reported in Ram Kishan Vs. State of U.P. (1996 Crl.L.J.440) a Division Bench of Allahabad High Court, held as follows It is stated that at the outset that plea of guilt of an accused is a voluntary act. It does not partake character of confession. The stage of investigation is over much before the stage of pleading guilt reaches. The Judge&amp#039s task is to fnd out truth involved in the case before him and if at any stage the accused pleads guilty and the Judge is satisfed that the said plea is voluntary plea and without any coercion, physical or mental, there is nothing in the Cr.P.C. to prevent such a guilt being recorded and thereafter on its basis, conviction can safely be recorded. 4.In the light of the above decisions, I am inclined to accept the plea of guilt of A1 to A3. I am satisfed that the above admission of A1 to A3 at this stage is voluntary and free from any coercion. A1 to A3 alleged to have committed an ofence Under Sections 323 and 509 IPC. A perusal of the record there is no prima-facie material against A1 to A3 U/Sec. 509

IPC and the material on record disclosed that A1 to A3 committed the ofence U/Sec. 506 IPC along with 323 IPC. In view of the powers vested by this Court U/Sec. 216 Cr.P.C., the charge framed U/Sec. 509 IPC is altered to U/Sec. 506 IPC and the same is informed to prosecution and learned counsel for A1 to A3. As per section 216 Cr.P.C., any court may altered or add any charge any time before judgment

pronounced and this Court already informed the alteration of charge U/Sec. 509 IPC

into 506 IPC to both sides and alteration of charge at this stage caused no prejudice to the accused as well as prosecution. In the light of section 216 Cr.P.C., this Court is altered the charge u/sec.509 IPC into 506 IPC. Since A1 to A3 admitted the guilt voluntarily and their own accord, this Court is inclined to accept the guilt of A1 to A3 for the ofence punishable 323 and 506 IPC. Hence I am of the opinion that A1 to A3 committed the ofence U/Ss 323 and 506 IPC and accordingly they are convicted U/s 248 (2) Cr.P.C. 5.In the facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the view that the accused is not entitled to the benefts of probation of ofenders Act. 6.I have heard A1 to A3 on the question of sentence. A1 is husband of A2 and A3 is daughter. A1and A3 submitted that they belongs to poor schedule caste Madiga Community and A1 is aged about 60 years, A2 is aged about 55 years and they both are sufering ill health and aged old ailments and A3 also sufering with serious gynic problem and they are doing coolie works for their livelihood and they are sole bread winners of their family and urged the Court to take lenient view in imposing sentence. She further pleaded for mercy. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions made by A1 to A3 and also considering the age of A1 and A3 and health problem of A3, this Court is inclined to take lenient view while imposing sentence which will meet the ends of justice. 7.In the result, I fnd the accused is guilty and he is convicted U/s 248 (2) Cr.P.C., of the ofence U/Ss. 323 and 506 IPC and A1 and A3 are directed to pay a fne of Rs.500/- each for the ofence of 323 IPC and also sentenced to pay a fne of Rs.1000/- each for the ofence 506 IPC. ( Total fne amount Rs.4,500/-) In default of payment of fne, A1 to A3 shall sufer S.I. for one month under each count.

Pronounced by me in open Court, this the 23 rd day of August, 2018

Judl. Magistrate of First Class, Darsi

Appendix of Evidence

- Nil -

J.M.F.C., Darsi

CC/153/2018 Convicted

Sub Inspector of Police vs Matti Padigelu

23 Aug 2018

IN THE COURT OF THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS :: DARSI

Present: Sri P. Srinivasa Rao, Judl. Magistrate of First Class, Darsi

Dated this the 23rd day of August, 2018

C.C. No. 153 of 2018

Between:

State – Sub Inspector of Police, Kurichedu Police Station… Complainant

AND

Mattii Padigelu and another ... Accused

The Sub-Inspector of Police, Kurichedu Police Station fled charge sheet against the accused 1 and 2 in Cr. No. 32/2018 for the ofences punishable

U/Sec.323 and 324 r/w 34 of IPC.

// J U D G M E N T //

A1 and A2 are present. The case is coming for trial. At this stage, the learned counsel for A1 and A2 fled application stating that A1 and A2 are ready to plead guilty and also prayed the court to accept the guilt of A1 and A2. The learned counsel for A1 and A2 also urged the Court that the admission of A1 and A2 are voluntary and request the Court to accept the same. The Prosecution side also submitted that A1 and A2 have right to admit the ofence at any stage of the proceedings and they also request the Court to accept the admission of A1 and A2.

The Prosecution also submitted that the court has wide powers to accept the guilt of

A1 and A2 at any stage of proceedings and they also requested the court to accept the admission of guilt of A1 and A2. I am satisfed that the admission of A1 and A2, at this stage, is voluntarily and free from any coercion. 2.In a decision reported in

State of Maharashtra Vs. Sukhdev Singh and another (1992 (3) ALT, NRC 33), it was held as follows Court may also act on admission made on the course of trial. There is no reason why the court could not act on the admission or confession made by accused in the course of the trial or in their statement recorded U/s 313 Cr.P.C. 3.In another decision reported in Ram Kishan Vs. State of U.P. (1996 Crl.L.J.440) a

Division Bench of Allahabad High Court held as follows It is stated that at the outset that plea of guilt of an accused are voluntary act. It does not partake character of confession. The stage of investigation is over much before the stage of pleading guilt reaches. The Judge task is to fnd out truth involved in the case before him and if at any stage the accused pleads guilty and the Judge is satisfed that the said plea is voluntary plea and without any coercion, physical or mental, there is nothing in the Cr.P.C. to prevent such a guilt being recorded and thereafter on its basis, conviction can safely be recorded. 4.In the light of the above decisions, I am inclined to accept the plea of guilt of A1 and A2. I am satisfed that the above admission of A1 and A2 at this stage is voluntary and free from any coercion. Hence

I am of the opinion that A1 and A2 had committed the ofence U/Sections 324 and 323 r/w 34 IPC and accordingly they are convicted U/s 248 (2) Cr.P.C. 5.In the facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the view that the A1 and A2 are not entitled to the benefts of probation of ofenders Act. 6.I have heard A1 and A2 on the question of sentence. They submitted that they belongs to poor schedule caste Mala community and they are eking out their livelihood by doing coolie works and they are sole bread winners of their family and they have responsibility to look after their entire family members and request the Court to take lenient view in imposing sentence. They further pleaded for mercy. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions made by A1 and A2, this Court is inclined to take lenient view while imposing sentence which will meet the ends of justice. 7.In the result, I fnd A1 and A2 are guilty and they are convicted U/s 248 (2)

Cr.P.C., of the ofence U/Sections 324 and 323 r/w 34 IPC and I sentenced A1 and A2 to pay a fne of Rs.1000/- each for the ofence U/Section 324 IPC and also sentenced to pay a fne of Rs.200/- each for the ofence U/Sec.323 IPC (Total fne amount is

Rs.2,400/- only). In default of payment of fne, A1 and A2 shall sufer S.I. for one month under each count.

Pronounced by me in open Court, this the 23 rd day of August, 2018

Judl. Magistrate of First Class, Darsi

Appendix of Evidence

- Nil -

J.M.F.C., Darsi

CC/205/2017 Convicted

Sub Inspector of Police vs Muraboina Venkateswarlu

23 Aug 2018

IN THE COURT OF THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS :: DARSI

Present: Sri P. Srinivasa Rao, Judl. Magistrate of First Class, Darsi

Dated this the 23rd day of August, 2018

C.C. No. 205 of 2017

Between:

State – Sub Inspector of Police, Thallur Police Station … Complainant

AND

Muraboina Venkateswarlu and others ... Accused

The Sub-Inspector of Police, Thallur Police Station fled charge sheet against the accused 1 to 6 in Cr. No. 71/2017 for the ofences punishable U/Sec.447, 427, 324 and 506 r/w 34 of IPC.

// J U D G M E N T //

A1 to A6 are present. The case is coming for trial. At this stage, the learned counsel for A1 to A6 fled application stating that A1 to A6 are ready to plead guilty and also prayed the court to accept the guilt of A1 to A6. The learned counsel for A1 to A6 also urged the Court that the admission of A1 to A6 are voluntary and request the Court to accept the same. The Prosecution side also submitted that A1 to A6 have right to admit the ofence at any stage of the proceedings and they also request the Court to accept the admission of A1 to A6. The Prosecution also submitted that the court has wide powers to accept the guilt of A1 to A6 at any stage of proceedings and they also requested the court to accept the admission of guilt of A1 to A6. I am satisfed that the admission of A1 to A6, at this stage, is voluntarily and free from any coercion. 2.In a decision reported in State of

Maharashtra Vs. Sukhdev Singh and another (1992 (3) ALT, NRC 33), it was held as follows Court may also act on admission made on the course of trial. There is no reason why the court could not act on the admission or confession made by accused in the course of the trial or in their statement recorded U/s 313 Cr.P.C. 3.In another decision reported in Ram Kishan Vs. State of U.P. (1996 Crl.L.J.440) a Division Bench of Allahabad High Court held as follows It is stated that at the outset that plea of guilt of an accused are voluntary act. It does not partake character of confession.

The stage of investigation is over much before the stage of pleading guilt reaches.

The Judge task is to fnd out truth involved in the case before him and if at any stage the accused pleads guilty and the Judge is satisfed that the said plea is voluntary plea and without any coercion, physical or mental, there is nothing in the

Cr.P.C. to prevent such a guilt being recorded and thereafter on its basis, conviction can safely be recorded. 4.In the light of the above decisions, I am inclined to accept the plea of guilt of A1 to A6. I am satisfed that the above admission of A1 to A6at this stage is voluntary and free from any coercion. Hence I am of the opinion that

A1 to A6 had committed the ofence U/Sections 324,447,427 and 506 r/w 34 IPC and accordingly they are convicted U/s 248 (2) Cr.P.C. 5.In the facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the view that the A1 to A6 are not entitled to the benefts of probation of ofenders Act. 6.I have heard A1 to A6 on the question of sentence.

They submitted that they are small farmers and they are eking out their lively hood by doing coolie and they are sole bread winners of their family and they have responsibility to look after their entire family members and request the Court to take lenient view in imposing sentence. They further pleaded for mercy. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions made by A1 to

A6, this Court is inclined to take lenient view while imposing sentence which will meet the ends of justice. 7.In the result, I fnd A1 to A6 are guilty and they are convicted U/s 248 (2) Cr.P.C., of the ofence U/Sections 324 447, 427 and 506 r/w 34

IPC and I sentenced A1 to A6 to pay a fne of Rs.1,000/- each for the ofence

U/Sec.324 IPC and also to pay a fne of Rs.200/- each for the ofences U/ss 447,427 and 506 IPC (Total fne amount is Rs.9,600/- only). In default of payment of fne, A1 to A6 shall sufer S.I. for one month under each count.

Pronounced by me in open Court, this the 23 rd day of August, 2018

Judl. Magistrate of First Class, Darsi

Appendix of Evidence

- Nil -

J.M.F.C., Darsi

CC/237/2017 Convicted

Sub Inspector of Police vs MUraboina Peddanna

23 Aug 2018

IN THE COURT OF THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS :: DARSI

Present: Sri P. Srinivasa Rao, Judl. Magistrate of First Class, Darsi

Dated this the 23rd day of August, 2018

C.C. No. 237 of 2017

Between:

State – Sub Inspector of Police, Thallur Police Station … Complainant

AND

Muraboina Peddanna and others ... Accused

The Sub-Inspector of Police, Thallur Police Station fled charge sheet against the accused 1 to 11 in Cr. No. 69/2017 for the ofences punishable U/Sec.143, 447, 427 r/w 149 of IPC.

// J U D G M E N T //

A1 to A11 are present. The case is coming for trial. At this stage, the learned counsel for A1 to A11 fled application stating that A1 to A11 are ready to plead guilty and also prayed the court to accept the guilt of A1 to A11. The learned counsel for A1 to A11also urged the Court that the admission of A1 to A11 are voluntary and request the Court to accept the same. The Prosecution side also submitted that A1 to A11have right to admit the ofence at any stage of the proceedings and they also request the Court to accept the admission of A1 to A11.

The Prosecution also submitted that the court has wide powers to accept the guilt of

A1 to A11 at any stage of proceedings and they also requested the court to accept the admission of guilt of A1 to A11. I am satisfed that the admission of A1 to A11, at this stage, is voluntarily and free from any coercion. 2.In a decision reported in

Division Bench of Allahabad High Court held as follows It is stated that at the outset that plea of guilt of an accused are voluntary act. It does not partake character of confession. The stage of investigation is over much before the stage of pleading guilt reaches. The Judge task is to fnd out truth involved in the case before him and if at any stage the accused pleads guilty and the Judge is satisfed that the said plea is voluntary plea and without any coercion, physical or mental, there is nothing in the Cr.P.C. to prevent such a guilt being recorded and thereafter on its basis, conviction can safely be recorded. 4.In the light of the above decisions, I am inclined to accept the plea of guilt of A1 to A11. I am satisfed that the above admission of A1 to A11 at this stage is voluntary and free from any coercion. Hence

I am of the opinion that A1 to A11 had committed the ofence U/Sections 447,427 and 143 r/w 149 IPC and accordingly they are convicted U/s 255 (2) Cr.P.C. 5.In the facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the view that the A1 to A11 are not entitled to the benefts of probation of ofenders Act. 6.I have heard A1 to A11 on the question of sentence. They submitted that they belongs to poor Yadava community and they are eking out their livelihood by doing coolie works andthey are sole bread winners of their family and they have responsibility to look after their entire family members and request the Court to take lenient view in imposing sentence. They further pleaded for mercy. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions made by A1 to A11, this Court is inclined to take lenient view while imposing sentence which will meet the ends of justice. 7.In the result, I fnd A1 to A11 are guilty and they are convicted U/s 255 (2)

Cr.P.C., of the ofence U/Sections 447,427 and 143 r/w 149 IPC and I sentenced A1 to A11 to pay a fne of Rs.400/- each for the ofence U/ss.447 and 427 IPC and also sentenced to pay a fne of Rs.200/- each for the ofence U/Sec.143 IPC (Total fne amount is Rs.11,000/- only). In default of payment of fne, A1 to A11 shall sufer S.I.

for one month under each count.

Pronounced by me in open Court, this the 23 rd day of August, 2018

Judl. Magistrate of First Class, Darsi

Appendix of Evidence

- Nil -

J.M.F.C., Darsi

CC/169/2018 Convicted

Sub Inspector of Police vs Chinnapureddy Subba Reddy

23 Aug 2018

IN THE COURT OF THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS :: DARSI

Present: Sri P. Srinivasa Rao, Judl. Magistrate of First Class, Darsi

Dated this the 23rd day of August, 2018

C.C. No. 169 of 2018

Between:

State – Sub Inspector of Police, Thallur Police Station … Complainant

AND

Chinnapureddy Subba Reddy and another ... Accused

The Sub-Inspector of Police, Thallur Police Station fled charge sheet against the accused 1 and 2 in Cr. No. 44/2018 for the ofences punishable U/Sec.324, 323 and 506 r/w 34 of IPC.

// J U D G M E N T //

A1 and A2 are present and they are examined under section 239 Cr.P.C., and they denied the ofence. Charges U/Sections 324, 506 and 323 r/w 34 IPC were framed, read over and explained to them in their known language for which they pleaded guilty and admitted the ofence. It appears that the admission of accused are voluntarily and free from coercion. Accordingly, this court is inclined to accept the plea of guilt of accused. Hence A1 and A2 are convicted under section 241 Cr.P.C. In the facts and circumstances of the case, A1 and A2 are not entitled for the benefts of P.O. Act. Heard accused on quantum of sentence. A1 and A2 submitted that they are small farmers and they are sole bread winners of their entire family and urged the Court to take lenient view while imposing the sentence. Having considering the facts and circumstances of the case and view of the submission made by A1 and A2 this Court is inclined to take lenient view in imposing sentence which will meet the ends of justice. In the result, I fnd A1 and A2 are guilty and convicted them under section 241 Cr.P.C. for the ofence U/Ss. 324,506 and 323 r/w 34 IPC and sentenced to pay a fne of Rs.1000/- each for the ofence 324 IPC and also sentenced to pay a fne of Rs.500/- each for the ofence Under Sections 323 and 506 IPC(Total fne amount Rs.4,000/-). In default of payment of fne A1 and A2 shall sufer S.I. for a period of one month under each count.

Pronounced by me in open Court, this the 23 rd day of August, 2018

Judl. Magistrate of First Class, Darsi

Appendix of Evidence

- Nil -

J.M.F.C., Darsi

Order Record 1,852 total

Case No.	Parties	Date	Type	Outcome
CC/153/2018	Sub Inspector of Police vs Matti Padigelu	23 Aug 2018	Judgment	Convicted
CC/169/2018	Sub Inspector of Police vs Chinnapureddy Subba Reddy	23 Aug 2018	Judgment	Convicted
CC/205/2017	Sub Inspector of Police vs Muraboina Venkateswarlu	23 Aug 2018	Judgment	Convicted
CC/237/2017	Sub Inspector of Police vs MUraboina Peddanna	23 Aug 2018	Judgment	Convicted
CC/340/2017	Sub Inspector of Police vs Palle Devaiah	23 Aug 2018	Judgment	Convicted
OS/96/2018	Yeruva Siva Prasad vs Bella Nageswara Rao	21 Aug 2018	Judgment	—
OS/158/2018	Vipparla Subbaiah vs Sriram Mariyamma	21 Aug 2018	Judgment	—
OS/159/2018	Chinthalacheruvu Subhan Bee vs Chinthalacheruvu @ Sk. Hussaian	21 Aug 2018	Judgment	—
CC/146/2018	Sub Inspector of Police vs Yerriboyina Koteswara Rao	21 Aug 2018	Judgment	—
CC/100076/2016	Sub Inspecor of POlice, Thallur PS vs Gollapati Amulya Raju @ Raju	21 Aug 2018	Judgment	—
EP/14/2015	Nidamanuri Khaja Rao vs Vsmakkella Bala Kotamma	20 Aug 2018	Order	—
EP/46/2017	Annareddy Venkata Reddy vs Ramireddy Rama Krishna Reddy	20 Aug 2018	Order	—
OS/3/2013	Cheedella Venkateswarlu vs Cheedella Subbaratnamma	20 Aug 2018	Judgment	—
OS/55/2018	Annem Dhana Lakshmi vs The Mandal Tahsildar	20 Aug 2018	Judgment	—
OS/86/2018	Gopireddy Srinivasa Reddy vs Papasani Padma	20 Aug 2018	Judgment	—
OS/88/2018	Gopireddy Srinivasa Reddy vs Papasani Padma	20 Aug 2018	Judgment	—
OS/113/2014	Manchala Nagaiah vs Chinthaguntla Mariya Dasu	20 Aug 2018	Judgment	—
CC/125/2018	Sub Inspector police vs Chimata Yedukondalu	20 Aug 2018	Judgment	—
CC/224/2018	Sub Inspector of Police vs Korrapati Chandram	20 Aug 2018	Judgment	—
CC/288/2015	State Sub-Inspector of Police, Darsi Police Statio vs Chintalacheruvu Hussain	20 Aug 2018	Judgment	—
OS/128/2018	Peetla Kotaiah vs Kavruri Chinna Kotaiah	17 Aug 2018	Judgment	—
CC/87/2015	State Sub-Inspector of Police vs Pulicherla Bajireddy	17 Aug 2018	Judgment	—
CC/109/2013	SHO subinspector of police podili vs Shaik Jameer Ahammed	17 Aug 2018	Judgment	—
CC/179/2013	SHO subinspector of police Darsi PS vs Kanisetty Peddanna	17 Aug 2018	Judgment	—
CC/183/2018	Sub Inspector of Police vs Bogisetti Balavenkateswarlu	17 Aug 2018	Judgment	—
CC/219/2018	Sub Inspector of Police vs Shaik @ Panem Saidabhi	17 Aug 2018	Judgment	—
OS/5/2007	Vemula Suseela vs Madhumanchi Venkata Subbaiah	16 Aug 2018	Judgment	—
OS/142/2018	Ravella Venkateswarlu vs Thumati Anjaiah	16 Aug 2018	Judgment	—
EP/48/2015	Bachina Rathamma died and 5 others vs Gunja Subba Rao	14 Aug 2018	Order	—
EP/51/2017	Sesham Venkateswarlu vs Kapparapu Parameshu	14 Aug 2018	Order	—
EP/53/2013	Devireddy Chalama Reddy vs Chilipi Chinna NArayana Reddy@ Narayana Reddy	14 Aug 2018	Order	—
OS/72/2018	Kummitha Subba Reddy vs Bonigala Prasanna Kumari	14 Aug 2018	Judgment	—
OS/124/2018	Kolla Gurunadham vs Nakka Dhanalakshmi	14 Aug 2018	Judgment	—
OS/227/2017	Telukutla @ Telukunti Gurva Rao vs Kuchipudi Peda Vokkaiah	14 Aug 2018	Judgment	—
OS/232/2009	Kommireddy Linga Reddy vs Kommireddy Krishna Reddy	14 Aug 2018	Judgment	—
OS/320/2017	Gangineni Yogamma vs Kolisetty Lakshmi Easwaramma	14 Aug 2018	Order	—
CC/173/2018	Sub Inspector of Police vs Vellampalli Srinu	14 Aug 2018	Judgment	—
CC/187/2018	P and E Inspector vs Kothapalli Srinivasa Rao	14 Aug 2018	Judgment	—
EP/4/2018	Medam Nagireddy vs Kakunuri Srinivasa Reddy	13 Aug 2018	Order	—
EP/25/2013	Yeti Peraiah vs Yadala Kasaiah and 7 others	13 Aug 2018	Order	—
OS/72/2018	Kummitha Subba Reddy vs Bonigala Prasanna Kumari	13 Aug 2018	Judgment	—
OS/124/2018	Kolla Gurunadham vs Nakka Dhanalakshmi	13 Aug 2018	Judgment	—
CC/147/2017	Sub Inspector of Police vs Marthala venkata Subba Reddy	13 Aug 2018	Judgment	—
CC/174/2018	P and E Inspector vs Sk. Madina Basha	13 Aug 2018	Judgment	—
CC/184/2018	P and E Inspector vs Thellakula Srinivasa Rao	13 Aug 2018	Judgment	—
CC/185/2018	P and E Inspector vs Alapati Sambasiva Rao	13 Aug 2018	Judgment	—
CC/186/2018	P and E Inspector vs Devarakonda Venkata Ramaiah	13 Aug 2018	Judgment	—
CC/188/2018	P and E Inspector vs Vathala Srinivasa Reddy	13 Aug 2018	Judgment	—
CC/100334/2015	AP State Sub Inspector of Police,Darsi vs Galem Bala Kotaiah	13 Aug 2018	Judgment	—
EP/20/2017	Bogireddy Venkateswarlu vs Dulla Anji Babu	10 Aug 2018	Order	—
OS/129/2018	Parchuri Seetha Ramulu vs Bandaru Subba Rao	10 Aug 2018	Judgment	—
CC/150/2018	Sub Inspector of Police vs Mekala Brahmaiah @ Venkata Brahmam	10 Aug 2018	Judgment	—
CC/151/2018	Sub Inspector of Police vs Sk. Khadar Vali @ Giri	10 Aug 2018	Judgment	—
CC/175/2018	P and E Station Inspector vs Bijjam Chinna Subba Reddy	10 Aug 2018	Judgment	—
CC/186/2017	Sub Inspector of Police vs Velugu Venkatrao	10 Aug 2018	Judgment	—
CC/209/2017	Sub Inspector of Police vs Peram Peda Peddireddy	10 Aug 2018	Judgment	—
CC/261/2017	Sub Inspector of POlice vs Juturi Nageswara Rao	10 Aug 2018	Judgment	—
CC/100185/2016	State Rep by Sub Inspector of police, Donakonda vs Billa Sailaja	10 Aug 2018	Judgment	—
EP/100054/2016	Mulamreddy Peda Obula Reddy vs Ganji Yedukondalu	09 Aug 2018	Order	—
CC/100149/2015	Sub Inspector of POlice, Donakonda P.S. vs Murikipudi Avulaiah	09 Aug 2018	Judgment	—
EP/13/2016	Thumati Upendra Rao vs Gujarlapudi Hanumaiah	08 Aug 2018	Order	—
OS/198/2017	Devandla Srinivasulu vs Bandaru Thirupathaiah	08 Aug 2018	Judgment	—
CC/100248/2015	State sub-inspector of Police vs Muthineni Subba Rao	08 Aug 2018	Judgment	—
EP/10/2018	Samanthapudi Mohan Siva Kumar vs Kolakaluri Chenna Basavaiah	07 Aug 2018	Order	—
EP/25/2011	Thumu RamanaReddy vs Mula VnkataLaxmamma	07 Aug 2018	Order	—
OS/96/2017	Banda Chinna Danaiah vs Rachakuntal Narayana	07 Aug 2018	Judgment	—
OS/135/2017	Gunji Siva Koteswara Rao vs Makkela Suseela	07 Aug 2018	Judgment	—
CC/172/2018	P and E Inspector vs Jagarlamudi Suresh	07 Aug 2018	Judgment	—
CC/176/2018	P and E Inspector vs Bellamkonda Ravindra Babu	07 Aug 2018	Judgment	—
CC/177/2018	P and E Inspector of Police vs Nalladimmu Srinivasa Reddy	07 Aug 2018	Judgment	—
CC/178/2018	P and E Inspector of Police vs Varisetty Gurunadham	07 Aug 2018	Judgment	—
EP/22/2017	Baddigam Hanumayamma vs Mekala Nageswara Rao	06 Aug 2018	Order	—
OS/104/2011	Eduru Anji Reddy vs Eduru Subba Reddy	06 Aug 2018	Judgment	—
OS/217/2005	Makkena Vijaya Dhana Kumari vs Kodamala Samuel	06 Aug 2018	Judgment	—
OS/245/2017	Bathula Brahmaiah vs Bathula Guravaiah	06 Aug 2018	Judgment	—
OS/63/2018	Sanikommu Ramanjaneya Reddy vs Dosakayalapati Ramanaiah	03 Aug 2018	Judgment	—
OS/74/2014	Gongati Venkata Reddy vs Gongati. Narasimha Reddy	02 Aug 2018	Judgment	—
OS/136/2018	Vipparla Chinna Subbaiah vs Sriram Chinna Kondaiah @ Jimmaiah	02 Aug 2018	Judgment	—
CC/41/2018	Prohibition and Excise Inspector vs Malapati Narasimha Rao	02 Aug 2018	Judgment	—
CC/103/2018	Sub Inspector of Police vs Ravi Govindu @ Govindaiah	02 Aug 2018	Judgment	—
CC/100310/2015	Paidimarry Venkata Satyanarayana vs Shaik Abdul Hameed	02 Aug 2018	Judgment	—
EP/15/2018	Koyarala Ramsingh vs Reddycharla Ashok Kumar	01 Aug 2018	Order	—
EP/25/2017	Nusum Venkateswara Reddy vs Cherukuri Yedukondalu	01 Aug 2018	Order	—
EP/8/2018	Duggineni Venkateswarlu vs Gurrapusala Ramakrishna	30 Jul 2018	Order	—
EP/41/2017	Patti Chinna Venkataiah vs Vipparla Chinna Lakshmaiah	30 Jul 2018	Order	—
OS/23/2018	Daka Hari Krishna Reddy vs Rondla Sheshamma	30 Jul 2018	Judgment	—
OS/173/2017	Jayamangala Prabhudas vs Ravipati Vijayalakshmi	30 Jul 2018	Judgment	—
OS/247/2008	Kuricheti Koteswara Rao vs Singareddy Venkata Reddy	30 Jul 2018	Judgment	—
CC/100024/2016	Sanikommu Rajasekhar Reddy vs Ms Sai Sampada Health Fitness and Sports Show Room,Ongole	30 Jul 2018	Judgment	—
CC/100220/2016	Sub Inspector of Police, Darsi P.S. vs Sriramula Phani Kumar	30 Jul 2018	Judgment	—
PRC/9/2018	Inspector of Police vs Kadagatla Israel	27 Jul 2018	Order	—
PRC/10/2018	Inspector of POlice vs Chilaka Nagesh @ nageswara Rao	27 Jul 2018	Order	—
OS/273/2017	Korrapati Krishna Rao vs Nallapaneni Srinivasa Rao	26 Jul 2018	Judgment	—
CC/192/2018	Sub Inspector of Police vs Dasari China Venkateswarlu	26 Jul 2018	Order	—
CC/100010/2017	Sub Inspector of Police, Darsi P.S. vs Bollampalli Aruna	26 Jul 2018	Judgment	—
CC/100011/2017	Sub Inspector of Police, Darsi P.S. vs Velugoti Madhva Rao	26 Jul 2018	Judgment	—
EP/100046/2016	Sanikommu Ramanjaneya Reddy vs Nalladimmu Bala Anki Reddy	24 Jul 2018	Order	—
OS/29/2018	Moghal Khadar Masthan Vali vs Sk. Moula	24 Jul 2018	Judgment	—
OS/65/2018	Bogireddy Anki Reddy vs Amara Venkata Rao @ Venkatrao	24 Jul 2018	Judgment	—
OS/66/2018	Sathuluri Sambasiva Rao vs Kothi Srinivasa Rao	24 Jul 2018	Judgment	—

Showing 100 of 1,852 orders — Log in to browse all pages.

Monthly Orders (Last 12 Months)

Aug 2018		83
Jul 2018		103
Jun 2018		75
May 2018		34
Apr 2018		79
Mar 2018		74
Feb 2018		103
Jan 2018		93
Dec 2017		153
Nov 2017		62
Oct 2017		96
Sep 2017		172

Frequently Asked Questions

How many cases has Sri P.Srinivasa Rao handled?

Sri P.Srinivasa Rao has handled 1862 court orders since 2017 at Senior Civil Judge, Darsi (Taluka). The average disposal rate is 121 orders per month.

What types of cases does Sri P.Srinivasa Rao hear?

Based on available records, Sri P.Srinivasa Rao primarily handles Civil matters (Original Suits, Execution Petitions) and Criminal matters (Criminal Cases) at Senior Civil Judge, Darsi (Taluka).

Where is Sri P.Srinivasa Rao currently posted?

Sri P.Srinivasa Rao is posted as Junior Civil Judge, Darsi at Senior Civil Judge, Darsi (Taluka), Prakasham, Andhra Pradesh.

Are judgments by Sri P.Srinivasa Rao available online?

Yes. 5 judgments by Sri P.Srinivasa Rao are available on Legistro with full text, outcome, and sections cited.

How fast does Sri P.Srinivasa Rao dispose cases?

Sri P.Srinivasa Rao disposes approximately 121 cases per month, based on 1862 orders handled over their tenure at Senior Civil Judge, Darsi (Taluka).

Since when is Sri P.Srinivasa Rao serving?

Sri P.Srinivasa Rao has been serving at Senior Civil Judge, Darsi (Taluka) since 2017.

Case Types

CC 45%

OS 41%

EP 8%

PRC 3%

MC 2%

DVC 1%

STC 0%

ELECOP 0%

Posting History

May 2017 — Aug 2018

Junior Civil Judge, Darsi · 1,862 orders

Outcomes on Record

Convicted 5

Other Judges at this Court

Sri S.Siva Sankar Reddy

Senior Civil Judge, Darsi

756 orders

Ms.k.nikhitha

Junior Civil Judge, Darsi

1,703 orders

← View all judges at Senior Civil Judge, Darsi (Taluka)