R. Ajay Kumar

Page No.1 of 8 Judgment in CC. No. 77 of 2021 on the file of Judicial Magistrate of First Class Court, Khanapur

IN THE COURT OF THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS

AT: KHANAPUR

Present:- Sri R. AJAY KUMAR Prl. Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Nirmal FAC: Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Khanapur (Dated this the 14 th day of June, 2024)

CC. 77 of 2021

(Crime No.02/2012 of Kadam PS)

Between: The State of Telangana, through, Station House Officer, Kadam P.S. ...Prosecution

and

1. Thakkala Sathaiah, S/o. Mallaiah, Age: 45 years, Caste: Boya, Occ: Agriculutre, R/o. Morriguda

2. Donthapuram Chinna Rajam, S/o. Rajam, Age: 42 years, Caste: Nethakani, Occ: Agriculture, R/o. Bellal

3. Thalari Gangaram, S/o. Posham, Age: 44 years, Caste: Nethakani, Occ: Agriculture, R/o. Bellal

4. Gurunathakam Srinivas, S/o. Rajam, Age: 35 years, Caste: Nethakani, Occ: Agriculture, R/o. Bellal

5. Allola Chinna Bapu, S/o. Narsaiah, Age: 30 years, Caste: Munnur Kapu, Occ: Agriculture, R/o. Bellal.

(Case against above Accused Nos. 1 to 3 and 5 was

disposed off vide CC. No. 72/2012 dt. 09.11.2020)

...Accused No.4

This case is coming before me for final hearing in the presence of APPO (Sri G.Ramakrishna) for the State and Sri M. Suresh, Advocate, counsel for the accused No.4 and having stood over for consideration till this day, the Court delivered the following.

-:J U D G M E N T:-

01)The above accused No. 1 to 5 are indicated for the offence under Sections 353, 342 and 506 r/w 34 of the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred as IPC) in Cr. No.

02 of 2012 by the Sub-Inspector of Police, Kadam Police Station.

Page No.2 of 8 Judgment in CC. No. 77 of 2021 on the file of Judicial Magistrate of First Class Court, Khanapur

02) T he brief facts of the charge-sheet are as follows:-

On January 3, 2012, at about 1730 hrs, while PW6, who was the Incharge of

Panchayat Secretary, Bellal village, was proceeding to Kalamadugu in bus, the accused Nos. 1 to 5 entered into the bus and dragged PW6 from the bus and took him to the Grampanchayat of Peddur village, where all of the accused confined him for about two hours and forced him to issue a dependent certificate to one Bhagya who do not belong to Bellal village. When PW6 refused, all of the accused threatened to kill him with pesticide poison. Enraged by the acts of the accused persons, PW6 went to the police station and lodged a report, as in Ex.P6.

03)Based on the report/Ex.P6, LW9/Sub-Inspector of Police, Kadam PS registered a case in Cr.No.02/2012 for the offence U/secs. 342, 353, 506 r/w 34 IPC, issued an FIR, and took up the investigation. During the course of the investigation, he examined and recorded the statement of PW6 and visited scene of offence where he examined and recorded the statements of Pws 1 to 4 and LW3 (Kondapuram

Balamanohar), prepared CDF in the presence of Pw5 and LW. 7 (Islavath Mohan).

On January 05 th , 2012 at 0800 hrs, the accused No.4 along with other accused persons were apprehended at Bellal village and on interrogation, voluntarily confessed about the commission of offence. On the same day at 0900 hrs, the accused persons were arrested and remanded to Judicial Custody. On completion of the investigation, he filed the charge sheet against the accused persons for the offence under U/Secs. 342, 353 and 506 r/w 34 IPC.

04)Upon receipt of the charge sheet, my learned Predecessor took cognizance for the offence U/Secs. 342, 353 and 506 IPC against the accused persons and assigned the case number as CC. 72 of 2012 which ended in acquittal by the Court of Addl.

JFCM, Nirmal on 09.11.2020.

Page No.3 of 8 Judgment in CC. No. 77 of 2021 on the file of Judicial Magistrate of First Class Court, Khanapur

05)Due to pendency of NBW against the accused No.4, case was split up from the main case and assigned CC No. 499 of 2018 and thereafter, this case was transferred to this Court on the point of Jurisdiction for disposal as such this Court assigned a new CC No. 77 of 2021.

06)On appearance of the accused, copies were furnished to him under Section 207 of Criminal Procedure Code (herein after referred as Cr.P.C.) and accused was examined under Section 251 of Cr.P.C in respect of accusation for the offence under

Sections 342, 353 and 506 r/w 34 IPC, read over and explained to him in his vernacular language, for which he pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried.

07)On 17.05.2024, the learned counsel for accused No.4 submitted that the evidence recorded in the main CC No. 72 of 2012 may be treated as the same in the case at hand in this case. On the other hand, the learned APP reported no objection regarding the adoption of the evidences of PWs. 1 to 6 in this case by giving up the evidences of LWs. 3, 7 and 9.

08)The prosecution adopted (06) witnesses. PWs. 1 to 4 are the eye witnesses.

PW5 is the panch for CDF and PW6 is the informant/victim in this case and subsequently, on behalf of the prosecution, Exs.P1 to P5 were also adopted.

09)After adopting the prosecution evidence, accused No.4 was given an opportunity of being heard by putting before him all the accusations alleged by the prosecution witnesses in the form of questions which have been recorded in the prescribed format in the manner as envisaged under section 313 of Cr.P.C. As aforesaid, the defence denied the allegations in toto and declined to adduce evidence.

10)Heard the arguments of learned APPO and learned counsel for accused No.4.

Page No.4 of 8 Judgment in CC. No. 77 of 2021 on the file of Judicial Magistrate of First Class Court, Khanapur

11) Now the point s for determination in this case are:

I) "Whether the accused No. 4 obstructed the legitimate duties of PW6 on

January 3rd, 2012, at about 1730 hours, at Kadam and thus committed an

offence punishable under Sec. 353 of the Indian Penal Code?"

II) " Whether the accused No. 4 wrongfully confined PW6 for two hours at

the Peddur Grampanchayat Office on January 3rd, 2012, and thereby

committed an offence punishable under Section 342 of the Indian Penal

Code?"

III) "Whether the accused No. 4 threatened PW6 with dire consequences,

demanding to drink the pesticide or to consume the same by the accused on

January 3rd, 2012, and thereby committed an offence punishable under

Section 506 of the Indian Penal Code?"

P oint No.I to III :-

All three points are taken up together for clarity, brevity, and to avoid

repetition.

12)PW1/alleged eyewitness to the incident testified that, during the relevant period, he used to work along with PW6 at Bellal village, and he does not know A1 to

A5. He further testified that on January 3rd, 2012, in the in the afternoon hours, while he was discharging his duty as village secretary at Grampanchayat Office,

Bellal, at that time, he heard some noise from the hall of Grampanchayath Office of

Peddur village. He heard a group of people demanding to issue certificate to PW6, and PW6 was not accepting their demand. As the talks were turning into heated arguments, he went to PW6 and found around 15 people of Bellal village demanding the certificate from PW6. Apprehending that the situation would get worse, he requested LW3/K. Balamanohar to inform the police about the incident. In the meantime, police came to the scene and took all of them to the police station, where

PW6 gave a report to the police.

Page No.5 of 8 Judgment in CC. No. 77 of 2021 on the file of Judicial Magistrate of First Class Court, Khanapur

13)PW2/eye witness to the alleged incident testified that, in the year 2012, he visited Kadam village to meet PW6 and met him at Peddur Grampanchayath, and at 7:00 p.m., while he was returning to his village, he found A1 to A3 and A5 along with

PW6. He further testified that he did not know about the incident between them. He failed to support the prosecution case and turned hostile.

14)PWs. 3 and 4 who are the eye witnesses to the incident denied their presence and failed to support the case of prosecution and completely turned hostile.

15)PW5/mediator to the CDF denied his presence at the scene and failed to support the case of prosecution and completely turned hostile.

16)PW6/Informant and victim testified that during the relevant period, he worked as Panchayath secretary of Udumpur Grampanchayat, and during that time he was in charge of Bellal Grampanchayath. On January 3rd, 2012, at 5.00 p.m., he came to

Kadam village to reach his home, and he boarded a bus, but A1 to A5 and other 18 persons were dragged out of the bus and asked to join them, where they took him to the Peddur Grampanchayath office, and there, they all started demanding him to issue a dependent certificate in their favour. When he informed them that since 2003, his powers as Grampanchayath Secretary to issue dependent certificates were seized, the accused did not heed his words and tortured to issue a dependent certificate in their favour. When he informed them that since 2003, his powers as Grampanchayath

Secretary to issue dependent certificates were seized, the accused did not heed his words and tortured him for two hours. During the said time, his colleagues, i.e., PW1 and LW3/K. Bala Manohar, who were present over, came near him and tried to pacify the matter, but the accused did not heed their words. Subsequently, PWs. 2 to 4 came to him and tried to pacify the matter, but the accused did not heed their words either.

Later, the accused took him to the MPDO office in Peddur village, and there, they brought one pesticide bottle and demanded that he either drink the pesticide or they

Page No.6 of 8 Judgment in CC. No. 77 of 2021 on the file of Judicial Magistrate of First Class Court, Khanapur would consume the same. However, he escaped from the clutches of the accused.

Then, he went to the police station and lodged a report as in Ex. P6.

17)The case at hand relates to wrongful confinement, obstruction of legitimate duties of PW6, and criminal intimidation against him by A4 regarding the issuance of a dependent certificate. At the outset, the prosecution mainly relies on the evidence of

PW6; apart from the evidence of PW6, no other witnesses have supported the prosecution's case and have turned hostile. According to PW6, when he boarded the bus to go home, accused Nos. 1 to 5 and other 18 members entered the bus and dragged him from the bus, took him to the Peddur panchayth office, and demanded to issue a dependent certificate, which he refused to do because he lacked the authority.

On that, all of the accused tortured him and threatened him to drink pesticide poison or they would consume it. As stated supra, PWs. 2 to 4—colleagues and alleged eyewitnesses to the incident—failed to support the prosecution's case and turned hostile. Although PW.1's evidence shows that a group of people demanded to PW6 issue a certificate, when he and Pws. 2 to 4 tried to calm the situation, they did not listen. However, his evidence against the identity of accused is silent. Though there is no dispute over the designation of PW6, during the cross-examination of PW6, he stated unequivocally that his working hours were 10:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., and according to his testimony, when he boarded the bus at 5.00 p.m. to return home, all of the accused apprehended him and brought him to the Grampanchayath office.

However, in order to invoke Sec. 353 IPC, the accused must have obstructed PW6's legitimate duties. As stated above, PW6's duty hours ended at 5:00 p.m., and the incident occurred after 5:00 p.m., indicating that PW6 was not on duty. Although the situation is related to his duties, he was not carrying them out at the time. As a result,

I found no case involving Section 353 of the IPC.

18)In moving to the allegation regarding wrongful confinement under Sec. 342, the evidence of PW6 demonstrates that the accused brought him to the

Page No.7 of 8 Judgment in CC. No. 77 of 2021 on the file of Judicial Magistrate of First Class Court, Khanapur

Grampanchayath Office and demanded to issue a dependent certificate. It is not the evidence of PW6 that he was wrongfully confined in a room; rather, it is the case that all of the accused persons were surrounded for about two hours regarding the demand for a dependent certificate. As stated supra, PW6 was not confined within four walls; rather, he was surrounded by people regarding the demand to issue dependent certificates. As a result, it cannot be considered wrongful confinement.

Furthermore, the evidence of PW1 clearly shows that he arrived at the scene and tried to calm the situation, and that PW1 entered the premises, indicating that PW6 was not confined. Regarding criminal intimidation, the accused displayed pesticide poison and demanded to drink it or they would consume it. In this regard, the

LW9/Investigating Officer who conducted the investigation did not seize any pesticide poison bottle. It is the burden of the prosecution to prove whether the accused used a pesticide poison bottle or not. If the pesticide bottle was seized, it could be sent to

FSL for report and analysis. Unless proven, it cannot be considered criminal intimidation; as such, there is no evidence that the pesticide was present, and moreover, Pw6 did not reveal the nature of the pesticide or describe the nature of the bottle. Though PW6's evidence refers to the aforementioned incident, it lacks essential ingredients to attract offence under sections 353, 342, and 506 of the IPC, and there is no other independent witness to back up his version. All these circumstances lead to the conclusion that the evidence of PW1 does not satisfy the essential elements for the offence under sections 353, 342, and 506 r/w 34 IPC.

Therefore, the prosecution miserably failed to prove its case for the offence under

Secs. 353, 342, and 506 r/w 34 IPC. Accordingly, accused No. 4 is entitled to acquittal. The points are answered in favour of accused No. 4 and against the prosecution beyond reasonable doubt.

19) In the result, accused No.4 is found not guilty for the offence U/Secs. 353, 342, 506 r/w 34 IPC and accordingly, he is acquitted U/sec. 255(1) of Cr.P.C. The accused No.4 is set at liberty forthwith. The bail bonds of the accused No.4, if any

Page No.8 of 8 Judgment in CC. No. 77 of 2021 on the file of Judicial Magistrate of First Class Court, Khanapur shall be canceled after lapse of appeal time as per section 437-A Cr.P.C. There is no such thing as case property or unmarked property in this case to pass final orders.

(Dictated to the Stenographer, transcribed by her, corrected and pronounced by me in the open court on this 14 th day of June, 2024)

Judicial Magistrate of First Class,

Khanapur

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

For Prosecution: For Defence:

PW1 : Bikluri Narayan NIL PW2 : Borla Thirupathi PW3 : Sheik Kareem PW4 : Rasamall Laxman PW5 : Lokini Gopi PW6 : Mohd Ibrahim

EXHIBITS MARKED

For Prosecution: For Defence:

Ex.P1 is the marked portion of 161 Cr.P.C statement of PW1 Nil Ex.P2 is the marked portion of 161 Cr.P.C statement of PW2 Ex.P3 is the marked portion of 161 Cr.P.C statement of PW3 Ex.P4 is the marked portion of 161 Cr.P.C statement of PW4 (Inadvertently marked as Ex.P2) Ex.P5 is the Signature of PW5 Ex.P6 is the Report

EXHIBITS MARKED

Nil

Judicial Magistrate of First Class,

Khanapur

Page No.1 of 3 PRC.No.27/2024

IN THE COURT OF THE II ADDITIONAL JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF

FIRST CLASS COURT :: NIRMAL ::

Present : Sri P.Ravinder Prl. Judicial Magistrate of 1st Class, Nirmal. FAC:II Addl.Judicial Magistrate of 1st Class, Nirmal.

Friday, this the 09th day of June, 2025.

PRC.No.29 of 2024

Between:-

The State, through S.H.O, Dilawarpur …… Complainant // And //

Pothindla Muresh, S/o.Pothindla Ahannna, Age:29 yrs, Caste:Nayakpod (ST), Occ: Record Assistant at Govt. Junior College (Boys) at Nirmal, r/o Dilawarpur village.

….. Accused

This P.R.C came before me for Committal in the presence of Assistant Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Prosecution for the State and Sri K.Rajalingam, Counsel for the accused and having been heard and stood over for consideration till this day, this Court delivered the following :

: :COMMITTAL ORDER: :

1]The Sub Inspector of Police Narsapur(G) filed a charge sheet in

Cr.No.117/2024 against the accused for the offence U/sec.85, 109 of

BNS.

This is a case of attempted to commit murder of LW-1 by beating her with stick over her head, with an intention of killing her, and subjecting to married woman (LW-1) to cruelty and harassed her in mentally & physically to bring additional dowry Rs.1,00,000/- from her parents. The place of offence Chakpalli village comes under the limits of PS Narsapur-G and falls within the jurisdiction of this Hon'ble Court.

The brief facts of the case are that on 18-10-2024 at 19:30 hours

Page No.2 of 3 PRC.No.27/2024 the complainant came to Police Station Narsapur-G and lodged a written petition in Telugu language, in which she stated that, 'About 13 years back her marriage was performed with Shaik Nayimuddin, age:36 years, Caste:Muslim, Occ:Coolie, r/o Nirmal. After performing of their marriage, only some days they lived happily, later he habituated to drink alcohol and without doing any work, he harassed her in mentally and physically to bring dowry Rs.1,00,000/- from her parents. Many times he beat her to bring money from her parents. So far they have no children. On 17-10-2024 at about 8 AM he quarreled with her to bring dowry, saying that "I have been telling you to bring dowry

Rs.1,00,000/- from your parents for many days, but you are not willing to bring money. Therefore I decided to kill you" and he took a stick from there and beat her over her head with intention to kill her. Caused she fell down on ground by unconscious. Then he thought that, she was died, at the time her uncle Shaik Jamal was coming there, on seeing him he went away from there. Her uncle Shaik Jamal informed the same to her mother Haseena Begam. Immediately she came to her and she taken her to GDR Hospital, Bhainsa for treatment. After treatment she come to police station and reported the matter and she requested to take necessary action.

On receipt of above complaint the LW-9 registered a case in

Cr.No.117/2024, U/Sec.85,109 BNS issued FIR's to all the concerned officials and took up the investigation.

During the course of investigation the LW-9 examined and

Page No.3 of 3 PRC.No.27/2024 recorded the statement of LW-1 in part-II Case Diary. Later he sent requisition to the Medical officer GDR Hospital, Bhainsa to issue injury certificate of the LW1 for further proceed. Visited scene of offence, but due to late night hours the CDF was not drafted.

on the next day i.e., on 19-10-2024 the LW-9 visited the scene of offence situated at Chakpalli village, and caused enquiry about the matter and examined the LWs-2 & 3 and recorded their detailed statements in part II CD U/Sec.180 BNSS. Observed the scene of offence and drafted rough sketch of the scene of offence conducted

CDF in the presence of the two mediators LWs-4 & 5 and searched for the accused.

During the course of investigation on 19-10-2024 at about 14:30 hours, the LW-9 received an information that, the accused is present at his house at Chakpalli village, On receiving information he along with sufficient force rushed to the spot and at 14:50 hours and found the accused was present in the house and seeing the police the accused tried to escape from there. Then the LW-9 and staff caught hold him and interrogated him. During the interrogation the accused voluntarily confessed to have committed this offence. Immediately the LW-9 orally summoned two mediators, LWs-6 & 7, before whom, the accused confessed this offence and conducted the confession and seizer panchanama of the accused and seized the crime weapon i.e., stick from the possession of accused in the presence of LWs-6 & 7. Later the accused and seized stick were brought to PS.Narsapur-G at 16:30 hours, effected his arrest duly serving U/Sec.47 & 48 BNSS Notices and

Page No.4 of 3 PRC.No.27/2024 made necessary entries in the connected records. Later the accused referred to Govt. Civil Hospital, Nirmal under the escort of PC 3567 of

PS.Narsapur-G for his medical examination as well as COVID Test. Later the accused was produced before the Hon'ble court at Nirmal for remand and the accused was remanded to judicial custody.

The LW-8/Medical officer (PVT) GDR Hospital Bhainsa who treated the LW-1 he issued MC and stated that the LW-1 received injuries "simple in nature". After compleation of investigation the LW9/P.

Hanmandlu, Sub Inspector of Police, Narsapur-G was filed Charge Sheet against the Accused for the offence punishable U/Sec.85, 109 BNS.

02].The case was taken cognizance for the offences under sections U/Sec.85, 109 BNS, against the accused by the I Additional

Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Nirmal, and numbered as PRC

27/2024.

03].On appearance of Accused Copies of documents were furnished to him as required under section 230 BNSS.

04].At this stage, the P.R.C 27 of 2024 was received by transfer from I Addl. Judicial Magistrate of First Class Nirmal, to this Court as per the proceedings of the Hon’ble Chief Judicial Magistrate Nirmal, vide

Dis.No.281/2025, dated 04-04-2025.

05].The primafacie case discloses for the offenses punishable under section U/Sec.85, 109 BNS and same is exclusively triable by the

Hon'ble Court of Sessions and the Accused submitted his committal

Bond, as such the case is committed to the Hon’ble Court of Sessions,

Page No.5 of 3 PRC.No.27/2024 Nirmal as required under section 232[a] BNSS.

06]. Accused was released on bail vide orders in Crl.M.P

No.501/2024, dated 27-12-2024 passed by the Hon’ble Prl. District and

Sessions Judge, Nirmal, and he will be continue to be on bail till

conclusion of trial before the Hon'ble Court of Sessions, Nirmal as required under section 232(b) BNSS.

07]. The Office is directed to submit the entire case records and also case property deposited vide CP.No.203/2024, by duly indexing to the Hon’ble Principle District and Sessions Court, Nirmal as required under section 232(d)BNSS.

08]. The Public Prosecutor, Hon’ble Principle District and

Sessions Court, Nirmal shall be informed about committal of the case

as required under section 232(c)BNSS.

Typed to dictation directly by my Typist, corrected and

pronounced by me in the open Court on this the 30th day of May, 2025.

Prl. Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Nirmal FAC:II Addl.Judl Magistrate of first Class Nirmal.

Appendix of Evidence

NIL

1 PRC.No.46/2022

IN THE COURT OF THE PRL. JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS

AT: NIRMAL

Present: Sri.P.Ravinder,

Prl. Judl. Magistrate of First Class,

Nirmal

Dated this the 26th day of May, 2025

PRC.No.46/2022

in

Crime No.81/2022 of P.S, Laxmanchanda

Between: The State of Telangana, through, Sub-Inspector of Police, PS Laxmanchanda.

... Complainant.

//And//

Thakkalla @ Rokkadi Sai Kumar, S/o.Poshetty, Age: 31 years, Caste: Tenugu, Occ: Driver, R/o: Rachapur village of Laxmanchanda mandal.

...Accused

This case is coming before me on this day for hearing in the presence of A.P.P.O for the State, and Sri S.Sudheer, learned counsel for accused and having stood over for consideration this court made the following:

COMMITTAL ORDER

1.The State represented by Sub-Inspector of Police, Laxmanchanda Police station filed charge-sheet against above accused in Crime No.81/2022 of P.S. Laxmanchanda for the offence U/s. 307 of IPC with the following allegations.

2. The brief facts of the charge sheet are as follows:

It is the case of prosecution that, the complainant/Allapally Sayanna lodged report

before P.S. Laxmanchanda stating that he is resident of Manjulapur village and eking out his

livelihood by working as Collection Executive at TATA Motors Finance Limited. Their

Prl.JMFC, Nirmal 2 PRC.No.46/2022 company had given TATA INTRA V30 vehicle bearing No.TS18-T-5476 to one Solanki

Sanju(L.W3) on the finance scheme under an agreement to pay monthly installments upto four years @ of Rs.15,100/- per month. After that L.W.3/S.Sanju consigned the vehicle to one Rokkadi Sai Kumar(accused) with instructions to pay finance monthly installments of the vehicle and to drive. But, the accused failed to pay the installments from past 3 months.

In this regard, as per the instructions of his Finance Manager, on 18.09.2022 at morning hours, L.W.1 along with his colleague namely Bekkam Ashok/L.W.2 went to the house of

L.W.3/S.Sanju and asked him about due installment amount, on that he told them that accused took his TATA INTRA V30 to his village Rachapur, with an agreement that he will pay the due installment and then L.W.3 took L.Ws1 and 2 along with him to Rachapur and asked accused about the payment of due installments of the vehicle and they informed him that if the pending installments are not cleared, the financiers will take away the vehicle. But accused denied to pay pending installments and moreover he clearly replied that he will not pay installments, what happened let it be happened, he will see and then accused threatened them with dire consequence stating that, if they come again for money, he will kill them.

Due to which they got afraid and thought that, there will be tussle. While LW1 along with

LW2/Ashok were returning to Nirmal on motor cycle, bearing No.TS-01-EG-2489, on the way at the outskirts of Rachapur village, accused dashed to his motorcycle from behind with an intention to kill him. As such, L.W.1 and L.W.2 fell down on the ground and L.W.1 received bleeding injuries over his head, right hand thumb finger, whereas L.W.2/Ashok received injuries over his head. The injured were shifted to hospital for treatment.

Thereafter, the complainant requested to take necessary action against the accused/Thakkalla @ Rokkadi Sai Kumar for attempting to kill L.Ws.1 and 2 with his vehicle.

3.Based on the report of LW1, LW10/G. Rahul, Sub Inspector of Police, registered a case in Cr.No.81/2022 for the offence under Sections 307 IPC, issued FIR and took up investigation. During the course of investigation, he examined and recorded the statement of LWs1 and 2, sent a requisition to the Duty Medical Officer, Government Area Hospital,

Nirmal for treatment and issuance of wound certificates. On the next day i.e., on

Prl.JMFC, Nirmal 3 PRC.No.46/2022 20.09.2022 L.W.10 visited the scene of offence situated at the outskirts of Rachapur village , and drafted rough sektch and Crime Details Form in the presence of LW5/A.Prem and LW6/

Shaik Zamath. Later, the Investigating Officer went to Kanakapur and Nirmal, examined and recorded the statements of LW3/S. Sanju and LW4/Mohammad Mohizuddin and recorded their statements. On 23.09.2022, the Investigating Officer collected MLC of

L.Ws.1 and 2 from L.W.9/Medical Officer, Dr.Avinash who opined that the injuries sustained by L.Ws1 and 2 are simple in nature. On 24.09.2022, on credible information,

L.W.10 along with his staff rushed to the house of accused situated at Rachapur village of

Laxmanchanda mandal and apprehended the accused and during the course of interrogation, the accused voluntarily confessed to have committed the said offence. Immediately, LW10 conducted confession-cum-seizure panchanama of accused, seized the crime vehicle Tata

Intra V30 bearing No.TS-18-T-5476 before the mediators. Later, L.W.10 brought the accused to Police Station, Laxmanchada at 12.30 hours and affected his arrest and produced him before the Court for judicial remand. On 18.10.2022, L.W.10 deposited the case property before the court vide CP Reg.No.15/2022 and Sl.No.126/2022. After collecting all necessary documents and on completion of investigation, LW10/Sub-Inspector of Police filed charge sheet against the accused for the offence under Section 307 IPC.

4. The case was taken on cognizance for the offence under Section 307 of Indian Penal

Code against the accused.

5. On appearance of the accused person before this court, copies of case documents on which the prosecution has relied upon were furnished to him as contemplated U/s. 207 of Cr.P.C.

and on questioning, the accused person submitted that he has enough means to engage counsel

before the Hon’ble Court of Sessions.

6. The prima-facie case discloses for the offence punishable under Section 307 of IPC, which is exclusively triable by the Court of Session, as such the case is committed to the

Hon’ble Sessions Court, Nirmal as required under section 209 [a] of Cr.P.C.

Prl.JMFC, Nirmal 4 PRC.No.46/2022

7.Accused was released on bail as per the orders of Hon’ble Prl. District and Sessions

Judge, Nirmal vide Crl.MP.No.313 of 2022 dated.21.10.2022.

8. The Office is directed to submit the entire case record and also the case property, which is deposited vide C.P.No.126/2022, by duly indexing to the Hon’ble Sessions Court,

Nirmal as required under Section 209 [c] of Cr.P.C.

9.Notify the Public Prosecutor about the commitment of this case to the Court of

Sessions U/S.209(d) Cr.P.C.

10.In the result, this case is committed to Court of Hon’ble Prl. Sessions Judge, Nirmal

U/s 209 (a) of Cr.P.C.

(Typed to my dictation by the Stenographer, corrected and pronounced by me in the open court on this the 26th day of May, 2025)

Sd/-

Prl. Judl. Magistrate of First Class, Nirmal

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

WITNESSES EXAMINED

For Prosecution: For Accused:

None None

EXHIBITS MARKED

For Prosecution: For Accused:

Nil Nil

Sd/-

PRL. JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS,

NIRMAL

Prl.JMFC, Nirmal

Dt: 26-05-2025

CC/468/2023

TSNR020007492023

IN THE COURT OF THE Prl. Junior Civil Judge

Nirmal:

Present: Prl. Junior Civil Judge Nirmal, 26th May, 2025

CC/468/2023

Between:

STATE OF TELANGANA

Address: Soan Soan Circle Igp, Warangal Region Nirmal … Plaintiff/Petitioner AND

Salla Sanketh Reddy Salla Address: 1- 06Manmad,Manmad,Manmad,Lokeshwaram,NIRMAL,TELANGANA 2:Vijaya Salla Age: 56 Occupation : 01-06Rajura Manmad Rajura Manmad Lokeshwaram NIRMAL

TELANGANA

3:Bhumareddy Salla Age: 53 Occupation : 1-06Rajura Manmad

Dt: 26-05-2025

CC/468/2023

Manmad Rajura Manmad Lokeshwaram NIRMAL

TELANGANA

4:Shvetha Salla Age: 36 Occupation : 1-24Watoli Manmad Manmad Watoli Manmad Lokeshwaram NIRMAL

TELANGAN

… Defendent/Respondent Counsel for Petitioner : ,Advocate Counsel for Respondent : ,Advocate

This (case type) having come before me for hearing today, having heard and considered the record, this court delivered the following :

ORDER

Accused No.2 and 3 are present. Accused No.1 and 4 are called absent. LW1 appeared through Video conference from Abroad through mobile of her counsel. Ld.APP present. Counsel for complainant and counsel for accused also present filed joint memo and the Ld.App filed petition to accord permission to withdraw the section of law for the offence punishable under sections 3 and 4 of D.P.Act by the prosecution and same is allowed vide

Crl.M.P.No.60/2025 and the case against A1 to A4 for the offence

punishable under sections 3 and 4 of D.P.Act is withdrawn and the accused No.1 to 4 are discharged for the offence punishable under sections 3 and 4 of D.P.Act. The LW1/victim appeared through video conference and reported that, she have taken divorce from accused No.1 through court and they are living separately and she have no objection to settle the matter. After withdrawal of section 3 and 4 of D.P.Act, the 498-A IPC is compoundable in nature but there is a provision to give observation period to the parties for 90 days. In

Dt: 26-05-2025

CC/468/2023 the present case already the LW1 and accused No.1 have taken divorce through court and they are living separately. In the circumstances above, there is no necessity to grant observation period of 90 days. Hence, the matter is referred to Lokadalath. A2 and A3 and LW1 appeared through video conference. Ld.APP and both counsel are present. Court constable present. The LW1 came forward to compound the matter and the LW1 and accused No.1 granted decree of divorce from the Hon’ble Senior Civil

Judge, Nirmal vide HMOP NO.53/2023 dated 28.04.2025. Hence,

the matter is compounded and the accused No.1 to 4 are acquitted under section 320(8) of CrPC.

This Order Generated in Case Information System (CIS) on 26-05-2025 Prl. Junior Civil Judge Nirmal (Visit ecourts.gov.in for updates or download mobile app “eCourts Services” from Android or iOS)

Dt: 15-05-2025

CC/483/20241 / 1

TSNR020016732024

IN THE COURT OF THE II Addl. Junior Civil Judge-

cum-II Addl. Judl. Magistrate of First Class:

Present: II Addl. Junior Civil Judge-cum-II Addl. Judl. Magistrate of First Class, Thursday, this the 15th day of May, 2025

CC/483/2024

Between:

Narsapur-G Address: Narsapur (NIRMAL) Nirmal Rural Circle Igp, Warangal Region Nirmal … Plaintiff/Petitioner AND

Mangali Muthyam . Address: 2-54/3Chakpelli,Chakpelli,Chakpelli,Narsapur

(G),NIRMAL,TELANGANA

2:Mangali Gajjaram @ Kunda Gajjaram . Age: 73 Occupation : 2-54/1Chakpalli Chakpelli Chakpalli Narsapur (G) NIRMAL

TELANGANA

3:Mangali Mahender @ Konda Mahender . Age: 48

Dt: 15-05-2025

CC/483/20241 / 1

Occupation : 2-54/6Chakpelli Chakpelli Chakpelli Narsapur (G) NIRMAL

TELANGANA

4:Mangali Chinnanna @ Kondamangali Chinnaiah . Age: 65 Occupation : 2-54/1Chakpelli Chakpelli Chakpelli Narsapur (G) NIRMAL

TELANGANA

5:Mangali Laxmi @ Kondamangali Laxmi . Age: 47 Occupation : 2-54/1Chakpelli Chakpelli Chakpelli Narsapur (G) NIRMAL

TELANGANA

6:Muthavva @ Konda Muthavva . Age: 27 Occupation : 2-54/1Chakpelli Chakpelli Chakpelli Narsapur (G) NIRMAL

TELANGANA

7:Konda Sunitha . Age: 36

Dt: 15-05-2025

CC/483/20241 / 1

Occupation : 2-54/6Chakpelli Chakpelli Chakpelli Narsapur (G) NIRMAL

TELANGAN

… Defendent/Respondent

This (case type) having come before me for hearing today, having heard and considered the record, this court delivered the following :

ORDER

A1, A3 to A7 called present. Lw1/Defacto-complainant/victim/K.Ravi Kumar and Lw2/victims/K.Poshetty is present. Narsapur(G) Police Station Court constable is present. Lw1 and Lw2 stated in the petition that they intends to compromise the case with the accused persons. Heard, on both sides. Perused the material on record, the offence punishable U/Secs.447,427,506 r/w 34 IPC is compoundable, U/Sec.320(1)(2) OF Cr.P.C. Therefore, in the cirsumstances set out in the petition is granted to compromise the matter as both parties voluntarily came forward to compromise the case. In the result the award is passed in terms of settlement in between the parties. As Accused persons and the Lw1 compromised the matter U/Sec.320(2) Cr.P.C., this petition is allowed and accused persons are acquitted for the offence U/Sec.447,427, 506 r/w 34 IPC and their bail bonds if any, shall stand cancelled. There is no such thing as case property to pass final orders

This Order Generated in Case Information System (CIS) on 15-05-2025

sd/-

II Addl. Junior Civil Judge- cum-II Addl. Judl. Magistrate of First Class (Visit ecourts.gov.in for updates or download mobile app “eCourts Services” from Android or iOS)