Sri. R. Raj Kumar

TSAD040005252013 26 PRC/26/2013Tamsi

Sub - Divisional Police Officer, Adilabad. Vs. Yelma Sanjay Reddy

COMMITTAL ORDER

( If the accused is in jail)

The accused is produced before the Court by the jail Authorities. He is charged with the offence punishable under under 307I.P.C. of INDIAN PENAL CODE, of , of , of ,. which is exclusively triable by the Court of Session. The copies of police report and other documents as specified in section 207 (or section 208) of the Code of Criminal Procedure have been supplied to the accused. The accused is not represented by any Lawyer. I explained him the provisions of the free legal aid available to the unrepresented accused persons. I asked him whether he desires to avail of free legal assistance.* He states that he has made his own arrangement for his defence before the Sessions Court by engaging a Lawyer. ( OR *- He states that arrangement may be made for appointment of a Lawyer on his behalf by the Sessions Court under Legal Aid Scheme. The Sessions Court will have to be intimated accordingly.) The case will have to be committed to the Court of Session. Hence the order:-

1. The case be committed to the Court of Session.

2. The accused is remanded to Magisterial Custody until commitment of the case and also during and until the conclusion of trial before the Court of Session vide section 209 (a) and (b) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

3. The accused may be provided with a Lawyer for his defence before the Sessions Court under the Free Legal Aid Scheme.

4. The Jail Authorities are directed to produce the accused before the Court of Session on receiving production warrant from that Court in Form No. IV, Chapter XXXIII of the Criminal Manual.

5. The record of the case, the documents and articles, which are to be produced in evidence, shall be sent to the Court of Session.

6. The police Station Officer, Tamsi be directed to produce muddemal property in the Court of Session on or before ........................................................... positively.

7. The Public Prosecutor shall be notified of the commitment of the case to the Court of Session.

Date : 13-02-2025 (T Durga Rani Kalidindi)

Spl. JFCM Mobile (PCR) -cum- I Addl. Junior Civil Judge,ADILABAD Visit ecourts.gov.in for updates or download mobile app “eCourts Services ” from Android or iOS

CC/41/20151 / 1Dt: 16-09-2016

IN THE COURT OF THE Junior Civil Judge: UTNOOR

Present: Junior Civil Judge, UTNOOR ____ day, this the __ day of ____, 20__

CC/41/2015

Between:

Athram Chandu Address: Age 40 yrs Caste Gond Occ Agril Ro. Balanpur village of Utnoor Mdl … Plaintiff/Petitioner AND

Mesram Jangu Address: Age 40 yrs Caste Gond Occ Agril Ro. Balanpur village … Defendent/Respondent

Counsel for : APP,Advocate

Counsel for : No Advocate,Advocate

This (case type) having come before me for hearing today, having heard and considered the record, this court delivered the following :

ORDER

This case is advanced to this day i.e, on 13-08-2016 in view of Lok Adalath. Accused, defacto complainant are present and are identified by PC.No. 2360 of PS Utnoor. Accused is charged for the offence U/sec. 324 IPC is compoundable as per the decision reported in 2015 (1) ALD (Crl) 280 of Hon&amp#039ble High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad and in the interest of justice no prejudice would be caused to the complainant. injured as they have compromise the matter. Hence the compromise is recorded. This case is compromise in Lok Adalath vide separate award. Accused is acquitted U/sec. 320(8) Cr.Pc. Bail bonds of

CC/41/20151 / 1Dt: 16-09-2016 the accused if any shall stand canceled.

This Order Generated in Case Information System (CIS) on 16-09-2016 Junior Civil Judge UTNOOR (Visit ecourts.gov.in for updates or download mobile app “eCourts Services” from Android or iOS)

Dt: 21-03-2014

CC/279/20131 / 1

TSAD040002892013

IN THE COURT OF THE Spl. JFCM Mobile (PCR) -

cum- I Addl. Junior Civil Judge:

Present: Spl. JFCM Mobile (PCR) -cum- I Addl. Junior Civil Judge, 21-03-2014

CC/279/2013

Between:

Insepctor of police, P. S. Traffic Adilabad. Address: P.S. Traffic Adilabad.

… Plaintiff/Petitioner AND

Shaik Ahmed Address: Age. 35 years, Caste. Muslim, Occ. TATA Sumo driver B.No.AP25U9999, ro. Mallapaly street Nizamabad.

… Defendent/Respondent

Counsel for Petitioner : Sr. Addl. Public Prosecutor,Advocate

Counsel for Respondent : ,Advocate

This (case type) having come before me for hearing today, having heard and considered the record, this court delivered the following :

ORDER

The accused present, He has been examined under section 251 Cr.P.C for the offence under section 338 IPC, The accused

Dt: 21-03-2014

CC/279/20131 / 1 pleaded guilty However he prayed to take lenient view considering the prayer of the accused, he is sentenced under section 252 Cr.P.C to pay fine of Rs. 1,000- are thousand only, for the offence under section 338 IPC ID SI for six months.

This Order Generated in Case Information System (CIS) on 21-03-2014

Spl. JFCM Mobile (PCR) -cum- I Addl. Junior Civil Judge (Visit ecourts.gov.in for updates or download mobile app “eCourts Services” from Android or iOS)

IN THE COURT OF THE Junior Civil Judge: UTNOOR

PRESENT:- P.B.KIRAN KUMAR

JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE.

UTNOOR.

CC. No.107 OF 2020

Between:

Mushakhan … Plaintiff/Petitioner AND

Mohammed Fasiuddin … Defendent/Respondent

O R D E R

This case is advanced i.e., on10-02-2018 A-1 to A-3 and defacto complaint/injured are present and are identified by PC.No.1852 PS.Utnoor. A-1 to A-3 are charged for the offence U/Sec.324, 323, 290 r/w 34 IPC. The offence U/Sec.324, 323, 290 r/w 34 IPC. Notice is given to A.P.P. The petition filed U/Sec.321 Cr.P.C. by the A.P.P. for withdrawing the section 290 IPC. is permitted by this court in the interest of justice. The offence U/Sec.324, 323 IPC is compoundable as per the decision reported in 2015 (1) ALD (Crl) 280 of High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad and in the interest of justice as no prejudice would be caused to the complaint / injured as they submitted that they have compromised the matter. Hence the compromise is recorded. This case is settled in Lok Adalath vide separate award. A1 to A3 are acquitted U/Sec.320 (8) of Cr.P.C. bail bonds of the accused if any shall stand cancelled.The unmarked property shall be destroyed after appeal time is over.

SD/-

Junior Civil Judge UTNOOR

IN THE COURT OF THE Junior Civil Judge: UTNOOR

PRESENT:- P.B.KIRAN KUMAR

JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE.

UTNOOR.

CC. No.107 OF 2020

Between:

Mushakhan … Plaintiff/Petitioner AND

Mohammed Fasiuddin … Defendent/Respondent

O R D E R

This case is advanced i.e., on10-02-2018 A-1 to A-3 and defacto complaint/injured are present and are identified by PC.No.1852 PS.Utnoor. A-1 to A-3 are charged for the offence U/Sec.324, 323, 290 r/w 34 IPC. The offence U/Sec.324, 323, 290 r/w 34 IPC. Notice is given to A.P.P. The petition filed U/Sec.321 Cr.P.C. by the A.P.P. for withdrawing the section 290 IPC. is permitted by this court in the interest of justice. The offence U/Sec.324, 323 IPC is compoundable as per the decision reported in 2015 (1) ALD (Crl) 280 of High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad and in the interest of justice as no prejudice would be caused to the complaint / injured as they submitted that they have compromised the matter. Hence the compromise is recorded. This case is settled in Lok Adalath vide separate award. A1 to A3 are acquitted U/Sec.320 (8) of Cr.P.C. bail bonds of the accused if any shall stand cancelled.The unmarked property shall be destroyed after appeal time is over.

SD/-

Junior Civil Judge UTNOOR